Consider the following premises. For all x_9, if x_9 works, then x_9 is not a server. For all x_9, x_9 will work or x_9 is curious. For all x_9, x_9 is a server. For all x_9, x_9 is a police officer. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_9, x_9 is curious.
 From the fact that for all x_9, x_9 is a server, and that for all x_9, x_9 is a police officer we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 is a server and x_9 is a police officer. From the fact that for all x_9, x_9 is a server and x_9 is a police officer we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 is a server. From the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 works, then x_9 is not a server, and that for all x_9, x_9 is a server we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 will not work. Finally, from the fact that for all x_9, x_9 will work or x_9 is curious, and that for all x_9, x_9 will not work we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 is curious. Therefore, the answer is yes.