You <i>can</i> say that. Someone working on AGI != they have a good pathway to AGI. And anyone telling you they have a good pathway to AGI is being ridiculously and naively over-optimistic (recall that back in the 1960s people thought they had a pathway to AGI - repeat this every other decade).<p>None of those projects have yet shown any real progress towards AGI. A roadmap and &quot;comprehensive architecture&quot; are just plans and conjectures, not results. The AGI conference is also still fairly niche.<p>EDIT: Agreed with below. I also want to clarify that I&#x27;m not saying AGI is unworthy of research. It&#x27;s just total early stages right now. Be aware that progress is incremental, and maintaining momentum (and research funding) is predicated on delivering tangible results and tools incrementally.