Consider the following premises. For all x_5, x_5 is not a soldier. For all x_5, if x_5 were poor, then x_5 is a soldier. For all x_5, x_5 is poor or x_5 will play squash. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_5 for which neither x_5 will play squash nor x_5 will work.
 From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 were poor, then x_5 is a soldier, and that for all x_5, x_5 is not a soldier we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is not poor. From the fact that for all x_5, x_5 is poor or x_5 will play squash, and that for all x_5, x_5 is not poor we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 will play squash. Finally, from the fact that for all x_5, x_5 will play squash we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 will play squash or x_5 will work, which contradicts that There is at least one x_5 for which neither x_5 will play squash nor x_5 will work. Therefore, the answer is no.