input
stringlengths 32
1.92k
| task
stringclasses 1
value | response
int64 0
2
| idx
int64 0
393k
| prompt
stringlengths 839
2.73k
| score
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
premise: They watched me constantly for weeks.
hypothesis: They left me on my own for weeks. | mnli | 2 | 200 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: They watched me constantly for weeks.
hypothesis: They left me on my own for weeks.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: It has a staff of about 100 employees, including attorneys and support staff, in 10 branch offices.
hypothesis: The 10 branches had close to 100 employees. | mnli | 0 | 201 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: It has a staff of about 100 employees, including attorneys and support staff, in 10 branch offices.
hypothesis: The 10 branches had close to 100 employees.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: First we applied three alternative concentrationresponse (C-R) functions to estimate premature mortality incidence.
hypothesis: No CR functions were applied to the incidence. | mnli | 2 | 202 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: First we applied three alternative concentrationresponse (C-R) functions to estimate premature mortality incidence.
hypothesis: No CR functions were applied to the incidence.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: All we've done is checked that the first two creditors divided their collective share of $125 appropriately
hypothesis: The first two creditors divided their shares correctly. | mnli | 0 | 203 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: All we've done is checked that the first two creditors divided their collective share of $125 appropriately
hypothesis: The first two creditors divided their shares correctly.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: However, little evidence remains of that era some ceramics in the museum, a few fortifications, a network of irrigation ditches.
hypothesis: There is little evidence left of that era. | mnli | 0 | 204 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: However, little evidence remains of that era some ceramics in the museum, a few fortifications, a network of irrigation ditches.
hypothesis: There is little evidence left of that era.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: , chief knowledge officers or chief technical officers) that diffuse responsibility across several senior-level managers.
hypothesis: Chief officers often spread their responsibility among senior-level managers. | mnli | 0 | 205 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: , chief knowledge officers or chief technical officers) that diffuse responsibility across several senior-level managers.
hypothesis: Chief officers often spread their responsibility among senior-level managers.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: oh no well i don't find a lot of time to watch TV and a lot of the time i find it during the day when i'm rocking my little girl to sleep so i watch a lot of reruns old shows
hypothesis: I enjoy watching the old reruns because I find them calming. | mnli | 1 | 206 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: oh no well i don't find a lot of time to watch TV and a lot of the time i find it during the day when i'm rocking my little girl to sleep so i watch a lot of reruns old shows
hypothesis: I enjoy watching the old reruns because I find them calming.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: so that will definitely help in taxes and what you will get back
hypothesis: You'll probably get a lot bigger refund. | mnli | 1 | 207 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: so that will definitely help in taxes and what you will get back
hypothesis: You'll probably get a lot bigger refund.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The smart Annie was not in evidence.
hypothesis: The clever Annie was not in proof. | mnli | 0 | 208 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The smart Annie was not in evidence.
hypothesis: The clever Annie was not in proof.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Yes, Mistuh Reese, suh?
hypothesis: THe slave spoke to Mr Reece. | mnli | 1 | 209 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Yes, Mistuh Reese, suh?
hypothesis: THe slave spoke to Mr Reece.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: At the heart of the sanctuary, a small granite shrine once held the sacred barque of Horus himself.
hypothesis: Horus has a shrine. | mnli | 0 | 210 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: At the heart of the sanctuary, a small granite shrine once held the sacred barque of Horus himself.
hypothesis: Horus has a shrine.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Postal Service's domestic rates for First-Class and Priority Mail to the inbound mail distribution described above.
hypothesis: Usps domestic rates for priority and first class mail ate described above. | mnli | 0 | 211 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Postal Service's domestic rates for First-Class and Priority Mail to the inbound mail distribution described above.
hypothesis: Usps domestic rates for priority and first class mail ate described above.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: do you like um any rock and roll at all
hypothesis: So you don't like rock and roll? | mnli | 2 | 212 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: do you like um any rock and roll at all
hypothesis: So you don't like rock and roll?
