Consider the following premises. For all x_16, x_16 will sleep or x_16 is an electrician. For all x_16, x_16 will cook or x_16 will play a game. For all x_16, x_16 is a soldier or x_16 will not cook. There is at least one x_16 for which if x_16 were an electrician, then x_16 is a doctor. For all x_16, if x_16 plays a game, then x_16 is a soldier. For all x_16, if x_16 sleeps, then x_16 is a doctor. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_16, either x_16 is a soldier or x_16 is a doctor are not true.
 From the fact that for all x_16, if x_16 sleeps, then x_16 is a doctor, that there is at least one x_16 for which if x_16 were an electrician, then x_16 is a doctor, and that for all x_16, x_16 will sleep or x_16 is an electrician we can infer that there is at least one x_16 for which x_16 is a doctor. From the fact that for all x_16, x_16 is a soldier or x_16 will not cook we can infer that for all x_16, if x_16 cooks, then x_16 is a soldier. From the fact that for all x_16, if x_16 cooks, then x_16 is a soldier, that for all x_16, if x_16 plays a game, then x_16 is a soldier, and that for all x_16, x_16 will cook or x_16 will play a game we can infer that for all x_16, x_16 is a soldier. Finally, from the fact that for all x_16, x_16 is a soldier, and that there is at least one x_16 for which x_16 is a doctor we can infer that some soldiers are doctors, which contradicts that For all x_16, either x_16 is a soldier or x_16 is a doctor are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.