Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
If you’re the digital equivalent of the Fire Department and shouldn’t refuse service, why are you treating hosting differently?<p>Is it because they can get hosting elsewhere? Well they can get web security elsewhere too, what’s the difference?<p>By the way comparing Cloudflare with the Fire Department is silly, as neither is Cloudflare the only game in town, nor is not having a website life threatening.<p>And if Cloudflare is the last line of defense for free speech, why do they refuse to host the same site?<p>It leaves a bad taste in my mouth for Cloudflare to somehow paint themselves as the good guys in this scenario, at most they’re the Swiss Bank, willing to do business with the despicables.