Replication Data for: Italy and the Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council. Playing the Two-Level Game
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The aim of this article is to assess Italy’s behaviour in the framework of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the United Nations Human Rights Council, both as a recommending State and as a State under review. The UPR is a peer review mechanism launched in 2008, through which all UN member States can make recommendations to each other regarding human rights practices. Drawing on role theory, liberal and constructivist institutionalism and the two-level game approach, the analysis reveals that Italian decision makers played parallel games at the domestic and international tables of the UPR, and managed to adapt country’s human rights foreign policy goals according to the different social contexts where they operated. Indeed, while in the review phasein Geneva Italy sought legitimacy for both its policies and its status as an interna' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Human rights","International organisation","Italian foreign policy"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The aim of this article is to assess Italy’s behaviour in the framework of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the United Nations Human Rights Council, both as a recommending State and as a State under review. The UPR is a peer review mechanism launched in 2008, through which all UN member States can make recommendations to each other regarding human rights practices. Drawing on role theory, liberal and constructivist institutionalism and the two-level game approach, the analysis reveals that Italian decision makers played parallel games at the domestic and international tables of the UPR, and managed to adapt country’s human rights foreign policy goals according to the different social contexts where they operated. Indeed, while in the review phasein Geneva Italy sought legitimacy for both its policies and its status as an interna' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
The aim of this article is to assess Italy’s behaviour in the framework of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the United Nations Human Rights Council, both as a recommending State and as a State under review. The UPR is a peer review mechanism launched in 2008, through which all UN member States can make recommendations to each other regarding human rights practices. Drawing on role theory, liberal and constructivist institutionalism and the two-level game approach, the analysis reveals that Italian decision makers played parallel games at the domestic and international tables of the UPR, and managed to adapt country’s human rights foreign policy goals according to the different social contexts where they operated. Indeed, while in the review phasein Geneva Italy sought legitimacy for both its policies and its status as an interna
Human rights; International organisation; Italian foreign policy