File
stringlengths 19
37
| Content
stringlengths 1
6.21M
|
|---|---|
104-10105-10211.pdf | 14-0000
104-10105-10211 =
[2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
- & RETURN TO C1
. M9 “ *
—_ . : (Backerour™ oo ~
( ; > SENDER WILL CHECHICL a aes | .. TOP AND BOTTOM
. a use Oniy
- Bo NOLBEWweCUeS.
whe "Name ANDADoREss | pare J inrriats |
(OS® alter Aled | 814, | Ae
AL J, aS : Of “la AA
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER
FROM: NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NO.
Foam wo. 937 Use previous editions
Up
14-0000
7 RETUANTO Cla
Background Use Oaly
NWO Net Reprariues
|
104-10105-10212.pdf | 14-0000
a ead
104-10105-10212 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
@ ae abe. . mS a ®, ty Lu
Spe, . woe aoa
OP ee -
: RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
two INet Reproduce
REPLY REQUESTED
“SPEED LETTER
Office of General Couasel DbO/PIe. oF
Walter : i ; EF. Addona]
BUBIECT: ket One. ¢ ae CDS--Yerbell
Addons
25
" SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
RESPONDER'S FILE
|
104-10105-10213.pdf | 14-0000
104-10105-10213
< ’ . .
2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
SENDER WILL CHECK cL
| ad ’. UNCLASSIFIED Zz
“CATION TOP ANO BOTTOM
~JNFIDENTIAL
| = [J PREPARE REPLY
|_| APPROVAL [—[oisparch | [RECOMMENDATION _|
[—jcommenr | [rue SS smevurn
r—Teoncunrence | [inronmarion | [sienarune
|
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER
FROM: NAME, ADDRESS ANO PHONE NO.
[RO sas, soness ane muons ne. —_f _os7=
ws Ff. Ad Gg One Dbdo Pic A © Aus |
PF UNCLASSIFIED? “[_|_conripentiat [| SECRED) |
FORM WO. 937 Use previous editions (40)
14-0000
FBI dats
y RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Orly
Do Nok Reoroduce
ORIGIN:
DATE :
SUBJECT:
BUREAU FILE:
FIELD FILE:
ORIGIN:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BUREAU FILE:
FIELD FILE:
ORIGIN:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BUREAU FILE:
FIELD FILE:
ORIGIN:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BUREAU FILE:
FIELD FILE:
ORIGIN:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BUREAU FILE:
FIELD FILE:
ORIGIN:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BUREAU FILE:
FIELD FILE:
ntfs, WERBE Fue an
LEAS
appROVED FOR R
cin HISTORICAL REVIEW
Atlanta, Geogia
8 July 1975
Mitchell Livingston Werbell, III
None Given
None Given
Atlanta, Georgia
9 August 1974
Mitchell Livingston Werbell, III
None Given
None Given
San Diego, California
7 August 1974
Mitchell Livingston Werbell, III
None Given
None Given
Director, FBI
6 August 1974
Mitchell Livingston Werbell, III
Internal Security - ABACO
Neutrality Matters - ABACO
62-108665
None Given
Atlanta, Georgia
22 July 1974
Mitchell Livingston Werbell, III
None Given
None Given.
New York, New York
19 July 1974
Mitchell Livingston Werbell, III
Internal Security - Abaco
Neutrality Matter - Abaco
None Given
None Given
14-0000
/ QETUANTO OM.
Background Use Gil
po Not Reprocucs
ORIGIN:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BUREAU FILE:
FIELD FILE:
ORIGIN:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BUREAU FILE:
FIELD FILE:
ORIGIN:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BUREAU FILE:
FIELD FILE:
ORIGIN:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BUREAU FILE:
FIELD FILE:
Las Vegas, Nevada
24 July 1974
Mitchell Livingston Werbell, III
None Given
None Given
Director, FBI (Cable)
25 June 1975
Mitchell Livingston Werbell III
William Martin Bell Neutrality
Matters - Grenada
None Given
None Given
Director, FBI (Cable)
24 January 1975
Mitchell Livingston Werbell, III
None Given
None Given
Director, FBI (Cable)
16 January 1975
Aladdin N, Al-Tayyar Internal Security
- Iraq
None Given
None Given
RETURN TO CIA
Bacligroun “au 250 Cniy
.. Do Mok. Rencoduce
oO «sg RELA
7 BE 27 UM FD Cn . i
Background Use Ont
APP atl ae
» OG Not Feprocduce Y rat) gc
@O. a pret wef puzha.
k
CV RETURN TO ©
Aesgrouns ae c
p99 1 Mot Reprocu
ARR — 7
Ongprosnacke | APPROVED FCP RELEASE 1993
———— CUA HISTORICAL EVIE PROGRA
“G eo 1443- ;
ee
ie MN
SAN AR a A ABI
Pte, 44%, Adhd, ¢
Smopnt Exif dn 4.
Casegnel Ye Oma Bree. ‘at,
Ye OSS p~ op th Ree YS
SAAR US # mob pdm
|
104-10105-10218.pdf | 14-00 @
DOD
104-10105-10218
[2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992,
y oo
es fo
1G
. &
reneral
c 7D01
AL
AY:
EXTENSION:
ie
:
5
g
*
77
FORM
3-62
610%
PREVIOUS
CITIONS
[-] SECRET
(-] CONFIDENTIAL
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
O
INTERNAL
USE ONLY
du
(] UNCLASSIFIED
14-0000
Cling
OCC 76-1072
B/ls/H
3 MAR 1976
7 RETURN TO CIA
(Sackground Use Only
AD0 Nok Reproduce
MEMORANDUM FOR: Associate General Counsel, OGC Loom
ne)
VIA : Deputy Director for Operations— gy!) /
SUBJECT : Mitchell Livingston WER BELL III
REFERENCE : Your memorandum of 24 February 1976,
Subject as above
1. Per reference request, we are forwarding
information in our files concerning contacts that have
taken place between this Agency and WER BELL.
2. The following is a summary of all DDO contact
directly with WER BELL which took place in 1959:
a. A July 1959° Memorandum to C/WH Division
signed by Grom s J. Flores) stated that General
Cabell called @lores to report that WER BELL had
called him. 9WER BELL discussed with General Cabell
a trip WER BELL had taken to the Dominican Republic
and offered to come to Washington at his own expense
to discuss the trip. No commitments were made to
WER BELL by General Cabell.
7 July 1959 Memorandum of Conversation
: b. A
signed by(T. J. Flores) stated that WER BELL was
met in Washington, D.C., b lores )who discussed
with WER BELL information*¢oncerning the Dominican
Republic, Fidel Castro, Fulgencio Batista and
General Pedraza.
c. A July°4959 Memorandum of. Conversation
signed br. J. Flores) stated that on 8 July 1959
O35 (lores alted WER BEL to set up an appointment.
During’the meeting, WER BELL was told that the
United States would not support any revolutionary
activities by General Pedraza. He was also told
that the U.S. will observe its international
obligations concerning Cuba and Pedraza, and that
wet ‘en. Olé...
2 Okan
14-0000
“py
RETURN TO CiA
the U.S. would not overlook any violations by Background Use Only
Pedraza or his followers of. the neutrality Laws ‘x90 Not Reproduce
Flores) said that the Agency had some interest in
the pdéssibility of his (WER BELL's) working
for us as an intelligence gatherer under terms
to be negotiated after.we obtained a security
clearance on hina Gores pointed out that the
Agency was not attempting to limit his actions
in connection with the Dominican Republic, nor 6
was it assuming any responsibility for those >
matters he carried out in his own behalf. (Flores
dictated a Secrecy Agreement to him and had him
sign it.
d. ASQ guly°t959 Memorandum for the Record
signed by(T. J. Flores)reported that Subject
called him on 9 July I959 from New York.. WER BELL
gave(Flores further information on Loos, fnu,
thé*represehtative of a Colonel Frei, fnu, of the
Swiss. army who had 1,000 men available for duty
as soldiers.
e. 20 suly “4959 Memorandum for the Record
signed by\T. J. Flores) reported that WER BELL
called, €lores) from Miami on 20 July to ask about
the Agency picking up the tab for his forthcoming
trip to the Dominican Republic. They discussed
his clearance which had not come through.
. £. A 3 August 1959 Memorandum for the
Record signed by Martha R. Tharpe reported that O35
on 24 July 195 *WER- BELL called for Mr. (Thomas J.
‘Flores Since pnores) was on leave, Tharpe took
the call. WER BELL gave Tharpe further infor-
mation concerning Pedraza and Batista. Tharpe
called WER BELL back that evening to tell him
that if he obtained further information to
report it to Mr. Justin coetll Me’ Cl Contacts
Representative in Miami, until Mr. Flores )returned
to Washington. a3
g. A saugust 1959 Memorandum for the Record
signed by(@l. J. Flores)stated that WER BELL phoned
him on 5 August 1959 to ask if there was any news
on his clearance. WER BELL said he wanted to go
to the Dominican Republic soon, and would like CIA
to pick up his expenses. He was told there was no
14-0000
03
news. (C1ores) and WER BELL gust fief39) p Dominican
Republic and Cuba. On 3 August florés) phoned
WER BELL and told him that his Geers? had not Barkers TO cia
been granted and that he should not predicate his. Rothe se Only
activities on the expectation of the clearance ats O NOs Reprodues
any given time. WER BELL said that the Pedraza
group was air lifting and dropping material into
Cuba.
h. A 9 Sept mber 1959 emorandum for the
Record signed by\T. J. Flores)reported that
WER BELL called (Flores on 9 September 1959 to
rovide information on Cuba. He was told by
03(Flores)that his clearance had not yet been
processed.
i. According to a 23 September 1959 °F
Memorandum for the Record signed by(T. J. Flores)
WER BELL called(Flores)on 9 September 1959 to
ask if his clearance,had come through since
he wanted the Agency’to finance his trip to
the Dominican Republic. .He was told it had
not. WER BELL told @lof8s jabout some people
who had been discussing the counterfeiting
of U. S. dollars and Cuban pesos for use in
connection withosXuban revolutionary activities.
He was told by lores )to contact the FBI.» On
13 September WER BELL had phoned (lores) at? home
to say that the FBI had referred him to the
Secret Service on the counterfeiting aspect,
and that no one seemed particularly interested
in the’ gun running. The Secret Service asked
him’to go to Miami at his own expense to obtain
further information on the matter and WER BELL
asked Flores") advice 3} lored said that he could
not%influence him one way or’the other since he
was not in a position to direct his activities,
but felt he might be better off to take no action.
He was told that (Flores)would be in touch with
him as soon as he hadSany further information
concerning our possible use of him.
j. Al3 Octoberv"1959 Memorandum for the
Record signed by (Thomas J. Flores)states that
WER BELL phoned him on 25 September 1959 to report
on Cuba. On 2 October 195933@lore’) talked with
WER BELL by phone and terminated the relationship.
3. The following undated memorandums are also contained in
WER BELL's file: .
pl
14-0000
pl
-q-
03 a. A Memorandum for the Record signed by,
¢. Flores )reports that WER BELL called flores, oh
3 August~1959 to discuss Cuban activities re Miami / RETURN TO CIA
his memorandum also records that WER BELL phoned ®2ckground Use Only
03 Flores Jagain on 26 August 1959 at which time activi ti@9 Not Reproduce
in the Dominican Republic and Cuban activities in
Miami were discussed. WER BELL also asked about the
status of his clearance, and was told it had not yet:
come through.
Qo
3
b. A letter signed "W'' addressed to (Tom) |
gave "W's" location and some information concerning
Batista and Castro. (This letter is probably in
the 1959 time frame.)
o3 c. A Memorandum of Conversation signed-by
T. Flores) reports that WER BELL called(Flore3 and
gave his~location. The status of WER BELL's
clearance was discussed and (Flores )told him it
had not yet come through.°3 WER BELL gave @lores) OF
some information concerning Batista. (This
memorandum probably is in the 1959 time frame.)
d. An unsigned report, apparently from
WER BELL, gave a summary of his contacts and
activities during a trip to the Dominican Republic.
(This report is probably in the 1959 time frame.)
4. A 17 December.1963 dispatch from Station Santo Domingo
reported that Station (Noc Officer Joseph Luna) recently met
WER BELL. in Santo Domingo. ,,, No further detaiYs of the meeting
were reported. 603
5. According to the CS file on WER BELL, three former
Agency employees were contacted in 1974 by WER BELL and other
representatives of a group called "Friends of Abaco (FOA),
a group allegedly advocating the secession of the island of
Abaco from the Commonwealth of the Bahamas. The three former
employees contacted are:
a. John Patrick Muldoon, retired from
CIA on 20 March 1972.
oF
Gheodore John Roussos), retired from CIA
oa (on 31 July 1970.) He was rehired on a
contract in February 1971. His contract
was terminated in September 1973.
14-0000
binv
¢ RETURN TO CIA
c. Walter Joseph Mackem, separated from CPeiround Use Only
CIA on 31 October 1973. NO Nok Reproduce
6.. Mr. Muldoon contacted Agency employee (E. James °F
McTighe\on 22 May 1974. Mr. Muldoon told Mr. McTighe
that he’ was nominal Vice President of a Washington-based
firm called "Security Consultants International.'"' He presented
Mr. McTighe with a report containing the essential data he
possessed concerning WER BELL and other members of FOA whom
he had met on 17 and 20 May 1974 in Washington, D.C. According
to Mr. Muldoon, WER BELL had hopes of establishing gaming
casinos, hotel and other tourist facilities in Abaco catering
to the U. S. tourist crowd. As a consequence of some run-in
with Prime Minister Pindling of the Bahamas, however, WER BELL
is apparently persona non grata in the Bahamas; hence his
ambitions appeared to be contingent on Abacan independence.
Mr. Muldoon reported that at least on two occasions WER BELL
made a concerted effort to involve persons formerly affiliated
with the Agency in the activities of the FOA in support of
its independence. On several occasions, WER BELL introduced
Mr. Muldoon and Mr% OuSSOS) as active Agency officials, implying
that either the Agenty or the United States Government supported
the aims of the FOA. WER BELL also proposed to Messrs. Muldoon
and Qoussos) in separate conversations that they conduct a study,
involving a°Visit to Abaco, to determine the feasibility of
Abaco's independence in political and economic terms. The
study was to include interviews with citizens of Abaco prior
to an alleged "plebiscite" on independence to take place in
Abaco on 28 June 1974.03 In default of the collaboration of
either Muldoon or (Roussos } WER BELL hired Mr. Walter Joseph 6
Mackem, a former Agency friend of both Muldoon and (Roussos)
According to WER BELL's file, Mackem later in 1974 contacted
the Agericy in an attempt to get an official policy on the
activities of the FOA. Mackem was informed that the case
comes under FBI jurisdiction, that this Agency has no official
involvement, and that all information we had on the matter had
been made available to the FBI. He was advised at that time
to report his contacts and any information he had to the FBI.
o3
7. On 24 March 1975, Mr. Joseph P. Hayes) assigned to
SE/PCH, reported that during the week of 9 March 1975, he
talked with Mr. Wesley Dyckman. Mr. Dyckman is a former Agency
employee employed by the Drug Enforcement Agency. According
‘to Dyckman, former Agency employee Walter Mackem was employed
in the Washington area:as a private investigator. He is also
involved with a paramilitary activity funded by some unnamed
British source, The activity, which Dyckman referred to as
14-0000
o3 (Roussos!) getting involved in this deal 3
4p |
, Z AETURN TO CIA
“6 (@ackground Use Only
nie 9 Not Reproduce
"the new land project" sought to establish a tax shelter on
one of the out-islands of the Caribbean by forcefully taking
over the island and establishing a government there. Mackem
is supposedly involved in the paramilitary training of forces
who would participate in this adventure. According to Dyckman,
the paramilitary training supposedly was to take place in
Georgia, where WER BELL is based.
8. On 31 August 1974, Mr. Rou$do9 met with Mr. K. Michael
Absher, who at that time was AC/E/GC, and told | him that
WER BELL was leaving for Athens on 31 A (Rous sell arms to
the Greek Government. WER BELL wanted Rouseps) to be _his
advisor in this venture and to go to a(g ENS 3 Roussos) told
WER BELL that he would check with CIA before? giving Wim an answer.
WER BELL asked (RBusso3 to see if the Agency was in favor of
such an arms a@e or at Mr. Absher strongly advised against
Gous sos) told Mr. Absher
that he understood and agreed not to get involvéd. (Roussos 3
said that WER BELL would probably cali him from Aindne and’
would give WER BELL a final negative reply.
9. On 22 July 1974, the FBI reported that WER BELL may
be in possession of a one-line note from former CIA Director:
William Colby stemming from a chance meeting with the Director
at an OSS alumni dinner, reading something like ''Good to. see
you again." This note was apparently used by WER BELL to
suggest that he and Mr. Colby were good friends. This infor-
mation was passed on to Mr. Colby on 9 August 1974.
10. According to reporting from several Stations, WER BELL
and Arthur L. Smith (a cohort of WER BELL's) were in several
Central American countries during August and early September
1962. Their principal activity appeared to be contacting
officials of the governments of Guatemala, Nicaragua, and
El Salvador for the purpose of obtaining recognition of a
de facto Cuban Government in exile called the "United
Organization: for the Liberation of Cuba."' In discussions with
Nicaraguan Government representatives, WER BELL claimed the
proposed Cuban Government in exile had the support of 90
separate Cuban exile organizations and 186,000 Cuban exiles.
WER BELL offered a representative of the Nicaraguan Government
$100,000 to obtain that government's recognition of the Cuban
Government in exile. The group claimed to have its headquarters
at 1025 Connecticut Avenue, NW, in Washington, D.C. While in
Guatemala, Smith claimed that the group had a man in the .
Department of State in Washington, D.C., whom they pay $6,000
per year ''to keep them advised."
14-0000
=P
Su nee \
/ ABTUAN TO CIA
-7- Background Use Only
» (Oo Not Reproduce
11. In December 1965 WER BELL contacted a Miami DCD
asset and told him that he and six Cuban exiles in the U. S.
had organized a group, including approximately 20 Cubans
inside Cuba, to perform a commando operation in Cuba during
early January 1966., Their primary mission was the assassination
of Fidel Castro, with the secondary mission of blowing up the
generators that supply electricity to Havana, Cuba. WER BELL,
at the time, stated that he was trying to get a "green light"
from CIA to proceed with the mission, and inferred that the
mission would be called off if such approval was not obtained.
12. On 7 February 1966 the Miami office of the FBI
reported that WER BELL had been in contact with various news
agencies concerning an alleged plan to assassinate Fidel Castro,
and reportedly also had discussed the plan with Mr. Richard
Phillips, Public Affairs Officer, Department of State, Washington,
D.C. WER BELL claimed to have a group of some 500 men infiltrated
into Cuba and said that they were ready for action to overthrow
the regime immediately following the assassination of Castro.
According to the FBI, WER BELL gave the impression that he is
acquainted with many high government officials, both in the U. S.
and other countries, arid implied. that his assassination plan
had been approved by CIA.
13. According to a memorandum in WER BELL's file, on 7
February 1968, one Bruce Arman Baker telephoned an employee
of this Agency and said he had been in contact with WER BELL.
Mr. Baker said that WER BELL was in the weapons manufacturing
business and delivered them by air throughout the world.
Mr. Baker said that he understood that WER BELL does this for
CIA. Mr. Baker said that he understood from WER BELL that he
would have to get a CIA security clearance to fly for WER BELL.
Baker said that he was afraid that his past smuggling record
might keep him from getting a CIA clearance. 35
14. WER BELL came to the attention of the Bangkok Station)
in early 1969 when he went to Thailand representing himself
as Vice President of Sionics, Atlanta, Georgia. He described
himself as a counterinsurgency expert, had a variety of weapons
to display, claimed to be a retired colonel, and introduced
himself at a local nightclub as Chief of CIA in Thailand.
WER BELL attempted to sell arms to the Thais and also to a
variety of U. S. military elements? ? (Station Bangkok) passed
the gist of his reputation to key personalities in the U. S.
mission and the Thai Government stressing that he was not
sponsored in any way by the U. S. Government.
14-0000
7 RETURN TO CIA
-8- Background Use Only
's Do Net Reproduce
15. WER BELL was also the subject of two memorandum
signed by Lawrence R. Houston. Mr. Houston, answering a
request from Joseph J. Liebling, Deputy Assistant Secretary
of Defense, on 23 February 1971, denied WER BELL's alleged
affiliation with the CIA. On 28 October 1971, Mr. Houston
wrote Mr. David H. Henretta, Jr., of the Industrial Security
Clearance Review Division, to return notarized Interrogatories
previously sent by Mr. Henretta.
16. We have no information on Colonel Bayard except news
articles reporting his death which were forwarded by the FBI.
17. Per your request, we have sent instructions to the
LA/Miami Station that there should be no contact with WER BELL.
Acting Chief
Latin America Division
E2 IMPDET
CL BY 012913
|
104-10105-10271.pdf | 14-00001
.:
f
104-10105-10271 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
E]UNCLASSIFED oOo” ja conr( attaL =. ]_ SECRET
ae ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET =, RETURN'TO CIA
ackorouna Use Only
SUBJECT: (Optional)
Bo Not Reproduce -
FROM:
Seymour R. Bolten
7320
7520
To. (Officer designation, room number, ond [ae COMMENTS (Number each comment to shew from whom
wilding) | recaven | ronwannen| to whem. Drow a line across column after each comment.)
1. Mr. John Morrison ; ta
OoGC 7D 01 lih/| | 1. Attached is an ad-
: vance@ informal copy of our
Np . ‘(proposed security deletions |
4° ~. land revisions of thé Hunt =.
"-Igalley proof. - Please note -
that this list has not yet . .
been reviewed by Mr. Blee — —.
and is,..therefore, still -- ~~
subject: to change... a
2. The DDO panel that -
reviewed the Hunt manuscript. |
has designated items, numbered
12, 14, 19, 21, 24 and 25, as
"hard core," by which we mean
that the Agency should insist
on their deletion or revision
and be prepared to obtain an
injunction and engage in
litigation should: Hunt refuse
li
SAB/DDO
sf 7 oP pW vec?
kcal, REVIEW PROGRAM
lo
C/o.
CONFIDENTIAL [_] Yseonty UNCLASSIFIED —
fot
2
=
—
&
oa
rc
.
610 vserrences SECRET
&
14-00000
a
CONFIDENTIAL
.
‘“
Fai
a.
Lg
° s
a
SUBJECT: Manuscript and Galley Proof of Undercover:
Memoirs of an American Agent by E. Howard Hunt
. NOTES: A. Pages and lines underlined
- and appearing at the begin-
- ning of the items below.
refer to the galley proof.
_B. Corresponding page and line
-- aistings as they appear in .
the manuscript are provided
in brackets at the end of
- each item.” Se
age 57, line,6 from bottom of page;
Pleasants Mr.fPleasants/retired under cover and his past
Yelationship should not be exposed. It is also recommended
that efforts be. made to have. the name "John Richardson" also
removed from the same sentence containing Mr.[Plea ant name.
(Page 96, line 17.).
2. Page 59, line 38 beginning with "However" and ending .~ ,
on page 60, line Z with “milieu”. Rutherford T. "Pinky" at
retired Ar anda hac CTA vr Tatannchs? ast dt aw o,
1
s oe
a2autcaav unacr cover 2a nas vu 1 atr oR snip SnouUiG Roe Be
exposed. His assignment inj Paris under’student cover/is
similarly classified. The description of this activity just yp N ‘
a couple of pages before the author gratuitously, mentions the”,
lack of an agreement between the Agency and the/ French barring’
unilateral operations in France/(Item 4 below) is potentially
an additionally damaging blow to liaison relationships. (Page
100, lines 10-14.)
CONFIDENTIAL ell
14-2000
OMT IL EAL b - V \
. . 1. ‘
«3 \s VE
_. ° 3. Page 63, line 21; the name [Frank Holcomb" ;
Mr. Holcomb retired under cover and Qs past relatYonship
with.the CIA should not be exposed. It is additionally
recommended that the entire paragraph wherein Mr. Holcomb's
name appears (lines 21-24) should be deleted because it ac-
knowledges CIA operations in support of anti-communist political
operations in Italy. (page 105, lines 18-21.) yt
4, » Page 63, line 30 beginning with: "By" and ending with
“arrangement! on line 33, page . dt is recommended that this ’
passage be deleted since its inclusion not only is not pertinent ~
zito the narrative but it unnecessarily jars,Jiaison with the
British) and is an implied insult to the/Fr nch/liaison services.
(page 106, lines 4-7.) 2
Joie
,
2 fa
,
«
2)
with "world" on Tine 27. This passage escribes a specific CIA .
operation which resulted in the production and distribution of . _
an animated cartoon based on George Orwell's Animal Farm. a
(Page 111, lines 6-9.) : Qe
6. ge 68, the pseudonym "John F. Rittenhouse" on line 34.
a <
The author's original CIA pseudonym was Classified, and even ak
though compromised, never appeared in the press and still exists < fil
on various currently classified documents. (page 114, line 23.) ““¥%
3
YX
7. Page 71, beginning with "Spanish" on line 28 and endin
with "America on line 20, page 72, and including the footnotes
ee cae on pages 71 and 72. This passage should be deleted because it
SS describes the Agency's role in[subsidi zing. producing and dis-.
27 tributing] "El Campesino's" book, Life and Death in the USSR.
(pages 120 [lines 4-20, including footnote] - 121 [lines 1-16,
including footnote.]) ~
8. Page 72 beginning with “Eudocia"™ on line 21 and-ending
with "Scribner's" on line 3Z. This. should be deleted because
it describes the Agency's role in the translation, fpublishing?”
and distribution/of Eudocio Ravines' book, The Yenan Way. “It
also describes William Buckley's role in that operation as a.
CIA officer. (Page 121, lines 17-23 and page 122, lines 1-6.)
9. Page 73 beginning with "Mexican" on line 5 through
"Rivera" on line 8. This should be deleted because it not only
describes sources and methods but also identifies a specific
CIA operation. (Page 122, lines 19-21 and page 123, line 1.)
EX TN ee eee.
oes ew
cya
14-0000“
oe, ( GU rhc WAL
10. Page 73 beginning with "Communism" on line 14 and.
ending with “reputation” on iine 15. This passage could serve
to identity a former asset in Mexico who is still living. (Page
123, lines 7-8.) :
°
. “fF s 4
11. Page 73 beginning with "cover'on line 17 through
"legend" on line 19. This should be deleted because it identifies, \\
a ClA-sponsored cover arrangement in Bangkok. Furthermore, thi \))
particular type of cover, the movie industry, has figured in
earlier unfavorable publicity to CIA in other Southeast Asian
countries and thus serves to further render suspect the use of
such cover in still other areas. (Page 123, lines 10-12.)
12. Page 73 beginning with " lanned" on line 22 through
“authentic™ on dine S of page 74 and including the footnote on
page 74. This shoul be deleted because it escribes,a specific
| P
; Operation involving the forgery of a page of the /Shafighad Post},
a and also includes descriptions of. sources and methods. Page’ 123, -
: lines 15-23 and all of page 124 including footnote.) ; .
ee 13. Page 77 beginning with "technical" on line 19 through ~‘}
i “station” on Line 21. This should be deleted because it describes. |
and authenticates a CIA operation. (Page 131, lines 2-4.) ©
ava. 14. Page 80 beginning with "surreptitious-entry" on line 9.
Kumbough "Embassy" on line 12, page 82. This should be deleted
¥ because it escribes a specific, sensitive poeaaisit as well as.
J
YQ sensitive, sources and methods including the/ acquisition of code”
weg. > materials} (Page 136, line 3 through page 139, line 20.)
Dh 15. Page 86 beginning with "Greek" on line 18 through ,
"countries" on Line 20. This should be deleted because it 4
Tdentifies a specific operation and the foreign assets involved:
in its support.. (Page 147, lines 6-8.) -
16. Page 95 beginning with "quasi-military"™ on line 11 ~ f
“through "East" on dine 16. This s ould be deleted because it | ;
t
describes various cover and support facilities used in Far Eas
Asian countries. (Page 163, lines 6-11.)
17. Page 95 beginning with "Hong Kong" on line 16 through
"Branch" on Line 19. This should be celeted because it describ
es
an operation conducted/ jointly with a liaison*Service in Hong i
Kong targettedjagainst Mainland China and as such is not only
damaging to current American detente efforts but is particularly
menacing to Hong Kong authorities in view of their proximity and
susceptibility to potential Chinese retaliatory pressures. (Page
-163, lines 11-14.) eae
c AAA MY Tet
3. | ae Nat? jar Deak Te
WK AMS
. 7 are
y CONFIDENTIAL —
. ; an 5
_. 18. Page 99 beginning with "disrupting" on line 5 through’
"display" on Line 27 and including the Footnote. on age 99. sy
- ‘Fhis passage describes specific CIA operations/in Tokyo targette
against China and as such are not only damaging to current detent
efforts but are also disruptive to liaison relationships wit
the Japanese:7 (Page 169 line 23 through-page 170, line 22,»
including fod6tnote.) ; . oO
/ : - . \
oe 19. Page 102 beginning with "Despite" on line
1 WZ ereturned' on line 10. This should be deleted becaus
Scribes a specific and sensitive CIA operation inclu
GY poets 15). (Page 175, lines 10-15.)-
i
(Ae
Csurreptitious-entr
refers to sensitive Agency sources and methodg.. (Page 181, |
Jines 2-3.) a, pos
hi 21: Page 108 beginning with "tap" on line 17 t
"Embassy" on line 7 age 109. This passage dea
With various operational proposals, activities inc
recruitment of an identifiable individual, as wel
sensitive methods of operation, e.g., surveillanc
(Page 187, lines 6-24 through page 188, lines 1-15.)
22. Page 109 beginning with "FBI" on Igjne 21 through
"station" on line 26. e "Ramirez" operation./ Describes an
Operation which began with the FBI's spotting Xf a possible
Soviet intelligence agent. Since this informdtyon was then
turned over to the Agency, a question arises /conterning the
need to seek the FBI's prior comments. (Pa 18 lines 6-11.)
23. Page 111 beginning with "The" on tide 22 through
“triumvirate” on line 25. It would seem\that an effort ought
to be made to have this passage deleted o hanged since itszy 4
damage potential tofliaison relationships With the Uruguayan 6
services/is considerable, and it does coh dize the current te
careers and livelihoods of the Agency's contacts.who are re-
ferred to by date and position and thus, dre Nentifiable.
(Page 192, lines 21-22.) 4
24. Page 115 beginning with "I'' on line 23 through
“department” on line 35. This passage should be deleted
because it describes Agency methods of operation --- acquisi-
tion and passage of information to and from a liaison service ---
as well as an overall Agency program of operational activities
within Uruguay involving the 'fmonitoring of forty-two telephone’.
lines}'. Page 200, lines 6-18.
ee CONFIDEN a, wey
Ue
14-0000
--National Press Building”. (Page 211, line 4.)
fRoger Goiran»
oan | Contreceria: _ —é
ADUINNTIUCINGIA..
a . . . 4 ye A nt
25. Page 116 beginning with "technical" on line 10 IY
through "secrets" on line 29. This passage should be, cinedy)
Decause it describes a Sensitive operation conducted jointly)
with a liaison (Uruguayan) service(which involved co e paterialg)
(Page 201, lines 12-23 and page 202, lines 1-9.)
26. Page 122 beginning with “The! én line 8 through
“"Djilas" on line 9. This passage should be deleted because it
attests to the Agency's subsidization of publication/of Djilas'
book. In addition an effort ought to bé.made toh
remove or appropriately alter the rest of the. pare
line 31. OGC's attention
this passage in order that they be made awareof i
interpretations. (Page 212, lines 4-5.) y
fo:
29. Page 126 beginning with "Chief'\.on last line through
"officers" on page 127, line 5. This passage should be deleted
because it SPE GET IES the classified activikies of a’ CIA officer,
is assignments in Tehran and Brussels], as well
4s his involvement in the compilation of ,a chassifie “encyclopedic
study" are unwarranted disclosures of Agency ethods. (Page 219,
lines 8- 13.) /
30. Page 130 beginning with "Free" on line 20 through "CIA"
on line 21. This phrase should be delete 1 serve
to affect the life. of one of the principals /o
Committee, [Mrs. M Marieda Bourgin, a former watt :
is now employed by the State Départment. f age 225, lines 10-11.)
31. Page 150, all of lines 14 throughN6. It would appear
that this description o the author's contact\with Dr. Barney
Malloy of CIA is very unfair to the latter. It implies that
Hunt had a special relationship with Dr. Malloyfand an effort
ought to be made by OGC to have the author rewyite this version
in “order to reflect Dr. Malloy's true role in fhis\ affair.
Page 260, lines 22-23 through page 261, lines 1- 2. >
BA) cys
14-0000%. «2
so sretanitis Ls
- °
C * CONFIDENT :¢
cr +e “os
32. Page 220, lines 5 through 10. This passage concern- |
ing the use of CIA alias documentation by Hunt and others in-
cludes loose language which implies that still another set of
documents was prepared by the CIA for Hunt's use --- i.e., a
set of documents which was not mentioned-‘during the recent * ;
Congressional "Watergate hearings". As such this is misleading
and could serve to create additional difficulties for the Agency.
It is recommended that the OGC make an effort to have the author
rewrite this paragraph in order that this potentially damaging
language be removed from his manuscript. (Page 387, lines 4-9.)
CONFIDENT? =a
|
104-10105-10277.pdf | 14-0000
104-10105-10277
en a ce .
hs 7
: 7 ry yO .
a - SEGRET
| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
.
@) Occ 74-1755
30 September 1974
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Meeting with E. Howard Hunt Re His Memoirs, "Undercover"
1, On 28 September 1974 Ray Rocca, Deputy Chief/CI Staff, °
and I met in the DCD Washington Field Office with E. Howard Hunt,
his attorney William A. Snyder, Jr., and Snyder's associate
Thomas W. Coons. As the meeting began, Hunt asked if it was -
being tape-recorded; I assured him that it was not. He said he did |
not care; but that, if it were to be recorded, he would like to know.
We then embarked upon the review according to the plan under which
we would demand the deletion of three items as classified and then
proceed to the remaining 29 items, only if Hunt was cooperative on
the first three. He and his lawyers appeared very cooperative, and
accordingly, the meeting continued to cover all 32 items.
Pe 2. Changes were agreed to in the items set forth in paragraphs
° 12, 14, and 25 of the CI Staff memorandum of 19 September 1974.
These appear at pages 73, 80-83, and 115 of the galley proof and
concern the fabrication of the Shanghai post for a Mexican operation,
the entry into the Guatemalan Embassy in Mexico City, and the joint
CiA-Uruguayan telephone monitoring operation. The wording of the
agreed changes is as' shown on the attached copies of the pertinent
pages of the galley proof. Essentially, these changes disguise the
identity of the fabricated newspaper and remove a reference to
journalists as agents; delete the word "Guatemalan"! to make the
entered embassy non-specific; and delete the reference to listening
posts and telephone monitoring to make that paragraph refer in more
general terms to our ability to cover targets without referring to the
use of electronic surveillance.
. E-2 IMPDET
‘ CL BY 058473
SECRET
Ci
14-0000 «
_ ; ; a an _ ; . 7 . , - . (
ren d seoet
3. We then proceeded to the 29 items which we would like to
see modified but which we could not consider classified. We made
this clear to Hunt and went through them one by one, discussing our
concern with each. Hunt contended that most of these items. should
not be considered sensitive since they had been publicized extensively;
in some cases confirmed in testimony; and,in the case of other ;
items, the principals involved were dead. However, he agreed to
changes in the items referred to in paragraphs 1, 3, 17, and 32 of
the Cl Staff memorandum of 19 September. These involve the deletions
of the names of Henry Pleasants and Frank Holcomb, both now
retired under cover; a direct reference to joint operations with the
British in Hong Kong against China; and the wording of his reference
to CIA alias documentation used by the Watergate burglars. The
language of this last item will be changed so that it no longer leaves
the impression that the documentation was prepared by the Agency
for this operation. 2
4. When we had finished, Hunt and his lawyers emphasized
as they had mentioned earlier in the meeting that it might be very
difficult to get the publisher to agree to changes in the unclassified
items. Mr. Snyder offered to present all of the items to the publisher
| for change without distinguishing between the classified and unclassi-
fied items. He said he would do this without implying they were all
gu classified. I felt it necessary to turn down his offer because of the
, risk of the publisher being unwilling to accept that many changes
with the result that we would have to go back to him on the three
classified items, thus presenting a situation similar to our retraction
of previously demanded deletions in the Marchetti book. I think
there would be some danger of the publisher using this in his adver-
tising and through reviewers for publicity purposes.
5. As we were leaving, Hunt showed me what was described
as a "comfort letter." This was a letter written by him to the
publishers on 17 May 1974 at the publisher's request which said
that in his opinion nothing in the manuscript violated any agreement
between himself and the CIA, nor would subject him to prosecution
under the espionage laws. As the meeting was ending, Hunt expressed
his hope that no publicity would be given to it and that the Agency
would not issue any kind of a'press release. In view of the Director's
decision that we shall issue a press release, I took pains to persuade
Hunt that public acknowledgment of the fact that we had reviewed his
oo SECRET
rg
14-0000
ne seeney «=O
( (
CS |
‘manuscript would be in his interest as well as ours. He had referred
more than once during the meeting to the need to avoid the appearance
of "a bear hug"; in other words, collusion or cooperation between him
and the Agency, leaving an inference that the book was designed to be
a whitewash of CLA. In view of this, it was easy to convince Hunt
that an Agency press release would be in his interest. I would note
here, however, that both Mr. Rocca and I felt that Hunt and his
lawyers were genuinely cooperative and that a press release which
is too harsh or denigrates the book or Hunt's motives might be unfair —
and considered by him to be in bad faith. Hunt appears to retain
admiration and respect for the Agency and seems convinced that
nothing in his book will harm our operations or personnel.
NO <.
. io :
Ve / \ COMA LE
HN DA RRISON, IR. (
Acting General Counsel
Attachments
ec: Acting DDO
SAB/DDO
DC/CI Staff
O/Security
Asst. to DCI
Mr. Walter Pforzheimer
c/Ccs
OGC:JDM:sin
Original - OGC Subj: PUBLICATIONS
1 - Chrono —
SEGRET | ;
|
104-10105-10285.pdf | [2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 | N RECORDS ACT OF 1992
}104-10105-10285] 10105-10285) 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATIO
un . wey wot: es 2
a . a : a
SUBJECT 9" FS Name Trace = Henry L. BRETTON. and PRAEGER jy. °
a Publishing Corporation ~~. _
SETERENCE #06C 7§-0088,.10 January ‘1975
coe 1. jin Resbonse to the referent reauest, we have checked
“IP, OSG/0C, FR, DCD, ITG,. and ‘CI files with the following results:
IP ~~ 201-153109 .
OSC/0C -- no record
FR -> no record | ;
- DCD -- see attachment
IT@ -- no record °
‘CI -=- no record -
‘CCS -- see helow
The IP 201 file indicated Subject was a former OSS man
tho had used the name Henry BISMARK. He was met by
Contact Division in 1964, apparentlv on several occasions,
due ‘to his plans to accent a position with the University
of Accra, Ghana. ‘At that time he indicated he did not
‘want to get involved with the Agency. There is no -vaner |
in the file after 1964, :
CCS reported various arencyv contacts with PRAFCFR but
(CCS itself has had no such contacts. Orn, Arthur X03, 24
Cox (retired 1962) used PPAECEP as cover while on
project 7PEVApr, ; - . 7
P2 IMPDPT CL BY 010154.
bject: | Mame Trace. - Henrw ti. RPY: TON
_ _Cornoration (Con! tS
and Pearcy e Publishine|
|
104-10105-10290%20(C06932214).pdf | 104-10105-10290) [2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
. AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : CIA
RECORD NUMBER : 104-10105-10290
RECORD SERIES : JFK
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : 80T01357A
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
AGENCY ORIGINATOR : CIA
FROM : CHIEF, COVER & COMMERCIAL STAFF
TO : ACTING GENERAL COUNSEL
TITLE : MR. E. HOWARD HUNT - ALIAS BIRTH CERITIFICATE
DATE : 11/02/1973
PAGES : 7
SUBJECTS : TOURIST CARD
JFK ASSASSINATION
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER
CLASSIFICATION : SECRET
RESTRICTIONS : 1A 1B
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED .IIN PART PUBLIC - RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 06/21/04
COMMENTS : JFK37 : F1O : 20040112-1033571
‘
([R] - ITEM IS RESTRICTED 104-10105-10290
NW 64937 Docid:32357551 Page 1
2 November 1973 | ..
MEMORANDUM FOR: - Acting General Counsel
SUBJECT: » “Mr, Eo Howard Hunt ~ Alias Birth Certificate
1. On 30 October 1973 I saw Mr, John S, Warner, Acting
General Counsel, to discuss two outstanding requests from the Special
Prosecutor's office in regard to U.S. passports which had been issued
to E. Howard Hunt and. a MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD on Mr,
Robert Bennett's session with the U.S. Prosecutor Silbert in July 1972.
I handed Mr. Warner a memorandum listing the type, number and dates
of the 2 passports which Mr. Hunt was issued between 1950 and 1970.
In reviewing the information in this memorandum, I mentioned Mr. Hunt's
tour in Spain in the middle 1960's and the fact that I had been instructed
not to include Mr. Hunt and his activities in my inspection of the Madrid
Station in 1965. [also mentioned to Mr. Warner that I remembered two
discussions with Mr. Skip Dunn late in 1972 during which he inquired of
me whether CIA had ever issued an alias passport to Mr. Hunt. I said
. that as I recalled, CIA did not initiate the issuance of a U.S, alias passport,
but that Mr. Hunt did have in his possession an alias travel document. ;
This came as a surprise to Mr. Warner, He had not been previously
aware that Mr. Hunt possessed a U.S. international travel document in
alias. As a result he called Mr. John Richards, Office of the IG, and _
asked whether Mr. Richards was aware of this and whether Mr. Dunn's
‘reports provided this information, After an interval, Mr. Richards |
called back and told Mr, Warner that I had provided information to Mr.
Dunn that Mr, Hunt had a tourist card in alias. According to Mr. Richards,
Mr. Dunn's memorandum quoted me as saying that my information came
from an" A-] source."” At that moment, I could not recall having made
such a statement,
E2 IMPDET
CL BY
059770
NW 64937 Docid:32357551 Page 2
2. Upon my return from Mr. Warner's office, I consulted with.
Mr, James W. Franklin, Chief, Official Cover Branch, CCS, with whom
I had discussed Mr. Dunn's inquiry in late 1972, [asked Mr. Franklin
whether he could refresh my memory, This he did immediately. He
reminded me that a newspaper article (Tab A) had appeared claiming
that one of the Watergate 5 had carried a U.S. passport in the name of »
Edward Hamilton. This newspaper article had been seen by Mr. Robert
Johnson, Deputy Director of the U.S. Passport Office, who had had the
U.S. Passport Office files examined with negative results. Mr. Johnson
then determined from the FBI that the document involved was not a U.S.
passport in the name of Edward Hamilton but a tourist card in that name.
I then remembered that because the information came from the FBI via
Mr. Johnson, I had not identified the source of my information, I
‘immediately called Mr. Warner and advised him of the foregoing.
3, Later in the afternoon of 30 October 1973 Mr. Franklin
came to my office with a number of documents. They consisted of a form
memorandum signed by me which was addressed to Mr, Hunt dated 29 June.
1970 (Tab B), a list of names numbering from 1 through 154, representing
true names (Tab C), and a second listing similarly numbered, representing
_ aliases (Tab D), Number 63 on the true name list reads E, Howard Hunt
and on the alias list, Edward Joseph Hamilton. Mr. Franklin explained «-
_ which I had forgotten -~ that we had obtained from TSD this list of outstanding
alias birth certificates issued by TSD in an attempt to recall~-if possible--
as many of these documents, or to determine what had happened to them. ,
(Most of these alias birth certificates were issued in connection with the
Bay of Pigs Operation, ) The memorandum was never forwarded to Mr. Hunt
because by June 1970, he had been retired for 3 months, This memorandum
had not been included in Mr, Hunt's cover file but had been kept with the
working papers pertaining to the action trying to recall as many of the
outstanding alias birth certificates as possible, As a result, the repeated
reviews of Mr. Hunt's cover file had not yielded the information that an
alias birth certificate had been issued to him, 97 of the 154 aliases were -
not previously recorded in the CCS central index and the indexing after the
acquisition of the list had been overlooked. The surfacing of these documents
at this time occurred because in re~discussing Mr. Hunt's possession of an
international travel document in alias reminded Mr, Franklin of the 1970 CCS
-exercise of recouping outstanding alias birth certificates, Discussions on the
same subject in December 1972 simply did not result in the same memory
association.
NW 64937 Docid:32357551 Page 3
we
Bb ea hd 1h dae
4, Jn the late afternoon of 30 October 1973 Mr. Franklin and
Isaw Mr. Warner, reported the foregoing facts to him, showed him
the documents, and agreed that we would ask Mr, Johnson to check
the Passport Office files once more to confirm that no U.S. passport
in the name of Edward Joseph Hamilton had ever been issued to Mr.
Hunt.. The result of Mr. Johnson's check is still outstanding at the
time of this writing.
ERICH W. ISENSTEAD>
Chief, Cover & Commercial Staff
4 Atts:
A: News Article
B: 29 June 70 Form Memo to Hunt
C: True Name Listing
D: Alias Name Listing
cc: IG via DDO
a A. farm
-- - mem termes Ee te
NW 64937 Docid:32357551 Page 4
rrr nae
4 . oe woe
( oe > ;
es dese Beare CO? _ eo
> ae vee Worms
Ze Many Vat & (997 2. oe
Ta 4 Sie .
3. “ ad) Ce 55. © cote ¢R=2Le
hie Abe fot vary $o- an | Y ar ce : ~ : eo
5. «ADE MOL? , tarry Clay h é fo, f ~0" Le Ly ie GReane, Civbr t
ce Res fee OK $8. SOLAT DgarG TVnZaLez we.
BARAKAUSEAS Alga fYAN ae uh ae
i or a — os Yi W aoe Eee }. “ Van BG GCUDT:. 3 Ca cil oe olde to 1Gte= Pee 4
* SoD Site - 05 » €0. Frontices 121@2 567
Ge SPEND, ste BcO 444 Zi. sit LP: S -
=O... Amtarili-t. (Cry,
ROSEND
Sm: Aho,
Beale, We 1 407
HAS, Alis A
AULR, William Ae
Major Hild i
250
x
BECERT, Jerome Ke —
35
OR ia Kew & Birreti
tatart he dre
16, ERICZSON, Poul /72/
17, KINAMTER, James Fel?
18, BARCUIN, Casinire 7)? /
BURKE,
Jon’
CHPOHUANT
. SHEREOOM,
perse vy
SICKER, * slexander Mi).
BYaEK, Stonhen Joo a
Pant 3077 7/
BR -ADETELD, Tony Eduard
v7
4e-
2, MELBERG, "Robert L219
ieee KLE,
RAN ITLEY,
BLAIR,
CUNTING WAM,
Poter ve oon
BEE
ak
at mon
noth Willa
zy Anézew Boe,
306 fron ES, Thomas Je *
DAICA, yanks i! ;
DALEY, Ve de fi
2 autor
Denalé 8." °
REAw a,
i:
meodore of? 7
Herbort /4~
ZUR xe, Paul 3.8997
Villian ei
aves Allen dre. g
TI iy, Ci tetas Winton #7 + of
REY, Wailien David i777
dom Rei aay ed
a
2)
27
ial
a7?
g- 3d
ue
: &8 Eb Re asia
SATE OFS ry
J
786 JOANS SON, Iver AA og bf om
sa tle JASUACW, vixelaL lh . ;
yo” — 75. “YER, & enjoin Frenidia 3 Piaf
7192 WAPUSTA, Peter Jos
: 100.
ep ATT e rer
a Soe thas ’
HECAT, 'Elne
TWAS aor EI, An
"OE
¥OCELA,
KAPPES, Ge J
8. HURTS :
Rita, Jack J21ie
. KEREED DY,
Lagi ores, 2 a
hte TUS , eats
fetes ° £
HORN, Rutug +.
EI WRT
STLDALGO 3 Sarn
Tnos2s
28
4,
“HOSOZ, Ste
ANCHUR, es
. SAROSZEVTC2Z,
‘SAUNZENIS, bn is WK
TN
ABA
ate pd vata 2 beds $
Paul dif,
cane
—
3 Waster
Jens '
YRUTVICLOWA, Walter 11 .
RRECZDYS 5 doseps ye a5e les
MASLOVSHE, Serge r oes
ae x3, Zisoréds UR
BAVZANTV SEY
pe
See 249
«€
Myron 74) _
dues am
«
ree
rey
lg
>
39 6 ist ane erele 1 oe wn jue !
LO, DILLO: gonn Ee7% 4a . - . aad
bi. m G SEDER, Cons tantine (It i LE , Mats on Swe shez /) STO
2, DEMONS, Vallica | Ee! we ESTEE, is nest oriy |
3. DALY, Vin HLEIN, Theodore 73" a _|
» TOSUSZAUSRY, Myrosian YP- Sy
Pran LUPU, Andrei Nicolae HE:
Ens Ru _ Un mown «al.
3 ea dh S ae: }
SEBS, V eR S Lqymorny, Paibip 142-25
CHIPIAN, Har wrolé EL D/¢ § ;
“Fuciis, Robert def
Sl. FRA HXLIN :
52. FLIC“, Charles 2. /7
NW 64937 Docid:32357551 Page 5
>
lucien Ve dre ¢
ad
23
Led 102.
f
101.
103.
10h.
105.
106.
on
ey INT
yen bd avends g
SMITE, Yavils
YOORE, Andrew
“ARSAK, Fran
XRIFSTELD, George
MULANE,
DAL Ine Kilbae TSE 6
Gorra
Rubon /s ve :
CF EP f, i
re ~ € FF |
i
ad Sea¥S FF |
PP AS -S
3 liR
HX
sa
ake
a7
107.
108.
110.
lll.
- 212.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
! 119,
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
150,
. AMLFO-3 (crypt).
Cc - oO
BARQUIN, Casimiro//7/
MORALES David S.2¢ #3
TRUE 0.
151. AIMAN, James Henry pi 49
152. STOIAKEN, Nicholas P.//ti#
153. TALLEY, Ulo/“”
Wh ER, Harry Richard/“/ eee
NEWMAST ay / 154. TURK Leo Lily 230
NASARENKO, Michael 77. yt |
IEPER Harr , aaften es Ee = a
PHILLIPS, rry C. 2 ohio 156, | THOMAS, Edward er a
- GREENE, Harris 157. None
‘PASLAWSKY, Nicholas.2K 158, TRIANOSKY, Harry 3/7
Uf 159, VINING, James L.2S-5 2 -
PAWLYSZYN, Myroslaw /“/< &
=/ 160. VAN COURTNEY, Donaldi/\
FRANK, Maryado f . E96
$24) 161. HARVEY, William K.7.¢- 427%
MOORE, Robert Butler "
PRIBANYEC, Janos /' 162. BULIK, Joseph 3 334
None . - -163, WILL, Kenneth John Yz- 73 |
164. SHORTALL, John W. ea
RASTENIS, Jonas/" 165. WATTS, Roy Furniss ASe3Ol}
REYNOLDS, Malcolm Eugene/27: 27 166. MERTZ,, R Richard 22/_
RAUS, Juric. 0%. 167. .None
RIKAND, Enno NA, 168. ZANKIN, Myroslaw /2"
wie 8. ALAGAZE~1. (Crypt)
RATCLIFF, Richards: -/@
REEVES , ,_ John M. Jr. 167
—————
STAROSTENKO, Henry} ~
IMLER, Norman C. 770 ooR
SLEEPER, Gordon // 2!"
Nonei”
None/
GONZ ALO, QUESADA Jr ery
SAGER, John YjPe. — Nl
i
SMITH, Edmund Gatbeiil - i &.- 538
SLENYS, Lindas K. Ny
'SOLNZEFF, Henry /*
"SOLER, Eva Dianal!h.
SATINSKAS, Henry}ifi |
STEVENS, George Agii-2 76%
WALLIN, Jack,.
TASHEFF , Mary ) // cy
NW 64997 Docid:32357551 Page 6
NW 64937 Docid:32357551 Page f
Post . “ . LLL 2 LARS ELT. wipers pepese cane! RT: = on? a
. og - : + (a. ; ; pa e
R 7H 2. Fig /AcKe2, Cernig & ($75 | BASI. yori wormanerr 2S
46° FF% 2., ADLAID, Glennon Fdwar Ze SO fd 2¢%),, PROS one PEL |
Aga 32. AHORN, Paul Reccer io-73855 0 PRYLTEY - Power &- “eo BAS.
BE - 3 755), AIVASEY, Matt $1 PE -obe) Ye -3F7558, GERG a Nery wl 3ssT
ents: FIZ5, ASHECPI, Howard Claes Braces GPL GEETSHAr, A subrey Lyle &. -29AP
WhE, AUDTSTO, Norio TPS, GONLATZ, Pocro Francisco #”
we iS BARICR, Algis = 26.21/15 6 CODTRGHVARGATE, Carlos tees
9e- 37, SARNAUN, dames Winabod Yarees S6reto, HABER, Frant isek “e7¥?
$4 BENAS, ‘BAPEDR, Andrew Frank® 3-/St763, WAR, Williom terk 7
NriC. BARRY "0, John Raymond MRE, ALLY, Roberta Snirley+#=——- “4g
un we
a9 ane mE Vallien John + | Mii. AMTLION, Edvard Josepa Mo —— 6S
i Gr- F785. 3. BELT, Willian Henry@iree# NREL, o HARRISON, Lowise eer
hah, BERTON Man oe US65~. HASEINS, Sonn > Martin #7
WAS. aerck ? <arl Tonale ©” f! ‘7 66, TE SRDEH, Roger Avcérew ARM
i Raz. pein “ Pa 1927870 | HILLARY, "Bernard Moerman on
14347 yh AlG, BERGETHGH, David Bjorn. UREB. HODOMICKE, Thomas York - GG
i PERT. BERCSON» Willisn Kinander wae aati: mal
A~WS18, BERTHLLI, Chi A a “eye
Semel Gb val ig. ae Beate hare ngelos” geese, HURLEY, Edward Elmor © Kase
| (Ae) 87720 (7IBTNSUANOER, Stanley Joo” | MRT Le TRVI'G, andrew ae :
cy 739 (hes 9921, BORDEN, Paul Thomas etna w&72- JACO3S, Stephan ee 5
ae Ban -wR22 BRABLEY, Taomas Edward *~ NRT © JAMES, "Nicholas a a 7 4
HECZ 23, BROITHCIM, John Albert whe -JARRCKT, Stanley, © a
a2 i) Boh, BRIce Robert Leo +” vAgS. SEFPRIZS nest -
B82 BRICK MI, Tad 8. 7216 TITERS , “Ivar #7 nn
. MDE g SRICGS, exb , ae i. ; WATT « JupDD, Nicholas &° . , : _!
7 avIR¢, Ue 29 BROOKE Paul Gregory & C271: (F/B. BACAR Eenjonin Franklintys- 775
OUEMGT O58. “BRUTOY, Wiliam Fmnott*~ «BBR. KARLOUTST, Paul eee IOC Te
H ve XASARIAN Fiwrsvds # _ i
Gist tesa” CATDPIL, a Treen en tr. eo NEEO6 XASA aT: tat yp She surds oe :
: 5395 ~ hae wy > Janes an wre AAS. KELLY, Myron on
|. TES pmo rete ee PA82, KENDALL, Poul © ;
i ? . Be ES : anes = a re ve MA nen . Pome / ‘
| weet 452. ROVTDCK, Cletus intorfsex)™ fa. SEROTIER, George Hickees © ve
a Fangs am eo Os Ch ae &' . .
| tad 33. CLE, Wit Davide” wABS. on, Sack snthory #7 LE Le
i les Aaqpwik. CONRAD, WILLIAM Robert eer? 96 STNSLOW, Join Willies << SOFT
| “pa 146354 CRONE, "Andrew Prules- +64; wA87. born Weiter oo :
i Aas Jun 36. | CURTAIN , Féuardo ABS vost a J cosh #°° EC
1. PF #21, 37 £H/DAILFY, "Jones © Mame a a see” as ~ 46
e3a, DERAT SKI, Vincent Josephe” ae ® a -
Wes Pe BELLE He ‘Alen’? — a ae -
al ce haaty aeeare, Conate to Bel C88 CGEA IES, * ire Shen of
; SLL. ‘DE LOX an : ER, Richard Ernes Loss
Rmehire TPOWAINE, Villian ! Henrye/sFe5, M936 roman 8 cae nee parm TE
pL eL3,.. DEAKOS, Victor Saruel®" LE7e bye ie ae ewer ca
: 52H bh, DIBOTS, Rene 2. ARMY R920 LOE, syron fp bKe 7
a 7 “ “15 mot scr frank Joseph # 58. IPg, andres Nicolae #" .
deca WELZ. EELSCH, Framk Tones A” e957 97br pars, George He, ARMY, 5 — 2
1 4 ee ib one urs a7 NAGE © MAGLIE, Philip Josegh 4-7 ~ i
i qt neb7. SLIECOR, William Monroe a we
RAR UT Bes dethur Hell WA99» MALABRE, Howland Eeword # Ang
‘ Nels PARON, Caeries AnérewxZ W300. MALOOF? 5 Serge - LG A838
ge 2585 gO, FILECOTA, Rober’ Th. ae gy cnoa, YARSAL, Moy Ruben eden
56) Ag FI phe FITSAMES, Lucian Charles vg ° veep eae
ae Te 2 25-99 7103. MASCi! IGAN, Andrew seo”
75 ‘fe 27; “524. LIGK, Charles oe C- 297 SIO: MAS , Fras
W056 NCADAN, George Thomas £ re
“Nij06, HOGAVIN, Gerrald,Joseph 7 25 3
L
rn
co . “fas
{ wom: a te MPa a : n
- qm
° . oh.
‘ ALIAS 7491 y 0 ALIAS
#07. MENICUCCI, Andrew Ro erth | gg-3 55°15}, STEVENS, James Henry
% ¥7108. MIRANDA, Diego 8S. £7 - 452, “None |
PRES aa wv . 47153. None é
WA110O, NACHBRUNN, Harry Richard MASA. TANIER, Lester Lewis
pA111. NASH, Mike De FES ca a araespcrer eer
PMAL12. PANOCK, Harry Charles Oy. 34-633 gg. T7Hee- TOGGITT, Edward J. be
WA113. PAPPS, William David E°5E IC VA157, TORREY, Erasmus | &"
Mk114. PARKER, Carl Frank 2” | 39158, TRABAN, Gregorio R.
WALI5. PASTOR, Nick Melee 159. VALCHIN, James Louis‘
PALIG. . PAULSON, Marty #~ > #AILGO. VAN CHADDE, Donald é
W117. PEVER, Laura Jean »” Yor wv GC lK-257F161, WALKER, William é
¥F1l18. POLACEK, Henry Prankyins/271 -/22162. . - WELK, Joseph, Reinholc
“7119. POLING, Janos fe 7P9163.~ ‘WIDEGREN’’ Keith J. 2
WSL20. RAHILL, Richard Kent #” Preah 164. « WILLEMS, Brenton Wall
MEX BXXXXRAWXKEKXRIANAEAXKNNY IG 36 MAGS, WISHFORD, Roy Furniss
M121. RANALLO, Jonas °° WAIGE. WOLF, ‘Frederick Morri
122. RATCLIFF, Matthew Edward £7e 34 WE167, WONG, Lam —_
25/723. REED, Juri ot wh168. ZEAMAN, Myron 2
W124. REESE, Eno #& a MiE69, ZIMMER, Paul R. £
AA1L25. REEse, Joseph Anthony “ . So,
WAL26. RESTELLER, Richard Lawrence !/.33/5
SAP 127. ROBERTS, John Martin | ar.
; SAKIN, Edmond Abel &
ROGERS, Robert E.2°
an'S RETTUM, Lowell Owen In En
w45 m- 354 Gf
NEE — er . tae iiceitt
PNE36. SEALE, Henry 4 ee
"137. SEALY, Robert Ruben 4~ §&S 7 ae
“F238. SELFE, Gordon Dale aRMw” ge ad .
W139, SHALER, Floyd A* - . shy
“140. SHIPLEY, Charles Joseph4. seitntaate we an ae
fl41. SHOWCROFT, Richard E. on Soo the . /
7291.42. SIMPSON, John DEF . “4; Y2_- oe \
4 LXE XXKEXKEXAKKE ee As
#7143 SIROTA, Edward G. #537, POONA
W844. SLATER, Lawrence 4” . oy F
WAL45. SNYDER, Gene ds 27, DB . ar
A446. None a. XN
PAL47, SORENSON, Henry ¢ sn
50148. STANDARD, George Adam*~_, ~ a
"149, STATEN, Samuel Addison #" yw
$350. XASHEEEK,STEPHENS, Marina T am SH es
NW 64997 Docid:32357551 Page 3
|
104-10105-10290.pdf | "104 10105- 10280
aK
2.
i 3. Us
Pook, ADEE , oe Ne er
; 5e ADEE Harry Q}: aye °
é. | RAGONA ferruzgie UB 3! € BAN, Ci
ANAKAUSES , Algsi os ROOLAT, LeGre BRZELeZ y.
&. $3 piOw: » Janes ue 2 3 fs Pro GCULTE, cok Tettel gue, /
S2. wr liar =tL¥ ° Veo ~
(se, et STE IS? po Kestns Bovnilt él. ek So 1B ET
3 Antar ili-2. (Cz att 62 GRatict a ere. 2) .
Li, fROSENBAUES (| witlien Af 139/S° : a Barter ur
12. ‘SEn: ShD, tag or Wilidex he sre ~ 63. uy? “OWES os. 21058
13 ux BEALE We Tite 4¢- 3:2 ran Fore’
Uys CEA 83, Alis\P/, 656 TARKTRS Jac dhe
15. BicERT, Jer sxe Fp — (27 ; . 66. Gent aaius 2) 2 oe N24
1G, fERICESOx, Poul /73/? van ; + 67. RILDALGO, Bc
17. (SIMAWER, Ines Fe he i 68. (FEMIT?, fronas eS 24
16, BARQUIR, Casimiro 777 / (omearncrirae inten ecrapys seeped PaO
3 e BICKER, Ale corp). . . aia
20, | BYZZX, Stephen Joo?’ 1-309?
2125) BURKE, Paul 347777 7 . 72. ||
22, | BRADFZELD, To ‘Edvard 4 C338 The SaNCrUR. Hiche ne K
23, LSHERVOOD, Jonny 747 . hy. |SAROSZEVICZ, S$geund EIA
se MELBERG, Robert Lice i 78, \aaMeIS, Ul a
25. SHA CXLEY, Taeodoreé/7 7 Pe JOANSOR, iver PA THAE
26, (BRANTLEY, Ue bort (4° yg TT MiKol Ane
27. 8 / Pr es 7. Franklin 3//,
OBO BLAIR, Willign 9/7! - De cea
2g, lcMThcHix, Janes Allen Jr. cue J ” 80. arés jfk
30. |CHAS, PeterZL- ~ $1. Raz AUT sey J Myron 348
82. [XCCELA, Ponds.
TLEY, Cletus Winton }Y- of 83. IKAPPES OG. / fee (Goss 7)
336 OARSY, wallids David 4777 gi,, |SURDZ, Keates 77%
4h | CANTER, WL an Bid m4 /~7 : 85. on Jack. J3/s7
35.| CRCCE y 86, SENEEDY, Johan We e-7 7
36.| FLORES, THe ar 87. ERUTYHO! Qua, Naltas A
0% 376} DAIGA, "Sendai ji A) 88. \RREGZDYS, Josep) 7 25/8
38.| DALEY, V. J di, .
39.1 We F
CHIEMAN, Harole EB.
DILLON, "sor 2-7" f9
Te oe is Re aeee a ham —¥ 7, Watson | Hus Shesyd > fe
~ y ih: - dao- *. feof 93. VAYERFSID, Es raest Swi ¥
DALY, Vincex if Ss. WEI 94. | SLEIN, Tacodore 73\ 72
y ¢ zit, 3: a -
Lh BUB0ES, Rona! Be7i 24 95 93| LOPUSZAUSAY, tyros ou Y)-
te Se cole A B ae f “, . Lr, Andres } Bicolpe ///.,
‘Oy udolt fe aa . _ - moun
L7e | EDWARDS, Willian Monroe Jre/ + poh 58, -[HAMONZY, Philip J. YF -fi0
18. Snee D ue oy." 995 | CHIP HAR, its arole be ALE
LO. ATH, seinen le cy 100, | “ASLOVSEY, Sorge T= 7iy7
60, |FuCiiS, Robert He “€ JOl. | MARTINEZ, Rubon jo 29
SL. |FRANKLIN, Lucdan\V. dre oy 102. SMITH, Navilenddr. 49°77
BA AS -
i
FLICE, Char los Be/” "Wes OW 103. SORE, Anérew F
OF . 10), 73 MARSAK, Franko
_ . 105. EHTESTELD, Geor
oe 106.
\ ee DA La Ou LZ fudyré é.
LANE, Gorra
14-0000
£407.
4 108.
TRUE
BARQUIN, IN, Casimiro /, a 27
MORALES David S.2273
110. /NEWMASTER, Harry Richar VAR
111. \NASARENKO, Michael /“. $s:
124, \RIKAND, Enno! 4
25. AMLFO-3 (Crypt w.i2.
12693(RATCLIFF, Richargz? “}@
127. REEVES, John M. Jr./0C7]
112. IEPER, Harry Cc. §-/27-
113. PHILLIPS, William D.72/2
114. |GREENE, Harris
115. PASLAWSKY, Nicholas .7/
11G. ;|PAWLYSZYN, Myroslaw VR
117. | FRANK, Maryado 2: /
118. |MOORE, Robert utler 77 2
119. RIBANYEC, opines
120. None
121. RASTENIS? J iat
122, REYNOLDS, M icolm Eugene/0;? 7
123. |RAUS, Juri/-:
12993 (REYNOLDS, Robert EB, —~
13103(RUCKER, Lucian 0. ID)976F
136, TAROSTEWKO, Hengy}/~
13793 IMLER, Norman C.¥9S
"138. LEEPER, Gordon } Pa
139. Nonel”
140. None
141 95(GONZALO, QUESADA JE.h/\
150, (TASHEFF, Marvy led
o5
33 CLE Dennis: oe 5-25 9/
) at eee
fbr iit - At gb 3p °
: 142 AGER John 4/7— =~ N11
143. [SMITH, Edmund
144, {SLENYS, Lindas 38,
145.03), SOLNZEFF, Henry 7/7
"146. SOLER, Eva Dianal)/.
