If the only thing you have on the CDN is libraries, it&#x27;s faster to have your site host them even if it&#x27;s on the other side of the world. When HTTP2 file push is widely supported, it becomes even more in favor of hosting locally, as you can start sending your libraries right after you are done sending the initial page without waiting for the browser to request them.<p>If you are using a CDN for images&#x2F;video, then yes, you would have savings from using a CDN since your users will have to nail up a connection to your CDN anyways.<p>Then again a fair number of the users for the site I&#x27;m currently working on have high latency connections (800ms+), so it might be distorting my view somewhat.