If you take a look through the FAQ, they do say that they are designing it to work within common photography workflows, giving example formats of JPEG, TIFF, and raw DNG (though I&#x27;m assuming the DNG is after their proprietary postprocessing, not a set of the true raw sensor outputs). They&#x27;re asking for input going forward, so take a few minutes to express your concerns about workflow and maybe it will be a better product for it.<p>I believe they are doing quite a bit of stacking, as they say they are processing up to 130 megapixels from 10 sensors to get the final image. There should definitely be a dynamic range improvement. I hope they can somehow apply their processing to video streams and provide a wide dynamic range (maybe even HDR) video, but I&#x27;d be surprised if they can do more than provide a cellphone-like 4K stream from a single sensor.<p>Focus speed shouldn&#x27;t be an issue. I&#x27;m guessing it&#x27;s using tiny cellphone-sized camera sensors, so even at the f&#x2F;2.4 printed around the lens, they&#x27;ll have massive depth of field. It looks like they even have the DOF printed on each lens: 10cm-infinity for the 35mm lenses, 40cm-inf for the 70mm, and 100cm-inf for the 150mm. Any focusing will be done computationally at post-processing time.<p>I&#x27;m interested in the concept; I just hope they&#x27;re a little more developer-friendly then Lytro turned out to be. I know there&#x27;s a lot of proprietary secret sauce going on with the computational post-processing, but if they can open up their system just a bit to let the crowd in to poke around, there&#x27;s probably a lot of unique creative opportunities.