Interesting. Thanks for the info.<p>&#62;Do I think Mozilla is holding back the open web by not supporting H.264? Yes.<p>I'm wondering if it's fair to expect Mozilla (which I'm given to understand is a non-profit organization) to pay a license fee on every download the way a commercial entity like Google or Apple does?  Do they get enough donations\royalties for this to be feasible?<p><i>Edit</i>: Mozilla's explanation: <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/22787/Mozilla_Explains_Why_it_Doesn_t_License_h264" rel="nofollow">http://www.osnews.com/story/22787/Mozilla_Explains_Why_it_Do...</a>