I think that Fair Use can be outscored to robots if it&#x27;s done right.<p>Doing it right means that they should think like economists. If mass sending sending false positive DCMA requests has very small cost to the sender, it&#x27;s profitable to do so and let the receiving end  pay the price.<p>Invalid takedown request should have a cost. It could be waiting period of X days before new takedown request can be send, or it could be money needed to lift the waiting period. Google has big enough volumes that they can afford to hire few people who review cases based on statistical sampling. It should be  possible to find equilibrium that minimizes the harm caused by incorrect DCMA request.