Datasets:

Modalities:
Text
Formats:
json
Languages:
English
Libraries:
Datasets
Dask
License:
Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet
image
stringlengths
98
98
prompt
stringclasses
62 values
answer
stringlengths
262
778
cot
stringclasses
127 values
final_diagnosis
dict
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the patella medial subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the patella medial subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"patella medial BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [77, 109, 266, 325, 191, 304], "final_diagnosis": {"patella medial BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 77, 109, 266, 325, 191, 304 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the patella lateral subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the patella lateral subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"patella lateral BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [46, 80, 267, 324, 189, 304], "final_diagnosis": {"patella lateral BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 46, 80, 267, 324, 189, 304 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the femur medial trochlea subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur medial trochlea subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial trochlea BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is an increased signal intensity in the subregion. It's size is less than 33% of the subregion. There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [79, 133, 156, 257, 181, 251], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial trochlea BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 1, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is an increased signal intensity in the subregion. It's size is less than 33% of the subregion. There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 79, 133, 156, 257, 181, 251 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 1 }, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the femur medial central subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur medial central subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial central BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [77, 131, 106, 235, 154, 247], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial central BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 77, 131, 106, 235, 154, 247 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the femur medial posterior subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur medial posterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial posterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [76, 132, 86, 196, 167, 248], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial posterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 76, 132, 86, 196, 167, 248 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the femur lateral trochlea subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur lateral trochlea subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral trochlea BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [40, 79, 188, 268, 181, 257], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral trochlea BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 40, 79, 188, 268, 181, 257 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the femur lateral central subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur lateral central subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral central BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [36, 79, 129, 231, 167, 254], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral central BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 36, 79, 129, 231, 167, 254 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the femur lateral posterior subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur lateral posterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral posterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [32, 77, 93, 192, 173, 256], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral posterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 32, 77, 93, 192, 173, 256 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the tibia medial anterior subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia medial anterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial anterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [78, 125, 156, 224, 0, 163], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial anterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 78, 125, 156, 224, 0, 163 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the tibia medial central subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia medial central subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial central BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [78, 126, 126, 177, 0, 172], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial central BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 78, 126, 126, 177, 0, 172 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the tibia medial posterior subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia medial posterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial posterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [77, 128, 79, 133, 0, 164], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial posterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 77, 128, 79, 133, 0, 164 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the tibia lateral anterior subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia lateral anterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral anterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [20, 70, 155, 231, 1, 150], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral anterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 20, 70, 155, 231, 1, 150 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the tibia lateral central subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia lateral central subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral central BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [20, 70, 129, 176, 0, 170], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral central BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 20, 70, 129, 176, 0, 170 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the tibia lateral posterior subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia lateral posterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral posterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [18, 70, 84, 138, 0, 167], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral posterior BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 18, 70, 84, 138, 0, 167 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 }, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose bone-marrow lesions (BMLs) in the tibia subspinous subregion? BMLs are scored using three MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33% of subregion, Grade 2: 33-66% of subregion, Grade 3: >66% of subregion), Number (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: 1 BML, Grade 2: 2 BMLs, Grade 3: ≥3 BMLs), and % of lesion that is BML excluding cyst (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <33%, Grade 2: 33-66%, Grade 3: >66%). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia subspinous subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size, number of BMLs, and percent of lesion that is BML. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia subspinous BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": (grade from 0-3), "Number of BML within subregion": (grade from 0-3), "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [66, 84, 81, 230, 0, 170], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia subspinous BML": {"Size of BML (including cyst)": 0, "Number of BML within subregion": 0, "% of lesion that is BML (excluding cyst)": 0}}}
