Here, as mainstream as media channels get: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.slate.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;double_x&#x2F;doublex&#x2F;2014&#x2F;12&#x2F;college_rape_campus_sexual_assault_is_a_serious_problem_but_the_efforts.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.slate.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;double_x&#x2F;doublex&#x2F;2014&#x2F;12&#x2F;colle...</a><p>Relevant points include: (1) some schools&#x27; policies are worded so as to &quot;lead to a young man being found responsible for a sexual offense simply if the complainant establishes that she had any degree of intoxication&quot;; and (2) even where the policy would appear to be stricter than that, administrators frequently <i>use</i> the &quot;she had 1 beer&quot; standard when judging male students. An example in the article involves a college <i>switching</i> the basis for its adjudged punishment from nonconsent to presence-of-alcohol when the poor boy involved sought help from a lawyer to force the school to consider his abundant evidence of consent. (The punishment stood; only the official basis for it changed.)<p>I&#x27;ll provide some other quotes from the article in a series of comments (since the unified comment was rejected for being too long):