Well, it actually shouldn&#x27;t introduce most of the bugs you find in OpenSSL. Plus, you don&#x27;t use it alone. It works like this:<p>1. Cryptographers come up with the algorithms and protocols with their mathematical proofs applied to their properties.<p>2. Someone uses tools like CRYPTOL for algorithms or AnBx for protocols to generate the code.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dsi.unive.it&#x2F;~modesti&#x2F;anbx&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dsi.unive.it&#x2F;~modesti&#x2F;anbx&#x2F;</a><p>3. The code is run through visual inspections, static analysis tools like ASTREE or SPARK, tests, covert channel analysis, and so on. Modified if problems are found.<p>4. An optimizing version of a certified compiler like CompCert produces the object code.<p>5. It&#x27;s distributed with public key cryptography and&#x2F;or Merkle Signatures if people don&#x27;t trust that. There&#x27;s modern versions with efficient or unlimited signing.<p>6. Optionally, a subversion-resistant process builds the fist compiler and checkers in stages.