No. The female rate increased less than the male rate.<p>The male rate was already <i>3 times</i> the female rate, and increased slightly more -- but because the female rate was so low to begin with, the female rate represented a 200% increase.<p>Out of 100,000 -- females started off at 0.5 and increased to 1.5.<p>Males otoh, started off at 1.5 and increased to 2.6.