To draugadrotten, I found it odd that someone would link to an Asian news source for information about Sweden, rather than a more local source like <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thelocal.se&#x2F;20151009&#x2F;tents-to-provide-shelter-for-refugees-in-sweden" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thelocal.se&#x2F;20151009&#x2F;tents-to-provide-shelter-for...</a> which also gives more context.<p>So I looked at your history, which is more odd since I can&#x27;t figure out why a Scandinavian like yourself would post a link to Channel NewsAsia.<p>As it turns out, the text is from Reuters, which is a news service that provides content to many newspapers and news sites. A better source for this Reuters piece is therefore <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;uk.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;2015&#x2F;10&#x2F;09&#x2F;uk-europe-migrants-sweden-primeminister-idUKKCN0S30YI20151009" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;uk.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;2015&#x2F;10&#x2F;09&#x2F;uk-europe-migrants-...</a> .<p>I see from your history that you&#x27;ve done this before. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=10095517" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=10095517</a> considers your link to an FT article as &quot;blogspam&quot;, because of FT&#x27;s paywall policies, and instead suggested you link to the original Reuters article. Indeed, I cannot read the FT page you linked to, but I can read the one from Reuters.<p>So as a suggestion, when you want to link to a Reuters piece in the future, link to the actual Reuters one.<p>Regarding the topic, we need mandatory quotas for all European countries, now. And the US should feel itself morally obligated to take in many more refugees as well.