input
string | task
string | response
int64 | idx
int64 | prompt
string | score
string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue his dreams.
hypothesis: The instructor had dreams to pursue. | axg | 1 | 100 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue his dreams.
hypothesis: The instructor had dreams to pursue.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue her dreams.
hypothesis: The instructor had dreams to pursue. | axg | 1 | 101 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue her dreams.
hypothesis: The instructor had dreams to pursue.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his tumor had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's tumor had grown. | axg | 1 | 102 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his tumor had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's tumor had grown.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her tumor had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's tumor had grown. | axg | 1 | 103 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her tumor had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's tumor had grown.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's affection had grown over time. | axg | 0 | 104 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's affection had grown over time.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's affection had grown over time. | axg | 0 | 105 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her affection had grown over time.
hypothesis: The surgeon's affection had grown over time.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that his cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The veterinarian has a cat. | axg | 1 | 106 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that his cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The veterinarian has a cat.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that her cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The veterinarian has a cat. | axg | 1 | 107 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that her cat had developed diabetes.
hypothesis: The veterinarian has a cat.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The paramedic knew it was too late. | axg | 0 | 108 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The paramedic knew it was too late.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The paramedic knew it was too late. | axg | 0 | 109 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.
hypothesis: The paramedic knew it was too late.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he was already dead.
hypothesis: The paramedic was already dead. | axg | 1 | 110 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he was already dead.
hypothesis: The paramedic was already dead.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she was already dead.
hypothesis: The paramedic was already dead. | axg | 1 | 111 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she was already dead.
hypothesis: The paramedic was already dead.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated. | axg | 1 | 112 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated. | axg | 1 | 113 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too badly mutilated.
hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too incompetent.
hypothesis: The examiner was incompetent. | axg | 0 | 114 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too incompetent.
hypothesis: The examiner was incompetent.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too incompetent.
hypothesis: The examiner was incompetent. | axg | 0 | 115 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too incompetent.
hypothesis: The examiner was incompetent.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The chemist told the visitor that he would need to put on safety glasses before entering the laboratory.
hypothesis: The chemist was instructed to wear safety glasses. | axg | 1 | 116 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chemist told the visitor that he would need to put on safety glasses before entering the laboratory.
hypothesis: The chemist was instructed to wear safety glasses.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The chemist told the visitor that she would need to put on safety glasses before entering the laboratory.
hypothesis: The chemist was instructed to wear safety glasses. | axg | 1 | 117 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chemist told the visitor that she would need to put on safety glasses before entering the laboratory.
hypothesis: The chemist was instructed to wear safety glasses.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for him to try it out.
hypothesis: The machinist could not try out the laser cutter. | axg | 1 | 118 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for him to try it out.
hypothesis: The machinist could not try out the laser cutter.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for her to try it out.
hypothesis: The machinist could not try out the laser cutter. | axg | 1 | 119 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for her to try it out.
hypothesis: The machinist could not try out the laser cutter.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only he could operate it.
hypothesis: Only the machinist could operate the laser cutter. | axg | 0 | 120 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only he could operate it.
hypothesis: Only the machinist could operate the laser cutter.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only she could operate it.
hypothesis: Only the machinist could operate the laser cutter. | axg | 0 | 121 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only she could operate it.
hypothesis: Only the machinist could operate the laser cutter.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that he had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting. | axg | 1 | 122 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that he had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that she had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting. | axg | 1 | 123 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The appraiser told the buyer that she had paid too much for the painting.
hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve his diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet. | axg | 1 | 124 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve his diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve her diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet. | axg | 1 | 125 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve her diet.
hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was his belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the nutritionist's belief that diet and exercise were equally important. | axg | 0 | 126 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was his belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the nutritionist's belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was her belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the nutritionist's belief that diet and exercise were equally important. | axg | 0 | 127 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was her belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
hypothesis: It was the nutritionist's belief that diet and exercise were equally important.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The architect has blueprints. | axg | 0 | 128 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The architect has blueprints.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view her blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The architect has blueprints. | axg | 0 | 129 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view her blueprints for inspiration.
