input
string | task
string | response
int64 | idx
int64 | generated_prompt
string | score
string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his blood would be drawn in an hour.
hypothesis: The patient's blood was going to be drawn in an hour. | axg | 1 | 232 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his blood would be drawn in an hour.
hypothesis: The patient's blood was going to be drawn in an hour.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had been unaware of.
hypothesis: The undergraduate was unaware of the petition. | axg | 0 | 209 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had been unaware of.
hypothesis: The undergraduate was unaware of the petition.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The patient had knowledge of rare skin conditions. | axg | 1 | 245 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The patient had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on her own.
hypothesis: The homeowner was not supposed to attempt rewiring. | axg | 0 | 247 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on her own.
hypothesis: The homeowner was not supposed to attempt rewiring.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue his dreams.
hypothesis: The student had dreams to pursue. | axg | 0 | 278 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue his dreams.
hypothesis: The student had dreams to pursue.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The client got fed up and went to a different law firm. | axg | 1 | 323 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The client got fed up and went to a different law firm.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that her proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The resident had a proposal to build a new airport. | axg | 0 | 267 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that her proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The resident had a proposal to build a new airport.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's shift was ending in an hour. | axg | 0 | 52 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's shift was ending in an hour.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated. | axg | 0 | 112 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's affection had grown over time. | axg | 1 | 104 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's affection had grown over time.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice he gave everyone.
hypothesis: The client gave that advice to everyone. | axg | 1 | 334 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice he gave everyone.
hypothesis: The client gave that advice to everyone.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The onlooker needed to stand back from the building site. | axg | 1 | 228 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The onlooker needed to stand back from the building site.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she had made the drink very strong.
hypothesis: The customer had made the drink very strong. | axg | 0 | 241 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she had made the drink very strong.
hypothesis: The customer had made the drink very strong.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The student wanted to become a web developer. | axg | 1 | 318 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The student wanted to become a web developer.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The witness finished asking questions. | axg | 0 | 264 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The witness finished asking questions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his dinner.
hypothesis: The chef was having dinner. | axg | 1 | 168 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his dinner.
hypothesis: The chef was having dinner.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments. | axg | 0 | 9 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her preparation style.
hypothesis: The chef's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction. | axg | 0 | 171 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her preparation style.
hypothesis: The chef's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve his diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet. | axg | 1 | 124 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve his diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty. | axg | 1 | 72 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The mechanic's car would be ready in the morning. | axg | 0 | 16 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The mechanic's car would be ready in the morning.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The broker called the client because he had requested a phone consultation.
hypothesis: The client had requested a phone consultation. | axg | 0 | 344 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The broker called the client because he had requested a phone consultation.
hypothesis: The client had requested a phone consultation.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that her cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The owner has a cat. | axg | 1 | 285 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that her cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The owner has a cat.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The customer couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars. | axg | 1 | 330 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The customer couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of her death.
hypothesis: The pathologist is dead. | axg | 1 | 79 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of her death.
hypothesis: The pathologist is dead.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise she would have to mop it all over again.
hypothesis: The janitor had already mopped the floor. | axg | 1 | 43 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise she would have to mop it all over again.
hypothesis: The janitor had already mopped the floor.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had a rare skin condition.
hypothesis: The specialist had a rare skin condition. | axg | 1 | 64 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had a rare skin condition.
hypothesis: The specialist had a rare skin condition.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions. | axg | 1 | 86 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house he had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The homeowner had purchased a house. | axg | 1 | 192 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house he had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The homeowner had purchased a house.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The taxpayer sought help filing taxes. | axg | 0 | 179 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The taxpayer sought help filing taxes.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to be helpful.
hypothesis: The client wanted to be helpful. | axg | 0 | 308 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to be helpful.
hypothesis: The client wanted to be helpful.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The manager wanted to fix the billing error quickly. | axg | 1 | 22 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The manager wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house she had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The inspector had purchased a house. | axg | 1 | 15 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house she had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The inspector had purchased a house.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The passenger knew it was too late. | axg | 1 | 286 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The passenger knew it was too late.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The child's affection had grown over time. | axg | 0 | 283 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The child's affection had grown over time.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The patient had a history of substance abuse. | axg | 0 | 191 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The patient had a history of substance abuse.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable. | axg | 0 | 57 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend his help sessions.
hypothesis: The student was running help sessions. | axg | 1 | 276 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend his help sessions.
hypothesis: The student was running help sessions.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that his cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The owner has a cat. | axg | 0 | 284 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that his cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The owner has a cat.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.
hypothesis: The protester was not on duty. | axg | 0 | 251 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.
hypothesis: The protester was not on duty.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was his belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the patient's belief that diet and exercise were equally important. | axg | 1 | 304 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was his belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the patient's belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The counselor had a history of substance abuse. | axg | 0 | 13 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The counselor had a history of substance abuse.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice she gave everyone.
hypothesis: The client gave that advice to everyone. | axg | 1 | 335 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice she gave everyone.
hypothesis: The client gave that advice to everyone.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The architect has blueprints. | axg | 1 | 128 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The architect has blueprints.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The student has blueprints. | axg | 0 | 306 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The student has blueprints.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The specialist had knowledge of rare skin conditions. | axg | 0 | 66 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The specialist had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that she had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting. | axg | 0 | 123 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that she had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed a lab assistant.
hypothesis: The scientist needed a lab assistant. | axg | 1 | 147 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed a lab assistant.
hypothesis: The scientist needed a lab assistant.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension. | axg | 1 | 83 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The customer's car would be ready in the morning. | axg | 1 | 194 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The customer's car would be ready in the morning.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The carpenter needed to stand back from the building site. | axg | 0 | 50 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The carpenter needed to stand back from the building site.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated. | axg | 1 | 113 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The employee performed well. | axg | 0 | 181 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The employee performed well.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed more experience in the lab.
