repo
stringlengths 7
67
| org
stringlengths 2
32
⌀ | issue_id
int64 780k
941M
| issue_number
int64 1
134k
| pull_request
dict | events
list | text_size
int64 0
279k
| bot_issue
bool 1
class | modified_by_bot
bool 2
classes | user_count
int64 1
77
| event_count
int64 1
191
| modified_usernames
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t9md/atom-vim-mode-plus
| null | 150,423,818 | 247 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "t9md",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1461344917000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I've been added many experimental, vmp original Motion, Operator, TextObject till now.\r\nSometime I'm confused for role of these essential building blocks.\r\n\r\ne.g. LastSelection is really TextObject?, SearchMatchForward is really TextObject? or should I implment it as Motion??\r\n\r\nSo to clarify role of those object, I dumped my thought here.\r\n\r\n# Operator\r\n\r\nDo something on target\r\n\r\nSomething? yank, delete, upCase, increment number, add selection, select.\r\nMost of something is **mutation** of text, but some operator not fall into this category such as select, add-selection.\r\n\r\nTarget? range of editor, range is defined by start and end position.\r\n\r\n# Motion\r\n\r\nMove cursor to new position\r\n\r\n# TextObject\r\n\r\nReturn range regardless of cursor position(or be tolerant of cursor position).\r\n\r\n# How to compose\r\n\r\nOperator do something on range, range is specified by motion or operator.\r\n\r\nRange specified by motion is range defined by start=\"initial cursor position\", end=\"cursor position after moved\"\r\n\r\n# Motion / TextObject distinguish\r\n\r\nNo clear border, but here is the hint I use.\r\n\r\nMotion can move continuously to forward or backward direction. \r\nTextObject is tolerant of current cursor position, so selected range include forward and backward direction of area of current cursor position.",
"title": "[NOTE] Role of Operator, TextObject, Motion",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "t9md",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1461346725000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1,302 | false | false | 1 | 2 | false |
primus/primus
|
primus
| 125,700,790 | 420 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "VarunBatraIT",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1452289410000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I am using latest primus with total.js framework \r\n\r\nI am getting error as \r\n```\r\n[09/01/2016 03:10:24.641] [LOG] [TypeError: Cannot set property query of #<IncomingMessage> which has only a getter]\r\n[09/01/2016 03:10:24.644] [LOG] ======= 2016-01-09 03:10:24: TypeError: Cannot set property query of #<IncomingMessage> which has only a getter TypeError: Cannot set property query of #<IncomingMessage> which has only a getter\r\n```\r\n\r\n\r\nIt is from the line\r\n\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/primus/primus/blob/master/transformer.js#L107\r\n\r\nI did this:\r\n\r\n\r\n```\r\nframework.on('ready', function () {\r\n this.primus = new Primus(this.server);\r\n this.primus.save(F.path.public(\"/js/primus.js\"));\r\n \r\n framework.eval(function () {\r\n Controller.prototype.primus = function () {\r\n return framework.primus;\r\n };\r\n });\r\n});\r\n```\r\n\r\nSo technicall I am doing exactly what one could have done in express.js \r\n\r\nOf course my js code is: \r\n\r\n```\r\nvar primus = new Primus();\r\n```\r\n\r\nI did get a reqeust in backend and in primus files, however it just doesn't work because of the mentioned problem. \r\n\r\nIf this is a bug in totaljs/primus or this is just a compatibility issue?",
"title": "cannot set property query error",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "lpinca",
"comment_id": 170209009,
"datetime": 1452327330000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I don't know total.js but my guess is that it sets a `query` property (a getter) on the request object under strict mode, so when primus tries to set the property an error is thrown.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "lpinca",
"comment_id": 170210082,
"datetime": 1452328509000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Replacing https://github.com/primus/primus/blob/9baed6cf65c3544928e767079d26a6cc6489f4fe/transformer.js#L107 with\r\n```js\r\nif (!('query' in req)) req.query = req.uri.query;\r\n```\r\nshould fix this but I'm not totally happy with it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "VarunBatraIT",
"comment_id": 170228960,
"datetime": 1452340170000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@Ipnica What would be the implications? I am noob sorry. \r\n\r\nAnd it isn't about happiness it is about making it work :) \r\n\r\nI will be speaking with the Totaljs guy. He is also a very proactive in these cases.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "lpinca",
"comment_id": 170229327,
"datetime": 1452340671000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "There are no issues with the above approach but IMHO it's better to also provide a setter (it can be a noop function) when defining the `query` property on the request.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "VarunBatraIT",
"comment_id": 170230795,
"datetime": 1452341178000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "For the time being I will do some hacks. However, I am very sure that next totaljs will have it. Do you think that it is a good idea that Primus should also take care of it with your proposed solution to avoid similar bugs in various other frameworks?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "VarunBatraIT",
"comment_id": 170230839,
"datetime": 1452341222000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "But lets just wait for the comments perhaps it has been done in some different way :+1:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "lpinca",
"comment_id": 170231302,
"datetime": 1452341744000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "We assume to receive a plain [`IncomingMessage`](https://nodejs.org/api/http.html#http_http_incomingmessage) object, not a spiced-up one, so I'm personally :-1: for fixing this in primus.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "VarunBatraIT",
"comment_id": 170232892,
"datetime": 1452342565000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I think most fraemwork spice it up to append some useful information https://github.com/totaljs/framework/blob/master/index.js#L14465 We do have something here. :) \r\n\r\nI will just wait for totaljs feedback on it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "petersirka",
"comment_id": 171570517,
"datetime": 1452760034000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_0 I have fixed it, please install a latest beta version of total.js `npm install total.js@beta`.\r\n@username_1 thanks again for the report.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "VarunBatraIT",
"comment_id": 171574768,
"datetime": 1452761484000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_2 @username_1 Thanks for the teamwork. :+1:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "VarunBatraIT",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1452761485000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2,908 | false | false | 3 | 12 | true |
apiaryio/dredd-hooks-ruby
|
apiaryio
| 150,617,789 | 5 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1461465638000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hello,\r\n\r\nI decided to tackle https://github.com/username_0/dredd-rack/issues/7, and to implement it using this gem in order to keep concerns separated. Before making _dredd-hooks-ruby_ a dependency of Dredd::Rack, however, I'd like to refactor/improve it a bit so:\r\n\r\n- its versions are named following the [Semantic Versioning][semver] conventions\r\n- it has a change log ([example][changelog])\r\n- its code \"feels more like Ruby\" - follows the usual naming conventions, is a bit more idiomatic...\r\n- its maintenance is easier for a Ruby dev. - add a few Rake tasks for testing, eventually add a unit test suite\r\n\r\nI'm happy to do that as a contribution to _dredd-hooks-ruby_, and opened this issue for coordination purpose.\r\n\r\n**More details**\r\n\r\nSome of that will be refactoring, but some will also introduce changes in the API (following the naming conventions may change the `include DreddHooks::Methods` statement for example), but to make it more familiar to Ruby developers.\r\n\r\nWhat I see as the API:\r\n\r\n- the binary name, and default URL, ports [can't be changed because Dredd relies on them]\r\n- the DSL [I see no reason to change it]\r\n- the DSL inclusion statement [if I change it I'll make the change explicit - that's the point of semantic versioning]\r\n- the hook names [no reason to change them, I mean it's a Dredd concern not a _dredd-hooks-ruby_ one] \r\n\r\n**Questions / Ideas**\r\n\r\nI've forked the project, and will start working on it. I have a few questions:\r\n\r\n1. I could formalize my TO DO list as a series of issues here (I can't open them against my fork), and close them from the corresponding commits. IMO it would allow to set a roadmap and they could be tagged accordingly, but I want to be sure it's OK before flooding you with issues and PR\r\n1. I'm assuming the current version being **0.0.1** makes changing the versioning scheme and slightly modifying the API not a big deal, but again, you are the maintainers and I don't want these changes to sound scary\r\n1. Finally, I think I can PR/merge against my own fork for a while, but I'd prefer to be able to increase the `0.x.x` version number to reflect the changes and Travis won't help if the corresponding releases are not available - that's mainly why I would prefer to PR here. Another option would be that I release those as `dredd-hooks` (instead of `dredd_hooks`) then handle it to you at some point (I think it would be a better name anyway, but let's explain that in the corresponding PR).\r\n\r\nWhat do you think?\r\n\r\n [semver]: http://semver.org\r\n [changelog]: https://github.com/username_0/simple_token_authentication/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md",
"title": "Coordination",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": 213986901,
"datetime": 1461512476000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "That's for the first step, a general review of style and tools. I haven't started renaming or DRYing anything yet.\r\n\r\nThe second step will be renaming things and removing duplication in a backward-compatible way, and I'll propose a few non-backward compatible changes as a third step.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "honzajavorek",
"comment_id": 214722242,
"datetime": 1461673435000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Exactly. I think in this case the version 0.0.1 basically denotes \"initial implementation\".",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": 214955072,
"datetime": 1461725518000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi @username_1,\r\n\r\nThanks for your details answer and for the green light! :D \r\n\r\nI'll put together a summary of the changes I already made and post it here in the next few days. I'll also open a few issues to reflect the refactoring I've done so far and the few changes to come.\r\n\r\nNote that I'm commenting each commit to ensure you can follow the refactoring even if not that familiar with Ruby, and commenting my intentions in each of the PR I opened against my fork. Anyway, I'll let you know when introducing more substantial changes, so you get a chance to step in.\r\n\r\n**Schedule**\r\n\r\nI started yesterday doing some preliminary refactoring before DRYing the `DreddHooks::Methods` and `DreddHooks::Runner` ([work in progress][dry-dsl]). I'll discuss the changes I made in the [corresponding PR against my fork][dry-dsl] to set some context and allow anyone to step into the discussion when they're ready.\r\n\r\nIn the next few days I plan to start DRYing these two modules quite a lot, in order to make the DSL extension as simple and cheap as possible.\r\nThen I'll modularize a little bit the `DreddHooks::Server` for readability and rename a few things around (in a backward-compatible way).\r\n\r\nThat's going to take some time, and by then we should be able to discuss about the third step I mentioned earlier. : )\r\n\r\n [dry-dsl]: https://github.com/username_0/dredd-hooks-ruby/pull/6\r\n\r\n**About the change log**\r\n\r\nI took a quick look at the references you mentioned and I think I got the idea. I'll start adding a few missing elements on the [`CHANGELOG`][changelog] I added to get it closed to the other ones, and, again, we can talk about it at some point.\r\n\r\nCheers!\r\n\r\n [changelog]: https://github.com/username_0/dredd-hooks-ruby/blob/29cd583e4fd336bf1f7591c3d007e17929a3efea/CHANGELOG.md",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": 216245883,
"datetime": 1462198276000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi @username_1,\r\n\r\n_I made a mistake an committed the entire refactoring with the wrong identity. It's fixed now, and_ I'm recreating the pull requests against my fork so you can review them when you're ready.\r\n\r\nAlso I think it's simpler if I create **one single** PR for the first step (refactoring to make the project more idiomatic and DRYing the code). It will correspond to the first ten PR against my fork.\r\n\r\nThen **one single** PR for the backward-compatible renaming tasks. And finally **one single** PR for the non-backward-compatible (but sensible IMHO) renaming tasks.\r\n\r\nThe three PR will reflect the different levels of \"discussability\" and reducing the review/discussion/merge process to three steps should make it less time-consuming for you as a team. What do you think?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "honzajavorek",
"comment_id": 217891862,
"datetime": 1462806449000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 Sorry for not being responsive for a while. I'll try to get someone skilled in Ruby :gem: fast to review your work (I'm convinced it'll be awesome!). If everything goes well and if you don't mind, I'd consider to add you as a contributor to the repository, so the changes are easier to coordinate. You do a lot of very good work here and I feel my lack of dedication to `dredd-hooks-ruby` only slows you down in making the project better.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": 217998357,
"datetime": 1462829999000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi @username_1,\r\n\r\nPlease don't worry about timings, you all do an awesome job creating all these tools and sometimes slowing down a little bit gives the occasion to make better decisions : )\r\nHopefully, the maintenance tasks [should become easier with the recent refactorings][doc].\r\n\r\nI'd be glad to get contributor access to the repo, thanks for your trust!\r\n\r\nI'm currently writing a small example application so I can check that I'm not missing anything important to make the `DreddHooks::Server` usable as a library.\r\n\r\n [doc]: https://github.com/username_0/dredd-hooks-ruby/blob/refactor-ensure-server-can-be-used-as-library/doc/README.md\r\n\r\nI'll keep you updated!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1469623201000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": 235572551,
"datetime": 1469623201000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I'll close this issue since coordination is now ensured in #13 : )",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "reopened",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1469623389000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hello,\r\n\r\nI decided to tackle https://github.com/username_0/dredd-rack/issues/7, and to implement it using this gem in order to keep concerns separated. Before making _dredd-hooks-ruby_ a dependency of Dredd::Rack, however, I'd like to refactor/improve it a bit so:\r\n\r\n- its versions are named following the [Semantic Versioning][semver] conventions\r\n- it has a change log ([example][changelog])\r\n- its code \"feels more like Ruby\" - follows the usual naming conventions, is a bit more idiomatic, a bit DRYer...\r\n- its maintenance is easier for a Ruby dev. - add a few Rake tasks for testing, eventually add a unit test suite\r\n\r\nI'm happy to do that as a contribution to _dredd-hooks-ruby_, and opened this issue for coordination purpose.\r\n\r\n**More details**\r\n\r\nSome of that will be refactoring, but some will also introduce changes in the API (following the naming conventions may change the `include DreddHooks::Methods` statement for example), but to make it more familiar to Ruby developers.\r\n\r\nWhat I see as the API:\r\n\r\n- the binary name, and default URL, ports [can't be changed because Dredd relies on them - correct me if I'm wrong]\r\n- the DSL [I see no reason to change it]\r\n- the DSL inclusion statement [if I change it I'll make the change explicit - that's the point of semantic versioning]\r\n- the hook names [no reason to change them, I mean it's a Dredd concern not a _dredd-hooks-ruby_ one] \r\n\r\n**Questions / Ideas**\r\n\r\nI've forked the project, and will start working on it. I have a few questions:\r\n\r\n1. I could formalize my TO DO list as a series of issues here (I can't open them against my fork), and close them from the corresponding commits. IMO it would allow to set a roadmap and they could be tagged accordingly or assigned to myself, but I want to be sure it's OK before flooding you with issues and PR\r\n1. I'm assuming the current version being **0.0.1** makes changing the versioning scheme and slightly modifying the API not a big deal, but again, you are the maintainers and I don't want these changes to sound scary\r\n\r\nWhat do you think?\r\n\r\n [semver]: http://semver.org\r\n [changelog]: https://github.com/username_0/simple_token_authentication/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md\r\n \r\n**Edit**: I removed the third question because I was mistaken: Travis CI is installing the gem locally, and there is no inconvenient in bumping the version number without releasing the corresponding gem. I'll just start working in my fork, and am willing to PR the result as soon as you want. : )",
"title": "Coordination - ensuring the gem is production-ready",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": 235573292,
"datetime": 1469623389000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Given its title, maybe I should keep this issue open until **v1.0.0**. Sorry for the confusion.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": 238015791,
"datetime": 1470477279000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 @netmilk I released **v0.1.0**, as a Semantic Versioning starting point.\r\n\r\nNo breaking changes from **v0.0.1**, and no new features either ([`CHANGELOG`][changelog]). In particular I didn't start adding documentation to the CLI itself, just to be sure not to put too much in a single release.\r\n\r\nNow I'll start using Dredd Hooks in Dredd::Rack to properly check that the `DreddHooks::Server` can be used smoothly as a library (I don't expect big problems, but I still expect to highlight minor issues). From there I'll determine the next steps to fix any remaining issue and improve the user experience. If you have any comments, ideas, just let me know : )\r\n\r\n [changelog]: https://github.com/apiaryio/dredd-hooks-ruby/blob/v0.1.0/CHANGELOG.md",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "honzajavorek",
"comment_id": 238177615,
"datetime": 1470646264000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 AFAIK sem ver doesn't support anything below v1.0.0 and recommends to start versioning with v1.0.0, but I didn't check this against the spec.\r\n\r\n👍 to all the work you did, it's really outstanding!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": 238405614,
"datetime": 1470697889000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "While the recommended version constraints must be as strict as possible at that point (currently `'0.1.0'` in our case, that means no one depending on the Dredd Hooks gem will see it updated without explicitely updating the constraint in their `Gemfile`), I still see value in setting milestones towards stabilizing the API.\r\nPrimarily, it allows to establish early communication with potential users and prevent uncomfortable elements to become part of the API.\r\n\r\nI also found that the semver convention can easily be extended to make the communication a bit more expressive, and in my pre-1.0.0 projects I enforce the following addition:\r\n\r\nAs long as MAJOR is 0:\r\n- PATCH releases SHOULD NOT (but MIGHT) introduce non-backward-compatible changes to the current API\r\n- MINOR releases MAY introduce non-backward-compatible changes or not, but SHOULD display a visible warning in their `README` when they do. (It MAY happen, though, that such changes be released without warning, see semver.org)\r\n\r\nThat is optional (of course), fully compatible with the semver spec and any user ignoring this and referring to the spec would err on the safe side (assuming that anything can change anytime).\r\nEven if not used explicitely, however, I find it provides a good guideline for communication and forces me to think early about what the project API is, while allowing changes (and mistakes!)\r\n\r\nThat what I had in mind when saying \"a semver starting point\" : )\r\n\r\n**Note**: Indeed, I never used this explicitely so far - I don't think it would help users to know the details, and the improvement in the communication should be perceptible without needing to agree on one more spec.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "honzajavorek",
"comment_id": 238515428,
"datetime": 1470738760000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 Okay! I totally dig moving towards sem ver 👍 I probably got just confused with the 0.x.x versions. As you write, it is valid sem ver, but [sem rel](https://github.com/semantic-release/semantic-release) had problems with it, so I probably just made an incorrect connection in my brain between those two.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gonzalo-bulnes",
"comment_id": 238566020,
"datetime": 1470752033000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I think you cannot really automate anything before v1.0.0, right? That's probably why. (I'm not familiar with Semantic Release, but I saw the Dredd issue about it; it reads interesting.)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 12,563 | false | false | 2 | 16 | true |
rstacruz/cheatsheets
| null | 210,984,485 | 46 |
{
"number": 46,
"repo": "cheatsheets",
"user_login": "rstacruz"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "BKSpurgeon",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1488346519000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "add comment clarifying the use of snake_case\r\n\r\nadd comment clarifying that g can be used instead of 'generate'",
"title": "add further clarifications on rails g migrate",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rstacruz",
"comment_id": 325824770,
"datetime": 1504046337000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Great work! Thank you for your contribution 😍",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 156 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
getsentry/raven-ruby
|
getsentry
| 218,048,815 | 656 |
{
"number": 656,
"repo": "raven-ruby",
"user_login": "getsentry"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "schneiderderek",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1490834194000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Added processors for sanitizing the body of PUT and PATCH requests.",
"title": "Add PUT and PATCH data processors.",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nateberkopec",
"comment_id": 290431498,
"datetime": 1490884737000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Definitely OK with this, but rather than separate processor classes, I'd prefer we have a single RequestMethodProcessor.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "schneiderderek",
"comment_id": 290471607,
"datetime": 1490892566000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 OK, just to be clear would you want all 3 (POST, PUT, and PATCH) combined into one processor or just PUT and PATCH?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nateberkopec",
"comment_id": 290721676,
"datetime": 1490969247000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 All three. Ideally you would have a constant or something that was just an array of [\"POST\", \"PUT\", \"PATCH\"] that you would use to show which HTTP methods you were scrubbing. Bonus points if you make it configurable.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "schneiderderek",
"comment_id": 290724588,
"datetime": 1490969872000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 Ok, my intent with the current design was to provide flexibility and configurability for the end user while using the existing methods for configuring the way data is processed (using processors). IMO by combining these into one processor we lose that. I'll combine them if you disagree.\r\n\r\nWhen you mention making it configurable, were you thinking something like this?:\r\n```ruby\r\nRaven.configure do |config|\r\n # Probably needs a better config name\r\n config.request_methods_sanitized_data = [\"POST\", \"PUT\"] \r\nend\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nateberkopec",
"comment_id": 290877835,
"datetime": 1491006152000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Yup, exactly like that.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "schneiderderek",
"comment_id": 290900822,
"datetime": 1491029426000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 I've updated the code to combine everything into 1 processor. Let me know what you think.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nateberkopec",
"comment_id": 292604335,
"datetime": 1491587054000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "One last comment left, then I'm good on this.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "schneiderderek",
"comment_id": 292630051,
"datetime": 1491593236000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 I've updated the docs to reflect your feedback.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nateberkopec",
"comment_id": 303151706,
"datetime": 1495470625000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Reverting because I want to put this off for 3.0",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "schneiderderek",
"comment_id": 303212999,
"datetime": 1495485385000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 Is there a 3.0 RC branch available so I could use this functionality now? Or should I just stick to using my fork?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nateberkopec",
"comment_id": 303267797,
"datetime": 1495504408000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "stick to your fork, I won't have something \"release-candidate-worthy\" for a while",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nateberkopec",
"comment_id": 303267931,
"datetime": 1495504474000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "also on your fork, you can be reasonably certain that the API you created here won't change and will not be appearing on master until 3.0. so don't worry about conflicts in the meantime with 2.x.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dhirendrx",
"comment_id": 872900885,
"datetime": 1625222330000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_1 We still haven't included it in the `4.6` release, do we have any plan to include it in a future release.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "st0012",
"comment_id": 872904302,
"datetime": 1625222715000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "@username_2 hey I'm the current maintainer of the SDK 👋 \r\nsince version 4.0 (`sentry-ruby`), the concept of SDK-side sanitization (processors) has been removed (like other Sentry SDKs). and the old SDK `sentry-raven` has entered maintenance mode now. so we won't introduce this feature to either one of them in the future.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2,206 | false | false | 4 | 15 | true |
galaxyproject/bioblend
|
galaxyproject
| 168,458,851 | 190 |
{
"number": 190,
"repo": "bioblend",
