Consider the following premises. For all x_6, if x_6 were a writer, then x_6 is running. For all x_6, if x_6 makes tea, then x_6 is reading a book. For all x_6, if x_6 were a taxi driver, then x_6 is reading a book. There is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 reads a book, then x_6 is running. For all x_6, x_6 will make tea or x_6 is a taxi driver. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 will go running.
 From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 makes tea, then x_6 is reading a book, that for all x_6, if x_6 were a taxi driver, then x_6 is reading a book, and that for all x_6, x_6 will make tea or x_6 is a taxi driver we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 will read a book. From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 will read a book we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 will read a book or x_6 is a writer. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 reads a book, then x_6 is running, that for all x_6, if x_6 were a writer, then x_6 is running, and that for all x_6, x_6 will read a book or x_6 is a writer we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which x_6 will go running. Therefore, the answer is yes.