Consider the following premises. For all x_8, if x_8 were a musician, then x_8 is a police officer. For all x_8, if x_8 were a lawyer, then x_8 is a musician. For all x_8, x_8 will not drive a car or x_8 is a lawyer. For all x_8, if x_8 were an astronaut, then x_8 is a musician. For all x_8, x_8 will drive a car or x_8 is an astronaut. There is at least one x_8 for which if x_8 were a police officer, then x_8 is bored. Can we infer the following from them? There is at least one x_8 for which x_8 is bored.
 From the fact that for all x_8, if x_8 were a musician, then x_8 is a police officer, and that there is at least one x_8 for which if x_8 were a police officer, then x_8 is bored we can infer that there is at least one x_8 for which if x_8 were a musician, then x_8 is bored. From the fact that for all x_8, x_8 will drive a car or x_8 is an astronaut, and that for all x_8, x_8 will not drive a car or x_8 is a lawyer we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 is an astronaut or x_8 is a lawyer. From the fact that for all x_8, if x_8 were an astronaut, then x_8 is a musician, that for all x_8, if x_8 were a lawyer, then x_8 is a musician, and that for all x_8, x_8 is an astronaut or x_8 is a lawyer we can infer that for all x_8, x_8 is a musician. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x_8 for which if x_8 were a musician, then x_8 is bored, and that for all x_8, x_8 is a musician we can infer that there is at least one x_8 for which x_8 is bored. Therefore, the answer is yes.