No kidding. I dropped WSJ.com last year and don't miss it.<p>The Internet delivers a WORLD of news sites meaning the traditional publishers have less of a voice than they did when paper was the sole medium.<p>Their proposed pay wall may ensnare existing readers, but who in his right mind is going to subscribe having never had a relationship with this provider before?  "Oh, you want money for that story, the same story I can see a 1,000 versions of in Google News? Buh-bye."<p>I'd love to see the evidence that supports this decision. This reeks of someone trying to save his job.