input
stringlengths 107
1.1k
| task
stringclasses 1
value | response
int64 0
2
| idx
int64 0
249
| prompt
stringlengths 870
1.87k
| score
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
premise: Gloria remarked as they shared their coffee break in the kitchen. Melissa suppressed a sigh. She had hoped to dodge the subject but might have known that Gloria's boundless interest in all things morbid and sensational would make it impossible.
hypothesis: Gloria's boundless interest in all things morbid and sensational would make dodging the subject impossible | cb | 0 | 100 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Gloria remarked as they shared their coffee break in the kitchen. Melissa suppressed a sigh. She had hoped to dodge the subject but might have known that Gloria's boundless interest in all things morbid and sensational would make it impossible.
hypothesis: Gloria's boundless interest in all things morbid and sensational would make dodging the subject impossible
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Merrill dropped into her chair. That altercation with Luke had drained her. She might have known that he would never divulge his relationship with Elise.
hypothesis: Luke would never divulge his relationship with Elise | cb | 0 | 101 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Merrill dropped into her chair. That altercation with Luke had drained her. She might have known that he would never divulge his relationship with Elise.
hypothesis: Luke would never divulge his relationship with Elise
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: ``Oh, very well,'' he said wearily. He might have known that it was useless to argue with McAllister - her tongue was as long as her will was strong.
hypothesis: it was useless to argue with McAllister | cb | 0 | 102 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``Oh, very well,'' he said wearily. He might have known that it was useless to argue with McAllister - her tongue was as long as her will was strong.
hypothesis: it was useless to argue with McAllister
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: I was angry with her for not saying anything, not doing anything. I still had a formless feeling that she understood me where my mother did not. Perhaps it was despair that made me believe there was one person in the world who might know that I was in despair.
hypothesis: he was in despair | cb | 0 | 103 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: I was angry with her for not saying anything, not doing anything. I still had a formless feeling that she understood me where my mother did not. Perhaps it was despair that made me believe there was one person in the world who might know that I was in despair.
hypothesis: he was in despair
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: ``For such a person, finding a protector might not be so difficult, even in Edinburgh.'' Jean smiled. He might have known that even someone as sensible as Miss van Wiliamsburgh would try to make a play of this sort.
hypothesis: even someone as sensible as Miss van Williamsburgh would try to make a play of this sort | cb | 0 | 104 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``For such a person, finding a protector might not be so difficult, even in Edinburgh.'' Jean smiled. He might have known that even someone as sensible as Miss van Wiliamsburgh would try to make a play of this sort.
hypothesis: even someone as sensible as Miss van Williamsburgh would try to make a play of this sort
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: L. Underneath, in purple ink, had been added. ``And love, Fenella'', with a capital X as a kiss. I might have known Lisabeth wouldn't have walked up the stairs herself to leave the note.
hypothesis: Lisabeth wouldn't have walked up the stairs herself to leave a note | cb | 0 | 105 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: L. Underneath, in purple ink, had been added. ``And love, Fenella'', with a capital X as a kiss. I might have known Lisabeth wouldn't have walked up the stairs herself to leave the note.
hypothesis: Lisabeth wouldn't have walked up the stairs herself to leave a note
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: He 'd gone. Philip had to get them back. His Dad would kill him if he found that he 'd taken them.
hypothesis: Philip had taken them | cb | 0 | 106 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: He 'd gone. Philip had to get them back. His Dad would kill him if he found that he 'd taken them.
hypothesis: Philip had taken them
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: There was no answer. Moving carefully, Benny stepped around the edges of the room, and opened the window shutters. Her momentary horror at seeing the unmistakable form of General Etienne was only slightly dulled by the realization that the stiff posture he was in could only mean he was dead.
hypothesis: General Etienne was dead | cb | 0 | 107 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: There was no answer. Moving carefully, Benny stepped around the edges of the room, and opened the window shutters. Her momentary horror at seeing the unmistakable form of General Etienne was only slightly dulled by the realization that the stiff posture he was in could only mean he was dead.
hypothesis: General Etienne was dead
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: I didn't really like the way the other boys treated him. I was new at the school and still observing, still beginning friendships. Perhaps Alec noticed that I did not ridicule him as the others did.
hypothesis: he did not ridicule Alec as the others did | cb | 0 | 108 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: I didn't really like the way the other boys treated him. I was new at the school and still observing, still beginning friendships. Perhaps Alec noticed that I did not ridicule him as the others did.
hypothesis: he did not ridicule Alec as the others did
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: And I was excited by my new importance. Proud and pleased to be playing opposite Frank Donovan who had once stood in for Hayden Coffin. Occasionally perhaps I should notice that he was not the jovial easy-going character I remembered from my humble place in the chorus.
hypothesis: Frank Donovan was not the jovial easy-going character she remembered | cb | 0 | 109 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: And I was excited by my new importance. Proud and pleased to be playing opposite Frank Donovan who had once stood in for Hayden Coffin. Occasionally perhaps I should notice that he was not the jovial easy-going character I remembered from my humble place in the chorus.
hypothesis: Frank Donovan was not the jovial easy-going character she remembered
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: ``And you're wrong about us. We're not children and I 'd say we're learning the rules pretty quickly.'' You may have noticed I'm not shaking any more!
hypothesis: he's not shaking any more | cb | 0 | 110 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: ``And you're wrong about us. We're not children and I 'd say we're learning the rules pretty quickly.'' You may have noticed I'm not shaking any more!
hypothesis: he's not shaking any more
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: When he was there we were Bonnie and Clyde, now he was gone we were Blondie and Dagwood. Or rather, now he was gone, I was Dennis. If I 'd been smarter or less vain I might have realized that this meant that my former role was now vacant.
hypothesis: this meant her former role was now vacant | cb | 0 | 111 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: When he was there we were Bonnie and Clyde, now he was gone we were Blondie and Dagwood. Or rather, now he was gone, I was Dennis. If I 'd been smarter or less vain I might have realized that this meant that my former role was now vacant.
hypothesis: this meant her former role was now vacant
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: For a while the notion gripped him, and he prowled the many floors of Hamleys looking for toys. He bought a magic set for Sebastian (although his ideal present for the kid would have been a brand-new name) and a marionette for Louise. He could remember that there was an age for puppets and magic just as he could remember the time that he 'd spent trying to fan a deck of cards or sitting in front of a mirror trying to get the hard consonants down like a real ventriloquist.
hypothesis: there was an age for puppets and magic | cb | 0 | 112 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: For a while the notion gripped him, and he prowled the many floors of Hamleys looking for toys. He bought a magic set for Sebastian (although his ideal present for the kid would have been a brand-new name) and a marionette for Louise. He could remember that there was an age for puppets and magic just as he could remember the time that he 'd spent trying to fan a deck of cards or sitting in front of a mirror trying to get the hard consonants down like a real ventriloquist.
hypothesis: there was an age for puppets and magic
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: I spent just over an hour with Patterson which, I found out later, turned out to be another first. Time is money in the City and few people are worth an hour unless it's over lunch and only then if you're involved in a takeover bid. It was also I learned one of the few occasions anyone at PKB could remember that Patterson had a meeting with his door shut and nobody got fired.
hypothesis: Patterson had a meeting with his door shut and nobody got fired | cb | 0 | 113 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: I spent just over an hour with Patterson which, I found out later, turned out to be another first. Time is money in the City and few people are worth an hour unless it's over lunch and only then if you're involved in a takeover bid. It was also I learned one of the few occasions anyone at PKB could remember that Patterson had a meeting with his door shut and nobody got fired.
hypothesis: Patterson had a meeting with his door shut and nobody got fired
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The Deputy Under Secretary could talk of his host's prospects and disappointments, he could learn of the problems of digging out foreign exchange and hard currency in the Third World, the tribulations over the renewal of Residence Permits, the difficulties of keeping reliable servants, but of his own world he must remain silent. The Deputy Under Secretary headed the Secret Intelligence Service of the United Kingdom, and that was not a subject matter for gossip and conversation on a bougainvillaea-fringed veranda as the lights of the fishermen's dug-outs floated inside the coral reef... No bloody way. He was a man who could be honest with himself and in honesty he could say that he was both pleased and relieved to be back at his desk on a grey Monday morning in London.
