Replication Data for: Measuring Ethnic Inequality: An Assessment of Extant Cross-National Indices
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This article offers an evaluation of cross-national measures of ethnic socioeconomic inequality. It demonstrates that the measures differ in important ways regarding empirical scope, conceptualization, measurement and aggregation. Despite significant advances in the measurement of ethnic inequality, all measures have shortcomings, such as limited and biased coverage as well as measurement error from the underlying data sources. Moreover, the empirical convergence between conceptually similar measures is strikingly low; some of the measures show no or even negative covariation. Four replication studies also indicate that extant measures of ethnic inequality are generally not interchangeable. Scholars should therefore take the various features highlighted in this evaluation into account before employing any of them. Based on this conclusi' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Data set assessment","Ethnic inequality","Horizontal inequality"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This article offers an evaluation of cross-national measures of ethnic socioeconomic inequality. It demonstrates that the measures differ in important ways regarding empirical scope, conceptualization, measurement and aggregation. Despite significant advances in the measurement of ethnic inequality, all measures have shortcomings, such as limited and biased coverage as well as measurement error from the underlying data sources. Moreover, the empirical convergence between conceptually similar measures is strikingly low; some of the measures show no or even negative covariation. Four replication studies also indicate that extant measures of ethnic inequality are generally not interchangeable. Scholars should therefore take the various features highlighted in this evaluation into account before employing any of them. Based on this conclusi' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
This article offers an evaluation of cross-national measures of ethnic socioeconomic inequality. It demonstrates that the measures differ in important ways regarding empirical scope, conceptualization, measurement and aggregation. Despite significant advances in the measurement of ethnic inequality, all measures have shortcomings, such as limited and biased coverage as well as measurement error from the underlying data sources. Moreover, the empirical convergence between conceptually similar measures is strikingly low; some of the measures show no or even negative covariation. Four replication studies also indicate that extant measures of ethnic inequality are generally not interchangeable. Scholars should therefore take the various features highlighted in this evaluation into account before employing any of them. Based on this conclusi
Data set assessment; Ethnic inequality; Horizontal inequality