Consider the following premises. If Robert works, then David is poor. David is driving a car or Robert is working. If Jessica were a cashier, then David is not poor. Robert is not curious. For all x_32, if x_32 drives a car, then x_32 is poor. Robert is curious if and only if it is windy. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: It is windy.
 From the fact that for all x_32, if x_32 drives a car, then x_32 is poor we can infer that if David drives a car, then David is poor via universal instantiation. From the fact that if David drives a car, then David is poor, that if Robert works, then David is poor, and that David is driving a car or Robert is working we can infer that David is poor via disjunction elimination. Finally, from the fact that Robert is curious if and only if it is windy, and that Robert is not curious we can infer that it is not windy via biconditional elimination, which contradicts that It is windy. Therefore, the answer is no.