Consider the following premises. For all x_8, if x_8 plays a game, then x_8 is a bartender. There is at least one x_8 for which if x_8 were a politician, then x_8 is not a bartender. For all x_8, x_8 will play a game or x_8 is an artist. For all x_8, x_8 is a bartender if and only if x_8 is an artist. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_8, x_8 is a politician.
 From the fact that for all x_8, x_8 is a bartender if and only if x_8 is an artist we can infer that for all x_8, if x_8 were an artist, then x_8 is a bartender. From the fact that for all x_8, if x_8 plays a game, then x_8 is a bartender, that for all x_8, if x_8 were an artist, then x_8 is a bartender, and that for all x_8, x_8 will play a game or x_8 is an artist we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 is a bartender. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_8 for which if x_8 were a politician, then x_8 is not a bartender, and that for all x_8, x_8 is a bartender we can infer that there is at least one x_8 for which x_8 is not a politician, which contradicts that For all x_8, x_8 is a politician. Therefore, the answer is no.