<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=189056.msg10077151#msg10077151">Quote from: Zaer Darkwail on 04-06-2014, 13:49:03</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Well, I did not ask succubus treated as cohort. GM said to treat succubus as cohort and I think the whole term confuses the overall function of the spell.<br/><br/>I am fine I recast the spell if I do not need make the magic circle and dimensional anchor also (would need remake charisma check to 're-negotiate' the contract which this case favors succubus heavily with her +8 mod vs +2 mod of mine). But the point of true name was to remove the extra hassle and keep record what day succubus is about to take off (as true name possessing allows bend the normal rules of the binding to make years lasting contracts).<br/><br/>So far as I know the succubus should be long term than short term thing (unless succubus gets killed in action and with player controlling succubus it should not be case as despite binding succubus is not suicidal; it would seek survive with limits of the binding).<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>So, you ARE trying to bring in a 12th level PC into the party via a back-door method? No, that was not a serious question, but again, I think this requires a GM intrivention so that we all understand what the boundaries are and how she is to be treated. As far as danger to Adrian, he knew going in that a succubus would roll him and no binding covers every situation and demons are known for finding that critical loophole that lets it free... and that may simply mean killing Adrian... if he didn't get really specific about a lot of things. "I didn't mean to bump him into that ballistabolt, how could I know it was aimed at me?"