&gt; I thought your response was fine :-) I see what you are saying now - basically that was part of Capistrano already, so moving it to its own gem is a very good idea.<p>Thanks for the vindication, if it wasn&#x27;t an external gem, I&#x27;d probably have to re-release Capistrano, exactly. This is less invasive.<p>&gt; Wouldn&#x27;t the new gem rely on Capistrano and not the other way around?<p>Typically yes, but I have a vested interest in promoting Harrow so that I can afford to keep working on open source, it&#x27;s slightly cheeky but apparently I earned some good will in all the time I&#x27;ve worked on Capistrano as we&#x27;ve had genuinely net-positive responses to the suggestion.<p>&gt; Regardless, the one lodging the issue probably should have stepped away from the keyboard before lodging the issue.<p>I&#x27;m guilty of writing much worse, a little empathy goes a long way on the internet. I just apply Hanlon&#x27;s razor anytime I see  something that makes my blood boil, apart from making me feel a little bit less bad about myself, it&#x27;s a quality of life improvement.<p>Thanks for the constructive discourse.