question
stringlengths 236
348k
| answer
stringlengths 10
2.11k
|
|---|---|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
libappstream-glib x86_64 0.8.3-3.eln145 https_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_eln_build_latest_basearch 1.4 MiB
qpdf-devel x86_64 12.2.0-1.eln148 copr_base 589.6 KiB
qt5-qtbase-devel x86_64 5.15.16-2.eln145 https_kojipkgs_fedora | qpdf is at version 12 or higher. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp: In lambda function:
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:170:29: error: âPointerHolderâ was not declared in this scope
170 | PointerHolder<Buffer> buffer = obj.getStreamData(qpdf_dl_all);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:170:49: error: expected primary-expression before â>â token
170 | PointerHolder<Buffer> buffer = obj.getStreamData(qpdf_dl_all);
| ^
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:170:51: error: âbufferâ was not declared in this scope; did you mean âBufferâ?
170 | PointerHolder<Buffer> buffer = obj.getStreamData(qpdf_dl_all);
| ^~~~~~
| Buffer
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:175:85: error: no matching function for call to âMagick::Blob::Blob(<brace-enclosed initializer list>)â
175 | Magick::Blob blob{buffer->getBuffer(), buffer->getSize()}; | Shows the failure during compilation. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[No matching package to install: 'fmt-devel']: [Requested package was not found.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/chacha20)']: [Requested package was not found.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/chacha20poly1305)']: [Requested package was not found.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/curve25519)']: [Requested package was not found by the package manager.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/hkdf)']: [Requested package was not found by the package manager.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/xts)']: [Requested package was not found by the package manager.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'gtest-devel']: [Requested package was not found by the package manager.]
=============
[Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [Package manager error, indicating that not all packages required for the build could be retrieved.]
=============
[ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/android-tools-35.0.2-2.el9.src.rpm) Config(centos-stream-9-aarch64) 0 minutes 25 seconds]: [Build for configuration `centos-stream-9-aarch64` failed after 25 seconds.]
=============
[Copr build error: Build failed]: [Error indicating general build failure.]
| Issue: Build failed since several required packages couldn't be found.
Resolution: All dependencies must be available at build time. This includes packages which are supposed to be retrieved from external repositories using package manager. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'fmt-devel' | Requested package was not found. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/chacha20)' | Requested package was not found. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/chacha20poly1305)' | Requested package was not found. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/curve25519)' | Requested package was not found by the package manager. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/hkdf)' | Requested package was not found by the package manager. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/xts)' | Requested package was not found by the package manager. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'gtest-devel' | Requested package was not found by the package manager. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Error: Some packages could not be found. | Package manager error, indicating that not all packages required for the build could be retrieved. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/android-tools-35.0.2-2.el9.src.rpm) Config(centos-stream-9-aarch64) 0 minutes 25 seconds | Build for configuration `centos-stream-9-aarch64` failed after 25 seconds. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Copr build error: Build failed | Error indicating general build failure. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: python3-pytest-twisted
You can try to add to command line:
--skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages]: [missing dependency]
=============
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: python3-pytest-twisted
You can try to add to command line:
--skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages]: [missing dependency]
| Issue: There's a missing dependency `python3-pytest-twisted` that is needed for the build / tests
Resolution: Package the required dependency |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: python3-pytest-twisted
You can try to add to command line:
--skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages | missing dependency |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: python3-pytest-twisted
You can try to add to command line:
--skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages | missing dependency |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -mbranch-protection=standard -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fPIC -MD -MQ libwlroots.so.10.p/backend_libinput_tablet_pad.c.o -MF libwlroots.so.10.p/backend_libinput_tablet_pad.c.o.d -o libwlroots.so.10.p/backend_libinput_tablet_pad.c.o -c ../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c: In function ‘add_pad_group_from_libinput’:
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:31:38: error: ‘calloc’ sizes specified with ‘sizeof’ in the earlier argument and not in the later argument [-Werror=calloc-transposed-args]
31 | group->rings = calloc(sizeof(unsigned int), group->ring_count);
| ^~~~~~~~
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:31:38: note: earlier argument should specify number of elements, later size of each element
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:44:39: error: ‘calloc’ sizes specified with ‘sizeof’ in the earlier argument and not in the later argument [-Werror=calloc-transposed-args]
44 | group->strips = calloc(sizeof(unsigned int), group->strip_count);
| ^~~~~~~~
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:44:39: note: earlier argument should specify number of elements, later size of each element
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:57:40: error: ‘calloc’ sizes specified with ‘sizeof’ in the earlier argument and not in the later argument [-Werror=calloc-transposed-args]
57 | group->buttons = calloc(sizeof(unsigned int), group->button_count);
| ^~~~~~~~
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:57:40: note: earlier argument should specify number of elements, later size of each element
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
[151/263] gcc -Ilibwlroots.so.10.p -I. -I.. -Iinclude -I../include -Iprotocol -I../protocol -Irender/vulkan/shaders -I/usr/include/libdrm -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wextra -Werror -std=c11 -DWLR_USE_UNSTABLE -DWLR_LITTLE_ENDIAN=1 -DWLR_BIG_ENDIAN=0 -Wundef -Wlogical-op -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Winit-self -Wstrict-prototypes -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 -Wendif-labels -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Woverflow -Wmissing-prototypes -Walloca -Wno-missing-braces -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -fmacro-prefix-map=../= -DHAS_GBM_BO_GET_FD_FOR_PLANE=1 -DLIBINPUT_HAS_HOLD_GESTURES=1 '-DICONDIR="/usr/share/icons"' -DHAS_XCB_ERRORS=0 -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wer]: [The error message indicates that the calloc() function is being used incorrectly. The calloc() function allocates memory for an array of objects, and it takes two arguments: the number of elements to allocate and the size of each element. In this case, the number of elements is specified first, but the size of each element is specified second. This is the wrong order, and it will cause the calloc() function to allocate the wrong amount of memory.]
| Issue: Library libwlroots cannot be compiled. The compiler is warning you about this error because it can potentially lead to memory corruption. If the wrong amount of memory is allocated, the program could overwrite other memory locations, which could cause the program to crash or behave in an unexpected way.
