Totally.<p>The article is a good read regarding data crunching, but I take exception to some of his methodology.<p>Specifically, he's only using data from 1929 and on -- this is all part of the hockey stick's head. The 1920s are supposedly the start of the dramatic temperature increase. So of course the graphs don't show a dramatic slope change; there's no pre-1929, lesser-slope data included.<p>Edit: I'm <i>not</i> implying intentional omission on his part; 1929 is the earliest year available from NOAA (ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/gsod).