Can someone explain clearly to me how an old publication like The New Yorker continues to succeed in both print and online form without resorting to these patterns, while an old publication like the Boston Globe <i>may</i> be resorting to these patterns because they&#x27;re failing to achieve high success? Is it just because The New Yorker has been very careful not to water down their brand? Has it always just had innately more national reach?<p>The Boston Globe publishes some really good long-form investigative journalism from time to time. Not always, but there are regularly some really good pieces coming out of it.