Texas professor fails entire class from graduating- claiming they used ChatGTP
The ability to 'cheat' on written assignments has always been a possibility. With the rise of the Internet, it became easier to source it from more places - with a counter balancing rise of plagiarism detectors. Now with Google, Grammarly and ChatGPT, it is trivial to copy/paste a pipeline with enough entropy to defeat many if not most detectors. I suspect the next generation of tools will be finish this cycle - we won't be able to build an arbitrary text distinguisher that works with acceptable accuracy.<p>Educators have to adapt. If you want to "know what someone knows" - then ask them face to face, or have them write it down on paper. We used to call these tests, and they work pretty well.<p>If you want someone to produce a piece of writing about something, how they produced it is less important than the result. If it is correct, clear, and gets the job done, then good. It's be the same for programming assignments - Copilot and ChatGPT make all un-proctored creation assignments a black box. You can evaluate the output, but it is nearly impossible to know what's in the box.