<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=66222.msg2965030#msg2965030">Quote from: MadPanda on 23-04-2010, 14:44:59</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Template, High Concept, and Trouble are the first three things you should come up with in the character generation process, as was posted much, much earlier in this thread.  Don't leave 'em until later.<br/><br/>I'm just not sure this combination is legal, and absent any comment from H2 on this point, I'd be disallowing it up front.  Even with it, I'd have liked to have been in on the loop so as to prevent this sort of confusion.  You and Hairy may try to convince me otherwise, of course, but I'd prefer to see this 'rightsized'.  (Otherwise, it's a little like bringing a <em>kansai</em> in on an Arthurian Romance in 1e D&amp;D.  Yes, it's a Fighter subclass, but there's this other problem of fitting the setting...)<br/><br/>In fact, I'd push for Emissary of Power linked to one of the Fae courts, which is about as close to Kitsune as you get.  Demonic Co-Pilot is, as far as I can tell, a bad idea.</blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>If we're going for Kitsune, then you wouldn't necessarily have to be linked to the Fae courts...one thing that Butcher hasn't done in the series is explain the supernatural beasties of the Far East.  But, yeah, Emissary of Power is probably the template you'd have to go with for one of them.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=66222.msg2965030#msg2965030">Quote from: MadPanda on 23-04-2010, 14:44:59</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Here's the problem: H2 is okay with it.  I'm <span class="bbc_u">not</span>, especially when I'm not in on the discussion where this is hammered out.  So if you're going to play silly buggers with the char-gen system, please let me know about it.<br/><strong><br/>I'd prefer to see Imogen restart, following normal processes, because I don't see <em>anything</em> in her posted character's first two stages that justifies the power suite she's assigned to the character.  It looks a lot like cherry picking, absent whatever has been discussed off-board.</strong><br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>Seconded.  Not just for the reasons Panda has listed above, but because<em><strong>everyone else</strong></em>has been good about following the standard character creation procedure.  You want to alter the powers just a little to allow for the character concept?  Fine.  But I have a problem with just throwing the character creation process right out the window.  Everyone ELSE has been good about it - what's the problem with one other player being nice about it?<br/><br/>Also, after careful scrutinization...<em><strong>the character is invalid, if she follows any template</strong></em>.<br/><br/>Level is Chest Deep - starting Refresh is 8 points.<br/><br/>Co-Pilot costs 1.   7 Points left.<br/><br/>Item of Power costs 2. 5 points left.<br/><br/>Honest Lies costs 1.  4 points left.<br/><br/>Sex Appeal costs 1.  3 points left.<br/><br/>Best Foot Forward costs 1.  2 points left.<br/><br/>Wizard's Sight costs 1.  1 point left.<br/><br/>And Marked by Power (which she *should* take) costs 1.  0 points left.<br/><br/><br/>Aaaaaaand she's an NPC.