Replication Data for: Peaceful Dyads: A Territorial Perspective
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Many dyads develop peaceful relationships, avoiding war for long, historical periods. Are such dyads common? How many exist, and why have they never fought? This study provides a territorial perspective on peaceful dyads, defined as those that never fight a war over a given historical period. It tests two explanations for why peaceful dyads exist: the territorial peace and the democratic peace. A series of hypotheses test the relative ability of these two theories to account for peaceful dyads. The tests employ three samples—all dyads, politically relevant dyads, and grievance dyads—from 1816-2001, with an emphasis on the Cold War and post-Cold War periods. Through our analyses, we reach three major findings. First, the absence of territorial conflict—but not democracy—predicts peaceful dyads. Second, the absence of territorial disagree' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["democratic peace","interstate peace","territorial peace"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Many dyads develop peaceful relationships, avoiding war for long, historical periods. Are such dyads common? How many exist, and why have they never fought? This study provides a territorial perspective on peaceful dyads, defined as those that never fight a war over a given historical period. It tests two explanations for why peaceful dyads exist: the territorial peace and the democratic peace. A series of hypotheses test the relative ability of these two theories to account for peaceful dyads. The tests employ three samples—all dyads, politically relevant dyads, and grievance dyads—from 1816-2001, with an emphasis on the Cold War and post-Cold War periods. Through our analyses, we reach three major findings. First, the absence of territorial conflict—but not democracy—predicts peaceful dyads. Second, the absence of territorial disagree' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Many dyads develop peaceful relationships, avoiding war for long, historical periods. Are such dyads common? How many exist, and why have they never fought? This study provides a territorial perspective on peaceful dyads, defined as those that never fight a war over a given historical period. It tests two explanations for why peaceful dyads exist: the territorial peace and the democratic peace. A series of hypotheses test the relative ability of these two theories to account for peaceful dyads. The tests employ three samples—all dyads, politically relevant dyads, and grievance dyads—from 1816-2001, with an emphasis on the Cold War and post-Cold War periods. Through our analyses, we reach three major findings. First, the absence of territorial conflict—but not democracy—predicts peaceful dyads. Second, the absence of territorial disagree
democratic peace; interstate peace; territorial peace