&gt; I&#x27;d say the SpiderOak people are not crazy for not having accepted it.<p>They didn&#x27;t simply not accept it.<p>They tossed one bit of feedback my way, which I addressed in a follow-up commit, and then they neglected to do anything further. No discussion, no rejection, etc.<p>If they wanted to reject it because of complexity concerns, I would have been fine with that. At least it would have been some sort of closure, and I wouldn&#x27;t feel like the person I replied to originally about this project being inactive. If it turns out that they&#x27;re actually still planning to develop it further, I&#x27;m happy to be proven wrong about that.<p>Today, &#x27;dchest wrote a superseding PR that solves the problem while maintaining a very small code diff, and I&#x27;d prefer his solution over my own. (I have no ego about my JavaScript coding skills. There are tens of millions of people who can do it better than me.)