Learning to See in the Dark
I'm always concerned when this type of deep learning image processing is presented. The resulting images look nice but there's no guarantee that all the extra detail visible in those images is genuine detail and not just "believable" data filled in by the net. Maybe fine for happy snaps but it's very important that users of the camera know that its output is just an "artist's impression."<p>It raises shades of the Xerox copiers which helpfully "compressed" images by deciding that 6s, 8s and 9s looked similar enough and using them interchangeably. (<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23588202" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23588202</a>)