147. ,SATINSKAS, HenryJiA
148. (STEVENS, George we Beate
149, WALLIN, Jack,7«
TRUE ° to
(AIMAN, James Herr) py. AS
TOIAKEN, Nicholas P. lee
i HOMAS, “Edvard? a
157. ~ None
(158. _{TRIANOSKY, Harry 347
1593/VINING, James L.£$-SS7 -
160. | VAN COURTNEY, aldi7é\
161, “HARVEY, William K.7.¢- 227
162. /BULIK, Joseph 3777
163. WILL, Kenneth John %/7- 73%
164, SHORTALL, John/W. Irv #7
165. |WATTS, Roy Furniss 25-397,
166. 1Z,, Richardiz22/
167. “None” ~
168. (ZANKIN, upposiagy*
, GAZE-1 {\Cryp
: . ob
Cire
Qo Foe wy Bee 4
Lt
te . . t
14-0000
ee ae pe
ok Cte
vente as eo
. Mate E
4°74 i
he 7H 2 7: Po xokes mkt
a fe FF8 200 ME verak ie * yam
Mee” 36 AHCRI, , Gren: non eur ued /°
IE - FFD he ATV rae Nodcror 4267: »
ends. -7795. ASHESE Fatt 21 he ese) 475936 ° ‘Peiwer es S- 34:
. wh, ee ty Moward Ciaé ‘31 ges) ifs 77958. nrlos Cues 7 S- 3a:
AUDTSTO —" les Nenry &— 395
- 7. oR, » fase . a: ’ Te "y aubrey Ly er — 393 T
. ge- FF Bante, Me s* oF a6 2013 5, Gorsirz, Pecro rranct TERY
: 34 3 SNAG. SAD A ames Winatonwas NGG. CUDINOVARCAIN, te anciccg®
eae, Bans, nérew Frank KA HABER, Frantisek werent L4G
‘134 AS -BALD. Meine Raymond” vf bl. AIF, Willian } tore
K BATIER, Mitten John + FALIY, mta Shé. oT
i . obi BAUS! i, Wallica Jame , Robez ta Snir ei a7,
: 3. BSLT , Wilidom t ae (G3. RAYTLTON, 3 Beware tc
. vas, BENTO, Alan tony Dyes EARS BISON, Touis #8 ae ome
BERUCE oe HASKiNB, “ W.
[ay 7Hh Bere bt ioe ide. EE ree
LP eevy. BERCSON, Wi avid Bjorn +7 qq2767. |ituRy, tern ger AYese: ino
ewes (seezmitd, rate. <inander . Us DOZICKr, vnard 2 Pee
i CRcje ; TEST, Alexa aries Angelo¥57 ids — a socal ore Ge
773 27720 rats ANGER, meta ee 1D. HURLEY, Eeward | =
‘aye 721. BORDEX Poul tankey Joo™” . MTle IRVING, andre poe Ks
ilicaase. asst, sre teord Wepes aAGOSS, Stephen ©
‘ ay Fy cr 23~ PRET’ TTHEIM, 3 Edward °~ uth JAxES, y 7
i) Bal, /Brrcz, Johm ‘Albert Ja! vicholss is
48 Fim ° CX, Rotert Lea +~ RECKI, Stanle
rites. (ERICHHM, Tad S. 7428 tags: JEFFRIES, taney fo .
avy epee: Bros, fern $164 erat, Ivar ©
fi om BROOKE, Paut Gregory #” Caen. rea Eicnolas Lz:
| Bees. cheari Mvenes Pano ity sinus, Pol 53 Frouldinta-2
‘ oh. nes Alan .f - Nes 0. ay au cen ais p<
i MB FF $32. BOUTC &A82. LY, tyron o -
SDAA a Cletus Mintor(uexe)~ KAS83. Lenceanen il sul «
1 PSST Ne CONRAD, Allien David WABI. TERESICK, 3 George Michzo2 Baye
{ 27-7 €46356 CROKE Puce Robert WBS. EY, J falter « 4
| Bes u8 365 CROME, Anivey ee? Bor? ee. (erste, John Anthony #2 Se /e
aoe 37 eapoarea r auarde + ser, ous water * ane So 9"
7 we DERANSEE vin * pA83. YOS?IX 5 ne * T
i Fes 39. STADE ae "4 incent Joseph?” ee “<9 osesh O° 70-2
i FSEON ace DELP APTORE aes ‘Alen’ s yi = LANSING, Jo! . — - So -.
} Q o DE = “9 meg Earl wes ae a
| 4y- 3 P ka. Domine Constantino ACEC IAAES, at EE.
i oe PAS pIsTzS, Willia Tt, ek) F etson ia Sh
i- DE AYOS 3 ya L bo ae senry "| TRFES ¥493. CTTNER RE “« nee Gre”
i; FG 5 52 HBO nar, ctor Samol*” . ppg ichard Ernes®) $°~
tn. . £5 Rene 3) ARMY “sve K95 ? aes ay "charles Eoverd at om
? 0635 N: « EXG@LSCH, Frank Ly » LOE ued syton
eee ELSTON? Budol Joseph +” £03 98 , Andred iit iA 7b 7
nia nob. ELIEGOR, Bote Abort +7 FFF OT rors, George _ a,
\ ‘ yne ¢ EVANS, Arthur Holl ‘onroew” ARG. NAGLIE, Pailip se ARIAY
ar bk “3 a OLS, BARON Che 3 ln Hi~99 » MALABRE Mh tae Josaph ¥ AS ~
C2 RE35 5 450 1200 ries Andrew 2 piAcO. ALOR wel owlanc zeward a= a)
sy G} | lb: F851. rile l=ccra, Robert IW wm ariol. iieennei : Serge . IC.
» FITSMES, Luci yin na” ZSCTATS, PR TT.
fLr2 oF, cian Ch SP Fl tbe de Puben #7
PFE. Gf x7; S2LHELTCE, Charles E) ses" 2 sO, Wasorete raed] as re2es,
' @% C-297710h. MASON, iK, Ancrew Frank #
8105. NCLTAN Gear Ye .
" whos, ECGAVIN cor go Thomas £: .
AVIN, Gorralé regs
An
14-00000. e
2 fase :
“e489 our
BEES ‘ -3-
. ae can ~
whe ares
ALIAS 7 4 0
© pon MENICUCCI, Andrew Rot de Lo 78-2275 151,
% 77108. MIRANDA, Diego 8S. 2-_/ - MASE,
* 8, a eek on wt ”’ 49153,
' NACHBRUNN, Harry Richard M154.
. pRLII HASH, Mike oy < Pears
e° WALI2. (ANOCK, Harry Char ae $.134-433 go-zt ee
€. M4113. PAPPS, William David 2°36 Ic NAI57,
‘MR114, PARKER, Carl Frank FIS7158.
WAl15, PASTOR, Nick & MAF 159.
vAL16.. PAULSON, Marty #~ + #ALG6O
Pe “4117. PEVER, Laura Jean *Ze2/ ; > GCO)K-GIF 161.
‘ YF118. POLACEK, Henry Franklin$127) -/22.162.
“£119. POLING, Janos a fe - FF$163.~
& wSl20. RAHILL, Richard Kent + oS 164,
P) WRXEXXXXR XKEHX /9E56 W165.
A. Mr121. RANALLO, Jonas #4: MA166.
fe B22. RATCLIFF, Matthew Edward &/¢ 73G w.167.
' 26/9423. REED, Juri whies,
ro W124. REESE, Eno # “ Mfz69,
: MAL25. REEse, Joseph Anthony “
WA26. RESTELLER, Richard Lawrence /33/5
; ROBERTS, John Martin vegace
a : at re}
e #129 ROGERS, Robert E.s4” c
i eer: —
w133. SAKIN, Edmond Abel tas -359/
: Nees — a
‘ rPI3G. SEALE, Henry a |
if A137. SEALY, Robert Ruben 4~ SES 2.
- 4€F38. SELFE, Gordon Dale ARMV a
YP439, SHALER, Floyd Aé -
F140. SHIPLEY, Charles Joseph4 meet win
po tfl41. SHOWCROFT, Richard E. 25 coo th
- |-22142. (GIMPSON, ‘John DEF 6 192-7 *
M [XHEXXXESNAXAXKH
. #73143 SIROTA, Edward G, << Pfs 3 37}
W144. SLATER, Lawrence *"
pals. SNYDER, Gene a 3712
M446. None’ -
_ , HAL47. SORENSON, Henry 7
* #70148, STANDARD, George Adam*~ _ .
"149, (ramen, Samuel Addison OF A
£50. SHEEE,STEPHENS, Marina T JEM gi} we
"EE, wh Re TTUM, Law 74 Owen 7 a
-4-
ALIAS
STEVENS, James Henry:
None
None £
TANIER, Lester Lewis
TOGGITT, Edward J. rm
TORREY, Erasmus 4~*
TRABAN, Gregorio R. 4
VALCHIN, James Louis ‘
AN CHADDE, Donald é-
Guauxes, William)o7 é-
ELK Joseph, Reirhot
‘WIDEGREN™” Keith J. ¢
WILLEMS, Brenton Wali
WISHFORD, Roy Furniss
WOLF, ‘Frederick Morri
WONG, Lam as
AMAN, Myron ie
ZIMMER, Paul R) £
. [7]
oa
1400000
ed .
Mey
é £e2 27: 7: 2. / ACE
p- F982. ee id & ae
of oi Letbene’ “ ie 2 yt} foe
Mee, M4 73003 AHGR ne ton Fdwsr Gita dese FORDASG!, Jorn Losmenen-
~ BETIS “h. AVES, i kone cay Feast, Fron en jon
eises “739 3. aerre Hatt *Gs ee cde ») ge-33855. FRYLTR, Rovert Power e LI,
, ~) Howard Cialis a6) We - 77358 0 GEUGAHO, Chor renee “45 -33
we Ce ACRISTO , Mario _ be Te CENTS 2 ries Tr cxry © S393 7
95-33 eee Ry Algis + OSS, COE eta ray
gy asin. DAPI = » Janes Winstont Wuaog fae ° CUDTEC MARGATE Caries yon s4f
MELO. BARRETO Tone 1 Frank 3-/EF ER, SABER, Frantisek vere ¢
134 se” “whe BATIER RETO, Jone Raymond uneD” HAIR, William Merk «~~
cia, BAUGH ‘eildien John 2” 2. HALIY, Roberta ‘Shirley * Vy
wr S, aoe 1, waniiss James o (PS3___BAMTLTON, Ee r20y vi 4
i WEB, BRENTON Mine oe Henry Qiie@ NRE. HARRISON, 1c word Josey rn a,
F NALS. SEruck. lan WRGS. HASEINS, Louisa a
| ATS. cenicn, D ee | MAIR, asattsh, foter me
| ALTE Eenesom, Waites finan GGA get, LEY, Dorsurd Herma ARMY
se Gre. Sa eeertd, charle Kinander uhés * HODORTCKE Thome Merman Ss
2ST, “ es a ma 2 s work 42,
i Troe tee 3 ‘Alexander - Belo GESTS, to pls aed raie Ff é
6/73 a. 100 (TETE MANGER, St 7 5°70. HURLEY, Eéward
tie $921, BORDEN, P anley Joo RTL. IRVING, And Elnar + K-25
ifs sippy OR22. - aul Thomas Aquina ” NRT26 ® rew ya
Ve. 2 BRACLEY , Taomas E eaware pe s k B JAC038, Sten} an -
‘ : » i 9D) ° ME
; ani) 5 fh. sane, John ‘Albert nds. Sanse! Nichol tas 7
G8 TlemettP25 BRIG 7M, eae = ‘74: erry serene, sins
f aloe. BRT Ta 2¢" 6. T SEMEIE G28
dv TEU (fp20 27 o a Cone Herb *~ MERKIES 5: , Ivar & 2)
Gp 17 808. pales Paul Gregory *” Games. HACKMAN choles
BB Ue29. CAYPBRL Willian Fmnoett “_ BRT. a LITST , Eenjosin Frankl shy &
“fo CARSEY IL, Janes Alan Jr NBO. XASAE ae Paulette «IOS 7
io. . aie» Peter —_ AAS1, ELL aaa Zigurds #* ‘
Wott h 32. Wage, WEEDL Pou —
‘ Bourn G ° pe - a
| Faas Pra, 336 OTe Wiliian Wintor{>tees) LA83. eres Poul *
ares CONRAD, filiien David ©” AAR, KERKST TOK, George Mickeol r/c
[ 2- es +635. CROWS, f free P Robert~" WAES. YEMEY, Jac alter #7 on,
Pe Wh 360, CORBELO ee pe 807: 86. EINSLOY, Jon k Anthony #= fete
q art > © uardco u nn we ion al -
: t 721, 37 WORLEY ny » James Poe Une, rostts Yelter 2 ii Ys SOF
. PLS 39. ne pel pe seq, Vi incent Josephe” Ns — : — , Josegn a * FEO - 2
| BEE ee Gn ene oo
pO bhi. "DE 1oxe, y Janes Earl 1 a aE maar ae
| gp-a8)2. Dowaten , Constantines SOGECS cre Eres eT
i ue Ps). “a * Nea be ian We LP EHES . bd ae ¥ we nen ft,
fen ° [eu01s Ba Viclor Semele?” P05. v9 eeitie Th, Richard a eee _
Shee fe S - er e MART am
ki ie $3- yi hs. ESGLSCH, Rene 2] ARMY’ és7e wh9S~ LOWE iyeon | 47 Edwa:
eeu6 wALS, ELPNONT ee Joseph 4 - 1°96. UIP. Andres aA 7.
: Kae WALT. ELIECOR, Fudolt Albarts” FFF 97ir- XOX nS, foneae sscotae ee
i pre. EVASS, a hor te m Yonroo#” ARG 6 MAGIIE, Paild He AKA my
ies eee! caenles and im MRO, KALAERE, Towle Sosesh a7 £45 ~
tek. “AS. £35 50. PILECCI aer Les Andrews i100. MALOEOF? owLend Edword wo ae
GO) ge 3 oL_, FTISH oes Robert 1 /, op VAREECHACE Serge « x THs
vi age) 7) I= cian Cha sa hey Rusen Pad
? aaa #79 afr FLICK Fchorles 26) a Z -99 Pro3, ASOUDAK Rar? ne Mele
“29971014. HOAR, Ancrow Prank?”
fe a
‘who’. an ‘George Thomas
® HCGAVIN, Gerrald
va 6, Joseph e 25.
@
14-0000
Durfee fo Ft
~
20.
226
230
7©
25.
26.
27.
28.
Be
30.
326
3
fo “ome ( “we
one ao © Mee
ASALIS, -€& séarist-: - 7 .
AASAL, Glen L679 Soe
SERWOCD, doh )}39 7 aie
ADKINS, Mate Yi ho 35L 55-
Apenioet, warry Chey bh 79D yp OE She
-Racond, Ferruggic UR ot
BARA? 52:8, Al gio A me
Da James Wei ge Jeein #7.
SPEED, Horace rit .
d ntarili- x (Cryns Sia? Kare b a Pirvrtlé Gl.
ROSENBAUER ete an AL139/S . 62.
SEMARD, va jor Wild hom Ae SroM ‘ 63
BEALE, We e907 252 ee
MEAS, Alis v a . 65.
Bauer, Jerome Fah — (ai te,
BRICESON, Poul/ 43/7 6h OE
68.
RIXAMDER, James Fe}
Ba POQUIN, casimiro 777 7
BECKER, * alexander}? ne
‘ BYZEX, Stophen Joes e309?
BURKE, Paul J.7 go) 330
BRADFIELD, Tony Edward 4¢-3
SHER 00D, Jonn fe fe :?
VELBERG, "Robert Lait/9
SHAC? ay, mnoodore G77 7
TD.
Tle.
T26
TBe
v/s
736
TR.
BRANTLEY, Herbort (4° Te
BURKE, Paul J.377/ 475
LATR, William 1
Allen dreO 27 df ’ D.
CURE NGHAM, Jac: CS - &0 .
CHAS, Peter fot . Si.
82.
BA SETLEY Cletus Winton #7~ Le 83.
CAREY, Willian David “Z 74 gi.
cannsh, Willian Rei ay ad 85.
CROCE, Andrew 72+
BLORES, Thomas Je PID if
DAIGA, Jenis/i Tm
DALEY, Ve s.fl/-
86.
4 2
83.
CHIPMAN, Horole EB. //c 7 - SO
Jjve
DILLON, John EIT 4o
DE GARDER, Const tantine (Ii 92
~ yf ©
DEMONS, Willd an Ref S¥e0
DALY, Vincen st Se NEI
DUBOTS, Rene 2.7% 27
=a att ;
SCAN, Frank Tel leFe!
EMMERS, Rudolf Al) oo? ”
EDUIADS, Willian Monroe Ure so CHE 28
Zone : . 8.
ie oe ye
HEATH, Donale Rel ~ “2 2.
Fucis, Robert Hef ta 101.
FRA? ALIN, Lucian Ve Jre f -_ “ i 102.
103.
10h.
105.
106.
FLICZ, Charles, £./-
“7Ey ao
neers 2 ae zak 2 7
Sh Nerto 1A1E Ra,
ete! av
nt
GR avreyye
ras vest
HUNT, Howe re joe |
Xone —
THA MINS, gacks SA
Boag, Rutue be gelloer
STEDALGO, Oc orncy
YENIT?, Tho=as “Me FF Am
HECAT, Elmer Edward /-- > MOS
TWASEIV, Anérd Shy;
dEnicsox, tonnen Mh
JANCHUR, Tienolas 3h
JAROSZENTCZ, Sigeund 2.74
TAU LS y U's is,
JOANSON, iver JK 7 EO
JASHACH, sayola lh ,
SYKOR Penjonin Franklin LA}
EAPUSTA, Pater JJ.’ PL
KARKLINS, Zigurds 7/7,
ERYZANIY SHY, Myren 74%
KCCELA, Poul dy. i
KAPPES, Gs fie Qaorge i
EURTZ, Wal sey 74 .
RIDA; Jack. J2030
KENESDY, Jonn Ye xe? 7
YRUTYHCLOWA, Walters JA
FRE IECZLYS, Joseph 7° f 2S See J Oe
AMBERGS, Joan UR
WE, Yatson Hwa Shen /d Sf?
ZATERYEID, Ernest svi
=-T7
SEETE , Treodore ZS" PP
LOPUSZAUSHY , nyrosicy Y>- =:
LUPU, Andréi Kicolaa H:,
Uninown
- MATONSY, Paiity IGF - EE “
CHIPHA OT
Rar ‘old EL A/¢ tA
Pies ea ae y
MASLOVSRY, Sorge 7- 72) >
EARTENEE Rubon/o woes
ree
MITH, Havile nd dre 5S 7
yOORE , Anérew Fe ea
MANSAK, Frank = 77%
XRIESPELD, George J+A
MULANE, ¢ Corrald “3 HX
2 ;
Dat buw Sra Elerre TIE, bi
14-0000
: 142.
107.
108.
110.
Ti.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
TRUE a
BARQUIN, Cas imiro /, / P/
MORALES David S.22 3
NEWMASTER, Harry Richard/“/A
NASARENKO, Michael /“.
PIEPER, Harry C. G-Jtn~ 222
PHILLIPS, William D.74/2
GREENE, Harris
‘PASLAWSKY, Nicholas./f/
PAWLYSZYN, Myroslaw
FRANK, Maryado gory
MOORE, Robert Butler $23)
PRIBANYEC, Janos /.:
None
RASTENIS, Jonas/ A
REYNOLDS, Ma 1colm Eugene/y°7 77
RAUS, Juri’: #
RIKAND, Enno A,
AMLFO=3 (Crypt) wie
RATCLIFF,° Richaray: “7
REEVES, John M. Jr./oc#]
127.
ee EVR —
TT O. srJaneFy
139, SULLIVAN, Denne Be 5-257/
143.
148.
149.
150.
STAROSTENKO, Henry}. .
IMLER, Norman Cc. v9 ooR
SLEEPER, Gordon //2*:
Nonei~
None Sf
GONZALO, QUESADA Jr wey
SAGER, John4/72. — W422
Lee GE
SMITH, Edmund Gakbriil -- %-$ ag
SLENYS, Lindas K. 32h,
‘SOLNZEFF, Henry /? '2
SOLER, Eva Dianal!/.
SATINSKAS, Henry//4 __
STEVENS, George Asih2 70”
WALLIN, Jack;-«
TASHEFF, Mary // /2¢/
Ge.
TRUE
AIMAN, James Henry pi.
STOLAKEN, Nicholas P.//<-
TALLEY, Ulo/*
TURK, Leo L.‘/*
THOMAS, Edward v7 -
None Y-
5
aval
ate
TRIANOSKY, Harry 37 7.
VINING, James Lin
$-5
BULIK, Joseph 3 WI
WILL, Kenneth John “7 *.
- VAN COURTNEY, DonaraA
HARVEY, William KFC:
4§-
yt
77
SHORTALL, John W. dr 7%Z7O
WATTS, Roy Furniss 25-39//
2]
MERTZ, Richard <<
None a
ZANKIN, Myros law pis
ALAGAZE-1 /(Crypt)
|
104-10105-10293.pdf | 14-0000
104-10105-10293 [2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
. ye “ . x . sot \ :
no a -
) ™ OGC 74-1755
SECRET
30 September 1974
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Meeting with E, Howard Hunt Re His Memoirs, "Undercover"
1.. On 28 September 1974 Ray Rocca, Deputy Chief/CI Staff, '
and I met in the DCD Washington Field Office with E. Howard Hunt,
his attorney William A. Snyder, Jr., and Snyder's associate
Thomas W. Coons. As the meeting began, Hunt asked if it was |
being tape-recorded; I assured him that it was not. He said he did
not care; but that, if it were to be recorded, he would like to know.
We then embarked upon the review according to the plan under which
we would demand the deletion of three items as classified and then
proceed to the remaining 29 items, only if Hunt was cooperative on
the first three. He and his lawyers appeared very cooperative, and
accordingly, the meeting continued to cover all 32 items.
2. Changes were agreed to in the items set forth in paragraphs
12, 14, and 25 of the CI Staff memorandum of 19 September 1974.
These appear at pages 73, 80-83, and 115 of the galley proof and
concern the fabrication of the Shanghai post for a Mexican operation,
the entry into the Guatemalan:Embassy in Mexico City, and the joint)
_CIA-Urugtayan telephone monitoring: operation. The wording of the
agreed changes is as shown on the attached copies of the pertinent _
pages of the galley proof. Essentially, these changes disguise the
identity of the fabricated newspaper and remove a reference to
journalists as agents; delete the word "Guatemalan" to make the
entered embassy non-specific; and delete the reference to listening
posts and telephone monitoring to make that paragraph refer in more
general terms to our ability to cover targets without referring to the
use of electronic surveillance.
. E-2 IMPDET
re CL BY 058473
SEGRET
14-0000
| SECRET
3. We then proceeded to the 29 items which we would like to
see modified but which we could not consider classified. We made
this clear to Hunt and went through them one by one, discussing our
concern with each. Hunt contended that most of these items should .
not be considered sensitive since they had been publicized extensively; :
in some cases confirmed in testimony; and,in the case of other :
items, the principals involved were dead. However, he agreed to
changes in the items referred to in paragraphs 1, 3, 17, and 32 of
the CI Staff memorandum of 19 September. These involve the deletions
of the names of Henry Pléasants) and Frank Holcomb, both now
retired under cover; a direct reference to joint operations with the
‘British in Hong Kong: against China; and the wording of his reference
to CIA alias documentation used by the Watergate burglars. The
language of this last item will be changed so that it no longer leaves
the impression that the documentation was prepared by the Agency
for this operation.
4. When we had finished, Hunt and his lawyers emphasized
as they had mentioned earlier in the meeting that it might be very
difficult to get the publisher to agree to changes in the unclassified
items. Mr. Snyder offered to present all of the items to the publisher
for change without distinguishing between the classified and unclassi-
fied items. He said he would do this without implying they were all
classified. I felt it necessary to turn down his offer because of the
risk of the publisher being unwilling to accept that many changes
with the result that we would have to go back to him on the three
classified items, thus presenting a situation similar to our retraction
of previously demanded deletions in the Marchetti book. I think
there would be some danger of the publisher using this in his adver-
‘tising and through reviewers for publicity purposes.
5. As we were leaving, Hunt showed me what was described
as a "comfort letter.'' This was a letter written by him to the.
publishers on 17 May 1974 at the publisher's request which said
that in his opinion nothing in the manuscript violated any agreement
between himself and the CIA, nor would subject him to prosecution
under the espionage laws. As the meeting was ending, Hunt expressed
his hope that no publicity would be given to it and that the Agency
would not issue any kind of a press release. In view of the Director's
decision that we shail issue a press release, I took pains to persuade
Hunt that public acknowledgment of the fact that we had reviewed his
SECRET ts 2
14-0000
SECRET
' manuscript would be in his interest as well as ours. He had referred
more than once during the meeting to the need to avoid the appearance
of "a bear hug"; in other words, collusion or cooperation between him
and the Agency, leaving an inference that the book was designed to be
a whitewash of CIA. In view of this, it was easy to convince Hunt
that an Agency press release would be in his interest. I would note
here, however, that both Mr. Rocca and I felt that Hunt and his
lawyers were genuinely cooperative and that a press release which
is too harsh or denigrates the book or Hunt's motives might be unfair
and considered by him to be in bad faith. Hunt appears to retain
admiration and respect for the Agency and seems convinced that
nothing in his book will harm our operations or personnel,
; TT ”
ve |
| .
j
tani CHHAUY at
HIN D> RRISON, JR. (
Acting General Counsel
Attachments
ce: Acting DDO
SAB/DDO
DC/CI Staff
O/Security
Asst. to DCI
Mr. Walter Pforzheime
c/ccs ;
OGC:JDM:sin
Original - OGC Subj: PUBLICATIONS
1 - Chrono ;
‘ SECRET
“
|
104-10106-10042.pdf | 14-0000
104-10106-10042
ENT JOHN F. KENNEDY AS:
ATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
SER EGA E ERD ary
2025 RELEASE UND
OF any
ShONET 20 October 1976
_ RETURNTO-CIA .
i ob - . Background Use Only -
Mre Gonett M. Steele,) President.
te _ /, Do Not Reproduce
(International Art Associates, gd.) a
. 26
Dear lr. Gteele,)
_. This document is intended to confirm discussione he d between
yourself, representing Gaternational Art Associates, Ltd/, hereinafter
referred to as the "Company} and Mr. John J. Murray, r., vepresenting
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). . If it conforms to your -
understanding of the agreement reached, kindly so acknowledge by
signing below, = Oe a
"1." You have agreed on behalf of tha Company to assist CLA
by placing on retainer Mr. Richard T. Gibson at an annual. fee of
$9,900 per annw. Thin fea will he paid to Mr. Gibson by the
Conpany in monthly increments of $750 each. ‘The Company will
overtly negotiate a retaindr contract with Mr. Gibson, which will
make eminently clear that both are negotiating and concluding the
contract as independent parties; that.the Company will. have no.
obligation to withhold Federal, state or Social Security income
‘ taxes.
2. In consideration of the support rendered, CIA will pay
the Company a fee of $10,000 per annum. Provision is ‘made in this
amount to offset any nominal expenses the firm incure in its overt
associations or support of Mr. Gibson. ; ,
3. °° CIA will reimburse the Company in quarterly increments
via 4 contrived contractual arrangement between the Company and
a notional facility of CIA. Cancelled checks will serve aa
adequate accounting for monies paid the Company.
"4, Because of CIA's interest in Mr. Gibson, it is requested
that the Company neither offer Mr. Gibson bona. Fide employment nor
accept any proposal of employment from him without prior consent
of CIA for a period of two (2) years following termination of this
agreement.
E2IMPDET
CL by: 063837
“to |
14-0000 nd
4
. TET Ea AS OER LP RE RE te
a . fe
a . .. . “yg a
‘ sen : id ae . ct
. a wn C3 €>
. we * ait 2 ¥
. ee ean, iy
5. All information relating to this Agreement 1s classified
secret. Both CIA and the Company agree that the most stringent
safeguards will be taken to protect this information, including
the existence of the agreement. Any information in any form that
must be given to a third party by either CIA or the Company will
--be done in strict conformance with the laws safeguarding national.
security information, and. only with full consultation between CIA
and the Company...
6. This agreement ; is atteative 1 October 1976 and shall remain
-in full effect for an indefinite period, subject to cancellation
at any time upon sixty (60) days’ notice by either party thereto.
. The CIA wishes to express its appreciation for the manner
in which you have received this request to perform a service
related to the national security of the United Statea and for
your Personal actenti OT! s thereto. , ;
‘CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
BY : : : . . a
> Special Contracting Officer
Pte DBs oS... : .,
(tatermational Art Associates, Ltd.)
Emmett M, Steela President Date
|
104-10106-10143.pdf | 14-001
104-10106-10143, [2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
. wo HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS STAFF MEMBERS
ae
-
FILE TITLE/NUMBER/VOLUNE: HSCA Request Ltr 8 May 1978 OLC 78-1573
RERUN VO QD
Oo wet ees)
INCLUSIVE DATES: Directorate of S & T Memo 22 June 1978
CUSTODIAL UNIT/LOCATION:
ROOM:
DELETIONS, IF ANY:
DATE DATE TO
RECEIVED | RETURNED { REVIEWED BY (PRINT NAME) | SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICI.
1-7.78 2.7 G Meena Buaceéy So Vite Ll iS
PJ0- 24 |9- to-P8| Kennett
reer] een SM Fos SOR
®
‘1
u
4%
NO DOCUMENTS MAY BE COPIED OR REMOVED FROM THIS FILE
. Peed eee a cata satis tate’ Ann
4 + .
-
A
‘Tro:] NAME ANS-ADDRESS | DATE [iniTiats| Top Secret
Scott Breckenridge, OLC a (Security Classification)
| 2 | 6D15, Has. FT !
[3[ —<—;Cr:SC<Cidr
2 CONTROL No. SC-01836-78
[ACTION ‘| —‘[OiRECT REPLY — | —s| PREPARE REPLY _| Copy
__fapproval | [DISPATCH | _| RECOMMENDATION
[—feowment | {Fle | [RETURN
| {concurrence [|__| INFORMATION Y TSIGNATURE
FROM: NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NO.
AEOZDD 6E60 Hg X656
Handle Via
ay SSS f
COMINT
Channels
Access to this document will be restricted to
those approved for the following specific activities:
ae
Warning Notice
Sensitive Intelligence Sources and Methods Involved
NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION
Unauthorized Disclosure Subject to Criminal Sanctions
ee
Top Secret
(Security Classification)
£2 IMPDET
Ey
: MES ¥
14-0000
, «© TOP SECRET'- EIDER - CHESS
SC-01836-78
Copy_1
MEMORANDUM FOR: Office of Legislative Counsel
ATTENTION : Scott Breckenridge
SUBJECT : HSCA Request
REFERENCE : HSCA Letter Dated 8 May 78, OLC 78-1573
1. (U) Reference requests access to information in
six areas pertaining to the U-2 Project. As you know
the U-2 Project files include about 150 boxes and over 650
reels of microfilm, all located at the Records Center. We
have reviewed the shelf listing titles to identify pertinent
files that might be responsive to the areas of request. The
information requested covers an era and an organization which
was not a part of this Directorate. As a result much of the
corporate memory is no longer available and research of the
files by current personnel is time consuming and requires
almost a learning process. We have depended a great deal
on the written History of the U-2 Project for leads to files
and for information contained in this memorandum.
2. (U) The primary interest of reference refers to
the U-2 Project, Detachment C, while stationed in Atsugi,
Japan. Attached are replies keyed to the six areas in the
HSCA letter.
3. (U) We realize that the information supplied by
this memorandum does not fully respond to all the areas
requested. Because of the broad and encompassing nature
of some of the requests in the HSCA letter and the fact
that our files are not organized to readily respond to
such broad requests we request that the HSCA staff review
the material and determine if their requests could be
limited or narrowed in some way.
Yonue A Abid
Thomas G. Ward
Acting Executive Officer
Directorate of
Science and Technology
Attachments:
As stated we May be downgraded to
Unclassified when
removed from attachment.
CL BY: 469804
TOP SECRET - EIDER - CHESS
14-0000
TOP SECRET - EIDER - CHESS
, a . Attachment To:
. SC-01836-78
SUBJECT: DDS&T Interim Reply to HSCA Request, 8 May 78,
OLC 78-1573
General Background: Detachment C advance party of
security and communication personnel departed the U.S.
for Atsugi, Japan, on 20 February 1957, the second echelon
of administrative personnel departed 4 March, and the main
body of the detachment with two U-2 aircraft and equipment
began deployment on 15 March. On 29 March Headquarters was
notified that all personnel and equipment were on base.
Operational readiness was forecast for the week of 8 April.
Operating procedures and liaison had been accomplished with
the following major U.S. components:
Far East Air Force 3-3
Far East Command and Theater Commander
Agency's (Tokyo Statiom and local support unit
54th Weather Reconnaissance Squadron
Atsugi Naval Air Station
Details or specific operating agreements or procedures
with the above components have not been located.
By mid-May 1957 the Detachment had flown 30 sorties.
All of these operations were preparations for the primary
mission of the Detachment. The first primary mission of the
Detachment, a flight over part of the USSR, occurred on
20 June 1957, however, this mission did‘not originate or
recover at Atsugi.
The first overflight of the USSR from Atsugi occurred
on 1 March 1958 and this flight was the only and last flight.
This flight, as other previous flights by other Detachments,
was tracked by Russian radar, even though the U-2 aircraft
had anti-radar applications, and a Soviet protest was made
on 5 March 1958 by the Soviet Ambassador to Washington,
Mikhail Menshikov. Attached are copies of the Soviet
Aide Memoires of 5 March and 21 April 1958 (Tab A).
; The Detachment continued to perform non-USSR missions
in the Far East area until the Powers flight of 1 May 1960.
Redeployment of the Detachment began in early July, the
last U-2 aircraft departed Japan on 9 July and all personnel
and other equipment cleared the base and turned the facilities
back to the Navy on 19 August 1960. ;
‘TOP SECRET - EIDER - CHESS
UPJ
14-0000
TOP SECRET '- EIDER - CHESS
During the deployment of Detachment C it performed
approximately 86 operational missions, of these only 43
originated and recovered at Atsugi.
1. Any and all information pertaining to the take-
offs and landings of the U-2 at Atsugi, Japan,
limited to the years 1959 through 1962.
We have been unable to locate files which would
contain logs of all take-offs and landings of the U-2
aircraft assigned to Detachment C. In addition to
the mission flights stated above we must assume that
there were a large number of take-offs and landings
which would include flights for pilot familiarization,
training, equipment testing, transitional and flights
(purely for cover purposes )3>
2. <Any and all information concerning the radar
procedures, facilities, and staff involved with
the U-2 flights at Atsugi, Japan, limited to the
years 1959 through 1962.
As stated in the General Background above we have
not located details or specific operating procedures
or agreements with the local Navy base at Atsugi.
nesters et 3. Any and all information pertaining to contact
between Marine Air Control Squadron #1, Air
Group II, lst Marine Wing, and U-2 personnel at
Atsugi, Japan, including but not limited to
housing, recreational, and eating facilities -
limited to the years 1959 through 1962.
We have not identified any relationship between
Detachment C and Marine Air Control Squadron #1. On
the subject of housing, we have noted that late in
1957 families were permitted at Detachment C and as
a result housing was provided in the compound assigned
to the Agency Support Unit and ten houses were rented
on the local market.
4. Any and all information pertaining to defectors
with knowledge of the U-2 program.
The DDS§T has not located any information pertaining
to defectors. We defer this request to the DDO.
-2-
TOP SECRET - EIDER - CHESS
14-0000
» ys +. TOP SECRET’ - EIDER - CHESS
5. Any and all information within the U-2 program
file pertaining to defectors with knowledge of
the U-2 program. ;
See above.
6. Any and all information concerning Soviet knowledge
of the U-2 program previous to May 1,.1960.
Attached is an extract from a report dated
3 March 1958 concerning Soviet Air Defense which
gives a summary of Soviet knowledge of the U-2
overflights between 20 June and 10 July 1956 (Tab B).
Also attached is a copy of the Soviet protest note
of 10 July 1956 concerning Mission 2013 on 4 July 1956
which was the first penetration of the Soviet borders
(Tab C).
-3-
TOP SECRET - EIDER - CHESS
14-0000
5 March 1958
_EMBASSY OF THE UNION OF
SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS
AIDE MEMOIRE
According to precisely established data, on March 2, 1958, at
4:05 hours Moscow time, an American military jet aircraft, having
appeared from the direction of the Sea of Japan, violated the state
torder of the Soviet Union in the area of the settlement of Velikaya
Xema and penetrated into the airspace of the Soviet Union, remain-
ing over its territory for a considerable period of time. Thereafter,
the aircraft left in the direction of the Sea of Japan in the area south
of the Olga Bay.
The information on this violation has been carefully checked
and there is no doubt as to its authenticity. The military representa-
tives of the United States, who in this case acted possibly without the
knowledge of the Government of the United States, will perhaps deny
the said violation, as has happened in the past. However, sucha
denial cannot eliminate the fact of violation itself. In any case, the
Soviet side would have no interest in commenting on this incident if
it had not actually taken place.
A the present time, when negotiations are being conducted
on the holding of a summit meeting which could contribute to an im-
provement of relations and to strengthening trust between states,
the violation of the Soviet border by an American military aircraft |
“may be evaluated as an attempt to undermine the efforts aimed at.
convening such a meeting and to aggravate the international situation.
From the messages of the President of the USA and his con-
versations with the Soviet Ambassador, as well as from statements
by other government officials of the USA, it is known to the Soviet
Government that the Government of the USA desires a rapprochement
between our governments and improvement in the relations between
them. There can hardly be any doubt that such facts of violation of
the borders of the USSR can have only one result--that of hindering
this cause and upsetting Soviet-American relations.
14-0000
The attention of the Government of the USA is invited to
the fact that in the present situation the violation of the airspace of
the USSR by an American military aircraft takes on a particularly
dangerous character since, as has been repeatedly reported, Ameri-
can military planes make flights around the clock over many countries
of the world carrying thermonuclear bombs. The Government of the
USA cannot fail to be aware of what genuinely catastrophic consequences
‘for the cause of peace will ensue when an American plane with sucha
load will find itself shot down.
The attention of the Government of the USA has already been
previously directed to cases of violation of the state boundaries of
the Soviet Union by American military aircraft. However, as proven
by the case cited, the authorities of the USA have not taken the necessary
easures to prevent such violations.
3
It is absolutely obvious that it is the duty of the governments of
the USSR and the USA to do everything possible to prevent any acts . :
capable of complicating the situation and the relations between the
Soviet Union and the USA.
The Soviet Government cannot but protest against the violations
of Soviet frontiers by. an American military aircraft and it expects that
the Government of the United States will punish severely those guilty
of the violation of the airspace of the USSR which has taken place and
tha: it will take steps to prevent such violations in the future.
Taking into account the present situation, where a summit con-
ference is being prepared, and also the spirit and purpose of the nego-
tiztions being conducted between our governments, the Soviet Government
would not like to make this matter public or subject it to discussion in
the UN.
The hope is expressed that this matter will be settled satisfac-
torily between the governments of the USSR and the USA and that there
«will be no need for the Soviet Government to resort to other means for
its settlement.
(Initialled by M. Menshikov) Washington, March 5, 1958
14-0000
-
21 April 1958
EMBASSY OF THE UNION OF
SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS
Note No. 9
The Embassy of.the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
presents its compliments to the Department of State of the United
States of America and, referring to the Aide-Memoire of the Depart-
ment of State dated March 31, 1958 and containing a reply of the
Government of the United States of America to the Aide-Memoire of
the Soviet Government dated March 5 concerning a violation of the
Soviet state border in the Far East by an American military jet air-.
craft, has the honor to communicate the following:
In the reply Aide-Memoire of the Department of State an
attempt is made to deny the fact of an American military aircraft.
having violated the Soviet border. .
As has already been communicated, the Soviet Government has
at its disposal carefully verified data on this violation, the reliability
of which leaves no room for doubt. According to these data, on March 2,
1958, at 4:05 a.m. Moscow time, an American military reconnaissance
aircraft of the Lockheed U-2 type, having appeared from the direction
of the Sea of Japan, violated the state border of the Soviet Union in the
area of the settlement Velikaya Kema, 32 kilometers south of that:
settlement. Then the violating aircraft deeply penetrated the airspace
of the USSR and, after remaining over its territory for a considerable
period of time, passed beyond the limits of the Soviet territory 45 kilo-
meters south of the Olga Bay at 8:ll a.m.
In the light of the established facts the reply of the Government
of the United States of America can in no way be recognized as satis~
factory. Naturally, the question arises as to how to explain sucha
reply of the American Government: whether it was misled deliberately
by its military representatives in the Far East or whether it considered
it possible to protect such persons subordinate to it, who, without re-
evard to the possible consequences, sanction violation of Soviet borders,
thus creating a threat of international complications.
14-0000
Such a reply of the Government of the United States of America
to the communication of the Soviet Government cannot fail to cause
serious concern, the more so since the new case of violation of Soviet
airspace took place after warnings on the part of the Government of
the USSR to the effect that American authorities should take the
necessary steps to prevent such violations.
In connection with the foregoing the Soviet Government expects
that the Government of the United States of America will undertake
further investigation of this act of violation of the airspace of the
USSR by an American military aircraft and will punish severely those
guilty of this violation. ,
The Soviet Government also expects that the Government of
the United States of America will take the necessary steps to prevent
violations of Soviet airspace by American aircraft in the future and |
states that in the event of new violations full responsibility for their
consequences will rest with the Government of the United States.
Washington, D. C.. April 1958
14-0000 .
.
. . , ‘, ty
. “ ‘
14-0000
ae tap SELREL — EIDE — LHEDD
“$C~O2164-58 -
of Initial Missions
viod from 20 June to 10 July 1956 the Soviet Bloc air defense
ected to eight penetrations of an unprecedented nature, seven
in a period of only eight deys. It must be remembered that
the only basis of judging the performance of the Soviet
s important because it is clear from REGAL rep ant thus nee |
re]
oO
defense business is conducted over lendlines and thus not
MIME. However, some tentative conclusions may be crawn frost
Hts and these are indicated as follows:
L. In spite of the fact that these missions come as a surprise,
© of them went undetected. This is clear evidence that their
20ers coverage extends above (72,000)feet.
2 .
- 236
3 yp/ TOP SECRET —EIDER—CHESS ce
Ta
mission aircraft was over the USSR, and a second 2ction which is
believed related is the moving of MIG-19 aircraft into East
Germany and Poland on 7 duly 1956. Also MIG-19's were moved
‘into Hungary at ahout this time. 7 : ;
3- The performance of ‘the Soviet system on the 5 J Ly mis ion,
- 201), was indeed curious. While the action evident tron(courne zy
is not clear an explanation which appears to fit the known facts
is offered as follows: As a vesult of the previous missions, the
Soviets had concluded the essential facts concerning the missions, 24
i.e., that they were for reconnaissance, that they flew above 65,000
feet, and that a penetration as deep as Moscow weS possible. ‘They
probably surmised that the 5 July mission was headed for Moscow when
the track appeared on a northeasterly heading. The loss of the ™,
target when it entered Soviet terr tory was probably deliberate and
the "red herring" track returning to the west was either a dodge
or @ convenience to avoid broadcasting a track for all the system
to see that a "hostile or intruder” was coming over Moscéw with no
mcans available to stop it, Tais idea is Supported by the use
of a raid munber assigned in the region just beyond the point q4
were the track had been "lost". In addition, the track was not
laceled "hostile or intruder" when it was broadeast after it
- ha Ssed_ beyond Moscow, The reporting of the traci when it did
Sppeer was only by Moscow and At has been Suggested that other
stations had been instructed not to broadcast the track. Further, it my
or Eay not be a coincidence that the height broadcast was almost
i €xactly half of the true altitude of the mission aircraft, but on
| the next missions » four days later » the altitude reporting was
consistently ebove~50,000 feet, , _~
—_
h, By 9 July 1956, in addition to the evident recognition of
the great height of the mission flights » tracking was better and
in general the performance of the warning system ves much improved.
3+ ‘The next day, 10 July 1956, the Soviet air defense warning
[sta closed a 3000 mile track with only two shart periods of ay
confusion or track loss. Altitude reporting was over 60,000 feat
| with one plot passed 68,800 which was only 100 feet off target.
6. The first eight missions proved that the air defense Warning
system is deployed in depth. This wes evident fran both the continuity 7) !
oF track and most forcefully from the ELIVE? date collected. Soma 1461
utereepts of Soviet Bloc radars operating in the 30c00 me/s band were
ovainsd by project ELINT as follows: TOKET-1331, WOIF?-37, GAGE-26,
PATTY CAKE-37, Other 30. These numbers cannot be equated to in- 4
dividual radar sets Since the same redar may be interceoted more than +
e
QO, te
onze. 616 TOKEN Sites were located, including 213 new Sites. Some
343 additional TOKEN signals were identified but aveileble information ; :
aces not permit Cetermination of location so that it must be con- | :
oO
cluded that these signals include both known and new sites, Because
of the limitation of ELINT to the 3000 me/s band and the Soviet
. practice of collocating radars on different frequencies the total
i numer of radars may be expected to be at least double the number
of sites.
eo 2)
wees
TOP SECRET —EIDER—cHESg —
14-0000
\ an Wr JCUNE! TT MIU OUTED
to | a 7. a SC-0216h-58
presence of large numbers of fighters although the seturetion poin:
T. “Confusion and track loss seamed to be related to the 4
(e2 not bsen determined because of insufficient data.
Na
| . 8. ‘The question of radars for height finding, the capabilities )
of TOKEN in this role, the introduction o2 ROCX CAKEs and late:
aevelopments are discussed in enother section. I+ is believed, |
however, that these missions were a catalyst in the introduction
i ROCK CAKEs. a9
@/py
= 25.
TOP SECRET — EIDER—CHESS
A
14-0000
a
a are
ar:
. wen
Se se ted
(Text of Russian Protest: Unofficial Translation)
Embassy of the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics 10 July 19567
Note No. 23
The Embassy of the Union of the Soviet Socialist
Republics presents its compliments to the Department of
State of the United States of America and, acting on in-
structions from the Soviet Government, has the honor to
state the following:
According to precisely verified data, on July 4 of
this year, at 8:18 a.m. Moscow Time, a twin-engined medium
bomber of the United States Air Force appeared from the
American Zone of Occupation in Western Germany and flew over
the territory of the German Democratic Republic, entering «
the air space of the Soviet Union from the direction of the
Polish People's Republic at.9:35 in the area of Grodno. The
aircraft which violated the air space of the Soviet Union
flew on the route Minsk, Vilnyus, Kaunas and Kaliningrad,
penetrating territory of the Soviet Union to the depth of
320 kilometers and remaining-over such territory for one
hour and 32 minutes.
On July 5 of this year, at 7:41 Moscow Time. a twin-
engine medium bomber of the United States Air Force, coming
from the American Zone of Occupation in Western Germany,
flew over the territory of the German Democratic Republic,
and at 8:54 penetrated the air space of the Soviet Union in
the area of Brest, coming from the direction of the Polish
People's Republic. The aircraft violating the air frontier
of the Soviet Union flew along the route Brest, Pinsk Bara-—
novichi, Kaunas, and Kaliningrad, having penetrated Soviet
territory to a depth of 150 kilometers and having remained
one hour and 20 minutes over such territory. The same day
another twin-engine bomber of the United States Air Force
Department of State of the
United States of America
Washington, D. C.
14-0000
eats
‘meee!
invaded the air space of the Soviet Union and penetrated
to a significant depth over Soviet territory.
On July 9 there took place new flights of United
States aircraft into the Soviet air space, : :
The above-mentioned violation of the air frontiers
of the Soviet Union by American aircraft cannot be inter—
preted as other than intentional and conducted for purp—
oses of reconnaissance. , ;
It must be underscored that these gross violations of
the air space of the Soviet Union took place at a time
~ when, as a result of the efforts of the Soviet Union and .
other peace-loving governments, a definite lessening of
international tensions has been achieved, when relations
between governments are improving, and when mutual confi- —
dence between them is growing. Such a development of inter-
national relations is fully Supported by the peoples of all
countries who are vitally interested in strengthening peace.
One cannot, however, fail to recognize that reactionary
circles hostile to the cause of peace in a number of coun-—
tries are worried by the relaxation of international tension
which has taken place. These circles do everything possible
to interfere with further improvement of relations between
countries and the creation of mutual trust among them. ;
Among such attempts is the said gross violation by the’
American Air Force of the air space of the Soviet Union,
which consistently carries out a policy of strengthening
peace and broadening businesslike cooperation with all
countries, including the United States of America.
In this connection, the fact attracts attention that
the said violations of the air frontier of the Soviet Union
by American aircraft coincided with the stay of General
Twining, U. S. Air Force Chief of Staff, in the Federal
Republic of Germany. ,
The Soviet Government energetically protests to the
Government of the United States against such gross viola-—
tion of the air space of the Soviet Union by American mili-
tary aircraft and considers this violation-as an intentional
act of certain circles in the United States, planned to ag-
gravate relations between the Soviet Union and the United
States of America.
14-0000
Calling the attention of the Government of the United
States to the inadmissibility of such violations of the
air space of the Soviet Union by American aircraft, the
Soviet Government states that all responsibility for possible
consequences of such violations rests with the Government of
the United States.
The Soviet Government expects that steps will be taken
by the Government of the United States to punish those
guilty for the said violations and to prevent such viola—
tions in the future. ;
Washington, D. C.
July 10, 1956 .
|
104-10106-10179.pdf | 14-0000
104-10106-10179 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
e
ve
Backgrour: te Suny
50 Net F Reproeta is
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
FROM: Robert D. Clark
' Office of General Counsel
- SUBJECT: “ 7 an PDLADLE: . Outside Lawyer to Draw Up -
wee TO -Deed of Trust «_ Se . : -
1. PDLADLE is a high-level defector residing in New York who has
had advanced to him a number of large "loans" over the years, in addition
to his "salary." Some of these monies have gone into the purchase of
some real estate in the State of New York. The Agency now wants a
Deed of Trust executed in favor of one of its nominees on the New York
real property.
2. Possible lawyers to handle drafting the Deed of Trust are:
ol .
(Natalie Koether} a cleared N.Y. lawyer, on whom FR
Division has an operational approval. They have an active
interest in using her and her husband. If Ms. Koéthe
used on the Deed of Trust, FR would lose an asset. Were it
not for our rule of no operational use of cleared attorneys,
, . FR apparently (accordingly to Eric Sowers) has no objection
. to Ms . Koether'} drawing up the Deed of Trust;
ce)
b. another cleared lawyer. The clearance on any such lawyer
would have to be updated by Security. The best candidate
Bill Ashbaugh and I were able to locate off the Cleared Attorneys
Panel was (Richard C. Kullen, Jr., OS #651 16) last cleared
21 March 1975; OG, 06
c. the case officer for PDLADLE, MONCURE, who is apparently
a practicing N.Y. lawyer who at one time worked for the Agency.
This idea was suggested by Vasia Gmirkin of CI Staff, the
client component on the Deed of Trust. The idea would be that
since MONCURE already knows that PDLADLE and MONCURE
would be used only on this PDLADLE job, the security and. cover
problems normally associated with allowing cleared attorneys
to become involved in operations would not be as pronounced as
ym wed amner ee 22M.. |
14-0000
() (3
etn RETURN TO CLA
Background Use Only
{D0 Nes Reprodune,
Te eae
pty
usual. On the other hand, his prior association with the Agency
could jeopardize PDLADLE if drafting the Deed of Trust exposes
MONCURE to more scrutiny than his present association with
PDLADLE already does; and ,
d. an attorney from OGC. N.Y. mortgage law would have tobe ;
researched to try to make the Deed of Trust-freely assignable from .. ~
_ one CIA nominee to another. N.Y. form books should be easily .
locatable in the D.C. law libraries. If the Deed of Trust follows N Yo
form, would the fact that the OGC lawyer is not licensed in N.Y.
in any way throw doubt on the document? When might the name
of the lawyer who drafted the document come to light?
Robert D. Clark »
RDC: kas
' Distribution:
Original - DEFECTORS
1 - RDC Signer
1 - Chrono
Letgee
Soden
VoL L.
|
104-10106-10188.pdf | 14-0000
104-10106-10188] “ | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT
JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
e
og : . . s
Cg aE REPRODUCE
SUBJECT: Sam Jaffe _ eEtRe TO CHA
ine
s
1. Sam Jaffe's relationship with the Agency predates his assignment
_ to Moscow as an ABC correspondent. During the period 1958-60 while in New
York Jaffe was a confidential informant of the FBI on his Soviet contacts
in New York. In addition, he had several meetings with the New York office
of CIA's Domestic Contact Division. While in Moscow with ABC Jaffe felt he’
_was the subject of a recruitment attempt by the KGB in 1962. We recounted
his story to the Regional Security Officer at the American Embassy in Moscow, ~~
copies of which went to both CIA and FBI. Jaffe covered the Gary Powers'
trial for ABC and flew on the same plane from New York to Moscow with the
Barbara Powers’ party. Prior to that trip he was briefed by a CIA psychologist
on ways to observe Powers's behavior and demeanor. Jaffe was never "ordered" -
to caver the Powers’ trial, but simply acted as an enterprising newspaperman ~
befriending Barbara Powers while her party was enroute and in the Soviet Union.
. > 22 During the latter part of his time in Moscow Jaffe was in contact -: .°
_ with a KGB officer, Kuvkov, and this relationship is a matter of record with °..
the FBI. There is some evidence that Jaffe was given preferential treatment
- by the Soviet authorities. Somé western pressmen felt that Jaffe, as an
aggressive newspaperman, was giving a little to get a story. Jaffe has Dy
given his version of his dealings with the KGB in a lengthy 1969 interview Joe
with the FBI. - Se CS
_...- | °3. The defector Nosenko pravided information on Jaffe's relationship
DBP SARI: to the KGB in 1964. However as time went on, further debriefings of Nosenko -
indicated that Nosenko was, not as sure about Jaffe's relationship as he had :
been originally. By 1968 Nosenko was positive only that Kuvkov had been in =.
touch with daffe, but Nosenko was not certain that Jaffe was a paid and
witting agent of the KGB... 2-70 Bg!
7 4. During Jaffe's taur in‘Hong Kong, and subsequently in Washington, - -_./
he was in touch with CIA officers. He provided good information on alcrinese 24 .
news officialland he was-helpful to the Agency_in reporting on a (Canadtan]|| -~..
‘ organization {The Committee of New China Policy} AN official} contact with
Jaffe ended in 1971. © \ oS ORF
: 5. Central to Jaffe's charges about CIA, which he has made public many
times, is Jaffe's belief that the CIA passed derogatory information about
him to his employers. Attached is a 24 November 1975 letter from Mr. Colby
to Jaffe which states categorically that no information in the CIA files had
ever been passed outside of official channels. In addition to this letter ©
daffe has been reassured on this point verbally on at least four other
occasions.. The CIA is positive that Jaffe's recall from Hong Kong in 1968
BR
14-0000
_ ~ | . - _ (
° and subsequent dismissal by ABC, are not related to any action taken by the
CIA., mo, :
had with Mr.| Ted Cowen, a British ‘intelligence official] in Hong Kong. Ob/O¥
According to: affe, [Cowen] told him that he had a "security problem" but 06
this problem would clear up in due course. A close check of our files can
not ellucidate what Cowen |was talking about. It is possible, of course, ot
that (Cowen was alluding to the Nosenko allegations as|the Britishjwere go 1
given much} of the Nosenko debriefings. The record is unclear on this )
point.. However, based on information available to this Agency, we feel we
have tried to pacify Jaffe with the statement contained in the Colby letter
that we have no evidence he has. evar been an agent of any foreign intelligence
service. ae ;
+ 6. In [ted coven with Jaffe he frequently recounts a conversation he
7. Jaffe has submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to CIA
which has resulted in the release of a large number of documents to him.
Jaffe can, of course, appeal our withholding of certain documents through
appropriate administrative and judicial procedures under the FOIA.
S16R
|
104-10106-10194.pdf | [104-10106-10194 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
: re. SELRE | _
' 10 March 1978
AYE FOR Sy fos
Eapiqroune Use vrai
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD LO oDet Reproducs
FROM: Robert D. Clark
Office of General Counsel
SUBJECT: Meeting in New York: PDLADLE
On 2 March 1978, the undersigned and Vasia Gmerkin of CI Staff met _
in New York City with the defectorsg
apartment of Bernard MONCURE. There aa Meput a first
mortgage on a New York City property of theirs located at 163 East 71st
Street, New York, New York, in favor of a devised facility nominee of
the Agency (Roush-Walker Company, 48 Alabama Street, S.W 5 Atlante,
Georgia, for a recited indebtedness of $167,429.88. They signed 2 classified
document acknowledging that the devised facility is an instrumentality of
the United States Government. This document was witnessed in alias by
Mr. Gmerkin and the undersigned ? SePrepistered strenuous objections
to the "mortgage."
‘ RDC: kas _Rébert D. Clark
Distribution: —— 4
Original - DEFECTORS ~
1 - RDC Signer
1 - Chrono
SECRET
SSE |
a IM FET CL Tee |
|
104-10106-10215.pdf | 14-00000
‘ 04-10106-10215 st 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION | RECORDS ACT OF 1992 jasecnsinanmne
+, .
eet
- weno ur YORK, COUNTY OF
MARCH
"EW YORK a:
Ornthe | 2nd da 1978 before me
personally cage
saan
to me known to be the individual g described in and who
- executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that
they exccuted the same,
STAT! OF HEW YORK, COUNTY OF . SS:
On the , before me
personally came
to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and
day of 19
say that he resides at No,
that he is the "
of
, the corporation described
in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he
knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed
to. said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so
afixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora-
tion, and that = he signed h_ ~— name thereto. by like oréler.
Hortgage Pate
TITLE NO.
WITH zl
(ROUSH-WALKER \ COMPANY
STANSADS FORM OF BREW YORK BOUND OF THLE DNDERWRITERS
Distributed by
CAXCAGO THWTLIE ; ‘
THSWRANCK COMPANY
SYATZ OF NEW
en
day of 19
RK, COUHTY OF $3:
On the
personally came
, before me
described in and who
and acknowledped that
to me known to be the individual
executed the foregoing instrument,
executed the same,
RETURA PS “
- Beekground Use
eC) 0 Meg Reproduce
STATH OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF $3:
On the day of 19, before me
personally came
the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with
whom I am personally acquainted, who, being~by me culy
sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No.
,
that. he knows
to be the individual
described in and who. executed the foregoing instrument
that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw
execute the same; and that he, said witness,
at the same time subscribed h name as witness thercto.
SECTIGN ; 5 a,
1406 ;
26 -/ pax Nap
couNTY axmemxx NEW YORK
BLOCK /
Lor
Recorded at Request of
- CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Return by Mail to
hots. [pred, ©
5 ye
fl tee tWD f eof
h 4 L1 ep 1(C0w
Zip No.
|
104-10106-10217.pdf | [104-10106-10217 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 eee
Jot
[eee
h
Spandard wed TA Ferry 5 TOM . HMutigage Meter, tad igual of Corpage on, (Steam eo RET eK a) a
CONSULT YOUR LAWYERS 028 SIGNING THIS INSTUMENT— THIS INSTZUMED — JULD BE UStDABy WP bu OL
ww a ground Use Orly
Sx@o Not Reproduce :
MORTGAGE NOTE
$ 167,429.88 New York, HiARCH 2,1978 19
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, We, sil husband and
wife, residing in the City, County and State of New York,
zy
promise to pay to (QRoush-WaLKER COMPANY, 48 Alabama Street, S.W.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA ( 30303)
. 2u)
or order, at the offices of(Roush-Walker Company, 48 Alabama Street, S.WJ)
Atlanta, Georgia, .
or at such other place as may be designated in writing by the holder of this note, the principal sum of
ONE HUNDRED SIXTY~-SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY NINE 88/100
($167,429.88) on demand. a Rollaxomax
M
XEECTE UBNSEIEK EGFR YS DEKCORE SLD Tes UCR Hea wad at nw ENE XK IKK PRE MONI PAOD
xaniden Max praidwxchis AX XXKXX MM KWAK AKAXKXXXXK XAKKRKXXALK KK A ARHLL TALK XX
IT IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY. AGREED, that the said principal sum secured by this note shall become due
= at the option of the holder thereof on the happening of any default or event by which, under the terms of
the mortgage securing this note, said principal sum may or shall become due and payable; also, that all
of the covenants, conditions and agreements contained in said mortgage are hereby made part of ‘this .
instrument. :
Presentment for payment, notice of dishonor, protest and notice of protest are hereby waived. °
This note is secured by a mortgage made by the maker to the payee of even date herewith, on property
situate inthe Borough of Manhattan, City, County d State of New York,
and commonly known as.and by Street Number 163 East 7lst, Street,|
!
New York, N.Y. ( 10021) .
This note may not be changed or terminated orally.
In the presence of:
14-0000
Veg
“Waite "ee —_—_
| 7 RETURN TO CA
STATE OF NEW YORK, Backgrounc Use Onjy .
ne Do Net Reproduce
COUNTY OF NEW YORK J
On this 2nd day of “MARCH J inthe year nineteen hundred and
seventy-eight ally came :
Segoe and .c eee :
tome known to be the the individuals deserthed in iutd who excented the forese
instrument, and they acknowledged te me that they exceuted the same.
area nnn IEenenree re ane
STATE OF NEW YORK,
COUNTY OF -
On this | day of . in the year nineteen hundred and
» before me personally came
ta me knawn, who, being by me duly sworn, did depnse and say that he resides at
that he is the . af
the corporation described in, and which executed the above instrument; that | he knows the seal
of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was se
affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corpovation. and that he signed namie
thercto by like order. ; ,
= 9 t | = taf : : .
a ee re ak
dh : foi Fp! 2 Wt
o ee - Bor = 88
ow 4 i i 29:5 Oo Ww 9
iH . > maa i Sse et SN. -
’ py P . i : ot @ .
= OG Hane Lesa ow A —
Over il Lf ri eeuRnH -p id
a O88 wv | } £0; 00; SQcd a
Ss PH <i I oo! Lames) DoS Ss "
os mu 90 | os + oe a SS
7 Aes | OVS | $4 ben - 8
fe OgEg? loa ride BIW Y
co. Hod « fH ie * iste XQ
ie Fadal wlss |e 288 2
DOT EAR EB Wn
3 Gre ae ordi ois & Et.
MS sda Ol gel 2128 B S
.2P? AO Ree ak @nk 3S
Ogee i S8ae ™ Ve
BRR | S827] ST
ae H i |2aA 6 3 ~
! 2 |g2.%
2 Eon was ..
| A | £46
]
STATE OF NEW YORK,
COUNTY OF -
On this day of » in the vear nineteen hundred and
» before me personally came ,
to me known ta be i the individual described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledzed to me that he executed the sainte.
|
104-10106-10218.pdf | “oa: 10106- St 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 wissen,
“nl
ay
(3 a ;
ae HIS: MORTC Gi 4, mad: the end we day of ARCH
.
* nineteen hundred and seventy=e elght
. New York
¢ the mortgarer, and
\(ROUSH-WALKE R COMPANY, 48 Alabama Street, S.w.)[atlanta, ¢ Georgia |
. , the -martgagec
WITNESSETH, that to secure the payment of an indebtedness in the sum of ($167,429, 88)
ONE HUNDRED SIXTYSEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED THENTYNINETGy Dollars
; lawful money of the United States, to be paid on demand,
? yebehoso a aoest x koraci tcc SINC COENDUKORDCHCUCN IIE RCRD AUK KOCK XKX XXX KKK MRK
F pecaoxecomc ecstatic aie atk OCICC CII RALIGCX ICICI CROCK I IOC BSI
, OMe
s according to a certain bond or obligation bearing even date herewith, the mortgagor hereby —
. mortgages to the mortgagee AL.I. that certain plot, piece or pareel of land, with the buildings
"and improvements thereon erected, situate lying and being in the Borough of Manhattan,
» ‘City, County and State of New York, bounded and described as follows:
—
°} BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of 7ist Street, distant:
,| 285 feet westerly from the corner formed by the intersection of the sé
northerly side of 7lst Street and the westerly side of Third Avenue;
RUNNING THENCE northerly, parajlel with Third Avenue and part of the s
through a party wall, 102 feet 2 inches to the center line of the bloc
THENCE westerly, along said center line of the block, 15 feet; :THENCE
southerly, parallel with Third Avenue and part of the way through anot
party wall, 102 feet 2 inches to the northerly side of 7ist Street; ar
THENCE easterly, along the northerly side of 7lst Street, 15 feet to
the point ¢ or place of beginning. .
Said premises now being known as and by Street Number 163 East |
i 7st Street, New York, New York. .
|
104-10106-10300.pdf | 14-0000
104-10106-10300 { 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
Jf. RETURN TO CIA _ OL IS SAYA he
me . "i Background Use Only . Cc
“us : Oo Not Reproduce se
Yurily Ivanovich NOSENKO
IDENTIFICATION: NOSENKO, Yurily Ivanovich, a Soviet
KGB officer who defected in 1964 and
was subsequently involuntarily con-
fined in the U.S. by the Agency for
a period of approximately three years.
BACKGROUND : NOSENKO first contacted Agency per-
sonnel in Switzerland in June 1962
and subsequently defected. in. January
1964. NOSENKO was brought to the U.S.
and after a period of relative freedom
. he was involuntarily confined in
_ April 1964. From April 1964 to
, August 1965, he was confined at an
Agency controlled site in Clinton, '
Maryland. From August 1965 to
October 1967,.NOSENKO was confined
at |Camp Pear Virginia. In October
1967, he was returned to the Washington
area, given increasing amounts of
freedom until he was given total free-
dom in April 1969. NOSENKO became a
U.S. citizen in April 1974. NOSENKO
meer ‘was employed by the Agency as a
consultant in March 1969 and continues
under contract to date. His present
salary is $23,500 per year.
