FW: RE: Engines and GF Status ,
 -----Original Message-----
From: Duncan Stewart [SMTP:DSTEWART@tnrcc.state.tx.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 1:09 PM
To: jfields@argentinc.com
Subject: RE: RE: Engines and GF Status

Jon, Here's the latest comment from Jim:
don't see why a test before the change and after the change using the same
analyzer would not demonstrate no increase in emissions.
DFS


>>> Jon Fields <jfields@argentinc.com> 08/29/00 08:38AM >>>
Duncan,
Ok.  We'll test an engine.  This project involves 5 identical engines.  We
want to test just one - will you accept that?  Will you accept portable
analyzer test results?  These analyzers have been certified by the state of
New Mexico to be plus/minus 3% from full trailer tests.
Thanks,
Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Duncan Stewart [SMTP:DSTEWART@tnrcc.state.tx.us]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 2:59 PM
To: jfields@argentinc.com
Cc: Jim Linville; James Randall
Subject: Fwd: RE: Engines and GF Status

FYI
>>> Jim Linville 08/28/00 02:21PM >>>
IF there is no increase in emissions, this is probably not a modification
and the Grandfathered status would remain.  They would need to demonstrate
that there is no change.  This could require testing before and after the
change.
>>> Duncan Stewart 08/28/00 01:43PM >>>
What say you all?
lcampbe@enron.com