Consider the following premises. For all x_5, if x_5 were happy, then x_5 is drinking water. There is at least one x_5 for which x_5 is happy or x_5 will read a book. For all x_5, x_5 will not drink water. For all x_5, if x_5 drinks water, then x_5 is happy. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_5, x_5 will not read a book.
 From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were happy, then x_5 is drinking water, and that for all x_5, if x_5 drinks water, then x_5 is happy we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is happy if and only if x_5 will drink water. From the fact that for all x_5, x_5 is happy if and only if x_5 will drink water, and that for all x_5, x_5 will not drink water we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is not happy. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 is happy or x_5 will read a book, and that for all x_5, x_5 is not happy we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will read a book, which contradicts that For all x_5, x_5 will not read a book. Therefore, the answer is no.