Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_11 for which x_11 will make tea or x_11 will drive a car. For all x_11, x_11 will go running or x_11 will not drive a car. For all x_11, if x_11 drinks water, then x_11 is running. For all x_11, if x_11 makes tea, then x_11 is drinking water. For all x_11, if x_11 goes running, then x_11 is driving a car. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_11, x_11 will not go running.
 From the fact that for all x_11, x_11 will go running or x_11 will not drive a car we can infer that for all x_11, if x_11 drives a car, then x_11 is running. From the fact that for all x_11, if x_11 makes tea, then x_11 is drinking water, and that for all x_11, if x_11 drinks water, then x_11 is running we can infer that for all x_11, if x_11 makes tea, then x_11 is running. From the fact that for all x_11, if x_11 drives a car, then x_11 is running, and that for all x_11, if x_11 goes running, then x_11 is driving a car we can infer that for all x_11, x_11 will drive a car if and only if x_11 will go running. From the fact that for all x_11, x_11 will drive a car if and only if x_11 will go running we can infer that for all x_11, if x_11 drives a car, then x_11 is running. Finally, from the fact that for all x_11, if x_11 makes tea, then x_11 is running, that for all x_11, if x_11 drives a car, then x_11 is running, and that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 will make tea or x_11 will drive a car we can infer that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 will go running, which contradicts that For all x_11, x_11 will not go running. Therefore, the answer is no.