Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet
uid
stringclasses
122 values
premise
stringclasses
121 values
hypothesis
stringclasses
122 values
chaos_dist
sequencelengths
3
3
mnli_labels
sequencelengths
1
5
worker_id
stringclasses
48 values
multilabel
sequencelengths
1
3
explanation
stringlengths
48
773
highlight_p
listlengths
0
12
highlight_h
listlengths
0
9
dist
sequencelengths
3
3
agg_dist
sequencelengths
3
3
taxonomy
sequencelengths
1
3
within_label_variation
stringclasses
3 values
20274n
In the summer, the Sultan's Pool, a vast outdoor amphitheatre, stages rock concerts or other big-name events.
Most rock concerts take place in the Sultan's Pool amphitheatre.
[ 11, 14, 75 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 2, 1 ]
w13
[ 0, 2 ]
The size of the amphitheatre suggests that it's easy to hold big events at Sultan's Pool, so the statement is probably true. However, nothing in the context limits big events from being held somewhere else, thus the statement may be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 70, "endIndex": 108, "text": "rock concerts or other big-name events", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Most rock concerts", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.699999988079071, 0.25 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
20274n
In the summer, the Sultan's Pool, a vast outdoor amphitheatre, stages rock concerts or other big-name events.
Most rock concerts take place in the Sultan's Pool amphitheatre.
[ 11, 14, 75 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 2, 1 ]
w16
[ 2 ]
While i in the context, the Sultan's Pool stages rock concerts and other big-name events we don't know if most rock concerts take place in the Sultan's Pool amphitheater, maybe they are a few.
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 32, "text": "Sultan's Pool", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 63, "endIndex": 83, "text": "stages rock concerts", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 18, "text": "rock concerts", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 50, "text": "Sultan's Pool", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.699999988079071, 0.25 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
20274n
In the summer, the Sultan's Pool, a vast outdoor amphitheatre, stages rock concerts or other big-name events.
Most rock concerts take place in the Sultan's Pool amphitheatre.
[ 11, 14, 75 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 2, 1 ]
w2
[ 2 ]
By using the word "most" it is implying the Sultan's Pool hosts the majority of rock concerts in a unstated area which the context does not mention, just that the amphitheater hosts several.
[ { "startIndex": 63, "endIndex": 69, "text": "stages", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 70, "endIndex": 74, "text": "rock", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 75, "endIndex": 83, "text": "concerts", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 4, "text": "Most", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 9, "text": "rock", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 18, "text": "concerts", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 23, "text": "take", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 29, "text": "place", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.699999988079071, 0.25 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
20274n
In the summer, the Sultan's Pool, a vast outdoor amphitheatre, stages rock concerts or other big-name events.
Most rock concerts take place in the Sultan's Pool amphitheatre.
[ 11, 14, 75 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 2, 1 ]
w28
[ 2 ]
The context states that Sultan's Pool stages rock concerts, but does state how many rock concerts take place. The Sultan's Pool could be the one of the only amphitheatres that stages rock concerts, making the statement true. However, the amphitheatre could be one of many that stage rock concerts, meaning it only stages a few and therefore does not stage "most" rock concerts as the statement says.
[ { "startIndex": 63, "endIndex": 83, "text": "stages rock concerts", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Most rock concerts", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.699999988079071, 0.25 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
20274n
In the summer, the Sultan's Pool, a vast outdoor amphitheatre, stages rock concerts or other big-name events.
Most rock concerts take place in the Sultan's Pool amphitheatre.
[ 11, 14, 75 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 2, 1 ]
w29
[ 2, 1 ]
No location is given so these statements can either be true or false or completely false. If we're talking about the whole United States, then most rock concerts would not take place at The Sultan's Pool.
[ { "startIndex": 63, "endIndex": 83, "text": "stages rock concerts", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 36, "endIndex": 40, "text": "vast", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 4, "text": "Most", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 32, "text": "take place in", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.699999988079071, 0.25 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
20274n
In the summer, the Sultan's Pool, a vast outdoor amphitheatre, stages rock concerts or other big-name events.
Most rock concerts take place in the Sultan's Pool amphitheatre.
[ 11, 14, 75 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 2, 1 ]
w30
[ 2 ]
There could be other venues that host even more rock concerts than the Sultan's Pool amphitheater.
[ { "startIndex": 63, "endIndex": 83, "text": "stages rock concerts", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Most rock concerts", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.699999988079071, 0.25 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
20274n
In the summer, the Sultan's Pool, a vast outdoor amphitheatre, stages rock concerts or other big-name events.
Most rock concerts take place in the Sultan's Pool amphitheatre.
[ 11, 14, 75 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 2, 1 ]
w39
[ 2 ]
"Most" rock concerts quantifies the events, which were not stated in the context. The context also mentioned other big-name events to consider that are not included in "rock-concerts." It's possible that the majority of rock-concerts take place in that space, but it's also possible that there is a more popular venue elsewhere.
[ { "startIndex": 87, "endIndex": 108, "text": "other big-name events", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 4, "text": "Most", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.699999988079071, 0.25 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
20274n
In the summer, the Sultan's Pool, a vast outdoor amphitheatre, stages rock concerts or other big-name events.
Most rock concerts take place in the Sultan's Pool amphitheatre.
[ 11, 14, 75 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 2, 1 ]
w4
[ 1 ]
The world is a big place with many venues. Regardless of whether the Sultan's Pool stages primarily rock concerts, or even hosts a ton of them, it clearly won't host most of *all* rock concerts that occur.
[ { "startIndex": 63, "endIndex": 83, "text": "stages rock concerts", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 32, "text": "the Sultan's Pool", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Most rock concerts", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.699999988079071, 0.25 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
20274n
In the summer, the Sultan's Pool, a vast outdoor amphitheatre, stages rock concerts or other big-name events.
Most rock concerts take place in the Sultan's Pool amphitheatre.
[ 11, 14, 75 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 2, 1 ]
w7
[ 1 ]
The context states that the venue called the Sultan's Pool holds events that include rock concerts. The statement that most rock concerts take place in this venue is most likely not true because this is only one venue, and the concerts could be held at any number of other venues.
