I&#x27;d say both are pretty likely.. another round of lower-power servers with potentially more cores... more infrastructure...  Combined with improvements in headless rendering pipelines.  I haven&#x27;t looked into it in well over a year now, but last I checked dynamic updates took about 2-3 days to get discovered vs. server-delivered being hours for a relatively popular site.<p>I&#x27;m guessing they&#x27;ve likely cut this time in half through a combination of additional resources, and performance improvements.  Wondering if they&#x27;d be willing to push this out as something better than PhantomJS... probably not as it&#x27;s a pretty big competative advantage.<p>I know MS has been doing JS rendering for a few years, they show up in analytics traffic (big time if you change your routing scheme on a site with lots of routes, will throw off your numbers).