Consider the following premises. For all x_6, x_6 is a server or x_6 is not a lawyer. For all x_6, if x_6 sleeps, then x_6 is a lawyer. There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 will sleep or x_6 is an electrician. For all x_6, if x_6 were an electrician, then x_6 is a server. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is a server.
 From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 is a server or x_6 is not a lawyer we can infer that for all x_6, if x_6 were a lawyer, then x_6 is a server. From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 sleeps, then x_6 is a lawyer, and that for all x_6, if x_6 were a lawyer, then x_6 is a server we can infer that for all x_6, if x_6 sleeps, then x_6 is a server. Finally, from the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 sleeps, then x_6 is a server, that for all x_6, if x_6 were an electrician, then x_6 is a server, and that there is at least one x_6 for which x_6 will sleep or x_6 is an electrician we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is a server. Therefore, the answer is yes.