<div style='text-align:Left;'><div><div><p style='margin:0 0 0 0;'><span><span>To classify threats, we used the International Union for Conservation of Nature ( IUCN )– Conservation Measures Partnership (CMP) Threats and Actions Classifications  framework . The  SWAP considers threats regardless of their origins ( e.g., local, state, regional, national, and international) where relevant to Idaho’s species and habitats. Similarly, where relevant, the plan describes conservation actions for Idaho species and habitats that could be addressed by federal resource management agencies or regional, national, or international partners and shared with other states (e.g., out- of-basin fish passage, threats on wintering grounds). </span></span></p><p><p style='margin:0 0 0 0;'><span><span>We used the Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation , as implemented in Miradi Adaptive Management Software for Conservation Projects, as the core methodology for revisions to this plan. This methodology is designed to allow key agencies and stakeholders in each of Idaho ’s 14 sections to discuss and hopefully come to agreement on focal conservation targets (both species and habitats ), key threats affecting these targets, the actions needed to mitigate these threats and/or restore the targets, and the monitoring indicators that can be used to track progress over time. </span></span></p><p><p style='margin:0 0 0 0;'><span><span>Our ultimate aim was to create a living action plan for each section that can become the basis for ongoing adaptive management of these important resources. For the 2015 SWAP revision, we took a “coarse filter –fine filter” approach to both address the “full array of wildlife” and “wildlife -related issues” in Idaho, but also to focus on actions that benefit multiple species and the habitats they depend on.</span></span></p><p><span /></p></div></div></div>
None
[]
{'Title': 'Idaho State Wildlife Action Plan', 'Author': '', 'Comments': '<DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>To classify threats, we used the International Union for Conservation of Nature ( IUCN )– Conservation Measures Partnership (CMP) Threats and Actions Classifications  framework . The  SWAP considers threats regardless of their origins ( e.g., local, state, regional, national, and international) where relevant to Idaho’s species and habitats. Similarly, where relevant, the plan describes conservation actions for Idaho species and habitats that could be addressed by federal resource management agencies or regional, national, or international partners and shared with other states (e.g., out- of-basin fish passage, threats on wintering grounds). </SPAN></SPAN></P><P /><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>We used the Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation , as implemented in Miradi Adaptive Management Software for Conservation Projects, as the core methodology for revisions to this plan. This methodology is designed to allow key agencies and stakeholders in each of Idaho ’s 14 sections to discuss and hopefully come to agreement on focal conservation targets (both species and habitats ), key threats affecting these targets, the actions needed to mitigate these threats and/or restore the targets, and the monitoring indicators that can be used to track progress over time. </SPAN></SPAN></P><P /><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Our ultimate aim was to create a living action plan for each section that can become the basis for ongoing adaptive management of these important resources. For the 2015 SWAP revision, we took a “coarse filter –fine filter” approach to both address the “full array of wildlife” and “wildlife -related issues” in Idaho, but also to focus on actions that benefit multiple species and the habitats they depend on.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>', 'Subject': 'Map contains the distribution of each of the forty-two Conservation Targets identified in the Idaho State Wildlife Action Plan.\n\nIn 2000, Congress created the Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program and State and Tribal Wildlife Grants Program (SWG), which for the first time, provided funding to state fish and wildlife agencies primarily for the conservation and management of nongame species. The funding was distributed to the states with the condition that each state develop a State Wildlife Action Plan—the strategic direction to implementing proactive, nonregulatory, action-based solutions to conserve fish and wildlife. Congress also required that all states commit to reviewing and, if necessary, revising their Wildlife Action Plans within 10 years.', 'Category': '', 'AntialiasingMode': 'None', 'TextAntialiasingMode': 'Force', 'Keywords': 'IDFG,SWAP,wildlife,conservation,species,of,greatest,conservation,need,fish,wildlife,distribution,and,abundance,condition,of,key,habitats,threats,conservation,actions,monitoring,adaptive,management,review,and,revision,coordination,public,participation'}
[{'geoTransforms': [{'wkid': 108190, 'latestWkid': 108190, 'transformForward': True, 'name': 'WGS_1984_(ITRF00)_To_NAD_1983'}]}, {'geoTransforms': [{'wkid': 108190, 'latestWkid': 108190, 'transformForward': False, 'name': 'WGS_1984_(ITRF00)_To_NAD_1983'}]}]
nan