Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 reads a book, then x_10 is making tea. For all x_10, x_10 is a lawyer. For all x_10, x_10 will drink water. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 were a lawyer, then x_10 is making tea. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, either x_10 will make tea or x_10 will drink water are not true.
 From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 is a lawyer we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 is a lawyer or x_10 will read a book. From the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 were a lawyer, then x_10 is making tea, that for all x_10, if x_10 reads a book, then x_10 is making tea, and that for all x_10, x_10 is a lawyer or x_10 will read a book we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will make tea. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will make tea, and that for all x_10, x_10 will drink water we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will make tea and x_10 will drink water, which contradicts that For all x_10, either x_10 will make tea or x_10 will drink water are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.