Yeah, I always cringe when conservative politicians rant about &#x27;traditional&#x27; marriage. Especially when the bulk of their region&#x27;s history allowed for things like polygamy^1 and forcing their victim to marry them after rape^2. To be fair, their &#x27;traditional&#x27; definition of marriage is certainty saner than parts of the historical version in the good book:<p>^1 &quot;..I will take your wives [plural] while you live to see it, and will give them to your neighbor.  He shall lie with your wives in broad daylight.  You have done this deed in secret, but I will bring it about in the presence of all Israel, and with the sun looking down.&quot; (2 Samuel 12:11-14 NAB)<p>^2 &quot;If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.&quot; (Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)