Nobody familiar with cryptome takes it seriously. While some of the data they host is incredibly useful, original content tends to be a joke.<p>Just read the <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Cryptome#History" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Cryptome#History</a> 2015 section (especially the archived sources) and draw your own conclusions.<p>IMO these guys are far beyond Alex Jones level.