Consider the following premises. For all x_2, if x_2 were bored, then x_2 is running. There is at least one x_2 for which if x_2 were a doctor, then x_2 is running. For all x_2, x_2 is a doctor or x_2 is a musician. For all x_2, if x_2 were a musician, then x_2 is bored. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_2, x_2 will not go running.
 From the fact that for all x_2, if x_2 were a musician, then x_2 is bored, and that for all x_2, if x_2 were bored, then x_2 is running we can infer that for all x_2, if x_2 were a musician, then x_2 is running. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_2 for which if x_2 were a doctor, then x_2 is running, that for all x_2, if x_2 were a musician, then x_2 is running, and that for all x_2, x_2 is a doctor or x_2 is a musician we can infer that there is at least one x_2 for which x_2 will go running, which contradicts that For all x_2, x_2 will not go running. Therefore, the answer is no.