question
stringlengths
236
348k
answer
stringlengths
10
2.11k
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mailcap']: [The module mailcap which is trying to be imported was not found.] ============= [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6Zl7m0 (%check)]: [The build failed in the %check part of the build process.]
Issue: The build failed because the mailcap module that is trying to be imported is not found, this is because the mailcap module was deprecated in python 3.11 and removed in python 3.13 adn this build is being built using python 3.13. Resolution: Switch to the alternative of the mailcap module which is the mimetypes module or use an older version of python to build the package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mailcap'
The module mailcap which is trying to be imported was not found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6Zl7m0 (%check)
The build failed in the %check part of the build process.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ meson.build:91:19: ERROR: Subproject exists but has no meson.build file. ]: [This is the actual error.]
Issue: A git snapshot tarball (such as those automatically generated by the popular git forges) was used as the sources, but the git repository from which it was taken contains git submodules. The content of git submodules are not included in such snapshot tarballs, but the build system expects them to be present, and hence the build fails. Resolution: git submodules are usually used for bundled dependencies. If a system version of the dependency can be used instead, it may be preferred to do so, by adding the respective build dependency to the build. If not, then a complete tarball which includes the contents of the git submodules must be used. This may be available from upstream as a download, or it may need to be manually generated by the following steps: 1) `git clone REPOSITORY_URL` 2) `cd DIRECTORY` 3) `git submodule update --init`
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: meson.build:91:19: ERROR: Subproject exists but has no meson.build file.
This is the actual error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [go: cloud.google.com/go/compute in vendor/modules.txt requires go >= 1.23.0 (running go 1.22.9; GOTOOLCHAIN=local) ]: [reason why the build failed, specifically a dependency requires newer version of Go than is available] ============= [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build)]: [denotes phase of the RPM build which failed; the %build phase itself]
Issue: One of the dependencies requires a newer version of Go than is available Resolution: Package newer version of Go, or try building older version of the package that doesn't require newer Go
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: go: cloud.google.com/go/compute in vendor/modules.txt requires go >= 1.23.0 (running go 1.22.9; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)
reason why the build failed, specifically a dependency requires newer version of Go than is available
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build)
denotes phase of the RPM build which failed; the %build phase itself
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [+ ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=avr --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3 checking build system type... Invalid configuration 'x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3': more than four components configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3 failed ]: [configure error caused build to fail]
Issue: Invalid value used for configure option --enable-debug-info Resolution: Check configure --help for valid values to specified option
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: + ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=avr --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3 checking build system type... Invalid configuration 'x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3': more than four components configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3 failed
configure error caused build to fail
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [fatal error: inc_linux/jni.h: No such file or directory]: [gcc is unable to locate the jni.h header file] ============= [compilation terminated.]: [compilation failed]
Issue: Either Java JDK is not installed, or gcc is not looking for header files in JAVA_HOME directory - JNI header files are not in standard gcc search directories and must be explicitly pointed to. Resolution: Add BuildRequires on java-devel or equivalent and make sure that JAVA_HOME is included in gcc search path
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: fatal error: inc_linux/jni.h: No such file or directory
gcc is unable to locate the jni.h header file
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: compilation terminated.
compilation failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [meson.build:1:0: ERROR: Value "consolekit" (of type "string") for option "session_tracking" is not one of the choices. Possible choices are (as string): "logind", "elogind", "ConsoleKit".]: [Error report during configuration phase.]
Issue: Configuration in Meson Build System is case sensitive. The configuration option used in %build phase in spec file doesn't match case-sensitive options provided. Resolution: Correct the configuration option used with case sensitivity in mind for Meson Build System.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: meson.build:1:0: ERROR: Value "consolekit" (of type "string") for option "session_tracking" is not one of the choices. Possible choices are (as string): "logind", "elogind", "ConsoleKit".
Error report during configuration phase.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [python3: /usr/include/python3.14/cpython/unicodeobject.h:332: PyUnicode_READ: Assertion `kind == PyUnicode_4BYTE_KIND' failed. /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7sHWCS: line 67: 46 Aborted (core dumped) CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:--O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer }" CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS:--O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer }" FFLAGS="${FFLAGS:--O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -I/usr/lib64/gfortran/modules }" FCFLAGS="${FCFLAGS:--O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -I/usr/lib64/gfortran/modules }" VALAFLAGS="${VALAFLAGS:--g}" RUSTFLAGS="${RUSTFLAGS:--Copt-level=3 -Cdebuginfo=2 -Ccodegen-units=1 -Cstrip=none -Cforce-frame-pointers=yes -Clink-arg=-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes --cap-lints=warn}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:--Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld-errors -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes }" LT_SYS_LIBRARY_PATH="${LT_SYS_LIBRARY_PATH:-/usr/lib64:}" CC="${CC:-gcc}" CXX="${CXX:-g++}" TMPDIR="/builddir/build/BUILD/python-sqlalchemy-2.0.40-build/.pyproject-builddir" RPM_TOXENV="py314" FEDORA=43 HOSTNAME="rpmbuild" /usr/bin/python3 -Bs /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py --generate-extras --python3_pkgversion 3 --wheeldir /builddir/build/BUILD/python-sqlalchemy-2.0.40-build/pyproject-wheeldir --output /builddir/build/BUILD/python-sqlalchemy-2.0.40-build/python-sqlalchemy-2.0.40-5.fc43.x86_64-pyproject-buildrequires -x ,asyncio,mssql_pymssql,mssql_pyodbc,mysql,mysql_connector,postgresql,pymysql,aiomysql,aioodbc,aiosqlite,asyncmy 1>&2 RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7sHWCS (%generate_buildrequires) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7sHWCS (%generate_buildrequires)]: [The is a bad exit status code from cython] ============= [Requirement satisfied: cython>=0.29.24; platform_python_implementation == 'CPython' (installed: cython 3.0.12)]: [cython seems installed and available]
Issue: python-sqlalchemy requires cython for performance, since cython returns a bad exit code the build fails Resolution: Investigate why there is a bad exit code from cython
