Dataset Viewer
input
stringlengths 32
1.92k
| task
stringclasses 1
value | response
int64 0
2
| idx
int64 0
393k
| prompt
stringlengths 839
2.73k
| score
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
premise: Conceptually cream skimming has two basic dimensions - product and geography.
hypothesis: Product and geography are what make cream skimming work. | mnli | 1 | 0 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Conceptually cream skimming has two basic dimensions - product and geography.
hypothesis: Product and geography are what make cream skimming work.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: you know during the season and i guess at at your level uh you lose them to the next level if if they decide to recall the the parent team the Braves decide to call to recall a guy from triple A then a double A guy goes up to replace him and a single A guy goes up to replace him
hypothesis: You lose the things to the following level if the people recall. | mnli | 0 | 1 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: you know during the season and i guess at at your level uh you lose them to the next level if if they decide to recall the the parent team the Braves decide to call to recall a guy from triple A then a double A guy goes up to replace him and a single A guy goes up to replace him
hypothesis: You lose the things to the following level if the people recall.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: One of our number will carry out your instructions minutely.
hypothesis: A member of my team will execute your orders with immense precision. | mnli | 0 | 2 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: One of our number will carry out your instructions minutely.
hypothesis: A member of my team will execute your orders with immense precision.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: How do you know? All this is their information again.
hypothesis: This information belongs to them. | mnli | 0 | 3 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: How do you know? All this is their information again.
hypothesis: This information belongs to them.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: yeah i tell you what though if you go price some of those tennis shoes i can see why now you know they're getting up in the hundred dollar range
hypothesis: The tennis shoes have a range of prices. | mnli | 1 | 4 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: yeah i tell you what though if you go price some of those tennis shoes i can see why now you know they're getting up in the hundred dollar range
hypothesis: The tennis shoes have a range of prices.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: my walkman broke so i'm upset now i just have to turn the stereo up real loud
hypothesis: I'm upset that my walkman broke and now I have to turn the stereo up really loud. | mnli | 0 | 5 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: my walkman broke so i'm upset now i just have to turn the stereo up real loud
hypothesis: I'm upset that my walkman broke and now I have to turn the stereo up really loud.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: But a few Christian mosaics survive above the apse is the Virgin with the infant Jesus, with the Archangel Gabriel to the right (his companion Michael, to the left, has vanished save for a few feathers from his wings).
hypothesis: Most of the Christian mosaics were destroyed by Muslims. | mnli | 1 | 6 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: But a few Christian mosaics survive above the apse is the Virgin with the infant Jesus, with the Archangel Gabriel to the right (his companion Michael, to the left, has vanished save for a few feathers from his wings).
hypothesis: Most of the Christian mosaics were destroyed by Muslims.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: (Read for Slate 's take on Jackson's findings.)
hypothesis: Slate had an opinion on Jackson's findings. | mnli | 0 | 7 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: (Read for Slate 's take on Jackson's findings.)
hypothesis: Slate had an opinion on Jackson's findings.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Gays and lesbians.
hypothesis: Heterosexuals. | mnli | 2 | 8 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Gays and lesbians.
hypothesis: Heterosexuals.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: At the end of Rue des Francs-Bourgeois is what many consider to be the city's most handsome residential square, the Place des Vosges, with its stone and red brick facades.
hypothesis: Place des Vosges is constructed entirely of gray marble. | mnli | 2 | 9 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: At the end of Rue des Francs-Bourgeois is what many consider to be the city's most handsome residential square, the Place des Vosges, with its stone and red brick facades.
hypothesis: Place des Vosges is constructed entirely of gray marble.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: I burst through a set of cabin doors, and fell to the ground-
hypothesis: I burst through the doors and fell down. | mnli | 0 | 10 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: I burst through a set of cabin doors, and fell to the ground-
hypothesis: I burst through the doors and fell down.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Fun for adults and children.
hypothesis: Fun for only children. | mnli | 2 | 11 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Fun for adults and children.
hypothesis: Fun for only children.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: It's not that the questions they asked weren't interesting or legitimate (though most did fall under the category of already asked and answered).
hypothesis: All of the questions were interesting according to a focus group consulted on the subject. | mnli | 1 | 12 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: It's not that the questions they asked weren't interesting or legitimate (though most did fall under the category of already asked and answered).
hypothesis: All of the questions were interesting according to a focus group consulted on the subject.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Thebes held onto power until the 12th Dynasty, when its first king, Amenemhet Iwho reigned between 1980 1951 b.c. established a capital near Memphis.
