Replication Data for 'Border Settlement and the Movement toward and from Negative Peace'
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'How does border settlement – that is, the management of salient territorial conflict – affect the prospects for negative peace? Using recently released data on dyadic interstate relationships during the period 1946-2001, we build on territorial peace research to argue, predict, and find three connections between border settlement and negative peace. More specifically, border settlement: (a) increases the likelihood that a dyad is at negative peace; (b) raises the likelihood that dyads transition from rivalry to negative peace relationships; and (c) consolidates negative peace – by impeding transitions toward rivalry relationships. We confirm each of these findings with a commonly used measure of border settlement, as well as an alternative indicator of unsettled borders: civil wars. These findings cumulatively support our argument, demo' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["interstate borders","negative peace","rivalry","territorial conflict"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'How does border settlement – that is, the management of salient territorial conflict – affect the prospects for negative peace? Using recently released data on dyadic interstate relationships during the period 1946-2001, we build on territorial peace research to argue, predict, and find three connections between border settlement and negative peace. More specifically, border settlement: (a) increases the likelihood that a dyad is at negative peace; (b) raises the likelihood that dyads transition from rivalry to negative peace relationships; and (c) consolidates negative peace – by impeding transitions toward rivalry relationships. We confirm each of these findings with a commonly used measure of border settlement, as well as an alternative indicator of unsettled borders: civil wars. These findings cumulatively support our argument, demo' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
How does border settlement – that is, the management of salient territorial conflict – affect the prospects for negative peace? Using recently released data on dyadic interstate relationships during the period 1946-2001, we build on territorial peace research to argue, predict, and find three connections between border settlement and negative peace. More specifically, border settlement: (a) increases the likelihood that a dyad is at negative peace; (b) raises the likelihood that dyads transition from rivalry to negative peace relationships; and (c) consolidates negative peace – by impeding transitions toward rivalry relationships. We confirm each of these findings with a commonly used measure of border settlement, as well as an alternative indicator of unsettled borders: civil wars. These findings cumulatively support our argument, demo
interstate borders; negative peace; rivalry; territorial conflict