question
stringlengths
236
348k
answer
stringlengths
10
2.11k
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.10 needed by python3-pyramid_beaker-0.8-1.fc36.noar
python3-pyramit_beaker requires Python 3.10
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [EXCEPTION: [Error('Command failed: \n # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 80e669d707c44a65ab2880d683bc7852 -D /var/lib/mock/f41-build-side-85719-49668308-5919190/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.h8_75ifa:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin \'--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"\' \'--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ \' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c \'/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --noclean --target i686 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/qt5-qtbase.spec\'\n', 1)]]: [Explains that exception happened because command /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn failed] ============= [Patch #101 (qtbase-5.15.10-fix-missing-qtsan-include.patch): + echo 'Patch #101 (qtbase-5.15.10-fix-missing-qtsan-include.patch):' + /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 --fuzz=0 patching file include/QtCore/headers.pri Hunk #1 FAILED at 1]: [Explains that error occured during applying this patch.]
Issue: Patch #101 (qtbase-5.15.10-fix-missing-qtsan-include.patch) failed. Resolution: Review qtbase-5.15.10-fix-missing-qtsan-include.patch and fix it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: EXCEPTION: [Error('Command failed: \n # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 80e669d707c44a65ab2880d683bc7852 -D /var/lib/mock/f41-build-side-85719-49668308-5919190/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.h8_75ifa:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin \'--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"\' \'--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ \' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c \'/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --noclean --target i686 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/qt5-qtbase.spec\'\n', 1)]
Explains that exception happened because command /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Patch #101 (qtbase-5.15.10-fix-missing-qtsan-include.patch): + echo 'Patch #101 (qtbase-5.15.10-fix-missing-qtsan-include.patch):' + /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 --fuzz=0 patching file include/QtCore/headers.pri Hunk #1 FAILED at 1
Explains that error occured during applying this patch.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ vendor/github.com/containers/storage/drivers/btrfs/btrfs.go:12:10: fatal error: btrfs/ioctl.h: No such file or directo]: [An error from gcc that clearly states why the compilation failed. ]
Issue: GCC cannot find a header file `btrfs/ioctl.h` which is needed in `storage/drivers/btrfs/btrfs.go`. Resolution: Install package 'btrfs-progs-devel' that contains the header file ' btrfs/ioctl.h'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: vendor/github.com/containers/storage/drivers/btrfs/btrfs.go:12:10: fatal error: btrfs/ioctl.h: No such file or directo
An error from gcc that clearly states why the compilation failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [In file included from dhcp.c:17: dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)()); | ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ dhcp.c:33:12: note: ‘check_listen_addrs’ declared here 33 | static int check_listen_addrs(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ dhcp.c:333:44: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] 333 | if (!iface_enumerate(AF_INET, &amp;parm, complete_context)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *) dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());]: [In file included from dhcp.c:17: dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)()); | ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ dhcp.c:33:12: note: ‘check_listen_addrs’ declared here 33 | static int check_listen_addrs(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ dhcp.c:333:44: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] 333 | if (!iface_enumerate(AF_INET, &amp;parm, complete_context)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *) dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());] ============= [In file included from lease.c:17: dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)()); | ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ lease.c:385:12: note: ‘find_interface_v4’ declared here 385 | static int find_interface_v4(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lease.c:469:35: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] 469 | iface_enumerate(AF_INET6, &now, find_interface_v6); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int, int, int, int, int, int, void *) dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int, int, int, int, int, int, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());]: [In file included from lease.c:17: dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)()); | ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ lease.c:385:12: note: ‘find_interface_v4’ declared here 385 | static int find_interface_v4(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lease.c:469:35: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] 469 | iface_enumerate(AF_INET6, &now, find_interface_v6); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int, int, int, int, int, int, void *) dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int, int, int, int, int, int, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());]
Issue: used gcc switched to new version 15, which changed default from stdc17 to stdc23. It prohibits using unspecified function parameters in callback. The code used prototype for storing callback without fully defining what parameter variants it may accept. Resolution: The fix were to stop defining callback like int (callback)(), but define all possible variants with fully defined function definitions parameters using union in the code. In this case it used union defining all different parameters possible.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: In file included from dhcp.c:17: dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)()); | ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ dhcp.c:33:12: note: ‘check_listen_addrs’ declared here 33 | static int check_listen_addrs(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ dhcp.c:333:44: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] 333 | if (!iface_enumerate(AF_INET, &amp;parm, complete_context)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *) dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());
In file included from dhcp.c:17: dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)()); | ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ dhcp.c:33:12: note: ‘check_listen_addrs’ declared here 33 | static int check_listen_addrs(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ dhcp.c:333:44: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] 333 | if (!iface_enumerate(AF_INET, &amp;parm, complete_context)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *) dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: In file included from lease.c:17: dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)()); | ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ lease.c:385:12: note: ‘find_interface_v4’ declared here 385 | static int find_interface_v4(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lease.c:469:35: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] 469 | iface_enumerate(AF_INET6, &now, find_interface_v6); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int, int, int, int, int, int, void *) dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int, int, int, int, int, int, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());
In file included from lease.c:17: dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr, int, char *, struct in_addr, struct in_addr, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)()); | ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ lease.c:385:12: note: ‘find_interface_v4’ declared here 385 | static int find_interface_v4(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lease.c:469:35: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] 469 | iface_enumerate(AF_INET6, &now, find_interface_v6); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int, int, int, int, int, int, void *) dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int, int, int, int, int, int, void *)’ 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [Failed to resolve the transaction: No match for argument: python3-pytest-twisted]: [DNF error message about a missing package]
Issue: The package python3-pytest-twisted is not available in the requested build root. Resolution: Add the missing package to the targeted distribution.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Failed to resolve the transaction: No match for argument: python3-pytest-twisted
DNF error message about a missing package
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/_preludedb.*so error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/__pycache__/preludedb.cpython-312.*pyc error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/preludedb-5.2.0-py3.12.egg-info error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/preludedb.py File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/_preludedb.*so File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/__pycache__/preludedb.cpython-312.*pyc File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/preludedb-5.2.0-py3.12.egg-info File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/preludedb.py]: [These file paths that are defined in %files do not match the reality on the filesystem.]
Issue: While processing files for build python3-preludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64, there are several entries in the spec file in the %files section that do not match the build environment. Resolution: Either fix the entries in the %files section or make sure the files are correctly installed in the %install section to the paths that are expected in %files.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/_preludedb.*so error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/__pycache__/preludedb.cpython-312.*pyc error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/preludedb-5.2.0-py3.12.egg-info error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/preludedb.py File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/_preludedb.*so File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/__pycache__/preludedb.cpython-312.*pyc File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/preludedb-5.2.0-py3.12.egg-info File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libpreludedb-5.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/preludedb.py
These file paths that are defined in %files do not match the reality on the filesystem.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [error: Failed build dependencies: python3dist(tox-current-env) >= 0.0.16 is needed by rust2rpm-27.0.1-2.fc43.noarch]: [Missing dependency.]
Issue: The build is missing a dependency. Resolution: Add missing dependency onto the build system and ideally into the specfile.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error: Failed build dependencies: python3dist(tox-current-env) >= 0.0.16 is needed by rust2rpm-27.0.1-2.fc43.noarch
Missing dependency.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(clap_complete/default) >= 4.5.47 with crate(clap_complete/default) < 5.0.0~)]: [There is error in providing dependency in specific version.]
