Consider the following premises. For all x_19, if x_19 were a carpenter, then x_19 is a bartender. There is at least one x_19 for which if x_19 cooks, then x_19 is a cashier. For all x_19, x_19 will read a book or x_19 is a carpenter. For all x_19, if x_19 drives a car, then x_19 is a cashier. For all x_19, x_19 will not read a book or x_19 will work. For all x_19, x_19 will cook or x_19 will drive a car. For all x_19, x_19 will work if and only if x_19 is a bartender. Can we infer the following from them? Some bartenders are cashiers.
 From the fact that for all x_19, x_19 will read a book or x_19 is a carpenter, and that for all x_19, x_19 will not read a book or x_19 will work we can infer that for all x_19, x_19 is a carpenter or x_19 will work. From the fact that there is at least one x_19 for which if x_19 cooks, then x_19 is a cashier, that for all x_19, if x_19 drives a car, then x_19 is a cashier, and that for all x_19, x_19 will cook or x_19 will drive a car we can infer that there is at least one x_19 for which x_19 is a cashier. From the fact that for all x_19, x_19 will work if and only if x_19 is a bartender we can infer that for all x_19, if x_19 works, then x_19 is a bartender. From the fact that for all x_19, if x_19 were a carpenter, then x_19 is a bartender, that for all x_19, if x_19 works, then x_19 is a bartender, and that for all x_19, x_19 is a carpenter or x_19 will work we can infer that for all x_19, x_19 is a bartender. Finally, from the fact that for all x_19, x_19 is a bartender, and that there is at least one x_19 for which x_19 is a cashier we can infer that some bartenders are cashiers. Therefore, the answer is yes.