Actually, I doubt restricting campaign spending by businesses will help the OP in his case.<p>The OP was talking about how restrictive and capricious the skilled immigration laws were <i>on him</i>. A person elected by nativist populist voters will likely try to take away the OP&#x27;s freedom (and ability to stay here), and make his life worse.<p>One organization working for the OP&#x27;s benefit, and the benefit of all skilled immigrants, as well the as the many undocumented is Fwd.us: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fwd.us&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fwd.us&#x2F;</a> They&#x27;re funded by Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, etc. Just as a note, many of these people have signed the <i>Giving Pledge</i>, so they&#x27;re not the evil billionaires people like to make them out to be: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Giving_Pledge" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Giving_Pledge</a><p>Other pro-immigration organizations, like the Chamber of Commerce, are also funded by big businesses. The Koch brothers are pro-immigrant, and have said they support legalizing the 11-12 million undocumented here. There is a lot of broad support in the business sector for making our laws more immigrant-friendly.<p>The OP&#x27;s life would have been a lot better had the 2013 &quot;Gang of 8&quot; Senate immigration bill (S.744, 133th Congress) passed: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.govtrack.us&#x2F;congress&#x2F;bills&#x2F;113&#x2F;s744" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.govtrack.us&#x2F;congress&#x2F;bills&#x2F;113&#x2F;s744</a><p>It would have made our immigration system a couple of order of magnitudes better, and made life for skilled immigrant especially better.<p>It didn&#x27;t pass, not because of business opposition to it, but because of right-wing tea-partyer grassroots nativist sentiment, and congressmen who were beholden to them.