Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01 ,
 FYI - We agree with the 17.500






"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 03/08/2001 11:51:38 AM

To:   Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities@TU
cc:
Subject:  Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01




Have spoken w/ both gas controls (HPL/DEFS) and will agree with your
17,500.



                    "Melissa
                    Jones"               To:     "Eileen Ponton"
<kponton@duke-energy.com>
                    <mjones7@txu.        cc:     "David Avila"
<davila1@txu.com>, "Charlie Stone"
                    com>                 <cstone1@txu.com>
                                         bcc:
                    03/08/01             Subject:     Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW 
FOR
03/07/01
                    09:27 AM









We disagree.  We show 17.500, that was 0200 to 0900 @  60 rate which equals
17.500






"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 03/08/2001 10:56:39 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU,
Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM,
LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject:  NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01




Per my gas control, Tufco went to 60,000 at midnight and reduced to 45,000
at 3:00 am due to PG&E having a compressor down.  Nom rate calculated on 3
hrs at 60,000 and 6 hrs at 45,000.  Please let me know if you have heard
differently.


DATE      NOM       FLOW - MCF           FLOW - MMBTU

3/07      18,750         14,140               14,522



BTU = 1.027
kponton@duke-energy.com, cstone1@txu.com, ggreen2@txu.com, 