I doubt many would agree with your moral absolutism.<p>Here in DC we have a $.05 charge on plastic bags.  Some of that money goes to restoring the river which is choked with plastic (and other) waste.  Plastic bag usage has dropped 80% since the bag tax was instituted.  So, we got a great outcome (lessened externalities from litter) at minimal cost and inconvenience.  Some of that is financial, less money (public and private) devoted to cleaning, less damage to public infrastructure (clogged sewers), less need to restore the river.<p>An alternative approach DC could have taken to the bag litter problem would have been to increase the enforcement budget for littering.  It would have been extremely expensive and its doubtful it would have cut down anywhere close to the amount of bag litter, so society would still bear the cost of the externality.<p>Most people would not pick the latter alternative, and would consider the minimal costs imposed on innocents to be well worth the outcome.  Moral absolutism over pragmatism can result in cutting off your nose to spite your face, in this case, continuing to bear the burden of the externality.