Consider the following premises. For all x_9, if x_9 goes running, then x_9 is not fast. For all x_9, if x_9 drives a car, then x_9 is playing a game. For all x_9, x_9 will go running if and only if x_9 will play a game. There is at least one x_9 for which if x_9 plays a game, then x_9 is driving a car. For all x_9, x_9 is fast. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_9, x_9 will drive a car.
 From the fact that there is at least one x_9 for which if x_9 plays a game, then x_9 is driving a car, and that for all x_9, if x_9 drives a car, then x_9 is playing a game we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will play a game if and only if x_9 will drive a car. From the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 goes running, then x_9 is not fast, and that for all x_9, x_9 is fast we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 will not go running. From the fact that for all x_9, x_9 will go running if and only if x_9 will play a game, and that for all x_9, x_9 will not go running we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 will not play a game. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will play a game if and only if x_9 will drive a car, and that for all x_9, x_9 will not play a game we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will not drive a car, which contradicts that For all x_9, x_9 will drive a car. Therefore, the answer is no.