Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will make tea. For all x_10, if x_10 climbs a mountain, then x_10 is taking a plane. For all x_10, if x_10 makes tea, then x_10 is taking a plane. For all x_10, if x_10 were bored, then x_10 is not taking a plane. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, x_10 is bored.
 From the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will make tea we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will make tea or x_10 will climb a mountain. From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 makes tea, then x_10 is taking a plane, that for all x_10, if x_10 climbs a mountain, then x_10 is taking a plane, and that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will make tea or x_10 will climb a mountain we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will take a plane. Finally, from the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 were bored, then x_10 is not taking a plane, and that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will take a plane we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is not bored, which contradicts that For all x_10, x_10 is bored. Therefore, the answer is no.