Resolution: To fix this error, you need to swap the order of the arguments to the calloc() function. For example, instead of writing:
group->rings = calloc(sizeof(unsigned int), group->ring_count);
You should write:
group->rings = calloc(group->ring_count, sizeof(unsigned int)); |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -mbranch-protection=standard -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fPIC -MD -MQ libwlroots.so.10.p/backend_libinput_tablet_pad.c.o -MF libwlroots.so.10.p/backend_libinput_tablet_pad.c.o.d -o libwlroots.so.10.p/backend_libinput_tablet_pad.c.o -c ../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c: In function ‘add_pad_group_from_libinput’:
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:31:38: error: ‘calloc’ sizes specified with ‘sizeof’ in the earlier argument and not in the later argument [-Werror=calloc-transposed-args]
31 | group->rings = calloc(sizeof(unsigned int), group->ring_count);
| ^~~~~~~~
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:31:38: note: earlier argument should specify number of elements, later size of each element
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:44:39: error: ‘calloc’ sizes specified with ‘sizeof’ in the earlier argument and not in the later argument [-Werror=calloc-transposed-args]
44 | group->strips = calloc(sizeof(unsigned int), group->strip_count);
| ^~~~~~~~
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:44:39: note: earlier argument should specify number of elements, later size of each element
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:57:40: error: ‘calloc’ sizes specified with ‘sizeof’ in the earlier argument and not in the later argument [-Werror=calloc-transposed-args]
57 | group->buttons = calloc(sizeof(unsigned int), group->button_count);
| ^~~~~~~~
../backend/libinput/tablet_pad.c:57:40: note: earlier argument should specify number of elements, later size of each element
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
[151/263] gcc -Ilibwlroots.so.10.p -I. -I.. -Iinclude -I../include -Iprotocol -I../protocol -Irender/vulkan/shaders -I/usr/include/libdrm -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wextra -Werror -std=c11 -DWLR_USE_UNSTABLE -DWLR_LITTLE_ENDIAN=1 -DWLR_BIG_ENDIAN=0 -Wundef -Wlogical-op -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Winit-self -Wstrict-prototypes -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 -Wendif-labels -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Woverflow -Wmissing-prototypes -Walloca -Wno-missing-braces -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -fmacro-prefix-map=../= -DHAS_GBM_BO_GET_FD_FOR_PLANE=1 -DLIBINPUT_HAS_HOLD_GESTURES=1 '-DICONDIR="/usr/share/icons"' -DHAS_XCB_ERRORS=0 -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wer | The error message indicates that the calloc() function is being used incorrectly. The calloc() function allocates memory for an array of objects, and it takes two arguments: the number of elements to allocate and the size of each element. In this case, the number of elements is specified first, but the size of each element is specified second. This is the wrong order, and it will cause the calloc() function to allocate the wrong amount of memory. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
contrib/meson.build:14:24: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconf]: [This part says the buildsuite didn't find a required dependency - bash-completion and so cannot proceed.]
| Issue: The required dependency isn't present in the buildroot.
Resolution: Explicitly require bash-completion in the spec file of the package. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
contrib/meson.build:14:24: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconf | This part says the buildsuite didn't find a required dependency - bash-completion and so cannot proceed. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/fwupd-2.0.8-build/BUILDROOT
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/etc/grub.d/35_fwupd
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/etc/grub.d/35_fwupd]: [There is an existing file not packaged into rpm. It will be missing in a target system.
Ommiting a file for packaging can cause user issues.]
| Issue: Unexpected unpackaged file found.
Resolution: Either package all files or don't create them at all. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/fwupd-2.0.8-build/BUILDROOT
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/etc/grub.d/35_fwupd
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/etc/grub.d/35_fwupd | There is an existing file not packaged into rpm. It will be missing in a target system.
Ommiting a file for packaging can cause user issues. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ /usr/bin/pytest -Wdefault
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Mrz6o7: line 48: /usr/bin/pytest: No such file or directory]: [The snippet shows missing pytest needed for the tests.]
| Issue: The BuildRequire on pytest is missing in the spec file.
Resolution: BuildRequire pytest |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ /usr/bin/pytest -Wdefault
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Mrz6o7: line 48: /usr/bin/pytest: No such file or directory | The snippet shows missing pytest needed for the tests. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.x9gxfL (%check)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.x9gxfL (%check)]: [cause of the failed rpm build (check phase)]
=============
[> raise exceptions.RefResolutionError(
"Unresolvable JSON pointer: %r" % fragment
)
E jsonschema.exceptions.RefResolutionError: Unresolvable JSON pointer: 'task_info'
/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/jsonschema/validators.py:813: RefResolutionError]: [reason why the tests failed]
| Issue: tests have failed during the %check phase
Resolution: fix the tests |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.x9gxfL (%check)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.x9gxfL (%check) | cause of the failed rpm build (check phase) |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
> raise exceptions.RefResolutionError(
"Unresolvable JSON pointer: %r" % fragment
)
E jsonschema.exceptions.RefResolutionError: Unresolvable JSON pointer: 'task_info'
/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/jsonschema/validators.py:813: RefResolutionError | reason why the tests failed |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[RPM build errors:
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/unzip.h
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/zip.h
File listed twice: /usr/lib64/libminizip-ng.so.4
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/mz*.h
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/unzip.h
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/zip.h
Child return code was: ]: [It says there are some files listed in %files section that are not installed.]
=============
[-DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/includ]: [This points to the CMake option that needs to be edited, so the files are installed correctly]
| Issue: Because the minizip-ng from version 4 changed the `CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR` CMake option. In previous version 3 it didn't included the 'minizip' path and it had to be added to the option like "-DCMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR=include/minizip". However, in new version 4, it is included and the "minizip" from the path needs to be removed, so the files are installed in the correct path
Resolution: Remove the "minizip" from CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR option. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
RPM build errors:
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/unzip.h
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/zip.h
File listed twice: /usr/lib64/libminizip-ng.so.4
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/mz*.h
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/unzip.h
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/zip.h
Child return code was: | It says there are some files listed in %files section that are not installed. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
-DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/includ | This points to the CMake option that needs to be edited, so the files are installed correctly |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1]: [Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process.]
