<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=153103.msg6997230#msg6997230">Quote from: Ryuka Tana on 30-09-2012, 12:05:55</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">"So, okay, say I go first, I'll pick who I choose Truth or Dare for, and then they choose and so on and so forth, but you can only choose someone who hasn't gone yet that 'round'? If that's what you mean, I'm okay with that, as long as we always remember who has gone each round. As for 'chickening out', I dunno, I personally feel like chickening out in a game of 'Truth or Dare' is kind of crappy, because why play (but that's me in a real life game, not Andi). So, maybe everyone gets a 'veto' (turn one dare into a truth) and the group is allowed to agree if something is 'going too far'? I mean, we know that the idea is for things to 'go to far', so we kinda have to decide how we'll decide that as well."<br/><br/><br/>"Maybe, out of character, we should agree on pacing, as I doubt we want to have the characters in the game decide ahead of time that they are going to have sex. I mean, it should evolve naturally, but we should at least agree that if someone wants to 'progress' sexually, that everyone agrees out of character that the game is at the right stage to start doing that... I dunno. I think too much maybe."<br/><br/><br/>"Also, Aribeth, you said 'two more characters' did Muse drop out or something?"<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/><br/>I agree with it evolving to sex, it was the entire idea anyways