Well, not really. What you&#x27;re describing is the floor for any product I&#x27;ll consider (depending on what &quot;fundamental flaws&quot; means), but that&#x27;s not security.<p>Security is process.<p>- Do the engineers writing the code have sufficient time to do a good job (assuming they are competent in the first place? Which gets to the hiring process), or does marketing win that battle?<p>- What is the security audit process? Who has the keys to the servers, who changes the keys when one of those people leaves&#x2F;dies?<p>- What processes exist to deliver security fixes to the lightbulb&#x2F;baby monitor&#x2F;robo-proctologist? How are consumers notified of the need, and how does the update payload delivery work?<p>- etc. etc. etc.<p>I mean, I do have a checklist of features for networked devices for my house. Those include things like user-serviceable certificates, root on things I own, etc. But unfortunately, when searching for a product, the important parts of the security picture are invisible, and reputation and visible implementation are really all there is to go on.<p>Which is why my lightbulbs don&#x27;t get wifi.