Consider the following premises. For all x_15, x_15 is a bartender if and only if x_15 is a soldier. For all x_15, if x_15 were a police officer, then x_15 is a soldier. There is at least one x_15 for which if x_15 drives a car, then x_15 is a police officer. For all x_15, if x_15 were a bartender, then x_15 is driving a car. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_15, the fact that x_15 were a police officer does not imply that x_15 is a bartender.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.