Consider the following premises. It is not cloudy. It is windy. It is cloudy or Patricia is driving a car. If it is windy, then Mary is a police officer. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: Patricia is not driving a car.
 From the fact that if it is windy, then Mary is a police officer, and that it is windy we can infer that Mary is a police officer via modus ponens. Finally, from the fact that it is cloudy or Patricia is driving a car, and that it is not cloudy we can infer that Patricia is driving a car via disjunctive syllogism, which contradicts that Patricia is not driving a car. Therefore, the answer is no.