Consider the following premises. For all x_8, if x_8 were a politician, then x_8 is playing tennis. For all x_8, if x_8 plays tennis, then x_8 is a politician. There is at least one x_8 for which if x_8 plays tennis, then x_8 is a politician. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_8, the fact that x_8 were a politician does not imply that x_8 is playing tennis.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.