I&#x27;m guessing you are just trolling, but still going to address this.<p>Every time an american agency finds a vulnerability they are faced with a choice:
- Use it, possibly against foreign targets
- Share it with american vendors to make the country and its businesses safer<p>It should be clear that in most cases the value of protecting american interest is vastly more valuable than attacking foreign interests.<p>It&#x27;s like Clinton lobbying cruise missiles at Afghanistan, whatever they destroyed was worth a lot less than the missile itself. If for example Apple and Google can be protected that is probably worth a lot more than whatever can be gained by using this offensively.<p>And note that every time a cyber weapon is used there is a large risk that the entity being attacked can learn how the attack worked and use this back at your interests.