<p><pre><code>  &gt; If they can search your home for it, they should be permitted to search
  &gt; your phone for it. Both should have the exact same expectation of
  &gt; privacy and the exact same judicial oversight.
</code></pre>
They <i>are</i> permitted to search your phone for it. The problem here is that they are saying:<p><i>We wish to search this home, as is our legal right. The home contains a safe that we claim we cannot open, and we wish to compel the manufacturer of the safe to assist us to search the safe. The manufacturer does not wish to do so, but we insist that they be forced to do so by threat of imprisonment.</i><p><i>Furthermore, we wish to do so by compelling the manufacturer of the safe to create technologies that could open all safes, without the knowledge of the safe owners. We claim we only want to open this one safe, but we have this long track record of opening as many safes as we can, using secret courts and hearings to obtain the right to search those safes without the owners of those safes having the opportunity to argue against us, which is a different level of judicial oversight than being applied to searching this one house.</i>