Consider the following premises. For all x_5, if x_5 were rich, then x_5 is drinking water. For all x_5, if x_5 takes a plane, then x_5 is a soldier. For all x_5, x_5 is rich or x_5 will listen to a song. For all x_5, if x_5 drinks water, then x_5 is a soldier. There is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 listens to a song, then x_5 is taking a plane. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_5, x_5 is not a soldier.
 From the fact that there is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 listens to a song, then x_5 is taking a plane, and that for all x_5, if x_5 takes a plane, then x_5 is a soldier we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 listens to a song, then x_5 is a soldier. From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were rich, then x_5 is drinking water, and that for all x_5, if x_5 drinks water, then x_5 is a soldier we can infer that for all x_5, if x_5 were rich, then x_5 is a soldier. Finally, from the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were rich, then x_5 is a soldier, that there is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 listens to a song, then x_5 is a soldier, and that for all x_5, x_5 is rich or x_5 will listen to a song we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 is a soldier, which contradicts that For all x_5, x_5 is not a soldier. Therefore, the answer is no.