This is like saying &quot;For a taste of the archetypical Apple design ethos, look at this 2001 iMac.&quot;  Sort of, but no.  They&#x27;ve matured a lot from their snotty early days - I don&#x27;t think their reviews since, oh, 2005 would be out of place in any highbrow magazine.<p>Their reviews of The Beatles&#x27; catalogue are great reading, for example.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;pitchfork.com&#x2F;reviews&#x2F;albums&#x2F;13436-magical-mystery-tour&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;pitchfork.com&#x2F;reviews&#x2F;albums&#x2F;13436-magical-mystery-to...</a>
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;pitchfork.com&#x2F;reviews&#x2F;albums&#x2F;13432-the-beatles&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;pitchfork.com&#x2F;reviews&#x2F;albums&#x2F;13432-the-beatles&#x2F;</a>
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;pitchfork.com&#x2F;reviews&#x2F;albums&#x2F;13431-abbey-road&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;pitchfork.com&#x2F;reviews&#x2F;albums&#x2F;13431-abbey-road&#x2F;</a>