Replication Data for: Shaping Electoral Outcomes: Intra- and Anti-systemic Violence in Indian Assembly Elections
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Electoral violence is perpetrated by anti-systemic actors opposed to the democratic system as well as by those vying for power through the electoral process. Even though the motivations for violent tactics are distinct, we do not know whether intra- and anti-systemic violence differ in their effects. Focusing on state-level elections in India – a country that combines nationwide elections with persistent political violence – we demonstrate that the distinction is crucial for understanding spatial patterns of electoral violence, and effects on election outcomes. Based on an original dataset of violence in legislative assembly elections between 1985 and 2008, we show that both tactics depress turnout overall, but that the effect is larger for anti-systemic violence. Intra-systemic violence appears to be more selectively targeted, as it is' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["violence, elections, turnout"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Electoral violence is perpetrated by anti-systemic actors opposed to the democratic system as well as by those vying for power through the electoral process. Even though the motivations for violent tactics are distinct, we do not know whether intra- and anti-systemic violence differ in their effects. Focusing on state-level elections in India – a country that combines nationwide elections with persistent political violence – we demonstrate that the distinction is crucial for understanding spatial patterns of electoral violence, and effects on election outcomes. Based on an original dataset of violence in legislative assembly elections between 1985 and 2008, we show that both tactics depress turnout overall, but that the effect is larger for anti-systemic violence. Intra-systemic violence appears to be more selectively targeted, as it is' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Electoral violence is perpetrated by anti-systemic actors opposed to the democratic system as well as by those vying for power through the electoral process. Even though the motivations for violent tactics are distinct, we do not know whether intra- and anti-systemic violence differ in their effects. Focusing on state-level elections in India – a country that combines nationwide elections with persistent political violence – we demonstrate that the distinction is crucial for understanding spatial patterns of electoral violence, and effects on election outcomes. Based on an original dataset of violence in legislative assembly elections between 1985 and 2008, we show that both tactics depress turnout overall, but that the effect is larger for anti-systemic violence. Intra-systemic violence appears to be more selectively targeted, as it is
violence, elections, turnout