Consider the following premises. For all x_9, x_9 will go running if and only if x_9 will read a book. For all x_9, if x_9 were bored, then x_9 is running. There is at least one x_9 for which x_9 is not bored. For all x_9, if x_9 goes running, then x_9 is bored. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_9, x_9 will read a book.
 From the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 goes running, then x_9 is bored, and that for all x_9, if x_9 were bored, then x_9 is running we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 will go running if and only if x_9 is bored. From the fact that for all x_9, x_9 will go running if and only if x_9 is bored, and that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 is not bored we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will not go running. Finally, from the fact that for all x_9, x_9 will go running if and only if x_9 will read a book, and that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will not go running we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will not read a book, which contradicts that For all x_9, x_9 will read a book. Therefore, the answer is no.