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: python3: /usr/include/python3.14/cpython/unicodeobject.h:332: PyUnicode_READ: Assertion `kind == PyUnicode_4BYTE_KIND' failed. /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7sHWCS: line 67: 46 Aborted (core dumped) CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:--O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer }" CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS:--O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer }" FFLAGS="${FFLAGS:--O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -I/usr/lib64/gfortran/modules }" FCFLAGS="${FCFLAGS:--O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -I/usr/lib64/gfortran/modules }" VALAFLAGS="${VALAFLAGS:--g}" RUSTFLAGS="${RUSTFLAGS:--Copt-level=3 -Cdebuginfo=2 -Ccodegen-units=1 -Cstrip=none -Cforce-frame-pointers=yes -Clink-arg=-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes --cap-lints=warn}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:--Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld-errors -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes }" LT_SYS_LIBRARY_PATH="${LT_SYS_LIBRARY_PATH:-/usr/lib64:}" CC="${CC:-gcc}" CXX="${CXX:-g++}" TMPDIR="/builddir/build/BUILD/python-sqlalchemy-2.0.40-build/.pyproject-builddir" RPM_TOXENV="py314" FEDORA=43 HOSTNAME="rpmbuild" /usr/bin/python3 -Bs /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py --generate-extras --python3_pkgversion 3 --wheeldir /builddir/build/BUILD/python-sqlalchemy-2.0.40-build/pyproject-wheeldir --output /builddir/build/BUILD/python-sqlalchemy-2.0.40-build/python-sqlalchemy-2.0.40-5.fc43.x86_64-pyproject-buildrequires -x ,asyncio,mssql_pymssql,mssql_pyodbc,mysql,mysql_connector,postgresql,pymysql,aiomysql,aioodbc,aiosqlite,asyncmy 1>&2 RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7sHWCS (%generate_buildrequires) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7sHWCS (%generate_buildrequires)
The is a bad exit status code from cython
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Requirement satisfied: cython>=0.29.24; platform_python_implementation == 'CPython' (installed: cython 3.0.12)
cython seems installed and available
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [+ /usr/bin/env CARGO_HOME=.cargo RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 'RUSTFLAGS=-Copt-level=3 -Cdebuginfo=2 -Ccodegen-units=1 -Cstrip=none -Cforce-frame-pointers=yes -Clink-arg=-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes --cap-lints=warn' /usr/bin/cargo tree -Z avoid-dev-deps --workspace --offline --edges no-build,no-dev,no-proc-macro --no-dedupe --target all --features engine,dbus_enabled,min,systemd_compat,extras,udev_scripts --prefix none --format '{l}: {p}' + sort -u ++ pwd + sed -e 's: (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5[^)]*)::g' -e 's: / :/:g' -e 's:/: OR :g' error: failed to select a version for the requirement `syn = "^1.0.73"` candidate versions found which didn't match: 2.0.52 location searched: directory source `/usr/share/cargo/registry` (which is replacing registry `crates-io`) required by package `stratisd_proc_macros v0.2.1 (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5/stratisd_proc_macros)` ... which satisfies path dependency `stratisd_proc_macros` of package `stratisd v3.6.5 (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5)` perhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored? As a reminder, you're using offline mode (--offline) which can sometimes cause surprising resolution failures, if this error is too confusing you may wish to retry without the offline flag. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kLlfd8 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kLlfd8 (%build]: [It shows the failure.] ============= [location searched: directory source `/usr/share/cargo/registry` (which is replacing registry `crates-io`)]: [It is the step that puts the dependencies into the local registry.]
Issue: In a previous step, not all the required dependencies were installed in the local registry. In particular, those for a dependency designated as a path dependency in the project's Cargo.toml for the top-level package were not installed. Resolution: Declare a workspace table in the Cargo.toml associated with the top-level package in the repo. Add both the top-level package and the small ancillary package to that workspace's members table.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: + /usr/bin/env CARGO_HOME=.cargo RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 'RUSTFLAGS=-Copt-level=3 -Cdebuginfo=2 -Ccodegen-units=1 -Cstrip=none -Cforce-frame-pointers=yes -Clink-arg=-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes --cap-lints=warn' /usr/bin/cargo tree -Z avoid-dev-deps --workspace --offline --edges no-build,no-dev,no-proc-macro --no-dedupe --target all --features engine,dbus_enabled,min,systemd_compat,extras,udev_scripts --prefix none --format '{l}: {p}' + sort -u ++ pwd + sed -e 's: (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5[^)]*)::g' -e 's: / :/:g' -e 's:/: OR :g' error: failed to select a version for the requirement `syn = "^1.0.73"` candidate versions found which didn't match: 2.0.52 location searched: directory source `/usr/share/cargo/registry` (which is replacing registry `crates-io`) required by package `stratisd_proc_macros v0.2.1 (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5/stratisd_proc_macros)` ... which satisfies path dependency `stratisd_proc_macros` of package `stratisd v3.6.5 (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5)` perhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored? As a reminder, you're using offline mode (--offline) which can sometimes cause surprising resolution failures, if this error is too confusing you may wish to retry without the offline flag. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kLlfd8 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kLlfd8 (%build
It shows the failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: location searched: directory source `/usr/share/cargo/registry` (which is replacing registry `crates-io`)
It is the step that puts the dependencies into the local registry.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ── Failure ('test-timezone.R:7:5'): with_timezone: changes the time zone ─────── ... %in% c("PDT", "PST") is not TRUE]: [Testsuite result with failed test output]
Issue: Failed test Resolution: This tests works with timezone - verify that the tzdata package is installed, or identify the specific part of the code it is testing
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ── Failure ('test-timezone.R:7:5'): with_timezone: changes the time zone ─────── ... %in% c("PDT", "PST") is not TRUE
Testsuite result with failed test output
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [CMake Warning (dev) at CMakeLists.txt:1 (PROJECT): cmake_minimum_required() should be called prior to this top-level project() call. Please see the cmake-commands(7) manual for usage documentation of both commands. This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it. -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:2 (CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED): Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake. Update the VERSION argument <min> value. Or, use the <min>...<max> syntax to tell CMake that the project requires at least <min> but has been updated to work with policies introduced by <max> or earlier. Or, add -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5 to try configuring anyway.]: [Description of the cause of the build failure]
Issue: Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake. Though are project has still configured CMake minimum version less than this value. Resolution: Bump the minimum supported CMake version in the project.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: CMake Warning (dev) at CMakeLists.txt:1 (PROJECT): cmake_minimum_required() should be called prior to this top-level project() call. Please see the cmake-commands(7) manual for usage documentation of both commands. This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it. -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:2 (CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED): Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake. Update the VERSION argument <min> value. Or, use the <min>...<max> syntax to tell CMake that the project requires at least <min> but has been updated to work with policies introduced by <max> or earlier. Or, add -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5 to try configuring anyway.
