So just to be clear... you want the same entities that are demanding backdoors and key escrows and the like to ultimately be the gatekeepers of security?  I can only imagine what a regulatory required update may include for, say, &quot;homeland security&quot; or other reasonable compromise... reasonable in the mind of a regulator or legislator.  I can see nothing but a legal framework rife with unintended consequences coming out of the practical implementation of such a suggestion.  I wonder how the current Apple controversy would work in such a world (not that there aren&#x27;t laws that may already apply in that case).<p>Look, I understand why you would want such a thing and I don&#x27;t believe that your desire is wrong.  However, the method you propose I don&#x27;t think would work the way you expect in the final analysis.<p>If you really want to do something in this area: why not work to create a consumer products security organization.  Yes, it wouldn&#x27;t have force of law, but you could certify products which manufacturers could use as a valuable distinguishing characteristic in the marketplace.  Yes, all of that requires good marketing, etc. and not everyone would pay attention... but that may be better than the use of government force.