Consider the following premises. For all x_14, if x_14 plays squash, then x_14 is listening to a song. For all x_14, x_14 is not a nurse. There is at least one x_14 for which x_14 is a nurse or x_14 will listen to a song. For all x_14, if x_14 listens to a song, then x_14 is playing squash. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_14, x_14 will not play squash.
 From the fact that for all x_14, if x_14 listens to a song, then x_14 is playing squash, and that for all x_14, if x_14 plays squash, then x_14 is listening to a song we can infer that for all x_14, x_14 will listen to a song if and only if x_14 will play squash. From the fact that there is at least one x_14 for which x_14 is a nurse or x_14 will listen to a song, and that for all x_14, x_14 is not a nurse we can infer that there is at least one x_14 for which x_14 will listen to a song. From the fact that for all x_14, x_14 will listen to a song if and only if x_14 will play squash we can infer that for all x_14, if x_14 listens to a song, then x_14 is playing squash. Finally, from the fact that for all x_14, if x_14 listens to a song, then x_14 is playing squash, and that there is at least one x_14 for which x_14 will listen to a song we can infer that there is at least one x_14 for which x_14 will play squash, which contradicts that For all x_14, x_14 will not play squash. Therefore, the answer is no.