Consider the following premises. For all x_4, if x_4 makes tea, then x_4 is driving a car. For all x_4, if x_4 plays tennis, then x_4 is making tea. James is not driving a car. For all x_4, if x_4 drives a car, then x_4 is playing tennis. Can we infer the following from them? James is not playing tennis.
 From the fact that for all x_4, if x_4 plays tennis, then x_4 is making tea, and that for all x_4, if x_4 makes tea, then x_4 is driving a car we can infer that for all x_4, if x_4 plays tennis, then x_4 is driving a car. From the fact that for all x_4, if x_4 plays tennis, then x_4 is driving a car, and that for all x_4, if x_4 drives a car, then x_4 is playing tennis we can infer that for all x_4, x_4 will play tennis if and only if x_4 will drive a car. From the fact that for all x_4, x_4 will play tennis if and only if x_4 will drive a car we can infer that James is playing tennis if and only if James is driving a car. Finally, from the fact that James is playing tennis if and only if James is driving a car, and that James is not driving a car we can infer that James is not playing tennis. Therefore, the answer is yes.