Consider the following premises. For all x_14, x_14 will listen to a song. For all x_14, if x_14 listens to a song, then x_14 is sad. For all x_14, if x_14 were sad, then x_14 is a police officer. If Jessica drives a car, then Elisabeth is not a police officer. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: Jessica is not driving a car.
 From the fact that for all x_14, if x_14 listens to a song, then x_14 is sad, and that for all x_14, x_14 will listen to a song we can infer that for all x_14, x_14 is sad via universal modus ponens. From the fact that for all x_14, if x_14 were sad, then x_14 is a police officer, and that for all x_14, x_14 is sad we can infer that for all x_14, x_14 is a police officer via universal modus ponens. From the fact that for all x_14, x_14 is a police officer we can infer that Elisabeth is a police officer via universal instantiation. Finally, from the fact that if Jessica drives a car, then Elisabeth is not a police officer, and that Elisabeth is a police officer we can infer that Jessica is not driving a car via modus tollens. Therefore, the answer is yes.