Go for a dictionary that defines dodge wrt to taxation:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.macmillandictionary.com&#x2F;us&#x2F;dictionary&#x2F;american&#x2F;tax-dodge" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.macmillandictionary.com&#x2F;us&#x2F;dictionary&#x2F;american&#x2F;ta...</a><p>It&#x27;s a technique that can be illegal.  That&#x27;s not what Google has done.  Google has used tax avoidance.<p>More info on Tax Avoidance vs Evasion (which is what a Tax Dodge commonly refers to):
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.translegal.com&#x2F;legal-english-lessons&#x2F;tax-avoidance" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.translegal.com&#x2F;legal-english-lessons&#x2F;tax-avoidan...</a><p><i>Sometimes I wonder why people think USA is that different from Russia. Ethics are non-existent in both countries.</i><p>You&#x27;re confused about the greater ethical question here.  The ethical question of whether or not a company should pay its &quot;fair share&quot; of taxes is below the ethical question of &quot;How should laws be enforced by a Government that can use deadly force and incarceration to achieve its aims?&quot;<p>The Government writes the laws and has all the power.  It is absolutely incumbent upon the Government to make the laws clear and not try to enforce their whims based upon flimsy unwritten &quot;spirit of the law&quot; arguments.