Woo hoo, I have a personal message from WyzardWhately which I feel I should quote in order to properly apologize (sorry, Wyzard).<br/><br/>1) To his latest OOC post numer one hundred fourty one, feeling that we are going off-topic, I PMed him:<br/><br/>"Not at all, WyzardWhately,<br/>you people are fun."<br/><br/>2) and his reply was:<br/><br/>... no longer included there, since Elliquiy staff says its against the rules; but it is a rather hot message, requiring a public apology on my part for being unreasonable and insulting ...<br/><br/>3) to which I feel adequate offering a public apology, back in OOC thread again:<br/><br/>Dear Wyzard,<br/>a) I have nowhere said that rules do not apply to me,<br/>b) but I sincerely apologise if I was clumsy enough to make you belive so.<br/>to make things more clear,<br/>c) I told you that your OSRIC interpretation was wrong,<br/>d) and later proved it with another AD&D 1 source,<br/>e) never saying that rules shouldn't apply to me,<br/>f) but asserting that we use GM rules here, not pure AD&D, and that GM decisions have precedence over OSRIC,<br/>g) and that GM-approved profile takes precedence over AD&D rules, being made a part of his world building effort.<br/><br/>I hope that now, Wyzard, I made things sufficiently clear, and again, offer you a public apology for any misunderstanding arising from my participation in this game. Here, it isn't hard for me to apologise.  O:)<br/><br/>Really, Wyzard, when Ruby invited me for some roleplay and I used wind walk, you haven't even looked at my character sheet (as you yourself admitted in one of your OOC messages) before showing OSRIC at me. Sloppy. In the relative absence of GM I thought it adequate to defend that role-play and the character involved within, but now that TGT is, can we say, back, I hope we're going to finilize the subject with this public apology of mine.