<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=177164.msg8429070#msg8429070">Quote from: Snickerz on 20-06-2013, 01:27:26</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">How do you get more specific on something that's not specific? Isn't that rather picking nits? <br/>I mean excuse me if I sound rather bitchy but wouldn't that be like telling someone they had to say what shade of blue their shirt was? <br/>She asked me what to put, I told her since he wouldn't be very experienced that it shouldn't be that big of a deal that she didn't put specifics down, seeing as there weren't any. I'm rather confused.<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>Well if the character isn't very experienced, just list that. 'hand to hand' tells us very little, but 'Jordaine has received very little formal training and his close combat largely just revolves around common brawling and use of natural agility' gives us a much more clear idea of how this character fights. On the other hand if he had no real capability or training in hand to hand the skill wouldn't necessarily need to be listed. I would consider anything listed as skill to be there by virtue of having superior capability than what the average person possesses.