Consider the following premises. For all x, if x reads a book, then x is a soldier. For all x, if x reads a book, then x is taking a plane. There is at least one x for which if x reads a book, then x is taking a plane. For all x, if x takes a plane, then x is reading a book. For all x, x is not a soldier. Can we infer the following from them? For all x, x will take a plane.
 From the fact that for all x, if x reads a book, then x is taking a plane, and that for all x, if x takes a plane, then x is reading a book we can infer that for all x, x will read a book if and only if x will take a plane. From the fact that for all x, if x reads a book, then x is a soldier, and that for all x, x is not a soldier we can infer that for all x, x will not read a book. From the fact that for all x, x will read a book if and only if x will take a plane we can infer that for all x, if x takes a plane, then x is reading a book. From the fact that there is at least one x for which if x reads a book, then x is taking a plane, and that for all x, if x takes a plane, then x is reading a book we can infer that there is at least one x for which x will read a book if and only if x will take a plane. Finally, from the fact that there is at least one x for which x will read a book if and only if x will take a plane, and that for all x, x will not read a book we can infer that there is at least one x for which x will not take a plane, which contradicts that For all x, x will take a plane. Therefore, the answer is no.