Political strategist: Clearly, attacking an opposing candidate on philosophical grounds is generally more effective than attacking the details of the opponent' s policy proposals. A philosophical attack links an opponent' s policy proposals to an overarching ideological scheme, thereby telling a story and providing context. This makes the attack emotionally compelling. Which one of the following is an assumption required by the political strategist' s argument?
A: The stories that people are most likely to remember are those that are emotionally compelling.
B: Political attacks that tell a story are able to provide more context than those that do not.
C: Voters are typically uninterested in the details of candidates' policy proposals.
D: Political attacks that are emotionally compelling are generally more effective than those that are not.
Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.
D