I flagged the post. The title makes it appear that the blog post is unbiased, but reading through, it&#x27;s clearly biased and trying to paint a rosy picture from the &quot;classic&quot; side.<p>To give some pointers:<p>1. Most bitcoiners still support Bitcoin Core. Bitcoin Core users are upgrading from 0.11 to 0.12 pretty fast that 0.12 has now more nodes than classic: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bitnodes.21.co&#x2F;nodes&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bitnodes.21.co&#x2F;nodes&#x2F;</a><p>2. The Classic nodes are mostly new and XT nodes: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;coin.dance&#x2F;nodes" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;coin.dance&#x2F;nodes</a> Users are not really moving from bitcoin core.<p>3. Classic has only 3% of hash power. They are even trying to rent hashing power to generate classic blocks: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;nodecounter.com&#x2F;mining_donation_fund.php" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;nodecounter.com&#x2F;mining_donation_fund.php</a>