My approach to answering this comes down to a very simple phrase that explains my political beliefs succinctly &quot;my rights begin where your rights end.&quot;<p>I don&#x27;t think anyone has <i>any</i> problem with people wanting to adhere to their faith.  The problem they have is with people of faith demand that someone else, who is otherwise &quot;following the rules&quot; do something that inconveniences them because of beliefs they don&#x27;t share and probably don&#x27;t agree with.  I&#x27;ve had vegan friends who choose not to eat meals with me because I am a meat enthusiast.  I&#x27;m fine with that and with their life choices.  But if we&#x27;re dining together and they begin dictating to me what I can and cannot eat on the menu, you can expect that I&#x27;ll be aggravated and won&#x27;t comply.<p>It&#x27;s wrong to ask someone else to accommodate your faith for you, especially when them accommodating might just as well fly in the face of their own, personal, convictions.  Now, if this person attempted to purchase a second seat next to them and had that seat filled by another passenger, then I can understand them asking if they could be moved elsewhere.  But if they&#x27;re refused, the only remaining choice is to politely get off the plane and wait for a flight that you can be accommodated on.  It&#x27;s not &quot;standing in the aisle and holding up the flight for 15 minutes&quot;.  That person&#x27;s religious convictions just ended up aggravating <i>every</i> passenger of that flight.