Did you miss the part where the government said they were fine with Apple keeping the custom iOS software version in their possession, and not giving it to the government?<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;aponline&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;20&#x2F;us&#x2F;politics&#x2F;ap-us-apple-encryption.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;aponline&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;20&#x2F;us&#x2F;politics&#x2F;ap-us...</a><p>&quot;Apple may maintain custody of the software, destroy it after its purpose under the order has been served, refuse to disseminate it outside of Apple and make clear to the world that it does not apply to other devices or users without lawful court orders,&quot; the Justice Department told Judge Sheri Pym on Friday. &quot;No one outside Apple would have access to the software required by the order unless Apple itself chose to share it.&quot;