Consider the following premises. For all x_12, if x_12 reads a book, then x_12 is curious. For all x_12, if x_12 were an artist, then x_12 is a mechanic. There is at least one x_12 for which if x_12 climbs a mountain, then x_12 is not a mechanic. For all x_12, x_12 will make tea or x_12 will read a book. For all x_12, if x_12 were curious, then x_12 is an artist. For all x_12, if x_12 makes tea, then x_12 is curious. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_12, x_12 will climb a mountain.
 From the fact that for all x_12, if x_12 makes tea, then x_12 is curious, that for all x_12, if x_12 reads a book, then x_12 is curious, and that for all x_12, x_12 will make tea or x_12 will read a book we can infer that for all x_12, x_12 is curious. From the fact that for all x_12, if x_12 were curious, then x_12 is an artist, and that for all x_12, if x_12 were an artist, then x_12 is a mechanic we can infer that for all x_12, if x_12 were curious, then x_12 is a mechanic. From the fact that for all x_12, if x_12 were curious, then x_12 is a mechanic, and that for all x_12, x_12 is curious we can infer that for all x_12, x_12 is a mechanic. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_12 for which if x_12 climbs a mountain, then x_12 is not a mechanic, and that for all x_12, x_12 is a mechanic we can infer that there is at least one x_12 for which x_12 will not climb a mountain, which contradicts that For all x_12, x_12 will climb a mountain. Therefore, the answer is no.