input
stringlengths 107
1.1k
| task
stringclasses 1
value | response
int64 0
2
| idx
int64 0
249
| prompt
stringlengths 870
1.87k
| score
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
premise: A: I, that would have been stupid, B: Yeah. A: and I don't think we did it. Everything else we handled in this seemed to be perfectly right. I don't think they would have done that.
hypothesis: they would have done that | cb | 1 | 200 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: I, that would have been stupid, B: Yeah. A: and I don't think we did it. Everything else we handled in this seemed to be perfectly right. I don't think they would have done that.
hypothesis: they would have done that
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: I really don't. But no, when the time comes hopefully we'll really look around before I decide on one for my parents B: Uh-huh. A: really do, because I have been raised in one, you know, so there's lot of things I know to look for. B: Yeah. A: And I don't think they'd want to go where they used to work, either you know.
hypothesis: they would want to go where they used to work | cb | 1 | 201 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: I really don't. But no, when the time comes hopefully we'll really look around before I decide on one for my parents B: Uh-huh. A: really do, because I have been raised in one, you know, so there's lot of things I know to look for. B: Yeah. A: And I don't think they'd want to go where they used to work, either you know.
hypothesis: they would want to go where they used to work
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: And as far as like them, uh, entertaining the rights that they should have. A: Uh-huh. B: I mean, we educate them, we feed them, we take care of them and they no sooner get out on the street and they're back in again. A: Uh-huh. B: I'm not saying they're all bad,
hypothesis: they're all bad | cb | 1 | 202 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: And as far as like them, uh, entertaining the rights that they should have. A: Uh-huh. B: I mean, we educate them, we feed them, we take care of them and they no sooner get out on the street and they're back in again. A: Uh-huh. B: I'm not saying they're all bad,
hypothesis: they're all bad
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Yeah, you're probably right, two years might be a little too long. B: Yeah, and there will be a lot of rebellion in that and when you get people who have no desire to be there in the first place, I don't think that they're going to be serving anybody.
hypothesis: they're going to be serving somebody | cb | 1 | 203 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Yeah, you're probably right, two years might be a little too long. B: Yeah, and there will be a lot of rebellion in that and when you get people who have no desire to be there in the first place, I don't think that they're going to be serving anybody.
hypothesis: they're going to be serving somebody
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: How did Radio Shack work? B: If you go in and buy anything they want your phone number. And I don't think they're going to call me and ask me how it's functioning,
hypothesis: they're going to call him | cb | 1 | 204 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: How did Radio Shack work? B: If you go in and buy anything they want your phone number. And I don't think they're going to call me and ask me how it's functioning,
hypothesis: they're going to call him
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: So, let's talk about the, uh, wonderful abuses in the State of Pennsylvania of personal property taxes whereby you can purchase something mail order and after the fact, the State of Pennsylvania can find out about it and send you a bill for the sales tax appropriate to that item that you purchased as well as interest and penalties from the time that you bought it. What do you think? Is Pennsylvania kind of out of line there? A: Well, actually, I do n't think they're out of line.
hypothesis: they're out of line | cb | 1 | 205 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: So, let's talk about the, uh, wonderful abuses in the State of Pennsylvania of personal property taxes whereby you can purchase something mail order and after the fact, the State of Pennsylvania can find out about it and send you a bill for the sales tax appropriate to that item that you purchased as well as interest and penalties from the time that you bought it. What do you think? Is Pennsylvania kind of out of line there? A: Well, actually, I do n't think they're out of line.
hypothesis: they're out of line
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: I do too. I believe about ten years ago that we went through a terrible time, but I don't, I believe that they're better now, you know, wh-, B: I think so. I don't think they're shoddy
hypothesis: they're shoddy | cb | 1 | 206 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: I do too. I believe about ten years ago that we went through a terrible time, but I don't, I believe that they're better now, you know, wh-, B: I think so. I don't think they're shoddy
hypothesis: they're shoddy
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: you know, sometimes I would go over, but you know, it wouldn't hit me in a big way because I knew that, uh, I would have it covered in that respect. A: Right. Right. That's good. I don't think we've gone that far, to pay it you know, in advance before we spend it,
hypothesis: they've gone that far | cb | 1 | 207 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: you know, sometimes I would go over, but you know, it wouldn't hit me in a big way because I knew that, uh, I would have it covered in that respect. A: Right. Right. That's good. I don't think we've gone that far, to pay it you know, in advance before we spend it,
hypothesis: they've gone that far
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: but, it was interesting to, I don't know if they're making them better or not, it's hard to say. I think they more of their parts plastic, which, you know, makes things break easier, but I think the technology is better. B: I think technology is better, I'm not sure. I think you've got a good point with the plastic and that. A: About quality. B: I don't think necessarily that, things are being made better uh, you know,
hypothesis: things are being made better | cb | 1 | 208 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: but, it was interesting to, I don't know if they're making them better or not, it's hard to say. I think they more of their parts plastic, which, you know, makes things break easier, but I think the technology is better. B: I think technology is better, I'm not sure. I think you've got a good point with the plastic and that. A: About quality. B: I don't think necessarily that, things are being made better uh, you know,
hypothesis: things are being made better
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: It was just a side benefit. B: Yeah, yeah, because, I'm not big or anything, but I'm not in great shape, But when I worked out, I got in pretty good shape. I didn't build up muscle, though, I just got real good and toned. A: Yeah. B: I don't think women look good with muscles.
hypothesis: women look good with muscles | cb | 1 | 209 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: It was just a side benefit. B: Yeah, yeah, because, I'm not big or anything, but I'm not in great shape, But when I worked out, I got in pretty good shape. I didn't build up muscle, though, I just got real good and toned. A: Yeah. B: I don't think women look good with muscles.
hypothesis: women look good with muscles
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: All right, well. A: Um, short term, I don't think anything's going to be done about it or probably should be done about it. B: Right. Uh, are you saying you don't think anything should be done in the short term?
hypothesis: anything should be done in the short term | cb | 2 | 210 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: All right, well. A: Um, short term, I don't think anything's going to be done about it or probably should be done about it. B: Right. Uh, are you saying you don't think anything should be done in the short term?
hypothesis: anything should be done in the short term
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Right. And I'm sure that would make a big difference, too. You know, you've got, A: Yeah. Well, what about a voluntary program? Do you think that would be a good idea?
hypothesis: a voluntary program would be a good idea | cb | 2 | 211 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Right. And I'm sure that would make a big difference, too. You know, you've got, A: Yeah. Well, what about a voluntary program? Do you think that would be a good idea?
hypothesis: a voluntary program would be a good idea
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: So again, it never really penalizes, the company doing the wrong. A: Right. That will, B: They can go right on doing the same old thing they always used to. A: Huh. B: And if they know some practice is wrong, you know,
hypothesis: some practice is wrong | cb | 0 | 212 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: So again, it never really penalizes, the company doing the wrong. A: Right. That will, B: They can go right on doing the same old thing they always used to. A: Huh. B: And if they know some practice is wrong, you know,
hypothesis: some practice is wrong
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Um, yeah, I guess that's not an easy solution. there's no easy solution for that. B: Uh-huh. I don't know that there is an easy solution, but if you could find a way to prevent some of it, and I'm not sure what it would be. It would be money better spent than, A: Uh-huh. B: do you know it costs more to keep an inmate on death row than it does to send a kid to Harvard?
