Me: &quot;Near as I can tell, you, me and Markhor are all in the same moral boat...&quot;<p>Coldtea: &quot;Only, one of us [the employer] has used the $x an hour work of that woman up to that point...&quot;<p>If you want to argue that coldtea isn&#x27;t making a moral argument as to why he isn&#x27;t responsible, be my guest. I don&#x27;t think my interpretation is unreasonable.<p><i>It seems quite reasonable to believe that our responsibility towards the other may increase if 1&#x2F; we somehow contributed to their misfortune, 2&#x2F; if we somehow benefit from it, or 3&#x2F; if we benefit from them in any way at all.</i><p>(2) and (3) are exactly what the author is calling the Copenhagen Interpretation. I thought this wasn&#x27;t a thing?