The question was around the Washington Post&#x27;s political standing not the BBC&#x27;s.<p>I wasn&#x27;t implying anything about the reporting accuracy just  commenting on the difference - it turns out less than I originally thought.<p>Always good to hear the BBC&#x27;s perceived lack of bias - shame it seems the current political climate in the UK (Conservative) appears to be attempting to cut it&#x27;s funding:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;media&#x2F;bbc-licence-fee" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;media&#x2F;bbc-licence-fee</a>
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.telegraph.co.uk&#x2F;culture&#x2F;tvandradio&#x2F;bbc&#x2F;10901155&#x2F;BBC-licence-fee-could-be-cut-under-Tory-government.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.telegraph.co.uk&#x2F;culture&#x2F;tvandradio&#x2F;bbc&#x2F;10901155&#x2F;B...</a>