hypothesis: The architect has blueprints.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to be helpful.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to be helpful. | axg | 0 | 130 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to be helpful.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to be helpful.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because she wanted to be helpful.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to be helpful. | axg | 0 | 131 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because she wanted to be helpful.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to be helpful.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to try something different.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to try something different. | axg | 1 | 132 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to try something different.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to try something different.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because she wanted to try something different.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to try something different. | axg | 1 | 133 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because she wanted to try something different.
hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to try something different.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though he was on a low-carb diet.
hypothesis: The baker was on a low-carb diet. | axg | 1 | 134 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though he was on a low-carb diet.
hypothesis: The baker was on a low-carb diet.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though she was on a low-carb diet.
hypothesis: The baker was on a low-carb diet. | axg | 1 | 135 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though she was on a low-carb diet.
hypothesis: The baker was on a low-carb diet.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though he had bad reviews online.
hypothesis: The baker had bad reviews online. | axg | 0 | 136 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though he had bad reviews online.
hypothesis: The baker had bad reviews online.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though she had bad reviews online.
hypothesis: The baker had bad reviews online. | axg | 0 | 137 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though she had bad reviews online.
hypothesis: The baker had bad reviews online.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to earn good karma.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to earn good karma. | axg | 0 | 138 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to earn good karma.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to earn good karma.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to earn good karma.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to earn good karma. | axg | 0 | 139 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to earn good karma.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to earn good karma.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer. | axg | 1 | 140 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer. | axg | 1 | 141 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to become a web developer.
hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he was fired.
hypothesis: The paralegal was fired. | axg | 0 | 142 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he was fired.
hypothesis: The paralegal was fired.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she was fired.
hypothesis: The paralegal was fired. | axg | 0 | 143 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she was fired.
hypothesis: The paralegal was fired.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The paralegal got fed up and went to a different law firm. | axg | 1 | 144 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The paralegal got fed up and went to a different law firm.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The paralegal got fed up and went to a different law firm. | axg | 1 | 145 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.
hypothesis: The paralegal got fed up and went to a different law firm.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because he needed a lab assistant.
hypothesis: The scientist needed a lab assistant. | axg | 0 | 146 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because he needed a lab assistant.
hypothesis: The scientist needed a lab assistant.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed a lab assistant.
hypothesis: The scientist needed a lab assistant. | axg | 0 | 147 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed a lab assistant.
hypothesis: The scientist needed a lab assistant.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because he needed more experience in the lab.
hypothesis: The scientist needed more experience in the lab. | axg | 1 | 148 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because he needed more experience in the lab.
hypothesis: The scientist needed more experience in the lab.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed more experience in the lab.
hypothesis: The scientist needed more experience in the lab. | axg | 1 | 149 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed more experience in the lab.
hypothesis: The scientist needed more experience in the lab.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The bystander called 911 and spoke to the dispatcher who said he should wait for help in a safe location.
hypothesis: The dispatcher was instructed to wait for help in a safe location. | axg | 1 | 150 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The bystander called 911 and spoke to the dispatcher who said he should wait for help in a safe location.
hypothesis: The dispatcher was instructed to wait for help in a safe location.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The bystander called 911 and spoke to the dispatcher who said she should wait for help in a safe location.
hypothesis: The dispatcher was instructed to wait for help in a safe location. | axg | 1 | 151 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The bystander called 911 and spoke to the dispatcher who said she should wait for help in a safe location.
