<i>&gt;He says: [...]  We say: [...]</i><p>But you&#x27;re just rewording it with synonyms in hopes of avoiding the application of the Copenhagen Interpretation to your&#x2F;coldtea&#x27;s post.<p><pre><code>  &quot;interaction&quot; == &quot;profit&quot;
</code></pre>
... because the blog author was <i>already</i> talking about &quot;interaction&quot; in terms of monetary benefits.<p><pre><code>  &quot;blame&quot; == &quot;increased responsibility&quot;
</code></pre>
... because the author already wrote &quot;<i>At the very least, you are to blame for not doing more.</i>&quot;  and &quot;doing more&quot; is what increased responsibility <i>is</i>.<p>Whether we use other synonyms such as &quot;profit&quot;, &quot;economic gains&quot;, &quot;saving time&quot;, &quot;outsourcing tedious work&quot;, etc, it doesn&#x27;t matter.<p>Likewise, using synonyms such as &quot;blame&quot;, &quot;responsibility&quot;, &quot;burden&quot;, &quot;cross to bear&quot;, &quot;moral debt&quot;, etc, doesn&#x27;t change the interpretation.