Replication Data for: Closing a Backdoor to Dual Citizenship: The German Citizenship Law Reform of 2000 and the Abolishment of the “Domestic Clause”
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The German citizenship law underwent a paradigmatic amendment in 2000. Oneoften overlooked change of this reform was the abolishment of the domestic clause(“Inlandsklausel”) that implied a substantial restriction to de facto dual citizenshipacceptance. Combining data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (waves1993–2006) with original data on origin country policies on dual citizenship andcitizenship reacquisition, we analyse the impact of the abolishment of the domesticclause on naturalization rates. We apply a difference-in-difference design to investigate the causal impact of this element of the reform which has remained under-studied. We do not find an impact of the abolishment of the domestic clause on naturalization rates, neither among the general migrant population, nor among Turkish migrants who are alleged to be tar' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["citizenship"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The German citizenship law underwent a paradigmatic amendment in 2000. Oneoften overlooked change of this reform was the abolishment of the domestic clause(“Inlandsklausel”) that implied a substantial restriction to de facto dual citizenshipacceptance. Combining data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (waves1993–2006) with original data on origin country policies on dual citizenship andcitizenship reacquisition, we analyse the impact of the abolishment of the domesticclause on naturalization rates. We apply a difference-in-difference design to investigate the causal impact of this element of the reform which has remained under-studied. We do not find an impact of the abolishment of the domestic clause on naturalization rates, neither among the general migrant population, nor among Turkish migrants who are alleged to be tar' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
The German citizenship law underwent a paradigmatic amendment in 2000. Oneoften overlooked change of this reform was the abolishment of the domestic clause(“Inlandsklausel”) that implied a substantial restriction to de facto dual citizenshipacceptance. Combining data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (waves1993–2006) with original data on origin country policies on dual citizenship andcitizenship reacquisition, we analyse the impact of the abolishment of the domesticclause on naturalization rates. We apply a difference-in-difference design to investigate the causal impact of this element of the reform which has remained under-studied. We do not find an impact of the abolishment of the domestic clause on naturalization rates, neither among the general migrant population, nor among Turkish migrants who are alleged to be tar
citizenship