You&#x27;ve missed my point, again.<p>We live in a world where eavesdropping on a private conversation is possible because people aren&#x27;t talking in a cone of silence every time they want privacy. The unlawful intent to listen in needs to be there, and then some sort of action is required to hear the conversation, such as holding a glass to a wall.<p>Exactly the same with digital messages. Sure, they can be listened to, but not by just anyone accidentally, as the video seems to suggest. Unlawful intent is required, and specific actions with specific software to listen in.<p>I&#x27;m all for encryption, but let&#x27;s get something straight: unencrypted messages are not dripping down the walls for anyone to read who passes by.