Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 plays squash, then x_10 is playing tennis. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 goes running, then x_10 is playing squash. For all x_10, x_10 will go running if and only if x_10 will cook. For all x_10, if x_10 plays tennis, then x_10 is taking a plane. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: For all x_10, the fact that x_10 cooks does not imply that x_10 is taking a plane.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.