tasksource/deberta-small-long-nli
Zero-Shot Classification
•
Updated
•
52.3k
•
39
text
stringlengths 49
577
| label
stringclasses 7
values | metadata
sequence |
---|---|---|
The agreement in question involves number in [[ nouns ]] and << reflexive pronouns >> and is syntactic rather than semantic in nature because grammatical number in English , like grammatical gender in languages such as French , is partly arbitrary . | CONJUNCTION | [
7,
7,
9,
10
] |
The agreement in question involves number in nouns and reflexive pronouns and is syntactic rather than semantic in nature because grammatical number in English , like [[ grammatical gender ]] in << languages >> such as French , is partly arbitrary . | FEATURE-OF | [
26,
27,
29,
29
] |
The agreement in question involves number in nouns and reflexive pronouns and is syntactic rather than semantic in nature because grammatical number in English , like grammatical gender in << languages >> such as [[ French ]] , is partly arbitrary . | HYPONYM-OF | [
32,
32,
29,
29
] |
In this paper , a novel [[ method ]] to learn the << intrinsic object structure >> for robust visual tracking is proposed . | USED-FOR | [
6,
6,
10,
12
] |
In this paper , a novel method to learn the [[ intrinsic object structure ]] for << robust visual tracking >> is proposed . | USED-FOR | [
10,
12,
14,
16
] |
The basic assumption is that the << parameterized object state >> lies on a [[ low dimensional manifold ]] and can be learned from training data . | FEATURE-OF | [
12,
14,
6,
8
] |
Based on this assumption , firstly we derived the [[ dimensionality reduction and density estimation algorithm ]] for << unsupervised learning of object intrinsic representation >> , the obtained non-rigid part of object state reduces even to 2 dimensions . | USED-FOR | [
9,
14,
16,
21
] |
Secondly the << dynamical model >> is derived and trained based on this [[ intrinsic representation ]] . | USED-FOR | [
11,
12,
2,
3
] |
Thirdly the learned [[ intrinsic object structure ]] is integrated into a << particle-filter style tracker >> . | PART-OF | [
3,
5,
10,
12
] |
We will show that this intrinsic object representation has some interesting properties and based on which the newly derived [[ dynamical model ]] makes << particle-filter style tracker >> more robust and reliable . | USED-FOR | [
19,
20,
22,
24
] |
Experiments show that the learned [[ tracker ]] performs much better than existing << trackers >> on the tracking of complex non-rigid motions such as fish twisting with self-occlusion and large inter-frame lip motion . | COMPARE | [
5,
5,
11,
11
] |
Experiments show that the learned [[ tracker ]] performs much better than existing trackers on the << tracking of complex non-rigid motions >> such as fish twisting with self-occlusion and large inter-frame lip motion . | USED-FOR | [
5,
5,
14,
18
] |
Experiments show that the learned tracker performs much better than existing [[ trackers ]] on the << tracking of complex non-rigid motions >> such as fish twisting with self-occlusion and large inter-frame lip motion . | USED-FOR | [
11,
11,
14,
18
] |
Experiments show that the learned tracker performs much better than existing trackers on the tracking of << complex non-rigid motions >> such as [[ fish twisting ]] with self-occlusion and large inter-frame lip motion . | HYPONYM-OF | [
21,
22,
16,
18
] |
Experiments show that the learned tracker performs much better than existing trackers on the tracking of complex non-rigid motions such as << fish twisting >> with [[ self-occlusion ]] and large inter-frame lip motion . | FEATURE-OF | [
24,
24,
21,
22
] |
Experiments show that the learned tracker performs much better than existing trackers on the tracking of complex non-rigid motions such as fish twisting with [[ self-occlusion ]] and large << inter-frame lip motion >> . | CONJUNCTION | [
24,
24,
27,
29
] |
Experiments show that the learned tracker performs much better than existing trackers on the tracking of complex non-rigid motions such as << fish twisting >> with self-occlusion and large [[ inter-frame lip motion ]] . | FEATURE-OF | [
27,
29,
21,
22
] |
The proposed [[ method ]] also has the potential to solve other type of << tracking problems >> . | USED-FOR | [
2,
2,
12,
13
] |
In this paper , we present a [[ digital signal processor -LRB- DSP -RRB- implementation ]] of << real-time statistical voice conversion -LRB- VC -RRB- >> for silent speech enhancement and electrolaryngeal speech enhancement . | USED-FOR | [
7,
13,
15,
21
] |
In this paper , we present a digital signal processor -LRB- DSP -RRB- implementation of [[ real-time statistical voice conversion -LRB- VC -RRB- ]] for << silent speech enhancement >> and electrolaryngeal speech enhancement . | USED-FOR | [
