How the <i>hell</i> is this a case of Poe&#x27;s Law? It&#x27;s an even-handed treatment of a contentious subject. I recognise that there are legitimate concerns, but that not everyone may be permitted to determine to his satisfaction whether those concerns are correct or not. I recognise that folks must be trusted, but also that they must be held accountable.<p>Where&#x27;s the crazy, nigh-parodic fundamentalism in that?