My take on this debacle.<br/><br/>1: People who are saying the crusader should be fine with it because "It's using evil to fight evil, which is good!" Are missing the lawful nature of the alignment. A neutral or chaotic character would make that distinction, such as robinhood as another suggested. But, a lawful good, or lawful neutral character who sees evil outsiders as an abomination and a threat to order in the world, would never make such a compromise, unless perhaps it was an extreme situation, that they had no rational choice BUT to compromise in. The entire point of the lawful alignment factor is that it makes your character unyielding, unbending, and stalwart in his beliefs. He doesn't bend the law, he doesn't incite chaos, he doesn't tolerate a breaking of his personal code. He dies first.<br/><br/>2: The entire "I'm gonna whack a mole the succubus the moment I see her true form!" thing, well to me that would depend on the scenario. Now that both parties have agreed the succubus will be disguised, there is no reason why he would strike. Now, if he did see her mask slip, and he did see that she was a minion of chaos and destruction, then I can't really see where anyone could fault the guy for going all stabby smitey on the fiend.<br/><br/>BUT, from the sounds of things, the situation is resolved to the three involved parties mutual agreement. So luckily, unless there is an ego flare up somewhere down the line, it looks like our succubus is free to endanger the souls and chastity of mortal souls. :D<br/><br/>By the way, I totally want Anton to wear his angel mask around this succubus now, just to see if he can freak her out with his aura of lawful goodness. lol