Replication Data for:  Making Washington Work:  Legislative Entrepreneurship and the Personal Vote from the Gilded Age to the Great Depression
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Studies of bill sponsorship in the modern Congress highlight the effects of constituency characteristics, seniority and committee membership.  These studies, however, are limited in their ability to assess the effects of institutions.  We provide the first systematic study of bill sponsorship in the pre-modern House of Representatives.  In doing so, we take advantage of this period’s expansive legislative agenda and variation in electoral system rules.  Using matching and event count models, we estimate the effects of institutions, electoral competition and members’ institutional positions and political experiences on their sponsorship of different types of bills.  We find that two reforms – the Australian ballot and nominating primary – increased sponsorship of bills designed to cultivate personal votes, thereby contributing to the gro' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Australian ballot","Bill sponsorship","Congress","Direct primaries","Personal vote"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Studies of bill sponsorship in the modern Congress highlight the effects of constituency characteristics, seniority and committee membership.  These studies, however, are limited in their ability to assess the effects of institutions.  We provide the first systematic study of bill sponsorship in the pre-modern House of Representatives.  In doing so, we take advantage of this period’s expansive legislative agenda and variation in electoral system rules.  Using matching and event count models, we estimate the effects of institutions, electoral competition and members’ institutional positions and political experiences on their sponsorship of different types of bills.  We find that two reforms – the Australian ballot and nominating primary – increased sponsorship of bills designed to cultivate personal votes, thereby contributing to the gro' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Studies of bill sponsorship in the modern Congress highlight the effects of constituency characteristics, seniority and committee membership.  These studies, however, are limited in their ability to assess the effects of institutions.  We provide the first systematic study of bill sponsorship in the pre-modern House of Representatives.  In doing so, we take advantage of this period’s expansive legislative agenda and variation in electoral system rules.  Using matching and event count models, we estimate the effects of institutions, electoral competition and members’ institutional positions and political experiences on their sponsorship of different types of bills.  We find that two reforms – the Australian ballot and nominating primary – increased sponsorship of bills designed to cultivate personal votes, thereby contributing to the gro
Australian ballot; Bill sponsorship; Congress; Direct primaries; Personal vote