And I remember why I hated GMing with rule lawyers. Let me say plainly and simply here, if you aren't happy with the game that I've offered, you're free to not play it. To be honest, I have things that I could do besides try to explain the same thing 3 or 4 times in 3 or 4 different ways to make it maybe make sense. And, yes, I'm frustrated.<br/><br/>I'll try to answer this in simple, declarative sentences.<br/><br/>No system, conceived, produced or played has ever been perfect, thus to expect it is unrealistic. I challenge anyone to offer a perfect, completely consistant and  playable system.<br/><br/>Again, the attunement for weapons and armor are considered magical enchantments for the purpose of placing further enchantments. Whether you are holding the weapon or currently attuned to it is immaterial. ABP merely bypasses this requirement.<br/><br/>I will not address the thoughts about relative merit for spellcasters, I've already addressed it and I'm not revisiting it again.<br/><br/>You are certainly free to buy a luck blade, if you can find the coin to buy it, someone willing to sell the weapon and you are determined to find one, that's an adventure all on it's own.<br/><br/>Finally, ABP is being used. That was announced before any applicant stepped forward, along with a link. It's the player's responsibility to read the material. I've tried to explain it and apparently, I've failed several times in both PM and post. I'm a reasonable person, but I'm not without limits.<br/><br/>If there are further questions on this, I will address them via PM and, to be frank, I think that I've tried hard enough with this.