Replication Files for: Modeling Theories of Women's Underrepresentation in Elections
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Research on women candidates in American elections uncovers four key facts: women are under-represented among i) candidates and ii) office holders, iii) perform better in office, and iv) win open seats at equal rates to men. Scholars offer two types of explanations: women are less willing to run than men, due to differential costs or a gap in self-perceived qualification, or voters discriminate at the ballot box. We formally model these mechanisms. Lower willingness to run predicts the first three facts but not the fourth. Voter discrimination at the ballot box predicts the first three facts and creates competing effects with respect to the fourth. Thus,  the major stylized facts cannot be explained without voter discrimination, whether overt or more subtle. We explore whether a close-election regression discontinuity distinguishes the ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Elections","Formal model","Gender","Women's representation"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Research on women candidates in American elections uncovers four key facts: women are under-represented among i) candidates and ii) office holders, iii) perform better in office, and iv) win open seats at equal rates to men. Scholars offer two types of explanations: women are less willing to run than men, due to differential costs or a gap in self-perceived qualification, or voters discriminate at the ballot box. We formally model these mechanisms. Lower willingness to run predicts the first three facts but not the fourth. Voter discrimination at the ballot box predicts the first three facts and creates competing effects with respect to the fourth. Thus,  the major stylized facts cannot be explained without voter discrimination, whether overt or more subtle. We explore whether a close-election regression discontinuity distinguishes the ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Research on women candidates in American elections uncovers four key facts: women are under-represented among i) candidates and ii) office holders, iii) perform better in office, and iv) win open seats at equal rates to men. Scholars offer two types of explanations: women are less willing to run than men, due to differential costs or a gap in self-perceived qualification, or voters discriminate at the ballot box. We formally model these mechanisms. Lower willingness to run predicts the first three facts but not the fourth. Voter discrimination at the ballot box predicts the first three facts and creates competing effects with respect to the fourth. Thus,  the major stylized facts cannot be explained without voter discrimination, whether overt or more subtle. We explore whether a close-election regression discontinuity distinguishes the 
Elections; Formal model; Gender; Women's representation