Consider the following premises. For all x_5, x_5 is bored. There is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 were excited, then x_5 is reading a book. For all x_5, if x_5 were excited, then x_5 is not bored. For all x_5, if x_5 reads a book, then x_5 is excited. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_5, x_5 will read a book.
 From the fact that there is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 were excited, then x_5 is reading a book, and that for all x_5, if x_5 reads a book, then x_5 is excited we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 is excited if and only if x_5 will read a book. From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were excited, then x_5 is not bored, and that for all x_5, x_5 is bored we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is not excited. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 is excited if and only if x_5 will read a book, and that for all x_5, x_5 is not excited we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will not read a book, which contradicts that For all x_5, x_5 will read a book. Therefore, the answer is no.