My experience is that people go on about it all across the spectrum, including lots of people who not only don&#x27;t think George W. Bush <i>did</i> steal the 2000 election, but who would have thought it was a good and justified thing if he <i>had</i>.<p>Gerrymandering is a real issue and a real thing that really effects election results, and, simultaneously, an effective distraction from the more serious problem of representation caused by FPTP in single-member districts. So, not only is it a popular target of the disaffected, its something the disaffected are redirected to vent their anger at <i>by</i> both sides of the partisan duopoly in different times and places, because while it is a real thing, none of the methods used to attack it fundamentally change the structures reinforcing the partisan duopoly, and in any given condition certain of the methods for fighting it will reinforce the position of one side or the other of that duopoly against the other within the basic duopoly-reinforcing structure.