Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_12 for which if x_12 drives a car, then x_12 is a soldier. For all x_12, if x_12 were a writer, then x_12 is a soldier. For all x_12, if x_12 goes running, then x_12 is a lawyer. For all x_12, x_12 is a writer or x_12 will drive a car. For all x_12, x_12 will go running. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_12, either x_12 is a lawyer or x_12 is a soldier are not true.
 From the fact that for all x_12, if x_12 were a writer, then x_12 is a soldier, that there is at least one x_12 for which if x_12 drives a car, then x_12 is a soldier, and that for all x_12, x_12 is a writer or x_12 will drive a car we can infer that there is at least one x_12 for which x_12 is a soldier. From the fact that for all x_12, if x_12 goes running, then x_12 is a lawyer, and that for all x_12, x_12 will go running we can infer that for all x_12, x_12 is a lawyer. Finally, from the fact that for all x_12, x_12 is a lawyer, and that there is at least one x_12 for which x_12 is a soldier we can infer that some lawyers are soldiers, which contradicts that For all x_12, either x_12 is a lawyer or x_12 is a soldier are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.