In Peck's antitrust suit against manufacturers of insulation, Peck's interrogatories asked for information concerning total sales of insulation by each of the defendant manufacturers in a particular year. The defendants replied to the interrogatories by referring Peck to the Insulation Manufacturer's Annual Journal for the information. If, at trial, Peck offers the annual as evidence of the sales volume, this evidence is:
A. Admissible, as an adoptive admission of the defendants.
B. Admissible, as a business record.
C. Inadmissible, as hearsay not within any exception.
D. Inadmissible, as lacking sufficient authentication. 
Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.
A