The &quot;my body&quot; argument is the central thrust of <i>Roe v Wade</i> and it <i>is</i> the very reason that abortion is no longer illegal. So that argument is absolutely worthy of consideration here.<p>Indeed, the stronger point is &quot;Don&#x27;t arrest me because I <i>might</i> commit some other crime.&quot; If we applied drug law logic to things like politics, we&#x27;d be arresting anyone who became a politician because they <i>might</i> be corrupting our society worse than any drug.<p>And I don&#x27;t get your seatbelt argument. If I don&#x27;t wear my seatbelt, I&#x27;m not harming anyone else - even if I get in an accident and get hurt or die due to my lack of wearing a seatbelt. Seatbelt laws are as unconstitutional as are the drug laws IMO. (Although, after reading about seatbelt law constitutionality, I see two decent arguments - 1) the driver can become a deadly projectile in an accident and 2) the driver is more likely to retain control of the vehicle with a seatbelt on. Those are good arguments, but I still don&#x27;t think they&#x27;re common enough occurrences that they should limit my personal freedom.)