APPROVAL : (1) The legal basis to confine NOSENKO
against his will was discussed by
Mr. Richard Helms, DD/P, and others with
the Deputy Attorney General on 2 April
1964 (Tab 1). On 3 April 1964, the
Agency General Counsel, Mr. Lawrence
Houston, advised the Director of Security
by memorandum that such confinement was
proper (Tab 2).
a
eee (2) There are a series of lettérs from
the DDCI, DCI and others to various
agencies, including the Department of
_Justice and the White House, covering
the period 1964 to 1969, evidencing
awareness of these agencies of the
NOSENKO affair (Tab 3).
(3) The conditions of NOSENKO's confine-
ment were established by the Office of
Security (Tabs 4 § 5).
up
14-0000
RESULTS
TERMINATION
a COMMENTS
cc
‘By memorandum dated 2 October 1968,
the Director of Security forwarded
two reports to the DDCI summarizing.
the results of the NOSENKO case to
that date. The reports are voluminous.
One was prepared by the Office of
Security and the other by the FBI.
Both reports conclude that NOSENKO
was a bona fide defector. A draft
memorandum attached to this file,
dated 21 October 1968 and prepared
by the CI Staff, raises question
regarding NOSENKO's bona fides
and challenges the above two reports.
NOSENKO continues under contract to
the Agency. He is brought to Washington ,
periodically to consult on matters ;
germane to his background and experience.
Various reports dre available in the
files of the Office of Security which
detail financial aspects of this case.
No final accounting has been made since
the project continues.
(1) While the Office of Security files
do document the rationale for the original
confinement of NOSENKO, they do not
document the rationale for his continued
confinement over so long a period of time.
A memorandum dated 5 August 1969 states
that various congressional staff officers
were briefed on NOSENKO and states that
concern for his safety, as well as con-
cern regarding his bona fides, prompted
the prolonged confinement.. (See Tab 6)
(2) Office of Security files document
a period in 1969 during which a mail
cover was placed on NOSENKO.
(3) During the above period, NOSENKO
was allowed a pleasure trip to Florida.
During this trip, Agency personnel, with
apparent Headquarters approval, obtained
the services of prostitutes. This
apparently occurred on at least two
occasions.
14-0000
FILES 2
DN eral
oe oe tee
CC
Office of Security files on NOSENKO
are maintained in the following
locations: ;
OS/SSD (Contact - Mr. Charles Phalen)
OS/SAG (Contact - Mr. Bruce Solie)
14-0000
SR April 1964
MEMORANDUM. FOR. RECORD 2
SUBJECT: Discussion. with Deputy Attorney. 2
_ _ General on Nosenko Case
e Eyec Wr Hellas.’ Mr. -Houston and Mr. Murphy met with ”
the Deputy Attorney General and tesbers of his staff to _
discuss subject case, - Present froz Hr. Katzenbacht s-— eet
staff were Messrs. Foley, Yeagley and Reis. 0. ae
ee Sarre Helas explained the Hosenko case briefly *: >.
what the legal position would be in circumstances in.
. which ve detained Nosenke against his will for this pur-
pose. . Second, we would have to he ready after determin-
ing. that we could obtain no additional information £rom oo -
Nosenko to deport him, We had thought of taking hin to
-Germany.and transferring hin to Soviat custody in Borlin. -
where this has been done a number of tines in the past. .
"3, There was some discussion of whether deportation.
to another country might be a consideration. Mr. Halas
explainad wo would probably face publicity probleas in!
deportiag to 2 third country of the kind we would en- —
counter if he ware free in the U. Ss. Nr.’ Helms noted _
there were many itess of. information which we and the.
‘FBI realize are of no significance because of the file —
holdingsswe have but which an unscrupulous newspaper man
could use to creates: sischies, This aspect was then dropped
and it was the consensus. that Berlin was probably the best
place, _
4. The question of the pasis for detention was again
raised and related by Mr. Foloy to the conditions under
which Nosenko is in this coumtry. We is hore as an “ex-
clusion and parole case" which means he has not been
admitted and has been paroled to the Agency which is
responsible for him while he is in this country. This
14-0000
/ a Do . “ .
: Ss Be py
parole can be interpreted’ to mean parole to a specific
locale which would provide sone justification for our _
detaining hin for questioning. It was then pointed out, -
however, that. if he said he wished to leave the country: .
to saturn to the Soviet Union, technically we would not -
bo able to detain. hin- further. .In this event, we would
be faced with the- need to deport his quickly and quiatly
and for this purposes the. immigration warrant of arrest.
and deportation, a5 probably the‘best instrument. 7
..Se: Ure. Katzenbsch asked Mr. Foley to check into -
this and Mr. Foley will in turn contact Mr. Houston,
~/-°. Mr. Houston will in turn discuss the problem with CIA .-—
- 2 -. ) O€£Fice of Securit officials to get the background-of |.
ees their liaison with the INS on these Matters, coe Re,
Nr. Helas thanked. Mr. Katzenbach for his assistance
parted amid some jovial banter with respect to
- "The Spy Who Came in Fros the Cold" about what we expected
to happen to him when he started to Climb ayer that “wall
in Berlin, = — ; ; , . _ :
a a, David E. Murphy”
oe, . CO Chief, SR Division
14-0000
14-0000
Tee
ae ‘ ui
Pd - ? at
tes iD a
1 _—— ‘ Oo OGG 64-0903
: * 7 i. 7
: ~ ROS
: - oe oan
: grt.
we - fe 3 Aprih 9646000 a
* MEMORANDUM FOR: : Director of Security i
~“- «-SUBJEGT: ©’ Parole Status of Defectors
.. 1,: On 2 April 1964 we had a discussion with the Department ~~ ey
ty, of Justice or the status of aliens whose inspection by I&NS is deferred <-
“upon arrival at our request and who are then paroled to this Agency. * oe
It was the position of the Department of Justice that we were responsible
7 for taking any action necessary to carry out the terms of the parole.
tf pee 2 hoe mw Eo Ue meER Som Sete NRT ft OO ON renee
“2, As you know,. a basic parole agreement was executed by the ; “.
- ‘Attorney General and the DCI on 10 February 1955. After setting up
'. conditions for authorizing parole in any one case, the agreement states: , - +
"After parole of such aliens, the Central intelligence Agency will assume." -: we
on responsibility for care, supervision and control of a.kind and degree it - - |
’ believes consistent with the internal security needs of the United States ,
| during continuance of their parole status." This means that the _
a responsible Agency officials must take the minimum action necessary
netfee oe a
.? .
Foe wns ws meee
. to protect the internal security needs of the United States. ‘The word :
“minimum" is not necessarily a limitation. It merely means that good -
judgment must be used as to what kind and degree of action is necessary,’ ,
: . =f . . : :
3. The agreement further provides that upon-completion of the :
parolee's intelligence or operational purposes in the United States or if :
internal security reasons so require, the alien will be removed from i,
this country through arrangements made by the Agency and, in such ve ;
case, the A ywill inform vice in advance of each proposed
Gus hehe 7) Mossle 7
LAWRENCE R, HOUSTON
General Counsel ,
. 7 . ta . . . : ‘ i Ro OR See et wen oy; ohne pete et
snvenetgd ence. ncn a ee ee A ee — — aa
me cane mame mae ym mame 7 : Lo . . ets re ee a et te me
14-0000
14-0000
(¢ _ (C Tanuary 1975
SUBJECT: Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO
l. Information that NOSENKO had defected and was in the United
States in February 1964 was known to appropriate agencies. and articles
had appeared in the public media.
2. NOSENKO was in the United States under an I&NS parole as
the responsibility of CIA. The FBI was fully advised of the Presence of
NOSENKO in the United States and interviewed NOSENKO | on several
occasions in March 1964. The United States Intelligence ‘Board was
also formally advised on 12 February 1964 concerning the defection of
NOSENKO, On 14 February 1964, NOSENKO was interviewed by Soviet
in the presence of I&NS and State Department officials
officials/and NOSENKO reaffirmed his previous request for asylum in
‘the United States.
14-0000
the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, as amerded,
‘I approve and xyacommend for your approval the entrance
of subject into the United States for permanent resideace
~ sinca-his ents ‘is in the interest of the nati national security
pay tn pasordance with previous correspondence in
. Section 7 cases,. it is understood that you, will present this.
: ‘Since his. defection i im: vebruary 7 1964,- ‘the: oubject has>
provided valuable. information to ae Agency and he will.
period of five. years and bas ‘submitted toa technical inter” .
rogation. Ths question of bona fides is a continuing one and
should any information be developed definitely disproving his <-_ eee
bona fides, it shall he mada available to your Service and the .. >
Attorney Gener ral, ms ra .
. Gz0er 1
> Sa a | Saeaded irom quarts
‘ downgrzdiag aad
! declazsificatisa
14-0000
ie ? 8 October 1969
sf Hod Osdorn se OR EIS
: dasa enemenemnpamanemeetemeerer re epmrterenra rman ine eet mananmnit enn tan nnn
14-0000
Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO (Aka: Yuri NOSSENKO) |”
30 October 1927
Nicolayey, Ukraine, USSR ao)
i Male - ‘Divorced -.- ‘Brown Biue/ Gray Sit. I inchea :
_ Soviet ~. | Carcasian -~ |
,
-_— ae
14-0000
Maa
ine
cS
Ee
en
1, USSR:
a oo ta s a 3 & Pgety: . a _ Z
14-0000
vich NOSSENKO'-
. 9
YYational-interest
. _ ws ad
wae Pe ss Sto this Ageatys—“Therefare- it
:
is requested subject's.”
*- parole to this Agency be extended far an additiqnal. |~
“ period of six. (6}. months beyond the expiration date of
"his stay of 16 August. 1969. Tet £0 ke
209 Wietor RA white
Deputy Director of Security- i
stigations and Operational Support) .
: {Inve
b |
OS/AAS/LW:es 16 July 1969 — -
+
HOT TO SE GISSEMINATED FHRTUER pa crea
~ 70 AWyBE aD) P
CEHTRAL [43 AERTS
args:
WOU
14-0000
: SH my
CORD
ERN AL”:
NLY
INT.
“USE 0
[7] CONFIDENTIAL
a
SECRET
PPEMICUS. *
EONICNS.
Sé
=6T0°
14-0000
foo 4s ( .
ft . 2 ~ -o
| . ; "dt February 19540
maswan 7 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. MeSeorge Buady a
SUSJECT: =) Yurd ‘Yvanovick BOSENKO .
xe
‘4. This monoraadim refers to the Szate Departuent =. -
relaase of 16 Fabruary.on subject case and provides addj-~*- -°
tional background as wéll-as information ea his current... i
Status... a So het SPoet Tine when, a
- Ze As 2 EGS staff officer, NOSENZO is regulariy=y
assigned to the Counterintelligance Directorate of the = .
KGB in Nescow but was included in ths Soviet delegation ~~
to the Disamaxent Conference’ as part of a cover arrange.
ment which sereitted his to carry out intelligence and fy 0.
Security iumetions in Geagva on behalf of the ECB...
=
ane <” Sa. HOSENXO also attended various sossions of the
“ ” Bisarmanent Conference held in Genova in 1982. During -
| the. course. of these sessions NOSENKO sough? contact with Te
./ O8£ficlials of the us. Governzent, informed these erficials =.
“i; That he was affiliated with the Sevier State Security ap~
-. > paratus and volunteerad to aid the U.S. Government ::
sere as 7 datecting Soviet subversive activity directed againat the |...
Cost of U.S, Government, - During the course of his contact with .. a
wl. . U.S. authorizries HOSENXO stated thar his cooperation with. -
the @. S. Governzant originated with his distaste and hatred .-
_'. £or the Soviat Yegime in seneral, with his desire to obtain 2°...
. + 7. yevange for the unjust doath of his father, ‘s Senior official" -
, Zn the Sovise Shipbuilding industry, and with the general .. - =
“ " adairatioa of the Americans with whom he had come in con~
“, tact within the Sovist Usien. a
eo, - 4. In lato January 1964, NOSENKO arrived in Genova, —
“Tol again Rasquerading as a maaher of the Soviet delegation —~
to the Disaraaent Conference, Subjecz Secretly uvtified .
His CIA contacts inthe United. States conceming -his pres--
euce ia Geneva and arrangad to meet with these contacts,.
Duriag a series of ssetings NOSENXO proyided informaticn
including docunsnts concerning Soviet Stato Security acti-~
vyitias within the USSR and abroad and a detailed Recount
ot the XSB operation against U. S. Professar & rghocra
which NOSENKO said ha had personally supervised at the
Girection of Szurcuas NiY¥, the Chairmen of the Coamittée
for State Security (X63). a
e
14-0000
. 7. . 7 tls “an on py = | ae.
5. During these MOST recent Heelings NOSENKO announced
Ais desires -to- laays tha uSsSs2 permanentiy and seek his fururg
in the West. rg Claised his new work in the KGs (First .. -
Daputy Chisf af thar cepartaent charged with the SUrveaillance
and recruitzent of Aperican yisiters to the USSR) was OxX~..
—. . pasding and that he would not be able to visit the Fest. ; :
oi. with any traquency.. Accordingly, he prepaxved ‘a -request for
' ™ palitieal asylus in the UGoitod States." He was taker-to -:. me
Fraaxfurt, Garmany where he is currantliy: undergoing intarro-
gation. Plans are now being made to remove hiz to the USS.
“8
Pee mee we * 2 Mg #84:
2g. “Itcshonld be noted that CIA ‘contact with su ject; °°
has not besr extensive and that wa Nill require additionat
thorough interrogation to establish Subjact?s beaa fides,.
ae Ts should -also be noted that HOSENKG's: daties Were: not ‘con-
re es srned with substantive aspects of the Disarmazent Conference,
bee aad he therefore is HOt expected to be able to shad Buch, if 7
Poole c ° anyy Light. on that aroa of our interest, . | ar he
a a Te. The possibllicy that ROSEHXO* 5 defection was dk -
boar Soa ct Signed to wreck the conference was most carefully considered,
Potts ‘i The-decision tc accept hin wag taken on thé convicrion thar
foo. so. the Soviets would nor have chosea such 3 yolnerablo agent: -
Po >. Qstazl officer of the X53) for this kind of Boye, . ;
ae
4 - 3 _ Thonas B.. Saranessines
2 _ 7 | Acting Deputy ‘Director:
. AA et Lm “~ for Plaas 1...
7, 7 CSR/DEM/Ji€ 0 11 Feb 64 er
el. ' Distribution:. ne Tooth -
Orig ~ Adse-. and
SR/CI/K-Dowaey TS
“Tec - C/CL i A er
icc - CSR. ae _ soe De
DD/Os ; oe
7
a
t
ryre ~
14-0000
“SUBJECT:
~ Stags,
. KGB in Moscow but-sas included in the Soviet dalegation
ment which pernittéd hia to eaxry out intelligence
| Sseurity Zunctions in Caneva on behalf of the KGB.
: Disarzasent Conference heid in Geneva in 1962,. During the-
- paratus. and yoluatesred zo aid the B. 3, Goverment-in
nt U. Ss Governnsnt, ~ Purine the courses of his contagz with =
‘. = . .
tact withia the Se
Fs. BAD bald
, CN TRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
- WASHINGTON 25, D.C.
. _, OFFICE OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
12 Febrnazy. 1964. °°
~
NEYORANDUM FAR: _ Vaktad States Intolligencs Board Meabers |
Yuri Ivanovich NOSENKO wo.
“) da This memorandua refars to the State Departuent’
‘Feleasa of 18 February on subject’ case and provides addi-
‘Sienal baskgrouad as wéll as infermation on his currené:-
__, 20, As a XSB staf¥ officer, NOSERXO ts regularly.
assignad toe the Counteriutel lisence Directorate of the
.t9 the Disarmament Confersaca as part of a cover ar
3, * NOSENZS also attended various sessions of
course of these sessions, HOSENKO. sought contact. vith -
ofticials of the Uy S, Goveranont, informed these cfficiais
that. he was sffiliatod with the Sevist Stata Security ap-
detecting Sovier. subversive activity: directed aesinst the |
U. S, anthorities, HOSEXES Stated that his cocperation with
tke U. S. Gaevernaant originated with his distasts and hatred.
for the Soviet regine in Seneyval, with his dasive te obtain —-"
revenge for the unjust desth of bis father, 2 senior official
in the Soviet Shipbuilding industry, and with the geveral -~
awsiration of the Anericans with wWhea he had coms in con
3 ® Union. . Loge eo Stel oa
on
' 4. In lats January 1384, HOSENZO avrivog in Genevs,
again masquerading as a mesabor of the Soviag delagation
fo ths Disarmament Conference, Subject Secretly notified
his Cik contacts in the United Stazes concerning bis pras-
ences in Gansya and arranzed to aeet with these contects,
Buring a series of meetings NOSENKS provided information
includins documents concoming Soviet State Security acti-
vitios within the USSR and abrond ang a detsi
14-0000
| SN ; | - : ‘ . . -
ao C. a :
of the XGH operation against U; 5. Professor Sarzhoorag ~
_ Which NOSENXO said he had personally supervised at-the —
. direction of SEHICHASTALY, the Chairman of the Comaitter _
. £or State Securlty-(XGB).° - Coe Ae Dae a
og Se. During: these most recent neatings:- NOSENZO announced
~ his: dasire to leave the USSR pernanently and seek his future
‘din the Nest. : He claimed his new workin the KGB (First:-: -
and reernitzent. of: American visitors: to.the USSR) was ax~
panding and that‘he would not be abla to visit the Yest .--
~ political asylum in. the United States. He was taken to---.-*
Frankfart, Geraany where he is currentiy undergoing interre-
- : Sore EAD tee . 1 otto. wl ete ra a
See By & should de seted that CIA contact with ‘Subject ~~
“has not beow extensive and that wa vill require additionsi
“thorough interrogation to establish Subject’*s bona fides. .-
= should alse be noted that NOSENKO'’s duties ware. not con-
and he therefore. is net expected to be ebla ta. shed. puch,
. Smyy light on that. area Of our interest. = +
“.fstaff officer of.the %63) for this kin
. . — a 7
"° Marshal’ 5. Carter ~ -
Lisutenant’Ganeral, USA | -
“x | . Deputy Biygetor > -
Beputy Chief of thar department charged with the surveillance
with any frequency. Accordingly, hea prepared a reguest: for 7
. gation. Plans are nov being made to Yenove him to the Ue Se
““earned with substantive aspects. of the Digareament Contereace,
L LE
7 7.. Tas possibility that NOSENXO's defection vas da-" | -~ :
“signed te wreck. the conference was most carefully considered.
.. The. decision to accept hiz. was: taken on the conviction that.
' the Soviets vould net. have chosen. such « yalnerable agent™
d of move, :
14-0000
Settee ree emp eee se
: - WASHINGTON, * "Pebseh
. Yuri .I:| Nosenxo told = -Sovi
- . Embassy“olicial at. theiercan: f=
frontation here-last 1 Friday. that;*
be lett: Switreriand. on the- way,
the. Uhited™ States 28 -hours} . :
hetence ‘his{detection~ was-tre~|Swiss:
: 3 to.
- to Lies aid
|! tha: Soviet, diplomat during their’
: ted to ale se Ib
erecceetbates usinesslike- co: 2 th:
- This statement by “ine focazer 1 sIaformation® ee able| defected: “ofshise owe vot pe
tats ‘officer ‘oi-the” Soviet Com-}today: ;has_ rth pew ight without any-outsid, ires
mites: ‘of, Stete';Security? tha on thé defectioa= > _ sie Siig statements Wugeraeen
;Secret police‘appeared to amount] They Sovier-ix ~ inked, did ‘not. allay Soviet -résenté
to a denial of the Soviet charge Geneva; ik. lwas* ment againstrSwis ‘authorities:
vthat. te, Swiss: duthorities. b3a| the. Swiss! police 2t.5 PAE Fed. Diplomatic-report
ting his}5- that #fr:“Noseako-was. miss-
a 1. ~.] gw But 3ir..Nosenko's - state
'.. Miz Nosenxo;"who quit“as a{maats“in- the? presence :of “th
whee member of the Soviet celegrtion! Soviet Exnbass¥ vftici2l: ace. said
. to the Genev2. sarmamentcon- le have. saowa that
ching the
State-Department “said that. So-].
viet “diploma ts:in foreign: ‘capi-
tals? ‘continued<to-register- ¢ com-
plaints ‘about alleged. negligence!
is actual ater. Mr: Negenko's | ‘conference
eS ference Feb: £ was’ allowed: to| defection: took“pl t JPL with the et:
rage” with {2--Soviet : Siplomat the. preceding daz:
here in’ the-presexce, of: ;United (3; S:Sovi2E: delégst on: ax
Fnounced” atithe: time. that=the ~*
|conontation was -takiag plac:
is Washingtom at the requestio£
the: Soviets Embassy, - but: no
other details.were made -oubdlic.jtom “field— “offic
Ione. department. said that. -abmigratio;
q, \
14-0000
fieswas? interview Syste
day by® officials. o! bath. “th
Russian and. SwEs 5 Em
icial was present each tine:
gsenko reaffirmed ‘his earlies
These developments - came
“is the Soviet Uniom kicked up
‘tg diplomatic fuss over the dis~
“appearance of° _Nosenko oD
Feb. 4, from Geneva, “where
ne nad teen assigned as an- .
Sexpert” in the Soviet delega- *
“Mion at the 37-nation disarma-
‘meat conference. ” Phillaps
‘said. he was.“on temporary
‘duty from KGZ. (secret DO.
neadavarers in Mos:
teow.
: Up ta yesterday Moscow
hed been Cirecting its public
‘Golomatic wrath at the
them with
charging
diplomat to inter:
o w25 to assuce
the United
o part in no.
ct on their soil. .- .
already had cée
charg 135.
Oa W ednesday. Phillis
See DEFECTOR, 3
14-0000
—_— I
‘
Shea-e
ire ee be
ices Soviet” disarmament. dele
gates: Semyom GK-+-Tsarapsi
gave-newsmen-an! angry’s state, Mascow ove a
-meéattaimed, at: the. “Swiss :and gation 2
tear Siu pedi
laces,
ie cou re the capitai: bss DB
inowiegaes of part orths KGB “Iwas-felt here:that Moscow:
; but” Pr a Blyr. 206 uch: Ss more. ‘might. chav
: Tae a any- “ate U.S:
' se-yeakold- Nosenko-: is. a gen-\ disarmament :negotiator’ Wil-
a
tuine deisctoc. thiugh ‘the pos-|tiam ‘C. Foster and’ Tsarapxin |
sidility70f his - being” a doubletneld another business session ;
agent ‘nas: not? teen: eee a Geneva yesterday at which i¥ Y
‘ed. Ituatsa felt- here - thatithey said the case-was-not dis-
t<"was nolcussedst. -
d id be. ex.f-- It also was‘noted . here that
- for. ary the™ Soviet. Communist: Party
14-0000
14-0000
{ “havaibecioate a are. to be made for the installation of”
“adequate‘air- conditioning equipment to insure that a.
comfortable. temperature is maintained. (It is under-
stood that there is quite a bit of equipment available
through Logistics channels, }
(3) Subject is to receive a bath; change of underwear;
change. of uniform; and a change of linen for his bed.
14-0000
_or schedule of. ‘assignments.
‘as to- their responsibilities in. this : matter,
-r ddition to- oe above,
wim ate nes
= r ascertained that we: will] have » custody. of:
athe Subject until at least July: ' It was: suggested that perhaps. we may
wish .to-explore. some modifications in the assignment of personnel ,
In. addition, ° ‘the Acting Chief, Support
Branch has suggested. that -: mmediate: consideration be givento. -
devising necessary. ‘procedures. to- -be’ followed’ ‘in the. event of an
emergency involving loss of “control of: ‘the Subject. ‘This ‘should
and ' ‘Specific’ procedures devised, and ali’ ‘guards properly informed |
- ° Se Jack M. Bauman
Bauman/ewd(5-12-64)
14-0000
|
104-10106-10312.pdf | [104-10106-10312 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
Yurily Ivanovich NOSENKO
IDENTIFICATION: NOSENKO, Yurily Ivanovich, a Soviet
: KGB officer who defected in 1964 and
was subsequently involuntarily con-
fined in the U.S. by the Agency for
a period of approximately three years.
BACKGROUND : NOSENKO first contacted Agency. per-
= 7 sonnel in Switzerland in June 1962
and subsequently defected in January
1964. NOSENKO was brought to the U.S.
and after a period of relative freedom
he was involuntarily confined in
April 1964. From April 1964 to
August 1965, he was confined at an
Agency controlled site in Clinton,
Maryland. From,August, 1965 to
October 1967, NOSENKO was confined
at Camp Peary, Virginia. In October
oe 1967, he was returned to the Washington
7 area, given increasing amounts of
freedom until he was given totai free-
dom in April 1969. NOSENKO became 2
U.S. citizen in April 1974. NOSENKO
was employed by the Agency as a
consultant in March 1969 and continues
under contract to date. His present
salary is $23,500 per year.
APPROVAL : (1) .The legal basis to confine NOSENKO
against his will was discussed by
Mr. Richard Helms, DD/P, and others with
the Deputy Attorney General on 2 April
1964 (Tab 1). On 3 April 1964, the
Agency General Counsel, Mr. Lawrence
Houston, advised the Director of Security
by memorandum that such confinement was
proper (Tab 2).
(2) There are a series of letters from
the DDCI, DCI and others to various
agencies, including the Department of
Justice and the White House, covering
the period 1964 to 1969, evidencing
awareness of these agencies of the
NOSENKO affair (Tab 3).
(3) The conditions of NOSENKO's confine-
ment were established by the Office of
Security (Tabs 4 § 5).
eons]
00'728
14-0000
_ RESULTS
TERMINATION
COMMENTS
“SEGRE
By memorandum dated 2 October 1968,
the Director of Security forwarded
two reports to the DDCI summarizing
the results of the NOSENKO case to
_that date. The reports are voluminous,
' One was prepared by. the Office of
Security and the other by the FBI.
Both reports conclude that NOSENKO
was a bona fide defector. A draft
memorandum attached.to this file,
dated 21 October 1968 and prepared
by the CI Staff, raises question
regarding NOSENKO's bona fides
and challenges the above two reports.
NOSENKO continues under contract to
the Agency. He is brought to Washington
periodically to consult on matters.
germane to his background and experience.
Various reports are available in the
files of the Office of Security which
detail financial aspects of this case.
No final accounting has been made since
tne project continues.
(1) While the Office of Security files
do document the rationale for the original
confinement of NOSENKO, they do not
document the rationale for his continued
confinement over so long a period of time.
A memorandum dated 5 August 1969 states
that various congressional staff officers
were briefed on NOSENKO and states that
concern for his safety, as well as con-
cern regarding his bona fides, prompted
the prolonged confinement. (See Tad 6)
(2) Office of Security files document
‘a period in 1969 during which a mail
cover was placed on NOSENKO.
(3) During the above period, NOSENKO
was allowed a pleasure trip to Florida.
During this trip, Agency personnel, with
apparent Headquarters approval, obtained
the services of prostitutes. This
apparently occurred on at least two
occasions.
00'729
14-0000
FILES
ea a)
Office of - ‘Security files on NOSENKO
are maintained in the following
locations:
OS/SSD (Contact ~- Mr. Charles Phalen)
OS/SAG (Contact - Mr. Bruce Solie)
3 00'740
|
104-10106-10325.pdf | “\104-10106-10325 - | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 | -
+ USUASSTFIED- Cnty. gg CONF? FUTIAL © secret
- Ty! .
“ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
; SUBJECT: {Optional} . os ; © ?
| Lit LCirm — Uy GY. leon . i
] FROM, ~~ EXTENSION | NO. —
(vittiam H. Godson
/RGA/O 03 1592
: Ea FORWARDED INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.}
1 AC/CI/RG&A/O aed
| AC/CI/REA 210% lo) Nu
ft
135. - af -
C/CI Staft Ee! Yon S~ 6: Vig arctica
j 2 1977 1977 | s-F, k-
_ | , :
uo | _ .
| ne
i |
| et -
t
|
vez G10 “itor (] secret ©] CONFIDENTIAL [J weet )sUNCLASSIFIED
Zp
14-0000
SOO DD ©
igen VY
1 November 1977
_MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Counterintelligence Staff
O35
FROM : (William H. Godson)
/RG&A/O
SUBJECT : Herbert Itkin File
1. I have reviewed the material in the Herbert Itkin
file which is divided into two main divisions. The first
concerns the details of Itkin's use as an unpaid witting
informant on matters concerning an attempt by Haitian exiles
in 1963 to unseat then President Duvalier. This involved
a large number of contacts with Haitian exiles in New York,
Washington, the Dominican Republic and Puerto Rico. Itkin
became a legal advisor for a Haitian Government-In-Exile and
put up $15,000 of his "own funds" for this Haitian enterprise.
Bernard E. MONCURE (P) a CI Staff staff agent in New York,
rode piggy-back on Itkin's contacts with the Haitians to make
his own operational contacts within the group. He also
provided a small amount of money to them ($4,300) from CIA
funds. It would seem from information in the file that there
was high-level governmental interest in removing Duvalier
from office in 1963. This information is contained in hand-
written notes which are paraphrased and indicate high-level
interest in the activities of the Haitian exile group. (I
suggest that this material be kept in case there are Freedom
of Information Act requests on CIA activities involving Haiti
in 1962-1963.)
: Z. The second and bulkier section of material concerns
Itkin's efforts to involve MONCURE and CIA in his attempts to
secure custody of his wife's children from her second marriage.
Itkin had been heavily involved as a lawyer and confidant with
Mafia syndicates and labor unions, particularly the teamsters.
While doing this he had gained a large amount of information
on the Mafia. In March 1963, MONCURE had recruited Itkin for
the FBI for domestic issues while maintaining for CIA the use
of Itkin for foreign intelligence matters. The FBI and the
federal prosecutors in New York starting in 1968 found I[tkin
to be a very important witness in a series of criminal indict-
ments starting with New York City Water Commissioner Marcus.
E2 IMPDET
CL BY 019816
7
Cet ee
74
14-0000
2}
Itkin and his wife had for a long time been :struggling to
maintain custody over her children from her second marriage.
Claiming that she had violated the custody stipulations of
a New York court by moving them more than 50 miles from New
York without his permission, Frederick Hersh, Mrs. Itkin's
former husband, gained custody of the children by means of
a ruling from the British court in 1966. Mrs. Itkin began
legal procedures in New York to regain the children. As
part of their effort they swore affadavits that Mrs. Itkin:
had taken the children to England at the request of the CIA.
itkin embellished on his CIA record by stating that he had
worked for CIA for many years prior to 1963, and insisted
that his original contact had been set up between Harold
Stassen and Allen Dulles in Philadelphia in the summer of |
1954. Most of these assertions were fabrications. MONCURE's
CIA relationship was exposed in various legal circles in
New York. The Agency wanted to avoid MONCURE's having to.
contradict Mr. and Mrs. Itkins' affadavits in court. The
FBI seemed to have been more interested in protecting Itkin's
reputation as a witness than in protecting MONCURE's reputa-
tion for honesty.
3. MONCURE did not appear in court. The Federal
authorities eventually placed protection around Itkin and
his wife, keeping them on a military reservation, whilé'
he appeared as a star witness in numerous Mafia cases which
led to covictions. : .
@B
4.. One small side issuegis worth noting: (Thomas L,
Roberts,) who was a(law partner of Itkin)until mid-1961, became
a (CIA staff agent under cover in Africa)24The many fraudulent
_activities of Itkin spread a scintilla of suspicion around
oberts The latter was given a polygraph examination in
‘rankfurt. He answered questions on his relationship with
Itkin including financial and his few contacts with Marcus
to the satisfaction of his interrogators.
5. Comments: The thrust of the file is mainly defensive.
CIA was reacting to Itkin's tactics to help his wife gain cus-
tody over her children. Itkin's numerous trips to England
and Europe were made on behalf of the FBI, and they were part
of an FBI attempt to-gain information on the Mafia. Before
the recruitment of Itkin and his utilization by the FBI, CIA
did pass to the Attorney General in 1963 information on a
Department of Labor official's alleged criminal involvement
with the Mafia, which MONCURE had elicited from Itkin. The
file also refers to MONCURE's continued contact with one Mafia
figure Lenzieri, who was a legal client, as a means of self-
protection as Lenzieri represented a channel back to the Mafia
SECRET”
14-0000
py
for MONCURE, who was apprehensive of Mafia retaliation because
of his involvement with Itkin.
6. I have talked to Will Kerbe who is presently the
case officer in contact for MONCURE. He says that MONCURE
is in limited law practice and is drawing a pension from
the Agency as well as a contract for services connected with
Golitsyn. There is probably nothing in the file which could
damage MONCURE's security as much of the information
regarding his association with Itkin has already been exposed.
The most recent information in the file is a January 1975
memorandum for the record from Acting Chief, CI, which
states that John K. Greaney, Assistant General Counsel had
learned that Seymour Hersh had learned details of the Itkin-: -
MONCURE relationship. It would appear that Mr. Greaney is ~
the most knowledgeable person in the agency on the legal
aspects of the Itkin case and probably maintains his own
files.
of
illiam H. Godson
|
104-10106-10421.pdf | Fao) et OP -
/104-10106- 10424) * [2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS | ACT OF 1992} 7
jrke vf |
Lo. J ‘je o A ee 4 : SIGNAL CENTER USE onty - ae & = i
off TEL” 4 “gq i} 0 0 oo © a —
SECRET a" OGe SUBS: ITKIN, HERBERT >
+ 4 . MESSAGE HANDLING INDICATOR 7 DATE 7 TME GROUP . OISPATCH NUMBER 7 7 _
TELEPOUCH _ A\FAMR-4225 Oe eee el
: 0 INDEX . 0 No INDEX
; D neturn to: E 2. IMPDET
0 Ip FILES . o CL BY: o34y40s
|3- (0 {3- a :
TO: (recaourne) (canseRra) pfETURN TO CA
; SECRET , TELEPOUCH Do Not Reproduce”
; : 2 :
| DISP NO: (FANUPNL2S
: DATE: 1& NOVEMBER 3973
(3-f0
TO: CHIL oF sate, GeLcpuree)
(374 ;
CHIEF OF STATION, CANBERRA)
FROM: CHIEF, EAST ASIA DIVISION
1
SUBJECT: MR» HERBERT ITKIN AL a pee det Mrs
car ;
FYI ONLY:
b- ON & NOVENEER 3973 MR-CLESLIE Vv. ash (Asto tug WASHTHG-
TOW, HAND CARRIED TO H@S 4 LETTER FROM AUSTRALIAN EJUSTICE A. R. MOFF-
ITT REQUESTING INFORMATION ON THE RELIAGILITY OF MR. HERSERT ITKIN
WHOM HE DESCRIBED AS A FORMER CIA AND FEI EMPLOYEE. THE FOLLOWING
PARAGRAPHS ARE THE GIST OF MR. MOFFITT'S LETTER, WHICH WAS ADDRESSED
CTO "MR. WILLIAM CROSBY’. {SIC} DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE:
: A. MOFFITT HOLDS A COMMISSION TO INQUIRE INTO THE INFIL-
2 TRATION OF ORGANIZED CRIMC INTO NEW SOUTH WALES. IT IS OF SUBSTANTIAL
LIMPORTANCE TO HIS INCUIRY THAT HE CONSIDER EVIDENCE GIVEN DURING A
COORDINATING OFFICERS .
IP USE ONLY
RELEASING OFFICER
CLASSIFICATION
FE CRE T
FILE NUMBER
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THF ISSUING OFFICF IS PROHIRITEN
ye?
(Hoods gt vd - ~ So Ng TOA NF > =m 6. Oo
Me aw * OuTGOIN TELEPOUCH
“ [thet Sede the eum coren vee fom ee uno
od TEL 8 , -O Oo. oO o.-.60Od i 4
ls ° cyassiricafion \, a , =" aN
at iol Oa a — 7 ees a a ners ieee 4) ae
“| "ayers. RET oo, we {6G€ sues: rath, HERBERT |
fee ; |ESSAGE HANDLING INDICATOR — ; OATS - Time Group _ DISPATCH NUMBER oo. is .
|". TELEPOUCH) = t” (Cramu3un25. _ oe i
. a INOEX i) ‘no’ noex . Pe ,
' 0 rerurn ro: . fo E 2. IMPDET
; a IP FILES : cL BY: O344gog5
COURT CASE IN ENGLAND IN JULY 1993 BY ITKIN.-
8. IN HIS TESTIMONY IN ENGLAND MR. ITKIN CLAINED TO HAVE
BEEN RECRUITED BY CIA IN AN “UNBDERCOVER CAPACITY” Ik ABOUT 3954. HE
CLAINED HE MAS WITH THE C.I.A. UNTIL MARCH 2963 AT WHICH TINE BY SOME |
ARRANGEMENT HE WORKED FO? GOTH THE FBI AND CIAy WTAL dAQUANY 24ba.
C- MOFFITT ASKS FOR INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF MR. TTKIN
ie
H
i DURING THE YEARS 2964 TO 19449 AND FOR COPIES OF “ANY RELEVANT. AFFI-
i
- }
| DAVITS OF PERSONS IN AUTHORITY AIN THE. rer OR CIA USED IN PROCEEDINGS / |
|
:
- a a i gis
IN USA.” x \ °
| D. MOFFITT NOTED THAT IN THE INTERESTS OF PRIVACY HE ROUT-
rT!
5 HIS LETTER VIA THE AUSTRALIAN-DIPLONATIC POUCH, AND ASKED TRAT Tht
i REPLY BE RETURNED TO HIF BY THE AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY IN WASHINGTON.
| 2. NR. MOFFITT’S REGUEST WAS HANDLESD BY THE OFFICE OF GENERAL
COUNCIL {0GC? WHO FIADE AVAILABLE FOR MR. MOFFITT COPIES OF THREE
! SAPFIDAVITS CALL OF WHICH IN PUBLIC DOMAIN} RELevant TO HERBERT ITKIN
j LAND HIS APFILIATION WITH THE, CIA. OGC CONCLUDED THEIR REPLY BY SAY-
= ING THAT, HERBERT ITKIN FURNISHED INFORMATION TO THE CIA OVER A PERTOD
; OF MANY YEARS, BUT THAT HE WAS NOT SERT TO ENGLAND TO COLLECT ANY
COORDINATING OFFICERS
IP USE ONLY
RELEASING OFFICER
CLASSIFICATION
FILE NUMBER
Oenn
023
RADAR ATER mi Re ites eee ime eee eee = o-e
Saad sae ‘ “duTeomne (-ELEPOUCH
ae ed) ng’ - SIGNAL CENTER here ONLY - _>
os -~ AGE cor “ace TOG TRE MRO
TEL a --0- GO oO ie
: . ie gurserieation |. oo. . a “ : :
cae ae €eRET "| Sees eee wi _.OGC. SUBI: (Tt, HERBERT
j ‘ i FMeESSAGE HANDLING INDICATOR" se DATE - TIME sroue DISPATCH NUMBER
if
ar: an ~~ aoe ee - ae peer nee oee en a
* TELEPOUCH | = - FintSines - Te
oO INDEX 0 nFovex é & .
' 0 RETURN TO: . E 2 IM PDET :
‘ O werues CL BY: O344OS
INFORMATION FOR CIA AND'HE DID NOT FURNISH THE CIA WITH ANY INFORMA-
TION WHILE HE WAS IN ENGLAND. .
| 3. OGC'S REPLY WAS SENT TO HR. MOFFITT IN THE SAME CHANNELS HIS |
REQUEST CAME IN. H@S POUCHING COPIES AFFADAVITS, BOTH LETTERS.
U/S/C# VIA POUCH
E2 IMPDET.-d
: 4 . 2. ‘, 4 fe
4 ; -
; . u
; y
04 ;
DATE : 5 fr. i Vue ia a co o J 1 rn ? = ; COORDINATING OFFICERS IP USE ONLY
ome oI OGC MR. GREANY {IN DRAFT}
UNITREA/ PMT SHH
EXT: SLAL/IOI CI MR. ROCCA {EN DPAFTS
THCODORE Ge SHACKLEY, C/EA
RELEASING OFFICER
CLASSIFICATION
SE CRE T
CROSS REFERENCE FILE NUMBER fe
|
104-10106-10547.pdf | 14-00000
104-10106-10547, | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE | (PRESIDENT JOHN F, KENNEDY ‘ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
‘Security Divte: ton:
predérat: Aviption ;
eee
“she Federal iavietion® Agency''a
Tepe
re
elon 7
" motitieatidny te is Phen ‘thet ‘your sstag sehtest
|
104-10106-10716.pdf | LOG =10106-10716 ; | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
Cra a any
‘
(see Houmn Munitions Bunker - Lease? by Subject firs)
ALLEGATION: oS CIA CONNECTION:
GARRISON has charged CIA had no connection vith the
that the turglary of the allege’ burglery of the Houma Munitions
Houma munitions bunker wes Bunker or any connection with the
"cIf-inspired." He issued bunker itself.
arrest warrants for Gorton Hovever, Pierre SCHLUMBERGER, preziéent
NOVEL and-Sergio ARCACHA of the SCHLUMBERGER CORPORATION, wee of
SHITE charging them with contact interest in 1950 for routine
the Houma burglary. exploitation es a forefen intelligence
souree. The FRI aiviee’ they had no objection
|
SUBJECT: SCHED BERGER WELL SURVEYING CORPORATION ;
|
|
. to, the. Agency's interrogsting Pierre |
SOURCE: ~ - SCHLUMBERGER who was en alien. In 2962
_ Darsrroe, IHC. was acavired by SCBELUMBERGER,
Enclosure 24 of THC. The fgency had a contract. with D«Y- i
CI/R2h renorantum ef STROM for an unclassified item| ($49,000 A y
7 ‘usust 1957. contract for the production of Mark II
limpet mines );/Agency interest was clessifies
Secret. SCHLUMBERGER, LTD. is a Dutch firm
controlled by French nstionais. After the
marger, it was determines that future relstioz-
. . ship with DAYSTROH must be governed by
—_ Agency policy not to place classifies contracts
with « foreign firm. In 1963 the same
__. @ecision wes reache? concerning Agency con-
tracts with Flectro-lMechaniesl Research, Inc.,
*a subsitiary of SCHLUMBERTER, LTD. EMR
dezlt in 211 rhases of telemetry. Contact
elesrances for other yersomel of SCHLUMBERGER
are set out below.
O= TEDISES RESULTS:
The SCHUUMRERGER COMPANY wes the subject of <2 name: check in
UG47 bec. use of < conte ct rejvest, and it wus determine? that there are
_ wunber of SCHLUMPER°ER corporations in Litin ‘serics which cre domi-
note? by Trench m-tion:ls. SCELUMBERCER has < patented eperntion for sn
oil well "shootine” service which is subscribei to by various of] companies.
The SCHLUMBERGER WELL SURVEYING CORPORATION in Eouston wis controlled by
Henri Ceorees DOLL, © Prench mstionsl. He was of coptsct interest in
1056 and 1957. Eis wife is the dcughter of Conrad SCHTUNBERCER.
seoner [See (vy [3! |
Sark ony AEF |
Do Not Reproduce
14-0900
a,
Cm August 1951 the Agency ves interested in contacting Professor Of ,
Edouaraé POLDINI, & geophysicist and professor at the University of . .
Geneva and formerly an employee of the SCHLUMBERGER CORPORATION in
Paris, for operational use. He was to be used as a channel to a Janus
- KANTAS who could give information about the fate of the previous employees of
the Jersey Company in Hungary, the production figures end extent of
exploitation of existing oil fields and exploration of new ol] fields
together with the names of the officials of the Russien Hungarien Company
who took over the Jersey Companys <2) ~~ ; oo oe
In March 1953 the SCHLUMBERGER file reflects that an FBI source
furnished information that. one Maurice Renri MARTIN, employed es an -
enginear by the SCHLUMBERGER Company, Paris, France, received a letter
dated 27 July 1951 at Moscow from one Sieg@ied Stefanovitch MOROSOFF,
seking MARTIN for specialized information concerning geophysics. The |
letter requested that MARTIN's reply be forwarded to Moscow through en inter-
mediary. From January 1932 util April 1937 MARTIN represented the SCHLUMBERGER
Company in Russia as an engineer, and it was thought that the correspondence
from MOROSOFF may represent a Soviet attempt to resume contact with MARTIV
end develop clandestine relations with him. The FBI conducted an investi-
gation dated Jime 1953 and determined that Maurice Henri MARTIN resided
at Nod Hill, Wilton, Connecticut and was employed by the SCHLUMBERGER
Well Surveying Co., Ridgefield, Connecticut. Informants adviseé that
elthough MARTIN was strongly nationalistic toward France, he Pave every
4ndication of being enti-Russien and there was no evidence of CP activities.
when DAYSTROM, INC. merged with SCHLUMBERGER, LTD., research was
done on the directors and officers of SCHLUMBERGER, LTD. The results
ere as follows:
OS indices reflect a record on Dillon ANDERSON, @ trustee of
Electro=Mechanical Research, Inc. (a subsidiary of SCHLUMBERGER, LTD.)
who vas also s proposed trustee of "NEW DAYSTROM" when it merged with
SCHLUMBERGER. ANDERSON is an attorney from Houston, Texas who wes
appointed by President EISENHOWER es en advisor to the Netional Security
Council from 1953 until 1956. ° He was considered for a special clesrance
in August 1955 but the briefing was not given. He was granted a covert Op
clearance in December 1953 and April 1954(for use as a covert essociate
on Project LPFUNKEL.
Pierre SCHLUMBERGER, President and Chief Executive Officer,
SCHLUMBERGER, LTD., Houston, Texas, French citizen, wes of contact
interest in 1950.
Cherles C. PARLIN, Director of SCHLUMBERGER, LTD., and a member
of the law firm of SHEARMEN, STERLING end WRIGHT, Englewood, Hew
Jersey, U. S. citizen, was of contact interest in 1962 but wes
security disapproved. PARLIN was allegedly the boy friend of Johanna
BEKER who was in contact with known Soviet Agents, ROBERT end JACK
SOBLE. EKER advised the FBI in 1957 that she received, paid for and
tranemittea to Robert SOBLE, OSS information which vas given her by
two former OSS employees. She also advised the FBI in 1957 that she
SECRET Cw?
14-00000
be qiven a very cener.l os line of her eetivitie: to P/RLIN oni , - |
f4 ts reliubly reportes thet PARLIN ond BEER shire? 2 hotel roon i
in Folland in 1057. PIRLIN recormente: « Willice Woart LANCASTER
for OSS employment. LANCASTER wis = eerver of the care law firm cs
PERLIB ené had « long record of Corzmnist, front <«ffilietions. PARLIN -
in 1956 travele? to Tussis ss © merber or % Geles: tion unfer the
epensorshir of the Ustional Council of Cherches. He wae also the
lnwyer for 6 Sviss 2 msrent Snjustrizliet who sola erms to the
Yoris “en3 the Convamist eountries since thet tire.
Clerk Drovillerd GOODMAN, Vice-President of SCHLUMBERGER, i
Ita., ouston, Texas, U. &. citizen, was security Gisapproved for
ure ty TED im 3692 omé for eontzct use in 1055 besed on his surport :
of Trofessor Dirk SFRUIK, = collescue ct HIT, who was indicted on i
» horee of hewine been s Cormunist conspirstor ané ifentifie® 2s = i
Corsanist Forty nemver. In Parch 1059 the sane ferogctory informetion ;
we fernisnel the Comtuct Office to be considered in ceternining say :
ure of TROPA. Also, c took written by COODEAN's wife, Fay Ellen os
GOODk AR, weg Povorably revievei ty the "DAILY WORKER" in i956.
Jenn C. LOGRIND, Vice-President of the SCHISM BERGER WaLL
SURVEZING CORPORATION, Fitcefielt, Comectiout (U. £&. citizen,
n “igsei Eouston, Texss 2G41) wes spproved for contact use in Msy
file is clenr. There is « notction thet one Ers. 7. C.
HD, S31G Fan’ell Street, Houston, Tess, in Noverber 10bb wes
rent of the Rousten Chipter, Frunee Forever, The Firhtinzs French
ttee in Americ... _
a
1%
Everett STRAITS, S:les Meansser, Houston rez, SCHIUMRERCER
‘ELL SUPVEYIIN Corveration, Houston, Texas, U. S. eltizen, wos security
proved (C:UTTON) for contset use in October 1950. Eis file is cleur.
Dniel ECMAMBESCES, French citizen, srcheolosist an? tezcher \
Sehr
gore, Frenee in 1955, w8 cme ed sn
wee cs 2 comrect scent in Fabul is fpril
-s e.ncelies 26 Sertember 1655. Eis file is
on Niebotas HAGAN, French Tinwneier, aac
; which eontsing « detctlet stedy of the inter-
rel:tionshirs ent farily esunections existims in French firms,
= tion on Deniel SC i ootcine’ therin. Diniel
2 e mescer < JEVING Corporstion,
tre Trever foc cnisten (1948-
egpoci te oF Don CURTPL of « wenlttor
i brother, Renri
Fecstes
ext FONEECOMVO, Emown Gommist,
EL, ~ rel-tive of the CURTEL fepily :
ce. Truns PORTECOSVO, Cilbvert's brother, !
fevectes to Ru
4 Sy Oh chor “y om
it vce mot snow ENCER Hell Surveyins Corporetion is in ny
wer comnected with the Well Surveyinn Corperction im Tulse.
Te awe
the Vel!
TOS a
-3-
: T/\
SECRET. YD
14.90000
cee SEGRET
° ar)
‘os SCELUMEERSER =n& Corspany 2ni enother SCHLUMBERGER subsisiary
Mirm, M:chine Bull (Competitor of IB), are connected with Schneiter
ani Compeny, 42 rue d'Anjon, Paris. Francois SAAR-DEMICHEL, runager
of Compegnie Internctionnle de Commerce, represents SCENEIDER for
the USSR end 1s a Soviet agent. In. Septerder 1961, an investigetion a
con@ucted in France disclose? thet “everything that takes plece in
the Elyzee is known in Boscov within 48 hours ané the originctor of
such intelligence is Francois SAAR-DEMICHRL.” Machines Bull ia
controlled by General Electric Company of the U. 5S. and SCHREIDER
ond Company is affiliated with U. S. Westinchouse Corporstion
umMier the newe SCHNEIDER-Westinghouse. :
}
|
{
{
{
. ”
The Study in KAGAR's file contains, the following sdditionsl
tnformetion goncerning BCHLUXSERCGER and Companys
_. Mewrice ané Rend SCHLUMEESGER ere affiliste’d with Lazard
Preres ané the Worms Bonk. Lazard Freres controls SCHNEIDER-
ilestinghouse anf hae « Hew Orlecns Branch Office. Closely essocieted
with the SCHLUMBERGER's ia Charles DOH. DOH wie born et Olesse in
1911 end arrived in tle Unite! States in 1937 to Join the SCHLUMBERGER
Yell Surveying Corporution at Houston, Texas. He teteme a U. 8.
citizen on 6 September 1950. Charles hes e brother, Jean, who was
closely associated with Leonard BOUN‘D, = suspected Soviet «cent.
HOUR was closely associated with Francois S/AR-DEMICKEL, previously
reatione? Soviet cgent cannected with SCELUMBERGER and Compsny.
Cusrles DOE was approved for Agency contact use in Septerber 1955 os i
a werber of the SCHUUMBERGER Well Surveying Corporstion. Eis file
is e'ear. - .
Roser Robert Hanri HENQUET, Executive Vice-Fresident, -
SCHUUMPERTER Well Surveying Corroretion, Fouston, Texss, was a’
for contact use on a Limited besia im October 1950. He had been an
erployee of OSE from 2943 to 1945; was given American citizenship _
end the Congsreseion:] Medul of Donor for bis deeds during World War I.
fyrthur Henry FRENTROP, <n employee of the SCELUMBERTER VELL
SURVEYING CORPORATION, Ridgefield, Connecticut, was of contact
interest in June 1956. Inform:tion concerning his spouse's critical
attitete towarde Averican eustoms and institutions and the dominant
,osition she exercise? over her busbond was furnishes the contact
office.
ry
|
104-10106-10753.pdf | 14-0
104-10106-10753 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 | oo
poy wy ; > 7 a Tgts Fg”
. 29 August 1968
SUBJECT: GEITZ, Charles . . . .
Charles SEITZ is identified as a pilot who was employed by the i
FLOURNOY Flying Service at the seme time-es-Leslie Norman BRADLEY. It - 1
46 reported that SEITZ stated that when BRADLEY learned of the aesasainetion {
(President KENNEDY), he decided he had to go to Siiemi immediately. ;
A check of OS records revealed the following information on one Charles
J. SEITZ who is currently being considered for a Proprietary Approval by
DOD far Project WUBETON. He is to be used as e flight instructor on an | zy
unwitting basis for ean Agency proprietary entity in Newton, Kansas. ‘The
eaults of investigation are not complete and clearance has not yet been
granted.
Charles J. SEITZ was born 31 January 1943 at Bteele City, Nebraska
and resides at 844 San Pablo, Wichita, Kansas. He is currently 4 test
pilot with Cessna Aircraft Company, Wichita, Kanses. From 1963 to dime
1966 Subject was in the U. 8. Army. He was ae flight mechanic and had
tours in Vietnam and Thailend.
Charles's father, Charles Williem SEITZ, was born 21 December 1917
at Hollenberg, Kansas end currently resides et 2111 South Terrace, Wichita,
Kanses 67218.
Inquiry wes mede of DOD if either Charles J. or his father Charles
Williem BETPZ, had ever been employed by the Jack R. FLOURNOY Flying |
Bervice and it was determined that both Charles J. SEITZ and his father
were employed by FLOURNOY in 1962-1963. Tha Jack R. FLOURNOY Flying Service
went out of bueiness in 1964 and the ower, Jack R. FLOURNOY, is currently
employed as 8 salesman. .
Yd
|
104-10107-10008.pdf | 14-001
104-10107-10008) | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
———
Lee ee TEEN TT
, ° To aed eee Ri ee
RETURN TO CIA Oe DF ~ CLE
Background Use Only PRP oe
Do Not Reproduce
j1 January 1977
he
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, SE Division
ATTENTION : Division Security Officer -
. Cm)
FROM + (thomas L. Briggs >
SE/X/LA .
SUBJECT : Appearance As Witness In Behalf of the
United States Government
REFERENCE : USA V. Gerald P. Hemming, Et Al. (76-371-CR-CA)
1. _ During the period of my employment as a-Special Agent. at the
Diug Enforcumont Acaluistinclcn Ct Tar. 1977), T conducted an
interview of Gér'ald Patrick Hemming (DPOB 1 March 1937, at Los Angeles,
California) on 23 May 1975 at DEA Headquarters in Washington, D.C.
_ My report. concerning that interview has become part of the case file
in -USA v. Gerald P. Hemming, Et Al., Case Number 76-371-CR-CA, -
Southern District of Florida, Miami, Florida. oe
2. Upon my entrance on duty in SE Division on 5 January 1977,
I orally informed the Division Security Officer, Billy Hix, about
the information in paragraph 1 above. Mr. Hix asked me to submit
the information in writing as soon as I was settled in the Division.
On 7 January 1977, however ,, Special Agent Robert Fredericks
telephonically contactediege Mason) DC/SE/X/LA, and told her that
the United States Attornery, Southern District of Florida, had
requested that I appear at the U.S. Courthouse, Miami, Florida on
10 January 1977 to confer with the Assistant United States Attorney,
Karen L. Atkinson, regarding my appearance as a witness in behalf of the
U.S. Government in the trial of Gerald P. Hemming.
3. During the afternoon of 7 January 1977 I conferred with Mr. Hix
who advised me to contact the Office of the General Counsel. I talked
to Mr. Edmund Cohen who advised me to get in touch with the Office of
Security, External Activities Branch (OS/EAB). I completed an
Outside Activity Approval Request (Form 879), obtained the concurrence
of DC/SE, Mr. John Stein, and submitted the Form 879 to OS/EAB.
OS/EAB sent me to Central Cover Staff (Mr. Blandford) and then to the
Office of the General Counsel. After discussions with Mr. Cohen, I called
zp
14-0000
i in) s
S/A Fredericks in Miami at Mr. Cohen's suggestion. S/A Fredericks was
not available. Mr. Cohen then advised me to return to my office and
he would contact me with further instructions. Mr. Cohen retained
the Form 879. Subsequently, Mr. Cohen advised me that I.should travel |
to Miami as requested and that CIA would reimburse me for expenses
connected with my activities in behalf of the U.S. Government. He
further advised me that being in an overt cover status I should state, ©
if asked under oath, that I am currently a CIA employee.
4. On 10 January 1977 I traveled to Miami where I met and
conferred with AUSA Karen Atkinson and DEA S/A Robert Fredericks.
They informed me that Gerald P. Hemming's case had been severed and
his trial would not begin on 11 January. AUSA Atkinson told me she
wanted me as a rebuttal witness if Gerald P. Hemming presented the
defense that he had been working at the direction of DEA. She said
they would not call me until and unless that defense was presented.
She also said that she felt that any attempt to question me concerning
my Current place of employment was irrelevent and she would object to
any such line of questioning. She said she would only ask me where
I was employed at the time I interviewed Hemming. I returned to
Washington B60. fe cailic Guy.
03
(Thomas L. Briggs)
Distribution:
1-ccs”
1- 0s
i- oc
ud
ae axon
14-0000
t
Gir
16 January 1978
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
FROM: Edmund Cohen
Assistant General Counsel
SUBJECT: U.S. v. Hemming
* o}
On 22 November 1977 the undersigned accompanied by Messrs .(Thomas
Briggs) Gary Mattocks and Robert Barteaux, travelled to Miami to confer with
Judge Hoeveler, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas M. Sherouse, U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Florida, about subject case. Messrs (Brig; s)and
Mattocks had dealt with Mr. Hemming while they were employed by the Drug
Enforcement Administration and Mr. Sherouse wanted them available as rebuttal
witnesses. Mr. Barteaux also was sought as a possible rebuttal witness to describe
the Agency's relationship with Mr. Hemming in the event that Hemming raised a
CIA defense.
ae)
2. On 23 November Mr. Griggs) Mr.. Barteaux and the undersigned met in
chambers with Judge Hoeveler, Mr. Sherouse, Mr. Roger Howard, law clerk to
Judge Hoeveler, and Mr. Ted Sakowitz, Public Defender for the Southern District
of Florida. Mr. Sherouse decided that Mr. Mattocks would not be required to
testify and he did not attend the meeting. The Judge initially expressed some reluc-
tance to have an ex parte conference because Mr. Hemming had assumed primary
responsibility for his own defense with only limited assistance from the Public
Defender. The Judge insisted that a transcript of the meeting be made but he
promised that the transcript would be sealed and, in fact, would not be transcribed.
3. The undersigned indicated that the Agency had no interest in the outcome
of the case and interposed no objection, fo ‘the introduction of any relevant information.
Our sole concern was to protect Mr icone his relationship with’CIA both before
and after his DEA employment. The Judge was informed that Me ®riggs')sole con-
nection with Hemming was on 23 May 1975 and that he had no contact with Hemming
during any period of Agency employment. The national security consequences of
exposure of Mf? ®riggs as well as the career consequences were outlined. In addition,
the Judge was informed that Mr. Barteaux was prepared to testify as an overt Agency
employee about any relationship between Hemming and CIA.
SEORET
ee IMPDET ch svP3E47- |
14-0000
-
“7
°
4. Judge Hoeveler asked Mr. Sakowitz to cross-examine Mr Grid to
determine whether he had any information which might be relevant to Hemming's
defense. Mr. Sakowitz stated that although he was aware that Mr. Hemming wished
to call Mr (Briggd23 a witness, he was not fully informed of all aspects of the case
and, therefc re, reluctant to question Mr. Griggs 2}Thereupon, Judge Hoeveler,
swore in Mr: riggs)and proceeded to ask him a series of questions to determine
whether Mr. Griggs) interaction with Mr. Hemming had been in any way connected
with his CIA employment. At the conclusion of this examination the Judge gave
Mr. Sakowitz a second opportunity to question Mr? Griggdand when Mr. Sakowitz
again declined, he stated that in light of the national security consequences which
had been brought to his attention he was not inclined to permit questions relating
to Mr. Grigg CIA employment.
[o)
5. At the conclusion of the conference in chambers, but before the jury was
admitted into the courtroom, Mr. Sherouse informed Mr. Hemming that Mr. riggs)°3
was available as a witness. When the trial proceeded Mr. Hemming concluded
his defense without calling Mr? Griggs. Mr. Sherouse, however, did call Mr. 03
@riggs)as a rebuttal witness. On cross-examination Mr. Hemming asked Mr .@riggs)
whether he was with CIA. Mr. Sherouse promptly objected to the question, the
Judge sustained the objection and Mr. Hemming went on to the next question. The
trial concluded soon afterwards without Mr. Barteaux being called as a witness.
It was subsequently learned that Mr. Hemming was found guilty as charged.
SA 7
i
PLM.
Edmund Cohen
EC: jz
Distribution:
Origing}/ LITIGATION-CRIMINAL, Hemming Gerald P.
- EC Signer
1 - Chrono
14-0000
CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE
_ OUTSIDE ACTIVITY APPROVAL REQUEST
COMPLETE AND FORWARD ORIGINAL AND 2 COPIES TO EXTERNAL ACTIVITIES BRANCH
DIRECTOR OF SECURITY; ATIN: EXTERNAL ACTIVITIES BRANCH
Si Divisio: >
ROOM NO. AND BLDG.
cast Dew 2023 229
aw
$1. FULL DESCRIPTION OF CUTSIDE ACTIVITY FOR WHICH APPROVAL !S REQUESTED INCLUDING NAMES OF ORGANIZATIONS OR INDIVIDUALS
CONCERNED. DATES. LOCALE. ETc. (Refer to HR 10-7 before completing)
| 2- REMARKS BY REQUESTOR
IN ENGAGING IN THE REQUESTED ACTIVITY, I WILL MAKE NO REFERENCE TO OR DISCUSS
MY CIA ASSIGNMENTS OR DUTIES. I (WILL, WILL NOT) BE IDENTIFIED AS EMPLOYED BY CIA
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
TF
SIGNATURE OF REQUESTING EMPLOYEE
f 3. COMMENTS AND CONCURRENCE OF STAFF, DIVISION OR OFFICE HEAD
DATE SIGNATURE OF OPERATING OFFICIAL
FOR COMPLETION BY EXTERNAL ACTIVITIES BRANCH AND RETURN OF ORIGINAL TO EMPLOYEE
DATE:
SECURITY. APPROVAL HAS BEEN (GRANTED, DENIED)
FOR THE ACTIVITY CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REQUEST.
(Pl (wor) CHIEF, SECURITY SUPPORT DIVISION
FORM OFF USE FPREVIQNS CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE
4 _ a . Ww v
sh Tle Sepp - er crrey There ath ue Q Doe
“ kas CED Crbduc& | on Bry ~ beh Lb
Bd, Bovteaws A be adh beady.
“Wa Beery pate,
ON FR ox SN Qe
qe Sgthe WP Tar She... 305 350 SY 49
Tk XS Oef.
ola . oa oS pea shi 7
le ay |
Tae ora
- | “hee cont / |
— - with be gta Dongs
NUS oe she Sens wh Lb lh ooh uy
oe racks, Oop, Hl ee | ‘fra care Hhd fir leh AW)
us nie of #6 Ppyfedda Batre wea oe
‘ we ( Vw
8 vega AN ph le Srgrdine ~~ Gz , iu, x ak
(Debene fF CARE A (fare 9% game [IY
it ~ Clk S Uf pf po
S/py/
oe Pao Wie al |
co Rec kale Mad oF .
bs Hane 7
“AR on, Sk oo,
ee
- = ——
(oe i <p —~ pecs
14-0000
7 a Coevala eR. Memaing)
Svs Hemming Chae Na 16211 -Cr 2 cA
POs Bld, 2 Ct Mme 300 NE Sus
(eat tain Flone 50-414 oe
__ Thomas M. Shevouse. Ast A Sit 1 ney S ds ae
Sax Mey rer 300 Ansley al ke
: =
a am -
= t
4
Revndlan Va 92040
State = 441 495B ____
a = 3 Ay tee
ve
we Ce, Clovicle a aj oY -
PON _
=abed a4 7 — —
- ds Cost one en aks _
- f se Stan Hen bee 1G. ce dl
ee aacae
SE, en own seh ,
eae nn
ok Me ~~€ Le hee a va
= " tat peal L. n Guy
ded a DS I hom siglo,
. p
_ .
Y
h CAG? fy 42 haf nal Cezn fe
i ra LA ? eat g ag
y a ad Sa vale
g
3 Yon TS RO teeny 1.6 A Gl Sm (47s
‘ Yor 2 wal!
Sls eee tare VA ec wa.
tn “Ti
- é
Te. ,
. :
“\
. , }
. ‘ :
> ;
Lia . :
J . . ’ :
14-0000
|
104-10107-10059.pdf | “\104-10107-10059 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 page Tiomeiraaee
a Le 7 - ( 9 7 ( 3 — o@e 76- 575
ee _ SEGRET . la-Av-9
RETURN TO CIA eet
Background Use Only “oo
Do Not Reproduce 7 October 1976
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division
ATTENTION ~~ : Mr. Rod Brooks |
FROM : Joal E. Keys, Chief
Corporate Cover Branch
Central Cover Staff
: é ,
SUBJECT : Request for Letter of Agreement
0? 4. Please prepare a Letter of Agreement between the Agency and ob
(LABLUE, which,.through the President of the firm, Mr. (Emmett Mw. Steela)
has agreed to place on retainer a Contract Agent of Europe Diviston,
ov (SOPHOHE/1. John Jd. Murray, Jr. represented the Agency tn these
negotiations. Identities will be forwarded under separate cover.
. ? om
2. Effective 1 October 1976, BBLUE will place on retainer (TOPHONE/1
at an annual retainer of2$9,000, which will be paid to him in monthly
increments of $750 by(LBBLUE. The Company will overtly negotiate a
retainer contract with, QOPHONE, which will make eminently clear that
both are negotiating and con iuding the contract as independent
parties; that the Company, LUE, will have no obligation to withhold
Federal, or state income taxes, or Social Security taxes.
3. In consideration of the support rendered, the Agency wil}
pay(L. ‘LUE $10,000 annually. Pravision. is made in this amount to
offset any nominal expenses the firm incurs in its overt associations
or support oft HONE/1. It also serves, in part, to minimize the
chances that duditing personnel will identify a wash transfer between
.the notional facility and payments to CLOPHONE/1
e
9
- 4. The Agency will retmburse(1 BBLUE in quarterly increments
via_a contrived contractual arrangement betwee LUE and a notional
facility of the Agency. Cancelled checks will serve as adequate
accountings for monies paid{LABLUE.