Issue: There is error in providing dependency crate(clap_complete/default) in specific version. Resolution: Provide dependency in proper version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(clap_complete/default) >= 4.5.47 with crate(clap_complete/default) < 5.0.0~)
There is error in providing dependency in specific version.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/customizations/cloudtrail/test_validation.py.rej ]: [This is the output of the patch command. It indicates that it failed.] ============= [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3GevrQ (%prep)]: [This is a line from rpmbuild that indicates that the build failed during %prep section execution.]
Issue: The build failed because (at least) one of the patches failed to be applied. Resolution: It is necessary to examine the patch that failed to apply and fix it - in this case the changes have been already applied upstream so the patch could be simply removed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/customizations/cloudtrail/test_validation.py.rej
This is the output of the patch command. It indicates that it failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3GevrQ (%prep)
This is a line from rpmbuild that indicates that the build failed during %prep section execution.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ Dependency "systemd" not found, tried pkgconf]: [Unmet dependency "systemd".] ============= [ Did not find CMake 'cmake' Found CMake: N]: [Unmet dependency "cmake".]
Issue: The build failed due to multiple unmet dependencies. Resolution: Include "cmake" and "systemd" packages in list of packages to install.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Dependency "systemd" not found, tried pkgconf
Unmet dependency "systemd".
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Did not find CMake 'cmake' Found CMake: N
Unmet dependency "cmake".
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [++ cat cvs.log Possible precedence problem between ! and pattern match (m//) at /builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/git-cvsserver line 5015. ++ return 1 error: last command exited with $?=1 not ok 30 - cvs diff -r v1 -u # # ( cd cvswork && cvs -f diff -r v1 -u >../cvsDiff.out 2>../cvs.log ) && # test_must_be_empty cvsDiff.out && # test_must_be_empty cvs.log # expecting success of 9402.31 'cvs diff -N -r v2 -u': ( cd cvswork && ! cvs -f diff -N -r v2 -u >../cvsDiff.out 2>../cvs.log ) && test_must_be_empty cvs.log && test -s cvsDiff.out && check_diff cvsDiff.out v2 v1 >check_diff.out 2>&1 ]: [Here build fails, because there is warning "Possible precedence problem between ! and pattern match (m//) ".]
Issue: It failed because of changes in new Perl 5.42.0. In script git-csvserver.perl, it is code on line 5015 "if(! $refName=~/^[1-9][0-9]*(\.[1-9][0-9]*)*$/)" which now raised the warning Resolution: There is more way how to fixed it, describe on page https://metacpan.org/release/ETHER/perl-5.41.12/view/pod/perl5414delta.pod#New-Warnings I used this replacement - if(! $refName=~/^[1-9][0-9]*(\.[1-9][0-9]*)*$/) + if(! ($refName=~/^[1-9][0-9]*(\.[1-9][0-9]*)*$/)) and it fixed the failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: ++ cat cvs.log Possible precedence problem between ! and pattern match (m//) at /builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/git-cvsserver line 5015. ++ return 1 error: last command exited with $?=1 not ok 30 - cvs diff -r v1 -u # # ( cd cvswork && cvs -f diff -r v1 -u >../cvsDiff.out 2>../cvs.log ) && # test_must_be_empty cvsDiff.out && # test_must_be_empty cvs.log # expecting success of 9402.31 'cvs diff -N -r v2 -u': ( cd cvswork && ! cvs -f diff -N -r v2 -u >../cvsDiff.out 2>../cvs.log ) && test_must_be_empty cvs.log && test -s cvsDiff.out && check_diff cvsDiff.out v2 v1 >check_diff.out 2>&1
Here build fails, because there is warning "Possible precedence problem between ! and pattern match (m//) ".
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [RPM build errors: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing File must begin with "/": %{_userunitdir}/fnott.service]: [It shows the build errors.]
Issue: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing File must begin with "/": %{_userunitdir}/fnott.service Resolution: Provide %changelog. And fix broken macros by installing the appropriate package: systemd-rpm-macros.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: RPM build errors: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing File must begin with "/": %{_userunitdir}/fnott.service
It shows the build errors.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [01:12:39 out: "cmd": "subscription-manager register --username=csapps-tmt-tests --password=csapps-tmt@tests --force\n", 01:12:39 out: "delta": "0:00:00.451704", 01:12:39 out: "end": "2024-07-14 21:14:31.721485", 01:12:39 out: "failed": true, 01:12:39 out: "msg": "non-zero return code", 01:12:39 out: "rc": 70, 01:12:39 out: "start": "2024-07-14 21:14:31.269781", 01:12:39 out: "stderr": "Unknown server reply (HTTP error code 400: Bad Request):\n<html><13>\n<head><title>400 The SSL certificate error</title></head><13>\n<body><13>\n<center><h1>400 Bad Request</h1></center><13>\n<center>The SSL certificate error</center><13>\n<hr><center>openresty</center><13>\n</body><13>\n</html><13>", 01:12:39 out: "stderr_lines": [ 01:12:39 out: "Unknown server reply (HTTP error code 400: Bad Request):", 01:12:39 out: "<html><13>", 01:12:39 out: "<head><title>400 The SSL certificate error</title></head><13>", 01:12:39 out: "<body><13>", 01:12:39 out: "<center><h1>400 Bad Request</h1></center><13>", 01:12:39 out: "<center>The SSL certificate error</center><13>", 01:12:39 out: "<hr><center>openresty</center><13>", 01:12:39 out: "</body><13>", 01:12:39 out: "</html><13>" 01:12:39 out: ], 01:12:39 out: "stdout": "Unregistering from: subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com:443/subscription", 01:12:39 out: "stdout_lines": [ 01:12:39 out: "Unregistering from: subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com:443/subscription" 01:12:39 out: ]]: [Subscription to RHEL8, RHEL9 done by subscription failed.]
