Remember when software didn&#x27;t need updates almost every day? It seems like we&#x27;ve regressed in terms of quality and the general principle of <i>doing it right the first time</i>. I understand that some things do change and bugs do occur, but I don&#x27;t think <i>everything</i> needs to, nor should the rate of bugs being found be anywhere near what it is today.<p>Personally, I prefer stability over &quot;new features&quot;, turn off automatic updates, and read changelists carefully. Anything which doesn&#x27;t have a good description and rationale of <i>why</i> it needs to be changed, and how that is relevant to my usage of the software, doesn&#x27;t get changed. (And software which doesn&#x27;t give me the option of doing so, doesn&#x27;t get used either.)