Internet connection, a &quot;human right?&quot; That&#x27;s merely an empty slogan. The notion of positive liberties breaks down under the slightest scrutiny.<p>What you&#x27;re really saying is that somebody has a positive obligation to provide every human on earth a particular product, presumably at a price that each can &quot;afford.&quot; This claim presents several unsolvable problems.<p>First, there&#x27;s no objective way to determine what this price might be for each person.<p>Second, if we could establish a price for each individual person to get &quot;full internet,&quot; you must admit that any person might prefer Zuck&#x27;s &quot;partial internet&quot; at, some lower price. If this person&#x27;s preference runs counter to my sensibilities, that&#x27;s my problem to get over.<p>Third, on whom does this obligation fall? Are you personally the one obligated to provide every human this product? If not you personally then whom? Zuck? Santa Clause?<p>Fourth, on what basis shall we draw the list of products that I will demand be affordably provided me? And who shall draw the list and ratify it? Self appointed SJWs fresh out of POLI-SCI 101 no doubt, except professor never assigned Locke or Hobbes.<p>Internet access seems rather high up the hierarchy of needs especially in countries where starvation remains known. What shall they demand next, Ferraris? Reductio ad absurdum.