Consider the following premises. For all x_2, x_2 is not a sailor. For all x_2, if x_2 goes running, then x_2 is an electrician. For all x_2, if x_2 were an electrician, then x_2 is a sailor. There is at least one x_2 for which x_2 will go running or x_2 will drink water. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_2, x_2 will not drink water.
 From the fact that for all x_2, if x_2 goes running, then x_2 is an electrician, and that for all x_2, if x_2 were an electrician, then x_2 is a sailor we can infer that for all x_2, if x_2 goes running, then x_2 is a sailor. From the fact that for all x_2, if x_2 goes running, then x_2 is a sailor, and that for all x_2, x_2 is not a sailor we can infer that for all x_2, x_2 will not go running. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_2 for which x_2 will go running or x_2 will drink water, and that for all x_2, x_2 will not go running we can infer that there is at least one x_2 for which x_2 will drink water, which contradicts that For all x_2, x_2 will not drink water. Therefore, the answer is no.