That post is great! thanks for the link, i hadn&#x27;t stumbled across it yet.<p>From what I can tell from that link though, it is exactly as I suspected, and openface 0.2 significantly outperforms openbr for the LFW test set. (whereas openfaces 0.1 was largely equivalent). Moreover, I think that there is clearly room for drastic improvement with the openface architecture, either by tweaking the layout of the NN&#x27;s, or simply throwing more data at it. It is not clear to me how openbr could be improved.