You won&#x27;t get both the front and the back of the table in focus, but given how far back you&#x27;d have to sit to get all three people in frame, you&#x27;d probably be able to get all three people in focus, especially if the guy in the back leans in a little. Also, I mentioned Canon because their high ISO modes are particularly low noise these days, even before noise reduction. And Nikon might have caught up as well, I haven&#x27;t reviewed lately.<p>But that&#x27;s actually not the most important part.<p>The most important part is that there are only two cameras in my life: my &quot;good&quot; camera and my smartphone, aka the camera I use when I know I&#x27;m going to be taking photos, and the camera I have on me all the time.<p>Since this image is probably boosted and noise reduced and photoshopped to make it the most presentable representation of the product, I really think the same amount of effort would get you better results, for less money, out of a DSLR. If you&#x27;re into spending money, the right DSLR and lens combo would get you far, far better results.<p>On the other hand, yes, DSLRs are bulky and you don&#x27;t want to carry them everywhere. But the Light is not a smartphone, so it&#x27;s yet another device to have to remember and carry around, so while it&#x27;s smaller, I&#x27;m still likely to leave it home because I just don&#x27;t think to bring cameras with me everywhere. I&#x27;ve got an older smartphone (Galaxy Note 3) that can take photos pretty near this quality in its fakey HDR mode. I&#x27;ve seen some shots out of the newest iPhone that very much rival this sort of photo. And that iPhone is cheaper than the Light, plus it&#x27;s not an extra device.