OK fair enough, I&#x27;ll see if we can get a better one then.<p>Honest to god we just used a standard one we got over a decade ago, and customized it with our name. We might have even gotten it off of legal zoom or something.<p>- The HRV&#x2F;(stress&#x2F;anxiety) study is peer-reviewed (and independent, we had no part in it).<p>- All our other papers are pending publication.<p>- Giovanni&#x27;s work on acoustic stimulation is peer reviewed, and from Northwestern. Again, we had no part in that.<p>- The meta-analysis one of our previous neuroscientists made is also peer reviewed.<p>- Dr. Olmstead&#x27;s paper is peer reviewed, so&#x27;s the Fatigue one we have up there, and all the other ones in our bibliography: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.brain.fm&#x2F;pdfs&#x2F;ResearchLibrary.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.brain.fm&#x2F;pdfs&#x2F;ResearchLibrary.pdf</a><p>- Hell, we&#x27;re even having our statistical user analysis peer reviewed, the one we have up (before we got popular) and the new one we&#x27;re making now.<p>Tryin&#x27; our best here :)<p>- Adam