<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=257737.msg12735298#msg12735298">Quote from: Saria on 27-10-2016, 00:51:53</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Yes - is the only thing that determines one's level the propensity to <em>violence</em>? Natsuki doesn't really have a "violent" power, or any real violent tendencies. Neither does her father, who has basically the same power (except he can't float and his invisibility/intangibility powers are <em>far</em> more developed). But he's a thief - a bank robber, basically. Although he has no inclination toward violence, and his power can't really hurt people (in and of itself)... there's no doubt he's a <em>serious</em> threat to society, as he's demonstrated.<br/><br/>And with Natsuki... well, let's just say this apple hasn't fallen <em>that</em> far from the tree.<br/><br/>While she couldn't <em>directly</em> harm the facility (and she would never <em>hurt</em> the guards), if she seriously put her mind to it, she could certainly give them <em>serious</em> trouble. She could trivially walk into even the most sensitive and well-guarded areas, and take pretty much what she wants. And of course, she would be a massive flight risk.<br/><br/>(In case anyone's wondering, I'm figuring the way they kept control of her was making her wear some kind of device - like those anklets people under house arrest wear - that tracks her movements, even when invisible or intangible. If she removes the device (say, by turning only her leg intangible so the bracelet falls off, or vice versa), an alarm would go off. Maybe it even alarms if she goes invisible or intangible, too.)<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>Threat level is power + tendency for violence. Like how Jessie was either a 2 or 3 due to her power, but since she doesn't have violent tendencies, she was given a 2. Power sets the level, if there's any indecisiveness, then violent tendencies sway the vote.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=257737.msg12735278#msg12735278">Quote from: Cassandra LeMay on 27-10-2016, 00:43:23</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">I am not too worried about threads. Sure, I throw out some ideas for threads and settings, but as long as we use post headers (and our own heads) to keep track of things, we can get by with only a few threads for starters. The more threads we have, the more threads we might end up that see only a very limited number of posts, and I am not sure if that is a good idea. Maybe we are overthinking this a bit. Could be we should just get the ball rolling and see where it leads us, do a bit of RPing and figure things out along the way?<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>Sounds good to me. I'll just be creating the initial list of threads I had since they'll be used, School Grounds will follow eventually.