Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_9 for which if x_9 were a poet, then x_9 is driving a car. For all x_9, x_9 will play a game. For all x_9, if x_9 plays a game, then x_9 is a poet. For all x_9, if x_9 drives a car, then x_9 is a poet. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_9 for which x_9 is a poet.
 From the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 drives a car, then x_9 is a poet, and that there is at least one x_9 for which if x_9 were a poet, then x_9 is driving a car we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will drive a car if and only if x_9 is a poet. From the fact that for all x_9, x_9 will play a game we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 will play a game or x_9 will drive a car. From the fact that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will drive a car if and only if x_9 is a poet we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which if x_9 drives a car, then x_9 is a poet. Finally, from the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 plays a game, then x_9 is a poet, that there is at least one x_9 for which if x_9 drives a car, then x_9 is a poet, and that for all x_9, x_9 will play a game or x_9 will drive a car we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 is a poet. Therefore, the answer is yes.