This depends a <i>lot</i> on the field. Every neuro paper I have reviewed has the author&#x27;s names and affiliations intact, along with unblinded citations like &quot;Experiment was done as we described previously (SameFolks et al., 1999).&quot;<p>On the other hand, I&#x27;ve always been suspicious that people can reliably guess the authors when doing a blinded review. I&#x27;ve seen one study that said 30% of reviewers (in a small sample) could do so, but that hardly seems like a reason to abandon the idea altogether.