Their first example is gun control, where much of the campaign money comes from the NRA.<p>However, the NRA gets most of its money for campaign contributions from small donors, with the average donation being $35 [1]. It seems that this example undermines their point more than supports it.<p>Their proposed solution, which is to give each voter $100 each election cycle to give to politicians that voter supports, would almost certainly make no difference in regard to gun control. That anti-gun control politicians would continue to receive more by a large amount than the pro-gun control politicians.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;money.cnn.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;cnnmoney-investigates&#x2F;nra-funding-donors&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;money.cnn.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;cnnmoney-investigates&#x2F;nra-funding-...</a>