input
string | task
string | response
int64 | idx
int64 | generated_prompt
string | score
string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his blood would be drawn in an hour.
hypothesis: The patient's blood was going to be drawn in an hour.
|
axg
| 1
| 232
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his blood would be drawn in an hour.
hypothesis: The patient's blood was going to be drawn in an hour.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had been unaware of.
hypothesis: The undergraduate was unaware of the petition.
|
axg
| 0
| 209
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had been unaware of.
hypothesis: The undergraduate was unaware of the petition.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The patient had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
|
axg
| 1
| 245
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The patient had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on her own.
hypothesis: The homeowner was not supposed to attempt rewiring.
|
axg
| 0
| 247
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on her own.
hypothesis: The homeowner was not supposed to attempt rewiring.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue his dreams.
hypothesis: The student had dreams to pursue.
|
axg
| 0
| 278
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue his dreams.
hypothesis: The student had dreams to pursue.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The client got fed up and went to a different law firm.
|
axg
| 1
| 323
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The client got fed up and went to a different law firm.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that her proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The resident had a proposal to build a new airport.
|
axg
| 0
| 267
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that her proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The resident had a proposal to build a new airport.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's shift was ending in an hour.
|
axg
| 0
| 52
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's shift was ending in an hour.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated.
|
axg
| 0
| 112
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's affection had grown over time.
|
axg
| 1
| 104
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's affection had grown over time.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice he gave everyone.
hypothesis: The client gave that advice to everyone.
|
axg
| 1
| 334
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice he gave everyone.
hypothesis: The client gave that advice to everyone.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The onlooker needed to stand back from the building site.
|
axg
| 1
| 228
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The onlooker needed to stand back from the building site.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she had made the drink very strong.
hypothesis: The customer had made the drink very strong.
|
axg
| 0
| 241
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she had made the drink very strong.
hypothesis: The customer had made the drink very strong.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The student wanted to become a web developer.
|
axg
| 1
| 318
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The student wanted to become a web developer.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The witness finished asking questions.
|
axg
| 0
| 264
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The witness finished asking questions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his dinner.
hypothesis: The chef was having dinner.
|
axg
| 1
| 168
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his dinner.
hypothesis: The chef was having dinner.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments.
|
axg
| 0
| 9
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her preparation style.
hypothesis: The chef's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction.
|
axg
| 0
| 171
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her preparation style.
hypothesis: The chef's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve his diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet.
|
axg
| 1
| 124
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve his diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty.
|
axg
| 1
| 72
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The mechanic's car would be ready in the morning.
|
axg
| 0
| 16
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The mechanic's car would be ready in the morning.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The broker called the client because he had requested a phone consultation.
hypothesis: The client had requested a phone consultation.
|
axg
| 0
| 344
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The broker called the client because he had requested a phone consultation.
hypothesis: The client had requested a phone consultation.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that her cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The owner has a cat.
|
axg
| 1
| 285
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that her cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The owner has a cat.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The customer couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
|
axg
| 1
| 330
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The customer couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of her death.
hypothesis: The pathologist is dead.
|
axg
| 1
| 79
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of her death.
hypothesis: The pathologist is dead.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise she would have to mop it all over again.
hypothesis: The janitor had already mopped the floor.
|
axg
| 1
| 43
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise she would have to mop it all over again.
hypothesis: The janitor had already mopped the floor.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had a rare skin condition.
hypothesis: The specialist had a rare skin condition.
|
axg
| 1
| 64
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had a rare skin condition.
hypothesis: The specialist had a rare skin condition.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions.
|
axg
| 1
| 86
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house he had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The homeowner had purchased a house.
|
axg
| 1
| 192
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house he had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The homeowner had purchased a house.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The taxpayer sought help filing taxes.
|
axg
| 0
| 179
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The taxpayer sought help filing taxes.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to be helpful.
hypothesis: The client wanted to be helpful.
|
axg
| 0
| 308
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to be helpful.