hypothesis: the Deputy Under Secretary was both pleased and relieved to be back at his desk on a grey Monday morning in London | cb | 0 | 114 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: The Deputy Under Secretary could talk of his host's prospects and disappointments, he could learn of the problems of digging out foreign exchange and hard currency in the Third World, the tribulations over the renewal of Residence Permits, the difficulties of keeping reliable servants, but of his own world he must remain silent. The Deputy Under Secretary headed the Secret Intelligence Service of the United Kingdom, and that was not a subject matter for gossip and conversation on a bougainvillaea-fringed veranda as the lights of the fishermen's dug-outs floated inside the coral reef... No bloody way. He was a man who could be honest with himself and in honesty he could say that he was both pleased and relieved to be back at his desk on a grey Monday morning in London.
hypothesis: the Deputy Under Secretary was both pleased and relieved to be back at his desk on a grey Monday morning in London
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: I WAS really only a bystander in the tragedy of young Mr and Mrs McLeod. It was not really my business although it could be said that I had known them both - had seen them about - for most of their lives.
hypothesis: she had known Mr. and Mrs. McLeod for most of their lives | cb | 0 | 115 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: I WAS really only a bystander in the tragedy of young Mr and Mrs McLeod. It was not really my business although it could be said that I had known them both - had seen them about - for most of their lives.
hypothesis: she had known Mr. and Mrs. McLeod for most of their lives
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Paula could not help herself. It was just the way she was. Others might say they hated her and mean it.
hypothesis: others hated Paula | cb | 0 | 116 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: Paula could not help herself. It was just the way she was. Others might say they hated her and mean it.
hypothesis: others hated Paula
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: How do you feel about gun control? B: Well, uh, I mean I don't think that guns should be outlawed
hypothesis: guns should be outlawed | cb | 1 | 117 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: How do you feel about gun control? B: Well, uh, I mean I don't think that guns should be outlawed
hypothesis: guns should be outlawed
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: I don't know how my parents did it. A: Yeah. B: I mean, there were five of us and I don't recall, you know, wanting anything in particular. Uh, but I don't know how my father did it. He worked at a truck line and he just didn't make that kind of money with five children. But we did okay. We had a house and a home and, but now, my wife and I both work and I don't believe we have as much as my parents did.
hypothesis: he and his wife have as much as his parents did | cb | 1 | 118 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: I don't know how my parents did it. A: Yeah. B: I mean, there were five of us and I don't recall, you know, wanting anything in particular. Uh, but I don't know how my father did it. He worked at a truck line and he just didn't make that kind of money with five children. But we did okay. We had a house and a home and, but now, my wife and I both work and I don't believe we have as much as my parents did.
hypothesis: he and his wife have as much as his parents did
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Well, how do you feel about the immigration laws? B: At, currently, I think they are a little restrictive. Uh, particularly for, uh, certain ethnic groups or from certain countries. Um, I think we should permit, uh, more immigration from eastern Europe, for example, uh, particularly uh, the Jewish, uh, uh, people from Russia. I think we could permit more of them in than we have permitted in the last, uh, several years. And, I think we have, uh, uh, too much restriction uh, on the Orientals also, but, of course, that's just my opinion. A: Yeah, well, I'm not real sure why I got this topic, because I don't think I checked it off on the list because I know very little about the current immigration laws.
hypothesis: he checked the topic off on the list | cb | 1 | 119 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Well, how do you feel about the immigration laws? B: At, currently, I think they are a little restrictive. Uh, particularly for, uh, certain ethnic groups or from certain countries. Um, I think we should permit, uh, more immigration from eastern Europe, for example, uh, particularly uh, the Jewish, uh, uh, people from Russia. I think we could permit more of them in than we have permitted in the last, uh, several years. And, I think we have, uh, uh, too much restriction uh, on the Orientals also, but, of course, that's just my opinion. A: Yeah, well, I'm not real sure why I got this topic, because I don't think I checked it off on the list because I know very little about the current immigration laws.
hypothesis: he checked the topic off on the list
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: boy, he's a big one. A: he's pretty big. That's why it really surprises me, you know, that he hasn't come back, because, like I said, he's never gone away like this before, and, I would think, you know, I mean, he might could get hurt by a car or something. I don't know that he could really get killed that easily because he is so big.
hypothesis: he could really get killed that easily | cb | 1 | 120 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: boy, he's a big one. A: he's pretty big. That's why it really surprises me, you know, that he hasn't come back, because, like I said, he's never gone away like this before, and, I would think, you know, I mean, he might could get hurt by a car or something. I don't know that he could really get killed that easily because he is so big.
hypothesis: he could really get killed that easily
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: and then once they do get elected, they don't have the power or the authority or the willingness to do those things that they promised, you know, beforehand. B: Right. A: You know, maybe it just wasn't possible at all in the first place, you know, like the no new taxes thing. You know, that's, uh, with the economy going the way it is and everything, that was nearly ridiculous thing to, even try to do. B: Yeah. Yeah. Well, I don't think he's going to have to worry about that next year.
hypothesis: he's going to have to worry about that next year | cb | 1 | 121 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: and then once they do get elected, they don't have the power or the authority or the willingness to do those things that they promised, you know, beforehand. B: Right. A: You know, maybe it just wasn't possible at all in the first place, you know, like the no new taxes thing. You know, that's, uh, with the economy going the way it is and everything, that was nearly ridiculous thing to, even try to do. B: Yeah. Yeah. Well, I don't think he's going to have to worry about that next year.
hypothesis: he's going to have to worry about that next year
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Oh, oh yeah, and every time you see one hit on the side of the road you say is that my cat. B: Uh-huh. A: And you go crazy thinking it might be yours. B: Right, well I didn't realize my husband was such a sucker for animals until I brought one home one night.
hypothesis: her husband was such a sucker for animals | cb | 0 | 122 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Oh, oh yeah, and every time you see one hit on the side of the road you say is that my cat. B: Uh-huh. A: And you go crazy thinking it might be yours. B: Right, well I didn't realize my husband was such a sucker for animals until I brought one home one night.
hypothesis: her husband was such a sucker for animals
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: And I don't think that rehabilitation is effective. A: Right. Have to agree with you, and I'm kind of in favor of capital punishment also. I just don't think that it acts much as a deterrent to these people because, uh, you still see them committing the same crimes,
hypothesis: it acts much as a deterrent to these people | cb | 1 | 123 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: And I don't think that rehabilitation is effective. A: Right. Have to agree with you, and I'm kind of in favor of capital punishment also. I just don't think that it acts much as a deterrent to these people because, uh, you still see them committing the same crimes,
hypothesis: it acts much as a deterrent to these people
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: so you hear so much, you get a little tired of it, but then again, so many people you got to understand only catch it once a day, maybe B: Yep. A: but I think the quality of uh, our news is just, uh, I don't believe it could be better
hypothesis: it could be better | cb | 1 | 124 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: so you hear so much, you get a little tired of it, but then again, so many people you got to understand only catch it once a day, maybe B: Yep. A: but I think the quality of uh, our news is just, uh, I don't believe it could be better
hypothesis: it could be better
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: And I've worked in the hospital for fifteen years and I've taken care of a few AIDS patients. A: Uh-huh. B: Uh, when they asked us did we want to, uh, keep it the same or, uh, spend more, spend less, uh, I think right now what they're spending is adequate. Uh, for my personal opinion. Uh, because I think it's something that's going to take them a while to come up with a, uh, vaccine for. A: Yeah. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. B: I don't think it's going to be that easy to come up with
hypothesis: it is going to be that easy to come up with | cb | 1 | 125 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: And I've worked in the hospital for fifteen years and I've taken care of a few AIDS patients. A: Uh-huh. B: Uh, when they asked us did we want to, uh, keep it the same or, uh, spend more, spend less, uh, I think right now what they're spending is adequate. Uh, for my personal opinion. Uh, because I think it's something that's going to take them a while to come up with a, uh, vaccine for. A: Yeah. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. B: I don't think it's going to be that easy to come up with
hypothesis: it is going to be that easy to come up with
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Yeah, they did. They put a lot of pressure on him from the outside and from the inside. Uh, it's funny watching them play, he's probably like a lot of quarterbacks, uh, when the pressure is really on when it's down to the last few minutes of the game for the season is when the guys seem to really do their best. B: Uh-huh. A: And I haven't quite figured that out, if they figure they have got it won or if there's no real hurry because the first three quarters or, uh, uh, if something happens that that adrenalin starts flowing.
