I would have zero issues if he was just proposing a solution to a problem that some people have, but he hasn&#x27;t done that. He&#x27;s suggested that using email in certain ways is <i>incorrect</i> and that it implies <i>bad things about you</i>.<p>&quot;In other words: The thing you are bad at is saying ‘no’ to people. &quot;<p>For fucks sake.<p>I&#x27;d also have no issues if this was on like the third page, but the fact it has this many upvotes suggests people agree with this, which makes me wonder: 1) WHY do you all care about other people&#x27;s inbox habits? How does this impact you? Why do you even think it&#x27;s your business in the least bit? 2) WHY do you presume you can actually infer anything important about a person based on that, to the point of saying some very insulting things about their character?<p>The author seems to believe we all inhabit the same bizarre world he does, where apparently most email is worthless, and yet your response to this apparently worthless stream of information implies many things about your character with a great deal of certainty. Like, what the fuck? Maybe there&#x27;s a common sense middle ground where I get email notifications about things that don&#x27;t require much action but are somewhat valuable to have, and I can read fast enough to parse the important things in a few seconds without having to spend significant time thinking about my email process.