You&#x27;re right of course, I definitely do not want to do that. But I <i>know</i>
I would vote individually on the issues that I care about.<p>For example, if everybody had a say, SOPA wouldn&#x27;t have gotten as far as 
it did. I would have voted it out, as would everybody else. But instead 
we had to sign a petition once it was nearly through. We could all be
pro-active about... well, everything! But instead, we&#x27;re kept on our 
toes being reactive to it all. (opt in not out, people!!! This ideal 
should exist everywhere but instead it&#x27;s nowhere to be found).<p>If everybody did that, I believe that each of us would have more of an 
effect on the country than electing somebody who is never going to agree 
100% with my beliefs, but is the best fit. That&#x27;s insane! There will
always be compromise.  In England, a party can promise to change x and y
if you vote for them, but once they finally come to power they might go
back on their promise. Okay, so what did I vote for then? Nothing. And 
there&#x27;s no accountability. This system is thoroughly broken and I refuse
to acknowledge it by &#x27;playing along&#x27;. And the worst thing about this is 
that nobody seems to notice, or care that picking the best out of a bad
bunch is how we should make our country work.<p>Vote Waldo.