Consider the following premises. For all x_8, if x_8 drives a car, then x_8 is a nurse. For all x_8, x_8 is a taxi driver or x_8 will drive a car. For all x_8, x_8 is not a nurse or x_8 will go running. For all x_8, if x_8 were a taxi driver, then x_8 is a nurse. There is at least one x_8 for which if x_8 were a doctor, then x_8 is rich. For all x_8, if x_8 goes running, then x_8 is rich. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_8, x_8 is not rich.
 From the fact that for all x_8, if x_8 were a taxi driver, then x_8 is a nurse, that for all x_8, if x_8 drives a car, then x_8 is a nurse, and that for all x_8, x_8 is a taxi driver or x_8 will drive a car we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 is a nurse. From the fact that for all x_8, x_8 is a nurse we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 is a nurse or x_8 is a doctor. From the fact that for all x_8, x_8 is a nurse or x_8 is a doctor, and that for all x_8, x_8 is not a nurse or x_8 will go running we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 is a doctor or x_8 will go running. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_8 for which if x_8 were a doctor, then x_8 is rich, that for all x_8, if x_8 goes running, then x_8 is rich, and that for all x_8, x_8 is a doctor or x_8 will go running we can infer that there is at least one x_8 for which x_8 is rich, which contradicts that For all x_8, x_8 is not rich. Therefore, the answer is no.