Err... I don&#x27;t understand. Are you saying that another statistician made a glaring error by massing 15.5% of an obviously diverse sub categories in a group of the world population so, using it as the source, you did the same?<p>People can and do identify as strongly religious or spiritual and atheist. Likewise, there are many agnostics who just don&#x27;t care. My point being, Atheist, agnostic, and non-religious are distinctly different, you don&#x27;t find many who are on the fence about being atheist. At the same time I don&#x27;t know that they identify as non-religious. To me non-religious is avoiding the conversation all together. Atheists have a leaning, they have beliefs, and in that, they have a religion. (Where it&#x27;s FSM or whatever)<p>These three groups make up what is other wise 15% of the human population (or the third largest group of all groups)it my be worth counting atheist apart from non-religious. At the same time charting Rasta at 0.06% seems a little unbalanced.