hypothesis: The capital near Memphis lasted only half a century before its inhabitants abandoned it for the next capital. | mnli | 1 | 13 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Thebes held onto power until the 12th Dynasty, when its first king, Amenemhet Iwho reigned between 1980 1951 b.c. established a capital near Memphis.
hypothesis: The capital near Memphis lasted only half a century before its inhabitants abandoned it for the next capital.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: I don't mean to be glib about your concerns, but if I were you, I might be more concerned about the near-term rate implications of this $1.
hypothesis: I am concerned more about your issues than the near-term rate implications. | mnli | 2 | 14 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: I don't mean to be glib about your concerns, but if I were you, I might be more concerned about the near-term rate implications of this $1.
hypothesis: I am concerned more about your issues than the near-term rate implications.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Issues in Data Synthesis.
hypothesis: Problems in data synthesis. | mnli | 0 | 15 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Issues in Data Synthesis.
hypothesis: Problems in data synthesis.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: well you see that on television also
hypothesis: You can see that on television, as well. | mnli | 0 | 16 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: well you see that on television also
hypothesis: You can see that on television, as well.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Vrenna and I both fought him and he nearly took us.
hypothesis: Neither Vrenna nor myself have ever fought him. | mnli | 2 | 17 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Vrenna and I both fought him and he nearly took us.
hypothesis: Neither Vrenna nor myself have ever fought him.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: This analysis pooled estimates from these two studies to develop a C-R function linking PM to chronic bronchitis.
hypothesis: The analysis proves that there is no link between PM and bronchitis. | mnli | 2 | 18 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: This analysis pooled estimates from these two studies to develop a C-R function linking PM to chronic bronchitis.
hypothesis: The analysis proves that there is no link between PM and bronchitis.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: He turned and smiled at Vrenna.
hypothesis: He smiled at Vrenna who was walking slowly behind him with her mother. | mnli | 1 | 19 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: He turned and smiled at Vrenna.
hypothesis: He smiled at Vrenna who was walking slowly behind him with her mother.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: We sought to identify practices that were commonly implemented by the agencies within the past 5 years.
hypothesis: We want to identify practices commonly used by agencies in the last 5 years | mnli | 0 | 20 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: We sought to identify practices that were commonly implemented by the agencies within the past 5 years.
hypothesis: We want to identify practices commonly used by agencies in the last 5 years
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The other men shuffled.
hypothesis: The other men were shuffled around. | mnli | 0 | 21 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The other men shuffled.
hypothesis: The other men were shuffled around.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: States must show reasonable progress in their state implementation plans toward the congressionally mandated goal of returning to natural conditions in national parks and wilderness areas.
hypothesis: Itis not necessary for there to be any improvement. | mnli | 2 | 22 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: States must show reasonable progress in their state implementation plans toward the congressionally mandated goal of returning to natural conditions in national parks and wilderness areas.
hypothesis: Itis not necessary for there to be any improvement.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: well it's been very interesting
hypothesis: It has been very intriguing. | mnli | 0 | 23 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: well it's been very interesting
hypothesis: It has been very intriguing.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: He started slowly back to the bunkhouse.
hypothesis: He returned slowly to the bunkhouse. | mnli | 0 | 24 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: He started slowly back to the bunkhouse.
hypothesis: He returned slowly to the bunkhouse.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: and it's it's quite a bit i think six something is the state and and uh the rest of the pie goes elsewhere but we're in a particular part of the state that's pretty well off so it's it's like we get a lot of that back as far as local taxation goes
hypothesis: I do not know exactly where the local taxes go. | mnli | 1 | 25 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: and it's it's quite a bit i think six something is the state and and uh the rest of the pie goes elsewhere but we're in a particular part of the state that's pretty well off so it's it's like we get a lot of that back as far as local taxation goes
hypothesis: I do not know exactly where the local taxes go.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: They're made from a secret recipe handed down to the present-day villagers by their Mallorcan ancestors, who came here in the early 17th century as part of an official repopulation scheme.
hypothesis: The recipe passed down from Mallorcan ancestors is known to everyone. | mnli | 2 | 26 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: They're made from a secret recipe handed down to the present-day villagers by their Mallorcan ancestors, who came here in the early 17th century as part of an official repopulation scheme.
hypothesis: The recipe passed down from Mallorcan ancestors is known to everyone.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: yeah well you're a student right
hypothesis: Well you're a mechanics student right? | mnli | 1 | 27 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: yeah well you're a student right
hypothesis: Well you're a mechanics student right?
