Replication Data for: Ingroup Love vs. Outgroup Hate: Which is More Important to Partisans and When?
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This is data for four separate studies (1 observational, 3 experimental). The research question asks whether protecting the partisan ingroup or denigrating partisan out-group is psychologically primary. It also tests whether partisans can be easily moved to denigrate the out-group (in a forced choice scenario) by exposing them to a moral threat to their own party before making this choice. Study 1 gives people a basic forced choice scenario. Study 2 adds the moral threat prior to the choice. Study 3 has the same moral threat but adds an 'opt out' option in the forced choice. Study 4 changes the moral threat so it is more personal and 'close to home'' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Affective polarization","Intergroup hosility","Partisanship"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This is data for four separate studies (1 observational, 3 experimental). The research question asks whether protecting the partisan ingroup or denigrating partisan out-group is psychologically primary. It also tests whether partisans can be easily moved to denigrate the out-group (in a forced choice scenario) by exposing them to a moral threat to their own party before making this choice. Study 1 gives people a basic forced choice scenario. Study 2 adds the moral threat prior to the choice. Study 3 has the same moral threat but adds an 'opt out' option in the forced choice. Study 4 changes the moral threat so it is more personal and 'close to home'' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
This is data for four separate studies (1 observational, 3 experimental). The research question asks whether protecting the partisan ingroup or denigrating partisan out-group is psychologically primary. It also tests whether partisans can be easily moved to denigrate the out-group (in a forced choice scenario) by exposing them to a moral threat to their own party before making this choice. Study 1 gives people a basic forced choice scenario. Study 2 adds the moral threat prior to the choice. Study 3 has the same moral threat but adds an 'opt out' option in the forced choice. Study 4 changes the moral threat so it is more personal and 'close to home'
Affective polarization; Intergroup hosility; Partisanship