Yes, very well put. I really enjoyed his technical answers, but when he dives into the philosophy I was disappointed to see the same very naive and narcissistic attitudes so many scientists have (that are even alluded to at the beginning of the article): you don&#x27;t need to try to understand philosophy, just use your superior STEM brain and technical intuitions and if you think about it for a few minutes, with a healthy splash of &quot;assuming my thesis, it is obvious my thesis is correct&quot; , the problem is trivial -- why have people been thinking about it for centuries?