Atman (Budismo)
An '''Ātman''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|ɑː|t|m|ə|n}}), '''attā''' o '''attan''' sa Budismo iyo an konsepto kan sadiri, asin manonompongan sa mga diskusyon kan konsepto kan non-self (''[[Anatta]]'') sa literaturang Buddhista.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0Guw2CnxiucC&pg=PA94|title=Pali-English Dictionary|author1=Thomas William Rhys Davids|author2=William Stede|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|year=1921|isbn=978-81-208-1144-7|page=22}}</ref>

Kadaklan sa Buddhistang tradisyon asin teksto pignenegaran an premise kan sarong permanente, dai nagbabagong ''atman'' (sadiri, kalag).<ref>John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-8120801585}}, p. 63, Quote: "The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism".</ref><ref name="anatmansources">'''[a]''' [http://www.britannica.com/topic/anatta Anatta] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151210185046/http://www.britannica.com/topic/anatta|date=2015-12-10}}, Encyclopædia Britannica (2013), '''Quote:''' "Anatta in Buddhism, the doctrine that there is in humans no permanent, underlying soul. The concept of anatta, or anatman, is a departure from the Hindu belief in atman (“the self”).";

'''[b]''' Steven Collins (1994), Religion and Practical Reason (Editors: Frank Reynolds, David Tracy), State Univ of New York Press, {{ISBN|978-0-7914-2217-5}}, p. 64; '''Quote:''' "Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence.";

'''[c]''' Dae-Sook Suh (1994), Korean Studies: New Pacific Currents, University of Hawaii Press, {{ISBN|978-0824815981}}, p. 171;

'''[d]''' Katie Javanaud (2013), [https://philosophynow.org/issues/97/Is_The_Buddhist_No-Self_Doctrine_Compatible_With_Pursuing_Nirvana Is The Buddhist ‘No-Self’ Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?] Which is “Boundless”{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150206211126/https://philosophynow.org/issues/97/Is_The_Buddhist_No-Self_Doctrine_Compatible_With_Pursuing_Nirvana|date=2015-02-06}}, Philosophy Now;

'''[e]''' David Loy (1982), Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?, International Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp. 65–74;

'''[f]''' KN Jayatilleke (2010), Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge, {{ISBN|978-8120806191}}, pp. 246–249, from note 385 onwards;

'''[g]''' Bruno Nagel (2000), Roy Perrett (editor), Philosophy of Religion: Indian Philosophy, Routledge, {{ISBN|978-0815336112}}, p. 33</ref> Alagad, sa ibang eskwelahan na Buddhista, an [[Sūtra|sutras]] asin [[tantras]] pigpresentar an nosyon  kan sarong ''atman'' o permanenteng "Sadiri", minsan ngani nagpapanongod sa sarong [[Absoluto (pilosopiya)|Absolutong]] sadiri asin bakong personal na sadiri.

== Toltolan ==
{{reflist}}
{{stub}}
An Ātman (), attā o attan sa Budismo iyo an konsepto kan sadiri, asin manonompongan sa mga diskusyon kan konsepto kan non-self (Anatta) sa literaturang Buddhista.

Kadaklan sa Buddhistang tradisyon asin teksto pignenegaran an premise kan sarong permanente, dai nagbabagong atman (sadiri, kalag).John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, , p. 63, Quote: "The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism".[a] Anatta , Encyclopædia Britannica (2013), Quote: "Anatta in Buddhism, the doctrine that there is in humans no permanent, underlying soul. The concept of anatta, or anatman, is a departure from the Hindu belief in atman (“the self”).";

[b] Steven Collins (1994), Religion and Practical Reason (Editors: Frank Reynolds, David Tracy), State Univ of New York Press, , p. 64; Quote: "Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence.";

[c] Dae-Sook Suh (1994), Korean Studies: New Pacific Currents, University of Hawaii Press, , p. 171;

[d] Katie Javanaud (2013), Is The Buddhist ‘No-Self’ Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana? Which is “Boundless”, Philosophy Now;

[e] David Loy (1982), Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?, International Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp. 65–74;

[f] KN Jayatilleke (2010), Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge, , pp. 246–249, from note 385 onwards;

[g] Bruno Nagel (2000), Roy Perrett (editor), Philosophy of Religion: Indian Philosophy, Routledge, , p. 33 Alagad, sa ibang eskwelahan na Buddhista, an sutras asin tantras pigpresentar an nosyon  kan sarong atman o permanenteng "Sadiri", minsan ngani nagpapanongod sa sarong Absolutong sadiri asin bakong personal na sadiri.

 Toltolan