It does seem to run straight into the &#x27;harmful interference&#x27; part of part 15.<p>I&#x27;ve seen people in previous discussions (mostly around the &#x27;rogue ap containment&#x27; feature of some wireless access points) try to argue that only &#x27;dumb&#x27; broadband jammers fall afoul of the limitations on jammers, and that &#x27;smart&#x27; or protocol aware jammers wouldn&#x27;t. I don&#x27;t agree, and based on the ruling against the conference centre that was abusing the AP containment feature of their wifi AP&#x27;s to block other peoples wifi signals, I&#x27;m guessing that the FCC doesn&#x27;t think so either.