Estimation of Potential KVSR fuel expense ,
 ---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 03:06 
PM ---------------------------


Jim Schwieger
09/25/2000 09:13 AM
To: Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Estimation of Potential KVSR fuel expense

Brad:
Right now we have to assume that we will be withdrawing Nov. 2000 through 
March, 2001 with a goal of emptying the facility down to 60 BCF.  This will 
require the injection of approximately 55 BCF of gas from April 1, 2001 
through October 31, 2001.  Available run time should be no lower than 98%.  
Why would it be greater?
The rest will have to be answered by someone else.

 Swig

---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 09:03 
AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Brad Blevins                           09/22/2000 09:26 PM
	

To: Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim 
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jack Simunek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Emma Kam Welsch/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Estimation of Potential KVSR fuel expense

Hanover Compression has given me a revised fuel consumption number of 7150 
BTU/horsepower-hr for the KVSRs once they have been converted to Clean Burn 
technology.  This compares to the present 7500 BTU/horsepower-hr.  We need to 
come to a consensus on the assumptions that will be used with this figure.  
These assumptions will need to be as follows:

How many hours a year do we really think that these units will run?  I am 
assuming that they will not be running if Bammel is on withdrawal.  Correct 
or not?
How much horsepower will really run?  This will be determined by how much 
market HPL will hope to capture from ANP and possibly Equistar.  It will also 
be affected by the suction pressure of the gas, which is, in turn, determined 
by how much HPL is injecting and pressures at Katy.
Finally, what available run time do we want to assume here?  90%?

I have no preconceived notions of what these assumptions should be; 
therefore, I am soliciting input from each of you.  We need to be in 
agreement before Emma starts her work.  Thank you.
jim.schwieger@enron.com