Can&#x27;t say I&#x27;m sympathetic to publishers. They&#x27;ve been rorting the system for a long time now.<p>When publisher substantial fund research more than government, I might start feeling differently. Of course, that will never happen as they couldn&#x27;t make money.<p>I really would like to know - what do publishers actually do that couldn&#x27;t be done on a more open system? And why can&#x27;t Universities manage the peer review system?