Consider the following premises. For all x_16, x_16 will play a game or x_16 is an astronaut. For all x_16, x_16 is a lawyer. For all x_16, x_16 will not play a game. There is at least one x_16 for which x_16 will drink water. For all x_16, if x_16 were a lawyer, then x_16 is bored. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_16 for which x_16 is an astronaut and x_16 will drink water.
 From the fact that for all x_16, if x_16 were a lawyer, then x_16 is bored, and that for all x_16, x_16 is a lawyer we can infer that for all x_16, x_16 is bored. From the fact that for all x_16, x_16 will play a game or x_16 is an astronaut, and that for all x_16, x_16 will not play a game we can infer that for all x_16, x_16 is an astronaut. From the fact that there is at least one x_16 for which x_16 will drink water, and that for all x_16, x_16 is bored we can infer that there is at least one x_16 for which x_16 will drink water and x_16 is bored. From the fact that there is at least one x_16 for which x_16 will drink water and x_16 is bored we can infer that there is at least one x_16 for which x_16 will drink water. Finally, from the fact that for all x_16, x_16 is an astronaut, and that there is at least one x_16 for which x_16 will drink water we can infer that there is at least one x_16 for which x_16 is an astronaut and x_16 will drink water. Therefore, the answer is yes.