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Dining room, grill, pub.
hypothesis: It has a dining room but no grill. | mnli | 2 | 213 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Dining room, grill, pub.
hypothesis: It has a dining room but no grill.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: What have you, my friend, he cried, "that you remain there like, how do you say it?, ah, yes, the stuck pig?" I explained that I was afraid of obliterating any foot-marks.
hypothesis: I didn't say anything when he asked me that question. | mnli | 2 | 214 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: What have you, my friend, he cried, "that you remain there like, how do you say it?, ah, yes, the stuck pig?" I explained that I was afraid of obliterating any foot-marks.
hypothesis: I didn't say anything when he asked me that question.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: But such a show would have meant the museum taking a hard look at its own, often controversial part in the art world.
hypothesis: The museum didn't want to look too closely into its part in the art world. | mnli | 1 | 215 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: But such a show would have meant the museum taking a hard look at its own, often controversial part in the art world.
hypothesis: The museum didn't want to look too closely into its part in the art world.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: But you will find fishermen, many of whom are direct descendants of some 600 Genoese mercenaries King Charles III rescued from captivity on Tunisia's Tabarka Island, hence the name.
hypothesis: Tabarka Island is part of Turkey. | mnli | 2 | 216 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: But you will find fishermen, many of whom are direct descendants of some 600 Genoese mercenaries King Charles III rescued from captivity on Tunisia's Tabarka Island, hence the name.
hypothesis: Tabarka Island is part of Turkey.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: And while we allow people to give a kidney to their child, we do not allow them to donate their heart.
hypothesis: You can't always donate organs to your child. | mnli | 1 | 217 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: And while we allow people to give a kidney to their child, we do not allow them to donate their heart.
hypothesis: You can't always donate organs to your child.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Unbar, Francisco! he called in Spanish.
hypothesis: He call Francisco in Spanish. | mnli | 0 | 218 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Unbar, Francisco! he called in Spanish.
hypothesis: He call Francisco in Spanish.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The Commission is unwilling to recommend an interpretation of the statute that produces such consequences, absent an express congressional intent that such burdens be imposed.
hypothesis: Unless congress expresses an intent that such burdens be imposed, the Commission is unwilling to recommend an interpretation of the statute that produces such consequences. | mnli | 0 | 219 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The Commission is unwilling to recommend an interpretation of the statute that produces such consequences, absent an express congressional intent that such burdens be imposed.
hypothesis: Unless congress expresses an intent that such burdens be imposed, the Commission is unwilling to recommend an interpretation of the statute that produces such consequences.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Who could there be?"
hypothesis: The speaker doesn't know who it is. | mnli | 1 | 220 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Who could there be?"
hypothesis: The speaker doesn't know who it is.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: My wife and daughter are the ones doing Riley.
hypothesis: My grandmother and grandmother's lesbian lover are doing Riley. | mnli | 2 | 221 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: My wife and daughter are the ones doing Riley.
hypothesis: My grandmother and grandmother's lesbian lover are doing Riley.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Take a backwaters trip through the lagoons and around the island villages.
hypothesis: Backwater rides are popular in this area. | mnli | 1 | 222 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Take a backwaters trip through the lagoons and around the island villages.
hypothesis: Backwater rides are popular in this area.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Alcohol use and trauma.
hypothesis: Trauma is the leading cause of alcohol abuse. | mnli | 1 | 223 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Alcohol use and trauma.
hypothesis: Trauma is the leading cause of alcohol abuse.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: In a culture where Xena and Hercules have hit TV shows, it's a lot more fun imagining that you are a valiant warrior doing business-as-battle than it is to admit that you're a pudgy functionary whose most daring deed is to draft a boldly worded memo.
hypothesis: Xena and Hercules both have hit shows on CBS. | mnli | 1 | 224 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: In a culture where Xena and Hercules have hit TV shows, it's a lot more fun imagining that you are a valiant warrior doing business-as-battle than it is to admit that you're a pudgy functionary whose most daring deed is to draft a boldly worded memo.
hypothesis: Xena and Hercules both have hit shows on CBS.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Laibson's imperfect altruists face a far subtler problem--they're not just weighing costs and benefits, they're engaged in games of strategy against their future selves.
