answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"7.04mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.09.002 | However, the decrease of Jsc of the Q4 device was quite substantial (from 7.04mAcm−2 to 4.11mAcm−2). | What is the value of Jsc? | 54124 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.005 | After drying in air the substrates were screen printed (active area 0.25 cm2) with a 40 wt% (90 wt% terpineol and 10 wt% ethylcellulose)-diluted TiO2-paste (Dyesol DSL 18 NR-T). | What is the value of active area? | 52905 |
{
"text": [
"0.98V"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.078 | After adding 1wt.% CuS, the PSCs yielded to the best power conversion efficiency of 11.28% with a VOC of 0.98V and JSC of 18.26mAcm−2, while the pure carbon electrode based PSCs attained the best power conversion efficiency of 9.36% with a VOC of 0.93V and JSC of 16.14mAcm−2 which is slightly higher than that of the PSCs based on pure carbon counter electrode. | What is the value of VOC? | 9251 |
{
"text": [
"6.21%"
],
"answer_start": [
135
]
} | 10.1039/C2CC34355J | As a result, the overall photoconversion efficiency (η) of the hollow TiO2DSC achieves 7.48%, which is higher than the P25 based DSC (∼6.21%) measured in parallel experiments by 21% and that reported in the literature (∼5.14%) by 46%. | What is the value of η? | 62423 |
{
"text": [
"8.14%"
],
"answer_start": [
181
]
} | 10.1039/C5CC07105D | The power conversion efficiency (PCE) increases with elongation of the conjugated spacer, and the dye with the dithieno[3,2-b]pyrrolobenzotriazole spacer has the best efficiency of 8.14%, which is comparable with that of an N719-based DSSC (8.03%). | What is the value of PCE? | 66801 |
{
"text": [
"0.691V"
],
"answer_start": [
104
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.052 | It can be found that the cell with the h-CoFe2O4@CNTs/PPy CE showed a high Jsc of 12.63mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.691V, a high FF of 0.709, and a high PCE of 6.19%. | What is the value of Voc? | 50345 |
{
"text": [
"0.82 V"
],
"answer_start": [
420
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2014.05.011 | Quite interestingly, we found that the initial efficiency, without any co-adsorbent, of only 1.9% (accompanied with a low open-circuit potential (Voc) of 0.67 V, fully incompatible with the positive Nernst potential of the redox electrolyte) was enhanced systematically with the increase of the molecular size of the co-adsorbent added in electrolyte, reaching efficiency values for CHENO up to 5.7% along with a Voc of 0.82 V. | What is the value of Voc? | 43458 |
{
"text": [
"0.58V"
],
"answer_start": [
243
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2019.137699 | The Jsc values of TiO2 nanoparticles without TiO2 compact layer and with TiO2 compact layer are 5.95 and 9.79mA.cm−2, respectively while the Voc values of TiO2 nanoparticles without TiO2 compact layer and with TiO2 compact layer are 0.52V and 0.58V, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 52052 |
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.005 | 10-μm thick mesoporous layer of sintered anatase TiO2 nanoparticles (diameter ∼20 nm) on a glass substrate with a transparent conductive oxide layer; an additional light-scattering layer of TiO2 nanoparticles with diameters of 400 nm is also applied in many cases The excitation and charge separation processes in high performance DSSCs, which are summarized in , rely on a series of kinetically controlled processes that are reminiscent of the electron-transfer events that occur within the photosynthetic apparatus ). | What is substrate? | 38389 |
{
"text": [
"0.700 V"
],
"answer_start": [
316
]
} | 10.1039/C8NJ00330K | When using a mixture of the reference PIMI electrolyte with pyridine ionic liquids (as an I− source), the value of Rrec has a further enhancement from 64 Ω to 93 Ω, which makes this cell have a lower rate constant for I3− reduction and further increases the Voc (0.728 V) compared with that of the device with PIMI (0.700 V). | What is the value of Voc? | 65305 |
{
"text": [
"771 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
186
]
} | 10.1039/C3CP54894E | Application of the commercially available MK2 and N719 sensitizers resulted in an energy conversion efficiency of 4.4% with a VOC of 733 mV and a JSC of 8.6 mA cm−2 for MK2 and a VOC of 771 mV and a JSC of 7.9 mA cm−2 for N719. | What is the value of VOC? | 63309 |
{
"text": [
"12.78%"
],
"answer_start": [
48
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR01864A | The as-prepared optimized device shows a PCE of 12.78%, which is increased by about 30% as compared with the reference device based on pristine PEDOT:PSS. | What is the value of PCE? | 12842 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
