No, it isn&#x27;t, if by full connectivity we mean a neutral net.<p>There are ways to provide a neutral internet for free.<p>See Mozilla&#x27;s partnership with Grameen Bank in Bangladesh. (You get 20MB of free data for viewing a ad). More details here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mozilla.org&#x2F;netpolicy&#x2F;2015&#x2F;05&#x2F;05&#x2F;mozilla-view-on-zero-rating&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mozilla.org&#x2F;netpolicy&#x2F;2015&#x2F;05&#x2F;05&#x2F;mozilla-view-o...</a><p>Or Pepsi&#x27;s campaign in India where you get codes on buying a soda, where each code gets you some data.<p>If Mark was indeed altruistic, he could get people 50MB of free data, which wouldn&#x27;t have costed more than what it&#x27;s costing him now(assuming that people would use more than 50 MB of fb on internet.org).<p>But that wouldn&#x27;t have allowed him to create a sustainable monopoly, even if people would have used facebook on a free neutral network, which would still have fetched him money.<p>The only value of this deal to Mark is that Facebook gets to create a monopoly. This is something that should worry you.