I disagree. &quot;Terrorist&#x27;s Phone&quot; is simply the most efficient way to identify the case. &quot;User&#x27;s Privacy&quot; would mean absolutely nothing to someone who hasn&#x27;t heard of the case as much as we have, especially considering most of Apple&#x27;s marketing nowadays is through that lens…<p>&gt; The government couldn&#x27;t have chosen a better case to publicize in search of a precedent in their favor.<p>If you&#x27;ll allow me to be pedantic, they could have; we can be pretty sure this phone has none of the evidence they want it to, and it&#x27;s not like anyone at Apple will lose sleep feeling responsible for aiding terrorism.<p>But my point is, this is simply the headline that will get the most clicks. Any political bias in it is coincidental. (And of course, it seems reasonable for most people to agree that, in a vacuum, it would be OK for Apple to unlock the phone, as long as it never affected other users.)