I think the question is framed poorly, and on that ground I&#x27;d challenge it from two angles:<p>First, one could argue that there are all sorts of additional C-like languages that weren&#x27;t listed - Java, C#, Rust, Go, etc.<p>One could also argue that &quot;Lisp&quot; is a more fundamental category of languages than &quot;C&quot;, so it&#x27;s not an apples-to-apples comparison. Exhibit A: the author&#x27;s list of Lisps included both dynamic and static languages, whereas the list of C&#x27;s included only statically typed ones. It captures the idea of a functional language with a unified representation for both code and data. C-like, on the other hand, seems to specifically mean C and its superset languages (a much smaller family than its descendants) according to the author&#x27;s usage.