I should detect hyperintense areas (BMLs) vs. normal low-signal bone; exclude vascular streaks (normal). There is no signal intensity difference in the bone, which makes it normal. The lesion is purely cystic.
{ "bounding_box": [ 66, 84, 81, 230, 0, 170 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": { "%_of_lesion_that_is_BML_(excluding_cyst)": 0, "Number_of_BML_within_subregion": 0, "Size_of_BML_(including_cyst)": 0 } } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the patella medial subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the patella medial subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"patella medial cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [77, 109, 266, 325, 191, 304], "final_diagnosis": {"patella medial cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 77, 109, 266, 325, 191, 304 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the patella lateral subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the patella lateral subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"patella lateral cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [46, 80, 267, 324, 189, 304], "final_diagnosis": {"patella lateral cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 46, 80, 267, 324, 189, 304 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the femur medial trochlea subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur medial trochlea subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial trochlea cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is loss of cartilage in the subregion. The lesion is less than 10% of the surface area of the subregion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [79, 133, 156, 257, 181, 251], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial trochlea cartilage lesion": {"size": 1, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is loss of cartilage in the subregion. The lesion is less than 10% of the surface area of the subregion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 79, 133, 156, 257, 181, 251 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 1 }, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the femur medial central subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur medial central subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial central cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [77, 131, 106, 235, 154, 247], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial central cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 77, 131, 106, 235, 154, 247 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the femur medial posterior subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur medial posterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial posterior cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [76, 132, 86, 196, 167, 248], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial posterior cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 76, 132, 86, 196, 167, 248 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the femur lateral trochlea subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur lateral trochlea subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral trochlea cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [40, 79, 188, 268, 181, 257], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral trochlea cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 40, 79, 188, 268, 181, 257 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the femur lateral central subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur lateral central subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral central cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [36, 79, 129, 231, 167, 254], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral central cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 36, 79, 129, 231, 167, 254 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the femur lateral posterior subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur lateral posterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral posterior cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [32, 77, 93, 192, 173, 256], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral posterior cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 32, 77, 93, 192, 173, 256 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the tibia medial anterior subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia medial anterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial anterior cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [78, 125, 156, 224, 0, 163], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial anterior cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 78, 125, 156, 224, 0, 163 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the tibia medial central subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia medial central subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial central cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [78, 126, 126, 177, 0, 172], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial central cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 78, 126, 126, 177, 0, 172 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the tibia medial posterior subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia medial posterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial posterior cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [77, 128, 79, 133, 0, 164], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial posterior cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 77, 128, 79, 133, 0, 164 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the tibia lateral anterior subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia lateral anterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral anterior cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [20, 70, 155, 231, 1, 150], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral anterior cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 20, 70, 155, 231, 1, 150 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the tibia lateral central subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia lateral central subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral central cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [20, 70, 129, 176, 0, 170], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral central cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 20, 70, 129, 176, 0, 170 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the tibia lateral posterior subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia lateral posterior subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral posterior cartilage lesion": {"Size of lesion": (grade from 0-3), "Depth of lesion": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [18, 70, 84, 138, 0, 167], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral posterior cartilage lesion": {"size": 0, "depth": 0}}}
