I think so - Pong was only available on the arcade machines at first, and cost a coin for each play, and real estate to hold those machines. Angry birds is available on people&#x27;s phones, 24 hours a day, and the only real estate it needed was a few offices. I&#x27;d argue it produced a lot more amusement value than Pong, compared the real capital it used. Card games could only be played with people, whereas Angry birds can be played solo, on a train. When the value of playing card games is higher, people still play card games.