I think what he&#x27;s trying to express may have some value, but I agree that he&#x27;s misreading quantum physics in a number of ways to try and use it to prop up his philosophical ideas.<p>The observer affecting the outcome of the experiment is an interesting property of quantum physics, but it only affects very small objects that have reached the point where they are almost at the edge of perceptible reality. And it really has nothing to do with consciousness or anything else he was putting across in the interview.<p>And of course, since the person doing the interview hasn&#x27;t even read basic pop-science stuff on this kind of physics, the guy doesn&#x27;t get called out on this.