Considering how tiny the bias is along with the added complexity of the solution (in a chaotic language like Javascript, no less), I&#x27;d say the SpiderOak people are not crazy for not having accepted it. There would be somewhat of an argument here if the original was reducing random bytes modulo 84. As it is, this is almost like dinging EdDSA for doing a similar thing: reducing a 512-bit number modulo a 252-bit integer instead of doing the &#x27;proper&#x27; procedure.