Dataset on framework for policy research in SSF
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Researchers, funders, and practitioners working to improve small-scale fisheries governance through action-oriented research partnerships must address a series of questions: How does policy and institutional change happen? Where are the opportunities for research to most constructively contribute? And, what role(s) do we, as researchers, seek to play? Building upon research on the political economy of policy reform, power dynamics, and the potential of engaged research, we propose a rubric to assess opportunities for research engagement in the policy process. Retrospectively examining three cases helps illustrate the application of this rubric and highlights different modes of research engagement—one at national level (Myanmar) and two at regional level (Pacific and Africa). We draw from literature review and applied experience a series' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["change processes","Institutions","Policy","Small scale Fisheries"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Researchers, funders, and practitioners working to improve small-scale fisheries governance through action-oriented research partnerships must address a series of questions: How does policy and institutional change happen? Where are the opportunities for research to most constructively contribute? And, what role(s) do we, as researchers, seek to play? Building upon research on the political economy of policy reform, power dynamics, and the potential of engaged research, we propose a rubric to assess opportunities for research engagement in the policy process. Retrospectively examining three cases helps illustrate the application of this rubric and highlights different modes of research engagement—one at national level (Myanmar) and two at regional level (Pacific and Africa). We draw from literature review and applied experience a series' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Researchers, funders, and practitioners working to improve small-scale fisheries governance through action-oriented research partnerships must address a series of questions: How does policy and institutional change happen? Where are the opportunities for research to most constructively contribute? And, what role(s) do we, as researchers, seek to play? Building upon research on the political economy of policy reform, power dynamics, and the potential of engaged research, we propose a rubric to assess opportunities for research engagement in the policy process. Retrospectively examining three cases helps illustrate the application of this rubric and highlights different modes of research engagement—one at national level (Myanmar) and two at regional level (Pacific and Africa). We draw from literature review and applied experience a series
change processes; Institutions; Policy; Small scale Fisheries