Description of the cause of the build failure
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ !! Copr timeout => sending INT]: [It tells you that the build took too long to complete]
Issue: The build took too long for the given timeout to complete in time. Resolution: Increase the timeout of the copr builder or find a high performance builder.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: !! Copr timeout => sending INT
It tells you that the build took too long to complete
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [error[E0432]: unresolved import `apple_flat_package` --> src/files.rs:26:5 | 26 | use apple_flat_package::PkgReader; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `apple_flat_package` | = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `apple_flat_package`, use `cargo add apple_flat_package` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`]: [During compilation there was attempt to import apple_flat_package which isn't present on the device] ============= [error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `debpkg` --> src/files.rs:284:23 | 284 | let mut deb_pkg = debpkg::DebPkg::parse(deb_file)?; | ^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `debpkg` | = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `debpkg`, use `cargo add debpkg` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`]: [During compilation there was attempt to import dpkg_package which isn't present on the device] ============= [error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `infer` --> src/files.rs:95:31 | 95 | let mut extension = match infer::get_from_path(compressed_file)? { | ^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `infer` | = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `infer`, use `cargo add infer` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`]: [During compilation there was attempt to import infer which isn't present on the device] ============= [error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `sevenz_rust` --> src/files.rs:178:5 | 178 | sevenz_rust::decompress(file_reader, zip_parent).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `sevenz_rust` | = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `sevenz_rust`, use `cargo add sevenz_rust` to add it to your `Cargo.toml` ]: [During compilation there was attempt to import sevenz_rust which isn't present on the device]
Issue: Trying to import functions during rust compilation which aren't present locally and are missing from cargo.toml Resolution: Either add them to cargo.toml or remove them from the source code
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error[E0432]: unresolved import `apple_flat_package` --> src/files.rs:26:5 | 26 | use apple_flat_package::PkgReader; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `apple_flat_package` | = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `apple_flat_package`, use `cargo add apple_flat_package` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`
During compilation there was attempt to import apple_flat_package which isn't present on the device
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `debpkg` --> src/files.rs:284:23 | 284 | let mut deb_pkg = debpkg::DebPkg::parse(deb_file)?; | ^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `debpkg` | = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `debpkg`, use `cargo add debpkg` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`
During compilation there was attempt to import dpkg_package which isn't present on the device
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `infer` --> src/files.rs:95:31 | 95 | let mut extension = match infer::get_from_path(compressed_file)? { | ^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `infer` | = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `infer`, use `cargo add infer` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`
During compilation there was attempt to import infer which isn't present on the device
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `sevenz_rust` --> src/files.rs:178:5 | 178 | sevenz_rust::decompress(file_reader, zip_parent).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `sevenz_rust` | = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `sevenz_rust`, use `cargo add sevenz_rust` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`
During compilation there was attempt to import sevenz_rust which isn't present on the device
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.182669.1747427007000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump] ============= [ Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.217751.1747427177000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump] ============= [ Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.218072.1747427191000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump] ============= [ Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.219312.1747427215000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump] ============= [ Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.797628.1747430975000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump] ============= [ Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.831082.1747431126000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump]
Issue: tmux has core-dumped. Resolution: This is a known issue. Please report the problem to the tmux team in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-80294
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.182669.1747427007000000.zst (present)
Record of tmux core dump
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.217751.1747427177000000.zst (present)
Record of tmux core dump
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.218072.1747427191000000.zst (present)
Record of tmux core dump
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.219312.1747427215000000.zst (present)
Record of tmux core dump
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.797628.1747430975000000.zst (present)
Record of tmux core dump
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.831082.1747431126000000.zst (present)
Record of tmux core dump
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [=============================================================================== Failure: test_self_dump(TestRDocRIDriver): </:class_methods/> was expected to be =~ <"{ancestors:\n" + " {\"Foo\" => [\"Inc\", \"Object\"],\n" + " \"Ambiguous\" => [\"Object\"],\n" + " \"Foo::Bar\" => [\"Object\"],\n" + " \"Foo::Baz\" => [\"Object\"],\n" + " \"Qux\" => [\"Object\"]},\n" + " attributes: {\"Foo::Bar\" => [\"attr_accessor attr\"]},\n" + " class_methods: {\"Foo::Bar\" => [\"new\"]},\n" + " c_class_variables: {},\n" + " c_singleton_class_variables: {},\n" + " encoding: nil,\n" + " instance_methods:\n" + " {\"Foo\" => [\"inherit\", \"override\"],\n" + " \"Foo::Bar\" => [\"attr\", \"blah\", \"bother\"],\n" + " \"Qux\" => [\"aliased\", \"original\"]},\n" + " main: nil,\n" + " modules: [\"Ambiguous\", \"Ext\", \"Foo\", \"Foo::Bar\", \"Foo::Baz\", \"Inc\", \"Qux\"],\n" + " pages: [\"README.rdoc\"],\n" + " title: nil}\n">. /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-rdoc-6.4.0-build/rdoc-6.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-6.4.0/test/rdoc/test_rdoc_ri_driver.rb:57:in 'TestRDocRIDriver#test_self_dump' 54: RDoc::RI::Driver.dump @store1.cache_path 55: end 56: => 57: assert_match %r%:class_methods%, out 58: assert_match %r%:modules%, out 59: assert_match %r%:instance_methods%, out 60: assert_match %r%:ancestors%, out =============================================================================== : (0.009597)]: [Failed test case] ============= [2225 tests, 4864 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications 99.9551% passed]: [Test suite result]
Issue: Failed test case. This is caused by Ruby 3.4 changing formatting of hashes, where JSON syntax is newly used Resolution: Apply the upstream fix (https://github.com/ruby/rdoc/pull/1187) or update to RDoc 6.8.0+
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: =============================================================================== Failure: test_self_dump(TestRDocRIDriver): </:class_methods/> was expected to be =~ <"{ancestors:\n" + " {\"Foo\" => [\"Inc\", \"Object\"],\n" + " \"Ambiguous\" => [\"Object\"],\n" + " \"Foo::Bar\" => [\"Object\"],\n" + " \"Foo::Baz\" => [\"Object\"],\n" + " \"Qux\" => [\"Object\"]},\n" + " attributes: {\"Foo::Bar\" => [\"attr_accessor attr\"]},\n" + " class_methods: {\"Foo::Bar\" => [\"new\"]},\n" + " c_class_variables: {},\n" + " c_singleton_class_variables: {},\n" + " encoding: nil,\n" + " instance_methods:\n" + " {\"Foo\" => [\"inherit\", \"override\"],\n" + " \"Foo::Bar\" => [\"attr\", \"blah\", \"bother\"],\n" + " \"Qux\" => [\"aliased\", \"original\"]},\n" + " main: nil,\n" + " modules: [\"Ambiguous\", \"Ext\", \"Foo\", \"Foo::Bar\", \"Foo::Baz\", \"Inc\", \"Qux\"],\n" + " pages: [\"README.rdoc\"],\n" + " title: nil}\n">. /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-rdoc-6.4.0-build/rdoc-6.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-6.4.0/test/rdoc/test_rdoc_ri_driver.rb:57:in 'TestRDocRIDriver#test_self_dump' 54: RDoc::RI::Driver.dump @store1.cache_path 55: end 56: => 57: assert_match %r%:class_methods%, out 58: assert_match %r%:modules%, out 59: assert_match %r%:instance_methods%, out 60: assert_match %r%:ancestors%, out =============================================================================== : (0.009597)
Failed test case
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: 2225 tests, 4864 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications 99.9551% passed
Test suite result
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ERROR tests/test_action.py ERROR tests/test_background_worker_build.py ERROR tests/test_createrepo.py ERROR tests/test_helpers.py ERROR tests/test_modifyrepo.py !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 5 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]: [Some errors in Python's test-suite.] ============= [ from copr_common.helpers import ( E ImportError: cannot import name 'USER_SSH_DEFAULT_EXPIRATION' from 'copr_common.helpers' (/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/copr_common/helpers.py]: [Python can not import the USER_SSH_DEFAULT_EXPIRATION symbol from 'copr_common.helpers' file. This means that the symbol doesn't exist there.]
