Consider the following premises. For all x_10, x_10 will not write a letter or x_10 will cook. For all x_10, x_10 will listen to a song if and only if x_10 is a lawyer. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 cooks, then x_10 is driving a car. For all x_10, x_10 will write a letter or x_10 will listen to a song. For all x_10, x_10 is not a lawyer. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will drive a car.
 From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will listen to a song if and only if x_10 is a lawyer, and that for all x_10, x_10 is not a lawyer we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will not listen to a song. From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will write a letter or x_10 will listen to a song, and that for all x_10, x_10 will not write a letter or x_10 will cook we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will listen to a song or x_10 will cook. From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will listen to a song or x_10 will cook, and that for all x_10, x_10 will not listen to a song we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will cook. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 cooks, then x_10 is driving a car, and that for all x_10, x_10 will cook we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will drive a car. Therefore, the answer is yes.