Eh, yes and no?  I don't have an issue with what was posted.  It's collaborative story-telling (even if I am the evil GM of doom) and we are all in this together, so adding detail is fine.  As long as you are stating things from a character's perspective, and are okay with them (potentially) being wrong, I don't mind that sort of thing.  At worst I might ask you to edit it out if it conflicts somehow.<br/><br/>If I did have something specific in mind and you want to post details then you may need to be okay with me saying your character is wrong.<br/><br/>That said, generally speaking I am more interested in the goal than in the process.  If you want to describe how you are accomplishing a roll, instead of leaving it to me to describe, I don't mind that.  If you pass the roll it happens how you say (probably), if you fail the roll your character was either wrong about the process or just screwed it up.<br/><br/>If you are stating that something is possible that I wouldn't even allow a roll for, I may ask it is edited out or just state your character is wrong.  Likewise if you are stating you accomplished a task that a roll would be required for I may ask it be edited out or state your character failed.<br/><br/>TLDR; I'm fine with players adding detail to the setting.  Trying to restore power to an airlock is something I would allow a roll for, and I don't mind you describing how your character would go about accomplishing said roll.