Mentioning the name &quot;Radley Balko&quot; during <i>voir dire</i> would probably be enough to get excluded from a criminal jury. If one somehow got on a jury (because the prosecutor assumed a typically ignorant pool?), one would still have to remain circumspect about one&#x27;s reasons for doubting guilt. One could probably get away with &quot;I don&#x27;t believe the expert witness&quot;. More specificity, like &quot;I&#x27;ve read lots of stuff that proves all of forensic &#x27;science&#x27; to be horseshit&quot;, would probably result in dismissal along with contempt. The beast must be fed.