Consider the following premises. For all x_7, x_7 will not play squash. There is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is bored if and only if x_7 will go running. For all x_7, x_7 will play squash if and only if x_7 is a bartender. For all x_7, x_7 is a bartender if and only if x_7 is bored. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_7, x_7 will go running.
 From the fact that for all x_7, x_7 will play squash if and only if x_7 is a bartender, and that for all x_7, x_7 will not play squash we can infer that for all x_7, x_7 is not a bartender. From the fact that for all x_7, x_7 is a bartender if and only if x_7 is bored, and that for all x_7, x_7 is not a bartender we can infer that for all x_7, x_7 is not bored. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_7 for which x_7 is bored if and only if x_7 will go running, and that for all x_7, x_7 is not bored we can infer that there is at least one x_7 for which x_7 will not go running, which contradicts that For all x_7, x_7 will go running. Therefore, the answer is no.