Lawyer: Juries are traditionally given their instructions in convoluted, legalistic language. The verbiage is intended to make the instructions more precise, but greater precision is of little use if most jurors have difficulty understanding the instructions. Since it is more important for jurors to have a basic but adequate understanding of their role than it is for the details of that role to be precisely specified, jury instructions should be formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language. Each of the following, if true, strengthens the lawyer's argument EXCEPT:
A: Most jurors do not have an adequate understanding of their role after being given jury instructions in convoluted, legalistic language.
B: The details of the role of the jurors cannot be specified with complete precision in simple, easily comprehensible language.
C: Most jurors are less likely to understand instructions given in convoluted, legalistic language than instructions given in simple, easily comprehensible language.
D: Jury instructions formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language can adequately describe the role of the jurors.
Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.
B