Issue: The build failed because a connection to subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com was not possible. Resolution: Check if the connection to subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com is not broken on Slack #ethel
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: 01:12:39 out: "cmd": "subscription-manager register --username=csapps-tmt-tests --password=csapps-tmt@tests --force\n", 01:12:39 out: "delta": "0:00:00.451704", 01:12:39 out: "end": "2024-07-14 21:14:31.721485", 01:12:39 out: "failed": true, 01:12:39 out: "msg": "non-zero return code", 01:12:39 out: "rc": 70, 01:12:39 out: "start": "2024-07-14 21:14:31.269781", 01:12:39 out: "stderr": "Unknown server reply (HTTP error code 400: Bad Request):\n<html><13>\n<head><title>400 The SSL certificate error</title></head><13>\n<body><13>\n<center><h1>400 Bad Request</h1></center><13>\n<center>The SSL certificate error</center><13>\n<hr><center>openresty</center><13>\n</body><13>\n</html><13>", 01:12:39 out: "stderr_lines": [ 01:12:39 out: "Unknown server reply (HTTP error code 400: Bad Request):", 01:12:39 out: "<html><13>", 01:12:39 out: "<head><title>400 The SSL certificate error</title></head><13>", 01:12:39 out: "<body><13>", 01:12:39 out: "<center><h1>400 Bad Request</h1></center><13>", 01:12:39 out: "<center>The SSL certificate error</center><13>", 01:12:39 out: "<hr><center>openresty</center><13>", 01:12:39 out: "</body><13>", 01:12:39 out: "</html><13>" 01:12:39 out: ], 01:12:39 out: "stdout": "Unregistering from: subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com:443/subscription", 01:12:39 out: "stdout_lines": [ 01:12:39 out: "Unregistering from: subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com:443/subscription" 01:12:39 out: ]
Subscription to RHEL8, RHEL9 done by subscription failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [mysql-test-run: *** ERROR: there were failing test cases ]: [mysql-test-run return non-zero exit code when any test failed] ============= [Failing test(s): main.func_regexp_pcre ]: [Describes which tests failed] ============= [Completed: Failed 2/1057 tests, 99.81% were successful. ]: [Describes how many tests failed] ============= [[ fail ]]: [marks failed test] ============= [CURRENT_TEST: main.func_regexp_pcre --- /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/main/func_regexp_pcre.result 2025-01-30 11:01:23.000000000 +0000 +++ /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/main/func_regexp_pcre.reject 2025-04-04 10:04:14.944071169 +0000 @@ -169,13 +169,13 @@ \p{Latin} 㐗 0 \p{Latin} 갷 0 \p{Ll} 1 0 -\p{Ll} A 0 +\p{Ll} A 1 \p{Ll} a 1 -\p{Ll} À 0 +\p{Ll} À 1 \p{Ll} à 1 -\p{Ll} Σ 0 +\p{Ll} Σ 1 \p{Ll} σ 1 -\p{Ll} Я 0 +\p{Ll} Я 1 \p{Ll} я 1 \p{Ll} ௨ 0 \p{Ll} ප 0 @@ -183,13 +183,13 @@ \p{Ll} 갷 0 \p{Lu} 1 0 \p{Lu} A 1 -\p{Lu} a 0 +\p{Lu} a 1 \p{Lu} À 1 -\p{Lu} à 0 +\p{Lu} à 1 \p{Lu} Σ 1 -\p{Lu} σ 0 +\p{Lu} σ 1 \p{Lu} Я 1 -\p{Lu} я 0 +\p{Lu} я 1 \p{Lu} ௨ 0 \p{Lu} ප 0 \p{Lu} 㐗 0 Result content mismatch - saving '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/var/1/log/main.func_regexp_pcre/' to '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/var/log/main.func_regexp_pcre/' ]: [Failed test output]
Issue: A tests from the testsuite failed Resolution: Investigate the failed test cause. It is possible to disable a specific test in the skipped-tests-list* files
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: mysql-test-run: *** ERROR: there were failing test cases
mysql-test-run return non-zero exit code when any test failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Failing test(s): main.func_regexp_pcre
Describes which tests failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Completed: Failed 2/1057 tests, 99.81% were successful.
Describes how many tests failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: [ fail ]
marks failed test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: CURRENT_TEST: main.func_regexp_pcre --- /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/main/func_regexp_pcre.result 2025-01-30 11:01:23.000000000 +0000 +++ /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/main/func_regexp_pcre.reject 2025-04-04 10:04:14.944071169 +0000 @@ -169,13 +169,13 @@ \p{Latin} 㐗 0 \p{Latin} 갷 0 \p{Ll} 1 0 -\p{Ll} A 0 +\p{Ll} A 1 \p{Ll} a 1 -\p{Ll} À 0 +\p{Ll} À 1 \p{Ll} à 1 -\p{Ll} Σ 0 +\p{Ll} Σ 1 \p{Ll} σ 1 -\p{Ll} Я 0 +\p{Ll} Я 1 \p{Ll} я 1 \p{Ll} ௨ 0 \p{Ll} ප 0 @@ -183,13 +183,13 @@ \p{Ll} 갷 0 \p{Lu} 1 0 \p{Lu} A 1 -\p{Lu} a 0 +\p{Lu} a 1 \p{Lu} À 1 -\p{Lu} à 0 +\p{Lu} à 1 \p{Lu} Σ 1 -\p{Lu} σ 0 +\p{Lu} σ 1 \p{Lu} Я 1 -\p{Lu} я 0 +\p{Lu} я 1 \p{Lu} ௨ 0 \p{Lu} ප 0 \p{Lu} 㐗 0 Result content mismatch - saving '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/var/1/log/main.func_regexp_pcre/' to '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/var/log/main.func_regexp_pcre/'
Failed test output
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [STEP 8/17: RUN mkdir -p $TMPDIR && mkdir -p "${HOME}" && chown -R $USER_ID:0 "${HOME}" && chmod -R 755 "${HOME}" COPY requirements.txt requirements.sh upstream_master_sync.py $TMPDIR/ # ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ # stderr (21 lines) # ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Emulate Docker CLI using podman. Create /etc/containers/nodocker to quiet msg. Trying to pull quay.io/rhscl/betka:latest... Getting image source signatures Copying blob sha256:0d109d54e924e3080fde590af878e48a8869ddc3720c3961c196205e417bc79f Copying blob sha256:80b613d8f1ff97f71b4b01e404b0d17d29ee58162c15135f6b9a5478cb1f7bff Copying config sha256:8684ecbb395a0a3cf0a167694de1ac3003feabac885dad82890f5c657329ac8a Writing manifest to image destination Trying to pull quay.io/rhscl/betka:0.11.2... Getting image source signatures Copying blob sha256:80b613d8f1ff97f71b4b01e404b0d17d29ee58162c15135f6b9a5478cb1f7bff Copying blob sha256:0d109d54e924e3080fde590af878e48a8869ddc3720c3961c196205e417bc79f Copying config sha256:8684ecbb395a0a3cf0a167694de1ac3003feabac885dad82890f5c657329ac8a Writing manifest to image destination Failed to set locale, defaulting to C.UTF-8 Failed to set locale, defaulting to C.UTF-8 chmod: cannot access 'COPY': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access 'requirements.txt': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access 'requirements.sh': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access 'upstream_master_sync.py': No such file or directory Error: building at STEP "RUN mkdir -p $TMPDIR &amp;&amp; mkdir -p "${HOME}" &amp;&amp; chown -R $USER_ID:0 "${HOME}" &amp;&amp; chmod -R 755 "${HOME}" COPY requirements.txt requirements.sh upstream_master_sync.py $TMPDIR/": while running runtime: exit status 1 ]: [Check the Dockerfile syntax. There is redundant '\' which caused that Dockerfile two directives are joined]
Issue: It failed because two Dockerfile directive have joined which causes the problem during the build Resolution: Please check Dockerfile syntax and remove redundand '\'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: STEP 8/17: RUN mkdir -p $TMPDIR && mkdir -p "${HOME}" && chown -R $USER_ID:0 "${HOME}" && chmod -R 755 "${HOME}" COPY requirements.txt requirements.sh upstream_master_sync.py $TMPDIR/ # ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ # stderr (21 lines) # ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Emulate Docker CLI using podman. Create /etc/containers/nodocker to quiet msg. Trying to pull quay.io/rhscl/betka:latest... Getting image source signatures Copying blob sha256:0d109d54e924e3080fde590af878e48a8869ddc3720c3961c196205e417bc79f Copying blob sha256:80b613d8f1ff97f71b4b01e404b0d17d29ee58162c15135f6b9a5478cb1f7bff Copying config sha256:8684ecbb395a0a3cf0a167694de1ac3003feabac885dad82890f5c657329ac8a Writing manifest to image destination Trying to pull quay.io/rhscl/betka:0.11.2... Getting image source signatures Copying blob sha256:80b613d8f1ff97f71b4b01e404b0d17d29ee58162c15135f6b9a5478cb1f7bff Copying blob sha256:0d109d54e924e3080fde590af878e48a8869ddc3720c3961c196205e417bc79f Copying config sha256:8684ecbb395a0a3cf0a167694de1ac3003feabac885dad82890f5c657329ac8a Writing manifest to image destination Failed to set locale, defaulting to C.UTF-8 Failed to set locale, defaulting to C.UTF-8 chmod: cannot access 'COPY': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access 'requirements.txt': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access 'requirements.sh': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access 'upstream_master_sync.py': No such file or directory Error: building at STEP "RUN mkdir -p $TMPDIR &amp;&amp; mkdir -p "${HOME}" &amp;&amp; chown -R $USER_ID:0 "${HOME}" &amp;&amp; chmod -R 755 "${HOME}" COPY requirements.txt requirements.sh upstream_master_sync.py $TMPDIR/": while running runtime: exit status 1
Check the Dockerfile syntax. There is redundant '\' which caused that Dockerfile two directives are joined
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job - nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noar]: [It shows the reason why the build failed.] ============= [ Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job - nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noar]: [This is the output from DNF showing the reason why it failed.]