hypothesis: it costs more to keep an inmate on death row that it does to send a kid of Harvard | cb | 0 | 213 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Um, yeah, I guess that's not an easy solution. there's no easy solution for that. B: Uh-huh. I don't know that there is an easy solution, but if you could find a way to prevent some of it, and I'm not sure what it would be. It would be money better spent than, A: Uh-huh. B: do you know it costs more to keep an inmate on death row than it does to send a kid to Harvard?
hypothesis: it costs more to keep an inmate on death row that it does to send a kid of Harvard
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: So am I. A: Are you, B: You know, I think it's kind of coming back around to that, don't you,
hypothesis: it's kind of coming back around to that | cb | 0 | 214 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: So am I. A: Are you, B: You know, I think it's kind of coming back around to that, don't you,
hypothesis: it's kind of coming back around to that
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: I thought Carter was good too, and that was, yeah, B: Did you? I always liked him, I thought he was great at the time and I just couldn't get over the fact that Reagan beat him. you know, that I just couldn't believe that he got voted out.
hypothesis: Carter got voted out | cb | 0 | 215 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: I thought Carter was good too, and that was, yeah, B: Did you? I always liked him, I thought he was great at the time and I just couldn't get over the fact that Reagan beat him. you know, that I just couldn't believe that he got voted out.
hypothesis: Carter got voted out
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Well I, uh, when is your next one, uh, scheduled now. B: Well it's like, the last one was my high school graduation the next one was when I graduated from college, so I guess about two more years. A: Yes, well, and do you think you'll have a baby to take back with you.
hypothesis: speaker B will have a baby to take back with her | cb | 2 | 216 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Well I, uh, when is your next one, uh, scheduled now. B: Well it's like, the last one was my high school graduation the next one was when I graduated from college, so I guess about two more years. A: Yes, well, and do you think you'll have a baby to take back with you.
hypothesis: speaker B will have a baby to take back with her
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Uh, I saw Seven Eleven that was hiring. B: Well, I'm sure with the new, uh, contract awarding I think it went to Lockheed, didn't it?
hypothesis: the contract went to Lockheed | cb | 0 | 217 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Uh, I saw Seven Eleven that was hiring. B: Well, I'm sure with the new, uh, contract awarding I think it went to Lockheed, didn't it?
hypothesis: the contract went to Lockheed
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: and both of those seem very easy to use compared to D Base. A: Uh-huh. Do you think D Base is more flexible or allows you to do more. Or do you think the others are pretty much compatible these days?
hypothesis: the others are pretty much compatible these days | cb | 2 | 218 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: and both of those seem very easy to use compared to D Base. A: Uh-huh. Do you think D Base is more flexible or allows you to do more. Or do you think the others are pretty much compatible these days?
hypothesis: the others are pretty much compatible these days
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Uh-huh. So, yeah, that's the thing is just to look at the school system in the area that you move into before you. A: Uh-huh. Of course we have a slight problem in that, uh, the number of the illiterate in America is mushrooming at this point, and, uh, you know, where our kids might be in a great school, we're still paying an awful lot of taxes for people who are on welfare and unemployment because they can't read, you know. B: Uh-huh. A: So. B: But do you think that there should be, um, nationwide, um, curriculum?
hypothesis: there should be a nationwide curriculum | cb | 2 | 219 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Uh-huh. So, yeah, that's the thing is just to look at the school system in the area that you move into before you. A: Uh-huh. Of course we have a slight problem in that, uh, the number of the illiterate in America is mushrooming at this point, and, uh, you know, where our kids might be in a great school, we're still paying an awful lot of taxes for people who are on welfare and unemployment because they can't read, you know. B: Uh-huh. A: So. B: But do you think that there should be, um, nationwide, um, curriculum?
hypothesis: there should be a nationwide curriculum
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: So, we're comparable. B: Yeah. A: As a matter of fact, I just paid my Richardson taxes because I live in Richardson and supplemented the Robin Hoods very thoroughly, I think. B: Yeah, I think Yeah, we have got it on the line, don't we.
hypothesis: they have got it on the line | cb | 0 | 220 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: So, we're comparable. B: Yeah. A: As a matter of fact, I just paid my Richardson taxes because I live in Richardson and supplemented the Robin Hoods very thoroughly, I think. B: Yeah, I think Yeah, we have got it on the line, don't we.
hypothesis: they have got it on the line
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Sometimes you hear things on the radio that, you know, could be true or couldn't be. B: Uh-huh. A: Uh, do you feel like this is, I guess they're spending a billion or so a year on this AIDS research. B: Uh-huh. A: Do you think they should spend more?
hypothesis: they should spend more | cb | 2 | 221 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Sometimes you hear things on the radio that, you know, could be true or couldn't be. B: Uh-huh. A: Uh, do you feel like this is, I guess they're spending a billion or so a year on this AIDS research. B: Uh-huh. A: Do you think they should spend more?
hypothesis: they should spend more
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: when you've lost something or uh, uh, don't have what other people have that's when you tend to realize, you know, what's out there and you know, what you have and what you don't have. A: Yeah I agree. B: So the original question, do we think they're you know, a security threat?
hypothesis: they're a security threat | cb | 2 | 222 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: when you've lost something or uh, uh, don't have what other people have that's when you tend to realize, you know, what's out there and you know, what you have and what you don't have. A: Yeah I agree. B: So the original question, do we think they're you know, a security threat?
hypothesis: they're a security threat
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Well, I don't know, uh, I have a hard time getting, uh, people on the telephone. B: Oh really. A: Uh-huh, getting through to anybody. Sometimes I call off and on all day, B: Huh. A: but anyway, uh, I guess we're supposed to be talking about family reunions aren't we.
hypothesis: they're supposed to be talking about family reunions | cb | 0 | 223 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Well, I don't know, uh, I have a hard time getting, uh, people on the telephone. B: Oh really. A: Uh-huh, getting through to anybody. Sometimes I call off and on all day, B: Huh. A: but anyway, uh, I guess we're supposed to be talking about family reunions aren't we.
hypothesis: they're supposed to be talking about family reunions
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Yeah. The radio doesn't really have much news sometimes. The stations I listen to are just mainly music. B: Yeah, I think you pretty much have to listen to all news station to get any news at all. A: Yeah. Do you think that TV is, uh, pretty accurate.
hypothesis: TV is pretty accurate | cb | 2 | 224 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Yeah. The radio doesn't really have much news sometimes. The stations I listen to are just mainly music. B: Yeah, I think you pretty much have to listen to all news station to get any news at all. A: Yeah. Do you think that TV is, uh, pretty accurate.
hypothesis: TV is pretty accurate
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: No, not really. I spends a lot of time with our income tax, though. especially, this year and last year. Um, I have been married for just a few years, so I've had to really switch around from the EZ form to the, uh, B: Schedule A. A: Right. B: Well, yeah. A: All the deductions and all that. B: Did you notice that when they passed the new simplified tax act, it seemed like it made everything harder?
hypothesis: when they passed the new simplified tax act it seemed like it made everything harder | cb | 0 | 225 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: No, not really. I spends a lot of time with our income tax, though. especially, this year and last year. Um, I have been married for just a few years, so I've had to really switch around from the EZ form to the, uh, B: Schedule A. A: Right. B: Well, yeah. A: All the deductions and all that. B: Did you notice that when they passed the new simplified tax act, it seemed like it made everything harder?
