Consider the following premises. For all x_10, x_10 will take a plane. For all x_10, if x_10 takes a plane, then x_10 is making tea. For all x_10, if x_10 were curious, then x_10 is not running. For all x_10, if x_10 makes tea, then x_10 is running. For all x_10, x_10 will read a book. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: For all x_10, x_10 is not curious.
 From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 takes a plane, then x_10 is making tea, and that for all x_10, if x_10 makes tea, then x_10 is running we can infer that for all x_10, if x_10 takes a plane, then x_10 is running via universal transitivity. From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will take a plane, and that for all x_10, x_10 will read a book we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will take a plane and x_10 will read a book via universal conjunction. From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will take a plane and x_10 will read a book we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will take a plane via universal simplification. From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 takes a plane, then x_10 is running, and that for all x_10, x_10 will take a plane we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will go running via universal modus ponens. Finally, from the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 were curious, then x_10 is not running, and that for all x_10, x_10 will go running we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 is not curious via universal modus tollens. Therefore, the answer is yes.