Yes. In 2003, when she started the company at 19,  Draper etc invested &amp; other well known SJWs like Henry Kissinger &amp; George Shultz joined her board because of her gender. They both knew &amp; give a shit that a decade later people would be talking about diversity. For 12 years, she flipped her blonde hair &amp; the men were fooled-&amp; the money just kept pouring in.<p>Do you really think VCs would invest $400 million &amp; Walgreens &amp; Cleveland Clinic would do deals with this company, that put people&#x27;s health at risk &amp; create massive liability, without diligence because she is a woman?<p>Maybe Theranos will fail. Obviously fraud is unacceptable. And the lack of peer review helps no one. But, the idea that she was funded because of her gender is absurd. If anything, given all the data on this topic, she was funded in spite of it- because she was trying something very difficult &amp; potentially revolutionary--not some dumb app.<p>I hope you&#x27;ll reconsider your thinking on this. Its hard enough for women to get funded; maybe it&#x27;s worth giving them the benefit of the doubt when they do.