question
stringlengths 236
348k
| answer
stringlengths 10
2.11k
|
|---|---|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[./src/lpcini.c: In function ‘create_lpc10_encoder_state’:
./src/lpcini.c:281:9: error: too many arguments to function ‘malloc’; expected 0, have 1
281 | malloc((unsigned) sizeof (struct lpc10_encoder_state));
| ^~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./src/lpcini.c:54:23: note: declared here
54 | extern void * malloc();
| ^~~~~~]: [This compiler error makes the build fail.]
=============
[./src/lpcini.c:54:23: warning: conflicting types for built-in function ‘malloc’; expected ‘void *(long unsigned int)’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
54 | extern void * malloc();
| ^~~~~~
./src/lpcini.c:48:1: note: ‘malloc’ is declared in header ‘<stdlib.h>’
47 | #include "f2c.h"
+++ |+#include <stdlib.h>]: [This snippet shows the header where the function is declared and states that the declaration is different.]
| Issue: The build failed because the function declaration differs from the actual function call later.
Resolution: Either remove the function declaration and add header where the function is declared or add the correct parameters to the function declaration. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
./src/lpcini.c: In function ‘create_lpc10_encoder_state’:
./src/lpcini.c:281:9: error: too many arguments to function ‘malloc’; expected 0, have 1
281 | malloc((unsigned) sizeof (struct lpc10_encoder_state));
| ^~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./src/lpcini.c:54:23: note: declared here
54 | extern void * malloc();
| ^~~~~~ | This compiler error makes the build fail. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
./src/lpcini.c:54:23: warning: conflicting types for built-in function ‘malloc’; expected ‘void *(long unsigned int)’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
54 | extern void * malloc();
| ^~~~~~
./src/lpcini.c:48:1: note: ‘malloc’ is declared in header ‘<stdlib.h>’
47 | #include "f2c.h"
+++ |+#include <stdlib.h> | This snippet shows the header where the function is declared and states that the declaration is different. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.18.1-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pytest-8.3.5-2.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pytest-cov-5.0.0-2.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-setuptools-78.1.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Problem: cannot install both python3-packaging-24.2-3.fc42.noarch from fedora and python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch from @System
- cannot install the best candidate for the job
- conflicting requests]: [Describes the failed transaction.]
| Issue: There is a conflict in the build requirements, causing the transaction to fail.
Resolution: Investigate the build requirements and resolve the conflict. It'll probably require removing version limits from some of the packages. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.18.1-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pytest-8.3.5-2.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pytest-cov-5.0.0-2.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-setuptools-78.1.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Problem: cannot install both python3-packaging-24.2-3.fc42.noarch from fedora and python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch from @System
- cannot install the best candidate for the job
- conflicting requests | Describes the failed transaction. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[=========== 2836 failed, 2137 passed, 1 warning in 769.57s (0:12:49) ===========
]: [2836 pytest tests have failed]
=============
[+ /usr/bin/pytest]: [pytest is invoked as part of the RPM build process inside the %check section]
| Issue: The build runs a test suite as part of its build process and that test suite has failed.
Resolution: The perfect solution is to resolve all test failures. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
=========== 2836 failed, 2137 passed, 1 warning in 769.57s (0:12:49) ===========
| 2836 pytest tests have failed |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ /usr/bin/pytest | pytest is invoked as part of the RPM build process inside the %check section |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(apple-flat-package/default) >= 0.20.0 with crate(apple-flat-package/default) < 0.21.0~)
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(debpkg/default) >= 0.6.0 with crate(debpkg/default) < 0.7.0~)
Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(directories/default) >= 6.0.0 with crate(directories/default) < 7.0.0~)
Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(infer/default) >= 0.19.0 with crate(infer/default) < 0.20.0~)
Problem 5: nothing provides requested (crate(sevenz-rust/default) >= 0.6.1 with crate(sevenz-rust/default) < 0.7.0~)
]: [Nothing provides several packages required in cargo.toml]
| Issue: These packages aren't present as they do not make sense to be universally present. There isn't a device that requires apple-package and debpkg at the same time. Some versions of infer and sevenz-rust might be available, but not in those versions.
Resolution: Remove packages which aren't present in the repository and verify available versions of these cargo packages in fedora rpm. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(apple-flat-package/default) >= 0.20.0 with crate(apple-flat-package/default) < 0.21.0~)
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(debpkg/default) >= 0.6.0 with crate(debpkg/default) < 0.7.0~)
Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(directories/default) >= 6.0.0 with crate(directories/default) < 7.0.0~)
Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(infer/default) >= 0.19.0 with crate(infer/default) < 0.20.0~)
Problem 5: nothing provides requested (crate(sevenz-rust/default) >= 0.6.1 with crate(sevenz-rust/default) < 0.7.0~)
| Nothing provides several packages required in cargo.toml |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[/script: line 1: fedpkg: command not found]: [a command is missing]
| Issue: fedpkg or fedpkg-minimal was not installed in the buildroot
Resolution: Add fedpkg-minimal to the list of packages required to build the SRPM |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/script: line 1: fedpkg: command not found | a command is missing |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DLPss6 (%check)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DLPss6 (%check)]: [rpm build failed during the %check phase]
=============
[github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/store
--- FAIL: TestStore (0.01s)
--- FAIL: TestStore/TestPushBlueprint (0.00s)
store_test.go:175:
Error Trace: /builddir/build/BUILD/osbuild-composer-135-build/osbuild-composer-135/_build/src/github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/store/store_test.go:175
Error: Not equal:
expected: blueprint.Blueprint{Name:"testBP", Description:"Testing blueprint", Version:"0.0.1", Packages:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test1", Version:"*"}}, Modules:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test2", Version:"*"}}, EnabledModules:[]blueprint.EnabledModule(nil), Groups:[]blueprint.Group{blueprint.Group{Name:"test3"}}, Containers:[]blueprint.Container{blueprint.Container{Source:"https://registry.example.com/container", Name:"example-container", TLSVerify:(*bool)(0xc000013a38), LocalStorage:false}}, Customizations:(*blueprint.Customizations)(0xc0004b0760), Distro:"", Arch:""}
