Replication Data for: All the President's Justices? The Impact of Presidential Copartisanship on Supreme Court Job Approval
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Supreme Court job approval is sensibly connected to its decisions, particularly salient ones. We fill a gap in the literature by theorizing—via a presidential appointment mechanism—how partisan alignment with the incumbent president (“presidential co-partisanship”) influences Supreme Court job approval. Analysis of data from 1986-2019 (supplemented by longer-term confidence data) shows that a president’s co-partisans are significantly more approving of the Court than out-partisans. Analysis of The American Panel Survey (TAPS) surrounding high-salience events during the transition from Obama to Trump shows that Republicans, who significantly increase in Court approval following Trump’s election victory, are anticipatory of Trump’s prospects of changing the Court. Democrats, whose approval significantly declines only after Justice Gorsuch’' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Job approval","Presidential co-partisanship","Presidents","Separation of powers","Supreme Courts"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Supreme Court job approval is sensibly connected to its decisions, particularly salient ones. We fill a gap in the literature by theorizing—via a presidential appointment mechanism—how partisan alignment with the incumbent president (“presidential co-partisanship”) influences Supreme Court job approval. Analysis of data from 1986-2019 (supplemented by longer-term confidence data) shows that a president’s co-partisans are significantly more approving of the Court than out-partisans. Analysis of The American Panel Survey (TAPS) surrounding high-salience events during the transition from Obama to Trump shows that Republicans, who significantly increase in Court approval following Trump’s election victory, are anticipatory of Trump’s prospects of changing the Court. Democrats, whose approval significantly declines only after Justice Gorsuch’' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Supreme Court job approval is sensibly connected to its decisions, particularly salient ones. We fill a gap in the literature by theorizing—via a presidential appointment mechanism—how partisan alignment with the incumbent president (“presidential co-partisanship”) influences Supreme Court job approval. Analysis of data from 1986-2019 (supplemented by longer-term confidence data) shows that a president’s co-partisans are significantly more approving of the Court than out-partisans. Analysis of The American Panel Survey (TAPS) surrounding high-salience events during the transition from Obama to Trump shows that Republicans, who significantly increase in Court approval following Trump’s election victory, are anticipatory of Trump’s prospects of changing the Court. Democrats, whose approval significantly declines only after Justice Gorsuch’
Job approval; Presidential co-partisanship; Presidents; Separation of powers; Supreme Courts