what is the design decision behind it?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.object(v=vs.100).aspx

In the above link Equals(Object) and Equals(Object,Object) are methods used to compare objects.

But in the Type class to compare instead of methods we have Operators as Type member(Equality and Inequality).
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.type.aspx

Why it is like that? Is there any design decision? Any thoughts.
Thank you,
Smith

what is the design decision behind it?
===

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.object(v=vs.100).aspx

In the above link Equals(Object) and Equals(Object,Object) are methods used to compare objects.

But in the Type class to compare instead of methods we have Operators as Type member(Equality and Inequality).
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.type.aspx

Why it is like that? Is there any design decision? Any thoughts.
Thank you,
Smith