actual : blueprint.Blueprint{Name:"testBP", Description:"Testing blueprint", Version:"0.0.1", Packages:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test1", Version:"*"}}, Modules:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test2", Version:"*"}}, EnabledModules:[]blueprint.EnabledModule{}, Groups:[]blueprint.Group{blueprint.Group{Name:"test3"}}, Containers:[]blueprint.Container{blueprint.Container{Source:"https://registry.example.com/container", Name:"example-container", TLSVerify:(*bool)(0xc000013a38), LocalStorage:false}}, Customizations:(*blueprint.Customizations)(0xc0004b0760), Distro:"", Arch:""}
Diff:
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@
},
- EnabledModules: ([]blueprint.EnabledModule) <nil>,
+ EnabledModules: ([]blueprint.EnabledModule) {
+ },
Groups: ([]blueprint.Group) (len=1) {
Test: TestStore/TestPushBlueprint
--- FAIL: TestStore/TestPushBlueprintToWorkspace (0.00s)
store_test.go:190:
Error Trace: /builddir/build/BUILD/osbuild-composer-135-build/osbuild-composer-135/_build/src/github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/store/store_test.go:190
Error: Not equal:
expected: blueprint.Blueprint{Name:"testBP", Description:"Testing blueprint", Version:"0.0.1", Packages:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test1", Version:"*"}}, Modules:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test2", Version:"*"}}, EnabledModules:[]blueprint.EnabledModule(nil), Groups:[]blueprint.Group{blueprint.Group{Name:"test3"}}, Containers:[]blueprint.Container{blueprint.Container{Source:"https://registry.example.com/container", Name:"example-container", TLSVerify:(*bool)(0xc000013a38), LocalStorage:false}}, Customizations:(*blueprint.Customizations)(0xc0004b0760), Distro:"", Arch:""}
actual : blueprint.Blueprint{Name:"testBP", Description:"Testing blueprint", Version:"0.0.1", Packages:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test1", Version:"*"}}, Modules:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test2", Version:"*"}}, EnabledModules:[]blueprint.EnabledModule{}, Groups:[]blueprint.Group{blueprint.Group{Name:"test3"}}, Containers:[]blueprint.Container{blueprint.Container{Source:"https://registry.example.com/container", Name:"example-container", TLSVerify:(*bool)(0xc000013a38), LocalStorage:false}}, Customizations:(*blueprint.Customizations)(0xc0004b0760), Distro:"", Arch:""}
Diff:
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@
},
- EnabledModules: ([]blueprint.EnabledModule) <nil>,
+ EnabledModules: ([]blueprint.EnabledModule) {
+ },
Groups: ([]blueprint.Group) (len=1) {
Test: TestStore/TestPushBlueprintToWorkspace
FAIL
exit status 1
FAIL github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/store 0.045s]: [specific test that failed]
| Issue: didn't pass the test suite during the %check phase of the RPM build
Resolution: verify whether the test failure is legitimate and fix the tests, if necessary |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DLPss6 (%check)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DLPss6 (%check) | rpm build failed during the %check phase |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/store
--- FAIL: TestStore (0.01s)
--- FAIL: TestStore/TestPushBlueprint (0.00s)
store_test.go:175:
Error Trace: /builddir/build/BUILD/osbuild-composer-135-build/osbuild-composer-135/_build/src/github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/store/store_test.go:175
Error: Not equal:
expected: blueprint.Blueprint{Name:"testBP", Description:"Testing blueprint", Version:"0.0.1", Packages:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test1", Version:"*"}}, Modules:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test2", Version:"*"}}, EnabledModules:[]blueprint.EnabledModule(nil), Groups:[]blueprint.Group{blueprint.Group{Name:"test3"}}, Containers:[]blueprint.Container{blueprint.Container{Source:"https://registry.example.com/container", Name:"example-container", TLSVerify:(*bool)(0xc000013a38), LocalStorage:false}}, Customizations:(*blueprint.Customizations)(0xc0004b0760), Distro:"", Arch:""}
actual : blueprint.Blueprint{Name:"testBP", Description:"Testing blueprint", Version:"0.0.1", Packages:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test1", Version:"*"}}, Modules:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test2", Version:"*"}}, EnabledModules:[]blueprint.EnabledModule{}, Groups:[]blueprint.Group{blueprint.Group{Name:"test3"}}, Containers:[]blueprint.Container{blueprint.Container{Source:"https://registry.example.com/container", Name:"example-container", TLSVerify:(*bool)(0xc000013a38), LocalStorage:false}}, Customizations:(*blueprint.Customizations)(0xc0004b0760), Distro:"", Arch:""}
Diff:
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@
},
- EnabledModules: ([]blueprint.EnabledModule) <nil>,
+ EnabledModules: ([]blueprint.EnabledModule) {
+ },
Groups: ([]blueprint.Group) (len=1) {
Test: TestStore/TestPushBlueprint
--- FAIL: TestStore/TestPushBlueprintToWorkspace (0.00s)
store_test.go:190:
Error Trace: /builddir/build/BUILD/osbuild-composer-135-build/osbuild-composer-135/_build/src/github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/store/store_test.go:190
Error: Not equal:
expected: blueprint.Blueprint{Name:"testBP", Description:"Testing blueprint", Version:"0.0.1", Packages:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test1", Version:"*"}}, Modules:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test2", Version:"*"}}, EnabledModules:[]blueprint.EnabledModule(nil), Groups:[]blueprint.Group{blueprint.Group{Name:"test3"}}, Containers:[]blueprint.Container{blueprint.Container{Source:"https://registry.example.com/container", Name:"example-container", TLSVerify:(*bool)(0xc000013a38), LocalStorage:false}}, Customizations:(*blueprint.Customizations)(0xc0004b0760), Distro:"", Arch:""}
actual : blueprint.Blueprint{Name:"testBP", Description:"Testing blueprint", Version:"0.0.1", Packages:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test1", Version:"*"}}, Modules:[]blueprint.Package{blueprint.Package{Name:"test2", Version:"*"}}, EnabledModules:[]blueprint.EnabledModule{}, Groups:[]blueprint.Group{blueprint.Group{Name:"test3"}}, Containers:[]blueprint.Container{blueprint.Container{Source:"https://registry.example.com/container", Name:"example-container", TLSVerify:(*bool)(0xc000013a38), LocalStorage:false}}, Customizations:(*blueprint.Customizations)(0xc0004b0760), Distro:"", Arch:""}
Diff:
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@
},
- EnabledModules: ([]blueprint.EnabledModule) <nil>,
+ EnabledModules: ([]blueprint.EnabledModule) {
+ },
Groups: ([]blueprint.Group) (len=1) {
Test: TestStore/TestPushBlueprintToWorkspace
FAIL
exit status 1
FAIL github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/store 0.045s | specific test that failed |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Error from server (AlreadyExists): project.project.openshift.io "sclorg-test-27902" already exists
Error from server (NotFound): error when creating "/root/.docker_credentials/rhel/registry_redhat_io_login_secret": namespaces "sclorg-test-28869" not found
Error from server (NotFound): namespaces "sclorg-test-28869" not found
error: you do not have rights to view project "sclorg-test-28869" specified in your config or the project doesn't exist
Uploading image rhel8/mariadb-1011:1 as mariadb:10.11 into OpenShift internal registry.