hypothesis: Laibson has selfish people that follow him. | mnli | 2 | 225 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Laibson's imperfect altruists face a far subtler problem--they're not just weighing costs and benefits, they're engaged in games of strategy against their future selves.
hypothesis: Laibson has selfish people that follow him.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: 'But if they catch me...'
hypothesis: But if they kill me | mnli | 2 | 226 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: 'But if they catch me...'
hypothesis: But if they kill me
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The win brought tears to her eyes, of course, and prompted a phone call to Mom in India.
hypothesis: She called her father after she lost, smiling as she did it. | mnli | 2 | 227 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The win brought tears to her eyes, of course, and prompted a phone call to Mom in India.
hypothesis: She called her father after she lost, smiling as she did it.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The New York Times ' Janet Maslin says the film works precisely because it is derivative--its stars, Matt Dillon and Gary Sinise, emulate the characters in The Usual Suspects , which gives them extraordinary opportunities to preen.
hypothesis: The movie stars Matt Dillon and Gary Sinise. | mnli | 0 | 228 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The New York Times ' Janet Maslin says the film works precisely because it is derivative--its stars, Matt Dillon and Gary Sinise, emulate the characters in The Usual Suspects , which gives them extraordinary opportunities to preen.
hypothesis: The movie stars Matt Dillon and Gary Sinise.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The Muslim campaign for Partition was led by London-trained Bombay lawyer, Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
hypothesis: Muhammad Ali Jinnah went to London to campaign for Partition. | mnli | 2 | 229 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The Muslim campaign for Partition was led by London-trained Bombay lawyer, Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
hypothesis: Muhammad Ali Jinnah went to London to campaign for Partition.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: it's um it's it's amazingly less expensive than it is
hypothesis: It's much more expensive that way. | mnli | 2 | 230 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: it's um it's it's amazingly less expensive than it is
hypothesis: It's much more expensive that way.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Automobile includes small trucks.
hypothesis: Small trucks are not great automobiles. | mnli | 1 | 231 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Automobile includes small trucks.
hypothesis: Small trucks are not great automobiles.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: You're quite safe." Her breath came more normally, and the colour was returning to her cheeks.
hypothesis: She started recovering from the mild shock she had gone through. | mnli | 1 | 232 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: You're quite safe." Her breath came more normally, and the colour was returning to her cheeks.
hypothesis: She started recovering from the mild shock she had gone through.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: probably so probably so um-hum
hypothesis: probably yes so uh-huh | mnli | 0 | 233 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: probably so probably so um-hum
hypothesis: probably yes so uh-huh
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: After its early failure, Hubble now provides vital clues to the universe.
hypothesis: Hubble failed earlier becuase they weren't making enough discoveries. | mnli | 1 | 234 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: After its early failure, Hubble now provides vital clues to the universe.
hypothesis: Hubble failed earlier becuase they weren't making enough discoveries.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: well they all come back from from the bottom
hypothesis: They bounce back from the bottom. | mnli | 0 | 235 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: well they all come back from from the bottom
hypothesis: They bounce back from the bottom.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: A library with the maximum allowable e-rate subsidy of 90 percent would still find itself paying a monthly Internet bill of $186.
hypothesis: A library has a maximum subsidy of 90% for utilities. | mnli | 1 | 236 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: A library with the maximum allowable e-rate subsidy of 90 percent would still find itself paying a monthly Internet bill of $186.
hypothesis: A library has a maximum subsidy of 90% for utilities.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: and i was never in a minor league city until i came Dallas we were a minor league city when i came here in fifty nine and i immediately bought season tickets uh to the class triple A uh uh Dallas Rangers
hypothesis: Dallas was always in the majors. | mnli | 2 | 237 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: and i was never in a minor league city until i came Dallas we were a minor league city when i came here in fifty nine and i immediately bought season tickets uh to the class triple A uh uh Dallas Rangers
hypothesis: Dallas was always in the majors.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Just a hunch.
hypothesis: It is just a guess | mnli | 0 | 238 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Just a hunch.
hypothesis: It is just a guess
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The SPAN A Guide to Legal Services Planning.
