Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_3 for which x_3 is a lawyer or x_3 is not a cashier. For all x_3, if x_3 were an artist, then x_3 is a cashier. For all x_3, if x_3 were a lawyer, then x_3 is an artist. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_3, the fact that x_3 were a lawyer does not imply that x_3 is a cashier.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.