Consider the following premises. For all x_5, x_5 is not an artist or x_5 is an office clerk. There is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will read a book or x_5 is not an office clerk. For all x_5, x_5 is an artist or x_5 will drive a car. For all x_5, if x_5 drives a car, then x_5 is reading a book. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_5, x_5 will not read a book.
 From the fact that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will read a book or x_5 is not an office clerk we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 were an office clerk, then x_5 is reading a book. From the fact that for all x_5, x_5 is an artist or x_5 will drive a car, and that for all x_5, x_5 is not an artist or x_5 is an office clerk we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 will drive a car or x_5 is an office clerk. Finally, from the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 drives a car, then x_5 is reading a book, that there is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 were an office clerk, then x_5 is reading a book, and that for all x_5, x_5 will drive a car or x_5 is an office clerk we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will read a book, which contradicts that For all x_5, x_5 will not read a book. Therefore, the answer is no.