Data for An evaluation of the suitability, readability, and quality of online resources for the self-management of depression
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Data for results of paper entitled 'An evaluation of the suitability, readability, and quality of online resources for the self-management of depression.'Objective:  To evaluate online depression self-management (SM) resources based on their readability, suitability, and quality to determine their appropriateness for use by patients.Methods: A Google search using patients’ most frequently searched terms was conducted. Resources were evaluated using readability indices, the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), and the DISCERN tool. The number of SM skills and other contributing factors (e.g., resource format) were also evaluated.Results: The mean readability score across the sample was grade 10 (SD 1.5, range 8-14) and 22.2% of resources (n=6) met the criteria for superior suitability. The sample mean scores were 58.8% (SD ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Cluster Analysis","Depression","Depressive Disorder","Health Resources","Internet","Self-Management","Smog"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Data for results of paper entitled 'An evaluation of the suitability, readability, and quality of online resources for the self-management of depression.'Objective:  To evaluate online depression self-management (SM) resources based on their readability, suitability, and quality to determine their appropriateness for use by patients.Methods: A Google search using patients’ most frequently searched terms was conducted. Resources were evaluated using readability indices, the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), and the DISCERN tool. The number of SM skills and other contributing factors (e.g., resource format) were also evaluated.Results: The mean readability score across the sample was grade 10 (SD 1.5, range 8-14) and 22.2% of resources (n=6) met the criteria for superior suitability. The sample mean scores were 58.8% (SD ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Data for results of paper entitled 'An evaluation of the suitability, readability, and quality of online resources for the self-management of depression.'Objective:  To evaluate online depression self-management (SM) resources based on their readability, suitability, and quality to determine their appropriateness for use by patients.Methods: A Google search using patients’ most frequently searched terms was conducted. Resources were evaluated using readability indices, the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), and the DISCERN tool. The number of SM skills and other contributing factors (e.g., resource format) were also evaluated.Results: The mean readability score across the sample was grade 10 (SD 1.5, range 8-14) and 22.2% of resources (n=6) met the criteria for superior suitability. The sample mean scores were 58.8% (SD 
Cluster Analysis; Depression; Depressive Disorder; Health Resources; Internet; Self-Management; Smog