Consider the following premises. forall x_10: P_10(x_10) -> U_2(x_10). forall x_10: P_10(x_10) or Q_10(x_10). exists x_10: Q_10(x_10) -> U_2(x_10). forall x_10: W_3(x_10). Can we infer forall x_10: ~W_3(x_10) from them?
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.