Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 were a server, then x_5 is excited. For all x_5, if x_5 were a politician, then x_5 is a server. For all x_5, if x_5 were a server, then x_5 is a politician. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 were a politician, then x_5 is excited.
 From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were a server, then x_5 is a politician, and that for all x_5, if x_5 were a politician, then x_5 is a server we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is a server if and only if x_5 is a politician. From the fact that for all x_5, x_5 is a server if and only if x_5 is a politician we can infer that for all x_5, if x_5 were a politician, then x_5 is a server. Finally, from the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were a politician, then x_5 is a server, and that there is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 were a server, then x_5 is excited we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which if x_5 were a politician, then x_5 is excited. Therefore, the answer is yes.