Ot
°. Please include the usual paragraphs of appreciation, secrecy,
and prohibition of bona fide employment. .
6. All information relating to this agreement is classified
secret. Both the Agency and the Company agree that the most stringent
Safeguards will be taken to protect this information, including the
E~2 INPDET
CL BY 055987
WARNING NOTICE
SENSITIVE INTELLIGERSE SOURCES
oy
rm
T
“ol | een
14-0000
of ‘ a ” > . . . . _ ;
«.
se OO sepa Ce
existence of the agreement. Any informatton in any form that must _
be given to a third party by either the Agency or the Corapany wil]
_be cone In strict conformance to the laws ‘safeguarding national. _
.. Security information, and only with full consultation between the
. Ageney and the Company, § ~~ - oo , rr
“
(JOEL EL KEYS) =o
SEQRET
|
104-10107-10085.pdf | N RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
‘/104-10107-10088) (2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATIO
(104-10107-10085) ~
ho wove .
wy . .
a
: ‘ : ge 69 CA47
. : - RETURNTO CIA -
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce y? Y
5 February 1969
MEMORANDUM FOR: Office of the General Counsel
VIA : Chief, Central Cover Staff
INFO > Mr. Rocca, CI Starr
93
SUBJECT : (fhomas Lee Roberts}) The Itkin Case
1. At our meeting on 30 January 1969, certain additional questions were
raised relative to the relationship between Goberts)ana Itkin.
Pay °
z
2A d& First, when did GBSLOBE Je come aware that Itkin and the
Conestoga Group Jhad approache (Roberts with a proposal to represent
cover company busirféss with interests from the United States and
England. We were given the name of the Conestoga Group)/no later
than 27 October 1966. We cannot say that we then knew t'
individual names of those involved. It was not uncommon for
G3 Goberts) to have discussions with a number of potential clients 3
when if became apparent that no real business was forthcoming
from this group, our interest ceased,
At the 30 January meeting, we were also asked certain 08
questions about (Roberts) financial involvement with the (Lew ‘firm)
he and Itkin has be; with prior to (Robert's ssociatic with
the Agency. 93
that he entered into an agreement with the firm on 31 May 1961 wherein he was
authorized leave of absence from 1 June 1961 to 31 May 1963 drawing $100.00
per week for that period.
. OF
c
cine MILLIGAN ) )
Chief, CcS(LBGLOBE
ge
of
2. We can ada nothing to(Roberts '\account of January 1968 reflecting =
|
104-10107-10087.pdf | 14-00000
104-10107-10087, | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
. a
wd ““¢ g
.
OGC 69-0402
4 March 1969
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
1. I showed Mr. George Carey his memorandum of 1955
to the Director referring to T. and H., and said we thought
that H. referred to a General Hardin, After considerable
speculation Mr. Carey finally placed T. as being Juan Trippe
and Hardin as an Air Force General who was being placed with
24 (an Am for operational reasons, primarily technical information
collection. Independently Mrs. Lovejoy bad checked with Mr.
Larocque, and he also recalled General Hardin was a man
Mr. Carey was interested in placing with (Pan An) for operational
reasons. zy
2 The Air Force Register lists a General Thomas O.
Hardin, Air Force Major General, who retired in 1955, which
would seem to fit in as he is listed as an airline executive.
Mr. Carey had no knowledge whatsoever of the Itkin case, and
we felt it was out of the question that General Hardin is
synonymous with Philip Harbin,
LAWRENCE R. HOUSTON:
General Counsel
OGC:LRH:bt
1-C/CI/R&A
1-DCS
2-General Counsel Ghrone
Wubject HERBERT ITKIN
2nd
|
104-10107-10089.pdf | 14-0000
104-10107-10089| {2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 Vile
f ASE ore CAI Te Cour ee ee ne ne ef
ELEPOuGH To Ee nn
O nar ro: - “N E 2 IMPDET,
io +3
™ Blo penn ee GL BY: 6344
ito: MELBOURNE.CANBERRA») 5
SE CR E T , TELEPOUCH
4
‘DISP NO: and-wnes
¢ ~ RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
Date L& NOVEMBER 3973 13-10
|| ito: CHIEF OF BASE. GELBouRNE>
CHIEF OF STATION. (CANBERRA) !3-4
= ECRET "6G STR: EN, -HERBERT_Y
|
|
|
:
i
:
if FROM: CHIEF, EAST ASIA DIVISTON
|) SUBJECT: NR. HERBERT. ITKIN ee, A arr,
FYI ONLY: ee | .
03 zy
wid: |}: feces -ON..b NOVENBER-1973 -1R- (LESLIE Verd ARVIS: ASO REP) IN BASHING -
TON. HAND CARRIED TO H@S A LETTER FROM AUSTRALIAN XJUSTICE A. R- MOFF-.
ITT REQUESTING INFORMATION O THE RELIAZILITY OF NR. HERECRT ITKIK
WHOM HE DESCRIBED AS A FORMER CIA AND FEZ EMPLOYEE. THE FOLLOWING
PARAGRAPHS ARE THE GIST OF mR. MOFFITT'S LETTER. WHICH MAS ADDRESSED
ETO "HR. WILLIAM CROS2Y". {SIC} DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGCUCE:
3 A. MGFFITT HOLDS A COMMISSION TO IN@UIRE INTO THE INFIL-
Z TRATION OF ORGANIZED CRIME IKTC NEW SQUTH WALES- IT IS OF SuSSTANTILi
Z IMPORTANCE TO HIS INCULIRY THAT KE CONSIDER EVIDENCE GIVEN DURING A
IP USE ONLY
, RELEASING OFFKER
IN E c R E SLassirication
CROSS REFERENCE
14-0000
‘oO. oO |G
a TELEPOUCH = = eg
OGG. SUBJ: ITKIN, HFRB
tol meer : a oo E 2 IMPDET
Po 0 w ones . ; CL BY: 0348405
CouRT CASE IN ENGLAND TH WULY 1974 BY ITKIN.
B. IN HIS TESTIMONY IN ENGLAND MR. ITKIN CLAINED TO HAVE.
|. BEEN RECRUITED BY CIA IN AN TUNEDERCOVER CAPACITY" IN ABOUT 3954. HE
| | CLAIMED HE WAS WITH THE C.I.A. UNTIL MARCH 1463 AT WHICH TINE BY SONE
| |. ARRANGEMENT HE WORKED FOR BOTH THE FBI AND CIA. UNTIL JANUARY 19b6.
_ C. HOFFITT ASKS FOR INFORKATION ON THE STATUS OF MR- ITKIX
i + DURING THE YEARS 3464 TO 469° AND FOR COPIES OF “ANY RELEVANT AFFI-
DAVITS OF PERSONS IN aurHosicrY an THE- FBI OR, CTA USED Ty PROCEEDINGS
~ 2
IN USA.” 8 NO
wat II jim: ¢ De: MOFFITT NOTED THAT IN THE INTERESTS, OF PRIVACY HE ROUT- |
: ED HIS LETTER VIA THE AUSTRALIAK-DIPLONATIC POUCH. AND ASKED THAT THE
REPLY BE RETURNED TO HIM BY THE AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY IN BASHINSTOK.
@. MR. MOFFITT'S REQUEST UAS HANELESD BY THE OFFICE OF GENERAL
_ ~ , COUNCIL tocc? WHO MADE AVATLABLE FOR MR- MOFFITT COPIES OF THREE
u AFFIDAVITS {ALL OF GHICH IN PUSLIC DOMAIN? RELEVANT TO HERBERT ITKIN
SAND HIS AFFILIATION WITH THE CIA- OGC CONCLUDED THEIR REPLY BY SAY-
ZING THAT HERBERT LTKIN FURNISHED INFORMATION TO THE CIA CYER A PERTOS
—
> OF MARY VE CARS. BUT THAT HE WAS NOT SERT TO ENGLAND TO COLLECT AY
IP USE ONLY
RELEASING OFFICER
14-0000
E 2 IMPDET
O wenss : CL BY: O344g5
| ANFORMATION FOR CIA AND’HE DID NOT FURNISH THE CEA WITH ANY INFORMA
TION WHILE HE BAS IN ENGLAND.
3+ 0GC"S REPLY WAS SENT TO MR. MOFFITT IN THE SANE CHANNELS HIS |
REQUEST CANE IN. Hes POUCHING COPIES AFFADAVITS, BOTH LETTERS.
‘U/S/CB VIA POUCH .
EZ IMPDET- |
paTe:3E KOVEMOCR Lv
Ouch ARESHER RAK
UNIT: EA/ ww
EXT: SLAL/9G33
COOROINATING OFFicens
OGC MR. GREARY iIK DRAFT}
IP USE ONLY
CI NR. ROCCA {3x DRAFT}
THEODORE G. SHACKLEY, C/EA
RELEASING OFFICER
~
Reger
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED
|
104-10107-10135.pdf | 14-001
'104-10107-10135| | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
. ‘os ‘ -;
. . ;
OGC 69-0181
31 January 1969
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
RETURN To CIA
SUBJECT: Herbert Itkin ‘ackground Use Only
© Not Reproduce
1. A meeting was held on 27 January 1969 with Messrs.
Rocca, Houston, Warner and myself to discuss the ramifications
of the confrontation with the New York FBI office on 17 January,
It was concluded that additional information was required on
03(Thomas L. Roberts) and (Robert Delson.°> I contacted the Director
of Security and requested the security files on these two individuals
and was advised that we could not have the security files but that
Mr. Ward Greene would bring the files to the office and discuss
their contents openly,
03 2. On 29 Ftanuary, Mr. Greene brought the security files
on Roberts) and elson) and was most cooperative in explaining
their contents, “Attached is a chronological rundown on the
pertinent information on {homas L, Roberts} affiliation with
the FBI, CIA and Itkin, 03
3. On 30 January a°*reeting was held°with Messrs. Houston,
Warner, Rocca, and @ugene Milligan), CCS/LPGLOBE, to discuss
the operational use of Mr. Roberts.) Mr®(R oberts) has been a
Staff Agent of CIA since 28 August 1961. From March 1964 to
ovember 1964 he spent time in (West Afric writing a monograph
on (West African legal) problems. /° It should “be noted that this
task was performed under a grant from a foundation which was
blown in the MHDOWEL exposures. In November 1964 Roberts) oF
was assigned for Cover to the (Radio Corporation of America 24
legal)staff where he remained until March 1965 and then went
to (Daka?),
{2-0
(4 pr
14-0000
2 A
4, The facts in the attached chronology are subject to
question since they are the result of oberta) own explanation of
his affiliation with Itkin rather than having been determined from
independent sources, The most critical aspect would appear to
be the owledge or suspicion that Itkin may have known of
03 (Roberts) affiliation with CIA. This knowledge is borne out by
the strange way in which Itkin repeatedly bring? obertsy name
into the story which Itkin develops about his CIA affiliations.
One of the questions. to be answered by (LPGLOBE personnel is
whether or not (R obezts) reported his activities with Itkin in Geneva,
Switzerland, in March 1966, There appears to be no record of
O3(R oberts!) having explained why he never pursued the Itkin debt or
what his financial contribution was to the (law firm of Itkin, RobertsoS
and Greenbaum. )
5. Mr. Rocca was advised by Mr. Sam Papich of the FBI
that the New, York District Attorney may be considering prosecution
against (Robe t for having absconded with funds received from
negligence cases. We do not have sufficient information to evaluate
the likelihood of criminal prosecution. It may be necessary to
discuss this problem with representatives of Mr. Hogan's office,
O .
6. With regard to Robert poison) there appear to have been
two operational considerations, one having been a request to use
him with Project DTPILLAR from November 1953 to February
1955, and then a request in 1963 by the Domestic Operations
Division for his use on Project WUBRINY. In March 1964 DO
Division advised Security that (Delson was not going to be used
on WUBRINY. Mr. Rocca comniénted that there are some rather
ominous allegations against members of the firm of (Delson, Levinv&S
and Gordon,) indicating that one member of the firm was a card-
carrying member of the Communist Party. At the present time
Mr. Rocca is investigating the DTPILLAR use of Mr, (Delson)
03
JOHN K, GREAN
Agsistant General Counsel
Attachment ...
ce: G/CI/R&A
{ 2/pf
14-0000
» a
°
7 March 1966 (Robert) received letter from Itkin but his
; secretary advised that (Rob. rts was on vacation
in Austria. Itkin contacted(Robertd in Gustria) 4
and set up meeting in (Geneva, Switzerland.)
2 es
15 March 1966 Meeting at (Hotel Beau Rivage) in Geneva}(®
Present were Itkin and (wife) (Jim Marcus),%
ob (Littman) and @wife) Meetitiy lasted three days.
No projects get. off the ground,
o¢
Nov 1966 (Robebts?in New York City, met at (Marcus's):
apartment with Itkin and (Marcus's) father.
Then met Itkin again at a dinner given by
(Mario Brod.)
ob *
Nov 1967 @ Sverty again in New York, nd contacted Itkin.
Had lunch with Itkin and (Bréd.) Last time
(Robétts) saw or heard of Itkin until he read in
the press about the (Marcud scandal,
06
‘Vay
14-0000
». . . i voe
. *
Nov 1949
Jan 1950
Nov 1950
Aug 1955
Nov 1955
June 1956
Fali 1956
Apr 1957
6 Apr 1961
1 June 1961
TK ipy
o>
(zHOMAs L, ROBERTS
2 ob
(Roberts volunteered his services to Boston FBI;
not accepted,
03 ire)
@obereJ left United States to study in(Paris)
From Nov. 1950 until Nov. 1955 reported on
security matters to the ®oston FBI) Office,
Labor Youth League. zy
06. 03
Itkin (hired Roberts) to work for @elson, Levin &
Gordon.) (Robe%td) says he was Gired to handle o&
maritime matters|in litigation.)
g
o
Roverey moved to New York City.
24
Restmed services of reporting to (BD Was a
paid informant of (New York FBD office reporting
on the National Lawyers Guild. 24
oO
(Roberts) and others submitted profit-sharing plan
to @elson, Levin & Gordon} not accepted,
of oF
03 , .
Q@oberts) resigned from(Delson, Levin & Gordon )
to form a new(firm, Roberts, Greenbaum & Itkin. 08
(No mention of financial arrangement of setting
up new firm.)
(Rovedtd came to Washington and talked with
Robert Amory about employment with CIA since
Amory had been a former profe$sor of \Roberts.
re) (Roberts was sent to overt CIA personnel recruiter
and filled out an application for employment with
CIA,
° , -
Rovere) took a leave of absence from the Gixm of oe
Roberts, Greenbaum & Itkin)which was to last -
from 1 June 1961] through 31 May (1963) Roberts) oz
at dA
14-0000
06
was to receive 6100) per week from the firm
while on the leave of absence, {(Roberts/ did
receive the following, payments:
04 (Sept) 1961 26200) & Dec) 1961 ~ 6100)
of Go Jam 1962 861003 @ Jus 1962 - $100) %
of (8 June) 1962 “G50Q NOTE: Roberts 3
received only $1,000) when he should have .
received ($10, 400)
24 Oo 03
12 July 1961 (FBl)advised that Roberts) was still reporting
to them in New York.
oO .
25 July 1961 (Ropes) was given CIA polygraph interview.
04
Aug 1961 Qobert3 approved by Office of Security for CIA
employment as a Staff Agent.
74
Sept 1961 @BD advised they had broken off all contact
with @oberts.) a8
. &
3 oO
24 May 1963 (Robertg wrote letter to (firm withdrawing his
membership effective 61 May) 1963.
04
. oO .
May 1965 Ag oberts) received a check from Jtkin for $2,500
but with the stipulation that Ro ert)! send $1,250
to England in order to get the money out of
reach of Itkin's first wife.
93 i2-I0
26 May 1965 (Robert arrived in(Dakar)
_ 9 -
16 June 1965 CRobért9). sent $500 to Itkin,in England after
; asking Itkin about a desk and chair to be sent
to Roberta, in (Dakar
23 {2a
10 Nov 1965 03(Robert9 forwarded money to Aida Itkin in England.
i]
Jan 1966 Itkin advised @obert) about the formation of
(Conestoga, Lid.) 7
a, :
; cs)
Feb 1966 Itkin wrote to Robert about Senator Lodge.
2
Bld
|
104-10107-10137.pdf | 14-0000
104-10107-10137
2 ty ( é
‘fof
| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KE
OGC 69-0181
31 January 1969
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
| B RETURN TO CIA
SUBJECT: Herbert Itkin Do Net Repro
1, A meeting was held on 27 January 1969 with Messrs.
Rocca, Houston, Warner and myself to discuss the ramifications
of the confrontation with the New York FBI office on 17 January.
It was concluded that additiona] information was required on
03 (Thomas L. Roberte\and Robert Delson)?? I contacted the Director
“tp
Security and requested the security files on these two individuals
and was advised that we could not. have the security files but that
Mr. Ward Greene would bring the files to the office and discuss
their contents openly,
32, On 29 Janyary, Mr. Greene brought the security files.
on(R oberta>and (Delson) and was most cooperative in explaining
their contents. Attached is a chronological rundown on the
pertinent information on (Thomas L. Roberts) affiliation with
‘the FBI, CIA and Itkin. 0}
3. On 30 Janua a meeting was heldwith Messrs. Houston,
Warner, Rocca, and(Eugene Milligan, CCS(LPGLOBE, to discuss
the operational use of Mr. (Robertge3 Mr {Robert} has been a
Staff Agent of CIA since 28 August 1961.,, From March 1964 to
Novembe 11964 he spent time in(West Africa) writing a monograph:
on (West African legal)problems. It should be noted that this
task was performed under a grant from a foundation which was
blown in the MHDOWEL exposures. In November 1964 (R oberte)
was assigned for Cover to the (Radio Corporation of America z4
legal) staff where he remained until March 1965 and then went
to (Dakar)
{2-10
tee a nent cee nt tn
14-0000
iz/pd
ld re ca) ( ( , z “ ast A me € €
4, The facts in the attached chronology are subject to
question since they are the result of (Robérts own explanation of
his affiliation with Itkin rather than having been determined from
independent sources, The most critical aspect would appear to
be the knowledge or suspicion that Itkin may have known of
°3 Roberts) affiliation with CLA, This knowledge ie borne out by
the strange way in which Itkin repeatedly brings (Roberts) name
into-the story which Itkin develops about his CIA affiliations, ©
One of the questions,to be answered by (ABGLOBE personnel is
whether or not (Robert reported his activities with Itkin in Geneva,
Switzerland, in March 1966, There appears to be no record of
03 (Roberts ") having explained why he never pursued the Itkin debt or
what his financial contribution was to the (law firm of Itkin, Roberts
and Greenbaum.) o&
.5. Mr. Rocca was advised: by Mr. Sam Papich of the FBI -
that the New York District Attorney may be conaidering prosecution
against Roberts)for having abeconded with funds received from
negligence cases. We do. not have sufficient information to evaluate
the likelihood of criminal prosecution. It may be necessary to
discuss this problem with representatives of Mr. Hogan's office,
0 ;
6. With regard to Robert Délson) there appear to have been
two opérational considerations, one having been a request to use
him with Project DIPILLAR from November 1953 to February
1955, and then a request in 1963 by the Domestic Operations
Divieion for his use on Project, WUBRINY. In March 1964 DO
Division advised Security that (Delson) was not going to be used
on WUBRINY. Mr. Rocca commented that there are some rather «
ominous allegations against members of the firm of @elson, Levin
and Gordon) indicating that one member of the firm was a card-
carrying member of the Communist Party. At the present time
Mr. Rocca is investigating the DIPILLAR use of Mr. (Delson,)
; Ob.
JOHN K, GREANEY
Assistant General Counsel
- pom Surhe?
tro. 7 moog
Attachment 1 - ogee’
i
a a
Jf det ros
i CICHB RA
|
104-10107-10178.pdf | 14-0000
104-10107-10178 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992: yen
ROUTING AND RECORD
1 SUBJECT: (Qpticnal}
LETTER OF INDEMNITY FOR(COLLINS navto)29
pNereazinn reeaneed
|
J
pa nn a a i eee ee
‘ FROM: exvension [| NO. 7} V/D-51)/76
William F. Donnelly. ... ect ne a
Acting Chief, Division D = ——- 427 | £17 November 1976
mrvere oT oom eames nee
¢ TO: (Giicer datiqnatien, room sumber, ond
j building) ops. ‘ .
SrersnnpuEnE'SUDIP BURDEN nL DURE nena
* DATE
OFFICER'S CGAUACHTS (Mumber each commen! te show from whem
INTHALS to whom, Grave ao line across columea after cack cor
FORY/ARDEO
. RECEIVED
RETURN f,
o¢
Ponet Use On
Bo Not "eproduce ”
ee euamescriauat ceca REE (Tae robo a ean! MMIC ONT Ene eatvA Aan h ania treme innesicneae fnemnimm nipcnee a: wemme-os.\maevrenvren necee tne
eae mc a
nar 4
je ~ eee
_ nas as
$
Ym nn ne ee tt men anne nina neater
wo
Pay
ny
=
[] ceucimenvian (CD GRP SRY
14-0000
DIV/D-511/76
17 November 1976
" MEMORANDUM FOR: Office of General Counsel
FROM : William F. Donnelly
Acting Chief, Division D =
SUBJECT : Letter of Indemnity for (Collins hadio)
1. We would appreciate your signing the attached
letters.
7 06,°G .
; 2. Mr. Yockey, Vice President and General Manager
[os Collins Government Teleconmunications Division, has
greed to conduct certain research and development work
on behalf of an Agency proprietary provided this Agency
guarantees all agreements entered iptolbygcollins)and
the proprietary. The attached letters will. serve this of
purpose. The unclassified letter will be for Mr. (Yockey's
retention. The classified letter will be shown for his
information and written acknowledgment and then returned
to Agency files.
| We Dvn
William F. Donnel
Attachments:
As Stated
14-0000
29 November 1976
_ 06
Dear vr.(Yockey? : 24
This letter acknowledges that the Liechtenstein
Austalt Electronic Products International Etablissement
is an instrumentality of the United States Government.
This Agency, as-the true party in interest, stands
behind all official agreements/of the Anstalt onda D)
siarantees its credits) . :
a] ee :
This classified letter will be retained in the
files of this Agency for safekeeping, but will be ©
available to you or your authorized representatives
at any. reasonable time. The United States Government
appreciates your cooperation in this matter relative to
the national security.
Sincerely,
C, Jf BRS 2, (yp fillers
2
Anthony 2D Lapham
General Counsel
Acknowledged
Ob
(tomirt recy yo
ryt
ee |
Me
4 inl
14-0000
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505
29 November 1976
Ob
Dear Mr. (cockey)
'' four company may enter into contractual agreements
involving this Agency. A classified letter of even
date herewith describes arrangements relating to these
agreements and is held in the files of this Agency for ©
safekeeping and has been acknowledged by you. This
classified letter is available for your inspection or
the inspection of a representative of your company at
. any reasonable time.
a a This Agency appreciates your cooperation in this
matter relative to the national security.
Sincerely, '
ha thang Ch hoplorte,
Anthony .A. Lapham
General Counsel
“Un
|
104-10107-10180.pdf | 14-001
4104-10107-10180 oe | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 , eX
(104-10107-10180) . 7-0
rs . € ee € OC MALI OPE
‘ 7
~ ne MO
Vy Ot
Background U
se O
Po Not Reprodues”
; i
t
“AMOPANDUM FOR: Director of Lesistics
wUBJECT _ t Request for Services of Collins Modem Field Service
Engineer
i. The Office of Comamications recently muorchased tvo Colline Radic
Company biodel. TE-216D-16D High Frequency Data Modems at a cost of $20,006
ach, These Modems are specially designed equinsent and will be used to
sest the feasibility of tranamitting Secure (enerynted) Yoice over a narrow
band, high frequency, radio cirenit. We also intend to determine their
suitability for use in high speed data transmission, and testa by our
Engineering Staff sre scheduled-to commence in mid-February.
2. Owing to the fact Modems are very complex in operation reauiring
special set-up techniques and adjustment, it vould be sdvemtegeous to have
@ speclalist available to sasist cux personnel and to assure timely completion
of the tests. Accordingly, if is requested that a contract be let with th
Collins Fedlo. Company for the semyices of a Field Service Engineer. Tt is
presently estimated that the services of thia Engineer will te required at
24 (Station “D", vre)ror epproximately six to elght weeks depending on test
: recuita. The exact date on which the Engineer is neaded vill be determined
ss preliminary installation of the equipment is completed. For planning
purposes, however, ve estimate he will be required om or about 6 March 1967.
3. it is understood from Giseussionsa with Collins reoregentatives at
Rewport Beach, Cslifornia, that engineering services of this tyne cost
apcroximately $2,000 per cionth in addition to travel expenses. Ye recommend f
fa the services of Modem Field Service Engineer, Mr.(Doreld Varren Baycott,)° ;
be secnred, as He has on Agency TOP SECRET clearanhee effective 19 May 1965,
Fs
tock
4. For any additionsl infornstion, please contact Mr.(Jeck W. Andrews )
on Extension £045, - 3
JOURN WY. COPTEY
Director of Communications
AGtachment:
=tauest for Procurement Services
> inj
14-0000
Engineer
(Signed) RICHARD H. LANSDALE
Office of Ceneral Counsel
APPROVAL:
2
(S/ Pow F.
ele oy ta
A?
f , Jeitectar oF Sersommel-
] c v
Addressee w/ath.
Director of Security s/o att.
Direeter of Personnel w/o att.
General Counsel «fo at:
El: Request for Eervices of Collins Hodem F)
hd
ies
Ay
Pho
iy
Q
7
Service
§ FEB i967
Sate.
|
104-10107-10183.pdf | 14-00000
104-10107-10183 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
( f
SC-022.64-53
‘Sucmery of Initial Missions
perloa from 20 June to 10 July 1956 the Soviet Bloc air defenss”. _
subjected ‘to eight penetrations of an unprecedented nature, seven >
thin a period of only eight deys. It must be remerdered that
5 the only basis of judging the performance of the Soviet
Lite
Ls important because it is clea = »recerial that |
ry defeuss bust ness is conducted over JanéTines “and thus. nok
, conclusions may be drawn. from
} these ere indicated as follows: :
i. In spite of the fact that these missions came as 2 surprise,
mone of them went undetected. ‘This is clear evidence that their
r2car coverage extends above 72, ,C00! feat.
~ 236
14-0000
5C-02164-58
2. By 5 July 1956, the fourth fist %, the USSR was aware
of the purpose of the missions and were taking counter action.
Cne positive action was the standdow of civil flights while the
p
mission aircraft was over the USSR, and a second action which is
b2lieved related is the moving of MIG-19 aircraft imto Eest
trmaay and Poland on.7 July 1956. Also HIG-19's were moved
inte Hungary at ahout this time. -
erformance of the Soviet sysvem on the 5 July mission,
indeed curious. While the action evident fraw Comm?
ar an explanation which appears to fit the known Pacts
fered as follows: As a result of the previous missions » the
ts bad concluded the essential facts concerning the nissions,
+, that they were for reconnaissance, that they flew zbove<65,000™~
et, and that a penetration as deep as Moscow wes possible. They.
obadly surmised that the 3 July mission wes headeé for Moscow when
track appeared on a northeasterly heading. “The toss of the * |
Brget whéi it entered Sovies territory wes provably deliberate and) )*
.the red herring" track returning to the west was either a dodge |‘
/Or e-convenience to avoid broadcasting a track for ell the system ,
'td ses that-a_/ "hostile or intruder" wes eoning over Moscow with no
means available to.stop it. This idea is supported by the use.
@ raid number assigned in the region just beyond the point
ve the track had been "lost". In adai tion, the treck was not yo
2oeled “hostile or intruder" when it ves broadcast after it
pessed beyond Moscow. THe. reporting .o? the track when it did |
Rar Was only by Moscow and it has been suggested that other oo \
tions had been instructed not to broadeast the track. ‘Further, + may.
¥ =ay nov be @ coincidence that the height broadcast was almost _ [
cxectly half of the true altitude of the mission aircraft, but-en
the text missions, four.days later, the altitude reporting was ..--- &
\_Sonsisteatly above"50,000 feet. . CS ae
CEI hy be OD be pe
Q uit
© ¢
ving
al
og
("oy oe
ake
re
Q
a)
ty a
Gi
QO
y
zt
Qu
a fty
bl
d ty
q
.
ou
4g
9 July 1956, in addition to the evident recogition of
ight of the mission flights, tracking was better and
he performance of the werning system was nuch improved.
9+ “he next day, 10 July 1956, ‘the Soviet air defense warning }
SYStSG closed a 3000 mile track with only tyo short periods of . ~
*usion or track loss. Altitude reporting vas over 60,000 feat
2 one plot passed 68,800 which was only 100 feet off target.
6. The first cight missions proved that the air defense warning
systen is deployed in dopth. (This was evident fran both the ‘continuity |
OF treck and most foreéefilly fron the ELD date collected. Some 163: ~
Va cepts of Soviet Bloc radars operating in the 3000 ne/s band were
o asd by project ELIUT as follows: TOXEN-1331, WHIFT-37, GAGE-26,
2 -37, Otner 30. These numbers cennot be equated to tn-
a?)
rb
é}
> Fg
adar sets since the same redar nay be intercepted more than
+ TOKEN sites were Located, including 213 new sites. Some
a1 TOKEN signals were identified out aveileble information
determination of location so that $+ must be con-
ese signals inelude both known and new sites. Because
imitetion of ELINT to the 3000 ne/s band and the Soviet ; !
collocating radars on different frequencies the total
of radars may be expected to be 2t.least double the numbar . to
Ss. , . 7
i
iM
fay 2)
©
O
ai
Oo fu
cr RS
try
tL
i
+H
Q er
R
ct
F
ty pb by
0
® ltd:
(3)
bh
|
ee
ch ty
- 2h ne
TOP SECRET — EIDER—CHESS
on
_ presente oF 1.
o2en
SC-02164-58
3
S}
-
. 3102 and track loss seemed to be related to the >
ar Ba TH BURDETS OF Tignters alt tnaovgn the saturation point
azterminsd because of insufficient date.
has not bd
8. The question of radars for height finding, ‘the | capabilities
of TOXEN in this role, the introduction oe ROCK CAKES end later
acvelormients are discussed in enother section. It is believed,
however, that these missions were & catalyst in the imbroduction
cf ROCK CAKEs.
- 25 -
TOP SECRET — EIDER— CHESS
|
104-10107-10195.pdf | 14-00000
104-10107-10195,
2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
ANIEL FLOFES
14-0000
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ,
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505
OGC 75-4191
13 November 1975
Personal and Confidential
The Honorable Barnard F. Jennings
Senior Judge, Circuit Court for
Fairfax County
4000 Chain Bridge Road
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Dear Judge Jennings:
An employee of this Agency who falls within that special category
of employees that members of my office have previously discussed with
you has been summoned for jury duty at Circuit Courtroom #6, Fairfax
County Courthouse, commencing 17 November 1975. It is my understanding
that you believe such employees should not serve on a jury.
The employee is identified by a copy of his jury summons returned .
under separate cover and, as previously agreed, we ask that this letter
and the name of the employee not be joined together. Mr. Edmund Cohen
of my office will be pleased to explain the circumstances further if you
desire. He can be reached at the follo.-ing number: 351-5648.
We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.
Sincerely,
7 Z,
rhc OO (Ow bn Ae
John S. Warner >
General Counsel
7
OGC: ECohen: aam
Distribution:
Original - Addressee (delivered by courier 11/13/75)
_1L~- JURY DUTY
1 - EC signature file ;
1 - Chrono NOTE: Per GMBreneman's call to Mrs. Chesby,
; Judge Jenning's secretary, Mr. Daniel Flores
has been excused from jury duty. Sandy called
Mr. Flores with this message.
Alyce 11/14/75 ea
14-00000 -
' = —_ 7”
_ we _
wegutia, ——L]_ SECRET
: :o UNCLASSIFIED oO
SUBJECT: Opnenal)
_____ Daniel Flores -
FROM:
-_ Jury Summons _ _ —
’ Frank Stewart TS ~ ¥O7 3)
OS/EAB Uf a/7y
ow from wham
COMMENTS (Number each comment fo sh
to whom. Drow @ Fine across column after each comment.)
To 1.
Request OGC action Re
attached.
INTERNAL
610 “some (secret =O) conrioentiaL CO KES =O UNCLASSIFIED
FORM
3-62
14-00000
CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE
OUTSIDE ACTIVITY APPROVAL REQUEST
L AND 2 COPIES TO EXTERNAL ACTIVITIES BRANCH
BATE
7 November 1975 _
COMPLETE AND FORWARD ORIGINA
DIRECTOR OF. SECURITY; ATIN: EXTERNAL ACTIVITIES BRANCH
(Staff, division or office head and security officer, where assigned)
Chief LA/COG
Chief La Security
—_—_—
ROOM NO. AND BLOG.
3D5325
G NAMES OF ORGANIZATIONS OR INOT VIDUALS
COMPONENT
" LA/COG
NAME ANO GRAOE OF EMPLOYEE (Print or
type)
Daniel Flores GS-12
b- FULL DESCRIPTION OF OUTSIDE ACTIVITY FOR WHICH APPROVAL 15 REQUESTED INCLUCIN
CONCERNED, GATES. LOCALE, ETC. (Refer to HR 10-7 before completing)
On 29 October 1975 I received a summons from the Circuit Court
of Fairfax County, Virginia to serve on jury duty peginning
17 November 1975 for two months.
I an presently(under Department of State cover (nominal) } Request
Guidance. _
BL
| REMARKS BY REQUESTOR
TED ACTIVITY, I WILL MAKE NO REFERENCE TO OR DISCUSS
IN ENGAGING IN THE REQUES'
MY CIA ASSIGNMENTS OR DUTIES. I (WILL, WILL NOT) BE IDENTIFIED AS EMPLOYED BY CIA
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
I1GNATURE OF REQUESTING EMPLOYEE -
. COMMENTS AND CONCURRENCE OF STAFF.
DIVISION OR OFFICE HEAD
CONCUR: MELE?
DaTE
TIVITIES BRANCH AND RETURN OF ORIGINAL TO EMPLOYEE
FOR COMPLETION BY EXTERNAL AC
DATE:
SECURITY APPROVAL HAS BEEN (GRANTED, DENIED)
FOR THE ACTIVITY CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REQUEST.
(FOR) CHler, SECURITY SUPPORT DIVISION U3
5 " cCLassiry AS APPROPRIATE
FORM ge POE TUES
oe ccm ns
14-00000
vets OF VIRGIN.
TO:
Carculs court of Fairte.. Conc,
a. received. on
19/3, YOU AR ‘LREBY SUMMONES ‘To
beyianing at 8:30 RM on the ir thyay
AvPEAR Loe
service for the
of Nove: S9L, in Circuit Courtrocy
Sa ae
Pairfax County Courthouse, 4¢
ur Ynd floor '
00 Chain brig.
.. . Jtioen
.
vonoca, Fairfax, va 22055
S you may have wilj
precludes you frou repor
“3 office at 691-2227 or 691-2226, Any correspond -.
. ' ke directed to the Chief Circuit Court Judge af o:
vee Please clock your mileaq
ant
cu
Bwered When you
report
wiut date, rf any
ng as directed vc Call the Clerk of
“ting to this summons
Reverey
- » County and not to the
@ from your licmm co t.. “ur cnouse and be Prepared
wwide to the Clerk of Court your roundtrin ee lege lon ibursement Durposes,
is pa a
oy (EC
) M0568, SHERIFS
“as Cities of
woot SOLis Church
. a
“. - - :
St
Ff
t
|
104-10108-10026.pdf | re 10 “ddloe “cts drodling ,
- RETURN TO GIA
Soot Use Only
» 0 Not Reproduce *
. Sal be Ven Veto Deg uty Re Cie
Pound. “Disto__ Pees vata 4~ wn er absence _
AN) noo AS ne.
; © bums an ‘eh Paice. usted SM Sa
—— gk Le ot \orthoul ! aL ake oe
| bal ie batten. is De. ‘YX Qannet bo. asad
Maen “Khe votte. ‘onview |
a i ole Qollis called a Simons - QRS,
—Docunaat © Vie ue Nek . LOU ahWanor :
a e _vrat xe Sint Uvolho. \es i yy
7 ous Wore. mT aa
ae mot make at
saga ayre® wrthoul the oe
fost bul eval vol a
Sal Rad Yorcommend _
‘ ae Ayers, As re Pasibe a
Ye S Sento. ees 7
Anis PB 94
2.
BR
|
104-10109-10320.pdf | 104-10109-10320 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
Palorwitty
22 APA Tl
iS 149
To KDaS -
FRO SAC KFe
SULJ (SUFPORT TS PILSIST SEAL o- LINDERS KEY
(LTAK'S Lith) - “219 SQ © Ost
a /i ol, f. ud lew - mwEN Se *
gre 32 caer eee t 7). Covt ae otf eerel
“40 Tee Waites 71: the bf Ceres Ly -
de ABUUT Gude AAS GE 22 APH T1, Hae eILLIAK Gener, TErlor wie
ATTENTIONS fie ESE , Cpe
OAK OF PERRIVE #25 & CLEARED a YD “WITTIVE CONFACT cP THIS POQECy FOR
RERY YRS, TPTO # Loos DISTANCE PHOEL OfLL FuGH LES Gitte 16 a ASSCCUTS
OF JACK PXDEFSOS, THITAKCR INGUINED AS TO LOSNER'S ASSOCIATION ¥ITH:
KIS ACEVCY £FD SEGAT PLLEGED ACTIVITIES OF AGENCY FT LIi"S ware
LIFDERUAN KEW, LICRTED ABOUT LICHT CILES Se OF HorestcrD fF
vensts SISCAYSE “2Y. | |
2. LOSHEE DELIED ANOLLEDGE OF F YD LESOCIATION VITH THIF FGLECY,
ac RPTD ME ES OFFYCES Uh CIaP VCH LEAEED LIAT'S La In FOL ULIV OF
wlSiil SEVENAL YS aso. CTHIS [2 TRUTH ASS ChITHER SITE Por Cenr
SPALSELT ACORGERTIO# CITN THI AS05091). NE ALSO PTD TET OFLY
PCTIVITY Tigh 26S ConP YORK FUACK GECUILDING fy GLO PIS DUELS Lect
Vy EEXEND. ; :
S$. LOSPES SPLOUATOS TAT VHITAKEN GAY HAVE COTS Lo HEE iP be
FROM STATE Can? alls. AL50, Soncunl CITs PACT ANULLELGL ¢
A
14-0000
PAGE TVo GF BO 14y¥ #212 0d
SCTIVITIES AT LIAR'S LAIG RY WAVE OSSCRVED THE YORK FORCE GVER
{E PAST WEEKEND APD FALSELY ASSOCIATED ACTIVITY vITH THIS
AGZXCY. FO FEELS AxOEESOR esta. OF AGENCY’ 5 pesT. IETEREST iv
KEY THROUGH DISCLOSURES OF CAPT BihD AYRES.
4, THIS IFO PRSSED 73 VENOH, SUGGEST HDGS PASS TS URL
END HAL | THABKS
cng JS Yk ad
|
104-10110-10095.pdf | 14-9000
104-10110-10095)
| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
Ww Luz12 ro "June 1992 |
‘ : RETURN TO ClA
ADMINISTRATIVE = INTERNAL USE ONLY Background Use Only
OS
INOK
TRAVEL BRIEFING DATA
me BUSTOS-VIDELA, Charlotte
OFFICE PHONE neo Orn ADE
WH «7811 .
GS-14 OO
af
DEPARTURE DATE STATUS COVER 7
‘30 June 1974 PCS STMNE Tnreccee]
STINT rinidad}| ,
PREVIOUS TRAVEL . 4.
y ’
EXPERIENCED TRAVEL - Formal briefing waived
CATEGORY -
RISK OF CAPTURE TRAVEL BRIEFING
SECURITY APPROVAL FOR TRAVEL VERIFIED IN SUBJECT FILE . | fees [fae |
SECURITY APPROVAL FOR TRAVEL BASED ON FILE REVIEW BY BRIEFING OFFICER ; | free | je |
SECURITY FILE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW SEFORE BRIEFING -
EMERGENCY CONTACTS (met on arrival, phone no., alternate action to make contact)
SECURITY REGULATIONS (operational talk, documents, indigenous employee hazards)
TRAVEL PRECAUTIONS (recognition overseas, camera, black market, currency exchange)
PERSONAL AFFAIRS (charge accounts, traffic tickets, litigation, neighbors)
home address, shop telk)
PERSONAL CORRESPONDENCE (limitations,
PERSONAL CONDUCT (morals, drinking, representative americans)
ASSOCIATION WITH FOREIGNERS (overseas briefing, phase out on return)
HOSTILE AUDIO SURVEILLANCE (microphones, shop talk at home-hotels, report to security)
ee
COVER PROBLEMS (adequacy, request for briefing on arrival, family knowledge)
RESPONSIBILITY ABROAD (local customs, traditions, religion, responsibility for dependents
OTHER
TRACE ELALG to f 8 97d se
REFERRED BACK TO CENTRAL COVER
S/PdesFi — 1 FA ET
FM Fz PART? SF,
CL! 6/2 ey
EN Ge 6,.Df5.-
DATE BRIEFED
RITtTy OFFIC
Wt-72
FORM 1987 Coirtons ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY meoterty
ENEE
aes
|
104-10110-10242.pdf | 14-00000
104-10110-10242 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 | :
a _ SECRET
18 July 1963
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Support Branch
FROM : Mr. Ramon R. Hart
SUBJECT : Manuel F. ARTIME Buesa
#210 838
1. The first phase of the audio surveillance of the
Subject at the SAS safehouse in Bethesda has been completed.
The Subject left Washington, D. C., on 13 July 1963. The
owner of the listening post, Mr .( Goi
moved out of his house, bag, baggage > and furniture, » on
12 July 1963 enroute to an overseas PCS assignment.
2. Mr. Charles MATT, the case officer in this case, has
advised that the Subject, along with a Cuban companion, Mr.
Rafael Aurelio QUINTERO Ibarbia (#252 529), will return to
Washington, D. C., to be billeted in the Bethesda safehouse on
Monday, 29 July 1963. Mr. MATT has fervently requested audio
coverage of the downstairs bar and telephone and the main floor
living room at this house in order to monitor the Subject's
conversations with QUINTERO curing * the absence of SAS case
officers.
3. The case was aoe eee to the District Field Office,
and Special Agent. & j 2
agent. It is Agent, :
" garage. In that latter space, which will be kept locked, he will
set up two regular AC-operated tape recorders to be actuated by
e two VOR's obtained from Franconia and paid for by SAS. Un-
#eknown to the Subject and his companion, a case officer will
Khave to service this equipment whenever an opportunity presents
| GROUP 1
Exctot 4 from auinmats
14-0000
)
IT]
C)
Aj
a]
Page Two
#210 838
h, ‘The. cover story to be used by Agent @#GREER: during
the installation is that he is working on thé housé at the _
Zequest of the _teesor “3. Washington real tate agent, Mr./ (wt
a2 : C555). Mr. supposedly maintains
the house’ for a y New York lawyer in‘ ordér to billet the latter's
transient clients. Case Officer MATT has engaged a maid to
clean up the house Mondays and Thursdays; however, she can be
told to stay away if Agent,‘ SETTER needs to do work there on
those days. It was also discreetly requested. by the undersigned
of Case Officer MATT not to kibbitz too mich while the techni-
cians are making the installation.
5. It is expected that the audio results of this type
of coverage will be superior to the results of the previous
"radio" phase. The only complication will be in servicing the
recorders on a timely basis. —,
lum [Xt he uy
Ramon R. Hart
ec: #252 529
t
|
104-10110-10243.pdf | 14-00000
104-10110-10243 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
_ SECRET.
t
18 July 1963
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Support Branch
FROM Mr. Ramon R. Hart
oe
SUBJECT : Manvel F. ARTIME Buesa
#210 838
l. The first phase of the audio surveillance of the
Subject at the SAS safehouse in Bethesda has been completed.
The Subject left Washington, D. ¢., on 13 July 1963. The
owner of the listening post, Mr./Fred C. THOMAS, Jr}Q7=5
moved out of his house, bag, baggage, and furniture, on
12 July 1963 enrouts to an overseas PCS assignment.
2. Mr. Charles MATT, the case officer in this case, has :
advised that the Subject, along with a Cuban companion, Mr. ;
Rafael Aurelio QUINTERO Ibarbia (#252 529), will return to |
Washington, D. C., to be billeted in the Bethesda safehouse on |
Monday, 29 July 1963. Mr. MATT has fervently requested audio rn
coverage of the downstairs bar and telephone and the main floor : .
living room at this house in order to monitor the Subject's
conversations with QUINTERO during the absence of SAS case
officers. : 2
3. The case was assigned to the District Field Office,
and Special Agent (Harold G. s designated as responsible
agent. It is Agent (TITTSLER's to place microphones in the
downstairs bar and the main floor living room and a tap on the
telephone and string all the wires to a crawl space over the
garage. In that latter space, which will be kept locked, he will
set up two regular AC-operated tape recorders to be actuated by
the two VOR's obtained from Franconia and paid for by SAS. Un-
beknown to the Subject and his companion, a case officer will
have to service this equipment whenever an opportunity presenta
itself.
eae
(pee tee omy Tea CSE Tce
7 629 7 ~ RETURN TO CIA
i) ' . Bao, 7. 3e Only
Ls es, Sua voduea
_
14-0000
2)
rr
C
ri
Page Two
#210 838
o3
hk. The cover story to be used by Agent (TITTSLER Jduring
the installation is that he is working on the house at the Ted of
request of the leasor, Was on xeal estate agent, Mr./R. Ve. O
Cortlandt weRESI (D Bf gees) J Mre T]supposedly maintains
the house for a New York lawyer in order to billet the latter's
transient clients, Case Officer MATT has engaged a maid to
clean up the house Mondays gnd redays; however, she can be
told to stay away if Agen Rfneeds to do work there on
those days. It was also discreetly requested by the undersigned
of Case Officer MATT not to kibbitz too mich while the techni-
clans are making the installation.
5. It is expected that the audio results of this type
of coverage will be superior to the results of the previous
“radio" phase. The only complication will be in servicing the
recorders on a timely basis.
Ramon R. Hart
ce: J#252 529 wo
lig
i RNR er me
4 ay ee ee
menKeT |
|
104-10110-10245.pdf | 14-0000 *
104-10110-10245) | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
.
Sremrc 2
P Eee eet YK ET
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Support Branch DATE: 1 July 1963
FROM: : Mr. Ramon R. Hart
SUBJECT : Manuel F. ARTIME Buesa
#210 838
1. On 24 June 1963, Mr. Charles Matt, sAs/MOB/PM, extension
6488, was referred to me by the SAS Security Officer, Mr. George
Iadner, and visited me in Room 4 E 21 to request some operational
support beginning 1 July 1963. Mr. Matt advised that two leaders
of the Cuban Exile Group were coming to Washington, D. C., on that
latter date to confer with CIA and other Government officials,
including probably Robert F. Kennedy, the Attorney General, concern-
ing the "new program” for the exiles,
%, Mr. Matt explained that a covert site (#302 922) located
at/ 9218 Aldershot Drive, Bethesda Maryland, had recently been
procured to billet these exiles and to serve as the meeting place
for these sensitive discussions to take place. Mr. Matt said that
SAS is vitally interested in what these two exiles say to each other
when the U. S. Government officials have departed after a day's
discussions. He, therefore, requested that microphones be concealed
in the house to monitor their comments.
3. Mr. Matt said that the two men would arrive on 1 July and
would be in Washington at the house for about a week or ten days.
. The audio coverage was requested for this entire time, Mr. Matt
* also said that the house would be retained for several more months
i and that the two exiles would return to Washington several more
times in that period and that an audio surveillance would probably
i95) be requested for these latter visits also.
ke 4. Mr. George Ladner supplied the true name of the leader of
“ the two. men, the captioned Subject. Having been informed by Mr.
- | Matt that the coyert site was a private dwelling place in an
--—-¥ expensive neighborhood, I assumed that there would be only two
__| methods of making an audio penetration of the premises:
eo aaa’
mie
ASTUAM Toc
Backoround Cae An}
Do Wot Fiasrodune
1400000
0)
rit
2)
8
iM
om
4
Page Two
#210 838
(a.) Concealing a tape recorder in the attic, base-
ment, or garage, and using a voice-operated
relay to actuate the recorder.
(b.) With the use of directories, search the
environs of the safehouse for the purpose
of locating a potential listening post where
radio transmissions could be monitored.
5 After checking with Mr. Joseph Langan, Acting Chief,
Operational Support Division, I assigned the case to the District
Field Office and directed some agents to case the house and the
neighborhood to determine which method of penetration should be
used. Mr. John Cryer was designated responsible agent at the
District Field Office, and after a quick survey, he reported that
the concealment and servicing of a tape recorder on the premises
would be impossible and that the only method would be the use of
& transmitter and a nearby listening post.
6. Using the directories in SRS, I ran the names of all the
residents of the houses within a quarter-mile of gthe covert site
ie SRD Indices and found ong [Fred C. Thonad? Ir.) (457 328),
of] 912T McDonald Drive, Bethesda, Maryland, to be a Staff employee.
Thrdigh telephone informtion, I located Mr.f Thtitas|at the Langley
Headquarters Building and personally contacted him the first thing
in the morning of 25 June 1963. I indicated to Mr. (‘Th s]the fact
that there was a safehouse in his neighborhood which we wanted to
"pug" and that he was the only Staff employee who lived within range
of our covert transmitters. I asked him if it would be too much of
an pages on om him for us to set up a listening post in his house.
Mr. [Théints lexplained that he was scheduked to depart for [Karachi, 10
Pakistan) on a PCS assignment in approximately a month but that he
would bé“glad to make his home available as a listening post. He
confided that his primary mission in/Karachi was to be the audio! 4)
penetration of the) Commmist Chinese Embassy land so he would look . uf
forward to the next week's operations in hig-home as valuable “<"2
training. The next step I took was to set up & meeting among
George Ladner, Charles Matt, Sam Halpern, Executive Officer of SAS,
and myself in Mr. Halpern's Office. I advised Mr. Halpern that the
SECRET Oh
14-0000
}
SECRET .-
Page Three
#210 838
audio surveillance appeared to: be technically feasible since I
had located a possible listening post. However, I admitted
to him that, even though the Office of Security has the "charter"
to conduct the surveillance, TSD controls the necessary expensive
equipment; Mr, Halpern mist arrange for TSD to transfer this
equipment to the Office of Security. Mr. Halpern declared that
the procurement of the necessary equipment should pose no problem
after he would mike a few telephone calls. I then returned to.
my office and made out a list of the equipment which I felt
would be necessary, and awaited advice from him as to whom to
contact in TSD to obtain it. 03
7. After checking with Mr. (Bi T. Bentlof the Audio Opera~
tions Branch of TSD as to appropriate equipment and after check-
ing through the specifications in the "Audio Manual" of TSD,
I selected the following:
Two voice-operated relays, QSC-2, $2,200.00
$1,100 each
Two Transmitter Radios, FM, 130 - 140 550.00
MCS, SRI~6H, @ $275 each ;
Two Battery Packs, 130 hrs. ops., 50.00
UWB-7, $25 each
Two Battery "A", 1.5 volts, Burgess 2 F 1.08
» 54 each
One Battery "B", 45 volts, Burgess A~-30 1.87
$1.87 each
TOTAL $2,802.95
8. About Noon on 25 June, I received a telephone call from
Mr. John W. McBee, extension aisi, of TSD, who told me that every-
thing had been laid on by SAS for me to obtain from TSD any
SECRET
14-0000
—
it
OQ
rt]
+
7
Page Four
#210 838
equipment necessary for this operation. Mr. McBee directed that
I £112 out a Form #88 and haye the technicians hand carry it to
the Franconia Depot in order to obtain the equipment. The use of
the Form #88 disturbed me in this matter because I had assumed
from Mr. Halpern that he would arrange it so that TSD would turn
over the equipment to us without charge to anyone. The use of
the Form #88 implies that a division is allocating funds for the
purchase of equipment. However, I filled out the Form #88,
listing the above equipment, and walked it down to SAS, where I
gave it to Charles Matt to have signed. The form, bearing the
SAS Cost Center #3132-5455~3400 » was completed and returned to
me within an hour, whereupon I gave it to DFO Agent Stan Lach,
who drove with it inmediately to the Franconia Depot. I called
ahead to Bob Woods and Charlie Beall of the T & I Shop at Franconia
and requested that they give a little briefing concerning the
operation of this equipment to Mr. Lach and Mr. Cryer, who was to
meet Mr, Lach there. Neither Cryer nor Lach had eyer had any
experience with any of the pieces of equipment on the list. Mr.
Woods and Mr. Beall were quite cooperative in this request.
9. Several problems kept appearing and disappearing while
the DFO technicians were transporting, installing, and testing
the equipment. One problem was the payment of the equipment. I;
received a telephone call from Mr. Dayton S. ("Doc") Barrows of
TSD, informing me that SAS had reneged on paying the $2,802.95 for
the equipment, but that if I would tell him what equipment we
wanted, he might be able to arrange to lend it to us. I told Mr.
Barrows that as far as I knew, we had indeed obtained the equipment
with the Form #88 y but that if we needed anything else, I would
contact him. Another problem which appeared was the rumor that
it was not two Cuban exiles who would be residing in the safehouse,
but only the captioned Subject and a Spanish speaking Staff employee.
If the rumor were actually true, it would seem that an audio
surveillance of the safehouse would not be necessary. I called
Charles Matt for an explanation, and he informed me that Senor
Artime was going to be the only person living in the house after
each day's discussions were completed - no Staff employee would
be living with him. I asked Mr. Matt to whom Senor Artime would be
see we
OF
ry
c
:
|
14-0000
if)
ir
C).
v
rm
=|
us
Page Five
#210 838
holding the conversations which we were to record. He replied
that he was interested in any visitors which the Subject might
receive and any telephone calls which he might make. I suggested
that possibly a telephone tap might be sufficient under these
circumstances. Mr. Matt disagreed and still requested a micro-
phone installation to cover the whole house if possible,
10. In addition to the equipment obtained from TSD, the DFO
agents took their own SRR-4 tuneable receiver and the SRR-4 charged
to the WFO. These receivers would be used in the listening post to
pick up the radiations from the two SRT-6H transmitters. It was
suggested to the DFO agents to borrow the two WFO transceivers to
be used to commmicate during the installation between the listening
post and the safehouse; however, the agents chose not to use them
and relied solely on telephonic commmications. The "A" and "B"
batteries picked up at Franconia were to be used in the SRR-4
receiver so that checks could be made from an automobile to see
just how far the radiations extended around the transmitters. A
report on the area covered by the transmitters was requested of
the DFO agents.
arrests
! ll. The first test of the SRI-6H from the safehouse to the
/ listening post was a failure. Its 50 milliwatt output, ordinarily
! good for a quarter mile, wasn't sufficient to reach the ‘receiver,
j 2/l0th's of a mile away. Its failure was blamed partly on the
; Gistance, partly on the brick construction of the listening post,
! and partly on the hilly contours of the housing development, which
i deflected the 135 megacycle, line-of-sight radiations.
' 12. When this disheartening news arrived, I immediately
telephoned Mr. Barrows of TSD and requested a pair of the more
powerful 150 milliwatt SRT-~7 transmitters, I telephoned Mr.
Barrows rather than filling out another Form #88 to avoid a
possible furor within SAS, Mr. Barrows consented to loan two of
these transmitters with their proper receivers on a hand receipt
to us, and Stan Lach was dispatched to Franconia to pick them up.
An ree ty to test it on 28 June 1963 was thwarted because
Mr. s}was having foreign visitors in for cocktails ‘mmiezesiome
that afternoon. But the equipment was installed and tested the
next day, Saturday, 29 June, and appeared to work satisfactorily,
SECRET (®
14-0000
Uy me DF ey 5 : :
switch.which. would, enable. the case officers to turn the transmitter,
off when they are “present at the house holding the sensitive dis- “.
turn it.on when they leave. . fo
o3
“ 15 ver.fteomea) and his wife have consented to do most of the
operating of the.tape recorder themselves in their own ‘basement. .
-With, the-use-.of the_yoice-cperated. paces te
° jus yO: ;
receiver, actuator, and recorder. Mr. (ThOdae fs well-known to his
bug", :and: the: preeene of the -new. equipment..in
i ‘the his vist org
|
104-10110-10291.pdf | 14-0000
104-10110- 10291 2 ~ [2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN Fe KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS SOG. 1992
_ E oe NOTIFICATION ‘OF ES.AAL SHMENT OR CANCELLATION
at cls OF OFFICIAL COVER BACKSTOP
8S NUM
BE
UOS- 26-3138 RETURN TO CIA
BASIC COVER PROVIDED oan Kop a
EFFECTIVE DATE — FORM 3254
OPERATIONAL COVER PROVIDED (HHB 20-7)
FoR TDY OTHER (Speci fy) . SUBMIT FORM 642 IMMEDIATELY TO- CHANGE | TELEPHONE
LIMITATION CATEGORY, TO ATEGORY _
(HHB 20-7) ;
SUBMIT FORM 642 IMMEDIATELY TO CHANGE, TELEPHONE
LIMITATION CATEGORY TO CATEGORY
(HHB 20-7) 0-5 —
FORM 3254 _T Cease) -2 TO BE ISSUED.
— “=a SUBMIT FORM 2686 FOR _
(HHB 20-11) .- 1 —~ 4 HOSPITALIZATION CARD.
: DO NOT WRITE IN- THIS BLOCK -
SUBMIT FORM 1322 FOR ANY CHANGE AFFECTING THIS
COVER. (HR 240-2e)
SUBMIT FORM 1323 FOR TRANSFERRING COVER
RESPONSIBILITY. CHR 240-2e)
| fea. CATEGORY 1! a CATEGORY 11
X {SUBMIT FORM 2688 FoR AGT HOSPITALIZATION CARD
REMARKS AND/OR COVER HISTORY . af
SJEJECT WELL Sb DENIED PGR IIIPE PLEION OF EPLOUEMT DYCEPT FOR US COVERNVENT
ATTLICATIONS.
DISTRIBUTION: ..”
COPY 1- CO/TRB OR CPD CONTROL VS/TW
COPY 2- OPERATING COMPONENT ‘
COPY 3-0S/SRD . s
COPY 4-0¢/DO/T
COPY 5. CC5-FILE
“FORM
_ 77
SS.
|
104-10110-10292.pdf | 14-0000
104-10110-10292 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
wt - 7" UNISTRATIVE = INTERNAL USE ONL Ss CEO
INTERVIEW REPORT
NAME OF SUBJECT "BR—GEL ne,
BUSTOS- VIDELA, Charlotte
REASON FOR INTERVIEW
Retirement:CIA . 30 Dec 1977 :
PERMANENT Po. TEMPORARY ADDRESS
0 Box 3030 . ,
re nus -CHurchH YA- 22043... Hore Take Pleene _2el- 2258
PRESENT TITLE, GRADE AND DIVISION of w . 3
LA,
DETAILS OF CONTEMPLATED FOREIGN TRAVEL
BADGES. PASSES. KEYS AND CREDENTIALS
CLEARANCES *
Commo —
3. SUBJECT was. INFORMED THAT THE SECURITY REGULATIONS AND THE ‘SECRECY AGREEMENT APPLY. G68 ONLY TO INTELLI-
GENCE INFORMATION: BUT, ALSO TO ANY STATISTICAL, ORGANIZATIONAL. OPERATIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION OF WHICH
HE is COGNIZANT. . " .
4. SUBJECT WAS INSTRUCTED THAT INFORMATION PERTAINING To INTELLIGENCE “OPERATIONS. SOURCES” AND METHODS PECULIAR
TO THE AGENCY MAY NOT BE DIVULGED TO PERSONS IN OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, EVEN THOUGH SUCH PERSONS ARE FULLY SECU-
RITY CLEARED WITHIN THEIR OWN DEPARTMENTS. Lo ou ,
5. SUeJECT was INFORMED THAT SHOULD ANY QUESTION ARISE ON SECURITY MATTERS HE MAY COMMUNICATE WITH THE AGENCY
FOR ADVICE AND GUIDANCE.
6. GENERAL: (Commenta, criticisms or suggestions and knowledge of any incidents or activities of persons which
seemed to have a security significance.)
, 03.
/s/|Tnomas Ae Gaines|
SIGNATURE OF _NTERVIEWER
i (a) (SA or one
Ae
a a
i A993 $099 est eesagters ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE “ONLY.”
(11-36)
BBR
|
104-10110-10295.pdf | 14-00000
104- 10110- 10298.
:"| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF wit Y
. ne “Ss. + VR VAGR: 7 Mee 7 _* : ING:
DATE
NOTIFICATION OF ESTABLISHMENT Oe CANCELLATI ( T aa
OF OFFICIAL COVER BACKSTOP |” si 25 mB 77
$s KUMBE
06°24-313fyeTyRAUTO Cl. o
Jeasic ‘cover’ PROVIDED ; -
EFFECTIVE DATE “SUBMIT FORM 3254."
wm , (HHB 20-7)
OPERATIONAL COVER “PROVIDED . .
FoR —____ TDy____ OTHER (Specify)
SUBMIT FORM 642 IMMEDIATELY TO CHANGE JELEPHONE
LIMITATION CATEGORY TO CATEGORY__ EAA: CATEGORY 1 TI CATEGOR
o- 7 —_—
caap 20°79 : RETURN ALL OFFICIAL DOCUMENTATION TO-CCS~
SUBMIT FORM 3254f cer W-2 TO BE ISSUED. SUBMIT FORM 2688 FOR
(8HB 20-11) — at - HOSPITALIZATION CARD.
SUBMIT FORM 1322 FOR ANY CHANGE AFFECTING THIS
COVER. (HR 240-2e)
SUBMIT "FORM 1323 FOR TRANSFERRING COVER
RESPONSIBILITY. CHR 240-2¢)
|, lean. CATEGORY | a | CATEGORY I1
SUBMIT FORM 2688 FOR_AGP HOSPITALIZATION CARD
REMARKS AND/OR COVER HISTORY
27 Auo Sl-Aug 62-Fas-Overt
Aug 62-Jul 67-Eqs-{2ac) Vi
Jul 67-19 Aug 72-Mexi State-womina\
1 Sep 72-27 Jun 74-Hqs-Ca ah
22 Jun 74-10 Nov 76<Trinidad-s Ptate-Int \I(.2I
11 Fov 76-26 Feb 77-Bgs(State-Int aN
27 Feb 77-.. . ~Hgs{State- Nomina 40
|
104-10110-10298.pdf | 14-9000
104-10110-10298) , 5 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 3 7
Pre tote tea
a 1 re
ee es
|
104-10110-10303.pdf | 14-00000
104-10110-10303) | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
“af
»* 7 . & ‘ , :
aes ee so £6 PEO:
NAME : BUSTOS-VIDELA, Charlotte Z.
DATE OF BIRTH | : 12 January 1929
| _ REF NUMBER w 4 56 8x0
: - POSITION ~ "3 Operations Officer
-LOCATION AND PHONE : Room 3-E-04, Extension 6954.
DATE OF INTERVIEW : 10 January 1973
INTERVIEWED BY : James E. Peters/William A. O'Donnell
PERIOD(S) OF ACQUAINTANCE WITH AGEE:
Various--see memorandum of 31 May 1972.
i .
' AGEE'S OTHER ACQUAINTANCES OR CONTACTS: |
Nothing additional. .
ADDITIONAL DATA:
Mrs. Bustos-Videla could offer no additional information
regarding Agee. How. ver, she suggested that Dorothy Hennick, .
Europe Division/Bern be contacted tq ascertain whether or not
Agee had contacted Jim Noland pe Mexico Station. ]
ee
RETURN TO CIA |” Disrovt cx we DLOL$i
Background Use Only>—~—-—--______"{
oduce :
“90
|
104-10110-10305.pdf | 14-0000.
*
see HY Tre as
ww
.
‘—
— ee *
(104-10110-10306) _| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |¢r creas
: .
on * . ” ( ef a 3 dG -
i
o.: : 7
31 May 1972
‘MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD — | ) (3
SUBJECT: Agee Effort Against Cuban Operations at the Mexico City Station |
Keanciy where
1. Elsie L SCALETTI recalls that Raymond A. FRADYER, Chief of
the Cuban Section, tried to get Agee to discuss the development of contacts
with access to the Cuban target in the Olympics. In these djscussions it may
well be that Agee was told pbout LIARM-1, (a member of the Mexican rifle team,
who was a contact(of the StationJand w ‘were trying to get invited to Cuba, 9%
(LIARM-1 is no longer a contact fof the Stationleven though he is still with {the
rifle team. J/
- 2. SCALETTI recalls the Cuban Section feeling very frustrated that
Agee could provide no leads or assistance to this section in its effort to target
against the Cuban teams. She recalls no memoranda prepared by Agee for the
Section, no leads given the Section, and he came to discuss the olympics with
- C/Cuba not more than half a dozen times. -
$. As SCALETTI recalls, it is unlikely that Agee knew any thing about
. the operations being run against the Cuban target fhan that which he might have
picked up at Headquarters or known about(the fationloperations in general --
such as audio, surveillance, photo surveillance, etc.
4. SCALETTI had Agee over to her home once for dinner; there were
- no other guests, Agee had SCALETTI, her husband, and Laura J. UTSTINE _o%
(on TDY) to his apartment once for dinner. The conversation was always2"™* 4 Ran
light. The only significant thing about Agee's plans which arose was his
discussion about buying used drycleaning equipment in the United States,
bringing it to Mexico and setting up a drycleaning plant. This was brought
up as something for the future and just an idea Phil was toying with.
: Sige Holand
5, SCALETTI ran into Agee by chance on the side street by the Embassy
one day after the arrival of John A, PROBERT. Agee said he understood
PROBERT had arrivedfas O§} and he wouid like to say hello. I suggested
he call PROBERT. I immediately informed PROBERT of my chance encounter
with Agee, and informed PROBERT that Agee had resigned under somewhat
of a cloud and suggested he get briefed himself on Agee's assignment in Mexico.
