Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 were a taxi driver, then x_10 is drinking water. For all x_10, x_10 will not drink water. For all x_10, if x_10 were curious, then x_10 is not a sailor. There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a taxi driver or x_10 is a sailor. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, x_10 is curious.
 From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 were a taxi driver, then x_10 is drinking water, and that for all x_10, x_10 will not drink water we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 is not a taxi driver. From the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a taxi driver or x_10 is a sailor, and that for all x_10, x_10 is not a taxi driver we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a sailor. Finally, from the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 were curious, then x_10 is not a sailor, and that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is a sailor we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is not curious, which contradicts that For all x_10, x_10 is curious. Therefore, the answer is no.