What, like his second comment (which was just a few minutes after his first, IIRC), which in it&#x27;s entirely is &#x27;(note that you can remount it readonly at boot, simply by adding an entry for it into &#x2F;etc&#x2F;fstab, that is marked &quot;ro&quot;)&#x27;?  Keep in mind we&#x27;ve had a single month since this bug was submitted.  Systemd had a release 11 days ago according to their repo[1], but if that wasn&#x27;t expected to be picked up and used by distros (which it might not, depending on the distro and what changes have been implemented since the distro shipped&#x2F;updated systemd), then the appropriate places to fix this are in the kernel and&#x2F;or as a patch to the distro package for systemd.<p>Really, I think the two appropriate places for this fix are the kernel, and if that&#x27;s not expected to be rolled out soon, as a patch to systemd to mount it read-only by the distro shipping systemd.  Systemd shipping the fix would only really help the small group of people that install systemd from source during the short window from 11 days ago until the next kernel is available (or that choose to run an older kernel), and makes the whole efivarfs situation a bit more confusing by leaving it read-only <i>and</i> immutable for the future.<p>1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;systemd&#x2F;systemd&#x2F;releases&#x2F;tag&#x2F;v229" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;systemd&#x2F;systemd&#x2F;releases&#x2F;tag&#x2F;v229</a>