They are covered in the TOS&#x2F;EULA, but based on some of things that have happened so far and some of the things written about it, it&#x27;s far from clear that this stuff would hold up in court. You might think it should, and I think it should, but who knows if a judge would agree:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jdsupra.com&#x2F;legalnews&#x2F;an-update-on-the-legal-implications-of-u-96288&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jdsupra.com&#x2F;legalnews&#x2F;an-update-on-the-legal-impl...</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.buzzfeed.com&#x2F;jwherrman&#x2F;want-to-publish-a-twitter-image-legally-just-embe#.lkOJZMvmv" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.buzzfeed.com&#x2F;jwherrman&#x2F;want-to-publish-a-twitter-...</a> -<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pando.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;01&#x2F;22&#x2F;how-twitters-new-embeds-will-make-social-medias-copyright-issues-even-weirder&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pando.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;01&#x2F;22&#x2F;how-twitters-new-embeds-will-ma...</a><p>Clear as mud.