Consider the following premises. For all x_8, if x_8 were a lawyer, then x_8 is drinking water. For all x_8, x_8 is a lawyer or x_8 is an artist. For all x_8, if x_8 makes tea, then x_8 is not drinking water. For all x_8, x_8 will make tea or x_8 is a soldier. For all x_8, if x_8 were an artist, then x_8 is drinking water. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_8 for which x_8 is not a soldier.
 From the fact that for all x_8, if x_8 were a lawyer, then x_8 is drinking water, that for all x_8, if x_8 were an artist, then x_8 is drinking water, and that for all x_8, x_8 is a lawyer or x_8 is an artist we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 will drink water. From the fact that for all x_8, if x_8 makes tea, then x_8 is not drinking water, and that for all x_8, x_8 will drink water we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 will not make tea. Finally, from the fact that for all x_8, x_8 will make tea or x_8 is a soldier, and that for all x_8, x_8 will not make tea we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 is a soldier, which contradicts that There is at least one x_8 for which x_8 is not a soldier. Therefore, the answer is no.