That is unfair.  However, we can still remedy that through the vote.<p>Motivating people to actually do that is a political problem.  Our process is just in this way.<p>Lazy &#x2F; uninformed people getting the product of those behaviors is arguably just, given the process does provide meaningful remedies.<p>It&#x27;s an interesting dynamic.  I do see it as somewhat self-correcting.  When it gets ugly enough, the process does allow for meaningful reform.  Right now, social progress is good.  Good enough to provide motivation for preserving the status quo.<p>Economic pressures continue to mount, but many people still have options, and what we value as people varies widely.  Many don&#x27;t need or want much, but they value social equality, consideration as people, etc... very highly.<p>Can the deal be made sweet enough for the peeps to accept an entrenched oligarchy?  Who knows?<p>My point though, on fairness, is the process in the USA is allowing that question to be posed, and posed fairly.  Sure, the people are being flooded with a lot of misinformation, but most of those people are completely free to talk among themselves, gather, organize, vote... too.<p>I will recognize voting rights attacks as unfair.  Alabama recently closing DMV offices in poor &#x2F; black counties is unacceptable.  Problems do exist, but so do remedies when people do organize and act.<p>They have to value doing that first though.  More and better advocacy is needed.