hypothesis: The SPAN A guide is a guide used for legal service planning. | mnli | 0 | 239 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The SPAN A Guide to Legal Services Planning.
hypothesis: The SPAN A guide is a guide used for legal service planning.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: yeah i think they did a pretty good job but they didn't follow it exactly but they did give it you know do it justice
hypothesis: They made a good rendition. | mnli | 0 | 240 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: yeah i think they did a pretty good job but they didn't follow it exactly but they did give it you know do it justice
hypothesis: They made a good rendition.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal a policy worthy of imitation.
hypothesis: The citizens of the U.S. are supposed to be proud of themselves. | mnli | 0 | 241 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal a policy worthy of imitation.
hypothesis: The citizens of the U.S. are supposed to be proud of themselves.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: She always says the right thing, does the right thing, wears the right clothes.
hypothesis: She does, says, and wears everything perfectly, consistently. | mnli | 0 | 242 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: She always says the right thing, does the right thing, wears the right clothes.
hypothesis: She does, says, and wears everything perfectly, consistently.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Leave the river briefly to loop east around Talcy, with its Romanesque church and the 13th-century chateau of Thizy, before ending your trip at Montr??al.
hypothesis: It is recommended that you leave river briefly before ending your trip at Montréal. | mnli | 0 | 243 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Leave the river briefly to loop east around Talcy, with its Romanesque church and the 13th-century chateau of Thizy, before ending your trip at Montr??al.
hypothesis: It is recommended that you leave river briefly before ending your trip at Montréal.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: yeah and i you know i think defense really is what wins wins uh in the long run you can have the best half back there is or the best quarterback but if they don't have any blocking maybe they can't do anything
hypothesis: I think a good defense is the most important thing you need to win games. | mnli | 0 | 244 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: yeah and i you know i think defense really is what wins wins uh in the long run you can have the best half back there is or the best quarterback but if they don't have any blocking maybe they can't do anything
hypothesis: I think a good defense is the most important thing you need to win games.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: 'You killed Derry.'
hypothesis: Derry is still alive. | mnli | 2 | 245 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: 'You killed Derry.'
hypothesis: Derry is still alive.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Twelve days later, I made my second.
hypothesis: It took twelve days to make another. | mnli | 0 | 246 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Twelve days later, I made my second.
hypothesis: It took twelve days to make another.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The number of Arawak had already fallen dramatically, so the Spanish began to import slaves from Africa to work the land; the first Africans arrived in 1517.
hypothesis: The Spanish had plenty of Arawak to use as slaves. | mnli | 2 | 247 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The number of Arawak had already fallen dramatically, so the Spanish began to import slaves from Africa to work the land; the first Africans arrived in 1517.
hypothesis: The Spanish had plenty of Arawak to use as slaves.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: and enjoy nature and uh kind of wipe out the stress of everyday life i'd always
hypothesis: I like to get out in nature and de-stress. | mnli | 0 | 248 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: and enjoy nature and uh kind of wipe out the stress of everyday life i'd always
hypothesis: I like to get out in nature and de-stress.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: but i i don't ever feel the need to dress that warmly i i don't have to travel that far to work uh what what what what about uh your clothes in the winter time up there
hypothesis: I have to catch a plane to go to work. | mnli | 2 | 249 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: but i i don't ever feel the need to dress that warmly i i don't have to travel that far to work uh what what what what about uh your clothes in the winter time up there
hypothesis: I have to catch a plane to go to work.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Mrs. Vandemeyer, she read, "20 South Audley Mansions.
hypothesis: "20 South Audley Mansions" is a book that Mrs. Vandemeyer read. | mnli | 0 | 250 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Mrs. Vandemeyer, she read, "20 South Audley Mansions.
hypothesis: "20 South Audley Mansions" is a book that Mrs. Vandemeyer read.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: I'd call it a bad date.
hypothesis: I'd consider it a bad date because the girl was rude to the waiter. | mnli | 1 | 251 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: I'd call it a bad date.
hypothesis: I'd consider it a bad date because the girl was rude to the waiter.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Traditionally a poor island, the native population has happily embraced the new seasonal lifestyle that has brought them proserity, and the old ways have almost completely disappeared.
