Consider the following premises. For all x_10, x_10 will drink water. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 reads a book, then x_10 is a lawyer. For all x_10, if x_10 drinks water, then x_10 is a lawyer. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a lawyer or x_10 will play a game.
 From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 will drink water we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will drink water or x_10 will read a book. From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 drinks water, then x_10 is a lawyer, that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 reads a book, then x_10 is a lawyer, and that for all x_10, x_10 will drink water or x_10 will read a book we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a lawyer. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a lawyer we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a lawyer or x_10 will play a game. Therefore, the answer is yes.