Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 were a musician, then x_10 is playing squash. For all x_10, x_10 is a musician if and only if x_10 will drive a car. For all x_10, x_10 will drive a car if and only if x_10 is an electrician. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 plays squash, then x_10 is a musician. For all x_10, x_10 is not an electrician. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, x_10 will play squash.
 From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will drive a car if and only if x_10 is an electrician, and that for all x_10, x_10 is not an electrician we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will not drive a car. From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 were a musician, then x_10 is playing squash, and that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 plays squash, then x_10 is a musician we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a musician if and only if x_10 will play squash. From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 is a musician if and only if x_10 will drive a car, and that for all x_10, x_10 will not drive a car we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 is not a musician. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a musician if and only if x_10 will play squash, and that for all x_10, x_10 is not a musician we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will not play squash, which contradicts that For all x_10, x_10 will play squash. Therefore, the answer is no.