Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is excited. For all x_7, if x_7 were a soldier, then x_7 is an astronaut. For all x_7, x_7 is not an astronaut. For all x_7, x_7 is a soldier or x_7 is an electrician. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_7, x_7 is not excited.
 From the fact that for all x_7, if x_7 were a soldier, then x_7 is an astronaut, and that for all x_7, x_7 is not an astronaut we can infer that for all x_7, x_7 is not a soldier. From the fact that for all x_7, x_7 is a soldier or x_7 is an electrician, and that for all x_7, x_7 is not a soldier we can infer that for all x_7, x_7 is an electrician. From the fact that for all x_7, x_7 is an electrician, and that there is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is excited we can infer that there is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is an electrician and x_7 is excited. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is an electrician and x_7 is excited we can infer that there is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is an electrician, which contradicts that For all x_7, x_7 is not excited. Therefore, the answer is no.