Here&#x27;s the paper he wrote on it, I think it&#x27;d be good to take a look at it directly.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;1306.0159" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;1306.0159</a><p>Scott is making a pair of claims:
If it&#x27;s possible to build a fast, noninvasive, perfect predictor then what more can science say to show that people don&#x27;t have free will?<p>If it&#x27;s impossible to build such a predictor, for some fundamental reason, then what more can science say to show that free will exists.