[ { "startIndex": 63, "endIndex": 83, "text": "stages rock concerts", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 29, "text": "rock concerts take place", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.699999988079071, 0.25 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
20274n
In the summer, the Sultan's Pool, a vast outdoor amphitheatre, stages rock concerts or other big-name events.
Most rock concerts take place in the Sultan's Pool amphitheatre.
[ 11, 14, 75 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 2, 1 ]
w8
[ 2 ]
It's not clear whether most rock concerts take place specifically in Sultan's Pool but only some of them.
[ { "startIndex": 63, "endIndex": 83, "text": "stages rock concerts", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 18, "text": "Most rock concerts", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.699999988079071, 0.25 ]
[ 2, 7 ]
null
115173n
Practice 16: Be Alert to New Monitoring Tools and Techniques
Practice 17 is to check for intrusions.
[ 22, 1, 77 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w0
[ 2 ]
The only correlation that the context and the statement have to each other is that each is a part of a complete list. There is no indication in the context that the next practice would be to check for intrusions.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Practice 16", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Practice 17", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 6 ]
null
115173n
Practice 16: Be Alert to New Monitoring Tools and Techniques
Practice 17 is to check for intrusions.
[ 22, 1, 77 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w1
[ 2 ]
The context only identifies what practice 16 is and doesn't provide information on practice 17. So, the statement on practice 17 could be true or false but is dependent on unknown info.
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 11, "text": "16", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 11, "text": "17", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 6 ]
null
115173n
Practice 16: Be Alert to New Monitoring Tools and Techniques
Practice 17 is to check for intrusions.
[ 22, 1, 77 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w19
[ 2 ]
The context statement tells us what practice 16 is about. It does not provide any information about practice 17, therefore the statement that it is about checking for intrusions could be true or false -- it is not possible to know for sure.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Practice 16", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Practice 17", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 6 ]
null
115173n
Practice 16: Be Alert to New Monitoring Tools and Techniques
Practice 17 is to check for intrusions.
[ 22, 1, 77 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w2
[ 2 ]
This statement could be true or false since it mentions a different practice than the one in the context. The statement refers to Practice 17 while the context mentions Practice 16.
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 11, "text": "16", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 11, "text": "17", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 6 ]
null
115173n
Practice 16: Be Alert to New Monitoring Tools and Techniques
Practice 17 is to check for intrusions.
[ 22, 1, 77 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w4
[ 2 ]
Since the statement is merely the next in a series of activities, there's nothing true or false than can be said about it in light of the context.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Practice 16", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Practice 17", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 6 ]
null
115173n
Practice 16: Be Alert to New Monitoring Tools and Techniques
Practice 17 is to check for intrusions.
[ 22, 1, 77 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w5
[ 2 ]
Statement has no relation to the context. The context describes step 16 whereas the statement describes step 17.
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 11, "text": "16", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 14, "text": "17 is", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 6 ]
null
115173n
Practice 16: Be Alert to New Monitoring Tools and Techniques
Practice 17 is to check for intrusions.
[ 22, 1, 77 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w6
[ 2 ]
Context refers to Practice 16 only. Statement refers to Practice 17 only. We do not have information on the statement to say whether it is true or false
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 60, "text": "Practice 16: Be Alert to New Monitoring Tools and Techniques", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 6 ]
null
115173n
Practice 16: Be Alert to New Monitoring Tools and Techniques
Practice 17 is to check for intrusions.
[ 22, 1, 77 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
These are two separate steps in a procedure, one not necessarily related to the other.
[ { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 21, "text": "Be Alert", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 38, "text": "check for intrusions", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 6 ]
null
115173n
Practice 16: Be Alert to New Monitoring Tools and Techniques
Practice 17 is to check for intrusions.
[ 22, 1, 77 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w8
[ 2 ]
The context doesn't talk about practice 17 so it could be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Practice 16", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Practice 17", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 6 ]
null
115173n
Practice 16: Be Alert to New Monitoring Tools and Techniques
Practice 17 is to check for intrusions.
[ 22, 1, 77 ]
[ 2, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
Practice 17 is not mentioned in the statement. It could be either true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Practice 16", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 39, "text": "Practice 17 is to check for intrusions.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 6 ]
null
131206n
FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE known as new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Research suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong.
[ 37, 0, 63 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w0
[ 1 ]
There is nothing in the context to support the claim that the statement is making. We would need more information on further studies done on the subject to know if the FDA's opinion was wrong.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 12, "text": "FDA suggests", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 39, "endIndex": 45, "text": "wrong.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
prob
131206n
FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE known as new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Research suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong.
[ 37, 0, 63 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w16
[ 1 ]
This statement is most likely to be false because the FDA is a very important organization and the statement just mentions that 'Research' suggest the FDA's 'opinion' is wrong. The FDA in the context didn't supply and opinion.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 40, "text": "FDA suggests there may be an association", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 44, "text": "Research suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
prob
131206n
FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE known as new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Research suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong.
[ 37, 0, 63 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w1
[ 2 ]
The context provides no information on the suggestion made by FDA thus it is not known if the statement is right or wrong. It could be either dependent on other details not made known.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 12, "text": "suggests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 3, "text": "FDA", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 8, "text": "Research", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 27, "text": "FDA's", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 35, "text": "opinion", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
131206n
FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE known as new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Research suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong.
[ 37, 0, 63 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w2
[ 2 ]
The statement mentions research about the FDA's findings being incorrect, but there is no way of telling that by the context considering only FDA's research is mentioned, not separate research about the FDA's findings.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 12, "text": "suggests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 3, "text": "FDA", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 8, "text": "Research", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 17, "text": "suggests", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 27, "text": "FDA's", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 35, "text": "opinion", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
131206n
FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE known as new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Research suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong.
[ 37, 0, 63 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w4
[ 0, 1 ]
The FDA is a large, well-funded organization. If they have an opinion on something, it's more likely than not they're correct. Unless you buy into regulatory capture, in which case it's more likely than not the statement is true.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 12, "text": "FDA suggests", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 44, "text": "FDA's opinion is wrong", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0, 0.5 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
131206n
FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE known as new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Research suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong.
