Consider the following premises. There is at least one y for which y is curious or y will not make tea. For all y, y is curious if and only if y is poor. For all y, if y were poor, then y is making tea. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: For all y, the fact that y makes tea does not imply that y is curious.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.