When you can be found to have committed sexual assault over the top of your &quot;victim&quot;&#x27;s vociferous assurance that nothing of the kind happened (oh wait, here&#x27;s another case:<p>&gt; Colorado State University-Pueblo suspended a male athlete for years after he was found responsible for sexually assaulting a female trainer. But the trainer never accused him of wrongdoing, and said repeatedly that their relationship was consensual. She even stated, unambiguously, &quot;I&#x27;m fine and I wasn&#x27;t raped.&quot;<p>&gt; When confronted, Doe confessed to the Complainant that she and Dean had engaged in sex. According to the lawsuit, the Complainant &quot;presumed&quot; this sex was nonconsensual, and reported it to the director of the athletic training program.<p>&gt; Later, when Doe found out, she gave Neal the bad news, and texted him the following messages:<p>&gt;&gt; &quot;One of the other Athletic Training students screwed me over!...She went behind my back and told my AT advisor stuff that wasn’t true!!! I’m trying so hard to fix it all.&quot;<p>&gt; Neal and Doe met in person to discuss the situation. Without Doe&#x27;s knowledge, Neal recorded their conversation. This audio recording further establishes that their sex was consensual. While in Neal&#x27;s presence, Doe fielded a phone call from a coordinator of the athletic training program and stated &quot;I&#x27;m fine and I wasn&#x27;t raped.&quot; She then called her mother and told her the same thing.<p>&gt; Both Doe and her mother pressed the administrators of the athletic training program—a husband and wife team—to drop the matter, but it was too late: they had already informed the Title IX office.<p>&gt; Doe told another administrator, &quot;Our stories are the same and he’s a good guy. He’s not a rapist, he’s not a criminal, it’s not even worth any of this hoopla!&quot;<p>&gt; The predetermined outcome for Neal was a guilty verdict: he was suspended for the remainder of Doe&#x27;s time at the university.<p>( <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;reason.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2016&#x2F;04&#x2F;19&#x2F;female-student-said-im-fine-and-i-wasnt" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;reason.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2016&#x2F;04&#x2F;19&#x2F;female-student-said-im-fi...</a> )), you need to read the sexual assault policy as if it will only ever be used to justify finding you responsible for sexual assault, because that is the case. Where there is ambiguity in the policy, it is fair to read it as if any formal proceeding will interpret it as far as is possible in favor of the accuser (or farther). And in the Minding the Campus report, 18 of 55 schools were found to have policies involving no stated threshold at all, while using language that is deliberately weaker than the legal standard for rape. At those schools, you are vulnerable to a claim of rape if the girl has had any amount of alcohol, just as you&#x27;re vulnerable to a claim of rape <i>by campus administration</i> if the girl had nothing to drink, maintains an ongoing relationship with you, and makes the formal statement that you never raped her at any point.<p>If you want to appeal to the idea that vague policies are benign as long as they&#x27;re applied reasonably in practice, then (a) this is a deeply misguided approach to a justice system, specifically designed to allow persecution on flimsy grounds of anyone disfavored, and (b) the facts are clear that, as applied, college sexual assault policies are being used to convict boys who have done nothing wrong. As cited in Emily Yoffe&#x27;s article, one higher education insurer found that of the sexual-assault-related claims it paid from 2006 to 2010, 72% went to men suing their school for railroading them.