Yeah, I agree with you and your wives point as well. We aren&#x27;t the target here.<p>One thing to note, as you point out. The R&amp;D on these new products while they seem relatively simple, they are very hard to get right. That costs a lot of money and certain companies like Dyson are willing to put in the resources. Take for example, their vacuums. So many are appalled at the price of a Dyson and act as if Dyson is robbing people. At the same time every major competitor has come out with designs similar to the Dyson &#x27;cinetic&#x27; tech. No one seems to have a problem buying obvious knockoffs. It&#x27;s safe to say Dyson singlehandedly made bag vacuums almost a thing of the past. Did bagless tech exist before Dyson? Yes, it just wasn&#x27;t very good. Does Dyson deserve to recoup some of that R&amp;D money? Sure. These products are expensive. So another company will knock it off and it won&#x27;t be quite as nice, at 1&#x2F;3 the price. Meanwhile people with unlimited budgets love this stuff!