<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=191946.msg9320191#msg9320191">Quote from: arkhos on 12-12-2013, 18:26:30</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">But in regards to Trek, a lot of people will argue that if it wasn't written by Roddenberry, then it's not 'real Trek'. I dunno. The characters are there, the ship is there, the races and organizations are there, etc - just because it's not presented in a way that certain people want it to be, doesn't mean it's "Not Trek". It even says so right on the DVD cover! :P<br/><br/>-ark<br/></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br/>It's the little things like "lightning Storm in space" that annoyed me, it's this dumbing down of dialogue that ruins the trek feeling for me. It's as if someone wanted to make a trek film but wasn't allowed to use anything scientific. I mean trek has had an uneasy relationship with science before. The voyager and Enterprise writers don't know what deuterium is and B'Elanna Torres literally can't identify shit with a tricorder.<br/><br/>I think everyone has an idea of what Trek is to them and unfortunately the new movies aren't Star Trek to me. Not gonna argue about it, it's just how I feel. Also 4th edition D&D can die in a cockfire  :P Kidding  ;D<br/><br/>