Consider the following premises. For all x_9, if x_9 were a poet, then x_9 is sleeping. For all x_9, x_9 is not a bartender. There is at least one x_9 for which if x_9 sleeps, then x_9 is a bartender. For all x_9, if x_9 sleeps, then x_9 is a poet. Can we infer the following from them? For all x_9, x_9 is a poet.
 From the fact that for all x_9, if x_9 sleeps, then x_9 is a poet, and that for all x_9, if x_9 were a poet, then x_9 is sleeping we can infer that for all x_9, x_9 will sleep if and only if x_9 is a poet. From the fact that there is at least one x_9 for which if x_9 sleeps, then x_9 is a bartender, and that for all x_9, x_9 is not a bartender we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will not sleep. Finally, from the fact that for all x_9, x_9 will sleep if and only if x_9 is a poet, and that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 will not sleep we can infer that there is at least one x_9 for which x_9 is not a poet, which contradicts that For all x_9, x_9 is a poet. Therefore, the answer is no.