<i>&gt; Unfortunately, today’s programming models and languages don’t offer any mechanism for such dynamic recovery from faults.</i><p>Sounds like somebody needs to learn about Erlang.<p><i>&gt; In June 2012, members of an international forum composed of vendors, academics, and researchers from the United States, Europe, and Asia met and discussed adding resilience to message-passing interface, or MPI, the programming model used in nearly all supercomputing code. Those present at that meeting voted that the next version of MPI would have no resilience capabilities added to it. So for the foreseeable future, programming models will continue to offer no methods for notification or recovery from faults.</i><p>Well, no.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20040918131755&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sics.se&#x2F;~joe&#x2F;thesis&#x2F;armstrong_thesis_2003.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20040918131755&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sics.se...</a>