Your severe exaggeration weakens your critique.  I read the comments here before the actual article and after reading yours I expected the article to devolve into a juvenile defense of communism at the end.  The author blames the problem in part on capitalism, but there was a distinct lack of &quot;no true Scotsman&quot; fallacy toward socialism.<p>Your anti-socialism bias is far more overt and absurd than the article&#x27;s vague anti-capitalism bias.  You got so bent out of shape at the mere mention of socialism in a positive light that you made up an argument that the article didn&#x27;t put forth just so you could accuse the author of a fallacy.  I don&#x27;t know what to call this.  It&#x27;s not even a strawman.  It&#x27;s intellectually dishonest.