<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=261903.msg12941832#msg12941832">Quote from: Vergil Tanner on 29-01-2017, 11:21:15</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Well, to be fair, I <em>did</em> offer first. ;)<br/><br/>But as far as "Risk" goes...you seem to be under the impression that David isn't in control...he is. It isn't like he's about to start ranting and raving in different voices in front of people, and if his Personalities know that it's serious, they'll be on (mostly) their best behaviour. <br/><br/>I mean, I'm fine with not being involved at this point, but...well, David IS one of the people who has been there the longest, and if he's ALWAYS being passed over for events because "he's unstable" (despite the fact that he <em>isn't</em>), well, when exactly will I ever get the chance to take part in anything important? I feel like you'll have to handwave him being present for SOMETHING important at SOME point, or he might as well be window dressing for all the impact / interaction he has.<br/><br/>I mean, if he's "too unstable" to meet the ambassador, does that mean he's "Too unstable" to be sent out on missions, too?<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>Not sure why you're capitalising words for me like I can't focus on words, but it doesn't help me to read anything and seems extremely condescending.<br/><br/>It depends how noticeable the annoying voices in his head actually are to someone else, I guess. It just seems unwise to me to present a possible risk instead of none. But if he is not at all a risk then yes, he would make as much sense to use as Prodigy. So in that case my bad for missing it.