Replication Data for: 'When Efforts to Depolarize the Electorate Fail' 
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The mass public has become affectively polarized—ordinary Americans increasingly dislike and distrust those from the other party, with accompanying negative consequences for our politics. Drawing on work in political and social psychology, this paper tests two mechanisms for reducing this discord, both of which have been shown to reduce similar biases in other settings: heightening partisan ambivalence, and using self-affirmation techniques. Employing a population-based survey experiment, I find that neither strategy reduces affective polarization in the aggregate. But this masks an important heterogeneity: heightening partisan ambivalence reduces affective polarization for ideological moderates, but increases such discord for those with more extreme ideological identities. Efforts to depolarize the electorate can make it more deeply di' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["affective polarization","partisan ambivalence","self-affirmation"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The mass public has become affectively polarized—ordinary Americans increasingly dislike and distrust those from the other party, with accompanying negative consequences for our politics. Drawing on work in political and social psychology, this paper tests two mechanisms for reducing this discord, both of which have been shown to reduce similar biases in other settings: heightening partisan ambivalence, and using self-affirmation techniques. Employing a population-based survey experiment, I find that neither strategy reduces affective polarization in the aggregate. But this masks an important heterogeneity: heightening partisan ambivalence reduces affective polarization for ideological moderates, but increases such discord for those with more extreme ideological identities. Efforts to depolarize the electorate can make it more deeply di' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
The mass public has become affectively polarized—ordinary Americans increasingly dislike and distrust those from the other party, with accompanying negative consequences for our politics. Drawing on work in political and social psychology, this paper tests two mechanisms for reducing this discord, both of which have been shown to reduce similar biases in other settings: heightening partisan ambivalence, and using self-affirmation techniques. Employing a population-based survey experiment, I find that neither strategy reduces affective polarization in the aggregate. But this masks an important heterogeneity: heightening partisan ambivalence reduces affective polarization for ideological moderates, but increases such discord for those with more extreme ideological identities. Efforts to depolarize the electorate can make it more deeply di
affective polarization; partisan ambivalence; self-affirmation