Nah. For me it was this 70 MB photo of Pluto that convinced me that they&#x27;re not hyping anything, but delivering actual results: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nasa.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;thumbnails&#x2F;image&#x2F;crop_p_color2_enhanced_release.png" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nasa.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;thumbnails&#x2F;image&#x2F;cro...</a><p>Think I spent half a day staring at that photo, just zooming and panning and wishing I had a bigger screen.  Anyhow, they bring up this data bandwidth issue front and center in the PDF.<p>More to my point (if I had one), the probe was launched in 2006 and took 9 years to get there.  The 70 MB photo was taken half a year ago and just now managed to get transmitted (surely they had other things queued up and so forth.)  I don&#x27;t think that I&#x27;ve done anything for 9 years, and I would never wait half a year for a page to load, so NASA&#x27;s convinced me that they can do longevity.