hypothesis: The client wanted to be helpful.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The manager wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
|
axg
| 1
| 22
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The manager wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house she had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The inspector had purchased a house.
|
axg
| 1
| 15
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house she had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The inspector had purchased a house.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The passenger knew it was too late.
|
axg
| 1
| 286
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The passenger knew it was too late.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The child's affection had grown over time.
|
axg
| 0
| 283
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The child's affection had grown over time.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The patient had a history of substance abuse.
|
axg
| 0
| 191
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The patient had a history of substance abuse.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable.
|
axg
| 0
| 57
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend his help sessions.
hypothesis: The student was running help sessions.
|
axg
| 1
| 276
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend his help sessions.
hypothesis: The student was running help sessions.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that his cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The owner has a cat.
|
axg
| 0
| 284
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that his cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The owner has a cat.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.
hypothesis: The protester was not on duty.
|
axg
| 0
| 251
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.
hypothesis: The protester was not on duty.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was his belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the patient's belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
|
axg
| 1
| 304
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was his belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the patient's belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The counselor had a history of substance abuse.
|
axg
| 0
| 13
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The counselor had a history of substance abuse.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice she gave everyone.
hypothesis: The client gave that advice to everyone.
|
axg
| 1
| 335
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice she gave everyone.
hypothesis: The client gave that advice to everyone.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The architect has blueprints.
|
axg
| 1
| 128
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The architect has blueprints.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The student has blueprints.
|
axg
| 0
| 306
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The student has blueprints.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The specialist had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
|
axg
| 0
| 66
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The specialist had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that she had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting.
|
axg
| 0
| 123
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that she had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed a lab assistant.
hypothesis: The scientist needed a lab assistant.
|
axg
| 1
| 147
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed a lab assistant.
hypothesis: The scientist needed a lab assistant.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension.
|
axg
| 1
| 83
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The customer's car would be ready in the morning.
|
axg
| 1
| 194
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The customer's car would be ready in the morning.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The carpenter needed to stand back from the building site.
|
axg
| 0
| 50
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The carpenter needed to stand back from the building site.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated.
|
axg
| 1
| 113
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The employee performed well.
|
axg
| 0
| 181
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The employee performed well.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed more experience in the lab.
hypothesis: The scientist needed more experience in the lab.
|
axg
| 0
| 149
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed more experience in the lab.
hypothesis: The scientist needed more experience in the lab.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for him to try it out.
hypothesis: The machinist could not try out the laser cutter.
|
axg
| 0
| 118
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for him to try it out.
hypothesis: The machinist could not try out the laser cutter.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had organized.
hypothesis: The administrator organized the petition.
|
axg
| 1
| 29
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had organized.
hypothesis: The administrator organized the petition.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The passenger knew it was too late.
|
axg
| 1
| 287
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The passenger knew it was too late.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The customer wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
|
axg
| 1
| 200
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The customer wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was her belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the nutritionist's belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
|
axg
| 1
| 127
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was her belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the nutritionist's belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt a sense of obligation.
hypothesis: The patient felt a sense of obligation.
|
axg
| 0
| 271
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt a sense of obligation.
hypothesis: The patient felt a sense of obligation.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that she needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The onlooker needed to stand back from the building site.
|
axg
| 0
| 229
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that she needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The onlooker needed to stand back from the building site.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his tumor had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's tumor had grown.
|
axg
| 1
| 102
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his tumor had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's tumor had grown.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The physician warned the patient that he could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
hypothesis: The physician could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
|
axg
| 1
| 48
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The physician warned the patient that he could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
hypothesis: The physician could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer.
|
axg
| 1
| 141
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The accountant sought help filing taxes.
|
axg
| 1
| 1
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The accountant sought help filing taxes.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she was already dead.
hypothesis: The paramedic was already dead.
|
axg
| 1
| 111
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she was already dead.
hypothesis: The paramedic was already dead.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he was fired.
hypothesis: The client was fired.
|
axg
| 1
| 320
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he was fired.
hypothesis: The client was fired.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her dinner.