hypothesis: they have got it won | cb | 2 | 126 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Yeah, they did. They put a lot of pressure on him from the outside and from the inside. Uh, it's funny watching them play, he's probably like a lot of quarterbacks, uh, when the pressure is really on when it's down to the last few minutes of the game for the season is when the guys seem to really do their best. B: Uh-huh. A: And I haven't quite figured that out, if they figure they have got it won or if there's no real hurry because the first three quarters or, uh, uh, if something happens that that adrenalin starts flowing.
hypothesis: they have got it won
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Uh, well then you must know a lot more about this than I do. B: Uh, I think, uh, the system right now, you know, you know, is fine. I think it should be by a jury. I don't think the judge should have, I mean he's just there kind of like the referee. A: Uh-huh, Uh-huh. B: Uh, I don't even think that it should be unanimous either. Uh,
hypothesis: it should be unanimous | cb | 1 | 127 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Uh, well then you must know a lot more about this than I do. B: Uh, I think, uh, the system right now, you know, you know, is fine. I think it should be by a jury. I don't think the judge should have, I mean he's just there kind of like the referee. A: Uh-huh, Uh-huh. B: Uh, I don't even think that it should be unanimous either. Uh,
hypothesis: it should be unanimous
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Uh-huh. It, I mean, I don't know, I don't think George Bush will make the American people happy with ninety-seven cents a week. A: No, no, not at all. B: I just don't think it was a well thought out incentive.
hypothesis: it was a well thought out incentive | cb | 1 | 128 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Uh-huh. It, I mean, I don't know, I don't think George Bush will make the American people happy with ninety-seven cents a week. A: No, no, not at all. B: I just don't think it was a well thought out incentive.
hypothesis: it was a well thought out incentive
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: but I found that, uh, it was made of some material which actually ended up rusting uh, after, A: Oh. B: even, despite, you know, diligent washing, it got rusty after about, uh, three weeks of use. And I don't think it was my fault because you know, I had made a point of like drying it off and cleaning it
hypothesis: it was his fault | cb | 1 | 129 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: but I found that, uh, it was made of some material which actually ended up rusting uh, after, A: Oh. B: even, despite, you know, diligent washing, it got rusty after about, uh, three weeks of use. And I don't think it was my fault because you know, I had made a point of like drying it off and cleaning it
hypothesis: it was his fault
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: and if they weren't spending all the money on drug testing, people could have got a raise. So, see, you know, there's different, I think that's more of a personal view of mine other than a yes, sir, we should have drug testing because there's really a problem B: Uh-huh. A: and I know that. But then, I have other views to it. B: I didn't think it was that expensive because my son was in probably a week and a half period
hypothesis: it was that expensive | cb | 1 | 130 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: and if they weren't spending all the money on drug testing, people could have got a raise. So, see, you know, there's different, I think that's more of a personal view of mine other than a yes, sir, we should have drug testing because there's really a problem B: Uh-huh. A: and I know that. But then, I have other views to it. B: I didn't think it was that expensive because my son was in probably a week and a half period
hypothesis: it was that expensive
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: I did, too. A: I mean, it was just more for my money. B: Yeah. I didn't think it was too long at all.
hypothesis: it was too long | cb | 1 | 131 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: I did, too. A: I mean, it was just more for my money. B: Yeah. I didn't think it was too long at all.
hypothesis: it was too long
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: That's true. A: So. B: Uh, the other argument is that the death penalty is a deterrent and I really don't, uh, agree with that. I don't think anyone who would commit uh, a crime that would get them the death penalty would stop at the moment and say, well, I was about to kill and dismember this person but, oh, if they catch me they're going to kill me so I better not do it. I just, don't think uh, that it works that way. A: Yeah. I don't think it's done.
hypothesis: it's done | cb | 1 | 132 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: That's true. A: So. B: Uh, the other argument is that the death penalty is a deterrent and I really don't, uh, agree with that. I don't think anyone who would commit uh, a crime that would get them the death penalty would stop at the moment and say, well, I was about to kill and dismember this person but, oh, if they catch me they're going to kill me so I better not do it. I just, don't think uh, that it works that way. A: Yeah. I don't think it's done.
hypothesis: it's done
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: But, uh, if the wind comes basically from the south it can be really bad. A: Uh-huh. B: Uh, the State of Wisconsin, as a matter of fact, uh, started some litigation against Illinois because of the air pollution we were getting. A: Uh-huh. B: Uh, I don't think it's going to go very far,
hypothesis: it's going to go very far | cb | 1 | 133 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: But, uh, if the wind comes basically from the south it can be really bad. A: Uh-huh. B: Uh, the State of Wisconsin, as a matter of fact, uh, started some litigation against Illinois because of the air pollution we were getting. A: Uh-huh. B: Uh, I don't think it's going to go very far,
hypothesis: it's going to go very far
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Yeah. Well, that's the guy that counts. A: Yes. But, maybe we'll get your guy. B: Oh, I don't think Jim Kelly is about to be swayed away from the Bills any time.
hypothesis: Jim Kelly is about to be swayed away from the Bills any time | cb | 1 | 134 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Yeah. Well, that's the guy that counts. A: Yes. But, maybe we'll get your guy. B: Oh, I don't think Jim Kelly is about to be swayed away from the Bills any time.
hypothesis: Jim Kelly is about to be swayed away from the Bills any time
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Yeah. How about Mister Rogers, is he still around? A: Yes. Yeah. They still show Mister Rogers. I don't think he's making new ones,
hypothesis: Mister Rogers is making new Mister Rogers | cb | 1 | 135 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Yeah. How about Mister Rogers, is he still around? A: Yes. Yeah. They still show Mister Rogers. I don't think he's making new ones,
hypothesis: Mister Rogers is making new Mister Rogers
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Yeah, and the ground will filter some of it but not all of it. A: No, not when you figure, I didn't realize one cow produces that much manure
hypothesis: one cow produces that much manure | cb | 0 | 136 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Yeah, and the ground will filter some of it but not all of it. A: No, not when you figure, I didn't realize one cow produces that much manure
hypothesis: one cow produces that much manure
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Yeah, that's crazy. B: and then you come here in the Dallas area, um, I don't believe that people should be allowed to carry guns in their vehicles.
hypothesis: people should be allowed to carry guns in their vehicles | cb | 1 | 137 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Yeah, that's crazy. B: and then you come here in the Dallas area, um, I don't believe that people should be allowed to carry guns in their vehicles.
hypothesis: people should be allowed to carry guns in their vehicles
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: but if they get the little tiny kids saving it now, in five years, when they get bigger, it'll work a little bit more, too. A: Yeah. True. B: Because it's, we've all got to do it right now. I just, I really amazed to find out that, eighty per cent are filled now, in garbage fills. In five years we're supposed to be at max. A: Uh-huh. B: I don't think I can keep my own garbage.
hypothesis: she can keep her own garbage | cb | 1 | 138 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: but if they get the little tiny kids saving it now, in five years, when they get bigger, it'll work a little bit more, too. A: Yeah. True. B: Because it's, we've all got to do it right now. I just, I really amazed to find out that, eighty per cent are filled now, in garbage fills. In five years we're supposed to be at max. A: Uh-huh. B: I don't think I can keep my own garbage.
