Consider the following premises. For all x_2, x_2 is a janitor or x_2 is a server. For all x_2, x_2 is not a janitor or x_2 will drive a car. For all x_2, x_2 is not a server or x_2 will listen to a song. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_2 for which neither x_2 will drive a car nor x_2 will listen to a song.
 From the fact that for all x_2, x_2 is a janitor or x_2 is a server, and that for all x_2, x_2 is not a janitor or x_2 will drive a car we can infer that for all x_2, x_2 is a server or x_2 will drive a car. Finally, from the fact that for all x_2, x_2 is a server or x_2 will drive a car, and that for all x_2, x_2 is not a server or x_2 will listen to a song we can infer that for all x_2, x_2 will drive a car or x_2 will listen to a song, which contradicts that There is at least one x_2 for which neither x_2 will drive a car nor x_2 will listen to a song. Therefore, the answer is no.