I remember what software, and the internet, used to be like 20 years ago. My user-experience, and expectations, has increased in almost every way imaginable during this time. From a 10,000 foot view, I&#x27;m extremely pleased with the way things have changed in the past 2 decades.<p>To answer your question with a question of my own: If you think that software&#x2F;service X sucks, why not see this as an opportunity to do something about it? If X really does suck, and if the reason X sucks is because it&#x27;s being designed&#x2F;managed all wrong, you could make a ton of money for yourself by building a company around building a better X which doesn&#x27;t suck. Build an alternative that prioritizes reliability over agile&#x2F;fast-releases&#x2F;new-feature-rollout, or whatever you think the problem is.<p>If you&#x27;re right, if users genuinely care so much about reliability, if reliability is important enough to sacrifice feature-experimentation, time-to-market and development-costs, then you should be able to achieve great market success and win over the current unreliable dinosaurs. More generally, some other company&#x2F;startup that espouses the above reliability-centered philosophy should be able to enter the market and start dominating it.<p>The fact that neither you, nor anyone else, has killed off the companies&#x2F;services&#x2F;products that you&#x27;re complaining about, leads me to suspect that users in general are willing to give up some reliability, in exchange for other benefits like low price and novel features. I know I certainly do.