Replication Data for:  Inferring Intentions from Consequences: How Moral Judgments Shape Citizen Perceptions of Wartime Conduct
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'How people interpret the intentions of others is fundamental to politics. This article examines intention-understanding in the domain of how citizens evaluate wartime conduct. Drawing on recent work in moral psychology, it ar-gues that people are more likely to attribute intentionality to wartime actions that produce morally bad consequences than otherwise identical actions that produce morally good consequences. We test this theory with two vignette-based, survey experiments. Our results show that this hypothesis holds in a vari-ety of contexts relating to civilian casualties and the destruction of heritage sites during war. By unlocking the moral psychology of intention-understanding, this article contributes to the field of political psychology in general, and more spe-cifically to theoretical debates in IR about public opinion on jus' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Laws of War","Political Psychology","Public Opinion","Survey Experiment"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'How people interpret the intentions of others is fundamental to politics. This article examines intention-understanding in the domain of how citizens evaluate wartime conduct. Drawing on recent work in moral psychology, it ar-gues that people are more likely to attribute intentionality to wartime actions that produce morally bad consequences than otherwise identical actions that produce morally good consequences. We test this theory with two vignette-based, survey experiments. Our results show that this hypothesis holds in a vari-ety of contexts relating to civilian casualties and the destruction of heritage sites during war. By unlocking the moral psychology of intention-understanding, this article contributes to the field of political psychology in general, and more spe-cifically to theoretical debates in IR about public opinion on jus' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
How people interpret the intentions of others is fundamental to politics. This article examines intention-understanding in the domain of how citizens evaluate wartime conduct. Drawing on recent work in moral psychology, it ar-gues that people are more likely to attribute intentionality to wartime actions that produce morally bad consequences than otherwise identical actions that produce morally good consequences. We test this theory with two vignette-based, survey experiments. Our results show that this hypothesis holds in a vari-ety of contexts relating to civilian casualties and the destruction of heritage sites during war. By unlocking the moral psychology of intention-understanding, this article contributes to the field of political psychology in general, and more spe-cifically to theoretical debates in IR about public opinion on jus
Laws of War; Political Psychology; Public Opinion; Survey Experiment