This statement is pretty confusing to me. It seems that they&#x27;re attempting to use the _legal_ phrase &quot;reasonable expectation of privacy&quot; in a decidedly non-legal sense. The term is in fact a legal one (see here [1] for a definition, or just google the term), and after reading through the definition, I find it hard for anyone to argue that they _should_ have a &quot;reasonable expectation of privacy&quot; when using _any_ public network. Sure, Tor users are using the network because it provides anonymity, but anonymity and &quot;expectation of privacy&quot; are two very distinct concepts. Tor allows them to PUBLICLY communicate ANONYMOUSLY. You can have an anonymous communication without any expectation of privacy, the same way you can have privacy without anonymity.<p>Note that I am not a lawyer and am making assumptions and inferences about legal matters based on internet searches. YMMV.<p>[1]: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;injury.findlaw.com&#x2F;torts-and-personal-injuries&#x2F;what-is-the--reasonable-expectation-of-privacy--.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;injury.findlaw.com&#x2F;torts-and-personal-injuries&#x2F;what-i...</a>