But Dyson here (if he&#x27;s properly quoted!) doesn&#x27;t actually use scientific approach to question anything. He just claims &quot;discrepancies&quot; which don&#x27;t exist under the assumptions on which the research is based. He approaches it as the &quot;weather&quot; (very short term) whereas the assumption is the &quot;climate&quot; (trends). Otherwise he wouldn&#x27;t even mention the &quot;discrepancies&quot; as the main argument.