Replication Data for: The Impact of Elite Frames and Motivated Reasoning on Beliefs in a Global Warming Conspiracy: The Promise and Limits of Trust
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Given the potential attitudinal and behavioral impact of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) conspiracy beliefs, it is important to understand their causes and moderators. Here, I engage two explanations for the variation in these beliefs: the first is the choice among elites to frame AGW using the phrase 'global warming' (GW) as opposed to 'climate change' (CC); the second is partisan motivated reasoning. I then develop a theory about the role of trust in moderating the impact of the two frames on AGW conspiracy beliefs. In the case of CC, which is perceived as less severe than GW (and is therefore less identity threatening among Republicans), I hypothesize that trust will moderate hoax beliefs among Republicans. In the case of GW, where the implications of existence beliefs have more unpleasant policy consequences, motivated reasoning ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Climate Change","Conspiracy Theory","Elite Framing","Global Warming","Hoax","Motivated Reasoning","Question Experiment","Trust"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Given the potential attitudinal and behavioral impact of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) conspiracy beliefs, it is important to understand their causes and moderators. Here, I engage two explanations for the variation in these beliefs: the first is the choice among elites to frame AGW using the phrase 'global warming' (GW) as opposed to 'climate change' (CC); the second is partisan motivated reasoning. I then develop a theory about the role of trust in moderating the impact of the two frames on AGW conspiracy beliefs. In the case of CC, which is perceived as less severe than GW (and is therefore less identity threatening among Republicans), I hypothesize that trust will moderate hoax beliefs among Republicans. In the case of GW, where the implications of existence beliefs have more unpleasant policy consequences, motivated reasoning ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Given the potential attitudinal and behavioral impact of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) conspiracy beliefs, it is important to understand their causes and moderators. Here, I engage two explanations for the variation in these beliefs: the first is the choice among elites to frame AGW using the phrase 'global warming' (GW) as opposed to 'climate change' (CC); the second is partisan motivated reasoning. I then develop a theory about the role of trust in moderating the impact of the two frames on AGW conspiracy beliefs. In the case of CC, which is perceived as less severe than GW (and is therefore less identity threatening among Republicans), I hypothesize that trust will moderate hoax beliefs among Republicans. In the case of GW, where the implications of existence beliefs have more unpleasant policy consequences, motivated reasoning 
Climate Change; Conspiracy Theory; Elite Framing; Global Warming; Hoax; Motivated Reasoning; Question Experiment; Trust