If you're saying that markets do not move on information alone and then several sentences later saying that serious investor _do_ let this type of information affect them? Looks suspiciously like self contradiction.<p>And I'll bet the WSJ has always done this. Pick up an issue from 1950 and see if it isn't tying current news stories to the market. It was the same then.<p>This seems to me to be another version of "things were so much better way back when and now it's all garbage"<p>But I'll bow out. I didn't RTA. Just found your comments popular yet (to me) seemingly uninformed.