Why Did The Media Keep The Recent Peaceful Icelandic Revolution Quiet?
Which is an easier explanation to believe?<p>1. The "media" got together and said to each other, "We better not cover this story at all, because it will give too many people dangerous ideas"<p>or<p>2. Media outlets individually (particularly in the US) decided not to cover the actions of the Icelandic government because they think most of their viewers don't care much about Iceland and/or because "check out what has slowly been happening in Iceland over the past 5 years" isn't much of a breaking news story.<p>This story <i>has</i> been covered, but just because it isn't to the extent that you wish it was covered does not mean a conspiracy must exist.<p>NPR did a story on Iceland just two days ago: <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2013/02/01/170867071/episode-435-a-new-mom-and-the-president-of-iceland" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2013/02/01/170867071/episode-...</a>