Consider the following premises. For all x_11, if x_11 were a carpenter, then x_11 is playing tennis. For all x_11, x_11 is not a lawyer. For all x_11, x_11 is a lawyer or x_11 is an artist. There is at least one x_11 for which x_11 is a carpenter. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_11, either x_11 is an artist or x_11 will play tennis are not true.
 From the fact that for all x_11, x_11 is a lawyer or x_11 is an artist, and that for all x_11, x_11 is not a lawyer we can infer that for all x_11, x_11 is an artist. From the fact that for all x_11, if x_11 were a carpenter, then x_11 is playing tennis, and that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 is a carpenter we can infer that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 will play tennis. Finally, from the fact that for all x_11, x_11 is an artist, and that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 will play tennis we can infer that there is at least one x_11 for which x_11 is an artist and x_11 will play tennis, which contradicts that For all x_11, either x_11 is an artist or x_11 will play tennis are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.