Consider the following premises. If Barbara works, then Robert is drinking water. If Robert drinks water, then it is sunny. Robert is making tea if and only if it is sunny. For all x_24, x_24 will not make tea. If Jessica reads a book, then Barbara is working. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: Jessica is not reading a book.
 From the fact that for all x_24, x_24 will not make tea we can infer that Robert is not making tea via universal instantiation. From the fact that Robert is making tea if and only if it is sunny, and that Robert is not making tea we can infer that it is not sunny via biconditional elimination. From the fact that if Jessica reads a book, then Barbara is working, and that if Barbara works, then Robert is drinking water we can infer that if Jessica reads a book, then Robert is drinking water via transitivity. From the fact that if Robert drinks water, then it is sunny, and that it is not sunny we can infer that Robert is not drinking water via modus tollens. Finally, from the fact that if Jessica reads a book, then Robert is drinking water, and that Robert is not drinking water we can infer that Jessica is not reading a book via modus tollens. Therefore, the answer is yes.