&gt;  The measure probably passed in order to discourage porn from being shot there.<p>That&#x27;s a reasonable guess, but once you look at the pattern in Michael Weinstein&#x27;s behavior, it&#x27;s clear what his real motives are.<p>Weinstein is the president of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, which championed the initiative.
The AHF has done good things in the past, but as of 2016, it&#x27;s doing far more harm than good.<p>Weinstein has a really puritanical view towards sex, and has a history of actively opposing harm-reduction approaches to HIV treatment and prevention. Despite the overwhelming amount of evidence in favor of pre-exposure prophylaxis in preventing HIV transmission, he has actively campaigned against it, intentionally spreading inordinate amounts of misinformation to discourage its use.<p>His logic is basically, &quot;we need to encourage condom use, and we should indoctrinate people into using condoms by ensuring that the porn they watch uses condoms&quot;. There are a lot of things wrong with this logic, not the least of which is that it&#x27;s had no effect on the number of condoms used in porn shoots, as everyone now just shoots in Las Vegas or other nearby cities instead.