As much as I&#x27;d love to take your word on this, for me this still falls into the &quot;they banned Christmas because of the Muslims&quot; category of made up propaganda intended to enrage the more credulous (see the other reply for a demonstration of this).<p>I asked for evidence on this once before on HN, and they came up with two links. Both referred to the exact same case. And that case involved two people so drunk that neither could actually recall what happened.<p>That person at least provided links (admittedly they actually undermined his claims, but still). You&#x27;ve provided nothing but a bold assertion.<p>My suggestion to you and the original poster: if what you claim is true, is actually true, then a) stop using the word &quot;drunk&quot; as it is ambiguous, use the phrase &quot;after one alcoholic drink&quot;, as this massively bolsters your case that the policy is ill-thought out b) have a link from a reputable source that actually backs up the reality of what you claim since on the face of it you&#x27;d expect a bigger fuss to have been made about this if it was true (much like I&#x27;d have heard about it via standard channels, not forwarded emails from racist uncles, if someone had actually banned Christmas because of the Muslims).<p>Edit: here&#x27;s the first policy my Googling returned, it all seems very reasonable to me:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;share.cornell.edu&#x2F;education-engagement&#x2F;sex-alcohol-and-clear-consent&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;share.cornell.edu&#x2F;education-engagement&#x2F;sex-alcohol-a...</a><p>Key phrases: &quot;drinking heavily&quot;, &quot;highly intoxicated&quot; and so on.