I will never be in that position, because I will never have millions to spend running for office. I would have to sell out <i>first</i>, just to get the money to become an elected representative, and then what moral grounds would I have for turning my patrons away?<p>It doesn&#x27;t really matter what I or anyone in my peer group thinks; as long as the war on drugs continues, none of us will ever run for office or have any visible role in politics. But it doesn&#x27;t matter, because the tech industry offers most of us substantially more significant opportunities to change the world around us than anything we could accomplish if we wasted 10x as much time on the political process.<p>You&#x27;re right that local politics is different; it is still mostly sort of democratic and amenable to change on the scale individuals and reasonably-sized groups can hope to achieve. But the scale of accomplishment available is correspondingly trivial, and the timescale is just as slow.<p>I don&#x27;t see that the tea party accomplished much as a grassroots movement. It looked to me like the established political power structure successfully co-opted the grassroots tea party during the year after it emerged and has been continuing business as usual ever since, using the &quot;tea party&quot; brand to give their existing agenda populist legitimacy.<p>I am very much visualizing a better world and doing what I can to help create it; I&#x27;m just not wasting my time trying to accomplish that through some sclerotic, glacial, anti-transparent political process. I&#x27;m just working to create the organizations I want to participate in directly, helping build mutual aid networks, and supporting community values around resource-sharing and skill-sharing. Hackerspaces and co-housing and open source software, these are the kinds of projects where my efforts can actually accomplish something to help make the world a better place.