Kids can't use computers, and why it should worry you
I get the feeling that the author was judging the person he was helping far more harshly than the <i>perceived</i> judgement she might have passed on him.<p>Maybe she was tired, clearly she was frustrated, but it wasn't obvious that she held the author in any disdain, though the author seemed to perceive it. What we're sure of is that the author held <i>her</i> in such low regard.<p>I wonder if she picked up on that. I suspect she did, and I suspect it contributes to the negative stereotypes that the author wanted to rail against by mentioning all this.<p>> ‘Do you know where the proxy settings are?’ I asked, hopefully.<p>> It took me about ten seconds to find and fill in the proxy settings.<p>Well for Christ's sake don't ask her something she almost surely doesn't know if it only took you ten seconds of looking. Look for ten seconds first.<p>The first rule of any educator is to never, under any circumstances, make someone feel inept. And it was so easily avoidable here.<p>~~~<p>Of course people can't use computers. They're not trying to use computers. They're trying to get X done. The computer is a device that, most of the time, <i>just gets in the way of doing X</i>.<p>Just the way that cars are a device that get from point A to point B. Few poeple get in a car to drive. They get in a car to locate themselves to point B.<p>In this case, the person can't use a computer because people like the author condescend a bit, fix the problem in ten seconds, and don't set them up to be just a bit wiser for next time.<p>The important part of the story is the part where the author explains that on some networks, you need to set extra settings so the office network can communicate with the outside world network. I hope the author explained what it took him ten seconds to do, so that she might be able to help herself next time. The omission (and disdain) leads me to suspect not, or at least that actually helping her was not an important part of the story.