Uh, but he is allowed to say <i>anything else</i> about it?<p>Besides, he previously used "my NDA is basically over" as a pretext for spilling the beans about it (<a href="http://twitter.com/Jason/status/8269986584" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/Jason/status/8269986584</a>).<p>So which is it? Does he care about the supposedly just-about expired NDA or doesn't he?