So, is this is a point in favor of <i>not</i> commenting your Javascript code or using inline docs?<p>Historically, I preferred to use inline JsDoc style comments as the source of documentation for my public APIs. Recently though, I decided that I didn&#x27;t like them and that I wanted something better. I was hoping to find some tool that parses my JS to AST, figures out what was being exported (e.g. what was public) and writes a JSON document that I could diff over time, to figure out what was documented and what wasn&#x27;t (in my external docs). So far, I have found this project called `doctor` which sounded close to what I&#x27;m looking for, but it still relies on comments ~ <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;jdeal&#x2F;doctor" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;jdeal&#x2F;doctor</a> ~ So, I might have to write it myself using something like Esprima to get the AST...