Issue: A necessary dependency, nim-srpm-macros RPM package, is not installed. Resolution: Make sure the above package is installed before you try to build the package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job - nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noar
It shows the reason why the build failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job - nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noar
This is the output from DNF showing the reason why it failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [DEBUG util.py:461: automake noarch 1.17-2.fc42 fedora 1.8 MiB]: [Automake 1.16 and newer is installed] ============= [+ /usr/bin/make -O -j16 V=1 VERBOSE=1 cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/pappl-retrofit-1.0b2-build/pappl-retrofit-1.0b2/missing automake-1.16 --foreign Makefile /builddir/build/BUILD/pappl-retrofit-1.0b2-build/pappl-retrofit-1.0b2/missing: line 81: automake-1.16: command not found WARNING: 'automake-1.16' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified 'Makefile.am' or 'configure.ac' or m4 files included by 'configure.ac'. The 'automake' program is part of the GNU Automake package: <https://www.gnu.org/software/automake> It also requires GNU Autoconf, GNU m4 and Perl in order to run: <https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf> <https://www.gnu.org/software/m4/> <https://www.perl.org/> make: *** [Makefile:565: Makefile.in] Error 127]: [Make reports automake-1.16 is missing on the system.]
Issue: automake-1.16 was used in configure script in the project. Resolution: Regenerate configure script at start of build phase in SPEC file, f.e. via autogen.sh, autoreconf etc. and rebuild the package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: DEBUG util.py:461: automake noarch 1.17-2.fc42 fedora 1.8 MiB
Automake 1.16 and newer is installed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: + /usr/bin/make -O -j16 V=1 VERBOSE=1 cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/pappl-retrofit-1.0b2-build/pappl-retrofit-1.0b2/missing automake-1.16 --foreign Makefile /builddir/build/BUILD/pappl-retrofit-1.0b2-build/pappl-retrofit-1.0b2/missing: line 81: automake-1.16: command not found WARNING: 'automake-1.16' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified 'Makefile.am' or 'configure.ac' or m4 files included by 'configure.ac'. The 'automake' program is part of the GNU Automake package: <https://www.gnu.org/software/automake> It also requires GNU Autoconf, GNU m4 and Perl in order to run: <https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf> <https://www.gnu.org/software/m4/> <https://www.perl.org/> make: *** [Makefile:565: Makefile.in] Error 127
Make reports automake-1.16 is missing on the system.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [Cannot load externalized builtin: "internal/deps/cjs-module-lexer/lexer:/usr/lib/node_modules_24/cjs-module-lexer/lexer.js". ----- Native stack trace ----- 1: 0x7f367494f621 node::builtins::BuiltinLoader::AddExternalizedBuiltin(char const*, char const*) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 2: 0x7f367494f80f node::builtins::BuiltinLoader::BuiltinLoader() [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 3: 0x7f367488bc30 node::InitializePrimordials(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 4: 0x7f367488bd70 node::GetPerContextExports(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 5: 0x7f367488bb48 node::InitializePrimordials(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 6: 0x7f367488be50 node::InitializeMainContextForSnapshot(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 7: 0x7f367488be75 node::InitializeContext(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 8: 0x7f367488beeb node::NewContext(v8::Isolate*, v8::Local<v8::ObjectTemplate>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 9: 0x7f36749d4174 node::NodeMainInstance::CreateMainEnvironment(node::ExitCode*) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 10: 0x7f36749d42c2 node::NodeMainInstance::Run() [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 11: 0x7f367492f047 node::Start(int, char**) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 12: 0x7f367455b5f5 [/lib64/libc.so.6] 13: 0x7f367455b6a8 __libc_start_main [/lib64/libc.so.6] 14: 0x565154ff2035 _start [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT//usr/bin/node-24] /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4HMIzZ: line 48: 35941 Aborted (core dumped) LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64 /builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT//usr/bin/node-24 -e "require('assert').equal(process.versions.node, '23.8.0')" error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4HMIzZ (%check)]: [What made build exit]
Issue: Possibly mismatch of paths of nodejs_modules Resolution: Try to use bundled cjs-module-lexer
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Cannot load externalized builtin: "internal/deps/cjs-module-lexer/lexer:/usr/lib/node_modules_24/cjs-module-lexer/lexer.js". ----- Native stack trace ----- 1: 0x7f367494f621 node::builtins::BuiltinLoader::AddExternalizedBuiltin(char const*, char const*) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 2: 0x7f367494f80f node::builtins::BuiltinLoader::BuiltinLoader() [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 3: 0x7f367488bc30 node::InitializePrimordials(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 4: 0x7f367488bd70 node::GetPerContextExports(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 5: 0x7f367488bb48 node::InitializePrimordials(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 6: 0x7f367488be50 node::InitializeMainContextForSnapshot(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 7: 0x7f367488be75 node::InitializeContext(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 8: 0x7f367488beeb node::NewContext(v8::Isolate*, v8::Local<v8::ObjectTemplate>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 9: 0x7f36749d4174 node::NodeMainInstance::CreateMainEnvironment(node::ExitCode*) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 10: 0x7f36749d42c2 node::NodeMainInstance::Run() [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 11: 0x7f367492f047 node::Start(int, char**) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131] 12: 0x7f367455b5f5 [/lib64/libc.so.6] 13: 0x7f367455b6a8 __libc_start_main [/lib64/libc.so.6] 14: 0x565154ff2035 _start [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT//usr/bin/node-24] /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4HMIzZ: line 48: 35941 Aborted (core dumped) LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64 /builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT//usr/bin/node-24 -e "require('assert').equal(process.versions.node, '23.8.0')" error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4HMIzZ (%check)
What made build exit
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ Installing: dnf5 x86_64 5.1.12-1.fc40 copr_base 581 k replacing dnf.noarch 4.19.0-1.fc40 replacing yum.noarch 4.19.0-1.fc]: [During the bootstrap, dnf5 package from the dnf5-testing Copr repository is being installed. This package contains an obsoletion of the dnf package.] ============= [Error: Transaction test error: file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.12-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noarch]: [Transaction test fails, because the dnf5 package from the dnf5-testing repository provides /etc/dnf/dnf.conf which is also provided by the dnf package that is already installed.]
