Sue owned a five-acre tract of land, one acre of which had previously been owned by Opal, but to which Sue had acquired title by adverse possession. Sue contracted to convey the full five-acre tract to Peg, but the contract did not specify the quality of title Sue would convey. Suppose Sue's contract had called for the conveyance of "a good and marketable title." Pursuant to that contract, Peg paid the purchase price and accepted a deed from Sue containing no covenants of title. Sue's title to the one acre subsequently proved defective and Peg was ejected by Opal. Peg sued Sue. Which of the following results is most likely?
A. Peg will win, because Sue's deed was fraudulent.
B. Peg will win, because the terms of the deed control Sue's liability.
C. Sue will win, because the terms of the deed control her liability.
D. Sue will win, because the deed incorporates the terms of the contract.
Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.
C