input
string | task
string | response
int64 | idx
int64 | prompt
string | score
string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing his taxes.
hypothesis: The accountant sought help filing taxes. | axg | 1 | 0 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing his taxes.
hypothesis: The accountant sought help filing taxes.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The accountant sought help filing taxes. | axg | 1 | 1 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The accountant sought help filing taxes.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on his stellar performance.
hypothesis: The supervisor performed well. | axg | 1 | 2 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on his stellar performance.
hypothesis: The supervisor performed well.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The supervisor performed well. | axg | 1 | 3 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The supervisor performed well.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on his managing style.
hypothesis: The supervisor has a managing style. | axg | 0 | 4 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on his managing style.
hypothesis: The supervisor has a managing style.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on her managing style.
hypothesis: The supervisor has a managing style. | axg | 0 | 5 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on her managing style.
hypothesis: The supervisor has a managing style.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need more time to complete the project.
hypothesis: The engineer needed more time. | axg | 0 | 6 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need more time to complete the project.
hypothesis: The engineer needed more time.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need more time to complete the project.
hypothesis: The engineer needed more time. | axg | 0 | 7 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need more time to complete the project.
hypothesis: The engineer needed more time.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments. | axg | 1 | 8 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments. | axg | 1 | 9 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that he was professionally mandated to report certain issues.
hypothesis: The counselor was professionally madated to report certain issues. | axg | 0 | 10 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that he was professionally mandated to report certain issues.
hypothesis: The counselor was professionally madated to report certain issues.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that she was professionally mandated to report certain issues.
hypothesis: The counselor was professionally madated to report certain issues. | axg | 0 | 11 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that she was professionally mandated to report certain issues.
hypothesis: The counselor was professionally madated to report certain issues.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that he had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The counselor had a history of substance abuse. | axg | 1 | 12 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that he had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The counselor had a history of substance abuse.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The counselor had a history of substance abuse. | axg | 1 | 13 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The counselor had a history of substance abuse.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house he had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The inspector had purchased a house. | axg | 1 | 14 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house he had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The inspector had purchased a house.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house she had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The inspector had purchased a house. | axg | 1 | 15 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house she had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The inspector had purchased a house.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The mechanic's car would be ready in the morning. | axg | 1 | 16 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The mechanic's car would be ready in the morning.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that her car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The mechanic's car would be ready in the morning. | axg | 1 | 17 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that her car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The mechanic's car would be ready in the morning.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that he had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The mechanic had completed the repair. | axg | 0 | 18 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that he had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The mechanic had completed the repair.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that she had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The mechanic had completed the repair. | axg | 0 | 19 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that she had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The mechanic had completed the repair.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The manager would be able to fix the billing error. | axg | 0 | 20 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The manager would be able to fix the billing error.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because she would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The manager would be able to fix the billing error. | axg | 0 | 21 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because she would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The manager would be able to fix the billing error.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The manager wanted to fix the billing error quickly. | axg | 1 | 22 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The manager wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because she wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The manager wanted to fix the billing error quickly. | axg | 1 | 23 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because she wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
hypothesis: The manager wanted to fix the billing error quickly.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he seemed trustworthy.
hypothesis: The therapist seemed trustworthy. | axg | 0 | 24 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he seemed trustworthy.
hypothesis: The therapist seemed trustworthy.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because she seemed trustworthy.
hypothesis: The therapist seemed trustworthy. | axg | 0 | 25 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because she seemed trustworthy.
hypothesis: The therapist seemed trustworthy.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he was seeking emotional support.
hypothesis: The therapist was seeking emotional support. | axg | 1 | 26 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he was seeking emotional support.
hypothesis: The therapist was seeking emotional support.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because she was seeking emotional support.
hypothesis: The therapist was seeking emotional support. | axg | 1 | 27 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because she was seeking emotional support.
hypothesis: The therapist was seeking emotional support.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that he had organized.
hypothesis: The administrator organized the petition. | axg | 1 | 28 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that he had organized.
hypothesis: The administrator organized the petition.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had organized.
hypothesis: The administrator organized the petition. | axg | 1 | 29 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had organized.
hypothesis: The administrator organized the petition.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that he had been unaware of.
hypothesis: The administrator was unaware of the petition. | axg | 0 | 30 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that he had been unaware of.
hypothesis: The administrator was unaware of the petition.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had been unaware of.
hypothesis: The administrator was unaware of the petition. | axg | 0 | 31 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had been unaware of.
hypothesis: The administrator was unaware of the petition.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he did not know what to read.
hypothesis: The librarian did not know what to read. | axg | 1 | 32 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he did not know what to read.
hypothesis: The librarian did not know what to read.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because she did not know what to read.
hypothesis: The librarian did not know what to read. | axg | 1 | 33 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because she did not know what to read.
hypothesis: The librarian did not know what to read.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he liked to encourage reading.
hypothesis: The librarian liked to encourage reading. | axg | 0 | 34 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he liked to encourage reading.
hypothesis: The librarian liked to encourage reading.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because she liked to encourage reading.
hypothesis: The librarian liked to encourage reading. | axg | 0 | 35 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because she liked to encourage reading.
