Vincent, who operated a local neighborhood liquor store, was robbed by a man wielding an unusual knife with a pearl-studded handle. Davis was arrested and charged with armed robbery of Vincent. At trial the prosecution calls Wilma to testify that, three days after the robbery of Vincent, she was robbed by Davis with a knife that had a pearl-studded handle. The court will most likely hold that Wilma's testimony is:
A. Admissible, as showing habit.
B. Admissible, as establishing an identifying circumstance.
C. Inadmissible, because it is improper character evidence.
D. Inadmissible, because its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.
Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.
B