hypothesis: The old ways of the native population has almost completely faded away. | mnli | 0 | 252 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Traditionally a poor island, the native population has happily embraced the new seasonal lifestyle that has brought them proserity, and the old ways have almost completely disappeared.
hypothesis: The old ways of the native population has almost completely faded away.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: For adventurous travelers looking for an introduction to the South, the rewards are rich.
hypothesis: For those who prefer more safety, other options are available. | mnli | 1 | 253 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: For adventurous travelers looking for an introduction to the South, the rewards are rich.
hypothesis: For those who prefer more safety, other options are available.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: It covers most but not all close Senate and gubernatorial races.)
hypothesis: The radio station covers most close gubernatorial races | mnli | 1 | 254 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: It covers most but not all close Senate and gubernatorial races.)
hypothesis: The radio station covers most close gubernatorial races
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The component may also be a contractor.
hypothesis: They were prohibited from being a contractor. | mnli | 2 | 255 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The component may also be a contractor.
hypothesis: They were prohibited from being a contractor.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The point is not that investing in foreign companies is necessarily a mistake.
hypothesis: Putting money into foreign companies poses a great risk. | mnli | 1 | 256 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The point is not that investing in foreign companies is necessarily a mistake.
hypothesis: Putting money into foreign companies poses a great risk.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Currently OASI and DI make payments to that Account, and HI receives payment.
hypothesis: The Account is the easiest way to keep track of payments made by OASI and DI on an annual basis. | mnli | 1 | 257 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Currently OASI and DI make payments to that Account, and HI receives payment.
hypothesis: The Account is the easiest way to keep track of payments made by OASI and DI on an annual basis.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: In addition to the effects on household saving choices, individual accounts may also affect the relationship and interactions between Social Security and private pensions.
hypothesis: Individual accounts would reduce demand for private pensions. | mnli | 1 | 258 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: In addition to the effects on household saving choices, individual accounts may also affect the relationship and interactions between Social Security and private pensions.
hypothesis: Individual accounts would reduce demand for private pensions.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Washington Post reports two attempts by private companies to grow embryos--a practice banned among federally funded researchers but allowed in the private sector.
hypothesis: The Washington Post was the first company to report on attempts of private companies growing embryos. | mnli | 1 | 259 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Washington Post reports two attempts by private companies to grow embryos--a practice banned among federally funded researchers but allowed in the private sector.
hypothesis: The Washington Post was the first company to report on attempts of private companies growing embryos.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: a plausible increase in the penetration of computer ownership by households over the course of a single year.
hypothesis: Computer ownership by households usually increases in a year. | mnli | 0 | 260 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: a plausible increase in the penetration of computer ownership by households over the course of a single year.
hypothesis: Computer ownership by households usually increases in a year.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: But the explanation is institutional, not ideological.
hypothesis: Many experts have argued that it's impossible to separate the institutional from the ideological in the circumstances. | mnli | 1 | 261 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: But the explanation is institutional, not ideological.
hypothesis: Many experts have argued that it's impossible to separate the institutional from the ideological in the circumstances.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: You and Tuppence have been sticking together like Siamese twins.
hypothesis: You and Tuppence have been hand in glove. | mnli | 0 | 262 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: You and Tuppence have been sticking together like Siamese twins.
hypothesis: You and Tuppence have been hand in glove.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Below the Rond-Point, the mood changes and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.
hypothesis: The mood changes below the Rond-Point, and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais. | mnli | 0 | 263 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Below the Rond-Point, the mood changes and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.
hypothesis: The mood changes below the Rond-Point, and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Participants generally agreed that improvements in corporate governance will bring about improvements in auditing.
hypothesis: The participants only agreed on a few subjects. | mnli | 1 | 264 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Participants generally agreed that improvements in corporate governance will bring about improvements in auditing.
hypothesis: The participants only agreed on a few subjects.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING
hypothesis: Granting permission. | mnli | 0 | 265 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING
hypothesis: Granting permission.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Ever see a contemplative Power Ranger?
hypothesis: Ever see a Power Ranger consider the consequences of their actions? | mnli | 1 | 266 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Ever see a contemplative Power Ranger?
hypothesis: Ever see a Power Ranger consider the consequences of their actions?
