&gt; (c)that the photograph [F5or pseudo-photograph] was sent to him without any prior request made by him or on his behalf and that he did not keep it for an unreasonable time.<p>I can&#x27;t find the citation, but there was a case brought up in my uni it ethics&#x2F;law module that noted that visiting a website that then downloaded something like that in the background was sufficient to disqualify that condition from applying, as there was a prior request to visit the webpage that delivered the image. even if the website wasn&#x27;t visited with the intention of the image.<p>and the person involved was jailed. they may have gotten out on appeal mind, but again, i can&#x27;t remember more details than that to verify