This FAQ has more than 1000 words, but these are the words that matter:<p><pre><code>  The only way to guarantee that such a powerful tool isn’t abused
  and doesn’t fall into the wrong hands is to never create it.
</code></pre>
Can a court force a company or an individual to create something that does not exist?<p>China required Google to actively censor search results about sensitive topics, and Google quit China. (They may now be heading back [1].)<p>Bing stayed in China and silently replaced their organic results with government-approved propaganda [2].<p>The best way to prevent governments from oppressing their citizens is to refuse to create tools that enable oppression.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2016&#x2F;01&#x2F;why-google-quit-china-and-why-its-heading-back&#x2F;424482&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2016&#x2F;01&#x2F;why-go...</a><p>[2] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;2014&#x2F;feb&#x2F;11&#x2F;bing-censors-chinese-language-search-results" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;2014&#x2F;feb&#x2F;11&#x2F;bing-censo...</a>