Consider the following premises. For all z_3, z_3 is a lawyer. There is at least one z_3 for which z_3 will listen to a song. For all z_3, z_3 will drive a car or z_3 is not a lawyer. Can we infer the following from them? For all z_3, either z_3 will listen to a song or z_3 will drive a car are not true.
 From the fact that for all z_3, z_3 will drive a car or z_3 is not a lawyer we can infer that for all z_3, if z_3 were a lawyer, then z_3 is driving a car. From the fact that for all z_3, if z_3 were a lawyer, then z_3 is driving a car, and that for all z_3, z_3 is a lawyer we can infer that for all z_3, z_3 will drive a car. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one z_3 for which z_3 will listen to a song, and that for all z_3, z_3 will drive a car we can infer that there is at least one z_3 for which z_3 will listen to a song and z_3 will drive a car, which contradicts that For all z_3, either z_3 will listen to a song or z_3 will drive a car are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.