Yeah, but there&#x27;s some other interesting stuff on that page, like &quot;... difficulty in identifying and understanding the implications of the switch to alternate law, which does not protect the angle of attack.&quot;<p>99.9% of the time it works one way, you <i>can&#x27;t</i> be steep enough to stall, then you change the rules on the guys. Yes, the pilots fucked up. But there&#x27;s pretty broad criticism of the HCI. The pilots are professionals and should know better, but when you swap the gas and the brake, it&#x27;s a rare driver that can cope with that. Sure, set a high bar for professionals, but leave out the arbitrary complexity.<p>Anywho, with regard to self driving cars, i think passive drivers will just give up and pull over when the autopilot can&#x27;t handle the situation. Aggressive drivers will be driving manually all the time anyway. Of course there are exceptions, but i&#x27;d bet that&#x27;s how it breaks out 95% of the time in practice.<p><i>edit</i><p>This is sorta like an anti-lock brake system that only works above 32 degrees fahrenheit. Just because there might be ice, we&#x27;re going to make your brakes worse even when there is no ice.<p>I think i get your point about de-skilling. They&#x27;ll need to be very careful of stuff that works <i>sometimes</i>