Arecibo telescope, on the brink of collapse, will be dismantled
The thing was iconic... even if not everyone watching/playing Goldeneye knew it was a real radio telescope, it was nevertheless one of those science megaprojects that featured prominently in the popular zeitgeist and got more than one young kid excited about what's out there in the stars.<p>But infrastructure ages, and 60 years isn't a bad run. What comes next? Clearly there's going to be a capabilities gap for a while, but now that it's 60 years after its original design, what kind of design is going to replace it? Do we even need giant monolith dishes anymore?<p>Hoping a radio astronomer can chime in here. For example, I know out in New Mexico they have a distributed array of  dishes (literally called the "Very Large Array", oh scientific creativity [0]) where, my understanding is, a bunch of computers stitch together all the individual signals and effectively get a resolution better than any single dish can. Is a design like that now state of the art, or does a monolithic design like Arecibo still give capabilities unique to single large dishes?<p>[0] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_Large_Array" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_Large_Array</a>