Replication Data for: How state capacity helps autocrats win elections
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Research has highlighted the role of the state in sustaining authoritarian regimes. But how does state capacity support autocrats during elections? I argue that one specific aspect of state capacity – control over territory through the state apparatus – helps autocrats ensure large majority electoral victories. High-capacity rulers can rely on local agents and institutions to subtly manipulate elections for instance by controlling the media or inhibiting the work of domestic election monitors throughout the territory while staying clear of costly manipulation such as election violence. In cross-national analyses of authoritarian multiparty elections from 1946 to 2017, I find that state territorial control increases the likelihood of large victories. Furthermore, high levels of state control correlate with subtle strategies of manipulati' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Authoritarianism","Election violence","Electoral manipulation","State capacity"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Research has highlighted the role of the state in sustaining authoritarian regimes. But how does state capacity support autocrats during elections? I argue that one specific aspect of state capacity – control over territory through the state apparatus – helps autocrats ensure large majority electoral victories. High-capacity rulers can rely on local agents and institutions to subtly manipulate elections for instance by controlling the media or inhibiting the work of domestic election monitors throughout the territory while staying clear of costly manipulation such as election violence. In cross-national analyses of authoritarian multiparty elections from 1946 to 2017, I find that state territorial control increases the likelihood of large victories. Furthermore, high levels of state control correlate with subtle strategies of manipulati' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Research has highlighted the role of the state in sustaining authoritarian regimes. But how does state capacity support autocrats during elections? I argue that one specific aspect of state capacity – control over territory through the state apparatus – helps autocrats ensure large majority electoral victories. High-capacity rulers can rely on local agents and institutions to subtly manipulate elections for instance by controlling the media or inhibiting the work of domestic election monitors throughout the territory while staying clear of costly manipulation such as election violence. In cross-national analyses of authoritarian multiparty elections from 1946 to 2017, I find that state territorial control increases the likelihood of large victories. Furthermore, high levels of state control correlate with subtle strategies of manipulati
Authoritarianism; Election violence; Electoral manipulation; State capacity