Consider the following premises. For all x_5, x_5 is curious or x_5 is a writer. For all x_5, if x_5 were curious, then x_5 is taking a plane. For all x_5, x_5 will not take a plane. There is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will play a game. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_5, either x_5 will play a game or x_5 is a writer are not true.
 From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were curious, then x_5 is taking a plane, and that for all x_5, x_5 will not take a plane we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is not curious. From the fact that for all x_5, x_5 is curious or x_5 is a writer, and that for all x_5, x_5 is not curious we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is a writer. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will play a game, and that for all x_5, x_5 is a writer we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will play a game and x_5 is a writer, which contradicts that For all x_5, either x_5 will play a game or x_5 is a writer are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.