Consider the following premises. For all x_14, if x_14 were a politician, then x_14 is playing tennis. There is at least one x_14 for which x_14 is a police officer or x_14 is not a politician. For all x_14, if x_14 plays a game, then x_14 is playing tennis. For all x_14, if x_14 plays tennis, then x_14 is a politician. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: For all x_14, the fact that x_14 plays a game does not imply that x_14 is a police officer.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.