Since you asked for an alternative view in the post that was deleted, here&#x27;s a fairly readable one:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;03&#x2F;cryonics.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;03&#x2F;cryonics.html</a><p>The author ends up in a moderately pro-cryonics position. The most important parts, to me, were the analogy to a medically-induced coma; the supposition that, if cryonic suspension becomes fully reversible some day, it would be treated as a normal part of travel and medicine; and the cryonicists&#x27; own admissions that they don&#x27;t fully expect the process to work, but merely hope that it will. There&#x27;s also a pretty long list of pro and con sources at the bottom of the article.