49
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA00793K | The devices were fabricated using screen printed TiO2 films (Solaronix paste) and the same liquid electrolyte as previously mentioned was used. | What is ? | 75122 |
{
"text": [
"13.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.12.002 | Due to the effective hole extraction and high VOC, the devices showed a maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 13.7%. | What is the value of PCE? | 8450 |
{
"text": [
"0.740 V"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA21878K | It is seen that the VOC, JSC, FF, and PCE are 0.740 V, 16.3 mA cm−2, 0.615 and 7.40%, respectively, for DSSCs with in situ-polymerized PEDOT. | What is the value of VOC? | 68455 |
{
"text": [
"23.53mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.226 | With the additional 980nm NIR laser irradiation, the average JSC value of the UC-PSC was boosted to 23.53mAcm−2, thus promoting the average PCE from 18.34% to 18.90%. | What is the value of JSC? | 2817 |
{
"text": [
"13.89mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.033 | The DSC with C-1 counter electrode perform poorly, the photovoltaic parameters being Jsc 13.89mAcm−2, Voc 0.659V, FF 0.42 and η 3.84%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 55048 |
{
"text": [
"18.23%"
],
"answer_start": [
186
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA09716F | For the devices based on HTLs with 3 wt% F4-TCNQ and thermal annealing (doped/annealed), the PCEs of the pero-SCs with SiTP-OMeTPA and Si-OMeTPA HTLs were further improved to 14.15% and 18.23%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 20116 |
{
"text": [
"3.63%"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.015 | DSSC fabricated from the dye 154 (η= 5.14%) exhibited promising performances, as compared to that with dye 155 (η= 3.63%). | What is the value of η? | 53187 |
{
"text": [
"1.02V"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.083 | The PSC-pristine without CuPc(tBu)4 exhibited a PCE of 15.3% with Voc=1.02V, Jsc=20.0mAcm−2 and FF=75%, while the PSC-CuPc(tBu)4 fabricated with the perovskite layer prepared from the precursor containing the optimal CuPc(tBu)4 concentration achieved an enhanced PCE of 17.3% that can be mainly ascribed to the obviously increased Jsc value (22.6mAcm−2) as shown in . | What is the value of Voc? | 3148 |
{
"text": [
"674.4mV"
],
"answer_start": [
175
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.028 | The cell with the mixed iodide system, KI: Pr4NI=16.6:83.4 (% weight ratio) however, showed an enhanced efficiency of 3.92% with Jsc=9.16mAcm−2, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 674.4mV and a fill factor of 63.4%. | What is the value of Voc? | 46924 |
{
"text": [
"9.90±0.38%"
],
"answer_start": [
241
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.181 | Among the four different bi-layer DSSC photoanodes constructed in this work, typical ∼25nm sized TiO2 nanoparticles underlayer and 1D nanowires upper layer (TNP+TNW) based photoanode has showed a maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 9.90±0.38% after TiCl4 post-treatment, higher than the PCE of photoanodes containing 3D TiO2 nanostructures such as hierarchical nanorods (THNR), core-shell microspheres and large nanocrystalline polygons+rods as upper layers. | What is the value of PCE? | 41087 |
{
"text": [
"2.05 Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1039/C1JM12710A | Since Rct1 of the 5 wt% KI-based devices (2.05 Ω cm2) is smaller than that of devices without KI (2.76 Ω cm2), the electron injection at the electrolyte/counter electrode (CE) interface is more efficient for the 5 wt% KI-based devices than that of the device without KI. | What is the value of Rct1? | 66344 |
{
"text": [
"13.1mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.12.007 | SY-01 gave JSC=12.9mAcm−2, VOC=708.5mV, and ff=0.7135, corresponding to η=6.5%, while the SY-02 sensitizer gave the best performance data, JSC=13.1mAcm−2, VOC=783.8mV, ff=0.7263, and η=7.5%. | What is the value of JSC? | 29976 |
{
"text": [
"14.70mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.01.016 | Jsc, Voc, and the fill factor for this system were 14.70mAcm−2, 0.60V, and 60%, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 40263 |
{
"text": [
"669 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
252
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.04.046 | For a typical device, a solar energy conversion efficiency (η) of 6.36% based on FD2 was achieved under simulated AM 1.5 solar irradiation (100 mW cm−2) with a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 13.76 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 669 mV, a fill factor (ff) of 0.691. | What is the value of Voc? | 52231 |
