<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=148869.msg7079567#msg7079567">Quote from: sesshomaruartist on 16-10-2012, 14:28:19</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">lol this is slowly self destructing &gt;_&lt;<br/><br/><br/>Edited: Like my last boss would say: Best luck with your future endeavors.<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>That tends to happen when the game hinges too much on a single person - as real life happens to us all.<br/><br/>Coming from a fellow GM, if something popped up and was going to take me completely out of the loop for muliple weeks; I would WANT my players to continue on and keep the story alive. Which do you think Nikkie would prefer:<br/><br/>1) Continue on without her, maybe mess up a few small things.<br/><br/>2) Come back to a dead game with 1/3 of the cast left still interested.<br/><br/>Im just syaing. Thats my thought proccess as a GM. Part of casting is finding players that understand the point and direction of the game. And its always good to have a backup GM set in place for events like these.<br/><br/>I do agree that we should take Nikkie's interest into account, but keep the cast intact and on track is probably one of her top priorities. Right now, waiting for her specific directions is only detrimental to that. Shes already given us the immediate goal of getting everyone in the throne room at least, start socializing, dinner, begin to bring up how the peace talks should be organized. What are we waiting on her for when we have so much still we can do without messing up the plot?? We can discover Kale's body later - like she said.