Consider the following premises. For all z_4, if z_4 were curious, then z_4 is a lawyer. There is at least one z_4 for which if z_4 were a carpenter, then z_4 is curious. For all z_4, if z_4 were a lawyer, then z_4 is listening to a song. Can we infer the following from them? For all z_4, the fact that z_4 were a carpenter does not imply that z_4 is listening to a song.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.