{
"text": [
"0.667 V"
],
"answer_start": [
261
]
} | 10.1039/C8NJ01482E | Presence of rhodanine-3-acetic acid and cyanoacetic acid as two different acceptors may be the reason for the variation in the values of the photovoltaic parameters for MR-3 and MR-4.Moreover, the VOC data showed an increasing order of MR-3 (0.71 V) > NCSU-10 (0.667 V) > MR-4 (0.661 V) co-sensitized with NCSU-10. | What is the value of VOC? | 75915 |
{
"text": [
"Ag"
],
"answer_start": [
121
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.030 | The device architecture of the PSC is: ITO/ZnO or UVO treated ZnO ETL/MA0.57FA0.38Rb0.05PbI3 perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD HTL/Ag ((A)). | What is ITO? | 7320 |
{
"text": [
"0.74V"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.015 | According to , HS440 shows a higher Jsc of 12mAcm−2, yet lower Voc of 0.74V than that of MS440, 10.1mAcm−2 for Jsc and 0.79V for Voc, explaining why both cells perform similarly in terms of efficiency. | What is the value of Voc? | 42001 |
{
"text": [
"0.93 V"
],
"answer_start": [
216
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE03620H | As listed in Table 1, the device with a photoactive area of 25 mm2 gives a PCE of 12.9% (Voc = 0.92 V, Jsc = 19.4 mA cm−2 and FF = 72.3%) and the PCE for the device with a photoactive area of 100 mm2 is 10.8% (Voc = 0.93 V, Jsc = 18.9 mA cm−2 and FF = 61.7%), indicating that the quality of the perovskite film does not decline with the increase in the photoactive area. | What is the value of Voc? | 17030 |
{
"text": [
"71.3±1.82%"
],
"answer_start": [
144
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.043 | The reference device fabricated from the pristine perovskite precursor shows an average Voc of 1.051±0.015V, a Jsc of 20.25±1.36mAcm−2, a FF of 71.3±1.82%, and a PCE of 15.41±0.55%, similar to the PCE values of planar devices fabricated under fully open air condition reported in other literature []. | What is the value of FF? | 1971 |
{
"text": [
"740.5 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA02319F | The DSSC coupled with the optimized CZTS CE achieved a cell efficiency of 7.94% with a VOC of 740.5 mV, a Jsc of 17.2 mA cm−2, and a FF of 0.62, which is comparable to those of a DSSC with a Pt CE (8.55%). | What is the value of VOC? | 63036 |
{
"text": [
"5.41%"
],
"answer_start": [
261
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.107568 | Under AM 1.5 simulated solar illumination, the cell based on NQX8 delivered a short circuit current density (Jsc) of 12.53mAcm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.64V, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.67, resulting in an overall power conversion efficiency (η) of 5.41%, whereas the NQX9-based cell showed a lower Voc of 0.60V and Jsc of 9.16mAcm−2, resulting in a lower η of 3.83%. | What is the value of η? | 49894 |
{
"text": [
"4.48%"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.055 | When more I2 is added into DEMPI, with the ratio of I2:DEMPI receiving 0.5:1, Device C displays the best PCE (4.48%). | What is the value of PCE? | 33293 |
{
"text": [
"68.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | Devices with pristine HTM 4 displayed distinctive performance (JSC = 17.9 mA cm−2; VOC = 1.04 V; FF = 68.0%; PCE = 12.8%) compared to devices employing pristine HTM Sp01 (JSC = 17.2 mA cm−2; VOC = 1.02 V; FF = 66.0%; PCE = 11.7%), owing to enhancement of the intermolecular π–π packing interactions, which favors efficient hole transport, improves light harvesting, and induces a charge-separated state.Moreover, the quinolizino acridine core has also been adopted to produce HTM 5 with diphenylethenyl as side units, and its effectiveness compared with HTM Sp01 and HTM 6, which have a triphenylamine core linked to a terminal diphenylethenyl (Fig. | What is the value of FF? | 13002 |
{
"text": [
"0.09 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
} | 10.1039/C9TA05422G | The active area of this electrode was fixed at 0.09 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 15275 |
{
"text": [
"17.38%"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123677 | As a result, the PCE of PSCs was greatly improved from 17.38% to 19.75% along with negligible hysteresis.a shows the chemical structure of the n-type small molecule, HPDT, a perylene diimide derivative combined with linear and ladder conjugated framework which highlights better electron transport than the other perylene diimide derivatives . | What is the value of PCE? | 12086 |
{
"text": [
"0.321%"
],
"answer_start": [
104
