So you're saying that it's not right for us to let people move from, say, 1 on a "quality of life" scale, to 80, because some people in the rich country might be lowered from 81 down to 80 for their sake?<p>I just made up the scale, but that seems to be the jist of the argument, and if that's what you're saying, then I think you're wrong. I think we can help those people more than we'd hurt anyone at home.