Global Spatial Distribution on Forest Classes and Uses
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Forests provide numerous ecosystem services, such as timber yields, biodiversity protection and climate change mitigation. The type of management has an eﬀect on the provision of these services. Often the demands for these services can lead to conﬂict – wood harvest can negatively impact biodiversity and climate change mitigation capacity. Although forest management diﬀerences are important, spatially explicit data is lacking, in particular on a global scale. We present here a ﬁrst systematic approach which integrates existing data to map forest management globally through downscaling national and subnational forest data. In our forest management classiﬁcation, we distinguished between two levels of forest management, with three categories each. Level 1 comprised primary, naturally regrown and planted forests. Level 2 distinguished betw' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["environmental modeling","forest management","forest resources","global distribution","land use","mapping"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Forests provide numerous ecosystem services, such as timber yields, biodiversity protection and climate change mitigation. The type of management has an eﬀect on the provision of these services. Often the demands for these services can lead to conﬂict – wood harvest can negatively impact biodiversity and climate change mitigation capacity. Although forest management diﬀerences are important, spatially explicit data is lacking, in particular on a global scale. We present here a ﬁrst systematic approach which integrates existing data to map forest management globally through downscaling national and subnational forest data. In our forest management classiﬁcation, we distinguished between two levels of forest management, with three categories each. Level 1 comprised primary, naturally regrown and planted forests. Level 2 distinguished betw' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Forests provide numerous ecosystem services, such as timber yields, biodiversity protection and climate change mitigation. The type of management has an eﬀect on the provision of these services. Often the demands for these services can lead to conﬂict – wood harvest can negatively impact biodiversity and climate change mitigation capacity. Although forest management diﬀerences are important, spatially explicit data is lacking, in particular on a global scale. We present here a ﬁrst systematic approach which integrates existing data to map forest management globally through downscaling national and subnational forest data. In our forest management classiﬁcation, we distinguished between two levels of forest management, with three categories each. Level 1 comprised primary, naturally regrown and planted forests. Level 2 distinguished betw
environmental modeling; forest management; forest resources; global distribution; land use; mapping