mfarre's picture
mfarre HF staff
fix task tag (#2)
39e81ba verified
metadata
datasets:
  - tomg-group-umd/cinepile
language:
  - en
license: apache-2.0
library_name: peft
pipeline_tag: video-text-to-text

Model Card for Video-LLaVA - CinePile fine tune

CinePile Benchmark - Open vs Closed models

Video multimodal research often emphasizes activity recognition and object-centered tasks, such as determining "what is the person wearing a red hat doing?" However, this focus overlooks areas like theme exploration, narrative and plot analysis, and character and relationship dynamics. CinePile addresses these areas in their benchmark and they find that Large Language Models significantly lag behind human performance in these tasks. Additionally, there is a notable disparity in performance between open and closed models.

In our initial fine-tuning, our goal was to assess how well open models can approach the performance of closed models. By fine-tuning Video LlaVa, we achieved performance levels comparable to those of Claude 3 (Opus).

Results

Model Average Character and relationship dynamics Narrative and Plot Analysis Setting and Technical Analysis Temporal Theme Exploration
Human 73.21 82.92 75 73 75.52 64.93
Human (authors) 86 92 87.5 71.2 100 75
GPT-4o 59.72 64.36 74.08 54.77 44.91 67.89
GPT-4 Vision 58.81 63.73 73.43 52.55 46.22 65.79
Gemini 1.5 Pro 61.36 65.17 71.01 59.57 46.75 63.27
Gemini 1.5 Flash 57.52 61.91 69.15 54.86 41.34 61.22
Gemini Pro Vision 50.64 54.16 65.5 46.97 35.8 58.82
Claude 3 (Opus) 45.6 48.89 57.88 40.73 37.65 47.89
Video LlaVa - this fine-tune 44.16 45.26 45.14 46.93 32.55 49.47
Video LLaVa 22.51 23.11 25.92 20.69 22.38 22.63
mPLUG-Owl 10.57 10.65 11.04 9.18 11.89 15.05
Video-ChatGPT 14.55 16.02 14.83 15.54 6.88 18.86
MovieChat 4.61 4.95 4.29 5.23 2.48 4.21

Fine-tuned model taking as starting point Video-LlaVA to evaluate its performance on CinePile.

Model Sources

  • Repository: Github with fine-tunning and inference notebook.

Uses

Although the model can answer questions based on the content, it is specifically optimized for addressing CinePile-related queries. When the questions do not follow a CinePile-specific prompt, the inference section of the notebook is designed to refine and clean up the text produced by the model.