Consider the following premises. There is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will drive a car or x_10 will make tea. For all x_10, x_10 will not work. For all x_10, if x_10 drives a car, then x_10 is working. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_10, neither x_10 will make tea nor x_10 will play squash.
 From the fact that for all x_10, if x_10 drives a car, then x_10 is working, and that for all x_10, x_10 will not work we can infer that for all x_10, x_10 will not drive a car. From the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will drive a car or x_10 will make tea, and that for all x_10, x_10 will not drive a car we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will make tea. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will make tea we can infer that there is at least one x_10 for which x_10 will make tea or x_10 will play squash, which contradicts that For all x_10, neither x_10 will make tea nor x_10 will play squash. Therefore, the answer is no.