Why do you say this?  Organic food has serious, measurable benefits.  The differences between organic and orthodox varies across food items, of course, but for some it is a very serious difference.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ewg.org&#x2F;foodnews&#x2F;summary.php" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ewg.org&#x2F;foodnews&#x2F;summary.php</a><p>I surmise that your contention is based on the Stanford study? Have you ever actually read the study yourself? Do you realize that its methodology is widely regarded as fundamentally flawed? Start here for a good review:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tfrec.wsu.edu&#x2F;pdfs&#x2F;P2566.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tfrec.wsu.edu&#x2F;pdfs&#x2F;P2566.pdf</a><p>...and of course, the Stanford study is just one. Many other studies, which I and many others assert are of a superior design, have come to the opposite conclusion. This one is particularly compelling (sorry for the wordpress.com link, it&#x27;s the only full text I can find online):<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;donamarianadoces.files.wordpress.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;07&#x2F;nutritional-quality-organics2.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;donamarianadoces.files.wordpress.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;07&#x2F;nutriti...</a>