hypothesis: she can keep her own garbage
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: And, uh, I got to stay home with my kids, which I really wanted to do, but now I could not go back and do it. B: Yeah. A: I really couldn't, I don't think I could stay home all the time and do nothing.
hypothesis: he could stay home all the time and do nothing | cb | 1 | 139 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: And, uh, I got to stay home with my kids, which I really wanted to do, but now I could not go back and do it. B: Yeah. A: I really couldn't, I don't think I could stay home all the time and do nothing.
hypothesis: he could stay home all the time and do nothing
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: nanny, sort of? Uh-huh. Uh-huh. B: and you know, I could envision a society where that would happen and make an interesting, uh, uh, story or whatever. A: Yeah. B: I don't think I have a philosophical problem with that.
hypothesis: she has a philosophical problem with that | cb | 1 | 140 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: nanny, sort of? Uh-huh. Uh-huh. B: and you know, I could envision a society where that would happen and make an interesting, uh, uh, story or whatever. A: Yeah. B: I don't think I have a philosophical problem with that.
hypothesis: she has a philosophical problem with that
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: That was kind of a funny movie with, uh, Richard Dreyfuss and Bill Murray. A: Uh-huh. B: That was fun. A: Golly, I don't think that I've ever heard of that movie.
hypothesis: he has heard of that movie | cb | 1 | 141 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: That was kind of a funny movie with, uh, Richard Dreyfuss and Bill Murray. A: Uh-huh. B: That was fun. A: Golly, I don't think that I've ever heard of that movie.
hypothesis: he has heard of that movie
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: so it's nice to get away. It's just amazing, how much you miss. B: Yeah, it, Yeah, it, yeah, it really is. I mean, I don't think I ever see the Little Dipper,
hypothesis: she has seen the Little Dipper | cb | 1 | 142 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: so it's nice to get away. It's just amazing, how much you miss. B: Yeah, it, Yeah, it, yeah, it really is. I mean, I don't think I ever see the Little Dipper,
hypothesis: she has seen the Little Dipper
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Yeah. It's, uh, I have modem night computer so I can log into the, uh, network at Georgia Tech and access my account through there, which can be useful. But, uh, yeah that and word processing is while I tend to, I mean, obviously, I do almost all of my report writing on my computer, uh, whether it's term papers or even some smaller homework assignments. A: Uh-huh. B: So it's I don't know, really become my mainstay I guess. I can't even remember, actually I don't think I've ever used a typewriter in my life to do a report. Because my family, when I was growing up, we got a basic computer. TRS Eighty when they first came out.
hypothesis: he has used a typewriter to do a report | cb | 1 | 143 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Yeah. It's, uh, I have modem night computer so I can log into the, uh, network at Georgia Tech and access my account through there, which can be useful. But, uh, yeah that and word processing is while I tend to, I mean, obviously, I do almost all of my report writing on my computer, uh, whether it's term papers or even some smaller homework assignments. A: Uh-huh. B: So it's I don't know, really become my mainstay I guess. I can't even remember, actually I don't think I've ever used a typewriter in my life to do a report. Because my family, when I was growing up, we got a basic computer. TRS Eighty when they first came out.
hypothesis: he has used a typewriter to do a report
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: I am right outside Baltimore. I am less than a mile from the Baltimore line. B: Um. A: And I go to a campus of the University of Maryland that is just, less than a mile from my house. So I'm actually in Baltimore, yeah, you could say I'm in Baltimore.
hypothesis: he is in Baltimore | cb | 0 | 144 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: I am right outside Baltimore. I am less than a mile from the Baltimore line. B: Um. A: And I go to a campus of the University of Maryland that is just, less than a mile from my house. So I'm actually in Baltimore, yeah, you could say I'm in Baltimore.
hypothesis: he is in Baltimore
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Now see I. A: I'm intrigued by it, but I'm not sure I want to go see it yet. B: Yeah, I don't think I want to see that either.
hypothesis: she wants to see that | cb | 1 | 145 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Now see I. A: I'm intrigued by it, but I'm not sure I want to go see it yet. B: Yeah, I don't think I want to see that either.
hypothesis: she wants to see that
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Do you go to museums in Europe? B: Uh, actually, no, I don't think I went to any of them.
hypothesis: she went to some of them | cb | 1 | 146 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Do you go to museums in Europe? B: Uh, actually, no, I don't think I went to any of them.
hypothesis: she went to some of them
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: I wouldn't be surprised. A: You know, because they don't want to send them to daycare. B: I doubt if they would say it was too long.
hypothesis: it was too long | cb | 1 | 147 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: I wouldn't be surprised. A: You know, because they don't want to send them to daycare. B: I doubt if they would say it was too long.
hypothesis: it was too long
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: But, uh, uh, I don't understand, I guess, why the schools seem to have such a high dropout rate in the big cities. B: Uh, well, I don't pretend to understand that either. Uh, but I'm not quite sure that it's the kind of thing that ought to be blamed on the schools. But then, again, I'm not quite sure where the blame ought to be put. Uh, because the dropout rate is, in those areas, w-, it's high in those areas where also there's poverty and crime. And they all seem to go together. And it seems like if you could eliminate one of the parts of that circle, where you have the dropout rate and crime and, you know, general poverty kind of conditions, that things ought to get better. So, uh, the other two a-, they're all three social issues and could be addressed by the government in any ways. And clearly, to me, is a kind of government thing to fix but it's just like, I don't expect them to know which part is best to fix just like I don't know. it's a complicated issue. I still don't think I would blame it directly on the school.
hypothesis: he would blame it directly on the school | cb | 1 | 148 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: But, uh, uh, I don't understand, I guess, why the schools seem to have such a high dropout rate in the big cities. B: Uh, well, I don't pretend to understand that either. Uh, but I'm not quite sure that it's the kind of thing that ought to be blamed on the schools. But then, again, I'm not quite sure where the blame ought to be put. Uh, because the dropout rate is, in those areas, w-, it's high in those areas where also there's poverty and crime. And they all seem to go together. And it seems like if you could eliminate one of the parts of that circle, where you have the dropout rate and crime and, you know, general poverty kind of conditions, that things ought to get better. So, uh, the other two a-, they're all three social issues and could be addressed by the government in any ways. And clearly, to me, is a kind of government thing to fix but it's just like, I don't expect them to know which part is best to fix just like I don't know. it's a complicated issue. I still don't think I would blame it directly on the school.
hypothesis: he would blame it directly on the school
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: She says that when her husband died oh, that my uncle had said that he would never put her in a rest home. So it's kind of, uh, I don't know. I mean, I don't think my parents would but she is getting pretty bad like she has to have like a little toilet right by her bed and, it's, A: Uh-huh. B: and my mom has to take care of her pretty much so it gets, I don't know. it's a hard decision, but I don't think I would do it to my parents personally.
hypothesis: she would do it to her parents | cb | 1 | 149 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: She says that when her husband died oh, that my uncle had said that he would never put her in a rest home. So it's kind of, uh, I don't know. I mean, I don't think my parents would but she is getting pretty bad like she has to have like a little toilet right by her bed and, it's, A: Uh-huh. B: and my mom has to take care of her pretty much so it gets, I don't know. it's a hard decision, but I don't think I would do it to my parents personally.
hypothesis: she would do it to her parents
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Big time there, sure is. B: It surely is. A: I don't think I'd go to work without a bulletproof vest on myself.
hypothesis: he would go to work without a bulletproof vest | cb | 1 | 150 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Big time there, sure is. B: It surely is. A: I don't think I'd go to work without a bulletproof vest on myself.