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: However, I believe that additional actions by the board and AICPA management will be needed to restore trust and confidence in the Institute over the longer-term.
hypothesis: Trust and confidence in the Institute have been lost forever. | mnli | 2 | 267 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: However, I believe that additional actions by the board and AICPA management will be needed to restore trust and confidence in the Institute over the longer-term.
hypothesis: Trust and confidence in the Institute have been lost forever.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Every tube contained a body, and every body was a famous figure from history.
hypothesis: The tubes held everyday people. | mnli | 2 | 268 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Every tube contained a body, and every body was a famous figure from history.
hypothesis: The tubes held everyday people.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Four sikhara domes rise above the entrance-porch in addition the mandapa hall for worshippers; a larger hall for dancing-girls; and the inner sanctuary, surrounded by an ambulatory for walking around the image of the deity.
hypothesis: Visitors are not permitted to walk around the image of the deity, but must sit quietly in front of it. | mnli | 2 | 269 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Four sikhara domes rise above the entrance-porch in addition the mandapa hall for worshippers; a larger hall for dancing-girls; and the inner sanctuary, surrounded by an ambulatory for walking around the image of the deity.
hypothesis: Visitors are not permitted to walk around the image of the deity, but must sit quietly in front of it.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The great Kanto earthquake of 1923 destroyed some 60,000 homes in Yokohama and took over 20,000 lives.
hypothesis: Yokohama took a long time to recover from the earthquake. | mnli | 1 | 270 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The great Kanto earthquake of 1923 destroyed some 60,000 homes in Yokohama and took over 20,000 lives.
hypothesis: Yokohama took a long time to recover from the earthquake.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: oh was that good i heard oh okay
hypothesis: Yes, I heard that was really good. | mnli | 0 | 271 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: oh was that good i heard oh okay
hypothesis: Yes, I heard that was really good.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The only adult males allowed in the Harem were the Black Eunuchs, who were in charge of security and administration.
hypothesis: The Black Eunuchs were responsible for the security and administration of the Harem. | mnli | 0 | 272 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The only adult males allowed in the Harem were the Black Eunuchs, who were in charge of security and administration.
hypothesis: The Black Eunuchs were responsible for the security and administration of the Harem.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Due to the amount of information now available, power has shifted from the physician to the patient.
hypothesis: Doctors have more power than ever thanks to better data availability. | mnli | 2 | 273 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Due to the amount of information now available, power has shifted from the physician to the patient.
hypothesis: Doctors have more power than ever thanks to better data availability.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: i know i am um i don't know anybody in their right mind that says that that i'm doing it because i want to i
hypothesis: I know there are people who think I'm doing it because I desire to. | mnli | 2 | 274 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: i know i am um i don't know anybody in their right mind that says that that i'm doing it because i want to i
hypothesis: I know there are people who think I'm doing it because I desire to.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Isn't that America's last bastion of mobsters, racists, and hacks?
hypothesis: It's America's first wave of racists. | mnli | 2 | 275 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Isn't that America's last bastion of mobsters, racists, and hacks?
hypothesis: It's America's first wave of racists.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Let me try it." She began snapping her fingers and saying the word eagerly, but nothing happened.
hypothesis: She became frustrated when the spell didn't work. | mnli | 1 | 276 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Let me try it." She began snapping her fingers and saying the word eagerly, but nothing happened.
hypothesis: She became frustrated when the spell didn't work.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: There is also an archaeological museum that displays older relics, including examples of Mycenaean pottery.
hypothesis: The museum is completely empty and doesn't have anything in it. | mnli | 2 | 277 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: There is also an archaeological museum that displays older relics, including examples of Mycenaean pottery.
hypothesis: The museum is completely empty and doesn't have anything in it.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: There are nonetheless a number of practices and alternative strategies that senior executives in leading organizations use to help define and institute their CIO positions to effectively meet business needs.
hypothesis: There are no practices and strategies that can help CIO positions to meet business needs at the moment. | mnli | 2 | 278 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: There are nonetheless a number of practices and alternative strategies that senior executives in leading organizations use to help define and institute their CIO positions to effectively meet business needs.
