Re: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy ,
 This would be analogous to every time you send me an e-mail, I forward it 
directly to Drew and Maria.  How do you tactfully advise your coworkers about 
corporate etiquette?  I wonder.
On a substantive note, I sincerely believe the analysis MKM wants is beyond 
the scope of this letter, and would have no qualms about sending it.  




Jeffery Fawcett
11/22/2000 08:22 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy

Now do you see why I didn't want to send this to Keith Petersen???  Anytime 
you send anything to Omaha, the MKM cult goes into their Satan worship 
chamber, they sing a few chants, and then sacrifice the good commercial 
effort to the demon regulatory god.  

Jeez, next time I'm gonna just send it out to the customer and ask for 
forgiveness later.



---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 11/22/2000 
08:10 AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           11/22/2000 08:07 AM
	

To: Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy  

Jeff,  do you have the information for the rate?  We would have to file a 
certificate and the rate would need to be calculated in accordance with the 
standard COS methodology-  I want to make sure that the rate you are planning 
to quote matches what the rate derivation for the filing would be-  avoid a 
potential issue-  maybe James could send us what he did- thanks  MK



Keith Petersen
11/21/2000 04:56 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Winckowski/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy

I have not yet reviewed, this is for your information.

Keith

---------------------- Forwarded by Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron on 11/21/2000 
04:53 PM ---------------------------


Jeffery Fawcett
11/21/2000 01:17 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin 
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald 
Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James 
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy

Attached for your review and comment is a broad outline of a rate proposal to 
Caithness for the construction and operation of the 40-mile lateral to the 
Big Sandy project.  This non-binding proposal was requested by Caithness' 
consultant, George Briden, as a starting point for modeling the economics of 
the project's gas supply and a basis for further discussions aimed at 
designing an appropriate deal structure.  For your information, James 
Centilli calculated the transport rate based on the (+/- 30%) $20.33MM cost 
estimate with a ten-year (contract) amortization.  

I plan to put this in the mail by the close of business tomorrow.  If you 
have any suggestions, please let me hear from you by mid-day.   Thanks.
jeffery.fawcett@enron.com