<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=259433.msg12827328#msg12827328">Quote from: KeyAndLocke on 07-12-2016, 21:07:07</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Depends on how the array is used. This isn't about violating a specific rule (besides the UA Ranger bit, but that's not a major problem on its own), this is about my being deeply suspicious of a character who has min-maxed point-buy <em>and</em> a web supplement version of the Ranger class <em>and</em> the most infamously disruptive alignment in the game <em>and</em> the most self-aggrandizing backstory in the book. I'm not asking you to mount a legal defense as to how everything checks out by the book, I'm worried that you're going approach social interaction like a legal battle where it doesn't matter how many other people are annoyed or upset so long as you have not technically broken any rules.</blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>The UA Ranger has already been reverted to the PHB Ranger.<br/><br/>I'm primarily looking for a more roguish Robin Hood, mainly a kind of scoundrel the kind of Han Solo and stuff. However his 'chaotic' nature means a free spirit to do what he deems best for himself (which might mean best for the group). Being Neutral as a suffix, he's primarily 'not evil' and being a womanizer, stays away from the 'goody' side of things. After all, going around seeking whores would not exactly bid well for his moral compass even if he's to give a begger a coin. Those who lean towards the better extreme of either side tend to get noticed. He doesn't want to get noticed.<br/><br/>When it comes to social interaction, I'd say my char would prefer to take a step back unless it's an actual report or something. Not much of a speaker, but one who communes with nature. He's primarily a combat-focused scout with a backstory he'd like to drop. He's not a 'Hero' in his eyes, but only in those who know him after all.