"user_login": "galaxyproject"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mvdbeek",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1469870852000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This goes together with https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/pull/2554.\r\nOn older galaxy instances install_resolver_dependencies will be silently ignored.\r\nIs that okay or should we explicitly check the galaxy version?\r\nping @username_1",
"title": "Add install_resolver_dependencies keyword to install_repository_revision",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nsoranzo",
"comment_id": 236580927,
"datetime": 1470058312000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 Thanks for the PR! I think that documenting it as in my inline comment should be enough.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nsoranzo",
"comment_id": 236599040,
"datetime": 1470062178000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 Just to be sure before I merge: ``install_tool_dependencies``, ``install_repository_dependencies`` and ``install_resolver_dependencies`` can all be `True` at the same time?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mvdbeek",
"comment_id": 236605966,
"datetime": 1470063515000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Yes, there is no problem setting any combination of these.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nsoranzo",
"comment_id": 236608028,
"datetime": 1470063937000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Cool, thanks!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 586 | false | false | 2 | 5 | true |
jhipster/generator-jhipster
|
jhipster
| 109,875,691 | 2,092 |
{
"number": 2092,
"repo": "generator-jhipster",
"user_login": "jhipster"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "atomfrede",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1444075689000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Close #2091",
"title": "Add spring-boot-configuration-processor",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "atomfrede",
"comment_id": 145653433,
"datetime": 1444075821000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I'll merge it right away.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jdubois",
"comment_id": 145662379,
"datetime": 1444077679000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Great, thanks !",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 51 | false | false | 2 | 3 | false |
OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn
|
OmniSharp
| 62,269,109 | 129 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "CoreyKaylor",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1426561116000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Similar to the way that R# can automatically import namespaces and add references based on code written into the editor. It would be nice if omnisharp could do the same type of thing.\r\n\r\nGolang has a similar behavior with the vim-go plugin. In the event of a conflict or multiple matches it defaults to the first match last time I checked. That might be a good starting point. I actually like the behavior of this vim plugin more than R# because it happens when the document is saved instead of while you're typing.",
"title": "Auto-import assembly / namespace",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nosami",
"comment_id": 84070684,
"datetime": 1426870874000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": ":+1: Would be cool if it could automatically download nuget packages too. I heard the aspnet team were working on this and would share the code with us.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "JulioJu",
"comment_id": 441277085,
"datetime": 1542989323000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "3 years after, there is a plan to add auto-import ? It seams that it's added for Visual-Studio-Code (see https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-vscode/issues/1117) but not for Vim Users. Actually, with omnisharp-vim, we could not auto import \"using\".\r\nThanks in advance for your answer ;-).",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "filipw",
"comment_id": 677384096,
"datetime": 1597907165000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "Implemented in https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn/pull/1896",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "filipw",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1597907166000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1,027 | false | false | 4 | 5 | false |
postmodern/chruby
| null | 19,078,442 | 197 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "almog",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1378419906000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "`https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1543052/Boxes/DebianSqueeze64.box` - 404\r\n`http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1537815/precise64.box` 509 too much traffic\r\n`https://github.com/downloads/xironix/freebsd-vagrant/freebsd_amd64_ufs.box` - 404",
"title": "Some Vagrant base boxes' links are broken",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "postmodern",
"comment_id": 79721940,
"datetime": 1426300259000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Closing this since I started using `schroot` and `debootstrap`. Haven't used the BSD Vagrant images in a long time.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "postmodern",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1426300259000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 335 | false | false | 2 | 3 | false |
usebenchmark/benchmark-insights
|
usebenchmark
| 60,271,242 | 6 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "kennethkoontz",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1425841967000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "distribution",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "jordanskole",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1427930936000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 0 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
chef/supermarket
|
chef
| 107,047,358 | 1,127 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "tas50",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1442515374000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Our current curry config has all the cookbooks in opscode-cookbooks. The Github api doesn't handle the move. We need to update these all to chef-cookbooks. Simple little change to enable curry.",
"title": "Curry needs to be updated for chef-cookbooks move",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "nellshamrell",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1443732261000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 196 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
Sylius/Sylius
|
Sylius
| 135,727,678 | 4,269 |
{
"number": 4269,
"repo": "Sylius",
"user_login": "Sylius"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Zales0123",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1456231522000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "| Q | A\r\n| ------------- | ---\r\n| Bug fix? | no\r\n| New feature? | yes\r\n| BC breaks? | no\r\n| Deprecations? | no\r\n| Fixed tickets | #4225\r\n| License | MIT\r\n| Doc PR |\r\n\r\nIn order to avoid (current or future) duplications and make new behat scenarios even easier to write and it (they're already pretty natural :smile:), here is propose of two additional contexts, containing reusable transformers. Concept is widely described in related issue, just to make it clear about new features:\r\n\r\n``SharedStorageContext``:\r\n- ``it`` -> transform to last resource from ``SharedStorage``\r\n- ``this|that|the {resource}`` -> transform to specific resource from ``SharedStorage``\r\n\r\n``LexicalContext``:\r\n- ``€103.00`` (string) -> ``10300`` (int)\r\n- ``20%`` (string) -> ``0.2`` (float)\r\n\r\nI'm sure we could find lots of more use cases that can be placed in one of this context. Moreover, I hope that by using them wisely, we could get rid of injecting ``SharedContext`` into most of contexts and minimize number of private functions.",
"title": "[RFC][Behat] Extract reusable transformers",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pamil",
"comment_id": 187687288,
"datetime": 1456232093000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": ":+1:, we will have to use shared context directly only to set a resource after this PR gets merged! :)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pjedrzejewski",
"comment_id": 188216001,
"datetime": 1456314556000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Thanks Mateusz! :+1:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 1,173 | false | false | 3 | 3 | false |
parasew/instiki
| null | 7,912,603 | 16 |
{
"number": 16,
"repo": "instiki",
"user_login": "parasew"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mkcode",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1351358456000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi,\r\n\r\nJust did the bare minimum changes to get instiki running on heroku. Uses the latest instiki and runs on the latest heroku cedar stack.\r\n\r\nThis isn't a real pull request. Just letting you know!",
"title": "Running on heroku",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dylanerichards",
"comment_id": 222021229,
"datetime": 1464304518000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Can this PR be closed?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "distler",
"comment_id": 222060538,
"datetime": 1464325234000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Merged by cherry-picking (as no one seemed up to producing a PR which would merge cleanly).",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "distler",
"comment_id": 481094921,
"datetime": 1554783222000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Just for the record,\r\n\r\n~~~~~\r\ngit clone https://github.com/parasew/instiki.git\r\ncd instiki\r\nheroku create [APPNAME]\r\nmv Gemfile Gemfile.orig\r\ngit mv Gemfile.heroku Gemfile\r\ngit mv Gemfile.lock.heroku Gemfile.lock\r\ngit commit -m \"Setup for heroku\"\r\ngit push heroku master\r\nheroku config:set RAILS_ENV=production\r\nheroku run rake db:migrate\r\n~~~~~\r\n\r\ndoes get Instiki up and running on Heroku.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 704 | false | false | 3 | 4 | false |
dannyvankooten/AltoRouter
| null | 112,841,326 | 128 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "tzfrs",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1445531383000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I have the two following routes\r\n\r\n $router->map('POST' , '/pages/[i:id]/posts/[i:postId]/comment/' ,'Comment#add');\r\n $router->map('GET' , '/pages/[i:id]/posts/[i:postId]/comment/' ,'Comment#get');\r\n\r\nWhen I'm now calling the first (POST) route without the trailing slash like this:\r\n\r\n /pages/1/posts/1/comment\r\n\r\nInstead the get method is called. What can cause this behaviour? Is this a known issue? Is it reproducible?",
"title": "Router reacts to GET method when POST route is called without trailing slash",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "koenpunt",
"comment_id": 150780101,
"datetime": 1445680684000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "The first thing that is being checked when matching routes is the request method; https://github.com/username_2/AltoRouter/blob/master/AltoRouter.php#L192\r\nSo I guess it has something to do with other routes you might have defined?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "koenpunt",
"comment_id": 150780185,
"datetime": 1445680788000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Or could it be that your server configuration adds slashes, which make the POST end up as GET",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dannyvankooten",
"comment_id": 153015514,
"datetime": 1446470644000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "A full list of your defined routes would be really helpful here @username_0",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "koenpunt",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1455558139000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "koenpunt",
"comment_id": 184321059,
"datetime": 1455558139000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Closing as stale. If your problem still exists please let me know and I'll reopen the issue.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 924 | false | false | 3 | 6 | true |
elixir-lang/elixir
|
elixir-lang
| 163,550,074 | 4,927 |
{
"number": 4927,
"repo": "elixir",
"user_login": "elixir-lang"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "eksperimental",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1467528112000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Private function Enum.random_index/2 has been replaced with Enum.random_integer/2\r\nand the deterministic examples had to be updated.",
"title": "Optimize Enum.random/1, Enum.take_random/2 for ranges",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "josevalim",
"comment_id": 230140086,
"datetime": 1467531304000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 beautiful, thank you!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "eksperimental",
"comment_id": 230154956,
"datetime": 1467554556000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "changes updated",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "eksperimental",
"comment_id": 230158199,
"datetime": 1467558672000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "does anybody know how can I represent a typespec for\r\n`@spec random_integer(integer, integer) :: integer`\r\nthat the return value would be within `lower_limit..upper_limit`\r\n\r\n/cc @username_2",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ericmj",
"comment_id": 230168740,
"datetime": 1467571664000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@spec random_integer(integer, integer) :: integer\r\nthat the return value would be within lower_limit..upper_limit\r\n\r\n```elixir\r\n@spec random_integer(lower, upper) :: lower..upper\r\nwhen lower: integer, upper: integer\r\n```\r\n\r\nBut we usually don't typespec private functions.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "eksperimental",
"comment_id": 230186302,
"datetime": 1467594102000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_2 that's exactly what I was looking for! thank you",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "eksperimental",
"comment_id": 230330760,
"datetime": 1467652979000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 we are for a final review.\r\nthe only issue left to be addressed is the one about traversing the enumerable twice https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/pull/4927/files#r69396589",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "josevalim",
"comment_id": 230338590,
"datetime": 1467656875000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": ":heart: :green_heart: :blue_heart: :yellow_heart: :purple_heart:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "eksperimental",
"comment_id": 230341738,
"datetime": 1467658562000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 should we backport by removing these changes realted to ranges with count =1, that changed the semantics?\r\nhttps://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/commit/b6245074614b241f0df2c0eedaf981412f67f71c#diff-6881431a92cd4e3ea0de82bf2338f8eaL2262\r\n\r\ninitially introduced in 095321451743ea000201b5f0ff3456a061ed62ba",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "josevalim",
"comment_id": 230342170,
"datetime": 1467658797000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I won't backport because I believe we should not change the random result for a given seed in a tiny release.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "eksperimental",
"comment_id": 230342663,
"datetime": 1467659062000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "great then. just wanted to make sure we are not missing anything.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 1,436 | false | false | 3 | 11 | true |
ylyc/circular_progress_bar
| null | 191,622,131 | 11 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "ammaratef45",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1480047037000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I want to import it to my project but things crash with me, So any one help me with the steps please\r\nI'm using android studio",
"title": "How can I import this to my project",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "BrianSullivan425",
"comment_id": 266843937,
"datetime": 1481658938000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Exactly my thoughts, too. Why is there no gradle file \"compile\" line that we can copy and paste into our project. Lame!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "AminJun",
"comment_id": 353690859,
"datetime": 1513985839000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "So how did you solve this guys ? @username_1 @username_0",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 309 | false | false | 3 | 3 | true |
contiv/ansible
|
contiv
| 123,829,618 | 11 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mapuri",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1450985161000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "**Background:**\r\nAt some point when we decided to use ansible for provisioning all our projects we started off with the ansible playbooks used by our packer builds. At that point `base` role was added to download and install multiple binaries. It was pretty much everything that packer builds were installing like backed in go, docker, etcd, ovs and so on.\r\n\r\n**Fast Forward to requirements:**\r\nOvertime as we have gained some more experience adding ansible plays for our own services, the existing organization of `base` role has gotten a bit unaligned with the general organization of other plays like:\r\n1. not all service specific dependencies are always installed together. Just to state one instance, docker binary get's installed in base but the service is setup as part of `docker` role; same is true with etcd and ovs.\r\n2. also overtime we have realized there are two broad environments that we are going to have a need to support with our ansible scripts for deploying Contiv services viz. **production** and **development**. A **production** environment would be a **stock** Ubuntu15.04 or Cento7.1 or in future a RHEL OS image loaded by the customer and then provisioned using our ansible playbooks according to their deployment. A **development** environment is similar to customer environment but we want some packages to be pre-installed in order to save time when bringing up the development environment. An example of **development** environment will be a vagrant box that we use for testing in our projects or the host machines that we use for development.\r\n\r\nResolving the above will hopefully help us get more clarity on how we can use our playbooks in customer/demo environments and development environments.\r\n\r\n**Proposal:**\r\n\r\nTo achieve the above two requirements, I propose the following:\r\n\r\n- move the service specific dependencies to respective roles that take care of provisioning the service. This shall address **1.** above.\r\n\r\n- introduce a new role called `dev` that shall take care of pre-installing the requirements needed for the **development** environment but it shall reuse the tasks from underlying services. This shall address **2.** above.\r\n\r\nAlso see the associated patch of something in works in my fork here: https://github.com/username_0/ansible/tree/devrole\r\n\r\nThis shall give a more concrete idea of what I have in mind. I will create a formal PR once I have it more polished and tested. Feel free to take a look and suggest other cleanups as well that you might have had in mind.\r\n\r\ncc @jainvipin @erikh",
"title": "Proposal: reorganize/cleanup the base role",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "mapuri",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1452038348000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mapuri",
"comment_id": 169173191,
"datetime": 1452038348000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "closed by #14",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2,559 | false | false | 1 | 3 | true |
aeolingamenfel/discord-text-adventure-bot
| null | 208,683,195 | 10 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "JiFish",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1487464373000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "It would be nice if the bot remembered the previously selected target and listen channels.\r\n\r\nEither the ability to specify them in the config or writing them somewhere when they are set would solve this.",
"title": "(Suggestion) Remember target and listen channels on restart",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "aeolingamenfel",
"comment_id": 280887976,
"datetime": 1487467255000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Should be fairly straightforward to have some sort of serialized data, I'll add this.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "aeolingamenfel",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1487470774000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "JiFish",
"comment_id": 280891870,
"datetime": 1487472920000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This isn't working for me. I get the following once I try to use either command after `main.json` has been created.\r\n\r\n```\r\nfs.js:557\r\n return binding.open(pathModule._makeLong(path), stringToFlags(flags), mode);\r\n ^\r\n\r\nError: EEXIST: file already exists, open '/home/jifish/adventure-bot/utility/../storage/main.json'\r\n at Object.fs.openSync (fs.js:557:18)\r\n at Object.fs.writeFileSync (fs.js:1222:33)\r\n at StorageManager.write (/home/jifish/adventure-bot/utility/StorageManager.js:56:12)\r\n at StorageManager.set (/home/jifish/adventure-bot/utility/StorageManager.js:73:14)\r\n at MessageHandler.setTargetChannel (/home/jifish/adventure-bot/MessageHandler.js:195:33)\r\n at MessageHandler.onMessage (/home/jifish/adventure-bot/MessageHandler.js:80:18)\r\n at DiscordClient.<anonymous> (/home/jifish/adventure-bot/app.js:28:20)\r\n at emitMany (events.js:127:13)\r\n at DiscordClient.emit (events.js:201:7)\r\n at DiscordClient.handleWSMessage (/home/jifish/adventure-bot/node_modules/discord.io/lib/index.js:1734:11)\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "reopened",
"author": "aeolingamenfel",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1487473004000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "It would be nice if the bot remembered the previously selected target and listen channels.\r\n\r\nEither the ability to specify them in the config or writing them somewhere when they are set would solve this.",
"title": "(Suggestion) Remember target and listen channels on restart",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "aeolingamenfel",
"comment_id": 280891936,
"datetime": 1487473004000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Hm, alright.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "aeolingamenfel",
"comment_id": 280892074,
"datetime": 1487473229000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 Just pushed a commit to master; see if it works for you.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "JiFish",
"comment_id": 280892177,
"datetime": 1487473392000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Fix works perfectly. Thanks for the quick response.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "aeolingamenfel",
"comment_id": 280892189,
"datetime": 1487473424000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "No problem! Glad to hear it fixed it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "aeolingamenfel",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1487473424000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1,714 | false | false | 2 | 10 | true |
JakeWharton/RxBinding
| null | 115,691,471 | 191 |
{
"number": 191,
"repo": "RxBinding",
"user_login": "JakeWharton"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "hzsweers",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1446929015000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Resolves #106",
"title": "Add back checkNotNull and check for them in ValidateBindingsTask",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "JakeWharton",
"comment_id": 154878691,
"datetime": 1447019581000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "AMAZE",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "hzsweers",
"comment_id": 154878804,
"datetime": 1447019718000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": ":fireworks:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 29 | false | false | 2 | 3 | false |
apache/spark
|
apache
| 91,875,493 | 7,089 |
{
"number": 7089,
"repo": "spark",
"user_login": "apache"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "brkyvz",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1435602665000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This PR also includes re-ordering the order that repositories are used when resolving packages. User provided repositories will be prioritized.\r\n\r\ncc @username_1",
"title": "[SPARK-8410][SPARK-8475] remove previous ivy resolution when using spark-submit",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "andrewor14",
"comment_id": 116886558,
"datetime": 1435623984000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "OK, merging into master 1.4, thanks @username_0. Do we need a fix for 1.3 as well?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 239 | false | true | 2 | 2 | true |
tensorflow/tensorflow
|
tensorflow
| 137,647,182 | 1,345 |
{
"number": 1345,
"repo": "tensorflow",
"user_login": "tensorflow"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "JACKHAHA363",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1456855954000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Otherwise there will be an error on my machine.",
"title": "random.sample cannot take np.array. fixed",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "JACKHAHA363",
"comment_id": 190838642,
"datetime": 1456856060000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I signed it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "JACKHAHA363",
"comment_id": 190838684,
"datetime": 1456856069000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I signed it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "KonradMagnusson",
"comment_id": 190923709,
"datetime": 1456869413000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "[Related fix.](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/pull/1335)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 137 | false | true | 2 | 4 | false |
mndrix/sms-over-xmpp
| null | 204,135,554 | 7 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mndrix",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1485811798000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Users should be able to block messages. The most common use case is for preventing SMS spam. Ideally a block action can trigger an external script for adding the phone number to a blacklist (presumably to block phone calls through a PBX).",
"title": "XEP-0191: Blocking Command (for spam)",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mndrix",
"comment_id": 278462660,
"datetime": 1486588239000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Upon further reading, XEP-0191 doesn't make sense for an external component. A client sends stanzas without a `to` attribute so the server handles them directly. An external component has no way of knowing when one entity has blocked another. Clients can still use XEP-0191 to block spam SMS locally but we can't use it to notify an external blacklist.\r\n\r\nI'd still like the component to facilitate blocking of abusive phone numbers, but we'll need another way to do it. Maybe a \"/block\" command or something.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 747 | false | false | 1 | 2 | false |
dobtco/formrenderer-base
|
dobtco
| 54,105,475 | 18 |
{
"number": 18,
"repo": "formrenderer-base",
