&gt;  A lot of the time those same students are doing the bulk of the legwork for those findings then attributed to a professor, who is under greater pressure to advance (not confirm) science, who may or may not have even participated heavily in the grunt work of that research. The professor then punishes the work under his&#x2F;her name, with no credit to the work of the students.<p>It&#x27;s important to note that though this seems to happen in all fields, it is far less common in some. I rarely hear of such things in astronomy; it does happen, but more often I hear about faculty explicitly working to ensure they can protect projects for their students so their students can get the credit deserved for doing the project. I hear of professors appropriating student research in biology and chemistry more frequently, however.<p>The occurrences of professors taking and publishing student research is certainly a problem, is unethical, and should be stopped. But the way in which it is usually discussed (&quot;in science&quot;) implies that it&#x27;s a systemic issue across all science, which (from my experience) isn&#x27;t true. This topic of credit and attribution for research deserves more nuanced discussion and fewer blanket statements.<p>Edit: Spelling, wording clarification.