It becomes non-trivial due to the marketing of their devices as secure systems. Just as with the burden of proof in defamation actions is higher in the case of a public figures, the &quot;triviality&quot; of the modification in this case is held to a higher standard due to the purpose of the product.<p>* I can&#x27;t reply below this threshold but I&#x27;m enjoying the back and forth. People buy iphones because they believe that there are no ways to &quot;trivially&quot; access their personal information. Even for Apple to do so would be a breach of that trust. See: &quot;Uber God Mode&quot;