"winningest attorney"?! Seriously?<p>But it's still interesting issue. While I agree that Freedom of expression is more important than preventing parties interested in the outcome of an election from creating publicity pieces that masquerade as documentaries, maybe we should also consider scrutinizing such expressions closely as to whether or not they should qualify as campaign donations or slander. Such scrutiny should come fast, because the damage done cannot be easily reversed.<p>OTOH, group A interested in electing candidate B could create a "docuslander" campaign against B in order to get candidate C punished.<p>It's a delicate and interesting issue.