I don&#x27;t see why YouTube (the medium) is the problem here. Both reputable or non-reputable sources can post content on YouTube.<p>The first video is an interview of two poll workers expressing their concerns regarding the unusually high number of voters that were removed from the voter roll. There aren&#x27;t any apparent reason why their testimony should not be considered as credible.<p>The second video shows a voter being shown a document she allegedly signed and that had for effect to switch her party affiliation from Democrate to Republican. However, it seems the signature on this document has been forged. There have been multiple reports of allegedly forged signatures during this election, most of them reported by voters on social media. Here is another example: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.facebook.com&#x2F;groups&#x2F;518955314959236&#x2F;permalink&#x2F;519676198220481&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.facebook.com&#x2F;groups&#x2F;518955314959236&#x2F;permalink&#x2F;51...</a><p>Sure the validity of these reports need to be verified but I don&#x27;t see why they should be dismissed beforehand.