Consider the following premises. For all x_17, if x_17 listens to a song, then x_17 is a taxi driver. For all x_17, if x_17 were a bartender, then x_17 is not making tea. There is at least one x_17 for which x_17 will make tea. For all x_17, x_17 is a bartender if and only if x_17 is a taxi driver. For all x_17, if x_17 were a taxi driver, then x_17 is listening to a song. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_17, x_17 will listen to a song.
 From the fact that for all x_17, if x_17 were a taxi driver, then x_17 is listening to a song, and that for all x_17, if x_17 listens to a song, then x_17 is a taxi driver we can infer that for all x_17, x_17 is a taxi driver if and only if x_17 will listen to a song. From the fact that for all x_17, if x_17 were a bartender, then x_17 is not making tea, and that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 will make tea we can infer that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 is not a bartender. From the fact that for all x_17, x_17 is a bartender if and only if x_17 is a taxi driver, and that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 is not a bartender we can infer that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 is not a taxi driver. Finally, from the fact that for all x_17, x_17 is a taxi driver if and only if x_17 will listen to a song, and that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 is not a taxi driver we can infer that there is at least one x_17 for which x_17 will not listen to a song, which contradicts that For all x_17, x_17 will listen to a song. Therefore, the answer is no.