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: it really is i heard something that their supposed to be starting a huge campaign in New York about um child abuse and stopping child abuse and it's supposed to be like it's starting there supposed to be like a big nationwide campaign and you know so hopefully that will take off and really do something i don't know there's just
hypothesis: It's unfortunate that nobody is organizing a child abuse campaign. | mnli | 2 | 28 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: it really is i heard something that their supposed to be starting a huge campaign in New York about um child abuse and stopping child abuse and it's supposed to be like it's starting there supposed to be like a big nationwide campaign and you know so hopefully that will take off and really do something i don't know there's just
hypothesis: It's unfortunate that nobody is organizing a child abuse campaign.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Postal Service were to reduce delivery frequency.
hypothesis: The postal service could deliver less frequently. | mnli | 0 | 29 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Postal Service were to reduce delivery frequency.
hypothesis: The postal service could deliver less frequently.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: And in another shift in the economy, it was found that lamb could be raised more cost-effectively on lowland farms in part because of the richer, more nutritious grazing land available there and as a result Lakeland farms became less profitable.
hypothesis: Another shift in the economy was found to be more nutritious. | mnli | 0 | 30 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: And in another shift in the economy, it was found that lamb could be raised more cost-effectively on lowland farms in part because of the richer, more nutritious grazing land available there and as a result Lakeland farms became less profitable.
hypothesis: Another shift in the economy was found to be more nutritious.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The rule contains information collection requirements which will allow EPA to determine that detergent additives which are effective in controlling deposits are used and that emission control goals are realized.
hypothesis: The rule has data collection requirements which aid the EPA to realize their emission control goals. | mnli | 0 | 31 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The rule contains information collection requirements which will allow EPA to determine that detergent additives which are effective in controlling deposits are used and that emission control goals are realized.
hypothesis: The rule has data collection requirements which aid the EPA to realize their emission control goals.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Almost every hill has to the northeast there's a Moorish fort; no fewer than four ruined fortresses guard the harbour entrance; and two more, still in good repair the Atalaya and Galeras castles protect the sea-front arsenal, of vital importance to Spain's military.
hypothesis: There are no castles Atalaya and Galeras. | mnli | 2 | 32 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Almost every hill has to the northeast there's a Moorish fort; no fewer than four ruined fortresses guard the harbour entrance; and two more, still in good repair the Atalaya and Galeras castles protect the sea-front arsenal, of vital importance to Spain's military.
hypothesis: There are no castles Atalaya and Galeras.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Were they in there?
hypothesis: Were they supposed to be in there? | mnli | 1 | 33 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Were they in there?
hypothesis: Were they supposed to be in there?
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Felicia's Journey takes place behind the eyes of its central a young Irish girl, Felicia, who crosses the sea to England in a hopeful quest to find the father of her unborn child; and the fat, middle-aged catering manager, Hiditch, who takes a paternal interest in the lass when it becomes clear that her young man has caddishly given her the slip.
hypothesis: The woman did not care where the man was as long as it was far. | mnli | 2 | 34 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Felicia's Journey takes place behind the eyes of its central a young Irish girl, Felicia, who crosses the sea to England in a hopeful quest to find the father of her unborn child; and the fat, middle-aged catering manager, Hiditch, who takes a paternal interest in the lass when it becomes clear that her young man has caddishly given her the slip.
hypothesis: The woman did not care where the man was as long as it was far.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: In the crypt are interred the remains of Voltaire and Rousseau, Hugo and Zola, assassinated Socialist leader Jean Jaurys, and Louis Braille, the inventor of the alphabet for the blind.
hypothesis: The remains of Voltaire and Rousseau, Hugo and Zola, assassinated Socialist leader Jean Jaurys, and Louis Braille are all interred in the crypt. | mnli | 0 | 35 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: In the crypt are interred the remains of Voltaire and Rousseau, Hugo and Zola, assassinated Socialist leader Jean Jaurys, and Louis Braille, the inventor of the alphabet for the blind.
hypothesis: The remains of Voltaire and Rousseau, Hugo and Zola, assassinated Socialist leader Jean Jaurys, and Louis Braille are all interred in the crypt.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: there's a uh a couple called um oh i'm going to forgot his name now uh Dirkson
hypothesis: I can't remember their name | mnli | 0 | 36 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: there's a uh a couple called um oh i'm going to forgot his name now uh Dirkson
hypothesis: I can't remember their name
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Poirot, I exclaimed, with relief, and seizing him by both hands, I dragged him into the room.
