Shit, I upvoted you by mistake ... now I have to give a response.<p>&#62; <i>Ok, why the poison? Maybe the owner simply wanted to do something cool.</i><p>So doing something cool means intruding on other people's rights? The threshold must be getting really low these days.<p>Really, people should start paying attention to the online world, and what does "property" mean in such a context.<p>And if your online presence on a social network is so fragile (since, after all, Facebook is a business and the users don't really have lots of implicit rights) ... than there should be national campaigns against it (after all, your online profile being mismanaged could cause some people more harm than smoking, so why the discrimination?) ... not to mention that people think of Facebook as a "common carrier" which couldn't be further from the truth.<p>Isn't it easier to just play nice and stop acting like a douche bag?<p>&#62; <i>It's an URL, not a wife.</i><p>It isn't just any URL, it's the link to your online profile. Your friends might have you bookmarked, Google might have you indexed by that URL.<p>It's like saying domain names like "sex.com" aren't worth anything. Well they do.