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.143 | The solar cell devices with MASnBr3 QDs, MASnBr2I QDs, MASnBrI2 QDs and MASnI3 QDs yield PCE of 0.155%, 0.321%, 0.202% and 0.106%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 7310 |
{
"text": [
"7.16%"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.084 | In the absence of I2, the quasi-solid state DSSC with 5% SiO2 achieved an average η of 7.16%, again ∼4% higher than the average η of the liquid-state counterpart (6.89%). | What is the value of η? | 26816 |
{
"text": [
"17.72mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.082 | On the other hand, the ACTS cell shows a much higher Jsc of 17.72mAcm−2 with relatively weak dye adsorption compared with the HTS cell. | What is the value of Jsc? | 25748 |
{
"text": [
"71.90%"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
} | 10.1016/j.mssp.2019.104671 | Most importantly, the best photovoltaic performances with the highest JSC (23.52mAcm−2), VOC (1.05V), and FF (71.90%) were obtained when 1.00mgmL−1 MgAc2 was added, resulting in a best PCE of 17.76%. | What is the value of FF? | 3257 |
{
"text": [
"0.48 V"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA05916K | The reference cell yielded the lowest photovoltaic parameters, with an average PCE of 5.09% under reverse scan (Jsc = 18.5 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.48 V, and FF = 57.2%). | What is the value of Voc? | 15427 |
{
"text": [
"5.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.11.025 | On the other hand, the Zn1-xMgxO buffer prepared by the sputtering method leads to the decrease in the η from 6.6 to 5.6% with increasing the [Mg]/([Mg]+[Zn]) from 0 to 0.10. | What is the value of η? | 8093 |
{
"text": [
"11.43%"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1039/C4TC02997F | For the free standing state, the flexible fiber solar cell displays Jsc, Voc, FF and η values of 23.21 mA cm−2, 0.723 V, 0.681 and 11.43%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 75938 |
{
"text": [
"MAPbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
233
]
} | 10.1039/C9CS00059C | The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) levels of all Pors (−3.23 to −3.26 eV) were sufficiently high compared to those of the perovskite layers (−3.90 eV), confirming the efficient blocking of unwanted electron transfer from MAPbI3 to HTMs. | What is perovskite? | 13614 |
{
"text": [
"0.75V"
],
"answer_start": [
126
]
} | 10.1016/j.jechem.2015.10.005 | For the device based on untreated CH3NH3PbI3–xClx film, a PCE of 4.0% is achieved with the open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) of 0.75V, the short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 15.1mA/cm2 and the fill factor (FF) of 0.36. | What is the value of Voc? | 8323 |
{
"text": [
"22.21mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
311
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103946 | Furthermore, because of the much higher hole mobility and well-aligned energy level to the valence band edge of the perovskite layer, XY1 could facilitate more efficient hole extraction/transport processes, resulting in superior photovoltaic performance of the XY1-based device (Voc, Jsc, FF, and PCE of 1.11V, 22.21mAcm−2, 76.18%, and 18.78%, respectively) over the PEDOT:PSS-based device (Voc, Jsc, FF, and PCE of 1.03V, 21.39mAcm−2, 74.03%, and 16.31%, respectively). | What is the value of Jsc? | 2693 |
{
"text": [
"6.91%"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA05923A | After being treated with TiCl4, the highest η of DSSCs based on Al-doped SnO2 nanocrystals is approximately 6.91%, which is a high overall photoconversion efficiency for SnO2-based DSSCs.Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have attracted considerable attention in recent years due to their low cost, simple fabrication process, and relatively high energy-conversion efficiency. | What is the value of η? | 77137 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
547
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.08.028 | GFs were prepared via the rapid exfoliation of graphite oxide according to our recent report, which used GFs as an electron transport promoter in photoanodes;GFs were prepared via subjecting GO to rapid exfoliation in a stream of argon according to recent work.To verify the GFs, used as electrode and a support, provide more advantages than 2D graphene sheets, we also prepared chemically reduced graphene oxide (GS) following a reported method.The GFs and GS CEs were fabricated following the method depicted in previous study.The photoanode of TiO2 films was fabricated according previously reported method.The surface morphologies of GFs and GFs-Pt films were observed through field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM; JSM-7001F, operated at 10 kV). | What is photoanode? | 23490 |