hypothesis: when they passed the new simplified tax act it seemed like it made everything harder
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Yeah, it's interesting because, uh, we're just having conversation on this, uh, with a couple of people yesterday. And I was expressing my frustrations that, uh, so many problems, I work in a high school, are that kids don't have a degree of self-discipline which may be reflected in society at large. Uh, and you can't expect in a classroom for a particular course an hour a day to counteract, uh, sixteen or seventeen years of influence at home. B: Right. A: Um, and, it's seen more so because when you call parents up, many parents won't even recognize that there is a problem and they'll say, oh, well, my kid, I've never heard anything about this before. This is the first time there have been problems. and, you wonder, don't these parents know that teachers talk,
hypothesis: teachers talk | cb | 0 | 226 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Yeah, it's interesting because, uh, we're just having conversation on this, uh, with a couple of people yesterday. And I was expressing my frustrations that, uh, so many problems, I work in a high school, are that kids don't have a degree of self-discipline which may be reflected in society at large. Uh, and you can't expect in a classroom for a particular course an hour a day to counteract, uh, sixteen or seventeen years of influence at home. B: Right. A: Um, and, it's seen more so because when you call parents up, many parents won't even recognize that there is a problem and they'll say, oh, well, my kid, I've never heard anything about this before. This is the first time there have been problems. and, you wonder, don't these parents know that teachers talk,
hypothesis: teachers talk
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: What you want. where do they get it?. A: Well, I don't know, I guess they don't have it at home, B: I can't imagine it would stay fresh long enough to,
hypothesis: it would stay fresh long enough | cb | 1 | 227 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: What you want. where do they get it?. A: Well, I don't know, I guess they don't have it at home, B: I can't imagine it would stay fresh long enough to,
hypothesis: it would stay fresh long enough
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: so there's only been really one working. A: Uh-huh, same here. Uh-huh. B: And, uh, it works for me but I can't see that it would work for probably the majority of people.
hypothesis: it would work for probably the majority of people | cb | 1 | 228 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: so there's only been really one working. A: Uh-huh, same here. Uh-huh. B: And, uh, it works for me but I can't see that it would work for probably the majority of people.
hypothesis: it would work for probably the majority of people
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Well, that's kind of the way I feel about rock and roll sometimes, too, I guess. They don't really, has kind of the same sound over and over, and the other thing I don't like about it is they have a tendency to play the instrumental so loud that you can't understand what the lyrics are A: Um. Right. B: you can't understand what they're saying on some of those songs which probably is just as well on some of them, too. A: Yeah. And I can't say that I like a lot of the very modern, uh, rock and roll,
hypothesis: she likes a lot of the very modern rock and roll | cb | 1 | 229 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Well, that's kind of the way I feel about rock and roll sometimes, too, I guess. They don't really, has kind of the same sound over and over, and the other thing I don't like about it is they have a tendency to play the instrumental so loud that you can't understand what the lyrics are A: Um. Right. B: you can't understand what they're saying on some of those songs which probably is just as well on some of them, too. A: Yeah. And I can't say that I like a lot of the very modern, uh, rock and roll,
hypothesis: she likes a lot of the very modern rock and roll
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: so I watch the fish, you know. Whatever I can do to keep myself occupied. I like to have the TV on, because that usually keeps me, um, more occupied. It kind of takes the time away and I don't realize, that's really the only time I ever watch TV, is when I'm on the bike. and then usually after I'm done riding the bike, just to cool myself down, I usually take a walk, you know, and that just kind of uh, gets me, you know, to where I'm not quite as tired I guess. But it's definitely a task. B: You think so? A: I can't say that I really enjoy it.
hypothesis: she really enjoys it | cb | 1 | 230 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: so I watch the fish, you know. Whatever I can do to keep myself occupied. I like to have the TV on, because that usually keeps me, um, more occupied. It kind of takes the time away and I don't realize, that's really the only time I ever watch TV, is when I'm on the bike. and then usually after I'm done riding the bike, just to cool myself down, I usually take a walk, you know, and that just kind of uh, gets me, you know, to where I'm not quite as tired I guess. But it's definitely a task. B: You think so? A: I can't say that I really enjoy it.
hypothesis: she really enjoys it
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: No, it was, I didn't like the way it ended. A: I know, well the only reason I know why it ended is on Arsenio Hall one night, Christopher Reeves told, that, you know, B: Uh-huh. A: I can't believe they killed them.
hypothesis: they killed them | cb | 0 | 231 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: No, it was, I didn't like the way it ended. A: I know, well the only reason I know why it ended is on Arsenio Hall one night, Christopher Reeves told, that, you know, B: Uh-huh. A: I can't believe they killed them.
hypothesis: they killed them
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Yeah. Those are pretty. A: Number one turned out just great, and the lady said she couldn't believe that they know that I had done it in the color that they had decorated the nursery
hypothesis: they know that she had done it in the colors that they had decorated the nursery | cb | 0 | 232 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Yeah. Those are pretty. A: Number one turned out just great, and the lady said she couldn't believe that they know that I had done it in the color that they had decorated the nursery
hypothesis: they know that she had done it in the colors that they had decorated the nursery
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: That is the reason, I don't play over there. B: Yeah. A: I like the course, but I don't play over there because, they don't, uh, you know don't allow you to pull a cart. B: Right. A: And, I don't think a cart damages the turf.
hypothesis: a cart damages the turf | cb | 1 | 233 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: That is the reason, I don't play over there. B: Yeah. A: I like the course, but I don't play over there because, they don't, uh, you know don't allow you to pull a cart. B: Right. A: And, I don't think a cart damages the turf.
hypothesis: a cart damages the turf
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: I do not know. I wonder where he gets it? You know, you must, I think TV is bad. Because they, uh, show all sorts of violence on, A: That and I do not think a lot of parents, I mean, I do not know how it is in the Air Force base. But, uh, I just do not think a lot of people, because of the economy, both need to work, you know. I just do not think a lot of parents are that involved any more.
hypothesis: a lot of parents are that involved | cb | 1 | 234 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: I do not know. I wonder where he gets it? You know, you must, I think TV is bad. Because they, uh, show all sorts of violence on, A: That and I do not think a lot of parents, I mean, I do not know how it is in the Air Force base. But, uh, I just do not think a lot of people, because of the economy, both need to work, you know. I just do not think a lot of parents are that involved any more.
hypothesis: a lot of parents are that involved
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Highland Park's thinking about going that route. B: Uh-huh. A: So it, and then I think that's going to push teachers to dress a lot more professionally than they do. B: Yeah, I don't think a lot of teachers are very professional
hypothesis: a lot of teachers are very professional | cb | 1 | 235 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Highland Park's thinking about going that route. B: Uh-huh. A: So it, and then I think that's going to push teachers to dress a lot more professionally than they do. B: Yeah, I don't think a lot of teachers are very professional
hypothesis: a lot of teachers are very professional
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Yeah, I think that's what aggravates a lot of people, is somebody does get a life sentence in place of the death penalty, and they wind up back on the streets after five years or six years or like the kid on the news tonight out in Mesquite who was out in six months.. B: Uh-huh. Yeah, it's just our criminal system is just so, I guess, overloaded, but the problem is not so much with the prison system, you know, I mean, because the cops are out there doing their job enforcing the laws, and the prison system are just, you know, they're trying to cope with them, but, you know, the thing about capital punishment I, you know, a lot of people don't think it would be a deterrent, uh, to future crime,
hypothesis: capital punishment would be a deterrent to future crimes | cb | 1 | 236 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Yeah, I think that's what aggravates a lot of people, is somebody does get a life sentence in place of the death penalty, and they wind up back on the streets after five years or six years or like the kid on the news tonight out in Mesquite who was out in six months.. B: Uh-huh. Yeah, it's just our criminal system is just so, I guess, overloaded, but the problem is not so much with the prison system, you know, I mean, because the cops are out there doing their job enforcing the laws, and the prison system are just, you know, they're trying to cope with them, but, you know, the thing about capital punishment I, you know, a lot of people don't think it would be a deterrent, uh, to future crime,
hypothesis: capital punishment would be a deterrent to future crimes
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: or you know, it doesn't seem that it's going to make much of a difference. B: Uh-huh. It, I mean, I don't know, I don't think George Bush will make the American people happy with ninety-seven cents a week.