hypothesis: Poirot was now back and I was sorry that he would take over what I now considered my own investigation. | mnli | 2 | 37 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Poirot, I exclaimed, with relief, and seizing him by both hands, I dragged him into the room.
hypothesis: Poirot was now back and I was sorry that he would take over what I now considered my own investigation.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The word aswan actually means trade or market in ancient Egyptian, signifying its most pre-eminent activity.
hypothesis: Aswan's meaning has not changed over time. | mnli | 2 | 38 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The word aswan actually means trade or market in ancient Egyptian, signifying its most pre-eminent activity.
hypothesis: Aswan's meaning has not changed over time.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: well what the market can bear and
hypothesis: THe market can't bear any of it. | mnli | 2 | 39 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: well what the market can bear and
hypothesis: THe market can't bear any of it.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: And to show just how fast Japan's new rulers were catching on, two punitive expeditions were launched against Korea and China in the grand manner of 19th-century gunboat diplomacy.
hypothesis: Japan's new rulers were catching on quickly. | mnli | 0 | 40 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: And to show just how fast Japan's new rulers were catching on, two punitive expeditions were launched against Korea and China in the grand manner of 19th-century gunboat diplomacy.
hypothesis: Japan's new rulers were catching on quickly.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: When the trust fund begins running cash deficits in 2016, the government as a whole must come up with the cash to finance Social Security's cash deficit by reducing any projected non-Social Security surpluses, borrowing from the public, raising other taxes, or reducing other government spending.
hypothesis: The public would generally prefer to see the government reduce its spending in other areas to finance Social Security. | mnli | 1 | 41 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: When the trust fund begins running cash deficits in 2016, the government as a whole must come up with the cash to finance Social Security's cash deficit by reducing any projected non-Social Security surpluses, borrowing from the public, raising other taxes, or reducing other government spending.
hypothesis: The public would generally prefer to see the government reduce its spending in other areas to finance Social Security.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: These organizations invest the time and effort to understand their processes and how those processes contribute to or hamper mission accomplishment.
hypothesis: These organizations invest lots of time to understand how some processes can contribute to or haampe | mnli | 0 | 42 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: These organizations invest the time and effort to understand their processes and how those processes contribute to or hamper mission accomplishment.
hypothesis: These organizations invest lots of time to understand how some processes can contribute to or haampe
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: and it is nice talking to you all righty
hypothesis: I talk to you every day. | mnli | 1 | 43 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: and it is nice talking to you all righty
hypothesis: I talk to you every day.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: You have access to the facts.
hypothesis: The facts are accessible to you. | mnli | 0 | 44 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: You have access to the facts.
hypothesis: The facts are accessible to you.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Build environment Engineering Manufacturing Production (all rate tooling) (1st set of production tooling)
hypothesis: It is the first set of production tooling for manufacturing. | mnli | 0 | 45 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Build environment Engineering Manufacturing Production (all rate tooling) (1st set of production tooling)
hypothesis: It is the first set of production tooling for manufacturing.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: As long you have your own household in order, fretting about your neighbor's spending habits is a lot like fretting about the color of his living-room rug.
hypothesis: You should worry about the color of your neighbor's rug. | mnli | 2 | 46 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: As long you have your own household in order, fretting about your neighbor's spending habits is a lot like fretting about the color of his living-room rug.
hypothesis: You should worry about the color of your neighbor's rug.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: yeah so um also of course they they can they join the they can always join the military service they are considered citizens i believe
hypothesis: They can't join the military service | mnli | 2 | 47 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: yeah so um also of course they they can they join the they can always join the military service they are considered citizens i believe
hypothesis: They can't join the military service
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: She smiled back.
hypothesis: She was so happy she couldn't stop smiling. | mnli | 1 | 48 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: She smiled back.
hypothesis: She was so happy she couldn't stop smiling.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: According to the Office of the Actuary at the Health Care Financing Administration, the estimated net present value of future additional resources needed to fund HI benefits alone over the 75 years is $4.
hypothesis: The net present value of future additional resources for funding HI benefits was $4. | mnli | 0 | 49 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: According to the Office of the Actuary at the Health Care Financing Administration, the estimated net present value of future additional resources needed to fund HI benefits alone over the 75 years is $4.
hypothesis: The net present value of future additional resources for funding HI benefits was $4.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Thus, with respect to the litigation services Congress has funded, there is no alternative channel for expression of the advocacy Congress seeks to restrict.
hypothesis: This is the only channel of expression of the advocacy that Congress seeks to restrict. | mnli | 0 | 50 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Thus, with respect to the litigation services Congress has funded, there is no alternative channel for expression of the advocacy Congress seeks to restrict.
hypothesis: This is the only channel of expression of the advocacy that Congress seeks to restrict.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: How do we fix this?'
hypothesis: Can we fix this? | mnli | 0 | 51 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: How do we fix this?'
hypothesis: Can we fix this?
