<i>potatolicious</i> argued that perhaps if we saw injustice, we'd move to correct things.<p>I'm arguing, simply, that the RIAAs lawsuits are chock full of injustice: a flawed core conceit (that IP addresses can identify individuals), lawbreaking (unlicensed PIs) and piles of collateral damage (file-sharing grandmothers?).<p>It's not that I think file-sharers should be able to violate copyright law.  It's that I see no evidence that the public is particularly motivated by injustice to seek change.