hypothesis: he would go to work without a bulletproof vest
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Well, presumably those who find out such information, if they are doing it, I would prefer to not to be known, and, I mean, you know, the classic, oh, I don't know C I conspiracy theories or whatever, would have such parties trying to do it without your knowledge. So there's,, things that invade that second type of privacy where you do know about them and possibly things that invade that second type of privacy without you knowing about it, and I can't talk about the second one other than to generate paranoia. It's a surmise and, I'd like to think that it's quite low, at least in this country. B: to surmise. It is there. A: I don't think I'd like the KGB monitoring my phone or anything like that.
hypothesis: he would like the KGB monitoring his phone | cb | 1 | 151 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Well, presumably those who find out such information, if they are doing it, I would prefer to not to be known, and, I mean, you know, the classic, oh, I don't know C I conspiracy theories or whatever, would have such parties trying to do it without your knowledge. So there's,, things that invade that second type of privacy where you do know about them and possibly things that invade that second type of privacy without you knowing about it, and I can't talk about the second one other than to generate paranoia. It's a surmise and, I'd like to think that it's quite low, at least in this country. B: to surmise. It is there. A: I don't think I'd like the KGB monitoring my phone or anything like that.
hypothesis: he would like the KGB monitoring his phone
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: That might be kind of tough, huh. A: It really would, yes, yes, and like I said, my sister's still in it, and I really don't think my mother'd want to be there, either.
hypothesis: his mother would want to be there | cb | 1 | 152 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: That might be kind of tough, huh. A: It really would, yes, yes, and like I said, my sister's still in it, and I really don't think my mother'd want to be there, either.
hypothesis: his mother would want to be there
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: I mean, you can't guarantee that they wouldn't escape from prison and do it again. A: Right. And then do it all over again. Uh-huh. B: And I don't think that rehabilitation is effective.
hypothesis: rehabilitation is effective | cb | 1 | 153 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: I mean, you can't guarantee that they wouldn't escape from prison and do it again. A: Right. And then do it all over again. Uh-huh. B: And I don't think that rehabilitation is effective.
hypothesis: rehabilitation is effective
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Oh, well that's good. A: but she really doesn't. Nobody thought she would adjust,
hypothesis: she would adjust | cb | 1 | 154 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Oh, well that's good. A: but she really doesn't. Nobody thought she would adjust,
hypothesis: she would adjust
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: What am I afraid of? A: Yes. B: Um, I don't know if I'm really afraid of spending too much. I just, uh, don't think that I need them, you know.
hypothesis: she needs them | cb | 1 | 155 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: What am I afraid of? A: Yes. B: Um, I don't know if I'm really afraid of spending too much. I just, uh, don't think that I need them, you know.
hypothesis: she needs them
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: That's fairly interesting. B: I bet that would be, rather interesting. Uh, that's, uh, self improvement, well, that's kind of a hobby but it is self improvement from the standpoint of probably relaxing, uh. A: Yeah, I don't know that I read anything strictly labeled self improvement.
hypothesis: she reads anything strictly labeled self improvement | cb | 1 | 156 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: That's fairly interesting. B: I bet that would be, rather interesting. Uh, that's, uh, self improvement, well, that's kind of a hobby but it is self improvement from the standpoint of probably relaxing, uh. A: Yeah, I don't know that I read anything strictly labeled self improvement.
hypothesis: she reads anything strictly labeled self improvement
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: They might be, but not at the human factors level. they're, B: Well, I heard it on the news today, I could swear it was IBM.
hypothesis: it was IBM | cb | 0 | 157 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: They might be, but not at the human factors level. they're, B: Well, I heard it on the news today, I could swear it was IBM.
hypothesis: it was IBM
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: But, uh, B: Okay. Uh, uh, I've had one or two American cars I think, and they were okay. I had a Pontiac once and I never had a problem with it, but, uh, my mother had a Dodge at one point and I had driven it a few times and I really did not feel that I would buy a Dodge just from,
hypothesis: she would buy a Dodge | cb | 1 | 158 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: But, uh, B: Okay. Uh, uh, I've had one or two American cars I think, and they were okay. I had a Pontiac once and I never had a problem with it, but, uh, my mother had a Dodge at one point and I had driven it a few times and I really did not feel that I would buy a Dodge just from,
hypothesis: she would buy a Dodge
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: I think that not only applies inside the public school system, but in society itself. there's been too much negative reinforcement. How much, like, the caught being good slips. How about, just the John Q citizen out there on the street? A: Yeah, well that's true. I think, really though, I mean, that's one thing that, I mean, my kids definitely get spanked when they need to be spanked. But I really do try to use positive, uh, reinforcement with them at home, also. And it really helps. And I mean, they don't get spanked very often, but they do when they deserve it, you know. But, uh, I don't think any kid should be exempt from being spanked.
hypothesis: some kid should be exempt from being spanked | cb | 1 | 159 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: I think that not only applies inside the public school system, but in society itself. there's been too much negative reinforcement. How much, like, the caught being good slips. How about, just the John Q citizen out there on the street? A: Yeah, well that's true. I think, really though, I mean, that's one thing that, I mean, my kids definitely get spanked when they need to be spanked. But I really do try to use positive, uh, reinforcement with them at home, also. And it really helps. And I mean, they don't get spanked very often, but they do when they deserve it, you know. But, uh, I don't think any kid should be exempt from being spanked.
hypothesis: some kid should be exempt from being spanked
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: I understand we are doing care of the elderly, right? A: Yes. B: And how do you feel about putting someone in the nursing home? A: Well, I don't think that uh, any of my relatives would really like to go there.
hypothesis: some of her relatives would really like to go there | cb | 1 | 160 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: I understand we are doing care of the elderly, right? A: Yes. B: And how do you feel about putting someone in the nursing home? A: Well, I don't think that uh, any of my relatives would really like to go there.
hypothesis: some of her relatives would really like to go there
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: It's divided, yeah. B: Wow! A: It really is, so we've got our Cowboys here and, uh, I don't think anybody roots differently
hypothesis: somebody roots differently | cb | 1 | 161 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: It's divided, yeah. B: Wow! A: It really is, so we've got our Cowboys here and, uh, I don't think anybody roots differently
hypothesis: somebody roots differently
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: if you get it on sale, A: Yeah, yeah, so we bought that or we bought the filets, and then the chicken, or turkey nuggets, and I don't think anybody in my house knows the difference, unless you tell them.
hypothesis: someone in his house knows the difference | cb | 1 | 162 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: if you get it on sale, A: Yeah, yeah, so we bought that or we bought the filets, and then the chicken, or turkey nuggets, and I don't think anybody in my house knows the difference, unless you tell them.
hypothesis: someone in his house knows the difference
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Have you followed that very much or, B: Uh, not really. I don't think anything will ever take over the NFL.
hypothesis: something will take over the NFL | cb | 1 | 163 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Have you followed that very much or, B: Uh, not really. I don't think anything will ever take over the NFL.
hypothesis: something will take over the NFL
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: All right, well. A: Um, short term, I don't think anything's going to be done about it or probably should be done about it.
hypothesis: something's going to be done about it | cb | 1 | 164 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: All right, well. A: Um, short term, I don't think anything's going to be done about it or probably should be done about it.
hypothesis: something's going to be done about it
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Oh, yes. Animals have a way of talking. B: Alfie did. I tell you if I could have gotten a hold of that cat that day. A: I don't know uh, that I'd trade my dog in for the world.
hypothesis: he would trade his dog in for the world | cb | 1 | 165 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Oh, yes. Animals have a way of talking. B: Alfie did. I tell you if I could have gotten a hold of that cat that day. A: I don't know uh, that I'd trade my dog in for the world.
hypothesis: he would trade his dog in for the world
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: but at the same time I think it would do them a world of good. B: Yeah. A: But there's a, B: I don't know that you could require everyone yeah, to do it for a whole year, or two years or something like that,
hypothesis: speaker A could require everyone to do it for a whole year | cb | 1 | 166 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: but at the same time I think it would do them a world of good. B: Yeah. A: But there's a, B: I don't know that you could require everyone yeah, to do it for a whole year, or two years or something like that,
hypothesis: speaker A could require everyone to do it for a whole year
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: I got a friend who goes there, by the way. I want to talk to you about that afterward, okay. B: Okay. Uh, I've, the high school I went to uh, was a good one also. And well, I guess you could say one of the problems with the public education system is the disparity between different schools.
