<div class="floatleft">(https://www.mediafire.com/convkey/0d06/edp7l4ylbdz97uv6g.jpg) <br/><span class="bbc_font" style="font-family: Georgia;"></span><div align="center"><strong><span class="bbc_size" style="font-size: 12pt;">Ari Warcaof </span></strong> <span class="bbc_font" style="font-family: Georgia;"> </span><div align="center"><strong> <span class="bbc_size" style="font-size: 12pt;">Businessman <br/>(of sorts) </span></strong></div></div></div><br/><span class="bbc_size" style="font-size: 11pt;">It’s imperative that Jaclyn view herself as a participant in our plan, but essentially she’s the operative—Peter says she’s independent.  I’ve seen that, but there is the need for holding course, not varying.  Once we agree, those are the orders, the way it will proceed.  <br/><br/>So it’s Rapido.  “Yes, Rapido.”  How to say this.  “Involving Rapido allows you to scapegoat her, while it being true, the raid on the jeweler due to her—that’s an example of we don’t want to vary from the truth.  If Rapido can somehow be re-involved, agreeing to that, there’s your credibility and another force that is working toward foiling du Monde.  She’ll help you I’d say as well as work on her own agenda.”  I eye Jaclyn, “that’s what I think.” <br/><br/>“Either way, I’d suggest being truthful.  Such things as you haven’t been loyal although the Berlin incident was not your fault.”  I fix her gaze: “That’s true.”  . . . “You want to prove your loyalty to her.  That’s true.” . . . “That’s very true.  You’re not saying you are loyal, just that you want to prove it.” <br/><br/></span><div class="floatleft">(https://www.mediafire.com/convkey/4474/fy1ijwqfvup45ew6g.jpg) <br/><span class="bbc_font" style="font-family: Georgia;"></span><div align="center"><strong><span class="bbc_size" style="font-size: 12pt;">Peter Warcaof</span></strong> <span class="bbc_font" style="font-family: Georgia;"></span><div align="center"><strong><span class="bbc_size" style="font-size: 12pt;">CGDA Benefactor</span></strong></div></div></div><br/><span class="bbc_size" style="font-size: 11pt;">Jaclyn feels that Nasty will land on her feet, I suppose being feline that way, Nasty landing on her feet.  But it’s worrisome that she’s been unavailable.  Does that mean she’s kidnapped or that she’s in hiding or something else?  No doubt, either way, an indication of the very dangerous du Monde.<br/><br/>I turn back to the conversation between Ari and Jaclyn.  <strong>“It’s an old trick Jaclyn.  You tell the truth and mislead with it.  One, <span class="bbc_u">you</span>, can do it.  It’s discipline.  You’re disciplined.  Saying certain things, not others that would be a lie.”</strong>  I try to think of an example.  <strong>“Someone asks if they’re handsome.  You answer with a coy smlle, ‘I admire your beard’—something true which misleads.”</strong>  <br/><br/>I return to an essential point, <strong>“Whatever is done, you do not want return by capture.  You want a voluntary return.”</strong> <br/><br/><strong>“We can create the essential ‘truths’.”</strong>  I look at Ari.  He nods, saying, “A script of truth, yes we can.” <br/></span>