Treaty Framing and Climate Science: Challenges in Managing the Risk of Global Warming
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Supplementary material to the article in the International Journal of Global Environmental Issues confronting explicitly the yawning gap between necessary GHG emissions reductions targets set by climate scientists and the results of decades-long international treaty negotiations and meetings.  The supplementary material considers A: Treaty Framing in the Context of Climate Forcing, 1990-2012; B: Decarbonisation vs. Climate Engineering; C: The Twentieth-Century Experience with Treaty Forcing; D: Do Climate Change Negotiations promote Unrealistic Targets?; E: Treaty Dependent Solutions for Climate Change; and Reference' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Environmental treaty law, Paris Agreement, climate forcing, climate science, greenhouse gas targets, risk, global warming"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Supplementary material to the article in the International Journal of Global Environmental Issues confronting explicitly the yawning gap between necessary GHG emissions reductions targets set by climate scientists and the results of decades-long international treaty negotiations and meetings.  The supplementary material considers A: Treaty Framing in the Context of Climate Forcing, 1990-2012; B: Decarbonisation vs. Climate Engineering; C: The Twentieth-Century Experience with Treaty Forcing; D: Do Climate Change Negotiations promote Unrealistic Targets?; E: Treaty Dependent Solutions for Climate Change; and Reference' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Supplementary material to the article in the International Journal of Global Environmental Issues confronting explicitly the yawning gap between necessary GHG emissions reductions targets set by climate scientists and the results of decades-long international treaty negotiations and meetings.  The supplementary material considers A: Treaty Framing in the Context of Climate Forcing, 1990-2012; B: Decarbonisation vs. Climate Engineering; C: The Twentieth-Century Experience with Treaty Forcing; D: Do Climate Change Negotiations promote Unrealistic Targets?; E: Treaty Dependent Solutions for Climate Change; and Reference
Environmental treaty law, Paris Agreement, climate forcing, climate science, greenhouse gas targets, risk, global warming