FW: PJM duplicate oasis requests to be annulled ,
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PJM OASIS REQUESTS BELOW HAVE BEEN ANNULLED PER OUR REQUEST.  These duplicate requests accounted for over 34,000 mw hrs .  Please let me know if there are any problems checking out w/ pjm on the requests below. 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	walton3@pjm.com@ENRON  
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Hanse, Patrick
Cc:	weathers@www1.pjm.com; mccomb@www1.pjm.com; baizma@www1.pjm.com; DESSENHE@www1.pjm.com
Subject:	FW: PJM duplicate oasis requests to be annulled

Per your request and further analysis by PJM OASIS and Market Settlements the
following OASIS numbers have been annulled.

99408
99637
99683
99754
99749
100089
100077

As indicated in the e-mail below, these are the numbers that you did not link.
If you have any further questions please contact either Aaron Baizman or myself
at 610-666-8972.

Frank Walton 3rd
Real Time Operations Support Analyst
System Operations
(610) 666-8849

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	McComb, John
> Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:43 AM
> To:	Walton, Frank C. III; Weathers, Brian
> Cc:	Baizman, Aaron; Dessender, H.E.
> Subject:	RE: PJM duplicate oasis requests to be annulled
>
> It would appear that the request is backwards
> They are using all the ones they say are duplicates, and not using the
> originals
> anyway consider this the OFFICIAL List of which ones you should annul,  and
> We'll do the same on the MSET side
>
> 7/01/2001  annul 99408
> 7/05/2001  annul 99637
> 7/06/2001  annul 99683
> 7/08/2001  annul 99754 & 99749
> 7/13/2001  annul 100089
> 7/13/2001  annul 100077
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Walton, Frank C. III
> Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 6:07 PM
> To:	Weathers, Brian; McComb, John
> Cc:	Baizman, Aaron
> Subject:	FW: PJM duplicate oasis requests to be annulled
>
> I have confirmed that this is the case.  If you could check on these and see
> what your side reveals than I can make a final decision as to whether or not
> to annul these.
>
> Frank Walton 3rd
> Real Time Operations Support Analyst
> System Operations
> (610) 666-8849
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Hanse, Patrick [SMTP:Patrick.Hanse@enron.com]
> Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 3:33 PM
> To:	walton3@pjm.com
> Cc:	Grace, Rebecca M.; Bentley, Corry; Thomas, Paul D.
> Subject:	PJM duplicate oasis requests to be annulled
>
> Frank
> Per your request to our phone conversation, please find below  the list
> of duplicate oasis requests that we are asking PJM to refund or annul
> because of system problems experienced by Enron on the PJM transmission
> site.
>
> 7/01/2001  Request that trans id 99409 be annulled (duplicate of 99408)
> 7/05/2001  Request that trans id 99639 be annulled (duplicate of 99637)
> 7/06/2001  Request that trans id 99688 be annulled (duplicate of 99683)
> 7/08/2001  Request that trans id 99754 & 99757 be annulled (duplicate of
> 99749)
> 7/13/2001  Request that trans id 100090 be annulled (duplicate of
> 100089)
> 7/13/2001  Request that trans id 100078 be annulled (duplicate of
> 100077)
>
> please call me if you have any questions or need anything else from
> Enron in order to get the corrections made to the above transmission
> request.  Thanks you for your attention to this matter.  Please respond
> back to me when the changes have been made and Enron's back office can
> check out mw's and $'s for the month of July.
>
> Patrick Hanse
> Enron Power Trading
> 713-853-3806
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
> may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others
> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized
> to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron
> Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
> message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an
> offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
> enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the
> intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as
> the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
marci.mansfield@enron.com, m..grace@enron.com