Consider the following premises. forall x_17: R_17(x_17) -> S_17(x_17). q_4 -> R_17(a_17). S_17(a_17) <-> q_4. Can we infer ~(S_17(a_17) -> R_17(a_17)) from them? If possible, name the inference rules being used at each step.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.