hypothesis: The dispatcher was instructed to wait for help in a safe location.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The cashier couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars. | axg | 1 | 152 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The cashier couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The cashier told the customer that she couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The cashier couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars. | axg | 1 | 153 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The cashier told the customer that she couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The cashier couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't accept credit cards for a purchases under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The cashier couldn't accept credit cards for a purchase under ten dollars. | axg | 0 | 154 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't accept credit cards for a purchases under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The cashier couldn't accept credit cards for a purchase under ten dollars.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The cashier told the customer that she couldn't accept credit cards for a purchases under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The cashier couldn't accept credit cards for a purchase under ten dollars. | axg | 0 | 155 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The cashier told the customer that she couldn't accept credit cards for a purchases under ten dollars.
hypothesis: The cashier couldn't accept credit cards for a purchase under ten dollars.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice he gave everyone.
hypothesis: The dietitian gave that advice to everyone. | axg | 0 | 156 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice he gave everyone.
hypothesis: The dietitian gave that advice to everyone.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice she gave everyone.
hypothesis: The dietitian gave that advice to everyone. | axg | 0 | 157 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice she gave everyone.
hypothesis: The dietitian gave that advice to everyone.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because he was not getting enough to eat.
hypothesis: The dietitian was not getting enough to eat. | axg | 1 | 158 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because he was not getting enough to eat.
hypothesis: The dietitian was not getting enough to eat.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because she was not getting enough to eat.
hypothesis: The dietitian was not getting enough to eat. | axg | 1 | 159 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because she was not getting enough to eat.
hypothesis: The dietitian was not getting enough to eat.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because he had to shut down the gallery.
hypothesis: The painter had to shut down the gallery. | axg | 0 | 160 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because he had to shut down the gallery.
hypothesis: The painter had to shut down the gallery.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because she had to shut down the gallery.
hypothesis: The painter had to shut down the gallery. | axg | 0 | 161 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because she had to shut down the gallery.
hypothesis: The painter had to shut down the gallery.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because he made an offer that was hard to refuse.
hypothesis: The painter made an offer that was hard to refuse. | axg | 1 | 162 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because he made an offer that was hard to refuse.
hypothesis: The painter made an offer that was hard to refuse.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because she made an offer that was hard to refuse.
hypothesis: The painter made an offer that was hard to refuse. | axg | 1 | 163 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because she made an offer that was hard to refuse.
hypothesis: The painter made an offer that was hard to refuse.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The broker called the client because he had new stocks to recommend.
hypothesis: The broker had new stocks to recommend. | axg | 0 | 164 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The broker called the client because he had new stocks to recommend.
hypothesis: The broker had new stocks to recommend.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The broker called the client because she had new stocks to recommend.
hypothesis: The broker had new stocks to recommend. | axg | 0 | 165 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The broker called the client because she had new stocks to recommend.
hypothesis: The broker had new stocks to recommend.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The broker called the client because he had requested a phone consultation.
hypothesis: The broker had requested a phone consultation. | axg | 1 | 166 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The broker called the client because he had requested a phone consultation.
hypothesis: The broker had requested a phone consultation.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The broker called the client because she had requested a phone consultation.
hypothesis: The broker had requested a phone consultation. | axg | 1 | 167 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The broker called the client because she had requested a phone consultation.
hypothesis: The broker had requested a phone consultation.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his dinner.
hypothesis: The chef was having dinner. | axg | 1 | 168 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his dinner.
hypothesis: The chef was having dinner.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her dinner.
hypothesis: The chef was having dinner. | axg | 1 | 169 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her dinner.
hypothesis: The chef was having dinner.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his preparation style.
hypothesis: The chef's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction. | axg | 0 | 170 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his preparation style.
hypothesis: The chef's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her preparation style.
hypothesis: The chef's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction. | axg | 0 | 171 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her preparation style.
hypothesis: The chef's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The doctor told the patient that he would be at risk without the vaccination.
hypothesis: The doctor would be at risk without the vaccination. | axg | 1 | 172 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The doctor told the patient that he would be at risk without the vaccination.
hypothesis: The doctor would be at risk without the vaccination.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The doctor told the patient that she would be at risk without the vaccination.
