Consider the following premises. If Susan were a musician, then Joseph is an artist. If Jessica were a server, then Susan is a musician. Jessica is a server if and only if it is cloudy. It is not windy. It is windy if and only if Joseph is an artist. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: It is cloudy.
 From the fact that if Jessica were a server, then Susan is a musician, and that if Susan were a musician, then Joseph is an artist we can infer that if Jessica were a server, then Joseph is an artist via transitivity. From the fact that it is windy if and only if Joseph is an artist, and that it is not windy we can infer that Joseph is not an artist via biconditional elimination. From the fact that if Jessica were a server, then Joseph is an artist, and that Joseph is not an artist we can infer that Jessica is not a server via modus tollens. Finally, from the fact that Jessica is a server if and only if it is cloudy, and that Jessica is not a server we can infer that it is not cloudy via biconditional elimination, which contradicts that It is cloudy. Therefore, the answer is no.