This is just bad jurisprudence. It's the reason why legal language is supposed to be intentionally vague; so that there aren't potential legal issues with doing something that a completely rational person might do. Obviously there is no intention for the law to be interfering with any super bowl parties you might want to have at home and no prosecutor would relish pursuing someone who did. This whole thing is pretty much a moot point unless you own a sports bar. That's what happens when lobbyists get to the lawmakers though...