Consider the following premises. For all x_6, x_6 is a musician. For all x_6, x_6 is not a politician. For all x_6, if x_6 were a musician, then x_6 is running. For all x_6, x_6 is a politician or x_6 is an electrician. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is not an electrician.
 From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 were a musician, then x_6 is running, and that for all x_6, x_6 is a musician we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 will go running. From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 is a politician or x_6 is an electrician, and that for all x_6, x_6 is not a politician we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is an electrician. From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 is an electrician, and that for all x_6, x_6 will go running we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is an electrician and x_6 will go running. Finally, from the fact that for all x_6, x_6 is an electrician and x_6 will go running we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is an electrician, which contradicts that There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is not an electrician. Therefore, the answer is no.