Towards assessing the preferred usage features of upper limb prostheses: most important items regarding prosthesis use in people with major unilateral upper limb absence - a Dutch national survey
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'CSV-file with survey results from people with upper limb absence (N=358) in the Netherlands. In the survey participants were asked to select their 10 most important items regarding prosthesis use from a diagram that contained 79 items (i.e. the HealthFan diagram). Consequently, they were asked to rank those ten items from most important to least important. Six participants did not fulfill the ranking task, in those cases, the selected factors are shown in random order. Due to the small group of people with ULA in the Netherlands, we do not provide any personal details in this dataset. The dataset only contains the top-10 selected items from the participants that were included in the analyses. A codebook to interpret the data was added as a PDF file' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Amputation","Artificial Limbs","Patient-reported outcome","Prostheses","Questionnaire","Upper Extremity"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'CSV-file with survey results from people with upper limb absence (N=358) in the Netherlands. In the survey participants were asked to select their 10 most important items regarding prosthesis use from a diagram that contained 79 items (i.e. the HealthFan diagram). Consequently, they were asked to rank those ten items from most important to least important. Six participants did not fulfill the ranking task, in those cases, the selected factors are shown in random order. Due to the small group of people with ULA in the Netherlands, we do not provide any personal details in this dataset. The dataset only contains the top-10 selected items from the participants that were included in the analyses. A codebook to interpret the data was added as a PDF file' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
CSV-file with survey results from people with upper limb absence (N=358) in the Netherlands. In the survey participants were asked to select their 10 most important items regarding prosthesis use from a diagram that contained 79 items (i.e. the HealthFan diagram). Consequently, they were asked to rank those ten items from most important to least important. Six participants did not fulfill the ranking task, in those cases, the selected factors are shown in random order. Due to the small group of people with ULA in the Netherlands, we do not provide any personal details in this dataset. The dataset only contains the top-10 selected items from the participants that were included in the analyses. A codebook to interpret the data was added as a PDF file
Amputation; Artificial Limbs; Patient-reported outcome; Prostheses; Questionnaire; Upper Extremity