So you want 100% of your deploys to be slower and less convenient than they need be just because you need to use another tool for 10% of them (and mostly for code that wasn&#x27;t even written in the organization, so those images might not even need to be maintained by the organization)? I&#x27;d understand if you&#x27;d want to do that for a 50-50 mix, but not 90-10.<p>Also, remember that Capsule doesn&#x27;t add another build step. You need to create JARs anyway, so you might as well make them capsules. You then either have the option of adding another step of building Docker images (just because you have some other Docker containers, most of them not even built by you) or not. Capsule just saves you that extra step and still lets you isolate your app in a container if you want, while making everything faster <i>and</i> management+logging easier. I don&#x27;t think the need&#x2F;wish to use containers for <i>isolation</i> should dictate your <i>packaging</i> solution.