Replication Data for: Building Cooperation Among Groups in Conflict: An Experiment on Intersectarian Cooperation in Lebanon
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Societies divided along ethnic or religious lines suffer from persistent conflict and underprovision of public goods.  Scholarly understanding of how to strengthen intergroup cooperation remains limited.  In this study, we set out to test the effectiveness of two interventions on intergroup cooperation: cross-group expert appeal and participation in a cross-group discussion.  The laboratory-in-the-field experiment is set in Lebanon’s capital Beirut and involves interactions between 180 Shia and 180 Sunni Muslim participants.  We find that the expert appeal increases intersectarian cooperation in settings that do not entail reciprocal exchange.  On average, cross-sectarian discussions do not improve cooperation, but those discussions where participants delve deeply into the conflict’s causes and possible remedies are associated with grea' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Clientelism","Cooperation","Discussion","Experiment","Lebanon","Muslim"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Societies divided along ethnic or religious lines suffer from persistent conflict and underprovision of public goods.  Scholarly understanding of how to strengthen intergroup cooperation remains limited.  In this study, we set out to test the effectiveness of two interventions on intergroup cooperation: cross-group expert appeal and participation in a cross-group discussion.  The laboratory-in-the-field experiment is set in Lebanon’s capital Beirut and involves interactions between 180 Shia and 180 Sunni Muslim participants.  We find that the expert appeal increases intersectarian cooperation in settings that do not entail reciprocal exchange.  On average, cross-sectarian discussions do not improve cooperation, but those discussions where participants delve deeply into the conflict’s causes and possible remedies are associated with grea' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Societies divided along ethnic or religious lines suffer from persistent conflict and underprovision of public goods.  Scholarly understanding of how to strengthen intergroup cooperation remains limited.  In this study, we set out to test the effectiveness of two interventions on intergroup cooperation: cross-group expert appeal and participation in a cross-group discussion.  The laboratory-in-the-field experiment is set in Lebanon’s capital Beirut and involves interactions between 180 Shia and 180 Sunni Muslim participants.  We find that the expert appeal increases intersectarian cooperation in settings that do not entail reciprocal exchange.  On average, cross-sectarian discussions do not improve cooperation, but those discussions where participants delve deeply into the conflict’s causes and possible remedies are associated with grea
Clientelism; Cooperation; Discussion; Experiment; Lebanon; Muslim