The whole point of law as a profession is to create profitable confusion, ambiguity, and power differentials. So the idea that you can automate this is - not impressive.<p>It might be useful in situations where there is one, and only one, clear, explicit, strict and agreed interpretation of a contract.<p>But that doesn&#x27;t cover most of contract law, where the point of the wording is often to <i>disguise and&#x2F;or hide by misdirection or omission</i> legal implications that can be exploited for profit, or to bully the other party into believing they have to accept terms without challenging them.