It&#x27;s interesting that you&#x27;re either purposefully cherry picking my comments or just not reading them. If you read my response above you would see that markets do not merely allow shoplifters to get away with it and I never suggested they should.<p>&gt;Generally speaking, we give monopoly powers of force to the Police. Private security forces are not allowed to use guns or tasers for example.<p>&gt;The effectiveness of unarmed security guards hired by insurance companies does jack-shit with regards to stopping a 7-11 gun-assisted theft.<p>I&#x27;m not sure where this limitation of no guns for private security guards is coming from. I know plenty of private security guards who carry guns.<p>&gt;Okay. The dump is owned by my county.<p>So you admit that what you were describing was a red herring and not a market failure.<p>&gt;And if the dump is a private, 3rd party entity... how do you expect the dump to actually force people to pay for the services?<p>What do you mean &quot;force people to pay for the services&quot;? If I go to an accountant and use their services, I pay them for it. That&#x27;s what we agreed to. If I didn&#x27;t agree to pay him he wouldn&#x27;t perform the service. Why would this be different? No force necessary.