15,
21,
23,
25
] |
In this paper , we present a digital signal processor -LRB- DSP -RRB- implementation of [[ real-time statistical voice conversion -LRB- VC -RRB- ]] for silent speech enhancement and << electrolaryngeal speech enhancement >> . | USED-FOR | [
15,
21,
27,
29
] |
In this paper , we present a digital signal processor -LRB- DSP -RRB- implementation of real-time statistical voice conversion -LRB- VC -RRB- for [[ silent speech enhancement ]] and << electrolaryngeal speech enhancement >> . | CONJUNCTION | [
23,
25,
27,
29
] |
[[ Electrolaryngeal speech ]] is one of the typical types of << alaryngeal speech >> produced by an alternative speaking method for laryngectomees . | HYPONYM-OF | [
0,
1,
9,
10
] |
Electrolaryngeal speech is one of the typical types of << alaryngeal speech >> produced by an alternative [[ speaking method ]] for laryngectomees . | USED-FOR | [
15,
16,
9,
10
] |
Electrolaryngeal speech is one of the typical types of alaryngeal speech produced by an alternative [[ speaking method ]] for << laryngectomees >> . | USED-FOR | [
15,
16,
18,
18
] |
However , the [[ sound quality ]] of << NAM and electrolaryngeal speech >> suffers from lack of naturalness . | EVALUATE-FOR | [
3,
4,
6,
9
] |
VC has proven to be one of the promising approaches to address this problem , and << it >> has been successfully implemented on [[ devices ]] with sufficient computational resources . | USED-FOR | [
22,
22,
16,
16
] |
VC has proven to be one of the promising approaches to address this problem , and it has been successfully implemented on << devices >> with [[ sufficient computational resources ]] . | FEATURE-OF | [
24,
26,
22,
22
] |
An implementation on << devices >> that are highly portable but have [[ limited computational resources ]] would greatly contribute to its practical use . | FEATURE-OF | [
10,
12,
3,
3
] |
In this paper we further implement << real-time VC >> on a [[ DSP ]] . | USED-FOR | [
10,
10,
6,
7
] |
To implement the two << speech enhancement systems >> based on [[ real-time VC ]] , one from NAM to a whispered voice and the other from electrolaryngeal speech to a natural voice , we propose several methods for reducing computational cost while preserving conversion accuracy . | USED-FOR | [
9,
10,
4,
6
] |
To implement the two << speech enhancement systems >> based on real-time VC , [[ one ]] from NAM to a whispered voice and the other from electrolaryngeal speech to a natural voice , we propose several methods for reducing computational cost while preserving conversion accuracy . | HYPONYM-OF | [
12,
12,
4,
6
] |
To implement the two speech enhancement systems based on real-time VC , [[ one ]] from NAM to a whispered voice and the << other >> from electrolaryngeal speech to a natural voice , we propose several methods for reducing computational cost while preserving conversion accuracy . | CONJUNCTION | [
12,
12,
21,
21
] |
To implement the two << speech enhancement systems >> based on real-time VC , one from NAM to a whispered voice and the [[ other ]] from electrolaryngeal speech to a natural voice , we propose several methods for reducing computational cost while preserving conversion accuracy . | HYPONYM-OF | [
21,
21,
4,
6
] |
To implement the two speech enhancement systems based on real-time VC , one from NAM to a whispered voice and the other from electrolaryngeal speech to a natural voice , we propose several << methods >> for reducing [[ computational cost ]] while preserving conversion accuracy . | EVALUATE-FOR | [
36,
37,
33,
33
] |
To implement the two speech enhancement systems based on real-time VC , one from NAM to a whispered voice and the other from electrolaryngeal speech to a natural voice , we propose several methods for reducing [[ computational cost ]] while preserving << conversion accuracy >> . | CONJUNCTION | [
36,
37,
40,
41
] |
To implement the two speech enhancement systems based on real-time VC , one from NAM to a whispered voice and the other from electrolaryngeal speech to a natural voice , we propose several << methods >> for reducing computational cost while preserving [[ conversion accuracy ]] . | EVALUATE-FOR | [
40,
41,
33,
33
] |
We conduct experimental evaluations and show that << real-time VC >> is capable of running on a [[ DSP ]] with little degradation . | USED-FOR | [
15,
15,
7,
8
] |
We propose a [[ method ]] that automatically generates << paraphrase >> sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures like BLEU and NIST . | USED-FOR | [
3,
3,
7,
7
] |
We propose a method that automatically generates [[ paraphrase ]] sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective << machine translation evaluation measures >> like BLEU and NIST . | USED-FOR | [
7,
7,
