Replication Data for: 'Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media'
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The below data and code replicates the main and appendix analyses for 'Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media'An important caveat to this data: by user agreements, we are unable to share the full text of either the Facebook or tweets. We created a unique identifier (id for Facebook and tweet_id for Twitter) that, alongside the handles/user names, can be used to rehydrate and gather the posts we used for this paper. We are happy to discuss the data limitations and how we gathered the data in more detail. Interest groups often post about their judicial advocacy on social media. We argue that they do so for two main reasons. First, providing information about the courts on social media builds the group’s credibility as a source of information with policymakers, media, and the public. Second, ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["amicus briefs","interest groups","social media","supreme court"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The below data and code replicates the main and appendix analyses for 'Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media'An important caveat to this data: by user agreements, we are unable to share the full text of either the Facebook or tweets. We created a unique identifier (id for Facebook and tweet_id for Twitter) that, alongside the handles/user names, can be used to rehydrate and gather the posts we used for this paper. We are happy to discuss the data limitations and how we gathered the data in more detail. Interest groups often post about their judicial advocacy on social media. We argue that they do so for two main reasons. First, providing information about the courts on social media builds the group’s credibility as a source of information with policymakers, media, and the public. Second, ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
The below data and code replicates the main and appendix analyses for 'Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media'An important caveat to this data: by user agreements, we are unable to share the full text of either the Facebook or tweets. We created a unique identifier (id for Facebook and tweet_id for Twitter) that, alongside the handles/user names, can be used to rehydrate and gather the posts we used for this paper. We are happy to discuss the data limitations and how we gathered the data in more detail. Interest groups often post about their judicial advocacy on social media. We argue that they do so for two main reasons. First, providing information about the courts on social media builds the group’s credibility as a source of information with policymakers, media, and the public. Second, 
amicus briefs; interest groups; social media; supreme court