Kofi left a surprise gift for his friend Nia in her mailbox because he knew she would not be home until the evening. Unaware of Kofi's gift, Jamal, another friend of Nia, checks her mailbox for his own reasons and finds the gift. Meanwhile, Layla tells Nia via text that there's a surprise waiting for her at home but doesn't specify what it is. When Nia arrives home, she sees Jamal holding the gift and assumes it's from him. Given this situation, whose perspective is incorrect about the origin of the gift and why? Provide a very brief response.
Nia's perspective is incorrect about the origin of the gift because she assumes the gift is from Jamal, when in fact it was Kofi who left the surprise in her mailbox. Her assumption is based on the sight of Jamal holding the gift when she arrives home, and although Layla told her about a surprise via text, Layla did not specify that the surprise was in her mailbox or that it was from Kofi. Nia does not have all the relevant information: Kofi's act of leaving the gift and Jamal's unrelated reason for checking the mailbox. Hence, her conclusion about the gift's origin is based on a mistaken interpretation of the visual information in front of her (seeing Jamal with the gift) without knowledge of the preceding events involving Kofi and Jamal.