I'm not going to try to explain reasoning anymore, it seems a pointless argument to make.<br/><br/>I'm sorry that you designed a character for apparently one purpose and that apparently no one figured that out until now. That was YOUR choice. If the DM knew about it, then it's partly his responsibility for not giving advice about it, but it's your character and play it as you will.<br/><br/>Everyone has offered valid and well meaning advice and suggestions that you want to take as libel (the appropriate term when in writing) and maligning your character. They are not.<br/><br/>I will simply say, at this point, that Wren, being chaotic good, can see the usefulness, if not agree with the act, of the succubus. As long as Adrian maintains control of her and she performs as ordered and isn't a threat to the party, she won't cause any waves. BUT if Adrian binds any more demons, like the bard, she's out. It's become too much of an issue to have a bunch of demons about her and she would be exceptionally uncomfortable. I would also agree that any rationale about making it ok to replace a member of the party's usefulness by using a creature under Adrian's control makes that character pointless. You can offer all the arguments that you like, the end result is that a player feels like he/she doesn't have a place in the group and their enjoyment of the game suffers so that you can play your character. That simply is not cool. Please consider the others in the group when you are planning things for the future of your character. You're free to summon and bind whatever you want, but there may be conquences that you may not enjoy. If a game stops being fun, I see no point in continuing it. Right now, that is not a concern, but it could become something of an issue.