Replication Data for: Strategic Discrimination
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Why are women and people of color underrepresented in US politics? This article offers a new explanation: strategic discrimination. Strategic discrimination occurs when an individual discriminates against a candidate out of concern that others will object to the candidate's identity. In a series of three experiments, I find that strategic discrimination exists, it matters for real-world politics, and it can be hard to overcome. The first experiment shows that Americans consider white male candidates more electable than equally qualified black and white women, and to a lesser extent, black men. These results are strongly intersectional, with black women rated less electable than either black men or white women. The second experiment shows that anti-Trump voters weigh Democratic candidates’ racial and gender identities when deciding who i' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Electability","Gender discrimination","Racial discrimination","US primary elections"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Why are women and people of color underrepresented in US politics? This article offers a new explanation: strategic discrimination. Strategic discrimination occurs when an individual discriminates against a candidate out of concern that others will object to the candidate's identity. In a series of three experiments, I find that strategic discrimination exists, it matters for real-world politics, and it can be hard to overcome. The first experiment shows that Americans consider white male candidates more electable than equally qualified black and white women, and to a lesser extent, black men. These results are strongly intersectional, with black women rated less electable than either black men or white women. The second experiment shows that anti-Trump voters weigh Democratic candidates’ racial and gender identities when deciding who i' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Why are women and people of color underrepresented in US politics? This article offers a new explanation: strategic discrimination. Strategic discrimination occurs when an individual discriminates against a candidate out of concern that others will object to the candidate's identity. In a series of three experiments, I find that strategic discrimination exists, it matters for real-world politics, and it can be hard to overcome. The first experiment shows that Americans consider white male candidates more electable than equally qualified black and white women, and to a lesser extent, black men. These results are strongly intersectional, with black women rated less electable than either black men or white women. The second experiment shows that anti-Trump voters weigh Democratic candidates’ racial and gender identities when deciding who i
Electability; Gender discrimination; Racial discrimination; US primary elections