<div class="floatleft">(http://i63.tinypic.com/2eqf9j4.jpg) <br/><span class="bbc_font" style="font-family: Georgia;"></span><div align="center"><strong><span class="bbc_size" style="font-size: 10pt;">Peter Warcaof</span></strong> <span class="bbc_font" style="font-family: Georgia;"></span><div align="center"><strong><span class="bbc_size" style="font-size: 10pt;">CGDA Benefactor</span></strong><br/>‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾</div></div></div>This could be disorienting.  As we sit here, Jaclyn asks questions that require a perspective I’d not taken.<br/><br/>I think back to Jaclyn’s return from the Cayman Islands.  Clearly, she had not slept.  Clearly, she had been living wild—that’s my choice at description, I heard the titters of ‘whore’ as she strolled in.  Had my attempted intervention then and there caused further anger—du Monde seeing me as interfering?  Du Monde objecting to me trifling with another of her possessions?  Well by Jove, I’d done the same if it was an issue.<em>Hee-hee!</em>, the irony being that Jaclyn nearly snapped my head off as I tried to help.  Perhaps she’s even attracted to the life du Monde might have offered.<br/><br/>I nod.<strong>“All possible I suppose.”</strong>What is the real attack?  Is du Monde a self-centered hellion who fixates on who and what she wants and eliminates anything or anyone who stands in the way?  If I were to sort things with that perspective, I’d say Jaclyn falls into the category of something (an object) she wants (in a very specific way) and I fall into the category of ‘get lost’.<br/><br/><strong>“My dear brother may not have the answers.  He is a good tactician and oftentimes can envision the puzzle picture with far fewer pieces required than for others.  So we shall see.”</strong><br/><br/>I add<strong>“But there is the possibility of no du Monde involvement at all.”</strong><em>Hee-hee!</em>I think I may be accused of pernicious optimism.<br/>