=============
[
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1]: [Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process.]
=============
[
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1]: [Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process.]
=============
[
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1]: [Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process.]
=============
[
Copr build error: Build fail]: [A final message from the copr build service about halting an attempt to complete the build.]
| Issue: Build time dependencies necessary to do the build aren't present in the repositories available to the builder.
Resolution: Handle the chained build in the correct order by building the missing dependencies before attempting to build the package. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1 | Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1 | Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1 | Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1 | Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Copr build error: Build fail | A final message from the copr build service about halting an attempt to complete the build. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Running test test_client_express (starting at 2025-03-31 22:11:15-04:00) ...
-----------------------------------------------
Running express client test
Running express test suite
Cloning into '/var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express'...
warning: Could not find remote branch 5.1.0 to clone.
fatal: Remote branch 5.1.0 not found in upstream origin
test/test-lib-nodejs.sh: line 81: pushd: /var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express: No such file or directory
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)]: [Running test test_client_express (starting at 2025-03-31 22:11:15-04:00) ...
-----------------------------------------------
Running express client test
Running express test suite
Cloning into '/var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express'...
warning: Could not find remote branch 5.1.0 to clone.
fatal: Remote branch 5.1.0 not found in upstream origin
test/test-lib-nodejs.sh: line 81: pushd: /var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express: No such file or directory
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)]
| Issue: The build of client_express failed for reason, that remote branch does not exit.
Resolution: Use the appropriate branch to fix this issue. See in the upstream repository which branch is active |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Running test test_client_express (starting at 2025-03-31 22:11:15-04:00) ...
-----------------------------------------------
Running express client test
Running express test suite
Cloning into '/var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express'...
warning: Could not find remote branch 5.1.0 to clone.
fatal: Remote branch 5.1.0 not found in upstream origin
test/test-lib-nodejs.sh: line 81: pushd: /var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express: No such file or directory
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1) | Running test test_client_express (starting at 2025-03-31 22:11:15-04:00) ...
-----------------------------------------------
Running express client test
Running express test suite
Cloning into '/var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express'...
warning: Could not find remote branch 5.1.0 to clone.
fatal: Remote branch 5.1.0 not found in upstream origin
test/test-lib-nodejs.sh: line 81: pushd: /var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express: No such file or directory
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1) |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[UUlib.xs:240:13: error: too many arguments to function ‘UUGetOption’; expected 0, have 4
240 | UUGetOption (opt, 0, cval, sizeof cval);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~]: [word error]
| Issue: Because changes of gcc to C23 standard, which forbid different number of arguments
Resolution: Fix the code |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
UUlib.xs:240:13: error: too many arguments to function ‘UUGetOption’; expected 0, have 4
240 | UUGetOption (opt, 0, cval, sizeof cval);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ | word error |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[lisp/progmodes/elisp-mode-tests.log:
FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-co-located-default
FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-el
FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-implicit-generic
FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-no-default
FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-separate-default
make[2]: *** [Makefile:348: check-doit] Error 2]: [This snippet displays why the build failed - since the building process incorporates some tests, when those tests fail, the build fails as well. ]
| Issue: This package follows commits on Emacs master repository. This means that breakages to some functionality is expected. Build failed because some tests failed.
Resolution: In this case, either update failing tests in upstream, fix the cause of those text failing, wait for someone to fix those tests and build package with newer commit or just disable those tests via package if core functionality stays intact. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
lisp/progmodes/elisp-mode-tests.log:
FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-co-located-default
FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-el
FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-implicit-generic
FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-no-default
FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-separate-default
make[2]: *** [Makefile:348: check-doit] Error 2 | This snippet displays why the build failed - since the building process incorporates some tests, when those tests fail, the build fails as well. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ERROR Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: No source number 0]: [This line says while parsing specfile, no Source0 was found in that specfile]
| Issue: The SRPM build submitted by Packit failed because there was no Source0 field in spec file.
Resolution: Specify Source0 in specfile |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ERROR Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: No source number 0 | This line says while parsing specfile, no Source0 was found in that specfile |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/metainfo/org.kde.gwenview.appdata.xml
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/metainfo/org.kde.gwenview.appdata.xml]: [This is the build error]
| Issue: There is a file that is part of the build, but is not listed among the files to be included in the package/subpackages nor is it excluded using the %exclude macro.
Resolution: Either add the file(s) to the list of files included in the package/subpackages or use the %exclude macro to exclude it from the packaging. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/metainfo/org.kde.gwenview.appdata.xml
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/metainfo/org.kde.gwenview.appdata.xml | This is the build error |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[No matching package to install: 'extra-cmake-modules >= 5.248.0']: [DNF reports that `extra-cmake-modules` with version >= 5.248.0 couldn't be found.]
| Issue: The extra-cmake-modules don't exist in the build repository, or exists in an incompatible version.
Resolution: Fix the dependency specification, or provide a newer extra-cmake-modules package in the build repository. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'extra-cmake-modules >= 5.248.0' | DNF reports that `extra-cmake-modules` with version >= 5.248.0 couldn't be found. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2uGqIu (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2uGqIu (%build)
]: [The build failed in %build phase]
=============
[/usr/include/asm-generic/int-l64.h:30:23: note: previous declaration as ‘typedef long unsigned int __u64’
30 | typedef unsigned long __u64;
| ^~~~~
make[1]: *** [Makefile:835: Common/DtaNvmeDrive.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaHexDump.o Common/DtaHexDump.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaHashPwd.o Common/DtaHashPwd.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaSataDrive.o Common/DtaSataDrive.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaResponse.o Common/DtaResponse.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaDev.o Common/DtaDev.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaDevEnterprise.o Common/DtaDevEnterprise.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaDevOpal.o Common/DtaDevOpal.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make: *** [Makefile:531: all] Error 2]: [The error suggests a conflict between type definitions for __s64 and __u64 in your project (Common/NVMeStructures.h) and the system headers (/usr/include/asm-generic/int-l64.h). This happens because both define the same types differently, leading to a clash during the build process.]
| Issue: The build failed because the code use different type compared to system type. In this case ppc64le.