. ‘RETURN TO CIA
Clr ry ees Background Use Only
MECREI Do Not Reproduce
1400000 +
spingtemar ameteomin stn oe
“ .
a , at cay C ‘
« 3, ° . ’ ( _ 9 =. oe - Loe
a ad
6. Agee knew that SCALETTI was in Mexico(under tourist cover,}
even though SCALETTI was working regular hours in the Embassy He
probably a!so_ knew that there were other (Station employees o utilizing
tourist cover. |
Obi, Stecneie
Elsie L SCALETTI -
|
104-10110-10306.pdf | 14-00
000 a] ”
[104-10110-10306§[ 202 =~" PF het
nee r i 0 25 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION R BRDS ACT OF
ve’ 7 : _( rune: penne ; ECORDS ACT OF 1992 k..
moe, OUTLINE*
\
Subject: Philip Burnett Franklin Agee Punt - vale
1. NAME OF OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE Elsie 1. Scaletti
2... PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT WAC. .
_ Were you ever personally acquainted with him?
emp eneeha me
, Yes or No _ yes . If you.were never personally
j: acquainted with him have you acquired anv information of
a personal nature concerning him through other persons?
Yes or No , Give details including dates,
by months and years as. best you can recall, ‘circumstances,
purpose and nature of any relationship vou may have had -
{ _. with him and provide all data relating to his character
! - or personality, {llustrating briefly with any-stories 07 A,
: other information acquired as a result of your. own /
relationship with him or which might have been acquired
from others. oo.
RETURN TO CIA
See attached memo Background Use Only
1 _ Do Not Reproduce
3. SUBJECT'S KNOWLEDGE OF YOU, PROJECTS, OR OPERATIONS IN
WHICH YOU PARTICIPATED .
“On the basis of your personal association with
Subject, either official or social, or, on the basis of
what you know or believe him to be knowledgeable of,
out line the nature and extent of information you believe
he could provide an opposition intelligence service as to
(a) your identity as an intelligence officer or employee,
(b) your personal background and experience including
places of assignments, and (c) operations in which you
participated in some way. (Cryptonyms should be employed
when known, The nature of the operations in any event
should be briefly but sufficiently described to lead to
their identification, with the dates or periods involved
and any comments OT observations as to their. success or
failure.)
See memo attached
: Poneuctla Page 1 of 3
ere
ory
—
4o--
emanate
° 4
5.
web Oa,
. OTHER AGE" CY PERSONNEL | : 7 oe .
List other: Agency personnel’ or former: persome!,
who on the basis of your own personal knowledge or
belief, had official or social contact with Subject.
Give brief information as to the period and nature of
such relationship for each.
See memo. attached.
OTHER U. S, GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL
List all other U. S. Government personnel who, on
the basis of your own personal knowledge or belief, had
particularly close official or social contact with
Subject. Identify the Bureau, Department, Agency or
Office with which each such person was emploved at the
time of the relationship and. give brief information
concerning the period and nature of such relationship
for each. Be
See memo attached
OTHER PERSONS
- List all other persons who irrespective of nation-
ality, sex, or employment are known or believed to have
had intimate or particularly close assocfation with him
and brief information concerning the identity and occu-
pation of such persons, your knowledge of such persons,
and the period and nature of the relationship of such
person with Subject. Include also the names of all.
American and foreign newspaper people with whom he is
known or believed to have had personal contact irre-
spective of the extent or closeness of their relation-
ship. Give names with brief information as to the period
and nature of such relationship for each.
{ know of none.
Page 2 of 3
Cae
| naa
on
pares
aan
is
.
4
N
t
7. HOSTILE INTELLIGENCE CONNECTIONS
Can you provide any information of any kind
tending to establish that Subject may have been
sympathetic to hostile ideologies or had contact
with and was cooperating with a hostile intelligence
service. Yes or No no « If yes, give
full details, . ,
Signed: on, OL a
Dated : 10 July 1972
*This is an Outline only of information desired. If vou
either knew the Subject or have any information from other
sources on any of the points contained in the outline, a
separate memorandum is needed with each paragraph. thereof
keyed to those in this outline. If you neither knew the
Subject nor have any information of the kind requested in —
any section of the outline (and only in such instance)
negative entries may be entered under all sections, and the
outlined returned after signing and dating. The Signed and
dated outline will thus serve as a memorandum for the files.
Page 3 of 3
14-0000
SECRET/SENSITIVE Co. 4
\
SUBJECT: Philip Burnett Franklin Agee
NAME OF OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE: _Elsie 1. Scaletti
PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT: - 7
| knew Phil during the entire time he was in
Branch | at Headquarters, and during his tour in
Mexico. We came to Mexico PCS at the same time. —
This means {| knew him from. 1965 until he resigned.
In Headquarters our relationship was limited to
business in the office, and that. was‘‘not very:-
frequent. We sat in different rooms. He handled $B
matters. 1 did the routing of all Branch _
correspondence which meant 1 decided wkat he was to
-see--this was anything affecting Soviet/Satellite/
Chinese matters.. My main.areas. of responsibility
were in the support field, Even thougn we were both
processing out at the same time, we did not exchange
stories much. However, since | traveled as a
"Tourist" and was not therefore allowed to bring
anything into Mexico, Phil offered to have some of
my things packed with his household effects since
he said he owned hardly anything. One day my husband
and | took some boxes of things over to his apartment
before work. {| do not remember the name of the
apartment development in Virginia, ‘but it was the
garden type. His apartment was nice--fairly new
but sparsely furnished. He helped us).unload the things
a.d take them upstairs. Then we parted. |! seem to recal
ine had some trouble witia his car that morning and we
dropped him off at a repair shop on the way to the
office. ; a
At this time, in Washington, Phil was very
pleasant, was nice to.work wit. He did not appear
to be pushy, even though tedid everything he could
to get the Mexican assignment. At this time, despite
his family problems, he did not appear to let these
affect iis work. At least from my position he seemed
to get his work done, not to procrastinate, not to
take a lot of time off. From the gossip I! heard,.
he was separated, and was anxious to get any assignment
overseas. When the possioility of this Olympic job
opened up in Mexico he grabbed it. As | recall, C/WH/ 1
was sympathetic toward nim also, and was happy to be
able to nelp Phil at tnis particular time.
SECRET/SENSITIVE 9» #8. 0
oe soot, SECRET/SENSETI VE
Tet ( a ~ C
. ° “In Mexico when PATT*s iouseitokd effects arrived
. he let me know; and as | recall, ne brougit them over
to my iouse and we unloaded them into our apartnent.
We did not go and pick them up. In thanks, we
invited him over to supper one evening. (Willard C.
CURTIS had given permission for individual officers
to have Phil over to dinner if no outsiders were
present and prior permission was obtained.) 1 think
| got permission fron the DCOS at that time, There
were only the three of us (Phil, my husband, and
myself--no maid, no other invited.guests) There was
no discussion of office. My husband knew Phil was with
i ; BKTRUST and was working on the Olympics in Mexico.
Conversation was light. During dinner,. as recall,
we talked about business in Mexico, and he mentioned,
his father was in the dry cleaning business, and
he thought he might be interested in’ bringing into
; Mexico some used dry cleaning equipment which is worth
; .. . - nothing in the United States, and set up some dry
: : ; cleaning: establishments in Mexico... The discussion
was merely in generalities--nothing specific as to
timetable or even if Phil were serious about this.
About a week later Phil brought his car over and
my husband helped him.work on his car--adjusting it
to the altitude, This must have been around September
1997. .
Shortly thereafter, when Laura B. UTSTINE was
in Mexico TDY (she worked in WH/1] and. also knew Phil
at Headquarters), Phil had my husband, me, and UTSTINE
over to his apartment (on Insurgentes Sur just off the
Viaducto) for dinner. It was.a huge. apartment, sparse ky
furnished. We had an enjoyable evening, very light
conversation. Talked mostly about Mexico. At this time
he showed us he nad several bedrooms (forget how many)
and hopefully his sons would be able to visit him.
During his tour in Mexico | only saw Phil tn the
Station occasionally--and then just in passingin the
halls. Once after | heard about Phil's having kidnajec
his boys, | thought |! saw them (can't remember why |
thought they were his) in front of the Embassy with a.
maid. | never saw Phil in the Embassy proper nor at
any Embassy functions (1 was tourist and did not
circulate in the Embassy).
During his toug in Mexico, Phil remained pleasant
but was certainl 465 fiud to talk to. After Phil.
resigned | saw him once. After Jolin PROBERT arrived
as COS, | saw Fhil along the side of the Embassy.
HES.
SECRET/SENSITIVE .
14-0000
CUPy
naan
We just greete:!: Gach other. ne said he heard PRODERT
was coming to Mexico and asked if he were here. He
wanted to call and say sello. | said yes. |
immediately informed PROBERT, and suggested the
latter; read Phil's file at tie Station as.it was
my understanding there was sone proslem about his
resignation, but did not know all the details.
(This was true as personnel matters in the Station s
were kept very close oy tne front office.) 1 do 3
not know if, when, or iow many times PROBERT might a
have met wita Phil. At this time Pnil looked neat q
and well kept, as I recall. iF
Soe aia
so cm aias S Bie Pr
3. SUBJECT'S KNOWLEDGE OF SCALETTI, PROJECTS, OR 4
OPERATIONS IN WHICH SCALETTI PARTICIPATED — a
a). Phil could definitely identify me as a long-
time BKTRUST employee a
b). Phil probably knew that Mexico was my first overseas>
assignment, and possibly.that | had a medical | ‘@
hold vefore. He knew | had~spent Umany years" — q
in Branch |, and was privy to almost everything
going on at the Mexico City Station. He
knew | was assigned to Mexico under tourist
cover but worked inside the Embassy. He knew
my husband was here as a professor at the Universit
of the Americas, and that he did not work for BKTRUS
c). [In Headquarters Phil knew 1 handled mo tlyythe
support projects olus sucr,extras as LICINland
(LBGLOBE (Goth NOQRA LILINK nad closed down either
just as PhgL ans bee ne Branch, or just before.
just 2s POG Eo REVAANDER, formerly with LILINK)?
was assigned to the Brancn then, and talked with
Phil about Mexico, and possibly about LILINKI*
remember keeping the LPGLOBE material very close,
gz in my own safe, and | do not think Phil know of
wy CLPBLOBE (LIREALM was then in Mexico undes (LPGLOBE),
but may have learned of, (LPRLOBE program afid LIREALM
through Ex-LIADLIB (see paragraph 4).
In Mexico City Phil knew | was in the Cuban section,
and privy to all operations being run against the
Cuban target. He did not know of operations in
particular except possibly LIARM-1 (now terminated)
wiio we hoped to use against the Cuban olympic
target. The Cuban Section tried to talk with Phil
many times about the Cuban delegations to the .
Olympics, but as | recall, C/Cuba only succeeded in
SECRET/SENSITIVE
Sa
‘the Cuban target little attention. /-
“OTHER AGENCY ‘PERSONNEL ©
aa . . +
SECr~T/SENSIT HVE” nn
GETTING Phil to.cone to our end of the hall
a couple of times. | was not in on the
discussions between C/Cuba (Raymond F. FRADYER) i
and Phil, but 1 believe they were mainly held i
to see who Phil nad met who might be useful i
against: tne Cuban target. |. know we thought et_
the time Phil was spending almost. full time on his
overt activities and the SB target, and he gave -
- At-Headquarters ‘in WH/) Phil «shared his cubicle >
.. program) and out to benefit nimself entirely-~
‘ mucn more so titan:
- aS mucn as Pnil, for different reasons. Ex-
- LPADLIB-1] was e@ much more pusia individual, less
with LIAODLIB-1 who was pressing. to get overseas .
exoerienced operationally (right out of tre JOT
Phil 24 LIADLIB-1 went aut of chaane
constantly, talking of (ROC cover)ideas (for nimself)};
and going right to the head of Training or JOT. ....
(can't remember which) and WOMACE on-ideas and ~ “|
suggestions, without ‘necessarily. gotag- through the.
Branch or Division. He nad many business deals on |
the side (one was as a landscaper in Virginia)
and had great prosp egy for business deals in |
Mexico.9; He wangled a 10C) job in Mexico (replacing?
LILINK) ‘and was inserted in the LAGLOBE program white
he knew Phil (1 think this was the’timing.) He was |
also quite open in nis bragging ne had been hired i
as a GS-13 (f think it was) and did not nave to go
up trpuranks. This might heave irritated Pail who
was still a 12. Ex-LIADLIB came to Mexico PCS about
the same time Pnil and | came. Although | rememoer
no close friendshi-. between Ex-LIADLIB and Phil
on the desk, tne fact they sat togetner, were
poth processing out for Mexico, would have meant
they nad sometning in common. Also, LIADLI8 was tnen —
nandling all the projects for CP and leftist ;
penetration operations for tie Station and Base
(Monterrey). Phil would have more than casual
interest in sone of these as some were being handled
in the field by Howard R. BENJAYA, an old friend of
Phil's fron ecador) | do not know that Phil-.and
; il :
Wena
-
SECRET/SENSITI VE
I I
>
( “SECRET/SENSITEVE (| -
Ex-LIADLIB ever met socially in Mexico or not.
1 am quite certain their work paths never crossed,
LIADLIB is still im Mexico. He has had a difficult
time since his "resignation" getting a job,
keeping a job, and making ends meet. It probadly
would be to BKTRUST's disadvantage now for
the two to meet. For this reason, and to assess
ex-LIADLIB-s present state of mind, Headquarters *
sent someone to talk with LIADLIB-1 in the spring
of 1972. At that time he still seemed bitter
against BKTRUST. ‘ a
Other than wishing to make special mention of
. EX-LJADLIB-1, | know of no Agency personnel
other than those in WH/} and. the Mexico City Statio
whom. he knew.
5S. OTHER U.S. GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL
. 1 know of none except the Olympic Attache in Mexico
under whom Agee worked fron July 1967 until the
end of the Olympics.
(hi fea
Yo eely (772
7 s
|
104-10110-10307.pdf | 14-00500"
104- 10110- 10307,
« 2025 RELEASE UNDER TH
E PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
f- - NOTIFICATION: OF. ESTAE a SHMENT OR GANCEWeATION A.
OF OFFICIAL COVER BACKSTOP 10 JULY 197
ar CHIEF, CONTROL DIVISION, OP Cogan 3138. RETU
EMPLOYEE NUMBE! Sie CTU RORWISORS
*
DEN Wat oe
CHIEF, CONTRACT PERSONNEL DIVISION, OP
L ——— —— - ——| oF FICIAL
: - COVER
“KEEP ON TOP OF FILE WHILE COVER IN EFFECT
SUBMIT FORM 3254 _ —
TO BE ISSUED. (HHB 20-11)
x [x] etic COVER PROVIDES FD
EFFECTIVE DATE
OPERATIONAL COVER PROVIDED
FOR TOY OTHER (Specify)
SUBMIT FORM 642 IMMEDIATELY TO CHANGE TELEPHONE
CIMITATION CATEGORY TO CATEGORY.
(He 20-7)
LIMITATION CATEGORY TO CATEGORY_
(HHB 20-7) :
| [eAaa: CATEGORY | a CATEGORY f na
| [RETURN ALL OFFICIAL DOCUMENTATION TO CCS
SUBMIT FORM 2688 FOR
HOSPITALIZATION CARD.
po NOT WRITE IN THIS BLOCK -
SUBMIT FORM gosa_ SE TEL w- -2 TO BE ISSUED.
(HHB 20-11) qm
SUBMIT “FORM 1322 FOR ANY CHANGE AFFECTING THIS
COVER. (HR 240-2e)
SUBMIT FORM 1323 FOR TRANSFERRING COVER
RESPONSIBILITY. (HR 240-2¢)
° SUBMIT FORM 2688 FOR HL osplTALI ZATION CARD . so
REMARKS AND/OR COVER HISTORY
QT AUG S1-<AUG 62-T BOVE
AWG 62-JULY eT REME) a4 oi
STAT
JULY 67910 AUG T2-) te TY INES
1 SEPT JUGS TB S- no)
20 TUNE TTRIRTAAD CPR TE STAM)
DISTRIBUTION:
copy 1 - cp or CPD.
copy 2° . OPERATING COMPONENT,
SUBMIT FORM 642 IMMED [ATELY TO CHANGE TELEPHONE
|
104-10110-10314.pdf | “\104-40110-10314| |
2025 RELEASE UNDER TH
3 E PRESIDENT JOHN F. KEN
. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RE
Re CORDS ACT OF 1992
HETORG Yo GA
Only
; Background Use
. Do Not Reproose?
DATE, UN S74
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, 0s/Clearance Division a
SUBJECT : Certification of Security Clearance
for CHARLOTTE 2. BUSTOS~V IDELA
Zehruvé
1. It is requested that the appropriate security
certification be prepared on Subject whose date of birth
is 12 JANUARY 1929
_ *«eeeeEe un er
, Ob
2. Your memorandum of certification should be
addressed to chief, ccs/ocn/State| ha
3. Subject will depart Washington, D.C. for: | rcs
[| TDY assignment to | PORT OF SPAIN | 2%
on or about . .
Vig La
Chief, Official Cover Branch
Cover and Commercial Staff
£ORN 9627 eatetoas SECRET
£2, IMPDET Cl. BY: 007622 (4-3
2.88
|
104-10110-10328.pdf | - WOTIEIeAT ON YORFESTABL
«MLE! TARY COVER “BACKSTOP:
SUEMIT ‘FORM: $e 70 CHANGE ‘enerearrow “CATEGORE to 53:
(HB 20-800-2)
ASCERTAIN THAT ARMY W-2 BEING ISSUED.
| (ap 20-6 61-1)
SUBMIT FORM 1323 FOR TRANSFERRING COVER RESPONSIBILTY.
(R 240.250)
REMARKS
|
104-10110-10340.pdf | 14-9000 ara ent CN al el Ta tt
104- 10110- 10380) ui z 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 f
i0N "GF “ESTABLISHMENT
t OF MILITARY. ( COVER: BACKSTOP:
|
104-10110-10433.pdf | barn
FILE NO. p52 O67 DATE
2. hy 1582 -
eee eet
SYNOPSIS
Live eddress established a §611 Jeson Streat, 10
Cheverly, Maryland, on 17 May 191. Houschol@cr end
all adult mewbors of his family vere Urterel. House- . ;
bolder notified local Post Office (Chaverld) that SUB-.. |.”
JICT was residing vith hin and also redisatid Lesaloc oc.
Post Office t3 notify(Hyattcville)roat Civico. Yustuca a
Unton telagran forvurted on 18 Kage 1561 for 2udys G.
a+
& .
eee, 2 oF 4
RETURN TO CIA
Background. Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
se my.
14-0000
ences ne Fateenens Pome fora of comamtestion. ‘They vere informed that Mrs.
6 067
CEIRAL
At| Chever); land: . .
“Ons 17 Mey 1961, « live eddress was established for Gladys |». ee
G, DARBRUWF at 6611 Jason Street!) Cheverly) mayen, through the —
rh
cooparation of (Dr. Bavard A) and(Anne B. householfer at an.
that afdresa. — OG ") @ BN,
eg 0G By
Oa the came date, Hrs. GALLOCH) her dauzttor, (Patricia) and. ¢
pad Nes were briefed to the effect that they 6 wis ecaept owe.
exy cables; Istters, talegreas or telephones ealls for Mra. DARBRUWT >.
In the event any inquiries wore received concerning Mra. DANBRUNE,® “|”
they wre to afvise that Mre. DANSK? wes residing vith thea but .-
that she wag not available at the muxnt. They were to determine a
Was wea calling and the purpose ef the call. the call was from.’ .
tha eable or telegraph office, rire” (GALLCOM of Gatete vas to call
back later as Mrs. DANBRUN? and receive the mssage requeat ~, »:
delivery of the written coble or telegram. In the event the inquiry :
waa from exy other source, they vare to ecntast the Reporting Agent
fumaedifately.
She cauy individuals vere further briefed, in gensral, as to
why Hire. DANBRUN? was cuyposedly residing vith them and vhy she vas
was the mother of Musfade H. DANBRUYP, who vas being held
& priocner by @ foreign governmmt. The mother hag sent a cable
to her son asking how he ts, vbether he needs anything, tnquiring
if thare ts euything she ean do for him, and asking him to please .
cozmunicate vith her, Ske is mow avaiting end expecting sane form
aa ; . ob
on of
Ca the foltoving day, 18 May 1961, Dr. Ga LOG) vea%Sontacted.
‘Fao above inforantion had been related to hin by Sirs. GALLOOM)at
the request of the Reporting Agent..g Dr. GAL wag requested to
notify the Cheverly the Gyattsville Poat offtces that Mre.
TARDE rea at his home end any mail received for her .
should be delivered to his address,
ol
On 22 May 1961, Dr. (SALIOGI as agetn contagted end he advised
tuat he hed personally Sed the Pcstaintresa at the Cheverly) Post
Osfice revaniing elivery of Mes, DAPRTVEtg mat] and roquezte’
4
. nr oe ft
rag . a
.
« . .
géa O67
i)
hor, in trn, to notify tha (Hyattsville)Poat Office,
06 . oy
Dr. Gntp0) a voll-incin(Washington Gvattet) He matntained
an office at 610 "kK" Street, N.2)ofor a muder of years until he po
was drafted into military services He served in the Army es a(dene
tist\ and waa hig release, es a Lieutenant Colonel, he re-opened - .,
ob (his "Private practice with an office at Q035 "I" Street, H.W.)°For
' @ muer of yoars ha was on the (Staff? of Georgetown University as job:
ea inatrustor of Gontistry id the(Georgetoun Dental Schoolzg He ~ |
hag resifed tn (Cheyer Mery land sfor at least the past twenty. =
years, previously at (2816 Laurel Avemsé and currently at(5611 08
Jesoa Stract) His dstighter, (Patricta,ia attending Maryland Unt-
veraity. His son, Georgd, is attending (St. Jon" College High
, ob ,
Daily contact vag maintained with Dr. (SALLGo)on 22, 23 and
Bh May 1962. As of the Istter date, no ecrzmmicetion had as yet
boca received for Mrs. DAWBRONT. Tt ,
On 18 Wey 1961, a Weatern Union Telesrnn ves sent to Bustace
+ DARERUN?, Reclusorio Nacional, Nueva Gerona, Isla de Pinos, Cuba.
A oopy of this telegram is attached ca Fehfbit #1.
A $ .
Exhibit #1 (Western Union Telegram dated 18 May 1961)
~2.
|
104-10110-10525.pdf | 14-00
‘
a
Soo
DOD
104-10110-10525
SUBJECT: BATISTA, Laureano
| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
<~
~
Ae BAAR.
SORE CT C
13 December 1967
‘Richard
(See also DAVIS, Rudolph
ALLEGATION: > "GIA CONNECTION:
Rudolph Richard DAVIS, Cuban - 7 - “Laureano BATISTA, Secretary
exile questioned ty GARRISON's staff of Military Affairs, Executive
in connection with a training ¢ Committee, Movimiento Democratica
for Cubans at Lacombe, Louisiana ® Cristiano (MDC), Miami, was
told the FBI in May 1964 that Laurearo granted a Provisional Operational
BATISTA, sent him 19 men from Miami in Approval on 30 December 1959
response to a request.from DAVIS in ; and an Operational fpproval on
1963. The men stayed at a home near - 20 February 1960 for use as a
Lacombe, Louisiana... _ PP Agent, Havana, Cuba.
SOURCE:
Memorandum No. 5, Enclosures 3 al
and 7. RETURN To CIA
Backgroung U
: Se On}
° Not Reproduce Y
OS INDICES RESULTS:
diy goubdecty @ 32 year old Cuban exile, was froma wealthy Cuban. -
family and in Cuba he was a banker. He was granted a POA in December
1959 and an OA in February 1960 for use 48 a PP agent in Havana, Cuba.
A copy of a letter in Subject's file datea 20 November 1963
signed by Subject as Secretary for Military Affairs, Executive Committee,
Movimiento Democrata Cristiano is addressed to Major General Bela K.
KTRALY, President, Hungarian Freedom Fighters Federation, Inc., and
offered the services of the MDC in arranging meetings and discussions
with other anti-CASTRO organizations and the Hungarian Freedom Fighters.
The Hungarian Freedom Fighters were (Agency sponsored and Covert Action e¥
Starfijwas interested in information‘on the MDC before granting approval
for contact between the two organizations. ;
DETAILS:
During an interview with the FBI in October 1963 in New York
Rudolph Richard DAVIS advised that in January 1961 he was in New York
where he served as coordinator between the MDC and the New York Police
Department. DAVIS also said that some nineteen men had been sent from .
gs cae t
@PARE HP | Eetets treo ctesofe
ee LW iilde d _a4
Bo yl »
* . ‘Miami to New Orleans by Laureano BATISTA in response to a request
by. DAVIS for men to work in a lumber business with which he was
connected. in Guatemala. The men stayed at a home near Lacombe,
louisiana. When the FBI seized dynamite and other explosives
nearby, the men became disgruntled and were unwilling to proceed to
Guatemala. So the lumber company paid their fare back to Miami.
Some of the names of these men were as follows: Victor
PANEQUE, Leodorino INTERIAN, Fernando FERNANDEZ, and fnu FORNES.
‘Crnorr
|
104-10110-10527.pdf | 1400000
=
1104 EF RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
104-10110-10627| | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION
fon is af interest to (CA/1\because it
the attached letter (propered by Leureano BATESTT falla--«
212 635) to Bela Kirely of the Ringarien Prectom Fighters Int.ecen
ZY (CA sponsored ectivity) Joms Comfon;’(CAL) asked for ary -vallable
ca of Security deta concerning Subject Creenization of the writer
of ths letter.,uTf there was nothing unfavoreble evellable concerning ~
either of then, (CA ves going to permit)Kiraly to met with tho representative
of Subject Organization in ontcr to ¢ Visthar. Kiraly could be of
help to Subject grow. Ot bar re 7 ete
"3. A review of Office of Security records revealed that Subje
Organization is an AntieCestro Grow aml that the writer of the letter
was of irtercct to the Acnsy umler an Crerctio=s) frproval in 1960.
a)
o
eet “pie 635
Clay |
SECRET
|
104-10110-10568.pdf | openers a
2 - Chteago Tteld Office flee Coataia n@ infor-
mation on the company. The Chicago telephone directory
3 "- geflecte the company waa formed in 1888 and has offices
' endfor representatives in the principal cities of the
“ world. (Gee attached Redbook ad). -
no ‘{nfornation. concerns :
@z-FBE wan who has “
in Chfcage for yeare.
a sole ower and is :
oa described Hargrave
In business, he is the type to put on a big show and is
not averee to putting more men than necessary. on @ job
in order to charge his ciftent « higher price and profit
accordingly. Mr. Johnson seid that, although Hargrave
advertises offices throughout the world ha doubte that -
these are any sore than cee teens 49642
&. Acasual inguiry pot to Richard Cefn, Chief
Investigator, Cook County aherte?'s Office, brought forth
the coment that Caia distrusts Hargrave. He sald hea ~~
7 perenne mat eon age ra Mane 8 ee s
person, : tee: ; Pia
"sting Biren
Ny
|
104-10110-10621.pdf | 14-0000
Slee
104-10110-10621
| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
,
@ SECRET rd]
DAVID L, CHRIST
Chief of TSD/Audio Operations Branch witting of the following:
AL audio operations world-wide since December 1957 to present
date. ,
Complete knowledge of alt RED aspects of audio equipment
research.
Had knowledge of certain Staff D and FI equipment and operations.
Gomplete knowledge of all audio assets in production and stocked
for use overseas.
Clearances through Top Secret, Special Intelligence clearance,
and "Q"' clearance.
World-wide knowledge cf the location of alt our audio technicians.
Having previously deen with the Applied Physics Branch of TSD,
he was also aware of many of our other R&D activities.
As Branch Chief in TSD, he hae full information on alk personnel
in TSD and g eneral knowledge of the overall activities, inckuding
the research programs. . .
He has been to ‘Isolation many timee,
SECRET
|
104-10110-10688.pdf | 14700000. md
7 ’ eh : Bis -
104-10110-10688 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
4c ae . . , = ~ ok SECRET
rene
_ €
7) , ORD-8271-70
10 December 1970
a
MEMORANDUM FOR: C/PSD/OS
eer
ATTENTION : Mr. Joseph Hossick
SUBJECT : CHRIST, David Lamar #43872
1, During the last week in November 1970, Mr. David L. Christ, ;
Chief of the Applied Physics Division, Office of Research and 1
Development retired from the Agency. He is currently employed by :
Devenco of New York City. > —
2. ORD has a contractual relationship with Devenco and it is
desired that the TOP SECRET clearance of Mr. Christ be activated so
that he may be involved in this Agency-sponsored work.
3. While he was in ORD, the subject held several special
clearances and it has been learned that he will require SI & TK in
his present status as a contractor's employee. When his TOP SECRET :
clearance has been activated, we will file a separate request to :
cover the special clearances.
4. It is therefore requested that the subject be processed for ad
an Industrial Security Approval at the TOP SECRET level. If any
further information is needed, please contact the undersigned on :
extension 3233.
Rect PCS
Richard P. O'Brien
Security Officer
ORD/DD/S&T
|
104-10111-10044.pdf | 14-001
104-40111-10044! | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
cok 4 . . _ Ff
BUILDING
REMARKS:
ee
tsa
BUILDING EXTENSION
FORM NO ‘244 REPLACES FORM 5-8 "GPO: 19570-43945 (7)
1FEB 55 WHICH MAY BE USED,"
14-0000
moo — . . oe .
oe O one 0
S-E-C-R-E-T
OPERATIONS FAMILIARIZATION COURSE #24
SEMINAR ROOM ROSTER . ya 4 A)
[7 “pels H
: dis caovl
BADGE NO. i ROOM D BADGE NO. 7 ROOM F
2411 AFFIN{TO, Thomas J. 2412 (BOSTON, M. David | 9;
2401 \BANIGK, John A. J 03 2421 \ \CHAMBERS, Austin Glos
2402 (Bt ERHOFF Robert L. 03 2413 | cHase, Pamela W. Jo3
2403 (¢ ELL/ Robert B.}0} 2422 | DONALDSON, Mary A.J23
2404 (¢ ; sTROM, Tacy A. }o3 p423 | cupuanr, Cleo L. Jos
240 (co EY,’ Ross E. J°3 2414 | GOERTZ, Margaret G. Jos
2406 t ‘, Mary S._.)° 2424/ KOLARIK, George T. } 03
2407 | ISENBERG, Don Le} 6% 2415 | LAYTON, Bobby E. j°3
2416 Fem, Nei1 R.J°3 2425 |KIDWELL, Donald M.]o3
2417 cute homas Mm.) 03 2426 | MARLING, George L. | 23
2408 Cah, arry E.J°3 2427 \MOORE, Davis W. }o3
2418 me Elizabeth J]°3 2428 (MOW, Richard K.) 3
2409 (/ NEWELL, chard D.\ 03 2429 | PLASAN, Charlotte L./03
2420 Cwenue, Edun Q.) 08 2419 {noomns, Lawrence E. / a5
2410 (2RoWKA, “oo 0% 2430 SHINN, Jerry L.
2431 (WEBB, Daniel po?
‘
Ls
. ; a np
on - ~
S-E-C-R-E-T Ze
|
104-10111-10045.pdf | 14-0000
Sioa
fore oo aa
COURSE: faa.
EE Oey
i Richard Kis
gnment
eG
|
104-10111-10076.pdf | 14-00000
104-10111-10076 a 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
ae SECRET
a. ne @
faa > . (When Filled In)
. . RECOMMENDATION FOR HONOR OR MERIT AWARD
(Submit In triplicate - see HR 20-37)
SECTION A PERSONAL DATA
T. EMP.SER.NO.. NAME OF PERSON RECOMMENDED (Last ,First Middle) 3. POSITION TITLE 4. GRADE |5. sp
059090 Christ David Lamar /AP/ORD/DD/S&T] 16 -R
6- OFFICE OF ASSIGNMENT 7.OFFICE EXT. (If bqs)] g. STATION
ORD 3486 | x [weavousaters | | Fiero (Specify location)
. WOME ADDRESS (No.,St..City,State,ZIP Code) 10. HOME PHONE Ti. CITIZENSHIP AND HOW ACQUIRED
6212 Maiden: Lane, Bethesda, Md., 20034 656-2127 USA, Birth -
12. RECOMMENDED AWARO [t3- 1tF RETIRING. DATE OF RETIREMENT [14- - POSTHUMOUS .
Intelligence Medal of Merit 30 November 1970 | [vs [x]
15. NAME OF NEXT OF KIN 16. RELATIONSHIP |[17. HOME ADDRESS (No..St.,City,Stete,ZIP Code) |i. HOME PHO
Wilma M. Christ Wife 6212 Maiden Lane, Bethesda,Md. |656- 212%
SECTION B ; RECOMMENDATION FOR AWARD FOR HEROIC ACTION OR ACCEPTANCE OF HAZARD ,
p19. WERE YOU AN EVEWITNESS TO THE ACT | WERE YOU AN EYEWITNESS TO THE ACT fia. WERE VOU AN EvewitTNEss To THE act = | [res | | wo
PERSONNEL IN IMMEDIATE VICINITY OR WHO ASSISTED IN ACT OR SHARED 1N SAME HAZARD:
ce _ ae eo
LIST ANY OF THE ABOVE PERSONS GIVEN AN AWARD OR RECOMMENDED FOR AWARD FOR PARTICIPATING IN ACT:
24. FULL NAME 25. AWARD RECOMMENDED
CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH ACT WAS PERFORMED: .
26. LOCATION : 28. TIME OF DAY
RETURNTO Gia
Background Use Only
_Bo Not Reproduca
a CC
SECTION C RECOMMENDATION FOR AWARD FOR ACHIEVEMENT, SERVICE, OR PERFORMANCE
33. DO YOU HAVE PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE, SERVICE OR PERFORMANCE [ves [| fuo |
34. OFFICIAL ASSIGNMENT OF PERSON RECOMMENDED AT TIME OF SERVICE OR PERFORMANCE
Chief, Applied Physics Division
35. COMPONENT OR STATION (Designation and location)
Office of Research and Development
36. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF ASSIGNED POSITION.- oe
29. PREVAILING GEOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND OBSTACLES ENCOUNTERED
Direct efforts of 10 professional research and development, scientists.
37. INCLUSIVE DATES FOR WHICH RECOMMENDED [38. ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED NOW IN SAME OR RELATED ASSIGNMENT
Nov. 1950. Nov. 1970 [x [ws | [w | ps id
PERSONNEL WHO ASSISTED OR CONTRIBUTED SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE SERVICE OR PERFORMANCE
40. FULL NAME ; 41. ORGN. TITLE 43. OFFICE OF ASSIGNMENT
LIST ANY OF THE ABOVE PERSONS GIVEN AN AWARD OR RECOMMENDED FOR AWARD FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE PERFORMANCE
45. TYPE OF AWARD
Form 600 use erevious enitios . 7 7 SECRET a ee —_ . . Lf
14-0000
pd
th ~ eS po (When Filled In) a
. if
SECTION D ° HARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
Aword for Heroic Action or Acceptance of Hozord: Was act voluntary? Describe why oct was outstanding, and if It wos more than normally expected.
Explain, why, and how. If an ceriol er marine operation, describe type and position of craft, crew position of individual, and oll unusual circumstances.
Indicate results ‘of the act. Enclose unclassified citation.
Award for Achievement, Service, of Performance: State character of service during period for which recommended. (Give complete description of admin-
istrative, technical, or professional duties and responsibilities if not covered in Section C; include dotes of assignment and relief.) What did the Individual
do that merits the award? Why was this outstanding when compared to others of like grade ond experience in similar positions or circumstances? If
appropriate, include production records and assistance rendered by other persons or units. What obstacles were encountered or overcome? Indicate re-
sults of achievement, service, or performance. Include reference to Fitness Reports, Letters of Commendation, or other documentation already on file which
supports this recommendation. Enclose unclassified citation. . .
-- oe
.
Mr. David L. Christ is recommended for the Intelligence Medal
of Merit in recognition of his career of especially meritorious service
which has contributed significantly to the missions of CIA.
_ Mr. Christ joined CIA in November of 1950 as the first research
and development electronics engineer in what has evolved as TSD. He
created an Applied Physics Branch setting high standards for himself
and the R&D engineers he recruited. His accomplishments included the
anti-disturbance mine and the time pencil, both of which are still
Agency stock items, and an IR beacon. As a pioneer in audio surveillance
devices, he. recognized very early that the use of systems concept
would be most productive in meeting Agency needs. As part of his
development program, his efforts led to the establishment of specialized
contract facilities such as Gaird: Atomic) which in 1953 was the first
Agency source of transistorized equipment. wi
In early 1957, Mr. Christ was made Chief of what is now the Audio
Operations Branch of TSD and, realizing that a drastic upgrading of
the caliber of field technicians was required, began aggressively re-
cruiting and training graduate engineers. His high standards and
efforts in this area are reflected in the fact that the majority of
TSD Audio mid-management personnel were recruited by him. In September
1960, he and two associates were apprehended while on an operation in
E>] continveo on ATTACHED SHEET
46. ENCLOSURES (List individually) 1F ORIGINATOR tS NOT AN EYEWITNESS OR DOES NOT HAVE PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE -ACT
OR PERFORMANCE. ATTACH AFFIDAVITS OF EYEWITNESS OR INDIVIDUALS HAVING PERSONAL KNOWLEOGE OF THE FACTS.
1. PROPOSED CITATION.
RECOMMENDATION INITIATED BY
ace . Ghar
Robert M. Chapman
PLOYEE MAKING RECOM: “[49. DATE
48. tw € ND SIGNAWY! — OF
SENT ae
Director of Research and
Development
9 NOV 1970
TUTLE AND SIGNATURE
Carl E. Duckett, Deputy Director
for Science and Technology
TITLE AND SIGNATURE .
Carl E. Duckett, Deputy Director
for Science and Technolog
TITLE AND SIGNATURE :
Carl E. Duckett, Deputy Director
for Science and. Technology
DATE
HEAD OF. CAREER SERVICE
_ (Career service of nominee) :
DATE
DATE
14-0000
Section D (Cont'd)
. a
a denied area.’ His exemplary conduct and personal courage
during the resulting two and one-half years incarceration
permitted the maintenance of a very difficult cover situation
and successful extraction of all three men,
Upon his return, Mr. Christ joined the Office of Research
and Development soon after its inception, assisting in the
definition and establishment of the various divisions. Under
his early guidance, the over-the-horizon radar program developed
finally into an operational system. His sensitivity to the
needs of Agency operational elements based upon his experience,
his technical expertise and his dedicated desire to broaden
the technological capabilities of the Agency precipitated |
his development of a major coordinated program of accelerated
R&D to provide the clandestine services with a number of new
audio surveillance techniques of which the laser probe is an .
example, and his conception and direction of the Microtechnology
R&D program. Within this program, the success of the micro-
power transistor led to the award of Medals of Merit to two
scientists under his supervision. Other progeny of the micro-
technology concept are three novel intelligence gathering
systems to function in the air, in space, and in the sea .
environments, one of which is approaching operational status.
Mr. Christ has also been responsible for pioneering efforts
in the area of Audio Surveillance Countermeasures, first pro-
posing the application of computers to the problem.
Mr. Christ's imaginative leadership and inspiration to
those working with him, his broad scope of interest, his resource-
fulness, and philosophical devotion to the cause of the Agency
and the United States have provided this Agency with an individua)
whose unique efforts and accomplishments over his 20 years
service are worthy of this recognition.
|
104-10111-10079.pdf | 14-0000
104-10111-10079] | | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
hahha! colts iS RS ss a a ie oe to the resscus
veh
chsast « vse ghee cee pao
fg wae @gicred ty Ws ere we)
Reap Pere Clty amd | i tare ries srr pitads 7
pac ag a trtyarty Mur 3 sorter iy wv Jat. > Cortes we
steed the resaors fay sats : .
on og @ taskelor than to
rs ths aot aie oP atuh
14-0000
Une® ia ea ot ak texger Use tavte be he tg ylazsed te eoexpa te aa
wee Vea iaitial 3
PATEEEGORL Se lop t toe
waa a aa adepgeess tel:
ef the casa, nop the.
na tee at “tka trial, hat Little
or oeaty ieworse8 wht oe
° ale ts fe wortstig & bencatt t te ae
Yon, Chedst GAG Ga Aree ‘3
the sumncacs af H pret !
estgrieler fa totar oF sg tached hana xe heey that ba ¢
' +f 6 mde, Vileutee, cloaks, wily rd other ifens
, Se sa falda Paeples, aed Te ro Selene, 8.
ea afftetal becisees ed wed Fite Crket x ae cocnalcas, ta Ba
#2 oiler Beware SBISP Eee :
tag ee
aosthar Chen
cap binae by Bre eser 49 » eepeusert the tochatdane seal tantie the”
pies the eepead 4g beet. It pea pet inte lod tes ert, Crist £Px
inoy yet ta baskdagten atterezy, Ke
_ Fires Cartas eopATe
stout 8 Srserlenn 8 lane ot Was Tes of Plivg and thet condi itand*
flees ero cafrwrely poor. She slue mow that foed bs
tclame vy a Cah vec rhode wea oceupies a coll with the
fotelens, fhe wes advil sed ot tte Col:uae gae the teclatelens
fea sya prier te Wis cepts: Vast (hay were fa goad eplatte ont
tes Bay G Geats% cecusleanelly Tatked fa t2a pritem, —
Deetar aa Rew aces ef ecackilLe tgeosbtena sclLdactied ty thei |
Lantéen to eb Rar bio-amd a reheat, rte Catot now tae of
14-0000
= . th amathy grant sored aa aa ‘te whet eat! a,
: +40 oho also ted Brava ota,
$
|
H
{
te
p.
1
i
\
i
H
t
'
|
104-10111-10086.pdf | [104-10111-10086 E UNDER THE PRESIDE
‘ aS 3 . se
NT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSIN
Pe SES SECRET:
“ESTABLISHMENT
BACKSTOP.
ATION RECORDS ACT OF 19921 a
oN RECORDS ACT OF 19921 Hq
i
t
t
|
104-10111-10094.pdf | 104- 10111-10094 | 2 I
” , ‘ |
employment 38 & Type A part time employee. In August 1958 Subject
; advised that she was divorcing her husband and wished to be reinstated
as a regular staff employee. Her reinstatement was approved and in
_ November 1959 she was transferred pack to Washington, D.C., Pcs.
: - During her employment in(Papama/she was under O. Grover. Back in
Washington she w28 assigned to DDP/ WH, Support ; safe, Logistics .
Section. | .
| 6. In April 1960 Subject legally resumed her maiden name.
i
i
{ © qu. Im May 1960 Subject.was certified to the State Department
t - in connection with ninety day proposed TDY in Havana, Cuba with
. IMARCG; and in October 1960 she was transferred from Havana to
- Guatemala. —— . . -+ . Le
{
eM
8, In November 1960 Security was advised that according to
‘information from "the Project" (presumably JMARC) Subject had,
while in Cuba, allegedly been having affaire "with the three people”
who were Nncarcerated in the Cuban jail". This allegation very pod-
1 sibly was exaggerated and from information in the file may have been
: -untrue. However, & Security officer ga the Project seemed definitely
under the impression that one had been having an affair with one of
them, i.e. fbave CHRISTY 4nd was of the opinion that her "immoral"
behavior was ™ a prooadle Contributing factor" to then recent arrests
of Agency personnel in Cuba. According +o ther version, appar-
ently hers, she went out one evening with(G T) and on other oc-
casions had group gocial contact with him and with two other TSD
technicians who arrived in Havana three days before she left to go to
the United States on leave. On the Saturday night prior to her depar-
ture on Sunday, she and he¥ two roommates, she said, entertained
these three men in their apartment.
9, In Guatemala, Subject met and dated a Ronald Stanley
DAVIE, an American who wa3 ‘Nwanted" by the FBI for car theft and mail
fraud. According to Subject she found this out by checking “the files"
and reported it to her superiors. Also according to Subject, “It was
decided" that there was “go real harm" in continuing her relationship
with this individual "a3 long 28 I kept on guard"; and she continued to
date him until the day he suddenly disappeared from Guatemala City
on 24 January 1961. She had, in fact, expected him for dinner the even-
ing of the day he disappeared. . °
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only'=- 7 0 >
Do Not Reproduce .
-Z-
eee
|
104-10111-10104.pdf | 14-0000
104-10111-10104) >7¥ [
ae
«
a,
«?
.
23]
Bédicott, Kenneth EF.
Akins, Richard 7.
Albertsen, Ceciz V. | a3
Amrine, Rorace
|_Aresworthy, Frank J.
Arneson, Paul 5.
(hurustine », Rei nald C.a3
Aurell, Georze =.
aker’, Johr: t.
Talaze, Willies =) 3
Taranowski , Fever
hernets, Lowered ©
. 7.
LED LO, 2G
Burkett, Herold e] 03
ytz, Nexvon $.
Childers, Joe E.(1t.Col)
Chmst,. Dovid
SOV Ole, FYaEMcLe i
Gonninthay, Puch
Griseoll, &i Lect PaJOF
Driseceli, “alter (Gr.)
Crnardt, Walter L223
vans, Bryan (Col.)
Ferris, Lewin E.(Lt.tol}
Fox, Ernest F.
Fox, Willian 2. /°5
cerburk, Thomas
Gerrison, Jamas A.
Sipvons, “illis (fr.]
Coiran, E27er a
fpoermmay, Gilbert C./
Tali, Virsinde
Giazell, Fardley 703
Hensel, Karl ©.{Czrt..}
Sileman, Elmer Rk.) oF
full, Harris &. (Col)
Gull, Kenneth D. dr.>93
Johnson, “illiam Bo
Jones, George A. A.(Col)
JORACNSON, Gordon Le
Faramessines, Thomas FR.
Keht, Harold D. (Col)
King, J. C.
Rmutson, Harry
Ropnes, Lewrence “(Cant
fkaTNe a: Vrs
latehfielé, Edvure OF |
“oSafferty, S200 an
MNeCleliong, Hs i. Cie
“stv, Charles i,
‘aury, John i,
Oo
Ch
a)
+
4
Gen
—
.
2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 i" ~~
Ne
Vi /20 47
E2245
10/8/52
LALAG
Norvhrop, vonmsten ¥, 6s
o'3rien, Jokn T. OF rors.
Piburm, Sawin A.(Briz.3en) w/e
ESTON, Howard J. 6/2 /ue
Rady. George A, 11/22 7
Reidy, Joseph 03 6/12/52
Richardson, Jehn Hamnond aoe
Ridar, Donald L. ee ee
Rogers, Luke P. V/s /5>
fovwiend, Willian F,
Rosrovelt, Archibald 2As 5
Rovertson, William A. iS /ai,
Retter, Tuctus © 9% fete.
Sestu, Ee 12/23 -
Sheanon, Le T. Wie/i“
(Stevens, Lewis £.793
Stewart, Gordon %J,
Stein, Sidney ° y
(Sutphen, Preston Le» &rQ) 8 Se
Tansey, Patrick H.(?ai.Gen}
(icrpert, Raph? 93
Torer, Harry K.{Lt.Col)
(triable » Carl T.doz 13 al
9
Triniet, Fillien S.(Col) 9/2h/2..
@incent, Chester)°5 LAS/_”
Walker, Fred Le (Col) 1/26/%..
Whitney, Purke 2/13/5
Walliams, Ogden \OF
1A
RETURN TO Cc | .
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
|
104-10112-10148.pdf | 14-0000
£|104-10112-10148) -
.
| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
a To cere
§ carte Divte on
, Paria, see Diva
Te Le requested that clearance | be gronted ~.
~ fo¥. the: Feassign f Avtar? 8&2
:, Career’ Agent, ¢ :
on bra]? 32 Y
8 Needartty, eledtance quaber. i
“3. te te * planaed that 4 :
Headquarters during Sunes 1965.
Date” Slafs
sSurity Approve fas been ‘granted for
Rand use Co
.. by cNis request,
Chie, § eisai Se Qe, Division
14-0000
To * Central Cover Staff
THROUGH: Office of Security
SUBJECT: 7
(True Name) ~
Lucien |
‘ notif ied
ifically author tzed’ and instruct ncea’
Seal hie
ie 1
ENTRAL COVER
feo: ra
ez t
14-00000.
“REQUEST
SUBMIT THIS FCRM IN DUPLICATE, ENCLOSED IN SEALED
Central Cover Staff.
THROUGH: Office of Security:
SUBUECT: “ane ae |) fas der
PGT: COREE, Lacie £.
(True Naze) an
STAFF OR DIVISION
tak
P PROV.
me
|
104-10112-10186.pdf | 14-00000. <a a i edt ssi db
(104- 10112- 40186 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY AS ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
< NOTIFICATION. OF ESTABLISHMENT “ .
- “OF MILITARY COVER BACKSTOP-
wet Robes es kya BES pe.
SERVICES Division.
CHIEF, MILITARY COVER,
DISTRIBUTION:
FORM
762 1551 OBSOLETE PRevtouUs EorTions.
14-0000gy
KETO
Ck
Sits
[| cory to cpp/op
CHIEF. MELETARY COVER,
DISTRIBUTION:
amma mama A ae A a Ce AN NERC TN — roy Gi
ture LA Se 39-4
7-62 1551 OBZOLETE PREVIOUS EDITIONS.
Pe ——4
Extlugeg from actoaallc
ores i
14-00000 > . VCURC 1
NOTIFICATION . OF ESTABLISAMENT .
“OF MILITARY COVER BACKSTOP:
<2 Faw mAnA ode wo
AND SBERVICES DIVIBION
SUEMET FORM “3320 FOR ANY ‘CHANGE AFFECTING THIS. COVERS)
Fay . ah Se
SUBMIT FORM 1323 FOR TRANSFERRING (
(R 240-250)
wor
net x he coe
FORM
7-62 1551 OesOLere ‘pacwious”
jeez 15510 rarien | | SECRET ee igs ea Saar
NOTIFICATION OF ESTABLISHMENT
OF MILITARY COVER BACKSTOP
MILITARY COVER BACKSTOP ESTABLISHED
BLOCK RECORDS :
(OPMEMO 20-800-11)
a. TEMPORARILY FOR DAYS, EFFECTIVE
b. CONTINUING, EFFECTIVE
[| SUBMIT FORM 642° TO CHANGE. LIMITATION CATEGORY TO 3.
CHB 20- 800-2)
ASCERTAIN THAT ARMY W-2 BEING ISSUED.
CHB 20-661-1)
[| SUBMIT FORM 1322 FOR ANY CHANGE AFFECTING THIS COVER.
(R 240-250) .
[| SUBMIT FORM 1323 FOR TRANSFERRING COVER RESPONSIBILITY.
(R 240-250)
i
Cc] COPY YO cPD/oP
DISTRIBUTION: 1-OSDKGS/_-4-PSD/0S, 1- ADPD/COMPT
Form
7-62 {551 OBSOLETE PREVIOUS EDITIONS.
|
104-10112-10204.pdf | 14-9000
104-10112-10204
“NOTIFICATION :
MIL TARY CO COVER BACKSTOP
REAGENT ele
CORDS AND “SERVICES{DIVISION
‘SUBMIT F
(R 240-250)
CHIEFS MILITARY “cove J
7 OT. FORM : RO:
OL 762 155] oosocerc paevto
|
104-10112-10323.pdf | “\104-407112-10323 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
we : “ we ~ . Toy _
ra | -. _ RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
(Do Not Repreduco
, ip ,
- 21 August 1974
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. F. I. G. Coleman
C/OPS/LSN
SUBJECT : FBI Investigation of Allegations
Regarding CIA Activities
1. Reference is made to your memorandum, dated 30 July
1974 and captioned as above, requesting that the names of
certain individuals and organizations be searched in Office
of Security records and the results of such checks which may
be passed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
2. The records of this Office contained no prior informa-
tion identifiable with Security Defense System; Intelligence
Services, Ltd.; or Advance Security Corporation. Our records
reflect no prior information identifiable with Howard Gibson
of Powder Springs, Georgia.
3. Mitchell Livingston Werbell III, born 8 March 1918
in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, served in the Office of
Strategic Services briefly from July to December 1945 during
World War II,. and has repeatedly come to the attention of
CIA through the intervening years thrcugh his activities,
primarily in connection with the Far East and Caribbean areas.
He has a reputation as a “wheeler dealer, con-man, arms peddler,
and soldier of fortune."
4. The foregoing information may be passed to the Federal
Bureau of Investigation.
5. The following information from Office of Security
records was recently passed to Mr. Frank Schwartz, Federal
Bureau of Investigation Liaison representative:
"John Patrick Muldoon - Subject was born 25 August
1937 at Washington, D. C. He entered on duty with the *
Agency on 7 January 1958 as a GS-03 Courier. During his
Agency career he became an Operations Officer primarily
in the Far East area. His overseas assignments included
(Malaysia, Bangkok, and areas of Indonesia) He went on a
Is - 2y
RB GORIT:
\
14.90000
Yee
ar
eave Without Pay status on 19 November 1971, pending
24 @isability retirement. His retirement became effective
on 19 November 1972, as a GS-12. At the time of retire-
ment he resided at 4305 Kentbury Drive, Bethesda,
Maryland. The latest notation in his file indicated he
may be employed as the Washington representative of the
firm, Security Consultants International."
6. Office of Security records reflect that an individual,
probably identical to Steve Van Cleave of Atlanta, Georgia,
had falsely claimed to the State Department in January 1974
that he worked for CIA in Latin America under cover of Coca
Cola Company. He also apparently indicated that he is known
to FBI representatives in Buenos Aires. This information is
contained in Agency cables DIR-507298, 30 January 1974, and
DIR-490860, 12 December 1973.
Charles S. Phalen
Chief
Security Support Division
|
104-10112-10450.pdf | 14-0001
1 14-1011 -
104 cacao 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
*
. c
ee a
bf
‘n Q . "OR
@ See ° ]
2h December 1959
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, IB/3
FROM : A/Chief, SB/2
SUBJECT a CROZIER, R. L.
#112569
This will confirm verbal advice of 23 December 1959 that the
writer advised Joseph KING, SO/OTR, that the Office of Security
would not favorably entertain a re uest for the Subject's
utilization in a staff capacity at Isolation )in view of his
current non-staff status and cover and security considerations
involved in connection with his current assignment in(Mexico )1/
as a Career Agent. It is understood that OTR will advise ,
WH Division that OTR cannot assign the Subject to(Isolatioy
for security and cover reasons. Ol
ewd (12=21j-59)
|
104-10113-10030.pdf | 104-10113-10030] | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
. . > 4
pd
14.90000
po .. °''“"" OVERSEAS PROCESSING SHEET
SUBJECT Cone , [2 SN B No, 2 C257
Title and Grade Bren. Oyte Off Begne VS Office & Division a
Estimated~date_of travel mY (CJ. pes (X]
' Destination| > B-2 Cover ffo-one spear
Itinerary Awe Lk
SECURITY FACTORS
Item ; Action Initiated Compl eted
1. Date of polygraph
LY 4 ss
—_ 7 Po
| CRYPTO
i po
Cy °
] conourrence — © | filafelh Res |
3, Flegs:
4. Other: Selig ef aoe ached Led fox 7 ee. Micherech
Price en bette, Lhaf MPD hl torhle, Lonel
Information regarding travel obtained from
FL,
Processing Sheet completed by... Cavs Date ;
14-0000
peveree qene eee Sete enn a
ole
|
|
|
|
|
oo
co
Go
to
co
co
cm
_
cI
NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL (TYPE)
OFFICE TRAVEL ORDER NO.
Rien precieeus pa er Geer: PD Vee ok
. . TR AV E L oO R D E R ys oss AEZOUNT, SrMpo
. av] we 14) ‘. ~ i ae on,
Lucied 6 Say aanta Een fiog Wie
NAME . OFFICE PHONE GRADE AND SALA!
lacasa KE CORSE 232% Bao UA
TITLE . OPFICIAL STATION .
Beha) 22
You are hereby authorized to ¢ravel and, incur necessary expenses in accordance with
Agency Regulations. - __ : : . oot
Tiaval ak Tiead fro ¥cantaghos B. &.. to(feige. tudocnips))
Oo | ex
“PURPOSE _. 7 . > 7
Pe FOE (Gseyoct whl be ender RAG corer Gila only eLlaws exe ject te remaia 3s
infective) cam seas. Kis FOS $tar wil, Gherafere te cue you~
“SPECIAL rageigions ancwups APPROPRIATE JUSTIFICATION)
COORDINATION, AS REQUIRED (To BE EFFECTED BY ORIGINATING OFFICE)
(J ep/p - ~[77 orner oFERATIONAL AREAS CCT THEATER CLEARANCE (IF OBTAINABLE)
Maximum per diem allowance is authorized in accordance
with Agency Regulations. Advance of funds is authorized.
TRAVEL TO BEGIN ON OR ABOUT TERMINATING APPROXIMATELY “| CERTIFICATION cer Pro
Certified a True Copy. Signed
copy on file-in Central Process=
ing Branch. Reviewed. No change
LY OWNED AUTOMOBILE AS FOLLOWS IF APPLICABLE — 7 hmendgd 38 indicated.’
ESTIMATED COST OF TRAVEL
ie tr
MODE OF TRAVEL (SPECIFY)
Oi Sic. «31 Ee
ALLOWANCE FOR PRIVATE!
(A) SEVEN CENTS PER MILE, NOT TO EXCEED COST BY COMMON CARRIER.
.
(8) SEVEN CENTS PER MILE, AS BEING MORE ADVANTAGEOUS TO
THE GOVERNMENT.
a
THE CHANGE OF OFFICIAL STATION INDICATED 18 EFFECTED IN THE INTEREST OF THE GOVERNMENT AN) Puor FOR YOUR PERSONAL CONVENIENCE
IN GONNECTION WITH CHANGE OF STATION, YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO TRANSPORT, YOUR IMMEDIATE FAMILY, YOUR HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PER-
SONAL EFFECTS, SUBJECT TO WEIGHT LIMITS, RESTRICTIONS AND PROVISIONS AS SET FORTH IN AGENCY REGULATIONS.
TRAVEL TO FIRST POST OF DUTY ABROAD, INCLUDING EXPENSES OF TRANSPORTATION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY. HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PERSONAL
EFFECTS ANO AUTOMOBILE, (5S AUTHORIZED.
RETURN FROM POST OF DUTY ABROAD, INCLUDING EXPENSES OF TRANSPORTATION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY, HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PERSONAL
EFFECTS AND AUTOMOBILE, 15 AUTHORIZED. Wilitery orders réquired ty Heise 22 Yay 5k
‘ DRPENDENTS TO TRAVEL WITH EMPLOYES.
DEPENDENTS TO TRAVEL WITHIN ONE YEAR OF EMPLOYEE. .
TEMPORARY DUTY. | DE, ROMMLL, CtrT., F227 94
ne
s
K. Barelivea. FHGT ; _ :
Gréca . Steud. CET . (DATE) SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
FORM NO. 33 27> > . an . : weet Lote eae cae . . Cow bee et toute 3 (20-48
ocT 1951 = SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF FORMS 23-27, 39-26, 34-4, 34-4A, B4-B. 36-207 AND 37-60 WHICH MAY NOT BE USED.
. . 4f U. 6. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1951 - 97630:
1400000
. ‘ -
oe Parr 2 S
ar ot Sok CEArE b o)
OFFICE TRAVEL ORDER NO.
TRAVEL ORDER elf oN.
ALLOTMENT ACCOUNT SYMBOL
cee sate ae
CAE eRe = fiw tet . it nat
ee } ay
OFFICE PHONE
tie
OFFICIAL STATION
nlell igenns oifiecr Se ida tbonyg De Co
You are hereby authorized to travel and incur necessary expenses in accordance with
Agency Regulations.
ITINERARY
Rastinctims f« C. to athess, Crsece to (Wackhort, Gereay po reture
vo Eas hick wang ¢ Ce
SPECIAL PROVISIONS (INCLUDE APPROPRIATE JUSTIFICATION)
This camels the origiuel arar anc Awd! ¢ 1 in their eslinety.
COORDINATION, AS REQUIRED (TO BE EFFECTED BY ORIGINATING OFFICE)
(—Jlbpp/r (—_J orner OPERATIONAL AREAS ; [7] vueaver CLEARANCE (IF OBTAINABLE)
Maximum per diem allowance is authorized in accordance ESTIMATED COST OF TRAVEL
with Agency Regulations. Advance of funds is suthorized. $ ;
TRAVEL TO BEGIN ON OR ABOUT TERMINATING APPROXIMATELY CERTIFICATION cev processing srancny
eee Gortifted « Brue Cony. Signed
MODE OF TRAVEL (SPECIFY)
copy on file in Central Process-
ing Branch. Reviewed. No change
ALLOWANCE FOR PRIVATELY OWNED AUTOMOBILE AS FOLLOWS IF APPLICABLE necessary. Amended as indicated,
Cy (A) SEVEN CENTS PER MILE, NOT TO EXCEED COST BY COMMON CARRIER,
(8) SEVEN CENTS PER MILE, AS BEING MORE ADVANTAGEOUS TO
THE GOVERNMENT.
THE CHANGE OF OFFICIAL STATION INDICATED IS EFFECTED IN THE INTEREST OF THE GOVERNMENT AND NOT FOR YOUR PERSONAL CONVENIENCE.
IN CONNECTION WITH CHANGE OF STATION, YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO TRANSPORT YOUR IMMEDIATE FAMILY, YOUR HOUSEHOLD GOODS, FER-
SONAL EFFECTS, SUBJECT TO WEIGHT LIMITS, RESTRICTIONS AND PROVISIONS AS SET FORTH IN AGENCY REGULATIONS.
TRAVEL TO FIRST POST OF DUTY ABROAD, INCLUDING EXPENSES OF TRANSPORTATION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY, HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PERSONAL
EFFECTS AND AUTOMOBILE, IS AUTHORIZED.
RETURN FROM POST OF DUTY ABROAD, INCLUDING EXPENSES OF TRANSPORTATION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY, HOUSZHOLD Goons, PERSONAL
EFFECTS AND AUTOMOBILE, IS AUTHORIZED,
Noted by KPD: 13 May Sh
DEPENDENTS TO TRAVEL WITH EMPLOYEE.
CJ DEPENDENTS TO TRAVEL WITHIN ONE YEAR OF EMPLOYEE.
SS eee PRED Ke S.0WELL, CAPT., ACC
f NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL (TYPE)
(oasis Se Com acest 7
(DATE) .- SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
_aepemmemenennerreyrreses
FORM NETS gh optAeadl hy (26-487)
: CT 1951 “53-2 are + evious EDITIONS OF FORMS 23-27, 33-26, 34-4, 34-4A, 34-8, 36-207 AND 37-60 WHICH MAY NOT BE USED.
P WEE ITE WU. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE; ton2 - 23061!
ipl SER
14-0000
rn sn . on ene . — £65
_ tt ra ; SEGLET Y- 3 ~ e, areay
. Ok tte ft; £
TRAVEL ORDER Elling tamed A
ALLOTMENT ACCOUNT SYMBOL
& Api LITh ; ; OOPS Oye be LF
OFFICE PHONE GRADE AND SALARY
ioe
OFFICIAL STATION
ya are hereby authorized to travel and incur necessary expenses in accordance with
.gency Regulations.
ATINERARY
(5-%
| Feshtagtans bo cs te atasce, crvocg tality
OBLIGATION REFERENCE No.
CHARGE TO ALLOTHENT No.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS (INCLUDE APPROPRIATE JUSTIFICATION) “oe “AUTHORIZING OFFICER
coun yoo lay tien Atelier Sages Tons eon-estanrvetved a wien ore t pase
aoe in aataorieed up to & total wmigsh allowance
COORDINATION, AS REQUIRED (TO BE EFFECTED BY ORIGINATING OFFICE)
| op/Pp Oo OTHER OPERATIONAL AREAS . | THEATER CLEARANCE UF OBTAINABLE}
Maximum per diem allowance is authorized in accordance ESTIMATED COST OF TRAVEL
with Agency Regulations. Advance of funds is authorized.
TRAVEL TO BEGIN ON OR ABOUT TERMINATING APPROXIMATELY
Certified a True Copy. Signed
MODE OF TRAVEL (SPECIFY) copy on file in Central Process=
. ing Branch. Reviewed. No change
ALLOWANCE FOR PRIVATELY OWNED AUTOMOBILE AS FOLLOWS IF APPLICABLE : necessary. Amended as “oo
- Oo (A) SEVEN CENTS PER MILE, NOT TO EXCEED COST BY COMMON CARRIER
(B) SEVEN CENTS PER MILE, AS BEING MORE ADVANTAGEOUS to
THE GOVERNMENT.
SIGNATURE
| THE CHANGE OF OFFICIAL STATION INDICATED IS EFFECTED IN THE INTEREST OF THE GOVERNMENT AND NOT FOR YOUR PERSONAL CONVENIENCE.
IN CONNECTION WITH CHANGE OF STATION, YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO TRANSPORT YOUR IMMEDIATE FAMILY, YOUR HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PER-
SONAL EFFECTS, SUBJECT TO WEIGHT LIMITS, RESTRICTIONS AND PROVISIONS AS SET FORTH IN AGENCY REGULATIONS.
oO TRAVEL TO FIRST POST OF DUTY ABROAD, INCLUDING EXPENSES OF TRANSPORTATION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY, HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PERSONAL
EFFECTS AND AUTOMOBILE, (8 AUTHORIZED.
RETURN FROM POST OF DUTY ABROAD, INCLUDING EXPENSES OF TRAN: t) fit le OLD GOODS, PERSONAL
EFFECTS AND AUTOMOBILE, I5 AUTHORIZED. ISL EEE
O DEPENDENTS TO TRAVEL WITH EMPLOYEE, , Eeted w EFbs LL key 19s
DEPENDENTS TO TRAVEL WITHIN ONE YEAR OF EMPLOYEE,
FRED He STCWELL, CAPTo, AGC
TEMPORARY DUTY. |
NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL (TYPE)
03. Tooter ae
Gre Xs Chaptey) SE M2
(DATE) SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
FORM NO. 33-27 (25-40)
ocT 1981 SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF FO! a ie 28, 34-4, 94-4A, 34-5, 36-207 AND 37-60 WHICH MAY NOT BE USED.
WU. 5. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1998 . 2597127
OVERSEAS PROCESSING SHEET
> . —
svweet (Qorvee ec Wo, SOMOS
Title and Grade Weg pee L/S LE - Office & Division DDFS
Estimated date of travel <> S44, o~ TDY (+ - PCs Cc]
Destination O-F arf Pa Cover
Itinerary
' SECURITY FACTORS
Item ; Action Initiated Comple ted
1, Date of polygraph
2. Clearances:
("] crrpro
Ci st
TJ Q
Cc] Certification
a Concurrence
3. Flags:
4, Others cA /d wd |
Vf
14-0000 . .
