this is the only reason here for this &quot;news&quot; &quot;article&quot;.<p>besides this, that is pure libel, with no source or fact checking from the &quot; journalist&quot;.  and that is just mentioned in passing. the &quot;journalist&quot; doesn&#x27;t even notice that is the only real interesting bit, and obviously does not expand or investigate on it. I&#x27;d love to hear what github has to say on this.<p>just flag this garbage.