I&#x27;d say this is more of a city planning office problem than a &quot;paternalistic California&quot; problem.<p>The plastic bag ban caused much gnashing of teeth, but it was a basic instance of market failure (nobody pays for the externalities of bag pollution), and people have adapted fine since the ban took effect.<p>You see the kind of standards worship that you described in the LA city planning office as well as SF.  There will be swearing up and down that this requirement is in place for a solid reason, and then in 5 years the requirement disappears.<p>Runoff from buildings is my favorite example: a few years ago, you had to ensure rainwater runoff from new structures was conveyed to the street.  By pumping it uphill if necessary.  You signed a document promising to maintain the pump in perpetuity.  (Reason: your runoff could damage nearby properties.)  Now, you <i>can&#x27;t</i> pump runoff to the street, you have to sequester some on-site.  (Reason: drought, plus, city can&#x27;t treat all that water itself.)<p>Another instance of this is installation of crosswalks.  One year, the city refuses to put in new crosswalks because &quot;it will encourage unsafe crossings&quot;.  Next year, city is putting in new crosswalks all over because it will encourage pedestrian activity, make citizens healthier, etc.