Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will play squash or x_5 is a bartender. For all x_5, if x_5 sleeps, then x_5 is listening to a song. For all x_5, if x_5 were a taxi driver, then x_5 is listening to a song. For all x_5, if x_5 plays squash, then x_5 is sleeping. For all x_5, if x_5 were a bartender, then x_5 is a taxi driver. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_5, x_5 will not listen to a song.
 From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were a bartender, then x_5 is a taxi driver, and that for all x_5, if x_5 were a taxi driver, then x_5 is listening to a song we can infer that for all x_5, if x_5 were a bartender, then x_5 is listening to a song. From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 plays squash, then x_5 is sleeping, and that for all x_5, if x_5 sleeps, then x_5 is listening to a song we can infer that for all x_5, if x_5 plays squash, then x_5 is listening to a song. Finally, from the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 plays squash, then x_5 is listening to a song, that for all x_5, if x_5 were a bartender, then x_5 is listening to a song, and that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will play squash or x_5 is a bartender we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will listen to a song, which contradicts that For all x_5, x_5 will not listen to a song. Therefore, the answer is no.