hypothesis: one of the problems with the public education system is the disparity between different schools | cb | 0 | 167 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: I got a friend who goes there, by the way. I want to talk to you about that afterward, okay. B: Okay. Uh, I've, the high school I went to uh, was a good one also. And well, I guess you could say one of the problems with the public education system is the disparity between different schools.
hypothesis: one of the problems with the public education system is the disparity between different schools
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: They have to for international trade. B: Yeah. A: But, I guess it's easier to switch back and forth than it used to be, uh, because uh, of computers coming into everything. B: Uh-huh. Yeah, I don't think switching back and forth is that big a deal.
hypothesis: switching back and forth is that big a deal | cb | 1 | 168 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: They have to for international trade. B: Yeah. A: But, I guess it's easier to switch back and forth than it used to be, uh, because uh, of computers coming into everything. B: Uh-huh. Yeah, I don't think switching back and forth is that big a deal.
hypothesis: switching back and forth is that big a deal
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: And now it's election time again so they're trying to lower them. B: Oh. A: So they're just talk about lowering them but they never do, they just keep raising them. B: I've never seen taxes really go down.
hypothesis: taxes would really go down | cb | 1 | 169 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: And now it's election time again so they're trying to lower them. B: Oh. A: So they're just talk about lowering them but they never do, they just keep raising them. B: I've never seen taxes really go down.
hypothesis: taxes would really go down
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: they did things for people, you know, for their communities, for their, uh, families, for their friends, where now, I'm not sure they really do. A: Yes. Yeah. Well, I think sometimes through groups and organizations, um, uh, when they asked the question I thought, well that sounds wonderful. And then, I wondered if people were unwilling but I think even if you went in with a negative attitude I don't think it would stay negative very long.
hypothesis: that attitude would stay negative very long | cb | 1 | 170 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: they did things for people, you know, for their communities, for their, uh, families, for their friends, where now, I'm not sure they really do. A: Yes. Yeah. Well, I think sometimes through groups and organizations, um, uh, when they asked the question I thought, well that sounds wonderful. And then, I wondered if people were unwilling but I think even if you went in with a negative attitude I don't think it would stay negative very long.
hypothesis: that attitude would stay negative very long
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: And, you know, the whole electronic classroom idea. I don't know if I I'm yeah, in favor of, yeah, A: I don't think that's going to work.
hypothesis: that is going to work | cb | 1 | 171 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: And, you know, the whole electronic classroom idea. I don't know if I I'm yeah, in favor of, yeah, A: I don't think that's going to work.
hypothesis: that is going to work
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Right. And they repacked the wheel bearings. A: and they repacked the the wheel bearings. Yeah but, uh, I've had considerable experience. you might say I'm, uh, uh, good back yard mechanic
hypothesis: she is a good back yard mechanic | cb | 0 | 172 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Right. And they repacked the wheel bearings. A: and they repacked the the wheel bearings. Yeah but, uh, I've had considerable experience. you might say I'm, uh, uh, good back yard mechanic
hypothesis: she is a good back yard mechanic
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Uh, well, it would depend on when you go it's not excessively crowded on the weekends. B: See I'd want to be there in the mornings like from nine thirty to ten thirty. A: Oh, I don't think that would be bad at all.
hypothesis: that would be bad | cb | 1 | 173 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Uh, well, it would depend on when you go it's not excessively crowded on the weekends. B: See I'd want to be there in the mornings like from nine thirty to ten thirty. A: Oh, I don't think that would be bad at all.
hypothesis: that would be bad
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: I think in s-, and it, just would depend upon the circumstances and the extent of the abuse and if another alternative was available. A: Uh-huh. Uh-huh. Um. Uh-huh. You know, now, I wonder what you think about this and, uh, unfortunately, we don't get to do it, but, uh, it used to be a long time ago, I guess in Biblical times when they had punishment, if somebody did something, for example, to your family, then you had the right to administer the punishment. So if somebody killed somebody in your family, then uh, if that person was caught and found guilty, you had the right to, uh, execute that person. And I know that, uh, if somebody had done something to my family, I would feel that I had the right to get revenge on them uh, but, I don't think that's done much anywhere.
hypothesis: that's done much anywhere | cb | 1 | 174 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: I think in s-, and it, just would depend upon the circumstances and the extent of the abuse and if another alternative was available. A: Uh-huh. Uh-huh. Um. Uh-huh. You know, now, I wonder what you think about this and, uh, unfortunately, we don't get to do it, but, uh, it used to be a long time ago, I guess in Biblical times when they had punishment, if somebody did something, for example, to your family, then you had the right to administer the punishment. So if somebody killed somebody in your family, then uh, if that person was caught and found guilty, you had the right to, uh, execute that person. And I know that, uh, if somebody had done something to my family, I would feel that I had the right to get revenge on them uh, but, I don't think that's done much anywhere.
hypothesis: that's done much anywhere
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: I spend a lot of time reading about these things. I'm quite interested. I find it very exciting for the coverage we have now, today. B: Yes and I think we do get pretty good coverage. I don't feel that the American people is being shortchanged by uh, the news coverage.
hypothesis: the American people are being shortchanged by the news coverage | cb | 1 | 175 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: I spend a lot of time reading about these things. I'm quite interested. I find it very exciting for the coverage we have now, today. B: Yes and I think we do get pretty good coverage. I don't feel that the American people is being shortchanged by uh, the news coverage.
hypothesis: the American people are being shortchanged by the news coverage
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Uh, uh, I've had one or two American cars I think, and they were okay. I had a Pontiac once and I never had a problem with it, but, uh, my mother had a Dodge at one point and I had driven it a few times and I really did not feel that I would buy a Dodge just from, A: Um. B: well, actually, I had uh, a Dodge Omni at one point A: Uh-huh. B: and that was, I think, what really prejudiced me against American cars because I did not feel that it was a very quality, uh, car.
hypothesis: the Dodge Omni was a very quality car | cb | 1 | 176 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Uh, uh, I've had one or two American cars I think, and they were okay. I had a Pontiac once and I never had a problem with it, but, uh, my mother had a Dodge at one point and I had driven it a few times and I really did not feel that I would buy a Dodge just from, A: Um. B: well, actually, I had uh, a Dodge Omni at one point A: Uh-huh. B: and that was, I think, what really prejudiced me against American cars because I did not feel that it was a very quality, uh, car.
hypothesis: the Dodge Omni was a very quality car
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: uh, but then when you quantify things and might also hold criminal trials for how many years is appropriate, uh, that they might leave it to somebody else who, uh, has expertise in that. B: Right, I agree, too. I don't think the jury should be the ones that put the sentencings down.
hypothesis: the jury should be the ones that put the sentencings down | cb | 1 | 177 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: uh, but then when you quantify things and might also hold criminal trials for how many years is appropriate, uh, that they might leave it to somebody else who, uh, has expertise in that. B: Right, I agree, too. I don't think the jury should be the ones that put the sentencings down.
hypothesis: the jury should be the ones that put the sentencings down
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Boy that's scary, isn't it. B: Oh, can you imagine, because it happens in the middle of the night, so you know, these parents didn't know the kid was gone until the kid is knocking on the door screaming, let me in.
hypothesis: the kid was gone | cb | 0 | 178 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Boy that's scary, isn't it. B: Oh, can you imagine, because it happens in the middle of the night, so you know, these parents didn't know the kid was gone until the kid is knocking on the door screaming, let me in.
