Who inherits your iTunes library when you die?
The problem here is that the content industry wants to have their cake and eat it too (quelle surprise).<p>Take ebooks as a much simpler example. The distribution costs of a single ebook are essentially zero. Even if you, as a publisher, pay Apple/Amazon 30% you're better off than retail and retail typically has a higher markup, means printing books, storing them in warehouses, shipping them across the country/world, etc.<p>On top of this ebooks are basically nontransferable whereas paper books can of course been sold secondhand. The latter is such a "problem" that the textbook industry, as just one example, will keep changing editions each year or two just to kill the secondhand market.<p>It should come as no surprise that ebooks are nontransferable either.<p>Given all these restrictions and lower costs of production it seems logical that ebooks should be cheaper than their dead tree equivalents. But oh no, they're typically the same price or even more expensive. This is nothing but greed. What's more, publishers are shooting themselves in the foot (long term) here because they should be encouraging a system whereby you can buy a given textbook, it can't be sold secondhand and the original owner keeps getting updates (people don't typically rebuy later editions of the same textbook I would guess).<p>Music isn't really that different. CDs, which are transferable, have the same costs of printing, storage, distribution and retail markup, even against the 30% (is this confirmed for music?) margin Apple/Amazon take yet I don't think you'll be saving any money by buying whole MP3 albums vs CDs (more often than not).<p>If electronic media were cheaper <i>like it should be</i> I think consumers would have an easier time accepting the nontransferability aspect. People, on the whole, have an innate sense of <i>fairness</i> (IMHO).<p>As far as iTunes accounts and the like go, on a practical level you can simply take over the account. Apple has a facility to change the Apple ID. I can't see any barriers to this.<p>EDIT: From [1]:<p><i>Traditional publishing has a traditional formula for calculating the retail list price, the price printed on the book. That list price is typically about eight times the cost of manufacturing. In clothing retail terms, that translates into a markup of about 88% between publisher and reader.</i><p><i>There are several reasons for the big percentage. Not only does the actual bookseller require a markup, but often there are two “middlemen” between the publisher and the bookstore: a distributor and a wholesaler who must each get a piece of the action. And of course the publisher wants to make a profit and better not sell merely for the cost of manufacturing.</i><p>which basically confirms the 12% figure. But I was referring to the retail markup and costs of distribution (distributor/wholesaler).<p>[1]: <a href="http://bookmakingblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/prices-discounts-markups.html" rel="nofollow">http://bookmakingblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/prices-discounts-...</a>