What the flying fuck<p>&gt;1) It assumes that, just because you&#x27;re a member of homo sapiens species, you ought to get resources that others produce. Why? I care more about my dog than I care about most people. If someone kidnapped my dog and 100k random people and told me: &quot;You can either save your dog or 100k random people. Choosing one will mean me killing the other&quot;. I would choose my dog to live and permit 100k people to die.<p>If you thought the trolley problem was a nice ehtics question, that right there is pure neglect for the value of human life. Can&#x27;t do anything about that for you mate.<p>&gt;2) Something very similar could be applied to dating and reproduction. Why not? You could argue that you live long enough to reproduce and that reproduction is the basic, biological purpose of life for all organisms. So, if someone is unattractive, just create a Basic Reproduction Guarantee. The same reasoning used for redistributing money could be used for redistributing sex. Since Basic Income is not considered stealing, then Basic Reproduction should not be considered rape.<p>The term &quot;basic&quot; income is stupid, and should not be used. What is basic is being able to live in reasonable conditions. As it stands, the only way to do that reliably right now is to have a guaranteed income. Sex is not necessary for you to survive.
And contrary to what you might think, no, basic income is not stealing. Taxes are not stealing. That&#x27;s part of living in a society. If you wish to not have things stolen from you, I highly recommend going to live in a remote part of the world, where noone will prevent you from doing your job. Of course, your job is probably only possible because of the whole framework that your society has put into place.