[ 37, 0, 63 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w5
[ 1 ]
There is nothing in the context stating that the information could be wrong, making the statement false.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 25, "text": "suggests there may be", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 35, "text": "suggests the FDA's opinion", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
131206n
FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE known as new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Research suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong.
[ 37, 0, 63 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w6
[ 1 ]
There is nothing in the context about research on the FDA's opinion. There is nothing in the context to affirm the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 124, "text": "FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE known as new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
131206n
FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE known as new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Research suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong.
[ 37, 0, 63 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w7
[ 1 ]
The FDA suggests there is a link, and there is no mention of research to the contrary.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 40, "text": "FDA suggests there may be an association", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 45, "text": "opinion is wrong.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
131206n
FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE known as new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Research suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong.
[ 37, 0, 63 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
It is not stated that the FDA's opinion is wrong so the statement is false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 12, "text": "FDA suggests", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 44, "text": "FDA's opinion is wrong", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
131206n
FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE known as new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Research suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong.
[ 37, 0, 63 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
We have no idea in this case whether the FDA is correct or incorrect.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 76, "text": "FDA suggests there may be an association between BSE and a form of human TSE", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 45, "text": "suggests the FDA's opinion is wrong.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.30000001192092896, 0.6499999761581421 ]
[ 2 ]
null
76016c
Divers can explore the deeps but you can also snorkel here, or take a glass-bottom boat or submarine tour to get a glimpse of this watery world.
Divers do not like to explore the deeps here.
[ 60, 1, 39 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w1
[ 1 ]
The context doesn't indicate whether or not the diverse like to explore in this location, but it is probably that they do because it is an offered activity. Thus it is probably not true that the divers don't like to explore there.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 18, "text": "explore", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 10, "text": "can", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 18, "text": "do not like", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 29, "text": "explore", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 2 ]
null
76016c
Divers can explore the deeps but you can also snorkel here, or take a glass-bottom boat or submarine tour to get a glimpse of this watery world.
Divers do not like to explore the deeps here.
[ 60, 1, 39 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w15
[ 1 ]
The statement suggests divers not liking that location to explore the deep, howeverthe context is speaking to a person snorkelling at that location.
[ { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 58, "text": "you can also snorkel here", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 44, "text": "do not like to explore the deeps here", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 2 ]
null
76016c
Divers can explore the deeps but you can also snorkel here, or take a glass-bottom boat or submarine tour to get a glimpse of this watery world.
Divers do not like to explore the deeps here.
[ 60, 1, 39 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w18
[ 2, 1 ]
Divers have the option to explore the depths, so this doesn't necessarily mean that they do not like to dive here. Given that there are so many ways to explore these waters, it is more likely that divers would like to dive here.
[ { "startIndex": 46, "endIndex": 53, "text": "snorkel", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 76, "endIndex": 105, "text": "bottom boat or submarine tour", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 131, "endIndex": 143, "text": "watery world", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 29, "text": "do not like to explore", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 2 ]
null
76016c
Divers can explore the deeps but you can also snorkel here, or take a glass-bottom boat or submarine tour to get a glimpse of this watery world.
Divers do not like to explore the deeps here.
[ 60, 1, 39 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w19
[ 1 ]
The context talks about all the ways to explore the watery world, including diving, snorkeling, going in a boat or submarine. Since diving is one way to explore the water, it can be assumed that people do this exploration because they like it, otherwise they would choose another of the methods listed. Therefore the statement that divers do not like to explore deep waters is likely to be false.
[ { "startIndex": 33, "endIndex": 105, "text": "you can also snorkel here, or take a glass-bottom boat or submarine tour", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 6, "text": "Divers", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 29, "text": "Divers do not like to explore", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 2 ]
null
76016c
Divers can explore the deeps but you can also snorkel here, or take a glass-bottom boat or submarine tour to get a glimpse of this watery world.
Divers do not like to explore the deeps here.
[ 60, 1, 39 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w2
[ 1 ]
The context explains that divers can explore the deeps in the area so it does not make sense truthfully that they would not like to do it without any extra info about the area.
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 10, "text": "can", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 9, "text": "do", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 13, "text": "not", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 18, "text": "like", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 2 ]
null
76016c
Divers can explore the deeps but you can also snorkel here, or take a glass-bottom boat or submarine tour to get a glimpse of this watery world.
Divers do not like to explore the deeps here.
[ 60, 1, 39 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w4
[ 2, 1 ]
Since the context seems like a business ad, and businesses generally want to advertise for attractive locations, it would make the most sense that the statement is most likely to be false. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense for the business to advertise. If it was just a description of a place, however, it could just as easily be "either true or false" since people might prefer to do the other activities mentioned.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 28, "text": "Divers can explore the deeps", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 29, "text": "do not like to explore", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 2 ]
null
76016c
Divers can explore the deeps but you can also snorkel here, or take a glass-bottom boat or submarine tour to get a glimpse of this watery world.
Divers do not like to explore the deeps here.
[ 60, 1, 39 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w5
[ 1 ]
The context clearly states that the divers explore the depths.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 28, "text": "Divers can explore the deeps", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 39, "text": "do not like to explore the deeps", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 2 ]
null
76016c
Divers can explore the deeps but you can also snorkel here, or take a glass-bottom boat or submarine tour to get a glimpse of this watery world.
Divers do not like to explore the deeps here.
[ 60, 1, 39 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w7
[ 2, 1 ]
The context does not mention whether or not divers would like to do something, only what is possible to do. The statement could possibly be true, but is likely not true because the list of possible things to do are common things that divers would like to do.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 10, "text": "Divers can", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 21, "text": "Divers do not like to", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 2 ]
null
76016c
Divers can explore the deeps but you can also snorkel here, or take a glass-bottom boat or submarine tour to get a glimpse of this watery world.
Divers do not like to explore the deeps here.
[ 60, 1, 39 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
Some divers do enjoy diving there since it is given as an option so the statement is false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 28, "text": "Divers can explore the deeps", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 39, "text": "Divers do not like to explore the deeps", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 2 ]
null
76016c
Divers can explore the deeps but you can also snorkel here, or take a glass-bottom boat or submarine tour to get a glimpse of this watery world.
Divers do not like to explore the deeps here.
