Consider the following premises. For all x_6, if x_6 were an electrician, then x_6 is an artist. For all x_6, if x_6 were an artist, then x_6 is a poet. For all x_6, x_6 is not a poet. For all x_6, if x_6 were an artist, then x_6 is a server. For all x_6, if x_6 were a server, then x_6 is an electrician. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is a server.
 From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 were a server, then x_6 is an electrician, and that for all x_6, if x_6 were an electrician, then x_6 is an artist we can infer that for all x_6, if x_6 were a server, then x_6 is an artist. From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 were an artist, then x_6 is a poet, and that for all x_6, x_6 is not a poet we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is not an artist. From the fact that for all x_6, if x_6 were a server, then x_6 is an artist, and that for all x_6, if x_6 were an artist, then x_6 is a server we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is a server if and only if x_6 is an artist. Finally, from the fact that for all x_6, x_6 is a server if and only if x_6 is an artist, and that for all x_6, x_6 is not an artist we can infer that for all x_6, x_6 is not a server, which contradicts that There is at least one x_6 for which x_6 is a server. Therefore, the answer is no.