Resolution: Ask upstream to support ppc64le.
Temporary workaround is to exclude this architecture:
ExcludeArch: ppc64le
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2uGqIu (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2uGqIu (%build)
| The build failed in %build phase |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/usr/include/asm-generic/int-l64.h:30:23: note: previous declaration as ‘typedef long unsigned int __u64’
30 | typedef unsigned long __u64;
| ^~~~~
make[1]: *** [Makefile:835: Common/DtaNvmeDrive.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaHexDump.o Common/DtaHexDump.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaHashPwd.o Common/DtaHashPwd.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaSataDrive.o Common/DtaSataDrive.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaResponse.o Common/DtaResponse.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaDev.o Common/DtaDev.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaDevEnterprise.o Common/DtaDevEnterprise.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -std=c++11 -I./linux -I./Common -I./Common/pbkdf2 -I./linux -I./LinuxPBA -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -c -o Common/DtaDevOpal.o Common/DtaDevOpal.cpp
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/sedutil-1.49.6-build/sedutil-1.49.6'
make: *** [Makefile:531: all] Error 2 | The error suggests a conflict between type definitions for __s64 and __u64 in your project (Common/NVMeStructures.h) and the system headers (/usr/include/asm-generic/int-l64.h). This happens because both define the same types differently, leading to a clash during the build process. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[semanageswig_wrap.c: In function '_wrap_semanage_get_hll_compiler_path':
semanageswig_wrap.c:4209:17: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
4209 | resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, SWIG_FromCharPtr(*arg3));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c: In function '_wrap_semanage_module_extract':
semanageswig_wrap.c:5045:17: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
5045 | resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, SWIG_NewPointerObj(*arg6, SWIGTYPE_p_semanage_module_info, 0));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [Build failed because function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput' expected 3 arguments.]
| Issue: The build failed due to changes in SWIG 4.3.0.
There is new declaration of SWIG_Python_AppendOutput is now:
SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void);
The 3rd parameter is new and the new $isvoid special variable should be passed to it.
Resolution: There are two ways how to solve it.
* Add the 3rd parameter to indicate whether or not the wrapped function returns void.
* or also consider replacing with:
SWIG_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj); |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
semanageswig_wrap.c: In function '_wrap_semanage_get_hll_compiler_path':
semanageswig_wrap.c:4209:17: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
4209 | resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, SWIG_FromCharPtr(*arg3));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c: In function '_wrap_semanage_module_extract':
semanageswig_wrap.c:5045:17: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
5045 | resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, SWIG_NewPointerObj(*arg6, SWIGTYPE_p_semanage_module_info, 0));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Build failed because function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput' expected 3 arguments. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ ruby -Ilib:spec -e 'Dir.glob "./spec/*spec.rb", &method(:require)'
Run options: --seed 53807
# Running:
.......................................................................................................F.........F..................
Finished in 7.228097s, 18.2621 runs/s, 29.0533 assertions/s.
1) Failure:
Hitimes::TimedValueMetric#test_0008_calculates the stddev of the durations [spec/timed_value_metric_spec.rb:61]:
Expected |0.05 - 0.047793456202974996| (0.002206543797025007) to be <= 0.001.
2) Failure:
Hitimes::TimedValueMetric#test_0017_can measure a block of code from an instance [spec/timed_value_metric_spec.rb:125]:
Expected |0.15 - 0.16569746200000002| (0.015697462000000023) to be <= 0.004.
132 runs, 210 assertions, 2 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips]: [Test failure. These tests measure time and comparing that the difference is in range.]
=============
[DEBUG buildroot.py:867: kernel version == 6.12.13-200.fc41.ppc64le]: [ppc64le platform can be slower with regards to execution and time sensitive tests do not account for slower (or software virtualized) platforms.]
| Issue: The time-based tests were not bet ween 0 and 0.001 and 0.004.
Resolution: Re-run the build, the tests might pass.
Ignore these time-sensitive tests as they are unreliable. Increase the time difference expected in tests, which would take into account slower platforms. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ ruby -Ilib:spec -e 'Dir.glob "./spec/*spec.rb", &method(:require)'
Run options: --seed 53807
# Running:
.......................................................................................................F.........F..................
Finished in 7.228097s, 18.2621 runs/s, 29.0533 assertions/s.
1) Failure:
Hitimes::TimedValueMetric#test_0008_calculates the stddev of the durations [spec/timed_value_metric_spec.rb:61]:
Expected |0.05 - 0.047793456202974996| (0.002206543797025007) to be <= 0.001.
2) Failure:
Hitimes::TimedValueMetric#test_0017_can measure a block of code from an instance [spec/timed_value_metric_spec.rb:125]:
Expected |0.15 - 0.16569746200000002| (0.015697462000000023) to be <= 0.004.
132 runs, 210 assertions, 2 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips | Test failure. These tests measure time and comparing that the difference is in range. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG buildroot.py:867: kernel version == 6.12.13-200.fc41.ppc64le | ppc64le platform can be slower with regards to execution and time sensitive tests do not account for slower (or software virtualized) platforms. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[PHPUnit 12.1.5 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.]: [The test suite is using PHPUnit version 12.1.5]
=============
[FAILURES!
Tests: 16, Assertions: 14, Failures: 2, PHPUnit Deprecations: 1, Skipped: 2.
]: [This is the test suite summary.
Test suite have failures.]
=============
[1) /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/end-to-end/patch-coverage/valid-arguments-with-invalid-path-prefix.phpt
Failed asserting that string matches format description.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
phpcov 11.0.0 by Sebastian Bergmann.
-Unable to detect executable lines that were changed.
-Are you sure your --path-prefix is correct?
-int(2)
+
+Fatal error: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot assign __PHP_Incomplete_Class to property SebastianBergmann\CodeCoverage\CodeCoverage::$analyser of type ?SebastianBergmann\CodeCoverage\StaticAnalysis\FileAnalyser in /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov:2
+Stack trace:
+#0 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov(2): unserialize()
+#1 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/PatchCoverage.php(35): include('...')