[ 60, 1, 39 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
w9
[ 1 ]
This is most likely false because the context mentions how many options divers have at the location. it sounds like the location is a great place for divers to go. Highly unlikely that divers wouldn't like exploring the depths there.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 28, "text": "Divers can explore the deeps", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 45, "text": "Divers do not like to explore the deeps here.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 2 ]
null
37131c
Saddam could emerge strengthened (and America tarnished) in the eyes of the Arab world.
Saddam could turn out weaker.
[ 66, 5, 29 ]
[ 0, 2, 2, 0, 0 ]
w0
[ 1 ]
The context claims that Saddam could emerge strengthened while the statement claims that Saddam could turn out weaker. These two sentences contradict each other.
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 32, "text": "could emerge strengthened", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 28, "text": "could turn out weaker", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104 ]
[ 0 ]
null
37131c
Saddam could emerge strengthened (and America tarnished) in the eyes of the Arab world.
Saddam could turn out weaker.
[ 66, 5, 29 ]
[ 0, 2, 2, 0, 0 ]
w1
[ 2 ]
The context notes Saddam "could" be strengthened, which indicates he also could be weakened, as stated in the statement. Thus, it is dependent and the statement could be either true or false based on the circumstances.
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 12, "text": "could", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 32, "text": "strengthened", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 12, "text": "could", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 28, "text": "weaker", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104 ]
[ 0 ]
null
37131c
Saddam could emerge strengthened (and America tarnished) in the eyes of the Arab world.
Saddam could turn out weaker.
[ 66, 5, 29 ]
[ 0, 2, 2, 0, 0 ]
w16
[ 2, 1 ]
While both the statement and context aren't 100% sure because they use the word 'Could' I'm leaning towards either true or false / most likely to be false, because strengthened and weaker are opposing words.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 32, "text": "Saddam could emerge strengthened", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 28, "text": "Saddam could turn out weaker", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104 ]
[ 0 ]
null
37131c
Saddam could emerge strengthened (and America tarnished) in the eyes of the Arab world.
Saddam could turn out weaker.
[ 66, 5, 29 ]
[ 0, 2, 2, 0, 0 ]
w2
[ 2, 1 ]
Since the context uses the word "could" that means even the opposite of strengthened, like "weaker" in the context, could technically be true, but it is very unlikely since it is the opposite. Also the statement does not refer to the view of the Arab world making it not soundly true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 12, "text": "could", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 32, "text": "strengthened", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 12, "text": "could", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 28, "text": "weaker", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104 ]
[ 0 ]
null
37131c
Saddam could emerge strengthened (and America tarnished) in the eyes of the Arab world.
Saddam could turn out weaker.
[ 66, 5, 29 ]
[ 0, 2, 2, 0, 0 ]
w4
[ 2 ]
Since the context only presents Saddam being strengthened as a possible outcome, it's also possible that he could emerge weakened (or neither). Seems equally likely to be true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 32, "text": "could emerge strengthened", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 12, "text": "could", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 28, "text": "weaker", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104 ]
[ 0 ]
null
37131c
Saddam could emerge strengthened (and America tarnished) in the eyes of the Arab world.
Saddam could turn out weaker.
[ 66, 5, 29 ]
[ 0, 2, 2, 0, 0 ]
w5
[ 2 ]
This context is explaining a situation that could go either way, making the statement possibly true, or possibly false.
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 32, "text": "could emerge strengthened", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 12, "text": "could", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104 ]
[ 0 ]
null
37131c
Saddam could emerge strengthened (and America tarnished) in the eyes of the Arab world.
Saddam could turn out weaker.
[ 66, 5, 29 ]
[ 0, 2, 2, 0, 0 ]
w6
[ 2 ]
The contexts says could, indicating a possibility, which also leaves room for the equally ambiguous opposite "could turn out weaker" in the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 32, "text": "Saddam could emerge strengthened", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 29, "text": "Saddam could turn out weaker.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104 ]
[ 0 ]
null
37131c
Saddam could emerge strengthened (and America tarnished) in the eyes of the Arab world.
Saddam could turn out weaker.
[ 66, 5, 29 ]
[ 0, 2, 2, 0, 0 ]
w7
[ 2, 1 ]
Sadam could turn out strengthened, but since this is not definite, it could possibly be true that he could turn out weakened.
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 32, "text": "could emerge strengthened", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 28, "text": "could turn out weaker", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104 ]
[ 0 ]
null
37131c
Saddam could emerge strengthened (and America tarnished) in the eyes of the Arab world.
Saddam could turn out weaker.
[ 66, 5, 29 ]
[ 0, 2, 2, 0, 0 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
Saddam could turn out stronger so that statement is false.
[ { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 32, "text": "emerge strengthened", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 28, "text": "turn out weaker", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104 ]
[ 0 ]
null
37131c
Saddam could emerge strengthened (and America tarnished) in the eyes of the Arab world.
Saddam could turn out weaker.
[ 66, 5, 29 ]
[ 0, 2, 2, 0, 0 ]
w9
[ 1 ]
Saddam could be seen as stronger in the eyes of the Arab community
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 32, "text": "Saddam could emerge strengthened", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 29, "text": "could turn out weaker.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.550000011920929, 0.44999998807907104 ]
[ 0 ]
null
113193c
of course you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that a bit
Annexing Cuba is a great idea.
[ 69, 0, 31 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1 ]
w0
[ 2, 1 ]
The context clearly states that Cuba would not like being annexed, so if the goal is to keep the peace, then the statement would be false. However, if one does not care about international relations and only thinks about what would be beneficial for them, it could potentially be a great idea.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 19, "text": "of course you could", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 35, "endIndex": 58, "text": "they wouldn't like that", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 30, "text": "great idea.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929 ]
[ 7 ]
null
113193c
of course you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that a bit
Annexing Cuba is a great idea.
[ 69, 0, 31 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1 ]
w1
[ 2, 1 ]
The context indicates indicating Cuba wouldn't be liked by them, which is contrary to the statement that annexation is a great idea. Thus, the statement is most likely false. However, there could be other circumstances not known that would make it a great idea even though they wouldn't like it, so it could also potentially be true.
[ { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 48, "text": "wouldn't", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 49, "endIndex": 53, "text": "like", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 24, "text": "great", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929 ]
[ 7 ]
null
113193c
of course you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that a bit
Annexing Cuba is a great idea.
[ 69, 0, 31 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1 ]
w14
[ 2 ]
Whether annexing Cuba is a good idea depends on whether you ask Cubans or others that have a stake in the situation.
[ { "startIndex": 35, "endIndex": 64, "text": "they wouldn't like that a bit", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 30, "text": "great idea.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929 ]
[ 7 ]
null
113193c
of course you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that a bit
Annexing Cuba is a great idea.
[ 69, 0, 31 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1 ]
w2
[ 2, 1 ]
The statement uses the term "great idea" which may contradict the Cuban people not liking it as mentioned in the context, but depending on who this is being discussed with, could still be considered a great idea, such as other country's leaders.
[ { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 25, "text": "annex", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 26, "endIndex": 30, "text": "Cuba", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 48, "text": "wouldn't", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 49, "endIndex": 53, "text": "like", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 58, "text": "that", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 8, "text": "Annexing", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 13, "text": "Cuba", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 24, "text": "great", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 29, "text": "idea", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929 ]
[ 7 ]
null
113193c
of course you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that a bit
Annexing Cuba is a great idea.
[ 69, 0, 31 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1 ]
w4
[ 2 ]
This can be either true or false, regardless of whether or not Cuba wouldn't like it. It depends entirely on whether it is good or bad for the particularly party considering the annexation.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 19, "text": "you could", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 29, "text": "great idea", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929 ]
[ 7 ]
null
113193c
of course you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that a bit
Annexing Cuba is a great idea.
[ 69, 0, 31 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1 ]
w5
[ 1 ]
IF Cuba would not like being annexed, then most likely it is not a good idea, making the statement false.
[ { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 53, "text": "wouldn't like", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 24, "text": "great", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929 ]
[ 7 ]
null
113193c
of course you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that a bit
Annexing Cuba is a great idea.
[ 69, 0, 31 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1 ]
w6
[ 1 ]
The context states could but they wouldn't like it, meaning it is possible and unlikeable, neither is equivalent to the good idea in the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 64, "text": "you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that a bit", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929 ]
[ 7 ]
null
113193c
of course you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that a bit
Annexing Cuba is a great idea.
[ 69, 0, 31 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1 ]
w7
[ 1 ]
If Cuba wouldn't like being annexed, that means it is not a great idea.
[ { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 58, "text": "wouldn't like that", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 30, "text": "great idea.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929 ]
[ 7 ]
null
113193c
of course you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that a bit
Annexing Cuba is a great idea.
[ 69, 0, 31 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
You could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that.
[ { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 64, "text": "wouldn't like that a bit", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 29, "text": "Annexing Cuba is a great idea", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929 ]
[ 7 ]
null
113193c
of course you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that a bit
Annexing Cuba is a great idea.
[ 69, 0, 31 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
Annexing Cuba may or may not be a good idea depending on who you ask. There could be consequences
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 58, "text": "you could annex Cuba but they wouldn't like that", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 30, "text": "Annexing Cuba is a great idea.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.44999998807907104, 0.550000011920929 ]
[ 7 ]
null
43365c
Further, given the dynamic environment agencies face, employees need incentives, training, and support to help them continually learn and adapt.
Over time agencies faced rigid environments where nothing changed.
[ 71, 4, 25 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w2
[ 1 ]
In the context, the environment is considered dynamic in which people need to adapt to work within, this is the opposite of a rigid environment where people wouldn't have to change to meet new challenges.
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 26, "text": "dynamic", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 27, "endIndex": 38, "text": "environment", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 116, "endIndex": 127, "text": "continually", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 128, "endIndex": 133, "text": "learn", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 138, "endIndex": 143, "text": "adapt", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 30, "text": "rigid", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 31, "endIndex": 43, "text": "environments", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 50, "endIndex": 57, "text": "nothing", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 58, "endIndex": 65, "text": "changed", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 3, 2 ]
prob
43365c
Further, given the dynamic environment agencies face, employees need incentives, training, and support to help them continually learn and adapt.
Over time agencies faced rigid environments where nothing changed.
[ 71, 4, 25 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w4
[ 1 ]
Just because the context lists several ways to boost employee learning and adaptation, doesn't mean the companies those employees are part of face environments where there is literally no change. That's not really possible.
[ { "startIndex": 128, "endIndex": 143, "text": "learn and adapt", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 50, "endIndex": 65, "text": "nothing changed", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 3, 2 ]
prob
43365c
Further, given the dynamic environment agencies face, employees need incentives, training, and support to help them continually learn and adapt.
Over time agencies faced rigid environments where nothing changed.
[ 71, 4, 25 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w0
[ 1 ]
The statement is a direct contradiction to the context. The environment is described as dynamic and continually adapting in the context, but in the statement, it is described as rigid and non-changing.
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 38, "text": "dynamic environment", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 116, "endIndex": 144, "text": "continually learn and adapt.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 43, "text": "rigid environments", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 50, "endIndex": 66, "text": "nothing changed.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 3, 2 ]
null
43365c
Further, given the dynamic environment agencies face, employees need incentives, training, and support to help them continually learn and adapt.
Over time agencies faced rigid environments where nothing changed.
[ 71, 4, 25 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w1
[ 1 ]
The context notes that environments are dynamic while the statement notes the environments are rigid. These conflict with one another and thus the statement is likely false.
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 26, "text": "dynamic", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 30, "text": "rigid", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 3, 2 ]
null
43365c
Further, given the dynamic environment agencies face, employees need incentives, training, and support to help them continually learn and adapt.
Over time agencies faced rigid environments where nothing changed.
[ 71, 4, 25 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w10
[ 1 ]
The context stated that employees have to continually learn and adapt, meaning they have to make changes. This makes the statement false.
[ { "startIndex": 39, "endIndex": 47, "text": "agencies", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 102, "text": "employees need incentives, training, and support", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 106, "endIndex": 143, "text": "help them continually learn and adapt", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 18, "text": "agencies", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 50, "endIndex": 65, "text": "nothing changed", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 3, 2 ]
null
43365c
Further, given the dynamic environment agencies face, employees need incentives, training, and support to help them continually learn and adapt.
