It&#x27;s not that wild when you read history about US government actions towards foreign&#x2F;domestic organisations&#x2F;individuals they deem have strayed to a point of challenging the status quo. The most obvious example is looking at how communism was treated post WW2. This I find amazing, not that I support communism, but that the government was so ready to act this way towards someones political choice, regardless of what that is. That&#x27;s far from upholding democratic values.<p>Another surprising one people dont realise if the CIA probably organised the removal of an Australian Prime Minister because he wanted to take the nation to a more neutral standing: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;1975_Australian_constitutional_crisis#Alleged_CIA_involvement" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;1975_Australian_constitutional...</a><p>So feeling this is a likely monitoring point seems a reasonable statement to me especially on any serious anti-authoritarian activity. As for evidence, that&#x27;s always going to be a hard one, whether its happening or not.