+ ret
TRAVEL ORDER
foe" | 5025
OFPICE TRAVEL CRDER NO. -
SrRLG/Sh
ALLOTMENT ACCOUNT SYMBOL
CES (en Rel -G19
GRADE AND SALARY
kajor = EA
23 Berth BAL
Locies Be Curiiy
OFFICE PHONE
GIL
OFFICIAL STATION
Warhine tetig Te Co ;
You are hereby authorized to travel and incur necessary expenses in accordance with
Agency Regulations. ° .
ITINERARY : . (b- -20°
Fashiogten, T. C, to Athans, Grieng ta(Pracxfut, Cong bet retam
i Waghincion, ©. f _-
NAME
To confer on gporaticcal aaitere in coanection with (25705,
SPECIAL PROVISIONS (INCLUDE APPROPRIATE JUSTIFICATION)
(ealstens cower prcers avtioriged.
ey ae
COORDINATION, AS REQUIRED (TO BE EFFECTED BY ORIGINATING OFFICE)
O pp/p Oo OTHER OPERATIONAL AREAS | THEATER CLEARANCE GF OBTAINABLE)
Maximum per diem allowance is authorized in accordance ESTIMATED COST OF TRAVEL
with Agency Regulations. Advance of funds “is authorized. ‘
TRAVEL TO BEGIN ON OR ABOUT TERMINATING APPROXIMATELY CERTIFICATION a PROCESSING BRANGH)
. 4 : Certified a True Copy. Signed
MODE Ob TRAGER. toPeairT) . Pe RG re copy on file in Central Process-
ing Branch. Reviewed. No change
necessary. Amended as indicated.
0 (A) SEVEN CENTS PER MILE, NOY TO EXCEED COST BY COMMON CARRIER.
(B) SEVEN CENTS PER MILE, AS BEING MORE ADVANTAGEOUS TO
THE GOVERNMENT.
7 "
Oj THE CHANGE OF OFFICIAL STATION INDICATED 1S EFFECTED IN THE INTEREST OF THE GOVERNMENT AND NOT FOR YOUR PERSONALCONVENIENCE,
Oo IN CONNECTION WITH CHANGE OF STATION, YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO TRANSPORT YOUR IMMEDIATE FAMILY, YOUR HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PER-
SONAL EFFECTS, SUBJECT TO WEIGHT LIMITS, RESTRICTIONS AND PROVISIONS AS SET FORTH 1N AGENCY REGULATIONS.
TRAVEL’ TO FIRST POST OF DUTY ABROAD, INCLUDING EXPENSES OF TRANSPORTATION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY, HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PERSONAL
EFFECTS AND AUTOMOBILE, {tS AUTHORIZED.
RETURN FROM POST OF DUTY ABROAD, INCLUDING EXPENSES OF TRANSPORTATION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY, HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PERSONAL
EFFECTS AND AUTOMOBILE. [8 AUTHORIZED.
O
O
Bb DEPENDENTS TO TRAVEL WITH EMPLOYEE, Military arders vegaized wt me: ad ral »
oO
s
DEPENDENTS TO TRAVEL WITHIN ONE YEAR OF EMPLOYEE, _¢
TEMPORARY DUTY.
NAME geo TITLE OF AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL (TYPE)
OB
CBresk t. Chapin, c/arr
FORM NO... .33-97 (20-46)
OcT, 1981 SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF FORMS. NESE 4-8, 34-4A, 34-5, 36-207 AND 37-60 WHICH MAY NOT BE USED.
sin) WA . U. 8. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1953 - 287127
Val.
(DATE) SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
x)
( ny . F. APPROVED BY
1400000
fra
SECURITY INrPRAhid
1S COMMISSION . SEC
wa Ouran | VOUCHERED
wacn . REQUEST FOR PERSONNEL ACTION R T Pa
REQUESTING OFFICE: Fill in items 4 through 12 and A through D except 6B and 7 unless otherwise ipructed,
if applicable, obtain resignation and fill in separation data on reverse.
L NAME (Mr.—Miss—Mre.—One given name, jnitial(s), and surname) 2 DATE OF BIRTH 4 REQUEST NO. & DATE OF REQUEST
Iucion E, CONEIN _ 29 New 1919 261-53 20 Oct 19%
__—_
& MATURE OF ACTION REQUESTED: & EFFECTIVE DA . C.S.
A. PERSONNEL (Specify whother appointment, promotion, separation, ete.) . A. PROPOSED 7 Ce OR OT HOR.
& POSITION (Specify whether establish, change frade or title, ete.)
LN PenoRDEO €
Fl Operations Officer (F) 45-2 |‘ homes Tme mp ™ Intell. Officer BDW9
| Major USA "| SERVICE, GRADE, AND Major USA
il pDP/ 1h. ORGANIZATIONAL DDP/SE / (
fission DESIGNATIONS SE _ bani
Nurnberg Ops. Fase | 5.24 Office of the ef
Hurnberg, Germany 11, HEADQUARTERS Washington, D, &,
[= | nas [ ] DEPARTIRENTAL 12 FIELD OR DEPARTIENTAL [| fae Cel DEPARTMENTAL
A. REMARKS (Use reverse if necessary)
Sransfer 1Q Vouchered Funds FRO Unvouchered Funds.
Concurrence 3
ee peoon
ESTED BY (Name and title) D. REQUEST APPROVED BY
03, (JOSEPH BURK ) SE/ADHIN
OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CALL (Name an
ROLES DUS) Re
13. VETERAN PREFERENCE
NONE OTHER] 5-PT. 1O-POINT
DISAB. |OTHE!
Signature: nn
d telephone extension)
23
Title:
14. POSITION CLASSIFICATION ACTION
Wwwil
cD ~ FI
3 [piel APPROPRIATION TOC S. [19 DATE OF APPOINT. | 20 LEGAL RESIDENCE
FROM: 3130 ~- 55 ~ O17 ¢ ) MERESSIONS ONLY) | J CLAIMED [] PROVET
MiW | om: 4 - 3200 - 20 HO STATE:
Zi. STANDARD FORM 50 REMARKS
Tenet t Renee aes
~ XY} ras S
2. CLEARANCES INITIAL OR SIGNATURE DATE | REMARKS: Toe orig ESTES Y Jo,
A ‘a nee 52
GEIL. OR POS. CONTROL
-ECASSIFICATION
pO PLACEMENT OR EMPL
EB
|
104-10113-10181.pdf | 14-00000
KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F
10113-10181
04
1
|
104-10113-10244.pdf | 1400090 aw
104- 10113- 10244) , a | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. “KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |.
. oi nee erne ia tmretinnmes AOC TURNOUT T® ~ ioeentecactie cetemaanmattioy Aad 7
ek a
_ En MAGE
. 28 APR eg
fe. keynes #. Passed a 4
; Commistionar of imanigration
, ond Notzralisatios .
Department of Justice Se 7
Washington, D.C. = a 4
Attention: Mr. Fronk E. Bartos
rks
Dear Sir:
en
SUDJECT: Miguel Angel DIAZ Iealgue(A li 264 049)
DPOB: 14 February 1937, Matancas, Cuba
Subject is a contract employee of thie Agency engaged
in activities in the furtherance of the national intelligence ;
riission. He is ocheduled to travel in the immediate future | ?
to Argentina and several other South American countries. 4
Yor operational seasons subject will bo documented
with a(Republic of Nicaragua Passport Number 86781 snd
1-94, A¥rival/Doparture Record Card, in the name of Juan
Hidalgo ELIZONDO Romano. The Form I-94 will be sur-
_ rendered at the time of bis departure from the United States.
It ia requested subject be issued Form 1-512, Reentry
Document, under the name of Jusn Hidalgo ELIZONDO .
Romano to permit his return to the United States. In this
connection, there are enclosed two (2) photographs ots sub-
ject.
Cte eee ee eran mene ne ee
Travel information will be submitted prior to subject's
dogarturo from the United States to permit control of Form
1-94, Arrival/Dsparture Record Card. Your Service will
be advised in edvance cf subject's rcturn to the United
States.
é
i
!
.
wih
oo 7S SEGRET
a a
Your cooperation ta thie matter leverymuch .
appre
a
"Sincerely,
a Enh x Vhs
tf Victor R. White
puty Director of Security
(Inves gations and Operational Support)
OT Te BE DISSEHIAZ T "3 pulayes
TO ANYGHE WF: NF FORTGER Om rg Brey
Enclosure _ CENTRAL WT Eas Ree ‘heen MISSION OF THE -
Qs/ LW:ea 15 April 1968
~~
Ane meee oo
i en ta en ey
|
104-10113-10249.pdf | 14.066
boo oF
104-10113-10249
m7 .
Le ee
a
elco unéeretes4 that AGTALZ1 will hove recaived a bam fits smallpox
Sie oe? °° eae
| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |t
. r ; . ; _ 7"
Roe | 7 “89 ime Boe
° , : 22 April
C2 Fon «tet, 5
O
AccsESa «ss is Esbort Baubsiat ) '
Preeti osy" Seematetel ef(Eleasagea eviiaay } fa alias
tar Uo ty Das Os
TERS s US Regortmdee Gated 5 ftgetl 1955, sams cudjest
i. crananitte’ hesquith for vse’! outline’ ta Eoforcace ere the
follezing Govecants issued in(alias for ANSTALH-1: i
siimary Fassport E>. €S7CL eat U- Se ateralicatios oem 1-98
in ;
itinerary ca which AKZDALE-1 ehould be briefed pofere ke erplics for the
Axgentise visa ia Bow York. ;
@. In keeping with arrensemonts made by SCDVAD, tho Kedical Offics
to proparing, for direst éalivery to Wi/s, the Interzational Woolzaticn
Certificate in alias to be used vith the above docucats. fThis cortifiats
ehould te ebéchsd for eccuracy ea to exua, place end Cate of fesus. It is
i '
3. £50/AD preparod’ bis above fiesraguca on the etrexgth of
informatica that (QIGcIESIS would instruct en Coasular post in
tio U.G. to place a vies in the pasoport. ta % was prepared in ana
weck frou cate of groquset tecguse oporaticcal ¢ «Ths requires=at
eqcoifioa use of 6 (Ceatral écerican)yascport. fo avoid placirg a long,
tixne-ccnsunirg 6 ted itinerary “in tho passport, it was civen © receat _
dsccance dats, which necessitated issuance aa the basis of exomplars iesacd
roarly one year earlier (ths rost receat ores availedls). ‘This short
itingrary oleo vould scex to make epplicatica at this tice in tho U.8. for
ea Argeatice viea sousvhat umsual, Oinos ve are nov infor=-i tat ADLZ1
raf “
egrecd to by ir. o% eatter of record. Tale emfirc
vith Kr@Genbrinty A chock with ths Arpeatins Eeimscy ty i
imticatcd that e [Eicareguna)trmnaicat im ths U.0. ena obtain en Aroontino.
vica in this . oo
Al
Ghuse ,
Excluded from iy sy.
Gownzracing eo;
Ogclasstfisatiar
~ SECRET
bi
SO sefitl
6. Sana ca to itles Tied dodina) oa cntceeioa caee b? Pefereat to
Laem
(Potracs J. recisa)
canes ~
Attactseat: 2 Taveless (hf)
rT saa
val I
Motritutica:
Ae &1 - s4rescss ;
1 ~ Ofca/asa (2-2) ; “
ye 2 1 Se bl iB
Wye’
SECKEY
we
|
104-10113-10254.pdf | .? . . e
oa) . . . os
ran oo
“\104710413-10284! - | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
,
w ; a = .
‘ . my
/
é : A . . Le e
" a ‘ . . os
oO a ‘ 5 APR 1968
7 ‘ . , ,
. . . . ; . SPE.
ESSGRGEDGM FCB: Chicf, YED/ID wo, oo
‘va t Gffice ef Security/Alien Sffoire State
egayecr t Roquest fer Alice Decunsatation fer mo |
4 ° - AGTIZLIT oo. a
Cn.
n eccerdanse. with prolininary ocaverzaticus 03 |
between ever Penbrini) U0/4/A,. and Wice (Yina Jepiks ) |
of .
ond we ter? Gate ok Pholad /B, it is requested that on
Wacareguan pert be issued in tho acme of
Suan “nidilige KL Ronano fer ALGTIN-117'e uso to
travel froa the United States te Avgentinos and returns.
In ecdition, it is requested that an irrival-Doparture
Eoserd. (1653 Fern 1-04) be be prepared for Gabjest.' ; i, |
31
The requested posoport ekhcald coataina ghorgod?
Gaited’ Btates multipld entry tourict visa end a le
chovircg entry inte tho United States My Hicai, Phen asa,
ao carly Apvil 1003. Inolusica of tho ® orged United
Otatcs vioo tn Cubject's pacspest vilFlnot afferd bia any
FRivileges ks coca not alrosdy egilly bold in bio true meee,
|
* icontity. - Tha pesepert should bo valid through the end —~ | |
cf 1¢€¢3, | :
3. Tho follovicy infcrmatica should be insluded ca
tho Feru I-94 to bo propared fcr Bubjest: (0 ; °
“a. ansat address in (Kanegua, Micareguat |
Calle 15 és Sopticabre Eo. 405.) r
SG |
/ | |
” ae :
. i LF
Ye % = ce” |
a |
oe |
4, 7 Se ‘lope “1
veocmo . —_—_— ; @ . : . Pd @ —_ f .
‘ . ” ” ot, ’ . ' . . :
, . : ° L. . .
b. Ant&oipsted eddress in the United Btatca:.
Airpert Internationa! Eotol, Miant Inter-
natiodal Airpert, Hieai, FPlerida.
above roquirencnts ‘ero boing coordinated with
tks coies, walien Affairs Gtaff, Office of Security, who
will bo kept informed every tino the passport is boing uscd
cr ¢ravol fren cr to tho United States prior to oxit and
> secntry to tha United a Gtates. The infermation vill include
flight number, Gate and plese ef departure aad recntry.
Tho Alien Affairs Staff been requested te previde
Vera-619 in alias,
ri
if
Thon ©
ped
; an Willies V. Brea
’ Chic?
¥estern Esaisphere Divisica
SECRET ®
ne
|
104-10113-10258.pdf | 14736000
104-10113- 510258 rev 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY J ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
J&A .
; UNITED STATES au MENT - . . }
*. “Memorqndum Sent i
a
TO : File : DATE: 5 April 1968 .
ran -
FrRoM : Chief, Alien Affairs Staff ° . af , .
’
suBjecT: Miguel Angel DIAZ Isalgué .
DPOB: 14 February 1937, Matanzas, Cuba , ,
ron 4253233(C) , ;
03 7 : ; _
7 1. (robert Fambrini) WH/4A, R.L. 1069, reported. - .
' subject is scheduled for. TDY travel to Argentine. He
isa paroled Cuban and will be. traveling in alias.
i] ‘2. (FambriniSie submitting a request to TSD foran te. .
fArgentineé\Passport with B-2 visa imprinted. This. ua
ocument will be used for travel in South America.
3, AnI-512, Reentry Document, will be requested
from the Service to permit his reentry as parolee.
ter
* inkl (ecshice | \
OS/AAS/LW:es 5 April 1968 . (
ao
SECRET
|
104-10114-10042.pdf | 104-10114-10042 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
‘
oe Ts EGRET
FI/sT,
(er 415 OCT 1954
Chief, Special Security Divisica
\
D dtd 28 Septesber 195, \
HASTY:mjd 1) Oct 195)
cc: FUE
_ CL@ED
een - CHIE:
nc 42 tf S3 ak anf
a SECRET os -
Uf
|
104-10114-10152.pdf | 14-00000
104-10114-101
Saket
PRL F
und Us :
oh Bieprgaies
|
104-10114-10160.pdf | 14-00000
104-10114 10160), 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
|
104-10114-10161.pdf | 14-9000
2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRI
ae ee SS :
|
104-10114-10162.pdf | 14-00000
104-10114-10162)_ | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
RETYPED FROM UNREADABLE
COPY.
7 October 1961
MEMORANDUM FOR: The Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
ATTENTION: Mr. Sam J. Papich
SUBJECT: COURT FOSTER WOOD
INTERNAL SECURITY - CUBA
Reference is made to a 25 March 1961 and a 6 July 1961 in-
vestigative report on captioned Subject which have previously
been, furnished to this Agency.
(Michael Weimer Stratton, born 21 January 1941, Austin, Texas,
who iS a current Agency employee, has recently been interviewed
concerning his knowledge of Court Foster -Wood whom |§tratton) had $
known since mutual attendance in high school. Attached is a de-
tailed report of the information furnished by [tratton] concerning
his knowledge of Wood.
Since [Strat ton} personally has sufficient reason to question
the activities of Wood and the activities of the associates of
Wood, [Stratton] has been advised to discontinue any further contact
with Wood.
It would be appreciated if your Bureau would furnish this
Agency any additional information brought to your attention con-
cerning Court Foster Wood and of particular interest would be any
information received by your Bureau concerning past association
of Court Foster Wood with[Michael Weimer Stratton}
The above information is for your use only and should not be
. disseminated outside your Bureau.
-FOR THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE:
R. L. Bannerman
Acting Director of Security
Attachment:
As noted
OS/SRS/BLSolie:ect - 16 October 1961 -
2 EVURN YS AiA
Background '.oe Oly
a lot ren
14.90000
14-0000
a , RETYPED FROM UNREADABLE
COPY.
SUBJECT: Court Foster Wood
[Michael Weimer Stratton} has recently advised that Court *
Foster Wood was a relatively close high school friend of [Stratton)-
_during mutual attendance at GeorgesMason High School, Falls Church,
Virginia, during 1957 to 1959. [Stratton]described Wood as an
‘average high school student who had no particular problems with
the exception that there were domestic difficulties between the
father and mother of Wood.
(Stiatton] became acquainted with the parents of Wood and made
' occasional visits to their home during the above period of time.
The father of Wood, Foster Wood, is an attorney who was then living
in Falls Church. Some time ago the father and mother of Court Wood
split up and Court Wood and father moved into an apartment on
Columbia Road, Washington, D.C. .
(Steatton advised that after graduation from high school in
June 1959 he lost any close contact with Wood who then started to
attend George Mason College, where he seemed to ‘have an interest
in philosophy.$ Stratton\ started to attend a military school and
Wood expressed extreme Opposition to military schools. >
(Stfattoa) married in 1960, which also helped to move [Stratton]
somewhat out~of the social circle of Wood. ${Stratton] believed that
for approximately a year, during 1959 to 1960, he did not actually
see Wood but advised that after this period.in which he did not
see Wood he has had a number of contacts with Wood, many of which
occurred during mutual attendance at the University. of Virginia
Extension School (night school) in early 1961. On one occasion
3 YStratton attended a party at the apartment occupied by Wood and
; ‘Father St the invitation of Wood, and on this occasion came into
contact with the 'new set of friends" of Court Wood, whom Stratton] $
described as being “beatnik_types." Girls in attendance at the
party, according to Stratton} appeared to be of the "street pickup"
type. _ ; z ce
After the above party Wood occasionally telephoned fStratton|s
and about Christmas 1960 Wood called and stated that he was going
to Cuba_under the auspices of the _Fair Play for Cuba Committee.
3 (Stratton) called on Wood after the return of Wood from Cuba and at
that time Wood lauded Castro very highly. The father of Wood was
“also present and [Stratton obtained the impression that the father
was also in sympathy wit Castro. S{Stratton recalled that he again,
at a later date, had visited the Wood apartment, this being an
occasion when Wood had been visiting somewhere in Falls Church
and contacted [Stratton] to ask Stratton }to take Wood home. On this
[=
it
14.90000
14-0000
ined teh Faye
fpuriment fox
Vedi aS
93
a oe]
a
gues,
Mad
14-0000
cepa dow o>
Ree ena y,
14-00000
14.90000
|
104-10114-10163.pdf | 14-00000
|
104-10115-10074.pdf | 14-00000 ‘ va beg,
104-10118-10074) | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 | be
‘BeITSTA, Levwreano -
{See 5 also DAVIS, | olgh Richara
Tauieans ‘BATISTA, ‘Secretary:
of Military Affairs, Executive -
” Comittee, Movimiento Democratica
‘Cristisno (MDC), Miamt, “wi
eronted a Provisional Operational
Approval on 30 Decénber 1959
and an (Operetional - Approval” 08. ty
30. Fetruzry. 1960 for use’ as }
:, PP Agent, . Heyans, Cubs3),
Radetgh Richard DAVIS, Cuban:
exile” ‘questioned ty GARRISON's start .
Subject,’ @:
ona Ip ine be Sono bree Te was granted a POA in Decenber .
“A copy of a. letter to , subject's file dated 22 Fovenber 21963 - ;
>." signed by Subject ag Secretary for Military Affsirs, Executive Committee
_. * Movinfento Denocrats Cristisno is sddreseed to Mejor General Bela K,
“1°,” KIRALY, Presifent, Hungarian Freedom Fighters Federation, Ine.,- and:
“2 - affered the services of the MDC in erranging meetings’ and @fscussions
oe a with other ant{-CASTRO orgenizations ond the Hungarian ‘Freedom Fighters.
[The Fungerian Freecom Fighters were Agency “sponsored) end - Covert fection -
Staff wes interes ted tn inform:tion onthe PDC before @onting « pproval ~ oe
- for conta ct between the. 1 by, orgentz ctions. Bo ars
DETATLS?
ae “Dering | an ‘tnterview with the PBI in Oct Loner 19% 63 in Kew York.
Pago? iph Richard DAVIS advised that in Jemnry 1961 he wes in Eew York”
- . where Le served as coordin-tor between the MDC cnd the Kew York Folice
Department. DAVIS. also Bald that Bore nineteen wen had bea sent from.
14-00000
Mi-ri to New Orleans by Laurecno BATISTA in response to = request
by DAVIS for men to work tn a lumber business vith which he wss
connected in Guatemala. The nen stsyed at « hore near Lacombe,
Louisiana. When the FBI seized dynzmite ana other explosives
‘nearby, the men became disgruntle@ end vere.unwilling to proceed to
fuctemile. So the lumber cormpiny paid their fure buck to Ficrt.
Some of the names of these ren were as follows: Victor |
PANB.UE, Leodorino INTERIAN, Fernando FERNANDEZ, and fnu FORWES.
|
104-10116-10261.pdf | 14-0000
104-10116-10261 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
Soe _
Catet, 150n/sRs |
CiA'e * Brown and Root Dinensions!"
) :S: Tas following employeas og ERM end
contact tse ’
oa the dates indicated:
11 Deceubar 1952 end
16 Februscy 1953,
‘Rl danusty 1957 end
AER, Meertet Aten, —
ie ad Apré2 1957
: Projeat Accowntant -
«© POS552.
x5 February 1957 and
G Mey 19ST
UAGMER, Richer’ Andrey, Civil:
a fossi0g
_., Tuore ie nd O8 cubject file on the BROW Fomdation but @ reference,
file centaing a mencrandun dated 30 Jtnuary 1967 to the Deputy Director, Plane -
- - Tr — 7 ae
"| Bxofuded irae aeeaats : _—
oo deciassMcatlea a -
7
ee bo Og
7 the
14-0000
fron Chief, Centrel Cover Grow cuicetatig the threat of expoaure of
opatetions an& conoludes that thea BROKN Foundation of Houston,
Texas wos one of the mint Wilnereble te exposure because public records
feflect direct ttea fran Agenay Tinting iustrunents elby:
PATIMAN in 196 to Lagitinate foundations and Agency we
. Projeate they have sponsored. ca hye fe or re
IE bt BEI000=57 3
a VERRON Find (EEAUDUEED “GS created by the Agensy in June 29580
onteneitly private phtlenthrapic foundation legally ixeorparat a we
_ Mader the Jaws of end with on office in the District of Columbia. | Tt £9 used ps)
Ca Cover and funding Rachonten for Por ject DILAMPREY. | Tha ehjective: of 8
; t of orginisn end Individued assets cagsble |
wf sreagthening the unity of nou<Commmist teachers end their orgauizatiens .:°
; throughout the world. These objestiveg ore ontrted out through the sotive ;
5 SUPPOTE by the Agensy of the. decernational programs of the National © .
{ Rducation Aagooiation (PELMTEI) end the World Confederation of Organizations ;
Of tha Danching Profession (ZHLACEPOD). with Valen IA is affiliated. In Merch °
4987 decausa oF exposure OF the Yorum md fin neve Weilig,y the Board =; -
manbers were contacted advieed ag follows) a —
Bech Vernon Pond beard. nécbar is being tévised that he wilt :
necelve a copy of the HUA and Wore ‘letters regarding prese.
; Ranbare but will probebly hove tos be will. not comment om the oreaifon’.
Of the ¥ Fung end kow initial contacts Werte modes . bas
RAMS. Albor® Hohe, THE = #0270533 (Vernon find Board Naser)
: "Witten G. CARR vas eronted ma Covert Saourity Clesrance oA 22 April
1955 Sor waritting use under Project DIPILLAR end on 21 Novesher 1967 ba
ms ; y @ perait bio vas ender Praject
“. DILAMPSEY in his position ef Sccretary—Censreal
of ths World Confederation -
ae Bryce REA, dea, ati af | lire Vernen And wp granted @ Covert :
Booursty Chearsuse for BOE E Gleared attorneys? panel. on co
Jet eee ep oe ee
oar) a
wy “* . . .
, ORAS aol.
. . hoes toy Ye
i! . . : : . an
wy
14-0000
15 Woveuber 1956 ent on 19 Sasteubar 1959 he recat ves another |
, Covert necurity Clearmee to peruit his use as @ Legces Cutout >
JELAGHEOD as Coordinator tor Africen Agtivities in Washington, DG. Goa” |
; Mt-adetutetrative officer of the Werld Confederation of Orgenizatione of the
fea
“2: at wes pot ponsitie te Sdentity @ subject fis on John qHOMPSOS
paoloyed by the Varld Confederation of Orgmizattons of the Tesching _
- BOR SESiane ee : 7 ey ore an - x _ oe
: - "08 Andtess were negstive oa. tia CART Poundatica, (om Thonse De GaB0r) ; :
“°._fmainena Peients of the Middle East (Project ZMVIMER) was exeaten
Map 2952 with ¢ urpose of employing aggreasive srapagenda to proote
lone
14-0000
tendatip of peoples of the Heat ant Widile Bast toverd the
Gaited ftates ond to eoxbat Commmisae Tt wae dneorporates as a:
‘woluntury, Boneprofit mesberstip cotporation under the Jase of New | -
Bs erty 156A oeied ogo ae oe naces ee ete
| BOTLY MS rea: & Good daak of nevspaper public tHe
cerning Ste Agency effilistion ducluting articles in tie Boviet TCD,
TASG anf USS INTERRATIONAL APFAIN. Gyrie wan ‘tse, on: Yan
5 There £g
68 indies
“na to why the Agency shonla beur the whole cost of the esntract vhich wae
| to be Zor datersdepartmentel usa, Dh May 1967 a note fa the Hite indicated.
| East H, D. ANDERSON Hoepdta) ond Tame Institute vill be engiged in classified |
_ Work Toy the Agency. TAOS VEE UO TRoUrd Of & clearance {scued. _ Lage:
- genes FOUL LO
en ettaahed pened aated 30 Simuery 1967 tren Cant, Central
Soyer ) Dagu Directoy Plant Thrvet. of Exposure A
DOO page York fines" erticle tee 26 Pebrusry 1987 dleolossa that tha :
MARSHALL Founfation of Houston, Texas channeled funds from the Agency to
» the Industriel end Labqr Relations at Comell University fron ;
an
14-0000
Gente Rufus BRO, Rectut.ive Vice President of GRIT ana ROOT, Ines
Houston, Texse, wae gronted w Cavest Security Clearance on £3 Octaber *
1903. for uss as a covert asqociete in the United States on Project, LPCOTMB. :
Og 82 April, 1965 he was grented & Provisional Covert Roourity Approval to.
perms cmitaet and oe ee ater ca commention sath his seoreeia wy
{Bae Sorving ea : Board of Dire B ter & proprietary » Sat uy ty: ;
Eaqurity Approval Sue this hos! wee-loseck conse seg gee w Covert
» Toe this yee wna issued on 16 1 1965. Trees o
were concelied 2 Ome 1967 ax BAGH wae not wed, 7 : Chgh bas
President end Director of BROW end ROG?, Inc., Houston
fent snd Trustee of the. BROW . Bouston, Teas, ..
Covert Security Approval on 3 December 1953 for usa es a
Covert Associate in the Us. de ude Prajest TRCOm. This
ERARR ES : _ : ol .
September 1955. Re was listed ae @ trustee of the |
Goalety tn April 1965. ,
signor of @ statement appeart
good, himinitarien orgenization tat mmy individuals
ty bave been geseciated with Ite
1958 atated thet Alin ©
ape elther pro<Comunist or eatiCammmniste® qoePetet |
"Yip eleswanse waa reqpan ated or Aasued for ERIVERS, Bie file ontainn
ae
14-0000
‘ oa 17 Augiot ar
and Mrester of Internati e
“Mots Dudtey cho wis greatad a covert Beciatty tppoaa dee
(use under Project LPCODH : On 26 ime 1959 he van iseuek & Covert Secardty
: : (Ga the President:
Approval. for use vith. Project + (He was to serve
14-0000
- «2 Soka Henry FREEMAN wes graated @ Covert Se
* dume 1957 te permit the weflizetion of his services under Project.
. A&. the tine be was & partner. dn the lerge Gnd lesding law firm of .
| FULBRIGHT, CROOKER, FREEMAN, BATES end JANORSKT at Houston, Texas
"0nd WHE BR trustee of the M, D. ANDERSON Medical Founietions
oe: eat Deshierl, Jes = £157, and PRUOGOTLMA
cr, Ernest Dashiell. COCKRELL, Jr. was. epproved for contact wee CALTECH
Om 10 June 1958 mad wa granted & Covert. Security Clearance on § 2
af two efi compinias tn Houston, ' 63 O11 Production Maiatenance, inc
ma Production Maintearyee Cammy, 3 a a
i Demy MARSHALL vas grented @ Covert Security Approval on 28
November 1958 in order that he cana be mada witting of Agency tnterest
in the CULLEN Foundation. PMAROSALL was Vice President of the Quintana
Petroleum Corporation of Houston, Texans which te the holding conpany owned
by the Hugh Hoy CULLEN femily. : MARSRALL'» wite, Mavgeret Cullen MARSHALL»
As © doughtar of Bugh Roy CULL, Oe
-. Ovete Culp ROBBY was prentad @ centinuing Wedieon clearence on 7 Aprai 1953
when she waa Director of the Feceral Seeurity Agency. A Covert Security ; Ly
Approval wos iseved 16 July 1962 te pernit her use under Project LPCORSET
ta i through HOBBY Fomlation of Housten, > |
Rexas of vaich she ie President. 1 26 Cetcber 1965 a Provisiensh
> Qvata Culp HOBBY's son, Wiliam Fottua ROBBY, Jey, born 19 January -
1932 et Houstan, Texas, was security approved for contact use on 23 Ney 1960.
“On 29 Jme.1962 he was granted a Covert Security Appreval te parnit hia
Mitting use
~SECKET
CAWAGEATL which vas to be eupported by the
14-0000
|
104-10117-10075.pdf | 14-9000
104-10117-
( 7-10075) | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
a
SECTION 1.
Submit in duplicate. Answer all questions completely. If question does not apply, write “NA.” Write “UNKNOWN?” only if you do not
know-the answer and it cannot be obtained from personal records. If additional space is required use extra pages the same size as this
page and sign each such page. Reference each continued item by “section and item number to which it relates.
. FULL NAME (Last-first-middle ) 2-DATE OF BIRTH] 3.PLACE OF BIRTH (City,State,Country)
Flores, Daniel :
. PRESENT STATUS (Single, widowed, divorced, or annulled) SPECIFY: Married 12
S. STATE DATE, PLACE. AND REASON FOR ALL DIVORCES OR ANNULMENTS
wNwA"
SECTION 11. SPOUSE
1. NAME OF SPOUSE (last- first-middle-maiden) + DATE QF BIRTH 3. PLACE OF BIRTH (spouse)
Flores, (Dorothy Arnettyob 0481 Jan 1935 Portland, Oregon
4. DATE AND PLACE OF MARRIAGE . C\TIZENSHIP OF SPOUSE (Tf naturalized. indicate date & place
18 November 1960 . reaneegee e-
USA
6. STATE DATE, PLACE. AND REASON FOR ALL SEPARATIONS. DIVORCES OR ANNULMENTS
mya"
7. OCCUPATION 8. PRESENT EMPLOYER
Legal Secretary (Arnold and Porter) 0%
9. EMPLOYER'S OR BUSINESS ADORESS (No., Street, City, State & Zip Code - Country if not U.S.)
: (0)
(229 19th)Street NW, Washington, D.C.
SECTION Lil. RESIDENCE (Since date of last PHS, if overseas residence indicate only city and country)
ADDRESS - LAST RESIDENCE FIRST (number, street, city,state,country) Jngl, oh + INCLUSIVE DATES (month & year)
(Guayaquil, Ecuador | (0 May 1969 |May 1971
Feb. 1974
(
"7
pp
yo]
%
we
c
i
Sept. 197
+3 .
ienna, va (8151 Larkin La.) | gen. 1974
SECTION IV. CHELDREN AND OTHER DEPENDENTS (Provide information for all children and dependents )
ob (Kendra) Flores 3 March 1971 F usa | $151 Larking La
= . Washington D Vienna a
o6 (Zola Marie)Flores 15 March 1974 USA fe
San ons
(4)
FORM OBSOLETE PREVIOUS
12-70 ute EDITIONS
“tal
14.90000
, RELATIVES BY BLOOD, MARRIAGE OR ADOPTION WHO EITHER (1) LIVE A
SECTION V. °° + (2) ARE NOT U.S. CITIZENS OR (3) WORK FOR A FOREIGN ‘GOVERNMENT 7 ..
: "y- "(Last-First-Middle) . . 2. : 7 City, State, Country)
"GUERRERO || Richard, Nephew” 3 “i BIRTH “ew “orleans ; La y,
5. CITIZENSHIP (Country) 6- ADDRESS OR COUNTRY IN WHICH RELATIVE RESIDES —— :
1) USA Ansbach, Germany
+ EMPLOYED BY
Army
NAME (Last-First-Middle) A
ote ey - .
FREQUENCY QF CONTACT
‘Periodic
"wire reve
2. -RELAT S}ONSHIP 3. DATE OF BIRTH [4
5. CITIZENSHIP (Country) ; ADDRESS OR COUNTRY IN WHICH RELATIVE RESIDES
(2) ; .
7. EMPLOYED BY 8. FREQUENCY OF CONTACT 9. DATE OF LAST CONTACT
1. NAME (Last-First-Middle ) 2. RELATIONSHIP 3. DATE OF BIRTH] 4-PLACE OF BIRTH (City, State ,Coumtry)
5. CITIZENSHIP (Country) 6. ADDRESS OR COUNTRY IN WHICH RELATIVE RESIDES
(3)
SECTION VI. PERSONAL DECLARATIONS
1. HAVE YOU BEEN ARRESTED. INDICTED, OR CONVICTED FOR ANY VIOLATION OF LAW (Other than for YES (explain X -
minor traffic, yiolation) SINCE THE .DATE OF YOUR LAST PHS below)
ei? 49) E.! : R . tow)
2. SINCE THE DATE OF YOUR LAST PHS, HAVE THERE BEEN ANY UNFAVORABLE INCIDENTS IN YOUR wire) | (explain
WHICH MIGHT REQUIRE EXPLANATION. below)
im
3. NAME OF YOUR PRESENT IMMEDLATE SUPERVISOR (include Room Number and Extension) Mr. Nestor “Sanchez Vw
. : X—74 RM 3.0 _
SECTION Vil. PERSONS TO BE NOTIFIED IN CASE OF EMERGENCY =~ <P
1. NAME (Last-First-Middle) as previous PHS 2. RELATIONSHIP
3. HOME ADDRESS (Number, Street, City, gtate, zip Code) \ tous 4. HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER
5S. BUSINESS ADDRESS (Number, Street, City, State, ZIP Code)-1NDICATE NAME OF FIRM| 6. BUSINESS TELEPHONE NUMBER & EXT.
OR EMPLOYER, |F APPLICABLE
we, : ota
7. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY, OTHER CLOSE RELATIVES (spouse, mother, father ...) MAY ALSO BE NOTIFIED. IF SUCH NOTIFICATION
1S NOT DESIRABLE BECAUSE OF HEALTH OR OTHER REASONS, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE PERSONS NOT TO BE NOTIFIED AND THE REASON.
ISECTION VIII. > ADDITIONAL REMARKS .
DATE SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE
“pal .
14.90000
1. NAME (Pirest-middle-last )
Pau (rem) a
th oF vember
CITY AND STATE .
DATE TO DATE “NUM Pa . CITY. AND STATE
Se “HAVE YOU BEEN -ARRESTED.. IND IGTED /7OR “CONVICTED FOR -ANY-VIOLATION OF LAW (Other than for .- Explai
_sinor ‘traffic violation). -SANCE ‘THE DATE .OF YOUR -LAST. PHS . | Beis) P "
6. SINCE THE “DATE OF YOUR LAST. PHS, HAVE THERE BEEN ANY. UNFAVORABLE INCIDENTS | iN YOUR LIFE YES (Explai /
WHICH MIGHT REQUIRE EXPLANATION . ~ : . below)
: inst
H 7 Piery OF Be" Nahoney’ ‘IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR
8. ADDITIONAL REMARKS (USE reverse if necessary)
29 Joisk 967
as tte
tected me ot . We te ee ee ee ee
14.90000
1. NAME (First-middle- last )
Daniel (nm) Flores
3..:1F MARRIED
PLACE OF MARRIAGE
ima, Peru to
SINCE (Date). _| NUMBER AND STREET.
: 08....
August 1961. 828 Connecticut ive., NAW,
DATE TO DATE NUMBER AND STREET
DATE TO DATE... NUMBER AND STREET
HAVE YOU BEEN ARRESTED. -INDICTED, -
minor traffic violation) SINCE THE DATE OF YOUR LAST PHS
WHICH MIGHT REQUIRE EXPLANATION
NAME OF YOUR PRESENT IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR
Harry T, Mahoney
ADDITIONAL REMARKS (Use reverse if necessary)
-CTURN PHS:
“12 @ HEADQUARTERS.”
Cy EMPLOYEE
Form!
ron uttte (4)
|
104-10117-10076.pdf | 14-0000
104-10117-10076
| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
sone ¢ ee
PERSONAL HISTORY STATEMENT — (Appendix I)
Listed below are names of organizations identified by the Attorney General, under his responsibility pursuant to
Executive Order 10450, dated. 27 April 1953, to st the names of. each foreign or domestic. arganization, association,
movement, group or combination.of persons which he designates as Totalitarian, Fascist, Communist, or subversive,
or:as baying adopted. or having shown a policy of advocating or: approving the:commission. of acts af force or vio-
lence to deny others their rights under. the Constitution of the United: States, or as seeking to alter the form. of
government. of the United States by unconstitutional means.
Fach applicant or employee.and spouse (if any). must. review the following list of organizations for certification
purposes,.and sign: on: the: last page.
: Boston. School for Marxist. Studies,.Bostan, Massachusetts
yarn revere art cn ; no one oe
Actlan. Committee to Free-Spain Now Bulgarian American: People's. League of the United States of
Alabama. People's. Btucattonal. Association (see Communist Politi- America
= wate tor tm Yugoslavia, Inc.
American Association. Reconstruction : - Callfornt Det Committee
Americam Branch. of: the Federation: of Greek Maritime Unions : brary . me, 381 Divisadero Btreet,.gan
American Christian: Nationalist. California Labar School,.Inc.. Pranciaco,
Party
American. Committee for Buropean: Workers: Relief (sce Socialist
American Comunittes: for Yugosiav: Retief; Inc:
to: G@unreyx Labor Conditions:in Europe .
: . ‘known sa the: |
‘ Citizens Committes: af the Upper West Side (New York City)
! Citisens Committes to Free Karl Browder
Citizens: Protective Leagus
Civil: Laberties Sponsoring Committes of Pitteburgh
‘Civil Rights Congress and. its affiliated organisations, including:
Civil Rights. Congress for Texas
Veterans Agsinst. Discrimination. of Givil’ Rights Cangrres of
New York
Civil Rights Gongress. for Texas (see Civil Rights Congress)
Columbians
Comite Coorlinador Pro: Republica Espanola
(Sea: Puerto Rican Comite Pro Libertades Civiles)
Committes-for'a Democratic Par Eastern Policy
American. Russian. Institute; New York, also:known as the Ameri- |’ Committees for Constitutianal and. Polities!. Preedom
can Russian Institute for. Cultural Relations with the Soviet | Committee for: Nationalist. Action -
Cammittee for Peace and Brotherhood Festival in Philadelphia
American Russian Instituts,. Philadelphia . Committees forthe Defenss of the Pittsburgh. Bix
Axsoerican Russian Institute of. San: Francisco Committes-for-the Negm-in the Arts
American: Russian: Institute of Gouthern California, Los Angeles Committee for the-Protection of the Bill of Rights
American Slav. Congress Committee. for. World Youth: Friendship and Cultural Exchange
American Women for Peace Committee to Aboliah Discrimination in Maryland
American. Youth. Congress (Bee. Congress Against. Discrimination; Maryland Congress
American Youth for Democracy Against Discrimination; Provisional Committee to Abolish
Armenian Progressive League of Americs Discrimination in the State of Maryland)
Ansociated Klans of Amertca Committee to: Aid the Pighting- Bouth
Association of Georgia: Klans Committes. to Defend Marie Bichardson
Association of. German Netionals (Reichsdeuteche Vereinigung) Committees to Defend the Rights and Preedom of Pittsburgh's
Aucland-Organiration Ger NSDAP; Overseas Branch of Nari Party ; Polltical Prisoners:
OComanitres’ to Uphold. the: Bill of Rights
Forum: Commonwealth College; Mena, Arkansas
Benjemin Davis Freedom Committees Communist Party, U. 8. A. its subdivisions, subsidiaries, and
Biack Dragon Goolety amliates
FORM 444d Use PREVIOUS EDITIONS -1- “)
RR ORES Sa aieties EE er es
14-0000
Communist Political Association, tts subdivisions, subaidiaries,
and affiliates, including:
Alabama People’s Educational Associstion
Florida Press and Educational League
Oklahoma League for Political Education
Peopic’s Educational and Press Association of Texas
Virginia League for People’s Education
Congress Against Discrimination
(800 Committee to Abolish Discrimination tn Maryiand)
Congress of American Revolutionary Writers
Congres of American Women
Congress cf the Unemployed
Connecticut Committee to Aid Victims of the Bmith Act
Connecticut State Youth Conference
Oouncil for Joba, Relief and Housing
Oouncil for Pan-American Democracy
Council of Greek Americans
Council on African Affairs
Croatian Benevolent Fraternity
Dai Nippon Butoku Kal (Military Virtue Boclety of Japan or Mill-
tary Art Society of Japan)
Dally Worker Press Chub
Daniels Defense Committees
Dante Alighiert Society (between 3635 and 1940)
Dennis Defense Committees
Detroit Youth Assembly
East Bay Peace Committee
Elsinore Progressive League
Emergency Conference to Gave Spanish Refugees (founding body
of the North American Spanish Ald Committee)
Everybody’s Oammittee to Outlaw War
Pamilies of the Baltimore Smith Act Victims
Pamilies of the Smith Act Victims
Pederatian of Italian War Veterans in the U. & A, Inc. (Assocta-
sione RNasionale Combsttenti Italiani, Federarione degli Stati
Uniti d’America)
Finnish-Americen Mutual Aid Society
Florida Press and Educational League (see Communist Politica)
Associstion)
Prederick Dougtass Educational Center
Freedam Stage, Inc. .
Friends of the New Germany (Preundo des Neuen Deutschlands)
Priends of the Soviet Unicon
Qaribaldl American Fraternal Society
George Washington Carver School, New York City
German-American Bund (Amerikadeutecher Volksbund)
German-American Republican League
German-American Vocational League (Deutache-Amerikaniscne
Berufsgemeinschalt)
Guardian Club °
Hariem Trade Union Council
Hlawaill Civil Liberties Committee
Fleimusha Kat, aleo known as Nokubei Heleki Gimusha Kal, Zaibel
Nihonjin, Heiyeku Gimushba Kai, and Zaibel Heimusha Bal (Jap-
nese Residing tn America Military Conscripts Association)
Hlellentc-American Brotherhood
Binode Kal (Imperial Japanese Reservists)
Pincmaru Kal (Rising Sun Flag Society —a group of Japanese
War Veterans) :
Hokubel Zaigo Shoke Dan (North American Reserve Officera Asso-
ciation)
Hollywood Writers Mobilisation for Defense
Hungarian-American Council for Democracy
Hungarian Brotherhood
Idaho Penston Union
Independent Party (Seattle, Washington)
{See Independent People’s Party)
Independent People’s Party
(See Independent Party)
Industrial Workers of the World
International Labor Defense
International Workers Order, ite subdivisions, subsidiaries and
amlistes
Japanese Association of America
Japanese Overseas Central Society (Kaigal Dobo Chuo Kat)
Japanese Overseas Convention, Tokyo, Japan, 1940
Japancee Protective Association (Recruiting Organiration)
Jefferson School of Social Acience, New York City
Jewish Culture Society
Jewish People’s Committee
Jewish People’s Praternal Order
Jixyoku linkal (The Committee for the Crisis)
Johneon-Porest Group
(See Johnsonites)
Johnasonites .
(Bee Johnson-Forest Group)
Joint Anti-Pasclsat Refugee Committee
Joint Council of Progressive Italian-Americans, Inc.
Joseph Wedemeyer Schoo! of Social Sclence, Bt. Louls, Missourt
EKibei Seinen Kai (Association of U. &. Citizens of Japanese An-
ceetry who have returned to America after studying tn Japan)
Enights of the White Camellia
Ku Klux Elan
Kyfflhacuser, also known as Kyffhacuser League (Xyffhaeuser
Bund), Eyffhacuser Pellowahip (Kyfthacuser Kameradachaft)
Kythaeuser War Relief (Kyffhaeuser Eriegahiifswerk)
Labor Council for Negro Rights
Labor Research Association, Inc.
Labor Youth League
League for Common Sense
League of American Writers
Lictor Bociety (Italian Black Shirts)
Macedonian-American People's League
Mario Morgantini Circle
Maritime Labor Committee to Defend Al Lannon
Maryland Congress Against Discrimination
(Bee Committee to Abolish Discrimination in Maryland)
Massachusetts Committee for the Bill of Rights
Massachusetts Minute Women for Peace (not connected with the
Minute Women of the U. 8. A. Inc.)
Maurice Braverman Defense Committee
Michigan Civil Rights Federation
Michigan Council for Peace
Michigan School of Social Gclence
Wanka Telkoku Gunyudan (Imperial Military Friends Group or
Southern California War Veterans)
National Association of Mezican Americans (also known as Asccia-
clon Nactonal Mexico- Americans) .
National Blue Star Mothers of America (not to be confused with
the Blue Star Mothers of America organized in February 1942)
National Committes for Freedam of the Press
National Committee for the Defense of Political Prisoners
National Committee to Win Amnesty for Smith Act Victims
National Committee to Win the Peace
National Conference on American Policy in Chins and the Par East
(@ Conference calied by the Committee for a Democratic Par
Eastern Policy)
National Council of Americans of Croatian Descent
National Council of American-Soviet Friendship
National Federation for Constitutional Liberties
National Labor Conference for Peace
Nationa! Negro Congress
National Negro Labor Council
Nationalist Action League
14.99000
Nationalist Party of Puerto Rico
Nature Priends of America (since 1935)
Negro Labor, Victory Committees
Kew Committee for Publications
Nichide! Kogyo Kaisha (The Great Fuji Theatre)
North American Committee to Ald Spanish Democracy
North American 6panish Ald Committce
North Philadelphis Forum
Northwest Japanese Association
Ohio School! of Bocial Sciences
Oklahoma Committee to Defend Political Prisoners
Oxiahoma League for Political Education (see Communist Politi-
cal Association)
Original Gouthern Elans, Incorporated
Pactfic Northwest Labor &chool, Beattie, Washington
Palo Alto Peace Club
Partido del Pueblo of Panama {operating in the Canal Zone)
Peace Information Center
Peece Movement of Ethiopia
People’s Drama, Inc.
People’s Educational and Press Association of Texas (see Commu
nist Political Association)
People’s Educational Association (incorperated under name Los
Educational Association, Inc.), also known as People’s
Educational Center, People’s University, People’s School
People’s Institute of Applied Religion
Peoples Programs (Seattle, Washington)
People’s Radio Foundation, Inc.
People’s Rights Party
Philadelphia Labor Committee for Negro Rights
Philadelphia School of Boctal Sclance and Art
Photo League (New York City)
Pittsburgh arts Club
Political Prisoners’ Welfare Committee
Polonia Society of the TWO
Progreastve German-Americans, also known as Progressive Ger-
man-Americans of Chicago
Proietarian Party of America
Protestant War Veterans of the United States, Inc.
Provisional Committee of Citizens for Peace, Bouthweet Aros
Provisional Committee on Latin American Affairs
Provisional Committee to Abolish Discrimination in the State of
Maryland
(Bee: Committees to Abolish Discrimination in Maryiend)
Puerto Rican Comite Pro Libertades Civiles (CLC)
(See Comite Pro Derechos Civiles)
Puertorriquenos Unidos (Puerto Ricans United)
Quad City Committee for Pesce
Queensbridge Tenants League
Revolutionary Workers League
Romanian-American Fraternal Society
Russian American Society, Inc.
Sakura Kal (Patriotic Goclety, oF Cherry Association — composed
of veterans of Russo-Japanese War)
Bamuel Adams School, Boston, Massachusetts
‘ Se ee ete
Banta Barbara Peace Porum
Gcbhappes Defense Committee
Gchnelderman-Darcy Defense Committee
Bchool of Jewish Btudies, New York City
Beattie Labor School, Beattie, Washington
Berdian-American Fraternal Society
Gerdian Vidordan Council .
Shinto Temples (limited to State Shinto abolished in 1945)
Olver Shirt Legion of America ”
@lavie Council of Southern California
Slovak Workers Society
Blovenian-American National Council
Goctalist Workers Party, including American Oommittee for Euro-
pean Workers’ Relief
Gokoku Kal (Fatheriand Society)
Southern Negro Youth Congress
Buiko Sha (Reserve Officers Association, Los Angeles)
Byracuse Women for Pesce
Tom Paine School of Social Science, Philadelphia, Pennsyivanis
Tom Paine School of Westchester, New York
Trade Union Committes for Peace
(See Trade Unionists for Peace)
Trade Unionists for Peace
(Bee Trade Unionista for Peace)
Tri-State Negro Trade Union Oouncil
Unrainian-American Fraternal Union
Union of American Croatians
Union of New York Veterans
United American Spenish Ald Committes
United Committee of Jewish Gocieties and Landsmanschaft Fed-
erations, also known as Coordination Oommittes of Jewish
Landsmapschaften and Praternal Organizations
United Committee of South Slavic Americans
United Defense Council of Southern California
United Hariem ‘Tenants and Consumers Organization
United May Day Committee
United Negro and Allied Veterans of America
Veterans Against Discrimination of Civil Rights Congress of New
York (see Civil Rights Congress)
Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade
Virginia League for People’s Education (see Communist Political
Association)
Voice of Freedom Committee
Walt Whitman School of Social Science, Newark, New Jereey
Washington Bookshop Association
Washington Committee for Democratic Action
Washington Committee to Defend the Bul of Rights
Washington Commonwealth Federation
Washington Pension Union
Wisconsin. Conference on Gocial Legislation
Workers Alliance (since April 1934)
Yiddlaher Kultur Parband
Young Communist League
Yugoslay-American Cooperstive Home, Inc.
Yugoelav Seamen's Club, Inc.
ay, we
a . ETM +.
14-0000
3h
al ‘Any phase of communications; administration; or personnel
i le
THIS DATE (Pill In)
September 6, 1961
1. Answer all questions completely or check appropriate box. If question is not applicable, write “NA”. Write “Un-
known” only if you do not know the answer and it cannot be obtained from personal records. Use blank space at
end of form for extra details on any question for which you have insufficient space.
2. Type, print or write carefully; illegible or incomplete forms will not receive consideration.
3. Consider your answers carefully. Your signature at the end of this form will certify to their correctness. Careful
completion of all applicable questions will permit review of your qualifications to the best advantage.
SECTION | GENERAL PERSONAL AND PHYSICAE”DAY
1. FULL NAME (Last+Firet-Middie)
eT ee
FLORES, Daniel PA 6 Pee ree
4, HEIGHT S. WEIGHT . 6. COLOR OF EYES 7. COLOR OF HAIR [APE COMPLEXION 9. TYPE BUILD
5+ 6" 165 pds. Brown Black } Dark
10. SCARS (Type end Location) Right cheek, one-half inch scar; left*upper Zip, one-
both received playing football
a
None
12. CURRENT ADDRESS (No., Street, City, Zone, State and Country)
2828 Connecticut Avenue,N. We, #20 / ; .
2828 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.
ashington 8, D. ©, & #203 - Washington 8, Dc.
- CURRENT PHONE NO. 15. OFFICE PHONE NO. & EXT. 16. LEGAL RESIDENCE (State, Territory or Country)
265-832 & None Washington, District of Columbia
18. OTHER NAMES YOU HAVE USED :
5 None
19. INDICATE CIRCUMSTANCES (Including Length of Time) UNDER WHICH YOU HAVE EVER USED THESE NAMES.
13. PERMANENT ADDRESS (No., Street, City, Zone, State and
Country) AND PHONE NO. x oe 6 3
NA -
SECTION I! POSITION DATA
1. INDICATE THE TYPE OF WORK OR POSITION FOR WHICH YOU ARE APPLYING
work.
2. INDICATE THE LOWEST ANNUAL ENTRANCE SALARY YOU WILL
not be conside: eeny position with a lower
entrence salary).
Pd
ra)
re)
mi
a
4
2
£
ES
we
ry
in)
[o)
io
(eo)
or
5
4 INDICATE YOUR WILLINGNESS TO TRAVEL
DATE AVAILABLE FOR EMPLOYMENT
- Immediately
| Joccasronsuuy ] Yewccuentiy [ Jeowstanrey | [orem
5. INDICATE YOUR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT ASSIGNMENT IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS (Check (X) each item applicable)
PXoursioe contimenvac uss,
6. INDICATE WHAT RESERVATIONS YOU WOULD PLACE ON ASSIGNMENTS OUTSIDE THE WASHINGTON, D.C. AREA.
I would be willing to travel within the United States provided
said travel would not involve a permanent move whereby my le gal
residence would be changed. However, it is my wish to live overseas
on a permanent Dasis. ;
(a
FORM 444 USE PREVIOUS EDITION. DY COONEY ee
14-0000
15. DATE OF ARRIVAL IN U.S. 16. PORT OF ENTRY 17. ON PASSPORT OF WHAT COUNTRY
NA NA NA
NA NA
@ | SECTION IV - EDUCATION
rr er ra
United States of America
af NATURAL- 6. NATURALIZATION CERTIFICATE NO.
"WA NA
7, COURT ISSUING NATURALIZATION CERTIFICATE 8. ISSUED AT (City, State, Country)
NA NA
9. HAVE YOU HELD PREVIOUS NATIONALITY 10. iF YES, GIVE NAME OF COUNTRY
P[res dL X NA
11, GIVE PARTICULARS CONCERNING PREVIOUS NATIONALITY.
NA
13. GIVE PARTICULARS
12. HAVE YOU TAKEN STEPS TO CHANGE [ves | .
PRESENT CITIZENSHIP . ca
f
N
IF YOU HAVE APPLIED FOR U.S. CITIZENSHIP, WHAT IS PRESENT STATUS OF YOUR APPLICATION (First Papere, Etc.)?
NA
14.
1. CHECK (X) HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDUCATION ATTAINED
LESS THAN HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE OVER TWO YEARS OF COLLEGE - NO DEGREE
IGH SCHOOL GRADUATE || BACHELOR'S RBEGREE
TRADE, BUSINESS, OR COMMERCIAL SCHOOL GRADUATE GRADUATE STUDY LEADING TO HIGHER DEGREE
Two YEARS COLLEGE OR LESS MASTER'S DEGREE a DOCTOR'S DEGREE
2. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ’
« ADDRESS (City, S: Country)
0
an Marcos,) Texas A
,
Pe | |
1. NAME OF BLEMENTAF SCROOL ” tate,
Ban Marcos)Elementary School”
3. DATES ATTENDED (From-end-To)
~» 19h2 - May, 1951 - [xX[ves no
¢2]
o
ct
1. NAME OF HIGH SCHOOL “T 2. ADORESS (City, State, Country)
Gan Marcos) High School ; ~ 6an Marcos,) Texas, U.S.A. ° .
3. DATES AT TENDED (From-and-To) “40 4. GRADUATE
Sept., 1951 - May, 19
1. NAME OF HIGH SCHOOL . ADDRESS (City, State, Country)
iS)
QZ
|
|
ro
RY
|
f\
5 baves ATTENDED Fomana Ta ema
: 4. COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY STUDY
SUBJECT DATES ATTENDED DATE SEM/QTR
[ xo | ReC'O | Grocity
[erom [v0 Gomctt)
. SECTION IV CONTINUED TO PAGE 3
. - * . Ey, . =
14.90000
rf sree
SECTION IV CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2
EO IN ITEM 4 WHICH REQUIRED SUBMI '
iTS CONTENT- BMISSION OF A WRITTEN THESIS, INDICATE THE TITLE
6. TRADE, COMMERCIAL AND SPECIALIZED SCHOOLS
8. OTHER EDUCATIONAL TRAINING NOT INDICATED ABOVE.
Weapons Training in Marine Corps. ;
Acted as partisan during cold weather training at Bridgeport,
California (Pickle Meadows = USMC).
a 3
@ | SECTION V FOREIGN LANGUAGE ABILITIES
COMPETENCE - IN ORDER LISTED
1. LANGUAGE _ R-Reed, W-Write, S-Speak
(Liat below each language in
which you poesess any degree FLUENT
of competence. Indicate your — BUT
Proficiency to Read, Write or opyiousty
Speak by placing a check (X)
in the appropriate box(es).
2. IF YOU HAVE CHECKED “ACADEMIC STUDY" UNDER *HOW ACQUIRED”, INDICATE LENGTH AND INTENSIVENESS OF STUDY.
NA
YOU HAVE INDICATEO FLUENCY FOR A LANGUAGE HAVING SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES IN SPOKEN AND WRITTEN FORM, EX-
AIN YOUR COMPETENCE THEREIN.
NA
4. DESCRIBE YOUR ABILITY TO DO SPECIALIZED LANGUAGE WORK INVOLVING VOCABULARIES AND TERMINOLOGY IN THE SCIEN-
TIFIC, ENGINEERING, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, MILITARY, AND OTHER SPECIALIZED FIELDS.
Could act as literal interpreter at almost any level.
3. IF YOU HAVE NOTED A PROFICIENCY IN LANGUAGE, WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO USE THIS ABILITY IN ANY POSITION FOR WHICH
YOU MIGHT SE SELECTED? .
14.90000
‘ ‘ a
SECTION VI GEOGRAPHIC AREA KNOWLEDGE AND FOREIGN TRAVEL
1. LIST BELOW ANY FOREIGN REGIONS OR COUNTRIES IN WHICH YOU HAVE TRAVELLED OR GAINED KNOWLEDGE AS A RESULT OF
RESIDENCE, STUDY OR WORK ASSIGNMENT. INDICATE TYPE OF KNOWLEDGE SUCH AS TERRAIN, HARBORS, UTILITIES, RAIL-
ROADS, INDUSTRIES, POLITICAL PARTIES, ETC.
KNOWLEDGE ACQUIRED BY
pd T v T y | ASSIGNe
RAVELIS
ENCE : up MENT
Marine Security Guard - American Embassy - Bolivia and Peru
Vacation - Chile; Argentina; Uruguay; Panama
3. UNITED STATES PASSPORT NUMBER AND EXPIRATION DATE, IF ISSUED.
No. (171850 °%SP-85575)) Passport has been cancelled.
SECTION Vil TYPING AND STENOGRAPHIC SKILLS
1. TYPING (wpm) | 2. SHORTHAND(wpnv 3. SHORTHAND SYSTEM USED - CHECK (X) APPROPRIATE ITEM
5 wpm | None | [ence | [arccownirine | [stenorvee | [owen (pecity)
2. INDICATE OTHER BUSINESS MACHINES WITH WHICH YOU HAVE HAD OPERATING EXPERIENCE OR TRAINING (Comptometer,
Mimeogmph, Card Punch, Etc.).
Thermofax, mimeograph, switchboard
DATES OF
TYPE OF
SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE RESIDENCE
otisia oman moana VES P|
Bolivia General knowledge £0
a
fone | Cider
Chile 9
Argentina | 6/30 /59
Uruguay 59
2. INDICATE THE PURPOSE OF VISIT, RESIDENCE, OR TRA
DATES AND
PLACE OF STUDY
NAME OF
REGION OR COUNTRY
General knowledg
SECTION Vil! SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS 4
1. List ALL HOBBIES AND SPORTS IN WHICH YOU ARE ACTIVE OR HAVE ACTIVELY PARTICIPATED. INDICATE YOUR PROFICIENCY
Foot ball - good
Basketball - fair
Swimming _ > = .good
Reading :- average
Contract.Bridge - very good.
- INDICATE ANY SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS
RESULTING FROM EXPERIENCE OR TRAINING WHICH MIGHT FIT YOU FOR A
PARTICULAR POSITION OR TYPE OF WORK.
None to my knowledge
+ EXCLUDING BUSINESS EQUIPMENT OR MACHINES WHICH YOU MAY HAVE LISTED IN ITEM 2, SECTION VII, LIST ANY SPECIAL
SKILLS YOU POSSESS RELATING TO OTHER EQUIPMENT AND MACHINES SUCH AS OPERATION OF SHORTWAVE RADIO (Indi-
cate CW epeed, sending and receiving), OF FSET PRESS, TURRET LATHE, SCIENTIFIC AND PROFESSIONAL DEVICES.
None
SECTION VIII CONTINUED TO PAGE 5
7 Ta
14.90000
Seen
SECTION Vill CONTINUED FROM PAGE 4
4. ARE YOU NOW OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A LICENSED OR CERTIFIED MEMBER OF ANY TRADE OR PROFESSION, SUCH AS PILOT,
ELECTRICIAN, RADIO OPERATOR, TEACHER, LAWYER, CPA, MEDICAL TECHNICIAN, ETC.? y 00
T es NO
S. IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED *YES® TO ABOVE, INDICATE KIND OF LICENSE AND STATE ISSUING LICENSE (Provide License Registry
Number, tf known).
NA
6. FIRST LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE (Year of Issue) 7. LATEST LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE (Year of Iaaue)
8. LIST ANY SIGNIFICANT PUBLISHED MATERIALS OF WHICH YOU ARE THE AUTHOR (Do NOT eubmit copies unless requested). INDICATE
TRE
z ITE LP UBLICATION DATE, AND TYPE OF WRITING (Non-Fiction of Scientific articles, General Intereat subjects, Novels, Short
tories, Ete). i. oar
None
9. INDICATE ANY DEVICES WHICH YOU HAVE !NVENTED ANO STATE WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE PATENTED.
None
10. LIST PUBLIC SPEAKING AND PUSLIC RELATIONS EXPERIENCE.
Have spoken in my father's church and other churches approximately
150 times. Met and assisted public in Embassies during my tour of
with the Marine Security Guard
11. LIST ANY PROFESSIONAL, ACADEMIC OR HONORARY ASSOCIATIONS OR SOCIETIES IN WHICH YOU ARE NOW OR WERE FORMERLY
A MEMBER. LIST ACADEMIC HONORS YOU HAVE RECEIVED.
None
SECTION IX 2 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
NOTE: (LIST LAST POSITION FIRST.) Indicate chronologicdé! history of emptoyment for past 15 years. Account for all periods
including casual employment and ail periods of unemployment. Giveaddress and state what you did during periodsof
unemployment. List all civilian employment by a foreign Govemment, regardless of dates. In completing item 9, “De-
scription of Duties” consider your experience carefully and provide meaningtul, objective statements,
1. INCLUSIVE DATES (From and To - By Mo. and Yr.) 2. NAME OF EMPLOYING FIRM OR AGENCY
\Hiliburn's\Drug Store
0
3S. NAME OF SUPERVISOR 0G
Mr illiam (Hillbu
7. SALARY OR EARNINGS 8. CLASS, GRADE(If Federal Service)
#1.00,00
Ountain enda
9. DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES
Employee at soda counter
10. REASONS FOR LEAVING .
To participate in school events (football).
SECTION IX CONTINUED TO PAGE 6
-3- SF
14-0000
. : ae SECTION IX CONTINUED FROM PAGE 5
1. INCLUSIVE DATES (From and To - By Mo. and Yr.)
July 195y-dune 1955
2. NAME OF EMPLOYING FIRM OR AGENCY
(Diamond)Grocery Store
= Se :
South Guadalupe St. San Marcos
4. KIND OF BUSINESS 5. NAME OF SUPERVISOR
vir. (Ignacto Gonzales) %6
6. TITLE OF JOB j & CLASS, GRADE (If Federal Service)
Butcher [s3U,00 [ren Week |
9. DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES
Slaughtering and preparing meat for sale as well-as actual selling.
10. REASONS FOR LEAVING
To attend college
1. INCLUSIVE DATES (From and To - By Mo. and Yr.)
ay 9 - September
3. ADDRESS (No., Street, City, State, Country)
San. Marcos)? Texas
Private School Y onn Darkman 9
6. TITLE OF JOB 8. CLASS. GRADE (If Federal Service)
Painter's Assistant Ts 35,00 [FER week |
9. DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES
Painted dormitories in the Academy
10. REASONS FOR LEAVING
To attend school
2. NAME OF EMPLOYING FIRM OR AGENCY
Economy )Department Stores
1. INCLUSIVE DATES (From and To - By Mo. and Yr.)
September, 1956 - July, 1957
3. ADORESS (Nv., Street, City, State, Country)
San Marcos }i0Texas .
s KIND OF BUSINESS 5. NAME OF SUPERVISOR ob
Clothing Store . Mr. (Max Mendlovitz_
6. TITLE OF JOB 8. CLASS. GRADE (If Federal Service)
Sales Clerk s 30,00
9. DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES
Assisted customers in selecting and buying goods.
