<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=86679.msg3811003#msg3811003">Quote from: Haibane on 24-10-2010, 16:25:39</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote"> *nods* I think it would have to be very small. But the day you're queueing at the checkout for 40 mins because someone stole the cashier would really be annoying, even if it only happened rarely.<br/><br/>And if it was someone whose job was more vital like a teacher, or a lawyer in a courtroom, well. I think you see where I'm heading on this.<br/><br/>Its a great fantasy world and I think it works, and I'm looking forward to the game very much, I just think it needs some realism to prop it up. You know how self-centred and money-grabbing big corporations are? They're not going to take lightly to one of their female staff missing about a day of each working week are they?</blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>I see what you mean, but it would really depend on the percentage of men. If it was 1% it would be exceedingly rare for it to happen, so maybe one day a month, or more, would be overlooked and could just be taken out of vacation time. Wouldn't be much different then just looking at it as pre-paternity leave. If the population of fertile men was larger then it could be a serious issue.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote">Quote</div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Personally if we're going to embrace the full-on fantasy of this I love the idea of just taking a woman in the street, its so hot and dirty and yummy, and obscenity laws be damned.</blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>My thoughts exactly, although it would be all the more intensly humiliating if there was a viable free alterntive and they knew it.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote">Quote</div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Well there's testing and carding for men, so the same government machinery could test and card women too. It makes perfect sense to me and wouldn't cost that much additionally.<br/><br/>Remember the purpose of the law - to increase the population. The purpose of the law isn't to allow random men to demand sex with any woman they please, the end result should be a pregnancy, so if women are infertile that becomes a whole different law and rather more sinister.</blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>You're not wrong, I was just thinking it would add an interesting aspect, and leave your lawyer with all the more work. But it would make more sense for the testing to be universal, so. *Shrugs*<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote">Quote</div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">I think there does need to be exemptions. Married women for example must be exempt, for all kinds of legal reasons pertaining to wills and legitimacy of offspring and such. A huge can of worms. I also think it isn't unreasonable for lesbians to be exempt either, I mean if the tables were turned how would you as a heterosexual male feel if it was a legal right for any gay man to accost you in the street and bugger you? Its exactly the same thing.</blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>Married women would only be exempt if their husbands were fertile, if not it would just become a refuge and every woman would mary just to get out.<br/><br/>Offspring would be the sole care of the Mother in any case where the card carrier does not consent to marrying them, as they will be fathering hundreds of children as long as they are out of wedlock they couldn't possibly be held responsible for them, hence govornment compensation which you suggest earlier.<br/><br/>It would be unreasonable for lesbians to be expempt because it's the same issue as the Married category, women would flock to it and would seriously drain the pool of women.<br/><br/>The concept your trying to get across with the hypothetical I understand. It's just that there is no testing for homosexuality, and even a straight woman could fake a gay relationship just once to get exemption. I also have to admit I'm a little befuddled, rape of any kind would be traumitizing, if it was by your sexual preference or not.