I&#x27;m big specifically on the 787 and the A380 in this order (perhaps reversed if I can get on upper deck on the A380, which almost never happens) because of the noise levels, humidity and pressure, which are MUCH better than the 777 and 747 and earlier aircraft, even renovated.<p>Most airlines flying into SIN have old IFE on the older aircraft which means 1 in 2 seats has a massive metal box taking away half your foot space, and my knees and the sides of my legs really do not appreciate this. Next generation (e.g. new BA 773s) is a flat thin black box, or nothing visible. For some reason, a 3-4-3 777 is also a guaranteed trolley-shoulder bash every time they serve food, another good reason to avoid airlines that like to fly it (including SQ); my shoulder doesn&#x27;t stick out as much from a newer aircraft seat but this could be psychological. Also, the A380 upper deck window seat has massive amounts of space on the window side which feels somewhat more private (you can practically stash your bag there).<p>One side effect of how quiet the 787 and A380 are is that you can hear babies from much further - perhaps 10 rows vs 2. So, it can be harder to sleep if you&#x27;re seated too close to a baby cluster in Y.<p>I don&#x27;t mind taking ages to deplane or board. It&#x27;s a fraction of the flight anyway, and the actual walking is quick and the rest seated. I used to care about the crowd&#x2F;volume when flying to SYD because SYD customs used to be highly inefficient, with LHR level of queues for foreigners. They made recent changes and now it&#x27;s faster than for Australians using e-gates, so I&#x27;m not as bothered by a slow deplaning for that either.<p>I do mind less noise in my ears for the 22h of flying from Australia to Europe on 3 legs. I&#x27;ll fly budget over SQ if the budget airline has a 787... sandwiches are cheaper than lost sleep!