Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 plays tennis, then x_10 is cooking. For all x_10, x_10 will climb a mountain or x_10 will play tennis. There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will not climb a mountain. For all x_10, if x_10 cooks, then x_10 is drinking water. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, x_10 will not drink water.
 From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 plays tennis, then x_10 is cooking, and that for all x_10, if x_10 cooks, then x_10 is drinking water we can infer that for all x_10, if x_10 plays tennis, then x_10 is drinking water. From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will climb a mountain or x_10 will play tennis, and that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will not climb a mountain we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will play tennis. Finally, from the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 plays tennis, then x_10 is drinking water, and that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will play tennis we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will drink water, which contradicts that For all x_10, x_10 will not drink water. Therefore, the answer is no.