Analysis of difficult decisions in categorization rehabilitation reviews in the Cochrane library
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In 2017, Cochrane Rehabilitation created an online relational database to crowd-source the “tagging” of Cochrane publications, both protocols and completed reviews, for relevance to rehabilitation. Rehabilitation professionals were invited to contribute to this tagging work through a public call for interest.  Twenty-five people from 13 countries responded to this call.  We set up the tagging system to allow one rehabilitation physician and one allied health professional to independently categorize all Cochrane reviews for: a) relevance to rehabilitation, b) relevance to specific professional groups, and c) broad areas of clinical practice by patient pathology. We resolved all disagreements between contributors by discussing these reviews during Review Committee meetings, which involved two physiotherapists and one physician, to ensure ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Evidence-based practice","Rehabilitation","Systematic review"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In 2017, Cochrane Rehabilitation created an online relational database to crowd-source the “tagging” of Cochrane publications, both protocols and completed reviews, for relevance to rehabilitation. Rehabilitation professionals were invited to contribute to this tagging work through a public call for interest.  Twenty-five people from 13 countries responded to this call.  We set up the tagging system to allow one rehabilitation physician and one allied health professional to independently categorize all Cochrane reviews for: a) relevance to rehabilitation, b) relevance to specific professional groups, and c) broad areas of clinical practice by patient pathology. We resolved all disagreements between contributors by discussing these reviews during Review Committee meetings, which involved two physiotherapists and one physician, to ensure ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
In 2017, Cochrane Rehabilitation created an online relational database to crowd-source the “tagging” of Cochrane publications, both protocols and completed reviews, for relevance to rehabilitation. Rehabilitation professionals were invited to contribute to this tagging work through a public call for interest.  Twenty-five people from 13 countries responded to this call.  We set up the tagging system to allow one rehabilitation physician and one allied health professional to independently categorize all Cochrane reviews for: a) relevance to rehabilitation, b) relevance to specific professional groups, and c) broad areas of clinical practice by patient pathology. We resolved all disagreements between contributors by discussing these reviews during Review Committee meetings, which involved two physiotherapists and one physician, to ensure 
Evidence-based practice; Rehabilitation; Systematic review