InVision has no physical headquarters and all 700 employees work remotely
While this is no doubt great I don't really believe a statement "But most importantly, Frein said, it helps InVision build a better product".
Under what metric? I don't believe that people who are forced to cooperate with video and screen sharing options can deliver a better product than these, who can walk up to a colleague and ask them in person or use a whiteboard to explain their problem. In the end, remote workers are logically forced to spent much more time in meetings that their "in-office" counterparts.<p>EDIT: You're very much all correct, but I still don't believe that I would be effective without any personal contact. Guess the experience is personal!