Funny to see people arguing about archaic laws passed by people in the 1700s. As if the people in the 1700s knew anything about the world in which we live, or could possibly have any foresight about what is good and what is not good. It&#x27;s similar to religious laws where people argue about what some Prophet said as applying for all time. We can see the flaw in that, we can&#x27;t see that we do the exact same thing with a country&#x27;s Constitution.<p>As if the Constitution is some holy document passed by God himself that is right and on the basis of which, I guess God, we can challenge the government which has real power.<p>That&#x27;s the way I see religion in general, of the little man with no power creating an imaginary God, a LORD of the universe, with which they can challenge people that have real power and make them behave. Guess what people with real power don&#x27;t care about your imagination.