"user_login": "dobtco"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jrubenoff",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1421096160000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Fixes dobtco/screendoor-v2#1228",
"title": "Adding .sub_labels",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ajb",
"comment_id": 69753882,
"datetime": 1421160271000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "This looks great in the screenshots you've provided, but without `dvl-core` it looks a little screwy. Remember that `formrenderer-base` does _not_ depend on dvl-core, and even though there are barely any visual styles in this repo, the layout should still render properly. (This is important for embeds.)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ajb",
"comment_id": 69755902,
"datetime": 1421160998000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Check out the updated version, lmk if you have questions. If you haven't been already, you can preview by opening `examples/index.html`.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrubenoff",
"comment_id": 69826059,
"datetime": 1421185389000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Made some CSS fixes, please review.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ajb",
"comment_id": 69840716,
"datetime": 1421190980000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Am I crazy or did my previous comment disappear? here's what it was:\r\n\r\n===\r\n\r\nAre these CSS tweaks for formrenderer, or Screendoor? \r\n\r\n1. You'll notice that for better or worse, formrenderer uses `px` values in its CSS. I'd like to either stick with this, or rework the entire file to use `rem` or `em` units.\r\n\r\n2. There is a layout error:\r\n\r\n",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrubenoff",
"comment_id": 69841858,
"datetime": 1421191498000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "1) I think this is OK in this instance. All labels are in relative units (`line-height: 1.5`), so `.label_sub` should as well.\r\n\r\n`.fr_item_spacer` has a padding equal to the height of the label, and a `line-height` equal to the heights of the inputs, which are also set in relative units:\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n2) Fixed.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ajb",
"comment_id": 69842176,
"datetime": 1421191626000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Cool, that last change wasn't compiled FYI. (You can also run `grunt watch` to watch your files and compile when they're changed.)\r\n\r\nAnd there is still this issue: \r\n\r\n",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ajb",
"comment_id": 69842629,
"datetime": 1421191805000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Alright, fixed and rebased.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 1,550 | false | false | 2 | 8 | false |
cundong/SmartAppUpdates
| null | 118,153,881 | 6 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "lanting",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1448064743000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: dalvik.system.PathClassLoader[DexPathList[[zip file \"/data/app/com.test.test-2/base.apk\"],nativeLibraryDirectories=[/data/app/com.liankai.test-2/lib/arm64, /vendor/lib64, /system/lib64]]] couldn't find \"libapkpatch.so\"\r\n\r\nCan you build a 64bit so lib please? Thanks.",
"title": "64 bit os error",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "cundong",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1450703303000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 298 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
amiaopensource/open-workflows
|
amiaopensource
| 186,994,265 | 3 |
{
"number": 3,
"repo": "open-workflows",
"user_login": "amiaopensource"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "kfrn",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1478158915000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Add two more resources",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "retokromer",
"comment_id": 258083447,
"datetime": 1478160826000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "LGTM",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 4 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
puppetlabs/facter
|
puppetlabs
| 106,446,962 | 1,172 |
{
"number": 1172,
"repo": "facter",
"user_login": "puppetlabs"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "peterhuene",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1442272975000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "rb_num2ulong was being called when outputting a Ruby value in JSON, YAML, or to\r\nthe console. This resulted in an underflow when the value was negative and the\r\nvalue was displayed as a large positive value.\r\n\r\nThe fix is to instead call rb_num2long which returns a signed version.",
"title": "(FACT-1235) Fix output of negative numbers returned by custom facts.",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "MikaelSmith",
"comment_id": 140442652,
"datetime": 1442332875000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": ":+1:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 286 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
dimagi/commcare-hq
|
dimagi
| 58,136,667 | 5,600 |
{
"number": 5600,
"repo": "commcare-hq",
"user_login": "dimagi"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "czue",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1424297416000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Reverts dimagi/commcare-hq#5599\r\n\r\n",
"title": "Revert \"Revert \"Icon for balance questions\"\"",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dimagimon",
"comment_id": 74959139,
"datetime": 1424297432000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": ":+1: No lint errors found.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 168 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
iron/iron
|
iron
| 53,220,234 | 253 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "rndr",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1420120848000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "[this](https://github.com/iron/iron/wiki/How-to-Benchmark-hello.rs-Example) page was last time update Nov 5, 2014.\r\nwhile it's definitely depends on hardware and env, i'm getting ~10x times smaller number of request/sec:\r\n```\r\nRunning 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:3000/\r\n 12 threads and 900 connections\r\n Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev\r\n Latency 2.75ms 5.42ms 16.94ms 87.35%\r\n Req/Sec 7.38k 1.65k 12.78k 71.13%\r\n 68881 requests in 10.04s, 7.49MB read\r\n Socket errors: connect 0, read 0, write 0, timeout 3899\r\nRequests/sec: 6858.84\r\nTransfer/sec: 763.58KB\r\n```\r\nIs unboxed closures such a regress for hello.rs?\r\ni've unsuccessfully tried to bench pre-unboxed hello.rs, but updating to latest rustc nightly before compiling was a bad idea, and updating to previous rustc nightly is such a pain.\r\n84K number is also mentioned in [README.md](https://github.com/iron/iron/blob/master/README.md)",
"title": "wiki page \"How to Benchmark hello.rs Example\" may be in need of update",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "reem",
"comment_id": 68491785,
"datetime": 1420132029000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "When you run `cargo run --release --example hello` cargo ignores the `--release` flag when you set `--example`, which is why you are seeing poor performance. Build iron with `cargo build --release` and then compile `hello.rs` manually using `rustc --opt-level=3 examples/hello.rs -L target/release -L target/release/deps -C lto --cfg ndebug` to get a fully optimized binary to test with.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rndr",
"comment_id": 70531560,
"datetime": 1421688865000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "i've finally been able to compile iron (deps, 1.0-alpha, ...) and with rust-lang/cargo#831 being fixed if i run `cargo run --release --example hello` i'm getting:\r\n```\r\nRunning 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:3000/\r\n 12 threads and 900 connections\r\n Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev\r\n Latency 2.11ms 2.77ms 5.91ms 65.31%\r\n Req/Sec 42.11k 7.80k 54.33k 65.23%\r\n 390795 requests in 10.02s, 42.49MB read\r\n Socket errors: connect 0, read 0, write 0, timeout 3944\r\nRequests/sec: 39011.24\r\nTransfer/sec: 4.24MB\r\n```\r\nI've tried building by hand with your commands and it's same.\r\nI guess it might be me running ubuntu under VMWare VM. Closing?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "reem",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1421689051000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "reem",
"comment_id": 70532020,
"datetime": 1421689051000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "It's probably because of the VM, I just ran the same thing and got 85k. Closing.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2,101 | false | false | 2 | 5 | false |
Microsoft/vscode
|
Microsoft
| 169,061,632 | 10,061 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "eamodio",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1470207511000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "- VSCode Version: `1.4.0-insider` e3758d2cdaae78082a08a45ae28ea1bed5f47e8c\r\n- OS Version: `OS X El Capitan 10.11.6`\r\n\r\nSteps to Reproduce:\r\n\r\nWorking on a PR for https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-vscode to add git CodeLens in addition to the references CodeLens. I've tried setting each (git vs references) as separate providers, and all in one provider, but since both types of CodeLens are asynchronously resolved the order of them is random -- as seen below:\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nIs there any way to control the order of how multiple CodeLens will combine on a single line?\r\n\r\nI should also mention that I tried changing the range associated with the CodeLens (one at the start of the line, the other at the end) but saw no difference either.\r\n\r\nAny help would be greatly appreciated!",
"title": "Is there anyway to control the order of multiple CodeLens per line?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": 237194991,
"datetime": 1470218127000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Code lenses for a line should be [sorted](https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/blob/master/src/vs/editor/contrib/codelens/browser/codelens.ts#L514) by the their start column... Unsure tho if that order remains during the resolve phase...",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": 237195200,
"datetime": 1470218189000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 Unrelated question: Why do you want to add this to the omnisharp extension and don't make a separate extension? I believe this is a very useful extension and everyone (not only omnisharp users) should benefit from this 👍",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": 237197061,
"datetime": 1470218737000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "So, if I have a simple code lenses provider that adds something for a decoration for each `abc` occurrence things work.\r\n\r\n```\r\n vscode.languages.registerCodeLensProvider({ pattern: '**/*.abc' }, {\r\n provideCodeLenses(document, token) {\r\n const result: vscode.CodeLens[] = [];\r\n let idx = -1;\r\n while ((idx = document.getText().indexOf('abc', idx + 1)) > 0) {\r\n const pos = document.positionAt(idx);\r\n const range = document.getWordRangeAtPosition(pos);\r\n result.push(new vscode.CodeLens(range, { title: `Command@${idx}`, command: 'extension.sayHello' }));\r\n }\r\n return result;\r\n }\r\n });\r\n```\r\n\r\n<img width=\"433\" alt=\"screen shot 2016-08-03 at 12 04 35\" src=\"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1794099/17361779/760077ae-5972-11e6-9563-e8603a6cb98a.png\">\r\n\r\n\r\n@username_0 Is it possible that the two providers create code lenses for the exact same range? Also, does one or both providers implement the `resolveCodeLens` method?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "eamodio",
"comment_id": 237246191,
"datetime": 1470233102000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 Thanks for the response! I published my changes so I can reference them here, but fyi the code is a bit of a mess as I'm still just beginning and have been moving code around to try an \r\nd fix this issue.\r\n\r\nQuick overview, I have 2 CodeLensProviders -- [`UsageCodeLensProvider`](https://github.com/username_0/omnisharp-vscode/blob/feature-git-code-lens/src/features/usagesCodeLensProvider.ts) and [`GitCodeLensProvider`](https://github.com/username_0/omnisharp-vscode/blob/feature-git-code-lens/src/features/gitCodeLensProvider.ts).\r\n\r\nAt first I had them both registered as independent providers with no communication between them. Then I had `UsagesCodeLensProvider` delegate to the other (basically created a promise that waited for both providers to resolve and then `concat`'d the resulting lens together -- with the Git ones last). Then I changed it to the code checked in -- adding both types of CodeLens basically in 1 provider. Still didn't work and then I tried playing with the range -- made the git CodeLens range [start after](https://github.com/username_0/omnisharp-vscode/blob/feature-git-code-lens/src/features/gitCodeLensProvider.ts#L78) the other and still didn't see any change.\r\n\r\nAs for the reasoning for adding this into the OmniSharp extension -- It was mainly laziness (not knowing how also). Since I knew that OmniSharp was already providing some CodeLens at the same points that I wanted to, I could piggyback on that. Even still I did start this as a separate extension, but I didn't want to have 2 copies of OmniSharp running and parsing the code (since I didn't know of anyway to share the same copy). And I also didn't (don't) know of a way to have vscode directly provide me a generic way of getting a type/interface declarations and method/properties for the languages so was unsure how to do this as a more general purpose extensions. Though I completely agree it would be far preferable if possible (and without this extension from having to attempt to parse things itself).\r\n\r\nThanks again!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": 237260245,
"datetime": 1470236013000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Ok, I understand how it ended up in the omnisharp extension... One could try to reuse the document symbol information but that might be a slippery slope... There is unfortunately no common ast nor reliable token information.\r\n\r\nSo, it's definitely favourable to have two separate providers. Since both use the same data source (`currentFileMemebersAsTree`) you will end up with the same ranges which isn't caught by our sorting. I see that you are modifying the [range](https://github.com/username_0/omnisharp-vscode/blob/feature-git-code-lens/src/features/gitCodeLensProvider.ts#L78) but beware that `Range` and `Position` is immutable meaning `with` won't modify but it create a *new* range instance that you should use. Then you should see an effect. \r\n\r\nOn our side I'll work on a change to make sorting better when ranges equal (like sort by provider then).",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "eamodio",
"comment_id": 237442558,
"datetime": 1470281132000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 Ugh -- stupid mistake :( Thanks so much for your help. With that fixed I see the ordering is stable now. As for the document symbol information -- is there anything you can point me to there that I might explore?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": 237473654,
"datetime": 1470295369000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "What you could try is to utilise the `vscode.executeDocumentSymbolProvider` from here: https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/extensionAPI/vscode-api-commands. It basically what the UI would call to get the document symbols to render in the quick pick box. Be aware that the symbol kinds and ranges might slightly differ... Tho I believe its worth a try",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": 237508280,
"datetime": 1470304580000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Pushed a change that sorts by provider type in case ranges are equal.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1470304580000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": 237508626,
"datetime": 1470304673000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "to verify have two provider like below and make sure that in a `foo.abc` file the `abc` text is annotated such that _2Command@n_ come before _Command@n_\r\n\r\n```\r\n vscode.languages.registerCodeLensProvider({ pattern: '**/*.abc' }, {\r\n provideCodeLenses(document, token) {\r\n const result: vscode.CodeLens[] = [];\r\n let idx = -1;\r\n while ((idx = document.getText().indexOf('abc', idx + 1)) > 0) {\r\n const pos = document.positionAt(idx);\r\n const range = document.getWordRangeAtPosition(pos);\r\n result.push(new vscode.CodeLens(range, { title: `Command@${idx}`, command: 'extension.sayHello' }));\r\n }\r\n return result;\r\n }\r\n });\r\n\r\n vscode.languages.registerCodeLensProvider({ pattern: '**/*.abc' }, {\r\n provideCodeLenses(document, token) {\r\n const result: vscode.CodeLens[] = [];\r\n let idx = -1;\r\n while ((idx = document.getText().indexOf('abc', idx + 1)) > 0) {\r\n const pos = document.positionAt(idx);\r\n const range = document.getWordRangeAtPosition(pos);\r\n result.push(new vscode.CodeLens(range, { title: `2Command@${idx}`, command: 'extension.sayHello' }));\r\n }\r\n return result;\r\n }\r\n });\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "aeschli",
"comment_id": 244340265,
"datetime": 1472812036000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "verifying...",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "reopened",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1472825656000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "- VSCode Version: `1.4.0-insider` e3758d2cdaae78082a08a45ae28ea1bed5f47e8c\r\n- OS Version: `OS X El Capitan 10.11.6`\r\n\r\nSteps to Reproduce:\r\n\r\nWorking on a PR for https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-vscode to add git CodeLens in addition to the references CodeLens. I've tried setting each (git vs references) as separate providers, and all in one provider, but since both types of CodeLens are asynchronously resolved the order of them is random -- as seen below:\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nIs there any way to control the order of how multiple CodeLens will combine on a single line?\r\n\r\nI should also mention that I tried changing the range associated with the CodeLens (one at the start of the line, the other at the end) but saw no difference either.\r\n\r\nAny help would be greatly appreciated!",
"title": "Is there anyway to control the order of multiple CodeLens per line?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": 244386485,
"datetime": 1472825656000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "<img width=\"410\" alt=\"screen shot 2016-09-02 at 16 13 16\" src=\"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1794099/18206731/3ca048a4-7128-11e6-8b6c-3d203be8b74f.png\">\r\n\r\nSomething is still wrong. Next try in September...",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1472825954000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrieken",
"comment_id": 244388020,
"datetime": 1472825990000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Actually, not true. The two provider I use have different ranges",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 8,501 | false | false | 3 | 16 | true |
hazelcast/hazelcast
|
hazelcast
| 95,713,898 | 5,730 |
{
"number": 5730,
"repo": "hazelcast",
"user_login": "hazelcast"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "pveentjer",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1437157162000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "The KeyAwareTransactionLogRecord.getKey is now merged into the TransactionLogRecord.",
"title": "Flattens the KeyAwareTransactionLogRecord",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gurbuzali",
"comment_id": 122514428,
"datetime": 1437209162000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": ":+1:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 88 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
caskdata/coopr-provisioner
|
caskdata
| 63,335,357 | 69 |
{
"number": 69,
"repo": "coopr-provisioner",
"user_login": "caskdata"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "wolf31o2",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1426896584000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Import-only...",
"title": "Import hadoop_wrapper version 0.2.0",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "duddun",
"comment_id": 85249543,
"datetime": 1427154579000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "LGTM ;-)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 22 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
apache/spark
|
apache
| 196,318,323 | 16,331 |
{
"number": 16331,
"repo": "spark",
"user_login": "apache"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "WangTaoTheTonic",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1482114205000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "## What changes were proposed in this pull request?\r\n\r\nBefore we show \"-\" while the timestamp is less than 0, we should update it as now the date string is presented in format \"yyyy-MM-dd .....\"\r\n\r\n## How was this patch tested?\r\n\r\n**Before:**\r\n\r\n\r\n**After:**\r\n",
"title": "[SPARK-18920][HISTORYSERVER]Update outdated date formatting",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "srowen",
"comment_id": 267913907,
"datetime": 1482138089000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I don't think this can be the right change -- it's construing any date before 2000 as invalid, which may happen to be OK but is pretty arbitrary. It arises as the result of formatting -1 as a date, and this method seems to try to handle that, but it's comparing the string to -1 I guess. Surely this should be handled elsewhere, like in whatever calls `formatDate`?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "srowen",
"comment_id": 268990273,
"datetime": 1482500017000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Ping @username_0 I don't think we can make this change -- can you investigate a more fundamental fix or close this?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 988 | false | true | 2 | 3 | true |
XLabs/Xamarin-Forms-Labs
|
XLabs
| 60,890,584 | 719 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jmeadecvlt",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1426190863000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "would have expected Serialize and Deserialize methods being declared.",
"title": "IJsonSerializer is empty?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "sami1971",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1426191752000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "sami1971",
"comment_id": 78600274,
"datetime": 1426191752000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "They are...\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/XLabs/Xamarin-Forms-Labs/blob/master/src/Serialization/XLabs.Serialization/ISerializer.cs\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/XLabs/Xamarin-Forms-Labs/blob/master/src/Serialization/XLabs.Serialization/IStringSerializer.cs\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/XLabs/Xamarin-Forms-Labs/blob/master/src/Serialization/XLabs.Serialization/IByteSerializer.cs\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/XLabs/Xamarin-Forms-Labs/blob/master/src/Serialization/XLabs.Serialization/IStreamSerializer.cs",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jmeadecvlt",
"comment_id": 78607974,
"datetime": 1426193003000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "ok, so just don't do this: Resolver.Resolve<IJsonSerializer>()?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jmeadecvlt",
"comment_id": 78608140,
"datetime": 1426193037000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Resolver.Resolve<IJsonSerializer>()?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "sami1971",
"comment_id": 78610717,
"datetime": 1426193397000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "The second option is correct (as long as you have registered a JSON serializer).\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/XLabs/Xamarin-Forms-Labs/blob/master/Samples/XLabs.Sample.WP/App.xaml.cs#L256",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jmeadecvlt",
"comment_id": 78613311,
"datetime": 1426193746000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "ok, looks like visual studio was giving me some trouble. apologies for the confusion and thanks for the fast response!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 948 | false | false | 2 | 7 | false |
jwilm/alacritty
| null | 198,870,731 | 54 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jwilm",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1483588303000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Would have been nice for #53.",
"title": "Add a way to ask Alacritty to print glutin events using environment or a command-line flag.",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "tcrayford",
"comment_id": 271179780,
"datetime": 1483909886000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Implemented in https://github.com/username_0/alacritty/pull/236",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "tcrayford",
"comment_id": 271684577,
"datetime": 1484079155000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 seeing as this is merged, can we close this issue for now?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "jwilm",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1484079473000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jwilm",
"comment_id": 271685924,
"datetime": 1484079478000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "yep, thanks",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 163 | false | false | 2 | 5 | true |
PowerShell/PowerShell
|
PowerShell
| 192,332,844 | 2,802 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "lzybkr",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1480437440000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This test is failing in some but not all nightly test runs in appveyor:\r\n\r\n```\r\nDescribing native commands lifecycle\r\n [-] native | ps | native doesn't block 2.63s\r\n Expected {00:00:00} to be greater than {00:00:00.1000000}\r\n at line: 18 in C:\\projects\\powershell-f975h\\test\\powershell\\Language\\Scripti\r\nng\\NativeExecution\\NativeCommandProcessor.Tests.ps1\r\n 18: $lastTime - $firstTime | Should BeGreaterThan \r\n([timespan]::new(0, 0, 0, 0, 100)) # 100 milliseconds\r\n```\r\n\r\nHere are two such examples:\r\nhttps://ci.appveyor.com/project/PowerShell/powershell-f975h/build/6.0.0-alpha.13-88\r\nhttps://ci.appveyor.com/project/PowerShell/powershell-f975h/build/6.0.0-alpha.13-94",
"title": "Native command pipeline test is not reliable",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "lzybkr",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1484259909000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 683 | false | false | 1 | 2 | false |
lxc/lxd
|
lxc
| 221,312,351 | 3,170 |
{
"number": 3170,
"repo": "lxd",
"user_login": "lxc"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "ktossell",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1492013093000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Device minor numbers are 12-bit, and the kernel expects combined major-minor device IDs to be passed as a 32-bit integer with the following components, from MSB to LSB:\r\n\r\n * 12 zero bits\r\n * the 4 upper bits of the minor number\r\n * all 8 bits of the major number\r\n * the 8 lower bits of the minor number\r\n\r\nCurrently LXD writes `(major | minor >> 8)` in the bits where the kernel expects to find the major number.",
"title": "Fix handling of devices with minor>255",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "brauner",
"comment_id": 293648594,
"datetime": 1492017653000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "jenkins: test this please",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "stgraber",
