Replication Data for: How Moral Foundations Shape Public Approval of Nuclear, Chemical, and Conventional Strikes: New Evidence from Experimental Surveys
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In this article, we present the results of two survey experiments onpublic support for nuclear, chemical, and conventional strikes. Weexamined how moral values of individuals interact with the approval ofdifferent kinds of strikes and with the effects of information about the ingroup and out-group fatalities. Our results show that while the public ismore averse to the employment of chemical weapons than to theconduct of nuclear or conventional strikes, the overall relationshipbetween strike approval and the individuals’ moral values does not differacross the three experimental treatments. In addition, we found thatindividuals’ scores in so-called “binding” moral values affect thesensitivity of the public for in-group fatalities. Findings of our papercontribute to the broader debates in the field about the strength andnature o' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["moral foundations theory, public attitudes, nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, survey experiment"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In this article, we present the results of two survey experiments onpublic support for nuclear, chemical, and conventional strikes. Weexamined how moral values of individuals interact with the approval ofdifferent kinds of strikes and with the effects of information about the ingroup and out-group fatalities. Our results show that while the public ismore averse to the employment of chemical weapons than to theconduct of nuclear or conventional strikes, the overall relationshipbetween strike approval and the individuals’ moral values does not differacross the three experimental treatments. In addition, we found thatindividuals’ scores in so-called “binding” moral values affect thesensitivity of the public for in-group fatalities. Findings of our papercontribute to the broader debates in the field about the strength andnature o' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
In this article, we present the results of two survey experiments onpublic support for nuclear, chemical, and conventional strikes. Weexamined how moral values of individuals interact with the approval ofdifferent kinds of strikes and with the effects of information about the ingroup and out-group fatalities. Our results show that while the public ismore averse to the employment of chemical weapons than to theconduct of nuclear or conventional strikes, the overall relationshipbetween strike approval and the individuals’ moral values does not differacross the three experimental treatments. In addition, we found thatindividuals’ scores in so-called “binding” moral values affect thesensitivity of the public for in-group fatalities. Findings of our papercontribute to the broader debates in the field about the strength andnature o
moral foundations theory, public attitudes, nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, survey experiment