Of course you can. As long as the courts can be persuaded that there is no causal nexus between the torture and the evidence, or if the torture actually isn&#x27;t legally torture. That assumes that the defendant can show (or is even aware) the torture actually took place.<p>Examples:<p>* prolonged solitary confinement: not legally torture<p>* fellow prisoner violence: not legally torture, no nexus<p>* prolonged pre-trial confinement: not really torture, but we may as well include it<p>* waterboarding&#x2F;drowning: not legally torture? (Supreme Court declined to rule)<p>* stress positions: cannot show it took place<p>* parallel construction: cannot show &#x2F; not aware