Replication For: Punctuated Equilibrium and Progressive Friction in Socialist Autocracy, Democracy and Hybrid Regimes
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The analysis of public policy agendas in comparative politics has been somewhat limited in terms of geography, time frame and political system with studies on full-blown autocracies and hybrid regimes few and far between. This article addresses this gap by comparing policy dynamics in three Hungarian regimes over 73 years. Besides our theoretical contribution related to policy-making in Socialist autocracy and illiberal democracy we also test hypotheses related to non-democratic regimes. We find that–similarly to developed democracies–policy agendas in autocracies are mostly stable with occasional but large-scale 'punctuations'. Our data also confirms that these punctuations are more pronounced in non-democratic polities. However, based on our results, illiberal political systems, such as the hybrid regime of Viktor Orbán, are difficult' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["policy agendas","punctuated equilibrium theory","institutional friction","democratic and non-democratic regimes","hybrid regimes","Hungary"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The analysis of public policy agendas in comparative politics has been somewhat limited in terms of geography, time frame and political system with studies on full-blown autocracies and hybrid regimes few and far between. This article addresses this gap by comparing policy dynamics in three Hungarian regimes over 73 years. Besides our theoretical contribution related to policy-making in Socialist autocracy and illiberal democracy we also test hypotheses related to non-democratic regimes. We find that–similarly to developed democracies–policy agendas in autocracies are mostly stable with occasional but large-scale 'punctuations'. Our data also confirms that these punctuations are more pronounced in non-democratic polities. However, based on our results, illiberal political systems, such as the hybrid regime of Viktor Orbán, are difficult' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
The analysis of public policy agendas in comparative politics has been somewhat limited in terms of geography, time frame and political system with studies on full-blown autocracies and hybrid regimes few and far between. This article addresses this gap by comparing policy dynamics in three Hungarian regimes over 73 years. Besides our theoretical contribution related to policy-making in Socialist autocracy and illiberal democracy we also test hypotheses related to non-democratic regimes. We find that–similarly to developed democracies–policy agendas in autocracies are mostly stable with occasional but large-scale 'punctuations'. Our data also confirms that these punctuations are more pronounced in non-democratic polities. However, based on our results, illiberal political systems, such as the hybrid regime of Viktor Orbán, are difficult
policy agendas; punctuated equilibrium theory; institutional friction; democratic and non-democratic regimes; hybrid regimes; Hungary