Consider the following premises. For all x_6, x_6 will play tennis. There is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 listens to a song, then x_6 is not reading a book. For all x_6, x_6 will read a book. For all x_6, if x_6 plays tennis, then x_6 is curious. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_6, x_6 will listen to a song.
 From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 plays tennis, then x_6 is curious, and that for all x_6, x_6 will play tennis we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is curious. From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 will read a book, and that for all x_6, x_6 is curious we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 will read a book and x_6 is curious. From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 will read a book and x_6 is curious we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 will read a book. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 listens to a song, then x_6 is not reading a book, and that for all x_6, x_6 will read a book we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which x_6 will not listen to a song, which contradicts that For all x_6, x_6 will listen to a song. Therefore, the answer is no.