How are they supposed to submit a vulnerability they don&#x27;t know about? I&#x27;m willing to bet they chose to remain willfully ignorant of the details. Are you saying they should not be allowed to outsource the work but instead must obtain the full exploit or nothing?<p>The real scary precedent is that they paid that much without obtaining the vulnerability exclusively and the technical aspect behind it. Or maybe it&#x27;s not a scary precedent (except in tax monies) that they outsourced the vulnerability without obtaining the know-how to reuse it on a whim.<p>Either way you look at it, it is opaque, regardless of whether it goes through the VEP (and the ERB within) or they use a secret company. Were one way more transparent than the other then we should definitely favor that approach.