Actually, they are underpaid writers who -- if this piece is any indication -- at least get it more right than the NYT[1]. If you&#x27;re aware of a more thoroughly researched account of Alcor&#x27;s history that is <i>less</i> negative than this one, I&#x27;d love to read it.<p>[1]: The NYT reported &quot;the procedure itself went mostly as planned&quot; when in reality -- quoting from Alcor&#x27;s own account of the events -- the woman&#x27;s head fell out of its &quot;enclosure&quot;, there was general &quot;confusion and disagreement&quot; on how to perform the procedure, and then &quot;cryoprotective perfusion was not generally successful&quot;.