<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=141836.msg6522155#msg6522155">Quote from: vin26m on 01-07-2012, 23:25:25</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Decency laws for regular people could also be enforced on slaves who have a DMV below a certain value?<br/><br/>There could just be social rebuffs instead of legal ones.  I could totally see Nereza saying to an owner in front of their ugly naked slave something like, "Would you be so kind as to put some rags on that... thing.  The ugly cunt is making me lose my appetite."<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>There are some subjective laws, especially in terms of public decency. Causing a public disturbance is often contingent on the place it occurs, and who is involved.  In that case it could function if it were partly social and partly legal. DMV is bad precedent, nobody would write a law that way, because of inflation, and other factors, meaning that the DMV of a a slave may not have much to do with whether or not it would be okay for them to be naked in public. More likely, if someone were to write such a law, it would be a general proscription against the 'display of slaves in public, either naked or in another state of undress which would be likely to cause offence, or a public disturbance to a reasonable person.' Ultimately, it would come down to the police to decide who to fine on the matter, and then, someone fined could go to court over it to argue whether or not it should have caused offence to a reasonable person, etc.<br/><br/>Figured I'd throw that out there. ;D