It may not be a "spam" blog, but if this is without John's permission, it <i>is</i> a wholesale lifting of copyrighted material that can't possibly be considered "Fair Use".<p>Somebody will say "Yes it can", but no, it can't. Fair Use considers the quantity used, and using 100% of a substantial body of work is not fair use. Furthermore, <i>even if</i> this is satire, which I would consider dubious, the satire is not in the use of the original material. This can be proved by the fact that the "satire" still stands if you just provide a link back to the original work, then a comment section beneath that. This is actually not a bad idea for a site or family of sites, but only if it works by linking the original. You know, like reddit or HN, neither of which would be in a safe legal position if instead of linking to things they <i>copied</i> them onto the site in bulk.