<div class="floatright">(https://elliquiy.com/elluiki/images/6/6f/Invisible-Man-780294.jpg)</div><strong>Skin</strong><br/>HP 23/23; AC 17; Init +3; Fort +5, Ref +4, Will +3<br/><br/><br/><br/>This Grand Arena they found themselves in front of was apparently a place of interlinked cause and effect. Sapients came to attempt to discorporate each other, causing victory and oblivion. Other sapients came to observe these encounters, causing emotional benefit. Providing 'entertainment' would cause the granting of currency and other valuables. Uncertain, it turned to Marcus.<br/><br/>"What is the meaning attached to entertainment? This one lacks referential experience for the word. This one presumes that the sapients gathered to observe this unity in combat seek emotional resonance by viewing the referenced combat in a non-participatory fashion. Is the inference made by that one that engaging in combat in such manner that the emotional resonance is amplified will result in the observant sapients supplying currency to this unity? If this inference is correct, how does this one or that one conduct combat in a manner to so amplify the resonance generated?"<br/><br/><br/>The incendiary sapient self-designated as Fyr was ignored unless prompted otherwise. Its actions and attitude had indicated lack of integration into the unity. It had not indicated intent to discorporate any component of the unity, but nor had it acted to benefit. The new suggested addition to the unity was likewise of current irrelevance. Evaluation of its benefit to the unit would be held abeyant pending additional understanding of its function.