Consider the following premises. For all x_6, if x_6 plays a game, then x_6 is a scientist. For all x_6, if x_6 drives a car, then x_6 is making tea. There is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were a scientist, then x_6 is driving a car. For all x_6, x_6 will not make tea. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_6, x_6 will play a game.
 From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 plays a game, then x_6 is a scientist, and that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were a scientist, then x_6 is driving a car we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 plays a game, then x_6 is driving a car. From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 drives a car, then x_6 is making tea, and that for all x_6, x_6 will not make tea we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 will not drive a car. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 plays a game, then x_6 is driving a car, and that for all x_6, x_6 will not drive a car we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which x_6 will not play a game, which contradicts that For all x_6, x_6 will play a game. Therefore, the answer is no.