Consider the following premises. For all y_3, if y_3 listens to a song, then y_3 is an artist. For all y_3, y_3 will drive a car. For all y_3, y_3 is an artist if and only if y_3 will drive a car. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one y_3 for which y_3 is not an artist.
 From the fact that for all y_3, y_3 will drive a car we can infer that for all y_3, y_3 will drive a car or y_3 will listen to a song. From the fact that for all y_3, y_3 is an artist if and only if y_3 will drive a car we can infer that for all y_3, if y_3 drives a car, then y_3 is an artist. Finally, from the fact that for all y_3, if y_3 drives a car, then y_3 is an artist, that for all y_3, if y_3 listens to a song, then y_3 is an artist, and that for all y_3, y_3 will drive a car or y_3 will listen to a song we can infer that for all y_3, y_3 is an artist, which contradicts that There is at least one y_3 for which y_3 is not an artist. Therefore, the answer is no.