Consider the following premises. For all x_9, if x_9 plays a game, then x_9 is a lawyer. For all x_9, x_9 will play a game. For all x_9, if x_9 makes tea, then x_9 is an artist. For all x_9, if x_9 were a lawyer, then x_9 is an artist. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: Jessica is an artist.
 From the fact that for all x_9, x_9 will play a game we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 will play a game or x_9 will make tea via universal addition. From the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 plays a game, then x_9 is a lawyer, and that for all x_9, if x_9 were a lawyer, then x_9 is an artist we can infer that for all x_9, if x_9 plays a game, then x_9 is an artist via universal transitivity. From the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 plays a game, then x_9 is an artist, that for all x_9, if x_9 makes tea, then x_9 is an artist, and that for all x_9, x_9 will play a game or x_9 will make tea we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 is an artist via universal disjunction elimination. Finally, from the fact that for all x_9, x_9 is an artist we can infer that Jessica is an artist via universal instantiation. Therefore, the answer is yes.