Replication Data for: Vigilantes and the state: understanding violence through a security assemblages approach
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The notion that states pursue a monopoly over the use of force rings increasingly hollow. From vigilantes that patrol the US’s southern border to thugs for hire in China, states are characterized by non-state violent actors. These trends are more pronounced in comparatively lower-capacity states. Employing the concept of “security assemblages,” this article proposes that it is crucial to consider historically-embedded relations among violent actors and institutions in order to understand their role and implications for state authority. This approach offers three insights: first, in low-capacity states, violence is not zero-sum. Rather, it is assembled among diverse actors, which have historically embedded comparative advantages. Therefore, second, state efforts to monopolize violence should be taken as an empirical question rather than a' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["monopoly on violence, vigilantes, the state, policing, Uganda"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The notion that states pursue a monopoly over the use of force rings increasingly hollow. From vigilantes that patrol the US’s southern border to thugs for hire in China, states are characterized by non-state violent actors. These trends are more pronounced in comparatively lower-capacity states. Employing the concept of “security assemblages,” this article proposes that it is crucial to consider historically-embedded relations among violent actors and institutions in order to understand their role and implications for state authority. This approach offers three insights: first, in low-capacity states, violence is not zero-sum. Rather, it is assembled among diverse actors, which have historically embedded comparative advantages. Therefore, second, state efforts to monopolize violence should be taken as an empirical question rather than a' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
The notion that states pursue a monopoly over the use of force rings increasingly hollow. From vigilantes that patrol the US’s southern border to thugs for hire in China, states are characterized by non-state violent actors. These trends are more pronounced in comparatively lower-capacity states. Employing the concept of “security assemblages,” this article proposes that it is crucial to consider historically-embedded relations among violent actors and institutions in order to understand their role and implications for state authority. This approach offers three insights: first, in low-capacity states, violence is not zero-sum. Rather, it is assembled among diverse actors, which have historically embedded comparative advantages. Therefore, second, state efforts to monopolize violence should be taken as an empirical question rather than a
monopoly on violence, vigilantes, the state, policing, Uganda