Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Screening of 2,717 SSR markers on the parental lines resulted in identification of 321 and 230 polymorphic markers on ICCRIL03 and ICCRIL04, respectively (Lichtenzveig et al. 2005; Varshney et al. 2009; Nayak et al. 2010; Gujaria et al. 2011; Thudi et al. 2011; ESM Table S2). The genotyping data were generated for the polymorphic markers on respective mapping populations. 241 marker loci including 214 SSRs, 6 GMMs and 21 DArT loci were placed on to genetic map for ICCRIL03 and 168 marker loci (151 SSRs, 10 GMMs and 7 DArT loci) in the case of ICCRIL04. In total, 62 (26.95 %) markers in the case of ICCRIL04 and 80 (24.92 %) markers in the case of ICCRIL03 remained unmapped. Varying levels of marker densities were recorded for different linkage groups (LGs) in both the maps and the average inter-marker distances were 2.71 and 3.27 cM in' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Chickpea","Drought tolerance","Genetic maps","Legumes","QTL"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Screening of 2,717 SSR markers on the parental lines resulted in identification of 321 and 230 polymorphic markers on ICCRIL03 and ICCRIL04, respectively (Lichtenzveig et al. 2005; Varshney et al. 2009; Nayak et al. 2010; Gujaria et al. 2011; Thudi et al. 2011; ESM Table S2). The genotyping data were generated for the polymorphic markers on respective mapping populations. 241 marker loci including 214 SSRs, 6 GMMs and 21 DArT loci were placed on to genetic map for ICCRIL03 and 168 marker loci (151 SSRs, 10 GMMs and 7 DArT loci) in the case of ICCRIL04. In total, 62 (26.95 %) markers in the case of ICCRIL04 and 80 (24.92 %) markers in the case of ICCRIL03 remained unmapped. Varying levels of marker densities were recorded for different linkage groups (LGs) in both the maps and the average inter-marker distances were 2.71 and 3.27 cM in' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Screening of 2,717 SSR markers on the parental lines resulted in identification of 321 and 230 polymorphic markers on ICCRIL03 and ICCRIL04, respectively (Lichtenzveig et al. 2005; Varshney et al. 2009; Nayak et al. 2010; Gujaria et al. 2011; Thudi et al. 2011; ESM Table S2). The genotyping data were generated for the polymorphic markers on respective mapping populations. 241 marker loci including 214 SSRs, 6 GMMs and 21 DArT loci were placed on to genetic map for ICCRIL03 and 168 marker loci (151 SSRs, 10 GMMs and 7 DArT loci) in the case of ICCRIL04. In total, 62 (26.95 %) markers in the case of ICCRIL04 and 80 (24.92 %) markers in the case of ICCRIL03 remained unmapped. Varying levels of marker densities were recorded for different linkage groups (LGs) in both the maps and the average inter-marker distances were 2.71 and 3.27 cM in
Chickpea; Drought tolerance; Genetic maps; Legumes; QTL