Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 drives a car, then x_10 is an artist. For all x_10, x_10 will not take a plane or x_10 will play tennis. For all x_10, x_10 is not an artist. For all x_10, x_10 will take a plane or x_10 will drive a car. There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will go running. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will go running and x_10 will play tennis.
 From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will take a plane or x_10 will drive a car, and that for all x_10, x_10 will not take a plane or x_10 will play tennis we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will drive a car or x_10 will play tennis. From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 drives a car, then x_10 is an artist, and that for all x_10, x_10 is not an artist we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will not drive a car. From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will drive a car or x_10 will play tennis, and that for all x_10, x_10 will not drive a car we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will play tennis. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will go running, and that for all x_10, x_10 will play tennis we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will go running and x_10 will play tennis. Therefore, the answer is yes.