&gt; <i>So, to be clear, you think it&#x27;s okay to ruin people&#x27;s lives because one woman doesn&#x27;t like them?</i><p>I don&#x27;t know how you could possibly take that away from my post unless you are being deliberately ignorant and selectively ignoring things I write. I quite clearly stated that I think the tribunals doing this stuff now are too often full of shit and that the federal regulations governing their behavior need to be reworked <i>and</i> that the result of the reworking (i.e. as a goal of the policy) should be that these tribunals <i>find fewer people guilty than they do now, resulting in FEWER EXPULSIONS THAN WE SEE NOW.</i><p>If a university expels a students because they have arrived at the conclusion that they believe, with let&#x27;s say 3:2 odds on, that a particular student did in fact commit a rape, then I have no problem with that. That is, however, substantially less than the burden of proof typically required to obtain a criminal conviction. Moreover, I don&#x27;t think that the findings of that tribunal, after the expelling the student, should have a serious impact on that student&#x27;s ability to successfully apply for admittance to some other school.