Please skim this: 
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Argumentum_ad_populum" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Argumentum_ad_populum</a><p>The way it relates to you is you think I&#x27;m wrong, see that 2 more people think so too, and make an arrogant remark that questions my reading comprehension. Many people thinking the same thing does not make it so.<p>Melinda was not talking about technology a lot - please re-read what she wrote.<p>Furthermore, even if she did focus on technology (it was actually Bill who did) - technology is not the solution to human happiness, as is shown by the obesity statistics in the USA.<p>Does that clear it up? If the goal of humanity is human happiness, technology has failed in the USA - the answer lies elsewhere clearly.<p>I don&#x27;t see that elsewhere, whatever they think it may be, addressed anywhere. Melinda addresses feminist notions - is that going to fix obesity and the myriad of problems USA citizens face? I don&#x27;t think so.<p>So where is the answer?<p>You&#x27;ll say &#x27;they&#x27;re focusing on something else right now&#x27;, to which I&#x27;ll say before you go and mess with another country&#x27;s infrastructure and economy by introducing foreign aid - maybe make sure a third of your own people are not miserable first.<p>Priorities are important - leaving your own citizens obese with no free health care while helping those half across the world is wrong. Do you see why?