The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 18, 70, 84, 138, 0, 167 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": { "depth": 0, "size": 0 }, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the patella superior location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the patella region, and the MOAKS grade. Represent the MOAKS grade in this format: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"patella superior osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [46, 109, 266, 325, 189, 304], "final_diagnosis": {"patella superior osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 46, 109, 266, 325, 189, 304 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the patella inferior location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the patella region, and the MOAKS grade. Represent the MOAKS grade in this format: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"patella inferior osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [46, 109, 266, 325, 189, 304], "final_diagnosis": {"patella inferior osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 46, 109, 266, 325, 189, 304 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the patella medial location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the patella medial region, and the MOAKS grade. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS grade: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"patella medial osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [77, 109, 266, 325, 191, 304], "final_diagnosis": {"patella medial osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 77, 109, 266, 325, 191, 304 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the patella lateral location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the patella lateral region, and the MOAKS grade. Represent the MOAKS grade in this format: {"patella lateral osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [46, 80, 267, 324, 189, 304], "final_diagnosis": {"patella lateral osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 46, 80, 267, 324, 189, 304 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the femur medial anterior location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur medial anterior region, and the MOAKS grade. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS grade: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial anterior osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [79, 133, 156, 257, 181, 251], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial anterior osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 79, 133, 156, 257, 181, 251 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the femur medial central location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur medial central region, and the MOAKS grade. Represent the MOAKS grade in this format: {"femur medial central osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [40, 79, 188, 268, 181, 257], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial central osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 40, 79, 188, 268, 181, 257 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the femur medial posterior location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur medial posterior region, and the MOAKS grade. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS grade: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial posterior osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [76, 132, 86, 196, 167, 248], "final_diagnosis": {"femur medial posterior osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 76, 132, 86, 196, 167, 248 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the femur lateral anterior location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur lateral anterior region, and the MOAKS grade. Represent the MOAKS grade in this format: {"femur lateral anterior osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [32, 77, 93, 192, 173, 256], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral anterior osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 32, 77, 93, 192, 173, 256 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the femur lateral central location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur lateral central region, and the MOAKS grade. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS grade: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral central osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [36, 79, 129, 231, 167, 254], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral central osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 36, 79, 129, 231, 167, 254 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the femur lateral posterior location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur lateral posterior region, and the MOAKS grade. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS grade: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral posterior osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [32, 77, 93, 192, 173, 256], "final_diagnosis": {"femur lateral posterior osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 32, 77, 93, 192, 173, 256 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the tibia medial location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia medial region, and the MOAKS grade. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS grade: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [78, 125, 156, 224, 0, 163], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia medial osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 78, 125, 156, 224, 0, 163 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, identify and grade the osteophyte at the tibia lateral location. Osteophytes are scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Small, Grade 2: Medium, Grade 3: Large. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the tibia lateral region, and the MOAKS grade. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS grade: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral osteophyte": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [20, 70, 155, 231, 1, 150], "final_diagnosis": {"tibia lateral osteophyte": {"grade": 0}}}
Osteophytes, also known as bony spurs, are shown as bumps or projections that stick out from the bones. They are graded according to size. If there are multiple osteophytes in a given subregion, the largest will be evaluated. The size of osteophyte should reflect protuberance (how far the osteophyte extends from the joint) rather than total volume of osteophyte. There is no bony protrusion from the anatomic contour of the bone in this subregion.