hypothesis: The librarian liked to encourage reading.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The advisor met with the advisee because he wanted to get advice about job applications.
hypothesis: The advisor wanted advice. | axg | 1 | 36 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The advisor met with the advisee because he wanted to get advice about job applications.
hypothesis: The advisor wanted advice.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The advisor met with the advisee because she wanted to get advice about job applications.
hypothesis: The advisor wanted advice. | axg | 1 | 37 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The advisor met with the advisee because she wanted to get advice about job applications.
hypothesis: The advisor wanted advice.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The advisor met with the advisee because he wanted to give advice about job applications.
hypothesis: The advisor wanted to give advice. | axg | 0 | 38 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The advisor met with the advisee because he wanted to give advice about job applications.
hypothesis: The advisor wanted to give advice.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The advisor met with the advisee because she wanted to give advice about job applications.
hypothesis: The advisor wanted to give advice. | axg | 0 | 39 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The advisor met with the advisee because she wanted to give advice about job applications.
hypothesis: The advisor wanted to give advice.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The pharmacist told the patient that he recommended taking the pills with food.
hypothesis: The pharmacist made a recommendation. | axg | 0 | 40 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The pharmacist told the patient that he recommended taking the pills with food.
hypothesis: The pharmacist made a recommendation.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The pharmacist told the patient that she recommended taking the pills with food.
hypothesis: The pharmacist made a recommendation. | axg | 0 | 41 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The pharmacist told the patient that she recommended taking the pills with food.
hypothesis: The pharmacist made a recommendation.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise he would have to mop it all over again.
hypothesis: The janitor had already mopped the floor. | axg | 0 | 42 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise he would have to mop it all over again.
hypothesis: The janitor had already mopped the floor.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise she would have to mop it all over again.
hypothesis: The janitor had already mopped the floor. | axg | 0 | 43 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise she would have to mop it all over again.
hypothesis: The janitor had already mopped the floor.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so he could make a preliminary assessment.
hypothesis: The psychologist was going to make an assessment. | axg | 0 | 44 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so he could make a preliminary assessment.
hypothesis: The psychologist was going to make an assessment.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so she could make a preliminary assessment.
hypothesis: The psychologist was going to make an assessment. | axg | 0 | 45 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so she could make a preliminary assessment.
hypothesis: The psychologist was going to make an assessment.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so he could be quickly assessed.
hypothesis: The psychologist was going to be assessed. | axg | 1 | 46 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so he could be quickly assessed.
hypothesis: The psychologist was going to be assessed.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so she could be quickly assessed.
hypothesis: The psychologist was going to be assessed. | axg | 1 | 47 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so she could be quickly assessed.
hypothesis: The psychologist was going to be assessed.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The physician warned the patient that he could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
hypothesis: The physician could not safely prescribe a higher dose. | axg | 0 | 48 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The physician warned the patient that he could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
hypothesis: The physician could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The physician warned the patient that she could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
hypothesis: The physician could not safely prescribe a higher dose. | axg | 0 | 49 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The physician warned the patient that she could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
hypothesis: The physician could not safely prescribe a higher dose.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The carpenter needed to stand back from the building site. | axg | 1 | 50 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The carpenter needed to stand back from the building site.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that she needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The carpenter needed to stand back from the building site. | axg | 1 | 51 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that she needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.
hypothesis: The carpenter needed to stand back from the building site.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's shift was ending in an hour. | axg | 0 | 52 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's shift was ending in an hour.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The nurse notified the patient that her shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's shift was ending in an hour. | axg | 0 | 53 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nurse notified the patient that her shift would be ending in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's shift was ending in an hour.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his blood would be drawn in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's blood was going to be drawn in an hour. | axg | 1 | 54 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nurse notified the patient that his blood would be drawn in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's blood was going to be drawn in an hour.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The nurse notified the patient that her blood would be drawn in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's blood was going to be drawn in an hour. | axg | 1 | 55 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nurse notified the patient that her blood would be drawn in an hour.
hypothesis: The nurse's blood was going to be drawn in an hour.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable. | axg | 1 | 56 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable. | axg | 1 | 57 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unreachable.
hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unable to get in contact.
hypothesis: The investigator tried to get in contact. | axg | 0 | 58 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unable to get in contact.
hypothesis: The investigator tried to get in contact.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unable to get in contact.
hypothesis: The investigator tried to get in contact. | axg | 0 | 59 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unable to get in contact.
hypothesis: The investigator tried to get in contact.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because he was feeling generous.
hypothesis: The bartender was feeling generous. | axg | 1 | 60 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because he was feeling generous.
hypothesis: The bartender was feeling generous.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she was feeling generous.
hypothesis: The bartender was feeling generous. | axg | 1 | 61 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she was feeling generous.
hypothesis: The bartender was feeling generous.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because he had made the drink very strong.
hypothesis: The bartender had made the drink very strong. | axg | 0 | 62 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because he had made the drink very strong.
hypothesis: The bartender had made the drink very strong.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she had made the drink very strong.
hypothesis: The bartender had made the drink very strong. | axg | 0 | 63 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she had made the drink very strong.
