No offense, but that would be a colossal waste of time and energy.  The entire field of protein folding is perpetually about 50 years from doing anything useful.  And approaches like Rosetta don't contribute that much to knowledge -- you run it for a billion CPU years, and all you've really learned is that if you run Rosetta long enough, you can occasionally find some good structures.<p>There are far more fruitful avenues of research in computational biology that deserve support -- unsexy things like comparative genomic analysis, searches for regulatory elements and networks based on large-scale gene-expression experiments, and other efforts to delineate the "parts list" of the genome.  In general, sequence analysis techniques are much more practical than anything involving protein structures.