Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_14 for which if x_14 were a soldier, then x_14 is an office clerk. For all x_14, if x_14 were a soldier, then x_14 is a lawyer. For all x_14, if x_14 were a lawyer, then x_14 is a soldier. For all x_14, x_14 is a lawyer if and only if x_14 will play tennis. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_14, the fact that x_14 plays tennis does not imply that x_14 is an office clerk.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.