Re: FW: CA for Green Mountain ,
 Andrea,

I had Mark Greenberg, an attorney that works on EOL matters, review Green 
Mountain's form of CA and he much prefers ours.  What he suggested is that 
you send the counteparty back our form and say something to the effect that 
EnronOnline has a standard form of Confidentiality Agreement we prefer to 
execute our form.  If the form meets with their approval we're golden.  If 
they don't like it have them call me (and I'll just refer them to Mark!).

Attached is our preferred form.







	Adriane Schultea/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/15/2001 11:47 AM
		 
		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: FW: CA for Green Mountain

thanks,
Tana!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Smith, Timothy M" <smithtm6@bp.com>@ENRON 
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Smith+2C+20Timothy+20M+22+20+3Csmithtm6+40bp+2Ecom+3E+40
ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 12:09 PM
To: Schultea, Adriane
Subject: CA for Green Mountain

Adriane,

Here's our Confidentiality Agreement for execution before we release our
financials.  Please let me know if you have any feedback.  Thanks.

TMS

 <<Form Unilat Confidentiality Agt - Application Service Provider ENRON
5-3-011.ZIP>>

 - Form Unilat Confidentiality Agt - Application Service Provider ENRON 
5-3-011.ZIP
adriane.schultea@enron.com