hypothesis: the kid was gone
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Oh, I see. A: um, and I think I'm getting a better caliber of student at the private school, because I think their parents pay more, and I think the kids are a little bit more challenged, because their parents are probably college educated, where at the public school, I don't think as many parents are college educated,
hypothesis: as many parents are college educated at the public school | cb | 1 | 179 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Oh, I see. A: um, and I think I'm getting a better caliber of student at the private school, because I think their parents pay more, and I think the kids are a little bit more challenged, because their parents are probably college educated, where at the public school, I don't think as many parents are college educated,
hypothesis: as many parents are college educated at the public school
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: I think that not only applies inside the public school system, but in society itself. there's been too much negative reinforcement. How much, like, the caught being good slips. How about, just the John Q citizen out there on the street? A: Yeah, well that's true. I think, really though, I mean, that's one thing that, I mean, my kids definitely get spanked when they need to be spanked. But I really do try to use positive, uh, reinforcement with them at home, also. And it really helps. And I mean, they don't get spanked very often, but they do when they deserve it, you know. But, uh, I don't think any kid should be exempt from being spanked. I mean, I think I wouldn't mind if a teacher spanked my child. But, you know, that's just my personal opinion, and that's not going to, I mean, I don't think that law will ever change.
hypothesis: the law will change | cb | 1 | 180 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: I think that not only applies inside the public school system, but in society itself. there's been too much negative reinforcement. How much, like, the caught being good slips. How about, just the John Q citizen out there on the street? A: Yeah, well that's true. I think, really though, I mean, that's one thing that, I mean, my kids definitely get spanked when they need to be spanked. But I really do try to use positive, uh, reinforcement with them at home, also. And it really helps. And I mean, they don't get spanked very often, but they do when they deserve it, you know. But, uh, I don't think any kid should be exempt from being spanked. I mean, I think I wouldn't mind if a teacher spanked my child. But, you know, that's just my personal opinion, and that's not going to, I mean, I don't think that law will ever change.
hypothesis: the law will change
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: but, uh, I can definitely, uh, see on down the road, you know, where we do have kids and are getting to that age, that's going to be a definite concern. A: Yeah, you talked before, about the school funding. I think there's only going to be one solution to school funding which I don't think will be necessarily the best way
hypothesis: the one solution to school funding will be necessarily the best way | cb | 1 | 181 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: but, uh, I can definitely, uh, see on down the road, you know, where we do have kids and are getting to that age, that's going to be a definite concern. A: Yeah, you talked before, about the school funding. I think there's only going to be one solution to school funding which I don't think will be necessarily the best way
hypothesis: the one solution to school funding will be necessarily the best way
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: I think so, I think, B: I really do. Oh, yeah, it's going to take, uh, you know, the police, I don't think can do it alone, you know.
hypothesis: the police can do it alone | cb | 1 | 182 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: I think so, I think, B: I really do. Oh, yeah, it's going to take, uh, you know, the police, I don't think can do it alone, you know.
hypothesis: the police can do it alone
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: How do you feel about that. B: I don't really, I more, I don't know about the government as much as, uh, the people, uh, I wouldn't consider to be a threat at all and I really don't feel much like the Soviet Union itself is a threat anymore.
hypothesis: the Soviet Union itself is a threat still | cb | 1 | 183 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: How do you feel about that. B: I don't really, I more, I don't know about the government as much as, uh, the people, uh, I wouldn't consider to be a threat at all and I really don't feel much like the Soviet Union itself is a threat anymore.
hypothesis: the Soviet Union itself is a threat still
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: That's what I've heard too. Uh, A: It seems bizarre to me. I don't quite understand it, although I think probably the worst thing that's happening at least the modern world today, is television.
hypothesis: the worst thing that's happening in the modern world is television | cb | 0 | 184 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: That's what I've heard too. Uh, A: It seems bizarre to me. I don't quite understand it, although I think probably the worst thing that's happening at least the modern world today, is television.
hypothesis: the worst thing that's happening in the modern world is television
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: I think the, uh, I think a lot of the commentators on, like the major networks, like right, it's kind of appropriate right now because of the election stuff going on, but, um, it seems that, um, they kind of get to throw their opinions into how they, you know, report on the news. A: Right. And I think even in the elections, they choose who they're going to follow and who they're not, and basically you know, if a candidate can get them to follow, then the news will, you know, kind of publicize his name. B: Yeah. Yeah, exactly. A: I don't think that the way I get the news is the right way to get it.
hypothesis: the way she gets the news is the right way to get it | cb | 1 | 185 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: I think the, uh, I think a lot of the commentators on, like the major networks, like right, it's kind of appropriate right now because of the election stuff going on, but, um, it seems that, um, they kind of get to throw their opinions into how they, you know, report on the news. A: Right. And I think even in the elections, they choose who they're going to follow and who they're not, and basically you know, if a candidate can get them to follow, then the news will, you know, kind of publicize his name. B: Yeah. Yeah, exactly. A: I don't think that the way I get the news is the right way to get it.
hypothesis: the way she gets the news is the right way to get it
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Well, you've got, well, any of the big cities you've got the different rival gangs and they're having their little turf wars over their little drug kingdoms and such, A: Uh-huh. B: And they get out their little Mac tens, they get out their little uzis and they're going to fight with them. And it doesn't matter what restrictions you put on that type of weapon or a class three firearm. If they want it they'll get it. I don't care if they've got to go down into New Mexico to get it they'll get it and they'll get across the border. Now my position, although, I have absolutely no use for a fully automatic weapon, anyway. A: Uh-huh. B: Since I am a law-abiding citizen and I have never had a felony, if I wanted to buy one, I don't think there should be that big of a restriction on it.
hypothesis: there should be that big of a restriction on it | cb | 1 | 186 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Well, you've got, well, any of the big cities you've got the different rival gangs and they're having their little turf wars over their little drug kingdoms and such, A: Uh-huh. B: And they get out their little Mac tens, they get out their little uzis and they're going to fight with them. And it doesn't matter what restrictions you put on that type of weapon or a class three firearm. If they want it they'll get it. I don't care if they've got to go down into New Mexico to get it they'll get it and they'll get across the border. Now my position, although, I have absolutely no use for a fully automatic weapon, anyway. A: Uh-huh. B: Since I am a law-abiding citizen and I have never had a felony, if I wanted to buy one, I don't think there should be that big of a restriction on it.
hypothesis: there should be that big of a restriction on it
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Uh, with regard uh, to jury trials. I really feel as though, uh, uh, whatever system has been used historically, in particular jurisdiction, you know, is really the only kinds of things that you can use. Because the jurisprudence is, you know, based uh, you know, on accumulated body of law. And if you have a situation where you change that body of law, then all of sudden they could start going back and digging up all these cases uh, that would be handled differently were they judged by today's standards. So I really don't think they can really do much of anything to change it.
hypothesis: they can really do something to change it | cb | 1 | 187 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Uh, with regard uh, to jury trials. I really feel as though, uh, uh, whatever system has been used historically, in particular jurisdiction, you know, is really the only kinds of things that you can use. Because the jurisprudence is, you know, based uh, you know, on accumulated body of law. And if you have a situation where you change that body of law, then all of sudden they could start going back and digging up all these cases uh, that would be handled differently were they judged by today's standards. So I really don't think they can really do much of anything to change it.
hypothesis: they can really do something to change it
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Right, you know, like In packaging A: Yeah. B: and, uh, you know, just goodness. A: Yeah, I don't think they do the packaging at this plant,
hypothesis: they do the packaging at this plant | cb | 1 | 188 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Right, you know, like In packaging A: Yeah. B: and, uh, you know, just goodness. A: Yeah, I don't think they do the packaging at this plant,
hypothesis: they do the packaging at this plant
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: The one thing I sometimes wonder about, um, in civil cases is, uh, whether, especially sort of in, uh, maybe like product liability, or medical malpractice, where there's, um, sort of a very technical decision to be made sometimes B: Yes. A: you know, it's not just a matter um, of, you know, did this guy rip off this guy, and it's just a matter of interpreting a contract, it's sort of a matter of, um, you know, sometimes getting into very technical issues, and I wonder um, if the system works adequately in educating the jurors about, uh, whatever, um, you know, issue is under discussion. B: I don't think that they educate them enough to really know what's going on.
