An undergraduate degree is necessary for appointment to the executive board. Further, no one with a felony conviction can be appointed to the board. Thus, Manu, an accountant with both a bachelor' s and a master' s degree, cannot be accepted for the position of Executive Administrator, since he has a felony conviction. The argument's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?
A: If Manu did not have a felony conviction, he would be accepted for the position of Executive Administrator.
B: Only candidates eligible for appointment to the executive board can be accepted for the position of Executive Administrator.
C: The felony charge on which Manu was convicted is relevant to the duties of the position of Executive Administrator.
D: An undergraduate degree is not necessary for acceptance for the position of Executive Administrator.
Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.
B