Replication Data for: Populism and Candidate Support in the US: The Effects of “Thin” and “Host” Ideology
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Much of the contemporary literature on populism focuses on its status as a 'thin' ideology comprising three key components: people-centrism, anti-elitism, and anti-pluralism. Populist politicians pair this 'thin' ideology with extreme positions on policy issues such as immigration or taxation (referred to as host  or 'thick' ideologies). A recent study using German samples leveraged conjoint experiments to disentangle the effects of these appeals on vote choice. The results not only showed that extreme host-ideological positions mattered more than so-called 'thin' populist appeals, but also that effects of populist appeals were nearly identical among populist and non-populist voters. Our replication in the US context reaffirms both the importance of host-ideological positions and the lack of heterogeneous effects by voters' 'thin' popul' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["conjoint experiment","populism","public opinion"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Much of the contemporary literature on populism focuses on its status as a 'thin' ideology comprising three key components: people-centrism, anti-elitism, and anti-pluralism. Populist politicians pair this 'thin' ideology with extreme positions on policy issues such as immigration or taxation (referred to as host  or 'thick' ideologies). A recent study using German samples leveraged conjoint experiments to disentangle the effects of these appeals on vote choice. The results not only showed that extreme host-ideological positions mattered more than so-called 'thin' populist appeals, but also that effects of populist appeals were nearly identical among populist and non-populist voters. Our replication in the US context reaffirms both the importance of host-ideological positions and the lack of heterogeneous effects by voters' 'thin' popul' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Much of the contemporary literature on populism focuses on its status as a 'thin' ideology comprising three key components: people-centrism, anti-elitism, and anti-pluralism. Populist politicians pair this 'thin' ideology with extreme positions on policy issues such as immigration or taxation (referred to as host  or 'thick' ideologies). A recent study using German samples leveraged conjoint experiments to disentangle the effects of these appeals on vote choice. The results not only showed that extreme host-ideological positions mattered more than so-called 'thin' populist appeals, but also that effects of populist appeals were nearly identical among populist and non-populist voters. Our replication in the US context reaffirms both the importance of host-ideological positions and the lack of heterogeneous effects by voters' 'thin' popul
conjoint experiment; populism; public opinion