I&#x27;m curious. Do others see this (among other faults) as a criticism and attack on everything masculine? It&#x27;s pretty thinly veiled to pretend to be egalitarian.<p>Unicorns and rainbows, every reference is to a woman, how girls are suppressed, bad behaviour is like &quot;football&quot; fans. They even slipped in a misogyny! Feminist bingo!<p>It fascinates me. We condemn the KKK for treating groups of people differently. Yet, when feminism (referred in the article) makes sexist and false statements, it&#x27;s lorded by the media.  For example, in Australia, domestic violence was a &quot;man&quot; thing. When a mother killed her daughter&#x2F;son is was never domestic violence.  &quot;Men&quot; need to be educated.  However, when you have a group (feminism, KKK) that prioritise one group over another, you get these propaganda campaigns that tend to spread worldwide. They encourage intolerance and demonise others.<p>Now, a fundamental problem with this article&#x27;s proposal Is that you can be as intolerant as you like as long as you don&#x27;t say curse words (unicorns and rainbows) and threaten to hit&#x2F;kill someone.  The truth is that far more damage has been done by far more subtle propaganda campaigns, especially in the last 5 years.  Not one of them would be stopped by this proposal.