Consider the following premises. forall x_16: U(x_16) -> Q_1(x_16). forall x_16: P_16(x_16) -> U(x_16). exists x_16: P_16(x_16) or Q_16(x_16). forall x_16: Q_16(x_16) -> U(x_16). forall x_16: ~Q_1(x_16). Can we infer forall x_16: ~T(x_16) from them? If possible, name the inference rules being used at each step.
The premises are contradictory and we can infer anything from them. Therefore, the answer is yes.