Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 were bored, then x_10 is a mechanic. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 were a bartender, then x_10 is bored. For all x_10, x_10 is a bartender if and only if x_10 will cook. For all x_10, if x_10 were a mechanic, then x_10 is reading a book. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, the fact that x_10 cooks does not imply that x_10 is reading a book.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.