Consider the following premises. For all x_5, x_5 is a lawyer. For all x_5, if x_5 goes running, then x_5 is not a lawyer. For all x_5, if x_5 were a server, then x_5 is a soldier. For all x_5, if x_5 were a soldier, then x_5 is running. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_5, x_5 is not a server.
 From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were a server, then x_5 is a soldier, and that for all x_5, if x_5 were a soldier, then x_5 is running we can infer that for all x_5, if x_5 were a server, then x_5 is running. From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 goes running, then x_5 is not a lawyer, and that for all x_5, x_5 is a lawyer we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 will not go running. Finally, from the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were a server, then x_5 is running, and that for all x_5, x_5 will not go running we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is not a server. Therefore, the answer is yes.