Lawyer: This witness acknowledges being present at the restaurant and watching when my client, a famous television personality, was assaulted. Yet the witness claims to recognize the assailant, but not my famous client. Ttherefore, the witness' s testimony should be excluded. The lawyer's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?
A: There are other witnesses who can identify the lawyer's client as present during the assault.
B: The testimony of a witness to an assault should be included only if the witness claims to recognize both parties involved in the assault.
C: It is impossible to determine whether the witness actually recognized the assailant.
D: It is unlikely that anyone would fail to recognize the lawyer's client.
Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.
B