I think another &quot;right&quot; question is how do we determine who gets put on the drone &quot;hit list&quot;?  This article put this question at the forefront of my mind: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.independent.co.uk&#x2F;voices&#x2F;i-am-on-the-us-kill-list-this-is-what-it-feels-like-to-be-hunted-by-drones-a6980141.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.independent.co.uk&#x2F;voices&#x2F;i-am-on-the-us-kill-list...</a><p>But this isn&#x27;t limited to just Drone killings.  This applies to much broader contexts...for example the governmental handling of Aaron Swartz comes to my mind (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Aaron_Swartz" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Aaron_Swartz</a>).<p>I think it is becoming increasingly clear that the US government isn&#x27;t always acting in the best interests of the people or liberty...so how did we get here and how do we fix it?  What is a better method?<p>And that is where I think this conversation starts to get very gray very fast.