That&#x27;s not accessible.<p>As I said:  IPCC&#x27;s SRREN gives mortality&#x2F;GWh statistics, and nuclear is <i>not</i> the safest, by that measure.  Data included Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, but not Fukushima.<p>Actually, I&#x27;ve previously discussed both here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;Futurology&#x2F;comments&#x2F;267e5e&#x2F;what_are_your_arguments_concerning_nuclear_power&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;Futurology&#x2F;comments&#x2F;267e5e&#x2F;what_are...</a><p>NB: Conca is a rather partisan pro-nuclear advocate. I&#x27;ve found his credibility wanting and bias quite evident in past.<p>The IPCC&#x27;s report:
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;srren.ipcc-wg3.de&#x2F;report&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;srren.ipcc-wg3.de&#x2F;report&#x2F;</a><p>Risks are in one of the appendixes (I&#x27;m not on a device which makes sorting this out trivial at the moment).