Consider the following premises. For all x_14, x_14 is rich. For all x_14, x_14 is excited. There is at least one x_14 for which x_14 is poor and x_14 is a cashier. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_14, either x_14 is excited or x_14 is poor are not true.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.