OCP4 loging address is default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com.
Login Succeeded!
Login to default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com was successfully.
Error: normalizing name "default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com//mariadb:10.11": normalizing name "default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com//mariadb:10.11": invalid reference format
Error: invalid reference format
]: [Creating project in OpenShift 4 cluster failed. The messages said that we are not able to get default route URL because of project does not exist.]
| Issue: The build failed because the new default routing address points to not existing one
Resolution: Delete old project that is used and create a new one that can be used or fix the test suite. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Error from server (AlreadyExists): project.project.openshift.io "sclorg-test-27902" already exists
Error from server (NotFound): error when creating "/root/.docker_credentials/rhel/registry_redhat_io_login_secret": namespaces "sclorg-test-28869" not found
Error from server (NotFound): namespaces "sclorg-test-28869" not found
error: you do not have rights to view project "sclorg-test-28869" specified in your config or the project doesn't exist
Uploading image rhel8/mariadb-1011:1 as mariadb:10.11 into OpenShift internal registry.
OCP4 loging address is default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com.
Login Succeeded!
Login to default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com was successfully.
Error: normalizing name "default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com//mariadb:10.11": normalizing name "default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com//mariadb:10.11": invalid reference format
Error: invalid reference format
| Creating project in OpenShift 4 cluster failed. The messages said that we are not able to get default route URL because of project does not exist. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[1 tests of 338 FAILED]: [summary of the test results from %check phase]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YekG4N (%check)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YekG4N (%check)]: [reasoning of the make why the rpm build failed]
=============
[ lsfd: UNIX dgram sockets: [03] ENDPOINTS-column ... FAILED (lsfd/mkfds-unix-dgram-ENDPOINTS-column)
]: [specific subtest that failed]
=============
[ lsfd: UNIX dgram sockets ... FAILED (1 from 4 sub-tests)
]: [summary of the group of tests that failed]
| Issue: Test suite that's run during the %check phase of rpm build has not passed
Resolution: Fix the specific test (related to lsfd and UNIX datagram sockets). |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
1 tests of 338 FAILED | summary of the test results from %check phase |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YekG4N (%check)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YekG4N (%check) | reasoning of the make why the rpm build failed |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
lsfd: UNIX dgram sockets: [03] ENDPOINTS-column ... FAILED (lsfd/mkfds-unix-dgram-ENDPOINTS-column)
| specific subtest that failed |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
lsfd: UNIX dgram sockets ... FAILED (1 from 4 sub-tests)
| summary of the group of tests that failed |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[=================================== FAILURES ===================================
____________________ TestCoreClient_0.test_account_creation ____________________
self = <urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x7f5bda819590>
def _new_conn(self) -> socket.socket:
"""Establish a socket connection and set nodelay settings on it.
:return: New socket connection.
"""
try:
> sock = connection.create_connection(
(self._dns_host, self.port),
self.timeout,
source_address=self.source_address,
socket_options=self.socket_options,
)
]: [Seems there is a test failure reported by pytest]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AUaFVJ (%check)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AUaFVJ (%check)]: [Due to the test failure the exit code is bad.]
| Issue: Regression introduced as an existing test fails w.r.t account creation.
Resolution: Contributor must tweak code such that account creation is not affected, current code change seems to introduce regression |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
____________________ TestCoreClient_0.test_account_creation ____________________
self = <urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x7f5bda819590>
def _new_conn(self) -> socket.socket:
"""Establish a socket connection and set nodelay settings on it.
:return: New socket connection.
"""
try:
> sock = connection.create_connection(
(self._dns_host, self.port),
self.timeout,
source_address=self.source_address,
socket_options=self.socket_options,
)
| Seems there is a test failure reported by pytest |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AUaFVJ (%check)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AUaFVJ (%check) | Due to the test failure the exit code is bad. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:]: [This indicates that build dependencies couldn't be installed correctly.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: python3dist(certifi) >= 2025.1.31]: [This shows which exact package couldn't be installed.]
| Issue: A build dependency package which matches "python3dist(certifi) >= 2025.1.31" couldn't be installed.
Resolution: Look whether this is a temporary failure, caused e.g. by a network issue. If it's not a temporary failure, verify that the dependency is listed correctly (e.g. spelled correctly, with a correct version, etc). If all of that it correct, you need to either remove the build dependency (if it's not included in system repositories, and your package can be built without it), replace it with another dependency that satisfies source code requirements, or add the missing dependency package to the repository before running the build again. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: | This indicates that build dependencies couldn't be installed correctly. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: python3dist(certifi) >= 2025.1.31 | This shows which exact package couldn't be installed. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Dynamic buildrequires detected
Going to install missing buildrequires. See root.log for details.]: [This indicates that the actual error is to be found in the root.log file.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:461: Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "flexiblas-devel-3.4.4-1.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "gcc-c++-14.1.1-6.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "gcc-gfortran-14.1.1-6.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "pybind11-devel-2.12.0-2.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.12.2-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "python3-devel-3.13.0~b3-1.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "python3-numpy-f2py-1:1.26.4-7.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: No match for argument: python3dist(array-api-strict)
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "python3-packaging-24.1-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:461: --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
]: [This is the dnf transaction that has failed. It lists packages that are already installed, those are irrelevant to the failure, but also packages that failed to install, in this case python3dist(array-api-strict).]
| Issue: The build failed because a dependency on python3dist(array-api-strict) couldn't be satisfied - the package does not exist in Fedora repositories.
Resolution: It is necessary to package the dependency for Fedora and wait until it is available in the repositories. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Dynamic buildrequires detected
Going to install missing buildrequires. See root.log for details. | This indicates that the actual error is to be found in the root.log file. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG util.py:461: Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "flexiblas-devel-3.4.4-1.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "gcc-c++-14.1.1-6.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "gcc-gfortran-14.1.1-6.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "pybind11-devel-2.12.0-2.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.12.2-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "python3-devel-3.13.0~b3-1.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "python3-numpy-f2py-1:1.26.4-7.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: No match for argument: python3dist(array-api-strict)
DEBUG util.py:461: Package "python3-packaging-24.1-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461: You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:461: --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
| This is the dnf transaction that has failed. It lists packages that are already installed, those are irrelevant to the failure, but also packages that failed to install, in this case python3dist(array-api-strict). |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
cc1: all warnings being treated as erro]: [All warnings found by gcc are treated as errors and need to be resolved.]
| Issue: The gcc option `-Werror` makes all warnings into errors.
