&gt; &quot;When advocating for rape victims, who are severely disadvantaged in these situations&quot;<p>Curious if you have a way to back up the claim the accusers are severely disadvantaged?
Based on how it is at Stanford and many universities in the US, the system is certainly stacked in the accuser&#x27;s favor. See, for example: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thefire.org&#x2F;stanford-trains-student-jurors-that-acting-persuasive-and-logical-is-sign-of-guilt-story-of-student-judicial-nightmare-in-todays-new-york-post-2&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thefire.org&#x2F;stanford-trains-student-jurors-that-...</a>. This leads to terrible mistakes, Joe Lonsdale comes to mind (it was since reversed, but the damage is likely done by then).<p>Edit: to downvoters, care to explain why..?