johnislarry's picture
Duplicate from philschmid/pyannote-speaker-diarization-endpoint
332fbc8
|
raw
history blame
7.87 kB
metadata
tags:
  - pyannote
  - pyannote-audio
  - pyannote-audio-pipeline
  - audio
  - voice
  - speech
  - speaker
  - speaker-diarization
  - speaker-change-detection
  - voice-activity-detection
  - overlapped-speech-detection
datasets:
  - ami
  - dihard
  - voxconverse
  - aishell
  - repere
  - voxceleb
license: mit
duplicated_from: philschmid/pyannote-speaker-diarization-endpoint

🎹 Speaker diarization

Relies on pyannote.audio 2.0: see installation instructions.

TL;DR

# load the pipeline from Hugginface Hub
from pyannote.audio import Pipeline
pipeline = Pipeline.from_pretrained("pyannote/[email protected]")

# apply the pipeline to an audio file
diarization = pipeline("audio.wav")

# dump the diarization output to disk using RTTM format
with open("audio.rttm", "w") as rttm:
    diarization.write_rttm(rttm)

Advanced usage

In case the number of speakers is known in advance, one can use the num_speakers option:

diarization = pipeline("audio.wav", num_speakers=2)

One can also provide lower and/or upper bounds on the number of speakers using min_speakers and max_speakers options:

diarization = pipeline("audio.wav", min_speakers=2, max_speakers=5)

If you feel adventurous, you can try and play with the various pipeline hyper-parameters.
For instance, one can use a more aggressive voice activity detection by increasing the value of segmentation_onset threshold:

hparams = pipeline.parameters(instantiated=True)
hparams["segmentation_onset"] += 0.1
pipeline.instantiate(hparams)

Benchmark

Real-time factor

Real-time factor is around 5% using one Nvidia Tesla V100 SXM2 GPU (for the neural inference part) and one Intel Cascade Lake 6248 CPU (for the clustering part).

In other words, it takes approximately 3 minutes to process a one hour conversation.

Accuracy

This pipeline is benchmarked on a growing collection of datasets.

Processing is fully automatic:

  • no manual voice activity detection (as is sometimes the case in the literature)
  • no manual number of speakers (though it is possible to provide it to the pipeline)
  • no fine-tuning of the internal models nor tuning of the pipeline hyper-parameters to each dataset

... with the least forgiving diarization error rate (DER) setup (named "Full" in this paper):

  • no forgiveness collar
  • evaluation of overlapped speech
Benchmark DER% FA% Miss% Conf% Expected output File-level evaluation
AISHELL-4 14.61 3.31 4.35 6.95 RTTM eval
AMI Mix-Headset only_words 18.21 3.28 11.07 3.87 RTTM eval
AMI Array1-01 only_words 29.00 2.71 21.61 4.68 RTTM eval
CALLHOME Part2 30.24 3.71 16.86 9.66 RTTM eval
DIHARD 3 Full 20.99 4.25 10.74 6.00 RTTM eval
REPERE Phase 2 12.62 1.55 3.30 7.76 RTTM eval
VoxConverse v0.0.2 12.76 3.45 3.85 5.46 RTTM eval

Support

For commercial enquiries and scientific consulting, please contact me.
For technical questions and bug reports, please check pyannote.audio Github repository.

Citations

@inproceedings{Bredin2021,
  Title = {{End-to-end speaker segmentation for overlap-aware resegmentation}},
  Author = {{Bredin}, Herv{\'e} and {Laurent}, Antoine},
  Booktitle = {Proc. Interspeech 2021},
  Address = {Brno, Czech Republic},
  Month = {August},
  Year = {2021},
}
@inproceedings{Bredin2020,
  Title = {{pyannote.audio: neural building blocks for speaker diarization}},
  Author = {{Bredin}, Herv{\'e} and {Yin}, Ruiqing and {Coria}, Juan Manuel and {Gelly}, Gregory and {Korshunov}, Pavel and {Lavechin}, Marvin and {Fustes}, Diego and {Titeux}, Hadrien and {Bouaziz}, Wassim and {Gill}, Marie-Philippe},
  Booktitle = {ICASSP 2020, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing},
  Address = {Barcelona, Spain},
  Month = {May},
  Year = {2020},
}