The context of this thread is the idea that support for Bernie Sanders stems in part from the fact that if the injustices he talks about aren&#x27;t addressed, there might be an <i>armed revolution</i> in the US.<p>You are free to believe that&#x27;s the case, but you cannot invoke the fallacy of relative privation to transform it into an open-and-shut argument.<p>I&#x27;m not doing anything to improve this thread at this point, so I&#x27;m bowing out now.