I think you might be misunderstanding how wikipedia works. It most certainly should NOT fairly represent minority viewpoints of editors. There are quite a lot of editors who believe in weird conspiracy theories, but that doesn&#x27;t mean they should be given prominence in the article.<p>The policies are designed to fairly represent significant minority viewpoints of scientists. (Talking about medical&#x2F;science articles here, which is what I mostly edit). When there is a significant controversy (e.g. chronic lyme), that is covered.<p>I&#x27;ve never seen any kind of PR company on wikipedia, although I don&#x27;t tend to edit company articles.