Replication Data for: Success of Economic Sanctions Threats: Coercion, Information and Commitment
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This study examines when and why threats of economic sanctions leadto successful extraction of policy concessions. Scholars identified three(not mutually exclusive) hypotheses that explain success of sanctionthreats: (a) the coercive, (b) the informational and (c) the publiccommitment hypothesis. The underpinning mechanisms for thehypotheses are, respectively, the economic cost of sanctions, uncertaintyabout the resolve of the sender and domestic audience cost for issuingempty threats. In this study, we offer an empirical test of the threehypotheses on threats effectiveness. In addition, we assess howvariation in the three mechanisms affects effectiveness of threatsrelative to imposed sanctions. For the expected economic cost, we usethe TIES data. To measure uncertainty, we generate a network ofdiplomatic relations, based on' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Conflict, Sanctions, Complex System, Crisis Bargaining"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This study examines when and why threats of economic sanctions leadto successful extraction of policy concessions. Scholars identified three(not mutually exclusive) hypotheses that explain success of sanctionthreats: (a) the coercive, (b) the informational and (c) the publiccommitment hypothesis. The underpinning mechanisms for thehypotheses are, respectively, the economic cost of sanctions, uncertaintyabout the resolve of the sender and domestic audience cost for issuingempty threats. In this study, we offer an empirical test of the threehypotheses on threats effectiveness. In addition, we assess howvariation in the three mechanisms affects effectiveness of threatsrelative to imposed sanctions. For the expected economic cost, we usethe TIES data. To measure uncertainty, we generate a network ofdiplomatic relations, based on' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
This study examines when and why threats of economic sanctions leadto successful extraction of policy concessions. Scholars identified three(not mutually exclusive) hypotheses that explain success of sanctionthreats: (a) the coercive, (b) the informational and (c) the publiccommitment hypothesis. The underpinning mechanisms for thehypotheses are, respectively, the economic cost of sanctions, uncertaintyabout the resolve of the sender and domestic audience cost for issuingempty threats. In this study, we offer an empirical test of the threehypotheses on threats effectiveness. In addition, we assess howvariation in the three mechanisms affects effectiveness of threatsrelative to imposed sanctions. For the expected economic cost, we usethe TIES data. To measure uncertainty, we generate a network ofdiplomatic relations, based on
Conflict, Sanctions, Complex System, Crisis Bargaining