Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 plays tennis, then x_10 is drinking water. For all x_10, if x_10 drinks water, then x_10 is cooking. For all x_10, if x_10 cooks, then x_10 is playing tennis. For all x_10, if x_10 drinks water, then x_10 is playing tennis. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, the fact that x_10 plays tennis does not imply that x_10 is drinking water.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.