Of course &quot;the Room&quot; was worse, by a long mile, but it was enjoyable. I have long been a connoisseur of &quot;bad movies&quot;.  Look for movies like &quot;Hillbillies in a Haunted House&quot; or &quot;Rock and Roll Wrestling Women vs. the Aztec Ape&quot; or one of my all time favorites &quot;Poor White Trash II&quot; (originally titled &quot;Scum of the Earth&quot;).  &quot;The Room&quot; had many (unintentionally) funny scenes.  &quot;Snowpiercer&quot; was not bad enough to be entertaining, so instead I found it turgid, overwrought, melodramatic, and extremely implausible.<p>The point is though that this is a question of taste.  Maybe my tastes simply aren&#x27;t aligned with what a lot of other people like.  But it is for that reason that I simply don&#x27;t trust RT.  For many things I used to use Ebert, since I could usually predict from his review wether I&#x27;d like it.<p>(I havent looked closely but I do wonder if selection bias impacts review sites.  If a limited appeal movie comes out, and the mainstream reviewers ignore it, and all the reviewers that RT aggregates are from the world that the move does appeal to, does it end up scoring much better than if all the mainstream usual suspects had reviewed it.)