Issue: Importing a non-existing python symbol at test-time, this typically means that the package is broken and it is good it fails at %check phase. Resolution: Take a look why the symbol disappeared, and start providing that (in the `copr_common` package) or remove the dependency.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: ERROR tests/test_action.py ERROR tests/test_background_worker_build.py ERROR tests/test_createrepo.py ERROR tests/test_helpers.py ERROR tests/test_modifyrepo.py !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 5 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Some errors in Python's test-suite.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: from copr_common.helpers import ( E ImportError: cannot import name 'USER_SSH_DEFAULT_EXPIRATION' from 'copr_common.helpers' (/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/copr_common/helpers.py
Python can not import the USER_SSH_DEFAULT_EXPIRATION symbol from 'copr_common.helpers' file. This means that the symbol doesn't exist there.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ !! Copr timeout => sending INT WARNING: Machine a97e46b4dd5e489ba0437eef36214d35 still running. Killing... Copr build error: Build failed]: [This is an information from Copr buildsystem that this build is taking too long and reach the timeout level.]
Issue: Copr killed this build because it reached the timeout level. Builds are not allowed to run forever. The default limit is 5 hours (18000 seconds) but users can increase it up to 30 hours (108000 seconds). Resolution: When you are submitting a new build you can specify the Timeout. The option is available both in WebUI and CLI (--timeout) and is specified in seconds.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: !! Copr timeout => sending INT WARNING: Machine a97e46b4dd5e489ba0437eef36214d35 still running. Killing... Copr build error: Build failed
This is an information from Copr buildsystem that this build is taking too long and reach the timeout level.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign !! Copr timeout => sending INT]: [Test named `tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign` in pytest run for too long and because of that the Copr build reached its build timeout thus Copr terminated this build as failed.]
Issue: The Copr build reached its timeout because of a stuck test case thus the build was terminated and labeled as failed. Resolution: Fix the test case.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign !! Copr timeout => sending INT
Test named `tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign` in pytest run for too long and because of that the Copr build reached its build timeout thus Copr terminated this build as failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [error: invalid command 'test']: [Error message]
Issue: setup.py test was deprecated and removed. Resolution: Use supported test invocation. E.g. add BuildRequires: python3-pytest and use %pytest in %check section of SPEC file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error: invalid command 'test'
Error message
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.]: [The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.] ============= [ File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping raise ConfigError(msg) sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).]: [The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.]
Issue: There was a breaking change in Sphinx 8.2.x. The projects need to update their codebase. Resolution: In conf.py should be intersphinx_mapping = {'python': ("https://docs.python.org/3/": None)} instead of intersphinx_mapping = {"https://docs.python.org/3/": None}
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.
The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping raise ConfigError(msg) sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).
The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [Curl error (6): Could not resolve hostname for ]: [Curl failure to query repository metadata]
Issue: dnf builddep failed due to networking issue Resolution: re-start build to choose different builder
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Curl error (6): Could not resolve hostname for
Curl failure to query repository metadata
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [error: failed to run custom build command for `libcryptsetup-rs-sys v0.4.1 (/builddir/build/BUILD/rust-libcryptsetup-rs-sys-0.4.1-build/libcryptsetup-rs-sys-0.4.1)` Caused by: process didn't exit successfully: `/builddir/build/BUILD/rust-libcryptsetup-rs-sys-0.4.1-build/libcryptsetup-rs-sys-0.4.1/target/rpm/build/libcryptsetup-rs-sys-3d90adc1219a44ec/build-script-build` (exit status: 101) --- stdout cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=LIBCRYPTSETUP_NO_PKG_CONFIG cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_i686-unknown-linux-gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_i686_unknown_linux_gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=HOST_PKG_CONFIG cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=LIBCRYPTSETUP_STATIC cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=LIBCRYPTSETUP_DYNAMIC cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_ALL_STATIC cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_ALL_DYNAMIC cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_PATH_i686-unknown-linux-gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_PATH_i686_unknown_linux_gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=HOST_PKG_CONFIG_PATH cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_PATH cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR_i686-unknown-linux-gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR_i686_unknown_linux_gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=HOST_PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR_i686-unknown-linux-gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR_i686_unknown_linux_gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=HOST_PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR --- stderr thread 'main' panicked at build.rs:14:19: Bindings require at least cryptsetup-2.2.0: pkg-config exited with status code 1 > PKG_CONFIG_PATH=:/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/share/pkgconfig PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_SYSTEM_LIBS=1 PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_SYSTEM_CFLAGS=1 pkg-config --libs --cflags libcryptsetup 'libcryptsetup >= 2.2.0' The system library `libcryptsetup` required by crate `libcryptsetup-rs-sys` was not found. The file `libcryptsetup.pc` needs to be installed and the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable must contain its parent directory. PKG_CONFIG_PATH contains the following: - - /usr/lib/pkgconfig - /usr/share/pkgconfig HINT: you may need to install a package such as libcryptsetup, libcryptsetup-dev or libcryptsetup-devel. note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JgVGFX (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JgVGFX (%build) Child return code was: 1 EXCEPTION: [Error('Command failed: \n # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 4ca34c5badd44998b075124d79c3dc05 -D /var/lib/mock/f43-build-58908172-6569188/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.xr_sewzh:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin \'--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"\' \'--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ \' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c \'/usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep --noclean --target i686 /builddir/build/SPECS/rust-libcryptsetup-rs-sys.spec\'\n', 1)] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 93, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 610, in do_with_status raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (cmd_pretty(command, env), output), child.returncode) mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed: # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 4ca34c5badd44998b075124d79c3dc05 -D /var/lib/mock/f43-build-58908172-6569188/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.xr_sewzh:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep --noclean --target i686 /builddir/build/SPECS/rust-libcryptsetup-rs-sys.spec' ]: [Shows the build failure.]
