Consider the following premises. For all x_19, if x_19 drinks water, then x_19 is a bartender. For all x_19, if x_19 writes a letter, then x_19 is a bartender. There is at least one x_19 for which x_19 will make tea or x_19 will play a game. For all x_19, x_19 will drink water or x_19 will write a letter. For all x_19, x_19 will not make tea. For all x_19, if x_19 plays a game, then x_19 is excited. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_19, x_19 is not a bartender.
 From the fact that there is at least one x_19 for which x_19 will make tea or x_19 will play a game, and that for all x_19, x_19 will not make tea we can infer that there is at least one x_19 for which x_19 will play a game. Finally, from the fact that for all x_19, if x_19 drinks water, then x_19 is a bartender, that for all x_19, if x_19 writes a letter, then x_19 is a bartender, and that for all x_19, x_19 will drink water or x_19 will write a letter we can infer that for all x_19, x_19 is a bartender, which contradicts that For all x_19, x_19 is not a bartender. Therefore, the answer is no.