Replication Data for: Of Two Minds, But One Heart: A Good “Gut” Feeling Moderates the Effect of Ambivalence on Attitude Formation and Turnout
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Popular psychological accounts argue that successful candidates address their appeals to citizens’ “hearts” rather than their “heads.” Yet research on campaigns shows that candidates win elections by getting voters to think about particular issues—especially issues that create ambivalence in the minds of opposition supporters. This paper helps to reconcile these “heart-centered” and “head-centered” accounts of preference formation during campaigns.  An original experiment and ANES data analyses (1980-2004) show that a “good gut feeling” toward a candidate helps citizens to overcome the paralyzing effect of ambivalence on attitude formation and turnout.  And, since turnout is most tenuous among those with lower income, this is where the effect is most pronounced.  Since Democratic candidates rely disproportionately on support from these ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Ambivalence","Attitude formation","Emotions","Enthusiasm","Non-attitudes","Voter turnout"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Popular psychological accounts argue that successful candidates address their appeals to citizens’ “hearts” rather than their “heads.” Yet research on campaigns shows that candidates win elections by getting voters to think about particular issues—especially issues that create ambivalence in the minds of opposition supporters. This paper helps to reconcile these “heart-centered” and “head-centered” accounts of preference formation during campaigns.  An original experiment and ANES data analyses (1980-2004) show that a “good gut feeling” toward a candidate helps citizens to overcome the paralyzing effect of ambivalence on attitude formation and turnout.  And, since turnout is most tenuous among those with lower income, this is where the effect is most pronounced.  Since Democratic candidates rely disproportionately on support from these ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Popular psychological accounts argue that successful candidates address their appeals to citizens’ “hearts” rather than their “heads.” Yet research on campaigns shows that candidates win elections by getting voters to think about particular issues—especially issues that create ambivalence in the minds of opposition supporters. This paper helps to reconcile these “heart-centered” and “head-centered” accounts of preference formation during campaigns.  An original experiment and ANES data analyses (1980-2004) show that a “good gut feeling” toward a candidate helps citizens to overcome the paralyzing effect of ambivalence on attitude formation and turnout.  And, since turnout is most tenuous among those with lower income, this is where the effect is most pronounced.  Since Democratic candidates rely disproportionately on support from these 
Ambivalence; Attitude formation; Emotions; Enthusiasm; Non-attitudes; Voter turnout