hypothesis: George Bush will make American people happy with ninety-seven cents a week | cb | 1 | 237 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: or you know, it doesn't seem that it's going to make much of a difference. B: Uh-huh. It, I mean, I don't know, I don't think George Bush will make the American people happy with ninety-seven cents a week.
hypothesis: George Bush will make American people happy with ninety-seven cents a week
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Well, I was never there for any sentencing. Uh, I finally got empaneled on one case, uh, on my next to the last day, and, uh, we got into the, uh, jury room to, uh, decide the case, and there was one guy on the jury who announced to everybody that he didn't need to deliberate, because he'd already decided that the guy was, uh, not guilty, and he would never vote for guilty. A: Huh. B: So, uh, they appointed me jury foreman and I, uh, didn't think that, uh, going in without deliberating allowed us to reach a verdict,
hypothesis: going in without deliberating allowed them to reach a verdict | cb | 1 | 238 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Well, I was never there for any sentencing. Uh, I finally got empaneled on one case, uh, on my next to the last day, and, uh, we got into the, uh, jury room to, uh, decide the case, and there was one guy on the jury who announced to everybody that he didn't need to deliberate, because he'd already decided that the guy was, uh, not guilty, and he would never vote for guilty. A: Huh. B: So, uh, they appointed me jury foreman and I, uh, didn't think that, uh, going in without deliberating allowed us to reach a verdict,
hypothesis: going in without deliberating allowed them to reach a verdict
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: And the tanks came in and, you know, pretty much took care of that. A: Exactly. B: And, A: Yeah, uh, that, personally I don't see as Gorbachev as being maybe a threat, and I think he's actually, honestly trying to do some change. B: Uh-huh. A: But I don't believe that he, in this first pass around, you know, being the first one to really turn things around or attempt to is going to be allowed to get away with it either.
hypothesis: Gorbachev is going to be allowed to get away with doing some change | cb | 1 | 239 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: And the tanks came in and, you know, pretty much took care of that. A: Exactly. B: And, A: Yeah, uh, that, personally I don't see as Gorbachev as being maybe a threat, and I think he's actually, honestly trying to do some change. B: Uh-huh. A: But I don't believe that he, in this first pass around, you know, being the first one to really turn things around or attempt to is going to be allowed to get away with it either.
hypothesis: Gorbachev is going to be allowed to get away with doing some change
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Robert Erwin, president of Biosource, called Plant Genetic's approach ``interesting'' and ``novel,'' and ``complementary rather than competitive.'' ``There is a large market out there hungry for hybrid seeds,'' he said. Mr. Robinson of Delta & Pine, the seed producer in Scott, Miss., said Plant Genetic's success in creating genetically engineered male steriles doesn't automatically mean it would be simple to create hybrids in all crops.
hypothesis: it would be simple to create hybrids in all crops | cb | 1 | 240 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Robert Erwin, president of Biosource, called Plant Genetic's approach ``interesting'' and ``novel,'' and ``complementary rather than competitive.'' ``There is a large market out there hungry for hybrid seeds,'' he said. Mr. Robinson of Delta & Pine, the seed producer in Scott, Miss., said Plant Genetic's success in creating genetically engineered male steriles doesn't automatically mean it would be simple to create hybrids in all crops.
hypothesis: it would be simple to create hybrids in all crops
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: His attorneys claim he was framed by the FBI and New York police as part of a campaign to destroy the black liberation movement of the 1960s. Because the federal Freedom of Information Act wasn't law at that time, the FBI wasn't required to turn over information on its investigations when Mr. Ferguson appealed his conviction in the 1960s. But in federal court in Manhattan, Judge Patterson said the FBI records could show that Mr. Ferguson's arrest was the result of questionable legal practices.
hypothesis: Mr. Ferguson's arrest was the result of questionable legal practices | cb | 0 | 241 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: His attorneys claim he was framed by the FBI and New York police as part of a campaign to destroy the black liberation movement of the 1960s. Because the federal Freedom of Information Act wasn't law at that time, the FBI wasn't required to turn over information on its investigations when Mr. Ferguson appealed his conviction in the 1960s. But in federal court in Manhattan, Judge Patterson said the FBI records could show that Mr. Ferguson's arrest was the result of questionable legal practices.
hypothesis: Mr. Ferguson's arrest was the result of questionable legal practices
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The trend toward lower rents may seem surprising given that some communities in New York are bemoaning the loss of favorite local businesses to high rents. But, despite the recent softening, for many of these retailers there's still been too big a jump from the rental rates of the late 1970s, when their leases were signed. Certainly, the recent drop in prices doesn't mean Manhattan comes cheap.
hypothesis: Manhattan comes cheap | cb | 1 | 242 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: The trend toward lower rents may seem surprising given that some communities in New York are bemoaning the loss of favorite local businesses to high rents. But, despite the recent softening, for many of these retailers there's still been too big a jump from the rental rates of the late 1970s, when their leases were signed. Certainly, the recent drop in prices doesn't mean Manhattan comes cheap.
hypothesis: Manhattan comes cheap
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The South Korean government is signing a protocol today establishing formal diplomatic relations with Poland. The two are also signing a trade agreement. South Korean government officials said they don't expect that Seoul can loan money to Warsaw, but it can ``offer experience.''
hypothesis: Seoul can loan money to Warsaw | cb | 1 | 243 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: The South Korean government is signing a protocol today establishing formal diplomatic relations with Poland. The two are also signing a trade agreement. South Korean government officials said they don't expect that Seoul can loan money to Warsaw, but it can ``offer experience.''
hypothesis: Seoul can loan money to Warsaw
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: In finding ``good news'' in Berkeley's new freshman admissions plan (``The Privileged Class,'' editorial, Sept. 20), you're reading the headline but not the story. The plan indeed raises from 40% to 50% the number of freshmen applicants admitted strictly by academic criteria. But that doesn't mean ``half of the students attending Berkeley'' will be admitted this way.
hypothesis: half of the students attending Berkeley will be admitted this way | cb | 1 | 244 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: In finding ``good news'' in Berkeley's new freshman admissions plan (``The Privileged Class,'' editorial, Sept. 20), you're reading the headline but not the story. The plan indeed raises from 40% to 50% the number of freshmen applicants admitted strictly by academic criteria. But that doesn't mean ``half of the students attending Berkeley'' will be admitted this way.
hypothesis: half of the students attending Berkeley will be admitted this way
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: GM confirmed it received U.S. antitrust clearance to boost its holding. Sansui Electric agreed to sell a 51% stake to Polly Peck of Britain for $110 million. Still, analysts said the accord doesn't suggest Japan is opening up to more foreign takeovers.
hypothesis: Japan is opening up to more foreign takeovers | cb | 1 | 245 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: GM confirmed it received U.S. antitrust clearance to boost its holding. Sansui Electric agreed to sell a 51% stake to Polly Peck of Britain for $110 million. Still, analysts said the accord doesn't suggest Japan is opening up to more foreign takeovers.