{ "bounding_box": [ 20, 70, 155, 231, 1, 150 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": { "grade": 0 }, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, assess Hoffa-synovitis. Hoffa-synovitis is scored using MOAKS grading based on the hyperintensity (brightness) in Hoffa's fat pad: Grade 0: Normal (fat pad looks dark throughout with minimal traceable linear streaks), Grade 1: Mild (fat pad looks dark in general but with some mild areas of hyperintensity), Grade 2: Moderate (fat pad shows some moderate areas of hyperintensity), Grade 3: Severe (fat pad shows severe areas of hyperintensity). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the Hoffa region, and the MOAKS grade. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS score: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"Hoffa-Synovitis": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The Hoffa's fat pad is located between the patella inferior border, the patellar tendon, the femur trochlear articular surface, the menisci, and the tibia anterior part. It is well seen in the sagittal view on the DESS image. The degree of Hoffa-Synovitis is graded by the hyperintensity (brightness) in Hoffa's fat pad. The score is based on size: 0= normal; 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe. The Hoffa's fat pad looks dark throughout the image, which is normal, There are some traceable linear streaks, but minimal. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [46, 100, 193, 298, 75, 228], "final_diagnosis": {"Hoffa-Synovitis": {"grade": 0}}}
The Hoffa's fat pad is located between the patella inferior border, the patellar tendon, the femur trochlear articular surface, the menisci, and the tibia anterior part. It is well seen in the sagittal view on the DESS image. The degree of Hoffa-Synovitis is graded by the hyperintensity (brightness) in Hoffa's fat pad. The score is based on size: 0= normal; 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe. The Hoffa's fat pad looks dark throughout the image, which is normal, There are some traceable linear streaks, but minimal.
{ "bounding_box": [ 46, 100, 193, 298, 75, 228 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": { "grade": 0 }, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, assess effusion-synovitis. Effusion-synovitis is scored using MOAKS grading based on the size of the fluid signal in the joint cavity: Grade 0: Physiologic amount of fluid, Grade 1: Small amount of fluid continuous in the retropatellar space, Grade 2: Medium amount of fluid, with slight convexity of the suprapatellar bursa, Grade 3: Large amount of fluid, causing capsular distension. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the effusion, and the MOAKS grade. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS grade: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"effusion-synovitis": {"grade": (grade from 0-3)}}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The effusion-synovitis is best seen in the axial view. The knee joint fluid is seen as hyperintense (bright) in the DESS image. The amount of fluid is physiologic, not enough to be continuous in the retropatellar space. I can see the joint capsule region, but there is minimal to no fluid accumulation visible as hyperintensity in the retropatellar space. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [26, 136, 1, 382, 1, 292], "final_diagnosis": {"effusion-synovitis": {"grade": 0}}}
The effusion-synovitis is best seen in the axial view. The knee joint fluid is seen as hyperintense (bright) in the DESS image. The amount of fluid is physiologic, not enough to be continuous in the retropatellar space. I can see the joint capsule region, but there is minimal to no fluid accumulation visible as hyperintensity in the retropatellar space.
{ "bounding_box": [ 26, 136, 1, 382, 1, 292 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": { "grade": 0 }, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
/n/lw_groups/hms/dbmi/rajpurkar/lab/OAI/xiaoman/data/images/9010308/00M/20040915_10243212_1.nii.gz
### Question: In this DESS MRI, measure medial meniscus anterior extrusions. Meniscal extrusion is measured as the maximum protrusion distance from the tibial plateau. Meniscal extrusion is scored using MOAKS grading: Grade 0: Extrusion is below 2mm, Grade 1: Extrusion is between 2 to 3mm, Grade 2: Extrusion is between 3 to 4.9mm, Grade 3: Extrusion is over 5mm. Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the medial meniscus region, and the MOAKS extrusion grade. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS grade: {"bounding_box": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], "final_diagnosis": {"medial meniscus anterior extrusion": (grade from 0-3)}} ### Answer (think step by step):
The medial meniscus anterior extrusion is measured by the maximum distance the meniscus is protruding from the margin of the tibial articular surface. It is measured in the sagittal view. The extrusion is below 2mm. Final diagnosis: {"bounding_box": [84, 130, 92, 220, 135, 167], "final_diagnosis": {"medial meniscus anterior extrusion": {"grade": 0}}}
The medial meniscus anterior extrusion is measured by the maximum distance the meniscus is protruding from the margin of the tibial articular surface. It is measured in the sagittal view. The extrusion is below 2mm.
{ "bounding_box": [ 84, 130, 92, 220, 135, 167 ], "final_diagnosis": { "ACL": null, "Hoffa-Synovitis": null, "PCL": null, "Patellar_Tendon": null, "effusion-synovitis": null, "femur_lateral_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_central_BML": null, "femur_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_lateral_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_lateral_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_anterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_central_BML": null, "femur_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_central_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_posterior_BML": null, "femur_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "femur_medial_posterior_osteophyte": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_BML": null, "femur_medial_trochlea_cartilage_lesion": null, "ganglion_cyst_presence": null, "iliotibial_band_signal_presence": null, "infrapatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "lateral_meniscus_lateral_extrusion": null, "lateral_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_anterior_extrusion": { "grade": 0 }, "medial_meniscus_anterior_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_body_morphology": null, "medial_meniscus_medial_extrusion": null, "medial_meniscus_posterior_morphology": null, "patella_inferior_osteophyte": null, "patella_lateral_BML": null, "patella_lateral_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_lateral_osteophyte": null, "patella_medial_BML": null, "patella_medial_cartilage_lesion": null, "patella_medial_osteophyte": null, "patella_superior_osteophyte": null, "pes_anserine_bursitis_presence": null, "popliteal_cyst_presence": null, "prepatellar_bursitis_presence": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_central_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_lateral_osteophyte": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_lateral_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_anterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_central_BML": null, "tibia_medial_central_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_medial_osteophyte": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_BML": null, "tibia_medial_posterior_cartilage_lesion": null, "tibia_subspinous_BML": null } }
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

