Nice! 
I&#x27;ve wanted to do something like this for awhile, too, but haven&#x27;t had the time yet.<p>What&#x27;s interesting to me, from a research point of view, is the degree of nuance the network uncovers for the clickbait.
We all know that &lt;person&gt; is going to be doing &lt;intriguing action&gt;, but for each person these actions are slightly different. 
The sentence completions for &quot;Barack Obama Says...&quot; are mainly politics related while &quot;Kim Kardashian Says...&quot; involve Kim commenting on herself.<p>So it might not really understand what it&#x27;s saying, but it captures the fact those two people will tend to produce different headlines.<p>Neat Idea: what if we tried the same thing with headlines from the New York Times (or maybe a basket of newspapers)?
We would likely find that the Clickbait RNN&#x27;s vision of Obama is a lot different from the Newspaper RNN&#x27;s Obama.
Teasing apart the differences would likely give you a lot more insight into how the two readerships view the president than any number polls would.