Consider the following premises. For all x_22, x_22 will drive a car if and only if x_22 will work. For all x_22, if x_22 were a carpenter, then x_22 is working. For all x_22, x_22 will not play squash. There is at least one x_22 for which x_22 will play squash or x_22 is a carpenter. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_22 for which x_22 will drive a car.
 From the fact that for all x_22, x_22 will drive a car if and only if x_22 will work we can infer that for all x_22, if x_22 works, then x_22 is driving a car. From the fact that there is at least one x_22 for which x_22 will play squash or x_22 is a carpenter, and that for all x_22, x_22 will not play squash we can infer that there is at least one x_22 for which x_22 is a carpenter. From the fact that for all x_22, if x_22 were a carpenter, then x_22 is working, and that there is at least one x_22 for which x_22 is a carpenter we can infer that there is at least one x_22 for which x_22 will work. Finally, from the fact that for all x_22, if x_22 works, then x_22 is driving a car, and that there is at least one x_22 for which x_22 will work we can infer that there is at least one x_22 for which x_22 will drive a car. Therefore, the answer is yes.