RE: Summary of NOI ,
 I don't think that it is absolutely imperative to attend.  However, we may =
be able to help Joe define some of the customer benefits of electronic serv=
ice.  Can one of the Tobys attend?

 -----Original Message-----
From: =09Holmes, Bradley =20
Sent:=09Friday, October 05, 2001 2:54 PM
To:=09Corman, Shelley
Subject:=09FW: Summary of NOI

Shelley: =20

Do you want me or someone in my group to participate in this proceeding?  I=
 don't see that the outcome will affect us directly but it might be interes=
ting to understand the issues. =20

Brad=20

 -----Original Message-----
From: =09Butler, Janet =20
Sent:=09Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:52 PM
To:=09Bagot, Nancy; Benner, Martha; Blair, Lynn; Boatman, Jack; Butler, Jan=
et; Cordes, Bill; Corman, Shelley; Culwell, Christi; Daniel, Shonnie; Darve=
aux, Mary; Dietz, Rick; Dornan, Dari; Dushinske, John; Farrell, Sharon; Fos=
sum, Drew; Fritch, Bret; Fulton, Donna; Goodpasture, John; Harris, Steven; =
Hartsoe, Joe; Hass, Glen; Hayes, Robert; Hayslett, Rod; Heckerman, Bambi; H=
ess, Theresa; Hill, Robert; Holmes, Bradley; Holtzman, Staci; Horton, Stanl=
ey; Janousek, Martha; January, Steven; Kilmer III, Robert; King Jr., Frazie=
r; Kirk, Steve; Kissner, Tim; Lantefield, Laura; Lichtenwalter, Blair; Loef=
fler, Michael; Lowry, Phil; Mann, Ruth; Martens, Donna; McCoppin, Dorothy; =
McGowan, Mike W.; Miller, Mary Kay; Nacey, Sheila; Nelson, Kimberly (ETS); =
Neppl, Ray; Neubauer, Dave; Neufeld, Eva; Novosel, Sarah; Paladino, Ranelle=
; Paschal, Zelda; Patterson, Geneva; Pavlou, Maria; Petersen, Keith; Place,=
 Janet; Porter, Gregory J.; Pribble, Dan; Prizont, Karina; Pryor, Tony; Rak=
er, Colleen; Rice, Randy; Ringblom, Kathy; Saunders, James; Sawyer, Lisa; S=
cott, Donna; Soldano, Louis; Stanton, Lon; Talcott, Jim; Taylor, Gina; Tu, =
Denis; Van Norden, Mike; Veatch, Stephen; Vignaroli, Donald; Warner, Jody; =
Watson, Kimberly; Wilkie, Kim; Wilson, Rob; Winckowski, Michele
Subject:=09Summary of NOI


Attached is an executive summary of the NOI on Electronic Service of Docume=
nts, RM01-11. Essentially, FERC wants to expand service electronically to a=
llow individuals to receive documents through email without the need for in=
terventions just to be kept informed of the proceedings. FERC is making two=
 proposals, one for service to parties and one for service to individuals f=
or a cost (FERC states cost recovery but no specifics).

Comments are due November 2. Joe has asked that I coordinate comments for o=
ur pipelines. Let me know who you wish to participate.=20

 << File: Summary-RM01-11.DOC >>=20
bradley.holmes@enron.com