&quot;The data is valuable only if someone has fair access to it. What an individual or a thousand may do with that data is an unknown and that is the real opportunity here, not the promise of a million subscribers paying you a dollar each.&quot;<p>Why is the data only valuable if someone has fair access to it? Right now, basically anyone can go license the Twitter data and have access to the full firehose. And I don&#x27;t know how you know if the data is real opportunity here (vs. advertising).<p>&quot;The desire by some individuals to make insane amounts of money on an idea are directly responsible for a massive SUCK experience for the end users of the software because those users are then forced to use the software in a way that makes the revenue predictable. I used to love to use Twitter because of all the wide variety of apps and things I could do with it with code. Now it&#x27;s just unusable and dying. I would pay to make that different, but there isn&#x27;t anything they offer that&#x27;s worth my time and effort, so I&#x27;ll go elsewhere.&quot;<p>Are you offering a better path for Twitter and their shareholders, or are you offering a path that feels better, but may have a much lesser outcome for those parties? If so, why would they take it?<p>And while I agree with you that Twitter is dying, it&#x27;s not unusable, it&#x27;s just not usable in the way that you want to use it.