Over time agencies faced rigid environments where nothing changed.
[ 71, 4, 25 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The context describes how to avoid rigid environments, which would make the statement true if these measures are not taken.
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 38, "text": "the dynamic environment", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 68, "text": "employees need", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 43, "text": "faced rigid environments", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 3, 2 ]
null
43365c
Further, given the dynamic environment agencies face, employees need incentives, training, and support to help them continually learn and adapt.
Over time agencies faced rigid environments where nothing changed.
[ 71, 4, 25 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w6
[ 1 ]
The dynamic enviornment agencies face in the context seems to be the opposite of the rigid environments of the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 15, "endIndex": 144, "text": "the dynamic environment agencies face, employees need incentives, training, and support to help them continually learn and adapt.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 3, 2 ]
null
43365c
Further, given the dynamic environment agencies face, employees need incentives, training, and support to help them continually learn and adapt.
Over time agencies faced rigid environments where nothing changed.
[ 71, 4, 25 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The employees need these things to change and adapt, but since we don't know whether or not they got them, it may or may not be true that nothing changed.
[ { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 68, "text": "employees need", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 50, "endIndex": 66, "text": "nothing changed.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 3, 2 ]
null
43365c
Further, given the dynamic environment agencies face, employees need incentives, training, and support to help them continually learn and adapt.
Over time agencies faced rigid environments where nothing changed.
[ 71, 4, 25 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
Agencies faced dynamic environments where changes were being made so the statement is false.
[ { "startIndex": 116, "endIndex": 143, "text": "continually learn and adapt", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 65, "text": "where nothing changed", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 3, 2 ]
null
43365c
Further, given the dynamic environment agencies face, employees need incentives, training, and support to help them continually learn and adapt.
Over time agencies faced rigid environments where nothing changed.
[ 71, 4, 25 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
The situation could have changed and the environment may have become more rigid over time. This could be either true or bad
[ { "startIndex": 19, "endIndex": 53, "text": "dynamic environment agencies face,", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 43, "text": "Over time agencies faced rigid environments", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.20000000298023224, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 3, 2 ]
null
8545c
He hadn't seen even pictures of such things since the few silent movies run in some of the little art theaters.
He had recently seen pictures depicting those things.
[ 73, 11, 16 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w1
[ 2, 1 ]
The context doesn't note when such things were seen, so it is not known if it was recently as put forth in the statement. The context however seems to imply it has been awhile since things were seen, so the statement is most likely false that this was recent
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 14, "text": "n't seen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 15, "text": "recently", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 20, "text": "seen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.25, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 4 ]
null
8545c
He hadn't seen even pictures of such things since the few silent movies run in some of the little art theaters.
He had recently seen pictures depicting those things.
[ 73, 11, 16 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w16
[ 1 ]
The context (He hadn't seen even pictures of such things) and statement (He had recently seen pictures depicting those things.)
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 14, "text": "He hadn't seen", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 31, "text": "pictures of", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 37, "endIndex": 43, "text": "things", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 29, "text": "He had recently seen pictures", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 46, "endIndex": 52, "text": "things", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.25, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 4 ]
null
8545c
He hadn't seen even pictures of such things since the few silent movies run in some of the little art theaters.
He had recently seen pictures depicting those things.
[ 73, 11, 16 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w18
[ 2 ]
This can be true if he had viewed these things recently and it caused him to remember seeing these things in the past when he used to watch silent movies in the art theatres. It can be false if he had seen these things in the distant past and is recalling how viewing these things caused him to remember viewing these things in an even more distant past such as an early childhood.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 43, "text": "hadn't seen even pictures of such things", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 110, "text": "since the few silent movies run in some of the little art theaters", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 29, "text": "recently seen pictures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.25, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 4 ]
null
8545c
He hadn't seen even pictures of such things since the few silent movies run in some of the little art theaters.
He had recently seen pictures depicting those things.
[ 73, 11, 16 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w20
[ 1 ]
To not see pictures of something other than a few silent pictures likely refers to older pictures. If that is the case, then stating to recently see pictures is very opposite of what was originally stated.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 14, "text": "hadn't seen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 20, "text": "recently seen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.25, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 4 ]
null
8545c
He hadn't seen even pictures of such things since the few silent movies run in some of the little art theaters.
He had recently seen pictures depicting those things.
[ 73, 11, 16 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w4
[ 0, 1 ]
This depends entirely on when the last time he saw silent movies was. If he saw one recently, the statement is likely to be true. If he hadn't seen one recently, it's most likely to be false.
[ { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 71, "text": "since the few silent movies", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 29, "text": "recently seen pictures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0, 0.5 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.25, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 4 ]
null
8545c
He hadn't seen even pictures of such things since the few silent movies run in some of the little art theaters.
He had recently seen pictures depicting those things.
[ 73, 11, 16 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w5
[ 1 ]
The context clearly states that because few silent movies run in little art theaters, he had never even seen pictures of whatever the pictures were showing. Because of this, that makes the statement that he had in fact seen pictures of said things before, false.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 28, "text": "hadn't seen even pictures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 29, "text": "had recently seen pictures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.25, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 4 ]
null
8545c
He hadn't seen even pictures of such things since the few silent movies run in some of the little art theaters.
He had recently seen pictures depicting those things.
[ 73, 11, 16 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w6
[ 1 ]
The statement is the opposite of the context. The context reads he hadn't seen and the statement says he has seen. This makes the statement most likely false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 43, "text": "He hadn't seen even pictures of such things", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.25, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 4 ]
null
8545c
He hadn't seen even pictures of such things since the few silent movies run in some of the little art theaters.
He had recently seen pictures depicting those things.
[ 73, 11, 16 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w7
[ 2, 1 ]
Saying he hadn't seen the pictures since the silent movies does not mean that he has seen the pictures recently, but it also does not mean that it is not true.
[ { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 71, "text": "since the few silent movies", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 20, "text": "recently seen", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.25, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 4 ]
null
8545c
He hadn't seen even pictures of such things since the few silent movies run in some of the little art theaters.
He had recently seen pictures depicting those things.
