Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_5 for which x_5 is not an office clerk. For all x_5, if x_5 plays tennis, then x_5 is making tea. For all x_5, if x_5 were a musician, then x_5 is an office clerk. For all x_5, if x_5 makes tea, then x_5 is a musician. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_5, x_5 will play tennis.
 From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 plays tennis, then x_5 is making tea, and that for all x_5, if x_5 makes tea, then x_5 is a musician we can infer that for all x_5, if x_5 plays tennis, then x_5 is a musician. From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 plays tennis, then x_5 is a musician, and that for all x_5, if x_5 were a musician, then x_5 is an office clerk we can infer that for all x_5, if x_5 plays tennis, then x_5 is an office clerk. Finally, from the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 plays tennis, then x_5 is an office clerk, and that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 is not an office clerk we can infer that there is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will not play tennis, which contradicts that For all x_5, x_5 will play tennis. Therefore, the answer is no.