Resolution: Fix all warnings which gcc treats as errors or don't compile your software with the option `-Werror`. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
cc1: all warnings being treated as erro | All warnings found by gcc are treated as errors and need to be resolved. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[meson.build:280:10: ERROR: Dependency "systemd" not found, tried pkgconfig]: ["systemd" is not foudn as a dependency by meson.build]
=============
[ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 665829041bcf4c3db56a3c512ac8dc46 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1746776165.100666/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.a7lj8nrm:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/pipewire.spec']: [Container is unable to spawn due to missing dependency, "systemd"]
| Issue: Missing dependency "systemd"
Resolution: Possibly, installing systemd-devel might help meson.build to discover systemd |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
meson.build:280:10: ERROR: Dependency "systemd" not found, tried pkgconfig | "systemd" is not foudn as a dependency by meson.build |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 665829041bcf4c3db56a3c512ac8dc46 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1746776165.100666/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.a7lj8nrm:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/pipewire.spec' | Container is unable to spawn due to missing dependency, "systemd" |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[mkfile.c:55:17: error: too many arguments to function ‘putfig’; expected 0, have 9]: [Compiler error about mismatching number of arguments between a function declaration and a function definition.]
| Issue: The function putfig has been declared in the old C-style with empty parameter list, which meant the function is defined later with correct parameters.
Resolution: Patch the sources and rewrite the function declarations so that the function arguments match the function definitions. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
mkfile.c:55:17: error: too many arguments to function ‘putfig’; expected 0, have 9 | Compiler error about mismatching number of arguments between a function declaration and a function definition. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
RPM build errors:
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dracut-105-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/05busybox
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dracut-105-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/90systemd-cryptsetup]: [Missing file error.]
| Issue: The files are missing on system, but are required in the spec file.
Resolution: Remove the respective lines from the spec file. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
RPM build errors:
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dracut-105-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/05busybox
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dracut-105-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/90systemd-cryptsetup | Missing file error. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .stdbool --fuzz=0
patching file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c
patching file src/ALAC/alac_encoder.c
Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .stdbool --fuzz=0
patching file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 38.
]: [This shows that same patch has been applied twice]
| Issue: Same patch has been applied twice, probably copy paste error.
Resolution: Check if all required patches has been applied once. Either this patch line was doubled or it was supposed to apply different patch |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .stdbool --fuzz=0
patching file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c
patching file src/ALAC/alac_encoder.c
Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .stdbool --fuzz=0
patching file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 38.
| This shows that same patch has been applied twice |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[type=AVC msg=audit(03/31/2025 04:19:47.622:26573) : avc: denied { unlink } for pid=299711 comm=pmlogger name=pmlogger.primary.socket dev="tmpfs" ino=18196 scontext=system_u:system_r:pcp_pmlogger_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file permissive=0 ]: [This indicates an Access Vector Control (AVC) denial, which is a security mechanism in SELinux that prevents unauthorized access to system resources. The process `pmlogger` (pid 299711) is trying to delete a symbolic link named `pmlogger.primary.socket` located in the `/tmpfs` filesystem.]
| Issue: The `pmlogger` process might not have the necessary permissions to delete the symbolic link. You can check the SELinux policy rules using `ausearch -i -m AVC -ts today` and potentially adjust them using `semanage` or `chcon` if needed.
Resolution: Make sure the pmlogger process is running with the correct security context and it has permissions to unlink. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
type=AVC msg=audit(03/31/2025 04:19:47.622:26573) : avc: denied { unlink } for pid=299711 comm=pmlogger name=pmlogger.primary.socket dev="tmpfs" ino=18196 scontext=system_u:system_r:pcp_pmlogger_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file permissive=0 | This indicates an Access Vector Control (AVC) denial, which is a security mechanism in SELinux that prevents unauthorized access to system resources. The process `pmlogger` (pid 299711) is trying to delete a symbolic link named `pmlogger.primary.socket` located in the `/tmpfs` filesystem. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/built_coefficients.rs.rej]: [The patching of the built_coefficients.rs has failed.]
=============
[+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/0001-Fix-test-build-on-i686.patch]: [This is the file that triggered the failure while patching.]
| Issue: The patching of the built_coefficients.rs has failed, this is most likely because the file that was about to be patched was updated in the place it was about to be patched so the original file of the patch no longer matches it or the patch contains a mistake.
Resolution: Review the patch and the file about to be patched, ensure the file about to be patched was not changed in the place that is being patched after the patch was created, ensure the patch file is in the correct format and does not contain any mistakes. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/built_coefficients.rs.rej | The patching of the built_coefficients.rs has failed. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/0001-Fix-test-build-on-i686.patch | This is the file that triggered the failure while patching. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[FAILED: obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib
"/usr/bin/python3" "../../build/rust/rustc_wrapper.py" --rustc=../../../../../../usr/bin/rustc --depfile=obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib.d --rsp=obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib.rsp -- -Clinker="clang++" --crate-name skrifa ../../third_party/rust/chromium_crates_io/vendor/skrifa-0.29.2/src/lib.rs --crate-type rlib --cap-lints=allow --cfg=feature=\"autohint_shaping\" --cfg=feature=\"std\" --cfg=feature=\"traversal\" -Cmetadata=skrifa-0.29 --edition=2021 -Cforce-unwind-tables=no -Crelocation-model=pic -Zsplit-lto-unit -Clinker-plugin-lto=yes -Cdefault-linker-libraries -Zdep-info-omit-d-target -Zmacro-backtrace -Zremap-cwd-prefix=. -Zexternal-clangrt --color=always --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -Ccodegen-units=1 --cfg cr_rustc_revision=\"rustc\ 1.79.0\ \(129f3b996\ 2024-06-10\)\ \(Red\ Hat\ 1.79.0-3.el9_5\)\" -Copt-level=3 -Zallow-features= -Clinker-plugin-lto=yes -Zsplit-lto-unit -Clinker-plugin-lto=yes -Dunsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn --emit=dep-info=obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib.d,link -o obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib LDFLAGS RUSTENV OUT_DIR=../../../../../../out/Release/gen/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib CARGO_PKG_VERSION=0.29.2 CARGO_PKG_NAME=skrifa CARGO_PKG_DESCRIPTION=Metadata\ reader\ and\ glyph\ scaler\ for\ OpenType\ fonts. CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR=../../third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/crate
error[E0599]: no method named `is_none_or` found for enum `Option` in the current scope
--> ../../third_party/rust/chromium_crates_io/vendor/skrifa-0.29.2/src/glyph_name.rs:97:26
|
97 | if name.as_ref().is_none_or(|s| s.is_empty()) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: there is a method `is_none` with a similar name, but with different arguments
--> /builddir/build/BUILD/rustc-1.79.0-src/library/core/src/option.rs:650:5
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0599`.]: [The corresponding error messages indicate that the rust compiler breaks with the error:
error[E0599]: no method named `is_none_or` found for enum `Option` in the current scope]
| Issue: The build is failing because the Rust code in the skrifa crate is using a method is_none_or on an Option that doesn't exist in the version of Rust being used for the build (Rust 1.79.0). The error message suggests using is_none instead.
