Saudi Arabia sentences tribesmen to death for resisting displacement
I'm wondering why the USA hasn't used its military muscle to force regime change in Saudi Arabia. They have valuable resources, and I don't think any major country would stand in the USA's way.<p>The people already live under a brutal repressive dictatorship. Why not replace it with something more tolerable?<p>My best guess is that doing so would dramatically increase terrorism in the region.<p>Venezuela would be another area in need of intervention, IMO.<p>Update: I'm as anti-war as it gets, but consider: when is there a moral imperative to act? If you could stop the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, should you? If you can stop your neighbor from going on a murdering spree, should you?