Fair enough, &quot;rich kids&quot; can also mean fresh-out-of-mom-and-dads&#x27; with too much money and not enough impulse control.<p>I guess the reason I assume the backlash is against &#x27;kids&#x27; and not &#x27;rich&#x27; is, to use my own anecdote, most everyone <i>I</i> know in this industry who might be incorrectly classified as &quot;rich kids&quot; came from much humbler circumstance, and they also try to keep perspective on their extreme good fortune as you do.<p>Perhaps it&#x27;s the circles we run in, but most of the people I know personally who would be caught in the crossfire of &quot;rich kids&quot; are aware and grateful daily of their massive advantage because of the stark contrast to their childhood economic experience - and it makes them work twice as hard to make sure they maintain it, as well as pay greater attention to those evils.<p>I feel like the truer crime called out by &quot;rich kids&quot; is reveling in privilege, oblivious at its cost to others - that total lack of societal awareness I tend to associate with children, which I guess is why &#x27;kids&#x27; seemed more backlash appropriate.