How Tim Cook is changing Apple
Apple has been an outlier kind of performer under Steve Jobs, because Jobs was an outlier kind of human being.  All I take away from that article is that people better start tempering their expectations of this new Apple, because once the product pipeline that Jobs oversaw is depleted, what we have left is merely a "very good" company built on a great foundation.<p>So much of the article seemed to point out the Tim Cook was friendlier in terms of investor relationships, but who cares about that (from a technologist point of view)?  I mean, the biggest indicator of the shift in their priorities is that they took 100 billion dollars in cash and used it for stock buybacks and dividends.   Can you imagine Google doing such a thing?  They would never dream of this, because they are too busy re-investing their profits with their big-picture potentially world changing research projects.<p>But hey, kudos for Tim Cook for not trying to be someone he is not, he's a money and operations guy.  So money and operations will get looked at at the expensive of innovation.  But this is not good for those who are used to miracles from Apple:<p><i>"It looks like it has become a more conservative execution engine rather than a pushing-the-envelope engineering engine," says Max Paley, a former engineering vice president who worked at Apple for 14 years until late 2011.</i><p><i>"I've been told that any meeting of significance is now always populated by project management and global-supply management," he says. "When I was there, engineering decided what we wanted, and it was the job of product management and supply management to go get it. It shows a shift in priority."</i><p>Yuck.  The geek inside dies a little at reading this.