<i>The point being that there is going to depend heavily on the specifics of the situation, so it&#x27;s dangerous to generalize.</i><p>That is certainly true. I do think a few people here seem to be taking a rather narrow interpretation of when services have been provided, though.<p>Say you sign up for access to an on-line newspaper, but then as it happens you&#x27;re busy and don&#x27;t actually read it. The newspaper still had reporters writing stories, and servers and Internet bandwidth to pay for, and admin staff dealing with the tax records triggered by your subscription, and so on. I don&#x27;t see why someone should necessarily expect to get back their money under those circumstances.<p>Perhaps a more obvious example would be an insurance policy. For obvious reasons, you can&#x27;t get a refund at the end of the period of insurance just because in practice you didn&#x27;t need to make a claim.<p>Whenever I&#x27;ve been putting terms and conditions together for a new service, the lawyers always seem very careful about exactly what constitutes offer and acceptance to form the contract, when provision of services starts, how the agreement can be ended and any terms that survive termination, and other details like that.