Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 were a server, then x_10 is not driving a car. For all x_10, x_10 will play tennis. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 plays tennis, then x_10 is driving a car. For all x_10, if x_10 works, then x_10 is driving a car. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, x_10 is a server.
 From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will play tennis we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will play tennis or x_10 will work. From the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 plays tennis, then x_10 is driving a car, that for all x_10, if x_10 works, then x_10 is driving a car, and that for all x_10, x_10 will play tennis or x_10 will work we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will drive a car. Finally, from the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 were a server, then x_10 is not driving a car, and that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will drive a car we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is not a server, which contradicts that For all x_10, x_10 is a server. Therefore, the answer is no.