Replication data for: Do Investor-State Disputes Hurt FDI?, by Andrew Kerner Krzysztof J. Pelc
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'What are the consequences of being sued for violating bilateral investment treaties (BITs)? The conventional wisdom is that investor-state disputes (ISDS) tarnish countries’ compliance record, and harm foreign direct investment in the process. We re-examine this belief in light of recent trends in ISDS. The regime has witnessed a proliferation of claims, a growing proportion of which allege breaches of provisions like fair and equitable treatment (FET) and indirect expropriation. Combined with a decrease in the rate of success of such claims, we argue that the average ISDS claim now carries less information than it once did. If so, investors should be less likely to update their expectations and reduce investments. We find consistent evidence for this through an examination of 812 investor-state disputes from 1987 to present day, across' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["'Investor State Dispute Settlement' 'Foreign Direct Investment'"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'What are the consequences of being sued for violating bilateral investment treaties (BITs)? The conventional wisdom is that investor-state disputes (ISDS) tarnish countries’ compliance record, and harm foreign direct investment in the process. We re-examine this belief in light of recent trends in ISDS. The regime has witnessed a proliferation of claims, a growing proportion of which allege breaches of provisions like fair and equitable treatment (FET) and indirect expropriation. Combined with a decrease in the rate of success of such claims, we argue that the average ISDS claim now carries less information than it once did. If so, investors should be less likely to update their expectations and reduce investments. We find consistent evidence for this through an examination of 812 investor-state disputes from 1987 to present day, across' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
What are the consequences of being sued for violating bilateral investment treaties (BITs)? The conventional wisdom is that investor-state disputes (ISDS) tarnish countries’ compliance record, and harm foreign direct investment in the process. We re-examine this belief in light of recent trends in ISDS. The regime has witnessed a proliferation of claims, a growing proportion of which allege breaches of provisions like fair and equitable treatment (FET) and indirect expropriation. Combined with a decrease in the rate of success of such claims, we argue that the average ISDS claim now carries less information than it once did. If so, investors should be less likely to update their expectations and reduce investments. We find consistent evidence for this through an examination of 812 investor-state disputes from 1987 to present day, across
'Investor State Dispute Settlement' 'Foreign Direct Investment'