Consider the following premises. For all x_6, if x_6 were a police officer, then x_6 is a cashier. For all x_6, if x_6 were a carpenter, then x_6 is a police officer. There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is a carpenter or x_6 will not drive a car. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_6, the fact that x_6 drives a car does not imply that x_6 is a cashier.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.