I am not sure you should be worried unless you beieve the document has been doctored.<p>I think the basic problem we are facing is that the definitions are rather open to interpretation. I think we can agree that someone who is unconscious is incapable of giving consent and that someone who is 100% sober is able to (assuming they are of a legal age and not mentally impaired) - the issue becomes where to draw the line. This gets gray very quickly.<p>The real argument here is this interpretation is being done by ad hoc and inexperienced &quot;courts&quot; using a balance of probability. The risk of making a mistake is very high no matter how well intentioned everyone involved is.