Consider the following premises. For all x_6, if x_6 were poor, then x_6 is an artist. For all x_6, if x_6 were an artist, then x_6 is an office clerk. There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is an office clerk or x_6 is not a soldier. For all x_6, x_6 is a soldier or x_6 is poor. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is an office clerk.
 From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 were poor, then x_6 is an artist, and that for all x_6, if x_6 were an artist, then x_6 is an office clerk we can infer that for all x_6, if x_6 were poor, then x_6 is an office clerk. From the fact that there is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is an office clerk or x_6 is not a soldier we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were a soldier, then x_6 is an office clerk. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were a soldier, then x_6 is an office clerk, that for all x_6, if x_6 were poor, then x_6 is an office clerk, and that for all x_6, x_6 is a soldier or x_6 is poor we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is an office clerk. Therefore, the answer is yes.