Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is an office clerk or x_7 is a politician. For all x_7, x_7 is not an office clerk or x_7 will go running. For all x_7, if x_7 were a politician, then x_7 is poor. For all x_7, x_7 is poor if and only if x_7 will go running. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_7, x_7 is not poor.
 From the fact that for all x_7, x_7 is poor if and only if x_7 will go running we can infer that for all x_7, if x_7 goes running, then x_7 is poor. From the fact that there is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is an office clerk or x_7 is a politician, and that for all x_7, x_7 is not an office clerk or x_7 will go running we can infer that there is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is a politician or x_7 will go running. Finally, from the fact that for all x_7, if x_7 were a politician, then x_7 is poor, that for all x_7, if x_7 goes running, then x_7 is poor, and that there is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is a politician or x_7 will go running we can infer that there is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is poor, which contradicts that For all x_7, x_7 is not poor. Therefore, the answer is no.