Replication data for: War, the Presidency, and Legislative Voting Behavior
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'An extraordinary body of scholarship suggests that war, perhaps more than any other contributor, is responsible for the emergence of a distinctly modern presidency. Central to this argument is a belief that members of Congress predictably and reliably line up behind the president during times of war. Few scholars, however, have actually subjected this argument to quantitative investigation. This paper does so. Estimating ideal points for members of Congress at the start and end of the most significant wars in the past century, we find consistent--albeit not uniform--evidence of a wartime effect. The outbreaks of both World Wars and the post-9/11 era--though not the Korean or Vietnam wars--coincided with discernible changes in member voting behavior that better reflected the ideological leanings of the presidents then in office. In the a' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Congress","Ideal point estimation","Presidents","War"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'An extraordinary body of scholarship suggests that war, perhaps more than any other contributor, is responsible for the emergence of a distinctly modern presidency. Central to this argument is a belief that members of Congress predictably and reliably line up behind the president during times of war. Few scholars, however, have actually subjected this argument to quantitative investigation. This paper does so. Estimating ideal points for members of Congress at the start and end of the most significant wars in the past century, we find consistent--albeit not uniform--evidence of a wartime effect. The outbreaks of both World Wars and the post-9/11 era--though not the Korean or Vietnam wars--coincided with discernible changes in member voting behavior that better reflected the ideological leanings of the presidents then in office. In the a' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
An extraordinary body of scholarship suggests that war, perhaps more than any other contributor, is responsible for the emergence of a distinctly modern presidency. Central to this argument is a belief that members of Congress predictably and reliably line up behind the president during times of war. Few scholars, however, have actually subjected this argument to quantitative investigation. This paper does so. Estimating ideal points for members of Congress at the start and end of the most significant wars in the past century, we find consistent--albeit not uniform--evidence of a wartime effect. The outbreaks of both World Wars and the post-9/11 era--though not the Korean or Vietnam wars--coincided with discernible changes in member voting behavior that better reflected the ideological leanings of the presidents then in office. In the a
Congress; Ideal point estimation; Presidents; War