What you propose is inherently paradoxical and irrational.<p>You say people (or intellectuals, at least) should make a conscious effort to avoid the psychology and biases of in-group&#x2F;out-grouping.<p>But what you are proposing is simply the creation of another in-group: &quot;those of us who don&#x27;t in-group,&quot; contrasted with the new out-group of &quot;those who do in-group and out-group.&quot;<p>You advocate for everyone to join your in-group of &quot;non-in-groupers,&quot; and condemn the out-groupers, those not aligned with your prescription for correct behavior -- exactly as all in-groupers have done before you, and precisely what you claim to be deploring.<p>It is thus a wholly and profoundly self-contradictory proposition, which cannot be admitted as logical or rational.