Vol. 18(1)- Replication Data for: Don’t Republicans Tweet Too? Using Twitter to Assess the Consequences of  Political Endorsements by Celebrities
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In the social media era, the name of the game for celebrities is engagement with fans. So why then do celebrities risk talking about politics on social media, which is likely to antagonize a portion of one’s fan base? With this question in mind, we analyze approximately 220,000 tweets from 83 celebrities who chose to endorse presidential candidates in the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign to assess whether there is a cost – defined in terms of engagement on Twitter – for celebrities who discuss presidential candidates. We also examine whether celebrities behave similarly to other campaign surrogates in being more likely to take on the “attack dog” role by going negative more often than going positive. We document how often celebrities of distinct political preferences tweet about Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and Hillary Clinton,' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["politics, social media, celebrities"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In the social media era, the name of the game for celebrities is engagement with fans. So why then do celebrities risk talking about politics on social media, which is likely to antagonize a portion of one’s fan base? With this question in mind, we analyze approximately 220,000 tweets from 83 celebrities who chose to endorse presidential candidates in the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign to assess whether there is a cost – defined in terms of engagement on Twitter – for celebrities who discuss presidential candidates. We also examine whether celebrities behave similarly to other campaign surrogates in being more likely to take on the “attack dog” role by going negative more often than going positive. We document how often celebrities of distinct political preferences tweet about Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and Hillary Clinton,' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
In the social media era, the name of the game for celebrities is engagement with fans. So why then do celebrities risk talking about politics on social media, which is likely to antagonize a portion of one’s fan base? With this question in mind, we analyze approximately 220,000 tweets from 83 celebrities who chose to endorse presidential candidates in the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign to assess whether there is a cost – defined in terms of engagement on Twitter – for celebrities who discuss presidential candidates. We also examine whether celebrities behave similarly to other campaign surrogates in being more likely to take on the “attack dog” role by going negative more often than going positive. We document how often celebrities of distinct political preferences tweet about Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and Hillary Clinton,
politics, social media, celebrities