Consider the following premises. For all x_6, x_6 is curious or x_6 is a poet. For all x_6, x_6 is not curious or x_6 is a taxi driver. For all x_6, if x_6 were a poet, then x_6 is a lawyer. For all x_6, if x_6 were a taxi driver, then x_6 is a lawyer. Can we infer the following from them? Karen is not a lawyer.
 From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 is curious or x_6 is a poet, and that for all x_6, x_6 is not curious or x_6 is a taxi driver we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is a poet or x_6 is a taxi driver. Finally, from the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 were a poet, then x_6 is a lawyer, that for all x_6, if x_6 were a taxi driver, then x_6 is a lawyer, and that for all x_6, x_6 is a poet or x_6 is a taxi driver we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is a lawyer, which contradicts that Karen is not a lawyer. Therefore, the answer is no.