Consider the following premises. There is at least one z for which if z plays tennis, then z is a server. For all z, z will not play tennis. For all z, z will play tennis or z will not read a book. For all z, if z were a server, then z is reading a book. Can we infer the following from them? For all z, z will read a book.
 From the fact that there is at least one z for which if z plays tennis, then z is a server, and that for all z, if z were a server, then z is reading a book we can infer that there is at least one z for which if z plays tennis, then z is reading a book. From the fact that for all z, z will play tennis or z will not read a book we can infer that for all z, if z reads a book, then z is playing tennis. From the fact that there is at least one z for which if z plays tennis, then z is reading a book, and that for all z, if z reads a book, then z is playing tennis we can infer that there is at least one z for which z will play tennis if and only if z will read a book. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one z for which z will play tennis if and only if z will read a book, and that for all z, z will not play tennis we can infer that there is at least one z for which z will not read a book, which contradicts that For all z, z will read a book. Therefore, the answer is no.