That option requires you to sacrifice one general spell per level per day; read it again.<br/><br/>Your stats add up to 38 points; the -2 racial penalty to strength and the -2 strength flaw stack, so you should have a strength of 5, not 7.<br/><br/>The feats Collegial Wizard and Precocious Apprentace do not statistically conflict, yet in their descriptions they are mutually exclusive. One requires extensive training in a university and the other extensive training at a master's hand. The sidebar they're in further explains that they are intended to differentiate between the two schools of thought. Taking both is blatant powergaming, and as a roleplayer I choose to fight it. Further, the one feat does not guarantee the ability to cast a 2nd level spell; using it to take that PrC is questionable at best. With everything else that's wrong about your character...<br/><br/>I am not being hostile. I'm annoyed and I'm reading through your character because last time I did it seemed overpowerful. With the enmity forming I decided to know a potential enemy. What I found is a character just as badly concieved and poorly constructed as the one you tried to pass off as a trapper in my game. So, let me clarify a few things.<br/><br/>First, I have contacted the DM privatly, as that is the only courtious thing to do right now. If he tells me to back off, then I'll back off. Right now, all he's done is ask for some of the math I did to find those flaws. You can extrapolate from there on your own, but it sounds to me like your character's approval can be rescinded. I will not speak of the exact contents of a PM, however.<br/><br/>Second, this is not about your character and mine. Yes, I am asking if her RP reactions are because of some kind of stupidity inherint to her character, and I expect an answer to that question; I am being quite serious when I ask it. Everything else is simple research and math.<br/><br/>Third, you could have handled this with dignity and checked up on my points, instead you chose to insult me. And that does not change the simple fact that you are wrong. You read the options wrong. Your math is wrong. These are not statements of anger, these are not the results of hostility.<em>This is fact</em>.