The article uses euphemisms and double-talk:<p><i>As more countries and states enact market systems that put a price on carbon emissions, clean energy technologies will actually become cheaper than fossil fuel technologies</i><p>Translated into plain English:<p><i>As more governments raise the price of fossil fuels through increased taxation, solar and wind may cost less than fossil fuels.</i><p>What does the author have to gain by obfuscating something so obvious?<p>What is the impact on people when their energy costs are raised? (Hint: energy - vast amounts of it - goes into everything, from growing food to producing artificial heart valves.)