The is_none_or method was probably introduced in a later version of Rust. The code in ../../third_party/rust/chromium_crates_io/vendor/skrifa-0.29.2/src/glyph_name.rs at line 97 is likely checking if an Option is either None or contains an empty string.
Resolution: There are 2 options to resolve the build failure:
1. Update rust compiler to newer version 1.86
2. The is_none_or method was probably introduced in a later version of Rust. The code in ../../third_party/rust/chromium_crates_io/vendor/skrifa-0.29.2/src/glyph_name.rs at line 97 is checking if an Option is either None or contains an empty string.
Modify that line of code like following:
Original code:
if name.as_ref().is_none_or(|s| s.is_empty()) {
Fixed code:
if name.is_none() || name.as_ref().map_or(false, |s| s.is_empty()) {
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
FAILED: obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib
"/usr/bin/python3" "../../build/rust/rustc_wrapper.py" --rustc=../../../../../../usr/bin/rustc --depfile=obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib.d --rsp=obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib.rsp -- -Clinker="clang++" --crate-name skrifa ../../third_party/rust/chromium_crates_io/vendor/skrifa-0.29.2/src/lib.rs --crate-type rlib --cap-lints=allow --cfg=feature=\"autohint_shaping\" --cfg=feature=\"std\" --cfg=feature=\"traversal\" -Cmetadata=skrifa-0.29 --edition=2021 -Cforce-unwind-tables=no -Crelocation-model=pic -Zsplit-lto-unit -Clinker-plugin-lto=yes -Cdefault-linker-libraries -Zdep-info-omit-d-target -Zmacro-backtrace -Zremap-cwd-prefix=. -Zexternal-clangrt --color=always --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -Ccodegen-units=1 --cfg cr_rustc_revision=\"rustc\ 1.79.0\ \(129f3b996\ 2024-06-10\)\ \(Red\ Hat\ 1.79.0-3.el9_5\)\" -Copt-level=3 -Zallow-features= -Clinker-plugin-lto=yes -Zsplit-lto-unit -Clinker-plugin-lto=yes -Dunsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn --emit=dep-info=obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib.d,link -o obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib LDFLAGS RUSTENV OUT_DIR=../../../../../../out/Release/gen/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib CARGO_PKG_VERSION=0.29.2 CARGO_PKG_NAME=skrifa CARGO_PKG_DESCRIPTION=Metadata\ reader\ and\ glyph\ scaler\ for\ OpenType\ fonts. CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR=../../third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/crate
error[E0599]: no method named `is_none_or` found for enum `Option` in the current scope
--> ../../third_party/rust/chromium_crates_io/vendor/skrifa-0.29.2/src/glyph_name.rs:97:26
|
97 | if name.as_ref().is_none_or(|s| s.is_empty()) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: there is a method `is_none` with a similar name, but with different arguments
--> /builddir/build/BUILD/rustc-1.79.0-src/library/core/src/option.rs:650:5
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0599`. | The corresponding error messages indicate that the rust compiler breaks with the error:
error[E0599]: no method named `is_none_or` found for enum `Option` in the current scope |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ cd pycairo-1.28.0
+ set -ex
+ CFLAGS='-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64-v2 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection'
+ LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 '
+ /usr/bin/python3.12 setup.py build '--executable=/usr/bin/python3.12 -sP'
/usr/bin/python3.12: can't open file '/builddir/build/BUILD/pycairo-1.28.0/setup.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ts6drB (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ts6drB (%build)]: [When "setup.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory" occurs it usually means that the package switched to a compliant PEP-517 build system, moving from setup.py to pyproject.toml.]
| Issue: The setup.py file does not exist anymore in the package, the macros need to be updated to build projects with pyproject.toml.
Resolution: To fix the issue the specfile needs to be updated to use new macros.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_build_macros is a good start to understand the change.
For more details look at https://peps.python.org/pep-0518/ and https://peps.python.org/pep-0517/
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ cd pycairo-1.28.0
+ set -ex
+ CFLAGS='-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64-v2 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection'
+ LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 '
+ /usr/bin/python3.12 setup.py build '--executable=/usr/bin/python3.12 -sP'
/usr/bin/python3.12: can't open file '/builddir/build/BUILD/pycairo-1.28.0/setup.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ts6drB (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ts6drB (%build) | When "setup.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory" occurs it usually means that the package switched to a compliant PEP-517 build system, moving from setup.py to pyproject.toml. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/ghostscript-10.02.1-txtwrite-device-needs-to-countdown-the-device-on-tex.patch
+ /usr/bin/git apply --index --reject -p1 ]: [It indicates the patch which being applied.]
=============
[error: patch failed: devices/vector/gdevtxtw.c:2059
Applying patch devices/vector/gdevtxtw.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1]: [It shows that patch application failed.]
| Issue: Patch application failed because (in this case) the patch had been upstreamed.
Resolution: Check that the patch has been upstreamed.
If yes: Remove the patch line from spec and the patch from dist-git. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/ghostscript-10.02.1-txtwrite-device-needs-to-countdown-the-device-on-tex.patch
+ /usr/bin/git apply --index --reject -p1 | It indicates the patch which being applied. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: patch failed: devices/vector/gdevtxtw.c:2059
Applying patch devices/vector/gdevtxtw.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1 | It shows that patch application failed. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'tkinter']: [This error indicates that required module `tkinter`, imported in `ttkbootstrap/style.py` was not present in the environment at runtime. ]
| Issue: One of the modules required was not present during execution of the `check` step. This caused the build.