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: but that takes too much planning
hypothesis: It doesn't take much planning. | mnli | 2 | 52 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: but that takes too much planning
hypothesis: It doesn't take much planning.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: I did not mention Monica in my lecture, but the first question I was asked was how President Clinton could do his job with all the distractions caused by the Monica Lewinsky affair.
hypothesis: They wanted to get through the lecture without any problems. | mnli | 1 | 53 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: I did not mention Monica in my lecture, but the first question I was asked was how President Clinton could do his job with all the distractions caused by the Monica Lewinsky affair.
hypothesis: They wanted to get through the lecture without any problems.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Analyzing Postal Service accounts for depreciation, fuel, and maintenance for city delivery carriers, we have estimated the average city delivery vehicle cost per route.
hypothesis: Driving cost estimates can be averaged will sufficient data. | mnli | 1 | 54 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Analyzing Postal Service accounts for depreciation, fuel, and maintenance for city delivery carriers, we have estimated the average city delivery vehicle cost per route.
hypothesis: Driving cost estimates can be averaged will sufficient data.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Because it plays on my childhood imagination.
hypothesis: The art plays on my young imagination. | mnli | 1 | 55 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Because it plays on my childhood imagination.
hypothesis: The art plays on my young imagination.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: it's slow it's uh there are many better machines on the market right now for
hypothesis: This is the fastest machine, you won't find a better machine. | mnli | 2 | 56 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: it's slow it's uh there are many better machines on the market right now for
hypothesis: This is the fastest machine, you won't find a better machine.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: At the heart of the sanctuary, a small granite shrine once held the sacred barque of Horus himself.
hypothesis: Horus is a god. | mnli | 1 | 57 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: At the heart of the sanctuary, a small granite shrine once held the sacred barque of Horus himself.
hypothesis: Horus is a god.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Consider the United States Postal Service.
hypothesis: Forget the United States Postal Service. | mnli | 2 | 58 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Consider the United States Postal Service.
hypothesis: Forget the United States Postal Service.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: In full costume.
hypothesis: He is wearing a mascot costume. | mnli | 1 | 59 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: In full costume.
hypothesis: He is wearing a mascot costume.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Although your journey is going to be difficult and at times you will doubt yourselves, the benefits to clients are well worth it and the satisfaction of hearing even the most recalcitrant of adversaries say that the new system is better than the one that went before is deeply rewarding.
hypothesis: The new system appears far more complex, but ultimately easier and more thorough. | mnli | 1 | 60 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Although your journey is going to be difficult and at times you will doubt yourselves, the benefits to clients are well worth it and the satisfaction of hearing even the most recalcitrant of adversaries say that the new system is better than the one that went before is deeply rewarding.
hypothesis: The new system appears far more complex, but ultimately easier and more thorough.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Take a remarkable statistic that Shesol cites but lets pass relatively unexamined.
hypothesis: They had data that was very relevant but under used. | mnli | 0 | 61 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Take a remarkable statistic that Shesol cites but lets pass relatively unexamined.
hypothesis: They had data that was very relevant but under used.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: It might have seemed like manna from heaven - up to thousands of dollars dropping, often unexpectedly, into the hands of a half-million Kentucky and Indiana residents this month.
hypothesis: A recent law proposed by congress has resulted in the seizure of thousands of dollars from Kentucky residents. | mnli | 2 | 62 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: It might have seemed like manna from heaven - up to thousands of dollars dropping, often unexpectedly, into the hands of a half-million Kentucky and Indiana residents this month.
hypothesis: A recent law proposed by congress has resulted in the seizure of thousands of dollars from Kentucky residents.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Get individuals to invest their time and the funding will follow.
hypothesis: If individuals will invest their time, funding will come along, too. | mnli | 0 | 63 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Get individuals to invest their time and the funding will follow.
