Are you kidding?  Automatic seatbelts are incredibly stupid, and are provably bad.  The only reason they were invented was because the federal government required cars to have &quot;passive safety devices&quot; installed, and they were aiming for airbags.  But lots of shitty car companies like Saturn were too cheap to install airbags so they installed mousebelts instead.<p>The whole problem with them is that they&#x27;re dangerous as hell, and offer zero benefit, and only drawbacks.<p>They&#x27;re dangerous because they encourage people, by supposedly being &quot;automatic&quot;, to not buckle up.  They&#x27;re not effective if you don&#x27;t buckle the lap belt, but during that time lots of people didn&#x27;t, because they thought it wasn&#x27;t necessary.  After all, what&#x27;s the point of an &quot;automatic seatbelt&quot; if you still have to manually buckle part of it?<p>So, if you&#x27;re going to go to the trouble of buckling the lap belt to get full effectiveness, what exactly is the benefit over having a normal 3-point belt?  There is none.<p>Finally, the belts were a total hindrance if you got in your car with anything in your hands, such as a briefcase or purse or bag.  Anyone driving alone (as most of the population does most of the time) and carrying something frequently just jumps in the front seat holding the bag, and puts it in the passenger seat or floor.  With the mousebelt in the way, this became a good way to get tangled up.<p>If you&#x27;re still driving that piece of shit, do yourself a favor and get a newer car.  That thing has no airbags and has terrible crashworthiness compared to anything newer than 25 years old.  You&#x27;re very likely to die in a crash in that car, which in a new car you would walk away from.