RE: Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy - MEETING TODAY AT 2pm ,
 I can make the call, let me know call in #.  Thanks.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Steffes, James D.  
> Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 6:12 AM
> To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; 
> Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; Mike Day 
> (E-mail); Swain, Steve
> Cc:	Noske, Linda J.; Shapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; 
> Sharp, Vicki
> Subject:	FW: Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy - MEETING 
> TODAY AT 2pm Houston Time
> 
> To discuss this outline and our issues list, can people 
> attend a 2pm Houston Time call.  The meet and confer may be 
> on-going, but maybe either Jeff or Sue can jump off.
> 
> Linda Noske will be sending out a call-in number.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Steffes, James D.  
> Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 8:04 AM
> To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; 
> Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; Mike Day (E-mail)
> Cc:	Shapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, Vicki
> Subject:	Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy
> 
> Following last week's meeting, here is my recommendation on 
> how to proceed with SCE.
> 
> 1.	Form Enron Negotiation Team
> 
> 	My recommendation is to use the same team we used with 
> PG&E + Jeff Dasovich.  My understanding was that Lisa M. was 
> the lead negotiator - I would not change this.  Jeff should 
> only be there to make introductions.
> 
> 2.	Meet & Confer (10/29)
> 
> 	Sue Mara and Jeff Dasovich will listen and report back 
> to everyone on what happens.  
> 
> 3.	Reformed Stipulation
> 
> 	I would propose that we take a wait and see approach to 
> this document.  Based on Dasovich's idea to get together with 
> SCE on Thursday, maybe let this ride.
> 
> 4.	Meeting
> 
> 	My understanding is that (Jeff D. please correct) SCE 
> can meet with us this Thursday.  Can everyone make it that 
> needs to be there?  Probably meet in California.  We should 
> put the laundry list on the table.
> 
> Please let me know what else we need to discuss or if anyone 
> disagrees.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim
d..steffes@enron.com