hypothesis: If individuals will invest their time, funding will come along, too.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: i often think gee i wish i had a video camera because i could sure use ten thousand dollars so but i like things like Evening Shade with Burt Reynolds i really enjoy that and uh
hypothesis: Video cameras that I need are very expensive. | mnli | 1 | 64 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: i often think gee i wish i had a video camera because i could sure use ten thousand dollars so but i like things like Evening Shade with Burt Reynolds i really enjoy that and uh
hypothesis: Video cameras that I need are very expensive.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The man on the ground thinks for a moment and yells back, You must work in management.
hypothesis: There was no one on the ground, man or woman. | mnli | 2 | 65 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The man on the ground thinks for a moment and yells back, You must work in management.
hypothesis: There was no one on the ground, man or woman.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: If, however, the evaluation question requires GAO to report on how satisfactory progress is or the reasons for problems in implementation, the more staff who can be on site over time, with the ricHe'st or thickest base for examining the situation as the many people involved see it, the sounder our causal conclusions and subsequent recommendations will be.
hypothesis: If the GAO has to report on the progress, the recommendations will be much poorer quality. | mnli | 2 | 66 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: If, however, the evaluation question requires GAO to report on how satisfactory progress is or the reasons for problems in implementation, the more staff who can be on site over time, with the ricHe'st or thickest base for examining the situation as the many people involved see it, the sounder our causal conclusions and subsequent recommendations will be.
hypothesis: If the GAO has to report on the progress, the recommendations will be much poorer quality.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The economy could be still better.
hypothesis: The economy has never been better. | mnli | 2 | 67 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The economy could be still better.
hypothesis: The economy has never been better.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Hills and mountains are especially sanctified in the cult of Jainism.
hypothesis: The cult of Jainism hates nature. | mnli | 2 | 68 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Hills and mountains are especially sanctified in the cult of Jainism.
hypothesis: The cult of Jainism hates nature.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The famous tenements (or lands ) began to be built.
hypothesis: The land remained deserted. | mnli | 2 | 69 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The famous tenements (or lands ) began to be built.
hypothesis: The land remained deserted.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: In the midst of this amazing amalgam of cultures is a passion for continuity.
hypothesis: A passion for continuity is not the most important of these cultures. | mnli | 1 | 70 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: In the midst of this amazing amalgam of cultures is a passion for continuity.
hypothesis: A passion for continuity is not the most important of these cultures.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Putting aside stage as a horse-drawn conveyance, a popular delicatessen, a part of a rocket, and an opportunity to mock Gail Sheehy (who seems to get a free ride from News Quiz participants), this question all but demanded the invention of a violent theatrical event, and that's not easy.
hypothesis: Gail Sheehy is a popular target for mocking on other shows. | mnli | 1 | 71 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Putting aside stage as a horse-drawn conveyance, a popular delicatessen, a part of a rocket, and an opportunity to mock Gail Sheehy (who seems to get a free ride from News Quiz participants), this question all but demanded the invention of a violent theatrical event, and that's not easy.
hypothesis: Gail Sheehy is a popular target for mocking on other shows.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Entreaties to the apartment's owner have gone nowhere.
hypothesis: The apartment's owner is very responsive. | mnli | 2 | 72 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Entreaties to the apartment's owner have gone nowhere.
hypothesis: The apartment's owner is very responsive.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Mrs. Cavendish is in her mother-in-law's room.
hypothesis: Mrs. Cavendish has left the building. | mnli | 2 | 73 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Mrs. Cavendish is in her mother-in-law's room.
hypothesis: Mrs. Cavendish has left the building.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: But I thought you'd sworn off coffee.
hypothesis: I thought that you vowed to drink more coffee. | mnli | 2 | 74 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: But I thought you'd sworn off coffee.
hypothesis: I thought that you vowed to drink more coffee.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: We stink all the time.
hypothesis: We always stink. | mnli | 0 | 75 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: We stink all the time.
hypothesis: We always stink.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: In an increasingly interdependent world, many pressing problems that affect Americans can be addressed only through cooperation with other countries.
hypothesis: We should be independent and stay away from talking and working with other nations. | mnli | 2 | 76 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: In an increasingly interdependent world, many pressing problems that affect Americans can be addressed only through cooperation with other countries.
hypothesis: We should be independent and stay away from talking and working with other nations.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Ca'daan continued.
hypothesis: Ca'daan refused to stop. | mnli | 1 | 77 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Ca'daan continued.
hypothesis: Ca'daan refused to stop.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The rule requires broadcasters to maintain a file for public inspection containing a Children's Television Programming Report and to identify programs specifically designed to educate and inform children at the beginning of those programs and to furnish such information to the publishers of program guides.
