&gt; In my book, nothing wrong with that.<p>Your book applies to what you do alone on your property.<p>When you act in a social context, other people&#x27;s books also matter. That your philosophy treats other people&#x27;s opinions as somehow irrelevant to your interactions with them is definitely of a piece with your &quot;pussy whipped&quot; framing.<p>Note also that you&#x27;re creating a false choice between a disingenuous &quot;apology&quot; and speaking the truth. A fake apology isn&#x27;t actually respectful of other people; it&#x27;s just a way to camouflage your disrespect. The choice you&#x27;re eliding is for you to actually understand why people object to that phrase and respect their views, whether or not you agree with them.<p>The reason you don&#x27;t, of course, is because you&#x27;d sound ridiculous if you actually expanded your implicit views. E.g.: &quot;I understand that most people today see men and women as equals, and I respect their right to believe it. But personally I disagree, and I think their mistake is not seeing that things were better back in the day when men had both legal and social dominance such that wives had neither control over family assets nor even the expectation that they might have a voice in the decision. I hope everyone comes to see the merit in my views, and that we together return to the legal and social structures that held prior to the adoption of the 19th amendment.&quot;