Consider the following premises. For all x_16, if x_16 makes tea, then x_16 is a nurse. For all x_16, x_16 is a soldier if and only if x_16 is excited. There is at least one x_16 for which if x_16 were a nurse, then x_16 is excited. For all x_16, x_16 is a doctor or x_16 is a soldier. For all x_16, if x_16 were an electrician, then x_16 is making tea. For all x_16, x_16 is not a doctor or x_16 is an electrician. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_16 for which x_16 is excited.
 From the fact that for all x_16, x_16 is a doctor or x_16 is a soldier, and that for all x_16, x_16 is not a doctor or x_16 is an electrician we can infer that for all x_16, x_16 is a soldier or x_16 is an electrician. From the fact that for all x_16, x_16 is a soldier if and only if x_16 is excited we can infer that for all x_16, if x_16 were a soldier, then x_16 is excited. From the fact that for all x_16, if x_16 makes tea, then x_16 is a nurse, and that there is at least one x_16 for which if x_16 were a nurse, then x_16 is excited we can infer that there is at least one x_16 for which if x_16 makes tea, then x_16 is excited. From the fact that for all x_16, if x_16 were an electrician, then x_16 is making tea, and that there is at least one x_16 for which if x_16 makes tea, then x_16 is excited we can infer that there is at least one x_16 for which if x_16 were an electrician, then x_16 is excited. Finally, from the fact that for all x_16, if x_16 were a soldier, then x_16 is excited, that there is at least one x_16 for which if x_16 were an electrician, then x_16 is excited, and that for all x_16, x_16 is a soldier or x_16 is an electrician we can infer that there is at least one x_16 for which x_16 is excited. Therefore, the answer is yes.