Consider the following premises. There is at least one x for which if x were excited, then x is a poet. For all x, if x plays tennis, then x is excited. For all x, x will cook or x is not a poet. For all x, x will not cook. Can we infer the following from them? For all x, x will play tennis.
 From the fact that for all x, x will cook or x is not a poet we can infer that for all x, if x were a poet, then x is cooking. From the fact that for all x, if x plays tennis, then x is excited, and that there is at least one x for which if x were excited, then x is a poet we can infer that there is at least one x for which if x plays tennis, then x is a poet. From the fact that there is at least one x for which if x plays tennis, then x is a poet, and that for all x, if x were a poet, then x is cooking we can infer that there is at least one x for which if x plays tennis, then x is cooking. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x for which if x plays tennis, then x is cooking, and that for all x, x will not cook we can infer that there is at least one x for which x will not play tennis, which contradicts that For all x, x will play tennis. Therefore, the answer is no.