Issue: Both the dnf package from the Fedora base image and the dnf5 package from the dnf5-testing Copr repo provide the /etc/dnf/dnf.conf file. This occurs because when using the dnf5-testing Copr repository, all dnf related packages are intended to come from this repository, set up with the obsoletion macro to manage the transition from dnf to dnf5. In this case, the dnf stack packages originate from two sources: the Fedora base image and the dnf5-testing Copr repo. As a result, a conflict arises as both the dnf package from the base image and the dnf5 package from the Copr repo attempt to provide the /etc/dnf/dnf.conf file. Resolution: There are essentially two solutions to resolve this issue. The first solution involves avoiding the use of packages from the dnf5-testing repository during the bootstrap process. Instead, packages from the Fedora repository can be utilized. From the perspective of Copr users, this can be achieved by assigning a high priority to the dnf5-testing Copr repository, ensuring that the regular Fedora repositories take precedence during installation. The second solution entails using the same version of the dnf package in both the base image and during the bootstrap. This would require either instructing the Copr tooling to employ the dnf package for the bootstrap process, aligning it with the Fedora base image, or creating a custom base image containing the dnf5 package to match the package used during the bootstrap.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Installing: dnf5 x86_64 5.1.12-1.fc40 copr_base 581 k replacing dnf.noarch 4.19.0-1.fc40 replacing yum.noarch 4.19.0-1.fc
During the bootstrap, dnf5 package from the dnf5-testing Copr repository is being installed. This package contains an obsoletion of the dnf package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Error: Transaction test error: file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.12-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noarch
Transaction test fails, because the dnf5 package from the dnf5-testing repository provides /etc/dnf/dnf.conf which is also provided by the dnf package that is already installed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [Report ------------------- ./t-pull.sh (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 8 Failed: 1) Failed test: 7 Non-zero exit status: 1 Files=100, Tests=702, 375 wallclock secs ( 0.40 usr 0.10 sys + 55.81 cusr 65.44 csys = 121.75 CPU) Result: FAIL make: *** [Makefile:43: test] Error 1 make: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/git-lfs-3.4.1/t' RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ik7p5Z (%check) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ik7p5Z (%che]: [the t-pull.sh test case failed]
Issue: The test suite is required to pass during the RPM build process. In this case, the test suite failed: t-pull.sh test case failed. Resolution: Analyze the output of the test case to resolve it. You can also report the issue upstream and work with the upstream developers to resolve it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Report ------------------- ./t-pull.sh (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 8 Failed: 1) Failed test: 7 Non-zero exit status: 1 Files=100, Tests=702, 375 wallclock secs ( 0.40 usr 0.10 sys + 55.81 cusr 65.44 csys = 121.75 CPU) Result: FAIL make: *** [Makefile:43: test] Error 1 make: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/git-lfs-3.4.1/t' RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ik7p5Z (%check) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ik7p5Z (%che
the t-pull.sh test case failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [RPM build errors: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/driverctl-0.101-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/driverctl]: [The files can't be found for this RPM]
Issue: The problem is actually in the %make_install macro in the specfile, since there was a Fedora change to unify /usr/bin and /usr/sbin folders (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin). This causes the installation to add these files to the wrong location. Resolution: There is a fix to add `PREFIX=%{_prefix} SBINDIR=%{_sbindir}` options to the `%make_install` macro
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: RPM build errors: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/driverctl-0.101-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/driverctl
The files can't be found for this RPM
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.14-1.fc41.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar]: [It's not possible to install all the required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed (dnf-data) package. ]
Issue: Some of the required packages were not installed. Resolution: Resolve the conflict first.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.14-1.fc41.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar
It's not possible to install all the required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed (dnf-data) package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [FAILED: obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib "/usr/bin/python3" "../../build/rust/rustc_wrapper.py" --rustc=../../../../../../usr/bin/rustc --depfile=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.d --rsp=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.rsp -- -Clinker="clang++" --crate-name libyuv_sys ../../third_party/crabbyavif/src/sys/libyuv-sys/src/lib.rs --crate-type rlib --edition=2021 -Dunsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn -Cforce-unwind-tables=no -Crelocation-model=pic -Cdefault-linker-libraries -Zdep-info-omit-d-target -Zmacro-backtrace -Zremap-cwd-prefix=. -Zexternal-clangrt --color=always --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -Cembed-bitcode=no -Clto=no -Ccodegen-units=1 --cfg cr_rustc_revision=\"rustc\ 1.79.0\ \(129f3b996\ 2024-06-10\)\ \(Red\ Hat\ 1.79.0-3.el9_5\)\" -Copt-level=3 -Zallow-features= --emit=dep-info=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.d,link -o obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib LDFLAGS RUSTENV OUT_DIR=../../../../../../out/Release/gen/third_party/crabbyavif/crabbyavif_libyuv_sys error: extern block cannot be declared unsafe]: [The error messages indicate that the rust compiler breaks with the error: extern block cannot be declared unsafe and the build failed] ============= [bindgen-cli x86_64 0.71.1-1.el9 build 1.9 M]: [Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild ] ============= [DEBUG util.py:461: rust-1.79.0-3.el9_5.x86_64]: [Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild]
Issue: The build failed because bindgen with version 0.71 generates rust codes that cannot be compiled with rust-1.79.0 on EPEL9. It's a bug in bindgen and reported https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-bindgen/issues/3052 Resolution: To fix this issue we need to update rust to the version 1.84 or newer in epel9. Or patch chromium to pass "--rust-target 1.79" to the bindgen CLI call.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: FAILED: obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib "/usr/bin/python3" "../../build/rust/rustc_wrapper.py" --rustc=../../../../../../usr/bin/rustc --depfile=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.d --rsp=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.rsp -- -Clinker="clang++" --crate-name libyuv_sys ../../third_party/crabbyavif/src/sys/libyuv-sys/src/lib.rs --crate-type rlib --edition=2021 -Dunsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn -Cforce-unwind-tables=no -Crelocation-model=pic -Cdefault-linker-libraries -Zdep-info-omit-d-target -Zmacro-backtrace -Zremap-cwd-prefix=. -Zexternal-clangrt --color=always --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -Cembed-bitcode=no -Clto=no -Ccodegen-units=1 --cfg cr_rustc_revision=\"rustc\ 1.79.0\ \(129f3b996\ 2024-06-10\)\ \(Red\ Hat\ 1.79.0-3.el9_5\)\" -Copt-level=3 -Zallow-features= --emit=dep-info=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.d,link -o obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib LDFLAGS RUSTENV OUT_DIR=../../../../../../out/Release/gen/third_party/crabbyavif/crabbyavif_libyuv_sys error: extern block cannot be declared unsafe
The error messages indicate that the rust compiler breaks with the error: extern block cannot be declared unsafe and the build failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: bindgen-cli x86_64 0.71.1-1.el9 build 1.9 M
Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: DEBUG util.py:461: rust-1.79.0-3.el9_5.x86_64
Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ = 2 failed, 1051 passed, 20 skipped, 7 deselected, 5 xfailed, 1 xpassed in 83.86s (0:01:23)]: [Two tests failed, 5 failed with caveats.] ============= [self = EntryPoint(name='foo', value='invalid-identifier:foo', group='foo') @property def extras(self) -> List[str]: match = self.pattern.match(self.value) > assert match is not None E AssertionError /usr/lib64/python3.13/importlib/metadata/__init__.py:197: AssertionError]: [Test assertion was broken.] ============= [ _________ [doctest] pkg_resources.NullProvider._validate_resource_path _________ 1609 >>> vrp('foo/../../bar.txt') 1610 >>> bool(warned) 1611 True 1612 >>> warned.clear() 1613 >>> vrp('foo/f../bar.txt') 1614 >>> bool(warned) 1615 False 1616 1617 Windows path separators are straight-up disallowed. 1618 >>> vrp(r'\foo/bar.txt') Expected: Traceback (most recent call last): ... ValueError: Use of .. or absolute path in a resource path is not allowed. Got nothing /builddir/build/BUILD/setuptools-68.2.2/pkg_resources/__init__.py:1618: DocTestFail]: [Test assertion was broken.] ============= [ extra tokens at the end of %endif directive in line 230: %endif # with test]: [Specfile syntax was violated.]
