Yes, a Wikipedia page is not on a physical resource like paper, so it does not have the resource costs that old-school encyclopedia&#x27;s have. But I have always felt that argument to be besides the point. There still is a limited resource at play, and that is time and effort for editors. I can see how including as much as possible by that rationale could lead to something that is not manageable.<p>I am not certain that is true, but it seems reasonable that it could be true. That is the point to argue against, not the one about physical media.