Consider the following premises. For all x_16, x_16 will play squash or x_16 is not a taxi driver. There is at least one x_16 for which if x_16 sleeps, then x_16 is playing squash. For all x_16, if x_16 drinks water, then x_16 is sleeping. For all x_16, x_16 will drink water or x_16 is a taxi driver. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_16, neither x_16 will play squash nor x_16 will climb a mountain.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.