"comment_id": 293658731,
"datetime": 1492019890000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "jenkins: test this please",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "stgraber",
"comment_id": 293666889,
"datetime": 1492021724000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "thanks!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 471 | false | true | 3 | 4 | false |
lapwinglabs/x-ray
|
lapwinglabs
| 159,547,780 | 189 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "rkmax",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1465525781000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This is the example from the documentation\r\n\r\n```js\r\n x('http://google.com', {\r\n main: 'title',\r\n image: x('#gbar a@href', 'title'), // follow link to google images\r\n }).write('google.json')\r\n\r\n```\r\nNow I tried with the dribble example but fetching info from another site\r\n\r\n```js\r\nx('https://dribbble.com', 'li.group', [{\r\n title: '.dribbble-img strong',\r\n image: '.dribbble-img [data-src]@data-src',\r\n short_description: x('.dribbble-link@href', '.shot-desc')\r\n}])\r\n .paginate('.next_page@href')\r\n .limit(3)\r\n .write('results.json')\r\n```\r\n\r\nbut I'm getting `[\r\nundefined,undefined,undefined]` in the **results.json** file",
"title": "Crawling to another site on collection always undefined",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "adriantomic",
"comment_id": 225180724,
"datetime": 1465565036000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Seems to be similar to this issue #65",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rkmax",
"comment_id": 225182209,
"datetime": 1465565427000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 I don't think so look the example",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rkmax",
"comment_id": 225189685,
"datetime": 1465567238000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Looking at the logs it seems like x-ray doesn't wait for the inner responses",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pisquared",
"comment_id": 225457383,
"datetime": 1465761972000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Got the same problem as @username_0.\r\nAs the docs indicate, a breadth-first crawling flow is recommended. So, you'd basically finish the root level of pages, then manually iterate over the second level and extend crawled data from the first level. Then proceed with the third. Solving this issue, really would confirm x-rays claim for being the next web scraper. So far great job, you're definitely on the right track!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "GeoffreyEmery",
"comment_id": 226980015,
"datetime": 1466313168000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "it would be really great to have a example of something more complex then google image for the crawling to the next site.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "GeoffreyEmery",
"comment_id": 227006542,
"datetime": 1466353883000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "just tried this with version version 2.0.2. and it is working if that helps anyone.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "arbh89",
"comment_id": 228240632,
"datetime": 1466734902000,
"masked_author": "username_4",
"text": "I have the same problem sa @username_0 .",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "van-nguyen",
"comment_id": 228726364,
"datetime": 1467028894000,
"masked_author": "username_5",
"text": "+1 should make it wait for inner response to fully resolve before continuing.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "tribet84",
"comment_id": 229806773,
"datetime": 1467325699000,
"masked_author": "username_6",
"text": "+1 it would be great to have this functionality working",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "albertpeiro",
"comment_id": 230114310,
"datetime": 1467482342000,
"masked_author": "username_7",
"text": "+1 no point on this library without it. Thanks for the effort though but it's hard to use this library without this issue fixed ;(",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "tribet84",
"comment_id": 230115342,
"datetime": 1467483774000,
"masked_author": "username_6",
"text": "@username_7 totally agree",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "zackcote",
"comment_id": 231084569,
"datetime": 1467899722000,
"masked_author": "username_8",
"text": "Just reiterating that this isn't working on x-ray version 2.3.0, definitely very frustrating. Also, so everyone knows, looks like there's a PR in the works here: https://github.com/lapwinglabs/x-ray/pull/181",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rkmax",
"comment_id": 234716585,
"datetime": 1469278224000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Yeah the PR #181 works",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Muscot",
"comment_id": 246150604,
"datetime": 1473548969000,
"masked_author": "username_9",
"text": "H guys, it world be a little sad If this project doesn't move forward, what can I do? I do not think I can merge to master? I do have my pull request? To solve nested crawling?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "alexchantastic",
"comment_id": 290957902,
"datetime": 1491095667000,
"masked_author": "username_10",
"text": "I think I'm still experiencing this issue except for arrays of collections. For example:\r\n\r\n```\r\nx('https://dribbble.com', 'li.group', [{\r\n title: '.dribbble-img strong',\r\n image: '.dribbble-img img@src',\r\n url: '.dribbble-link@href',\r\n tags: x('.dribbble-link@href', '.tag', [{\r\n name: 'strong',\r\n url: 'a@href'\r\n }])\r\n}])\r\n (function(err, obj) {\r\n console.log(obj);\r\n });\r\n```\r\n\r\nWhen I run this I get something like:\r\n\r\n```\r\n[ { title: 'Wages App',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/997070/screenshots/3404578/wages_teaser.gif',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404578-Wages-App',\r\n tags: [] },\r\n { title: 'Tokyo Gifathon Day 1',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/566817/screenshots/3404873/tokyogifathon01_dribbble_teaser.gif',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404873-Tokyo-Gifathon-Day-1',\r\n tags: [] },\r\n { title: 'Designer_01',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/1387536/screenshots/3404325/__-1_teaser.png',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404325-Designer-01',\r\n tags: [] },\r\n { title: 'Messenger - Redesign Sneak peek',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/825808/screenshots/3404548/ui-sneak-peek_teaser.png',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404548-Messenger-Redesign-Sneak-peek',\r\n tags: [] },\r\n { title: 'Cube sliding of Room decoration assistant',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/525747/screenshots/3404498/cube_teaser.gif',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404498-Cube-sliding-of-Room-decoration-assistant',\r\n tags: [] },\r\n { title: 'Poor Jelly Donut...',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/1044993/screenshots/3404725/poor-donut_teaser.png',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404725-Poor-Jelly-Donut',\r\n tags: [] },\r\n { title: 'APP Data page design',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/827126/screenshots/3404373/designbyzoeyshen_teaser.jpg',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404373-APP-Data-page-design',\r\n tags: [] },\r\n { title: 'Task Manager ',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/257709/screenshots/3404733/task_manager_shot_3_50__teaser.png',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404733-Task-Manager',\r\n tags: [] },\r\n { title: 'Galaxy of goop',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/671617/screenshots/3404102/dribbble-06_teaser.jpg',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404102-Galaxy-of-goop',\r\n tags: [] },\r\n { title: 'Sticker Mule Now',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/24974/screenshots/3404796/sticker-mule-now_teaser.png',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404796-Sticker-Mule-Now',\r\n tags: [] },\r\n { title: 'LUV App',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/311820/screenshots/3404736/cover_teaser.png',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404736-LUV-App',\r\n tags: [] },\r\n { title: 'Esc icon',\r\n image: 'https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/164417/screenshots/3404557/esc_teaser.jpg',\r\n url: 'https://dribbble.com/shots/3404557-Esc-icon',\r\n tags: [] }]\r\n```\r\n\r\nNote that the tags array is empty.\r\n\r\nThis seems to work:\r\n\r\n```\r\nx('https://dribbble.com', 'li.group', [{\r\n title: '.dribbble-img strong',\r\n image: '.dribbble-img img@src',\r\n url: '.dribbble-link@href',\r\n tags: x('.dribbble-link@href', ['.tag'])\r\n}])\r\n (function(err, obj) {\r\n console.log(obj);\r\n });\r\n```\r\n\r\nBut I would like to produce a collection.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rkmax",
"comment_id": 306538304,
"datetime": 1496765810000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi guys I can see this issue still is open, any update? or plan to fix this issue and the related ones",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "alexchantastic",
"comment_id": 306567859,
"datetime": 1496771995000,
"masked_author": "username_10",
"text": "@username_0 I ended up using CasperJS with PhantomJS. It's a bit more boilerplate code, but gave me more flexibility to do what I needed to do.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "markotom",
"comment_id": 312182567,
"datetime": 1498802375000,
"masked_author": "username_11",
"text": "+1",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "MrYakobo",
"comment_id": 330624837,
"datetime": 1505844734000,
"masked_author": "username_12",
"text": "+1, this issue really is annoying, forcing you to make callback functions for every call...",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Mehdi-Hp",
"comment_id": 395752672,
"datetime": 1528462647000,
"masked_author": "username_13",
"text": "Still no fix?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 6,011 | false | false | 14 | 21 | true |
18F/regulations-core
|
18F
| 100,413,958 | 11 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "cmc333333",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1439327646000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Right now, the only way to lock down write access is via including or not including django projects. Let's beef that up so that the api can be public facing. Options include HMACing the message, HTTP Auth, or simpler API key sharing.",
"title": "Secure write access via hmac or other authentication",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "tadhg-ohiggins",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1441066752000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 233 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
redfin/react-server
|
redfin
| 172,201,877 | 596 |
{
"number": 596,
"repo": "react-server",
"user_login": "redfin"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "careylin",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1471634433000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@doug-wade permalinked to the old logo, this links to the new logo",
"title": "Link to new logo in readme",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gigabo",
"comment_id": 241111354,
"datetime": 1471634498000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Not loading right for me? 😕 \r\n\r\n",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "careylin",
"comment_id": 241111546,
"datetime": 1471634552000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "hmm, will investigate",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "careylin",
"comment_id": 241112766,
"datetime": 1471634856000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Oh duh, @doug-wade already encountered this bug https://github.com/isaacs/github/issues/316 which is why he used the permalink >.<",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gigabo",
"comment_id": 241114975,
"datetime": 1471635468000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Yeah, looks awesome now! 🎉 \r\n\r\n",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 498 | false | false | 2 | 5 | false |
facelessuser/BracketHighlighter
| null | 52,681,102 | 214 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "techdev5521",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1419277099000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "When working in a line of code where the brackets are on the same line, the indication of the current bracket overrides the gutter linting icons. Is there a while to prioritize Sublimelint over BH?\r\n\r\n",
"title": "Prioritize SublimeLint",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pkmital",
"comment_id": 168813716,
"datetime": 1451942718000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Follow up, how can I entirely disable the gutter icons for BracketHighlighter so that another plugin may use the gutter?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "facelessuser",
"comment_id": 168816669,
"datetime": 1451943242000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "This is covered in the docs: http://username_2.github.io/BracketHighlighter/customize/#configuring-highlight-style.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 718 | false | false | 3 | 3 | true |
Symantec/Dominator
|
Symantec
| 169,986,537 | 201 |
{
"number": 201,
"repo": "Dominator",
"user_login": "Symantec"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "keep94",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1470679387000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Both region and profile required for aws sources.",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rgooch",
"comment_id": 238327832,
"datetime": 1470680172000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Let's just remove the support for command-line driver+url pairs. Force everyone to provide a -sourcesFile.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 106 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
rhysd/NyaoVim
| null | 174,737,547 | 82 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "haifengkao",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1472815355000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I have experienced some random crashs when opening new files.\r\nIt might be caused by other plugins or chrome itself.\r\nDoes NyaoVim provide crash logs for debugging?",
"title": "Question: where is the crash log?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rhysd",
"comment_id": 244371346,
"datetime": 1472822077000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "NyaoVim currently does not save a log to any file. I think you need to execute NyaoVim with `NODE_ENV=debug`, or keeping NyaoVim process attached by `nyaovim --no-detach` may dump an critial error log to stdout.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 376 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
photonstorm/phaser
| null | 86,249,452 | 1,843 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "youssefdetovernickr",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1433781620000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This isn't really an issue, pretty good that it does this but there's only one issue with it.. If you split your screen for 2 browsers to test your game, and you want to send over information to the other and want to see it happen (simulating clients on a server), you can't do this as that window is frozen until you actually click on the window to make it active again, however this makes the other browser inactive again..\r\n\r\nIs there a possibility to temporary hide this, or some type of debug mode to disable that freezing?",
"title": "The game is inactive when the window is inactive.",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "photonstorm",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1433784547000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "photonstorm",
"comment_id": 110084143,
"datetime": 1433784547000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "`game.stage.disableVisibilityChange = false`",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 572 | false | false | 2 | 3 | false |
octobercms/october
|
octobercms
| 159,181,101 | 2,109 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Benpxpx",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1465396850000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "If any changes are made in code view of Froala(Was present in previous editor as well) we have to swap back to design view and then save to make sure the changes have taken effect.",
"title": "Changes made in code view of Froala not saving",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gabsource",
"comment_id": 225345695,
"datetime": 1465635684000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "##### Expected behavior\r\nSubmitting while the RichEditor is source mode should take the latest value present in the source mode editor instead of the latest from the WYSIWYG mode.\r\n\r\n##### Actual behavior\r\nSubmitting while the RichEditor is in source mode does not send the actual value. We need to switch to WYSIWYG mode to persist it.\r\n\r\n##### Reproduce steps\r\n- Install Rainlab.Pages plugin\r\n- Create a new Page using the Pages plugin\r\n- Set a title and url\r\n- Switch the content editor to source mode\r\n- Type something like `<p>Hellow World!</p>`\r\n- Save either using the _Save_ button or keyboard shortcut\r\n- Reload the browser\r\n- Open the test page\r\n- The content is empty\r\n\r\n##### October build\r\n345\r\n\r\n##### Plugins version\r\nRainlab.Pages 1.2.6",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "FelixINX",
"comment_id": 225455796,
"datetime": 1465759988000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_0 with Redactor, the editor was adding some HTML stuff (div, p), is it the same issue here? I am unable to test the new editor from here.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Benpxpx",
"comment_id": 225535265,
"datetime": 1465811066000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_2 When I've been switching between code view and design view, I've not noticed any extra HTML added to the code when I switch back to code view.\r\n\r\n@username_1 Thank you for doing that, very much appreciated. I didn't have time to do the full one until today, but you beat me too it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "claudchan",
"comment_id": 232270783,
"datetime": 1468392454000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "I have the same issue. Any fixes?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "LukeTowers",
"comment_id": 232505268,
"datetime": 1468448783000,
"masked_author": "username_4",
"text": "+1, same issue for me",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "DanielHitchen",
"comment_id": 241688704,
"datetime": 1471947516000,
"masked_author": "username_5",
"text": "This is still an issue",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "daftspunk",
"comment_id": 244504140,
"datetime": 1472856275000,
"masked_author": "username_6",
"text": "Thanks, it is labelled medium priority and will be looked at soon.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "daftspunk",
"comment_id": 253025263,
"datetime": 1476215456000,
"masked_author": "username_6",
"text": "Fixed as part of https://github.com/rainlab/pages-plugin/issues/193, available in [October Build 370+](http://octobercms.com/changelog).",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "daftspunk",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1476215466000,
"masked_author": "username_6",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "agm1984",
"comment_id": 834582805,
"datetime": 1620404007000,
"masked_author": "username_7",
"text": "We just solved this error in a Vue JS project by using the vanilla JS FroalaEditor.\r\n\r\nWe studied the commit from back on October 12 2016 and saw what it was doing:\r\n\r\n``` javascript\r\nif (this.content_editor.codeView && this.content_editor.codeView.isActive()) {\r\n this.content_editor.html.set(this.content_editor.codeView.get());\r\n}\r\n\r\nthis.content = this.content_editor.html.get();\r\n```\r\n\r\n`this.content_editor` is the Froala editor:\r\n\r\n``` javascript\r\nimport FroalaEditor from 'froala-editor';\r\n\r\nthis.content_editor = new FroalaEditor('div#text_editor1', this.configContent);\r\n```\r\n\r\nIn the above code, the part that fixes the error is, onSave if the editor is in codeView, set html to codeView.get().\r\nThis works because `codeView.get()` returns a string.\r\n\r\nFor us, the final piece was to do\r\n```\r\nthis.content = this.content_editor.html.get();\r\n```\r\n\r\nbecause you can't use v-model with the vanilla editor, so `this.content` is the value sent to the server when you press save.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2,631 | false | false | 8 | 11 | true |
syedhali/EZAudio
| null | 91,728,423 | 170 |
{
"number": 170,
"repo": "EZAudio",
"user_login": "syedhali"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "louis49",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1435564340000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Using preprocessor macro to import external library TPCircularBuffer to be usable with or without cocoapods",
"title": "Cocoapod compatibility with External lib",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "hakanw",
"comment_id": 117989466,
"datetime": 1435831767000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "+1\r\n\r\nIt's impossible right now to have both EZAudio and AmazingAudio in the same projekt due to duplicate symbol errors from the linker.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "syedhali",
"comment_id": 118140943,
"datetime": 1435865382000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "So I just released 0.7.1 that allows EZAudio and the Amazing Audio Engine to work together by providing a subspec for EZAudio. Just change your Podfile to use the `EZAudio/Core` subspec like so:\r\n```\r\nplatform :ios, '8.0'\r\n\r\ntarget 'EZAudioAmazingAudio' do\r\npod 'EZAudio/Core', '0.7.1'\r\npod 'TheAmazingAudioEngine', '~> 1.4'\r\nend\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "louis49",
"comment_id": 118141874,
"datetime": 1435865680000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Thanks.\r\nI will add a bug on microphone tomorrow ;-)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 630 | false | false | 3 | 4 | false |
WebMemex/webmemex-extension
|
WebMemex
| 207,526,311 | 27 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Treora",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1487081613000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Mainly just making a cleanup of Oliver's code: https://github.com/username_2/pdf2text4extensions",
"title": "Extract text content from PDFs",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "arpitgogia",
"comment_id": 280857425,
"datetime": 1487436160000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I'd like to take this up. Please describe further.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Treora",
"comment_id": 280873617,
"datetime": 1487450683000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "{\r\n plainText: \"bla bla blabla...\",\r\n title: \"Bla.\",\r\n numPages: 3,\r\n ...\r\n}\r\n```\r\n\r\nWe'll probably use the core of [PDF.js](https://mozilla.github.io/pdf.js/) in the same way [Oliver's code](https://github.com/username_2/pdf2text4extensions) does, though I am not sure if we can import just the core or if it only comes along with the rendering part. Perhaps have a look at its docs and examples.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "oliversauter",
"comment_id": 282487042,
"datetime": 1488032657000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I talked to @vaibhav, he wanted to take this task on. Is that still valid Vaibhav?\r\n\r\n@username_0 I suggest adding him as a contributor, so we can assign the task.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "oliversauter",
"comment_id": 282487090,
"datetime": 1488032706000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I talked to @username_3, he wanted to take this task on. Is that still valid Vaibhav?\r\n\r\n@username_0 I suggest adding him as a contributor, so we can assign the task.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "vaibsharma",
"comment_id": 282493686,
"datetime": 1488039147000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "Yes I want to take this task .",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "oliversauter",
"comment_id": 282498938,
"datetime": 1488043980000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "ok great. Happy Hacking!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Treora",
"comment_id": 283638881,
"datetime": 1488457170000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_3 / @username_2: do I understand plans changed again? For me this feature does not have a high priority and nothing is blocked by it, so no problem if it moves to the waiting list again, but if somebody wants to implement it I am glad to assist.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "oliversauter",
"comment_id": 283641092,
"datetime": 1488457822000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_3 is having his midterm exams until 11 March, so wont be able to take it on anytime soon and there are other people who want to take it on...soon coming :)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "vaibsharma",
"comment_id": 283648427,
"datetime": 1488459977000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "I pushed whatever I was able to commit . Please have a look at #43 . Rest I will do after midsems :) . Thanks",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "oliversauter",
"comment_id": 283648508,
"datetime": 1488460001000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I am sorry I might have mixed up some things...so many new people in the last days. :/\r\n\r\nIt appears that @username_3 was working on this!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "RajPratim21",
"comment_id": 284412733,
"datetime": 1488810933000,
"masked_author": "username_4",
"text": "Hi, I am taking a try on it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "vaibsharma",
"comment_id": 285866433,
"datetime": 1489238649000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "Sorry @username_0 @username_2 for the delay . I was busy with my university exams .\r\nIs this issue is not mandatory for now or someone is working on it ?\r\nIf not .. then can I again start with it ?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Treora",
"comment_id": 305903945,
"datetime": 1496436094000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Another overripe issue. Was fixed in #88 (merged in d59ce46).",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "Treora",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1496436094000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1,881 | false | false | 5 | 15 | true |
mesos/mesos-go
|
mesos
| 223,996,034 | 294 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jdef",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1493084604000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Currently the examples for the v0 and v1 APIs live under the `api/v0` and `api/v1` packages. This proposal would move them OUT of the `api` tree and into a top-level `examples` tree. Additionally, the `api/v1/lib` package would be folded into `api/v1` (moving everything from `lib` up one level, and then remove `lib`). The example v1 Docker builder would also move to examples. The final structure would resemble something like this:\r\n```\r\napi/\r\n v0/\r\n ...\r\n v1/\r\n backoff/\r\n encoding/\r\n executor/\r\n extras/\r\n ...\r\n vendor/\r\nexamples/\r\n v0/\r\n executor/\r\n flagcheck/\r\n persistent_scheduler/\r\n ...\r\n v1/\r\n docker/\r\n example-scheduler/\r\n example-executor/\r\n vendor/\r\n```\r\n\r\n/cc @username_1",
"title": "proposal: repackage examples as a top-level dir",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pires",
"comment_id": 296882144,
"datetime": 1493089888000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "This looks great! 👍",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 750 | false | false | 2 | 2 | true |
