I think the point of the article is that if you use the naive selection criteria, anything over 41-43% on a 50% random chance is actually &#x27;hot&#x27;. So it&#x27;s probably worth reviewing that study&#x27;s selection criteria to see if in fact there&#x27;s a larger hot hand factor than you might think at first glance.<p>The second point the article makes is that it&#x27;s very likely the selection criteria in your NBA study is not precisely defined enough to determine the baseline percentage.