{
"text": [
"13.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
158
]
} | 10.1039/C9TC01741K | Although the 1:1 ratio of C60 to C70 yielded the highest PCE, even 10% addition of C70 to C60 molecules, which corresponds to FM (9:1), improved the PCE from 13.8% to 14.0%. | What is the value of PCE? | 14779 |
{
"text": [
"7.9 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.physe.2015.02.023 | According to the results the Jsc is increased from 7.9 mA/cm2 to 13.5 and 14.31 mA/cm2 for the thicknesses of 4, 10 and 12 μm. | What is the value of Jsc? | 37009 |
{
"text": [
"15.65 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
120
]
} | 10.1016/j.jssc.2016.03.025 | The DSSCs based on Ni0.5Co0.5Se2 CE achieved a higher power conversion efficiency of 6.02% with a Voc of 0.70 V, Jsc of 15.65 mA/cm2, and FF of 0.54, which was comparable to that of the Pt-based reference cell (6.11%). | What is the value of Jsc? | 53356 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
180
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.09.009 | The current density-voltage (J–V) characteristics of the devices were measured by Keithley 2400 source measurement unit using a San-Ei Electric XES 301S AM 1.5G solar simulator at 100mWcm−2 calibrated by a Hamamatsu S1337-BR silicon photodiode. | What is the value of solar? | 9133 |
{
"text": [
"13.44mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
147
]
} | 10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.12.037 | Perovskite solar cells with the optimized structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/MAPbI3(methylbenzene)/PCBM/TPBi/Ag (have OR exhibit) a Voc of 0.90V, a Jsc of 13.44mA/cm2, an F.F. | What is the value of Jsc? | 1613 |
{
"text": [
"16.37%"
],
"answer_start": [
215
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.004 | Compared to HT-TiO2 ESL based devices, the PSCs based on UV-TiO2 ESL exhibited enhanced short circuit current density (Jsc) of 21.05 mA cm−2, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.08, fill factor (FF) of 0.72, and PCE of 16.37%. | What is the value of PCE? | 1144 |
{
"text": [
"11.68mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
301
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.04.031 | Under optimized conditions, the DSSCs based on LS-4 exhibited a maximum solar energy to electricity conversion efficiency of 6.05% with photovoltaic parameters (Jsc=13.23mAcm−2, Voc=642mV, ff=0.711), while for LS-5, the optimized efficiency of 5.15% was obtained with the photovoltaic parameters (Jsc=11.68mAcm−2, Voc=638mV, ff=0.696). | What is the value of Jsc? | 34029 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1039/C004372A | It retards charge recombination and improves electron injection from dye molecules to TiO2. | What is ? | 70249 |
{
"text": [
"0.77 V"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA12349A | As shown in Table 1, all of the DSCs based on NbSe2 CEs had a comparatively similar Voc (0.76–0.77 V), higher than that of 0.72 V based on the Pt CE. | What is the value of Voc? | 77191 |
{
"text": [
"6.401%"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA00990A | As a result, the device gives the optimal η of 6.401% when the monomer concentration is 0.02 M.After the optimization of polymerization voltage, polymerization time and the concentration of EDOT, a maximum η of 6.401% is achieved, which is comparable to that of cells based on Pt CEs. | What is the value of η? | 62350 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.crci.2015.06.008 | Interestingly, the photoactivity on these complexes in TiO2 based DSSCs spans over 700nm, but the maximum IPCE reaches only 50%, pointing that there is room for improvement, namely by increasing the electron injection quantum yield (Bis-diimine copper(I) complexes are valuable dyes to be used for solar energy conversion schemes first because they exhibit MLCT transition in the visible spectrum. | What is ? | 41243 |
{
"text": [
"12.41%"
],
"answer_start": [
167
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA13582C | The perovskite would also exhibit hysteresis properties in its J–V characteristics.The CH3NH3PbI3(Cl) cell without NH4Cl provides a power conversion efficiency (η) of 12.41% for the reverse scan. | What is the value of η? | 20154 |
{
"text": [
"3.85%"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
} | 10.1039/C2CC35754B | The device with blended BDCTBT and PC61BM as an active layer provided a VOC of 1.04 V, a JSC of 11.2 mA cm−2, a fill factor (FF) of 0.33, resulting in a PCE of 3.85%. | What is the value of PCE? | 72336 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
135