Resolution: Ensure that package providing `tkinter` must be installed during execution of the `check` step. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'tkinter' | This error indicates that required module `tkinter`, imported in `ttkbootstrap/style.py` was not present in the environment at runtime. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Error: Invalid value for '[PATH_OR_URL]': Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(128)
cmdline: git fetch -v -- origin +refs/pull/37301/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr-changes/37301
stderr: 'fatal: couldn't find remote ref refs/pull/37301/head']: [This seems like Packit wasn't able to clone PR HEAD]
=============
[Try 'packit prepare-sources -h' for help.]: [Packit performed a build]
| Issue: Build failed because Packit wasn't able to download Sources from PR HEAD
Resolution: Try to rerun Packit in PR by force-pushing PR or by commenting on PR with /packit rebuild-failed |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Error: Invalid value for '[PATH_OR_URL]': Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(128)
cmdline: git fetch -v -- origin +refs/pull/37301/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr-changes/37301
stderr: 'fatal: couldn't find remote ref refs/pull/37301/head' | This seems like Packit wasn't able to clone PR HEAD |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Try 'packit prepare-sources -h' for help. | Packit performed a build |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:1785:25: error: too many arguments to function ‘SYSTEM_BG’; expected 0, have 1
1785 | SYSTEM_BG("splash.bmp");
| ^~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:19:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.h:30:6: note: declared here
30 | void SYSTEM_BG();
| ^~~~~~~~~]: [Build failure - incorrect function call in C code]
=============
[/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shipsdl2.c:409:6: error: conflicting types for ‘SYSTEM_DRAW_BG’; have ‘void(char *)’
409 | void SYSTEM_DRAW_BG(char *bmp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shipsdl2.c:7:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.h:31:6: note: previous declaration of ‘SYSTEM_DRAW_BG’ with type ‘void(void)’
31 | void SYSTEM_DRAW_BG();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [Build failiure - double declaration of a function with conflicting arguments]
| Issue: The SYSTEM_BG() function was called with an argument, but it's defined without any, causing the compilation to fail.
The SYSTEM_DRAW_BG is being declared twice, once as void(char *), second time as void(void). That is not allowed in C.
Resolution: Remove the argument from the SYSTEM_BG function call
Unify the SYSTEM_DRAW_BG function delaration or remove one of the declarations to fix the conflict. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:1785:25: error: too many arguments to function ‘SYSTEM_BG’; expected 0, have 1
1785 | SYSTEM_BG("splash.bmp");
| ^~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:19:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.h:30:6: note: declared here
30 | void SYSTEM_BG();
| ^~~~~~~~~ | Build failure - incorrect function call in C code |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shipsdl2.c:409:6: error: conflicting types for ‘SYSTEM_DRAW_BG’; have ‘void(char *)’
409 | void SYSTEM_DRAW_BG(char *bmp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shipsdl2.c:7:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.h:31:6: note: previous declaration of ‘SYSTEM_DRAW_BG’ with type ‘void(void)’
31 | void SYSTEM_DRAW_BG();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Build failiure - double declaration of a function with conflicting arguments |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[CC=clang]: [clang is being used as the C compiler.]
=============
[CXX=clang++]: [clang++ is being used as the C++ compiler]
=============
[gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfgâ]: [This is the error message from the build failure.]
| Issue: The rpm set clang as the C compiler, but the build system hard-coded gcc as the compiler, so it fails because it is trying to use a command line argument that is meant for clang.
Resolution: Fix the package's build system so that it respects the CC environment variable and doesn't hard-code gcc. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CC=clang | clang is being used as the C compiler. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CXX=clang++ | clang++ is being used as the C++ compiler |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfgâ | This is the error message from the build failure. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
raise ConfigError(msg)
sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).]: [The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. ]
=============
[ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['http://docs.python.org/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.]: [The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. ]
=============
[ File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
raise ConfigError(msg)
sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).]: [The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. ]
=============
[ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['http://docs.python.org/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.]: [The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. ]
| Issue: There was a breaking change in Sphinx 8.2.x. The projects need to update their codebase.
Resolution: In conf.py should be
intersphinx_mapping = {'python': ('http://docs.python.org/', None)}
instead of
intersphinx_mapping = {'http://docs.python.org/': None} |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
raise ConfigError(msg)
sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error). | The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['http://docs.python.org/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list. | The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
raise ConfigError(msg)
sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error). | The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['http://docs.python.org/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list. | The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Error:
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(botocore) < 1.35~~ with python3dist(botocore) >= 1.34.30)
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(s3transfer) < 0.11~~ with python3dist(s3transfer) >= 0.10)
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)]: [Required combination of packages botocore and s3transfer is no available in installed repositories.]
=============
[Copr build error: Build failed]: [Build failure message.]
=============
[ sudo dnf install copr-rpmbuild
/usr/bin/copr-rpmbuild --verbose --drop-resultdir --task-url https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/backend/get-build-task/6972137-fedora-38-x86_64 --chroot fedora-38-x86_64]: [Reproducer command]
| Issue: Required packages were not available when requested.
Resolution: Ensure that all required packages are available for package manager, and are free of conflicts. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Error:
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(botocore) < 1.35~~ with python3dist(botocore) >= 1.34.30)
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(s3transfer) < 0.11~~ with python3dist(s3transfer) >= 0.10)
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) | Required combination of packages botocore and s3transfer is no available in installed repositories. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Copr build error: Build failed | Build failure message. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
sudo dnf install copr-rpmbuild
/usr/bin/copr-rpmbuild --verbose --drop-resultdir --task-url https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/backend/get-build-task/6972137-fedora-38-x86_64 --chroot fedora-38-x86_64 | Reproducer command |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp:69:46: error: invalid conversion from âconst xmlError*â {aka âconst _xmlError*â} to âxmlError*â {aka â_xmlError*â} [-fpermissive]
69 | xmlError *error = xmlGetLastError();
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
| |
| const xmlError* {aka const _xmlError*}
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp: In member function âvirtual bool FileScanXML::data(const char*, int, std::string*)â:
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp:98:46: error: invalid conversion from âconst xmlError*â {aka âconst _xmlError*â} to âxmlError*â {aka â_xmlError*â} [-fpermissive]
98 | xmlError *error = xmlGetLastError();
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
| |
| const xmlError* {aka const _xmlError*}
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp: In constructor âMimeHandlerXslt::MimeHandlerXslt(RclConfig*, const std::string&, const std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >&)â:
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp:162:33: warning: âint xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefault(int)â is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
162 | xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefault(0);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
In file included from internfile/mh_xslt.cpp:25:
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:953:17: note: declared here
953 | xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefault(int val);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:13:
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlversion.h:500:44: warning: âint* __xmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValue()â is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
500 | #define XML_GLOBAL_MACRO(name) (*__##name())
| ~~~~~~~~^~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:900:37: note: in expansion of macro âXML_GLOBAL_MACROâ
900 | #define xmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValue XML_GLOBAL_MACRO(xmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValue)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp:163:5: note: in expansion of macro âxmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValueâ
163 | xmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValue = 0;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlversion.h:499:27: note: declared here
499 | attrs XMLPUBFUN type *__##name(void);
| ^~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:885:16: note: in expansion of macro âXML_DECLARE_GLOBALâ
885 | #define XML_OP XML_DECLARE_GLOBAL
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:859:3: note: in expansion of macro âXML_OPâ
859 | XML_OP(xmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValue, int, XML_DEPRECATED) \
| ^~~~~~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:881:3: note: in expansion of macro âXML_GLOBALS_PARSER_COREâ
881 | XML_GLOBALS_PARSER_CORE \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:886:1: note: in expansion of macro âXML_GLOBALS_PARSERâ
886 | XML_GLOBALS_PARSER
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[2]: *** [Makefile:1979: internfile/mh_xslt.lo] Error]: [Propagated exception, raised by and invalid type conversion in a compiled code.]