hypothesis: There are no practices and strategies that can help CIO positions to meet business needs at the moment.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: By one estimate, Russia's economic output would more than double if the Russians simply sold off their natural resources instead of trying to make something out of them.
hypothesis: It is possible that Putin wants to develop the financial independence and work skills of Russians and the loss of money in less profit to merely selling off materials is worth the manufacturing expertise gained by his people as they create goods within their own country. | mnli | 1 | 279 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: By one estimate, Russia's economic output would more than double if the Russians simply sold off their natural resources instead of trying to make something out of them.
hypothesis: It is possible that Putin wants to develop the financial independence and work skills of Russians and the loss of money in less profit to merely selling off materials is worth the manufacturing expertise gained by his people as they create goods within their own country.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Research over the last 20 years has changed the scientific view of life.
hypothesis: The last 5 years of research have a higher proportion influence. | mnli | 1 | 280 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Research over the last 20 years has changed the scientific view of life.
hypothesis: The last 5 years of research have a higher proportion influence.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Perhaps he should clear out even farther and head for California.
hypothesis: Maybe he should head for California to clear out even farther? | mnli | 0 | 281 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Perhaps he should clear out even farther and head for California.
hypothesis: Maybe he should head for California to clear out even farther?
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: yeah well uh we're not uh really sailors but i want some summer soon to um hire a sailboat with a captain since we're not you know versed in that and uh go to the Caribbean
hypothesis: He has sailed a little. | mnli | 1 | 282 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: yeah well uh we're not uh really sailors but i want some summer soon to um hire a sailboat with a captain since we're not you know versed in that and uh go to the Caribbean
hypothesis: He has sailed a little.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: For the moment, he sought refuge in retreat, and left the room precipitately.
hypothesis: He stayed put and sat on the floor. | mnli | 2 | 283 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: For the moment, he sought refuge in retreat, and left the room precipitately.
hypothesis: He stayed put and sat on the floor.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: In June you can watch dealers haggling over heaps of white silkworm cocoons.
hypothesis: During the summer months dealers barter for piles of silkworm cocoons. | mnli | 0 | 284 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: In June you can watch dealers haggling over heaps of white silkworm cocoons.
hypothesis: During the summer months dealers barter for piles of silkworm cocoons.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The results looked like Versace melded with Blade Runner , says Newsweek 's Steven Levy.
hypothesis: Steven Levy has never seen Blade Runner. | mnli | 2 | 285 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The results looked like Versace melded with Blade Runner , says Newsweek 's Steven Levy.
hypothesis: Steven Levy has never seen Blade Runner.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: uh you know if you have a large acid spill you know well gee maybe you better check this person who's handling all these acids you know i work with a wafer fab so we do a lot with chemicals and acids and
hypothesis: Acid is handled by workers. | mnli | 0 | 286 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: uh you know if you have a large acid spill you know well gee maybe you better check this person who's handling all these acids you know i work with a wafer fab so we do a lot with chemicals and acids and
hypothesis: Acid is handled by workers.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The bourgeoisie showed off its new prosperity with extravagant furnishings, silks, satins, and baubles, and in 1852 Paris opened its first department store, Au Bon Marche.
hypothesis: Paris opened the first department store. | mnli | 0 | 287 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The bourgeoisie showed off its new prosperity with extravagant furnishings, silks, satins, and baubles, and in 1852 Paris opened its first department store, Au Bon Marche.
hypothesis: Paris opened the first department store.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: He waited for the group on the nearby 18 th green to finish.
hypothesis: He was patient while hte group on the 18th hole finished. | mnli | 0 | 288 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: He waited for the group on the nearby 18 th green to finish.
