Replication Data for: Mapping Adoption of ISFM Practices Study - The Case of Kenya, Rwanda & Zambia
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Studies have shown that the uptake of ISFM remains low – largely because it is a new paradigm and its promotion by extension service providers is limited. Nkonya et al (2016) observed that only 6% of farmers use ISFM compared to 19% and 25% for inorganic fertilizer and organic inputs respectively. This study was done in three case study countries: Kenya, Rwanda and Zambia using both primary and secondary data collected to document adoption of ISFM. To test and validate new tools for documenting adoption of agricultural technologies, a mobile phone survey was conducted only in Rwanda due to budget constraints. The results are compared with data collected using traditional data collection methods – i.e., in-person household survey – in which an enumerator interviews farmers in person. Secondary data will be used to document adoption of ISF' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Integrated Soil Fertility Management","ISFM","Kenya","Rwanda","SMS survey","Zambia"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Studies have shown that the uptake of ISFM remains low – largely because it is a new paradigm and its promotion by extension service providers is limited. Nkonya et al (2016) observed that only 6% of farmers use ISFM compared to 19% and 25% for inorganic fertilizer and organic inputs respectively. This study was done in three case study countries: Kenya, Rwanda and Zambia using both primary and secondary data collected to document adoption of ISFM. To test and validate new tools for documenting adoption of agricultural technologies, a mobile phone survey was conducted only in Rwanda due to budget constraints. The results are compared with data collected using traditional data collection methods – i.e., in-person household survey – in which an enumerator interviews farmers in person. Secondary data will be used to document adoption of ISF' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Studies have shown that the uptake of ISFM remains low – largely because it is a new paradigm and its promotion by extension service providers is limited. Nkonya et al (2016) observed that only 6% of farmers use ISFM compared to 19% and 25% for inorganic fertilizer and organic inputs respectively. This study was done in three case study countries: Kenya, Rwanda and Zambia using both primary and secondary data collected to document adoption of ISFM. To test and validate new tools for documenting adoption of agricultural technologies, a mobile phone survey was conducted only in Rwanda due to budget constraints. The results are compared with data collected using traditional data collection methods – i.e., in-person household survey – in which an enumerator interviews farmers in person. Secondary data will be used to document adoption of ISF
Integrated Soil Fertility Management; ISFM; Kenya; Rwanda; SMS survey; Zambia