Issue: Missing "%echo 'pkgconfig(libcryptsetup)'" in %generate_build_requires section . Crate's build.rs script can not find the missing dependency, so there is a build failure. Resolution: Add "%echo 'pkgconfig(libcryptsetup)'" to spec file at end of %generate_build_requires section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error: failed to run custom build command for `libcryptsetup-rs-sys v0.4.1 (/builddir/build/BUILD/rust-libcryptsetup-rs-sys-0.4.1-build/libcryptsetup-rs-sys-0.4.1)` Caused by: process didn't exit successfully: `/builddir/build/BUILD/rust-libcryptsetup-rs-sys-0.4.1-build/libcryptsetup-rs-sys-0.4.1/target/rpm/build/libcryptsetup-rs-sys-3d90adc1219a44ec/build-script-build` (exit status: 101) --- stdout cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=LIBCRYPTSETUP_NO_PKG_CONFIG cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_i686-unknown-linux-gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_i686_unknown_linux_gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=HOST_PKG_CONFIG cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=LIBCRYPTSETUP_STATIC cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=LIBCRYPTSETUP_DYNAMIC cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_ALL_STATIC cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_ALL_DYNAMIC cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_PATH_i686-unknown-linux-gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_PATH_i686_unknown_linux_gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=HOST_PKG_CONFIG_PATH cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_PATH cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR_i686-unknown-linux-gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR_i686_unknown_linux_gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=HOST_PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR_i686-unknown-linux-gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR_i686_unknown_linux_gnu cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=HOST_PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR --- stderr thread 'main' panicked at build.rs:14:19: Bindings require at least cryptsetup-2.2.0: pkg-config exited with status code 1 > PKG_CONFIG_PATH=:/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/share/pkgconfig PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_SYSTEM_LIBS=1 PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_SYSTEM_CFLAGS=1 pkg-config --libs --cflags libcryptsetup 'libcryptsetup >= 2.2.0' The system library `libcryptsetup` required by crate `libcryptsetup-rs-sys` was not found. The file `libcryptsetup.pc` needs to be installed and the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable must contain its parent directory. PKG_CONFIG_PATH contains the following: - - /usr/lib/pkgconfig - /usr/share/pkgconfig HINT: you may need to install a package such as libcryptsetup, libcryptsetup-dev or libcryptsetup-devel. note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JgVGFX (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JgVGFX (%build) Child return code was: 1 EXCEPTION: [Error('Command failed: \n # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 4ca34c5badd44998b075124d79c3dc05 -D /var/lib/mock/f43-build-58908172-6569188/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.xr_sewzh:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin \'--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"\' \'--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ \' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c \'/usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep --noclean --target i686 /builddir/build/SPECS/rust-libcryptsetup-rs-sys.spec\'\n', 1)] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 93, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 610, in do_with_status raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (cmd_pretty(command, env), output), child.returncode) mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed: # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 4ca34c5badd44998b075124d79c3dc05 -D /var/lib/mock/f43-build-58908172-6569188/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.xr_sewzh:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep --noclean --target i686 /builddir/build/SPECS/rust-libcryptsetup-rs-sys.spec'
Shows the build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-sender File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-receiver ]: [File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-sender and File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-receiver: These lines tell you the specific files that are missing. The path /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT is crucial. This is the root directory where the package will be "installed" during the build process. It's a temporary staging area. The RPM build process expects to find the udp-sender and udp-receiver executables within this staging area, specifically in the usr/bin subdirectory.]
Issue: This RPM build failure message tells you exactly what's wrong: the RPM package is trying to include the files /usr/bin/udp-sender and /usr/bin/udp-receiver, but the build process can't find them where it expects them to be. Resolution: The most likely reason is that the udpcast software isn't being compiled and installed correctly within the build environment. The RPM spec file (the instructions for building the RPM) is supposed to handle this. The build process should compile the source code, and then install the resulting executables into the BUILDROOT directory. If this installation step is failing or is missing, the files won't be there.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-sender File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-receiver
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-sender and File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-receiver: These lines tell you the specific files that are missing. The path /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT is crucial. This is the root directory where the package will be "installed" during the build process. It's a temporary staging area. The RPM build process expects to find the udp-sender and udp-receiver executables within this staging area, specifically in the usr/bin subdirectory.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [2024-02-03 20:04:31.993 utils.py ERROR Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/api.py", line 1592, in prepare_sources self.up.prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation( File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 638, in prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation SRPMBuilder(upstream=self, ref=upstream_ref).prepare( ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 975, in __init__ self.rpmbuild_dir = self.upstream.absolute_specfile_dir ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 99, in absolute_specfile_dir return self.absolute_specfile_path.parent ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 111, in absolute_specfile_path raise FileNotFoundError( FileNotFoundError: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4.]: [Packit tried to prepare repository and find a specfile under /cli/*.spec path. This snippet show error that tells no such specfile under cli/vercajk.spec exists.]
Issue: Packit in Copr build, specifically in creating SRPM failed, the key issue was that Packit was told to look for specfile under cli/vercajk.spec path but no specfile was found under that path. Resolution: Specify in .packit.yaml file the right path where the specfile is.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: 2024-02-03 20:04:31.993 utils.py ERROR Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/api.py", line 1592, in prepare_sources self.up.prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation( File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 638, in prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation SRPMBuilder(upstream=self, ref=upstream_ref).prepare( ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 975, in __init__ self.rpmbuild_dir = self.upstream.absolute_specfile_dir ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 99, in absolute_specfile_dir return self.absolute_specfile_path.parent ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 111, in absolute_specfile_path raise FileNotFoundError( FileNotFoundError: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4.
Packit tried to prepare repository and find a specfile under /cli/*.spec path. This snippet show error that tells no such specfile under cli/vercajk.spec exists.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: python3-pytest-asyncio >= 0.24 DEBUG util.py:459: You can try to add to command line: DEBUG util.py:459: --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages ]: [The required package python3-pytest-asyncio is either not available or is not available in required version.]
Issue: The build dependency cannot be satisfied. Resolution: You have to work with the maintainer of python3-pytest-asyncio to build it in the required version. As a temporary solution, you can disable the test suite.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: python3-pytest-asyncio >= 0.24 DEBUG util.py:459: You can try to add to command line: DEBUG util.py:459: --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
The required package python3-pytest-asyncio is either not available or is not available in required version.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/libqalculate-5.5.2-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libqalculate.so.23.3.2]: [This indicates that the libqalculate.so.23.3.2 file was not found while trying to package it in the %files part of the build process.]
Issue: The file libqalculate.so.23.3.2 file was not found while trying to package it in the %files part of the build process, it does not exist, it's not named correctly or it is not located in the correct directory. Resolution: Ensure the libqalculate.so.23.3.2 file is located in the correct directory, it is created during the build process and it is named correctly or that the %files section of the spec file contains the correct path and filename.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/libqalculate-5.5.2-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libqalculate.so.23.3.2
This indicates that the libqalculate.so.23.3.2 file was not found while trying to package it in the %files part of the build process.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [=================================== FAILURES =================================== _ test_naked_invocation[args3-usage:\n http --pretty {all, colors, format, none} [METHOD] URL [REQUEST_ITEM ...]\n\nerror:\n argument --pretty: invalid choice: '$invalid' (choose from 'all', 'colors', 'format', 'none')\n\nfor more information:\n run 'http --help' or visit https://httpie.io/docs/cli\n\n] _ ignore_terminal_size = None, args = ['--pretty', '$invalid'] expected_msg = "usage:\n http --pretty {all, colors, format, none} [METHOD] URL [REQUEST_ITEM ...]\n\nerror:\n argument --prett...', 'colors', 'format', 'none')\n\nfor more information:\n run 'http --help' or visit https://httpie.io/docs/cli\n\n" @pytest.mark.parametrize( 'args, expected_msg', [ ([], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE), (['--pretty'], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE_PRETTY_WITH_NO_ARG), (['pie.dev', '--pretty'], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE_PRETTY_WITH_NO_ARG), (['--pretty', '$invalid'], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE_PRETTY_WITH_INVALID_ARG), ] ) def test_naked_invocation(ignore_terminal_size, args, expected_msg): result = http(*args, tolerate_error_exit_status=True) > assert result.stderr == expected_msg E AssertionError: assert 'usage:\n .../docs/cli\n\n' == 'usage:\n .../docs/cli\n\n' E E usage: E http --pretty {all, colors, format, none} [METHOD] URL [REQUEST_ITEM ...] E E error: E - argument --pretty: invalid choice: '$invalid' (choose from 'all', 'colors', 'format', 'none') E ? - - - - - - - -... E E ...Full output truncated (5 lines hidden), use '-vv' to show tests/test_cli_ui.py:65: AssertionError ----------------------------- Captured stderr call ----------------------------- ]: [The test suite failed.] ============= [_______________________ test_plugins_installation[True] ________________________ httpie_plugins_success = <function httpie_plugins_success.<locals>.runner at 0x3ff9fdd7920> interface = Interface(path=PosixPath('/tmp/pytest-of-mockbuild/pytest-0/test_plugins_installation_True0/interface'), environment=<...dout': <tempfile._TemporaryFileWrapper object at 0x3ff9fdd7890>, 'stdout_encoding': 'utf-8', 'stdout_isatty': True}>) dummy_plugin = Plugin(interface=Interface(path=PosixPath('/tmp/pytest-of-mockbuild/pytest-0/test_plugins_installation_True0/interface...ue}>), name='httpie-0a89011a', version='1.0.0', entry_points=[EntryPoint(name='test', group='httpie.plugins.auth.v1')]) cli_mode = True @pytest.mark.requires_installation @pytest.mark.parametrize('cli_mode', [True, False]) def test_plugins_installation(httpie_plugins_success, interface, dummy_plugin, cli_mode): > lines = httpie_plugins_success('install', dummy_plugin.path, cli_mode=cli_mode) tests/test_plugins_cli.py:10: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ]: [Installation of dummy plugin failed.] ============= [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.afkYZL (%check) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.afkYZL (%check) Child return code was: 1 ]: [The build failed in %check phase.]
