Replication data for: Detecting and Deterring Information Search in Online Surveys
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This paper introduces a framework for evaluating methods of combatting information search in online surveys. Three empirical studies based on the framework suggest that search is a serious but manageable problem. Search frequency varies substantially with question content, ranging from 2 to 30 percent in batteries of general political knowledge questions. Deterrence works: a pledge not to cheat reduces search by half. Detection also works: web browser paradata identify 70-85 percent of search, while 60-85 percent of search on knowledge questions is undertaken by respondents who correctly answer ``catch'' questions about obscure Supreme Court cases. Detection and deterrence are complements: deterrence reduces search ex ante, while detection quantifies success and provides ex post options for dealing with undeterred search. I' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Cheating","Experiments","Knowledge and learning","Measurement error","Paradata","Survey methodology"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This paper introduces a framework for evaluating methods of combatting information search in online surveys. Three empirical studies based on the framework suggest that search is a serious but manageable problem. Search frequency varies substantially with question content, ranging from 2 to 30 percent in batteries of general political knowledge questions. Deterrence works: a pledge not to cheat reduces search by half. Detection also works: web browser paradata identify 70-85 percent of search, while 60-85 percent of search on knowledge questions is undertaken by respondents who correctly answer ``catch'' questions about obscure Supreme Court cases. Detection and deterrence are complements: deterrence reduces search ex ante, while detection quantifies success and provides ex post options for dealing with undeterred search. I' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
This paper introduces a framework for evaluating methods of combatting information search in online surveys. Three empirical studies based on the framework suggest that search is a serious but manageable problem. Search frequency varies substantially with question content, ranging from 2 to 30 percent in batteries of general political knowledge questions. Deterrence works: a pledge not to cheat reduces search by half. Detection also works: web browser paradata identify 70-85 percent of search, while 60-85 percent of search on knowledge questions is undertaken by respondents who correctly answer ``catch'' questions about obscure Supreme Court cases. Detection and deterrence are complements: deterrence reduces search ex ante, while detection quantifies success and provides ex post options for dealing with undeterred search. I
Cheating; Experiments; Knowledge and learning; Measurement error; Paradata; Survey methodology