Linux distros without systemd
I get that not everybody likes systemd, but a lot of the criticisms seem misguided and looking at sysvinit with role-colored glasses.<p>For example, people are complaining about logind being included, but forget that consolekit was unmaintained before that. Yes, there's parts to systemd that not everyone will use, like container support, but in that case you can pretty safely ignore that use case.<p>For me, systemd has provided a much more consistent way of managing services. There's a tightly defined service definition format that allows one to comfortably modify any 3rd party service as well, (unlike random, variable-quality shell scripts), relatively small amount of commands to learn that work consistently across services, mounts, timers etc. There's also much better handling of modern hardware, hotplugging & the like.<p>I can't say I miss sysvinit. Also, stuff like [1] from the anti-systemd camp doesn't inspire confidence.<p>1 - <a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/786593" rel="nofollow">https://lwn.net/Articles/786593</a>