Okay.   Not trying to be difficult.<br/><br/>What is the point of having everybody arrive, one by one, so that they can just proceed to ignore each other?<br/><br/>Let's look at the game thread in a brief outline of what happened so far:<br/>2 characters entered, Jenny and MG.  They spoke to each other and addressed the bartender.  YAY! We can wait for the bartender's response.<br/><br/>Then a new character came in: Cross.  He didn't mention anybody else in his post, went in and addressed the bartender.  We can assume that he doesn't find anything odd about a redhaired asian woman and a tough farmgirl sitting at the bar.  In fact, we didn't see him even acknowledge them, so we can assume that he didn't even see them or something.<br/><br/>Kate and Alex arrived, and I had Kate stay outside asking Alex a question so that Phaia could respond, since we're entering together.  This way, she can react too before we go in.  Also, this allows the people in the saloon to respond to Cross' entrance if they want.<br/><br/>Before Phaia can post, though, a third character comes through: Logan.  He noticed the other three characters in the saloon, but not the two he just walked past at the door.<br/><br/>Do you guys consider incorporating some response to what's already happening in the thread before you post your action?  I don't think it's necessary that everybody acknowledge<strong>every </strong>detail of a room, a character, etc. in their post if it's not relevant, but there are characters in here with dots of epic appearance and these are the only people out of their homes in a freaky, terrified town.  Shouldn't that be a consideration?<br/><br/>My real concern is this: if we don't have any character interaction, or if we ignore each other's posts, then it's going to be a pointless game devoid of<strong>roleplay</strong>.  Within this group, it seems that we have polar opposites for our RP styles and our sense of continuity, and I really want to get us on the same page if possible.