Consider the following premises. For all x_16, if x_16 reads a book, then x_16 is a politician. For all x_16, if x_16 drinks water, then x_16 is reading a book. For all z, z will drink water. Can we infer the following from them? Karen is not a politician.
 From the fact that for all x_16, if x_16 drinks water, then x_16 is reading a book, and that for all x_16, if x_16 reads a book, then x_16 is a politician we can infer that for all x_16, if x_16 drinks water, then x_16 is a politician. From the fact that for all z, z will drink water we can infer that Karen is drinking water. From the fact that for all x_16, if x_16 drinks water, then x_16 is a politician we can infer that if Karen drinks water, then Karen is a politician. Finally, from the fact that if Karen drinks water, then Karen is a politician, and that Karen is drinking water we can infer that Karen is a politician, which contradicts that Karen is not a politician. Therefore, the answer is no.