Consider the following premises. For all x_13, if x_13 were a sailor, then x_13 is making tea. For all x_13, if x_13 makes tea, then x_13 is not driving a car. Elisabeth is driving a car. For all x_13, if x_13 were curious, then x_13 is a sailor. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_13, x_13 is curious.
 From the fact that Elisabeth is driving a car we can infer that there is at least one x_13 for which x_13 will drive a car. From the fact that for all x_13, if x_13 were curious, then x_13 is a sailor, and that for all x_13, if x_13 were a sailor, then x_13 is making tea we can infer that for all x_13, if x_13 were curious, then x_13 is making tea. From the fact that for all x_13, if x_13 makes tea, then x_13 is not driving a car, and that there is at least one x_13 for which x_13 will drive a car we can infer that there is at least one x_13 for which x_13 will not make tea. Finally, from the fact that for all x_13, if x_13 were curious, then x_13 is making tea, and that there is at least one x_13 for which x_13 will not make tea we can infer that there is at least one x_13 for which x_13 is not curious, which contradicts that For all x_13, x_13 is curious. Therefore, the answer is no.