&gt;it may be hard to find information about Karen that&#x27;s up to the standards of Wikipedia sources<p>that&#x27;s a fair reason but I suspect your second point is more relevant<p>&gt;and it might be more practical from an information-organization standpoint to have a mention of Karen combined into a page about the series in general<p>quoting report<p>&quot;The world probably doesn’t need zillions of explanatory articles about the Japanese video game franchise Pokémon.&quot;<p>why? if people are willing to devote their time to the task I don&#x27;t see a reason why their work shouldn&#x27;t be preserved.<p>On the other side I do also understand the reason behind it<p>&quot;keep a standard&quot;<p>but for the same reason you can&#x27;t get technical on technical topics and we have the simple English entries.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;simple.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Hydrogen" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;simple.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Hydrogen</a><p>Maybe just as we have the simple entries we should also have anime and sci-fi.