MPAA attacks Ars for "challenging efforts to curb content theft"
I love Ars Technica. They fairly consistently have the best journalism of any mainstream-oriented tech news site, work hard to stay unbiased (though don't always achieve that 100%), and hire quality writers.<p>That being said, I don't like this piece. It's emotional, and even as they admit, hyperbolic. Unless "crazy freetards" is a word the MPAA used in their posting, I don't see a legitimate reason for Ars to use it. The bill might be <i>absolutely freaking insane</i>, but I don't read Ars to be told that, I read Ars to be informed about the issue.<p>I understand their passion, their disgust, and their defensiveness. I share their sentiments exactly. I just don't understand why that should undermine their professionalism.