Investors: Your company is responsible for discovering fraudulent bookkeeping practices of your accountants. You were given access to investment funds to hire six auditors to examine the books, but you hired only four auditors. We must conclude that your company purposely hired only the limited number of auditors in an effort to avoid the full extent of the fraudulent bookkeeping practices from being exposed. Company president: Our company tried to hire six auditors, but the stringent hiring requirements set by the investors were so strict that it was impossible to find two more qualified auditors. The company president responds to the investors' accusation by
A: proving that the investors' comments are self-contradictory
B: rewording the investors conclusion to make it more favorable to the company president
C: highlighting a relevant fact that challenges the conclusion drawn by the investors
D: accusing the investors of attempting to conceal the fraudulent bookkeeping practices
Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.
C