Thanks Hyde, and for the description of Richard. Is that his first or second name? Thinking in 1920s terms, people would usually be called by the surnames.<br/><br/>Also... sorry, everyone, I need to say that I'm struggling with the writing style here somewhat. The third person omniscient storytelling style of yours Hyde, is hard for me to get into and enjoy. You keep saying things like 'the party noticed that' and 'the group realised such-and-such' which to me is god-moding. If my character is going to see or realise something I'd like me to be the one who writes it. Also, Florence spoke to Richard in my last post but he ignored me. I would like your post that follows mine to include a suitable response to it. So I'm finding this play style somewhat unappealing. Do you always write in this way?<br/><br/>And... so far no-one seems to be interacting much at all - everyone's comments seem to be directed at a vague group presence. I'm trying to get responses from people by talking to their characters but so far no-one's biting. Unless things change I think I'll be unable to continue as I don't find this level of character interaction interesting.<br/><br/>Once again, sorry, but I need to say this now before we commit further.