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103946 | Photovoltaic properties of these devices with an aperture area of 0.0729cm−2 were tested under AM 1.5G illumination at an intensity of 100mWcm−2. | What is the value of illumination? | 2679 |
{
"text": [
"620 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.023 | After samples with various particle sizes are applied in DSSC, an increase of open-circuit voltage (Voc) from 620 mV to 765 mV is observed with the increase of particle size from 8 nm to 48 nm. | What is the value of Voc? | 45852 |
{
"text": [
"2.90 ± 0.03%"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.086 | The cell with the bare PEDOT:PSS shows a poor power conversion efficiency (η) of 2.90 ± 0.03% with an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.67 ± 0.00 V, a short-circuit current density (jsc) of 9.32 ± 0.25 mA cm−2, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.46 ± 0.01 (). | What is the value of η? | 38901 |
{
"text": [
"0.90 V"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA13646A | We found that, under 1 sun illumination, the devices based on the new HTM X3 and LEG4 yielded a higher efficiency of 5.8% with a JSC of 9.70 mA cm−2, a VOC of 0.90 V and a fill factor (FF) of 0.66. | What is the value of VOC? | 63939 |
{
"text": [
"7.77%"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA01017A | The DSSC based on the NiS/PEDOT (d) CE achieved a PCE as high as 7.77%, which is higher than that of the DSSC with Pt, PEDOT or NiS CE only. | What is the value of PCE? | 74837 |
{
"text": [
"8.92%"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA00287K | Surprisingly, this performance is even superior to that of conventional ITO-based OSCs, for which 8.92% PCE with a Jsc of 16.83 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.75 V, and FF of 0.71 was obtained. | What is the value of PCE? | 18197 |
{
"text": [
"0.70V"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2015.11.003 | In , the open-circuit voltage (Voc) of as-synthesized sample prepared for 70h is 0.70V, which is similar to that of samples prepared for 25 and 50h (0.71V, 0.69V, respectively), but the sample prepared for 70h presents a superior short-circuit current (Jsc) over the samples prepared for 25 and 50h. | What is the value of Voc? | 59311 |
{
"text": [
"2.08%"
],
"answer_start": [
208
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA21296K | After treatment with the TiCl4 solution, the Jsc value of the BNW–TiCl4 cell increases greatly to 4.06 mA cm−2, and the Voc slightly increases to 718 mV while the FF decreases to 0.71, thus leading to a η of 2.08%. | What is the value of η? | 74670 |
{
"text": [
"11.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
36
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00200A | The optimized PSC exhibits a PCE of 11.7%, a 15% enhancement compared to that of the PSC without PbAc2. | What is the value of PCE? | 16103 |
{
"text": [
"1.89 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2010.07.009 | The conversion efficiency of the DSSCs prepared by anthocyanin dyes from mulberry extract is 0.548%, with VOC of 0.555 V and JSC of 1.89 mA/cm2, and FF of 0.53. | What is the value of JSC? | 29209 |
{
"text": [
"11.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
130
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA09122B | Device performance correlated well with trends in carrier lifetimes where 2% Sr substituted mixed cation perovskites gave rise to 11.2% PCE relative to 7.7% for CsPbI2Br films.In summary, this comprehensive review provides an overview of the progress in the past five years in organic–inorganic and all-inorganic lead mixed halide perovskites, the impact on their optical properties, and the improvements in device efficiency achieved with controlled halide substitution. | What is the value of PCE? | 17331 |
{
"text": [
"4.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.175 | The DSSCs based on PTZ-2 and PTZ-3 gave improved conversion efficiencies of 5.81% and 5.22%, respectively, compared to the reference dye PTZ-1 (PCE = 4.04%), which could be due to improvement of Jsc. | What is the value of PCE? | 40887 |
{
"text": [
"1.05 V"
],
"answer_start": [
39
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | A high Jsc of 16.12 mA cm−2 and Voc of 1.05 V revealed that very few electrons and holes recombine and at last, a PCE of 12.04% (cell area = 0.09 cm2) was achieved at the standard solar AM1.5G intensity of 100 mW cm−2 (the PCE was further improved to 14.8% with a 0.065 cm2 solar cell). | What is the value of Voc? | 13280 |
{
"text": [
"21.84mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
134
