One Dyadic Peace Leads to Another?  Conflict Systems, Terminations, and Net Reduction in Fighting Groups
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Governments often fight multiple conflicts simultaneously and each conflict can have multiple groups. Prior research on civil war termination has been conducted at the conflict-level, where all the groups in one civil war have been terminated, or at the dyadic-level, where group terminations are examined separately. In practice conflict-level studies mostly tell us how to preserve peace once a civil war has already ended, while dyadic studies tell us about the durability of specific group terminations within a civil war. Hence our understanding of how ongoing civil wars are ended is limited, particularly, with respect to multiparty conflicts. We put forth a systems-approach that treats dyadic terminations as connected processes where group terminations influence the future behavior of other groups, incentivizing a system towards greater' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["civil war","termination","recurrence","systems approach","peace agreement","implementation","dyadic","aggregate outcomes","military victory"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Governments often fight multiple conflicts simultaneously and each conflict can have multiple groups. Prior research on civil war termination has been conducted at the conflict-level, where all the groups in one civil war have been terminated, or at the dyadic-level, where group terminations are examined separately. In practice conflict-level studies mostly tell us how to preserve peace once a civil war has already ended, while dyadic studies tell us about the durability of specific group terminations within a civil war. Hence our understanding of how ongoing civil wars are ended is limited, particularly, with respect to multiparty conflicts. We put forth a systems-approach that treats dyadic terminations as connected processes where group terminations influence the future behavior of other groups, incentivizing a system towards greater' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Governments often fight multiple conflicts simultaneously and each conflict can have multiple groups. Prior research on civil war termination has been conducted at the conflict-level, where all the groups in one civil war have been terminated, or at the dyadic-level, where group terminations are examined separately. In practice conflict-level studies mostly tell us how to preserve peace once a civil war has already ended, while dyadic studies tell us about the durability of specific group terminations within a civil war. Hence our understanding of how ongoing civil wars are ended is limited, particularly, with respect to multiparty conflicts. We put forth a systems-approach that treats dyadic terminations as connected processes where group terminations influence the future behavior of other groups, incentivizing a system towards greater
civil war; termination; recurrence; systems approach; peace agreement; implementation; dyadic; aggregate outcomes; military victory