hypothesis: The rule makes broadcasters keep a file about children's television programming. | mnli | 0 | 78 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The rule requires broadcasters to maintain a file for public inspection containing a Children's Television Programming Report and to identify programs specifically designed to educate and inform children at the beginning of those programs and to furnish such information to the publishers of program guides.
hypothesis: The rule makes broadcasters keep a file about children's television programming.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: well because how how hot i mean like like in the coldest that it gets in winter down there how much is it
hypothesis: It's hot all the time where I live, including winter. | mnli | 1 | 79 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: well because how how hot i mean like like in the coldest that it gets in winter down there how much is it
hypothesis: It's hot all the time where I live, including winter.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Each of the men wore leather armor and dressed in the style of heavy riders.
hypothesis: The men were naked. | mnli | 2 | 80 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Each of the men wore leather armor and dressed in the style of heavy riders.
hypothesis: The men were naked.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The man should have died instantly.
hypothesis: The man was perfectly fine. | mnli | 2 | 81 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The man should have died instantly.
hypothesis: The man was perfectly fine.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: In summer the rice forms a green velvety blanket, then turns golden in autumn when it ripens and is harvested.
hypothesis: The rice is golden and harvestable in the summer, but turns green in autumn. | mnli | 2 | 82 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: In summer the rice forms a green velvety blanket, then turns golden in autumn when it ripens and is harvested.
hypothesis: The rice is golden and harvestable in the summer, but turns green in autumn.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Just as the Daily Worker and New Masses , socialist papers from the 1930s, were peppered with citations of Marx and Engels, Educational Liberator is peppered with references to their libertarian equivalents--Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises.
hypothesis: Citations from Marx were used in socialist papers in the 30s. | mnli | 0 | 83 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Just as the Daily Worker and New Masses , socialist papers from the 1930s, were peppered with citations of Marx and Engels, Educational Liberator is peppered with references to their libertarian equivalents--Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises.
hypothesis: Citations from Marx were used in socialist papers in the 30s.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: To be sure that any needlework item is the genuine article (as opposed to an inferior import or machine-made piece), look for a lead seal with an M, the emblem of IBTAM meaning it's been certified by the Instituto de Bordado, Tapecaras e Arte?sanato da Madeira (Institute of Madeiran Embroidery, Tapestry, and Handicrafts), an official island organization that has a showroom/museum on Rua Visconde de Anadia, 44.
hypothesis: There is a seal to show authenticity in needlework items made in Italy. | mnli | 1 | 84 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: To be sure that any needlework item is the genuine article (as opposed to an inferior import or machine-made piece), look for a lead seal with an M, the emblem of IBTAM meaning it's been certified by the Instituto de Bordado, Tapecaras e Arte?sanato da Madeira (Institute of Madeiran Embroidery, Tapestry, and Handicrafts), an official island organization that has a showroom/museum on Rua Visconde de Anadia, 44.
hypothesis: There is a seal to show authenticity in needlework items made in Italy.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: I'm not into this Multivista stuff, because what is some dumpy system when compared to a beautiful hyperextension of the sun somewhere over Kuchara, when compared to the golden hue of onion fried with the kse-fi waves, when compared to the number of dividers for credit membranes in a wallet of a rich man, when compared to the magnificent smell of a briessante roll dunked in wholesome milk synthetically enriched with substances boosting the secretion of happiness hormones, that one from two years ago, not three,' Gonzo said in a tone characteristic for a man who just discovered a solution to his life problem.
hypothesis: He's not into this multivista stuff because what is some dumpy system compared to the magnificent smell of a cinnamon roll dunked in wholesome milk. | mnli | 0 | 85 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: I'm not into this Multivista stuff, because what is some dumpy system when compared to a beautiful hyperextension of the sun somewhere over Kuchara, when compared to the golden hue of onion fried with the kse-fi waves, when compared to the number of dividers for credit membranes in a wallet of a rich man, when compared to the magnificent smell of a briessante roll dunked in wholesome milk synthetically enriched with substances boosting the secretion of happiness hormones, that one from two years ago, not three,' Gonzo said in a tone characteristic for a man who just discovered a solution to his life problem.
hypothesis: He's not into this multivista stuff because what is some dumpy system compared to the magnificent smell of a cinnamon roll dunked in wholesome milk.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: No matter what I ended up doing, I think I would have found some way within that profession to do public work, because that's what I was taught, Zelon said.
