Replication Data for: The Cart and the Horse Redux: The Timing of Border Settlement and Joint Democracy
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Do democratic dyads handle their disputes more peacefully than non-democratic dyads, or have they cleared the most contentious issues (i.e., unsettled borders) off their foreign policy agenda before becoming democratic? In this study, we compare the conflicting answers of the democratic peace and the territorial peace and examine the empirical record to see which is more accurate. We find that almost all contiguous dyads settle their borders before they become joint democracies. Furthermore, the majority of non-contiguous dyad members also settle their borders with all neighboring states before their non-contiguous dyad becomes jointly democratic. Such findings are consistent with the theoretical expectations of the territorial peace, rather than the democratic peace. They also weaken a core argument of the democratic peace, for our ana' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["democratic peace","interstate conflict","territorial peace","territory"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Do democratic dyads handle their disputes more peacefully than non-democratic dyads, or have they cleared the most contentious issues (i.e., unsettled borders) off their foreign policy agenda before becoming democratic? In this study, we compare the conflicting answers of the democratic peace and the territorial peace and examine the empirical record to see which is more accurate. We find that almost all contiguous dyads settle their borders before they become joint democracies. Furthermore, the majority of non-contiguous dyad members also settle their borders with all neighboring states before their non-contiguous dyad becomes jointly democratic. Such findings are consistent with the theoretical expectations of the territorial peace, rather than the democratic peace. They also weaken a core argument of the democratic peace, for our ana' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Do democratic dyads handle their disputes more peacefully than non-democratic dyads, or have they cleared the most contentious issues (i.e., unsettled borders) off their foreign policy agenda before becoming democratic? In this study, we compare the conflicting answers of the democratic peace and the territorial peace and examine the empirical record to see which is more accurate. We find that almost all contiguous dyads settle their borders before they become joint democracies. Furthermore, the majority of non-contiguous dyad members also settle their borders with all neighboring states before their non-contiguous dyad becomes jointly democratic. Such findings are consistent with the theoretical expectations of the territorial peace, rather than the democratic peace. They also weaken a core argument of the democratic peace, for our ana
democratic peace; interstate conflict; territorial peace; territory