Help me to understand:  how is this different than publishing scans of documents found in a public dumpster?  If you don't want your credit card bills published on the internet, shred all your mail before throwing it away.  If you don't want me to republish the contents of your semi-private URL's, encrypt everything.<p>Yes, in theory the public could have accessed this information on their own, but why would it be polite or desirable to republish it?  At a first glance, this looks like an immature stunt of the sort I'd hope would be scorned.  I'm not arguing that it's illegal -- just rude.<p>Are people voting this up to encourage more such stunts? To call attention to the risks?  Why?