20,
23
] |
We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective << machine translation evaluation measures >> like [[ BLEU ]] and NIST . | HYPONYM-OF | [
25,
25,
20,
23
] |
We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures like [[ BLEU ]] and << NIST >> . | CONJUNCTION | [
25,
25,
27,
27
] |
We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective << machine translation evaluation measures >> like BLEU and [[ NIST ]] . | HYPONYM-OF | [
27,
27,
20,
23
] |
We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment , i.e. , -LRB- i -RRB- their << grammaticality >> : at least 99 % correct sentences ; -LRB- ii -RRB- their [[ equivalence in meaning ]] : at least 96 % correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment ; and , -LRB- iii -RRB- the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets . | CONJUNCTION | [
31,
33,
18,
18
] |
We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment , i.e. , -LRB- i -RRB- their grammaticality : at least 99 % correct sentences ; -LRB- ii -RRB- their equivalence in meaning : at least 96 % correct << paraphrases >> either by [[ meaning equivalence ]] or entailment ; and , -LRB- iii -RRB- the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets . | USED-FOR | [
43,
44,
40,
40
] |
We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment , i.e. , -LRB- i -RRB- their grammaticality : at least 99 % correct sentences ; -LRB- ii -RRB- their equivalence in meaning : at least 96 % correct paraphrases either by [[ meaning equivalence ]] or << entailment >> ; and , -LRB- iii -RRB- the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets . | CONJUNCTION | [
43,
44,
46,
46
] |
We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment , i.e. , -LRB- i -RRB- their grammaticality : at least 99 % correct sentences ; -LRB- ii -RRB- their equivalence in meaning : at least 96 % correct << paraphrases >> either by meaning equivalence or [[ entailment ]] ; and , -LRB- iii -RRB- the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets . | USED-FOR | [
46,
46,
40,
40
] |
We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment , i.e. , -LRB- i -RRB- their grammaticality : at least 99 % correct sentences ; -LRB- ii -RRB- their << equivalence in meaning >> : at least 96 % correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment ; and , -LRB- iii -RRB- the amount of [[ internal lexical and syntactical variation ]] in a set of paraphrases : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets . | CONJUNCTION | [
56,
60,
31,
33
] |
We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment , i.e. , -LRB- i -RRB- their grammaticality : at least 99 % correct sentences ; -LRB- ii -RRB- their equivalence in meaning : at least 96 % correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment ; and , -LRB- iii -RRB- the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of [[ paraphrases ]] : slightly superior to that of << hand-produced sets >> . | COMPARE | [
65,
65,
72,
73
] |
The << paraphrase >> sets produced by this [[ method ]] thus seem adequate as reference sets to be used for MT evaluation . | USED-FOR | [
6,
6,
1,
1
] |
[[ Graph unification ]] remains the most expensive part of << unification-based grammar parsing >> . | PART-OF | [
0,
1,
8,
10
] |
We focus on one [[ speed-up element ]] in the design of << unification algorithms >> : avoidance of copying of unmodified subgraphs . | PART-OF | [
4,
5,
10,
11
] |
We propose a << method >> of attaining such a design through a method of [[ structure-sharing ]] which avoids log -LRB- d -RRB- overheads often associated with structure-sharing of graphs without any use of costly dependency pointers . | USED-FOR | [
13,
13,
3,
3
] |
The proposed [[ scheme ]] eliminates redundant copying while maintaining the quasi-destructive scheme 's ability to avoid over copying and early copying combined with its ability to handle << cyclic structures >> without algorithmic additions . | USED-FOR | [
2,
2,
26,
27
] |
The proposed << scheme >> eliminates redundant copying while maintaining the [[ quasi-destructive scheme 's ability ]] to avoid over copying and early copying combined with its ability to handle cyclic structures without algorithmic additions . | FEATURE-OF | [
9,
12,
2,
2
] |
The proposed scheme eliminates redundant copying while maintaining the quasi-destructive scheme 's ability to avoid [[ over copying ]] and << early copying >> combined with its ability to handle cyclic structures without algorithmic additions . | CONJUNCTION | [
15,
16,
18,
19
] |
We describe a novel technique and implemented [[ system ]] for constructing a << subcategorization dictionary >> from textual corpora . | USED-FOR | [
7,
7,
11,
12
] |
