Consider the following premises. For all x_13, if x_13 takes a plane, then x_13 is cooking. For all x_13, if x_13 drives a car, then x_13 is cooking. For all x_13, x_13 will drive a car or x_13 will take a plane. Some lawyers will read a book. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_13, either x_13 will cook or x_13 is a lawyer are not true.
 From the fact that for all x_13, if x_13 drives a car, then x_13 is cooking, that for all x_13, if x_13 takes a plane, then x_13 is cooking, and that for all x_13, x_13 will drive a car or x_13 will take a plane we can infer that for all x_13, x_13 will cook. From the fact that some lawyers will read a book we can infer that there is at least one x_13 for which x_13 is a lawyer. Finally, from the fact that for all x_13, x_13 will cook, and that there is at least one x_13 for which x_13 is a lawyer we can infer that there is at least one x_13 for which x_13 will cook and x_13 is a lawyer, which contradicts that For all x_13, either x_13 will cook or x_13 is a lawyer are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.