I don&#x27;t think this is really related to the comment you&#x27;re replying to.  Whether or not discrimination exists is not the same as whether or not &quot;the value and importance of intersectionality and representation&quot; (article quote) is something we should consciously pursue.  How does that <i>not</i> carry a bias towards reverse discrimination?  I agree with the OP, I&#x27;m scratching my head about how the article simultaneously argues that we need to treat everyone equally, but also need to tally their intersectionality combo bonus points and force an equal &quot;representation.&quot;  You can either argue for ignoring all labels or for special label-based treatments, not both.<p>To take it into a perhaps more productive but related area, how would you say we should overcome bias?  It seems to me if you try too hard, you will just introduce another form of bias.