Examiner seniority and experience are associated with bias when scoring communication, but not examination, skills in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) in Australia
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'We compared the mean scores awarded for generic and clinical communication and physical examination skills in 2 undergraduate medicine OSCEs in relation to examiner characteristics (gender, examining experience, occupation, seniority, and speciality). Our OSCE focused on 3 domains graded across 9 criteria (items): generic communication skills (4 items); clinical communication skills (i.e., medical history taking; 3 items); and physical examination skills (2 items). A grade was awarded for each criterion and post-assessment processing assigned a numerical mark to each grade, as follows: fail (F = 3/10); borderline pass (P- = 5/10); clear pass (P = 7/10); and exceeded expectations/distinction (P+ = 9/10). The numerical marks were totalled to give an overall score for each student within each domain. Grades were entered into an in-hous' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Examiner, bias, communication, examination, OSCE, Australia"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'We compared the mean scores awarded for generic and clinical communication and physical examination skills in 2 undergraduate medicine OSCEs in relation to examiner characteristics (gender, examining experience, occupation, seniority, and speciality). Our OSCE focused on 3 domains graded across 9 criteria (items): generic communication skills (4 items); clinical communication skills (i.e., medical history taking; 3 items); and physical examination skills (2 items). A grade was awarded for each criterion and post-assessment processing assigned a numerical mark to each grade, as follows: fail (F = 3/10); borderline pass (P- = 5/10); clear pass (P = 7/10); and exceeded expectations/distinction (P+ = 9/10). The numerical marks were totalled to give an overall score for each student within each domain. Grades were entered into an in-hous' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
We compared the mean scores awarded for generic and clinical communication and physical examination skills in 2 undergraduate medicine OSCEs in relation to examiner characteristics (gender, examining experience, occupation, seniority, and speciality). Our OSCE focused on 3 domains graded across 9 criteria (items): generic communication skills (4 items); clinical communication skills (i.e., medical history taking; 3 items); and physical examination skills (2 items). A grade was awarded for each criterion and post-assessment processing assigned a numerical mark to each grade, as follows: fail (F = 3/10); borderline pass (P- = 5/10); clear pass (P = 7/10); and exceeded expectations/distinction (P+ = 9/10). The numerical marks were totalled to give an overall score for each student within each domain. Grades were entered into an in-hous
Examiner, bias, communication, examination, OSCE, Australia