Only the last two items on your list (protecting privacy, ending the war on drug users) remotely qualify as change. Everything else qualifies as &quot;funneling more money into existing programs&quot;.<p>Consider the most establishment presidential candidate in the race right now. Would Hillary Clinton even use different words to describe her policy proposals?<p>I could imagine policy <i>details</i> that might count as change, but you don&#x27;t seem to be advocating those. E.g., if you wanted to provide affordable education by replacing teachers with Khan Academy, or cut infrastructure costs down to everywhere-else-in-the-world levels [1] by breaking the back of public employee unions or other such reforms. Are you advocating big change like this?<p>[1] Delhi Metro Phase 2, 77 miles of track and 85 stations cost Delhi $2.9B and 3 years. Hudson Yards, 1 mile of track and 1 station, cost NYC $2.5B and 9 years.