Replication Data for: The Impact of Group Identity on Coalition Formation
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Bargaining and coalition building are a central part of modern politics. We argue that majoritarian bargaining is important for the formation of coalitions and that group-identity preferences impact partner selection. We test the effect of gender, race and ideological distance in a majority-rule bargaining experiment and find that ideological distance significantly affects the likelihood and amount offered to potential partners. We conclude that formateurs need not be purely rational actors pursuing policy goals and/or the benefits of office. Rather, they also care about the identity of their partners, preferring others who are like themselves' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Coalition Formation, Laboratory Experiments, Baron and Ferejohn Model, Legislative Bargaining, Social Identity"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Bargaining and coalition building are a central part of modern politics. We argue that majoritarian bargaining is important for the formation of coalitions and that group-identity preferences impact partner selection. We test the effect of gender, race and ideological distance in a majority-rule bargaining experiment and find that ideological distance significantly affects the likelihood and amount offered to potential partners. We conclude that formateurs need not be purely rational actors pursuing policy goals and/or the benefits of office. Rather, they also care about the identity of their partners, preferring others who are like themselves' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Bargaining and coalition building are a central part of modern politics. We argue that majoritarian bargaining is important for the formation of coalitions and that group-identity preferences impact partner selection. We test the effect of gender, race and ideological distance in a majority-rule bargaining experiment and find that ideological distance significantly affects the likelihood and amount offered to potential partners. We conclude that formateurs need not be purely rational actors pursuing policy goals and/or the benefits of office. Rather, they also care about the identity of their partners, preferring others who are like themselves
Coalition Formation, Laboratory Experiments, Baron and Ferejohn Model, Legislative Bargaining, Social Identity