Consider the following premises. For all x_6, x_6 is a police officer if and only if x_6 is poor. For all x_6, if x_6 were curious, then x_6 is running. There is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 goes running, then x_6 is poor. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were curious, then x_6 is a police officer.
 From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 were curious, then x_6 is running, and that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 goes running, then x_6 is poor we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were curious, then x_6 is poor. From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 is a police officer if and only if x_6 is poor we can infer that for all x_6, if x_6 were poor, then x_6 is a police officer. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were curious, then x_6 is poor, and that for all x_6, if x_6 were poor, then x_6 is a police officer we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were curious, then x_6 is a police officer. Therefore, the answer is yes.