Consider the following premises. Jessica is a police officer or Michael is playing a game. If Linda climbs a mountain, then Richard is driving a car. Susan is happy or Linda is climbing a mountain. Jessica is not a police officer. If Susan were happy, then Richard is driving a car. If Richard were a soldier, then Michael is not playing a game. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: Richard is not driving a car.
 From the fact that Jessica is a police officer or Michael is playing a game, and that Jessica is not a police officer we can infer that Michael is playing a game via disjunctive syllogism. From the fact that if Richard were a soldier, then Michael is not playing a game, and that Michael is playing a game we can infer that Richard is not a soldier via modus tollens. Finally, from the fact that if Susan were happy, then Richard is driving a car, that if Linda climbs a mountain, then Richard is driving a car, and that Susan is happy or Linda is climbing a mountain we can infer that Richard is driving a car via disjunction elimination, which contradicts that Richard is not driving a car. Therefore, the answer is no.