<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=204610.msg10079446#msg10079446">Quote from: NicciKotor on 05-06-2014, 01:04:10</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Mostly wrong. Spellstrike is where you get to channel a touch spell through the weapon strike. You do not need to role a touch attack since the sword attack is the touch. Once you hit the spell is added to the sword damage automatically.</blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>I didn't say you needed to roll a second touch attack when using spellstrike. You roll only the single attack, changing the melee touch attack into a melee weapon attack. It replaces it, not on top of it.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=204610.msg10079446#msg10079446">Quote from: NicciKotor on 05-06-2014, 01:04:10</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Same thing with spell storing. The stored spell is unleashed as a free action when the weapon deals damage, which means the sword is already touching as the spell discharges. No need for a seperate touch attack roll since the weapon is already doing that.<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>Mind linking me to where it says that? (SPECIFICALLY: That you do not need to roll another touch attack if the spell that you're casting as a free action requires one. It needs to call it out and make it an exception to the normal rules, or otherwise the normal rules apply, forcing you to make an attack to land the cast spell as well.) The threads I linked in my previous post say differently, though I've posted the question on Paizo's rule forums (http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2r4r2?Spell-Storing-Weapons-and-Attacks) for further clarification, so we'll see what they have to say.