Genuine question: Do people take Cryptome seriously?<p>I tried reading one of their publications [1] and found the writing absurd. Phrases like &quot;few observers were aware that the re-territorialization of detainees would be undergirded by the courthouse’s archeology of evocative discursive foundations&quot; or &quot;recisions may condemn immigrant sites as exilic borderlands of unlitigatable extraterritoriality, a condition of spatial quarantine that transforms them into the new lazarettos of the metropolitan system&quot;.<p>I don&#x27;t want to come off as anti-intellectual, and maybe that all makes perfect sense to other people, but for me whatever point they were trying to make was lost in the verbiage.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cryptome.org&#x2F;cartome&#x2F;Natsios-Voir-Dire.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cryptome.org&#x2F;cartome&#x2F;Natsios-Voir-Dire.pdf</a>