+#2 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/cli/PatchCoverageCommand.php(41): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\PatchCoverage->execute()
+#3 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/cli/Application.php(52): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\PatchCoverageCommand->run()
+#4 Standard input code(10): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\Application->run()
+#5 {main}
+ thrown in /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov on line 2
/builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/end-to-end/patch-coverage/valid-arguments-with-invalid-path-prefix.phpt:19
]: [This is the detailed failure description, with diff from expected and actual output]
| Issue: PHP raises a TypeError exception because of __PHP_Incomplete_Class.
This may be related to serialization and missing extension
Resolution: Analyse the valid-arguments-with-invalid-path-prefix.phpt unit test |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
PHPUnit 12.1.5 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors. | The test suite is using PHPUnit version 12.1.5 |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
FAILURES!
Tests: 16, Assertions: 14, Failures: 2, PHPUnit Deprecations: 1, Skipped: 2.
| This is the test suite summary.
Test suite have failures. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
1) /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/end-to-end/patch-coverage/valid-arguments-with-invalid-path-prefix.phpt
Failed asserting that string matches format description.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
phpcov 11.0.0 by Sebastian Bergmann.
-Unable to detect executable lines that were changed.
-Are you sure your --path-prefix is correct?
-int(2)
+
+Fatal error: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot assign __PHP_Incomplete_Class to property SebastianBergmann\CodeCoverage\CodeCoverage::$analyser of type ?SebastianBergmann\CodeCoverage\StaticAnalysis\FileAnalyser in /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov:2
+Stack trace:
+#0 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov(2): unserialize()
+#1 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/PatchCoverage.php(35): include('...')
+#2 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/cli/PatchCoverageCommand.php(41): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\PatchCoverage->execute()
+#3 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/cli/Application.php(52): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\PatchCoverageCommand->run()
+#4 Standard input code(10): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\Application->run()
+#5 {main}
+ thrown in /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov on line 2
/builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/end-to-end/patch-coverage/valid-arguments-with-invalid-path-prefix.phpt:19
| This is the detailed failure description, with diff from expected and actual output |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:]: [Problem resolving transaction.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: python3dist(soupsieve) >= 2.6]: [The package python3dist(soupsieve) not found.]
| Issue: The package python3dist(soupsieve) not found.
Resolution: Provide the package python3dist(soupsieve). |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: | Problem resolving transaction. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: python3dist(soupsieve) >= 2.6 | The package python3dist(soupsieve) not found. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[tilde.c:37:14: error: conflicting types for ‘strcpy’; have ‘char *(void)’
37 | extern char *strcpy ();
| ^~~~~~]: [compiler error stating that function `strcpy` is redefined]
| Issue: gcc couldn't compile the code
Resolution: Check that flags and libraries are used properly |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
tilde.c:37:14: error: conflicting types for ‘strcpy’; have ‘char *(void)’
37 | extern char *strcpy ();
| ^~~~~~ | compiler error stating that function `strcpy` is redefined |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:233 (message):
Could NOT find RAPTOR (missing: RAPTOR_LIBRARY RAPTOR_INCLUDE_DIR)]: [CMake can't find definition of the mentioned options.]
| Issue: Until the missing CMake options are not defined, it won't work.
Resolution: There are two ways to resolve this.
First to define the missing options to the cmake build.
The second is to turn off the RAPTOR by defining the `-DCOPASI_USE_RAPTOR:BOOL=OFF` |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:233 (message):
Could NOT find RAPTOR (missing: RAPTOR_LIBRARY RAPTOR_INCLUDE_DIR) | CMake can't find definition of the mentioned options. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
Processing files: dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.noarch
error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion
error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/dn]: [This process the %filelist section and it report that files usr/share/bash-completion are present in filelist section, but not present in buildroot.]
| Issue: You entered in %filelist section files and directories paths that are not present in buildroot.
Resolution: Either in %install mkdir this directories and create files or remove this lines from %filelist section. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Processing files: dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.noarch
error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion
error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/dn | This process the %filelist section and it report that files usr/share/bash-completion are present in filelist section, but not present in buildroot. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ !! Copr timeout => sending I]: [This is a sign that Copr build system terminated the build process using SIGINT because the time was out.]
=============
[
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Cneu]: [Since `%check` is the last spec section mentioned before the actual failure, it is clear that it is a failure in tests (not %build or %install).]
| Issue: The build of copr-backend package typically finishes relatively quickly, within 10 minutes. The default Fedora Copr timeout, in the year 2024, is by default 5 hours. Because it timeouted, it seems that the build simply hung. In this case during the test-suite execution.
Resolution: Fix the test-suite. It probably found a real problem in the package, and it is *very* good it was found at package build-time. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
!! Copr timeout => sending I | This is a sign that Copr build system terminated the build process using SIGINT because the time was out. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Cneu | Since `%check` is the last spec section mentioned before the actual failure, it is clear that it is a failure in tests (not %build or %install). |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/sbin/foreman-certs
absolute symlink: /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/foreman.migrations -> /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/foreman.migrations
absolute symlink: /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/foreman.migrations/.applied -> /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/foreman-migrations-applied
absolute symlink: /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/foreman-proxy-content.migrations -> /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/foreman-proxy-content.migrations
absolute symlink: /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/katello.migrations -> /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/katello.migrations
absolute symlink: /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/foreman-proxy-content.migrations/.applied -> /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/foreman-proxy-content-migrations-applied
absolute symlink: /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/katello.migrations/.applied -> /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/katello-migrations-applied
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/sbin/foreman-certs]: [List of the files that got installed, but are not expected]
| Issue: There are files that were installed with the RPM, but they are not listed in the %files section of the specfile.
