&gt; Although even some desktop apps manage to be as janky and dog slow as almost anything from the Win98 era, e.g. iTunes until a couple of years ago. By contrast, the cheapest Third World market smartphone would run Win98 apps blinding fast.<p>It is easy to take potshots at e.g. iTunes, but the real reason software &quot;got worse&quot; is not developers getting lazy.  What happened is that expectations for CPU-intensive features rose (memory protection, ASLR, NX, encryption, low-latency audio, high-efficiency codecs, ClearType) while willingness to pay vanished.  In Win98 times, you bought your music player from the developer (remember Winamp?) whereas now it comes free with your OS, which is itself probably free.  So of course it is all half-assed now, but it&#x27;s not &quot;lazy&quot; to spend resources on software someone will pay for, and not on software nobody will pay for.<p>You could absolutely reverse this, but it has nothing to do with native or web technology, and everything to do with changing consumer attitudes about choosing software.<p>&gt; On the desktop, the hardware is finally winning--it&#x27;s just too damn fast. Hopefully that will happen with smartphones too.<p>From 1995 until today, power consumption in desktop processors grew about 5-15x, depending on how exactly you measure.  5-15x more power on mobile devices is simply not an option, unless we have a &quot;new physics&quot; kind of breakthrough in both battery and thermal technology.