Consider the following premises. q. forall x_16: P_12(x_16). forall x_16: P_16(x_16) or Q_16(x_16). forall x_16: Q_16(x_16) -> R_16(x_16). forall x_16: P_16(x_16) -> R_16(x_16). Can we infer ~P_12(a_11) from them?
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.