My argument is that correlation doesn&#x27;t imply causation. Just because all current examples are biased does not mean that the only way to do things is to be biased, right?<p>To put it another way, the concept of disruptive change is when some company does something different than all the other companies have done up to that point. I imagine uber, airbnb et al being told by someone that the &#x27;empirical evidence is 100% against them&#x27; as well.