<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=111594.msg5464543#msg5464543">Quote from: Red Doctor on 12-11-2011, 23:26:02</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Pretty much, could be 1 on 1, or it could be a massive group melee as they did in medieval times. But rather than scoring its till the opponent yields basically. Creating a nice toss up between honour, and getting a sword through the chest. So its perfectly possible that people might decide they would rather die, but t would be rare, but maybe a bit more frequent with bitter enemies fighting. Thoughts on that?<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>Hmm, a battle royale would certainly be fun to watch, but very difficult to officiate. The only rules that apply are ones that can be enforced, and in the middle of a hacking and slashing cluster-fuck I doubt that much could be done to protect someone wether they yeild or not. Plus it opens up all kinds of opportunities for cheating.<br/><br/>Dunno, I like the idea, but I think 1v1 bracketology makes a lot more sense to me. I'd like to hear from some others on the subject (P'Tulla maybe), to see if we have enough contestants to justify a separate category and what they would like to see out of such an event. Maybe that would lend some clarity.<br/><br/>Good ideas so far Doc.