Resolution: Fix the list of installed files in the specfile. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/sbin/foreman-certs
absolute symlink: /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/foreman.migrations -> /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/foreman.migrations
absolute symlink: /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/foreman.migrations/.applied -> /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/foreman-migrations-applied
absolute symlink: /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/foreman-proxy-content.migrations -> /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/foreman-proxy-content.migrations
absolute symlink: /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/katello.migrations -> /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/katello.migrations
absolute symlink: /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/foreman-proxy-content.migrations/.applied -> /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/foreman-proxy-content-migrations-applied
absolute symlink: /usr/share/foreman-installer/config/katello.migrations/.applied -> /etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/katello-migrations-applied
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/sbin/foreman-certs | List of the files that got installed, but are not expected |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig
A]: [Build failure reason.]
| Issue: The bash-completion package is required for the build process, but missing.
Resolution: Add BuildRequire: bash-completion to your .spec file. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig
A | Build failure reason. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[========== 22 failed, 854 passed, 8 deselected, 48 warnings in 12.74s =========]: [Pytest test suite failed.]
| Issue: The test suite is executed during the RPM build process and is required to pass. In this case, 22 test cases failed.
Resolution: Make sure all test cases pass. You can also disable those that fail if they are not relevant or cannot work. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
========== 22 failed, 854 passed, 8 deselected, 48 warnings in 12.74s ========= | Pytest test suite failed. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[/builddir/build/BUILD/dispenso-1.2.0/tests/concurrent_vector_test_common.h:1443:1: error: template argument 3 is invali]: [Source code can't be compiled.]
| Issue: Sources could not be compiled.
Resolution: Follow the suggestions and error messages from the compiler and fix the source code. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/builddir/build/BUILD/dispenso-1.2.0/tests/concurrent_vector_test_common.h:1443:1: error: template argument 3 is invali | Source code can't be compiled. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Problem: package rpm-build-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 requires rpm = 4.19.91-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
- package rpm-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with redhat-rpm-config < 290-1 provided by redhat-rpm-config-288-1.fc40.noarch
- cannot install the best candidate for the job]: [Message indicating that the requested package rpm-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 can not be installed due to conflicts with another, already present, package.]
| Issue: One of the required packages, redhat-rpm-config-288-1.fc40.noarch, was in conflict with an already installed package.
Resolution: Before attempting a build, ensure that no dependencies are in conflict with one another, or with packages installed on the build host. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem: package rpm-build-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 requires rpm = 4.19.91-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
- package rpm-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with redhat-rpm-config < 290-1 provided by redhat-rpm-config-288-1.fc40.noarch
- cannot install the best candidate for the job | Message indicating that the requested package rpm-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 can not be installed due to conflicts with another, already present, package. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VD7Tod: line 31: scl: command not fou]: [Explains that the error occured because `scl` command was not found.]
| Issue: `scl` command was not found.
Resolution: Install package containing scl binary |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VD7Tod: line 31: scl: command not fou | Explains that the error occured because `scl` command was not found. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[plugins: asyncio-0.24.0, mock-3.14.0]: [This snippet shows the plugins used by pytest in the test run. It can help determining where the bug comes from.]
=============
[tests/coordinator/test_assignors.py EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE [ 2%]]: [This snippet shows the row of capital Es, indicating that all of the tests errored.]
=============
[__________________ ERROR at setup of test_assignor_roundrobin __________________
@pytest.fixture(scope="session", autouse=True)
def event_loop_policy() -> AbstractEventLoopPolicy:
"""Return an instance of the policy used to create asyncio event loops."""
> return asyncio.get_event_loop_policy()
/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pytest_asyncio/plugin.py:1056:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
/usr/lib64/python3.14/asyncio/events.py:806: in get_event_loop_policy
warnings._deprecated('asyncio.get_event_loop_policy', remove=(3, 16))
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
name = 'asyncio.get_event_loop_policy'
message = '{name!r} is deprecated and slated for removal in Python {remove}'
def _deprecated(name, message=_DEPRECATED_MSG, *, remove, _version=sys.version_info):
"""Warn that *name* is deprecated or should be removed.
RuntimeError is raised if *remove* specifies a major/minor tuple older than
the current Python version or the same version but past the alpha.
The *message* argument is formatted with *name* and *remove* as a Python
version tuple (e.g. (3, 11)).
"""
remove_formatted = f"{remove[0]}.{remove[1]}"
if (_version[:2] > remove) or (_version[:2] == remove and _version[3] != "alpha"):
msg = f"{name!r} was slated for removal after Python {remove_formatted} alpha"
raise RuntimeError(msg)
else:
msg = message.format(name=name, remove=remove_formatted)
> warn(msg, DeprecationWarning, stacklevel=3)
E DeprecationWarning: 'asyncio.get_event_loop_policy' is deprecated and slated for removal in Python 3.16
/usr/lib64/python3.14/warnings.py:677: DeprecationWarning]: [The setup of the test failed. asyncio.get_event_loop_policy() is deprecated in Python and will be removed in version 3.16. This issues a DeprecationWarning which is treated as error and invalidates the test run.]
| Issue: The build failed because asyncio plugin of pytest uses a deprecated function asyncio.get_event_loop_policy(). The tests of aiokafka are configured in a way that treats the warnings as errors. The whole test run fails.
Resolution: There are two solutions: asyncio pytest plugin should be fixed so that it doesn't use a deprecated Python function. aiokafka can be temporarily configured to ignore DeprecationWarnings during the test run, since the code causing the test failure doesn't come from it own. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
plugins: asyncio-0.24.0, mock-3.14.0 | This snippet shows the plugins used by pytest in the test run. It can help determining where the bug comes from. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
tests/coordinator/test_assignors.py EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE [ 2%] | This snippet shows the row of capital Es, indicating that all of the tests errored. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
__________________ ERROR at setup of test_assignor_roundrobin __________________
@pytest.fixture(scope="session", autouse=True)
def event_loop_policy() -> AbstractEventLoopPolicy:
"""Return an instance of the policy used to create asyncio event loops."""
> return asyncio.get_event_loop_policy()
/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pytest_asyncio/plugin.py:1056:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
/usr/lib64/python3.14/asyncio/events.py:806: in get_event_loop_policy
warnings._deprecated('asyncio.get_event_loop_policy', remove=(3, 16))
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
name = 'asyncio.get_event_loop_policy'
message = '{name!r} is deprecated and slated for removal in Python {remove}'
def _deprecated(name, message=_DEPRECATED_MSG, *, remove, _version=sys.version_info):
"""Warn that *name* is deprecated or should be removed.
