Consider the following premises. For all z, if z goes running, then z is not a sailor. There is at least one z for which if z were an artist, then z is a sailor. For all z, z is a sailor or z will not read a book. For all z, z will read a book or z is an artist. Can we infer the following from them? For all z, z will go running.
 From the fact that for all z, z is a sailor or z will not read a book we can infer that for all z, if z reads a book, then z is a sailor. From the fact that for all z, if z reads a book, then z is a sailor, that there is at least one z for which if z were an artist, then z is a sailor, and that for all z, z will read a book or z is an artist we can infer that there is at least one z for which z is a sailor. Finally, from the fact that for all z, if z goes running, then z is not a sailor, and that there is at least one z for which z is a sailor we can infer that there is at least one z for which z will not go running, which contradicts that For all z, z will go running. Therefore, the answer is no.