Hi Adam, Thanks for the response.<p>I know it was a vague question of mine, but I didn&#x27;t realise the detail you were prepared to give it. So thanks, again. I&#x27;m no expert (my background is more musical), but I do understand most these concepts and perspectives involved. To articulate better my question: Technically how are you manipulating audio and what effect does that have on brainwaves. Your answer, understandably, was more contextual than specific. so let me specify the parts I am hoping to understand.<p>How do you manipulate audio?<p>I am in right in understanding your disguising a basic and specific pulse throughout the music. or... are you modulating it rhythmically (very slightly) out of phase with the rest of the music. If you are only applying it to certain frequencies then it seems you may be creating binaural beat like tendencies in the ears abillity to create implicit tones (Hidden frequencies, not physically present).<p>What effect does this have on brainwaves?<p>You stated in general you are matching rhythms to that of the brain. Can you expound this? 
What theory of Rhythmic psychological organissation are you purporting&#x2F;ascribing to? how is your audio intereacting with this model? What is the effect of your audio on the model?<p>I understand you may have a whole toolbox of tricks going on here and that you don&#x27;t want to give away your product entirely. Feel free to gloss over introducing technical terms, though its helpful for all reading, I think most people here can quickly come upto speed on stuff. I&#x27;m not asking you for the secrets of your product - just more specifics on how it relates to the research you are citing.<p>Thanks for the article link, it looks very interesting reading.<p>A couple of reflections on your product: I personally don&#x27;t like the music and therefore can&#x27;t listen to it. It doesn&#x27;t sound human to me and therefore my brain rejects it. Have you heard of the theory of &quot;participatory discrepancy&quot; (Keil C. and Feld, S. (1994). It highlights the value of discrepencies (randomness) rhythm for creating groove. I think cognitivly there is a similar principle at play (perhaps you know it, I can&#x27;t find reference to it right now - will dig it out if this area interests you). I also feel, on the website, that the lack of actual specifics twinned with a large scholary general body of work, is ultimately devaluing your product. Though that may, quite rightly, be your choice in promotion, to engage me a couple of pages about whats actually going, twinned with a couple of very specifc to your model studies, would make me give this product real integrity and longterm value. For example Stober&#x27;s powerpoint on the MIIR EEG dataset here (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;bib.sebastianstober.de&#x2F;2015-01-31_NEMISIG.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;bib.sebastianstober.de&#x2F;2015-01-31_NEMISIG.pdf</a> - illustrates complex concepts that your describing, very simply. Incidentally I think lifetime subcriptions after a long trial period would probably have the most chance of getting my support.