Consider the following premises. For all x_11, x_11 is an office clerk or x_11 is a cashier. For all x_11, if x_11 were an office clerk, then x_11 is playing tennis. There is at least one x_11 for which if x_11 were rich, then x_11 is playing tennis. For all x_11, if x_11 were a cashier, then x_11 is rich. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_11, neither x_11 will play tennis nor x_11 will play a game.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.