3D ReasonKnee: 3D Grouned Reasoning Dataset

This repository contains code for preprocessing, generating, and analyzing 3D knee MRI data for osteoarthritis assessment.

Repository Structure

Data Organization

  • /data/
    • /OAI/ - Raw DICOM files from OAI dataset
    • /labels/ - Contains taxonomymatch csv files with MOAKS scores
    • /images/ - Contains the preprocessed images
    • /masks.zip - Contains the segmentation masks of all subregions and lesions given by nnU-Net, please use cat masks_aa masks_ab > masks.zip and unzip masks.zip
    • /split_files/ - Contains patient_id,time,study_folder,series_folder,knee_side,path,image_filepath,label_filepath infomation of all studies with random train/val/test split files
    • /question_files/ - Contains mapping files for subregions and grades
      • questions.json - Queries created based on the MOAKS framework
      • cot_question_mapping.json - Expert Chain of Thought of each question
      • labels.json - label subregion/lesion mapping of the masks
      • grade_dict.json - Example structure of all possible scores
      • question_subregion_mapping.json - Corresponding subregion of each question
    • /generate_data/ - Contains final generated data with image paths (image), prompts (prompt), chain-of-thought reasoning (cot), and final diagnoses including bounding boxes of subregions and grade assessments (final_diagnosis).

Code Organization

  • /code/
    • /data_preprocessing/ - Scripts for initial data preparation of raw DICOM files
      • dcm2nifti.py - Converts DICOM files to NIfTI format and save to ./data/images/

How to Use

  1. OAI Download: Please download the original raw DICOM files from https://nda.nih.gov/oai/query-download
  2. DICOM to NIfTI Conversion: Use /code/data_preprocessing/dcm2nifti.py to convert DICOM files to NIfTI format
  3. Data Example: data file can be found in /generate_data/

Example Data Format

Below is an example of the data format in our generated data files:

  {
    "image": "/data/images/9021195/48M/20090518_12801512_1.nii.gz",
    "prompt": "### Question:\nIn this DESS MRI, can you diagnose cartilage lesions in the femur medial central subregion? Cartilage lesions are scored using two MOAKS components: Size (Grade 0: None, Grade 1: <10% of surface area, Grade 2: 10-75% of surface area, Grade 3: >75% of surface area) and Percent of full-thickness loss (Grade 0: No full-thickness loss, Grade 1: <10% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 2: 10-75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss, Grade 3: >75% of cartilage defect shows full-thickness loss). Provide your reasoning, the bounding box of the femur medial central subregion, and the MOAKS scores for size and depth. The output format should be a JSON object with the bounding box coordinates and the MOAKS scores: {\"bounding_box\": [start_slice, end_slice, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max], \"final_diagnosis\": {\"femur medial central cartilage lesion\": {\"Size of lesion\": (grade from 0-3), \"Depth of lesion\": (grade from 0-3)}}}\n### Answer (think step by step):\n",
    "answer": "The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.\n Final diagnosis: {\"bounding_box\": [83, 141, 117, 261, 154, 258], \"final_diagnosis\": {\"femur medial central cartilage lesion\": {\"size\": 0, \"depth\": 0}}}",
    "cot": "The cartilage looks gray in the DESS image. It covers the articular surfaces of the bones. I need to see whether the patient's cartilage has a smooth surface, evenly distributed thickness. If there is an abrupt thinning of cartilage, disruption of contour, it implies a cartilage lesion. There is no abrupt change in cartilage contour or any absence of cartilage in this subregion.",
    "final_diagnosis": {
      "bounding_box": [
        83,
        141,
        117,
        261,
        154,
        258
      ],
      "final_diagnosis": {
        "femur medial central cartilage lesion": {
          "size": 0,
          "depth": 0
        }
      }
    }
  }

License and Access Restrictions

The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) is a multi-center, ten-year observational study of men and women, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (part of the Department of Health and Human Services). To obtain access to OAI data you will need an NDA user account. Account can be requested directly from the NIMH Data Archive (NDA) website https://nda.nih.gov/oai/query-download.

Our 3DReasonKnee dataset is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This allows for:

  • Sharing and adaptation of the material
  • Commercial use
  • With the requirement to provide appropriate attribution
Downloads last month
130