Everyone is nitpicking bits and pieces of my answers. First the culture, then the sustainability, now health.<p>Yes, I&#x27;m quite aware of the results, and authors of that large scale study, and the paper, the same authors published the all-cause mortality study too (also based on 50 grams), which WHO decided not to reference. There&#x27;s plenty of evidence, WHO is pretty much years behind that evidence, if not decades.<p>There&#x27;s nothing to discuss. Yes, the increase is 17%, which given the low chance of colorectal isn&#x27;t that much of a big deal but the increase is significant, although, cardiovascular disease increase is much bigger, obesity huge.<p>The moderate &quot;healthy&quot; amount is really vague.<p>If I were trying to positively influence the developing world, imposing energy&#x2F;water&#x2F;resource hungry animal agriculture business wouldn&#x27;t be a first step. It&#x27;s irrational to consider it.<p>&gt; <i>Freedom of Information Act documents reveal that the U.S. Department of Agriculture warned the egg industry that saying eggs are nutritious or safe may violate rules against false and misleading advertising.</i><p>When the evidence for meat and dairy ends up documented in 5000 papers, I guess the same will happen with them, same thing happened with cigarettes after thousands of papers. It takes time, but the evidence provided is sufficient now.