Consider the following premises. For all x_13, x_13 is a taxi driver or x_13 is not sad. For all x_13, x_13 is a taxi driver or x_13 is not excited. For all x_13, x_13 is excited. Can we infer the following from them? James is not a taxi driver.
 From the fact that for all x_13, x_13 is excited we can infer that for all x_13, x_13 is excited or x_13 is sad. From the fact that for all x_13, x_13 is a taxi driver or x_13 is not sad we can infer that for all x_13, if x_13 were sad, then x_13 is a taxi driver. From the fact that for all x_13, x_13 is a taxi driver or x_13 is not excited we can infer that for all x_13, if x_13 were excited, then x_13 is a taxi driver. Finally, from the fact that for all x_13, if x_13 were excited, then x_13 is a taxi driver, that for all x_13, if x_13 were sad, then x_13 is a taxi driver, and that for all x_13, x_13 is excited or x_13 is sad we can infer that for all x_13, x_13 is a taxi driver, which contradicts that James is not a taxi driver. Therefore, the answer is no.