Not really. We&#x27;re probably closer than we are far apart, but I think the distinction is important; for instance, we usually discuss the presumption of innocence in terms of &quot;innocent until proven guilty&quot; and then base our opinions off the modern (indeed, message-board) interpretation of the word &quot;proof&quot;. Mathematical certainty was not an objective of the framers, or of their predecessors.<p>Which is relevant here, of course, because of the demand for access to source code to increase certainty.<p>But: you&#x27;d be right if you assumed the &quot;1st and 4th Amendment&quot; thing was what actually motivated me to comment. I&#x27;m a message board nerd too!