Consider the following premises. For all x_11, if x_11 reads a book, then x_11 is not driving a car. There is at least one x_11 for which x_11 will cook or x_11 is an electrician. For all x_11, x_11 will not cook or x_11 will drive a car. For all x_11, x_11 is not an electrician. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: For all x_11, x_11 will read a book.
 From the fact that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 will cook or x_11 is an electrician, and that for all x_11, x_11 will not cook or x_11 will drive a car we can infer that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 is an electrician or x_11 will drive a car via existential resolution. From the fact that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 is an electrician or x_11 will drive a car, and that for all x_11, x_11 is not an electrician we can infer that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 will drive a car via existential disjunctive syllogism. Finally, from the fact that for all x_11, if x_11 reads a book, then x_11 is not driving a car, and that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 will drive a car we can infer that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 will not read a book via existential modus tollens, which contradicts that For all x_11, x_11 will read a book. Therefore, the answer is no.