Consider the following premises. For all x_6, x_6 will not drink water. For all x_6, x_6 is curious or x_6 will go running. For all x_6, if x_6 drinks water, then x_6 is rich. For all x_6, if x_6 were curious, then x_6 is drinking water. For all x_6, if x_6 were rich, then x_6 is curious. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 will not go running.
 From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 drinks water, then x_6 is rich, and that for all x_6, if x_6 were rich, then x_6 is curious we can infer that for all x_6, if x_6 drinks water, then x_6 is curious. From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 drinks water, then x_6 is curious, and that for all x_6, if x_6 were curious, then x_6 is drinking water we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 will drink water if and only if x_6 is curious. From the fact that for all x_6, x_6 will drink water if and only if x_6 is curious, and that for all x_6, x_6 will not drink water we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is not curious. Finally, from the fact that for all x_6, x_6 is curious or x_6 will go running, and that for all x_6, x_6 is not curious we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 will go running, which contradicts that There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 will not go running. Therefore, the answer is no.