Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_3 for which x_3 will not work or x_3 will go running. For all x_3, if x_3 were a bartender, then x_3 is a poet. For all x_3, x_3 will work or x_3 is a bartender. For all x_3, if x_3 goes running, then x_3 is a poet. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_3, x_3 is not a poet.
 From the fact that for all x_3, x_3 will work or x_3 is a bartender, and that there is at least one x_3 for which x_3 will not work or x_3 will go running we can infer that there is at least one x_3 for which x_3 is a bartender or x_3 will go running. Finally, from the fact that for all x_3, if x_3 were a bartender, then x_3 is a poet, that for all x_3, if x_3 goes running, then x_3 is a poet, and that there is at least one x_3 for which x_3 is a bartender or x_3 will go running we can infer that there is at least one x_3 for which x_3 is a poet, which contradicts that For all x_3, x_3 is not a poet. Therefore, the answer is no.