Consider the following premises. exists x_14: Q_8(x_14) -> P_14(x_14). forall x_14: P_14(x_14) <-> W(x_14). forall x_14: ~Q_6(x_14). forall x_14: W(x_14) <-> Q_6(x_14). forall x_14: W(x_14) -> Q_8(x_14). Can we infer forall x_14: P_14(x_14) from them?
 From forall x_14: P_14(x_14) <-> W(x_14) we can infer forall x_14: P_14(x_14) -> W(x_14). From forall x_14: W(x_14) -> Q_8(x_14), exists x_14: Q_8(x_14) -> P_14(x_14) we can infer exists x_14: W(x_14) -> P_14(x_14). From forall x_14: W(x_14) <-> Q_6(x_14), forall x_14: ~Q_6(x_14) we can infer forall x_14: ~W(x_14). From exists x_14: W(x_14) -> P_14(x_14), forall x_14: P_14(x_14) -> W(x_14) we can infer exists x_14: W(x_14) <-> P_14(x_14). Finally, from exists x_14: W(x_14) <-> P_14(x_14), forall x_14: ~W(x_14) we can infer exists x_14: ~P_14(x_14), which contradicts forall x_14: P_14(x_14). Therefore, the answer is no.