Consider the following premises. For all x_16, if x_16 plays a game, then x_16 is rich. If Linda were rich, then it is snowing. For all x_16, x_16 is an electrician if and only if x_16 will play a game. For all x_16, if x_16 were an astronaut, then x_16 is an electrician. Can we infer the following from them? If Linda were an astronaut, then it is snowing.
 From the fact that for all x_16, x_16 is an electrician if and only if x_16 will play a game we can infer that for all x_16, if x_16 were an electrician, then x_16 is playing a game. From the fact that for all x_16, if x_16 were an astronaut, then x_16 is an electrician, and that for all x_16, if x_16 were an electrician, then x_16 is playing a game we can infer that for all x_16, if x_16 were an astronaut, then x_16 is playing a game. From the fact that for all x_16, if x_16 were an astronaut, then x_16 is playing a game, and that for all x_16, if x_16 plays a game, then x_16 is rich we can infer that for all x_16, if x_16 were an astronaut, then x_16 is rich. From the fact that for all x_16, if x_16 were an astronaut, then x_16 is rich we can infer that if Linda were an astronaut, then Linda is rich. Finally, from the fact that if Linda were an astronaut, then Linda is rich, and that if Linda were rich, then it is snowing we can infer that if Linda were an astronaut, then it is snowing. Therefore, the answer is yes.