I'm getting kinda tired of this debate. I'm gonna lay down the law as the DM, considering I already had this same exact debate (Plus more on this subject).<br/><br/>The main issue seems to be that it isn't exactly "Clear". Whether or not it does.  Now, lets clear a few things up. It does not say the "Caster" casts the spell. It says the "Weapon" cast the spell. This is a very clear difference. The weapon is the one doing the casting. Not the caster. If it said "The caster can then cast a spell" THEN we'd have to go through this. But it does not.<br/><br/>I don't want to be shown a forum either. If I have to be shown a forum about how a spell works, in a game IM running, that's a bit contradiction. The rules, while existing for a reason, are under my juristicition, and up to me to take the way I want in the case of a Dispute.<br/><br/>Plus. A touch spell missing is extremely rare as it is, so it just seems to be a bit of pointless bureaucracy.<br/><br/>Also, Nicci: For everyone's sake, i'd ask you to make all your rolls clear somewhere, and visable, preferably linked.  As to avoid future confusion.