Re: FW: There is one more revision Debbie made in Paragraph 2b. ,
 Hi Ben,

I've given it a quick look. Looks a lot different from when I last saw it.  I 
don't see a triggering event on the obligations in 2 a.  Was there another 
fix agreed to by all (maybe the "as required by law" language?)  Also, any 
idea why the service charge language was deleted in b?  Maybe it isn't a 
problem.  Also, do you have a copyy of the site plan approval?  

Talk to you soon,

Kay


From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 10:14 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: FW: There is one more revision Debbie made in Paragraph 2b.

Kay:

I'd like to talk to you about this in the morning...


-----Original Message-----
From: MedleyB@gtlaw.com@ENRON
Sent: Wed 5/23/2001 12:19 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben; awhite2@enron.com; Krimsky, Steven
Cc: 
Subject: There is one more revision Debbie made in Paragraph 2b.

 <<7BHL07!.DOC>> I have blacklined it for your convenience.  Please call her
with any comments you may have.


_______________________________________________________________
The information contained in this transmission may contain
privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.

 - 7BHL07!.DOC <<7BHL07!.DOC>>
ben.jacoby@enron.com