Replication Data for: Gender and Status in American Political Science: Who determines whether a scholar is noteworthy?
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This article investigates gender disparities in status construction in American political science, focusing on three questions: 1) Do institutions within the discipline of political science – including departments, APSA, editorial boards, academic honor societies – reflect or remedy gender disparities that exist in many forms of recognition, including appointments to top leadership and citations? 2) Are institutions with centralized and accountable appointment mechanisms less gender skewed compared to networked and decentralized selection processes where implicit bias may go unchecked? 3) Do  efforts of women to lean in—to publish and to claim a seat at leadership tables—increase the likelihood that higher level status positions will follow?   We find that the distribution of highest status positions is still gender skewed, that women ar' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Political Science, Gender"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This article investigates gender disparities in status construction in American political science, focusing on three questions: 1) Do institutions within the discipline of political science – including departments, APSA, editorial boards, academic honor societies – reflect or remedy gender disparities that exist in many forms of recognition, including appointments to top leadership and citations? 2) Are institutions with centralized and accountable appointment mechanisms less gender skewed compared to networked and decentralized selection processes where implicit bias may go unchecked? 3) Do  efforts of women to lean in—to publish and to claim a seat at leadership tables—increase the likelihood that higher level status positions will follow?   We find that the distribution of highest status positions is still gender skewed, that women ar' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
This article investigates gender disparities in status construction in American political science, focusing on three questions: 1) Do institutions within the discipline of political science – including departments, APSA, editorial boards, academic honor societies – reflect or remedy gender disparities that exist in many forms of recognition, including appointments to top leadership and citations? 2) Are institutions with centralized and accountable appointment mechanisms less gender skewed compared to networked and decentralized selection processes where implicit bias may go unchecked? 3) Do  efforts of women to lean in—to publish and to claim a seat at leadership tables—increase the likelihood that higher level status positions will follow?   We find that the distribution of highest status positions is still gender skewed, that women ar
Political Science, Gender