But I don&#x27;t see anyone on the internet writing articles rebutting any of the points.  I.e. I&#x27;d expect someone to write an article where they negate each point on that list e.g. &quot;Illegal immigration - I think Trump is crazy to bring this point up because there is nothing wrong with illegal immigration. The reason we should not be against illegal immigration is because ...&quot; and so on and so on, for each point.  The wall is an implementation detail.  I see people focus on that but then it&#x27;s almost like they&#x27;re trying to avoid the topic.<p>Trump seems like a very pragmatic reasoner.  Keeps things simple. His way of reasoning seems to go something like this: &quot;Illegal immigration.  Are you for it, or against it? Against it? Ok.  Would a wall help? Yes or no.  Yes? Ok but you seem apprehensive about it.  Why are you apprehensive? It&#x27;s going to be expensive? We have a trade deficit with Mexico.  I bet I could force them to pay for it by using strong arm tactics and adding taxes onto things they like exporting here.  I&#x27;m good at negotating shit like that.  Are you still apprehensive?&quot; And so on.<p>I just simply can&#x27;t find any coherently written rebuttals other than articles that go &quot;Trump is crazy. He&#x27;s an narcissist. He&#x27;s a racist&quot; basically just ad hominems.  No one is being critical about any of his points.  So it&#x27;s very weird when I see all the hostility against him but no actual counter arguments.