Arturo Di Modica has a point
Wow, I'm glad I read this! I knew the bull was guerilla art (put there without permission), and I knew (thought) that the girl was, too. And as such I thought it was a brilliant work of appropriation, and should stay.<p>But it turns out the girl is the result of a marketing campaign by a global advertising corporation for a giant investment fund. That changes everything.<p>Companies should not be let to use individual artists' work for their own corporate agenda. That's not right, whatever the message.<p>Di Modica, who still owns the bull, should put it somewhere else -- maybe in a different city.