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.178 | The device employing 5mol% Zn-doped NiOX as HTL exhibited improved JSC and VOC values as compared to the un-doped NiOX devices (18.71–21.84mAcm−2 and 0.99V–1.03V for JSC and VOC, respectively). | What is the value of JSC? | 3593 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.025 | The other semicircle at low frequency region is attributed to the Nernst diffusion impedance (ZN) of I−/I3− redox couple in electrolyte. | What is redox couple? | 59698 |
{
"text": [
"2.79%"
],
"answer_start": [
162
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.060 | It can be seen that the DSSC with PC counter electrode shows following characteristics: a Jsc of 14.12mA/cm2, a Voc of 0.67V, a FF of 0.30, and an overall PCE of 2.79%. | What is the value of PCE? | 55582 |
{
"text": [
"0.67 V"
],
"answer_start": [
154
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2014.05.011 | Quite interestingly, we found that the initial efficiency, without any co-adsorbent, of only 1.9% (accompanied with a low open-circuit potential (Voc) of 0.67 V, fully incompatible with the positive Nernst potential of the redox electrolyte) was enhanced systematically with the increase of the molecular size of the co-adsorbent added in electrolyte, reaching efficiency values for CHENO up to 5.7% along with a Voc of 0.82 V. | What is the value of Voc? | 43448 |
{
"text": [
"717mV"
],
"answer_start": [
186
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.12.018 | Dye JY48 containing additional electron-withdrawing group benzothiadiazole (BTD) gave the highest PCE of 8.44%, around 1.1 times of that of YD2−o−C8, with a Jsc of 18.43mAcm−2, a Voc of 717mV and a FF of 0.64 under AM 1.5G irradiation. | What is the value of Voc? | 31027 |
{
"text": [
"76.16%"
],
"answer_start": [
197
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.051 | Therefore, the Y-doping perovskite solar cells using the Y/Ti molar ratios of 3% in the hydrothermal grown solution achieved the best PCE of 18.11% with Jsc of 22.50mAcm−2, Voc of 1.06V, and FF of 76.16% and the average PCE of 17.24±0.87% with Jsc of 22.23±0.63mAcm−2, Voc of 1.05±0.02V, and FF of 74.60±1.56%. | What is the value of FF? | 1561 |
{
"text": [
"860 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1039/C2EE23988D | For both TFRS-52 and TFRS-54, the VOC reaches 860 mV, showing one of the highest values recorded for DSCs incorporating Ru(II) sensitizers. | What is the value of VOC? | 73724 |
{
"text": [
"9.19%"
],
"answer_start": [
321
]
} | 10.1039/C7QI00329C | Subsequently, after impregnating Ni-NCs in the I−/I3− electrolyte, the nanoparticles on the surface of each TiO2 morphology acted as excellent scattering centers to provide a potential interface between TiO2 and Ni-NCs and enhance both light absorption and scattering, leading to improvements in the PCEs to 5.8%, 8.37%, 9.19% and 10.02% for the PSL, SSL, SPL and IBL-based photoanodes, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 64023 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
214
]
} | 10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.04.059 | Silver paste was applied on both of the conductive sides.The incident photon to current efficiency (IPCE) was measured under light illumination of air mass 1.5 global (AM 1.5G) with the incident light intensity of 100mW/cm2. | What is the value of illumination? | 36604 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA07004C | The hole conductor, poly(triarylamine) (PTAA), was deposited onto the MAPbI3/mesoscopic TiO2/bl-TiO2/FTO substrate by spin-coating of PTAA/toluene (15:1 v/v), 7.5 μL lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide/acetonitrile (170:1 w/v), and 7.5 μL t-BP/acetonitrile (1:1 v/v) additive solutions at 3000 rpm for 30 s. | What is substrate? | 18631 |
{
"text": [
"0.16cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
49
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.03.015 | Cell active area was tested with a metal mask of 0.16cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 39697 |
{
"text": [
"10.70%"
],
"answer_start": [
197
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.014 | These results indicate that Phen-I can be used as a universal CIL for PSCs.In conclusion, we synthesized a simple Phen derivative, Phen-I, and demonstrated a considerable enhancement in PCEs, from 10.70% to 18.13%, of inverted PSCs by inserting Phen-I as interlayer between metal electrode and ETL. | What is the value of PCE? | 63 |
{
"text": [
"3.80%"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1016/j.jssc.2012.02.026 | With the improvement of NAs length, the Jsc and η of ZnO@TiO2 NAs increased (T1, 1.20%; T2, 2.94%; T3, 3.80%), which is similar to the case of ZnO NAs. | What is the value of η? | 49388 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA03608J | For instance, an n-type BaSnO3 ETL with respectable UV absorption was developed to replace the regular TiO2 ETL in a conventional n–i–p PVSC and manifested clear inhibition of UV-induced decomposition of perovskite. | What is ETL? | 19569 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
