I understand the practical issues with older generations lasting forever, but I think it&#x27;s better for society to place limitations on these matters, rather than nature placing the permanent limitation of death.<p>Presidents have 4 year terms. Why can&#x27;t people have 80 years where they&#x27;re allowed to vote, and then lose that right forever? Or maybe they can be sent to a separate society where they&#x27;re permitted to vote and debate things that apply to their own sphere, but must still follow universal laws set by a &quot;central society&quot;, to prevent deeply immoral actions. For example, maybe alcohol is permitted to be permanently illegal in their society, but they still aren&#x27;t allowed to lynch people or prosecute people without due process.<p>These are certainly very difficult problems to solve, and there are many counter-arguments to that particular. But I think there are solutions to these issues other than death, and I think many of those solutions are much preferable to death.<p>A society that adapts to become biologically immortal will find their own ways to adapt to dealing with zeitgeists and progress.