This judgement is a travesty.<p>- Justice is only just if it is handed out evenly and in proportion to the crime.  If ten million people share an mp3 and only one person is convicted for it, should that person have to pay for the alleged damages caused by the ten million?  That's contrary to my sense of justice and to hundreds of years anglo-saxon jurisprudence.<p>- Stealing one CD from a store is clearly a more tortuous act than making one copy of the songs on a CD.  If you steal a CD then the owner doesn't have it any more.  If you make a copy of a CD then the copyright owner's potential sales may be diminished by some theoretical fraction of the original value of the CD.