Consider the following premises. For all x_10, x_10 is an electrician. For all x_10, x_10 is not a lawyer. For all x_10, x_10 is curious or x_10 is an astronaut. There is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 were curious, then x_10 is a lawyer. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, either x_10 is an astronaut or x_10 is an electrician are not true.
 From the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which if x_10 were curious, then x_10 is a lawyer, and that for all x_10, x_10 is not a lawyer we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is not curious. From the fact that for all x_10, x_10 is curious or x_10 is an astronaut, and that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is not curious we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is an astronaut. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is an astronaut, and that for all x_10, x_10 is an electrician we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is an astronaut and x_10 is an electrician, which contradicts that For all x_10, either x_10 is an astronaut or x_10 is an electrician are not true. Therefore, the answer is no.