Replication Data for The Supreme Court as an Electoral Issue: Evidence from Three Studies
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Judicial nominations, particularly those to the Supreme Court, have been a salient topic in recent presidential and senate elections. However, there has been little research to determine whether judicial nominations motivate political behavior. Across three studies we demonstrate the important role judicial nominations play in influencing political behavior. In Study One, we analyze the extent to which voters perceive judicial nominations as an important electoral issue. We find that Republicans ---and especially strong Republicans ---are more likely to perceive judicial nominations as important. In Study Two, we analyze how congruence with an incumbent Senator's judicial confirmation votes influences voters' decision to vote for the incumbent. We find that congruence with a Senator's judicial confirmation votes is a strong predictor of' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Supreme Court","Elections","Political Behavior","Judicial Nominations"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Judicial nominations, particularly those to the Supreme Court, have been a salient topic in recent presidential and senate elections. However, there has been little research to determine whether judicial nominations motivate political behavior. Across three studies we demonstrate the important role judicial nominations play in influencing political behavior. In Study One, we analyze the extent to which voters perceive judicial nominations as an important electoral issue. We find that Republicans ---and especially strong Republicans ---are more likely to perceive judicial nominations as important. In Study Two, we analyze how congruence with an incumbent Senator's judicial confirmation votes influences voters' decision to vote for the incumbent. We find that congruence with a Senator's judicial confirmation votes is a strong predictor of' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Judicial nominations, particularly those to the Supreme Court, have been a salient topic in recent presidential and senate elections. However, there has been little research to determine whether judicial nominations motivate political behavior. Across three studies we demonstrate the important role judicial nominations play in influencing political behavior. In Study One, we analyze the extent to which voters perceive judicial nominations as an important electoral issue. We find that Republicans ---and especially strong Republicans ---are more likely to perceive judicial nominations as important. In Study Two, we analyze how congruence with an incumbent Senator's judicial confirmation votes influences voters' decision to vote for the incumbent. We find that congruence with a Senator's judicial confirmation votes is a strong predictor of
Supreme Court; Elections; Political Behavior; Judicial Nominations