Consider the following premises. For all x_12, x_12 will cook if and only if x_12 is a poet. There is at least one x_12 for which if x_12 were a taxi driver, then x_12 is excited. For all x_12, if x_12 were a poet, then x_12 is playing tennis. For all x_12, if x_12 plays tennis, then x_12 is a taxi driver. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_12, the fact that x_12 cooks does not imply that x_12 is excited.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.