<i>This article has lots of false assumptions. </i>
I agree.<p>In fact, this article is so preconcieved reading it&#x27;s last sentence felt like: &#x27;scrolling, scrolling to continue reading after the ads... aaaand... where is the reasoning-part and the criterion-part of this piece?&#x27;<p>Considering the article&#x27;s lack of substance and the subsequent unquestioning cheering here on HN, this article delivers less enlightenment on the future of EV than it is a statement about the bias on HN towards EV. And probably about the bias in the valley as well.