This is interesting to listen to, b&#x2F;c Eno is well-known and has some interesting observations and ideas, but as far as his main idea, that art is play, he seems tragically unaware of the sexual implications of &quot;hair styles, boob jobs, music,&quot;  It&#x27;s not merely play, it&#x27;s demonstrations of reproductive fitness.  Even when he talks about two females on a bus &quot;synchronizing.&quot;  How can he be so oblivious?<p>It&#x27;s ironic b&#x2F;c he begins the discussion invalidating the idea that art is an &quot;industry,&quot; in order to enable it to merit value under contemporary economic systems, but then spends his time constructing an alternate view in which art has value as &quot;play.&quot;  And this definition of culture as a collection of rituals has already been thought by people hundreds of years ago.  Rituals are a subset of culture, not an ersatz.<p>I&#x27;m only halfway in so far...