And? This bears no relevance to the point I made.<p>What I said was:<p>&#x27;...then interjected the piece several times with discussion about their political research website product&#x27;<p>If you&#x27;re making the comparison in that Wolfram is a mathematician giving his opinion on Ramanujan, a historical mathematician, well you&#x27;re missing my point entirely - in fact if you read my comments here you&#x27;ll see that I find the article really excellent in those parts where he refrains from his advertising.<p>My issue is with comments like:<p>&quot;Today with Mathematica and the Wolfram Language we have immensely more powerful tools with which to do experiments and make discoveries in mathematics (not to mention the computational universe in general).&quot;<p>Well, today with &#x27;modern software&#x27; would do don&#x27;t you think? If it was once or twice it&#x27;d be forgiveable, but there are several paragraphs like this throughout the article.<p>Yes, I realise it was first posted on the wolfram blog, but I think it would have been a little more respectful had Wolfram restrained himself at least a bit in this regard, it&#x27;s incredibly jarring when you&#x27;re talking on a historical subject.