hypothesis: Japan is opening up to more foreign takeovers
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: So who knows? In a generation or two some of the New Crowd may attain true respectability, perhaps to be displaced in turn by a later flock of unscrupulous raptors. Or perhaps Wall Street, when it has suffered enough, will realize that finance is a service industry, and change its ethos.
hypothesis: finance is a service industry | cb | 0 | 246 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: So who knows? In a generation or two some of the New Crowd may attain true respectability, perhaps to be displaced in turn by a later flock of unscrupulous raptors. Or perhaps Wall Street, when it has suffered enough, will realize that finance is a service industry, and change its ethos.
hypothesis: finance is a service industry
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Richard Breeden had n't noticed that his new desk had just four telephone lines and one phone .
hypothesis: Richard Breeden's new desk had just four telephone lines and one phone | cb | 0 | 247 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Richard Breeden had n't noticed that his new desk had just four telephone lines and one phone .
hypothesis: Richard Breeden's new desk had just four telephone lines and one phone
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The city's Campaign Finance Board has refused to pay Mr. Dinkins $95,142 in matching funds because his campaign records are incomplete. The campaign has blamed these reporting problems on computer errors. And, says Mr. Dinkins, he didn't know the man his campaign paid for a get-out-the-vote effort had been convicted of kidnapping.
hypothesis: the man Mr. Dinkins' campaign paid for a get-out-the-vote effort had been convicted of kidnapping | cb | 0 | 248 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: The city's Campaign Finance Board has refused to pay Mr. Dinkins $95,142 in matching funds because his campaign records are incomplete. The campaign has blamed these reporting problems on computer errors. And, says Mr. Dinkins, he didn't know the man his campaign paid for a get-out-the-vote effort had been convicted of kidnapping.
hypothesis: the man Mr. Dinkins' campaign paid for a get-out-the-vote effort had been convicted of kidnapping
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations law, or RICO, the government has the authority to seek to freeze or seize a defendant's assets before trial. According to individuals familiar with Mr. Antar's case, prosecutors issued their warning this week after one of Mr. Antar's attorneys asked whether legal fees might be subject to seizure. In a letter, prosecutors told Mr. Antar's lawyers that because of the recent Supreme Court rulings, they could expect that any fees collected from Mr. Antar may be seized.
hypothesis: any fees collected from Mr. Antar may be seized | cb | 0 | 249 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations law, or RICO, the government has the authority to seek to freeze or seize a defendant's assets before trial. According to individuals familiar with Mr. Antar's case, prosecutors issued their warning this week after one of Mr. Antar's attorneys asked whether legal fees might be subject to seizure. In a letter, prosecutors told Mr. Antar's lawyers that because of the recent Supreme Court rulings, they could expect that any fees collected from Mr. Antar may be seized.
hypothesis: any fees collected from Mr. Antar may be seized
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: It was a complex language. Not written down but handed down. One might say it was peeled down.
hypothesis: the language was peeled down | cb | 1 | 0 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: It was a complex language. Not written down but handed down. One might say it was peeled down.
hypothesis: the language was peeled down
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: It is part of their religion, a religion I do not scoff at as it holds many elements which match our own even though it lacks the truth of ours. At one of their great festivals they have the ritual of driving out the devils from their bodies. First the drummers come on - I may say that no women are allowed to take part in this ritual and the ladies here will perhaps agree with me that they are fortunate in that omission.
hypothesis: no women are allowed to take part in this ritual | cb | 1 | 1 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: It is part of their religion, a religion I do not scoff at as it holds many elements which match our own even though it lacks the truth of ours. At one of their great festivals they have the ritual of driving out the devils from their bodies. First the drummers come on - I may say that no women are allowed to take part in this ritual and the ladies here will perhaps agree with me that they are fortunate in that omission.
hypothesis: no women are allowed to take part in this ritual
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The Paris to Rouen railway was being extended to Le Havre, and the line cut straight through Dr Flaubert's land. Part of it was to be compulsorily purchased. You could say that Gustave was shepherded into creative retreat at Croisset by epilepsy.
hypothesis: Gustave was shepherded into creative retreat at Croisset by epilepsy | cb | 1 | 2 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: The Paris to Rouen railway was being extended to Le Havre, and the line cut straight through Dr Flaubert's land. Part of it was to be compulsorily purchased. You could say that Gustave was shepherded into creative retreat at Croisset by epilepsy.
hypothesis: Gustave was shepherded into creative retreat at Croisset by epilepsy
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Part of it was to be compulsorily purchased. You could say that Gustave was shepherded into creative retreat at Croisset by epilepsy. You could also say he was driven there by the railway.
hypothesis: Gustave was driven to creative retreat in Croisset by the railway | cb | 1 | 3 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Part of it was to be compulsorily purchased. You could say that Gustave was shepherded into creative retreat at Croisset by epilepsy. You could also say he was driven there by the railway.
hypothesis: Gustave was driven to creative retreat in Croisset by the railway
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Some of them, like for instance the farm in Connecticut, are quite small. If I like a place I buy it. I guess you could say it's a hobby.
hypothesis: buying places is a hobby | cb | 1 | 4 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Some of them, like for instance the farm in Connecticut, are quite small. If I like a place I buy it. I guess you could say it's a hobby.
hypothesis: buying places is a hobby
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Look, my dear, I'm not in my dotage yet, and I know I'm a grumbler and a complainer. You could say the only form of comfort I 've got are my complaints.
hypothesis: the only form of comfort he has are his complaints | cb | 1 | 5 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Look, my dear, I'm not in my dotage yet, and I know I'm a grumbler and a complainer. You could say the only form of comfort I 've got are my complaints.
hypothesis: the only form of comfort he has are his complaints
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Then the silence in the Zoo became complete. Woil stared around him and then suddenly with a push of his wings raised himself into the air, turned, and landed ten feet away on the back of a green bench. Creggan could see that he was afraid and that his fear was making him terribly uncertain.
hypothesis: Woil was afraid | cb | 1 | 6 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Then the silence in the Zoo became complete. Woil stared around him and then suddenly with a push of his wings raised himself into the air, turned, and landed ten feet away on the back of a green bench. Creggan could see that he was afraid and that his fear was making him terribly uncertain.
hypothesis: Woil was afraid
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: But, of course, that just wasn't possible. Her disappointment over Jonathan, which had driven her to France in the first place, had been relegated somewhere to the back of her mind. Now in retrospect she could see that marriage to him would have been a ghastly mistake and that her reaction to discovering that he had been seeing other women while he had been engaged to her had had far more to do with wounded pride than with a wounded heart.
hypothesis: marriage to Jonathan would have been a ghastly mistake | cb | 1 | 7 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: But, of course, that just wasn't possible. Her disappointment over Jonathan, which had driven her to France in the first place, had been relegated somewhere to the back of her mind. Now in retrospect she could see that marriage to him would have been a ghastly mistake and that her reaction to discovering that he had been seeing other women while he had been engaged to her had had far more to do with wounded pride than with a wounded heart.
hypothesis: marriage to Jonathan would have been a ghastly mistake
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Like now. The Community in Knockglen would defend Eve vociferously. Even some of the Sisters here in Dublin might see that the girl had a point.
hypothesis: the girl had a point | cb | 1 | 8 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Like now. The Community in Knockglen would defend Eve vociferously. Even some of the Sisters here in Dublin might see that the girl had a point.
hypothesis: the girl had a point
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: ``They have to be crushed, Bobkins!'' So saying, she marched off down the gravel path, making the kind of crunching noise Robert had thought could only be produced by the BBC sound-effects department. As they rounded the edge of the building he could see that behind the house was a vast garden.
