<i>Yes, some idea require a certain nuanced approach to fully comprehend, others however, do not. This is not one of them. I guess you can throw up you up your hand and cry "I can't decide, these waters are too ethically difficult to navigate, argh!" and forever cop out. It's easier.</i><p>That is not what he is saying though.  He is arguing for a more rational and more balanced view than that advocated by the original article, which was quite "all-or-nothing".  This does not mean that genocide is not bad, it certainly is.  But because they committed genocide does not mean they did not have other good qualities and achievements as well.