Entrepreneur, the Magazine That Sues Entrepreneurs
Here's a sideways look at this:<p>If you have a trademark you are <i>legally</i> required and compelled to go after anyone who is infringing on it.  Otherwise it is deemed that you have let it lapse into the public domain.<p><i>enter debate on trademarks, patents, blah blah etc...</i><p>My point is that clearly EMI should not have been awarded a trademark on the term "entrepreneur" in the first place.  However, once that trademark was granted, there was no other option but for them to start aggressively guarding it.<p>(and to a lesser extent EMI, if they had any decency, shouldn't have attempted to trademark it).<p>Don't hate the player, hate the game, etc