This is a Bloomberg article by Megan McArdle. I was expecting it to be vocal in it support of harrasment, but in fact it makes the reasonable point that any kind of &quot;line&quot; is a judgement call and a slippery slope. Once you start banning people for death threats, you&#x27;ll be asked to start banning people for anti-Erdogan material etc, etc.<p>However, a lot of what people have been asking twitter to do is not actually dependent on ideological content but about blocking, block evasion by new accounts (&quot;eggs&quot;), and the like. See <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;art-marketing&#x2F;putting-out-the-twitter-trashfire-3ac6cb1af3e" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;art-marketing&#x2F;putting-out-the-twitter-tra...</a> (speaking of censorship, putting that title into google returns one derogatory reference to the article but <i>not</i> the article itself, whereas on Bing and therefore DDG it&#x27;s the top search result!)