Well Danese Cooper, who wrote the thing, said she was deliberately made to author it to be incompatible.<p>I don&#x27;t understand this line of reasoning, where somebody can say, &quot;person A at Sun says it was intentional&quot;, then somebody else says, &quot;person B at Sun says it wasn&#x27;t intentional&quot;, and then acts as if that settles the matter.<p>All it means is that there&#x27;s contention about it <i>at best</i>.<p>... and whether it was intentional or not doesn&#x27;t affect what the text actually says.