Replication Data for: Comparing ‘responsible party government’ in the US and the UK
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Responsible parties are conventionally defined as those capable of announcing their legislative goals and then passing them on the strength of their own members’ votes.  In this paper, I consider why UK majority parties have closely approximated these conditions for responsibility since the 1880s, while US majority parties have never approximated them closely.  I provide the first systematic evidence on when the British opposition began to offer across-the-board opposition to the government’s agenda and when the government became able to pass bills using only its own members’ votes.  I also explore the role that leaders’ control of the legislative agenda and their followers’ nominations played in these developments.  I attribute US parties’ inability to mimic their British counterparts to different costs of defending bill passage coalit' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["nomination control","responsible parties","roll rates"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Responsible parties are conventionally defined as those capable of announcing their legislative goals and then passing them on the strength of their own members’ votes.  In this paper, I consider why UK majority parties have closely approximated these conditions for responsibility since the 1880s, while US majority parties have never approximated them closely.  I provide the first systematic evidence on when the British opposition began to offer across-the-board opposition to the government’s agenda and when the government became able to pass bills using only its own members’ votes.  I also explore the role that leaders’ control of the legislative agenda and their followers’ nominations played in these developments.  I attribute US parties’ inability to mimic their British counterparts to different costs of defending bill passage coalit' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Responsible parties are conventionally defined as those capable of announcing their legislative goals and then passing them on the strength of their own members’ votes.  In this paper, I consider why UK majority parties have closely approximated these conditions for responsibility since the 1880s, while US majority parties have never approximated them closely.  I provide the first systematic evidence on when the British opposition began to offer across-the-board opposition to the government’s agenda and when the government became able to pass bills using only its own members’ votes.  I also explore the role that leaders’ control of the legislative agenda and their followers’ nominations played in these developments.  I attribute US parties’ inability to mimic their British counterparts to different costs of defending bill passage coalit
nomination control; responsible parties; roll rates