Consider the following premises. For all x_12, if x_12 works, then x_12 is curious. For all x_12, if x_12 were curious, then x_12 is working. There is at least one x_12 for which x_12 will work or x_12 is not curious. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_12, the fact that x_12 were curious does not imply that x_12 is working.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.