Perceptions of Electoral Integrity - US 2016 (PEI_US_1.0)
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This data-set by the Electoral Integrity Project evaluates the integrity of the US presidential election held on 8 November 2016. Based on a survey collecting the views of US-based political scientists, this research provides independent and reliable evidence to assess whether the 2016 presidential election met international standards of electoral integrity.The survey asks respondents to evaluate how the presidential election on 8 November 2016 was conducted in each of the 50 US states plus the District of Columbia. The study collects 49 indicators to measure electoral integrity. These indicators are clustered to evaluate eleven stages in the electoral cycle as well as generating an overall summary Perception of Electoral Integrity (PEI) 100-point index and comparative ranking of US states. The datasets are available for analysis at tw' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["electoral integrity, US elections, electoral malpractice, voting behavior, comparative politics, procedural fairness, free and fair","US presidential election"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This data-set by the Electoral Integrity Project evaluates the integrity of the US presidential election held on 8 November 2016. Based on a survey collecting the views of US-based political scientists, this research provides independent and reliable evidence to assess whether the 2016 presidential election met international standards of electoral integrity.The survey asks respondents to evaluate how the presidential election on 8 November 2016 was conducted in each of the 50 US states plus the District of Columbia. The study collects 49 indicators to measure electoral integrity. These indicators are clustered to evaluate eleven stages in the electoral cycle as well as generating an overall summary Perception of Electoral Integrity (PEI) 100-point index and comparative ranking of US states. The datasets are available for analysis at tw' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
This data-set by the Electoral Integrity Project evaluates the integrity of the US presidential election held on 8 November 2016. Based on a survey collecting the views of US-based political scientists, this research provides independent and reliable evidence to assess whether the 2016 presidential election met international standards of electoral integrity.The survey asks respondents to evaluate how the presidential election on 8 November 2016 was conducted in each of the 50 US states plus the District of Columbia. The study collects 49 indicators to measure electoral integrity. These indicators are clustered to evaluate eleven stages in the electoral cycle as well as generating an overall summary Perception of Electoral Integrity (PEI) 100-point index and comparative ranking of US states. The datasets are available for analysis at tw
electoral integrity, US elections, electoral malpractice, voting behavior, comparative politics, procedural fairness, free and fair; US presidential election