<i>But what you are proposing is simply the creation of another in-group: &quot;those of us who don&#x27;t in-group,&quot; contrasted with the new out-group of &quot;those who do in-group and out-group.&quot;</i><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Non_sequitur_%28logic%29" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Non_sequitur_%28logic%29</a><p><i>You advocate for everyone to join your in-group of &quot;non-in-groupers,&quot; and condemn the out-groupers, those not aligned with your prescription for correct behavior -- exactly as all in-groupers have done before you, and precisely what you claim to be deploring.</i><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Straw_man" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Straw_man</a><p><i>It is thus a wholly and profoundly self-contradictory proposition, which cannot be admitted as logical or rational.</i><p>Ironically, this conclusion rests on nothing but logical fallacies.