hypothesis: behind the house was a vast garden | cb | 1 | 9 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``They have to be crushed, Bobkins!'' So saying, she marched off down the gravel path, making the kind of crunching noise Robert had thought could only be produced by the BBC sound-effects department. As they rounded the edge of the building he could see that behind the house was a vast garden.
hypothesis: behind the house was a vast garden
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: ``Do you mind if I use your phone?'' Ronni could see that Guido's brain was whirring.
hypothesis: Guido's brain was whirring | cb | 1 | 10 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``Do you mind if I use your phone?'' Ronni could see that Guido's brain was whirring.
hypothesis: Guido's brain was whirring
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: ``Look, lady, give me a break. I just deliver the stuff, I don't interview it for the Sunday papers.'' He waved the paper at her and even at a distance she could see that it said very little.
hypothesis: the paper said very little | cb | 1 | 11 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``Look, lady, give me a break. I just deliver the stuff, I don't interview it for the Sunday papers.'' He waved the paper at her and even at a distance she could see that it said very little.
hypothesis: the paper said very little
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: ``You 've heard something like that before. Haven't you, Jimmy?'' Jimmy had been shaken by those sounds more shaken than the others for good reason but Cardiff could see that he was unprepared to show it as he pushed himself away from the reception counter.
hypothesis: Jimmy was unprepared to show he had been shaken | cb | 1 | 12 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``You 've heard something like that before. Haven't you, Jimmy?'' Jimmy had been shaken by those sounds more shaken than the others for good reason but Cardiff could see that he was unprepared to show it as he pushed himself away from the reception counter.
hypothesis: Jimmy was unprepared to show he had been shaken
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: It was Alan's idea. He made a sour kind of joke out of it, that they must wait until their wedding night. Carolyn agreed because she could see he meant it although she didn't understand why.
hypothesis: Alan meant it | cb | 1 | 13 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: It was Alan's idea. He made a sour kind of joke out of it, that they must wait until their wedding night. Carolyn agreed because she could see he meant it although she didn't understand why.
hypothesis: Alan meant it
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: And why bother to write anyway? What was there to say? Mary had some vague idea that Adam's parents might suspect he was down here and come to see him.
hypothesis: Adam was down here | cb | 2 | 14 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: And why bother to write anyway? What was there to say? Mary had some vague idea that Adam's parents might suspect he was down here and come to see him.
hypothesis: Adam was down here
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: ``And you're not having this dress,'' Nora said, bending down to look at the price tag. ``It's two and a half guineas!'' she hissed at Louise who could tell that she was genuinely appalled.
hypothesis: Nora was genuinely appalled | cb | 1 | 15 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``And you're not having this dress,'' Nora said, bending down to look at the price tag. ``It's two and a half guineas!'' she hissed at Louise who could tell that she was genuinely appalled.
hypothesis: Nora was genuinely appalled
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: She said good morning to Alice and Alice said hallo. She was thin and rather tall with a very lined gentle face and hair that was white but which Alice could see had once been blonde. She could also have told this was Tina's mother before Mrs Darne went off down the passage that led to the Headmaster's Flat.
hypothesis: this was Tina's mother | cb | 1 | 16 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: She said good morning to Alice and Alice said hallo. She was thin and rather tall with a very lined gentle face and hair that was white but which Alice could see had once been blonde. She could also have told this was Tina's mother before Mrs Darne went off down the passage that led to the Headmaster's Flat.
hypothesis: this was Tina's mother
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: She might have sat all afternoon, nibbling and stuporous, exhausted but not sleepy. But the glazier finally came down from the upper floor, cheerfully announcing that all was now right and tight and he would be on his way. Maggie could tell that he would have liked to stop for a chat that he felt sorry for her left on her own but she lacked either her grandmother's grace or her mother's energy so she did not offer him tea.
hypothesis: the glazier would have liked to stop for a chat | cb | 1 | 17 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: She might have sat all afternoon, nibbling and stuporous, exhausted but not sleepy. But the glazier finally came down from the upper floor, cheerfully announcing that all was now right and tight and he would be on his way. Maggie could tell that he would have liked to stop for a chat that he felt sorry for her left on her own but she lacked either her grandmother's grace or her mother's energy so she did not offer him tea.
hypothesis: the glazier would have liked to stop for a chat
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Jim waited. He waited a long time, and when the young doctor finally came out, it was almost dark. Jim could nonetheless tell by his anxious face that something was wrong.
hypothesis: something was wrong | cb | 1 | 18 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Jim waited. He waited a long time, and when the young doctor finally came out, it was almost dark. Jim could nonetheless tell by his anxious face that something was wrong.
hypothesis: something was wrong
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: ``Yes?'' ``Nathan?'' He could tell it was long-distance the line was so gravelly and hollow but he didn't recognise the voice.
hypothesis: the call was long-distance | cb | 2 | 19 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``Yes?'' ``Nathan?'' He could tell it was long-distance the line was so gravelly and hollow but he didn't recognise the voice.
hypothesis: the call was long-distance
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Chopra stood unsteadily on his feet. The shapechanger bounded around with excitement. Chopra could tell something had happened.
hypothesis: something had happened | cb | 1 | 20 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Chopra stood unsteadily on his feet. The shapechanger bounded around with excitement. Chopra could tell something had happened.
hypothesis: something had happened
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: It seemed impossible that anyone could endure such pain for so long, but at last the doors of the Renault slammed and there was comparative silence. The engine was started up, revving violently as the car was turned round on the narrow road. John could tell that it was being driven back up the hill towards Putna.
hypothesis: the car was being driven back up the hill towards Putna | cb | 2 | 21 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: It seemed impossible that anyone could endure such pain for so long, but at last the doors of the Renault slammed and there was comparative silence. The engine was started up, revving violently as the car was turned round on the narrow road. John could tell that it was being driven back up the hill towards Putna.
hypothesis: the car was being driven back up the hill towards Putna
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Just when you think you 've got it straight, along comes the Fool with his pig's bladder and whops you on the nose. By the way, I'm no idiot. I could tell Gillian and Stuart weren't thrilled to see me at the airport.
hypothesis: Gillian and Stuart weren't thrilled to see her at the airport | cb | 1 | 22 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Just when you think you 've got it straight, along comes the Fool with his pig's bladder and whops you on the nose. By the way, I'm no idiot. I could tell Gillian and Stuart weren't thrilled to see me at the airport.
hypothesis: Gillian and Stuart weren't thrilled to see her at the airport
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: He's weird enough to have undressed me without thinking, according to some mad notion of the ``proper'' thing to do. Perhaps he thought I couldn't lie in bed with my clothes on.
hypothesis: she couldn't lie in bed with her clothes on | cb | 0 | 23 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: He's weird enough to have undressed me without thinking, according to some mad notion of the ``proper'' thing to do. Perhaps he thought I couldn't lie in bed with my clothes on.
hypothesis: she couldn't lie in bed with her clothes on
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: That is to say, I did not take sufficient account of the fact that at that time of the day, what Mr Farraday enjoys is a conversation of a lighthearted, humorous sort. Knowing this to be his likely mood when I brought in the tea yesterday afternoon, and being aware of his general propensity to talk with me in a bantering tone at such moments, it would certainly have been wiser not to have mentioned Miss Kenton at all. But you will perhaps understand that there was a natural tendency on my part in asking what was after all a generous favour from my employer to hint that there was a good professional motive behind my request.
