Consider the following premises. For all x_19, if x_19 drives a car, then x_19 is running. For all x_19, if x_19 were poor, then x_19 is fast. There is at least one x_19 for which x_19 is poor if and only if x_19 will go running. For all x_19, x_19 will drive a car or x_19 will not play tennis. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_19, the fact that x_19 plays tennis does not imply that x_19 is fast.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.