RuntimeError is raised if *remove* specifies a major/minor tuple older than
the current Python version or the same version but past the alpha.
The *message* argument is formatted with *name* and *remove* as a Python
version tuple (e.g. (3, 11)).
"""
remove_formatted = f"{remove[0]}.{remove[1]}"
if (_version[:2] > remove) or (_version[:2] == remove and _version[3] != "alpha"):
msg = f"{name!r} was slated for removal after Python {remove_formatted} alpha"
raise RuntimeError(msg)
else:
msg = message.format(name=name, remove=remove_formatted)
> warn(msg, DeprecationWarning, stacklevel=3)
E DeprecationWarning: 'asyncio.get_event_loop_policy' is deprecated and slated for removal in Python 3.16
/usr/lib64/python3.14/warnings.py:677: DeprecationWarning | The setup of the test failed. asyncio.get_event_loop_policy() is deprecated in Python and will be removed in version 3.16. This issues a DeprecationWarning which is treated as error and invalidates the test run. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ install -Dpm 0644 '%{SOURCE1}' /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/polkit-125-2.el10.x86_64/usr/lib/sysusers.d/polkit.conf
install: cannot stat '%{SOURCE1}': No such file or directory]: [Error report that announces missing sysuser configuration.]
| Issue: %files section defines a file in sysusers configuration directory, but that file is missing from sources.
Resolution: Provide the sysusers configuration file in package sources or delete the associated line from %files section. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ install -Dpm 0644 '%{SOURCE1}' /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/polkit-125-2.el10.x86_64/usr/lib/sysusers.d/polkit.conf
install: cannot stat '%{SOURCE1}': No such file or directory | Error report that announces missing sysuser configuration. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[xsltproc --nonet -o doc/ambiguous_words.1 http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl -
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl
warning: failed to load external entity "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl"
]: [Build failure reason.]
| Issue: The build process is trying to download data from the internet. This is not allowed as per Fedora Packaging guidelines.
Resolution: Remove requirement of downloading data from the internet. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
xsltproc --nonet -o doc/ambiguous_words.1 http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl -
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl
warning: failed to load external entity "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl"
| Build failure reason. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[libtool: compile: /builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/aarch64-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/src -L/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/aarch64-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/aarch64-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -B/usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/bin/ -B/usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/include -isystem /usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/sys-include -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_DEBUG -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -DHAVE_RPC_XDR_H=0 -DHAVE_TIRPC_RPC_XDR_H=0 -DHAVE_AS_SYM_ASSIGN=1 -I. -I../../../../libsanitizer/sanitizer_common -I.. -I ../../../../libsanitizer/include -I ../../../../libsanitizer -isystem ../../../../libsanitizer/include/system -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wno-long-long -fPIC -fno-builtin -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fomit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -fvisibility=hidden -Wno-variadic-macros -I../../libstdc++-v3/include -I../../libstdc++-v3/include/aarch64-redhat-linux -I../../../../libsanitizer/../libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -std=gnu++17 -DSANITIZER_LIBBACKTRACE -DSANITIZER_CP_DEMANGLE -I ../../../../libsanitizer/../libbacktrace -I ../libbacktrace -I ../../../../libsanitizer/../include -include ../../../../libsanitizer/libbacktrace/backtrace-rename.h -O2 -g -grecord-gcc-switches -Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -mbranch-protection=standard -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -D_GNU_SOURCE -MT sanitizer_termination.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/sanitizer_termination.Tpo -c ../../../../libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_termination.cpp -o sanitizer_termination.o >/dev/null 2>&1
../../../../libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp:489:31: error: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘__sanitizer::termio’
489 | unsigned struct_termio_sz = sizeof(struct termio);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [The compilation fails due an undefined structure.]
| Issue: The sizeof operator tries to get size of the "termio" structure, but the structure isn't defined in the source code.
Resolution: The source code needs to be updated to avoid usage of the termio structure. This specific case is related to a recent change in glibc where the termio structure has been removed. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
libtool: compile: /builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/aarch64-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/src -L/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/aarch64-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/aarch64-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -B/usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/bin/ -B/usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/include -isystem /usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/sys-include -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_DEBUG -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -DHAVE_RPC_XDR_H=0 -DHAVE_TIRPC_RPC_XDR_H=0 -DHAVE_AS_SYM_ASSIGN=1 -I. -I../../../../libsanitizer/sanitizer_common -I.. -I ../../../../libsanitizer/include -I ../../../../libsanitizer -isystem ../../../../libsanitizer/include/system -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wno-long-long -fPIC -fno-builtin -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fomit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -fvisibility=hidden -Wno-variadic-macros -I../../libstdc++-v3/include -I../../libstdc++-v3/include/aarch64-redhat-linux -I../../../../libsanitizer/../libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -std=gnu++17 -DSANITIZER_LIBBACKTRACE -DSANITIZER_CP_DEMANGLE -I ../../../../libsanitizer/../libbacktrace -I ../libbacktrace -I ../../../../libsanitizer/../include -include ../../../../libsanitizer/libbacktrace/backtrace-rename.h -O2 -g -grecord-gcc-switches -Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -mbranch-protection=standard -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -D_GNU_SOURCE -MT sanitizer_termination.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/sanitizer_termination.Tpo -c ../../../../libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_termination.cpp -o sanitizer_termination.o >/dev/null 2>&1
../../../../libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp:489:31: error: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘__sanitizer::termio’
489 | unsigned struct_termio_sz = sizeof(struct termio);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | The compilation fails due an undefined structure. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
util-host-info.c:94:31: error: passing argument 1 of âpcre2_substring_list_free_8â from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
94 | pcre2_substring_list_free((PCRE2_SPTR *)list);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| const PCRE2_UCHAR8 ** {aka const unsigned char **}
In file included from suricata-common.h:155,
from util-host-info.c:27:
/usr/include/pcre2.h:949:1: note: expected âPCRE2_UCHAR8 **â {aka âunsigned char **â} but argument is of type âconst PCRE2_UCHAR8 **â {aka âconst unsigned char **â}
949 | PCRE2_TYPES_STRUCTURES_AND_FUNCTIONS
|]: [This is causing the build to fail, as the make command fails with Error.]
| Issue: Pcre2 new version 10.43 changed the argument in `pcre2_substring_list_free` function from `PCRE2_SPTR *` to `PCRE2_UCHAR8 **`. This means that packages that make use of this function have to port their usage to the new function definition.
