Consider the following premises. forall x_16: Q_16(x_16) -> Q(x_16). q. forall x_16: Q_4(x_16) -> Q(x_16). forall x_16: Q_4(x_16) or Q_16(x_16). forall x_16: W_4(x_16). Can we infer ~q from them? If possible, name the inference rules being used at each step.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.