You should read the article. What they did wasn&#x27;t about shifting people from different majors on gender. It was about making CS more accessible in general. It probably increased their CS enrollment (and retainment) significantly. Some things they did:<p>1) separate experienced from inexperienced programmers in intro classes minimizing intimidation effects where it feels like you are behind from the start.<p>2) early research programs. Get students involved in applications of CS rather than just theory and fundamental programming for 2 years.<p>3) &quot;share what works&quot; and &quot;demystify success&quot; are communication with other colleges and moocs about what works in teaching cs along with giving more clear guidelines of what successful performance looks like.<p>So. These have the added benefit of improving the gender gap, but really these are items that will help EVERY CS student. I don&#x27;t think they corrected for impact of girls who code movements and increased encouragement in HS (eg increase if they had done nothing), but then it isn&#x27;t a scientific study just a case study.