The idea that the constitution shouldn't be too highly regarded even seems like a legitimate point to make in trials:<p><i>The charges stemmed from the CCP’s interpretation of Guo’s actions as subversive to its rule. His defense was not to dispute the evidence, but to argue that the published materials were not subversive, and that the constitution covers freedom of speech anyway. The prosecution asserted that the interests of the Party-State take priority.</i><p><a href="http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/27316/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/27316/</a>