Electoral Management Survey, (EMS-2.0)
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This dataset by the Electoral Integrity Project covers a global expert survey of electoral management bodies undertaken during the summer of 2021. The Electoral Management Survey (EMS) 2.0 asks electoral officials about how elections are run in their respective jurisdictions. The codebook describes all variables included in the dataset release of May 2023.This study is conducted by Toby S. James and Holly Ann Garnett for the Electoral Integrity Project based at the Royal Military College of Canada, Queen’s University, and the University of East Anglia. This survey follows on from a survey undertaken in 2019 and published in 2020. This dataset is described as version 2.0.The survey was undertaken in collaboration with International IDEA who co-designed and supported the distribution of the survey.    Overall, 242 EMBs were contacted' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Election Management","Elections","Electoral Integrity","Electoral Integrity Project","Electoral Management","Electoral Management Bodies","Global"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This dataset by the Electoral Integrity Project covers a global expert survey of electoral management bodies undertaken during the summer of 2021. The Electoral Management Survey (EMS) 2.0 asks electoral officials about how elections are run in their respective jurisdictions. The codebook describes all variables included in the dataset release of May 2023.This study is conducted by Toby S. James and Holly Ann Garnett for the Electoral Integrity Project based at the Royal Military College of Canada, Queen’s University, and the University of East Anglia. This survey follows on from a survey undertaken in 2019 and published in 2020. This dataset is described as version 2.0.The survey was undertaken in collaboration with International IDEA who co-designed and supported the distribution of the survey.    Overall, 242 EMBs were contacted' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
This dataset by the Electoral Integrity Project covers a global expert survey of electoral management bodies undertaken during the summer of 2021. The Electoral Management Survey (EMS) 2.0 asks electoral officials about how elections are run in their respective jurisdictions. The codebook describes all variables included in the dataset release of May 2023.This study is conducted by Toby S. James and Holly Ann Garnett for the Electoral Integrity Project based at the Royal Military College of Canada, Queen’s University, and the University of East Anglia. This survey follows on from a survey undertaken in 2019 and published in 2020. This dataset is described as version 2.0.The survey was undertaken in collaboration with International IDEA who co-designed and supported the distribution of the survey.    Overall, 242 EMBs were contacted
Election Management; Elections; Electoral Integrity; Electoral Integrity Project; Electoral Management; Electoral Management Bodies; Global