ilyabirman/Likely
| null | 204,676,988 | 121 |
{
"number": 121,
"repo": "Likely",
"user_login": "ilyabirman"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "iamakulov",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1485976497000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Closes #120.\r\nA part of #31.\r\n\r\n**TO DO** (the list will be updated):\r\n- [ ] Rename `svgi` in the service descriptor into something more meaningful\r\n- [ ] Rename `name` in the service descriptor into something like `publicButtonName`: this parameter goes into the button class, so it should be explicit that it shouldn’t be changed for backward compatibility\r\n- [ ] Replace `utils.js` with Lodash (make sure it doesn’t affect the bundle size)",
"title": "[WIP] Major refactoring",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "iamakulov",
"comment_id": 306212094,
"datetime": 1496675219000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I’ll close this for now to clean up the PR list. I’m going to come back to this in July",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 529 | false | false | 1 | 2 | false |
google/closure-compiler
|
google
| 154,048,516 | 1,785 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "brad4d",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1462897278000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I got this idea from a suggestion that we add a check for, probably accidental, calls to x.prototype.foo()\r\ninstead of x.prototype.foo.apply() (or call()).\r\n\r\nIt's a good idea, but probably not worth spending closure-compiler eng time on. It would be great if people could quickly write their own errors and warnings like this one by using a DSL like the one used by refasterJS, just a bit of JS template with annotations. For this example, I'm thinking it would look something like this.\r\n\r\n/**\r\n * Warn if code calls a method on func.prototype directly instead of using its call() or apply() method.\r\n * @param {Function} func\r\n * @identifierParam someFunc\r\n * @warning Direct call to prototype method. Did you mean to use apply() or call()?\r\n */\r\nfunction warning_prototypeMethodCall(func, someFunc) {\r\n func.prototype.someFunc(/** @anyParameters */);\r\n}\r\n\r\nThere would be a compiler option to specify one or more files containing such templates to be used during compilation.\r\n\r\nThis could even be extended to optimizations or other code modification.\r\nClosure-compiler eng could use this as a quick way to prototype an optimization.",
"title": "Provide refasterJS-style DSL to allow quick definition of custom compiler passes",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "MatrixFrog",
"comment_id": 218212020,
"datetime": 1462897384000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "cc @username_2 who created RefasterJS",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mknichel",
"comment_id": 218358633,
"datetime": 1462940789000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Hi @username_0 ,\r\n\r\nYou can use RefasterJS syntax with the Closure Compiler conformance framework (https://github.com/google/closure-compiler/wiki/JS-Conformance-Framework - BANNED_CODE_PATTERN).\r\n\r\nHave you seen this before? Are you asking for something that's not possible with that?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "brad4d",
"comment_id": 218807401,
"datetime": 1463069629000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "That's a very good point, @username_2. I'm not very familiar with the\nconformance framework, which is why I forgot about it here.\nI know it can prevent compilation of banned code patterns.\nCan it also just warn?\nCan it modify the AST also?\n\nThanks,\nBradford",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mknichel",
"comment_id": 218949535,
"datetime": 1463113775000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I don't think you can cause one particular conformance rule to warn while the rest error, but I think you can cause all conformance violations to warn by setting the level for JSC_CONFORMANCE_VIOLATION..\r\n\r\nRight now there's no support for transforming code in the compiler with the RefasterJS syntax. It's something that we have discussed before, but so far we've never come up with a use case to implement it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "brad4d",
"comment_id": 219087209,
"datetime": 1463155531000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "So to sum-up the current state of things:\r\n\r\n- The JS conformance framework will allow users to forbid or give warnings for code patterns they define, but it isn't fine-grained enough now to treat some patterns as errors and others as warnings.\r\n- RefasterJS can be used for code transformations, but the compiler doesn't support incorporating such transformations into a compiler pass.\r\n\r\nSo, suppose I'm a super power user, and I really want to define my own custom code manipulation, warnings, and errors on top of what the compiler can provide. The current solution would be a tool chain that looks something like this.\r\n\r\nWhenever compilation is needed...\r\n1. Run RefasterJS over the code with my custom code modification definitions.\r\n2. Get my custom warnings by running the compiler once with minimal code modification options, JS Conformance errors treated as warnings, and my custom \"warnings\" JS Conformance specifications.\r\n3. Run the compiler again with all the options I want enabled and my custom JS Conformance error specifications.\r\n\r\nSo, all this is do-able if a bit awkward in places.\r\n\r\nIt seems reasonable to just use RefasterJS for custom code modification.\r\nThe main awkwardness is around defining some code patterns as warnings and others as errors.\r\nAllowing separate specification of error and warning conformance patterns in a single invocation of the compiler at least doesn't *sound* like it would be difficult, but there are a lot of more important things to work on, so I'll just close this.\r\n\r\nThanks.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "brad4d",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1463155531000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "concavelenz",
"comment_id": 219198079,
"datetime": 1463196634000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "There was some discussion and proposal to create conformance rule \"level\" (lint, warning, error) but I haven't implemented it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mknichel",
"comment_id": 219234909,
"datetime": 1463249552000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "We're still discussing how to classify conformance errors (security, lint, performance, etc.) - we may propose something to you in the upcoming months.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3,931 | false | false | 4 | 9 | true |
MicrosoftResearch/Azimuth
|
MicrosoftResearch
| 186,740,309 | 11 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "afrendeiro",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1478075933000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Azimuth doesn't seem to be Python 3 ready. Could this be done?",
"title": "Support Python 3",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "antonkulaga",
"comment_id": 277370326,
"datetime": 1486158228000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Totally agree, python2 is super-outdated!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Toseph",
"comment_id": 553916787,
"datetime": 1573742422000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "This is an old ticket but I'd like to add a +1 for python3 support.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pablocarderam",
"comment_id": 695066206,
"datetime": 1600460264000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "Anyone coming here, check out https://github.com/milescsmith/Azimuth",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "shenweiyan",
"comment_id": 797270618,
"datetime": 1615530871000,
"masked_author": "username_4",
"text": "This version is great, but why there is no issue? I have encountered some problems and want to ask for advice.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 349 | false | false | 5 | 5 | false |
at-import/breakpoint
|
at-import
| 121,568,537 | 154 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "pdehaan",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1449778645000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I'm using Node.js and ran `npm i breakpoint-sass` and got the previous error when trying to use the `@breakpoint` mixin in my Sass file.\r\n\r\n### package.json\r\n```json\r\n{\r\n \"name\": \"break-sass\",\r\n \"version\": \"1.0.0\",\r\n \"dependencies\": {\r\n \"breakpoint-sass\": \"2.6.1\"\r\n },\r\n \"devDependencies\": {\r\n \"gulp\": \"3.9.0\",\r\n \"gulp-sass\": \"2.1.1\"\r\n }\r\n}\r\n```\r\n\r\n### gulpfile.js\r\n```js\r\nconst breakpoint = require('breakpoint-sass');\r\nconst gulp = require('gulp');\r\nconst sass = require('gulp-sass');\r\n\r\ngulp.task('sass', function() {\r\n return gulp.src('in.scss')\r\n .pipe(sass({\r\n includePaths: [\r\n breakpoint.includePaths\r\n ]\r\n }).on('error', sass.logError))\r\n .pipe(gulp.dest('out.css'));\r\n});\r\n```\r\n\r\n### in.scss\r\n```scss\r\n$hidpi: min-resolution 1.5dppx;\r\n\r\n#foo {\r\n @include breakpoint($hidpi) {\r\n content: 'Device Pixel Ratio of at least 1.5';\r\n }\r\n}\r\n```\r\n\r\n## Actual results:\r\n```\r\n➜ break-sass gulp sass\r\n\r\n/Users/username_0/dev/tmp/del/break-sass/node_modules/breakpoint-sass/stylesheets/_breakpoint.scss:4\r\n$Breakpoint-Settings: (\r\n ^\r\nSyntaxError: Unexpected token :\r\n at Module._compile (module.js:439:25)\r\n at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10)\r\n at Module.load (module.js:356:32)\r\n at Function.Module._load (module.js:312:12)\r\n at Module.require (module.js:364:17)\r\n at require (module.js:380:17)\r\n at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/username_0/dev/tmp/del/break-sass/gulpfile.js:1:82)\r\n at Module._compile (module.js:456:26)\r\n at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10)\r\n at Module.load (module.js:356:32)\r\n```",
"title": "\"SyntaxError: Unexpected token :\" when using Node.js",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Snugug",
"comment_id": 186803140,
"datetime": 1456053964000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I'm not entirely sure why you expected this to work? Breakpoint doesn't provide any JavaScript whatsoever so `includePaths` isn't a thing that can be used. Breakpoint is distributed through NPM as an [Eyeglass](https://github.com/sass-eyeglass/eyeglass) module, so you'll need to use Eyeglass to use it via NPM",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "Snugug",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1456053966000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Overload119",
"comment_id": 294377330,
"datetime": 1492380778000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I just ran into this while setting up a Rails 5 app with.\r\n\r\nThis was the only Google result for the issue, so hopefully this will save someone some time:\r\n\r\nI ended up running something like this in the `sass.js` loader:\r\n\r\n`path.join(__dirname, '../../../node_modules/breakpoint-sass/stylesheets'),` in\r\n\r\n```\r\nconst ExtractTextPlugin = require('extract-text-webpack-plugin')\r\nconst { env } = require('../configuration.js')\r\nconst path = require('path');\r\n\r\nmodule.exports = {\r\n test: /\\.(scss|sass|css)$/i,\r\n use: ExtractTextPlugin.extract({\r\n fallback: 'style-loader',\r\n use: [\r\n { loader: 'css-loader', options: { minimize: env.NODE_ENV === 'production' } },\r\n 'postcss-loader',\r\n {\r\n loader: 'sass-loader',\r\n options: {\r\n includePaths: [\r\n require('bourbon').includePaths,\r\n // I don't know how to configure this to not be manual...\r\n path.join(__dirname, '../../../node_modules/breakpoint-sass/stylesheets'),\r\n ],\r\n }\r\n },\r\n ]\r\n })\r\n}\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis was simpler than learning how Eyeglass would integrate into Webpacker rails.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3,066 | false | false | 3 | 4 | true |
Semantic-Org/Semantic-UI
|
Semantic-Org
| 136,012,248 | 3,751 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Morrolan",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1456308110000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/username_0/efp8z6Ln/292/\r\n\r\nWhen creating a 'ui vertical menu' (<http://semantic-ui.com/collections/menu.html#vertical-menu>), the format differs if it is summoned from a dropdown - whether it is 'ui dropdown' or 'ui simple dropdown item'. The menu on the left and right have exactly the same code, yet look vastly different when rendered.\r\n\r\nOne would expect that 2 menu's with the exact same code would look the same regardless of how they appeared on screen?",
"title": "'ui vertical menu' format differs if summoned by dropdown",
"type": "issue"
}
] | 491 | false | true | 1 | 1 | true |
gautema/CQRSlite
| null | 237,238,682 | 31 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "ktheeten",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1497970274000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi,\r\n\r\nI am trying to integrate CQRSlite with a solution that uses NServiceBus. NServiceBus uses Autofac as its DI container. To integrate everything in Autofac, I tried the following :\r\n\r\n```\r\nbuilder.RegisterType<Session>().As<ISession>();\r\nbuilder.RegisterType<SFEventStore>().As<IEventStore>();\r\nbuilder.RegisterType<MemoryCache>().As<ICache>();\r\nbuilder.Register(c =>\r\n {\r\n return new CacheRepository(new Repository(c.Resolve<IEventStore>()), c.Resolve<IEventStore>(), c.Resolve<ICache>());\r\n\r\n })\r\n .As<IRepository>();\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis causes a circular dependency exception on the IRepository. When an ISession is resolved, Autofac resolves an IRepository to a CacheRepository, which in turn resolves the Repository to a CacheRepository because the constructor of a CacheRepository requires an IRepository:\r\n\r\n`public CacheRepository(IRepository repository, IEventStore eventStore, ICache cache);`\r\n\r\nAny idea how to solve this?\r\n\r\nI really want to use CQRSlite because it contains great functionality for our solution!\r\n\r\nThanks,\r\nKarl",
"title": "Using Autofac as DI container",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gautema",
"comment_id": 309865575,
"datetime": 1497987522000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "It looks like Autofac has some built in support for decorators. Maybe you can try it? \r\n\r\nI do however find it strange that the builder method don't work as it is. You could try making a builder method for Session instead and see if it works?\r\n\r\n[Adapters and Decorators](http://docs.autofac.org/en/latest/advanced/adapters-decorators.html)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ktheeten",
"comment_id": 310319098,
"datetime": 1498121681000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Tried it with the Autofac decorator, but still no luck. I [opened a question on StackOverflow](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44671464/autofac-circular-dependency) about this, explaining what I tried.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ktheeten",
"comment_id": 311079569,
"datetime": 1498488066000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi Gaute,\r\n\r\nI was able to resolve the circular dependency stuff (was related to NServicebus).\r\n\r\nI have another question. In the sample implementation, you register a **scoped** instance of the CacheRepository. Does this ultimately mean that for every command that is handled, a new CacheRepository is created? So if you then Get an aggregate from the session (and as a consequence from the CacheRepository) would you agree that an aggregate will never be retrieved from the cache, unless you put it in there first within the handler?\r\n\r\nSo in this code:\r\n\r\n```\r\n public async Task Handle(DeactivateInventoryItem message)\r\n {\r\n var item = await _session.Get<InventoryItem>(message.Id, message.ExpectedVersion);\r\n item.Deactivate();\r\n await _session.Commit();\r\n }\r\n```\r\n\r\nthe InventoryItem will not be in the cache? It will be retrieved from the event store however.\r\n\r\nRegards\r\nKarl",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gautema",
"comment_id": 311125914,
"datetime": 1498498260000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Even if the Cache is scoped, both System.Runtime.Caching.MemoryCache used by .NET Full framework and Microsoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory.MemoryCache used by .NET Core stores the events in a globally scoped cache. So it will be cached, but feel free to try with a debugger to make sure.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "gautema",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1498500869000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2,862 | false | false | 2 | 6 | false |
coreos/go-tspi
|
coreos
| 130,336,031 | 4 |
{
"number": 4,
"repo": "go-tspi",
"user_login": "coreos"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "iaguis",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1454325898000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "When we send requests to tpmd, we could potentially block for a long\r\ntime if an unexpected service is listening on that port.\r\n\r\nAllow setting a timeout so users of the library can limit this\r\npossibility.\r\n\r\nSee https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/1816#issuecomment-172875302",
"title": "tpmclient: add timeout",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jonboulle",
"comment_id": 178005862,
"datetime": 1454339028000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "lgtm after docstring fix",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "iaguis",
"comment_id": 178065415,
"datetime": 1454345682000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Updated.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jonboulle",
"comment_id": 178085783,
"datetime": 1454347882000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "LGTM, was in two minds about making this the default (rather than adding `NewWithTimeout`) but I think we should err on the side of having it explicit since it is quite important IMHO.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 494 | false | false | 2 | 4 | false |
JoshClose/CsvHelper
| null | 200,587,889 | 627 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mattbrailsford",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1484300975000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Whilst parsing a CSV with a string value that contains both a quoted string and newlines, the parser will fail on any preceding newline following the quoted string treating the new line as a new record. Ie\r\n\r\n 1,\"My string value container a \\\"quoted\\\" string\r\n and a line break\"\r\n\r\nIn this example, the parser will fail and treat \"and a line break\" as a new record, rather than a continuation of the entire string value.",
"title": "Newline parsing fails if string contains a quoted string",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "JoshClose",
"comment_id": 272476088,
"datetime": 1484322704000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "`\\\"` is not how a quote is escaped. You need a double double quote `\"\"`.\r\n\r\nThis is how the data should look based on what you're expecting.\r\n```cs\r\n1,\"My string value container a '\"quoted'\" string\r\nand a line break\"\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "JoshClose",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1496462699000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 648 | false | false | 2 | 3 | false |
JOML-CI/JOML
|
JOML-CI
| 128,819,232 | 75 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "elect86",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1453814867000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "`Matrix4f.rotation(1f, 10f, 0f, 0f)` returns `m00 = 46.51007`. `glm` returns instead `m00 == 1`",
"title": "Rotation() result divergence",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "httpdigest",
"comment_id": 175111276,
"datetime": 1453827026000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Why does not anyone read the JavaDocs... I put about 99.9% of the effort in writing documentation and not Java code. ;)\r\nThat JavaDoc clearly says:\r\n**The axis described by the three components needs to be a unit vector.**",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "chriscamacho",
"comment_id": 175139741,
"datetime": 1453830600000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I'm surprised, your surprised people don't read docs.... ;)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "elect86",
"comment_id": 175150276,
"datetime": 1453832019000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I gave a try normalizing it before but I got a wrong result anyway, I will double check",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "httpdigest",
"comment_id": 175168081,
"datetime": 1453833745000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Doing:\r\n```Java\r\nMatrix4f m = new Matrix4f();\r\nm.rotation(1, 1, 0, 0); // <- rotate 1 radians (approx. 57 degrees) about the x axis\r\nSystem.err.println(m);\r\n```\r\ngave:\r\n```\r\n 1,000E+0 0,000E+0 0,000E+0 0,000E+0\r\n 0,000E+0 5,403E-1 -8,415E-1 0,000E+0\r\n 0,000E+0 8,415E-1 5,403E-1 0,000E+0\r\n 0,000E+0 0,000E+0 0,000E+0 1,000E+0\r\n```\r\nwhich is correct and should be what GLM outputs.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "elect86",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1453891916000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "elect86",
"comment_id": 175553134,
"datetime": 1453891916000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Yep, I already tried that and was the same.\r\n\r\nAnyway it turned out it was indeed the normalization..\r\n\r\nMy bad, sorry for the bother",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "httpdigest",
"comment_id": 175570044,
"datetime": 1453894129000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Alright, cool. It's okay, keep bothering if you have trouble with anything else. :)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "elect86",
"comment_id": 176082312,
"datetime": 1453973563000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "You may want to add a matrix3f.normal()",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "httpdigest",
"comment_id": 176102257,
"datetime": 1453975835000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "No, I don't. Because [it is already there](https://github.com/JOML-CI/JOML/blob/master/src/org/joml/Matrix3f.java#L2411). :)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "elect86",
"comment_id": 176115903,
"datetime": 1453977525000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Yep",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "httpdigest",
"comment_id": 176121040,
"datetime": 1453978130000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Added with https://github.com/JOML-CI/JOML/commit/970dc6a5601c251482c53609b0a1726f9a6d994b",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 1,330 | false | false | 3 | 12 | false |
kestrelm/Creature_Godot
| null | 165,084,519 | 4 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "blurymind",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1468331221000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "It would be great if we could control bone rotation and ttranslation via scripting. That way the player could look in a specific direction (mouse cursor for example).",
"title": "[feature request] Translate bones via runtime code in game",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "blurymind",
"comment_id": 232052494,
"datetime": 1468331288000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "set_bone_pos and set_bone_rot! Please this will be amazing to have :)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "kestrelm",
"comment_id": 232104290,
"datetime": 1468342536000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Sounds good, I have a number of tasks I need to push out first but I will definitely take note of this.\r\n\r\nCheers",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "blurymind",
"comment_id": 277736679,
"datetime": 1486398914000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This would really put it on par with spine 2d..\r\nI guess ideally it would be best if we can overlay a rotation on top of the animation that is running on a bone. Overlay or Overwrite - control with a 0-1 degree \r\n\r\nIt will enable to make a game where the character is aiming his gun to where the mouse pointer is for example, while running",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 687 | false | false | 2 | 4 | false |
cms-sw/cmssw
|
cms-sw
| 241,769,867 | 19,645 |
{
"number": 19645,
"repo": "cmssw",
"user_login": "cms-sw"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "davidlange6",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1499703742000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "for comment about what clang-tidy does to CMSSW (and likely big and not mergeable - this is what clang-tidy check boost-use-to-string does on the tip of CMSSW_9_3_X as of a few days ago",
"title": "clang check boost-use-to-string",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "davidlange6",
"comment_id": 314158887,
"datetime": 1499703898000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "please test",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "davidlange6",
"comment_id": 314164079,
"datetime": 1499704975000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "please test",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "slava77",
"comment_id": 314296194,
"datetime": 1499736450000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "-1\r\n\r\nthis technically looks OK, but it should compile",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ianna",
"comment_id": 314713194,
"datetime": 1499853049000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "+1",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dmitrijus",
"comment_id": 315015599,
"datetime": 1499936035000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "+1",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "davidlange6",
"comment_id": 315195722,
"datetime": 1499978455000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "please test\r\n\r\nthe compilation error seems unrelated - i wonder if it reproduces",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "davidlange6",
"comment_id": 316667624,
"datetime": 1500547757000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "please test",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "davidlange6",
"comment_id": 316779906,
"datetime": 1500572929000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "merge",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 361 | false | true | 4 | 9 | false |
RubaXa/Sortable
| null | 125,311,815 | 719 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "dwburdick",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1452135448000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Would it be possible to set a maximum number of items for a list? I'm using two separate lists -- a master and a user-selected list. I'd like to allow the user to move or clone a maximum of five items from the master list to the user-selected list. Thanks for the great tools.",
"title": "Set maximum number of items for a list?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "RubaXa",
"comment_id": 170449127,
"datetime": 1452495437000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Use advanced groups: https://github.com/username_1/Sortable/tree/dev#group-option",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "RubaXa",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1452588147000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "LeszekKicior",
"comment_id": 479463079,
"datetime": 1554293581000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "The link provided no longer works, and the solution isn't explained anywhere. Can anyone elaborate on how to create groups with a set maximum length?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "owen-m1",
"comment_id": 479559142,
