Consider the following premises. There is at least one z_3 for which if z_3 reads a book, then z_3 is driving a car. For all z_3, z_3 will drink water or z_3 is an artist. For all z_3, if z_3 were an artist, then z_3 is a lawyer. For all z_3, if z_3 drinks water, then z_3 is a lawyer. For all z_3, z_3 will read a book. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one z_3 for which z_3 will drive a car and z_3 is a lawyer.
 From the fact that there is at least one z_3 for which if z_3 reads a book, then z_3 is driving a car, and that for all z_3, z_3 will read a book we can infer that there is at least one z_3 for which z_3 will drive a car. From the fact that for all z_3, if z_3 drinks water, then z_3 is a lawyer, that for all z_3, if z_3 were an artist, then z_3 is a lawyer, and that for all z_3, z_3 will drink water or z_3 is an artist we can infer that for all z_3, z_3 is a lawyer. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one z_3 for which z_3 will drive a car, and that for all z_3, z_3 is a lawyer we can infer that there is at least one z_3 for which z_3 will drive a car and z_3 is a lawyer. Therefore, the answer is yes.