10. REASONS FOR LEAVING
-To join the Marine Corps.
2. NAME OF EMPLOYING FIRM OR AGENCY
1. INCLUSIVE DATES (From and To - By Mo. and Yr.)
wy 26, 19 - July 2 1961 United States Marine Corps
3. ADDRESS (No., Street, City, State, Country)
Marine Corps Schools, Quantico, Virginia
4. KIND OF BUSINESS 5S. NAME OF SUPERVISOR
Military . - 1Gol. John Magruder
6. TITLE OF JOB ®. CLASS. GRADE (If Fodera! Service)
)
Marine Corps Museum Attendant |s 100.00 |rermontH Cpl. (E-
SECTION IX CONTINUED TO PAGE 7
- ot ; SS
miu
14-0000
oa os (
"9. DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES
Acted as guide to all visitors entering Museum, explaining
Marine Corps history, etc. Also on several occasions acted as
interpreter for visiting military personnel from Latin America,
10. REASONS FOR LEAVING
2. NAME OF EMPLOYING FIRM OR AGENCY
06 (Ohio Valley) Engineering Company
Dis charged
1. INCLUSIVE DATES (From and To - By Mo. and Yr.) .
July 28, 1961 - August 30, 1961
3. ADDRESS (No., Street. City, State, Country) . . .
. Capitbl and I Streets, S. W.), Washington, D. CG.
Construction Mr.(L. G. Bruce) 0G
"Laborer. a .
Service)
Laborer rer Hour
9. DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES
Handyman for Company
4. KIND OF BUSINESS : 5. NAME OF SUPERVISOR
6. TITLE OF JOB : 7. SALARY OR EARNINGS
9. DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES
8. CLASS. GRADE (If Federal
Service)
10. REASONS FOR LEAVING
8. IF PRIOR SERVICE WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 1S NOTED ABOVE, INDICATE THE
MUMBER OF YEARS CREDITABLE TOWARD U.S. CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT, iF KNOWN. 7 1/2 years
.
8S. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN DISCHARGED OR ASKED TO RESIGN FROM ANY POSITION. i YES [ono
HAVE YOU LEFT A POSITION UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH YOU DESIRE TO EXPLAIN? (Clves [Ano
IF YOUR ANSWER TO EITHER OR BOTH QUESTIONS IS “YES®, GIVE DETAILS
‘
Honorably discharged from United States Marine Corps.
14.90000
SECTION Xt MILITARY SERVICE
1. CURRENT DRAFT STATUS
1. ARE YOU REGISTERED FOR THE ORAFT UNDER YES | 2. SELECTIVE SERVICE CLASSIFF | 3. SELECTI RVICE NO.
THE UNIVERSAL MILITARY TRAINING AND | X [ves] CATION VE SERVIC
SERVICE ACT OF 1948 (As amended) | [wo | IV-A {1-65-35-18 Jb
4. IF OEFERRED, GIVE REASON S, LOCAL ORAFT BOARD NO. OR DESIGNATION AND ADDRESS
NA G65 - 101 1/2 BE. San antonio st. ,0%
2. MILITARY SERVICE RECORD (yp (Lockhart ,) Texas
1. CURRENT AND/OR PAST ORGANIZATIONAL MEMBERSHIP
CHECK [X) AS MARINE AIR COAST NATIONALIAIR NAT*L| FOREIGN ORGAN. OR MIL.
APPROPRIATE ARMY NAVY CORPS FORCE | GUARD SuarD | GuaRD | SERVICE (Specify):
4. TOTAL LENGTH OF EXTENDED ACTIVE S. ARM,
FORCES (Poet ond current ENDED ACTIVE DUTY IN U MED
years :
CURRENT SERVICE 6. TOTAL LENGTH OF ACTIVE DUTY IN FOREIGN MILITARY OR-
GANIZATION
26 July,1957 ~
7. RANK, GRADE OR | PAST SERVICE CURRENT SERVICE 6. SERVICE, SERIAL OR FILE NUMBER (If now serving, provide cur-
RATE > Cc 1 E rent number)
pi. —
9. PRIMARY MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL PAST SERVICE CURRENT SERVICE
SPECIALTY (Moe or Deasignator) AND TITLE
Olyl - Chief Clerk
10. SECONDARY MIL. OCCUPATIONAL PAST SERVICE CURRENT SERVICE
SPECIALTY (Moe or Designator) AND
TITLE ; None
i. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MILITARY DUTIES (Indicate whether applicable to pest of current service)
Past Service: Clerk - Maintained personnel service records.
2 years as Security Guard in the American Embassies in
La Paz, Bolivia and Lima, Peru.
None
ersonne AGMINnA § =| OF)
3. DATE SEPARATEO FROM EXTENDED ACTIVE DUTY (Paat servicg
5. DATE ENTERED
ACTIVE DUTY =
12. CHECK (X) TYPE OF SEPARATION FROM ACTIVE DUTY
X/ RELEASE TO INACTIVE DUTY |_| RETIREMENT FOR COMBAT DISABILITY |
Previnewen ronsce | [wermenent ron envatcnconaonny —] [on
13. CHECK (X) COMPONENT IN WHICH YOU SERVED
X [Resuian |X] RESERVE (Including the National and Air National Guard) r | OTHER (Including AUS)
3. MILITARY RESERVE, NATIONAL GUARD AND ROTC STATUS
1, DO YOU NOW HAVE; 2. ARE YOU NOW A MEMBER OF THE YES 3. ARE YOU NOW A MEMBER OF
YES
RESERVE STATUST x NAT'L. GRD. OR AIR NATAL. THE ROTC? | |
[two | Sant X [no x
4. IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED “YES” TO ITEMS 2,2 OR 3 ABOVE, CHECK COMPONENT MEMBERSHIP BELOW
[pron X ranine conrd — [warvonaccuanq [coastovano] [wavy ore | WDIcATE move CATEGORY Now
[pavd [am ronce [aim warouana{ [anwy qore | [am ronce nord on
5. CURRENT RANK, GRADE OR 6 DATE OF APPOINTMENT IN CURRENT |7. EXPIRATION DATE OF CURRENT RESERVE OBLIGA-
N
RATE Cpl, (E- May, 1959 January 20, 1962
8. CHECK (X) CURRENT RESERVE CATEGORY | [READY RESERVE] _ |STANDEY(Active)]| X [STANDBY(Inactive)| | RETIRED
9. PRIMARY MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTY (Mas or Dosig- |10. SECONDARY MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTY (Moa or Dee-
netor) AND TITLE . - ignator) AND TITLE * .
O11 None
1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MILITARY RESERVE DUTIES
i
m
yy
None
12. ARE YOU CURRENTLY ASSIGNED OR ATTACHED YES | 13. IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED “YES” TO ITEM 12, GIVE UNIT OR AGENCY
TO A RESERVE, NAT'L. GUARD OR ROTC TRAIN- AND AODRESS oe
ING UNIT 3 ix {ro |
16. HAVE YOU A MILITARY MOBILIZATION Assion- |_| 15. IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED “YES” TD ITEM 14, GIVE UNIT OR AGENCY
MENT? : eto NO ADORESS :
16. iNDICATE- TOTAL MILITARY SERVICE] YEARS MONTHS 17. WHERE ARE YOUR SERVICE RECORDS KEPT?
-FOR LONGEVITY PURPOSES INCLUD-
ING ACTIVE AND INACTIVE DUTY 7 Headquarters Mar*ne Corps
ef
14-0000
4 rr a ‘
SECTION XI - FINANCIAL STATUS
1-ARE YOW ENTIRELY DEPENDENT ON YOUR SALARY? (lves KK]no
2. IF YOUR ANSWER IS "NO" TO THE ABOVE, STATE SOURCES OF OTHER INCOME
Wife's income
3. BANKING INSTITUTIONS WITH WHICH YOU HAVE ACCOUNTS
NAME OF INSTITUTION ADDRESS (City, State, Country)
0 eWe O Avenue,
4. HAVE YDU EVER SEEN IN, OR PETITIONED FOR, BANKRUPTCY, (] ves [X]no
5. 1F YOUR ANSWER IS "YES" TO THE ABOVE, GIVE PARTICULARS, INCLUDING COURT AND DATE(S)
6. GIVE THREE CREDIT REFERENCES IN THE UNITED STATES
NAME * ADDRESS (No., Street, City, State)
General Motors Acceptance Corp. Portland 5, Oregon
P.O. Box 725,
Gulf Oil Corporation Atlanta 9, Georgia
917 Caroline Steet,
Ninde Furniture Company Fredericksburg Virginia
7. DO YOU RECEIVE AN ANNUITY FROM THE UNITED STATES OR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT UNDER ANY RETIREMENT
ACT, PENSION, OR COMPENSATION FOR MILITARY OR NAVAL SERVICE? ‘| YES fx] NO
6. 1F YOUR ANSWER 1S “*YES*’* TO THE ABOVE QUESTION, GIVE COMPLETE DETAILS
9. DO YOU HAVE ANY FINANCIAL INTEREST IN, OR OFFICIAL CONNECTIONS WITH NON-U.S. CORPORATIONS OR BUSINESSES: OR IN
OR WITH U.S. CORPORATIONS OR BUSINESSES HAVING SUBSTANTIAL FOREIGN INTERESTS?
("] ves . NO (If anewer “YES®, fumish details on separate sheet.)
SECTION XII MARITAL STATUS
1. PRESENT STATUS (Single, Married, Widowed, Separated, Divorced, or Annulled) SPECIFY: Married
2. STATE OATE, PLACE, AND REASON FOR ALL SEPARATIONS, DIVORCES OR ANNULMENTS
NA . °
WIFE, HUSBAND If you have been married more than once - including annulments - use a separate sheet for former wife or
OR FIANCE: husband giving data required below for all previous marriages. If marriage contemplated, fill in appropriate
. information for fiance. .
3. NAME (First) : (Middle) {Maiden) —~(Last) + 4
Dorothy anne _ 96 _arnett
4. STATE ANY OTHER NAMES EVER USED INDICATE CIRCUMSTANCES (Including length of time) UNDER WHICH ANY
OF THESE NAMES WERE USED. IF LEGAL CHANGE GIVE PARTICULARS
(Where and by what authority). USE EXTRA SPACE PROVIDED ON PAGE 16
OF THIS FORM TO RECORD THIS INFORMATION.
Dorothy A, Moran
N.W. j 24
12. DATE OF BIRTH 18. PLACE OF BIRTH (City, State, aan 14, CITIZENSHIP
January 31, 1935 Portland, Oregon United States of
SECTION XII CONTINUED TO PAGE 10
9. 597
14.99000
rr i -10-
SECTION XU CONTINUED FROM PAGE 9 .
14. IF BORN OUTSIDE U.S. - DATE OF ENTRY 15. PLACE OF ENTRY
NA -* : ay NA . oo.
16. FORMER CITIZENSHIP(S) Country(iee)7 17, DATE U.S. CITIZENSHIP 78. WHERE ACQUIRED (City, State, Country)
NA NA NA
19. OCCUPATION 20. PRESENT EMPLOYER (Also give former employer, or if spouse deceased or
7 . employed give last two employers) S
Legal Secretary* (Boykin and De Francis) d 0
Former: epartment of State
1. EMPLOYER'S OR BUSINESS ADDRESS (No., Street, City, State, Country)
1.000 16th St., NoW., Suite 603) Washington 6, D.C
22. DATES OF MILITARY SERVICE (From and to - Sy Mo. and Yr.)
None
23. BRANCH OF SERVICE - ~ 24. COUNTRY WITH WHICH MILITARY SERVICE AFFILIATED
25. DETAILS OF OTHER GOVERNMENT SERVICE, U.S. OR FOREIGN Pope ign Service - Jan., 1958 - Oct.,
1960: Civil Service - April] 196) - June 1961
SECTION XIII CHILOREN AND OTHER DEPENDENTS e
1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FOR ALL CHILDREN AND DEPENDENTS
[”~”~C~SNAME RELATIONSHIP | DATE AND PLACE OF BIRTH | CITIZENSHIP ADDRESS
3. NUMBER OF OTHER DEPENDENTS (inctuding epous
parents, step-perents, alster, etc.) WHO OEPEND ON
YOu FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THEIR SUPPORT, OR
CHILOREN OVER 21 YRS. QF AGE WHO ARE NOT
SEL F-SUPPORTING. .
2. NUMBER OF CHILDREN (Including ate,
children and doce e
edopted children) WHO ARE
UNMARRIED, UNDER 2! YRS. OF AGE,
ANO NOT SELF-SUPPORTING.
SECTION XIV FATHER (Give same information, for Stepfather and/or Guardian on @ separate sheet) e
Jose S, Flores x [ves F
TAG TER NAMES HE HAS USED INDICATE CIRCUMSTANCES (Including length of time) UNDER WHICH HE HAS
EVER USED THESE NAMES. IF LEGAL CHANGE, GIVE PARTICULARS (Where
and by what authority). USE EXTRA SPACE PROVIDED ON PAGE 16 OF THIS
FORM TO RECORD THIS INFORMATION.
=. FUN OL. ES AC
10. IF BORN OUTSIDE U.S. - DATE OF ENTRY 1%. PLACE OF ENTRY . . .
May 2h, 1918 Unknown a
12. FORMER CITIZENSHIP(S) (Country(ies)7 |,19., DATE U.S. CITIZENSHIP 14. WHERE ACQUIRED (City, State, Country)
ACQUIRED
Mexican : 9 . +» Austin AXAS
15. OCCUPATION 16. PRESENT EMPLOYER (Givo last employer, if Father is deceased or unemplayod)
Baptist Minister Mexican Baptist Church
17. EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS ADORESS OR FAT *S SUSINESS ADDRESS IF SELF-EMPLOYEO
ILITARY, SERVICE (From-and-To,
CATES OF M
my know edge never
21, DETAILS OF OTHER GOVERNMENT SERVICE, U.S. OR FOREIGN
= | SY
14.90000
iseohy
» ‘| SECTION XV
1. FULL NAME (Laet-Piret-Middle)
__Flores,(agustina )a
8. STATE OTHER NAMES SHE HAS USED
None to knowledge
3. DATE OF DEATH 4. CAUSE OF DEATH
June 1939 Unknown
DMST ANCES (incliding length of time) UNDER WHICH SHE HAS
SE NAMES. IF LEGAL CHANGE, GIVE PARTICULARS (Where
thority). USE EXTRA SPACE PROVIDED ON PAGE 16 OF THIS
6. CURRENT ADDRESS - GIVE LAST ADORESS, IF DECEASED (No., Street,
S. Austin and Lee Streets
ATE OF BIRTH
San Marcos
: 7 OD 8. PLACE OF BIRTH (City, State, Country) ee a
September 20, 19034 Mier y Noriega, Nuevo Leon, Mexico VMiexican \ |
10. IF BORN OUTSIDE V.5.~ DATE OF ENTRY 11, PLACE OF ENTRY
Unknown
12, FORMER CITIZENSHIP(S) /Country(iee)7
NA
15. OCCUPATION
Housewife
ACQUIRED
Unknown
15. DATE U.S. CITIZENSHIP | 14. WHERE ACQUIRED (City, State, Couha
NA NA
16. PRESENT EMPLOYER (Give last employer, if Mother ia deceased or unemployed,
N.
17, EMPLOYER’S BUSINESS ADDRESS OR MOTHER'S BUSINESS ADDRESS IF SELF EMPLOYEO
NA
18, DATES OF MILITARY SERVICE (Fronrend-To) 19. BRANCH OF SERVICE 20. COUNTRY
NA
21, DETAILS OF OTHER GOVERNMENT SERVICE, U.S. OR FOREIGN
> | SECTION XVI
1. FULL NAME (Last-F iret-Middlo)
(Patlan, Francés Dob
Renteria Rachel)o&
4. CURRENT ADDRESS (No., Street, City, Zone, State, Country)
11 Lambert St.$°San Antonio
I FULL NAME (Lact-F iret-Middie)
Black, Rebecca Mary)?6
4. CURRENT ADDRESS (No., Street, City, Zone, State, Country)
San Marcos,) Texas
01 S. Guadalupe st
1 FULL NAME (Laat-Firat-Middile,
Flores ,/Samue1\0
—
Wo., Street, City, Zone, State, Country)
i | Texas
g
Route 2, Box 320, San Marcos
FULL NAME, (Last-Firat-Middle) °
Bruce, Esther
. " oe City, Zone, State, Country)
7 FULL NAME (Last-F irat-Middle)
Flores, (Eleazar, 0G |
Texas
NA NA
BROTHERS AND SISTERS (Including Half-, Step- and Adopted Brothers and Sisters)
2. RELATIONSHIP 3. CITIZENSHIP (Country)
Sister U.S. of America
3. LIVING
3. CITIZENSHIP (Country)
U.S. of America
6. AGE
: K [ves | [xo | 39
2. RELATIONSHIP 3. CITIZENSHIP (Country)
Sister U.S. of America
K[res | [xo |
Brother U.S. of America
S. LIVING 6. AGE
X[rves | [xo | 32
3. CITIZENSHIP (Country)
U.S. of America
PXives | [xo | 2g
2. RELATIONSHIP 3. CITIZENSHIP (Country)
Sister U.S. of america
3S. LIVING 6. AGE
iX[ves| jo] 2
3. CITIZENSHIP (Country)
U.S. of America
2. RELATIONSHIP
Sister
2. RELATIONSHIP
-Brother
2. RELATIONSHIP
Brother
4. CURRENT AODRESS (No., Street, City, Zone, State, Country)
Dec eased
1. FULL NAME (Last-Firat-AMiddle)
Flores, (Juan)o6
4. CURRENT ADDRESS (No., Street, City, Zone, State, Country)
De Ceased
ee] 7 |
2. RELATIONSHIP 3. CITIZENSHIP (Country)
U.S. of America
3. LIVING 6. AGE
PD Tves [XT xo | NA
14.90000
SECTION XVII FATHER-IN-LAW e
¥, FULL NAME (Last-Firet-Middle) 2. LIVING 3. DATE OF DEATH 4. CAUSE OF DEATH
‘Arnett, Carl Raymond) 74 XT | [so]
$3. STATE OTHER NAMES HE HAS USED INDICATE CIRCUMSTANCES (Including tength of time) UNDER WHICH HE HAS
EVER USED THESE NAMES. IF LEGAL CHANGE, GIVE PARTICULARS (Where
and by what authority). USE EXTRA SPACE PROVIDED ON PAGE 16 OF THIS
FORM TO RECORD THIS INFORMATION.
Ray
6. CURRENT OR LAST ADORESS (No., Street, City, State, Country) OO
505 Washington St., Milwaukie, 22,) Oregon
4S" DATE OF BIRTH 8 PLACE OF BIRTH (City, State, Country)
9. CITIZENSHIP
‘January 2, 1909 -j{ Minot, North Dakota U.S. of america
10, 1F BORN OUTSIDE U.S.- DATE OF ENTRY 11. PLACE OF ENTRY
WA NA .
12. FORMER CITIZENSHIPIS) LCountry(ies)) 13. DATE U.S. CITIZENSHIP 14. WHERE ACQUIRED (City, State, Country)
NA . ACQUIRED NA NA
16. PRESENT EMPLOYER (Give last employer, if Father-in-Law is deceased or unemployed)
Wilhelm Inc), Portland, Oregon
18. OCCUPATION .
| Warehouse -Foreman
‘SECTION XVID - OD MOTHER-IN-LAW
e
| fompkins alma. Des
| fompkins, Alma Dean)oG Ke po
5. STATE OTHER NAMES SHE HAS USED INDICATE CIRCUMSTANCES (Including length of time} UNDER WHICH SHE HAS
EVER USED THESE NAMES. IF LEGAL CHANGE, GIVE PARTICULARS (Where
ob and by what authority). USE EXTRA SPACE PROVIDED ON PAGE !6 OF THIS
Alma Dean Arnett 03 FORM TO RECORD THIS INFORMATION.
—
6. CURRENT OR LAST ADDRESS (No., Street, City, State, Country) rere,
(13920 8.E. Portland View Place, Portland 36, Oregon
7. DATE OF BIRTH 8. PLACE OF BIRTH (City, State, Country)
May 1910 -+ Portland, Oregon U.S. of Americg
10. IF BORN OUTSIDE U.S. - DATE OF ENTRY We PLACE OF ENTS
| WA
12. FORMER CITIZENSHIP(S) LCountryfies}7 13. DATE U.S. CITIZENSHIP 14, WHERE ACQUIRED (City, State, Country)
RA .: _ AeauinED NA Na
OCCUPATION 16. PRESENT EMPLOYER (Give last employer, tf Mother-in-Law is deceased or unemployed)
SECTION XIX RELATIVES BY BLOOD, MARRIAGE OR ADOPTION WHO EITHER (1) LIVE ABROAD,
. (2) ARE NOT U.S. CITIZENS OR (3) WORK FOR A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT
FULL NAME (Last-Firat-Middle) .
None to my. knowledge
3. ADDRESS OR COUNTRY IN WHICH RELATIVE RESIDES S. EMPLOYED BY
6. CITIZENSHIP (Country) . «77 FREQUENCY OF CONTACT PATE OF SAS omen
° .
8. DATE OF LAST CONTACT
1. FULL NAME (Laest-First-Middle) 2. RELATIONSHIP Pace |
4, ADDRESS OR COUNTRY IN WHICH RELATIVE RESIDES 8. EMPLOYED BY
6. CITIZENSHIP (Country) 7. FREQUENCY OF CONTACT 8. DATE OF LAST CONTACT
1, FULL NAME (Last-First-Middie) 2. RELATIONSHIP
@. ADDRESS OR COUNTRY IN WHICH “ELATIVE RESIDES 5. EMPLOYED BY
6. CITIZENSHIP (Country) 7. FREQUENCY OF CONTACT 8. DATE OF LAST CONTACT
1. FULL NAME (Last-First-Middle) . 2. RELATIONSHIP
4. ADORESS OR COUNTRY IN WHICH RELATIVE RESIDES 5S. EMPLOYED BY
ry :
6. ‘CITIZENSHIP (Country 7. FREQUENCY OF CONTACT 8. DATE OF LAST CONTACT
5 ee
SECTION XIX CONTINUED TO PAGE 13
Jilirhetiaintpatatashlnietanion enn nae nee cena nanEEEEED
oO
old
14-0000
——$——— ee
SECTION XIX CONTINUED FROM PAGE 12
6. SPECIAL REMARKS, IF ANY, CONCERNING RELATIVES NOTED IN SECTION XIX ABOVE
NA
. RELATIVES BY BLOOD, MARRIAGE OR ADOPTION WHO ARE IN THE MILITARY OR CIVIL
© | SECTION Xx . SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES °
1. NAME (Lest-First-Middie) 2. RELATIONSHIP . 4. CITIZENSHIP
Arnett, Raymond Wesley 9G * | Bro-in-law |U.S. of America
ODRESS (No., Street, City, State, Country)
U.S. Army Depot, Pueblo, Colorado
1. NAME (Leat-Firat-Middle) 2. RELATIONSHIP 4. CITIZENSHIP
- = 2 °
2nd Cousin U.S. of America
6. TYPE AND LOCATION OF SERVICE (If known)
Air Station, ¢ : _ Aviation - lst Sgt., USMC
1. NAME (Laat-Pirat-Middle) 2. RELATIONSHIP pee CITIZENSHIP
5. ADDRESS (No., Streat, City, State, Country) 6. TYPE ANO LOCATION OF SERVICE (If known)
@ | SECTION XXI REFERENCES, ACQUAINTANCES, AND NEIGHBORS e
1. LIST FIVE CHARACTER REFERENCES, NOT RELATIVES, IN THE U.S., WHO KNOW YOU INTIMATELY
(Last-Firat-Middle) (No., Street, City and State) ae ({No., Street, City and State) .
Mr. .and Mrs. (Jose Esp{nog a)\ San Marcos, Texas (San Marcos,) Texas
. 6
Mr, (Thaxter Goodell) N\Washington, D.C, : Alexandria irginia
>— 1711 Massachutes Ave.|,)o%
Mr, (Alfred Beaty Dept. of Agriculture | Washington, D.C
Cpl, (Michael Hennessy Lima, Peru tMiraflores, Lima, Per
2. LIST FIVE PERSONS, IN THE U.S. WHO KNOW YOU SOCIALLY - NOT RELATIVES, SUPERVISORS OR EMPLOYERS
(Last-First-Middte) (No., Stgeet, City and State) (No., Street, City and State)
’s) Departme Hilitop House} o& |
ickland Jr washing 2 J pc Li d fash DG
i D ovat: 6 Ohio
fl73 Bartolome Herrera
ores img Per
“BUSINESS ADDRESS : RESIDENCE ADORESS i
(Laast-Firat-Middie) (No., Street, City and State) (No., Street, City and State)
Ga oo
14.90000
SECTION XXII CLUBS, SOCIETIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
NOTE: List names and eddresses of all clubs, societies, professional societies, employee groups or organizations of any kind -
(Include membership in, or support of, any organization having headquarters or branch in a foreign country) to which you
* belong or have belonged.
(Number, Street, City, State, Country) [From | To
oo
(San Marcos) Texas sep 195h
G Ge High School, Sept.,.
o3s)J0 Texas _ 19
} y ex G
2? . .
NAME AND CHAPTER
i
rs)
ed
19
ee
=
f
<4
SECTION XXHI . RESIDENCES FOR THE PAST 15 YEARS
(Mamber, reat City State, Coun) [row [ed
#20
ALGAAS
Le 96
1 : '€: . 2 O| Ms 9
5 ;
USIS Building ra _& ith Floors, La Paz, Bolivia
‘eT Company, Headquarters Marine Gorps, Henderson
Hall, Washington 2 D.C, Sept.,1958 Nov. ,199
Cold Weather Training Battalion, Pickle Meadows, . Laue 198
Bridgeport, California ~ Jan 1953 Aug 9G
Marine Corps Base 9 Palms, California Dec. 195} Janes 14
Martne Corps Recruit Depot, San Diego California
Marine Corps Base cage Pendleton California De q
re)
S01 S. Guadalupe St., San Marcos, Texas
(Howard Payne Co11 Se Brownwood,) Texas
Sol Ss. Guadalue St., San Marcos, Texas | sone | sent...
. .
_ ener: a a OE
ee enamel
14-0000
tate
. x moe
-1 SECTION XXIV
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
- .
1. DO YOU ADVOCATE OR HAVE YOU EVER ADVOCATED; OR ARE YOU NOW OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A MEMBER OF;
OR HAVE YOU EVER SUPPORTED OR BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH ANY POLITICAL PARTY, INDIVIDUAL OR ORGAN -
IZATION WHICH ADVOCATES OR TEACHES THE OVERTHROW OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES BY
FORCE, VIOLENCE OR OTHER UNCONSTITUTIONAL MEANS, OR SEEKS BY FORCE OR VIOLENCE TO OENY PERSONS
THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES?
2. IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED °YES® TO THE AGOVE QUESTION, EXPLAIN
[ fves | 4. IF SO, TO WHAT EXTENT? f
3. DO YOU USE OR HAVE YOU
EVER USED INTOXICANTS? X[xo |
. IF 50, TO ?
5. DO YOU USE OR HAVE You | [ves [& IF s WHAT EXTENT
EVER USED NARCOTICS? x[xo |
J. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A MEMBER OF, OR SUPPORTED, OR HAD ANY CONNECTIONS WITH A FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ORGAN-
IZATION OR ITS ACTIVITIES? Coy
Es
[xno IF ANSWER IS "YES®, GIVE COMPLETE DETAILS.
8. LIST BELOW THE NAMES OF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS, AGENCIES OR OFFICES TO WHICH YOU HAVE APPLIED°?FOR EM-
PLOYMENT SINCE 1940
I served years in the United States Marine Corps. a
KNOWLEDGE, ANY OF THE ABOVE HAVE CONDUCTED AN INVESTIGATION OF YOU, INDICATE THE NAME OF THE
D THE APPROXIMATE DATE OF THE INVESTIGATION.
An investigation ( I do not know by whom) was conducted prior
to my departure for Bolivia where I was attached to the American
or ges. This investigation took place during August and September
of 1958.
NOTE SPECIAL| If your answor is "YES* to the following Questions 10, 11 er 12, provide the Information requested for each
INSTRUCTIONS | question on a seporate, signed sheet and attach the sheet to this form in a sealed envelope.
10. HAVE YOU, OR TO YOUR KNOWLEDGE HAS YOUR SPOUSE, EVER BEEN DETAINED, ARRESTED, INDICTED OR CON-
VICTED FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THE LAW OTHER THAN A MINOR TRAFFIC VIOLATION IN THE UNITED STATES OR
IF SO, STATE NAME OF COURT, CITY, STATE, COUNTRY, DATE, MATURE OF OFFENSE AND DISPOSITION OF CASE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION ABOVE.
11. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN ARRESTED, COURT-MARTIALED OR OTHERWISE PUNISHED UNDER MILITARY LAW OR REG-
ULATION? IF SO, DESCRIBE INCIDENT(S) AND PROVIDE DATE(S) OF OCCURRENCE ON SEPARATE SHEET IN AC~
CORDANCE WITH SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS ABOVE.
RE ANY UNFAVORABLE INCIDENTS IN YOUR LIFE, NOT MENTIONED ABOVE, WHICH MAY BE OISCOVERED
QUENT INVESTIGATION, WHETHER YOU WERE DIRECTLY INVOLVED OR NOT, WHICH MIGHT REQUIRE EX-
PLANATION? IF SO, DESCRIBE INCIDENT(S) AND PROVIDE DATE(S) OF OCCURRENCE ON SEPARATE SHEET IN AC-
CORDANCE WITH SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS ABOVE.
SECTION XXV PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
1. NAME (Firat-Middle-Last) 2. RELATIONSHIP
Mrs. Daniel Flores Wife
3. HOME ADDRESS (No., Street, City, Zone, State, Country) 4. HOME PHONE VS
Washington 8, D.C 265-8322 0”
Ss ‘BUSINESS ADDRESS (N: , Zone, State, Comtry) - INDICATE NAME OF FIRM OR
EMPLOYER, IF FSS (Wo. Steet
oykin and De Francis »°5
1000 16th St., Suite 603} Washington 6, D.C.
7. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY, OTHER CLOSE RELATIVES (Spouse, Mother, Father) MAY ALSO BE NOTIFIED. 1F SUCH NOTIFICATION
IS NOT DESIRABLE, BECAUSE OF HEALTH OR OTHER REASONS, PLEASE SO STATE.
0,
In all cases wife: Relative, Mrs. Vicente Patién) 631 S. River St.}°%
lo (Seguin, Texas Telephone (Fp 9~1087 \ a5
ad
14.90000
. gal ag 9
SECTION XXVI CERTIFICATION
YOU ARE INFORMED THAT THE CORRECTNESS OF ANY STATEMENT MADE
: WILL BE INVESTIGATED. IN THIS APPLICATION
1 have read and understand the instructions. | Certify thet the foregoing answers ore true and correct to the best of m
knowledge and belief. {| agree that ony misstatement or omission os to material fact will constitute grounds for immediate
dismissal or rejection-of my application. { also understand that any false statement made herein may be punishable by
low (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001). .
we, ana
x (Cit
Yl.
Lh fh Abt een A A :
3. sigMeEp at (City and State) 7
Washington, District of Columbia
NOTE: Use the following space for extra details. Reference each continued item by sectio v7 id item number to which it relates,
sign your name at the end of the added material. If additional space is required us# extra pages the same size as this
page and sign each such page. ‘
MARITAL STATUS: Item #), Section XII . o&
September 1, 1956 to October 6, 1956. Married to(Lt. Col. Joseph G,
Moran\in Portland, Oregon, by Circuit Court Judge. Used name of (Moran)
until November 1,, 1960, when changed to Flores. _ o6
FATHER-IN-IAW: Item #5, Section XVII
Short name for Raymond
GEOGRAPHIC AREA KNOWLEDGE AND FOREIGN TRAVEL: Item #1, Section VI
Argentina 2 July 1959 to 3 July 1959 Travel
Panama 10 November 1958 to 13 November 1958 Travel -
SEE ATTACHED SHEET FOR PERTINENT INFORMATION RELATIVE TO STEP-MOTHER.
Signed at Washington, D. C., this j “~day of September,
1961.
Daniel Flores
14-0000
3
Ip
ATTACHMENT TO FORM NO. lhl - PERSONAL HISTORY STATEMENT
Section XV - nia
Full name: (oneepeton R,) Flores
Living: Yes
Other Names She Hag Used: None to my knowledge
Current Address: Ol S. Guadalupe Street, San Marcos,\ Texas
Date of Birth: Detember 8, 191) O
Place of Birth: Mexico
Citizenship: Mexican
If Born Outside U.S. - Date of Entry: December 8, 1922
Place of Entry: Unknown
Former Citizenships: None
Occupation: Homemaker and Missionary
Present Employer: (Mexican Baptist Church, SanMarcos, Texas
Never served in Military or other Government service to my knowledge,
This paper is attached to and hereby made a part of Form No. bbb.
cs
|
104-10117-10203.pdf | 14-9000
104-10117-10203 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
z December 1967 RUMPARTS ArtieLs s mtituia * ®sh@
Me . Brows and Root Pineueicas’"
“lS he #oLLowiig employees ef tow! ead 00,
contact wea 08 the dates Aindteateds _
vam, Rose - = Basak ,
t “ME Decenbar 1952 ond
co Gna of Foreign © conic 216
ge reign Operstions ; Febru 1993.
- ANO5S52NB mid
‘WARIER, Merritt aunea,'c Chiet
Project n-ne .
.° Passe
4s Iebraary 2 199% ont
. 8 Ka F957
“2 Tuere 16 no 08 cubject file oa the BROKN Pomdation but reference |, ©
file contains a wenoranton Gated. ” pce 1967 to the Deputy Pirectors Flas |
Wd28:P8 66. 6B Nay d -
14-0000
Agenay fntine oo rs te identified by
b j feed hic)
PATMAN in 196K to Jegitinate fomdations end Agensy
oo.
hee
13
of the oeching Profession (JELACEPOD) with whieh MEA is affiliated. In Merch |
"A967 decmuse oF exposure of the Yornon Fund in neve media, the Booed
a , Mambers wore eoxtaoted advised ag follows: rr
: "Beek Vernon Fund bore miuber 1s boing wivised that he will
‘ fetelve a copy of the ANA ond WOIP letters Fegarding prese . .
Bllegstions; he vill seknovledgn his membership on the Yerncn
Fund board if confronted with the fest; he wilh scknovledge that the -:
Vernon Find has supported KCOTP ena that it made @ faw emsl2 grants -:
the Finds he willbe informed thet the Vernon Fund records Stench
available te the poblic, short of subpoena} he will be askad to return *
eny files or papers relating +o the Vernon Windy he will be told that
Br. CARR (Hilidan George CARR) has not yet had to identify any boora@ °C
sembers but wild probably hove to; he wilt not coment on the oreetdon =
,, Of tha Vernon Pung and kov initial contacts were modes. te ad
RIMM, AMbert. pte, TEE = 4170533 (Vemnon fun’ Besta Heuber)
ae ts)
_:,_BvO0 MEN, dea, utters’ AL Toe Veenod Flot, wp gianted w Govert
rt Cuearsase’ For AE Ds Sep ns mp ete « co
ro
Pee ye Be Wdt:b@ 66, 6B Adve. |
14-0000
a i
15 Woveuber 1956 and on 19 Sesteuber 1958 he received
covert pecurdty Clesrence te peruit his use 8-8 Leseen
NPE t
X ta Ape22 1967 @ atscussten von held betwoen ‘en, Agsncy representative
| Gnd Sita TROMPSOH end Ray SIKS of the WCOIP (World Confederation of ee
: weomaisetsoos bf tus Teoching Fratamaion) conceming future fimding for).
$8 age RE Doserh EMRE wea granted a Covert Eecurty Arprovak
om 28 Diy 1957 for use an a witting wxployee of Project HIVILACIS and!
3 19 thy 2962 bs Seetee ae carer Securaty Approve) fer bis wee by Project.
: ‘0D ag Coordinator for Afriom Activities in Wabidagton Co GUE...
38 Stsinistrative officer of the Vovld Confederation of Orgenizations of the oe
Deacking Prafesaion. earner ie po _
wes not ponsdble te Mdentity @ subject Mle on dubn ToMpsag
Ward Confederation of Orgenizations of the Teaching _
Of Andiees were negative oo ts CABOT Youndution, (GEE ‘theoss De Ganon)
diperictn Fetents of the uiaare Bout 0 2377 and $65300 ne
| fwaescen Friente ef thé Mile East (Project ZINIHIER) ves exectea dn
19 with the purpose of enpleying aggressive propagenia to promote
SEER
a Wd96 : bo “66. 68 dd
14.90000
“Aue trtendshty or ig ofthe Heat tm Mae Rast tase the
Seeeires
Tt wae dacorporated ng
2 eon crn eomparetiton on under. fhe lave of Hew :
fect fide cathe Bin otnto Prod. the attecbed
“oN Sh 32 0 ets ua tem 9
iniivss refject a file cn the } RDERGOY B ;
sin éiverse 10 BleXngtes., Syetema
‘ty coherent cadiation was contracted,
tat ani Tuwor Institute, University of
cher 2963 but ap of 16 April 1964
a, Devety Daren, Fis = Teeter Sree Cola a Ase
Smee ae oe Tents 4s cometdered
Sat of the Rost lnwcoe So % exposures
a
ae xA Se Tn tsa” artiste Se 8 brary 2067 aesioee tat th
MAREUALE Pounae hee ae mereaehe 26e 26 February fece the Agency to
BRIDGE Nereis oe alias ot Sa et Sa
iA BR. BA Add
14-00000
Birra
°° Semen BRON, Preoddomt aol Direst ROOP, Ines, Houston
‘Texas end Fraditdenxt and Trustee of the. doton, ‘Texas, if
. te
8
of the .
Aivieory
A REVS in Septender' 1955. trustee
goalaty in April 1965.
vee & signer of a statement erpeering
ty the Iron Curtain -
Oe HEN York Ts aitpping for 39 Tebmany 195k wtabed thet Alten’
'" SYIVERB,. Governor of Texss, esd he plenned te ask hix Isgivlatonte to
neoke weberchtp in the Communist
14-00000
<> (Bhecia De CABON, Jee uot Epnvoved for contest tee on 17 August ° |
1961.. At the time he vap Tice. Frasident amd Rirecter of Taternstional,
‘Texas Dutsdiene and Chemical. re arimel fee residing in. Lausanne, * st:
| foe hriezin
i Widiete A, SUITE ste granted da Cperational Clesraase on 22 -August .
A958 For Gee Gy an agent fn Latin America: wer cameretioy cover, On oe
i EEBNY 1955 @ Covert Gecurity Clearance ves iscuad to METS to porsit his *
- 188 GR@ Co Assoniate te the Thited States under Project. LEFUUKTL....--
& the time he had @ member of bupiness interests ‘da Rousten, Texas, 4s ee.
William As STE Constraction Oapany, Houston, Textet Texag Eistern |
“.. Me0a GAWORERE wes granted 6 Covers fecurity Approval on 32 Narch AA
an ander thet he could’ he naa witting of Agency intavest in tha He De Loy
“ANDERSON Foundations. His file contains & newspaper olfening from the © |
WACHINGICH EAS for 3 Deewnbor 1963 watch concerns hin sypotniment ap 32).
Special coussel for a Texan State Court of Dhquiry into the assassination oF
". Poasident MNINROZ. ar
WET ba 66, 6B Ydds y
14-00000
‘“"~ dota Henry FREEMAN ims granted a Covert Security Approval on 23.
June 1957 to permit the utiliretion of his services under Project LECOTT
At the time be wag & parteer. in the lerge ond leading lew firm of.
FULBRIGHT, CROOKER, FREEMAN, BATHS end JAWORSKE at Housten, Texas = -
3}
da comention with her i."
of @ brondeasting activity <3
i ass
3 March 1966 primarily to use the
.. Ovete Culp HODBY's scp Witiion Fettua ROBBY, des, born 19 Jenutry <”
1932 et Houston, Texas, was security approved for contact use on 23 Noy
~ the tine he wee Aseceiate Hiitor of the ROUBTON POST, Kouston, Texas. ~
bak io SME CH RAE at Sea
14.90000
poe : ,
1966 for the sone uses
|
104-10117-10251.pdf | 14-9000
104-10117-10251 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992]... . ... ....
oe ‘ oa
'
7)
nr ot . .
7 AR rele nr : Ad *
an é . . ‘ a
at » oF °
oo .
-
CTL NC 3619 REQUESTOR HALL CFFICE SRS CEALGES
N3°19 RE OMONT, BERNARD
REOMCNT,BERNARD OR 68 C481654
fy “ /D LST BOJAN68 P2 RAMPARTS /W CHG TO SRS .
/2 2168419
--------=----------+----- Ni--I/ND~-U/ND--S A--CO~-----~---------=- a
REDMCNT y BERNARD OR 66 359808
/D BCOK OFMAR66 P462 KAGAN, NICHOLAS
/2 2913295 .
a7 22-220 --- = ------- == NI--I /ND-~U/ND--SA--C0------------------=74-----
REDMCNT,»@ERNARD SIDNEY os M351C1C :
/& RECMCND, BERNARD SIDNEY
7b RCTRENBERG, BERNARC SIDNEY
fA ROTRRERG SB
47 99377954
me ra a oc an mew rman 0 a a en NIi-- I[/ ND--U/ND-~S A- -€ 0 ---- nn ee ne
RPEOMCNT,PERNARO SIDNEY OR M351010
7’ REOMCNT» JOAN /Y F /0 SPO REDMONT,BERNARD SIDNEY /T MRS
4Z 128C442 ;
Po rr rn rn enn NI--1/NO--U/ND~-SA--CO---—- -------- --------------
N3BCLS BUCHANAN, THOMAS
BUCKANANeT G
0 Dw OINOV4B P5
/2 9169631
OR 48 U3€4CEC
7L DC yWAS /W CHG TC MIC
BUCKANAN, THOMAS
/Z 6165636
BUCHANAN, THOMAS B
/8 VEAUGZ1 CLARKVILLE VI
/2 2165628 24
------------------------- I-- I/ND--U/ND--S A--CO--~~4~------~ -----~----~---
. OR .64 C408647
7/0 MEM 18JUN64 P1 ATTCTC/CONTRACTORS
. BUCHANAN,THCMAS C OR 49 RO38399
7&4 BUCHANNON,TOM /D F L4VUN49 P4tDW 27JUN46 P2 MARSHALL »MARION D
7L OC ehAS ;
72 1€6639 \
BUCHANAN sTHCMAS E OS R112748
/® 31AUG99 LAFAYETTE LA
/Z 0165649
S3UCHANAR,THCMAS ELIE CS R112748
7B C&AUG9F LAFAYETTE LA
4Z 9169641
14.90000
oo ‘ _ . . .
,
;
» : yan ee
CTL VG 3215 REQUESTOR HALL CFFICE SRS O6AUG69
N3712 BUCHANAN, THCMAS - ;
BUCKANAN,THCMAS G OS 64 M35111Eu
/T JR -
/Z €169644
atalaiaialatetetatatetanatatatatatetebaeeete NI--1/ND--U/ND-~SA--CQ—--~~-~~--------- -—----__
BUCHANAN, THOMAS G OR 64 R351164
/O NYT 12SUN64 VCL5 OSWALD,LEE H
/Z 19S642
Won nooo oo --------------- NI--1/ND--U/ND-~~SA--CQ-~--~--~-~--~-~~-----~---_.
BUCHANAN,THOMAS G OR 64 R266988
7) wEEKLY PAMPHLET 95DEC64 P1 TCCSIN
42 909285
won = eon anne ------------- NI~~I/ND--U/ND--S A~-CO-~------~~--------—-~+---_-
BUCHANAN, THGMAS G OR 64 266988
/D PAMPLET S5SEP64 P2 TOCSIN
17 21ESES3 .
wo -----+----------------- NI-~1/ND--U/ND-~SA--COQ------~~—-~-~---------~--~-_
|
104-10117-10268.pdf | 14-00000
104-10117-10268) ,
| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHIN F. KENNEDY <a RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
ee | att (BG uy
SECRET
7 July 1977
’ MEMORANDUM FOR: Office of Security, Clearance Division
ATTENTION | Mr. Joe Murphy
FROM OP/Contract Personnel Divisior.
SUBJECT : Notification of Contract Terminations
werte tet
Listed below are contract terminations received dur:ng the month of June 1977.
Name SSN SFN TE ORG Termination Date
03,08 , re
Annis, Carole Ann . 005428507 672196 CE EA 25 March 1977
Barga, Judy K. 519501284 654601{ CE OSIG 26 May 1977
Brown, Thomas J. 081160726 087840] IC OGCR 30 May 1977
Bull, Katherine S, 493440700 182961] CE EUR 29 April 1977
Day, Walter L. 507076762 683575) IC ICS 22 May 1977
Fishow, Evelyn M. 291180012 546928) CE ISS 3 June 1977 ‘
Frey, Frederick W. 108221041 676214) IC OSI 15 June 1977
Gleason, Robert D, 210409564 676971) CE FBIS 23 May 1977
oodpasture, Ann L. 446149768 013914 Ic IG 20 May 1977
reenstein, Fred 1. 3,08 331261868 66390 IC OSI 15 June 1977
Hargrove, Erwin C., Jr. 497325244 671272 Ic OSI 15 June 1977
Harnage, William A, . 223804686 619339} CE OSIG 15 June 1977
Holsti, Ole R. 548404442 677885{ IC OSI 15 June 1977
Jensen, Beverly 564569690 391891 CE NE 4 June 1977
Keegan, Patricia A. 231584387 237031) CE NE 12 May 1977
Kiev, Ari 083267818 609830) IC OSI 15 June 1977
Loecher, Karl F. 051428566 789641) IC OPR 30 April 1977
Martinez, Barbara Jean 525828737 672329 CE LOG 3 June 1977
SECRET E2IM2DET
CLBY063837 alo
14-0000
NAME
ret
03,08
McFarlane, Sharon K.
Minekime, Norman E.
Montgomery, Jeanette N.
Morris, Carol Lce
Phillips, Judy B,
Ruth, Roberta Ann
Singleton, Walter F.
Trager, Diane M.
Brunow, Steven E.
Carroll, Hugh M.
Firment, Lynda R,
Frye, Christine
Gray, Barbara H.
Habari, Terpsithea
Harms, Werner O.
Henning, Julia M.
Heumann, Gertraude
Howard, Irene O,
Aldridge, Beverl? A.
Anderson, Barbara V.
Bancroft, Roper W.
‘|Blackman, Edson E. II
Chedid, Patricia A.
Cunningham, Huph T.
Dudley, George M. 0
~~
Howell, Gwendolyn W.
Johnson, Dana C.
Kenney, Ellen Jane
LeFevre, Jane
Little, Jeffrey K.
Lofgren, Joan M.
Mather, Peggy Ann
‘1’Goodlett-Bowen, Norma -
McCutcheon, Katherine
Morden, Karren I,
Nobert, Marilyn Jcan
Phillips, Kenneth R,
Ransom, Alison G.
SECRET
‘SSN SFN
520447069 565910
128422843 600765
525501118 581225
567866614 622763
230544853 678205
174309494 665671
225245972 039688
046445459 684186
183347384 465450
350306996 582195
064384161 615892
577561373?
587802323 -648746—
215687793 641523.
578564033 660921 —
08336 ;
239283246 104102
256628421 486785
004685976 679551
054369777 =?
"280446526 670101
No SSN ' 681418
201120242 126364
233627239 138364
No SSN 683899
022308200 182429
241907795 .662197
223969825 679677
579523274 212436
032308979 532453
225785758 642239
296324215 681917
_ 485200235 646270
360340786 233452
540408060 184344
120347691 588784
453068932 675394
394505004 634937
SECRET
TE
CE
Ck
CE
CE
CE
_CE
CA
CE
r
VU
CE
CE
Ic
CE -
CE
CE
Ic
IC
CE
CE
~ 1c
CE
FN
CA
CE
FN
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
ORG
AF
NPIC
NE
OMS
Commo
OMS
FRD
Fin
Sec
NE
ODE
NPIC
NPIC
Sec
NE
OTR
Pers
EUR
Commo
NPIC
SE
FBIS
FRD
AF
FBIS
EUR
OSI
OTR
OTR
BA
OTS
EUR
Fin
AF
icUR
NE
* NPIC
AF
Termination Date
8 April 1977
25 February 1977.
31 ay 1977
5 June 1977
4 June 1977
18 June 1977
3 June 1977
27 May 1977
17-June 1977
30 June 1977
24 June 1977
30 June 1977 ;
21 January 1977
24 June 1977
27 May 1977
23 June 1977
30 June 1977
31 May 1977
24 June 1977
30 June 1977
10 June 1977
28 May 1977
30 June 1977
27 May 1977
4June 1977 |
23 May 1977
31 January 1975
3 June 1977
3 June 1977
13 May 1977
11 June 1977
27 May 1977
15 June 1977
29 December 1976
18 June 1977
13 May 1977
3 June 1977
14 June 1977
gee. SECRET
Name oo SFN TE ORG Termination Date
oe rama OOK AED Le) 306 : j
‘sail 485105490 055849 CE AF 27 May 1977
Vagnina, Daniele ‘S. 231640291 641680 CE OTR 30 June 1977
Weaver, Carol M. 380361880 586457 CE AF 10 May 1977
West, Bill C, 113332128 015790 | IC OSR 13 May 1977
Williams, James H. 578701385 662217 | CE LOG 30 June 1977
Wolfe, Elizabeth L. 412667301 663774 CE OSIG 18 June 1977
Woodyear, Franccs A, 579501526 133351 | CE EA 6 May 1977
Meybaum, Heino W, 565464787 051918 CA EUR 10 June 1977
Edger, Ruth C, 447461282 679606 CE LA 10 June 1977
Kelley, Joseph Bt 579388251 016617 Consl: OGC 31 May 1977
Type Employee Codes _... . = 8 : -
CE ~ Contract Employee
CA - Career Associate
IC ~ Independent Contractor
‘Conslt - Consultant
FN - FBIS Foreign National
fara Tarchie
OP/CPD
SECRET | “196
|
104-10117-10296.pdf | 14-9000
104-10117-10296 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
(> . \ 7 f p . Yo HEN i eee -
oP HEADQUARTERS — uncle
: : é? ; :
_
| L.A. DATE lo Septée
TO : Special Agent in Charge, DFO Office of Origin
SUBJECT: (op PCGonr ‘ Petey Pax / POS.:
5 NOS SA. GU i1D/3/L- a -
BO Ll. a Use Gopperedentials, if feasible; however(rTop nay. t be. used.
(_] of covert interest, conduct investigation according to
standard regulations except as noted below. ‘ - ; a
2. DFO will conduct the following NAC's
4. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
DISTRIBUTION.
oo ATTACHMENTS —° ie “
ssa |e ; | P| |
FORM ' So wy So es
Na L720 YESS 7 a
coe tea th edn
|
104-10118-10427.pdf | 14-00000
104-10118-10427, | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT gra ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
os Organization and activities of the
Deputy Director (Research)
Development Projects Division « Special Projects Branch
a ee ce pectal Srojects Branch
As recommended, the Special Projects Branch of DPD plus the
necessary supporting units have been transferred-to DD/R. -
Technic al Services Division
aaa eewices Mivision
Further study did not commend implementation of the Working
Group's recommendation that all TSD research and development ba
placed under DD/R. The DD/P made a substantial argument in favor
of leaving all of TSD under his control in order to insure close and
intimate relations with the operating units. Further, an argument of
almost overwhelming proportions indicated that the DD/R already had
some very major responsibilities without taking on the diverse and
generally unrelated responsibilities of TSD,
4
Other Research and Development
SEES Ane evelopment
After considerable additional study it was decided to transfer all
ELINT to DD/R, except for the direct command of certain field unitg
which under all circumstances should be left under the station chiefs,
Research and development in suppoxst of NPIC would fall under DD/R
for those very advanced items, but not for current production require-
ments.
-§8.
14-0000
Coordination
The ataff of the Assistant for Coordination has continued to work
on the same basis as formerly and continues to be constituted of
assignees from other agencies. There appears to be progress in
. achieving closer inter-agency coordination, but whether this is due
to the work of the Coordination Staff or to the DCI's personal interest
in this subject would be hard to determine,
Princeton Consultants to ONE.
This group has been continued.
National Photographic Interpretation Center
The Executive Director has personally kept under review the work-
load of NPIC. NPIC is recruiting in anticipation of an increased work-
load.
Caliber of Personnel
The new DD/I is cognizant of this problem and is taking steps to
improve the caliber of the personnel.
a.
Merger of ONE and OCI
It has been decided not to merge these offices.
Preparation and Dissemination of Memoranda
Too many uncoordinated memoranda are still being circulated.
The practice of asking other departments to prepare memoranda has
not beén adopted.
White House Relations
(This matter was handled orally by the Working Group and con-
sequently the comments will be handled similarly. }
14-0000
“SH/~! °
Research on International Communism
rn at vOMMmuniS
The DD/I has established a special staff under an experienced
intelligence officer for this purpose, and this staff ig getting gradually
organized.
Office of Scientific Intelli ence
enc intelligence
OSI is remaining under DD/I, but DD/R will eventually open hig
career service to those who wish to join it.
DD/R's Operational Responsibilities
It has been firmly established that DD/R will operate those pro-
jecta which he develops. We believe that DD/R has implemented some
of the principles in the special annex of the Working Group report,
14-0000
Mr}
Organization and Activities of the
Intellizence Communit
oy
National Indications Center - Watch Committee
eet x_Vatch Committe
General Carter, the new Chairman of the Watch Committee, has
mado a thorough review of its activities and NIC operations. Steps
have been taken to sae that NIC is Properly manned with the right
personnel, and the Department.of State is being constantly reminded
of its obligations in this regard. We also believe that the methods of
operations of the Watch Committee have now been aligned in accord-
ance with the objectives of the Working Group.
CIA Relations with the Department of State
partment of State
Sifce the issuance of the. Working Group report, a special team
composed of a senior representative from the Agency and from the
Department of State have etudied-the ‘entire’problem of "cover." They
have Fegched ai agreed formula for.this cover and for correcting some
Qf-thezproblemse-that-attracted the-attention of the Working Group..This
incladesktherRorkigmServicaxe; ignationy *A’new agreement has been
reached on tha handling of State communications. since the production
of the Working Group report the level on which COMINT policy is |
handled in CIA has been raised to that of Asaistant Deputy Director.
State's Counter Communism Office .
mis Otfice
The proposal for the creation of such an office in the Department
of State appears to have come to naught,
State's Operational Center
The State Operational Center also appears to have come to naught.
State at White House Briefings |
The Department of State does not attend the White House briefings.
Receipt of Top Classification Messages
ea Smeaton Messages
Tho DCI has taken up with the White House the necessity for being
included in the dissemination of all top classification messages.
~le
14-0000
1c.
11.
12.
3S yeu kr
The or ganization of the DCI/DDCI's office is currently under study.
The Audit Staff is removed from the DD/S area and placed under
the Inspector General.
The Compirolles is removed from the DD/3 area, given greatly
expanded responsibilities, anu will report directly to the DCI/
DDCI's office.
The General Counsel's office is removed from under the DD/S,
will resume responsibility for Congressional relations, and will
report directly to the DCI/DDCI's office.
The Office of Cperations is disbanded. Contact-Division to DD/P
as nucleus for Domestic Division. Foreign Documents Division
to be combined with OCR Library. Foreign Broadcast Information
Division to be independent unit reporting directly to DD/I.
Position of Assistant DD/P for Covert Action abolished.
Assistant DD/P for Paramilitary and Air Support Operations created.
Central Support Staff under DD/P created. This will draw together
such support as personnel, logistics and budget and will also take
over technical support from those operating units of TSD which
remain in the DD/P, e. g§-, Secret writing, audio operations, etc.
The Central Support Staff will also absorb the present Operational
Services Staff and certain other activities.
A Special Task Force is created for such operations of a magnitude
that transcends the capabilities of one division.
The International Organizations Division and Covert Action Staff
are combined, putting together our largest activities in this field.
A Domestic Division is created. This will absorb as its nucleus
Contact Division of CO from the DD/I, the Commercial Staff, the
Air Proprietary Branch irom DPD, ultimately the management of
CAT from the DD/S, and those aspects of cover which involve
contacts with the U.S. business community,
A Deputy Director for Research is created. This or ganization will
take over the Office of Scientific Intelligence from the DD/I, Special
Projects ...:m DPD, all research and development from TSD, and
other research and development activities currently located in various
units of the Agency such as the Office of Communications, NPIC, etc.
SEZ RET
. .
14-0000
March 29, 1962
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Notes on discussions between myself, Carter, Kirkpatrick
Coyne and Schuyler in review of report of the Kirkpatrick
Committee
Following recommendations call for further consideration and
possible modification,
Office of the DCI
1. Page ll - Comptroller gs ae
Terms of Reference of the Financial Policy and Budget
Committee under the Comptroller and the Executive Committee
as provided hereafter must be clarified to provide continuing .
program review by a senior committee as par? of an orderly
| program and budget process. ‘
2. . Offices of Coordination.
Differences between Kirkpatrick and Schuyler position
as outlined in the report and Coyne's position should bs
considered and reconciled. Page 3, Item C, Responsibility for
SIGINT policiea and resulting international arrangements asa
responsibility of this office should be further considered.
3. Public relations directive should be issued on policy of
speech making and public appearances by Agency employees,
- including DCI and the Deputies.
4. Page 6. Reduction of forces consideration should be given
with continuing 3-man management review committez {such as
‘the Kirkpatrick Committee) exploring for the DCI and the DDCI
ways and means of eliminating duplication and consolidating
functions, eliminating unneces sary activities, with the objective
of developing better organization at lesser cost and with
fewer personnel. ;
5. 6.B. Terms of Refersnce for the Executive Director and
the selection of this man should he discussed between McCone
and Carter at an early date.
14-0000
-# Il. Office of DD/P
~ 1. Paze 9: Important to move on an Assistant DD/P for
Paramilitary operations and alr Support. There is
coatinuing criticiam of the Ageacy for lack of professionalism
in these activities, most particularly airborne,
Zz. Domestic Division.
aa mestic Miv-sion.
. Care must be exercised and the merger of Contact
Division with tha balance of the Domeatic Division and
also care must be exercised to be sure that the Domestic
Division "gathers up" all fragments of CIAts activities
ae dispersed throughout the United States with the exception
of Security Division, ‘
3. Deputy Chief of the Division of British Commonwealth
Definition of this office must be worked out to avoid
confusion with respect to small British areas such as Hong
Kong, Singapore, British Guiana, ete. The purpose of
this office probab ¥ to handle Commonweaith versus Colonial
Office affairs.
4. CIA/3tate Relations. ‘
aaa melatlons
Review of salary allowances, expense accounts,
living conditions, etc., of CLA agents under State cover
versus Foreign Service Cificerg comparable conditions
should be made and if criticism legitimate, corrective
meéasures:should be taken without impairing abilitgeattets
of SixtiGHto-handle special costly situations which might
bedéne by specific authorization: Also audit and control
of personal expenses of COS must be developed immediately.
my. Ctfice of DD/I
l. Carter and MceCone should agree on selection of a DD/I,
Deputy DD/I and Chief of OCl as initial step in improving personnel
within this office, .
&. Merger of O/NE and OCI should be delayed until new
DD/1 is installed and makes his recommendations, :
14-0000
3. National Board of Estimates should be reviewed and
improved where necessary and consideration given to formation
of a special group within O/NE to analyze on a continuiag basis
objectives of Soviet/Sino Bloc, international communism and
their pursuit of their cold war activities and in their efforts to
establish world domination. Note: Thie office previously
existed directly under DD/I but was abandoned a few months
ago,
4. Proper Maison with finance, State Department, and
agreed methods for DCI to brief NsC as provided by law
should be worked out.
5. National Photographic Interpretation Center, Page 19.
Note this requires immediate study, possibly by USIB.
Fear that the work load on the NPIC will overwhelm itandasa
result it will be unable to process vast amount of {information
during months of May through September should be quickly studied
and arrangements made through USIB to disperse read-out to SAC
and Army St. Louis Center if doing so necessary to keep our
processing and read-out on a current basis. This matter
considered of greatest importance,
IV. Elements of DD/R
1. It should be recognized that Deputy Director for
Research is a cover and this‘ office not necessarily confined
to research but should be tad sed with operationed responaibi-
lities. Also most important project under DD/R is OXCART,
therefore DD/R must be restrained from taking on collateral
activities so fast that OXCART will suffer. The DD/R ,
responsibilities will cover all phases of Agency responsibility
and activity in NRO which may or may not include the actual
operation of OXCART. It will include intelligence input into
OXCART and CORONA and SAMOS Planning, irrespective of
where operations rest.
2. Location of OSI should be resolved.
3. Interrelationship between DD/R and DD/P to provide
staff support and particularly the CI production should be
established by directive of Deputy DCI.
14-0000
4. With resrect to pate 23, certain operational responsaibi.
Uities should pass from DO/2 to DD/P upon completion of
research and cevelopment; however a study should be made to
determine whether the tmany fully intesrated operational activities
such as OXCART and some fully integrated ELINT operations
should not be permanently under DD/R who Is to have both
Operational and research and development responsibilities,
Considerations of OXCART
re ee AN
i. Responsibility for all phasea of OXCART are to follow
the direct supervision of Sec/Def and DCI by agreement with the
OD, Charyk as AR/Sec.Def., will be executive head of NRO, DD/R
will be his Deputy and by assignment will be responsible for all
phases of OXCART.
2. Details of Operations, as contrasted to R&D, will be
worked out at a later date.
. 3. NSC directive agreed OXCART tasks are responsibility
of Special Group and question of augmentation is a matter for Special
Group, not CIA, to decide. ;
“he 4. DD/R should be charged with the responsibility of
mobilizing and utilizing all necessary resources of DD/I, DD/P and
DD/S and General Counsel in performance of DD/R's assigned respon-~
sibility as Deputy Director NRO and manager of OXCART project.
5. Question of use of Air Force officers versus civilfans
must be decided by higher authority, likewise the question of Operational
responsibility between that of CLA or DD/R or personnel secanded from
the Air Force versus direct Air Force operation must be decided by DCI
and Sec/Def. and the President after careful consideration of all issues
and problems relating to this matter. .
6. Because of imminence of commencement of test
flights immediate careful attention should be given to all aspects of
the cover story ag certain jaformation concerning the plane will
become known when it ig observed in FAA (hat Othey radar
V. National Indications Center Watch Committee
ERE atch Cornmnittee
1, Appointment should ba made next week for General
Carter and myself to visit the NIC and the DIA Centera and
observe the Watch Committee Operations and make a judgment
as to whether this organization is properly set up and
efficiently operating, and to rosolve differences between
Mr. Coyne and USIB,
14-0000
‘.
2. White House briefings should continue; a substitute
for Mr. Amory should be arranged until a more adequate
arrangement is provided: Daily briefings of Bundy, Clifton
and Taylor and an occasional briefing of the President by
DCI should suffice.
JOHN A, McCONE
Director
14-0000
a
6 April 1962
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence
SUBJECT : Final Report of Working Group on Or ganization
and Activities
1. Ihave the honor to present herewith the final report of the
working group which you established in January to consult with you and
advise on the organization and activities of tha Central Intelligence
aL een
Agency, and of its relationship with other agencies in the intelligence
community. This report reflects the views of the working group and is
divided into two parts. The first part deals primarily with the organiza-
x tion of the Central Intelligence Agency and reflects the unanimoua views
g
of the working group. The second part contains comments and recom-
mendations on areaa dealing with the work of the Central Intelligence
Agency and activities of the intolligence community in which the working
group was either unable to agree or felt that considerably more study
was needed before action was taken.
Zz. For the record I would note that the working group held its
first session on January 3 and met on 35 different days between that date
and its final session with you on March 28, During its work the group
had approximately 100 briefings. Most of these briefings dealt with the
organization and activities of the Central Intelligence Agency, but also
included a full day spent with the Department of State in addition to several
briefings on State Department activities and ite relations with CIA; approxi-
mately one-half day spent in the Pentagon in addition to other briefings
by the Defense Intelligence Agency; and a full week Spent visiting SAC,
NORAD and other activities in the United States. We were briefed by
the head of every major coraponent in the CIA with the excepticen of three
DD/P 2rea divisions whose briefings had to be excluced becauge of the
pressure of time. However, we feel that having heard from four other
area aivisions the working group had a knowledge of the activities and
problems of these units, In addition to the 106 briefings, the working
group had move than ten executive sessions in which it discussed and
debated at great length its findings and conclusions. Finally, there were
aon oan
ee ee Oh) Ke ~ fetes \
foe : fee pesos SO
on ” — \
( i
1768F
14-0000
some 20 mectings with yourself, and with senior Agency officials to
discuss our findings and conclusions. These included at least two
sessions with each of the Deputy Directors and with the Assistant
Director for National Estiraates and the Assistant Director for Cure
rent Intelligence,
3. The attached report does not purport to be complete or ex-
haustive in any respect, but rather it is an aide memoir to recall to
mind our oral discussions and to record some of the reasons and
philosophy behind our recommendations,
Al
Lyman B. Kirkpatrick
cc; DDCI .
Attachment
eet reed [ns oe -
pe lie |
ppl s .
DOVE (6b ofan Keni Lietre aha)
Ad\S=z
po\P
Cp dedi SL
-2-
“9
Ree
wu
14-0000
PARTI
This section deals primarily with the organization
of the Central Intelligence Agency and represents
the view of the entire Working Group.
14-0000
OFrFICl OF TES DCI
ee
ee te eee tee
Organization of LCs OYfice
tre recoinmend that the organization of the DCI's office be
/
- systematized control of messages both oral and written, anda
clear delineation of the responsibilities of the assistants to the /
DCI In this connection we would urge that a secretariat be 270
oe
| changed in order to provide more effective support to the DCI, a /
_ €reated,- that the head of this secretariat assign {ndividual re+
sponsibilities to each of the personal assistants to the DCI, that J
daily staff meetings be held for a full exchange on the activities
f of the staff, and that all personnel in the Agency be advised as
to how to keep the DCI's staff informed Properly of the activities /
of tha Agency.
Comptroller
We recommend that the Comptroller's office be brought
out from under the DD/S, report directly to the DCI"s office and J
receive full authority for fotal fiscal control of the Agency.
