Restaurant owner: The newspaper reporter who panned my restaurant acknowledges having no special expertise about food and its preparation. His previous job was as a political reporter. He is a good writer, but he is not a true restaurant critic. A newspaper would never call someone a drama critic who had no special training in theater. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion drawn in the restaurant owner's argument?
A: The newspaper reporter who panned the restaurant acknowledges having no special expertise about food and its preparation.
B: The newspaper reporter who panned the restaurant is a good writer.
C: The newspaper reporter who panned the restaurant is not a true restaurant critic.
D: A newspaper would never call someone a drama critic who had no special training in theater.
Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.
C