Pollen dispersal patterns differ among sites for a wind-pollinated species and an insect-pollinated species
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'MATERIALS AND METHODSWe assessed pollen dispersal patterns of A. tuberculatus at one roof and one ground site in 2014 and of both A. tuberculatus and S. lycopersicum at two roof and two ground sites in 2015.  Because methods and results were similar between the two years, and the 2015 study was more comprehensive, only methods and results for 2015 are presented here.  A summary of the results from 2014 can be found in Appendix S1 (see the Supplementary Data with this article) and the results from the 2014 analysis can be found in Appendix S2. Study species – Amaranthus tuberculatus was chosen as the wind-pollinated species because amaranths grow well in urban areas (Del Tredici, 2010; Aloisio et al., 2016), it is dioecious (Hager et al., 1997), and there have been no individuals reported in the counties where our study sites wer' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Amaranthaceae","Amaranthus tuberculatus","green roofs","pollination biology","pollen dispersal","Solanaceae","Solanum lycopersicum","urban habitats"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'MATERIALS AND METHODSWe assessed pollen dispersal patterns of A. tuberculatus at one roof and one ground site in 2014 and of both A. tuberculatus and S. lycopersicum at two roof and two ground sites in 2015.  Because methods and results were similar between the two years, and the 2015 study was more comprehensive, only methods and results for 2015 are presented here.  A summary of the results from 2014 can be found in Appendix S1 (see the Supplementary Data with this article) and the results from the 2014 analysis can be found in Appendix S2. Study species – Amaranthus tuberculatus was chosen as the wind-pollinated species because amaranths grow well in urban areas (Del Tredici, 2010; Aloisio et al., 2016), it is dioecious (Hager et al., 1997), and there have been no individuals reported in the counties where our study sites wer' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
MATERIALS AND METHODSWe assessed pollen dispersal patterns of A. tuberculatus at one roof and one ground site in 2014 and of both A. tuberculatus and S. lycopersicum at two roof and two ground sites in 2015.  Because methods and results were similar between the two years, and the 2015 study was more comprehensive, only methods and results for 2015 are presented here.  A summary of the results from 2014 can be found in Appendix S1 (see the Supplementary Data with this article) and the results from the 2014 analysis can be found in Appendix S2. Study species – Amaranthus tuberculatus was chosen as the wind-pollinated species because amaranths grow well in urban areas (Del Tredici, 2010; Aloisio et al., 2016), it is dioecious (Hager et al., 1997), and there have been no individuals reported in the counties where our study sites wer
Amaranthaceae; Amaranthus tuberculatus; green roofs; pollination biology; pollen dispersal; Solanaceae; Solanum lycopersicum; urban habitats