Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were a lawyer, then x_6 is a musician. For all x_6, if x_6 plays a game, then x_6 is a musician. For all x_6, x_6 will not take a plane or x_6 is a lawyer. For all x_6, if x_6 listens to a song, then x_6 is playing a game. For all x_6, x_6 will take a plane or x_6 will listen to a song. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is a musician.
 From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 will take a plane or x_6 will listen to a song, and that for all x_6, x_6 will not take a plane or x_6 is a lawyer we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 will listen to a song or x_6 is a lawyer. From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 listens to a song, then x_6 is playing a game, and that for all x_6, if x_6 plays a game, then x_6 is a musician we can infer that for all x_6, if x_6 listens to a song, then x_6 is a musician. Finally, from the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 listens to a song, then x_6 is a musician, that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were a lawyer, then x_6 is a musician, and that for all x_6, x_6 will listen to a song or x_6 is a lawyer we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is a musician. Therefore, the answer is yes.