Consider the following premises. forall x_6: Q_6(x_6) -> R_6(x_6). exists x_6: T_1(x_6) <-> R_6(x_6). forall x_6: P(x_6) -> Q_6(x_6). forall x_6: T_1(x_6) or P(x_6). Can we infer forall x_6: ~R_6(x_6) from them? If possible, name the inference rules being used at each step.
 From forall x_6: P(x_6) -> Q_6(x_6), forall x_6: Q_6(x_6) -> R_6(x_6) we can infer forall x_6: P(x_6) -> R_6(x_6) via universal transitivity. From exists x_6: T_1(x_6) <-> R_6(x_6) we can infer exists x_6: T_1(x_6) -> R_6(x_6) via existential biconditional elimination. Finally, from exists x_6: T_1(x_6) -> R_6(x_6), forall x_6: P(x_6) -> R_6(x_6), forall x_6: T_1(x_6) or P(x_6) we can infer exists x_6: R_6(x_6) via existential disjunction elimination, which contradicts forall x_6: ~R_6(x_6). Therefore, the answer is no.