[ 73, 11, 16 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
He had not recently seen pictures so the statement is false.
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 28, "text": "n't seen even pictures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 7, "endIndex": 29, "text": "recently seen pictures", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.25, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 4 ]
null
8545c
He hadn't seen even pictures of such things since the few silent movies run in some of the little art theaters.
He had recently seen pictures depicting those things.
[ 73, 11, 16 ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2 ]
w9
[ 2, 1 ]
This could be either true or false because the statement is not very specific about the things they had seen. it is likely to be false because the statement says they had recently seen those things, but the statement says otherwise.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 43, "text": "hadn't seen even pictures of such things", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 52, "text": "He had recently seen pictures depicting those things", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.05000000074505806, 0.25, 0.699999988079071 ]
[ 4 ]
null
2133n
The tomb guardian will unlock the gate to the tunnel and give you a candle to explore the small circular catacomb, but for what little you can see, it is hardly worth the effort.
The tomb garden can give you a thorough tour of the catacombs.
[ 76, 10, 14 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w5
[ 1 ]
According to the context, you will not receive a thorough tour. You will only have the gate unlocked for you and be given a candle.
[ { "startIndex": 123, "endIndex": 146, "text": "what little you can see", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 44, "text": "a thorough tour", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
prob
2133n
The tomb guardian will unlock the gate to the tunnel and give you a candle to explore the small circular catacomb, but for what little you can see, it is hardly worth the effort.
The tomb garden can give you a thorough tour of the catacombs.
[ 76, 10, 14 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w6
[ 1 ]
The context mentions a catacomb and does not mention a garden. The context also refers to a guardian. The context also mentions that there is little visibility, due to the size of the candle light.
[ { "startIndex": 46, "endIndex": 52, "text": "tunnel", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 68, "endIndex": 74, "text": "candle", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 105, "endIndex": 113, "text": "catacomb", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 17, "text": "guardian", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 8, "text": "tomb", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 52, "endIndex": 61, "text": "catacombs", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
prob
2133n
The tomb guardian will unlock the gate to the tunnel and give you a candle to explore the small circular catacomb, but for what little you can see, it is hardly worth the effort.
The tomb garden can give you a thorough tour of the catacombs.
[ 76, 10, 14 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w1
[ 1 ]
The context notes that the tomb guardian will provide a candle for you to tour the catacomb which implies that you explore on your own. This is contrary to the idea in the statement that the guardian will give you a tour.
[ { "startIndex": 57, "endIndex": 74, "text": "give you a candle", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 44, "text": "tour", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
2133n
The tomb guardian will unlock the gate to the tunnel and give you a candle to explore the small circular catacomb, but for what little you can see, it is hardly worth the effort.
The tomb garden can give you a thorough tour of the catacombs.
[ 76, 10, 14 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w16
[ 1 ]
This statement is probably not true because the context mentions what the tomb guardian does and it contradicts giving a tour of the catacombs.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 17, "text": "The tomb guardian", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 23, "endIndex": 52, "text": "unlock the gate to the tunnel", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 86, "endIndex": 113, "text": "the small circular catacomb", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 15, "text": "The tomb garden", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 48, "endIndex": 61, "text": "the catacombs", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
2133n
The tomb guardian will unlock the gate to the tunnel and give you a candle to explore the small circular catacomb, but for what little you can see, it is hardly worth the effort.
The tomb garden can give you a thorough tour of the catacombs.
[ 76, 10, 14 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w18
[ 2 ]
It seems that there is a typographical error in the statement and that garden should read guardian. Assuming this is true, you cannot assume that the guardian will be giving any tours after the key is given. The guardian may give a tour or may not.
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 41, "text": "guardian will unlock the gate to", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 57, "endIndex": 89, "text": "give you a candle to explore the", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 44, "text": "tomb garden can give you a thorough tour", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
2133n
The tomb guardian will unlock the gate to the tunnel and give you a candle to explore the small circular catacomb, but for what little you can see, it is hardly worth the effort.
The tomb garden can give you a thorough tour of the catacombs.
[ 76, 10, 14 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w2
[ 2, 1 ]
While the statement does not explicitly mention the tomb guardian does not give tours, making the context slightly possible, it appears more likely that you are left to yourself to explore since guardians normally stay at the entrance.
[ { "startIndex": 57, "endIndex": 61, "text": "give", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 62, "endIndex": 65, "text": "you", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 66, "endIndex": 67, "text": "a", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 68, "endIndex": 74, "text": "candle", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 75, "endIndex": 77, "text": "to", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 78, "endIndex": 85, "text": "explore", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 22, "text": "will", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 19, "text": "can", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 24, "text": "give", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 28, "text": "you", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 30, "text": "a", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 44, "text": "tour", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
2133n
The tomb guardian will unlock the gate to the tunnel and give you a candle to explore the small circular catacomb, but for what little you can see, it is hardly worth the effort.
The tomb garden can give you a thorough tour of the catacombs.
[ 76, 10, 14 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w4
[ 1 ]
Since the guardian is giving people a candle, it's implied that the guardian will not be giving the tour itself. Otherwise, it'd probably just continue to hold the candle while it led the tour.
[ { "startIndex": 57, "endIndex": 74, "text": "give you a candle", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 44, "text": "give you a thorough tour", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
2133n
The tomb guardian will unlock the gate to the tunnel and give you a candle to explore the small circular catacomb, but for what little you can see, it is hardly worth the effort.
The tomb garden can give you a thorough tour of the catacombs.
[ 76, 10, 14 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w7
[ 1 ]
The context says "what little you can see", which implies that the tour is not thorough.
[ { "startIndex": 123, "endIndex": 146, "text": "what little you can see", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 31, "endIndex": 44, "text": "thorough tour", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
2133n
The tomb guardian will unlock the gate to the tunnel and give you a candle to explore the small circular catacomb, but for what little you can see, it is hardly worth the effort.
The tomb garden can give you a thorough tour of the catacombs.
[ 76, 10, 14 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
The tomb garden was not mentioned previously so the statement is false.
[ { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 52, "text": "gate to the tunnel", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 15, "text": "tomb garden", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
2133n
The tomb guardian will unlock the gate to the tunnel and give you a candle to explore the small circular catacomb, but for what little you can see, it is hardly worth the effort.
