Consider the following premises. If James were an artist, then it is windy. It is not overcast. It is late if and only if it is overcast. If it is windy, then James is an artist. It is windy if and only if it is late. Can we infer the following from them? James is an artist.
 From the fact that it is late if and only if it is overcast, and that it is not overcast we can infer that it is not late. From the fact that if James were an artist, then it is windy, and that if it is windy, then James is an artist we can infer that James is an artist if and only if it is windy. From the fact that James is an artist if and only if it is windy we can infer that if James were an artist, then it is windy. From the fact that it is windy if and only if it is late, and that it is not late we can infer that it is not windy. Finally, from the fact that if James were an artist, then it is windy, and that it is not windy we can infer that James is not an artist, which contradicts that James is an artist. Therefore, the answer is no.