Replication Data for: 'Does group engagement with members constitute a “beneficial inefficiency”?'
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This article explores the role of variations in organizational form in explaining levels of group access. Specifically, we test whether group forms incorporating more extensive engagement with members receive policy advantages. We develop and test a account of beneficial inefficiencies. Our account reasons that the costs of inefficient intra-organizational processes and practices associated with enhanced engagement with members are beneficial as they generate crucial “access goods” — specifically encompassing positions — that in turn receive enhanced policy benefits. The costs of intra-organizational practices allowing members to engage more thoroughly in decision making are thus beneficial inefficiencies. We test this proposition using data on the Australian interest group system. Using the tools of cluster analysis, we identify three ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["advocacy, interest groups, policy, Australia, organizational form"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This article explores the role of variations in organizational form in explaining levels of group access. Specifically, we test whether group forms incorporating more extensive engagement with members receive policy advantages. We develop and test a account of beneficial inefficiencies. Our account reasons that the costs of inefficient intra-organizational processes and practices associated with enhanced engagement with members are beneficial as they generate crucial “access goods” — specifically encompassing positions — that in turn receive enhanced policy benefits. The costs of intra-organizational practices allowing members to engage more thoroughly in decision making are thus beneficial inefficiencies. We test this proposition using data on the Australian interest group system. Using the tools of cluster analysis, we identify three ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
This article explores the role of variations in organizational form in explaining levels of group access. Specifically, we test whether group forms incorporating more extensive engagement with members receive policy advantages. We develop and test a account of beneficial inefficiencies. Our account reasons that the costs of inefficient intra-organizational processes and practices associated with enhanced engagement with members are beneficial as they generate crucial “access goods” — specifically encompassing positions — that in turn receive enhanced policy benefits. The costs of intra-organizational practices allowing members to engage more thoroughly in decision making are thus beneficial inefficiencies. We test this proposition using data on the Australian interest group system. Using the tools of cluster analysis, we identify three 
advocacy, interest groups, policy, Australia, organizational form