Yes, precisely.  So many times a debate is about whether or not something does measurable harm.  People or policies with a measure if success are often cited as evidence of lack of harm.  Whether it&#x27;s taking drugs or raising the tax rate, if the subjects in question continue to prosper, it is assumed no harm is done.<p>However people forget to ask the question whether the outcomes are maximised?  Could the blogger have been the next Steve Jobs but for the weed use?  I don&#x27;t pretend to have the answer but I see the question is rarely asked.