&gt; I&#x27;d even suggest that a major reason why cars have supremacy at the moment is that they are more inclusive of people than bikes are.<p>This is mostly true because &gt;&gt;we make it true&lt;&lt;. You see plenty of older people, people with kids, kids themselves, etc. biking around in the Netherlands or Denmark. This is because they have good support for biking, such that people 8 - 80 can bike around town.<p>Plus, it&#x27;s not like cars universally win at inclusiveness: They&#x27;re <i>less</i> inclusive of the poor, for example, because they&#x27;re vastly more expensive to own and operate than a bike. The poor who need a car because there&#x27;s no good transit or biking options have to spend a huge % of their income on transportation.<p>&gt; This redesigned city needs to make room for people who aren&#x27;t 25 years old and single.<p>Honestly, it sounds like you just haven&#x27;t been to any city with a high (15%+) bike modal share, because then you&#x27;d see how your assumptions are wrong. If you live in America, that&#x27;s understandable, because we don&#x27;t have any major cities like that. But they do exist, elsewhere in the world. Visiting Amsterdam or Copenhagen could be eye-opening.