Consider the following premises. For all z, if z plays tennis, then z is a sailor. For all z, if z writes a letter, then z is playing tennis. There is at least one z for which if z works, then z is writing a letter. For all z, if z were a sailor, then z is drinking water. Can we infer the following from them? For all z, the fact that z works does not imply that z is drinking water.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.