hypothesis: The guest was having dinner.
|
axg
| 0
| 347
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her dinner.
hypothesis: The guest was having dinner.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to try something different.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to try something different.
|
axg
| 1
| 132
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to try something different.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to try something different.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The paramedic knew it was too late.
|
axg
| 1
| 109
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The paramedic knew it was too late.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The student asked the teacher if he could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension.
|
axg
| 1
| 82
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student asked the teacher if he could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that she might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.
hypothesis: The homeowner needed time to rewire the house.
|
axg
| 0
| 249
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that she might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.
hypothesis: The homeowner needed time to rewire the house.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that he had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting.
|
axg
| 1
| 122
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that he had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The supervisor performed well.
|
axg
| 0
| 3
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The supervisor performed well.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty.
|
axg
| 0
| 73
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The paralegal got fed up and went to a different law firm.
|
axg
| 1
| 145
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The paralegal got fed up and went to a different law firm.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he was already dead.
hypothesis: The passenger was already dead.
|
axg
| 1
| 288
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he was already dead.
hypothesis: The passenger was already dead.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not escape.
hypothesis: The child was trapped.
|
axg
| 1
| 353
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not escape.
hypothesis: The child was trapped.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on his own.
hypothesis: The homeowner was not supposed to attempt rewiring.
|
axg
| 0
| 246
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on his own.
hypothesis: The homeowner was not supposed to attempt rewiring.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not escape.
hypothesis: The firefighter was trapped.
|
axg
| 0
| 174
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not escape.
hypothesis: The firefighter was trapped.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The nurse notified the patient that her shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The patient's shift was ending in an hour.
|
axg
| 1
| 231
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nurse notified the patient that her shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The patient's shift was ending in an hour.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only she could operate it.
hypothesis: Only the child could operate the laser cutter.
|
axg
| 1
| 299
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only she could operate it.
hypothesis: Only the child could operate the laser cutter.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend her help sessions.
hypothesis: The student was running help sessions.
|
axg
| 0
| 277
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend her help sessions.
hypothesis: The student was running help sessions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that he had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The customer had completed the repair.
|
axg
| 1
| 196
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that he had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The customer had completed the repair.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The witness finished asking questions.
|
axg
| 0
| 265
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The witness finished asking questions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he did not know what to read.
hypothesis: The child did not know what to read.
|
axg
| 0
| 210
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he did not know what to read.
hypothesis: The child did not know what to read.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she was fired.
hypothesis: The client was fired.
|
axg
| 1
| 321
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she was fired.
hypothesis: The client was fired.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he seemed trustworthy.
hypothesis: The therapist seemed trustworthy.
|
axg
| 1
| 24
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he seemed trustworthy.
hypothesis: The therapist seemed trustworthy.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions.
|
axg
| 1
| 87
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could get an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The student tried to get an extension.
|
axg
| 0
| 259
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could get an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The student tried to get an extension.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because she was not getting enough to eat.
hypothesis: The client was not getting enough to eat.
|
axg
| 0
| 337
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because she was not getting enough to eat.
hypothesis: The client was not getting enough to eat.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he was seeking emotional support.
hypothesis: The therapist was seeking emotional support.
|
axg
| 1
| 26
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he was seeking emotional support.
hypothesis: The therapist was seeking emotional support.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments.
|
axg
| 1
| 8
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for his services.
hypothesis: The homeowner provides services.
|
axg
| 1
| 272
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for his services.
hypothesis: The homeowner provides services.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable.
|
axg
| 1
| 56
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve her diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet.
|
axg
| 0
| 125
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve her diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
false
|
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer.
|
axg
| 1
| 140
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that his proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The resident had a proposal to build a new airport.
|
axg
| 1
| 266
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that his proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The resident had a proposal to build a new airport.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The customer would be able to fix the billing error.
|
axg
| 1
| 198
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The customer would be able to fix the billing error.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The child's affection had grown over time.
|
axg
| 1
| 282
|
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The child's affection had grown over time.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION
|
true
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.