Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_6 for which if x_6 were bored, then x_6 is climbing a mountain. For all x_6, x_6 is a scientist or x_6 will not work. For all x_6, if x_6 were a scientist, then x_6 is bored. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_6, the fact that x_6 works does not imply that x_6 is climbing a mountain.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.