Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is not bored. For all x_10, if x_10 were a nurse, then x_10 is a lawyer. For all x_10, x_10 is bored or x_10 will work. For all x_10, x_10 is a nurse. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will work and x_10 is a lawyer.
 From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 were a nurse, then x_10 is a lawyer, and that for all x_10, x_10 is a nurse we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 is a lawyer. From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 is bored or x_10 will work, and that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is not bored we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will work. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will work, and that for all x_10, x_10 is a lawyer we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will work and x_10 is a lawyer. Therefore, the answer is yes.