Consider the following premises. For all x, x is a bartender. For all x, if x makes tea, then x is excited. There is at least one x for which if x were excited, then x is making tea. For all x, if x were excited, then x is not a bartender. Can we infer the following from them? For all x, x will make tea.
 From the fact that for all x, if x were excited, then x is not a bartender, and that for all x, x is a bartender we can infer that for all x, x is not excited. From the fact that there is at least one x for which if x were excited, then x is making tea, and that for all x, if x makes tea, then x is excited we can infer that there is at least one x for which x is excited if and only if x will make tea. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x for which x is excited if and only if x will make tea, and that for all x, x is not excited we can infer that there is at least one x for which x will not make tea, which contradicts that For all x, x will make tea. Therefore, the answer is no.