Replication Data for: Do Governments Mean Business When They Derogate? Human Rights Violations During Notified States of Emergency, Review of International Organizations, 8 (1), 2013, pp. 1-31
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Whether international human rights treaties constrain the behavior ofgovernments is a hotly contested issue that has drawn much scholarly attention.The possibility to derogate from some, but not all, of the rights enshrined in theInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) during declared andofficially notified states of emergency provides a hitherto unexplored test case. Ifgovernments were increasingly violating non-derogable rights during derogationperiods then this provides evidence that the ICCPR has no sufficient constrainingeffect on state parties. I analyze whether specific individual human rights as well astwo aggregate rights measures are systematically more violated during derogationperiods in a global sample over the period 1981 to 2008. I find that regime typematters: autocracies step up ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["compliance","derogation","human rights","international treaty","public emergency"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Whether international human rights treaties constrain the behavior ofgovernments is a hotly contested issue that has drawn much scholarly attention.The possibility to derogate from some, but not all, of the rights enshrined in theInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) during declared andofficially notified states of emergency provides a hitherto unexplored test case. Ifgovernments were increasingly violating non-derogable rights during derogationperiods then this provides evidence that the ICCPR has no sufficient constrainingeffect on state parties. I analyze whether specific individual human rights as well astwo aggregate rights measures are systematically more violated during derogationperiods in a global sample over the period 1981 to 2008. I find that regime typematters: autocracies step up ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Whether international human rights treaties constrain the behavior ofgovernments is a hotly contested issue that has drawn much scholarly attention.The possibility to derogate from some, but not all, of the rights enshrined in theInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) during declared andofficially notified states of emergency provides a hitherto unexplored test case. Ifgovernments were increasingly violating non-derogable rights during derogationperiods then this provides evidence that the ICCPR has no sufficient constrainingeffect on state parties. I analyze whether specific individual human rights as well astwo aggregate rights measures are systematically more violated during derogationperiods in a global sample over the period 1981 to 2008. I find that regime typematters: autocracies step up 
compliance; derogation; human rights; international treaty; public emergency