We describe a novel technique and implemented << system >> for constructing a subcategorization dictionary from [[ textual corpora ]] . | USED-FOR | [
14,
15,
7,
7
] |
We also demonstrate that a << subcategorization dictionary >> built with the [[ system ]] improves the accuracy of a parser by an appreciable amount | USED-FOR | [
10,
10,
5,
6
] |
We also demonstrate that a subcategorization dictionary built with the system improves the [[ accuracy ]] of a << parser >> by an appreciable amount | EVALUATE-FOR | [
13,
13,
16,
16
] |
We also demonstrate that a << subcategorization dictionary >> built with the system improves the accuracy of a [[ parser ]] by an appreciable amount | EVALUATE-FOR | [
16,
16,
5,
6
] |
A number of powerful << registration criteria >> have been developed in the last decade , most prominently the criterion of [[ maximum mutual information ]] . | HYPONYM-OF | [
19,
21,
4,
5
] |
Although this criterion provides for good registration results in many applications , << it >> remains a purely [[ low-level criterion ]] . | FEATURE-OF | [
16,
17,
12,
12
] |
In this paper , we will develop a [[ Bayesian framework ]] that allows to impose statistically learned prior knowledge about the joint intensity distribution into << image registration methods >> . | USED-FOR | [
8,
9,
24,
26
] |
In this paper , we will develop a Bayesian framework that allows to impose [[ statistically learned prior knowledge ]] about the joint intensity distribution into << image registration methods >> . | USED-FOR | [
14,
17,
24,
26
] |
In this paper , we will develop a Bayesian framework that allows to impose << statistically learned prior knowledge >> about the [[ joint intensity distribution ]] into image registration methods . | FEATURE-OF | [
20,
22,
14,
17
] |
The << prior >> is given by a [[ kernel density estimate ]] on the space of joint intensity distributions computed from a representative set of pre-registered image pairs . | USED-FOR | [
6,
8,
1,
1
] |
The prior is given by a [[ kernel density estimate ]] on the space of << joint intensity distributions >> computed from a representative set of pre-registered image pairs . | USED-FOR | [
6,
8,
13,
15
] |
The prior is given by a kernel density estimate on the space of << joint intensity distributions >> computed from a representative set of [[ pre-registered image pairs ]] . | USED-FOR | [
22,
24,
13,
15
] |
Experimental results demonstrate that the resulting [[ registration process ]] is more robust to << missing low-level information >> as it favors intensity correspondences statistically consistent with the learned intensity distributions . | USED-FOR | [
6,
7,
12,
14
] |
Experimental results demonstrate that the resulting registration process is more robust to missing low-level information as [[ it ]] favors << intensity correspondences >> statistically consistent with the learned intensity distributions . | USED-FOR | [
16,
16,
18,
19
] |
We present a [[ method ]] for << synthesizing complex , photo-realistic facade images >> , from a single example . | USED-FOR | [
3,
3,
5,
10
] |
After parsing the example image into its << semantic components >> , a [[ tiling ]] for it is generated . | USED-FOR | [
11,
11,
7,
8
] |
Novel tilings can then be created , yielding << facade textures >> with different dimensions or with [[ occluded parts inpainted ]] . | FEATURE-OF | [
15,
17,
8,
9
] |
A [[ genetic algorithm ]] guides the novel << facades >> as well as inpainted parts to be consistent with the example , both in terms of their overall structure and their detailed textures . | USED-FOR | [
1,
2,
6,
6
] |
A [[ genetic algorithm ]] guides the novel facades as well as << inpainted parts >> to be consistent with the example , both in terms of their overall structure and their detailed textures . | USED-FOR | [
1,
2,
10,
11
] |
Promising results for [[ multiple standard datasets ]] -- in particular for the different building styles they contain -- demonstrate the potential of the << method >> . | EVALUATE-FOR | [
3,
5,
22,
22
] |
We introduce a new << interactive corpus exploration tool >> called [[ InfoMagnets ]] . | HYPONYM-OF | [
9,
9,
4,
7
] |
[[ InfoMagnets ]] aims at making << exploratory corpus analysis >> accessible to researchers who are not experts in text mining . | USED-FOR | [
0,
0,
4,
6
] |
As evidence of its usefulness and usability , [[ it ]] has been used successfully in a research context to uncover relationships between language and behavioral patterns in two distinct << domains >> : tutorial dialogue -LRB- Kumar et al. , submitted -RRB- and on-line communities -LRB- Arguello et al. , 2006 -RRB- . | USED-FOR | [
8,
8,
28,
28
] |
