Replication Data for: What Motivates Reasoning? A Theory of Goal-Dependent Political Evaluation
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Rather than exhibiting bias or open-minded reasoning at baseline, we argue that information processing is motivated by whatever goals a context makes salient. Thus, if politics feels like debate, people will be motivated to argue for their side. If politics feels like deliberation, they will be motivated to seek consensus through open-minded processing. Results from three experiments demonstrate: 1) Politics evokes thoughts similar to conflictual contexts and dissimilar from deliberative contexts. 2) Consequently, information labeled “political” primes the motivation to counterargue, leading to opinion polarization. Absent such labeling, no such motivation is evident, explaining why bias is common but not inherent to politics. 3) Despite this capacity for bias, people can be motivated to actively process and accept counter-attitudinal i' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Deliberation","Human information processing","Motivated reasoning"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Rather than exhibiting bias or open-minded reasoning at baseline, we argue that information processing is motivated by whatever goals a context makes salient. Thus, if politics feels like debate, people will be motivated to argue for their side. If politics feels like deliberation, they will be motivated to seek consensus through open-minded processing. Results from three experiments demonstrate: 1) Politics evokes thoughts similar to conflictual contexts and dissimilar from deliberative contexts. 2) Consequently, information labeled “political” primes the motivation to counterargue, leading to opinion polarization. Absent such labeling, no such motivation is evident, explaining why bias is common but not inherent to politics. 3) Despite this capacity for bias, people can be motivated to actively process and accept counter-attitudinal i' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Rather than exhibiting bias or open-minded reasoning at baseline, we argue that information processing is motivated by whatever goals a context makes salient. Thus, if politics feels like debate, people will be motivated to argue for their side. If politics feels like deliberation, they will be motivated to seek consensus through open-minded processing. Results from three experiments demonstrate: 1) Politics evokes thoughts similar to conflictual contexts and dissimilar from deliberative contexts. 2) Consequently, information labeled “political” primes the motivation to counterargue, leading to opinion polarization. Absent such labeling, no such motivation is evident, explaining why bias is common but not inherent to politics. 3) Despite this capacity for bias, people can be motivated to actively process and accept counter-attitudinal i
Deliberation; Human information processing; Motivated reasoning