Replication Data for: The conditional effect of conspiracy thinking on attitudes toward climate change
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Even though climate scientists are nearly unanimous that climate change is real and manmade, about 40% of Americansreject the scientific consensus. Why? The largest contributing factor is partisanship; however, recent studies argue thatunderlying conspiracy thinking exerts a positive, linear effect on climate change denial. In this article, we reexamine theeffect of conspiracy thinking on climate change attitudes by accounting for the various pathways that conspiracy thinkingcould drive denialism in a politically polarized environment. We find the effects of conspiracy thinking on climate changedenial are not only larger than previously suggested, but also non-monotonic and conditional on individuals’ partyidentification. Moreover, we find evidence suggesting conspiracy thinking affects independents’ positions, and even thei' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Climate Change","Conspiracy"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Even though climate scientists are nearly unanimous that climate change is real and manmade, about 40% of Americansreject the scientific consensus. Why? The largest contributing factor is partisanship; however, recent studies argue thatunderlying conspiracy thinking exerts a positive, linear effect on climate change denial. In this article, we reexamine theeffect of conspiracy thinking on climate change attitudes by accounting for the various pathways that conspiracy thinkingcould drive denialism in a politically polarized environment. We find the effects of conspiracy thinking on climate changedenial are not only larger than previously suggested, but also non-monotonic and conditional on individuals’ partyidentification. Moreover, we find evidence suggesting conspiracy thinking affects independents’ positions, and even thei' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Even though climate scientists are nearly unanimous that climate change is real and manmade, about 40% of Americansreject the scientific consensus. Why? The largest contributing factor is partisanship; however, recent studies argue thatunderlying conspiracy thinking exerts a positive, linear effect on climate change denial. In this article, we reexamine theeffect of conspiracy thinking on climate change attitudes by accounting for the various pathways that conspiracy thinkingcould drive denialism in a politically polarized environment. We find the effects of conspiracy thinking on climate changedenial are not only larger than previously suggested, but also non-monotonic and conditional on individuals’ partyidentification. Moreover, we find evidence suggesting conspiracy thinking affects independents’ positions, and even thei
Climate Change; Conspiracy