Consider the following premises. For all x_8, if x_8 works, then x_8 is playing tennis. For all x_8, x_8 will not play tennis. For all x_8, if x_8 plays tennis, then x_8 is working. There is at least one x_8 for which x_8 will work. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: For all x_8, x_8 will not go running.
The premises are contradictory and we can infer anything from them. Therefore, the answer is yes.