Oh, they are already: &quot;Cunha was caught last year with millions of dollars in bribes in secret Swiss bank accounts, after having falsely denied to Congress that he had any foreign bank accounts. Cunha also appears in the Panama Papers&quot; - <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;commentisfree&#x2F;2016&#x2F;apr&#x2F;21&#x2F;dilma-rousseff-enemies-impeached-brazil" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;commentisfree&#x2F;2016&#x2F;apr&#x2F;21&#x2F;dilma-r...</a><p>My point is, from the perspective of an average voter, replacing a corrupt bunch with another corrupt bunch is a pointless exercise, so might as well send in the strongman. That&#x27;s pretty much the standard scenario in which democracy dies (Weimar, fascist Italy, II French Republic, all the way back to Julius Caesar).