Statement on Nature Machine Intelligence
There are already big names in this list and it was a a tenth (~30) only a few hours ago when I signed. Yoshua Bengio, Jeff Dean, Yann LeCun, Ian Goodfellow, ... Even if it only represents their personal opinion, like herd immunity I'm certain this will prevent widespread adoption.<p>When I started in NLP as an undergrad, almost all the papers I cared about were free to read from the ACL Anthology. As I shifted into broader machine learning, arXiv became my new home. Nature's closed Machine Intelligence would be a step back. I am glad that researchers and scientists want to keep research open and accessible.<p>P.S. It's already weird that Nature has DeepMind papers. At least in that case DeepMind have a formalized agreement / enough clout that they can host the paper themselves but even the hint of ambiguity can kill knowledge propagation at many institutions. An example would be "Mastering the Game of Go without Human Knowledge"[0] / "Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search"[1].<p>[0]: <a href="https://deepmind.com/documents/119/agz_unformatted_nature.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://deepmind.com/documents/119/agz_unformatted_nature.pd...</a><p>[1]: <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/alphago/AlphaGoNaturePaper.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/alphago/AlphaG...</a>