Is intentionally damaging someone without valid reason really sufficient to win a lawsuit? That seems pretty broad: I do that every time I browse the peanut butter section at the supermarket.<p>If the CEO of Apple told the CEO of Uber over a recorded phone call, &quot;The Board, the Shareholders, and I all agree on cutting your app out of the store for no reason other than we hate your guts and it&#x27;ll bring us joy to watch you suffer&quot;, it still seems like that shouldn&#x27;t be enough to win a lawsuit. It&#x27;s Apple&#x27;s store: They get to choose the apps they want in their store. What next - are we going to have judges force bookstores to stock books because &quot;your reasons for not stocking the book aren&#x27;t good enough&quot;?<p>Of course, Uber surely has explicit agreements with Apple, Google, and even their hosting provider. You don&#x27;t build a multibillion dollar business on top of someone without even calling them to make sure it&#x27;s okay.