<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=244881.msg12122171#msg12122171">Quote from: Inferior Rabbit on 02-03-2016, 16:47:06</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Here it is. (https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=245239.0)<br/><br/>We'll do this one interview at a time, so it's not a mess to make sense of. Whos able to go first?<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>You sure that won't make us all have to wait forever just to write?<br/><br/>Just to add some clarification: Some interviews may take longer than others. This relies on the person's IRL activity and the time they have to output posts every day. So if we do have the type of person who puts out one post a week, I sometimes become that person depending on how busy I am but not this week, you're making everyone else or those who are more active have to wait for that longer interview to finish before they can post. The interview process in that case could take nearly the entire month of March to complete before any sandboxing happens.<br/><br/>When you originally said for everyone to post, it seemed a little more controlled. It also seemed to give you control on which interview you felt like responding to first. If you wanted people to only post again after everyone's first post received a response, then it gives you control of the speed of the interview process. If someone does go AWOL, vacation, just plain-old absent for who knows how many days, you can set a time to skip that person so that everyone isn't held up waiting on him or her.<br/><br/>But, however you want to do it, I just felt the one-at-a-time thing would work in an idealistic world where everyone was super active and didn't go to college or work full-time job and had all the time in the world to just sit in front of a computer and just text role play all day.