As evidence of its usefulness and usability , it has been used successfully in a research context to uncover relationships between language and behavioral patterns in two distinct << domains >> : [[ tutorial dialogue ]] -LRB- Kumar et al. , submitted -RRB- and on-line communities -LRB- Arguello et al. , 2006 -RRB- . | HYPONYM-OF | [
30,
31,
28,
28
] |
As evidence of its usefulness and usability , it has been used successfully in a research context to uncover relationships between language and behavioral patterns in two distinct domains : [[ tutorial dialogue ]] -LRB- Kumar et al. , submitted -RRB- and << on-line communities >> -LRB- Arguello et al. , 2006 -RRB- . | CONJUNCTION | [
30,
31,
40,
41
] |
As evidence of its usefulness and usability , it has been used successfully in a research context to uncover relationships between language and behavioral patterns in two distinct << domains >> : tutorial dialogue -LRB- Kumar et al. , submitted -RRB- and [[ on-line communities ]] -LRB- Arguello et al. , 2006 -RRB- . | HYPONYM-OF | [
40,
41,
28,
28
] |
As an [[ educational tool ]] , it has been used as part of a unit on << protocol analysis >> in an Educational Research Methods course . | USED-FOR | [
2,
3,
15,
16
] |
Sources of training data suitable for << language modeling >> of [[ conversational speech ]] are limited . | USED-FOR | [
9,
10,
6,
7
] |
In this paper , we show how training data can be supplemented with text from the web filtered to match the style and/or topic of the target << recognition task >> , but also that it is possible to get bigger performance gains from the data by using [[ class-dependent interpolation of N-grams ]] . | USED-FOR | [
46,
49,
27,
28
] |
We present a [[ method ]] for << detecting 3D objects >> using multi-modalities . | USED-FOR | [
3,
3,
5,
7
] |
We present a << method >> for detecting 3D objects using [[ multi-modalities ]] . | USED-FOR | [
9,
9,
3,
3
] |
While [[ it ]] is generic , we demonstrate << it >> on the combination of an image and a dense depth map which give complementary object information . | USED-FOR | [
1,
1,
7,
7
] |
While it is generic , we demonstrate << it >> on the combination of an [[ image ]] and a dense depth map which give complementary object information . | USED-FOR | [
13,
13,
7,
7
] |
While it is generic , we demonstrate it on the combination of an [[ image ]] and a << dense depth map >> which give complementary object information . | CONJUNCTION | [
13,
13,
16,
18
] |
While it is generic , we demonstrate << it >> on the combination of an image and a [[ dense depth map ]] which give complementary object information . | USED-FOR | [
16,
18,
7,
7
] |
While it is generic , we demonstrate it on the combination of an image and a << dense depth map >> which give [[ complementary object information ]] . | FEATURE-OF | [
21,
23,
16,
18
] |
It is based on an efficient representation of [[ templates ]] that capture the different << modalities >> , and we show in many experiments on commodity hardware that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods on single modalities . | USED-FOR | [
8,
8,
13,
13
] |
It is based on an efficient representation of templates that capture the different modalities , and we show in many experiments on commodity hardware that our [[ approach ]] significantly outperforms << state-of-the-art methods >> on single modalities . | COMPARE | [
26,
26,
29,
30
] |
It is based on an efficient representation of templates that capture the different modalities , and we show in many experiments on commodity hardware that our [[ approach ]] significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods on << single modalities >> . | USED-FOR | [
26,
26,
32,
33
] |
It is based on an efficient representation of templates that capture the different modalities , and we show in many experiments on commodity hardware that our approach significantly outperforms [[ state-of-the-art methods ]] on << single modalities >> . | USED-FOR | [
29,
30,
32,
33
] |
The [[ compact description of a video sequence ]] through a single image map and a dominant motion has applications in several << domains >> , including video browsing and retrieval , compression , mosaicing , and visual summarization . | USED-FOR | [
1,
6,
20,
20
] |
The << compact description of a video sequence >> through a single [[ image map ]] and a dominant motion has applications in several domains , including video browsing and retrieval , compression , mosaicing , and visual summarization . | USED-FOR | [
10,
11,
1,
6
] |
The compact description of a video sequence through a single [[ image map ]] and a << dominant motion >> has applications in several domains , including video browsing and retrieval , compression , mosaicing , and visual summarization . | CONJUNCTION | [
10,
11,
14,
15
] |
No dataset card yet