Well, I think the main flaw is that reasonable people could think that survival fitness and perception reflecting reality and very closely related. The argument that there could be a better survivability fitness than reflecting reality is overblown by Professor Hoffman. It&#x27;s not like we don&#x27;t already know that our perceptions can be misguided, optical illusion thrives on it. It&#x27;s also extremely hard to believe we could come up with such a successful device as science if our perception of the universe was so off. If there is a divergence, it&#x27;s in fringe effects (like optical illusions) and low percent or sub-percent, not a major shift and distorsion.<p>It&#x27;s a fun idea to entertain, but I&#x27;m worried that someone with a PhD could hold that our perceptions are so far off.