Issue: Multiple tests have failed. Resolution: Check if test failures are connected to actual issues, and not false positives. If they are indeed caused by deficiencies in user code, fix them and submit the build again.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: = 2 failed, 1051 passed, 20 skipped, 7 deselected, 5 xfailed, 1 xpassed in 83.86s (0:01:23)
Two tests failed, 5 failed with caveats.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: self = EntryPoint(name='foo', value='invalid-identifier:foo', group='foo') @property def extras(self) -> List[str]: match = self.pattern.match(self.value) > assert match is not None E AssertionError /usr/lib64/python3.13/importlib/metadata/__init__.py:197: AssertionError
Test assertion was broken.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: _________ [doctest] pkg_resources.NullProvider._validate_resource_path _________ 1609 >>> vrp('foo/../../bar.txt') 1610 >>> bool(warned) 1611 True 1612 >>> warned.clear() 1613 >>> vrp('foo/f../bar.txt') 1614 >>> bool(warned) 1615 False 1616 1617 Windows path separators are straight-up disallowed. 1618 >>> vrp(r'\foo/bar.txt') Expected: Traceback (most recent call last): ... ValueError: Use of .. or absolute path in a resource path is not allowed. Got nothing /builddir/build/BUILD/setuptools-68.2.2/pkg_resources/__init__.py:1618: DocTestFail
Test assertion was broken.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: extra tokens at the end of %endif directive in line 230: %endif # with test
Specfile syntax was violated.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 88, in <module> run_cmd(mock + ['--install'] + pkgs) ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 64, in run_cmd return subprocess.check_call(command, **kwargs) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)]: [Traceback from Python runtime, caused by `CalledProcessError` exception being raised from within as script. ] ============= [No match for argument: java-17-openjdk-devel]: [Package `java-17-openjdk-devel` was not found by the package manager.]
Issue: One of the required packages,`java-17-openjdk-devel`, was not retrieved by the package manager. Resolution: Check if the `java-17-openjdk-devel` package is available from installed repositories. If it is not, contact maintainers or add relevant repositories before retrying the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 88, in <module> run_cmd(mock + ['--install'] + pkgs) ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 64, in run_cmd return subprocess.check_call(command, **kwargs) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
Traceback from Python runtime, caused by `CalledProcessError` exception being raised from within as script.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: No match for argument: java-17-openjdk-devel
Package `java-17-openjdk-devel` was not found by the package manager.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:73 (find_package): Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Boost" (requested version 1.71.0) with any of the following names: BoostConfig.cmake boost-config.cmake Add the installation prefix of "Boost" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set "Boost_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above files. If "Boost" provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it has been installed. -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!]: [Boost was not found by cmake]
Issue: Boost library wasn't found by cmake Resolution: Either add fixed path where boost is located or add boost as dependency
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:73 (find_package): Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Boost" (requested version 1.71.0) with any of the following names: BoostConfig.cmake boost-config.cmake Add the installation prefix of "Boost" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set "Boost_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above files. If "Boost" provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it has been installed. -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
Boost was not found by cmake
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [RPM build errors: error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/gwenview-25.04.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/qt6/plugins/kf6/kfileitemaction/slideshowfileitemaction.so.4 File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/gwenview-25.04.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/qt6/plugins/kf6/kfileitemaction/slideshowfileitemaction.so.4]: [This is the build error]
Issue: The build tried to package a file that does not exist. It might be due to a typo in the filename or the file was present in the previous releases but now is removed/renamed. Resolution: Fix the filename or remove it from the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: RPM build errors: error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/gwenview-25.04.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/qt6/plugins/kf6/kfileitemaction/slideshowfileitemaction.so.4 File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/gwenview-25.04.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/qt6/plugins/kf6/kfileitemaction/slideshowfileitemaction.so.4
This is the build error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [RPM build errors: error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/linux-arm64-0.19.2.tgz: No such file or directory error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/linux-x64-0.19.2.tgz: No such file or directory Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/linux-arm64-0.19.2.tgz: No such file or directory Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/linux-x64-0.19.2.tgz: No such file or directory]: [Source files could not be found found that was extracted from src.rpm]
Issue: Source files could not be found found that was extracted from src.rpm Resolution: Add source files in spec file and rebuild the src.rpm
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: RPM build errors: error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/linux-arm64-0.19.2.tgz: No such file or directory error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/linux-x64-0.19.2.tgz: No such file or directory Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/linux-arm64-0.19.2.tgz: No such file or directory Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/linux-x64-0.19.2.tgz: No such file or directory
Source files could not be found found that was extracted from src.rpm
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ CMake Error at auxil/binpac/CMakeLists.txt:35 (message): Could not find prerequisite package 'BIND']: [Error noting missing prerequisite.]
Issue: There is a missing build prerequisite. Resolution: Make sure the build system has all the prerequisites.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: CMake Error at auxil/binpac/CMakeLists.txt:35 (message): Could not find prerequisite package 'BIND'
Error noting missing prerequisite.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ # Failed test 'did not search PATH for C++ compiler when given absolute path to C compiler' # at t/03-cplusplus.t line 73. # got: 'g++' # expected: '/builddir/build/BUILD/perl-5.41.13-build/perl-5.41.12/dist/ExtUtils-CBuilder/some/directory/what/doesnt/exist/cc' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 7. ../dist/ExtUtils-CBuilder/t/03-cplusplus.t ........................... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/7 subtests ]: [Here build failed, because test got different result as expected]
Issue: The test failed because it did not expect $ENV{CXX}, and consequently $cb->{config}{cxx}, to be defined at runtime. https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/23277 Resolution: There are two way how to solve it. The test should be skipped entirely if $CXX is set, or $CXX needs to be (temporarily) unset.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: # Failed test 'did not search PATH for C++ compiler when given absolute path to C compiler' # at t/03-cplusplus.t line 73. # got: 'g++' # expected: '/builddir/build/BUILD/perl-5.41.13-build/perl-5.41.12/dist/ExtUtils-CBuilder/some/directory/what/doesnt/exist/cc' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 7. ../dist/ExtUtils-CBuilder/t/03-cplusplus.t ........................... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/7 subtests
Here build failed, because test got different result as expected
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [Failed to download metadata (metalink: "https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=s390x") for repository "fedora"]: [dnf failed to download repository metadata]
Issue: Build failed during dependency installation due to dnf failure. Possibly broken network. Resolution: These kinds of problems are usually fixed by rebuilding.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Failed to download metadata (metalink: "https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=s390x") for repository "fedora"
dnf failed to download repository metadata
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [DEBUG util.py:556: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '-M', 'df98b1bea2f446379804ec783a40c71f', '-D', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913-bootstrap/root', '-a', '--capability=cap_ipc_lock', '--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.5x7lyrb2:/etc/resolv.conf', '--console=pipe', '--setenv=TERM=vt100', '--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash', '--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/installation-homedir', '--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock', '--setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', '--setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8', '--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8', '--resolv-conf=off', '/usr/bin/dnf5', 'builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/php-twig-1.44.7-6.fc43.src.rpm', '--setopt=deltarpm=False', '--setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes', '--allowerasing', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/installation-homedir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', 'PS1': '<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C.UTF-8', 'SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP': '0', 'SYSTEMD_SECCOMP': '0'} and shell False DEBUG util.py:459: Updating and loading repositories: DEBUG util.py:459: build 100% | 85.2 KiB/s | 3.5 KiB | 00m00s DEBUG util.py:459: Repositories loaded. DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: nothing provides requested (php-composer(symfony/debug) >= 3.4 with php-composer(symfony/debug) < 4) DEBUG util.py:608: Child return code was: 1 ]: [DNF fails to resolve dependencies]
