A neat development, and I am consistently intrigued and impressed by collaboration tools for teams. As an internal tool, I could see it being constructive in some limited scenarios. If anybody can mention instances where using something like this or Google Docs with multiple people at the same time, I&#x27;d love to hear your stories to level-up my understanding of use-case scenarios.<p>But...in my business experience with teams across a few different industries, however, I&#x27;d say &quot;No&quot; so fast you&#x27;d think I had some kind of inherent bias.<p>Well, I think I do. The modern conference call, speed of data transfer, and online presentation tools that exist should - and do - work just fine when there is one expert at the controls. Usually that expert was me. Taking disparate pieces from different people and getting them in right, often in real-time, was part of my job. Another part of my job was helping people &quot;talk through&quot; what they intended to communicate, and help phrasing and spelling along the way.<p>Examples include responses to RFPs in a Word template, or any one of the development phases in a PowerPoint 11x17 or slide deck. These would eventually be client-facing, and could be done on the fly if so desired (rather than input&#x2F;output versioning, often hosted on SharePoint). Then, when finished, it was suitable for production.<p>I don&#x27;t see how Paper is an improvement on this process, but rather, a situation of allowing too many cooks in the kitchen. Again, I&#x27;m only speaking from my realm, and take pride in learning about new things (like JamKazam) that are still developing or even ahead of their time. YMMV.