Replication Data for: TIP for Tat: Political Bias in Human Rights Trafficking Reporting
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Human trafficking affects millions of people globally, disproportionately harming women, girls, and marginalized groups. Yet one of the main sources of data on global responses to trafficking, the Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report, is susceptible to biases because report scores are tied to political outcomes. The literature on human rights measurements has established two potential sources of bias. The first is the changing standards of accountability --- where more information and increased budgets change the standard to which countries are held over time. The second is political biases in reports, which are amended to comply with the interests of the reporting agency. In this paper, we examine whether either of these biases influence the TIP Reports. As opposed to other country-level human rights indicators, the State Department iss' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["human rights, trafficking in persons, measurement, bias"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Human trafficking affects millions of people globally, disproportionately harming women, girls, and marginalized groups. Yet one of the main sources of data on global responses to trafficking, the Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report, is susceptible to biases because report scores are tied to political outcomes. The literature on human rights measurements has established two potential sources of bias. The first is the changing standards of accountability --- where more information and increased budgets change the standard to which countries are held over time. The second is political biases in reports, which are amended to comply with the interests of the reporting agency. In this paper, we examine whether either of these biases influence the TIP Reports. As opposed to other country-level human rights indicators, the State Department iss' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Human trafficking affects millions of people globally, disproportionately harming women, girls, and marginalized groups. Yet one of the main sources of data on global responses to trafficking, the Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report, is susceptible to biases because report scores are tied to political outcomes. The literature on human rights measurements has established two potential sources of bias. The first is the changing standards of accountability --- where more information and increased budgets change the standard to which countries are held over time. The second is political biases in reports, which are amended to comply with the interests of the reporting agency. In this paper, we examine whether either of these biases influence the TIP Reports. As opposed to other country-level human rights indicators, the State Department iss
human rights, trafficking in persons, measurement, bias