Consider the following premises. For all x_7, if x_7 climbs a mountain, then x_7 is poor. There is at least one x_7 for which if x_7 listens to a song, then x_7 is climbing a mountain. For all x_7, x_7 will listen to a song or x_7 is not a lawyer. Can we infer the following from them? If we can, name the inference rule being used: For all x_7, the fact that x_7 were a lawyer does not imply that x_7 is poor.
That contradicts the premises. Therefore the answer is no.