Consider the following premises. For all x_6, if x_6 works, then x_6 is driving a car. For all x_6, if x_6 were a musician, then x_6 is a poet. There is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were a poet, then x_6 is driving a car. For all x_6, if x_6 were a nurse, then x_6 is a poet. For all x_6, x_6 is a musician or x_6 is a nurse. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_6, x_6 will not drive a car.
 From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 were a musician, then x_6 is a poet, that for all x_6, if x_6 were a nurse, then x_6 is a poet, and that for all x_6, x_6 is a musician or x_6 is a nurse we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is a poet. From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 is a poet we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is a poet or x_6 will work. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were a poet, then x_6 is driving a car, that for all x_6, if x_6 works, then x_6 is driving a car, and that for all x_6, x_6 is a poet or x_6 will work we can infer that there is at least one x_6 for which x_6 will drive a car, which contradicts that For all x_6, x_6 will not drive a car. Therefore, the answer is no.