I have an OnHub, but even then I&#x27;m a little wary of Google&#x27;s track record when it comes to &quot;sunsetting&quot; products.<p>There is no explicit foolproof assurance from either Apple or Google, but in Apple&#x27;s case they haven&#x27;t been known for introducing products and then dropping all support for it when it fails to live up to sales&#x2F;strategic expectations.<p>In fact Apple&#x27;s modern track record is pretty impressive - the latest iOS runs on a phone introduced in 2011.<p>Google&#x27;s &quot;throw everything at the wall and keep the stuff that sticks&quot; approach is IMO one that only makes sense when you discount brand value completely and assume nobody will remember the stuff that didn&#x27;t stick, and their unceremonial shutdowns. It&#x27;s a theoretically appealing approach but IMO impractical because people remember.<p>Even when Google compensates people for the shutdowns - see the Nexus Q - it still leaves a bad taste, and makes people wonder if they&#x27;re buying a real honest product in a particular space or an experiment to be cut lose at a moment&#x27;s notice.