Wow, the concept of a PAC is something I never even knew existed.  I don&#x27;t think I get it.  Isn&#x27;t an employer supposed to be a source of money for the employee, not the the other way around.  Hypothetically, if Disney have 180K employees, and each did contribute $1000 a year, that comes to $180 million a year.<p>Now, if the company made around $5bn profit a year, $180m is a mere 3.6% of their profits - why is such a move funded out of the pockets of employees, and not the company profits (i.e. the shareholders).  I know why, but if it&#x27;s really that important, shouldn&#x27;t it be a company investment and not an employee investment?<p>Of course my figures are extremely exaggerated, as the actual money raised is in the low millions.