"datetime": 1554308291000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "@username_2 The demo in the README has this example: https://jsbin.com/nacoyah/edit?js,output\r\n\r\nThe last `qux` Sortable will stop allowing items once it reaches a max length of 4 items.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 690 | false | false | 4 | 5 | true |
hedefalk/atom-vue
| null | 103,827,970 | 2 |
{
"number": 2,
"repo": "atom-vue",
"user_login": "hedefalk"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mehwww",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1440822385000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "https://github.com/atom/language-sass/blob/master/grammars%2Fscss.cson#L1",
"title": "Fix scss grammer",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "hedefalk",
"comment_id": 135943345,
"datetime": 1440826364000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Looks good to me!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "hedefalk",
"comment_id": 135943382,
"datetime": 1440826450000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Published 0.3.0.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 106 | false | false | 2 | 3 | false |
aspnet/Mvc
|
aspnet
| 103,568,301 | 3,049 |
{
"number": 3049,
"repo": "Mvc",
"user_login": "aspnet"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "rynowak",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1440700386000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Change ModelBinding to use a single pass",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rynowak",
"comment_id": 135516444,
"datetime": 1440700395000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "/cc @username_1",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rynowak",
"comment_id": 136408041,
"datetime": 1441035312000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 ping",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dougbu",
"comment_id": 136453166,
"datetime": 1441045416000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": ":shipit: once you've whacked the hidden gremlins and the tests are working again.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "davidfowl",
"comment_id": 136645103,
"datetime": 1441098898000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "This was merged right?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 126 | false | false | 3 | 5 | true |
bitc/lushtags
| null | 143,804,897 | 29 |
{
"number": 29,
"repo": "lushtags",
"user_login": "bitc"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "CristhianMotoche",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1459082211000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I really like this project, so I updated its dependencies and added the capability to build the project with stack (against the resolver `5.9.`). It would be awesome if you can take a look at the changes and upload the package to `hackage` and `stackage`. If I can help you with something, just let me know it.\r\nThanks in advance.",
"title": "Add support for current libraries and build project with Stack",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "bitc",
"comment_id": 202335120,
"datetime": 1459161041000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Thanks! For uploading to hackage I think the version number should be incremented. It would be great if you could submit another pull request. Also, I'd be happy to give you permission to upload to hackage and stackage yourself, please tell me if you are interested and if you know how I can do this",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 629 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
jOOQ/jOOQ
|
jOOQ
| 119,650,950 | 4,765 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "tomdcc",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1448951066000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi\r\n\r\nWe are generating code against a Postgres database that has the widely used `pgcrypto` extension installed. `pgcrypto` has many functions that have parameters that are not named. This results in many warnings each time we generate code, which spams our output and makes it difficult to see any warnings that we actually care about.\r\n\r\nFor the time being, I've explicitly excluded all of the pgcrypto function names from generation, but this isn't a great solution: not only is that list of function names fragile, but if we ever want to call any directly from our app (currently we just call one from a postgres function of our own) we'll be back in the same boat.\r\n\r\nIt would be nice to have a generator option to suppress this warning.",
"title": "Provide option to suppress warnings about functions without named parameters",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "lukaseder",
"comment_id": 160918920,
"datetime": 1448963918000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Thank you for your suggestion. The discussion is similar to that of #4764. There's certainly room for improvement, but we need to find the most far-sighted solution to fine-tuning logging. Let's further discuss in the other issue.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "lukaseder",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1448963969000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "lukaseder",
"comment_id": 160919396,
"datetime": 1448963969000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Closing this as a duplicate of the renamed issue #4764",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 1,027 | false | false | 2 | 4 | false |
jschaedl/Iban
| null | 55,275,327 | 15 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "tubssp",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1422015283000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "https://www.versioneye.com/php/username_1:iban/1.11\r\n\r\nDas ist jetzt nur ein kosmetisches Problem, da mir die installierte Version 1.1.6 als zu alt angezeit wird, aber lässt sich das abstellen?",
"title": "VersionEye zeigt eine Version 1.11 an.",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "jschaedl",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1478421860000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 191 | false | false | 2 | 2 | true |
karen-irc/karen
|
karen-irc
| 169,807,099 | 754 |
{
"number": 754,
"repo": "karen",
"user_login": "karen-irc"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "saneyuki",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1470591554000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "<!-- Reviewable:start -->\nThis change is [<img src=\"https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg\" height=\"34\" align=\"absmiddle\" alt=\"Reviewable\"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/karen-irc/karen/754)\n<!-- Reviewable:end -->",
"title": "refactor(ExIterable): move into src/lib/ExIterable",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "saneyuki",
"comment_id": 238101230,
"datetime": 1470596367000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Reviewed 38 of 38 files at r1.\nReview status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.\n\n---\n\n\n\n*Comments from [Reviewable](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/karen-irc/karen/754)*\n<!-- Sent from Reviewable.io -->",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "saneyuki",
"comment_id": 238360373,
"datetime": 1470686862000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Reviewed 9 of 39 files at r1, 20 of 27 files at r2.\nReview status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.\n\n---\n\n\n\n*Comments from [Reviewable](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/karen-irc/karen/754)*\n<!-- Sent from Reviewable.io -->",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 708 | false | false | 1 | 3 | false |
jstedfast/MailKit
| null | 68,010,736 | 176 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "migig",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1428902795000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "MimeKit has a [very useful adapter](https://username_1.github.io/MimeKit/docs/MimeKit/MimeMessage.html#M:MimeKit.MimeMessage.CreateFromMailMessage%28System.Net.Mail.MailMessage%29) which allows me to convert from `MailMessage` to `MimeMessage`.\r\n\r\nIs there something similar which allows me to convert from `System.Net.Mail.SmtpClient` to `MailKit.Net.Smtp.SmtpClient`?\r\n\r\nPorting our SMTP code over to MailKit would be easier that way, and of course, the built-in SMTP functionality reads things from `Web.config`, so it's easier to rely on that behavior and then convert/adapt to the type expected by the MailKit library.",
"title": "Is there an adapter method to create SmtpClient?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jstedfast",
"comment_id": 92353996,
"datetime": 1428932198000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "No, there is no such API in MailKit. I'm not sure how I would go about making such an adapter, unfortunately.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "migig",
"comment_id": 92407398,
"datetime": 1428939886000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 Well what I'd do is just copy all the relevant properties from the source object into a new target object.\r\n\r\nHowever, thinking about this again, I'm not sure this functionality belongs in MailKit. It's a stand-alone library, it doesn't need any baggage from the .NET FCL.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "migig",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1428939890000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1,014 | false | false | 2 | 4 | true |
kubernetes/kubernetes
|
kubernetes
| 101,774,267 | 12,888 |
{
"number": 12888,
"repo": "kubernetes",
"user_login": "kubernetes"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "caesarxuchao",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1439941647000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Breaking #12755 into smaller pieces. This is the first PR, it includes:\r\n\r\n1. 26a1992: enforces the URL exposed by apiserver to be in the form of prefix/group/version/...\r\n * for api/v1, we set the APIPrefix=\"api\", group=\"\", version=\"v1\", so the URL is still /api/v1\r\n * for experimental api, we set the APIPrefix=\"api\" (the exact name is open to discussion), group=\"experimental\", version=\"v1alpha1\", so the URL is /api/experimental/v1alpha1. And all future API groups will have the same APIPrefix.\r\n * for openshift and other third party API, we can either make prefix=\"osapi\", group=\"\", or prefix=\"\", group=\"osapi\", so the URL will not be changed.\r\n\r\n2. 45f3232: stop apiserver from encoding api.Status to a specific version unless the version is v1.\r\n\r\n3. 4e4dc89: let the existing two experimental objects use experimental storage which uses the v1alpha1 codec. This maybe needed to pass tests.\r\n\r\nThere will be subsequent PR depending on this one:\r\n\r\n1. factoring out default version, oldest version, storage version, etc. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/12755#discussion_r37247918\r\n\r\n2. add KubeAPIPrefix https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/12755#discussion_r37251228\r\n\r\n3. move api.Status to unversioned https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/12755#discussion_r37251228\r\n\r\n4. move /expapi to /api/experimental https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/12755#discussion_r37251963\r\n\r\n5. ease our testing for multiple groups/versions\r\nhttps://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/12755#discussion_r37329030\r\n\r\n@uluyol @username_2 @username_3 @krousey @username_1 @derekwaynecarr",
"title": "add more supports for multiple groups; change the version of experimental api v1alpha1",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "smarterclayton",
"comment_id": 132722125,
"datetime": 1440007138000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Can we summarize the current status of the proposal into a proposal document or design (if one doesn't exist)? I have a lot of concerns about this but I'm finding I can't keep up with the pace of the design. I think this is a fundamental part of the core product we're changing, so if anything deserves a proposal it's this. I'd also like to offer my feedback on the pieces that are important to us (as an external API group that has different needs than expapi) and I'm worried about spreading around these pulls.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "smarterclayton",
"comment_id": 132722195,
"datetime": 1440007153000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_3 re my comment about this needing a proposal",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "caesarxuchao",
"comment_id": 132734283,
"datetime": 1440009119000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1, I will write one.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "caesarxuchao",
"comment_id": 135131296,
"datetime": 1440613653000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "cc @lavalamp, this is the first step of #12591.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "caesarxuchao",
"comment_id": 136532386,
"datetime": 1441066007000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_2, you can ignore the second commit \"don't encode api.Status to a version if the version is not v1\", because we changed our plan for it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nikhiljindal",
"comment_id": 136582255,
"datetime": 1441081687000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I just glanced over the later part of PR as its a big one.\r\nI have added some comments, which should give you enough to work on for now.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "caesarxuchao",
"comment_id": 136590702,
"datetime": 1441085384000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "#12837 enables validate by default and it reveals the problem that validation doesn't work across groups of different versions. I'm fixing the problem.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "caesarxuchao",
"comment_id": 136592237,
"datetime": 1441086264000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "client.ServerAPIVersions() needs to be fixed. Currently it reports:\r\nServer does not support API version 'experimental/v1alpha1'. Falling back to 'v1'.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nikhiljindal",
"comment_id": 136841441,
"datetime": 1441137469000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Is it possible to take the test changes out of this PR?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "caesarxuchao",
"comment_id": 136845246,
"datetime": 1441137956000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Unless we have a way to disable the tests related to experimental objects, they will fail without the changes to the tests.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "bgrant0607",
"comment_id": 143944236,
"datetime": 1443502376000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "Is this PR still active?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "caesarxuchao",
"comment_id": 143944408,
"datetime": 1443502526000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "No. Thanks for the reminding.\r\n\r\nSuperseded by #14156, #13833, and #13581 etc.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3,147 | false | true | 4 | 13 | true |
brian-team/brian2
|
brian-team
| 66,966,593 | 441 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "thesamovar",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1428432979000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Not sure if this is easy/possible/desirable, but it might be nice to have collapsible elements at various places in the sphinx documentation. For example, in the reference documentation, you might want to collapse the methods for a class. For the preferences, they naturally form a collapsible hierarchy. etc.\r\n\r\nNot high priority, just a thought.",
"title": "Collapsible items in Sphinx documentation",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "thesamovar",
"comment_id": 322269309,
"datetime": 1502735154000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Some ideas on this here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2454577/sphinx-restructuredtext-show-hide-code-snippets\r\n\r\nIt seems though that the numpy autogenerated docstrings won't make this easy to do because they are organised as a series of paragraphs rather than sections, so automatically hiding a section wouldn't be straightforward. It might be done with CSS selectors because you can reference, for example, ``A+B`` and it means a B element but only if it follows an A element. Not sure if it's worth the effort though.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 875 | false | false | 1 | 2 | false |
ManageIQ/manageiq
|
ManageIQ
| 161,897,160 | 9,385 |
{
"number": 9385,
"repo": "manageiq",
"user_login": "ManageIQ"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Ladas",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1466680246000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Service should load all_vms from nested services\r\n\r\nThen parent service page shows all vms of all nested services, which is a nice overview.",
"title": "Service should load all_vms from nested services",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Ladas",
"comment_id": 228018692,
"datetime": 1466680306000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 @gmcculloug if you have any insight guys, it would be nice. Point is to see all VMs in the top level service.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "bzwei",
"comment_id": 228386988,
"datetime": 1466784297000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "cc @username_2",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "kbrock",
"comment_id": 228626316,
"datetime": 1466979350000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Thanks bill. @ladas let's talk Monday. I would like to know where the old code was not bringing back all the vms. Sounds like you found a bug. But I'm guessing the bug is not in the call to all_vms vs direct_vms",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "kbrock",
"comment_id": 229951446,
"datetime": 1467380932000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": ":+1: with this pr.\r\n\r\nI think the failure may be a bad test. @username_0 could you take a look at the return values and determine the underlying cause?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Ladas",
"comment_id": 229982383,
"datetime": 1467388392000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_2 test should be fixed now",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "kbrock",
"comment_id": 230046727,
"datetime": 1467406969000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_0 is this for darga?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 680 | false | true | 3 | 7 | true |
zudov/html5-entity
| null | 67,583,095 | 3 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "nikita-volkov",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1428668741000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Update the \"base\" bounds in the Cabal file to support GHC 7.10 ",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "zudov",
"comment_id": 91537549,
"datetime": 1428669005000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Sure. HEAD already support GHC 7.10 (travis build included). I'll upload it to hackage now.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "zudov",
"comment_id": 91598287,
"datetime": 1428680959000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Done.\r\nhttps://hackage.haskell.org/package/html5-entity-0.2.0.3",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "zudov",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1428680959000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 154 | false | false | 2 | 4 | false |
hunkim/word-rnn-tensorflow
| null | 240,825,707 | 61 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "zhuzhujulie",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1499307340000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi, we can see that you prepare 3 files from the data directory.\r\n“input.txt” represents the training data\r\n\"vocab.pkl\" represents the vocabulary list\r\nAnd i don't understand what does the \"data.npy\" stands for?",
"title": "about the prepared files?",
"type": "issue"
}
] | 211 | false | false | 1 | 1 | false |
primefaces/primeng
|
primefaces
| 180,290,321 | 996 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jaurakunal",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1475237968000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi,\r\n\r\nI've upgraded my code to angular 2.0.1. When I try running npm install primeng --save it errors out with these lines at the end of npm-debug.log \r\n\r\n**638 verbose stack Error: The package [email protected] does not satisfy its siblings' peerDependencies requirements!\r\n638 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\lib\\install.js:125:32\r\n638 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\lib\\install.js:268:7\r\n638 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\read-installed\\read-installed.js:142:5\r\n638 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\read-installed\\read-installed.js:263:14\r\n638 verbose stack at cb (C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\slide\\lib\\async-map.js:47:24)\r\n638 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\read-installed\\read-installed.js:263:14\r\n638 verbose stack at cb (C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\slide\\lib\\async-map.js:47:24)\r\n638 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\read-installed\\read-installed.js:263:14\r\n638 verbose stack at cb (C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\slide\\lib\\async-map.js:47:24)\r\n638 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\read-installed\\read-installed.js:263:14\r\n639 verbose cwd C:\\Kunal\\Personal\\MobileApps\\MHS\\Website\\Paperfit2.0\r\n640 error Windows_NT 6.3.9600\r\n641 error argv \"C:\\\\Program Files\\\\nodejs\\\\node.exe\" \"C:\\\\Program Files\\\\nodejs\\\\node_modules\\\\npm\\\\bin\\\\npm-cli.js\" \"install\" \"primeng\" \"--save\"\r\n642 error node v4.2.1\r\n643 error npm v2.14.7\r\n644 error code EPEERINVALID\r\n645 error peerinvalid The package [email protected] does not satisfy its siblings' peerDependencies requirements!\r\n645 error peerinvalid Peer [email protected] wants reflect-metadata@~0.1.8\r\n645 error peerinvalid Peer [email protected] wants [email protected]\r\n645 error peerinvalid Peer [email protected] wants [email protected]\r\n646 verbose exit [ 1, true ]**\r\n\r\nHere's what I have in my package.json file\r\n\r\n\r\n**{\r\n \"name\": \"paperfit\",\r\n \"version\": \"2.0.0\",\r\n \"description\": \"Perfit redesigned\",\r\n \"main\": \"index.js\",\r\n \"scripts\": {\r\n \"test\": \"echo \\\"Error: no test specified\\\" && exit 1\",\r\n \"postinstall\": \"typings install\",\r\n \"typings\": \"typings\",\r\n \"build:vendor\": \"gulp copy-vendor-files\",\r\n \"build:dev\": \"gulp clean-dist && gulp copy-vendor-files && gulp build --dev\",\r\n \"build:prod\": \"gulp clean-dist && gulp copy-vendor-files && gulp build --production && node systemjs.builder.js\",\r\n \"deploy:local\": \"gulp clean-local-tomcat && gulp deploy-to-local-tomcat\"\r\n },\r\n \"author\": \"Kunal Jaura\",\r\n \"license\": \"ISC\",\r\n \"dependencies\": {\r\n \"@angular/common\": \"~2.0.1\",\r\n \"@angular/compiler\": \"~2.0.1\",\r\n \"@angular/core\": \"~2.0.1\",\r\n \"@angular/forms\": \"~2.0.1\",\r\n \"@angular/http\": \"~2.0.1\",\r\n \"@angular/platform-browser\": \"~2.0.1\",\r\n \"@angular/platform-browser-dynamic\": \"~2.0.1\",\r\n \"@angular/router\": \"~3.0.1\",\r\n \"@angular/upgrade\": \"~2.0.1\",\r\n\r\n \"core-js\": \"^2.4.1\",\r\n \"reflect-metadata\": \"^0.1.8\",\r\n \"rxjs\": \"5.0.0-beta.12\",\r\n \"systemjs\": \"0.19.39\",\r\n \"zone.js\": \"^0.6.25\",\r\n\r\n \"angular-in-memory-web-api\": \"~0.1.1\",\r\n \"bootstrap\": \"^3.3.6\",\r\n \"moment\": \"^2.14.1\",\r\n \"ng2-bs3-modal\": \"^0.6.1\"\r\n },\r\n \"devDependencies\": {\r\n \"codelyzer\": \"0.0.24\",\r\n \"concurrently\": \"^3.0.0\",\r\n \"del\": \"^2.2.1\",\r\n \"gulp\": \"^3.9.1\",\r\n \"gulp-autoprefixer\": \"^3.1.0\",\r\n \"gulp-clean-css\": \"^2.0.10\",\r\n \"gulp-concat\": \"^2.6.0\",\r\n \"gulp-if\": \"^2.0.1\",\r\n \"gulp-sourcemaps\": \"^1.6.0\",\r\n \"gulp-typescript\": \"^2.13.6\",\r\n \"gulp-uglify\": \"^1.5.4\",\r\n \"lite-server\": \"^2.2.2\",\r\n \"systemjs-builder\": \"^0.15.23\",\r\n \"tslint\": \"^3.13.0\",\r\n \"typescript\": \"^2.0.3\",\r\n \"typings\": \"^1.4.0\",\r\n \"yargs\": \"^4.7.1\"\r\n }\r\n}**\r\n\r\nAny help on this would be much appreciated.\r\n\r\nCheers\r\nKunal",
"title": "Unable to install primeng with angular 2.0.1",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "watalberto",
"comment_id": 250756296,
"datetime": 1475245152000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Did you try removing reflect-metadata from your package.json and letting it decide which version download??\r\nMy package.json is very similar, just that I don't have 2 of your dependencies and I never install 'reflect-metadata', I just leave npm choose which version install...",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jaurakunal",
"comment_id": 250795656,
"datetime": 1475254369000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 thanks for that suggestion. I did try your appraoch and the reflect-metadata error went away but I now get this.\r\n\r\n1739 verbose stack Error: The package [email protected] does not satisfy its siblings' peerDependencies requirements!\r\n1739 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\lib\\install.js:125:32\r\n1739 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\lib\\install.js:268:7\r\n1739 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\read-installed\\read-installed.js:142:5\r\n1739 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\read-installed\\read-installed.js:263:14\r\n1739 verbose stack at cb (C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\slide\\lib\\async-map.js:47:24)\r\n1739 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\read-installed\\read-installed.js:263:14\r\n1739 verbose stack at cb (C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\slide\\lib\\async-map.js:47:24)\r\n1739 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\read-installed\\read-installed.js:263:14\r\n1739 verbose stack at cb (C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\slide\\lib\\async-map.js:47:24)\r\n1739 verbose stack at C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node_modules\\npm\\node_modules\\read-installed\\read-installed.js:263:14\r\n1740 verbose cwd C:\\Kunal\\Personal\\MobileApps\\MHS\\Website\\Paperfit2.0\r\n1741 error Windows_NT 6.3.9600\r\n1742 error argv \"C:\\\\Program Files\\\\nodejs\\\\node.exe\" \"C:\\\\Program Files\\\\nodejs\\\\node_modules\\\\npm\\\\bin\\\\npm-cli.js\" \"install\" \"primeng\" \"--save\"\r\n1743 error node v4.6.0\r\n1744 error npm v2.15.9\r\n1745 error code EPEERINVALID\r\n1746 error peerinvalid The package [email protected] does not satisfy its siblings' peerDependencies requirements!\r\n1746 error peerinvalid Peer @angular/[email protected] wants [email protected]\r\n1746 error peerinvalid Peer @angular/[email protected] wants [email protected]\r\n1746 error peerinvalid Peer @angular/[email protected] wants [email protected]\r\n1746 error peerinvalid Peer [email protected] wants [email protected]\r\n1746 error peerinvalid Peer [email protected] wants [email protected]\r\n\r\n:-(",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "jaurakunal",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1475255274000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jaurakunal",
"comment_id": 250799204,
"datetime": 1475255274000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 - My bad. Stupid mistake. Forgot to delete the node_modules folder and re-install everything after removing refelct-metadata from my package.json.\r\n\r\nOnce I did that the install went through fine. Interestingly, though, it ended up installing the same version of reflect-metadata that the package.json wanted it to.\r\n\r\nAnyways, thanks for helping out with this.\r\nCheers\r\nKunal",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "watalberto",
