This is a non sequitur.<p>(more specifically: we weren&#x27;t arguing about my first assertion, we were arguing about my second assertion. So the fact that you&#x27;re trying to refute my second assertion, that there is no evidence he have out A&#x27;s more freely, by attacking my first assertion, is irrelevant. I fully acknowledge that absent the department&#x27;s response, we don&#x27;t have the full picture of whether or not the department&#x27;s issue was with the actual teaching content, but that was not what you and I were discussing)