They are being paid to &quot;correct&quot; them by the person who has a vested interest in how the &quot;corrections&quot; portray the facts, linguistically. Let&#x27;s toss out a hypothetical example:<p>Fact: Hillary Clinton is being investigated regarding her use of a private email server.<p>Fact via &quot;Correction&quot;: Republicans have instigated an investigation into Hillary Clinton&#x27;s use of a private email server for political gain.<p>See what I&#x27;m alluding to? If not, then okay, but I don&#x27;t think I can get much more granular.