Consider the following premises. For all x_9, if x_9 were rich, then x_9 is bored. For all x_9, if x_9 were bored, then x_9 is rich. For all x_9, x_9 is not bored. For all x_9, if x_9 makes tea, then x_9 is rich. For all x_9, if x_9 drives a car, then x_9 is making tea. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_9, x_9 will not drive a car.
 From the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 were bored, then x_9 is rich, and that for all x_9, if x_9 were rich, then x_9 is bored we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 is bored if and only if x_9 is rich. From the fact that for all x_9, x_9 is bored if and only if x_9 is rich, and that for all x_9, x_9 is not bored we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 is not rich. From the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 drives a car, then x_9 is making tea, and that for all x_9, if x_9 makes tea, then x_9 is rich we can infer that for all x_9, if x_9 drives a car, then x_9 is rich. Finally, from the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 drives a car, then x_9 is rich, and that for all x_9, x_9 is not rich we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 will not drive a car. Therefore, the answer is yes.