Amazon threatens to suspend French deliveries after court order
The other side of the story... <a href="https://www.france24.com/en/20200414-french-court-faults-amazon-over-virus-safety-limits-deliveries" rel="nofollow">https://www.france24.com/en/20200414-french-court-faults-ama...</a> or <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/1ad863ef-dc39-43a3-b714-e5ef3c4a8e15" rel="nofollow">https://www.ft.com/content/1ad863ef-dc39-43a3-b714-e5ef3c4a8...</a><p>> Laurent Degousee, of the SUD-Commerce union that was behind the complaint, acknowledged that Amazon had "not stood idly by" amid the crisis but had taken a "slew of measures without any evaluation".<p>> He said that the taking of temperatures had sometimes caused queues and thus risked possible infection.<p>So Amazon had the choice of either;<p>a) taking the court ruling seriously and doubling down on efforts to ensure worker safety and working out what needs to be done to lift the suspension<p>or<p>b) raising a middle finger and threatening to suspend all deliveries, thereby adding fuel to the notion that Amazon doesn't take worker safety seriously and creating opposition in France that will now work on strategies for "what to do if Amazon pulls out of our market?"<p>Which one seems like a smarter response?