RE: TW Contract Template Clean-up ,
 Here's what I noticed in researching the points listed below:

Point #	Point Name				Template 				Comment	

6828	NGPL Gray County 			Panhandle Receipts Delivery 		Already exists under PHDEL template
8143	TW/Seven M Gas Sherman CO. I/C	Panhandle ReceiptsDelivery		Already exists under PHDEL template
9028	Delhi Cheyenne				Panhandle Receipts			Point has term date of 11/18/98
9278	TW/NNG Hutchinson Cactus Lateral	Panhandle Receipts/Delivery		Already exists under PHDEL and PHREC template (as bi-directional pt)
12354	Dominion Gas/Tule Lake I/C		CE9Receipts				Already exists under CE9REC template
13855	Getty Fed "24" #1			West Texas Receipts			Point has term date of 11/18/98
15409	Jones Trust #44-565 CMP		Panhandle Receipts			Point has term date of 11/18/98
56943	Valero Ward				West Texas ReceiptsDelivery		Already exists under WTDEL template
57096	Northwest Bloomfield			San Juan Receipts			Is this point valid any longer?
58710	PNM Thompson				CE9ReceiptsDelivery			Already exists under CE9DEL template
500517	Delhi Ward I/C				West Texas ReceiptsDelivery		Already exists under WTDEL template
500540	El Paso Blanco I/C			San Juan 2 ReceiptsDelivery		Should not be added to a template since they were set up 
												as alt pt on each contract (until we move to new system)

3531	TW/NNG Beaver				Panhandle Deliveries			Already exists under PHDEL template
500176	Dale Ferguson Tap			Panhandle Deliveries			Needs to be added to PHDEL template
500203	Continental Follette			Panhandle Deliveries			Needs to be added to PHDEL template
500390	Sum WTG Delivery Pt 			Panhandle Deliveries			Already exists under PHDEL template

Lindy - Could you verify if POI #57096 is still valid for any reason?

Ramona - It appears that some of these points are available for displacement.  In the new system, Linda indicated that a separate group has been set up for any points you have identified as valid.  I will assume then that these should not be added to the paired template (ie, if a delivery point allows displacement, then they will only be added to the related basin delivery template.  Nominating this point as a receipt would depend on the displacement grouping defined in the new system for pools and interruptibles.).


Thanks,
Elizabeth


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lee, Dennis  
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 1:48 PM
To:	Bastida, Nancy; Brostad, Karen; Brown, Elizabeth; Carter, Zuela; Eldridge, Dale; Lee, Dennis; Trevino, Linda; Lohman, TK; Lindberg, Lorraine; Donoho, Lindy; Watson, Kimberly; Y'barbo, Paul; McConnell, Mark; Lokay, Michelle; Frazier, Perry; Matthews, Ron; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Kowalke, Terry; Buchanan, John; Betancourt, Ramona 
Subject:	TW Contract Template Clean-up

In cleaning up some template information, the following points were found to be on no templates. 

	1. Do they belong on a template?
	2. Is the template listed the correct one?

Unless I hear differently, I will go ahead and update the templates accordingly.


Point #	Point Name				Template 

6828	NGPL Gray County 			Panhandle Receipts
8143	TW/Seven M Gas Sherman CO. I/C	Panhandle Receipts
9028	Delhi Cheyenne				Panhandle Receipts
9278	TW/NNG Hutchinson Cactus Lateral	Panhandle Receipts
12354	Dominion Gas/Tule Lake I/C		CE9Receipts
13855	Getty Fed "24" #1			West Texas Receipts
15409	Jones Trust #44-565 CMP		Panhandle Receipts
56943	Valero Ward				West Texas Receipts
57096	Northwest Bloomfield			San Juan Receipts
58710	PNM Thompson				CE9Receipts
500517	Delhi Ward I/C				West Texas Receipts
500540	El Paso Blanco I/C			San Juan 2 Receipts

3531	TW/NNG Beaver				Panhandle Deliveries
500176	Dale Ferguson Tap			Panhandle Deliveries
500203	Continental Follette			Panhandle Deliveries
500390	Sum WTG Delivery Pt 			Panhandle Deliveries


Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
dennis.lee@enron.com
dennis.lee@enron.com, nancy.bastida@enron.com, karen.brostad@enron.com, 