I was following the logic of this post up until this part:<p>&gt; In 2008, Dropbox hit a key milestone on the path to their MVP when they released a video demonstrating their product. Tens of thousands joined the waiting list. So actually, the minimum viable product was the video itself<p>I&#x27;m not sure if I agree with this, because its suggesting that all you really need to prove your idea is smoke and mirrors. If Dropbox didn&#x27;t have anything behind its video, we&#x27;d see a huge backlash from angry viewers wondering why they made the video before the product. I was under the assumption that an MVP allows you to get your product out quickly and change it with feedback. Not just for proving that your idea is widely desired.