Replication Data for: Factual Corrections and COVID-19 Misinformation: Evidence From Simultaneous Experiments in Ten Countries
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Replication data for 'Factual Corrections and COVID-19 Misinformation: Evidence From Simultaneous Experiments in Ten Countries.'ABSTRACT: What can be done to reduce misperceptions about COVID-19 vaccines? We present results from experiments conducted simultaneously on YouGov samples in ten countries (n=10,600), which reveal that factual corrections consistently reduce false belief about the vaccines. Globally, exposure to corrections increases belief accuracy by .16 on a 4-point scale, while exposure to misinformation decreases belief accuracy by .09 on the same scale. Neither misinformation nor factual corrections affect intent-to-vaccinate or vaccine attitudes. We find modest evidence that the effects of fact-checks endure, with 39% of the original correction effect in the direction of greater accuracy still detectable two weeks afte' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Misinformation"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Replication data for 'Factual Corrections and COVID-19 Misinformation: Evidence From Simultaneous Experiments in Ten Countries.'ABSTRACT: What can be done to reduce misperceptions about COVID-19 vaccines? We present results from experiments conducted simultaneously on YouGov samples in ten countries (n=10,600), which reveal that factual corrections consistently reduce false belief about the vaccines. Globally, exposure to corrections increases belief accuracy by .16 on a 4-point scale, while exposure to misinformation decreases belief accuracy by .09 on the same scale. Neither misinformation nor factual corrections affect intent-to-vaccinate or vaccine attitudes. We find modest evidence that the effects of fact-checks endure, with 39% of the original correction effect in the direction of greater accuracy still detectable two weeks afte' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Replication data for 'Factual Corrections and COVID-19 Misinformation: Evidence From Simultaneous Experiments in Ten Countries.'ABSTRACT: What can be done to reduce misperceptions about COVID-19 vaccines? We present results from experiments conducted simultaneously on YouGov samples in ten countries (n=10,600), which reveal that factual corrections consistently reduce false belief about the vaccines. Globally, exposure to corrections increases belief accuracy by .16 on a 4-point scale, while exposure to misinformation decreases belief accuracy by .09 on the same scale. Neither misinformation nor factual corrections affect intent-to-vaccinate or vaccine attitudes. We find modest evidence that the effects of fact-checks endure, with 39% of the original correction effect in the direction of greater accuracy still detectable two weeks afte
Misinformation