Before I even click, I notice that&#x27;s not a Stanford link. But instead something hosted by a political organisation that takes a stand on this very issue. Should I be worried by this oddity?<p>And now I&#x27;ve read it, and we&#x27;ve gone from confusion about what &quot;drunk&quot; means to confusion about what &quot;intoxication&quot; means. Do you have anything that actually defines this term in this context? Does a memo from 2009 have some kind of special legal force, that allows the widest possible interpretation of this term? If they meant after the first alcoholic drink, why didn&#x27;t they clearly state that? Instead they used &quot;intoxicated&quot; which generally, but ambigously, means &quot;really drunk&quot; (thesaurus suggestion: &quot;helplessly inebriated&quot;). That&#x27;s also what I would assume, but then I&#x27;m interpreting this memo in good faith.