Consider the following premises. There is at least one z for which if z drinks water, then z is reading a book. For all z, if z drinks water, then z is not a carpenter. For all z, if z reads a book, then z is drinking water. For all z, z is a carpenter. Can we infer the following from them? For all z, z will read a book.
 From the fact that there is at least one z for which if z drinks water, then z is reading a book, and that for all z, if z reads a book, then z is drinking water we can infer that there is at least one z for which z will drink water if and only if z will read a book. From the fact that for all z, if z drinks water, then z is not a carpenter, and that for all z, z is a carpenter we can infer that for all z, z will not drink water. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one z for which z will drink water if and only if z will read a book, and that for all z, z will not drink water we can infer that there is at least one z for which z will not read a book, which contradicts that For all z, z will read a book. Therefore, the answer is no.