You repeatedly appeal to one specific irrationality, and don&#x27;t explain why that irrational behavior (as opposed to many others) will occur.<p>Nor do you explain why redistribution is necessary. Assuming the masses can control law enforcement well enough to impose redistribution, why can&#x27;t the masses also simply prevent the rich from harming them and form their own economy? Let me guess - more finely tuned irrationality?<p>It seems like your alleged irrationalities conspire in odd ways to make your very specific policy prescription the only possible solution. [edit: my mistake on this paragraph, I did indeed confuse you with another poster.]