&gt; That isn&#x27;t what the post says.<p>No, literally, you&#x27;ve cherry picked the part,  the post is much more nuanced:<p>&quot;Because some animals fuck anything that moves and doesn&#x27;t, including dead animals[1] and other species[2]. Not sure if applying human categories such as &quot;homosexual&quot; to non-human animals is helpful, though.&quot;<p>&gt; If we can find any imaginable sexual behaviour (for example, homosexuality) in the animal kingdom, how is any imaginable sexual behaviour (for example, homosexuality) a &quot;human construct&quot;?<p>The behavior is of course not a human construct. Using animal behavior to prove any human practice is, because any practice can be supported that way. Just like the post you didn&#x27;t quote fully also tries to suggest and exactly what I attempted to summarize, even if it can be better worded, for what I&#x27;m ready to apologize.