Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_14 for which x_14 will play tennis or x_14 will drink water. For all x_14, if x_14 goes running, then x_14 is a bartender. For all x_14, x_14 will not play tennis. For all x_14, x_14 is a lawyer. For all x_14, if x_14 were a lawyer, then x_14 is running. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_14 for which x_14 will drink water and x_14 is a bartender.
 From the fact that for all x_14, if x_14 were a lawyer, then x_14 is running, and that for all x_14, x_14 is a lawyer we can infer that for all x_14, x_14 will go running. From the fact that there is at least one x_14 for which x_14 will play tennis or x_14 will drink water, and that for all x_14, x_14 will not play tennis we can infer that there is at least one x_14 for which x_14 will drink water. From the fact that for all x_14, if x_14 goes running, then x_14 is a bartender, and that for all x_14, x_14 will go running we can infer that for all x_14, x_14 is a bartender. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_14 for which x_14 will drink water, and that for all x_14, x_14 is a bartender we can infer that there is at least one x_14 for which x_14 will drink water and x_14 is a bartender. Therefore, the answer is yes.