Re: Enron and Labor Relationships ,
 I think the answer to #1 is:  as much as possible, but I'm not altogether 
certain--pretty sure that our preference would be to use our own internal 
construction folks as much as possible.  Answer to #2 would be very 
interesting; I don't know the answer, but I'm sure that it's tightly linked 
to the answer to #1.  I think you might want to start with Shelly Corman to 
find the right contact for the pipeline constructions.

I leave for S.D. tonite.  I'll give you updates as the day transpires 
tomorrow.

Best,
Jeff




James D Steffes
09/10/2000 12:50 PM
To: rick johnson@enron.com
cc: jeff dasovich, sandra mccubbin, richard shapiro 
Subject: Enron and Labor Relationships

Rick --

The information below is very helpful for Government Affairs across the 
country.  I have a few other questions to support our advocacy:  

1. How much of our new power plant development is not subject to Building & 
Construction Trade Labor Agreements? 

2. Does Enron have any specific policies on whether or not we should use 
Union labor on our construction?  We recently established human rights and 
environmental policies, I am wondering if this applied to Unions?

3. Do you know if the pipelines are also using Union labor on their 
expansions?  Or maybe, who could tell me?

Thanks.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 09/10/2000 
12:46 PM ---------------------------


Jeff Dasovich
09/08/2000 11:46 AM
To: Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Samuel 
Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J 
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, 
James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Enron and Labor Relationships  

Rick:  Thanks very much.



Rick Johnson@ENRON
09/08/2000 11:35 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:  
Subject: Enron and Labor Relationships

Jeff, per your recent voice mail,  below you will find the labor relationship 
summary that I prepared for Sandy.  
Hope it is helpful, please call if I can be of any assistance. Rj. 

---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000 
11:29 AM ---------------------------


Rick Johnson
08/29/2000 07:16 PM
To: Sandy McCubbin
cc:  
Subject: Enron and Labor Relationships

Sandy, I was again disapointed to hear that Union leaders are accusing Enron 
as being unfriendly to Labor.  In the last 20 months we have pursued 
construction on over 3000 MW of new generation capacity.  
Enron Development Activity subject to Building & Construction Trade Labor 
Agreements
California 
 500 mw - PDEF - FeB. 99
 750 mw - PEF - Feb. 2000
Indiana
 550 mw- Westfork Development -  Oct. 99
Illinois
 680 mw - Lincoln Energy Facility - Nov 99 
Tennessee
 540 mw -  Gleason Power I - Oct 99
Oregon 
 240 mw - Coyote II (planned January 2001)
 Ethynol Plant - Columbia County - Baugh Const. June 2000

Hopefully this will prove to be valuable information:  In addition to the 
direct agreements, Enron is pursuing third party projects in Chicago and New 
York City that will be subject to labor agreements.

If the parties are interested, feel free to have them contact me directly 
503-464-7548
Regards, Rick Johnson
james.steffes@enron.com