Issue: php-composer(symfony/debug) version >= 3.4 and < 4 is not available Resolution: If symfony/debug is a runtime dependency, the package needs to be adapted to run with available dependency, or missing dependency be added, or packaged retired. If symfony/debug is a buildtime dependency, only used byt the test suite, the test suite needs to be adapted of relevant unit tests ignored.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: DEBUG util.py:556: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '-M', 'df98b1bea2f446379804ec783a40c71f', '-D', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913-bootstrap/root', '-a', '--capability=cap_ipc_lock', '--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.5x7lyrb2:/etc/resolv.conf', '--console=pipe', '--setenv=TERM=vt100', '--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash', '--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/installation-homedir', '--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock', '--setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', '--setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8', '--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8', '--resolv-conf=off', '/usr/bin/dnf5', 'builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/php-twig-1.44.7-6.fc43.src.rpm', '--setopt=deltarpm=False', '--setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes', '--allowerasing', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/installation-homedir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', 'PS1': '<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C.UTF-8', 'SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP': '0', 'SYSTEMD_SECCOMP': '0'} and shell False DEBUG util.py:459: Updating and loading repositories: DEBUG util.py:459: build 100% | 85.2 KiB/s | 3.5 KiB | 00m00s DEBUG util.py:459: Repositories loaded. DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: nothing provides requested (php-composer(symfony/debug) >= 3.4 with php-composer(symfony/debug) < 4) DEBUG util.py:608: Child return code was: 1
DNF fails to resolve dependencies
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4JLmug (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4JLmug (%build) RPM build errors: Child return code was: 1 ]: [The build failed during %build phase.] ============= [seccomp_control_open.c: In function ‘install_filter’: seccomp_control_open.c:88:3: error: #error Unknown architecture 88 | # error Unknown architecture | ^~~~~ make[1]: *** [<builtin>: seccomp_control_open] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mstackrealign -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -std=c99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -I../lib -pedantic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-parameter -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes seccomp_deny_open.c ../libtlpi.a -o seccomp_deny_open make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' seccomp_deny_open.c: In function ‘install_filter’: seccomp_deny_open.c:87:3: error: #error Unknown architecture 87 | # error Unknown architecture | ^~~~~ make[1]: *** [<builtin>: seccomp_deny_open] Error 1 make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' gcc -o libseccomp_demo libseccomp_demo.c -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mstackrealign -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -std=c99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -I../lib -pedantic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-parameter -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes ../libtlpi.a -lseccomp make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mstackrealign -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -std=c99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -I../lib -pedantic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-parameter -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes seccomp_arg64.c ../libtlpi.a -o seccomp_arg64 make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' seccomp_arg64.c: In function ‘main’: seccomp_arg64.c:144:19: warning: overflow in conversion from ‘long long int’ to ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long int’} changes value from ‘4294967297’ to ‘1’ [-Woverflow] 144 | seek_test(fd, 0x100000001); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mstackrealign -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -std=c99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -I../lib -pedantic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-parameter -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes seccomp_bench.c ../libtlpi.a -o seccomp_bench make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mstackrealign -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -std=c99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -I../lib -pedantic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-parameter -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes dump_seccomp_filter.c ../libtlpi.a -o dump_seccomp_filter make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' make: *** [Makefile:47: all] Error 2]: [You are trying to use seccomp_control_open on architecture where it does not exists.]
Issue: seccomp_control/deny_open only builds on x86_64 and aarch64 only. Everywhere else the build fails. Resolution: Add to the SPEC file in %build section: %ifnarch x86_64 aarch64 sed --in-place /seccomp_control_open/d seccomp/Makefile %endif
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4JLmug (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4JLmug (%build) RPM build errors: Child return code was: 1
The build failed during %build phase.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: seccomp_control_open.c: In function ‘install_filter’: seccomp_control_open.c:88:3: error: #error Unknown architecture 88 | # error Unknown architecture | ^~~~~ make[1]: *** [<builtin>: seccomp_control_open] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mstackrealign -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -std=c99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -I../lib -pedantic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-parameter -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes seccomp_deny_open.c ../libtlpi.a -o seccomp_deny_open make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' seccomp_deny_open.c: In function ‘install_filter’: seccomp_deny_open.c:87:3: error: #error Unknown architecture 87 | # error Unknown architecture | ^~~~~ make[1]: *** [<builtin>: seccomp_deny_open] Error 1 make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' gcc -o libseccomp_demo libseccomp_demo.c -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mstackrealign -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -std=c99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -I../lib -pedantic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-parameter -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes ../libtlpi.a -lseccomp make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mstackrealign -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -std=c99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -I../lib -pedantic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-parameter -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes seccomp_arg64.c ../libtlpi.a -o seccomp_arg64 make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' seccomp_arg64.c: In function ‘main’: seccomp_arg64.c:144:19: warning: overflow in conversion from ‘long long int’ to ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long int’} changes value from ‘4294967297’ to ‘1’ [-Woverflow] 144 | seek_test(fd, 0x100000001); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mstackrealign -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -std=c99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -I../lib -pedantic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-parameter -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes seccomp_bench.c ../libtlpi.a -o seccomp_bench make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mstackrealign -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -std=c99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -I../lib -pedantic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-parameter -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes dump_seccomp_filter.c ../libtlpi.a -o dump_seccomp_filter make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/tlpi-241221-build/tlpi-dist/seccomp' make: *** [Makefile:47: all] Error 2
You are trying to use seccomp_control_open on architecture where it does not exists.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [ Copr build error: Build fail]: [Final build failure message.] ============= [ WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 1]: [Final attempt to install dependencies by DNF.] ============= [ matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock Copr repository 81 kB/s | 1.5 kB 00:00 Additional repo http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org 173 kB/s | 3.8 kB 00:00 fedora 155 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00 updates 44 kB/s | 13 kB 00:00 Error: Problem: package usd-devel-23.11-2.fc40.aarch64 from copr_base requires libusd_ms.so.0.23.11()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package usd-devel-23.11-2.fc40.aarch64 fro]: [The `usd-devel` package requires `libopenvdb.so.10.1()(64bit)` and `usd-libs(aarch-64) = 23.11-2.fc40`. But their providers can not be installed.]