Issue: The test suite in %check section failed. Resolution: It seems that the test suite is trying to install a plugin. Make sure that it does not require an internet connection, as all builds are done without an internet connection. Work with upstream on fixing the test suite. Alternatively, you may temporarily disable the test suite.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: =================================== FAILURES =================================== _ test_naked_invocation[args3-usage:\n http --pretty {all, colors, format, none} [METHOD] URL [REQUEST_ITEM ...]\n\nerror:\n argument --pretty: invalid choice: '$invalid' (choose from 'all', 'colors', 'format', 'none')\n\nfor more information:\n run 'http --help' or visit https://httpie.io/docs/cli\n\n] _ ignore_terminal_size = None, args = ['--pretty', '$invalid'] expected_msg = "usage:\n http --pretty {all, colors, format, none} [METHOD] URL [REQUEST_ITEM ...]\n\nerror:\n argument --prett...', 'colors', 'format', 'none')\n\nfor more information:\n run 'http --help' or visit https://httpie.io/docs/cli\n\n" @pytest.mark.parametrize( 'args, expected_msg', [ ([], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE), (['--pretty'], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE_PRETTY_WITH_NO_ARG), (['pie.dev', '--pretty'], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE_PRETTY_WITH_NO_ARG), (['--pretty', '$invalid'], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE_PRETTY_WITH_INVALID_ARG), ] ) def test_naked_invocation(ignore_terminal_size, args, expected_msg): result = http(*args, tolerate_error_exit_status=True) > assert result.stderr == expected_msg E AssertionError: assert 'usage:\n .../docs/cli\n\n' == 'usage:\n .../docs/cli\n\n' E E usage: E http --pretty {all, colors, format, none} [METHOD] URL [REQUEST_ITEM ...] E E error: E - argument --pretty: invalid choice: '$invalid' (choose from 'all', 'colors', 'format', 'none') E ? - - - - - - - -... E E ...Full output truncated (5 lines hidden), use '-vv' to show tests/test_cli_ui.py:65: AssertionError ----------------------------- Captured stderr call -----------------------------
The test suite failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: _______________________ test_plugins_installation[True] ________________________ httpie_plugins_success = <function httpie_plugins_success.<locals>.runner at 0x3ff9fdd7920> interface = Interface(path=PosixPath('/tmp/pytest-of-mockbuild/pytest-0/test_plugins_installation_True0/interface'), environment=<...dout': <tempfile._TemporaryFileWrapper object at 0x3ff9fdd7890>, 'stdout_encoding': 'utf-8', 'stdout_isatty': True}>) dummy_plugin = Plugin(interface=Interface(path=PosixPath('/tmp/pytest-of-mockbuild/pytest-0/test_plugins_installation_True0/interface...ue}>), name='httpie-0a89011a', version='1.0.0', entry_points=[EntryPoint(name='test', group='httpie.plugins.auth.v1')]) cli_mode = True @pytest.mark.requires_installation @pytest.mark.parametrize('cli_mode', [True, False]) def test_plugins_installation(httpie_plugins_success, interface, dummy_plugin, cli_mode): > lines = httpie_plugins_success('install', dummy_plugin.path, cli_mode=cli_mode) tests/test_plugins_cli.py:10: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Installation of dummy plugin failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.afkYZL (%check) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.afkYZL (%check) Child return code was: 1
The build failed in %check phase.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [version conflict for package "Tcl": have 9.0.0, need 8.6 while executing "package require Tcl 8.6" (file "test/tester.tcl" line 33)]: [Error message]
Issue: Mismatched version of dependency, requested version is different from what is provided. Resolution: Package depends on Tcl version that is not present in Fedora, either fix in upstream or create a patch that fixes the issue.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: version conflict for package "Tcl": have 9.0.0, need 8.6 while executing "package require Tcl 8.6" (file "test/tester.tcl" line 33)
Error message
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(condtype/default) >= 1.3.0 with crate(condtype/default) < 2.0.0~) You can try to add to command line:]: [cargo crate may not have been added to fedora/copr yet]
Issue: unsatisfied dependencies Resolution: run rust2rpm condtype and upload to spec to same copr project
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(condtype/default) >= 1.3.0 with crate(condtype/default) < 2.0.0~) You can try to add to command line:
cargo crate may not have been added to fedora/copr yet
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [Finish(bootstrap): chroot init]: [The 'Finish(bootstrap): chroot init' means that Mock finalized bootstrap installation, so there's no problem.] ============= [Finish: installing minimal buildroot with dnf]: [The "Finish: installing minimal buildroot with dnf" means that even the minimal buildroot was successfully initialized.] ============= [Start: build phase for rebase-helper-0.28.1-3.fc38.src.rpm]: [The "Start: build phase..." part means that Mock started building the source RPM. ] ============= [Finish: build phase for rebase-helper-0.28.1-3.fc38.src.rpm]: [Source RPM has been successfully built.] ============= [Error: Problem: package python3-sphinx_rtd_theme-1.1.1-2.fc38.noarch from copr_base requires (python3.11dist(sphinx) < 6~~ with python3.11dist(sphinx) >= 1.6), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both python3-sphinx-1:5.3.0-3.fc38.noarch from fedora and python3-sphinx-1:7.2.6-5.fc38.noarch from copr_base - cannot install the best candidate for the job]: [But `python3-sphinx_rtd_theme` from `copr_base` seems to require non-installable dependencies in buildroot.]
