Hard to take someone who calls himself an "Austro-Anarchist Libertarian Legal Theor[ist]" and went to a law school I've never heard of (note:  I am a law student now) seriously.  From a legal perspective, this guy's political biases show through.  Editor of the liberatarian papers?  Check. In the end, I thought it was a long article that is 1) fanciful and 2) a rehash of prior ideas.