This is exactly what the FBI want&#x27;s you to think and why they&#x27;ve carefully handpicked this case to try and set this legal precedent on - ridding us of our fundamental rights to privacy and security.<p>Out of all the 13 pending cases the FBI have with Apple using the All Writs Act (they&#x27;ve also said they have another 175 iPhones to unlock), this has the least chance of holding anything meaningful given it&#x27;s his consent-to-monitor work phone, not his personal phone (which he destroyed), wasn&#x27;t used at the scene of the crime, of which the FBI already have 6 week old iCloud backups of and would&#x27;ve had all the phones iCloud backups if they hadn&#x27;t disabled them by instructing for the phones password to be reset.<p>Yet of all the pending cases under seal this is the one they&#x27;ve chosen to break character and go public on, exploiting this tragic event and using the fear around terror and emotions of victims for maximum PR and political effect to further their agenda of violating the security of millions of customers - which is both deceitful and clever, as apparently it&#x27;s working.<p>I&#x27;ve always watched in bewilderment at the US Govt&#x27;s response to terror, they&#x27;re prepared to spend trillions fighting wars, billions changing Airport security, aren&#x27;t prepared to do anything to change the easy access to the semi-automatic weapons that were actually used to kill all the victims, but are prepared to compromise the security and privacy of millions of peoples lives, violating 1st and 5th amendment constitutional rights for the theater of accessing useless data on a dead terrorist&#x27;s work phone - for something which US citizens have less chance to die from than their own furniture? ...and the US public majority approves.