"comment_id": 250979567,
"datetime": 1475425167000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "hey! that's good, you're welcome! ;)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 6,951 | false | false | 2 | 6 | true |
kubernetes/kubernetes
|
kubernetes
| 105,715,232 | 13,779 |
{
"number": 13779,
"repo": "kubernetes",
"user_login": "kubernetes"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "aaronlevy",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1441848829000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "The current conformance-test-v1 branch does not use the KUBE_MASTER_URL extracted from the kubeconfig.\r\n\r\nIt looks like this change is already in master from: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/commit/29da889bbf0acbf579ea155e4cc66ae168705468\r\n\r\nBut looks like only part of that change was pulled into conformance-test-v1: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/commit/104aa5d361e624a2d11198ef00fd737dab588f60",
"title": "Use KUBE_MASTER_URL in conformance test",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ixdy",
"comment_id": 139398355,
"datetime": 1441923526000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "ok to test",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ixdy",
"comment_id": 139403953,
"datetime": 1441925323000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "oh, this branch is not whitelisted, so @k8s-bot will never test it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "erictune",
"comment_id": 140229429,
"datetime": 1442271905000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "LGTM.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "erictune",
"comment_id": 140229533,
"datetime": 1442271951000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Merging because it is to a special branch that I am the defacto owner of",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 570 | false | true | 3 | 5 | false |
apple/swift-package-manager
|
apple
| 120,909,538 | 44 |
{
"number": 44,
"repo": "swift-package-manager",
"user_login": "apple"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "neonichu",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1449538247000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Fixes the issue that all packages available in the sandbox are passed to each invocation of `llbuild()`, even when they are not dependencies of the package being built right now.\r\n\r\nThe issue is relevant when build products are being linked, currently only the case for binaries. The generated linker commands will potentially contain not yet build libraries, leading to linker errors.",
"title": "Limit dependencies passed to llbuild()",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ddunbar",
"comment_id": 162950412,
"datetime": 1449595158000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Thanks, that is a real problem. We intend to move to a model where the entire dependency graph is built in a single invocation, but we should definitely fix this until that is complete...\r\n\r\nCan you add a test case that reproduces the failure and the fix? This seems like something that is important to capture in our tests.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "neonichu",
"comment_id": 162964015,
"datetime": 1449597832000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Will do, am not entirely sure how the testsuite works, yet. \r\n\r\nI think I would add a new test to `FunctionalBuildTests.swift` as well as a fixture. Is the numbering of fixtures just consecutive?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mxcl",
"comment_id": 162969516,
"datetime": 1449599192000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Thanks this is indeed an issue, I will review it a bit more carefully than other PRs today since we should be planning for the better fix.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "neonichu",
"comment_id": 163077795,
"datetime": 1449624625000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Added a test case for this now, based on `23_buildexec_multdep`. \r\n\r\nWhile doing that I discovered a problem with my original fix, though — for local dependencies, the URLs out of `get` do not match the ones from a `Manifest` (one is the filesystem location of the package, the other one the sandbox location). I'm now comparing just the basenames (see 6bce065577ca000d90054c7f90bf20f613496df8), because I am assuming the package name needs to be unique for a single build. Is that correct?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mxcl",
"comment_id": 163128225,
"datetime": 1449642877000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Yes, we need a proper URL class (Foundation isn't there yet). What I've been doing for now is ensuring the URL is normalized with some other code in other places. We'll probably want to do the same.\r\n\r\nStill it would be nicer I think to add `==` for Package than do the URL comparison.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mxcl",
"comment_id": 163440522,
"datetime": 1449705263000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "We can compare for the two different types.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mxcl",
"comment_id": 163444729,
"datetime": 1449706661000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Also we need the recursive dependencies passed. I think. This recently changed slightly due to a fix in SwiftC. I'll have to check.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "neonichu",
"comment_id": 163557204,
"datetime": 1449740721000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "That makes sense, linking recursive dependencies will definitely be required for dynamic linking.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mxcl",
"comment_id": 164010927,
"datetime": 1449858692000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "In fact, the auto-linker should take care of both situations for us.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mxcl",
"comment_id": 164927321,
"datetime": 1450220459000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I'll make the adaptions needed here. Thanks.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mxcl",
"comment_id": 164943054,
"datetime": 1450225193000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "It disturbs me that our current tests didn't identify this issue. I will make a note and add some more tests after merging this.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mxcl",
"comment_id": 164944434,
"datetime": 1450225726000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "https://github.com/apple/swift-package-manager/commit/215b7269f4b28440241b8e20dfc21b5b91b582b7",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2,422 | false | false | 3 | 13 | false |
napalm-automation/napalm
|
napalm-automation
| 240,991,468 | 390 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "johnkeates",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1499354118000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Would it be possible to support pfSense in napalm?",
"title": "pfSense Support",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dbarrosop",
"comment_id": 313434602,
"datetime": 1499355665000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Well, we don't have any plans to support it but if you are looking into implementing support yourself we can certainly help.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "ktbyers",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1515807337000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 174 | false | false | 3 | 3 | false |
Microsoft/msbuild
|
Microsoft
| 164,944,095 | 774 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "eerhardt",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1468274187000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "After https://github.com/NuGet/Home/issues/3102 is fixed. The next issue that the CLI will be blocked on is that the generated $(ProjectName).nuget.props and $(ProjectName).nuget.targets files are not loaded when using MSBuild on .NET Core.\r\n\r\nFrom my preliminary debugging, it appears that the Common.props/targets files are not loading up the Microsoft.NuGet.props/.targets when on .NET Core.\r\n\r\nNormally on desktop builds, these NuGet .props and .targets files are loaded because they are installed to the \"ImportBefore\"/\"ImportAfter\" folders in Program Files. However, these folder locations are not applicable on .NET Core.\r\n\r\nThis is blocking the CLI using MSBuild to build .csprojs for .NET Core cross-plat.",
"title": ".nuget.props and .nuget.targets files are not loaded in MSBuild on .NET Core",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rainersigwald",
"comment_id": 231892872,
"datetime": 1468278713000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "To get this going we'll need `Microsoft.NuGet.ImportAfter.targets` and friends in a NuGet package that we can unpack into an MSBuild directory, or to incorporate that functionality directly into common targets.\r\n\r\nWorkaround for now: you can get past this by copying the nuget files from `C:\\Program Files (x86)\\MSBuild\\14.0\\Microsoft.Common.Targets\\ImportAfter\\Microsoft.NuGet.ImportAfter.targets` to {msbuildlocation}`\\Extensions\\15.0\\Microsoft.Common.targets\\ImportAfter\\` (and so on for props).",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "cdmihai",
"comment_id": 236726643,
"datetime": 1470090319000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Being designed in #784",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "cdmihai",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1470090319000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1,236 | false | false | 3 | 4 | false |
frederik-jacques/TNImageSliderViewController
| null | 145,457,625 | 12 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "2113industries",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1459663021000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I just installed via Cocoapods into my project. I used the exact code from the example project but I got a ton of errors in the TNImageSliderViewController.swift file.\r\n\r\nThe only way that I was able to get around this was to copy all of the code from the TNImageSliderViewController.swift from the example project and paste it into the same file in my project.\r\n\r\nI'm still getting a handful of \"unknown class\" errors for TNImageSliderView and TNImageSliderViewController.\r\n\r\nAlso getting crash from a found nil optional on this line...\r\n`imageSliderVC.images = [image1, image2, image3]`",
"title": "CocoaPods install issue",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "frederik-jacques",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1459870372000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "frederik-jacques",
"comment_id": 205859765,
"datetime": 1459870372000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I just updated the podspec with a new version which removes the errors for Xcode 7.3 & Swift 2.2",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 685 | false | false | 2 | 3 | false |
gavinwahl/django-u2f
| null | 53,312,221 | 6 |
{
"number": 6,
"repo": "django-u2f",
"user_login": "gavinwahl"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mjjohnson",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1420311773000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Implemented a TODO related to a token's counter. The counter is [stored by the token, starts at 0](http://fidoalliance.org/specs/fido-u2f-v1.0-ps-20141009/fido-u2f-implementation-considerations-ps-20141009.html#token-counters), and should always increase. If not, it [may be an indication that the original device has been cloned](http://fidoalliance.org/specs/fido-u2f-v1.0-ps-20141009/fido-u2f-overview-ps-20141009.html#counters-as-a-signal-for-detecting-cloned-u2f-devices). (However, as far as I can tell, the device *may* also have wrapped around to 0 after reaching its maximum value.)\r\n\r\nThis patch adds a field to the U2FKey model for the last seen counter value. Upon successful authentication, it updates the counter value to the current value. However, if the counter value is not larger than the last seen value, it doesn't sign the user in (nor update the last seen value). A signal is provided to allow a website to perform their own actions (e.g., sending a warning email or locking the user's account pending some further action).\r\n\r\nThere are some things that should probably be decided before this is pulled. First of all, since this is a model change, it might be good to provide a migration. I didn't see any existing migrations, so perhaps it would be worth adding one? (It wouldn't help for this change, but would for any future changes.) If you think this is a good idea, I'm happy to create one and add it to the pull request.\r\n\r\nSecondly, is refusing to authenticate the user the correct behavior? Or should it only send the signal, and allow the website to decide what to do? (I like the idea of being flexible, but I also like the idea of good defaults...not sure what the right balance is here.)\r\n\r\nFinally, I'd like to add a test to verify that the signal gets sent, but I'm not sure of the best way to test signals. It looks like we might need to add a mock library such as [mock](http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/mock/) (part of the standard library in Python 3), but I wanted to hold off adding a new dependency unless you thought it was a good idea.",
"title": "Store login_counter and verify it's increasing",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gavinwahl",
"comment_id": 68618631,
"datetime": 1420339821000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Thanks for implementing this, let me think about those questions.\r\n\r\nThe specs are maddeningly vague about handling rollover -- first it says \"If the counter value has moved backward, it signals that there is more than one U2F device with the same key pair for the origin\", which seems like there isn't overflow, but then \"...if they suspect token cloning due to non-increasing counter values (other than wrap-around).\" \r\n\r\nHow are you supposed to tell if a nonincreasing counter value is due to wraparound or cloning? Require counters increase, unless they decrease by 'a lot', for some arbitrary value of 'a lot'? That doesn't sound very nice.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gavinwahl",
"comment_id": 69483693,
"datetime": 1420951998000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I think he means does roll over, but it'll never happen in practice. The 31-bit counter will roll over after 68 years if it's used once per second.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mjjohnson",
"comment_id": 69514226,
"datetime": 1421014223000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Heh, that does put it in perspective. Hopefully other manufacturers provide similarly generous counters. I'm thinking that perhaps we should just make it clear in the documentation that if a non-increasing counter value is seen, it's either cloning or rollover, and then let site owners decide what to do about it if the value is ever non-increasing? (Potentially they could evaluate their policy based on the manufacturer: for instance, in the case of Yubico, rollover will never happen, so it must be an attempt at cloning.)\r\n\r\nThis is kind of punting, but the standard also seems to avoid the issue. (Too bad it didn't specify a minimum number of bits for the counter or something...)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gavinwahl",
"comment_id": 258976861,
"datetime": 1478556052000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I'm thinking the right behavior might just be to generate a log message",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gordonzola",
"comment_id": 380755866,
"datetime": 1523528883000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Is there something to do with this PR before merging, aside a rebase + conflict fix?\r\nI’m willing to help if needed.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gordonzola",
"comment_id": 381052592,
"datetime": 1523605423000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Given that there is three distinct strategies regarding a non-incrementing counter, this shouldn’t be in the scope of this lib to make a choice for the developers that will use it.\r\nHowever, we should give the choice, as a settings value for example. If we implement the 3 strategies as functions/classes, it allows to implement even other strategies.\r\n\r\nSo I suggest the implementation of the 3 following strategies:\r\n\r\n- forbid login with a U2F challenge containing an incorrect counter (and contact the user to tell her that we detected a problem with this attempt)\r\n- automatically disable the U2F device after a suspicious login (and contact the user). The user will then have to use either a TOTP token, or a backup code\r\n- automatically block the user after a suspicious login (and contact the user). This would be quite extreme, as it’s then difficult for the user to recover the account\r\n\r\nContacting the user should use the known contact methods: mail and/or SMS, if we have the user’s phone number.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 4,759 | false | false | 3 | 7 | false |
gratipay/gratipay.com
|
gratipay
| 139,628,065 | 3,944 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "whit537",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1457541058000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "We've already done manual payouts via Transferwise (https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/249 and https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/381). Do they have an API? Can we promote them to a first-class payout route that users can configure directly?",
"title": "automate Transferwise as a payout route",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "whit537",
"comment_id": 194381204,
"datetime": 1457541094000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@rohitpaulk Maybe this is a better alternative to #3870 than #726?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "whit537",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1479757747000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "whit537",
"comment_id": 262046909,
"datetime": 1479757747000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Closing as a duplicate of #3855.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 379 | false | false | 1 | 4 | false |
MultiMC/MultiMC5
|
MultiMC
| 167,953,164 | 1,630 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "benmac022",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1469652584000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "When I launch any version i come with an error saying cannot download minecraft assets and here is a log of it: http://paste.ee/p/pUit8. This was on minecraft 1.10 that I tried loading. Can someone please help me.",
"title": "Error downloading minecraft assets",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "peterix",
"comment_id": 235798862,
"datetime": 1469680615000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Just try again. There's a good chance it will work - it was just files out of many.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "peterix",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1518617982000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 296 | false | false | 2 | 3 | false |
adobe/brackets
|
adobe
| 54,577,089 | 10,393 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "sudosiyang",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1421416210000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "It will generate a file called '.bracket.json'.And then the Brackets will crash in a minute.\r\nWhen I open the program again , the code hints can't use. \r\n\r\nThis question led me to not be able to write code in this project, which has seriously affected me with this software.\r\n\r\n",
"title": "Javascript File Inference Problem will cause crash",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "redmunds",
"comment_id": 70279727,
"datetime": 1421425770000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 Brackets creates the project preference file (.brackets.json) to set preference to exc;lude the problematic file from future JS code hint processing. You can safely delete it if you think it causing a problem. For more info see: https://github.com/adobe/brackets/wiki/JavaScript-Code-Hints#javascript-file-inference-problem\r\n\r\nAs stated in that article, you can also try increasing the timeout value of `jscodehints.inferenceTimeout` preference.\r\n\r\nDoes that help?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "sudosiyang",
"comment_id": 70356602,
"datetime": 1421475725000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Thanks@username_1",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "sudosiyang",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1421475725000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 877 | false | false | 2 | 4 | true |
digitalocean/godo
|
digitalocean
| 79,895,119 | 50 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "kunalkushwaha",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1432399516000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi,\r\n\r\nI am trying to use [RebuildByImageID(id, ImageID)](https://github.com/digitalocean/godo/blob/master/droplet_actions.go#L135) for creating a droplet from snapshot image.\r\n\r\nProblem I am facing is with `id` param passed in API, it gives error, \r\n```\r\nPOST https://api.digitalocean.com/v2/droplets/6370882/actions: 404 The resource you were accessing could not be found\r\n```\r\n\r\nWhat should be the value passed in `id` ?",
"title": "Issue with RebuildByImageID() API.",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "bryanl",
"comment_id": 105379299,
"datetime": 1432611404000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "You should use the id of the the droplet. You can see a sample of the JSON returned at https://developers.digitalocean.com/documentation/v2/#retrieve-an-existing-droplet-by-id.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "kunalkushwaha",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1432614219000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "kunalkushwaha",
"comment_id": 105389095,
"datetime": 1432614219000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Thanks for answer. I understood the issue.\r\n\r\nActually got confused in recreating droplet from snapshot image vs restoring droplet to a backup image.\r\n\r\nClosing the issue.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 770 | false | false | 2 | 4 | false |
Dlayer/dlayer
|
Dlayer
| 160,177,187 | 121 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "deanblackborough",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1465909794000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "- Dlayer_Session_Content::pageSelected() - Not keen on this returned TRUE|NULL, should be TRUE|FALSE, update later",
"title": "Small things to fix later",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "deanblackborough",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1469395123000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "deanblackborough",
"comment_id": 234803050,
"datetime": 1469395123000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Switched to using Pivotal tracker to track tasks, I will make it public once v1.00 is released.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 209 | false | false | 1 | 3 | false |
rethinkdb/docs
|
rethinkdb
| 105,954,632 | 893 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "kureikain",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1441954404000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I write a simple website monitoring with RethinkDB changfeed https://github.com/username_0/simplyrethink/tree/master/example/server_monitoring\r\nI wonder if I can submit a tutorial for it? Or the tutorials are only written by RethinkDB dev",
"title": "Can I write doc for tutorial?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "danielmewes",
"comment_id": 140211347,
"datetime": 1442266326000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Hi @username_0, are you talking about the example projects in our docs? http://rethinkdb.com/docs/examples/\r\n\r\nIn general we're very happy about pull requests.\r\n\r\nKeep in mind that depending on the contents, it might take a few iterations before we can merge a new docs page. So you might want to publish your tutorial independently somewhere while we're reviewing it and working with you on getting it into the right format etc.\r\n\r\n(closing because it's more of a question than an issue)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "danielmewes",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1442266326000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 724 | false | false | 2 | 3 | true |
ReactiveX/RxJava
|
ReactiveX
| 29,609,489 | 968 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "lexer",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1395099958000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Sample:\n\n``` java\nObservable<HttpResponse> observeResponse(String url) {\n Observable<HttpResponse> observable = Observable.create(new Observable.OnSubscribeFunc<HttpResponse>() {\n @Override\n public Subscription onSubscribe(final Observer<? super HttpResponse> observer) {\n HttpResponse response = null;\n try {\n response = httpClient.getResponse(url);\n observer.onNext(response);\n observer.onComplete();\n } catch (Exeception e) {\n observer.onError(e);\n }\n\n return new Subscription() {\n @Override\n public void unsubscribe() {\n if (response != null) {\n response.disconnect();\n }\n }\n }\n }\n }\n\n return observable;\n}\n```\n\nProblem with that implementation that unsubscribe don't interrupt execution. It seems that this block should be wrapped by FutureTask that got canceled in unsubscribe.\n\nProbably FutureTask is bad class to use and there is something build in to RxJava?",
"title": "What is the proper way to implement observable that get canceled after unsubscribe?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rorlig",
"comment_id": 403298397,
"datetime": 1531066468000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 how did you ultimately resolve this issue?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 1,044 | false | false | 2 | 2 | true |
conveyal/gtfs-editor
|
conveyal
| 81,184,854 | 223 |
{
"number": 223,
"repo": "gtfs-editor",
"user_login": "conveyal"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "brunosan",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1432683227000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This PR expands the instructions, and integrates the example creating a fresh stack with AWS CloudFormation.\r\n\r\ncc @username_1.",
"title": "Expand instructions, add Cloudformation script",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "zugaldia",
"comment_id": 106086211,
"datetime": 1432762515000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": ":+1:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "brunosan",
"comment_id": 234328006,
"datetime": 1469122814000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This also fixes the export error for the missing `public/data` folder.\r\n\r\n",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "zugaldia",
"comment_id": 237246988,
"datetime": 1470233278000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 🎉",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 322 | false | false | 2 | 4 | true |
keenlabs/KeenClient-iOS
|
keenlabs
| 153,468,429 | 155 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "paulofierro",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1462546351000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "But when offline this is not the case — the block is not called at all.\r\n\r\nThis is my use case:\r\n\r\nOur app adds lots of events in short time spans and calling `uploadWithFinishedBlock:` can add duplicate events as events that are uploading are only cleared from the pending queue when the upload completes. Therefore we internally keep track of whether an upload is in progress or not, and clear this flag when the block we pass in is called.\r\n\r\nAs this the block isn't called while offline this means that our app will never upload new events. For now we've added a work around where we don't call `uploadWithFinishedBlock:` while offline.",