hypothesis: there was a natural tendency on her part to hint that there was a good professional motive behind her request | cb | 1 | 24 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: That is to say, I did not take sufficient account of the fact that at that time of the day, what Mr Farraday enjoys is a conversation of a lighthearted, humorous sort. Knowing this to be his likely mood when I brought in the tea yesterday afternoon, and being aware of his general propensity to talk with me in a bantering tone at such moments, it would certainly have been wiser not to have mentioned Miss Kenton at all. But you will perhaps understand that there was a natural tendency on my part in asking what was after all a generous favour from my employer to hint that there was a good professional motive behind my request.
hypothesis: there was a natural tendency on her part to hint that there was a good professional motive behind her request
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: But don't dilly-dally for too long. Once it's published we are all going to look a little risible if we have made no adjustments to what is after all known as being predominantly my own design of gallery. Also I am a bit older than the rest of you but you can perhaps understand that I don't want to drop dead without a proper and public recantation.
hypothesis: he doesn't want to drop dead without a proper and public recantation | cb | 1 | 25 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: But don't dilly-dally for too long. Once it's published we are all going to look a little risible if we have made no adjustments to what is after all known as being predominantly my own design of gallery. Also I am a bit older than the rest of you but you can perhaps understand that I don't want to drop dead without a proper and public recantation.
hypothesis: he doesn't want to drop dead without a proper and public recantation
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: I should dearly have liked to know whether they were Europeans or Americans, but I couldn't hear the accents. They appeared to be arguing. I hoped the white men weren't telling him to eliminate all witnesses because I don't believe it would have needed much persuasion.
hypothesis: eliminating all witnesses would have needed much persuasion | cb | 0 | 26 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: I should dearly have liked to know whether they were Europeans or Americans, but I couldn't hear the accents. They appeared to be arguing. I hoped the white men weren't telling him to eliminate all witnesses because I don't believe it would have needed much persuasion.
hypothesis: eliminating all witnesses would have needed much persuasion
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: But the damage was done as far as my faith was concerned, which is probably why I went mad. So anyway, that Christmas Eve night confirmed my worst fears, it was like a kind of ``royal flush'' for the infant Jimbo. All three kings - Pa Santa and the King of Kings - all down the pan together... And to be honest I don't believe any of them stands a chance of ever making a comeback with me.
hypothesis: any of the three kings stands a chance of ever making a comeback with him | cb | 0 | 27 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: But the damage was done as far as my faith was concerned, which is probably why I went mad. So anyway, that Christmas Eve night confirmed my worst fears, it was like a kind of ``royal flush'' for the infant Jimbo. All three kings - Pa Santa and the King of Kings - all down the pan together... And to be honest I don't believe any of them stands a chance of ever making a comeback with me.
hypothesis: any of the three kings stands a chance of ever making a comeback with him
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: He had seen something I should have, which was a car turning in from Soho Square and coming up behind me. My right foot hovered over the accelerator pedal and I balanced Armstrong on the clutch. I wasn't as convinced as Malpass that Nevil was out of harm's way.
hypothesis: Nevil was out of harm's way | cb | 0 | 28 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: He had seen something I should have, which was a car turning in from Soho Square and coming up behind me. My right foot hovered over the accelerator pedal and I balanced Armstrong on the clutch. I wasn't as convinced as Malpass that Nevil was out of harm's way.
hypothesis: Nevil was out of harm's way
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Jed wondered. He 'd scarcely set eyes on him since the night they 'd had dinner together at the house in Westwood. Nobody had mentioned him either and Jed didn't feel he should ask.
hypothesis: Jed should ask | cb | 2 | 29 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Jed wondered. He 'd scarcely set eyes on him since the night they 'd had dinner together at the house in Westwood. Nobody had mentioned him either and Jed didn't feel he should ask.
hypothesis: Jed should ask
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Yet what good came from knowing that a woman had killed herself? The children who had suffered a trauma would survive the experience, scarred by it and a little flawed by it. They would never forget that for a week they had imagined the act of murder had been committed.
hypothesis: for a week the children had imagined the act of murder had been committed | cb | 1 | 30 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Yet what good came from knowing that a woman had killed herself? The children who had suffered a trauma would survive the experience, scarred by it and a little flawed by it. They would never forget that for a week they had imagined the act of murder had been committed.
hypothesis: for a week the children had imagined the act of murder had been committed
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Nora calculated that there must be lots of single men up there so she decided it was ideal for the ``manhunt'', as we called it, even though the train fare was a serious consideration. I remember we went up to Euston together one Saturday morning, very excited, to buy the ticket in advance. It was a secret - if my parents had known she was going away alone they would have soon put the kybosh on it.
hypothesis: Nora was going away alone | cb | 1 | 31 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Nora calculated that there must be lots of single men up there so she decided it was ideal for the ``manhunt'', as we called it, even though the train fare was a serious consideration. I remember we went up to Euston together one Saturday morning, very excited, to buy the ticket in advance. It was a secret - if my parents had known she was going away alone they would have soon put the kybosh on it.
hypothesis: Nora was going away alone
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: His mother driving the car, so happy, young-looking and fashionably dressed and his father, a big, confident man in a smart suit, smiling and turning round to say something to Simon in the back seat. Marie thought of her own mother with her frumpy clothes and ageing, lined face. No one would have guessed that she was only forty-two.
hypothesis: Marie's mother was only forty-two | cb | 1 | 32 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: His mother driving the car, so happy, young-looking and fashionably dressed and his father, a big, confident man in a smart suit, smiling and turning round to say something to Simon in the back seat. Marie thought of her own mother with her frumpy clothes and ageing, lined face. No one would have guessed that she was only forty-two.
hypothesis: Marie's mother was only forty-two
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: ``I hope you are settling down and the cat is well.'' This was a lie. She did not hope the cat was well.
hypothesis: the cat was well | cb | 0 | 33 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``I hope you are settling down and the cat is well.'' This was a lie. She did not hope the cat was well.
hypothesis: the cat was well
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Jane ate without pausing. Hunger was an unknown experience. She had never imagined it could actually hurt.
hypothesis: hunger could actually hurt | cb | 1 | 34 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Jane ate without pausing. Hunger was an unknown experience. She had never imagined it could actually hurt.
hypothesis: hunger could actually hurt
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Miss Martindale had had a school, but her rigid ideas and stern manner had frightened the children, and their parents had taken them away. And gradually the school declined, until she had to give it up and retire to end her days in the white cottage with the inevitable cat as her only companion. Breeze had never imagined that digging was such hard work.
hypothesis: digging was such hard work | cb | 1 | 35 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Miss Martindale had had a school, but her rigid ideas and stern manner had frightened the children, and their parents had taken them away. And gradually the school declined, until she had to give it up and retire to end her days in the white cottage with the inevitable cat as her only companion. Breeze had never imagined that digging was such hard work.
hypothesis: digging was such hard work
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: ``You don't need to worry. We're quite adequately chaperoned. Rosa is a woman of strict moral principles.'' If she knows I'm in here she's probably hovering outside the door right now.
hypothesis: he's in here | cb | 1 | 36 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``You don't need to worry. We're quite adequately chaperoned. Rosa is a woman of strict moral principles.'' If she knows I'm in here she's probably hovering outside the door right now.
hypothesis: he's in here
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: I said you were mad to come over at this time. It's a world event. Don't you know that Venice is packed with visitors?
hypothesis: Venice is packed with visitors | cb | 2 | 37 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: I said you were mad to come over at this time. It's a world event. Don't you know that Venice is packed with visitors?
