I&#x27;m not sure I see what you&#x27;re arguing. Implementing a more secure system is never convenient, but that obviously has nothing to do with whether it&#x27;s justified.<p>As for my quoted statement, how can you really disagree? Having a system where &quot;only the good guys&quot; (i.e. Apple, right?) can break the security of any device is <i>precisely</i> what law enforcement has been asking for for years, and what HN users and the tech-savvy in general have been railing against. Now that Apple has completely admitted that this system exists, users are downvoted here for pointing it out?