The actual damages that resulted from his actions were pretty small and purely financial.<p>Even if you prosecute on the basis of what <i>could have</i> happened (maybe we start charging everyone who runs a red light with manslaughter?), we&#x27;re still not reaching the level of physical harm to anyone or (barring complete negligence on the part of the Tribune) a catastrophic material loss.<p>You <i>really</i> think society&#x27;s need to avenge that wrong is worth spending $30k a year to hold him in federal prison, exposing him to possible violent harm, and depriving him of his future?  Sorry, but that&#x27;s <i>insane</i>.  He should pay the actual damages, a punitive fine, and perform community service, tops.