hypothesis: Venice is packed with visitors
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: And what she had said, and went on saying quietly, calmly, efficiently, was that she loved Maggie. She paid attention. At eight Maggie had not known that her grandmother was famous but she had seen that people had something in their manner when they looked at Rachel.
hypothesis: Maggie's grandmother was famous | cb | 1 | 38 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: And what she had said, and went on saying quietly, calmly, efficiently, was that she loved Maggie. She paid attention. At eight Maggie had not known that her grandmother was famous but she had seen that people had something in their manner when they looked at Rachel.
hypothesis: Maggie's grandmother was famous
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: They 'd seen Miss Lavant on the promenade and about the town, always walking slowly, sometimes with a neat wicker basket. Kate had often thought she was beautiful. She hadn't known she was in love with Dr Greenslade who had a wife already and three children.
hypothesis: Miss Lavant was in love with Dr Greenslade | cb | 1 | 39 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: They 'd seen Miss Lavant on the promenade and about the town, always walking slowly, sometimes with a neat wicker basket. Kate had often thought she was beautiful. She hadn't known she was in love with Dr Greenslade who had a wife already and three children.
hypothesis: Miss Lavant was in love with Dr Greenslade
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Did he intend everyone in the castle to know he did not want the wife he had married in such a hurry? Did he intend to ignore her completely? Then Isabel saw Ellen's stunned face and realised that her maid at least did not know she had spent the night alone.
hypothesis: Isabel had spent the night alone | cb | 1 | 40 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Did he intend everyone in the castle to know he did not want the wife he had married in such a hurry? Did he intend to ignore her completely? Then Isabel saw Ellen's stunned face and realised that her maid at least did not know she had spent the night alone.
hypothesis: Isabel had spent the night alone
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Most of them young, about his age, stood and talked and drank and laughed. The two girls he had noticed earlier were standing talking to some other girls. Graham hoped they all realised that just because he was standing talking to Slater that didn't mean he was gay too.
hypothesis: Graham was gay too | cb | 0 | 41 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Most of them young, about his age, stood and talked and drank and laughed. The two girls he had noticed earlier were standing talking to some other girls. Graham hoped they all realised that just because he was standing talking to Slater that didn't mean he was gay too.
hypothesis: Graham was gay too
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: He said that maybe I wasn't ready to join the Party just yet. Terry's passion for equality appealed to my purer mind, and his hatred of existing authority appealed to my resentments. But although I hated inequality it didn't mean I wanted to be treated like everyone else.
hypothesis: he wanted to be treated like everyone else | cb | 2 | 42 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: He said that maybe I wasn't ready to join the Party just yet. Terry's passion for equality appealed to my purer mind, and his hatred of existing authority appealed to my resentments. But although I hated inequality it didn't mean I wanted to be treated like everyone else.
hypothesis: he wanted to be treated like everyone else
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: ``Oh, my poor Folly... We 've been together for five years, Lexy and I - she practically holds that company together. Of course I gave her an ``A''. But that doesn't mean I'm having an affair with her.
hypothesis: he is having an affair with Lexy | cb | 0 | 43 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``Oh, my poor Folly... We 've been together for five years, Lexy and I - she practically holds that company together. Of course I gave her an ``A''. But that doesn't mean I'm having an affair with her.
hypothesis: he is having an affair with Lexy
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Nevertheless, her heart sank at the thought of spending an evening with him in his present state of mind, and she was tempted to invent a sore throat in order to get out of it. But he had been very helpful over the Puddephat business, she admitted to herself, and his moods were unpredictable - he might be on top of the world by the time he arrived at the cinema. ``I'm still keen if you are '' she said brightly pretending she had not noticed anything was amiss.
hypothesis: something was amiss | cb | 1 | 44 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Nevertheless, her heart sank at the thought of spending an evening with him in his present state of mind, and she was tempted to invent a sore throat in order to get out of it. But he had been very helpful over the Puddephat business, she admitted to herself, and his moods were unpredictable - he might be on top of the world by the time he arrived at the cinema. ``I'm still keen if you are '' she said brightly pretending she had not noticed anything was amiss.
hypothesis: something was amiss
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: What must it be like to be imprisoned here, day after day, month after month? I wonder, does he keep them chained and manacled, thought Fenella, or does he use sorcery? And so utterly immersed was she in this strange blue and green land that was not feeling strange any more that she did not even notice that she was weighing sorcery against steel chains and seriously considering the likely outcome.
hypothesis: Fenella was weighing sorcery against steel chains | cb | 2 | 45 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: What must it be like to be imprisoned here, day after day, month after month? I wonder, does he keep them chained and manacled, thought Fenella, or does he use sorcery? And so utterly immersed was she in this strange blue and green land that was not feeling strange any more that she did not even notice that she was weighing sorcery against steel chains and seriously considering the likely outcome.
hypothesis: Fenella was weighing sorcery against steel chains
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Strasbourg, Vienna, Bucharest, Istanbul, not stopping, not looking back. I saw her tossing newly gauffred curls as the open roadster headed east, away from Ollie... Temporarily I managed to re-erect my jocular facade, but inside I was panicking. He could take her away I thought he could just do that he has such power to hurt me this little furry creature who hasn't even noticed that I 've given up the weed.
hypothesis: he has given up the weed | cb | 1 | 46 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Strasbourg, Vienna, Bucharest, Istanbul, not stopping, not looking back. I saw her tossing newly gauffred curls as the open roadster headed east, away from Ollie... Temporarily I managed to re-erect my jocular facade, but inside I was panicking. He could take her away I thought he could just do that he has such power to hurt me this little furry creature who hasn't even noticed that I 've given up the weed.
hypothesis: he has given up the weed
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: It - the tractor, the boys and the bulbs in the earth - knew she had chosen for them and was coming back to them. Of course there was still love, there was healthy, growing love and its name was called Work. She had fallen in love with it so slowly and gently and sweetly that she had never noticed it had happened.
hypothesis: falling in love had happened | cb | 1 | 47 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: It - the tractor, the boys and the bulbs in the earth - knew she had chosen for them and was coming back to them. Of course there was still love, there was healthy, growing love and its name was called Work. She had fallen in love with it so slowly and gently and sweetly that she had never noticed it had happened.
hypothesis: falling in love had happened
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: After the twelfth dot, two thirds of the way down the page, the transcript of this long session tails away into blank paper. I suppose what's happened is this. He has gone on staring out of the window thinking and she has gone on staring at him waiting with such absorption that neither of them noticed the tape had run out.
hypothesis: the tape had run out | cb | 1 | 48 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: After the twelfth dot, two thirds of the way down the page, the transcript of this long session tails away into blank paper. I suppose what's happened is this. He has gone on staring out of the window thinking and she has gone on staring at him waiting with such absorption that neither of them noticed the tape had run out.
hypothesis: the tape had run out
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: ``His name is Matthew Blake,'' Mandy informed Charity as they descended the steps from their cabin on to the paved pathway that led to the lodge. Thankfully she hadn't even noticed that Charity had changed from the blue wrap-around skirt and was now wearing red shorts with her white silk blouse.
hypothesis: Charity had changed from the blue wrap-around skirt | cb | 1 | 49 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``His name is Matthew Blake,'' Mandy informed Charity as they descended the steps from their cabin on to the paved pathway that led to the lodge. Thankfully she hadn't even noticed that Charity had changed from the blue wrap-around skirt and was now wearing red shorts with her white silk blouse.
hypothesis: Charity had changed from the blue wrap-around skirt
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
Subsets and Splits