Consider the following premises. For all x_15, x_15 is fast or x_15 is a police officer. For all x_15, x_15 is not a bartender. There is at least one x_15 for which x_15 is a bartender or x_15 will go running. For all x_15, x_15 is not fast or x_15 will cook. For all x_15, x_15 is not a police officer. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_15, either x_15 will cook or x_15 will go running are not true.
 From the fact that for all x_15, x_15 is fast or x_15 is a police officer, and that for all x_15, x_15 is not fast or x_15 will cook we can infer that for all x_15, x_15 is a police officer or x_15 will cook. From the fact that there is at least one x_15 for which x_15 is a bartender or x_15 will go running, and that for all x_15, x_15 is not a bartender we can infer that there is at least one x_15 for which x_15 will go running. From the fact that for all x_15, x_15 is a police officer or x_15 will cook, and that for all x_15, x_15 is not a police officer we can infer that for all x_15, x_15 will cook. Finally, from the fact that for all x_15, x_15 will cook, and that there is at least one x_15 for which x_15 will go running we can infer that there is at least one x_15 for which x_15 will cook and x_15 will go running, which contradicts that For all x_15, either x_15 will cook or x_15 will go running are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.