Consider the following premises. For all x_10, if x_10 were excited, then x_10 is poor. For all x_10, if x_10 were excited, then x_10 is playing a game. There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 is excited or x_10 is not poor. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, the fact that x_10 were poor does not imply that x_10 is playing a game.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.