Consider the following premises. For all x_8, x_8 is not poor. For all x_8, x_8 will drink water if and only if x_8 is a poet. For all x_8, if x_8 drinks water, then x_8 is poor. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_8 for which x_8 is a poet.
 From the fact that for all x_8, x_8 will drink water if and only if x_8 is a poet we can infer that for all x_8, if x_8 were a poet, then x_8 is drinking water. From the fact that for all x_8, if x_8 drinks water, then x_8 is poor, and that for all x_8, x_8 is not poor we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 will not drink water. Finally, from the fact that for all x_8, if x_8 were a poet, then x_8 is drinking water, and that for all x_8, x_8 will not drink water we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 is not a poet, which contradicts that There is at least one x_8 for which x_8 is a poet. Therefore, the answer is no.