Oh, look.  Another PMP proponent who didn&#x27;t _WANT_ any agile practice success rushing to quote everyone who has reflected on the fact that it isn&#x27;t perfect.  This guy kills his credibility with the &quot;let&#x27;s hold a rave on the grave of Agile, I&#x27;ll bring the Molly&quot; attitude.<p>Also, he clearly never learned the secret sauce of &quot;agile&quot; that Scrum and modern proponents only pay lip service to because it doesn&#x27;t &quot;sell well&quot;: Fucking.  Technical. Practices.  I&#x27;ve spent over a dozen years now on teams that focused on a.) pair programming b.) test coverage and testability c.) CI (actual CI on one branch - not GitFlow B.S.) and d.) Close customer involvement.  We shipped high quality, low bug software that made money for the businesses.  Teams that fail to learn technical excellence leave 75% of the value of &quot;agile&quot; on the table, and 9 times out of 10 it&#x27;s the fools in suits that won&#x27;t &#x27;let&#x27; them do it.<p>As far as I&#x27;m concerned, big organizations can go to hell &amp; keep failing over and over.  As software becomes more powerful, &#x27;we&#x27; don&#x27;t need them: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;allankelly.blogspot.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;10&#x2F;software-has-diseconomies-of-scale-not.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;allankelly.blogspot.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;10&#x2F;software-has-disecono...</a>