Replication Data for: How Market Dynamics of Domestic and Foreign Social Media Firms Shape Strategies of Internet Censorship
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'There is ongoing debate over whether authoritarian regimes can maintain control overinformation given the rise of social media and the Internet. In this debate, China isoften cited as a prime example of how authoritarian regimes can retain control, but todate, there has been limited research on whether China’s online censorship strategiescan be replicated in other authoritarian regimes. This article shows that China’s abilityto censor social media rests on the dominance of domestic firms in China’s market forInternet content. The absence of U.S. social media firms in China allows the Chinesegovernment to engage in censorship through content removal, which can quickly andeffectively suppress information. In contrast, for most other regimes, the market forsocial media is dominated by U.S. multinational firms, e.g., Faceb' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Social Media, China, Censorship, Internet"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'There is ongoing debate over whether authoritarian regimes can maintain control overinformation given the rise of social media and the Internet. In this debate, China isoften cited as a prime example of how authoritarian regimes can retain control, but todate, there has been limited research on whether China’s online censorship strategiescan be replicated in other authoritarian regimes. This article shows that China’s abilityto censor social media rests on the dominance of domestic firms in China’s market forInternet content. The absence of U.S. social media firms in China allows the Chinesegovernment to engage in censorship through content removal, which can quickly andeffectively suppress information. In contrast, for most other regimes, the market forsocial media is dominated by U.S. multinational firms, e.g., Faceb' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
There is ongoing debate over whether authoritarian regimes can maintain control overinformation given the rise of social media and the Internet. In this debate, China isoften cited as a prime example of how authoritarian regimes can retain control, but todate, there has been limited research on whether China’s online censorship strategiescan be replicated in other authoritarian regimes. This article shows that China’s abilityto censor social media rests on the dominance of domestic firms in China’s market forInternet content. The absence of U.S. social media firms in China allows the Chinesegovernment to engage in censorship through content removal, which can quickly andeffectively suppress information. In contrast, for most other regimes, the market forsocial media is dominated by U.S. multinational firms, e.g., Faceb
Social Media, China, Censorship, Internet