I've never quite understood why the resistance to the various Ogg formats?<p>I certainly falls into that "good enough" category for encoding audio and video, the same as Divx and mp3. And it appears to stream at rates a few percentage points lower than the prevalent licensed formats.<p>My little Sansa clip player plays it quite happily and I like that I can stuff more songs onto its little 4GB memory if I reencode everything in Ogg, with really no perceptible different in sound. The few Ogg encoded videos I've seen seem perfectly fine and take up less space and use less bandwidth off of my disk to watch...<p>I was mystified when Google and Chrome went h264. Seems like lots of expensive licenses for something that's cross platform and well supported with no real expense associated with it.<p>seriously, why the hate?