Someone using TOR should know that exit nodes will know that you used TOR, but by design they are not supposed to be able to find out who you were talking to, or what you were talking about.<p>The general assumption back when Silk Road was created was that TOR itself was safe, and the most likely way to be discovered was for your personal machine to be compromised.  This belief was only strengthened by the FBI&#x27;s repeated failures to take down Silk Road.<p>Heck, this was still a widespread belief AFTER Silk Road was taken down!  For example <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;motherboard.vice.com&#x2F;read&#x2F;the-fbis-deep-web-raid-seized-a-bunch-of-fake-sites" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;motherboard.vice.com&#x2F;read&#x2F;the-fbis-deep-web-raid-seiz...</a> quotes a security researcher who came to the conclusion in late 2014 that the FBI was just scanning TOR, and TOR itself had not been compromised.<p>For a comparison to phones, the Supreme Court has held that a list of people you called is not protected, but the contents of your phone calls are.  Similarly I think they should rule in this case that the fact you&#x27;re using TOR is not protected, but the details of what you were doing on TOR is covered by the 4th amendment.