hypothesis: they educate the jurors enough to really know what's going on | cb | 1 | 189 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: The one thing I sometimes wonder about, um, in civil cases is, uh, whether, especially sort of in, uh, maybe like product liability, or medical malpractice, where there's, um, sort of a very technical decision to be made sometimes B: Yes. A: you know, it's not just a matter um, of, you know, did this guy rip off this guy, and it's just a matter of interpreting a contract, it's sort of a matter of, um, you know, sometimes getting into very technical issues, and I wonder um, if the system works adequately in educating the jurors about, uh, whatever, um, you know, issue is under discussion. B: I don't think that they educate them enough to really know what's going on.
hypothesis: they educate the jurors enough to really know what's going on
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: The kind you have sounds very interesting, though. A: Well, um, they're really sweet dogs. uh, we thought probably our neighborhood in Houston had more of this breed than any other place just because of, um, the family that had them and bred them.
hypothesis: their neighborhood in Houston had more of this breed than any other place because of the family that had them and bred them | cb | 0 | 190 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: The kind you have sounds very interesting, though. A: Well, um, they're really sweet dogs. uh, we thought probably our neighborhood in Houston had more of this breed than any other place just because of, um, the family that had them and bred them.
hypothesis: their neighborhood in Houston had more of this breed than any other place because of the family that had them and bred them
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: You know, back around, you know, in the twenties and thirties when they were growing up, uh, you know, they were all located together, in one small community. A: Right, right. Right. B: And I mean when time went on the family grew and moved away and so forth. And now when they come together it's generally, you know, like say the kids of those people who are not, you know, anywhere near one another and I do not think they feel the closeness that they used to be there. Which is a shame
hypothesis: they feel the closeness that they used to be there | cb | 1 | 191 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: You know, back around, you know, in the twenties and thirties when they were growing up, uh, you know, they were all located together, in one small community. A: Right, right. Right. B: And I mean when time went on the family grew and moved away and so forth. And now when they come together it's generally, you know, like say the kids of those people who are not, you know, anywhere near one another and I do not think they feel the closeness that they used to be there. Which is a shame
hypothesis: they feel the closeness that they used to be there
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: it was so fattening. B: That sounds good. A: But, I don't think we gained any weight from it
hypothesis: they gained any weight from it | cb | 1 | 192 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: it was so fattening. B: That sounds good. A: But, I don't think we gained any weight from it
hypothesis: they gained any weight from it
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: but that is one of my solutions. Uh... B: I know here in Dallas that they have just instituted in the last couple of years, uh, a real long period of time that you can absentee vote before the elections. And I do not think they have seen a really high improvement.
hypothesis: they have seen a really high improvement | cb | 1 | 193 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: but that is one of my solutions. Uh... B: I know here in Dallas that they have just instituted in the last couple of years, uh, a real long period of time that you can absentee vote before the elections. And I do not think they have seen a really high improvement.
hypothesis: they have seen a really high improvement
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: And, uh, I think they've all developed kind of an interest in reading also. A: That's re-, yeah. B: I'm not saying they read all the right things
hypothesis: they read all the right things | cb | 1 | 194 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: And, uh, I think they've all developed kind of an interest in reading also. A: That's re-, yeah. B: I'm not saying they read all the right things
hypothesis: they read all the right things
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: I look at our big green containers, and I say, well, they work fine and I keep mine outside the garage so that I don't have any odors but it's clearly a place where, uh, uh, A: Oh, right. B: it will be interesting to see how well that works and I'm glad the community is doing it. Uh, it's one of those things that kind of has to be forced on people. Uh, I don't know what you saw back, uh, years ago, but for me the thing that strikes me is uh, growing up in rural South Dakota where, hey the farmers brought their eggs to town and the local hatchery would candle them and package them is that, uh, in the fifties, uh, you could say we had the recycling going on then that we should have now. Which was all the milk bottles were glass
hypothesis: they had the recycling going on then that they should have now | cb | 0 | 195 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: I look at our big green containers, and I say, well, they work fine and I keep mine outside the garage so that I don't have any odors but it's clearly a place where, uh, uh, A: Oh, right. B: it will be interesting to see how well that works and I'm glad the community is doing it. Uh, it's one of those things that kind of has to be forced on people. Uh, I don't know what you saw back, uh, years ago, but for me the thing that strikes me is uh, growing up in rural South Dakota where, hey the farmers brought their eggs to town and the local hatchery would candle them and package them is that, uh, in the fifties, uh, you could say we had the recycling going on then that we should have now. Which was all the milk bottles were glass
hypothesis: they had the recycling going on then that they should have now
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: And they go down the line ten years and then on some little technicality they get out and on the streets again doing the same they did before. A: Uh-huh. B: And, you know, that's about the only thing. Like for theft and stuff like that or manslaughter, you know, I don't think they should do that.
hypothesis: they should do that | cb | 1 | 196 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: And they go down the line ten years and then on some little technicality they get out and on the streets again doing the same they did before. A: Uh-huh. B: And, you know, that's about the only thing. Like for theft and stuff like that or manslaughter, you know, I don't think they should do that.
hypothesis: they should do that
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A: Oh, wow! But maybe you shouldn't be held responsible for something you did several years ago. B: So, I know. A: That's the other thing. I mean a lot of people as kids or, you know, young people get into some things that they get out of later on and I don't think they should really have to pay for that forever.
hypothesis: they should really have to pay for that forever | cb | 1 | 197 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: A: Oh, wow! But maybe you shouldn't be held responsible for something you did several years ago. B: So, I know. A: That's the other thing. I mean a lot of people as kids or, you know, young people get into some things that they get out of later on and I don't think they should really have to pay for that forever.
hypothesis: they should really have to pay for that forever
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: Uh, I have, uh, I guess a lot of thoughts about the Vietnam War, um, I guess I feel like I was pretty young while it was going on and so there's probably a lot of things I remember and a lot of things that I really didn't have a clue as to what was happening. B: Yeah. A: Um, looking back, like maybe some of the things that I know now, I'm not sure I do believe it was worth the cost in dollars and lives. That was one of the questions that she asked us to think about, because we never went to war. I don't think we were committed to winning it and getting out
hypothesis: they were committed to winning the Vietnam War and getting out | cb | 1 | 198 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: Uh, I have, uh, I guess a lot of thoughts about the Vietnam War, um, I guess I feel like I was pretty young while it was going on and so there's probably a lot of things I remember and a lot of things that I really didn't have a clue as to what was happening. B: Yeah. A: Um, looking back, like maybe some of the things that I know now, I'm not sure I do believe it was worth the cost in dollars and lives. That was one of the questions that she asked us to think about, because we never went to war. I don't think we were committed to winning it and getting out
hypothesis: they were committed to winning the Vietnam War and getting out
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: B: um, they try to encourage you to follow a specific curriculum, although you don't have to. A: Uh-huh. B: And then if you have particular religious beliefs they're kind of monitored. You know, they will allow you to, I can't think of any examples but certain religious groups don't want their children in public schools because the influence. And maybe they were a group of Mennonites or something like that. A: Uh-huh. B: I don't think they're were in this area
hypothesis: they were in this area | cb | 1 | 199 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise containing an embedded clause and the corresponding hypothesis that is an extraction of that clause, determine if the premise entails the hypothesis. Return 0 for entailment and 1 for not entailment
### INPUT
premise: B: um, they try to encourage you to follow a specific curriculum, although you don't have to. A: Uh-huh. B: And then if you have particular religious beliefs they're kind of monitored. You know, they will allow you to, I can't think of any examples but certain religious groups don't want their children in public schools because the influence. And maybe they were a group of Mennonites or something like that. A: Uh-huh. B: I don't think they're were in this area
hypothesis: they were in this area
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
Subsets and Splits