Forgive me, I&#x27;m doing my best to stay above board.  This is not an attack...<p>You misunderstand me.<p>I think that 11944 was too many papers, and should be narrowed down to papers by hard scientists.  I&#x27;m saying out of those 11944, a potentially huge number were social studies, news studies, and other fields that have nothing to do with climate modeling.  When you remove those from the 11944, what do you have?  10000?  5000?  1000?<p>It&#x27;s completely negligent, at the least.<p>So, how big is that majority, really? And how many of them agree with the IPCCs more conservative estimates vs the scary, less likely ones?<p>It&#x27;s really hard to say with noise like this.  And no, this doesn&#x27;t mean I get my science opinions from Rush Limbaugh.  That&#x27;s noise, too.