You are rather proposing a vast curtailment of personal freedom, according to your personal interpretation of reified &quot;democratic and humanist values&quot; -- an extremely vague and nebulous concept that, once stripped of the layers of indirection and obfuscation, amounts to nothing more than &quot;what I personally happen to think constitutes good and proper behavior.&quot;<p>Moreover, you propose that not only the government, but also private entitites ought to be so regulated by your own arbitrary philosophical restrictions, a sort of Dead Kennedys &quot;California Über Alles&quot;-esque oppressive police state that not only promotes but mandates a particular narrow interpretation of liberal values.<p>This is no different in character from any other totalitarian dictatorship, though the exact set of values you advocate differs to a greater or lesser extent. They&#x27;ve all always thought of themselves as &quot;good&quot; and &quot;moral&quot; and &quot;proper,&quot; all sought to improve society and remodel others&#x27; thinking by force and coercion, and always in the name of &quot;ensuring justice.&quot;