Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 were bored, then x_10 is a lawyer. There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is bored or x_10 is a musician. For all x_10, x_10 is not a lawyer. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, neither x_10 is a musician nor x_10 is excited.
 From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 were bored, then x_10 is a lawyer, and that for all x_10, x_10 is not a lawyer we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 is not bored. From the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is bored or x_10 is a musician, and that for all x_10, x_10 is not bored we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a musician. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a musician we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a musician or x_10 is excited, which contradicts that For all x_10, neither x_10 is a musician nor x_10 is excited. Therefore, the answer is no.