Replication Data for: Social Preferences: Measuring Private, Public and Group Preferences through Focus Groups
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'How does the social nature of focus groups shape what researchers learn about preferences? This paper delineates three preference types - private, publicly expressed and group preferences - and introduces a new method for measuring each in a focus group setting. Original data on people’s preferences for punishing rape, wife-beating, and theft across 80 focus groups in 20 villages in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo reveal clear differences across preference types, featuring more extreme punishment preferences in the public sphere. A within-subject experiment also shows that focus group discussions themselves affect people’s private preferences by making them more extreme, which has ethical implications for researchers that use focus groups worldwide. The social nature of preferences observed in Democratic Republic of Congo underscore' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Democratic Republic of Congo","Ethics","Focus Groups","Methodology","Norms","Violence against Women"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'How does the social nature of focus groups shape what researchers learn about preferences? This paper delineates three preference types - private, publicly expressed and group preferences - and introduces a new method for measuring each in a focus group setting. Original data on people’s preferences for punishing rape, wife-beating, and theft across 80 focus groups in 20 villages in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo reveal clear differences across preference types, featuring more extreme punishment preferences in the public sphere. A within-subject experiment also shows that focus group discussions themselves affect people’s private preferences by making them more extreme, which has ethical implications for researchers that use focus groups worldwide. The social nature of preferences observed in Democratic Republic of Congo underscore' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
How does the social nature of focus groups shape what researchers learn about preferences? This paper delineates three preference types - private, publicly expressed and group preferences - and introduces a new method for measuring each in a focus group setting. Original data on people’s preferences for punishing rape, wife-beating, and theft across 80 focus groups in 20 villages in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo reveal clear differences across preference types, featuring more extreme punishment preferences in the public sphere. A within-subject experiment also shows that focus group discussions themselves affect people’s private preferences by making them more extreme, which has ethical implications for researchers that use focus groups worldwide. The social nature of preferences observed in Democratic Republic of Congo underscore
Democratic Republic of Congo; Ethics; Focus Groups; Methodology; Norms; Violence against Women