I had to Google the Blub Paradox (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Paul_Graham_%28computer_programmer%29#The_Blub_paradox" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Paul_Graham_%28computer_progra...</a>) but I see what you mean. It&#x27;s based on the idea that someone who disagrees with you about something can&#x27;t be acting rationally, rather that they are somehow incapable of perceiving your wisdom. Sometimes that is the case, of course, but I don&#x27;t think that explains why Lisp isn&#x27;t the universal language that everyone writes everything in.<p>I have a lot of warm fuzzy feelings about Lisp as well, but a lot of Lisp advocacy has been of the &quot;One True Language&quot; variety as opposed to &quot;right tools for the right job, and here&#x27;s why Lisp might be the right tool for you&quot;. It doesn&#x27;t affect my perception of Lisp, but it doesn&#x27;t help market it either.