Agreed about the true scandal. NS only mentions 3 charges, an undisclosed conflict of interest, a slip-up (intentional or unintentional) in his methodology (and how he wrote it up), and drawing blood from children outside of a medical facility. Without knowing more about the charges (and being a layman) revoking his license seems extreme. I'll bet a lot of published papers have similar problems.<p>It's been determined the East Anglia University climate researchers broke the law by obfuscating data, but the statute of limitations has run out. Let's see if any of them lose their positions.