We recommend that the Comptroller be designated Chair-
man of a Financial Policy and Budget Committee composed of i
the appropriate senior officers of the Agency. We believe that
14-0000
| a nee 9 ne we ese etee te ee
¥
such a committee should be kept fully and currently informed of
all Agency activities, and in order to be effective should meet
regularly and submit its reports to the DDCI and DCI,
Inspector General
We recommend that the Audit Staff be combined with the
staff of the Inspector General and that the merged staff report to
the DCI’s office.
We belleve that the size of the Inspector General Staff
from their respective components in order to perform more
frequent {nspections of Agency units. We urge ‘inspections af
least anoually of major operations and of field stationa,
General Counsel
We recommend that the General Counsel's staff be
removed from the organization of the Deputy Director (Support)
and report directly to the office of the DCI, Ta such a position
the General Counsel should resume the responsibility for the
direction and guidance of the work of the Legislative Counsel,
which is currently the responsibility of the Inspector General,
\
should ba increased with qualified professional personnel assigned (wy
(e
aa
“
%
vA
e
G
\
t
™,
2
14-0000
ne = pee eg ees
Cable Secretariat ‘
We have examined the Cable Secretariat which is currently
* located in the office of the DCI and reports to the Executive Officer, va
We believe it should continue to be in the office of the Director under
the careful supervision of the Executive Director. We are con-
cerned that as it now operates requirements for cables have not |
been adequately coordinated, and cables have been disseminated
too often on the judgment of junior officers. We believe this needs fe
careful study.
Contracts 7
We believe that the Agency is vulnerable on sole-source <
- oe”
contracts for auch activities as TSD and DPD, and that those “7? fh.
ake 7
contracts currently in existence should be reviewed and that all: , he
“ we
such future contracts should be passed on by the DCI's office i we
prior to approval.
Personnel Assignments
We believe that the DDCI and DCI should be the final .
approving authority for all assicnmenta to positions of Chief /
or Deputy Chief of Offices (DD/2 Divisions and Staffs) or of
field stations and bases, both foreign and domestic.
14-0000
mae
We believe the DCI's office should also review all asalga- a
ments in the middle management echelon with particular reference
” to insuring the proper language qualifications, operational training
and suitability,
Public Relations
We recommend that the ‘present system of public relations
by the Agency be changed, While we see the necessity for the wit!
DCI to have an assistant in his office handling relations with the
public media, we belleve that every effort should be made to |
minimize the amount of publicity that CIA receiwes,
eee et ee
. We strongly secommend that the Present practice of
giving background briefings to newspapermen cease and that
CIA give information to the press only where CIA has something
which for operational reasons should be released on an unattri-
butable basis, We urge that no public Speeches be given by
Agency officials.
Reduction {n Force
aheeeoan tn vorce
We recommend that the DCI and DDCI insure that the
present reduction in force in the Agency include senior officers,
particularly supergrades who are no longer as effective as they
should be in their assignments,
14-0000
Handling of Communications Other Than Cables
We note that under present arrangements communications,
other than cables are handled by the Records Integration Division:
ay
v
) _
of DD/P, which is not always fully cognizant of the interests of
=~
\
non-DD/P parts of the Agency. We recommend that the entire
Sy
system of handling incoming and outgoing communications be
subjected to further study with a view to insuring adequate dis-
semination of all communications, Particularly in DD/I, DD/R
CC aoe
and DD/S, which may have need for Prompt receipt of such
material,
Executive Director
Sane Sirector
Executive Director, inasmuch as we believe this to be primarily
& matter that should be tailored to the personal preferences of
We have not tried to spell out the responsibilities of the |
H
!
the DCI and DDCI and how they wish to Operate their office and ;
the Agency. We urge, however, that Special attention be directed
—_
to the avoidance of a straight vertical line of command; i.e,, all
problems should not have to pase through each of the three officers. :
Executive Committee
=e Vommittee
We recommend the creation of an Executive Committee
to be chaired by the DDCI ang consist of the four Deputies, the
14-0000
Comptroller, and the Assistant to the DCI for Coordination and
Intelligence Community Guidance. This Committee, from a
policy standpoint, would review Proposed major projects and
maintain a continuous review of all major activities and make
Bppropriate recommendations thereon to the DCI. This Com-
malttee would replace the present Project Review Committee.
14-0000
ORGANIZATION AND ACTIVITIES OF THE / min lop
DEPUTY DIRECTCR (PLANS) fades 4
' Office of the DD/P
eae OE ne Boi
We commend the decision of the DD/P to abolish the position
of the A/DDP/A, and believe that the restoration of the previous
organization with just the DD/P and COP in the line of command
in the front office will result ina clear delineation of responsibili-
ties and more efficient operations.
The Staffs
We studied at some length the staffs in the DD/P. We con-
sidered a possible merger ofthe FI, Cl and CA staffs. We also
studied proposals for divesting the staffs of all operational responsi-
bilities, We beliave that while both are desirable objectives, neither
<.
are practicable under present circumstances. We therefore urge
that the FJ, Cland CA Staff functions be drawn closer together
under the Chief of Operations and that these organizations insofar
as practical act in the classical sense as staffs for the DD/P. We
further believe that the Operational Services Staff, the Central Staff,
and the residual of the Cover and Commercial Staff, after the changes
recommended below are completed, be transferred to the Central
Support Staff which is proposed,
14-0000
a en
fee ee erm came eseae
oe eee
ce ef meee ene oe
/
Merger of Covert Action Staff and International Organizations Division
The DD/P haa advised us of hia desire to merge the Covert
Action Stalf with the International Crganizations Division. White
this ia contrary to the trend of divesting staffs of operational duties,
we nevertheless do not observe any major reasona against sucha
merger and believe that it should be tried out in accordance with
the DD/P's wishes. |
Central Support Staff
We recommend that the DD/P draw together into a Central
Support Staff control of personnel and other support matters cur-
. 4
rently decentralized to the divisions and staffs in order to locate
these functions directly under him.
Special Task Force Cperations
We recommend the creation of an organizational entity to
be known as "Special Task Force Operations* reporting directly
to the DD/P, which shali be activated and deactivated upon need,
and which shall be the command inechanis:n for handling such
projects as the Cuban operation which demands the creation of an
organization from Agency-wide assets,
14-0000
RRR
Assistant to DD/P for Paramilitary and Air Support Operations
We recommend the creation of an office in the DD/P to be
known as Paramilitary and sir Support Operations, under the
direction of an Assistant DD/P, to develop the capability for covert
paramilitary and air support operations. We suggest that the bulk
of this new organization be located at c 10 dw where it will have
facilities for organization and training. Such a move will also relieve
the burden on the headquarters building. We recommend that the
individual to head this organization be drawn from military service
and be a senior Colonel or a Brigadier General with wartime para-
military experience. Having in mind the total disestablishment of .
. 4
the DPD in its present form, we recommend that the Air Support
Branch of DPD be transferred to the new Paramilitary Office of DD/P.
Domestic Division - an
a Son
We endorse the-proposal to create a Domestic Division. We
strongly urge that the new Domestic Division utilize the Contact
Division of OO, which is to be transferred from the DD/I to the DD/P,
as the nucleus for field work in the United States. We also believe
that this Domestic Division should take over those functions of the
Cover and Commercial Staff presently carried out by the Commercial.
Group, plus all those activities of the Cover Division which involve
14-0000
- SECRET
contacts with domestic organizations in the United States such as
business and foundationa. This would involve the transfer to this--.
Domestic Division of the Air. Proprietaries Branch of DPD, and of
the responsibility for the management of CAT from the DD/S, and
of managing Fairways ‘Corporation, In consolidating CAT and Fair- |
waya into the Air Propritaries Branch we wish to draw attention
to the neces sity of having the right man to head this branch. |
We would also urge that a complete review be made of the ©
Agency's present and future requirements for air proprietaries and
that a statement of the requirements be provided the Air Proprictaries
Branch indicating exactly what may ba needed in all parts of the world.
With the création of the Domestic Division we urge that the DD/P |
examine. the requirements levied. by DD/P components on the Office
of Security for operational support and if possible > reassign these
requirements to the Domestic Division in order to relieve the Office |
of Security for its more important responsibilities in regard to the
security of CLA,
Operational Aids Unit
The DD/P should have a new unit charged with the following
functions:
-10-
14-0000
a. Residual TSD activities not transferred to DD/R.
b. Preparation of "operational characteristics" for new
or improved equipment desired to be developed by DD/R.
c. Close contact with DD/R activities involving develop-
ment of iteme for DD/P.
d. The condact of rigorous field tests of these itema
before they are released to divisions for operational use.
We recommend that all of the research and development responsi-
bilities currently in TSD be transferred to DD/R. Remaining units
in TSD should be transferred to the new DD/P division recommended
above; e.g., Audio Support less Research and Dévelopment, Photo-
graphic Support less R & D, Special Assistance, Intelligence,
Personnel, Authentication, and Graphic Arts Reproduction. We
note, however, that DD/P himself would prefer to retain under his
own responsibility the R & D function as it pertaina to specific items
to be used by individual agents (audio devices, incendiary itema, etc. ).
Deputy Chief for British Commonwealth Affairs, Western European .
Division
We recommend the creation in the Western European
Division of a second Deputy Chief for British Commonwealth Affaira.
We suggest that this Deputy Chief have ae hie line responsibilities
14-0000
LN SS
all matters involving (_ y . ;
| 7]. Further, this officer should
have full control authority over. C
yg
. ; . . e
and all other components of the Agency, including the DD/I,should
keep this officer advised on‘a daily basis C > Ly
Wear Plans
Because of the vital importance of war plans to the Agency's
relations to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, we recommend that the War
Plans Croup receive direct support from the DDCI, even though it
should remain organizationally as a part of the Central Support Staff
of the DD/P. ‘
Police Pro g rams
. We are convinced that United States Government support to
the police in friendly nations can provide great benefits to the
United Statea and that some of these benefits will assist CIA in its
_work,. The President has recently indicated to AID that he wishes
this program to receive strong support. We believe that CIA should
14-0000
Fe CA pr renee
*
.
give it greater support than it has previously received, We recom-~
mend that the police group in the CI Staff receive such augmentation
2s is necessary, and that Project | C 2 c
7] be transferred from the NE Division to the CI Staff.
Liaison with Department of State
We urge that the DD/P centralize liaison with the Department
of State and maintain careful records of all discussions betiveen the
Agency and State Department officials. We note that nearly every
area division chief has a weekly meeting with his counterpart in n the
Department t but that under the present system there is no organized
method for keeping the central management of thé DD/P informed
of what takes place at these meetings.
Advice to State on Black Propaganda
a.
We recommend that the DD/P develop procedures which will
insure that other appropriate agencies of the government (Department
of State,” Defense, White House and USIA) are kept appropriately
informed of black propaganda activities which otherwise might be
misunderstood and believed to be legitimately the views of a foreign
power, We have in mind our discussions with the Department which
heard expressed concern that ‘the Department was unaware of certain
black propaganda activities relating to Communist China and conse-
quently was led astray,
-I]3-
harets Srebre
rent thy
14-0000
re a a ee Oe at
CIA Personnel Under State Cover
We recommend that CIA personnel under the Department of
State cover make greater efforts to truly live their cover. We. believe
in this connection that the DCI should receive assurances from the
'_DD/P, after proper study, that CIA allowances for rents, servants —
and entertainment are in line with comparable State Department
allowances.
WLegitimate" LC oe -lcover
We recommend that the Agency more and more place people
under L osx ma cover by the’ Megitimate" method of recruiting |
individuals, having them [_ ; oF J
and be t Ov
J : and ioliow through a
‘nermal L og Jeareer, CIA should obviously keep £
ot J] advised concerning these individuals, work with C
of a on their assignments which will be mutually beneficial,
and covertly train them. By. this method such individuals will be
under true C. o¢ 4 cover and will not only be unknown to
other intelligence services, but also to their colleagues in Cc
oF J.
-~14.
14-0000
et ae one
sent ae tea
Latin American Operations
We urge that the Agency give high priority to supporting
the expansion of activities of Latin America, and i insure that the ©
proper level of competence is assigned to these important posts.
American Friends of the Middle Eaat
| We recommend that the Project for support of the organization
known as s the American Friends of the Middle East, which is cur-
rently being run by the NE Division, be transferred to the 10 Division
inasmuch as it now transcends NE Division area responsibilities and
has activities in Africa, or, if it is determined that AFME activities
. : , . a
are not worth the Agency's support, that the project be abolished.
-~15-
we net eee epee ev mene ney sean aed enna agg mente pee gnereeeneneecene,
Prire
aed
on
©
14-0000
ORGANIZATION AND ACTIVITIES OF TRE -
SPUTY DIRSCTOR (INTELLIGENCE) wy
Office of the DD/I
We have carefully reviewed the organization and activities
of the DD/I's immediate office and believe that with the addition
of a full thme deputy he will be able to assert the degree of
influence on the management of ‘the units under him required for
sound operations, At present his three office assistants provide
good atatt work in this review, but we did observe that a con-
siderable amount of the intelligence produced in the DD/I area
is reviewed at no higher a level than office chief, if that.
‘ We recommend that the DD/I establish in his office a
focal point through which all intelligence, processed or unevalusted,
going to the White House must flow. If for reasons of urgency a
report is sent to the White House prior to evaluation, we recom-
mend that a special notice to the effect that it is unevaluated be
attached to the report and that an evaluation follow the report at
the earliest possible moment.
Board of National Estimates
The Office of National Estimates should be strengthened by
the addition of one top-level foreign affairs expert to the Board of
Estimates, and if obtainable a top-level scientist and a top-levol
economist. We also believe that the Board would benefit by the
. -1
aA, oh vm:
RET
<<
we
14-0000
addition of an individual experieaced in business in the international
field, provided one of sufficient caliber could be found who would
be willing to spend two.or three years on the Board of Estimates.
Control of Estimates
We urge that the DCI utilize the USIB to control the
echeduling and to limit the number of National Estimates.
Office of Operations
We recommend that the Office of Operations be abolished,
that the Contact Division be transferred to DD/P to be the nucleus
of the Domestic Division, ; NG
‘The DD/I has advised us that with the transfer of Contact
Division, Office of Operations, to the DD/P, he is considering
closer integration of the Foreign Documents Division and the
Foreign Broadcast Information Division. These units have a lot
in common: both process unclassified information, both have
considerable language capability. We believe such an integration
should be considered, On the other hand, the Assistant Director
for Central Reference believes very strongly that the Foreign
Documents Division should be assigned to OCR. He advances as
reasons; that the procurement of foreign documents are arranged
by OCR; that the dissemination of the FDD product is handled by
OCR; that OCR through its relationa with the Library of Congress
<1
SeCheT
14-0000 oe, co ; . OLGUILS
. . . , H
. and other agencies is in a good position to assist in coordinating
the exploitation of foreign documents. We urge that the DD/I
integrate FDD and FBID into the most compatible area of the —
DD/I organization,
_ . 7 ae ae r .
Support of Cenis AX ee”.
Support for the Center for International Studies (CENIS) 2
at MIT is currently being handled by the DD/P.. If such eupport, . {
is worth continuing, and we question this, we recommend that
it be transferred to the DD/I's office.
-~ 18 -
14-0000
ORGANIZATION AND ACTIVITIES OF THE
DEPUTY DIRECTOR (SUPPORT)
Security Office
We recommond that the burden on the Security Office for
support of the DD/P be reviewed (see DD/P section). Ia the
meantime, we believe that a careful look at the Security Office
is necessary to insure that the volume of work it {s carrying
is not in any way feopardizing {ta primary responsibility of
“insuring that every‘possible measure is takea to keep the Agency
“gecure, |
We recommend that all security clearantes be centralized
undsr the Office of Security; ¢.g., clearances that are issued
by DPD, OCI, NPIC, and other Agency components, While we
would leave the policy of granting clearances with the appropriate
officials, we believe that the Office of Security should maiatain
a centralized index for special clearances and do all of the
processing of these clearances.
Audit Staff
We recommend that the Inspection and Audit Staff check
regularly on activities in the LockiBad plant which are of vital
concern to the Agency.
14-0000
-—~
D2D Support
We recommend that the DD/S be given the responsibility for
-support to all projects under the control of DD/R, providing of
course the neccasary security safeguarda, and that in the future
no parallel support mechanism be developed in the Agency.
Automatic Data Processing
We believe the Automatic Data Processing Staff can
properly remain under the DD/S inaemuch as this is a support
machanism, although wa strongly recommend that the DD/S
iu consultation with other deputies concerned direct this staff
to aggressively pursue the objective of automation in the Agency
in such a way as to insure the ultimate compatability of auto~
matic data processing aystems throughout the intelligence
a.
cormmunity.-
14-0000
'
|
!
:
ORGANIZATION AND ACTIVITIES OF THE.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR (RESEARCH)
The Office of the Deputy Director (Research) having already
been created, we now make the following recommendations as to
those units which should be included under this Deputy.
Development Projects Divigion - Special Projects Branch
We recommend that the Special Projects Branch of DPD
plue the necessary Supporting elements, including those projects
supporting the Department of Defense in advance reconnaissance
programs, be placed under DD/R.
Technical Services Division
Set ces vivision
.We recommend that all TSD research and development
be placed under DD/R. _ *
Other Research and Development
We recommend that the extent to which research and
development for SIGINT collection equipment, including agents!
SIGINT equipment, air-borne collection, etc., should be transferred
to DD/R, be left as a matter for negotiation and agreement between
DD/I and the Director of Communications.
We recommend all research and development in support of
NPIC be transferred to DD/R.
14-0000
rs earner ete ence entnce
yee
<
PART Ul
This section contains comments and recommendations on areas
of the work of the Central Intelligence Agency and activities of the
intelligence community in which the working group was either unable
to agree, or felt that considerably more study waa needed before
action is taken. These views are presented herewith so that they
may assist and guide those who may be asked to pursue these matters
further.
14-0000
Coordination
We note your intention to abolish the present office of the
Assistant for Coordination end to create in its stead an Assistant
to DCI for Coordination and Intelligence Community Guidance.
With the exception of Mir. Coyne, we are fully in accord. We set
forth below our concept of the principal functions of this Assistant.
a. He should be the DCI's principal advisor on coordina-
tion matters within the community and his personal representative
in dealing on ‘such matters with top officials of the community.
b. When so directed he should represent the DCI in
negotiations and discussions on intelligence mattérs with appropriate
officials of foreign governments.
c. He should be responsible for development of Comint
and Elint policy insofar as thie is an Agency function. |
d. He should keep continually under review the general
extent and direction of the intelligence efforta of the community to
insure that such efforts fully and effectively support national policy,
submitting reports and recommendations te DCI as appropriate.
e. He should correspondingly maintain a continuing
review of activities and efforts of the Agency to insure that they
remain fully and effectively coordinated with the activities and
efforts of other members of the community.
14-0000
nee ant enn ee A RA EES A NE I TE Ee Se
<a ee
We do not consider it practicable at this time to suggest the
number or qualificaticas of supporting staff officers for this
Assistant. We feel, however, that he will need a group of such
officers and that they should be of particularly high caliber and
broad experience. The functions we visualize for this office are
highly important for the community and for CIA, They have not
been adequately handled in the past. The Assistant should be given
whatever staff the full development of his role may later require.
. Mr, Coyne does not concur in this recommendation. He die.
agrees with (a) the proposed organizational placement and title of
the recommended office, ‘because this would perpetuate the present
ineffective arrangement of the Coordination Office now in existence
and would not provide the recommended office with the stature required
to assist the DCI in fulfilling his heavy responsibilities throughout
the Intelligence Community; (b) the limitations in the functional
concepts of the office, as outlined above. Further, he does not con-
cur in this recommendation because it doss not distinguish sufficiently
the internal CIA operating functions of the DDCI from the community-
wide functions which the recommended office must perform if the
DCI is to execute effectively his principal mission as assigned in
the President's Directive of January 16, 1962. Mr. Coyne believes
14-0000
that if the office is established along the lines recommended above,
it will be incapable of effectively assisting the DCI in performing
his principal Presidentially-assigned responsibilities of (a)
coordinating and effectively guiding the total U. S. foreign intelli-
" gence effort; (b) establishing necessary policies and procedures to
assure adequate coordination of foreign intelligence activities at all
levels; (c) maintaining a continuing review, with the heads of the
Departments and Agencies concerned, of the programs and activities
of all U. S. agencies engaged in foreign intelligence activities; and
’ (d) assuring efficiency and effectiveness, and avoiding undesirable
duplication in the total foreign intelligence effort. Mr. Coyne will
4
submit his recommendations on this subject at a later date. :!
Princeton Consultants to ONE
‘Mr. Coyne recommends that.this group be disbanded based on
advice from principal concerned officers of the Agency that the group
makee no contribution to the intelligence estimating effort. The other
members feel that on balance the group should be continued.
National Photographic Interpretation Center
We are concerned about the capability of NPIC to handle what
may be a greatly increased volume of work in coming months. We
~25-
14-0000
recommend that as a matter of priority the USIB have this matter
reviewed and insure that any increased flow of raw material does
not result in slowing down the prompt and complete processing'so
urgently required.
Caliber of Personnel
We believe that the DD/I should devote some considerable:
effort to improving the caliber of personnel in his offices. Although
we did not make a study in depth, we believe that there is a serious
_ problem in this regard in OCI and that steps should be taken under
the new management of OCI to improve the caliber of supervisory
personnel and thus improve the morale of that office.
Merger of ONE and oc!
We studied at some length the feasibility of merging the Office
of National Estimates with the Office of Current Intelligence. We
found the Office of Current Intelligence eager for a merger, the
Office of National Estimates strongly opposed. The DD/I was inclined
to favor it, but foresees certain personnel difficulties. We do not
believe that such a merger would be wise unless it was well esta-
blished that the result would be the creation of better national estimates
and current intelligence dailies and weeklies. The DD/I feels that
14-0000
he should be given at least sixty days to explore this proposal and
to prepare hia recommendations. We concur,
Mr. Coyne does not agree with the above paragraph and in lieu
thereof recommends that the ONE and OCI be merged now. He
believes that such merger will result in improved intelligence
products to support the national policy makers. !
Preparation and Dissemination of Memoranda
We have noted considerable unhappiness in the Department of
State because ONE and OCI have established the practice of distri-
buting throughout the community, and to the White House, uncoordinated
memoranda on intelligence matters. These memoranda are prepared
as “think pieces", but the Department of Siate feels that they often
seem to influence policy at high levels. We think the Department
of State has a point, and we urge‘that such memoranda be carefully
restricted to circulation within the Agency unless or until they have
been coordinated across-the-board,
‘We also urge that the DCI adopt the practice of asking other
“agencies to prepare such memoranda if the subjects fall within the
purview of their responsibilities; e. g-, the Department of State on
strictly political matters. We believe that, at a minimum, when
CIA is asked for a memorandum that inquiries should be made of
-
14-0000
other departments to determine whether such a memorandum hasn't
already been prepared or might be in the process of preparation,
White House Relations
We are concerned about Agency relationships with the White
House insofar as handling of intelligence matters is concerned. We
would like the opportunity to discuss this with you orally before
framing recommendations.
Research on International Communism
OT MUI ST
We are concerned about the reported inadequacy of research
done on International Communism. At the present time some is
done in the DD/I area in both OCI and ONE, some is done in the DD/P
area in the International Communism Division of the Counter Intelli-
gence Staff, and some is done in the State Department in the Special
«.
Studies Group of INR. The DD/I expressed himself as believing
this was sufficiently covered. The Chief, CI Staff believea it is
insufficiently covered, Representatives of the Department of State |
urged that greater expertise be brought to bear on the subject.
Inasmuch as it will fall squarely on the shoulders of the DCIif not
enough is being done, we urge that the matter be reviewed by the DCI
at an early date to satisfy himself that all necessary research in this
field 1a ‘being accomplished.
- 28 «
14-0000
Office of Scientific Intelligence
On the new chart we have shown OSI as a division under DD/R
since we understand this to be‘ your desire. We feel, however, that
OSI in its major activities is more closely linked to DD/I than ta
DD/R and therefore more properly belengs under DD/I, DD/I himself
‘strongly supporte this view and urges that he retain OSI. We believe
that if this is approved, scientists in OSI should be members of DD/R's
career service, subject to transfer between OSI and units of DD/R as
might be agreed between the deputy directors concerned.
DD/R's Operational Responsibilities
We have some concern relative to your intention to have DD/R
carry into the operational phase his responsibility for certain major
projects involving complex and coordinated operations which are
highly sensitive and where a mis;step could have serious national
or international repercussions. DD/R's key people will be mostly
scientists, technological experts or leaders in specialized develop-
ment fields, Such individuals on the average have no professional
intelligence operating experience and little background or interest
in detailed operational problems requiring thorough inter-agency
coordination, painstaking and tedious follow-up actions and careful
attention to security details. DD/P, on the other hand, has a number
°
14-0000 -
of top-flight people who for some years have dealt almost exclusively
with just such problerns,
We recognize all the difficulty, in the course of a project of this
type, of shifting responsibility from one deputy to the other; and we
realize that development must also lap over into the operational
phase. We suggest having as a general rule (but granting that excep-
tions will arise) that when operation begins the responsibility for the
operations should be the DD/P's, but that DD/R should retain his
responsibility for seeing that the equipment he haa developed continues
to function properly. There is here attached a specially classified
annex, “e
“
ORGANIZATION AND ACTIVITIES OF THE
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY
National Indications Center - ‘Vatch Committee
sational maications Center - w/atcn Gommittes
We have examined quite carefully the National Indications
Center, ita organization, its capacity to support fully the Watch
Committee, and its relations with other departments and agencies,
We note that opinions within the community concerning NIC and its
functions vary widely ~~ from the feeling that it should be abolished,
or combined with DIA indications center -= to the belief that it is
entirely satisfactory in its present situation. We do not fully sub-
scribe to either of these views, ‘
The functions of the Watch Committee, and NIC, with their
terms of reference, were developed prior to the time when DIA was
created, Now DIA has developed‘a strong capability to provide both
early warning and indications of approaching crises to the community.
Its capacity in thia regard will develop even further in the months
ahead,
We are aware that USIB is now considering the Fitch Committee
Report. But we doubt that few if any members of that Committee
were intimately aware of the full capacity of DIA and of its future
plans. We note that General Carroll was reluctant to be drawn into
the Committee's deliberations,
14-0000
We recommend, therefore, that except as noted below, NIC
operations be allowed to continue as they are for the next three or
four months, At that time we recommend a thorough review of the
Watch Committee and NIC operations, particularly in the light of
DIA's capabilities and activities, with a view to redefining the
responsibilities and functions of NIC as may then appear desirable.
Mr. Coyne disagrees and recommends that the NIC be abolished
now, and that the DIA be assigned the national: strategic warning
function and that its personnel complement be enlarged to include
representation from appropriate members of USIB. Mr. Coyne
points to reasons outlined in his memorandum to the DCI dated
February 5, 1962.
We do believe that the National Indications Center should be
properly manned and should receive both the high caliber of pere-
sonnel at the proper grade and the number of personnel to perform
its function promptly and efficiently. In this connection the Depart-
ment of State has no representatives at NIC at present and the DCI
should ask the Secretary to remedy this situation immediately.
We would suggest a change in the present method of preparing
the Watch Committee report. If NIC is adequately manned, we see
no reason why it should not draft, 24 hours in advance, the weekly
- 32-6
14-0000
sehtr
_ Watch Committee report, circulate it to all agencies for considera- -
tion prior to discussion at the Watch Committee meeting when it
could be decided upon in final form and reproduced and dis seminated.
Related to the Watch Committee -- but also an important aspect
of all coordinated intelligence community reports -- we believe that
substantive disagreements should be encouraged and even spelled
out in Watch Committee reports; that NIEs and SNiEs rather than
being suppressed or covered by watered down language as is some-
times the case today, in all cases should reflect the consensus of.
views of the intelligence community. If there are differing minority
views on the part of one or more agencies, including CIA, these
should be spelled out in appropriate footustes.
CIA Relations with the Department of State
ao.
. We examined the relations of CIA with the Department of State.
’ Several matters of concern in this area are mentioned in the section
on the DD/P, We would note that "covering" for the Agency poses
certain problema for the Department in its relations with the Congress.
These include such items that attract Congressional interest as: .
the number of officers in each Embassy, particularly the political
section; the designation of CIA officers asL 2%); the CIA role in
-~ 33 -
14-0000
handling State communications, etc. In these areas we recommend
close liaison be maintained with State on Congressional matters and
that whenever possible State be given a helping hand with the appro- |
priate Congressional committees on these matters. |
We are particularly concerned that the c 2 ¢ 2 designa-
tions of CIA personnel C 24 J, particularly c ae are go
revealing, We recommend that the Agency arrange with State to
- Cb - « 24 . aq designations.
The Department of State indicated concern about the level in
CIA on which Comint policy matters are handled, and also. noted that |
on occasions there appears to be lack of coordination within CIA on
Comint policy matters. This factor is one. of the reasons why we
recommend raising the level of Sigint policy matters to the Assistant —
_ to the DCI for Coordination and Intelligence Community Guidance.
State's Counter Communism Office
ee One Vitice
We reviewed with some interest the proposed creation in the
office of the Deputy Under Secretary for Political Affairs of the
Department of State of a strategy group for combatting communism. .
While the full scope of its function is as yet unclear, wa believe that -
CIA should follow the developments in thia office closely as its
activities will have considerable bearing on the work of the Agency.
14-0000
State's Overational Center
We reviewed with some interest the embryonic operational
center which the Department of State is developing. We found that
this is an interesting development and would obviously have bearing
‘on the intelligence community,
State at White House Briefings
We recommend that in accordance with the present practice of
a representative of the Defense Intelligence Agency attending the
briefings of the White House staff by CIA, that a representative of
the Department of State also be invited to attend these meetings.
a
Receipt of Top Classification Messages
We recommend that the DCI take up directly with the President
the preblem of receiving all Pertinent measagea dealing with foreign
affairs which might have any bearing on intelligence estimates or
reports, or on covert operations, We have particularly in mind
such communications as between the President and Khrushchev, etc.
We believe that it is important for the DCI to see such messages in
order to give proper guidance to the intelligence and operational
activities of the Agency.
14-0000
4
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
April 3, 1962
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr, Lyman B, Kirkpatrick
Inspector General
Central Intelligence Agency
In the course of our discussions aS members of Mr, McCone'gs
Working Group on Intelligence and in our March 28 meeting with
Messrs, McCone and Carter, fr indicateg that I did not concur
in the "Coordination" Section of the draft report which we
discussed with the pcr and the DDcr,
In line with the foregoing, it would be appreciateg ir
you would;
1) Amend the Second sentence of the Section to reaq:
"With the exception of Mr, Coyne, we are fully in accord,”
- 2) Add at the end of the Section a new Paragraph
' reading ag follows:
"Mr, Coyne does not concur in this recommenda
tion. He disagrees with (a) the Proposed
organizational Placement and title of the recommended
of (a) coordinating and effectively Guiding the total
U. S. foreign intelligence effort; (b) establishing
necessary Policies and Procedures: to assure adequate
coordination of foreign intelligence activities at
all levels; (c} maintaining a continuing review,
14-0000
w
"with the heads of the Departments and Agencies
concerned, of the programs and activities of all
U. S. agencies engaged in foreign intelligence
activities; and (da) assuring efficiency and
effectiveness, and avoiding undesirable duplication
in the total foreign intelligence effort, e
Coyne will submit his recommendations on this
subject at a later date,"
I would appreciate receiving a copy of the revised report
of the Working Group at your earliest convenience,
$ PIL
J. Patrick Coyne
14-0000
f-.
y
4 oS
\
, anetednan ahem
uo
| a
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence
SUBJECT: After Action Report on the Findings |
of the Working Group
This is with reference to the memorandum of 6 April
1962 which presented you with the final report of the Working
Group which you established in January to consult and advise
on the organization and activities of the Central Intelligence
Agency. This report indicates the action which has been
taken on the findings of the Working Group, and if no action
has been taken the reasons therefor. The comments here
are in the same order as they appeared in the report of the
Working Group.
(ligne) Lo son B, Mistouciciek
Lyman B. Kirkpatrick
Executive Director
‘Attachment
cc: DpCcI
LBK:jre: Retyped gmk (23 Oct. 62)
Distribution:
Orig - Addressee w/att
1 ~ DDCI w/att
1- Exec. Dir. w/att
Lan
APPROVED FOR RELEASE 1983. ee Ord
" GIARISTORICAL REVIEW PROGRAM: © 2? Cctober 1962 AAS .
: me oo _ a Of DT
14-00000 . . —_—aT-s
. . : CT:
Metis y
Re ee ed
Operational Aids Unit
oa es Vnit
This recommendation was rendered inapplicable in view ‘of the
decision not to transfer TSD to DD/R.
Deputy Chief for British Commonwealth Affairs, Western European
Division
As recommended, this position has been created and is now
occupied by Mr. John Caswell; A review will shortly bs made to
determine the degree of control that this unit has over Liaison, |
War Plans
As recommended, the DDCI is giving full support to the War
Plans Group, and is assisted in this effort by the Executive Director.
Police Programs
a : As recommended, CIA is giving the police program greater
4 support. An Agency Officer heads the police program in AID, and
: _he has been provided an Executive Officer by the Agency. Project
. (ENDOMORPH)will be transferred to the GI Staff. .
. Liaison with the Department of State -
ber tment of state
The DD/P has centralized the control of liaison with the Depart-
ment of State and careful records are now maintained of all discussions.
Advice to State on Black Propaganda
The Chief, CA Staff, is now charged with advising State, and
other departments where appropriate, of any black Propaganda activi-
ties that might be misinterpreted by the U.S. Government if they were
-presumed to be legitimately the statement of another government. .
CLA Personnel Under State Cover
EE tat Cover
The DD/P is making a thorough review of State cover directed
toward insuring that CIA personnel are not out of line in their various
allowances with their State Department colleagues.
14-0000
Ra uisiedh
aetna teat ens ee
Assistant to DD/P for Paramilitary and Air Support Operations ‘
We recommend the creation of an office in the DD/P to be
known as Paramilitary and /ir Support Operations, under the
direction of an Assistant DD/P, to develop the capability for covert
paramilitary and air support operations. We suggest that the bulk
of this new organization be located at Isolation where it will have
facilities for organization and training. Sucha move will also relieve
the burden on the headquarters building. We recommend that the
individual to head this organization be drawn from military service
and be a senior Colonel ora Brigadier General with wartime para-
military experience. Having in mind the total disestablishment of
the DPD i in its Present form, we recommend that the Air Support
Branch of DPD be transferred to the new Paramilitary Office of DD/P.
Domestic Division - a.
We endorse the proposal to create a Domestic Division, We |
strongly urge that the new Domestic Division utilize the Contact
Division of OO, which is to be transferred. from the DD/I to the DvP,
as the nucleus for field worl in the United States. We also believe
that this Domestic Division should take over those functions of the
Cover and Commercial Staff presently carried out by the Commercial.
Group, plus all those activities of the Cover Division which involve
14-0000 : Wiaste ities
| all matters involving liaison with the Britieh or with Canadian) ,
| Australian and New Zealand intelligence ‘services except matters)
o “concerned with, Sigint and Comsee, Further, this officer should
have full control authority o over fiaison exchange of information 3
ee)
7 : with ‘the British and the above mentioned Commonwealth services, /
eet ee
and all other components of the Agency, including the DD/I,should
keep this officer advised ona daily basis ‘of liaison relations ¥ with a
\ the Britiah services!
War Plans
Because of the vital importance of war plans to the Agency's 8
relations to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, we recommend that the War
‘Plane Group receive direct support from the DDCI, even though it
should remain organizationally as apart of the Central Support Staff
ofthe DD/P. *
a
Police Prog rams
WwW ¢ are convinced that United States Government support to
the police in friendly nations can provide great benefits to the
United States and that some of these benefits will assist CIA in its
_work,. The President has recently indicated to AID that he wishes
«
this program to receive strong support. We believe that CIA should
14-0000 wouasi tie 3
give it greater support than it has previously received. We recom- _
mend that the police group in the CI Staff receive such augmentation
as is necessary, and that Project ENDOMORPH (police training
om
a
‘school)’be transferred from the NE Division to the CI Staff.
1
|
|
|
|
|
| Liaison swith Department of state . | — 7
We urge that the DD/ P centralize liaison with the Department.
| of State and maintain careful records of all discussions between the |
Agency and State Department officials. We note that nearly every.
area division chief has a weekly meeting with his counterpart in the
Department but that under the present system there is no organized
’ method for keeping the central management of the DD/P informed
an ‘of what takes place at these meetings, . .
coe a Advice to State on Black Propacanda
waka oy ee
a
We recommend that the DD/P develop procedures which will
insure that other appropriate agencies of the government (Department
of State,” Defense, White House and USIA) are kept appropriately
informed of black propaganda activities which otherwisé might be
misunderstood and believed to be legitimately the views of a foreign
power. We have in mind our discussions with the Department which
heard expressed concern that ‘the Department was unaware of certain :
black propaganda activities relating to Communist China and conse-
quently was led astray,
14-0000
ee rs ry eee ate
CIA Personnel Under State Cover
We recommend that CIA personnel under the Department of
State cover make greater efforts to truly live their cover. We believe
in this connection that the DCI should receive assurances from the
: DD/P, after proper study, that CIA allowances for rents, servants
and entertainment are in line with comparable State Department |
allowances. |
"Legitimate" Foreign Service! Cover
. We recommend that the Agency more and more place people
under F Foreign | Service cover by the’ “Legitimate” method of recruiting
individuals, having them take and j pass the Foreifa Service. exams |
and be gommissioned in the F oreign Service and follow through a
‘normal ‘Foreign Service/career, CIA should obviously keep the ?
Department jadvised concerning these individuals, work with the y
\ Department) on their assignments which will be mutually beneficial,
" and covertly train them. By this method such individuals will be
under true: Foreign Service’cover and will not only be unknown to
other intelligence services, but also to their colleagues in'the
\ Foreign Service, /
-~14.
war » i
OL GAEL
armen emnemeeeeeenmnenermernunnenenenrrirececeementemr mT
14-0000
Sbbitéi
_ Watch Committee report, circulate it to all agencies for considera- —
tion prior to discussion at the Watch Committee meeting when it
could be decided upon in final form and reproduced and disseminated. ,
_ Related to the Watch Committee -- but also an important aspect
of all coordinated intelligence community reports -- we believe that
substantive disagreements should be encouraged and even spelled
‘out in Watch Committee reports; that NIEs and SNIEs rather than
being suppressed or covered by watered down language as is ‘some-
times the case today, in all cases should reflect the consensus of
views of the intelligence community. lf there are differing minority
views on the part of one or more agencies, including CLA, these .
Bhould be spelled out in appropriate footnotes.
CIA Relations with the ¢ Department of State
_ We examined the relations of CIA with the Department of State.
, Several matters of c concern in this area are mentioned in the section
on the DD/P. We would note that "covering" for the Agency poséa
certain problema for the Department in its relations with the Congress. °
These include such items that attract Congressional interest as: |
the number of officers in each Embassy, particularly the political
section; the designation of CIA offi icera as(FSRa; the CIA role in
~ 33 ~
SECRET
14-0000
SLUR
handling State communications, etc. In these areas we recommend
close liaison be maintained with State on Congressional matters and
that whenever possible State be given a helping hand with the appro-
priate Congressional committees on. these matters.
We are particularly concerned that the Foreign Service designa-
tions of CIA personnel funder § State | cover’ » particularly ESR, are 20
: revealing. We recommend that the Ageney arrange with State to.
vee
“cover CIA personnel equally with FSS and FSOsde signations,
The Department of State indicated concern about the level in
CIA on which Comint policy matters are handled, and also noted that |
on occasions there appears to be lack of coordination within CLA on
Comint policy matters. This factor is one of the reasons why we
recommend raising the level of Sigint policy matters to the Assistant
_ to the DCI for Coordination and Tptelligence Community Guidance. .-
State's Counter Communism Office -
' We reviewed. with some interest the proposed creation in the
' office of the Deputy Under Secretary 3 for Political Affairs of the
Department of State ofa strategy group for combatting communism.
While the full scope of its function i is as yet unclear, we believe that
CIA should follow the developments in thie office closely aa its
activities will have considerable bearing on the work of the Agency.
. - 34 -
~
us
Cren
|
104-10119-10040.pdf | 14-00000
104-10119-10040),
a, a
.| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
22 November 1968
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Security
SUBJECT : Herbert Itkin/Mario Brod et.al.
l. Reference is made to your instructions concerning this
case and my attached memorandum concerning research on whether af
or not Itkin was ever, in fact, utilized by this Agency prior to his
contacts with Brod. ,
2. All available sources in the Agency reflect no record of
Itkin or of Philip Harbin, who was allegedly his case officer. Harbin
has been checked both as a true name and as an alias. Although the
name is not registered in the Agency, this of course does not mean
that some Agency representative did not make this up and use it
without telling anyone.
3. My visceral reaction is that Itkin is lying about his
contacts with Mr. Dulles and Philip Harbin. However, since there
appears to be a possibility of an extreme "flap" if Itkin gives the same
story to the.-newspapers that he gave to Mr. Houston, I would recommend
that, with the concurrence of Mr. Helms, Mr. Dulles be interviewed and
asked if he remembers anything about this case. es
ms
4. LIalso spoke with Harry Mason, x5231, in Finance who
handles OS budgetary matters and is a personal acquaintance, Without
giving him any names I asked him if it would be possible to track down
the receipt that Itkin claims he gave Harbin for the $5000.00. Harry
says if the case was handled properly and the account is still outstanding
it will be fairly easy to find the receipt. I have done nothing further on
this, pending your instructions.
Ward K. eene
SA/EPD
Attachment
RETURN To CHA
Background (las - 4
* Do Net Foor. :
". 22 November 1968
ITKIN, Herbert |
Subject States:
When he was first admitted to the bar in 1953
he was employed by the firm of Delson, Levin & Gordon
in New York City. (Now Delson and Gordon.) Itkin
alleges that one partner, Levin, had close ties with
Alger Hiss, Cyrus Eaton and other of similar persuasion.
Because of the viewpoint of the law firm, Subject states
that he began passing information to Senator Joseph
McCarthy. However, in the Spring of 1954, Senator
McCarthy told Itkin that he was getting into trouble and
allegedly reported that he had passed Itkin's reports to
CIA, Itkin then states that a meeting was set up for
him either in June/July/or August of 1954 with Mr. Allen
Dulles. This meeting was at the Bellewe Stratford in
Philadelphia. His contact was reportedly a man known
as Philip Harbin.
At this time, Itkin says he was able to report on
matters affecting U Nu, then the Premier of Burma, the
Indonesian Foreign Minister; and the owner or editor
of the New Delhi Times. Itkin also claims to have had
personal contacts with Luis Gutierrez, Consul General
of El Salvador, and with a number of other people who
had Guatemalan contacts. Itkin says the only money he
received from Harbin was $5,000.00, which was supposed
to be repayable and for which he gave a receipt, he believes
sometime in 1957. He said the money was notsrepaid.
Itkin states that he met Mario Brod in 1961 and
that Brod was represented to him as a former Colonel
in the OSS who had intelligence connections. From then
on his contact was Brod and apparently Harbin dropped
out of the picture.
"EM
No record of Herbert Itkin in Office of Security
records, other than newspaper clippings.
No record of Herbert Itkin in RI files.
No record of Philip Harbin in Office of Security.
No record of Philip Harbin as a DCS alias.
No record of Philip Harbin in OS pseudo files.
No record of Philip Harbin as either a pseudo or
a registered alias in RI/CRYPTO.
No record of Philip Harbin in RI files.
The {lle of Mario Brod reflects no information concerning his
contacts with Herbert Itkin and reflects no information concerning a
Philip Harbin.
During Itkin's meeting with Mr. Houston he mentioned that the
law firm had a negro lawyer named Thomas L. Roberts, #193026, who
had very useful contacts with the United Nations. Itkin stated that
Roberts was a very presentable and intelligent negro who left the firm
and now had a law practice in Dakar.
The Office of Security file concerning Roberts reflects'that:
a6
‘. Mr. Roberts lis a current employee of this Agency
under deep cover in Dakar} In January of 1968 Roberts
furnished this Office with an extensive summary of his
past association with Herbert Itkin. He also mentioned
that he and Itken had associated with Mario Brod at a dinner
party in 1965 and had had lunch with Brod in 1967. There is
no indication, however, that Roberts is aware of any use of
Itken as a CIA informant during the 1950's.
cman
+ ~~ — ele
EYCS ONLY
|
104-10119-10182.pdf | 104-10119-10182 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
= rT —_
re
lobe lle
16 February 1970
: Director of Security
: Comments on Manuscript Give Us This Day;
CIA and the Bay of Figs Invasion by Edward J.
Hamilton
‘This mmanuecript has ‘evidently been kicking around in publishing
circles since at least mid-1968, presumably without CJA clearance.
William Buckley of the National Review seems to have been "shopping” it
at one point, One publisher rejected it as too "controversial", and noted .
its. confidential’ nature as well as its potential for libel suits.
2. in the foreword to this manuscript, the author (whom I shall
under his assumed name of Hamilton), describes the book as a
al account" of CIA's role in the Bay of Pigs affair in which he was
: ¢-CIA participant for 19 months. He notes in the foreword his hope
that somsone would have written this book so that he would not have to do
it; now convinced that, if he does not write it, it will never be written,
_he has taken up his pen "reluctantly and in a mood of nostalgic bitterness."
Hamilton. states that he has used no official files or documents and has:
ted no one in preparing this work. Where true names are used in
ke rnanuscript for CIA personnel, he writes that they have been publicly
entified before, and in this contention I believe that he is correct, with
possible exception offdim’ Roe i] The author's claim that this book
would provide no information not known to Castro's intelligence service,
or that details this late are of no value to the opposition,iz, in my view,
seriously open to question.
3. The book is, in general,favorable to CIA actions in the Bay of
The villains of the piece are certain liberal figures in the Kennedy
inistration (Schlesinger, Goodwin, Stevenson) and to some extent, -
F resident himself. In his concluding chapter, the author's bitterness
is Undisguised against those in the Administration and the presa who took
the opportunity of the Bay of Pigs incident to attack and denigrate CIA,
4, Messrs.:: -Biesell ‘and Barnes and the author's other CIA co-
workers in the Cuban Project, by and large, are given quite favorable
reatment. One exception is General Cabell, whom the author excoriates,
and it is apparent that Hamilton's opinion of Jerry Droller is far from
, bene "_ RETURN TO CIA “
noc ee Background es Only
buck i Do Not Reprodued ee)
Ca
rij
tie
_ . _. Bide. Ha ee
14-0000
~ sor ~
nt is apparent that Hazollton feels - very deeply about the Bay of ;,
P gs and its aftermath, to the extent that he‘is willing to put his caree
som the Hae by circulating this manuscript to several publishers without.”
“apparent clearance or suthorisation.: [He has utilised as his nom de plo
' aie assigned tohim in the project for dealing with the: Cubaa‘
= at wopld aot take anyone who was s involved in the Cuban. Project
hated Narnia cn CIA cocexiey.. ‘This analysis states -
what the author states, whether right or wrong. “Where. Thave occasion:
=e y added comments of my own: thoy are tn brackets (J.
As noted above
“Distribution 0 2 w/att. |
Origk 2 - DI SernBAY et
eee Aol
1400000
po _ YES ad
if
~ a
- a othe ghapter opens , in 1986. in Ambassador Garduex's “éttice. fa Havane,
Ww re © courtesy call was being paid on the Ambassador by the CIA Central:
_, dmericanand Caribbean. Chiefs of Station who are holding their annual regional. "
“7 amnocting,s “Reis noted that one of the reasons for selecting the place of meeting.
< =2re the: “absonce’ Y f Comnraunist embassies” (pe 8. The presence. of Col. ait
4 ly invelved”. ‘4nthe Bogotaso,: setting the stage for Harailton's subse-
‘ ¢ comment. © [Actually Castro played a junior role'in the Bogotaze, and
at wan after the Bay of Pigs that. Mz, Dalles assigned Hamilton the tak, of
determining ‘Castea'g-role in the ‘Bogotazo. } {p- 7)..: Hamilton states that:
‘subsequent: three-years, ‘while while ‘funds ‘wore being ‘eellected in South America
fot Castro's, 26th ‘of July Movement, there were no orders: ‘from ‘GIA. ‘Head-
zters to penetrate pre-Castro groups abroad (p.°10).” He then states: ‘that
‘jn March 1960 he was “having coffee with the nowly-elected president of the
gentry to which Iwas assigned.” (p.10) {This could reveal the author's -
me President ident Hardon al sf teeemeymne became President in.
ch 1960) |
2. Mr. ‘Richard ‘Bissell and: ‘Ms. ‘Tracy Barnes are » mentioned and
‘the author adds that he had worked with ‘Barnes as a member of the team ~ _
7 pusted President Arden: from Guatemala {p. 11); At this point] Hamilton
ocalled to Headquarters to become ‘Chief.af Political Action in.an! 3...
on «approved project to assist ‘Caban exiles in overthrowing ‘Castro. ~
duties would include organising Cuban leaders into 6. ‘government-in-. -
which would form a provisional government in Cuba when Castro was
cod out. ‘Samilten's base was to be in'Cesta Rica, provided ex-President °:
“‘Figueres. could obtain Costa Rican agreement (p-21).-' [This ‘link could |
in wiew of Figuares' xpcent re-election » as a Presigent,
co Pit Mt this. ‘point the manuscript. introduces the Project Chief a Joke.
joumably Mr.: “Esterline}, who is referred to as Jake throughout (p.. 12).
also meet Droller about whom there is some “diversity in attitudes”
ong CIA officers. Droller's operational name of Frank Bender is noted (p13),
‘and he is referred to as Bender throughout the rest of the manuscript. | {This
is not the first time Droller has been identified as. Bender; his mame was =.
gown by Arthur Schlesinger in his book A_ Thousand Days in 1965.}- ‘Bender's => .-
, “cover telephone ‘arrangements in Miami and New York, which allowed him to
answer local calls there at his Washington desk, are disclosed {p. 14). °
Fnmiltn etaton hat Bender tld lm cat ae fara he bnww “Richard Hales Bo:
‘the “Gandeatine’ ‘Services, had not been cut in™.{p. Mes us,
a cr"
mo ° iro Oat
3 3 EVES Gilt
1400000
| chapter
- that he viait Havana, and that the CIA Cover Staff provided him with the docu-
mentation for his operational alies of Edward J. Hamilton which he kept for
duration of the Project (p. 23). Upon returning from Havana, ‘Hasmilton |
da report and recommendaticas., ‘Phe first recommendation was that
Strobe assassinated before oF coincident with the invasion.’ Mamiltos coa-
dered this his principal secommendstion, ‘but Barnes would oaly tell him |
ok subscqutntly that it was in the bands ‘of a “special group.” ° ‘86 fer as Hazailton
~ wes pole to determine,’ -mo plan was ever developed within "GIA to assassinate
& i p. 130: [These comineate would be-ustortansts if published:
7 ject for the Vice President. “Slamilton states that Cashman advised him that
_.. Nixon “as Chairman [sic] of the National Security Council, wae the real |
- ‘Sams ping tend thn proce” tte Aminietrion's fol peat and troubles
: ahooter regarding it. © “The General gave Hamilton his private telephone =. ,
‘in the event that he had something for the Vice President's urgent |
SEQET
14-0000
3Mamiltos tells. of visitiag Project |
ables, noting the building's Gisguise us an-slectronics firm for cover pur-*
es {p. 39), as well as ‘CIA subsidies to Cubsn exils ‘groups and newspapers.
7 Project, -
ates Sat thn py Aen eres rere ote Toe a fud
idiosyncrasion, ‘as well ne gonne macoeat of those wholwoilé not join.
14-0000
Qupter Th (commencing at page. “5. This is a second Chapter I end,
i
} -
i ‘le
i
atiempt tot having fafled, it
d to set them up in Mexico City, to which Hamilten-aad his /
“yepaived. Hamilton's office was to be independent ‘the Station}
Se at Ns Sac Sstsneesed bam Be principal manage ;
Se ee eee eee nee ote Unpeseitie to ealaia
Toms children = he should be living under an assumed same in
ee eee
14-0000 ww .
ri
a
ce
. im
me
“one of the world's most experienced
hs U. 8, citisenship.{p. 59). CIA fasiding of tha Frente thr
: came to the attention of the der including:s
a
as
PAL *
14-0000
7 BYES UikY ©
pn.
: efforts inte Cuba, tha roll-up
Mand tae pone secnrd fr livering supplies to those’:
* gotten inte ‘Cuba... “Maritime operations :
ES OLY ~
Be: “te me: ‘chapter Hamiltca levels some eritictom at Ambasasder
Bonsal, ‘whom he. describes as § tneftectual a sal whoea tie calls "famsiling ©”
OB
Moet'3 ervivil at ae Miami Base,
| lowing the seve 5 >. gelations with Gaba, as “unwelcome”, |
Decause he felt him tobe “basically either soft on Communism or st least -
ferribly confused about the issues" {p.96). Hamilton offers his criticiem ~
of Manuel (Manolo] Ray becense the latter had stayed wit ‘Castro too long -
~ HBG ~
_ 9-
es 3 1 * ‘salates Hamatiton's touchy visit, ith scat iraamaibora’’ om
ee the Fronte; ete rcmcha training bases, Their breakfast conversa-‘«
* - tions-with President ‘Ydigoras are described. .This breakfast wives the author
_. ) g chance'to reflect back on the CIA role in the overthrow of Guatemalan. - +
‘ » President Arbens: He recalls the three exiled leaders of Guatemala, his
@wm support for Dr. Cordova to head the new government, and State's veto .
-of Col. Ydigoras:as “vaguely authoritarian.” At a crocial moment, howeves, -
“Dr. Cordova had te undergo cancer surgery. and therefore could not be salectad;
| wthe-cholce fell.on Castillo Armas. Now Ydigores. was Piesident but was sub-
Sen Saree et
m Taigeres. ‘(Davis’ name hes been peullshed Jat
i “ghee Guatessaian trataing site, Hamilton refers to being greeted
there by an American Army Lt. Colonel whose name was “Freank."“ Ina:
footnote, Hanillton adds that this cfficer had been detailed to CIA for the”
“Project;-and that “Credible allegations of his actions during the invasion |
strongly suggest that he-was to some extent mentally uabalanced” (p.. 124).
conversations between Hamiltoa and “Frank”, ‘as well as the initial
‘unfortunate polemics of Frente-chiol Tony Varona, are described. “hon
. “The presence “od Greci Berete to help in the training of fee a
; ‘Brignée is-noted,: Coleone] Lake’ presence end | parachute fraining 12 is. ania Bae
": mentionsd (pp. 155-138), se -
t ba
14-0000
SRG ay Tracy Barees ‘Hamilton se peliskangee al
_ tone whexe the Jatter is working'oa his famous White Payer on Gaba {p..15D,°
po “was there that Hamilton learned that Secretary of State Rusk had-veto!d the “”
Pe _, exiginal point-of davasion as toc “noisy.
os mesting and asks Baraes if everything was going wall, \ Hamilton interprets
miosting Sod nh ae i er err ankarender hove dhsot tot erveaion plas
_Which the latter had subsequently denied. ““Marailtos‘alse mentions the fact.
: of bles Setefing of Stevendion bales rethe
14-00000
ays ORLY
- i - .
a ‘Hamilton states that. the: Joint Gilets of ‘Staff assessment team.
- ayhsited:the Guatemalan eamps and issued an enthusiastic appraissl as to
the: Brigads's ‘training and battle readiness. {p.'160). The wuthor notes,
‘ahat. this was important in. the. Mae of Post-tavasion attempts |
“Gua footaate, ‘Hiamfiton writes that * afier the invasion. ‘Ponder.
proce by Oe racer the exiles referred to'him: freely, and ‘useall
Latte 5 ee ee «Hamilton ‘also adds that he ‘learned: that
; Noadanat Gel.: King’s crony", were becoming increasing!
‘active ‘among non-Frente Cubans in ‘Washington and New York. tp. 163). :
“ital presumably out ‘across Hamilton's political action Mnea:} ° rr a
- 3. ~The remainder ofthe chapter is largely taken up’ with dlacassions
of iotra-Frenté. ‘problems, with a note of the fact that American infiltre-"
‘ton. operations | into’ ‘Gabe had virtually conned because: ‘of theis lack call
tee tuted
“ ‘Sen
oS gy 2
QATD
1400000
to. ceding with, Misael, Backes, Jake, Bontse end(Sa:
qattitt the whise Howse canted a broader base in the Previn; and, ;
how important tt waa te the ‘White House to bring Manolo Ray into't picture. -
Hemlton potted ot rie ee Car eiitjanaleated that Ray wetace Da be
c se retans ve hare tent
Gato
14-0000
cos gy Hy
on ~ tion to obtain a re-fusling stop an the sewing to neces Mee ce ee aaca
_ -to'bomb Cuba failed because: of the a venality of» vines ths force: officer,
. 3. With. 5 eogard to the selection of the Bay of Pigs » landing site, aE
oS - Hamilton states that. assault plans were almost entirely in the hands of the .
_ “Pentagon{p. 205). “Relations. with Lem Jones! pele yelations fire ja -
ar “GEA project afficer is flown to the: , Carries’ Boxer, ‘agehip of
a naval task force that was assémbled in Puerto Rican waters.. ‘This -.-
. officer was to serve as lisisca between the naval task force ‘commander...
14-0000
voy 7 psa
and ‘Barnes and Hamilton draft a mesange to Stevenson. “When Stevenson.
"received it‘and was advised of the true nature of the planes, Hamilton’
: * Socal ceod ac ame wt se ‘be .chacked out ‘with
“ Seeretary Bask. athe meantime, the second .atrike was beld up (p. 235).
Cabell and Bissell west to meet Rusk at State.
14-0000
8 bs only
ve AB
_ Chapter XiUl (commencing op. a8)
L ‘The tenor of seravke in this chapter aud in the zonctasion of the
__ previous chapter is that the meeting with Rusk included the President, —
"- Restow, and Stevenson. “[Other authoritative accounts have included aly”
Rusk, Cabell and Bissell; Tracy Barnes has said he also was preseat.:.3t
is believed that the President was not at the meeting but was contacted by
‘Rusk on the telephone at his Visginia home. There is no other indicatl:
other thas ‘Hamilton's allegation,’t that ‘Walt Rostow was Present] "{p.2i9).
a
Bibi
7 ns iS AY
14-0000
This chapter desc
fpead, “These jeta from the Boxer were allowed a reconnaissance run. gt
| + over.the beach {p. 222), Finally the President avthorised.an hour's alr .
. eieukat dowa before beapragaeend was fone’ OP ee Brigade’ ‘B-26's
1400000
Hanudltca is highly critical of the post-invas
| attacks om CIA by Adminiatration officials and the press.. Hamilton
_;the President's establishment of the Taylor. Comtaltise 10 look into tha
' canses Of-the failure and states his conclusion that the Committee was
“whitewash the New Frontier by heaping guilt on CIA” (p, 234):
|
104-10119-10183.pdf | "04 10119- 10183
y | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
anes” WOES - 2 i @ .
Gaynt ae ae “<@ , | /) @ e
Zic /, .
Va (7). | RETUAN TO GIA
. Background Use Only
Oo Not Represuce
wren fyil._ 46)
TRACY IAM ED i
| phate ¢ Chad é a Take (Ezterteay) |
DRAC ER falta hoahd ~ Se 5 pow
oo one Te chacsas of Cente,
Helus nok cautin elHovd he tas COC%.
NWwle th F ~ ppesleagron Ar chee l etl (Tpoaoiw é/ - . AOG4S5—
flaw Syptewsth und en a
MH acany secs) pg LE
rn 1 ote fcr howe Se
Gk Pah Ee etanard oe fete ay IP
een FiO leven
3
oo. . - - @
@ esp. @
mevdiorns pooper BS eccsoes le “Osta - — ae 3/ .
awe Gam Cothrran uo ode £ . _ aacied | LF
Miwon oe Ay So
14.90000
|
104-10119-10220.pdf | "104 [2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
104-10119-10220
wee Mw. wt
e207 ; ‘ ot 3
27 June 1968
MEMORANDUM’ FOR? C/CI/OA’
SUBJECT: | LOPEZ, Henry P. (201-253203)
REFERENCE: CI/OA Memorandum of 6 June 1968
. In response to tiie referenced memorandum, the follow-
ing information is provice.:
1. Field and iicadquarters traces, other than
operational material contained in subject's 201 files,
@re negative. Green List trace request No. 189405
Was submitted 26 June 1968. ,
2. From 1961 until August 1966, subject
lived in Mexico City with his wife and two children. g
While in México City, subject fwas 2a ps setwofeStati on O
Mexico, City and travelled extensively throughcut
i Central and Latin America [o:-VOrIR sponsored~oner: 2 ‘+
ationalmactivity} In August 1966. s bject was
>
obliged to leave Mexico City due to his wife's in-
Creasing medical prebiem in aljusting to the hiah
t G4
altitude encountered there. Ih Oc
Subject established residence in Nn
1 oe
rk Cityfiwhere , oF
his cover employment has & that of c
onsultent
20
os
a
DOM hu
to WUSALINE, a WOPLAY proprietary cempany. Te ES
been employed in this Capacizy un te the present time.
Since 1965, there have been no caaraes in subject's¥fonily
3 7 mh “
status, _ Y
_.
. tN
63"
‘ (Rickes’, ry zone, |
_S/IB/S
oN
era
é
|
104-10119-10225.pdf | SDAA PIAS nD Se PSE ORE Gd EEE a EB en US EE NE MUR dhs A
: 2025 RELEASE | UNDER THE se JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION IN RECORDS ACT OF 1992
‘following Agency ZT
ELAS:
1 Domestic ‘Field Investigation fe Vv able *fepert Will follow within 66 days
Bote, ee
|
104-10119-10247.pdf | 14-00000
104-10119-10247) | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
. e
wor oe
ented (Ib Dee (LGR AtgarRt prueba celal
Lo doy ey Late” BW SSN RETUAN TO GIA
“ Jus = = wb fn. 7 Background Use Onky
Subject advised that Aline‘ HOSBY was a newepaperman in SCHAPIRO' #0 Wot Reproduce |
office. MULBY, durir:: the vast year, tad been in the hospital on several |
occasions, and one dicn't see too met. of her. Subject also acvised that i
HOSEY stuck mostly to the foreign circuit rather than the Bnbassy circuit,
Subject stated that one of the reasons MOSBY was in the hoapital, on one
occasion, was the fact, that she had an abortion, according to gossip.
J Subject stated that another newspaperwomen in Moscow was Priscilla
JOWN30N. Subject advised that JOHNSON had the reputation of being a rairly
Foot reporter and one whom the Soviets kept on a month to month visa basia,
Subject indicated that it was highly-posesible the Sovieta had attenupted to r ;
recruit. JOWNSON, as she spent a lot of time with Soviet nationals. a i i
|
oubjoct. was queried as to whether he had ever made an unauthorized
disclosure of classified information in the' Soviet Union, to which he re-
plied that he had not disclosed classified information as sugh. He stated
that his cover, which he had used for the period in between/State Depart~77 /
manf}) issignments, was that he was a (consultant of the AEC, particularly ey '
to tne Joint Atomic unergy Intelligence Committee; composed of AEC, CLA,
State, NSA, Joint Chiefs, and the Armed Services|.~] Subject stated that he .
had indieated to individuals, when questioned, at he had done economic ;
research amd onalysis in tha Soviet field and that he had done this ever : |
gince he nad first become a{Stat ¢,Departmen smployes. Subject etated that,
_ amonp others, he had discussed this wi th fay HUTCHINS, his counterpart in
the (British tnbasnye} ee ems ocioy ,
Subject was asked for his itinerary on his roturn trip to the United
States and who authorized the trip. Subject stated that he had long planned *
ts come home via the Far Kast, and it was a well publicized plan, tis stated :
thet when ho left Moscow, he stayed over in Delhi for a week to soa if there
warc any objections from Headquarters as to his itinerary, Ho stated that '
when ha resal ved no instructiona to the contrary, he returnod to the United |
tutes via his previously announced plane ard the differensog in fares being t
harne bro hin, .
af
Subject departed Nogcow 1 September 1960 (1:00 A,li.}3 wont to Tashkent
wed thon to selhs here he spont one weeks Banrkok, daya; Saigon, 6 dayoy.
Hon You, © caysy Tokyo, 5 days; Hawaii, 5 dayss San Francisco, 5 days;
Loc anvelse, ? days; Lus Vepas, 2 days; Denver, 10. daysy arrived Washington
OD) eteber LOF6Q, ;
|
104-10119-10338.pdf | [104-10119-10338 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
a7 reo
a -
Chief, Cversces Erench, Employees Division, SSS
ip Loy
Attention: J. S. Reff
Chief, Special Security Branch DEC] 4950
RITTENHSUSE, John F. (Pseudo - UPC)
#23500
pESORDED
CONTROL 0
Reference is made to your memorandum dated 28 November 1950 requesting
security concurrence in the conversion of the Subject's status from that of GPC
Steff Euployee to thet of uPC Steff Avent. ~% is contenpleted that the Subject
Spe be essigned tolfeai-c “ty “ees, as GS-15, Intellisence Ufficer, under deep
&t a CGVEr. —
This is to advise that from a security standpvint this office offers no
objection to the propesed conversicn und sssi.nnent of the Subject.
FOR TEP SECURITY OFFICER, CIA:
JiRimp
ce:file
—
|
104-10119-10339.pdf | 14-00000
104-10118-10838 | 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |
>. x -
rn Or -
a SECRET
Office Memorandum e UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : Chief, Special Security Branch DATE: 28 November 1950
Attn: Mr. George P. Loker, Jr.
FROM : Chie2, Overseas Branch
SUBJECT: John F. Rittenhouse (Fseudc — OPC)
#23500
Concurrence is requested in the conversion of the subject's status
from that of OPC Staff Employee to tnat of OPC Staff Agent. The subject is
to be assimed to Miexice Cli; as a GS-13, Intelligence Officer under
(Pepartment of State>Deep Cover.
It is further reouested that the aporopriate certification be sent to
ir, (Gaidfiegis pffice in the /Nerartne iF Stat 3 _ ee
. < ok. _ f-GE yy
“ fh
JOSEPH S. REFF i :
ey
/ Ae
[ ue ae oe Cos 2 en. SEGRET U wor
Ln
|
Subsets and Splits