Consider the following premises. For all x_5, if x_5 cooks, then x_5 is drinking water. For all x_5, if x_5 drinks water, then x_5 is cooking. For all x_5, if x_5 makes tea, then x_5 is cooking. For all x_5, x_5 will not drink water. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will make tea.
 From the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 drinks water, then x_5 is cooking, and that for all x_5, if x_5 cooks, then x_5 is drinking water we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 will drink water if and only if x_5 will cook. From the fact that for all x_5, x_5 will drink water if and only if x_5 will cook, and that for all x_5, x_5 will not drink water we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 will not cook. Finally, from the fact that for all x_5, if x_5 makes tea, then x_5 is cooking, and that for all x_5, x_5 will not cook we can infer that for all x_5, x_5 will not make tea, which contradicts that There is at least one x_5 for which x_5 will make tea. Therefore, the answer is no.