I don&#x27;t know, to me it just sounds like a gimmicky way to get more people to apply. That&#x27;s what recruiters do. They try to get as many people to apply as possible, and then filter the hell out of them. So just because a recruiter &quot;reached out&quot; to you via linkedin or something, it doesn&#x27;t mean they think highly of you. Actually, you should assume that they don&#x27;t care at all about what you&#x27;ve achieved. You&#x27;re just one of many fish they&#x27;re trying to pass through their funnel.<p>That&#x27;s why I am genuinely curious what they plan to do once they hire teams. Let&#x27;s say you hire a team of a designer and a developer. It&#x27;s not like they will be always working together and with no one else in the company. Chances are you won&#x27;t be working as the tag team forever. That would be stupid both for the company and for these people because you are being too closed minded and won&#x27;t learn much by only interacting with the other person when there are so many other talented people in the company. I presume that isn&#x27;t what they plan to do. Then that leaves us with the option of just hiring them &quot;as a team&quot; but once they&#x27;re in, there&#x27;s no guarantee that they will work as the same team, just like how most acquisitions work--when they acquire a company they say stuff like &quot;Company A&#x27;s expertise will be helpful in us developing our such and such core features&quot;, but after the acquisition they all disperse and get assigned to different teams after a while.<p>So... what&#x27;s the point? Well that&#x27;s why I think it&#x27;s a gimmicky way to attract attention and get more people to apply. Any counter argument?