SURF description faster with FAST detecion?
for my master thesis, i am running some test on the SIFT SURF en FAST algoritms for logo detection on smartphones.

when i simply time the detection, description en matching for some methods i get the following results.

For a SURF detector and SURF descriptor:

180 keypoints found

 - 1,994 seconds keypoint calculation time   (SURF) 
   
 - 4,516 seconds description time   (SURF)

 - 0.282 seconds matching time      (SURF)



when I use a FAST detector in stead of the SURF detector

319 keypoints found

 - 0.023 seconds keypoint calculation time   (FAST)

 - 1.295 seconds description time   (SURF)

 - 0.397 seconds matching time      (SURF)


The FAST detector is much faster than the SURF detector, and even detects almost twice as many keypoints 100 times faster. These results are predictable.

The next step though is not a predicted result. How is it possible that de SURF descriptor is faster with the 319 FAST keypoints then with the 180 SURF keypoints.

From what I know, the description has no relation with the detection algorithm... yet these results are not as predicted.

does any one know how this is possible?
SURF description faster with FAST detecion?
===

for my master thesis, i am running some test on the SIFT SURF en FAST algoritms for logo detection on smartphones.

when i simply time the detection, description en matching for some methods i get the following results.

For a SURF detector and SURF descriptor:

180 keypoints found

 - 1,994 seconds keypoint calculation time   (SURF) 
   
 - 4,516 seconds description time   (SURF)

 - 0.282 seconds matching time      (SURF)



when I use a FAST detector in stead of the SURF detector

319 keypoints found

 - 0.023 seconds keypoint calculation time   (FAST)

 - 1.295 seconds description time   (SURF)

 - 0.397 seconds matching time      (SURF)


The FAST detector is much faster than the SURF detector, and even detects almost twice as many keypoints 100 times faster. These results are predictable.

The next step though is not a predicted result. How is it possible that de SURF descriptor is faster with the 319 FAST keypoints then with the 180 SURF keypoints.

From what I know, the description has no relation with the detection algorithm... yet these results are not as predicted.

does any one know how this is possible?