Using diagrams and graphs to distort data has been utilized for such a long time that seems hard to find cases where it was correctly used to help understanding data. I even know a famous Swedish sketch (and accompanying song) that has misrepresenting diagrams as its central theme.<p>I can prove without a fault that the most code running on my server is the kernel. I can also prove that its the least significant code in the system. Counting cycles, the kernels idle function runs often at 99%. Counting bytes stored on the disk, the kernel is just a few MB in a vast sea of TB&#x27;s of data stored and thus are far less than 1% of the machine. In terms of cognitive thinking, the machine could be described as a Linux box, a Debian machine, a GNU&#x2F;Linux system, or a webserver, each attributing different independence to the kernel running inside. In terms of user-interaction, the kernel barely exist and I rarely ever interacts with it. In terms of executable binaries that I run, most have a larger number of syscalls in them.<p>The statement that &quot;the diagrams are drawn in a way to twist the facts according to their view on reality&quot; is a perfectly unbiased. If I were at a court and saw a diagram being presented by a party, I would by default distrust it and wonder what the actually data say.