exactly. I used the term master because that's what we are using internally. We could have called it foobar of course :-)<p>For the poster of the article, a stable (i.e slow moving) master was important, for us stable release branches.<p>The head of their master only uses as new releases are made. Our master moves constantly and releases are tagged on the release-branches.<p>It's really just a matter of terminology though.<p>Another point I wanted to make with my post was that you don't need as many branches as the original article for quite the same advantages.