I don&#x27;t want to play study tennis with dogma. However, here are some representative examples:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pmc&#x2F;articles&#x2F;PMC3182557&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pmc&#x2F;articles&#x2F;PMC3182557&#x2F;</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;cdp.sagepub.com&#x2F;content&#x2F;13&#x2F;4&#x2F;148" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;cdp.sagepub.com&#x2F;content&#x2F;13&#x2F;4&#x2F;148</a><p>IQ and its heritability are about as uncontroversial among psychiatrists as global warming is among climate scientists.<p>Here&#x27;s a good blog post about the personal implications of this, and how this knowledge can be used productively and charitably: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;slatestarcodex.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;01&#x2F;31&#x2F;the-parable-of-the-talents&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;slatestarcodex.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;01&#x2F;31&#x2F;the-parable-of-the-tale...</a>