hypothesis: This is like using the postition as a banker to help make regulations better for the public. | mnli | 1 | 86 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: No matter what I ended up doing, I think I would have found some way within that profession to do public work, because that's what I was taught, Zelon said.
hypothesis: This is like using the postition as a banker to help make regulations better for the public.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Clark also expressed the hope that he and Redgrave could continue with their marriage.
hypothesis: Clark hoped that he could continue their marriage. | mnli | 0 | 87 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Clark also expressed the hope that he and Redgrave could continue with their marriage.
hypothesis: Clark hoped that he could continue their marriage.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The poverty, for instance, does not create the sense of shame as it does for people who live in Western countries.
hypothesis: Poverty doesn't create a sense of shame in any country. | mnli | 2 | 88 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The poverty, for instance, does not create the sense of shame as it does for people who live in Western countries.
hypothesis: Poverty doesn't create a sense of shame in any country.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Back on the road to Jaisalmer, one last splash of color delights the senses before you plunge into the the fields are dotted with mounds of red hot chili peppers.
hypothesis: The road to Jaisalmer is bumpy and unpleasant to ride on. | mnli | 1 | 89 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Back on the road to Jaisalmer, one last splash of color delights the senses before you plunge into the the fields are dotted with mounds of red hot chili peppers.
hypothesis: The road to Jaisalmer is bumpy and unpleasant to ride on.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: they supplied some uh you know they were some groups uh the Vicksburg if you ever get a chance to go over to Vicksburg the battleground at Vicksburg uh there's an area there where there was uh some Texas uh groups and they had an interesting time there
hypothesis: There were also North Carolina troops at Vicksburg. | mnli | 1 | 90 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: they supplied some uh you know they were some groups uh the Vicksburg if you ever get a chance to go over to Vicksburg the battleground at Vicksburg uh there's an area there where there was uh some Texas uh groups and they had an interesting time there
hypothesis: There were also North Carolina troops at Vicksburg.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: which i mean i think it should be anyway
hypothesis: I don't think it should be that way | mnli | 2 | 91 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: which i mean i think it should be anyway
hypothesis: I don't think it should be that way
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Also, compensation committees need to understand the implications of compensation to provide incentives for management to do the right thing for the company and its shareholders versus themselves.
hypothesis: The implications of compensation to provide incentives for management to do the right thing for the company and its shareholders versus themselves should always be ignored by compensation committees. | mnli | 2 | 92 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Also, compensation committees need to understand the implications of compensation to provide incentives for management to do the right thing for the company and its shareholders versus themselves.
hypothesis: The implications of compensation to provide incentives for management to do the right thing for the company and its shareholders versus themselves should always be ignored by compensation committees.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The fourth-century Roman emperor Gratianus was an early visitor, followed much later by such luminaries as the Romantic poet Alphonse de Lamartine, Queen Victoria, Saint-Sa?«ns, and Rachmaninov.
hypothesis: Gratianus was a Roman empoeror. | mnli | 0 | 93 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The fourth-century Roman emperor Gratianus was an early visitor, followed much later by such luminaries as the Romantic poet Alphonse de Lamartine, Queen Victoria, Saint-Sa?«ns, and Rachmaninov.
hypothesis: Gratianus was a Roman empoeror.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: So, I went to court by myself and told them the truth, but it didn't do me any good.
hypothesis: I went and told the truth at court but it didn't do me any good. | mnli | 0 | 94 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: So, I went to court by myself and told them the truth, but it didn't do me any good.
hypothesis: I went and told the truth at court but it didn't do me any good.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Click More Links (on the right-hand side under Miscellaneous), and from
hypothesis: There are no links to click under Miscellaneous. | mnli | 2 | 95 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Click More Links (on the right-hand side under Miscellaneous), and from
hypothesis: There are no links to click under Miscellaneous.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: and so i started watching it and all of a sudden stay tuned next week and i went what
hypothesis: I wouldn't have started watching it if I'd known. | mnli | 1 | 96 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: and so i started watching it and all of a sudden stay tuned next week and i went what
hypothesis: I wouldn't have started watching it if I'd known.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: no oh no oh well take care
hypothesis: Bye for now. | mnli | 0 | 97 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: no oh no oh well take care
hypothesis: Bye for now.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: 'Hello, Ben.'
hypothesis: I ignored Ben | mnli | 2 | 98 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: 'Hello, Ben.'
hypothesis: I ignored Ben
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: how can you prove it
hypothesis: Can you tell me how to prove it? | mnli | 0 | 99 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: how can you prove it
hypothesis: Can you tell me how to prove it?
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 1