If the donation thing is incorrect or exaggerated, how did he make the $300,000 he supposedly had (<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tees/8446247.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tees/8446247.stm</a>) when the police raided his home?  Seems impressive if it's just ad revenue.