While you bring up a valid issue (per e.g. [1]), it&#x27;s not clear to me what you&#x27;re trying to say about it. Even less clear to me is how any sort of coherent legal regime would be imposed on something like Internet.org, which presumably has access to sufficient resources to carve up its legal entities into the tastiest possible slices (such that e.g. the local entities only run the base stations while content approval decisions are ostensibly made by a mailbox in Panama or whatever).<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Pruneyard_Shopping_Center_v._Robins" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Pruneyard_Shopping_Center_v._R...</a>