Moral judgments reflect default representations of possibility
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Materials, data, and code for the paper 'Moral judgments reflect default representations of possibility'. Abstract: Moral judgment requires representing what is possible: judging that someone ought to do something implies that they actually can do that thing. And if they cannot do that thing, then it’s not the case that they ought to have done it. Moral judgments are often made quickly and effortlessly, suggesting that they may rely on default, rather than deliberative, representations of what is possible. To investigate this possibility, we asked participants to make 10 different kinds of moral judgments either very fast or more slowly about 240 different actions across 12 contexts. We found that these moral judgments were more similar to one another when participants were forced to quickly assess the morality of i' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["morality"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Materials, data, and code for the paper 'Moral judgments reflect default representations of possibility'. Abstract: Moral judgment requires representing what is possible: judging that someone ought to do something implies that they actually can do that thing. And if they cannot do that thing, then it’s not the case that they ought to have done it. Moral judgments are often made quickly and effortlessly, suggesting that they may rely on default, rather than deliberative, representations of what is possible. To investigate this possibility, we asked participants to make 10 different kinds of moral judgments either very fast or more slowly about 240 different actions across 12 contexts. We found that these moral judgments were more similar to one another when participants were forced to quickly assess the morality of i' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Materials, data, and code for the paper 'Moral judgments reflect default representations of possibility'. Abstract: Moral judgment requires representing what is possible: judging that someone ought to do something implies that they actually can do that thing. And if they cannot do that thing, then it’s not the case that they ought to have done it. Moral judgments are often made quickly and effortlessly, suggesting that they may rely on default, rather than deliberative, representations of what is possible. To investigate this possibility, we asked participants to make 10 different kinds of moral judgments either very fast or more slowly about 240 different actions across 12 contexts. We found that these moral judgments were more similar to one another when participants were forced to quickly assess the morality of i
morality