Replication Data for: Shaping Influence in Governance Networks: The Role Of Motivations and Information Exchange
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In governance networks, some actors might have more influence than others in the group’s collective decision-making. This paper investigates whether an actor’s pro-social and/or self-interested motivations to participate in a governance network help predict its level of influence in the group. We argue that information exchange is an important mediator in this relationship because an actor’s tendency to actively diffuse information will depend on its motivations; while other participants being exposed to information from an actor are likely to increase the actor’s influence on them. Using a unique relational dataset from ten anti-corruption multi-stakeholder partnerships (MSPs) in Latin America, Africa and Eurasia, we find that self-interested actors, rather than pro-socially motivated ones, take the lead in information-exchange activit' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["governance networks","influence","information exchange","mediation","motivations","multi-stakeholder partnerships","path analysis"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In governance networks, some actors might have more influence than others in the group’s collective decision-making. This paper investigates whether an actor’s pro-social and/or self-interested motivations to participate in a governance network help predict its level of influence in the group. We argue that information exchange is an important mediator in this relationship because an actor’s tendency to actively diffuse information will depend on its motivations; while other participants being exposed to information from an actor are likely to increase the actor’s influence on them. Using a unique relational dataset from ten anti-corruption multi-stakeholder partnerships (MSPs) in Latin America, Africa and Eurasia, we find that self-interested actors, rather than pro-socially motivated ones, take the lead in information-exchange activit' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
In governance networks, some actors might have more influence than others in the group’s collective decision-making. This paper investigates whether an actor’s pro-social and/or self-interested motivations to participate in a governance network help predict its level of influence in the group. We argue that information exchange is an important mediator in this relationship because an actor’s tendency to actively diffuse information will depend on its motivations; while other participants being exposed to information from an actor are likely to increase the actor’s influence on them. Using a unique relational dataset from ten anti-corruption multi-stakeholder partnerships (MSPs) in Latin America, Africa and Eurasia, we find that self-interested actors, rather than pro-socially motivated ones, take the lead in information-exchange activit
governance networks; influence; information exchange; mediation; motivations; multi-stakeholder partnerships; path analysis