hypothesis: The scientist needed more experience in the lab. | axg | 0 | 149 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed more experience in the lab.
hypothesis: The scientist needed more experience in the lab.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for him to try it out.
hypothesis: The machinist could not try out the laser cutter. | axg | 0 | 118 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for him to try it out.
hypothesis: The machinist could not try out the laser cutter.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had organized.
hypothesis: The administrator organized the petition. | axg | 1 | 29 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had organized.
hypothesis: The administrator organized the petition.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The passenger knew it was too late. | axg | 1 | 287 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The passenger knew it was too late.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The customer wanted to fix the billing error quickly. | axg | 1 | 200 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The customer wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was her belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the nutritionist's belief that diet and exercise were equally important. | axg | 1 | 127 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was her belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the nutritionist's belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt a sense of obligation.
hypothesis: The patient felt a sense of obligation. | axg | 0 | 271 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt a sense of obligation.
hypothesis: The patient felt a sense of obligation.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that she needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The onlooker needed to stand back from the building site. | axg | 0 | 229 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that she needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The onlooker needed to stand back from the building site.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his tumor had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's tumor had grown. | axg | 1 | 102 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his tumor had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's tumor had grown.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The physician warned the patient that he could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
hypothesis: The physician could not safely prescribe a higher dose. | axg | 1 | 48 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The physician warned the patient that he could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
hypothesis: The physician could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer. | axg | 1 | 141 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The accountant sought help filing taxes. | axg | 1 | 1 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The accountant sought help filing taxes.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she was already dead.
hypothesis: The paramedic was already dead. | axg | 1 | 111 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she was already dead.
hypothesis: The paramedic was already dead.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he was fired.
hypothesis: The client was fired. | axg | 1 | 320 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he was fired.
hypothesis: The client was fired.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her dinner.
hypothesis: The guest was having dinner. | axg | 0 | 347 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her dinner.
hypothesis: The guest was having dinner.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to try something different.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to try something different. | axg | 1 | 132 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to try something different.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to try something different.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The paramedic knew it was too late. | axg | 1 | 109 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The paramedic knew it was too late.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The student asked the teacher if he could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension. | axg | 1 | 82 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student asked the teacher if he could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that she might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.
hypothesis: The homeowner needed time to rewire the house. | axg | 0 | 249 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that she might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.
hypothesis: The homeowner needed time to rewire the house.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that he had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting. | axg | 1 | 122 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that he had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The supervisor performed well. | axg | 0 | 3 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The supervisor performed well.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty. | axg | 0 | 73 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The paralegal got fed up and went to a different law firm. | axg | 1 | 145 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The paralegal got fed up and went to a different law firm.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he was already dead.
hypothesis: The passenger was already dead. | axg | 1 | 288 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he was already dead.
hypothesis: The passenger was already dead.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not escape.
hypothesis: The child was trapped. | axg | 1 | 353 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not escape.
hypothesis: The child was trapped.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on his own.
hypothesis: The homeowner was not supposed to attempt rewiring. | axg | 0 | 246 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on his own.
hypothesis: The homeowner was not supposed to attempt rewiring.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not escape.
hypothesis: The firefighter was trapped. | axg | 0 | 174 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not escape.
hypothesis: The firefighter was trapped.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The nurse notified the patient that her shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The patient's shift was ending in an hour. | axg | 1 | 231 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nurse notified the patient that her shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The patient's shift was ending in an hour.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only she could operate it.
hypothesis: Only the child could operate the laser cutter. | axg | 1 | 299 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only she could operate it.
hypothesis: Only the child could operate the laser cutter.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend her help sessions.
hypothesis: The student was running help sessions. | axg | 0 | 277 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend her help sessions.
hypothesis: The student was running help sessions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that he had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The customer had completed the repair. | axg | 1 | 196 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that he had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The customer had completed the repair.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The witness finished asking questions. | axg | 0 | 265 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The witness finished asking questions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he did not know what to read.
hypothesis: The child did not know what to read. | axg | 0 | 210 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he did not know what to read.
hypothesis: The child did not know what to read.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she was fired.
hypothesis: The client was fired. | axg | 1 | 321 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she was fired.
hypothesis: The client was fired.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he seemed trustworthy.
hypothesis: The therapist seemed trustworthy. | axg | 1 | 24 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he seemed trustworthy.
hypothesis: The therapist seemed trustworthy.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions. | axg | 1 | 87 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could get an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The student tried to get an extension. | axg | 0 | 259 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could get an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The student tried to get an extension.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because she was not getting enough to eat.
hypothesis: The client was not getting enough to eat. | axg | 0 | 337 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because she was not getting enough to eat.
hypothesis: The client was not getting enough to eat.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he was seeking emotional support.
hypothesis: The therapist was seeking emotional support. | axg | 1 | 26 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he was seeking emotional support.
hypothesis: The therapist was seeking emotional support.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments. | axg | 1 | 8 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for his services.
hypothesis: The homeowner provides services. | axg | 1 | 272 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for his services.
hypothesis: The homeowner provides services.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable. | axg | 1 | 56 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve her diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet. | axg | 0 | 125 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve her diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer. | axg | 1 | 140 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that his proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The resident had a proposal to build a new airport. | axg | 1 | 266 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that his proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The resident had a proposal to build a new airport.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The customer would be able to fix the billing error. | axg | 1 | 198 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The customer would be able to fix the billing error.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The child's affection had grown over time. | axg | 1 | 282 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The child's affection had grown over time.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.