Replication Data for: Language, Partisanship, and Cognition
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The way that people understand problems manifests in the way they use language. In this paper I develop a theory of language and cognition that suggests that the structure of language mirrors the structure of cognition. Several constructs, like the Elaboration Likelihood Method and Fuzzy Trace Theory suggest that particular delivery styles are differently persuasive. I connect the literature on language and cognition, and then develop a theory of how bottom-up and top-down processing is indicative of how partisans conceptualize problems. I demonstrate how the structure of language is differently informative than the selection of lexical items. It is the how, not the what, that creates influential messaging and reveals how people conceptualize political problems. I examine four corpora across several linguistic dimensions. I conclude wit' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["language, partisanship, cognition"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The way that people understand problems manifests in the way they use language. In this paper I develop a theory of language and cognition that suggests that the structure of language mirrors the structure of cognition. Several constructs, like the Elaboration Likelihood Method and Fuzzy Trace Theory suggest that particular delivery styles are differently persuasive. I connect the literature on language and cognition, and then develop a theory of how bottom-up and top-down processing is indicative of how partisans conceptualize problems. I demonstrate how the structure of language is differently informative than the selection of lexical items. It is the how, not the what, that creates influential messaging and reveals how people conceptualize political problems. I examine four corpora across several linguistic dimensions. I conclude wit' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
The way that people understand problems manifests in the way they use language. In this paper I develop a theory of language and cognition that suggests that the structure of language mirrors the structure of cognition. Several constructs, like the Elaboration Likelihood Method and Fuzzy Trace Theory suggest that particular delivery styles are differently persuasive. I connect the literature on language and cognition, and then develop a theory of how bottom-up and top-down processing is indicative of how partisans conceptualize problems. I demonstrate how the structure of language is differently informative than the selection of lexical items. It is the how, not the what, that creates influential messaging and reveals how people conceptualize political problems. I examine four corpora across several linguistic dimensions. I conclude wit
language, partisanship, cognition