Consider the following premises. If it is windy, then it is snowing. If Linda were a carpenter, then it is windy. If it snows, then Linda is a carpenter. If it is sunny, then it is snowing. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: The fact that it is sunny does not imply that it is windy.
 From the fact that if it snows, then Linda is a carpenter, and that if Linda were a carpenter, then it is windy we can infer that if it snows, then it is windy via transitivity. From the fact that if it is windy, then it is snowing, and that if it snows, then it is windy we can infer that it is windy if and only if it is snowing via biconditional introduction. From the fact that it is windy if and only if it is snowing we can infer that if it snows, then it is windy via biconditional elimination. Finally, from the fact that if it is sunny, then it is snowing, and that if it snows, then it is windy we can infer that if it is sunny, then it is windy via transitivity, which contradicts that The fact that it is sunny does not imply that it is windy. Therefore, the answer is no.