Same, as I saw it start in one direction (objection to a term) and then move toward a different one (larger discussion of communication and format?) in order to work through...I guess the issue with the term quality at the outset? There&#x27;s some crossing between &#x27;quality&#x27; and &#x27;goals&#x27; that doesn&#x27;t quite make sense to me, because logically I tend to think there&#x27;s an &quot;objective&quot; perspective to whether goals have been reached or not in a fashion that reflects...quality...Not necessarily in the &#x27;property&#x27; definition, but definitely related, in that achieving the goal would be reliant on the quality of the work in both views (e.g. it has the property of working and it works properly).