Replication data for: Autocracies and Terrorism: Conditioning Effects of Authoritarian Regime-Type on Terrorist Attacks
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Though empirical research has generally demonstrated that democracies experience more terrorism than autocracies, research suggests that this depends upon complex institutional differences that go beyond the democracy-autocracy divide.  This study examines these differences, linking institutions to strategies of coercion and co-optation.  Using zero-inflated negative binomial regression estimations on Geddes’ (2003) autocratic regime-type data for 161 countries between 1970 and 2006, we find that single-party authoritarian regimes consistently experience less domestic and international terrorism relative to military autocracies and democracies.  This finding is robust to a large number of specifications, underscoring the explanatory power of regime type for predicting terrorism.  Our explanation for these findings is that party-based au' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Autocracy","Democracy","Dictatorship","International regimes","Terrorism"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Though empirical research has generally demonstrated that democracies experience more terrorism than autocracies, research suggests that this depends upon complex institutional differences that go beyond the democracy-autocracy divide.  This study examines these differences, linking institutions to strategies of coercion and co-optation.  Using zero-inflated negative binomial regression estimations on Geddes’ (2003) autocratic regime-type data for 161 countries between 1970 and 2006, we find that single-party authoritarian regimes consistently experience less domestic and international terrorism relative to military autocracies and democracies.  This finding is robust to a large number of specifications, underscoring the explanatory power of regime type for predicting terrorism.  Our explanation for these findings is that party-based au' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Though empirical research has generally demonstrated that democracies experience more terrorism than autocracies, research suggests that this depends upon complex institutional differences that go beyond the democracy-autocracy divide.  This study examines these differences, linking institutions to strategies of coercion and co-optation.  Using zero-inflated negative binomial regression estimations on Geddes’ (2003) autocratic regime-type data for 161 countries between 1970 and 2006, we find that single-party authoritarian regimes consistently experience less domestic and international terrorism relative to military autocracies and democracies.  This finding is robust to a large number of specifications, underscoring the explanatory power of regime type for predicting terrorism.  Our explanation for these findings is that party-based au
Autocracy; Democracy; Dictatorship; International regimes; Terrorism