Alright, I need to bring this up after reading Dan's last post, since it looks like he's gonna snatch Spencer up.<br/><br/>In this game it looks like we're about to be out of sweet butts. Dan has designs on Spencer and Leo is about to take Danica as his Old Lady in the game.  I suppose that the sweet butts can be NPC's or mentioned. I will not be making another one, at least not for some time as I have three characters already. That… and well, I don't find them the easiest to play.<br/><br/>I would like to express that group games of this fashion are not the place for monogamy.  In a real SoA setting… well yes there is monogamy but not always. One might want to do some research into outlaw biker gangs to find out the harsh realities of how women are treated by bikers. I'd rather be a dish rag on the bar than a biker chick in a real outlaw group… or any group really.<br/><br/>I just wanted to put it out there that there should not be any monogamous couples because if people went monogamous the game would lose a lot of the fun involved and then we'd lose players. Our game will die.<del>and let's face it, it's not on the fast track at the moment as it stands</del>. I won't say you cannot be monogamous, but if you chose that route, you might to consider a second character who isn't monogamous or perhaps a one on one game with these characters outside of our game while playing these here in the group. :-)<br/><br/>If a sweet butt becomes an Old Lady, she's still going to have to be part of the industry. I'm not sure that's including Ingrid as well as Primarch mentioned using surveillance tape of her when she was a sweet butt as a porn video.  But she's a member so I don't know if she's going to be doing 'new' videos.<br/><br/>However, if someone has 'Old Lady' status, I don't think that they should be required to prostitute. There's too many possible NPC's for that.<br/>