Microsoft: Rust Is the Industry’s ‘Best Chance’ at Safe Systems Programming
What is the exact aspect of "systems programming" that precludes the use of higher-level languages which are safe by default? Unless we are writing device drivers or OS kernels, why are we using these low-level languages for mission-critical applications?<p>Even parts of managed languages which are typically frowned upon from a "systems programming" perspective, such as GC, can be viewed as a positive when trying to iterate. GC can be treated like a backstop which helps to keep your application from exploding while you work on memory management, and then you can incrementally address heap alloc (aka latency) concerns with an application that actually runs (for a little while at least). Trying to iterate on memory pressure and related concerns with a C/C++ application is nothing short of nightmare fuel from my perspective, but I spend most of my time in higher-level languages these days.<p>I think it is also very hard to make a performance argument in 2020. Especially when you are comparing low level against something like the newest C#/.NET Core stack. Just take a look at the most recent TechEmpower plaintext benchmark (round 19). How many new business "systems" are being "programmed" that aren't ultimately just web servers passing HTML/JSON around, executing business logic, and reading/writing bits of data to some database?