The tomb garden can give you a thorough tour of the catacombs.
[ 76, 10, 14 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w9
[ 1 ]
The tomb guardian can give a tour. A 'garden' cannot. This could be a mistake that mistakes a garden for a guardian. If it is not, it is untrue.
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 113, "text": "guardian will unlock the gate to the tunnel and give you a candle to explore the small circular catacomb", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 61, "text": "garden can give you a thorough tour of the catacombs", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.15000000596046448, 0.8500000238418579 ]
[ 8, 2 ]
null
77299n
The inquiry expanded very quickly, however, from asking what technology failed to an examination of contextual influences, such as
They moved they inquiries over from technology failing because they thought it may be something else.
[ 9, 46, 45 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
Both the context and statement noted that the inquiry moved from looking at failed technology, so the two statements are congruent and the statement is most likely to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 72, "endIndex": 78, "text": "failed", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 20, "text": "expanded", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 47, "endIndex": 54, "text": "failing", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 10, "text": "moved", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8500000238418579, 0.15000000596046448, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
77299n
The inquiry expanded very quickly, however, from asking what technology failed to an examination of contextual influences, such as
They moved they inquiries over from technology failing because they thought it may be something else.
[ 9, 46, 45 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w13
[ 0, 2 ]
Redirecting the inquiry to another possibility does not have to mean they completely moved away from technology failures. The context says they expanded the inquiry which could include tech failures in relation to another reason.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 20, "text": "inquiry expanded", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 25, "text": "moved they inquiries", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.8500000238418579, 0.15000000596046448, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
77299n
The inquiry expanded very quickly, however, from asking what technology failed to an examination of contextual influences, such as
They moved they inquiries over from technology failing because they thought it may be something else.
[ 9, 46, 45 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w14
[ 0 ]
The context seems to indicate they were looking for a deeper reason than just technology failing.
[ { "startIndex": 61, "endIndex": 71, "text": "technology", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 72, "endIndex": 78, "text": "failed", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 100, "endIndex": 121, "text": "contextual influences", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 31, "endIndex": 54, "text": "from technology failing", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 79, "endIndex": 100, "text": "may be something else", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8500000238418579, 0.15000000596046448, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
77299n
The inquiry expanded very quickly, however, from asking what technology failed to an examination of contextual influences, such as
They moved they inquiries over from technology failing because they thought it may be something else.
[ 9, 46, 45 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w22
[ 0 ]
The conversations seemed to move away from technology failing to a consideration of other factors.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 20, "text": "inquiry expanded", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 61, "endIndex": 78, "text": "technology failed", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 100, "endIndex": 121, "text": "contextual influences", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 10, "text": "moved", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 31, "endIndex": 54, "text": "from technology failing", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 86, "endIndex": 100, "text": "something else", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8500000238418579, 0.15000000596046448, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
77299n
The inquiry expanded very quickly, however, from asking what technology failed to an examination of contextual influences, such as
They moved they inquiries over from technology failing because they thought it may be something else.
[ 9, 46, 45 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w4
[ 0 ]
Most times, if an inquiry switches focus it's because the new focus is seen as a better one to complete the goals of the inquiry, especially in light of it expanding which means new information probably came to the fore.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 33, "text": "expanded very quickly", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 79, "endIndex": 100, "text": "may be something else", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8500000238418579, 0.15000000596046448, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
77299n
The inquiry expanded very quickly, however, from asking what technology failed to an examination of contextual influences, such as
They moved they inquiries over from technology failing because they thought it may be something else.
[ 9, 46, 45 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The statement is most likely true because the context describes individuals looking for a reason for failure.
[ { "startIndex": 72, "endIndex": 78, "text": "failed", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 47, "endIndex": 54, "text": "failing", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8500000238418579, 0.15000000596046448, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
77299n
The inquiry expanded very quickly, however, from asking what technology failed to an examination of contextual influences, such as
They moved they inquiries over from technology failing because they thought it may be something else.
[ 9, 46, 45 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w6
[ 0 ]
The inquiry expanded can be considered similar to the inquiry moved over, and the contextual influences of the context can refer to the something else in the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 20, "text": "inquiry expanded", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 71, "text": "from asking what technology", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 79, "endIndex": 121, "text": "to an examination of contextual influences", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 54, "text": "They moved they inquiries over from technology failing", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 86, "endIndex": 100, "text": "something else", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 76, "endIndex": 85, "text": "it may be", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8500000238418579, 0.15000000596046448, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
77299n
The inquiry expanded very quickly, however, from asking what technology failed to an examination of contextual influences, such as
They moved they inquiries over from technology failing because they thought it may be something else.
[ 9, 46, 45 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
They changed from only looking at what technology failed, but we do not necessarily know why.
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 20, "text": "inquiry expanded", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 55, "endIndex": 101, "text": "because they thought it may be something else.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.8500000238418579, 0.15000000596046448, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
77299n
The inquiry expanded very quickly, however, from asking what technology failed to an examination of contextual influences, such as
They moved they inquiries over from technology failing because they thought it may be something else.
[ 9, 46, 45 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
The inquiry expanded from technology failing to other contextual influences as well.
[ { "startIndex": 85, "endIndex": 121, "text": "examination of contextual influences", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 76, "endIndex": 100, "text": "it may be something else", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8500000238418579, 0.15000000596046448, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
77299n
The inquiry expanded very quickly, however, from asking what technology failed to an examination of contextual influences, such as
They moved they inquiries over from technology failing because they thought it may be something else.
[ 9, 46, 45 ]
[ 2, 2, 1, 0, 2 ]
w9
[ 0 ]
The investigation moved away from the conclusion that technological failure is the key element
[ { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 121, "text": "from asking what technology failed to an examination of contextual influences", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 54, "text": "moved they inquiries over from technology failing", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.8500000238418579, 0.15000000596046448, 0 ]
[ 4 ]
null
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

LiveNLI

A datasets port of LiveNLI, introduced in Ecologically Valid Explanations for Label Variation in NLI. Original .csv version can be found here. Besides this port, I have nothing to do with the dataset.

Downloads last month
58