Consider the following premises. For all x_5, x_5 is not a musician or x_5 will write a letter. For all x_5, x_5 will not write a letter or x_5 will read a book. For all x_5, x_5 is a musician. For all x_5, x_5 is not a lawyer or x_5 will listen to a song. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_5 for which neither x_5 will listen to a song nor x_5 will read a book.
 From the fact that for all x_5, x_5 is a musician we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is a musician or x_5 is a lawyer. From the fact that for all x_5, x_5 is a musician or x_5 is a lawyer, and that for all x_5, x_5 is not a musician or x_5 will write a letter we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 is a lawyer or x_5 will write a letter. From the fact that for all x_5, x_5 is a lawyer or x_5 will write a letter, and that for all x_5, x_5 is not a lawyer or x_5 will listen to a song we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 will write a letter or x_5 will listen to a song. Finally, from the fact that for all x_5, x_5 will write a letter or x_5 will listen to a song, and that for all x_5, x_5 will not write a letter or x_5 will read a book we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 will listen to a song or x_5 will read a book, which contradicts that There is at least one x_5 for which neither x_5 will listen to a song nor x_5 will read a book. Therefore, the answer is no.