=============
[[2024-01-26 15:23:19,253][ ERROR][PID:3560690] Build failed: Backend process error: No success file => build failur]: [General build failure report.]
=============
[[2024-01-26 15:23:19,259][ ERROR][PID:3560690] Backend process error: No success file => build failur]: [General build failure report.]
| Issue: Error was raised during compilation of the c++ code, caused by code in file 'internfile/mh_xslt.cpp'.
Resolution: Ensure proper type of function parameters. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp:69:46: error: invalid conversion from âconst xmlError*â {aka âconst _xmlError*â} to âxmlError*â {aka â_xmlError*â} [-fpermissive]
69 | xmlError *error = xmlGetLastError();
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
| |
| const xmlError* {aka const _xmlError*}
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp: In member function âvirtual bool FileScanXML::data(const char*, int, std::string*)â:
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp:98:46: error: invalid conversion from âconst xmlError*â {aka âconst _xmlError*â} to âxmlError*â {aka â_xmlError*â} [-fpermissive]
98 | xmlError *error = xmlGetLastError();
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
| |
| const xmlError* {aka const _xmlError*}
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp: In constructor âMimeHandlerXslt::MimeHandlerXslt(RclConfig*, const std::string&, const std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >&)â:
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp:162:33: warning: âint xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefault(int)â is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
162 | xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefault(0);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
In file included from internfile/mh_xslt.cpp:25:
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:953:17: note: declared here
953 | xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefault(int val);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:13:
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlversion.h:500:44: warning: âint* __xmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValue()â is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
500 | #define XML_GLOBAL_MACRO(name) (*__##name())
| ~~~~~~~~^~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:900:37: note: in expansion of macro âXML_GLOBAL_MACROâ
900 | #define xmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValue XML_GLOBAL_MACRO(xmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValue)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
internfile/mh_xslt.cpp:163:5: note: in expansion of macro âxmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValueâ
163 | xmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValue = 0;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlversion.h:499:27: note: declared here
499 | attrs XMLPUBFUN type *__##name(void);
| ^~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:885:16: note: in expansion of macro âXML_DECLARE_GLOBALâ
885 | #define XML_OP XML_DECLARE_GLOBAL
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:859:3: note: in expansion of macro âXML_OPâ
859 | XML_OP(xmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValue, int, XML_DEPRECATED) \
| ^~~~~~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:881:3: note: in expansion of macro âXML_GLOBALS_PARSER_COREâ
881 | XML_GLOBALS_PARSER_CORE \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:886:1: note: in expansion of macro âXML_GLOBALS_PARSERâ
886 | XML_GLOBALS_PARSER
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[2]: *** [Makefile:1979: internfile/mh_xslt.lo] Error | Propagated exception, raised by and invalid type conversion in a compiled code. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
[2024-01-26 15:23:19,253][ ERROR][PID:3560690] Build failed: Backend process error: No success file => build failur | General build failure report. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
[2024-01-26 15:23:19,259][ ERROR][PID:3560690] Backend process error: No success file => build failur | General build failure report. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.
Configuration error:
Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).]: [Error message]
| Issue: Project documentation as configured is not buildable with sphinx of this version.
Resolution: Fix the documentation configuration either by changing the source code or by adding a patch with fix. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.
Configuration error:
Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error). | Error message |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[audemo.c: In function ‘rescanCB’:
audemo.c:524:23: error: passing argument 2 of ‘XawListChange’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
524 | (const char **)makeFileList(globals->fileNames, globals->numFiles),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| const char **
In file included from audemo.c:97:
/usr/include/X11/Xaw/List.h:170:26: note: expected ‘char **’ but argument is of type ‘const char **’
170 | String *list,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~]: [A compiler errors on a wrong argument to XawListChange() function call.]
| Issue: XawListChange() function changed a type of the second argument from "const char **" to "String *".
Resolution: Change a type cast of of the second argument from "(const char **) to "(String *)". |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
audemo.c: In function ‘rescanCB’:
audemo.c:524:23: error: passing argument 2 of ‘XawListChange’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
524 | (const char **)makeFileList(globals->fileNames, globals->numFiles),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| const char **
In file included from audemo.c:97:
/usr/include/X11/Xaw/List.h:170:26: note: expected ‘char **’ but argument is of type ‘const char **’
170 | String *list,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ | A compiler errors on a wrong argument to XawListChange() function call. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/dnf5 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-40-x86_64-1710410771.274888/root/ --releasever 40 install @buildsys-build --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontex]: [This snippet states that dnf5 command failed]
=============
[
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarc]: [This snippet states, why exactly dnf5 failed: could not install package which is needed by another package as a dependency.]
| Issue: Package required by another package cannot be installed because nothing provides it. (It cannot be found)
The redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch package is for a much older fedora version (34) and in repos for a current fedora version its dependencies may not be present
Resolution: Update the required packages of this build, so no out-of-date ones are present. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/dnf5 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-40-x86_64-1710410771.274888/root/ --releasever 40 install @buildsys-build --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontex | This snippet states that dnf5 command failed |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarc | This snippet states, why exactly dnf5 failed: could not install package which is needed by another package as a dependency. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[y 45 kB/s | 1.5 kB 00:00
Additional repo https_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_or 104 kB/s | 3.8 kB 00:00
Additional repo https_download_copr_fedorainfra 100 kB/s | 3.3 kB 00:00
Fedora - ELN BaseOS - Developmental packages fo 68 kB/s | 2.3 kB 00:00
Fedora - ELN AppStream - Developmental packages 66 kB/s | 2.3 kB 00:00
Fedora - ELN CodeReady Linux Builders - Build p 66 kB/s | 2.3 kB 00:00
Error:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-mmgu1jug/perl-FileHandle-Fmode/perl-FileHandle-Fmode.spec) Config(fedora-eln-x86_64) 1 minutes 34 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 77fb7256ea894b5a9d9b7112ce42a363 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-bootstrap-1706200861.636798/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.q00l_rzh:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>]: [This is one of the three attempts Mock does to install the BuildRequires specified in spec file. All of the three attempts failed to install `clang-rpm-macros` which runtime-depends on `clang = 13.0.0`. But no package providing this exists.]
| Issue: Because the BuildRequires aren't installable.