Issue: Because the BuildRequires specify a non-installable package. Resolution: Fix the dependency tree, either python3-sphinx_rtd_theme or python3-sphinx or both.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Finish(bootstrap): chroot init
The 'Finish(bootstrap): chroot init' means that Mock finalized bootstrap installation, so there's no problem.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Finish: installing minimal buildroot with dnf
The "Finish: installing minimal buildroot with dnf" means that even the minimal buildroot was successfully initialized.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Start: build phase for rebase-helper-0.28.1-3.fc38.src.rpm
The "Start: build phase..." part means that Mock started building the source RPM.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Finish: build phase for rebase-helper-0.28.1-3.fc38.src.rpm
Source RPM has been successfully built.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Error: Problem: package python3-sphinx_rtd_theme-1.1.1-2.fc38.noarch from copr_base requires (python3.11dist(sphinx) < 6~~ with python3.11dist(sphinx) >= 1.6), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both python3-sphinx-1:5.3.0-3.fc38.noarch from fedora and python3-sphinx-1:7.2.6-5.fc38.noarch from copr_base - cannot install the best candidate for the job
But `python3-sphinx_rtd_theme` from `copr_base` seems to require non-installable dependencies in buildroot.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [============================= test session starts ============================== platform linux -- Python 3.13.0, pytest-8.3.4, pluggy-1.5.0 rootdir: /builddir/build/BUILD/mock-5.9-build/mock-git-3857.8f7301c collected 37 items tests/plugins/test_rpmautospec.py ............ [ 32%] tests/test_buildroot.py . [ 35%] tests/test_buildroot_lock.py .F. [ 43%] tests/test_config_loader.py . [ 45%] tests/test_config_templates.py ......x... [ 72%] tests/test_installed_packages.py . [ 75%] tests/test_package_manager.py ......... [100%]]: [Test are included into the build process.] ============= [FAILED tests/test_buildroot_lock.py::test_buildroot_lock_output - TypeError: ... ]: [Test named `test_buildroot_lock_output` has failed during the package build.] ============= [ def test_buildroot_lock_output(): """ test the buildroot_lock.json file format """ tc, buildroot, plugins = _mock_vars(RPM_OUTPUT, REPOQUERY_OUTPUT) &gt; _call_method(plugins, buildroot) tests/test_buildroot_lock.py:137: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tests/test_buildroot_lock.py:105: in _call_method method() py/mockbuild/plugins/buildroot_lock.py:115: in produce_lockfile fdlist.write(json.dumps(data, indent=4, sort_keys=True) + "\n") /usr/lib64/python3.13/json/__init__.py:238: in dumps **kw).encode(obj) /usr/lib64/python3.13/json/encoder.py:200: in encode chunks = self.iterencode(o, _one_shot=True) /usr/lib64/python3.13/json/encoder.py:261: in iterencode return _iterencode(o, 0) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = &lt;json.encoder.JSONEncoder object at 0x7f2a44694a50&gt; o = &lt;MagicMock name='mock.get_image_digest()' id='139819511716160'&gt; def default(self, o): """Implement this method in a subclass such that it returns a serializable object for ``o``, or calls the base implementation (to raise a ``TypeError``). For example, to support arbitrary iterators, you could implement default like this:: def default(self, o): try: iterable = iter(o) except TypeError: pass else: return list(iterable) # Let the base class default method raise the TypeError return super().default(o) """ &gt; raise TypeError(f'Object of type {o.__class__.__name__} ' f'is not JSON serializable') E TypeError: Object of type MagicMock is not JSON serializable]: [The `test_buildroot_lock_output` test has failed with traceback `TypeError: Object of type MagicMock is not JSON serializable` The `MagicMock` object is used for mocking the python object so this might be an issue in how the code is tested.]
Issue: One of the tests executed as part of the build has failed. Resolution: Please fix the test or code tested by the test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: ============================= test session starts ============================== platform linux -- Python 3.13.0, pytest-8.3.4, pluggy-1.5.0 rootdir: /builddir/build/BUILD/mock-5.9-build/mock-git-3857.8f7301c collected 37 items tests/plugins/test_rpmautospec.py ............ [ 32%] tests/test_buildroot.py . [ 35%] tests/test_buildroot_lock.py .F. [ 43%] tests/test_config_loader.py . [ 45%] tests/test_config_templates.py ......x... [ 72%] tests/test_installed_packages.py . [ 75%] tests/test_package_manager.py ......... [100%]
Test are included into the build process.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: FAILED tests/test_buildroot_lock.py::test_buildroot_lock_output - TypeError: ...
Test named `test_buildroot_lock_output` has failed during the package build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: def test_buildroot_lock_output(): """ test the buildroot_lock.json file format """ tc, buildroot, plugins = _mock_vars(RPM_OUTPUT, REPOQUERY_OUTPUT) &gt; _call_method(plugins, buildroot) tests/test_buildroot_lock.py:137: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tests/test_buildroot_lock.py:105: in _call_method method() py/mockbuild/plugins/buildroot_lock.py:115: in produce_lockfile fdlist.write(json.dumps(data, indent=4, sort_keys=True) + "\n") /usr/lib64/python3.13/json/__init__.py:238: in dumps **kw).encode(obj) /usr/lib64/python3.13/json/encoder.py:200: in encode chunks = self.iterencode(o, _one_shot=True) /usr/lib64/python3.13/json/encoder.py:261: in iterencode return _iterencode(o, 0) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = &lt;json.encoder.JSONEncoder object at 0x7f2a44694a50&gt; o = &lt;MagicMock name='mock.get_image_digest()' id='139819511716160'&gt; def default(self, o): """Implement this method in a subclass such that it returns a serializable object for ``o``, or calls the base implementation (to raise a ``TypeError``). For example, to support arbitrary iterators, you could implement default like this:: def default(self, o): try: iterable = iter(o) except TypeError: pass else: return list(iterable) # Let the base class default method raise the TypeError return super().default(o) """ &gt; raise TypeError(f'Object of type {o.__class__.__name__} ' f'is not JSON serializable') E TypeError: Object of type MagicMock is not JSON serializable
The `test_buildroot_lock_output` test has failed with traceback `TypeError: Object of type MagicMock is not JSON serializable` The `MagicMock` object is used for mocking the python object so this might be an issue in how the code is tested.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/15/include/omp.h:557:1: error: template with C linkage 557 | template&lt;typename __T&gt; | ^~~~~~~~ /builddir/build/BUILD/darktable-5.0.1-build/darktable-5.0.1/src/imageio/format/imageio_format_api.h:24:1: note: β€˜extern "C"’ linkage started here 24 | extern "C" { | ^~~~~~~~~~ [ 97%] Linking C shar]: [Use of C++ in scope defined as C code]
Issue: Source code has an error which prevents the build Resolution: Remove C++ code from parts that should only contain C code
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/15/include/omp.h:557:1: error: template with C linkage 557 | template&lt;typename __T&gt; | ^~~~~~~~ /builddir/build/BUILD/darktable-5.0.1-build/darktable-5.0.1/src/imageio/format/imageio_format_api.h:24:1: note: β€˜extern "C"’ linkage started here 24 | extern "C" { | ^~~~~~~~~~ [ 97%] Linking C shar
Use of C++ in scope defined as C code
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [E TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for |: 'type' and 'type']: [cause of the failed tests] ============= [RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SpPQzz (%check) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SpPQzz (%check)]: [reason why the build failed]
Issue: Using typing hints for union in Python 3.9 that are supported since Python 3.10 Resolution: Use the backward-compatible `Union[X, Y]`
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: E TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for |: 'type' and 'type'
cause of the failed tests
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SpPQzz (%check) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SpPQzz (%check)
reason why the build failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.fc39.s390x.debug /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254]: [Multiple unpackaged files were found. This unacceptable, as all installed files must be tracked by the package manager for purposes of future updates, or removal. Not to mention the inherent security risk.] ============= [RPM build errors: absolute symlink: /usr/bin/clang-format-diff -> /usr/share/clang/clang-format-diff.py Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.fc39.s390x.debug /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254]: [Full list of RPM errors encountered during the build. The most important being the existence of unpackaged installed files.]