Issue: Required files can not be obtained, as the DNF can not find any available providers. Resolution: Ensure that all dependencies are available during build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Copr build error: Build fail
Final build failure message.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 1
Final attempt to install dependencies by DNF.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock Copr repository 81 kB/s | 1.5 kB 00:00 Additional repo http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org 173 kB/s | 3.8 kB 00:00 fedora 155 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00 updates 44 kB/s | 13 kB 00:00 Error: Problem: package usd-devel-23.11-2.fc40.aarch64 from copr_base requires libusd_ms.so.0.23.11()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package usd-devel-23.11-2.fc40.aarch64 fro
The `usd-devel` package requires `libopenvdb.so.10.1()(64bit)` and `usd-libs(aarch-64) = 23.11-2.fc40`. But their providers can not be installed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-autoindex.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-dav.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-default.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-info.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-languages.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-manual.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-multilang-errordoc.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-userdir.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/proxy-html.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-autoindex.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-dav.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-default.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-info.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-languages.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-manual.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-mpm.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-multilang-errordoc.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-ssl.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-userdir.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/proxy-html.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/httpd.conf absolute symlink: /etc/httpd/run -> /run/httpd File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/21/398ff3d966036ce0a55d13d1ded69e117d67b5 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/35/a42834432a5e668f34160fb8863dc47eba0293 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/44/07155384153a78894bc796d9a1484516b23579 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/49/9c5094810b73f6f08e33eed5c986afa2209b13 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/56/abda1e49fd7823389544538474f0d309a7d720 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/63/c6d5e35f078612448ae2ee9d01834d35052fd8 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/8a/996ecc55d2a03ae337d0b23910e74e6b180e2b RPM build warnings: RPM build errors: File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/93/689bd7f944cd9bf8aa976b080e7a293fbbbf3c File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/a1/01cb36155e1f7500a0946e68c30ff43b1d0556 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/a5/065ee2fa4f7a7747b2d5243a0050e4d7bd45fa File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/a8/dc1fcb06666079269272d0ea8e32f7590b2707 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/ed/f305e5b0547a5a0f2caa82abeb3e579581528c File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/fb/6c4d5e0d4768e2277929d8082f3718ffddb960 Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-autoindex.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-dav.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-default.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-info.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-languages.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-manual.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-multilang-errordoc.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-userdir.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/proxy-html.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-autoindex.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-dav.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-default.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-info.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-languages.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-manual.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-mpm.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-multilang-errordoc.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-ssl.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-userdir.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/proxy-html.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/httpd.conf Child return code was: 1]: [Describes the actual problem. ]
Issue: The build failed because files were installed to the RPM_BUILD_ROOT, but they were not listen in %files section. Resolution: Remove directories "original" and "extra" from RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/httpd/conf/, because we don't want to package them and they are also not mentioned in %files section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-autoindex.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-dav.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-default.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-info.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-languages.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-manual.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-multilang-errordoc.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-userdir.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/proxy-html.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-autoindex.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-dav.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-default.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-info.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-languages.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-manual.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-mpm.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-multilang-errordoc.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-ssl.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-userdir.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/proxy-html.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/httpd.conf absolute symlink: /etc/httpd/run -> /run/httpd File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/21/398ff3d966036ce0a55d13d1ded69e117d67b5 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/35/a42834432a5e668f34160fb8863dc47eba0293 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/44/07155384153a78894bc796d9a1484516b23579 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/49/9c5094810b73f6f08e33eed5c986afa2209b13 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/56/abda1e49fd7823389544538474f0d309a7d720 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/63/c6d5e35f078612448ae2ee9d01834d35052fd8 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/8a/996ecc55d2a03ae337d0b23910e74e6b180e2b RPM build warnings: RPM build errors: File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/93/689bd7f944cd9bf8aa976b080e7a293fbbbf3c File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/a1/01cb36155e1f7500a0946e68c30ff43b1d0556 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/a5/065ee2fa4f7a7747b2d5243a0050e4d7bd45fa File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/a8/dc1fcb06666079269272d0ea8e32f7590b2707 File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/ed/f305e5b0547a5a0f2caa82abeb3e579581528c File listed twice: /usr/lib/.build-id/fb/6c4d5e0d4768e2277929d8082f3718ffddb960 Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-autoindex.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-dav.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-default.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-info.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-languages.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-manual.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-multilang-errordoc.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-userdir.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf /etc/httpd/conf/extra/proxy-html.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-autoindex.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-dav.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-default.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-info.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-languages.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-manual.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-mpm.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-multilang-errordoc.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-ssl.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-userdir.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/extra/proxy-html.conf /etc/httpd/conf/original/httpd.conf Child return code was: 1
Describes the actual problem.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: pkgconfig(luajit) DEBUG util.py:459: You can try to add to command line: DEBUG util.py:459: --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages]: [The pkgconfig(luajit) package was not found by dnf.]
Issue: The pkgconfig(luajit) package was not found by dnf. Either it is misnamed in the BuildRequires, named differently in the dnf repositories or not supported on this achitecture. Resolution: Ensure the BuildRequires of pkgconfig(luajit) is spelled correctly, is available on the dnf repos and is available on the architecture you are building for.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: pkgconfig(luajit) DEBUG util.py:459: You can try to add to command line: DEBUG util.py:459: --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
The pkgconfig(luajit) package was not found by dnf.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [src/user.c:145:54: error: passing argument 2 of ‘load_entry’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] 145 | e = load_entry(file, log_error, pw, envp); | ^~~~~~~~~ | | | void (*)(const char *)]: [This shows the error message from GCC, which causes the build to fail]
Issue: The build has failed because GCC returns an error during the compilation of the package. Resolution: Work with the upstream code and create a patch that resolves the GCC error.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: src/user.c:145:54: error: passing argument 2 of ‘load_entry’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] 145 | e = load_entry(file, log_error, pw, envp); | ^~~~~~~~~ | | | void (*)(const char *)
This shows the error message from GCC, which causes the build to fail
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [No matching package to install: 'mongo-c-driver-devel']: [Package 'mongo-c-driver-devel' cannot be installed because it's not available in enabled RPM repositories.]
Issue: One of the required build dependencies, 'mongo-c-driver-devel', cannot be installed so the build cannot proceed. Resolution: If the dependency is required, you need to provide it to proceed with the build process. If it's not required, remove it from BuildRequires and update the %build section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: No matching package to install: 'mongo-c-driver-devel'
Package 'mongo-c-driver-devel' cannot be installed because it's not available in enabled RPM repositories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [+ %cmake3_build /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BuTcVK: line 47: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BuTcVK (%build)]: [The line where the issue occurred.] ============= [ cmake3 ppc64le 3.14.7-1.el7 epel 7.6 M]: [This snippet shows the version of the cmake3 package to be installed in the buildroot.]
Issue: The %cmake3_build macro did not expand correctly. Resolution: Make sure that a version of the cmake/cmake3 package which is recent enough is present in the buildroot to provide this macro.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: + %cmake3_build /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BuTcVK: line 47: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BuTcVK (%build)
The line where the issue occurred.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: cmake3 ppc64le 3.14.7-1.el7 epel 7.6 M
This snippet shows the version of the cmake3 package to be installed in the buildroot.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package. Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation. Snippets are delimited with '================'. Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution. Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences. Snippets: [Running Mkbootstrap for Storable () chmod 644 "Storable.bs" "/usr/bin/perl" "/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp" -typemap '/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/typemap' Storable.xs > Storable.xsc Failed to load or import from ExtUtils::ParseXS (version 3.57). Please check that ExtUtils::ParseXS is installed correctly and that the newest version will be found in your @INC path: Can't locate fields.pm in @INC (you may need to install the fields module) (@INC entries checked: /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.41 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.41 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5) at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS/Node.pm line 53. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS/Node.pm line 57. Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS.pm line 70. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS.pm line 73. Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp line 9. make: *** [Makefile:366: Storable.c] Error 2 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....]: [Here the build fails, because the perl module 'ExtUtils::ParseXS' could not locate perl module 'fields'.]
Issue: The build failed because the rpm which provides `perl(fields)` was not available in the buildroot and module 'ExtUtils::ParseXS' requires it. Resolution: ExtUtils::ParseXS is provided by rpm perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS, so this package has to be updated to install all run-time dependencies. Because 'perl(fields)' was not found by perl-generators, it has to be listed in spec 'Requires: perl(fields)'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution. Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact. Snippet: Running Mkbootstrap for Storable () chmod 644 "Storable.bs" "/usr/bin/perl" "/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp" -typemap '/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/typemap' Storable.xs > Storable.xsc Failed to load or import from ExtUtils::ParseXS (version 3.57). Please check that ExtUtils::ParseXS is installed correctly and that the newest version will be found in your @INC path: Can't locate fields.pm in @INC (you may need to install the fields module) (@INC entries checked: /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.41 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.41 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5) at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS/Node.pm line 53. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS/Node.pm line 57. Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS.pm line 70. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS.pm line 73. Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp line 9. make: *** [Makefile:366: Storable.c] Error 2 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Here the build fails, because the perl module 'ExtUtils::ParseXS' could not locate perl module 'fields'.