I dunno, I think that&#x27;s some bullshit doublespeak right there.  He conflates emacs and the gnu project, while claiming to want the best possible emacs.<p><pre><code>   The GNU Emacs maintainer&#x27;s responsibility is to take charge of Emacs
   on behalf of the GNU Project, and produce the best possible GNU Emacs
   -- which means, the one that advances our aim the most.
   [...]
   It includes making sure dynamic loading resists GPL violation. [1]

</code></pre>
Non bs would be to say, eg, &quot;the task of our maintainer is to build the best emacs possible subject to the political goals of the gnu project.&quot;<p>Note that I&#x27;m not sharing my opinion of whether this is good or bad; I just dislike bs.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lists.gnu.org&#x2F;archive&#x2F;html&#x2F;emacs-devel&#x2F;2015-10&#x2F;msg00234.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lists.gnu.org&#x2F;archive&#x2F;html&#x2F;emacs-devel&#x2F;2015-10&#x2F;msg00...</a><p>edit: I take it back; you&#x27;re talking about the message to the NSA?  I skipped over everything in brackets while reading...