basically a comedian asked question on why women were still choosing non-hard sciences in scandinavian countries inspite of the overt and covert equality measures. it ends up pitting one side against other. My reading is only one side had evidence and the other side used lots of emotion. Google threw up these references<p>1. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mercatornet.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;view&#x2F;a_funny_thing_happened_on_the_way_to_gender_equality_in_norway" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mercatornet.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;view&#x2F;a_funny_thing_happe...</a><p>2. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;TheRedPill&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1vuho8&#x2F;the_documentary_that_made_scandinavians_cut_all&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;TheRedPill&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1vuho8&#x2F;the_docu...</a>