he should be fired and never be allowed to work in the scientific community again.  i just read his cv though and he's got more experience than god, which means, he knew just exactly how wrong what he was doing was.  what a fool.  maybe he's losing his mind.  he is 61 years old.  and arrogant?  his reviewers challenged some of his assertions in his paper and they got his paper back with him saying things like "i can't find the data to support this right now.. have to give it to you later."  or "corrections made" when nothing had been changed.  that is arrogance!