Resolution: Fix the `clang` or `clang-rpm-macros` package. If you don't have permissions to do this, ask the corresponding maintainer. This failure is not your fault. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
y 45 kB/s | 1.5 kB 00:00
Additional repo https_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_or 104 kB/s | 3.8 kB 00:00
Additional repo https_download_copr_fedorainfra 100 kB/s | 3.3 kB 00:00
Fedora - ELN BaseOS - Developmental packages fo 68 kB/s | 2.3 kB 00:00
Fedora - ELN AppStream - Developmental packages 66 kB/s | 2.3 kB 00:00
Fedora - ELN CodeReady Linux Builders - Build p 66 kB/s | 2.3 kB 00:00
Error:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-mmgu1jug/perl-FileHandle-Fmode/perl-FileHandle-Fmode.spec) Config(fedora-eln-x86_64) 1 minutes 34 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 77fb7256ea894b5a9d9b7112ce42a363 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-bootstrap-1706200861.636798/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.q00l_rzh:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot> | This is one of the three attempts Mock does to install the BuildRequires specified in spec file. All of the three attempts failed to install `clang-rpm-macros` which runtime-depends on `clang = 13.0.0`. But no package providing this exists. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[t9402-git-cvsserver-refs.sh (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 37 Failed: 4)
Failed tests: 30-32, 34
Non-zero exit status: 1]: [This message shows which tests have failed]
=============
['cvs.log' is not empty, it contains:
++ cat cvs.log
Possible precedence problem between ! and pattern match (m//) at /builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/git-cvsserver line 5015.]: [This code shows why the test has failed]
| Issue: The build has failed because of Perl warning message has populated cvs.log during the tests. The tests doesn't expect this message and fail instead.
Resolution: Work with upstream code to suppress this Perl warning. The code that produces this warning is in file git-cvsserver on line 5015 |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
t9402-git-cvsserver-refs.sh (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 37 Failed: 4)
Failed tests: 30-32, 34
Non-zero exit status: 1 | This message shows which tests have failed |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
'cvs.log' is not empty, it contains:
++ cat cvs.log
Possible precedence problem between ! and pattern match (m//) at /builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/git-cvsserver line 5015. | This code shows why the test has failed |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[DEBUG: install: cannot stat 'etc/account-serrver.conf-sample': No such file or directory]: [Expected file `etc/account-serrver.conf-sample` was not found in its expected location.
Name of the file appears to be a typo.]
=============
[INFO: EXCEPTION: [Error()]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 93, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 600, in do_with_status
raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (command, output), child.returncode)
mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed:
# bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/openstack-swift.spec
]: [Error indicating failed mock build. It isn't actual cause of the issue, rather a stack trace of the build failure.]
| Issue: Name of file `account-serrver.conf-sample` contains a typo. Therefore it cannot be present at the expected location. Causing build to fail.
Resolution: Fix typo in the file name `account-serrver.conf-sample`. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG: install: cannot stat 'etc/account-serrver.conf-sample': No such file or directory | Expected file `etc/account-serrver.conf-sample` was not found in its expected location.
Name of the file appears to be a typo. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
INFO: EXCEPTION: [Error()]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 93, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 600, in do_with_status
raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (command, output), child.returncode)
mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed:
# bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/openstack-swift.spec
| Error indicating failed mock build. It isn't actual cause of the issue, rather a stack trace of the build failure. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[./client.go:382:31: non-constant format string in call to (*github.com/emersion/go-smtp.Client).cmd
./client.go:411:31: non-constant format string in call to (*github.com/emersion/go-smtp.Client).cmd
FAIL github.com/emersion/go-smtp [build failed]
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qQ7D5A (%check)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qQ7D5A (%check)]: [It marks the build failure information and describes the issue.]
| Issue: Go wants non-constant format strings to be explicitly handled
Resolution: Most likely convert the string. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
./client.go:382:31: non-constant format string in call to (*github.com/emersion/go-smtp.Client).cmd
./client.go:411:31: non-constant format string in call to (*github.com/emersion/go-smtp.Client).cmd
FAIL github.com/emersion/go-smtp [build failed]
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qQ7D5A (%check)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qQ7D5A (%check) | It marks the build failure information and describes the issue. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch from copr_xxmitsu_llvm_priority_10
]: [nim-srpm-macros is needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch but is not available from source]
=============
[You can try to add to command line:
--no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates
--skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages]: [--no-best and --skip-broken are probable workarounds but their usage is not optimal]
| Issue: dnf5 command fails since nim-srpm-macros is not avaialble
Resolution: Build nim-srpm-macros from source if not available using the build terminal |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch from copr_xxmitsu_llvm_priority_10
| nim-srpm-macros is needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch but is not available from source |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
You can try to add to command line:
--no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates
--skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages | --no-best and --skip-broken are probable workarounds but their usage is not optimal |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(picky) >= 7.0.0~rc.12 with crate(picky) < 8.0.0~)
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(picky-krb/default) >= 0.9.0 with crate(picky-krb/default) < 0.10.0~)
Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(picky/x509) >= 7.0.0~rc.12 with crate(picky/x509) < 8.0.0~)
Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(uuid/default) >= 1.15.0 with crate(uuid/default) < 2.0.0~)
Problem 5: nothing provides requested (crate(uuid/v4) >= 1.15.0 with crate(uuid/v4) < 2.0.0~)]: [Package manager reports issues with resolution of dependencies. 5 required packages were not found in installed repositories.]
| Issue: Some of the dependencies were not available.
Resolution: All packages required for the successful build must be available in the installed repositories with appropriate versions. Check repositories for presence of required packages, adjusting constraints on versions as necessary. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.