Pre-analysis Plan for 'Making Deliberation Work: Reason-giving and Information Processing'
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Despite growing interest in deliberative initiatives, there remains a gap between theoretical work on deliberation and the empirical findings. One area that deserves greater attention is how people process information within a deliberative setting. This experiment considers the way in which deliberative rules affect participants' behavior during and after deliberative sessions, specifically looking at the way in which reason-giving rules promote accuracy motivated reasoning. This work helps to both bridge the divide between theoretical and empirical work on deliberation and better understand a potential mechanism to encourage the formation of qualified policy preferences, helping to overcome the starkly partisan thinking evidenced in a polarized political climat' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Deliberation","Experiments","Political discussion"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Despite growing interest in deliberative initiatives, there remains a gap between theoretical work on deliberation and the empirical findings. One area that deserves greater attention is how people process information within a deliberative setting. This experiment considers the way in which deliberative rules affect participants' behavior during and after deliberative sessions, specifically looking at the way in which reason-giving rules promote accuracy motivated reasoning. This work helps to both bridge the divide between theoretical and empirical work on deliberation and better understand a potential mechanism to encourage the formation of qualified policy preferences, helping to overcome the starkly partisan thinking evidenced in a polarized political climat' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Despite growing interest in deliberative initiatives, there remains a gap between theoretical work on deliberation and the empirical findings. One area that deserves greater attention is how people process information within a deliberative setting. This experiment considers the way in which deliberative rules affect participants' behavior during and after deliberative sessions, specifically looking at the way in which reason-giving rules promote accuracy motivated reasoning. This work helps to both bridge the divide between theoretical and empirical work on deliberation and better understand a potential mechanism to encourage the formation of qualified policy preferences, helping to overcome the starkly partisan thinking evidenced in a polarized political climat
Deliberation; Experiments; Political discussion