title
stringlengths 8
78
| text
stringlengths 3
643
|
---|---|
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | So, though, now let's define what a broncidlaric acid and a broncillary base is. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | A bronzedidlori acid is a molecule that donates an H ion, while a broncillary base is a molecule that accepts an H ion. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | So acid strength of a broncillary acid increases with increasing S character. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | So why is that? |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | Well, to examine that, let's recall one simple concept. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | So, here we have a protons. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | We have a nucleus and protons inside that nucleus. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | And this is our one S orbital, our two S orbital and the two P orbital. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | So recall that as our electron gets closer and closer to our protons in the nucleus, the energy level of the entire atom decreases, so it becomes more stable. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | So the closer our electron is to our nucleus, the more stable that atom is. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | And let's look what happens when an acid, a brothed lauric acid, reacts. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | So, when a brothed Laric acid, reacts, it creates a conjugate base. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | So a brothelary base, and it creates an hion. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | Now, if this has a lot of S character, that means the electron pair here will be found in that S character. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | So, the more S character we have, the closer our electrons are to our nucleus and the more stable our conjugate bases. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | And if we have a stable conjugate base, that means our acid will be more likely to form this conjugate base, and therefore, our acid will be more likely to dissociate. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | And that means our asset will be a stronger acid. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | So, therefore, the more character a broccoliy acid has, the stronger the base it produces. |
Lewis Acids and Bases .txt | And that means the better that acid. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So in this lecture, we're going to discuss the Con ingle Prelog priority system. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Now, the system is used for either one of two things. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | It's either used in determining the absolute configuration of your enantomers to either R or S absolute configuration, or it's used to help you rank groups attached to double bonds. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So in this lecture, we're going to focus primarily on this usage here. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So whenever you're using this system, four important rules must be followed that will help you to get or find the highest priority groups. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So let's look at rule number one. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So, atom with higher atomic number receives higher priority. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So let's see what that means via this example. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So here we have a carbon carbon double bond. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So let's examine this carbon carbon number one. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So carbon number one is attached to two groups. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | It's either attached to the H or it's attached to the carbon here. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So which atom has a higher atomic number? |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Well, clearly the carbon has a higher atomic number, and that means this group attached this carbon has a higher priority than this group here. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Likewise, let's examine the second carbon. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | The second carbon of the double bond is also attached to a carbon, and it's also attached to an H.
Which one of these two groups has a higher atomic number? |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Well, clearly, the carbon has a higher atomic number, and so the carbon wins. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | And let's label it with an asterisk. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So notice that in this compound, our groups with the higher priorities are on the same side of the double bond. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | And that means this must be a Z isomer. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So let's look at rule number two for isotopes. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | The isotope with a higher atomic weight wins. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Remember, two compounds or two atoms are isotopes if they have the same number of protons and electrons, but different number of neutrons. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So they differ in atomic weight. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So let's look at the following example. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Let's suppose we have a carbon carbon double bond. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So let's examine this carbon here. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | This carbon is attached to an H group and also to a D group. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | D is simply deteriorate. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | It's the isotope of H. So since D has a higher atomic weight, d must have a higher priority than H.
So this group has a higher priority than this group. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Likewise, for the second carbon in a double bond, we have the following two groups. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Once again, we have the H and we have the D.
So our D, the deteriorium, has a higher atomic weight, so it has a higher priority. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | And now we have an allochene where our two higher priority groups are on opposite sides of the double bond. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | And that means this must be an Eisomer. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So let's look at rule number three. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | If we have the same atom, if we have a tie between our atoms, we move to the next atom. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So let's see exactly what that means. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Let's look at the following example. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | We have a carbon carbon double bond. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So let's begin with this carbon, the first carbon in the double bond. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So this carbon is attached to a carbon of this side and a carbon on that side. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So far, we have a tie. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | We can't determine the atomic number, so we move on to the next atom. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So there is no next atom here. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | But here we have a following carbon atom. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So that means this side wins. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | It has a higher atomic number and it also has a higher atomic weight. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So this side, this group, has a higher priority than the lower group. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Likewise, for this carbon, we have the same exact situation. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So, once again, as the first example, we have the Z Isomer, because our two higher priority groups are the same size. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Finally, let's look at rule number four. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | A double bond to a carbon is considered as two single bonds. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So let's see exactly what that means. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Let's suppose we have our double bond here. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So a carbon and carbon double bond. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | We want to examine the groups attached to our first carbon. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So here we have a carbon in a carbon. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So so far, no one wins. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | And a carbon and a carbon. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So no one wins. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | But we have a double bond here. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | And this double bond, according to rule number four, is actually, or actually looks something like this. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So every double bond is considered as having two single bonds. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So we erase this double bond and we replace one carbon and a second carbon. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So two more single covalent bonds. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So now this side, this group has a higher atomic weight. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | And so this group wins, and this group must be the higher priority group. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Now, on this side of the carbon, we have two identical methyl groups. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So we have carbon and carbon. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | So no one wins here. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | And so for this carbon, the in lock pre lock priority system does not work. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | It yields two groups with the same exact priority. |
Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System .txt | Sorry. |
Stability of Alkenes.txt | So let's suppose we have a certain alky, let's say hexine, for example, and let's write out all different types of isomers of hexine. |
Stability of Alkenes.txt | Now, if we compare the stability of one isomer of hexine to another isomer of exe, we'll see a difference in stability. |
Stability of Alkenes.txt | In other words, some isomers are more stable than other isomers. |
Stability of Alkenes.txt | So in general, why is that? |
Stability of Alkenes.txt | Why is it that some isomers of alkans are more stable than other isomers of that same alkane? |
Stability of Alkenes.txt | So we're going to address that question in this lecture. |
Stability of Alkenes.txt | So let's begin by defining change in Enthalpy affirmation. |
Stability of Alkenes.txt | So loosely speaking, enthalpy affirmation is the energy difference between the final product and its constituent elements. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.