Sorry, that&#x27;s not right. What I meant was at this point, we just won&#x27;t know. Or are we assuming that the FDA would&#x27;ve never caught on and shut them down if it wasn&#x27;t for WSJ? That they would&#x27;ve let fraudulent testing go on unabated.<p>I don&#x27;t know really know what WSJ did that wouldn&#x27;t have otherwise come up in regular FDA proceedings other than telling a bunch of millionaires they were stupid with their money.<p>P.S: To my point there are two articles on the HN frontpage about Theranos just today. This now seems like click-bait hoarding. The original WSJ piece was obviously warranted (if for anything then as a warning to SV biotech investors).