I don&#x27;t think that is a valid concern in this case. From what I understand, &quot;dark patterns&quot; is hardly an euphemism, and implies that the perpetrator of &quot;dark patterns&quot; is acting in bad faith. The only reference to it that I can find providing a definition (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;darkpatterns.org" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;darkpatterns.org</a>) says that dark patterns &quot;are not mistakes, they are carefully crafted with a solid understanding of human psychology, and they do not have the user’s interests in mind&quot;.