&gt; Oh please, you absolutely understood what he really meant and are arguing over the wrong usage of words rather than the point he was making.<p>First, I&#x27;m not entirely sure this person is a <i>he</i>. In the absence of an indicator of which gender a person is, I typically don&#x27;t assume.<p>&quot;Oh please, you absolutely understood&quot; is not a justifiable statement here. What knowledge do you possess of what I do or do not understand?<p>And I&#x27;m not being pedantic here: I actually though that &#x27;polack was trying to weasel in the suggestion that Assange is guilty without proving beyond a shadow of a doubt (which no Internet commentor really should be able to, barring a huge evidence mis-handling by the Swedish investigators).