Don&#x27;t forget, one of the issues is: on which legal basis is Apple requested to help:<p>The question is, is this act (the whole text follows):<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;All_Writs_Act" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;All_Writs_Act</a><p>&quot;(a) The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.<p>(b) An alternative writ or rule nisi may be issued by a justice or judge of a court which has jurisdiction.&quot;<p>a reasonable legal ground in this case to demand from a company to <i>change their products,</i> in this case make a special version of the operating system? Is this act good to mean &quot;we can order anything to anybody&quot;? Especially when there is &quot;the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act of 1992&quot; (CALEA).<p>&quot;All Writs&quot; appears to be too dangerous to be used for precedents like this one, &quot;change your products to help us.&quot; What is the next requested change going to be? Give us the change you&#x27;ve made (&quot;obviously not an &quot;unnecessary burden&quot; anymore&quot;). Make more changes, permanently. (&quot;you&#x27;ve agreed already before!&quot;).