"Possible," said Wagner, "but not likely. Every expert consulted was absolutely certain that the bones were approximately two-hundred years old, and in a living person, even a two-hundred year old one, the bones wouldn't show that kind of age. The dating can only tell us the death-date of the person who the bones originally belonged to. Furthermore, the nutrition and chemical markers in the bones show that the people who the bones did originally belong to, lived two-hundred years ago, likely as slaves. A long-lived person would have more recent environmental markers, modern chemical traces."<br/><br/>