VERY interesting. Thanks for posting. I wasn&#x27;t familiar with CALEA.<p>For clarity, a CALEA type approach wouldn&#x27;t compel a company to ACTIVELY subvert their own systems (as in Apple creating new tools for the Gov&#x27;t to achieve that end under All Writs).<p>Instead, CALEA would force companies to create LESS secure systems from the start which could then be subverted passively (no All Writs component) on request to allow for &quot;lawful intercept&quot;. Is that a fair characterization?<p>But in sum, a legal argument based on CALEA. Makes sense. Thanks-