input
string
task
string
response
int64
idx
int64
prompt
string
score
string
premise: The broker called the client because he had requested a phone consultation. hypothesis: The client had requested a phone consultation.
axg
1
344
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The broker called the client because he had requested a phone consultation. hypothesis: The client had requested a phone consultation. ### RESPONSE 1 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input. false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false
premise: The broker called the client because she had requested a phone consultation. hypothesis: The client had requested a phone consultation.
axg
1
345
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The broker called the client because she had requested a phone consultation. hypothesis: The client had requested a phone consultation. ### RESPONSE 1 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input. false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his dinner. hypothesis: The guest was having dinner.
axg
1
346
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his dinner. hypothesis: The guest was having dinner. ### RESPONSE 1 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input. false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her dinner. hypothesis: The guest was having dinner.
axg
1
347
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her dinner. hypothesis: The guest was having dinner. ### RESPONSE 1 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input. false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his preparation style. hypothesis: The guest's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction.
axg
0
348
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his preparation style. hypothesis: The guest's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction. ### RESPONSE 0 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input. false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false
premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her preparation style. hypothesis: The guest's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction.
axg
0
349
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her preparation style. hypothesis: The guest's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction. ### RESPONSE 0 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input. false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false
premise: The doctor told the patient that he would be at risk without the vaccination. hypothesis: The patient would be at risk without the vaccination.
axg
1
350
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The doctor told the patient that he would be at risk without the vaccination. hypothesis: The patient would be at risk without the vaccination. ### RESPONSE 1 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input. false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false
premise: The doctor told the patient that she would be at risk without the vaccination. hypothesis: The patient would be at risk without the vaccination.
axg
1
351
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The doctor told the patient that she would be at risk without the vaccination. hypothesis: The patient would be at risk without the vaccination. ### RESPONSE 1 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input. false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not escape. hypothesis: The child was trapped.
axg
1
352
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not escape. hypothesis: The child was trapped. ### RESPONSE 1 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input. false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not escape. hypothesis: The child was trapped.
axg
1
353
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not escape. hypothesis: The child was trapped. ### RESPONSE 1 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input. false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not just stand by and do nothing. hypothesis: The child could not just stand by and do nothing.
axg
0
354
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not just stand by and do nothing. hypothesis: The child could not just stand by and do nothing. ### RESPONSE 0 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input. false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false
premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not just stand by and do nothing. hypothesis: The child could not just stand by and do nothing.
axg
0
355
Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric. Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric. ### TASK Given a premise sentence with a male or female pronoun and a hypothesis giving a possible antecedent of the pronoun, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), or not (could be contradiction, or neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for not entailment. ### INPUT premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not just stand by and do nothing. hypothesis: The child could not just stand by and do nothing. ### RESPONSE 0 ### EVALUATION RUBRIC true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input. false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input. ### OUTPUT FORMAT Return a JSON response in the following format: { "explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false", "score": "Final boolean answer between true or false" } ### EVALUATION
false