Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 reads a book, then x_10 is an artist. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 drives a car, then x_10 is making tea. For all x_10, x_10 will drive a car or x_10 is not an artist. For all x_10, if x_10 makes tea, then x_10 is reading a book. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will drive a car if and only if x_10 is an artist.
 From the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 drives a car, then x_10 is making tea, and that for all x_10, if x_10 makes tea, then x_10 is reading a book we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 drives a car, then x_10 is reading a book. From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will drive a car or x_10 is not an artist we can infer that for all x_10, if x_10 were an artist, then x_10 is driving a car. From the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 drives a car, then x_10 is reading a book, and that for all x_10, if x_10 reads a book, then x_10 is an artist we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 drives a car, then x_10 is an artist. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 drives a car, then x_10 is an artist, and that for all x_10, if x_10 were an artist, then x_10 is driving a car we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will drive a car if and only if x_10 is an artist. Therefore, the answer is yes.