Consider the following premises. For all x_12, if x_12 drinks water, then x_12 is working. There is at least one x_12 for which if x_12 sleeps, then x_12 is drinking water. For all x_12, if x_12 drinks water, then x_12 is sleeping. For all x_12, if x_12 works, then x_12 is drinking water. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: For all x_12, the fact that x_12 works does not imply that x_12 is sleeping.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.