So just to be clear: He said he used drugs, a gate agent smelled drugs, the cops smelled drugs, and you just want to argue that if a dog also smelled drugs that that dog is unreliable even though the arrested party says the dog was correct..?<p>I just don&#x27;t understand what point you&#x27;re even trying to make. Just seems like you want to talk&#x2F;criticise drug-dog evidence even though it has no relation to this case at all.<p>If the guy arrested and whose money was taken says he used drugs right before arriving at the airport I, for one, believe him. He has more to lose by saying that than he does by lying about it.