Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 were a scientist, then x_10 is curious. For all x_10, x_10 is an office clerk or x_10 is a scientist. For all x_10, if x_10 cooks, then x_10 is drinking water. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 drinks water, then x_10 is cooking. For all x_10, if x_10 drinks water, then x_10 is not curious. For all x_10, if x_10 were an office clerk, then x_10 is curious. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will not cook.
 From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 were an office clerk, then x_10 is curious, that for all x_10, if x_10 were a scientist, then x_10 is curious, and that for all x_10, x_10 is an office clerk or x_10 is a scientist we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 is curious. From the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 drinks water, then x_10 is cooking, and that for all x_10, if x_10 cooks, then x_10 is drinking water we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will drink water if and only if x_10 will cook. From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 drinks water, then x_10 is not curious, and that for all x_10, x_10 is curious we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will not drink water. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will drink water if and only if x_10 will cook, and that for all x_10, x_10 will not drink water we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will not cook. Therefore, the answer is yes.