Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were bored, then x_6 is taking a plane. For all x_6, x_6 will take a plane or x_6 is not a lawyer. For all x_6, x_6 is poor or x_6 is bored. For all x_6, if x_6 were poor, then x_6 is a lawyer. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_6, x_6 will not take a plane.
 From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 will take a plane or x_6 is not a lawyer we can infer that for all x_6, if x_6 were a lawyer, then x_6 is taking a plane. From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 were poor, then x_6 is a lawyer, and that for all x_6, if x_6 were a lawyer, then x_6 is taking a plane we can infer that for all x_6, if x_6 were poor, then x_6 is taking a plane. Finally, from the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 were poor, then x_6 is taking a plane, that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were bored, then x_6 is taking a plane, and that for all x_6, x_6 is poor or x_6 is bored we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which x_6 will take a plane, which contradicts that For all x_6, x_6 will not take a plane. Therefore, the answer is no.