Consider the following premises. For all x_9, x_9 will make tea if and only if x_9 is a politician. For all x_9, x_9 is a politician if and only if x_9 will go running. There is at least one x_9 for which if x_9 makes tea, then x_9 is cooking. For all x_9, x_9 will not cook. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_9, x_9 will go running.
 From the fact that there is at least one x_9 for which if x_9 makes tea, then x_9 is cooking, and that for all x_9, x_9 will not cook we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will not make tea. From the fact that for all x_9, x_9 will make tea if and only if x_9 is a politician, and that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will not make tea we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 is not a politician. Finally, from the fact that for all x_9, x_9 is a politician if and only if x_9 will go running, and that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 is not a politician we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will not go running, which contradicts that For all x_9, x_9 will go running. Therefore, the answer is no.