195
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.152 | The as-obtained slurries were transferred onto the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glasses using doctor-blade method, and followed by drying in vacuum at 90 °C for 5 h, yielding different CEs.The TiO2 photoanodes (Yingkou OPE Tech New Energy Co., Ltd., China) were heated to 500 °C for 30 min and cooled to 100 °C later on The surface morphologies of GO, PANI, and PANI/GO were examined using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Nova NanoSEM 450) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai F30). | What is photoanodes? | 37884 |
{
"text": [
"0.82V"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.01.008 | The PSCs with the CZTS layer of 97nm in thickness (i.e., n=1) show a peak photovoltaic performance, from which we get the best device with Jsc=9.70mA/cm2, Voc=0.82V, FF=76.10% and power conversion efficiency (η) of 6.02% (). | What is the value of Voc? | 802 |
{
"text": [
"12.53mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
49
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.003 | In comparison, the Pt based DSSC exhibits JSC of 12.53mAcm−2, VOC of 803mV, FF of 69% with an overall PCE of 6.94%. | What is the value of JSC? | 42246 |
{
"text": [
"6.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA02032D | In the case of N719, the cell showed a slightly higher performance with Jsc = 14.6 mA cm−2, Voc = 637 mV, FF = 0.67 and η = 6.2%.The measured incident photon to electron conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra of the T133 through T136 and N719 based cells are shown in Fig. | What is the value of η? | 69733 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
142
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.09.013 | The current density−voltage (J−V) characteristics of the DSSCs were measured using an electrometer (KEITHLEY 2400) under AM 1.5 illumination (100 mW/cm2) provided by a solar simulator (1 kW xenon with AM 1.5 filter, PEC-L01, Peccel Technologies). | What is the value of illumination? | 32887 |
{
"text": [
"437"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2012.09.013 | The maximum absorption peaks of D1–D3 on the TiO2 film are at 440, 419, and 437 nm, respectively. | What is TiO2? | 59296 |
{
"text": [
"662 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
125
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2010.03.085 | Finally, the best DSSC is fabricated employing LJ6, for which the device performance data are η=3.30%, JSC=8.07 mA cm−2, VOC=662 mV, FF=0.63, showing the best anchoring capability among all three sensitizers, attributed to the cyanoacetic acid group.The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiencies (IPCEs) of these DSSC dyes are shown in . | What is the value of VOC? | 36343 |
{
"text": [
"0.2cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
154
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.02.044 | The NiO electrodes were made by applying the precursor solution onto the conducting glass substrates by doctor blade using Scotch Magic tape as a spacer (0.2cm2 active area), followed by sintering in a Nabertherm B150 oven at 450°C for 30min. | What is the value of active area? | 24913 |
{
"text": [
"17.06%"
],
"answer_start": [
181
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.069 | Accordingly, the resultant PSCs fabricated with TBP addition at a volume ratio of 7/1000 (v/v, TBP/isopropanol) exhibits significant device performance enhancement with a PCE up to 17.06%, while the pristine one merely obtains a lower PCE of 14.56%, achieving a 17.2% of the PCE enhancement. | What is the value of PCE? | 11351 |
{
"text": [
"1.01V"
],
"answer_start": [
371
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.057 | Since Cs2CO3 mainly enhanced Voc of PSCs while Bphen enhanced FF, double interlayers of Bphen and Cs2CO3 were used in PSCs, both Voc and FF of the devices (glass/ITO/PEDOT:PSS/CH3NH3PbI3−xClx/PCBM/Bphen/Cs2CO3/Ag) are higher than those of the devices without any electroncollection interlayer (glass/ITO/PEDOT:PSS/CH3NH3PbI3−xClx/PCBM/Ag), the Voc increases from 0.91 to 1.01V, and FF increases from 0.53 to 0.72. | What is the value of Voc? | 6310 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
41
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.040 | The light intensity was kept constant at 100mWcm−2 measured with a CMP 3 Kipp and Zonen pyranometer. | What is the value of light intensity? | 25844 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.