I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s plausible that Tesla is responsable for it, but we can raise some questions surrounding the event.<p>Apparently there&#x27;s still no scientific consensus (is that even possible?) on the Tunguska explosion and NASA seems to acknowledges that.<p>Taken from:
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;science.nasa.gov&#x2F;science-news&#x2F;science-at-nasa&#x2F;2008&#x2F;30jun_tunguska&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;science.nasa.gov&#x2F;science-news&#x2F;science-at-nasa&#x2F;2008&#x2F;30...</a><p>&quot;A century later some still debate the cause and come up with different scenarios that could have caused the explosion,&quot; said Yeomans&quot;<p>No remains of the asteroid, no impact crater and the claims from Tesla together is what is fascinating to me.