Consider the urban&#x2F;rural dichotomy that exists in many places.  In such places, even in very homogenous places, you will find a pronounced &quot;privilege&quot;.  An Osakan in Tokyo, East Londoner in London proper, a farmboy from Högsby vs someone in Stockholm. A mestizo from the country side vs a mestizo MDFer.  It&#x27;s more than race or religious and it&#x27;s something beside &quot;oppression&quot;.  Alike people tend to help people like themselves.  Sometimes that breaks along class, color, accent, political leanings, ethnicity, physique, etc.  You can find someone disadvantaged and someone else privileged by being considered part of a given group.<p>It seems to me the better way is to empower those groups.  Give them resources --be it educational facilities with an emphasis on overcoming a different framework etc.  If we want people from East end London to be able to compete with people from London proper, while not building &quot;posers&quot; we&#x27;d want to have them understand how one can better fit into that structure (attempting to modify that structure may not be the best approach.  For a look at changing an entrenched structure refer to the many revolutions which failed in their grand ambitions at changing their societies (even homogenous ones).<p>Further, let&#x27;s say I wanted to do well in China.  Do I keep on insisting on being a Yank?  Or do I try to adapt to the mainstream culture, learn their &quot;language&quot; -which is more than just knowing Mandarin but other aspects of friendship and interpersonal relationships?  It may depend if I want to work for a foreign (non_Chinese company) or local.