Whatever happened to due process?
Is due process the wrong term?  Can't due process occur after the fact?  For example, you can be arrested for suspicion of drunk driving, taken off the road, put into custody, and found to be innocent, and that is still part of due process.  Your actions appeared to be causing a threat to others, so the government stopped your actions immediately and let the courts decide your guilt or innocence.  How is that different than taking a site that is suspected of harming other people offline immediately and then work on deciding guilt or innocence?<p><i>Note:</i> I don't necessarily disagree with the author, but I am playing devil's advocate here.