Please, go read the Trademark applications. Apple's is very broad while <i>not</i> including a use as retail sales platform while Fujitsu's is very, very specific to include <i>only</i> a use as a retail sales platform. There isn't an overlap in actual use no matter how much the devices may look/act alike.<p>In the Beatles case, Apple wanted to change the name to have a much broader TM to include music use cases. At that point the trademarks came into obvious conflict. It's not about domains, it's about uses. You pay for each category of use. When you look at how those categories are broken down it becomes obvious why it's set up that way.