hypothesis: He was patient while hte group on the 18th hole finished.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: i think so i don't know i just uh i'm unhappy with it but and well i'm i'm sort of semi fortunate right now i'm a graduate student so i don't make that much what i make isn't taxed very highly because i'm still in school
hypothesis: I have never been a college student. | mnli | 2 | 289 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: i think so i don't know i just uh i'm unhappy with it but and well i'm i'm sort of semi fortunate right now i'm a graduate student so i don't make that much what i make isn't taxed very highly because i'm still in school
hypothesis: I have never been a college student.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: He thought about ways to achieve this life goal for a long time, which means until he learned the basics of text editing, which happened at his first job at a firm trading in plastic bags landfill disposal permits.
hypothesis: He thought about ways to achieve his life goals for a long time. | mnli | 0 | 290 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: He thought about ways to achieve this life goal for a long time, which means until he learned the basics of text editing, which happened at his first job at a firm trading in plastic bags landfill disposal permits.
hypothesis: He thought about ways to achieve his life goals for a long time.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Kofukuji's many surviving artworks and artifacts are housed in its newest building, the Museum of National Treasures, a fireproof repository built in 1958 to honor Kofukuji's immense cultural and historic importance.
hypothesis: The fireproof repository built in 1958 is considered to be enough to protect the artifacts. | mnli | 0 | 291 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Kofukuji's many surviving artworks and artifacts are housed in its newest building, the Museum of National Treasures, a fireproof repository built in 1958 to honor Kofukuji's immense cultural and historic importance.
hypothesis: The fireproof repository built in 1958 is considered to be enough to protect the artifacts.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: no not near as much as i'd like to i mean i've i tend to stay pretty busy at my job and uh
hypothesis: If my job wasn't so busy, I do that a lot more. | mnli | 1 | 292 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: no not near as much as i'd like to i mean i've i tend to stay pretty busy at my job and uh
hypothesis: If my job wasn't so busy, I do that a lot more.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: We have a problem concerning gift etiquette.
hypothesis: The problem we have with gift etiquette is people not knowing how to choose appropriate gifts. | mnli | 1 | 293 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: We have a problem concerning gift etiquette.
hypothesis: The problem we have with gift etiquette is people not knowing how to choose appropriate gifts.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The Inglethorps did not appear.
hypothesis: The Inglethorps were the first ones to turn up. | mnli | 2 | 294 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The Inglethorps did not appear.
hypothesis: The Inglethorps were the first ones to turn up.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: equivalent to increasing national saving to 19.
hypothesis: National savings are 18 now. | mnli | 1 | 295 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: equivalent to increasing national saving to 19.
hypothesis: National savings are 18 now.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: There's a sort of bidding war going on, with law schools offering ever-increasing financial packages -- most of it loans, said Dean Glen.
hypothesis: No one really cares about the new students coming to their institutions. | mnli | 2 | 296 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: There's a sort of bidding war going on, with law schools offering ever-increasing financial packages -- most of it loans, said Dean Glen.
hypothesis: No one really cares about the new students coming to their institutions.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Today, as always, the time-honored occupations of fishing and farming support Martinique's fragile existence the delicious rum also helps.
hypothesis: Martinique makes more money from fishing than from farming. | mnli | 1 | 297 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Today, as always, the time-honored occupations of fishing and farming support Martinique's fragile existence the delicious rum also helps.
hypothesis: Martinique makes more money from fishing than from farming.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Comments regarding enforcement issues and questions raised by the regulated industry were addressed by EPA in four Detergent Rule Question and Answer Documents.
hypothesis: All the issues and questions raised by the regulated industry were addressed by the EPA. | mnli | 1 | 298 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Comments regarding enforcement issues and questions raised by the regulated industry were addressed by EPA in four Detergent Rule Question and Answer Documents.
hypothesis: All the issues and questions raised by the regulated industry were addressed by the EPA.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The Ottoman Empire surrendered when World War I ended the following year, and, following a declaration by the League of Nations (the forerunner to the United Nations), Britain became rulers of Palestine by mandate.
hypothesis: If the Ottoman Empire never surrendered, Palestine wouldn't have been ruled by the British. | mnli | 1 | 299 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The Ottoman Empire surrendered when World War I ended the following year, and, following a declaration by the League of Nations (the forerunner to the United Nations), Britain became rulers of Palestine by mandate.
hypothesis: If the Ottoman Empire never surrendered, Palestine wouldn't have been ruled by the British.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.