The "Frenchies" also claims its effects is observable in scans, which is quite a bit more than just saying "we have a bunch of anecdotes".<p>More importantly their criticism centers on the Brits relying on self-reporting based on subjective experiences in trying (or not trying) to locate it, and an assumption that if the g-spot is real, only some women would have it.<p>If the g-spot is real, and all women have it, but some factor other than genetics determines whether or not they'll find it or not, and be able to stimulate it or not, then the British study falls apart.