Well, it sounds like<br/><br/>Kunoichi could go either way.<br/><br/><del>You</del>TheGlyphstone and Zaer would prefer to stick with 3.5.<br/><br/>Pale would like to switch to Pathfinder.<br/><br/>As I have said, I -really- like Pathfinder, the principle drawback is one that TheGlyphstone and Zaer have both raised: TheGlyphstone remarked--"we'll be here all month tracking down everything that's changed with the number of abilities and effects we have on all our characters."<br/><br/>Although, Pale said "Id assume (since Pathfinder already says that D&D 3.5 stuff that wasn't rewritten should be acceptable) that 3.5 is still good in pathfinder. As long as thats the case it  means easy conversion to a more refined system."<br/><br/>I just got a membership on http://www.dinglesgames.com/ (http://www.dinglesgames.com/)  I really like his encounter generator. I used it with my tabletop group over Christmas when we gamed--all of like two sessions. He has an encounter and an NPC generator for Pathfinder and 3.5. So, I could GM either system.<br/><br/>The biggest benefit of Pathfinder, in my mind is that there are no dead levels.