That&#x27;s my point. People&#x27;s expectations for driverless cars are vastly higher for no particularly good reason. Sure, a driverless car <i>could</i> potentially do a lot better than a human, but if it merely does as well as a human then it&#x27;s already good enough here. You can slice the gordian knot of the ethical dilemma by saying &quot;when presented with two bad choices, we&#x27;ll pick whichever one is closer to the car&#x27;s path&quot; and it&#x27;s fine. But people talk about it as a difficult problem to overcome because they&#x27;re unwilling to accept human-level performance.