No, I meant it in the sense that we have the rule of law in this country, and I didn't understand how the original commenter thought his opinions factored into a case that had been decided as a matter of "fact".<p>Opinions about the reasonableness of the law are one thing. But opinions about whether the defendant here was <i>actually found liable</i> are another: she had a trial, she had vigorous defense, and both a district and appellate hearing found the industry's version of the facts more compelling.