The ones I have seen do interviews both before and after. I sampled 10 kink.com &#x27;films&#x27; via the Pirate Bay and none of them had been edited (in terms of removing the intro interviews, I didn&#x27;t wait for the downloads to complete). It may well be that some providers or the viewer themselves edits these out, and I appreciate that if you are not receptive to such material then perusing it for legal purposes must be distressing. But I hardly think it&#x27;s fair to blame the media creator for what happens to their content afterwards, given that the various &#x27;porn tube&#x27; sites seem to reduce everything to 5 or 10 minute clips of the most explicit bits.<p>I certainly don&#x27;t mean to make light of your concerns. I can appreciate that involuntarily dealing with this material is depressing at best and dehumanizing at worst, and have often made the case for censorship and government intrusion in regards to contraband material such as child porn on both legal and moral grounds. However, I am unable to understand your seeming animus towards an individual production company, notwithstanding its prolific output and the exploitative tone of its branding.