Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 sleeps, then x_10 is taking a plane. For all x_10, x_10 is an astronaut if and only if x_10 is curious. For all x_10, if x_10 takes a plane, then x_10 is running. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 were an astronaut, then x_10 is sleeping. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, the fact that x_10 were curious does not imply that x_10 is running.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.