Consider the following premises. For all x_9, if x_9 were a lawyer, then x_9 is curious. There is at least one x_9 for which x_9 is a server. For all x_9, if x_9 were an artist, then x_9 is curious. For all x_9, x_9 is a lawyer. For all x_9, if x_9 were curious, then x_9 is a soldier. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_9, either x_9 is a soldier or x_9 is a server are not true.
 From the fact that for all x_9, x_9 is a lawyer we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 is a lawyer or x_9 is an artist. From the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 were a lawyer, then x_9 is curious, that for all x_9, if x_9 were an artist, then x_9 is curious, and that for all x_9, x_9 is a lawyer or x_9 is an artist we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 is curious. From the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 were curious, then x_9 is a soldier, and that for all x_9, x_9 is curious we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 is a soldier. Finally, from the fact that for all x_9, x_9 is a soldier, and that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 is a server we can infer that some soldiers are servers, which contradicts that For all x_9, either x_9 is a soldier or x_9 is a server are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.