Replication data for: Fight the Youth: Youth Bulges and State Repression
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'It is generally acknowledged that large youth cohorts or “youth bulges” make countries more susceptible to anti-state political violence. Thus we assume that governments are forewarned about the political demographic threat that a youth bulge represents to the status quo and will attempt to preempt behavioral challenges by engaging in repression.  A statistical analysis of the relationship between youth bulges and state repression from 1976-2000 confirms our expectation. Controlling for factors known to be associated with coercive state action, we find that governments facing a youth bulge are more repressive than other states.  This relationship holds when controlling for, and running interactions with, levels of actual protest behavior. Youth bulges and other elements that may matter for preemptive state strategies should therefore be' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Political repression","Youth bulges"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'It is generally acknowledged that large youth cohorts or “youth bulges” make countries more susceptible to anti-state political violence. Thus we assume that governments are forewarned about the political demographic threat that a youth bulge represents to the status quo and will attempt to preempt behavioral challenges by engaging in repression.  A statistical analysis of the relationship between youth bulges and state repression from 1976-2000 confirms our expectation. Controlling for factors known to be associated with coercive state action, we find that governments facing a youth bulge are more repressive than other states.  This relationship holds when controlling for, and running interactions with, levels of actual protest behavior. Youth bulges and other elements that may matter for preemptive state strategies should therefore be' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
It is generally acknowledged that large youth cohorts or “youth bulges” make countries more susceptible to anti-state political violence. Thus we assume that governments are forewarned about the political demographic threat that a youth bulge represents to the status quo and will attempt to preempt behavioral challenges by engaging in repression.  A statistical analysis of the relationship between youth bulges and state repression from 1976-2000 confirms our expectation. Controlling for factors known to be associated with coercive state action, we find that governments facing a youth bulge are more repressive than other states.  This relationship holds when controlling for, and running interactions with, levels of actual protest behavior. Youth bulges and other elements that may matter for preemptive state strategies should therefore be
Political repression; Youth bulges