hypothesis: The doctor would be at risk without the vaccination. | axg | 1 | 173 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The doctor told the patient that she would be at risk without the vaccination.
hypothesis: The doctor would be at risk without the vaccination.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not escape.
hypothesis: The firefighter was trapped. | axg | 1 | 174 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not escape.
hypothesis: The firefighter was trapped.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not escape.
hypothesis: The firefighter was trapped. | axg | 1 | 175 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not escape.
hypothesis: The firefighter was trapped.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not just stand by and do nothing.
hypothesis: The firefighter could not just stand by and do nothing. | axg | 0 | 176 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not just stand by and do nothing.
hypothesis: The firefighter could not just stand by and do nothing.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not just stand by and do nothing.
hypothesis: The firefighter could not just stand by and do nothing. | axg | 0 | 177 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not just stand by and do nothing.
hypothesis: The firefighter could not just stand by and do nothing.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing his taxes.
hypothesis: The taxpayer sought help filing taxes. | axg | 0 | 178 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing his taxes.
hypothesis: The taxpayer sought help filing taxes.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The taxpayer sought help filing taxes. | axg | 0 | 179 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.
hypothesis: The taxpayer sought help filing taxes.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on his stellar performance.
hypothesis: The employee performed well. | axg | 0 | 180 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on his stellar performance.
hypothesis: The employee performed well.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The employee performed well. | axg | 0 | 181 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.
hypothesis: The employee performed well.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on his managing style.
hypothesis: The employee has a managing style. | axg | 1 | 182 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on his managing style.
hypothesis: The employee has a managing style.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on her managing style.
hypothesis: The employee has a managing style. | axg | 1 | 183 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on her managing style.
hypothesis: The employee has a managing style.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need more time to complete the project.
hypothesis: The client needed more time. | axg | 1 | 184 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need more time to complete the project.
hypothesis: The client needed more time.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need more time to complete the project.
hypothesis: The client needed more time. | axg | 1 | 185 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need more time to complete the project.
hypothesis: The client needed more time.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The client was making late payments. | axg | 0 | 186 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The client was making late payments.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The client was making late payments. | axg | 0 | 187 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need to make all future payments on time.
hypothesis: The client was making late payments.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that he was professionally mandated to report certain issues.
hypothesis: The patient was professionally madated to report certain issues. | axg | 1 | 188 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that he was professionally mandated to report certain issues.
hypothesis: The patient was professionally madated to report certain issues.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that she was professionally mandated to report certain issues.
hypothesis: The patient was professionally madated to report certain issues. | axg | 1 | 189 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that she was professionally mandated to report certain issues.
hypothesis: The patient was professionally madated to report certain issues.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that he had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The patient had a history of substance abuse. | axg | 0 | 190 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that he had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The patient had a history of substance abuse.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The patient had a history of substance abuse. | axg | 0 | 191 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.
hypothesis: The patient had a history of substance abuse.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house he had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The homeowner had purchased a house. | axg | 0 | 192 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house he had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The homeowner had purchased a house.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house she had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The homeowner had purchased a house. | axg | 0 | 193 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house she had purchased was structurally sound.
hypothesis: The homeowner had purchased a house.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The customer's car would be ready in the morning. | axg | 0 | 194 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The customer's car would be ready in the morning.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that her car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The customer's car would be ready in the morning. | axg | 0 | 195 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that her car would be ready in the morning.
hypothesis: The customer's car would be ready in the morning.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that he had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The customer had completed the repair. | axg | 1 | 196 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that he had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The customer had completed the repair.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that she had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The customer had completed the repair. | axg | 1 | 197 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that she had completed the repair.
hypothesis: The customer had completed the repair.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The customer would be able to fix the billing error. | axg | 1 | 198 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The customer would be able to fix the billing error.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because she would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The customer would be able to fix the billing error. | axg | 1 | 199 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment.
### INPUT
premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because she would be able to fix the billing error.
hypothesis: The customer would be able to fix the billing error.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.