Towards fearless SIMD
> Code written for too high a SIMD capability will generally crash (it’s undefined behavior), while code written for too low a SIMD capability will fall short of the performance available.<p>I can't help but think that SIMD intrinsics are the wrong level of abstraction. Literally assembly being moved into a high level language but without the ability for the compiler to optimize well. Hand written intrinsics can really be fine tuned for a given microarchitecture, but I think XLA's approach of having a higher level of abstraction, then JIT compiling to the device in question (whether it be SIMD of X width, or a gpu, or a tpu) is the right way to go.<p>Whenever I see hand coded assembly, I can't help but think to myself:<p>* Did the author actually have instruction scheduling information on hand when writing this?<p>* For what generation of chips was this found to be optimal for, and is it still? Invariably, you wind up with hand coded assembly routines that were written a long time ago still in use without anyone revisiting the code or it's performance.