I disagree. First of all &quot;Appetite&quot; for which this article was accepted is decently ranked (whatever you think of these rankings). It&#x27;s in Q1 for both Nutrition and Psychology. H-Index of 80 is pretty solid. It&#x27;s the 179th ranked Psychology journal which isn&#x27;t bad for such a niche journal. For Nutrition it&#x27;s ranked 23rd [1]. So as far as food related cognitive science is concerned I&#x27;d call this a pretty decent journal.
Since it is accepted it has gone through a successfull review process already.<p>More importantly though...why is it bad that unpublished research is linked to on HN. I&#x27;d rather read it and make up my own mind than wait for it to go through a review process. The topic at hand is at least tangentially related to core HN content, too as eating chocolate might make you a better programmer&#x2F;entrepreneur.<p>[1]: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.scimagojr.com&#x2F;journalsearch.php?q=29994&amp;tip=sid&amp;clean=0" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.scimagojr.com&#x2F;journalsearch.php?q=29994&amp;tip=sid&amp;c...</a>
It has a (whatever you think of these is another matter)