Consider the following premises. For all x_5, if x_5 were a carpenter, then x_5 is a poet. There is at least one x_5 for which x_5 is a server or x_5 will work. For all x_5, x_5 is not a poet. For all x_5, x_5 is a carpenter if and only if x_5 is a server. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_5, x_5 will not work.
 From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were a carpenter, then x_5 is a poet, and that for all x_5, x_5 is not a poet we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is not a carpenter. From the fact that for all x_5, x_5 is a carpenter if and only if x_5 is a server, and that for all x_5, x_5 is not a carpenter we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is not a server. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 is a server or x_5 will work, and that for all x_5, x_5 is not a server we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will work, which contradicts that For all x_5, x_5 will not work. Therefore, the answer is no.