Issue: Multiple files were installed by the package but not tracked in the spec file, therefore they were not packaged and could cause issues in the future. Resolution: Ensure that all files installed by the package are tracked in the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.fc39.s390x.debug /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254
Multiple unpackaged files were found. This unacceptable, as all installed files must be tracked by the package manager for purposes of future updates, or removal. Not to mention the inherent security risk.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: RPM build errors: absolute symlink: /usr/bin/clang-format-diff -> /usr/share/clang/clang-format-diff.py Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.fc39.s390x.debug /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254
Full list of RPM errors encountered during the build. The most important being the existence of unpackaged installed files.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ + scl enable '%{scl}' - /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Sgo1r8: line 33: scl: command not fou]: [Missing command 'scl']
Issue: Missing utility or script 'scl' Resolution: Provide 'scl' to the enviroment
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: + scl enable '%{scl}' - /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Sgo1r8: line 33: scl: command not fou
Missing command 'scl'
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [FAIL: test_ipa_subdom_server ============================ [==========] tests: Running 13 test(s). [ RUN ] test_ipa_trust_dir2str [ OK ] test_ipa_trust_dir2str [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [ OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_exists [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [ OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_exists [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fallback [sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75993] failed with status [1]. [sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75994] failed with status [1]. [sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75995] failed with status [1]. [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75996] failed with status [1]. [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [ OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fallback [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fail [sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [76001] failed with status [1]. [ OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fail [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_trust_oneway_init [ ERROR ] --- test_ctx->ipa_ctx->server_mode->trusts [ LINE ] --- src/tests/cmocka/test_ipa_subdomains_server.c:1002: error: Failure! [ FAILED ] test_ipa_server_trust_oneway_init [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_trust_init [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [ OK ] test_ipa_server_trust_init [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_create_trusts [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [ OK ] test_ipa_server_create_trusts [ RUN ] test_get_trust_direction_inbound [ OK ] test_get_trust_direction_inbound [ RUN ] test_get_trust_direction_outbound [ OK ] test_get_trust_direction_outbound [ RUN ] test_get_trust_direction_twoway [ OK ] test_get_trust_direction_twoway [ RUN ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_root [ OK ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_root [ RUN ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_member [ OK ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_member [==========] tests: 13 test(s) run. [ PASSED ] 12 test(s). [ FAILED ] tests: 1 test(s), listed below: [ FAILED ] test_ipa_server_trust_oneway_init 1 FAILED TEST(S) FAIL test_ipa_subdom_server (exit status: 1)]: [Log of the failed test.] ============= [FAIL: test_ipa_subdom_server]: [Name of the failed test.]
Issue: The testsuite failed. Resolution: Analyse the test failure. If unsure, try contacting upstream for additional assistance.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: FAIL: test_ipa_subdom_server ============================ [==========] tests: Running 13 test(s). [ RUN ] test_ipa_trust_dir2str [ OK ] test_ipa_trust_dir2str [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [ OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_exists [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [ OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_exists [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fallback [sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75993] failed with status [1]. [sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75994] failed with status [1]. [sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75995] failed with status [1]. [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75996] failed with status [1]. [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [ OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fallback [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fail [sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [76001] failed with status [1]. [ OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fail [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_trust_oneway_init [ ERROR ] --- test_ctx->ipa_ctx->server_mode->trusts [ LINE ] --- src/tests/cmocka/test_ipa_subdomains_server.c:1002: error: Failure! [ FAILED ] test_ipa_server_trust_oneway_init [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_trust_init [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [ OK ] test_ipa_server_trust_init [ RUN ] test_ipa_server_create_trusts [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery! [ OK ] test_ipa_server_create_trusts [ RUN ] test_get_trust_direction_inbound [ OK ] test_get_trust_direction_inbound [ RUN ] test_get_trust_direction_outbound [ OK ] test_get_trust_direction_outbound [ RUN ] test_get_trust_direction_twoway [ OK ] test_get_trust_direction_twoway [ RUN ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_root [ OK ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_root [ RUN ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_member [ OK ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_member [==========] tests: 13 test(s) run. [ PASSED ] 12 test(s). [ FAILED ] tests: 1 test(s), listed below: [ FAILED ] test_ipa_server_trust_oneway_init 1 FAILED TEST(S) FAIL test_ipa_subdom_server (exit status: 1)
Log of the failed test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: FAIL: test_ipa_subdom_server
Name of the failed test.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [node:assert:95 throw new AssertionError(obj); ^ AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected values to be strictly equal: + actual - expected + '\nfiller\n' - 'goodbye\n' at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs22-22.15.1-build/node-v22.15.1/test/parallel/test-child-process-stdout-flush-exit.js:54:12) at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs22-22.15.1-build/node-v22.15.1/test/common/index.js:435:15) at ChildProcess.emit (node:events:518:28) at maybeClose (node:internal/child_process:1101:16) at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:304:5) { generatedMessage: true, code: 'ERR_ASSERTION', actual: '\nfiller\n', expected: 'goodbye\n', operator: 'strictEqual' } Node.js v22.15.1]: [Issue in check section - test failing]
Issue: Test failed due to a flaky nature of parallel tests, race condition Resolution: Either don't make all test fails, fail the build or just rerun the build
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: node:assert:95 throw new AssertionError(obj); ^ AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected values to be strictly equal: + actual - expected + '\nfiller\n' - 'goodbye\n' at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs22-22.15.1-build/node-v22.15.1/test/parallel/test-child-process-stdout-flush-exit.js:54:12) at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs22-22.15.1-build/node-v22.15.1/test/common/index.js:435:15) at ChildProcess.emit (node:events:518:28) at maybeClose (node:internal/child_process:1101:16) at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:304:5) { generatedMessage: true, code: 'ERR_ASSERTION', actual: '\nfiller\n', expected: 'goodbye\n', operator: 'strictEqual' } Node.js v22.15.1
Issue in check section - test failing
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [[ERROR] error: Source option 5 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later.]: [Maven build failure related to the Java compiler not supporting a particular source option.] ============= [[ERROR] error: Target option 5 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later.]: [Maven build failure related to the Java compiler not supporting a particular target option.]
Issue: The Java compiler used during the build is newer than what the upstream build uses and does not support source and target option 5 but at least 8. Resolution: Inspect the pom.xml file and find a build property affecting the Java source and target options. Set it to the a version supported by the packaged Java compiler. You may need to patch the sources.