"title": "Completion block not called when offline",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "heitortsergent",
"comment_id": 217487806,
"datetime": 1462551317000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Hey @username_0, thanks for reporting this! I had not tested for that use case, sorry for the wrong information in the docs. So it seems we have two things to fix:\r\n\r\n1. Duplicate upload when calling `uploadWithFinishedBlock` multiple times in a row (before an event finishes uploading and gets deleted from sqlite)\r\n2. Call `uploadWithFinishedBlock` completion block regardless of success/fail like stated in docs\r\n\r\nI'll open another issue for the first one, and keep you updated on the second one here!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "paulofierro",
"comment_id": 218226841,
"datetime": 1462900517000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Thanks @username_1! \r\n\r\nI found one more case where this would happen — if `prepareJSONData:andEventIds` fails, then `data.length = 0` at https://github.com/keenlabs/KeenClient-iOS/blob/master/KeenClient/KeenClient.m#L841 which means the completion block isn't called.\r\n\r\nIts very rare but we have seen it happen.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "heitortsergent",
"comment_id": 218227970,
"datetime": 1462900765000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "That makes sense. Thanks for being so thorough @username_0! 👍 \r\n\r\nI'll work on a fix for this issue this week.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "heitortsergent",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1463496583000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1,575 | false | false | 2 | 5 | true |
lihongxun945/jquery-weui
| null | 163,785,956 | 206 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "lihongxun945",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1467703055000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "目前可以用的是 npm 官方CDN，用法如下：\r\n\r\n- https://npmcdn.com/[email protected]/dist/js/jquery-weui.min.js\r\n- https://npmcdn.com/[email protected]/dist/css/jquery-weui.min.css\r\n\r\n其他几个文件的引用方式都可以参考上述链接。\r\n我会在下一次更新的时候把这个加到官方文档。因为是NPM官方的CDN，大陆访问的速度可能不是很快，所以请自行决定是否使用",
"title": "CDN支持",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "lihongxun945",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1469172324000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 247 | false | false | 1 | 2 | false |
toorop/go-pusher
| null | 216,097,620 | 8 |
{
"number": 8,
"repo": "go-pusher",
"user_login": "toorop"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Deleplace",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1490195325000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Library user may close Client, to reclaim back its Pusher connection and stop its network activity.",
"title": "(*Client).Close",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "toorop",
"comment_id": 288646265,
"datetime": 1490256890000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Thanks ; )",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 109 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
christopherdro/react-native-calendar
| null | 191,662,121 | 78 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "challenger532",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1480067260000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hello, \r\n\r\nInstead of showing the words 'prev' and 'next', it's better to show the name and previous month and next month, example:\r\nIf current displayed month is 'Nov', show 'Oct' on the left and 'Dec' on the right.\r\n\r\nThanks,",
"title": "Prev month and next month",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "christopherdro",
"comment_id": 265076813,
"datetime": 1481007890000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "You can do this by using props `prevButtonText` and `nextButtonText` or create your own menu bar and disable the built in one by setting the prop `showControls` to false.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "christopherdro",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1481007890000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 397 | false | false | 2 | 3 | false |
iverberk/larasearch
| null | 60,628,825 | 72 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1426064888000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I myself do not know what is needed to change in order for this to work within Laravel 5.0 but I would love to see it, I imagine it's a few method name changes or something not too much.",
"title": "Laravel 5.0 update possible?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "thangngoc89",
"comment_id": 78242630,
"datetime": 1426071510000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I'm working on a L5 branch \r\nYou can install and try it (using composer vcs)\r\nhttps://github.com/username_3/larasearch/pull/71",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 84911094,
"datetime": 1427102936000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 if you could explain the steps to do so I've be very thankful lol",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "thangngoc89",
"comment_id": 84935665,
"datetime": 1427106424000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 you can do something like this\r\n\r\n```js\r\n\"repositories\": [\r\n {\r\n \"type\": \"vcs\",\r\n \"url\": \"https://github.com/username_1/larasearch\"\r\n }\r\n ],\r\n \"require\": {\r\n \"username_3/larasearch\": \"dev-develop\"\r\n }\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 84936349,
"datetime": 1427106563000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 Thanks I'll give it a shot.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "thangngoc89",
"comment_id": 84973861,
"datetime": 1427114051000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 OK. PRs welcome",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "marijang",
"comment_id": 92273178,
"datetime": 1428914528000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Is it L5 Possible?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 92279230,
"datetime": 1428915838000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_2 I'm currently using the version shown above and it is working properly for pretty much everything. I haven't been able to get on-change indexing working properly I believe it may be because of the changes to the Queue system between L4 and L5 but I haven't had time to look into it and try to create a PR to fix it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "marijang",
"comment_id": 92288420,
"datetime": 1428916911000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Are you using lennynyktyk version?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 92301460,
"datetime": 1428920412000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_2 no just googled it. I'm going to try it tonight.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 93153173,
"datetime": 1429064047000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_2 how do I install that version of this package? I'm not good at version control.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "marijang",
"comment_id": 93241456,
"datetime": 1429083401000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_3 must approve pull request\r\nhttps://github.com/username_3/larasearch/pull/75\r\n\r\nI will wait L5 version. This is great package. I need it for autocomplete for search users:D\r\n\r\nThanks @username_3",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 93291105,
"datetime": 1429091378000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_2 by specifying the location of @username_1 project I was able to install his pull requests before being approved. I can't do that with the lennynyktyk version?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "iverberk",
"comment_id": 94435701,
"datetime": 1429531847000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "I just updated a bunch of stuff to make this compatible with L5. Could people check the L5 branch and see if it works within Laravel 5 installations?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 94436083,
"datetime": 1429532006000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I will in about 12 hours. I'll give it a thorough testing.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 94609918,
"datetime": 1429581093000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_3 I'm so terrible at using git to install specific versions. What version should I set to install the changes you want?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "thangngoc89",
"comment_id": 94615192,
"datetime": 1429582677000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 It should be dev-L5 branch in composer",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 94616553,
"datetime": 1429583004000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Yeah I'm mean `\"username_3/larasearch\": \"dev-develop\",` what should go where `\"dev-develop\"`",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "iverberk",
"comment_id": 94663893,
"datetime": 1429600720000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "@username_0 you should add \"username_3/larasearch\": \"dev-L5\" to your composer dependencies.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 94723879,
"datetime": 1429609850000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_3 okay I ran into the same issue I had previously manually fixed.\r\n```ssh\r\n[ErrorException]\r\n Undefined index: errors\r\n```\r\nduring the first batch. Going through the code I found this in `\\Iverberk\\Larasearch\\Index.php`\r\n```php\r\nif ($results['errors'])\r\n```\r\nand by changing it to\r\n```php\r\nif ( array_key_exists('errors', $results) )\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "iverberk",
"comment_id": 94760590,
"datetime": 1429617515000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "I believe the bulk import should always return if there are errors or not? So how are you hitting this case? Which version of Elasticsearch are you using?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 95039067,
"datetime": 1429680370000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_3 no I'm not saying the bulk isn't returning properly. It seems as though when there are no errors present in the `$results` when no errors occur. So by using `$results['errors']` an exception for `Undefined index: errors` is thrown. Where as with my fix it looks to see if the key `['errors']` exists within `$results` or not.\r\n\r\nWith my change shown above the entire package now works wonderfully. Artisan commands for `paths` and `reindex` with `--relations` as well as `--dir=app/Models` worked perfectly. Also, was able to text that the observer and queue jobs are queuing and firing as they should. Everything except the `$results['errors']` is working flawlessly.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 95039147,
"datetime": 1429680430000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Here's my `->bulk()` method:\r\n```php\r\npublic function bulk($records)\r\n {\r\n $params['index'] = $this->getName();\r\n $params['type'] = $this->getProxy()->getType();\r\n $params['body'] = $records;\r\n\r\n $results = self::getClient()->bulk($params);\r\n\r\n if ( array_key_exists('errors', $results) )\r\n {\r\n $errorItems = [];\r\n\r\n foreach ($results['items'] as $item)\r\n {\r\n if (array_key_exists('error', $item['index']))\r\n {\r\n $errorItems[] = $item;\r\n }\r\n }\r\n\r\n throw new ImportException('Bulk import with errors', 1, $errorItems);\r\n }\r\n }\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1430802194000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pfeiferchristopher",
"comment_id": 98950402,
"datetime": 1430802194000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_3 I'm sorry I forgot to post this. But I did in fact have an older version of ES installed on my local environment and that was causing the issue. I have been using purely `dev-L5` and it's been working great.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 4,310 | false | false | 4 | 25 | true |
stcorp/coda
|
stcorp
| 194,593,452 | 17 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "svniemeijer",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1481289087000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "It happens in practice that GRIB files contain a mix of GRIB1 and GRIB2 messages.\r\n\r\nTo support this we will have to:\r\n\r\n- [ ] Combine `coda_format_grib1` and `coda_format_grib2` into a single `coda_format_grib`\r\n- [ ] Introduce support for unions in the memory backend of CODA\r\n- [ ] Change the CODA type mapping of GRIB files from an array of records (with each record being a grib message) into an array of unions with each union having `grib1` and `grib2` fields pointing to the GRIB1 or GRIB2 record.",
"title": "Allow GRIB files to contain combination of GRIB1 and GRIB2 messages",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "svniemeijer",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1482253237000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 505 | false | false | 1 | 2 | false |
scylladb/seastar
|
scylladb
| 168,726,598 | 176 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "tgrabiec",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1470080895000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "HEAD = 0bcdd282c54d00651dd0518da91944a6ec97dab6 + the following diff:\r\n```diff\r\ndiff --git a/core/reactor.cc b/core/reactor.cc\r\nindex 55164df..4f68279 100644\r\n--- a/core/reactor.cc\r\n+++ b/core/reactor.cc\r\n@@ -534,13 +534,14 @@ void reactor_backend_epoll::complete_epoll_event(pollable_fd_state& pfd, promise\r\n auto pr = std::make_unique<promise<io_event>>();\r\n iocb io;\r\n prepare_io(io);\r\n- io.data = pr.get();\r\n+ auto f = pr->get_future();\r\n+ io.data = pr.release();\r\n _pending_aio.push_back(io);\r\n if ((_io_queue->queued_requests() > 0) ||\r\n (_pending_aio.size() >= std::min(max_aio / 4, _io_queue->_capacity / 2))) {\r\n flush_pending_aio();\r\n }\r\n- return pr.release()->get_future();\r\n+ return f;\r\n });\r\n }\r\n \r\n@@ -2864,7 +2865,8 @@ void engine_exit(std::exception_ptr eptr) {\r\n }\r\n \r\n void report_failed_future(std::exception_ptr eptr) {\r\n- report_exception(\"WARNING: exceptional future ignored\", eptr);\r\n+ abort();\r\n+// report_exception(\"WARNING: exceptional future ignored\", eptr);\r\n }\r\n \r\n future<> check_direct_io_support(sstring path) {\r\n```\r\n\r\n```\r\n#2 0x00000000004d25f9 in report_failed_future (eptr=...) at core/reactor.cc:2868\r\n#3 0x0000000000f845f6 in future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >::~future (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)\r\n at /home/centos/src/scylla/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/scylla-1.2.1/seastar/core/future.hh:772\r\n#4 do_void_futurize_apply<auto rpc::recv_helper<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>, rpc::do_want_client_info>(rpc::signature<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>&&, rpc::do_want_client_info)::{lambda(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)#1}::operator()(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)::{lambda()#1}::operator()()::{lambda(future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >)#1}, future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > >(std::enable_if&&, auto rpc::recv_helper<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>, rpc::do_want_client_info>(rpc::signature<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>&&, rpc::do_want_client_info)::{lambda(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)#1}::operator()(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)::{lambda()#1}::operator()()::{lambda(future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >)#1}) (\r\n func=func@entry=<unknown type in /usr/bin/scylla, CU 0xf30d9b3, DIE 0xfa67b4b>) at /home/centos/src/scylla/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/scylla-1.2.1/seastar/core/future.hh:1179\r\n#5 0x0000000000f8583e in futurize<void>::apply<auto rpc::recv_helper<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>, rpc::do_want_client_info>(rpc::signature<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>&&, rpc::do_want_client_info)::{lambda(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)#1}::operator()(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)::{lambda()#1}::operator()()::{lambda(future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >)#1}, future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > >(auto rpc::recv_helper<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>, rpc::do_want_client_info>(rpc::signature<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>&&, rpc::do_want_client_info)::{lambda(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)#1}::operator()(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)::{lambda()#1}::operator()()::{lambda(future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >)#1}&&, future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >&&)\r\n (func=<optimized out>) at /home/centos/src/scylla/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/scylla-1.2.1/seastar/core/future.hh:1227\r\n#6 future<> future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >::then_wrapped<auto rpc::recv_helper<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>, rpc::do_want_client_info>(rpc::signature<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>&&, rpc::do_want_client_info)::{lambda(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)#1}::operator()(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)::{lambda()#1}::operator()()::{lambda(future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >)#1}, future<> >(auto rpc::recv_helper<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>, rpc::do_want_client_info>(rpc::signature<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>&&, rpc::do_want_client_info)::{lambda(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)#1}::operator()(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)::{lambda()#1}::operator()()::{lambda(future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >)#1}&&)::{lambda(future<>)#1}::operator()<future_state<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > >(auto, future<>) (state=<unknown type in /usr/bin/scylla, CU 0xf30d9b3, DIE 0xfa6b004>, __closure=0x60704739cc20)\r\n at /home/centos/src/scylla/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/scylla-1.2.1/seastar/core/future.hh:909\r\n#7 continuation<future<> future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >::then_wrapped<auto rpc::recv_helper<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>, rpc::do_want_client_info>(rpc::signature<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>&&, rpc::do_want_client_info)::{lambda(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)#1}::operator()(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)::{lambda()#1}::operator()()::{lambda(future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >)#1}, future<> >(auto rpc::recv_helper<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>, rpc::do_want_client_info>(rpc::signature<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>, std::function<future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > > (rpc::client_info const&, query::read_command, range<dht::ring_position>)>&&, rpc::do_want_client_info)::{lambda(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)#1}::operator()(lw_shared_ptr<rpc::protocol<net::serializer, net::messaging_verb>::server::connection>, long, temporary_buffer<char>)::{lambda()#1}::operator()()::{lambda(future<foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >)#1}&&)::{lambda(future<>)#1}, foreign_ptr<lw_shared_ptr<query::result> > >::run() (this=0x60704739cc00) at /home/centos/src/scylla/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/scylla-1.2.1/seastar/core/future.hh:402\r\n#8 0x00000000004d132e in reactor::run_tasks (this=this@entry=0x607000111000, tasks=...) at core/reactor.cc:1500\r\n#9 0x00000000004fbc6b in reactor::run (this=0x607000111000) at core/reactor.cc:1853\r\n#10 0x0000000000515c79 in smp::<lambda()>::operator()(void) const (__closure=0x600000085700) at core/reactor.cc:2640\r\n#11 0x00000000004ce24e in std::function<void ()>::operator()() const (this=<optimized out>) at /opt/scylladb/include/c++/5.3.1/functional:2271\r\n#12 dpdk_thread_adaptor (f=<optimized out>) at core/reactor.cc:2449\r\n#13 0x00000000006dac3b in eal_thread_loop ()\r\n---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---select-frame 6\r\n#14 0x00007ffa7ceefdc5 in start_thread (arg=0x7ffa718cd700) at pthread_create.c:308\r\n#15 0x00007ffa7cc1d21d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:113\r\n```",
"title": "Failed future ignored somewhere inside rpc",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "avikivity",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1477382841000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 11,316 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
CompuMasterGmbH/cammIntegrationPortal
|
CompuMasterGmbH
| 167,823,888 | 13 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jochenwezel",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1469616008000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Major improvements shall be\r\n\r\n- improved data integrity after deleting items sometimes left over some foreign-key-items\r\n- performance, especially for\r\n - navigation data lookup\r\n - IsUserAuthorized checks\r\n- Allow and Deny rules for memberships \r\n- Allow and Deny rules for authorizations\r\n- pave the way for (multiple) membership inheritance\r\n - inheritance of completely calculated membership sets, so that inheriting from a 2nd group with a deny rule for user A **doesn't** automatically deny user A being Allow-member of 1st group\r\n- pave the way for (multiple) authorizations inheritance\r\n - inheritance of all Allow and Deny rules, so that inheriting from a 2nd security object with a deny rule for user A **does** automatically deny user A being authorized of 1st security object\r\n- pave the way for splitting application objects into security objects + 0...n navigation items",
"title": "Redesign of whole security concept",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jochenwezel",
"comment_id": 235553922,
"datetime": 1469617259000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "What was the purpose of the server IDs with negative numbers and the dependencies of related code? Do they point to changed database structure? If yes, code update is required.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 1,065 | false | false | 1 | 2 | false |
wso2/product-ei
|
wso2
| 217,208,804 | 382 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "milindaperera",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1490612262000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Relates #353",
"title": "[Docs] Remove start-all.sh script information from EI Documentation",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Nashaath",
"comment_id": 289800624,
"datetime": 1490713629000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Removed information related to start-all.sh script from https://docs.wso2.com/display/EI610/Running+the+Product.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "Nashaath",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1490713629000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 124 | false | false | 2 | 3 | false |
retf/Boost.Application
| null | 56,913,286 | 35 |
{
"number": 35,
"repo": "Boost.Application",
"user_login": "retf"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Heather",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1423320040000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "correct path_impl for NTDDI_VERSION >= 0x06010000",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "retf",
"comment_id": 73368417,
"datetime": 1423322520000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "tks for the fix",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Heather",
"comment_id": 73368802,
"datetime": 1423323165000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "yey!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 19 | false | true | 2 | 3 | false |
kubernetes/kubernetes
|
kubernetes
| 149,542,540 | 24,486 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "a-robinson",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1461090245000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Its lack of coverage is quite sad, given how much logic it contains. It shouldn't be that much work to mock out the GCE service object and get significantly more coverage than what we currently have.",
"title": "Write unit tests for the gce cloud provider package",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "spiffxp",
"comment_id": 308879640,
"datetime": 1497564600000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "/sig cluster-lifecycle\r\n/area platform/gce\r\nsince we lack a sig-gcp at the moment",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 280 | false | true | 2 | 2 | false |
DragonFlyBSD/DragonFlyBSD
|
DragonFlyBSD
| 44,809,459 | 2 |
{
"number": 2,
"repo": "DragonFlyBSD",
"user_login": "DragonFlyBSD"
}
|
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "victoredwardocallaghan",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1412347184000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Upstream fixes",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrmarino",
"comment_id": 161682122,
"datetime": 1449157566000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "The repository at GitHub is only a mirror (iow read-only). Pull requests are not supported.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 92 | false | false | 2 | 2 | false |
Schamper/nodebb-plugin-shoutbox
| null | 72,175,381 | 76 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "kurt-stolle",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1430403342000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "The plugin does not work with the latest version of NodeBB",
"title": "Plugin does not work with 0.7.x",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Aeternax",
"comment_id": 106571916,
"datetime": 1432841118000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I have it running fine with 0.7.x.\r\nWhat errors are you getting?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "alesaint",
"comment_id": 115686294,
"datetime": 1435325340000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "On my side that's work but I can't remove and edit message since 0.7.0",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "Schamper",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1448301116000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Schamper",
"comment_id": 159010453,
"datetime": 1448301116000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "New version is compatible with 0.9.x.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 229 | false | false | 4 | 5 | false |
langateam/sails-auth
|
langateam
| 142,634,818 | 139 | null |
[
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "aman-gautam",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1458649743000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi,\r\n\r\nIt's a general observation that this repo hasn't been too active in 2016. The number of open issues have crossed 50, the only code related commits have been the merging of pull requests, the dependencies are out of date. \r\n\r\nIs it still safe to use this project in a production system?\r\n\r\nBest\r\nAman",
"title": "Is the project still active?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "tjwebb",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1459105774000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "tjwebb",
"comment_id": 202126352,
"datetime": 1459105774000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "See https://github.com/langateam/sails-auth/issues/118.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 361 | false | false | 2 | 3 | false |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.