Consider the following premises. For all x_2, if x_2 drives a car, then x_2 is playing squash. There is at least one x_2 for which x_2 will not drive a car. For all x_2, x_2 will drive a car or x_2 will not play squash. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_2, x_2 will play squash.
 From the fact that for all x_2, x_2 will drive a car or x_2 will not play squash we can infer that for all x_2, if x_2 plays squash, then x_2 is driving a car. From the fact that for all x_2, if x_2 plays squash, then x_2 is driving a car, and that for all x_2, if x_2 drives a car, then x_2 is playing squash we can infer that for all x_2, x_2 will play squash if and only if x_2 will drive a car. Finally, from the fact that for all x_2, x_2 will play squash if and only if x_2 will drive a car, and that there is at least one x_2 for which x_2 will not drive a car we can infer that there is at least one x_2 for which x_2 will not play squash, which contradicts that For all x_2, x_2 will play squash. Therefore, the answer is no.