Thing is, you&#x27;re kind of shooting yourself in the foot here, because a programming language concept should better be very different from something like quantum computing. I know next to nothing about quantum computing, but I do know that currently its significance is mostly theoretical. Concepts like functors and monads (in the context of programming) are literally workman&#x27;s tools. If explaining to a carpenter how to use a new kind of hammer is as subtle and complex as explaining the standard model, then there is something fundamentally wrong with the hammer. If, in addition, carpenters using the new hammer don&#x27;t seem to be building things significantly faster (or things that are significantly harder to build) than those using the plain-old hammer, I think it&#x27;s safe to say that the new hammer kind of sucks.<p>You&#x27;re basically telling carpenters, listen, learning to use the new hammer is quite tricky (it&#x27;s abstract, complicated shit) but it&#x27;s going to expand your minds, and in the end, after all the hard work, you&#x27;ll be building things in a completely different way than you do today (although the final result would be rather similar) -- it&#x27;s totally worth it!