<i>Esperanto has certainly caught on</i> - well it hasn&#x27;t died out, I&#x27;ll give it that. And you can probably do more things and more varied things in Esperanto than many niche regional languages, particularly online ( <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;esperante" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;esperante</a> ktp.) . But it hasn&#x27;t caught on in any official sense, it&#x27;s learned and used by people who want to learn and use it, not by any big formal groups who think it is the fairest, the cheapest, the most reasonable, the xyz-est option for them, or because they think providing their non-Esperanto related services in Esperanto would be useful to their customers or profitable for their business.<p><i>&quot;no one speaks it&quot; is one of these: it usually just means that one thinks the people who speak it are not important.</i> - That&#x27;s a view I haven&#x27;t considered before, but I might go with it for regional languages; if you ignore a regional language with few speakers then you are ignoring those people - but even native Esperantists speak another native language as well, and most people speak a native language better than they speak EO. So ignoring it because &quot;nobody speaks it&quot; doesn&#x27;t close off communication completely from any one person, it just changes the lines of which languages could connect you to different people.<p><i>Esperanto has only carrots</i> - an apt analogy, when English has Hollywood films, the hyperstimulus of carrot cake spiced latte, to literature&#x27;s austere plain carrot. EO might have only carrots, but it doesn&#x27;t have a killer-app carrot. Say it was the ... language of extreme sports - how many people would want to pick it up then?<p><i>It&#x27;s really more costly to provide translations than try to open English programs in every country, even in places where children have difficulty getting access to quality instruction even in their native language?</i> - I could quote a lot more of Claude Piron&#x27;s essay which I linked, but the whole thing is quite interesting. He certainly wasn&#x27;t arguing for forcing everyone to learn English, he was for forcing English native speakers to learn Esperanto (or potentially something similar), as well as everyone else learning it, out of a kind of idealism for fairness and equality and putting everyone on a more level playing field as far as communication goes, as much as for just money saving. (Something I think wouldn&#x27;t really work).