And I was replying to the part of your message where you replied to the original commenter saying that he was wrong because Norvig was talking about: <i>dynamic programming language, not a dynamically typed programming language</i>, but the original commenters comment still makes sense if you replace <i>dynamically typed programming language</i> with <i>dynamic programming</i>. I never said Norvig posted it, I said that the grandparent of my post - the original comment you replied to - posted it.