He is still not credible. That he &quot;sees&quot; the &quot;discrepancies&quot; doesn&#x27;t prove that the science and the conclusions of climate scientists are invalid or that the problem isn&#x27;t very real.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;graphics&#x2F;2015-whats-warming-the-world&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;graphics&#x2F;2015-whats-warming-the-wor...</a><p>&quot;Researchers do not expect their models to reproduce weather events or El Niño phases exactly when they happened in real life. They do expect the models to capture how the whole system behaves over long periods of time. For example, in 1998 there was a powerful El Niño, when the equatorial Pacific Ocean warms ( we&#x27;re in another one of that scale now). A simulation wouldn&#x27;t necessarily reproduce an El Niño in 1998, but it should produce a realistic number of them over the course of many years.&quot;<p>In short, the models aren&#x27;t supposed to replace the short-term weather forecasts but to model the behavior of the very big and complex system we&#x27;re living in over more years.<p>And yes, it&#x27;s the humanity&#x27;s use of fossil fuels that is warming the world:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;graphics&#x2F;2015-whats-warming-the-world&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;graphics&#x2F;2015-whats-warming-the-wor...</a>