Smallest compiler ever
Yesterday, I stuck in the internet with this article about programming language called `BrainFuck`.
[http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/][1]


  [1]: http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/

So what is wonder me is this

      Brainfuck is the ungodly creation of Urban Müller, whose goal was apparently 
    to create a Turing-complete language for which he could write the smallest
    compiler ever, for the Amiga OS 2.0.  His compiler was 240 bytes in size. 
    (Though he improved upon this later -- he informed me at one point that
    he had managed to bring it under 200 bytes.)

So, is it smallest compiler of Turing-complete programming languages really today?
And is it proven that smaller compiler doesn't exist anyway?

Is there any results in this area. It's really interested me, is there any smallest value of size of Turing-complete programming language's compiller and what is that value?


Smallest compiler ever
===

Yesterday, I stuck in the internet with this article about programming language called `BrainFuck`.
[http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/][1]


  [1]: http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/

So what is wonder me is this

      Brainfuck is the ungodly creation of Urban Müller, whose goal was apparently 
    to create a Turing-complete language for which he could write the smallest
    compiler ever, for the Amiga OS 2.0.  His compiler was 240 bytes in size. 
    (Though he improved upon this later -- he informed me at one point that
    he had managed to bring it under 200 bytes.)

So, is it smallest compiler of Turing-complete programming languages really today?
And is it proven that smaller compiler doesn't exist anyway?

Is there any results in this area. It's really interested me, is there any smallest value of size of Turing-complete programming language's compiller and what is that value?

