That would only occur in cases where it can be positively proven that rape did not occur. To avoid conviction the accused must demonstrate that there is reasonable doubt they raped the other party. That means that it is still possible it occurred, but in order to reduce the risk of convicting an innocent person they get to go free. I guess that&#x27;s the lesser of two evils.<p>In terms of identifying the accused, Australia has <i>sub judice</i> rules that generally prohibit identifying the accused. I&#x27;m surprised that the UK doesn&#x27;t either, given how closely our systems of law are related!