A Quick Comparison of Nim vs. Rust
It's feels like a shame to me that the one Python maxim that Nim has chosen to reject is "there should be one and preferably only one way to do it" - from this flows so much of the other goodness of the Python ecosystem. I worry that some of the metaprogramming magic that Nim allows will result in the loss of that feeling that I can view source on almost any 3rd party Python code and immediately feel like I can follow what's going on. Maybe community standards can help restrain this somewhat.<p>Also:<p>> mapWidth, mapwidth and map_width all map to the same name<p>Why or why? Editors and IDEs now need Nim-aware search code!?