Just so we&#x27;re clear: your assertion is that because the password generator uses a non-cryptographically secure PRNG, generating unique 20+ character alphanumeric passwords for every login is worse than people&#x27;s default behavior?<p>I mean, I get that it&#x27;s worse than other keepass implementations - that&#x27;s obviously a problem - but if this gets people to stop using &quot;hunter2&quot; or &quot;p4$$w0rd&quot; that&#x27;s got to be worth something, right?