<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=243891.msg12404545#msg12404545">Quote from: ThisOneGal on 12-06-2016, 01:47:54</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Alright, GM post is finally up. &gt;&lt;<br/><br/>Weather has cooled down, finally. Should be able to reply within a reasonable timeframe again.<br/><br/><hr/><br/>Would people rather I try to get a reply up after each of you individually, or wait until everyone has gone?<br/>Individually *might* result in me having longer replies (stress might), but will result in some redundancy/temporal weirdness from a mechanical standpoint.<br/><br/><hr/><br/>As a note: the way I'm probably be going to handling rolls from now on is: PCs roll, NPCs react. You decide what action/skill you're taking and the NPCs will roll accordingly (assuming your skill/action is a viable one). By default, you have the 'narrative initiative'.<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>The nice thing about group responses is that it gives us a sense of rounds. Should we post ?  Who is up?  That sort of thing.<br/><br/>Mostly I'm trying to figure out how to keep people from collecting Hachi's blood later to find out who made her morph.  Or am I worrying too much ?