Consider the following premises. For all x_14, if x_14 climbs a mountain, then x_14 is playing a game. There is at least one x_14 for which x_14 will drink water or x_14 will not play a game. For all x_14, if x_14 drives a car, then x_14 is climbing a mountain. For all x_14, if x_14 plays a game, then x_14 is climbing a mountain. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_14, the fact that x_14 drives a car does not imply that x_14 is drinking water.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.