Replication Data for: Intrinsic Motivation in Public Service: Theory and Evidence from State Supreme Courts
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This paper provides a theoretical and empirical analysis of the intrinsic preferences of state appellate court judges. We construct a panel data set using published decisions from all state supreme courts from 1947 to 1994. We estimate the effects of changes in judge employment conditions on a number of measures of judicial performance. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that judges are intrinsically motivated to provide high-quality decisions, and that at the margin they prefer quality over quantity. When judges face less time pressure -- whether from the introduction of an intermediate appellate court, the weakening of electoral demands, or an increased judge salary -- they write more well-researched opinions that are cited more often by later judges. These effects are strongest when judges have more discretion to select t' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["intrinsic incentives, judicial performance"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This paper provides a theoretical and empirical analysis of the intrinsic preferences of state appellate court judges. We construct a panel data set using published decisions from all state supreme courts from 1947 to 1994. We estimate the effects of changes in judge employment conditions on a number of measures of judicial performance. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that judges are intrinsically motivated to provide high-quality decisions, and that at the margin they prefer quality over quantity. When judges face less time pressure -- whether from the introduction of an intermediate appellate court, the weakening of electoral demands, or an increased judge salary -- they write more well-researched opinions that are cited more often by later judges. These effects are strongest when judges have more discretion to select t' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
This paper provides a theoretical and empirical analysis of the intrinsic preferences of state appellate court judges. We construct a panel data set using published decisions from all state supreme courts from 1947 to 1994. We estimate the effects of changes in judge employment conditions on a number of measures of judicial performance. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that judges are intrinsically motivated to provide high-quality decisions, and that at the margin they prefer quality over quantity. When judges face less time pressure -- whether from the introduction of an intermediate appellate court, the weakening of electoral demands, or an increased judge salary -- they write more well-researched opinions that are cited more often by later judges. These effects are strongest when judges have more discretion to select t
intrinsic incentives, judicial performance