Elon Musk Tried to Destroy a Tesla Whistleblower
Bloomberg conveniently left out the reason why "Tripp has since changed lawyers". It's because he published on Twitter a trove of confidential internal Tesla documents. Once he did that his lawyer knew they had no case anymore. Tripp only deleted the documents after his lawyer was able to get in touch with him. This showed that he did in fact access internal Tesla systems and he did in fact exfiltrate this information. But somehow Bloomberg paints Tesla in a negative light, as they always do.<p>This is what's left of the fallout:<p>"B advised that the Tweets by Mr. Tripp yesterday were issued by him on his own accord. Mr. Tripp has clearly been impacted emotionally by what $TSLA has done to him.He is very concerned about being gagged & wants to protect the public, more than his own personal interest. ++"<p><a href="https://twitter.com/StuartMeissner/status/1030138369840500736" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/StuartMeissner/status/103013836984050073...</a><p>"It is accurate that we no longer rep M.Tripp in any matter.Nor do we have a need for any connection whatsoever with his attys in his Nev civil action.There wont be further comment on this.We still rep K.Hansen with re to his SEC submission & do have confidence in his submission"<p><a href="https://twitter.com/StuartMeissner/status/1072952816703102976" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/StuartMeissner/status/107295281670310297...</a><p>"Also Mr. Tripp's Twitter account WAS NOT suspended/removed by twitter this AM. He himself voluntarily terminated his twitter account on advice of myself, so that there will not b any more confusion re if he has published anything or not. There is enough confusion re $TSLA already"<p><a href="https://twitter.com/StuartMeissner/status/1030139433276846081" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/StuartMeissner/status/103013943327684608...</a>