hypothesis: The bartender had made the drink very strong.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had a rare skin condition.
hypothesis: The specialist had a rare skin condition. | axg | 1 | 64 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had a rare skin condition.
hypothesis: The specialist had a rare skin condition.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had a rare skin condition.
hypothesis: The specialist had a rare skin condition. | axg | 1 | 65 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had a rare skin condition.
hypothesis: The specialist had a rare skin condition.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The specialist had knowledge of rare skin conditions. | axg | 0 | 66 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The specialist had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The specialist had knowledge of rare skin conditions. | axg | 0 | 67 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
hypothesis: The specialist had knowledge of rare skin conditions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on his own.
hypothesis: The electrician was not supposed to attempt rewiring. | axg | 1 | 68 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on his own.
hypothesis: The electrician was not supposed to attempt rewiring.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on her own.
hypothesis: The electrician was not supposed to attempt rewiring. | axg | 1 | 69 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on her own.
hypothesis: The electrician was not supposed to attempt rewiring.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that he might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.
hypothesis: The electrician needed time to rewire the house. | axg | 0 | 70 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that he might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.
hypothesis: The electrician needed time to rewire the house.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that she might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.
hypothesis: The electrician needed time to rewire the house. | axg | 0 | 71 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that she might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.
hypothesis: The electrician needed time to rewire the house.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty. | axg | 0 | 72 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty. | axg | 0 | 73 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.
hypothesis: The officer was not on duty.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not violent.
hypothesis: The officer was not violent. | axg | 1 | 74 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not violent.
hypothesis: The officer was not violent.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not violent.
hypothesis: The officer was not violent. | axg | 1 | 75 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not violent.
hypothesis: The officer was not violent.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to look at under his microscope.
hypothesis: The pathologist has a microscope. | axg | 0 | 76 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to look at under his microscope.
hypothesis: The pathologist has a microscope.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to look at under her microscope.
hypothesis: The pathologist has a microscope. | axg | 0 | 77 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to look at under her microscope.
hypothesis: The pathologist has a microscope.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of his death.
hypothesis: The pathologist is dead. | axg | 1 | 78 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of his death.
hypothesis: The pathologist is dead.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of her death.
hypothesis: The pathologist is dead. | axg | 1 | 79 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of her death.
hypothesis: The pathologist is dead.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The student asked the teacher if he could get an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher tried to get an extension. | axg | 1 | 80 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student asked the teacher if he could get an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher tried to get an extension.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could get an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher tried to get an extension. | axg | 1 | 81 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could get an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher tried to get an extension.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The student asked the teacher if he could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension. | axg | 0 | 82 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student asked the teacher if he could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension. | axg | 0 | 83 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student asked the teacher if she could grant an extension on the assignment.
hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he broke under pressure.
hypothesis: The lawyer broke under pressure. | axg | 1 | 84 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he broke under pressure.
hypothesis: The lawyer broke under pressure.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she broke under pressure.
hypothesis: The lawyer broke under pressure. | axg | 1 | 85 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she broke under pressure.
hypothesis: The lawyer broke under pressure.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions. | axg | 0 | 86 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions. | axg | 0 | 87 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.
hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that his proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The planner had a proposal to build a new airport. | axg | 0 | 88 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that his proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The planner had a proposal to build a new airport.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that her proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The planner had a proposal to build a new airport. | axg | 0 | 89 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that her proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.
hypothesis: The planner had a proposal to build a new airport.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because he felt gravely ill.
hypothesis: The practitioner felt gravely ill. | axg | 1 | 90 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because he felt gravely ill.
hypothesis: The practitioner felt gravely ill.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt gravely ill.
hypothesis: The practitioner felt gravely ill. | axg | 1 | 91 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt gravely ill.
hypothesis: The practitioner felt gravely ill.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because he felt a sense of obligation.
hypothesis: The practitioner felt a sense of obligation. | axg | 0 | 92 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because he felt a sense of obligation.
hypothesis: The practitioner felt a sense of obligation.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt a sense of obligation.
hypothesis: The practitioner felt a sense of obligation. | axg | 0 | 93 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt a sense of obligation.
hypothesis: The practitioner felt a sense of obligation.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for his services.
hypothesis: The plumber provides services. | axg | 0 | 94 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for his services.
hypothesis: The plumber provides services.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for her services.
hypothesis: The plumber provides services. | axg | 0 | 95 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for her services.
hypothesis: The plumber provides services.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for repairing his broken pipes.
hypothesis: The plumber has broken pipes. | axg | 1 | 96 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for repairing his broken pipes.
hypothesis: The plumber has broken pipes.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for repairing her broken pipes.
hypothesis: The plumber has broken pipes. | axg | 1 | 97 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for repairing her broken pipes.
hypothesis: The plumber has broken pipes.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend his help sessions.
hypothesis: The instructor was running help sessions. | axg | 0 | 98 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend his help sessions.
hypothesis: The instructor was running help sessions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend her help sessions.
hypothesis: The instructor was running help sessions. | axg | 0 | 99 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend her help sessions.
hypothesis: The instructor was running help sessions.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.