The article is informal about intelligence and then comes up with a couple of ad-hoc examples where computers beat humans. It&#x27;s unclear that they have much to do with intelligence.  The following definition of the term has been proposed:<p><pre><code>   Intelligence measures an agent’s ability to 
   achieve goals in a wide range of environments. 
</code></pre>
Togelius even addresses this a little by pointing out that humans have to be trained to be a pilot of a president. But
it is unclear at this point to what extent computers can be intelligent in this sense. Alpha-Go&#x27;s reinforcement learner, probably the most astonishing part of Alpha-Go, was not (to the best of my knowledge) Go-specific, instead, it was a general-purpose reinforcement learner. I doubt it can learn much more complicated forms of interaction without a simple reward function (such as games).<p>Nevertheless, I&#x27;m quite optimistic, but it&#x27;s far from the foregone conclusion that the author implies it it.