did you intend to leave off the first two sentences of this post?<p><pre><code>    I hate pot. I hate it even more than hard drugs. ..
</code></pre>
i am trying to understand why this comment is on top for this article<p>the comment fail to address the linked study and instead quotes an unrelated third party,<p>the quote is truncated and anecdotal(One reference point)
,<p>the source of information for this teacher is eavesdropping on teenagers&#x27; bravado,<p>and the teacher seems to confuse his own conclusion seemingly for some rhetorical zing<p><pre><code>   I hate when people say that it’s just experimenting. Because from what I’ve seen, it’s when my students stop experimenting.
</code></pre>
the argument of &#x27;just experimenting&#x27; i understood meant the kids were experimenting with the chemical processes of their bodies, but the teacher convolutes the term with all forms of experimenting<p>from this quote i recognise this teacher only references his world in relation to cannabis, and to be choosing which students he is friendly with based on how they talk about cannabis among themselves