FW: Supreme Court Petition ,
 We need to get CRA or CMTA to sign on -- because they were in the earlier Preferred Policy decision plus they filed for rehearing in this case as well. This can be circulated.  I'll send it to the Metals people.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Duncan [mailto:EDuncan2@ArterHadden.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:12 PM
To: Mara, Susan
Cc: douglass@energyattorney.com
Subject: Supreme Court Petition


Sue,
 
Attached is a draft of the Petition which can be circulated.
 
I recommend that an Alliance member join the Alliance as a Petitioner to eliminate any issue about standing.  I am assuming that there is at least one willing member who was also a formal party to the proceeding which resulted in the Preferred Policy Decision.  Was the Alliance a formal party to that proceeding?
 
The basic structure of the Petition is complete.  I shall complile the Exhibits and then review same to determine whether the citations and to add any arguments which have been overlooked.
 
I would like to file on November 9.  I think that this Petition and the Commonwealth Petition should be filed on the same day.  If you concur, I will coordinate with Commonwealth's counsel.
 
I look forward to your comments.  EWD
jeff.dasovich@enron.com