Key point: unreasonable burdens may not be imposed<p>The order also said:<p>&quot;The order provided that the Company be fully reimbursed at prevailing rates, and compliance with it required minimal effort on the part of the Company and no disruption to its operations&quot;<p>So the FBI could be expected to reimburse Apple for weakening its product and future earnings.<p>More details on that specific case as it relates to Apple vs. FBI are available from a post by a computer crime law professor [1]<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;volokh-conspiracy&#x2F;wp&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;19&#x2F;preliminary-thoughts-on-the-apple-iphone-order-in-the-san-bernardino-case-part-2-the-all-writs-act&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;volokh-conspiracy&#x2F;wp&#x2F;201...</a>