I did already apologize, but...<br/><br/>I don't usually let my daily stresses come out here (the whole point of this place for me is getting away from the day-to-day grind!) but I was probably feeling a bit more irritable than usual the other night. My general goal with interaction here is to be one of the people who makes things more fun, not less. So just to make sure it gets seen, I am<em>very </em>sorry if I sounded pushy or whiny or aggressive about what I mistakenly perceived as spoilers.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=237173.msg11688687#msg11688687">Quote from: Thorne on 01-10-2015, 23:59:28</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">At this point, I only really have one question - who didn't take a campaign trait? <br/>I'm only curious. I expect there was a good reason, if that's true; they're mostly an easy tie-in with a little bonus, for those of us who are bad at connecting characters (... I am in this boat often enough myself, I judge no one).<br/>My brief look at sheets led me to believe we all had that tie-in, and I'm now a little bit confused. </blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>Yeah, I apparently missed that, too, which was part of what led to my confusion. I sort of quick-skim other people's characters. 1) I don't consider myself so familiar with PF that I'd feel qualified trying to 'check' other people's characters (and I wouldn't even if I did feel that familiar with the rules, unless they specifically asked for my help). I'm an old 3.5 maven and I still get confused sometimes about the (extremely) similar rules. 2) It's probably old-fashioned of me, but as others have mentioned, my reflex is to leave other characters a bit of a mystery to myself unless people are specifically asking for relationship ties.