Do you know of a previous case that&#x27;s similar to what you&#x27;re describing here? Because I&#x27;m having a hard time understand this. Unless Apple entered into an agreement with Uber, I don&#x27;t see how Uber would have an expectation that their relationship with the App Store would continue in its same form into perpetuity. And I&#x27;m almost positive there is some condition in the apple developer agreement that says &quot;We reserve the right to terminate without notice or reason&quot; or something similar.<p>What you&#x27;re saying is reasonable, and I could see how a judge might agree with the arguments you&#x27;ve made. But it also seems like Apple could say, &quot;We don&#x27;t like the CEO of Uber&#x27;s haircut&quot;, which is as valid as any other reason to terminate a non-contractual relationship. If Uber wanted protection for the billions they invested, they should have negotiated a proper agreement. Maybe I just don&#x27;t understand how the law works.