Consider the following premises. For all x_17, if x_17 were a doctor, then x_17 is running. There is at least one x_17 for which x_17 is not bored or x_17 will listen to a song. For all x_17, x_17 is bored or x_17 will go running. For all x_17, x_17 is not a doctor. For all x_17, x_17 is a police officer. For all x_17, if x_17 goes running, then x_17 is a doctor. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_17, either x_17 is a police officer or x_17 will listen to a song are not true.
 From the fact that for all x_17, if x_17 were a doctor, then x_17 is running, and that for all x_17, if x_17 goes running, then x_17 is a doctor we can infer that for all x_17, x_17 is a doctor if and only if x_17 will go running. From the fact that for all x_17, x_17 is a doctor if and only if x_17 will go running, and that for all x_17, x_17 is not a doctor we can infer that for all x_17, x_17 will not go running. From the fact that for all x_17, x_17 is bored or x_17 will go running, and that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 is not bored or x_17 will listen to a song we can infer that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 will go running or x_17 will listen to a song. From the fact that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 will go running or x_17 will listen to a song, and that for all x_17, x_17 will not go running we can infer that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 will listen to a song. Finally, from the fact that for all x_17, x_17 is a police officer, and that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 will listen to a song we can infer that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 is a police officer and x_17 will listen to a song, which contradicts that For all x_17, either x_17 is a police officer or x_17 will listen to a song are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.