Consider the following premises. For all x_8, if x_8 were a musician, then x_8 is reading a book. For all x_8, x_8 will cook. For all x_8, x_8 is not a bartender. For all x_8, x_8 is a bartender or x_8 is curious. For all x_8, if x_8 were curious, then x_8 is reading a book. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_8 for which either x_8 will read a book or x_8 will cook are not true.
 From the fact that for all x_8, x_8 is a bartender or x_8 is curious, and that for all x_8, x_8 is not a bartender we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 is curious. From the fact that for all x_8, x_8 is curious we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 is curious or x_8 is a musician. From the fact that for all x_8, if x_8 were curious, then x_8 is reading a book, that for all x_8, if x_8 were a musician, then x_8 is reading a book, and that for all x_8, x_8 is curious or x_8 is a musician we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 will read a book. Finally, from the fact that for all x_8, x_8 will read a book, and that for all x_8, x_8 will cook we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 will read a book and x_8 will cook, which contradicts that There is at least one x_8 for which either x_8 will read a book or x_8 will cook are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.