For what? LOL<p>Even Ben Bernanke says we should have jailed banking executives after 2008.<p>In case you&#x27;re not being purposefully obtuse, you can watch about how the reams of evidence of criminal behavior (you know, of actual written-down crimes) was ignored by the justice department (you know, the same agency that is pursuing this case), via PBS Frontline: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pbs.org&#x2F;wgbh&#x2F;pages&#x2F;frontline&#x2F;untouchables&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pbs.org&#x2F;wgbh&#x2F;pages&#x2F;frontline&#x2F;untouchables&#x2F;</a><p>Frontline, was able to find direct evidence of executive criminality with just a cursory investigation (with no power of subpoena). The excuses coming out of the justice department&#x27;s mouthpiece were so laughable, that he resigned the day after the piece went to air.<p>There&#x27;s a two-tier system in place here, and crimes like defacing a website causing a paltry amount of damage, although real, should be the crimes the justice department ignores if they&#x27;re not able to apply justice to all crimes fairly and evenly.