Yes, some, probably most people, &quot;see&quot; sheep. After reading Blake Ross&#x27; discussion of this I&#x27;ve been wondering how to explain it to the aphantasic. It&#x27;s a little bit like having a second monitor except it doesn&#x27;t occupy a part of your visual field. For most people, except da Vinci, it&#x27;s fainter and less detailed than a real sense impression. Like I can be sitting in a coffeeshop and think of a sunset. The first sunset image I get is almost involuntary. For me it will be cliché, like a stock photo, but I can alter it, or add detail. (Other people may get fantasy landscapes or particular sunset memories).<p>I can tell you what the colors are like, but it doesn&#x27;t replace my current visual image. If I focus strongly on the sunset, I may miss things happening in reality, but reality is never fully replaced.<p>That said, don&#x27;t take an internet social science quiz too seriously or think you&#x27;re deficient. People are different.<p>Blake Ross noted how this seems to be related to how he just doesn&#x27;t remember a lot of sensory details that other people find important. So perhaps there is some general purpose sense-memory reconstruction and recombination system. But the nature of what you get might depend on what was available. Perhaps for you, remembering a place would be about reconstructing the layout of it. For others it might be visual details, for still others important events or people they shared the space with.