Replication Data for: The dynamics underlying the rise of star performers
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In the article connected to this data set, we propose that star performers' abilities develop according to a multi-dimensional, multiplicative and dynamical process. Based on existing literature, we defined a dynamic network model, including different parameters functioning as enhancers or inhibitors of star performance. The enhancers were multiplicity of productivity, monopolistic productivity, job autonomy, and job complexity, whereas productivity ceiling was an inhibitor. These enhancers and inhibitors were expected to influence the tail-heaviness of the performance distribution. We therefore simulated several samples of performers, thereby including the assumed enhancers and inhibitors in the dynamic networks, and compared their tail-heaviness. Results showed that the dynamic network model resulted in heavier and lighter tail distri' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Talent development, Productivity, Dynamical System, Network models, Simulation, L-moments"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In the article connected to this data set, we propose that star performers' abilities develop according to a multi-dimensional, multiplicative and dynamical process. Based on existing literature, we defined a dynamic network model, including different parameters functioning as enhancers or inhibitors of star performance. The enhancers were multiplicity of productivity, monopolistic productivity, job autonomy, and job complexity, whereas productivity ceiling was an inhibitor. These enhancers and inhibitors were expected to influence the tail-heaviness of the performance distribution. We therefore simulated several samples of performers, thereby including the assumed enhancers and inhibitors in the dynamic networks, and compared their tail-heaviness. Results showed that the dynamic network model resulted in heavier and lighter tail distri' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
In the article connected to this data set, we propose that star performers' abilities develop according to a multi-dimensional, multiplicative and dynamical process. Based on existing literature, we defined a dynamic network model, including different parameters functioning as enhancers or inhibitors of star performance. The enhancers were multiplicity of productivity, monopolistic productivity, job autonomy, and job complexity, whereas productivity ceiling was an inhibitor. These enhancers and inhibitors were expected to influence the tail-heaviness of the performance distribution. We therefore simulated several samples of performers, thereby including the assumed enhancers and inhibitors in the dynamic networks, and compared their tail-heaviness. Results showed that the dynamic network model resulted in heavier and lighter tail distri
Talent development, Productivity, Dynamical System, Network models, Simulation, L-moments