&gt; I guess I trust Tesla on this one so far -<p>Tesla is a party to the incident and has a reason to spin it as far in their favor as possible. Their account also completely omits any mention of the window of the jeep being broken with a rock and the driver&#x27;s side seat belt being severed so idk why we should just swallow their account on it&#x27;s face.<p>How about trusting a source that doesn&#x27;t have a dog in the race?  Here&#x27;s ars technica&#x27;s writeup:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;tech-policy&#x2F;2015&#x2F;10&#x2F;tesla-says-reno-journalist-struck-security-guards-on-gigafactory-grounds&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;tech-policy&#x2F;2015&#x2F;10&#x2F;tesla-says-reno-j...</a><p>You can read that and see it&#x27;s a lot more neutral than Tesla&#x27;s blog post. It reports tesla&#x27;s side and also info from RGJ&#x27;s article and supplements that with comments from the sheriff.<p>&gt; they have pretty much a perfect record of being honest-to-God and fair<p>The hero worship is real.