<br/>I'm cool either way. Still not sold on the system being used, but--as a gamer--am open to going through a few uses of the system for combat or for other things and seeing how exactly it turns out.<br/><br/>I think, just my opinion, that part of the problem in moving things along comes from--as already referenced--1) the fact that the only character who seemed to be of a leader-type had to withdraw and (again, just my view of it) 2) the inherent problem with the person running the game being involved with a given side of the story as opposed to helping run the logistics of both sides getting off the ground and interacting with one another and the storyline(s).<br/><br/>To put it in a context I'd be more at ease in explaining:<br/>It's like you have a competitve D&D game where one group of players are the usual PCs and the other is the monsters, villains, and other antagonists, but the DM isn't judging the game but has made a character and joined in on one side or the other.<br/><br/>Anyways, I think there's potential and am happy to move in whatever direction we/you decide. If we begin anew, though, I might play someone other than Thunderclap.