Consider the following premises. There is at least one x for which if x plays squash, then x is driving a car. For all x, if x drives a car, then x is playing squash. For all x, if x were bored, then x is driving a car. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: For all x, the fact that x were bored does not imply that x is playing squash.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.