what are the pros and cons of using "dekningsbidrag" vs IRR on real estate projects as kpi?
user
pros of using "dekningbidrag" vs irr on real estate projects as kpi: 
- dekningbidrag focuses on the financial viability of the project and rewards design quality, which can improve the overall project development outcome.
- it is easier to measure than irr and usually produces more accurate results.

cons of using "dekningbidrag" vs irr on real estate projects as kpi:
- dekningbidrag may not reward projects that maximize economic returns in the long term, as it focuses on the financial viability of the project in the short term. 
- it does not necessarily reward projects that minimize risks or maximize leasability in the future.
assistant
Pros of using "Dekningbidrag" vs IRR on real estate projects as KPI: 
- Dekningbidrag focuses on the financial viability of the project and rewards design quality, which can improve the overall project development outcome.
- It is easier to measure than IRR and usually produces more accurate results.

Cons of using "Dekningbidrag" vs IRR on real estate projects as KPI:
- Dekningbidrag may not reward projects that maximize economic returns in the long term, as it focuses on the financial viability of the project in the short term. 
- It does not necessarily reward projects that minimize risks or maximize leasability in the future.
assistant