All you may need is HTML
Yes.  Yes.  You can use HTML and write just fine.  It's a <i>markup</i> language,
like old runoff, which could be used to generate nice, fancy prospectus 
documents for a major gov. agency in a far northern country I worked in,
when I was a wee child.  A good markup language is all you need.
It makes for <i>better</i> writing, because the writer focuses on content,
not the pretty presentation, which should be done <i>after</i> the content is
written.<p>I am getting my nose rubbed in this truth - about the benefits of basic
minimal website design.  Most websites are useless.  Mine is pretty useless.
I write it to have a web-presence, promote my consulting business, and 
because I feel a need to write (maybe that is an illness? - not sure..).
I find writing forces me to think better, and the investment side of our
business, requires I think well, or we die quickly.  It's a harsh world now.<p>I found this Hackernews post, by researching how to update critical browser
stuff, which has been borked for us, by our trading platform provider.
Updating browser on Linux - and guess what? - lose all bookmarks, all 
customizations, everything.  Arrrrgh!!!  (happens EVERY update, of course).<p>Simple is often better.  And the Web (most of it) has become crap, mostly.
Or dangerous, toxic vector for economic assault.  Bloody awful, nasty and 
sad.  So it goes.<p>I am converting our crappy website from a provider (one.com) which bought
our simplesite.com website builder thing, which worked pretty good.
But the site had all this fancy stuff for menus and images and videos, and
a truckload of .css stuff - sure, nice and fancy.  But the conversion to the
One.com builder stuff, does not work, of course.  We cannot update (at all)
our site from the data-description that one.com has in it's website-builder
software.  As of the forced conversion, we were complete off the air. Borked.<p>SO, this is stupid.  Complexity and fancy design - is mostly stupid, and
it also creates contrived dependency (keeps customers locked, makes them
be forced to open their wallets and send you cash - good for providers,
bad for customers.)<p>I got so pissed off, I decided to do it all ourselves.  We built our site
at AWS as an EC2 instance.  Fucking website-building software is a scam, 
mostly.<p>The original poster is right.  All you really need is HTML (AND some stuff to 
render videos and audio and maybe code to get paid for stuff, maybe...). Most
of the .css stuff is fluff. And people are getting <i>REAL</i> tired of being
dusted with fluff.  OP is right.<p>Our old website is <a href="https://www.gemesyscanada.com" rel="nofollow">https://www.gemesyscanada.com</a>   It was a mess - a long
bunch of stuff, posted over the years, research-logs, blogs, notes, etc.
But now that it is a One.com, we cannot update it.  The websitebuilder 
software gets to 90%, and then hangs - and we do not even get any error
messages telling us what the problem is.  Arrrgh.<p>We are building a simpler version - using AWS-EC2 - we have one free EC2
instance which I am experimenting with: <a href="http://35.182.107.190" rel="nofollow">http://35.182.107.190</a>   and that
is it.  We have not even got a domain set up yet - it's all hacking & testing
for now.  But it looks like we can go this route.  The whole thing is an
exercise in vanity and ego.  It really is, honestly.  But why not?  It is
what our tiny little business does, and it is what I am.  I've been doing
AI since I went to Dr. Geoff Hinton's classes, and got a copy of Xerion
working on a P/C running Linux - back in the 1990's.  One must not hide 
one's light under a bushel, right?   So, we need a website.<p>And a bad one, that looks goofy, and is honest, is better than a really
fancy one, full of obfuscation, deception, dis-information and old-fashioned
lies.  (Kinda like - oh - just about most things now?)<p>All you may need is HTML.  Yup.  Mostly true.
- M. Langdon, Director, Owner, Floor-cleaner, Barn-builder, Portfolio Manager
  GEMESYS Ltd.