Ethical considerations of access to the HackerOne community
I looked through the task manager of a corporate issued laptop and saw tasks belonging to very similar companies, as part of the disk image IT makes.<p>The corporation likely has a license for the software, as well as conditions for all their employees to expect monitoring.<p>A formalized bug bounty program would enable the software producer to have secure software.<p>Why exactly is HackerOne drawing a distinction with this software producer? I read the whole article and still miss what the controversy with this producer is.<p>Is all monitoring software now banned from HackerOne under the guise of a moral high ground HackerOne just created?