Replication Data for: When Diversity Works: The Effects of Coalition Composition on the Success of Lobbying Coalitions
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Lobbyists frequently join forces to influence policy, yet the success of active lobbying coalitions remains a blind spot in the literature. This article is the first to test how and when characteristics of active coalitions increase their lobbying success. Based on pluralist theory one can expect diverse coalitions, uniting different societal interests, to signal broad support to policymakers. Yet, their responsiveness to this signal (i.e. signaling benefits) and contribution incentives within the coalition (i.e. cooperation costs) are likely to vary with issue salience. This theory is tested on a unique dataset comprising 50 issues in five European countries. Results reveal a strong moderating effect of salience on the relationship between coalition diversity and success: On less salient issues, homogenous coalitions are more likely to' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Cooperation strategies","Lobbying coalitions"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Lobbyists frequently join forces to influence policy, yet the success of active lobbying coalitions remains a blind spot in the literature. This article is the first to test how and when characteristics of active coalitions increase their lobbying success. Based on pluralist theory one can expect diverse coalitions, uniting different societal interests, to signal broad support to policymakers. Yet, their responsiveness to this signal (i.e. signaling benefits) and contribution incentives within the coalition (i.e. cooperation costs) are likely to vary with issue salience. This theory is tested on a unique dataset comprising 50 issues in five European countries. Results reveal a strong moderating effect of salience on the relationship between coalition diversity and success: On less salient issues, homogenous coalitions are more likely to' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Lobbyists frequently join forces to influence policy, yet the success of active lobbying coalitions remains a blind spot in the literature. This article is the first to test how and when characteristics of active coalitions increase their lobbying success. Based on pluralist theory one can expect diverse coalitions, uniting different societal interests, to signal broad support to policymakers. Yet, their responsiveness to this signal (i.e. signaling benefits) and contribution incentives within the coalition (i.e. cooperation costs) are likely to vary with issue salience. This theory is tested on a unique dataset comprising 50 issues in five European countries. Results reveal a strong moderating effect of salience on the relationship between coalition diversity and success: On less salient issues, homogenous coalitions are more likely to
Cooperation strategies; Lobbying coalitions