Resolution: Change the argument to the function from `PCRE2_SPTR *` to `PCRE2_UCHAR8 **` in the function calls. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
util-host-info.c:94:31: error: passing argument 1 of âpcre2_substring_list_free_8â from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
94 | pcre2_substring_list_free((PCRE2_SPTR *)list);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| const PCRE2_UCHAR8 ** {aka const unsigned char **}
In file included from suricata-common.h:155,
from util-host-info.c:27:
/usr/include/pcre2.h:949:1: note: expected âPCRE2_UCHAR8 **â {aka âunsigned char **â} but argument is of type âconst PCRE2_UCHAR8 **â {aka âconst unsigned char **â}
949 | PCRE2_TYPES_STRUCTURES_AND_FUNCTIONS
| | This is causing the build to fail, as the make command fails with Error. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Handling cleo (>=2.1.0,<3.0.0) from hook generated metadata: Requires-Dist (poetry)
Requirement not satisfied: cleo (>=2.1.0,<3.0.0)]: [This part discovers the needed build requirements and checks their status. cleo needs to fit in versions greater or equal 2.1.0 (>=2.1.0) but lower than 3.0.0 (<3.0.0). cleo has not yet been installed into the buildroot]
=============
[Problem: package python3-cleo-2.2.1-1.fc43.noarch from http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_rawhide_latest_basearch requires python(abi) = 3.13, but none of the providers can be installed
- installed package python3-devel-3.14.0~a6-1.fc43.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.14.0~a6-1.fc43 provided by python3-3.13.2-2.fc43.i686 from fedora
- installed package python3-devel-3.14.0~a6-1.fc43.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.14.0~a6-1.fc43 provided by python3-3.13.2-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora
- installed package python3-devel-3.14.0~a6-1.fc43.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.14.0~a6-1.fc43 provided by python3-3.13.2-2.fc43.x86_64 from http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_rawhide_latest_basearch
- cannot install the best candidate for the job]: [python3-cleo is a built RPM name providing the upstream requirement cleo. There is a version 2.2.1-1 available in koji rawhide repository (http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_rawhide_latest_basearch), but that version requires "python(abi) = 3.13" which is not available in the Copr repository. Python in the Copr repository provides a different version of "python(abi)" which doesn't match the requirement. Dependency resolver tries to find a suitable version (python3-3.13.2-2.fc43.x86_64) which provides "python(abi) = 3.13" but that would conflict with Python version available in Copr (python3-devel-3.14.0~a6-1.fc43.x86_64). That Python version provides most probably "python(abi) = 3.14". This can't be automatically resolved.]
| Issue: The attempt to build poetry fails because there is no matching python3-cleo package that could be installed into the buildroot. python3-cleo requires a lower version of Python ABI than the one that's available in the repository and when it tries to pull that lower version, two Python packages conflict.
Resolution: The right way to fix the issue is to ensure that python3-cleo requires python(abi) = 3.14. That means building python-cleo (this is the component name in Fedora) with Python 3.14 in the same environment, in which we try to build poetry. Such built package will correctly require python(abi) = 3.14 and that requirement can be satisfied by python3-devel-3.14.0~a6-1.fc43.x86_64. Only after python3-cleo with correct requires is available, we can try to build poetry again. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Handling cleo (>=2.1.0,<3.0.0) from hook generated metadata: Requires-Dist (poetry)
Requirement not satisfied: cleo (>=2.1.0,<3.0.0) | This part discovers the needed build requirements and checks their status. cleo needs to fit in versions greater or equal 2.1.0 (>=2.1.0) but lower than 3.0.0 (<3.0.0). cleo has not yet been installed into the buildroot |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem: package python3-cleo-2.2.1-1.fc43.noarch from http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_rawhide_latest_basearch requires python(abi) = 3.13, but none of the providers can be installed
- installed package python3-devel-3.14.0~a6-1.fc43.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.14.0~a6-1.fc43 provided by python3-3.13.2-2.fc43.i686 from fedora
- installed package python3-devel-3.14.0~a6-1.fc43.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.14.0~a6-1.fc43 provided by python3-3.13.2-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora
- installed package python3-devel-3.14.0~a6-1.fc43.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.14.0~a6-1.fc43 provided by python3-3.13.2-2.fc43.x86_64 from http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_rawhide_latest_basearch
- cannot install the best candidate for the job | python3-cleo is a built RPM name providing the upstream requirement cleo. There is a version 2.2.1-1 available in koji rawhide repository (http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_rawhide_latest_basearch), but that version requires "python(abi) = 3.13" which is not available in the Copr repository. Python in the Copr repository provides a different version of "python(abi)" which doesn't match the requirement. Dependency resolver tries to find a suitable version (python3-3.13.2-2.fc43.x86_64) which provides "python(abi) = 3.13" but that would conflict with Python version available in Copr (python3-devel-3.14.0~a6-1.fc43.x86_64). That Python version provides most probably "python(abi) = 3.14". This can't be automatically resolved. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Error: YAML Exception reading /home/travis/build/faktaoklimatu/web-cz/web-core/collections/_studies/2023-reserse-vodik.md: (<unknown>): did not find expected key while parsing a block mapping at line 28 column 7]: [It shows the YAML error in the file "web-core/collections/_studies/2023-reserse-vodik.md" at line 28, column 7.]
| Issue: The file "web-core/collections/_studies/2023-reserse-vodik.md" has invalid YAML syntax, a key was expected at line 28, column 7.
Resolution: Fix the YAML syntax in the file "web-core/collections/_studies/2023-reserse-vodik.md". |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.