I guess you intended to say inner <i>dialogue</i>, and you didn&#x27;t mistakenly use it instead of inner <i>monologue</i>.  I couln&#x27;t be sure because I&#x27;ve mostly seen inner <i>monologue</i> until now.<p>I do have an inner <i>dialogue</i> too (I guess I&#x27;ve an inner Socrates which doesn&#x27;t know to shut up for a second and to stop bothering me with stupid questions), I usually think in a dialectical manner.  I haven&#x27;t experienced your ortographic mistakes, or I haven&#x27;t recognised yet that I do make them too.  But sometimes I think of typing one word and I end up typing a completely different one: I want to type <i>baboon</i> and I end up typing, sth. like <i>trumpet</i> (made up example). This only happens with english though, so maybe it&#x27;s because english is slowly becoming a sinaitic language with an iconographic ortography.<p>That said I use my inner dialogue to study languages, and I&#x27;ve succeeded with English and Italian, my L2 and L3.  I&#x27;ve perfect english reading writing skills, and in italian high reading skills and good listening comprehension (and I studied it for one and a half year, without native speakers to talk to except for scarce weekly lessons at the uni).  What I do is I do my daily thinking in the target language.  And if I have to speak in one of the languages (including my mother tongue, turkish), I have to do a context switch, which takes some seconds.  If I had to switch from one language to another in the middle of the phrase, my pronunciation will be very very bad, with a very strong turkish accent, whereas if I were in <i>context</i>, I articulate way way better.<p>One thing is, this method is hard to share, when someone asks me how I study languages, I have to talk about self immersion etc., because I don&#x27;t want to make people think that I&#x27;m nuts.