My position is that contact with a situation doesn&#x27;t make you more obligated to assist than someone who had no contact. The details of your obligation, or the second boyfriend&#x27;s obligation, are entirely based on your mutual agreements and understandings.<p>The really weird thing about the Copenhagen Interpretation is that it imposes an &quot;uncanny valley&quot; of moral virtue. If I ignore a situation and provide 0 help, I&#x27;m virtuous. If I help to the tune of K or more, I&#x27;m virtuous. But if I provide 0 &lt; R &lt; K help, I&#x27;m suddenly a villain. This is just a really weird idea and I can&#x27;t see any reasonable justification for it.