Forcing people to do work they don&#x27;t want to often times leads to disgruntlement.  It appears that you are purposefully misreading what I wrote to come up with the last rhetorical question you made.  Such tactics are not conducive to proper discourse.<p>Great to write on paper that we will exempt those who are mentally&#x2F;physically unable to work.  Then we will end up with a bunch of edge cases that force a government agency to be created that will end up drawing up rules&#x2F;regulations in order to arbitrate these decisions.  We will employ enough people in order to process&#x2F;monitor all exempt people.  It would in my opinion just be better to ensure a base level of existence regardless of ability.<p>I&#x27;ve met a number of welfare recipients who don&#x27;t want to work and it is a good thing that they aren&#x27;t working due to their toxic personalities.  Then there are people who are on welfare who are great to be around.  It&#x27;s a sufficiently large group that you&#x27;ll find all kinds.<p>In regards to your first sentence.  Surely you don&#x27;t believe that every person who can be employed can find work.  I don&#x27;t think anyone really believes that it is always the case that the number of people who wants jobs is less than the available number of jobs.  Even if the system proposed is enacted then some people will still not be able to find work since there aren&#x27;t enough jobs for everyone.  We will add another layer of bureaucracy to ensure that those who claim they can&#x27;t find work really can&#x27;t find work. This already exists to some extent with unemployment benefits but would need to be expanded to really make sure no one is taking advantage of the system.