State projections for Covid-19
This is all fine and good.  And I should state that I am on board with the actions (in San Francisco/California) taken so far.  However, I'm not unconditionally so.<p>I get that right now we're buying time. My current understanding is that we're trying to slow the spread of the disease because the existing health care system was going to quickly collapse under the weight; whether or not that should have been the case or not is a discussion for another day.  I also understand that we are -not- trying to contain the disease, just "serialize" its progression (so to speak) through the population.<p>Assuming that understanding is sufficiently correct, what I'm not hearing enough of is what is being done with the time we're buying.  Many in the Hacker News audience likes to talk about "externalities" and how the wise appreciates those externalities in their actions.  Shutting down the economy has externalities; those externatlities can be life or death as well.  If the strategy of those implementing the "shelter in place" is one of just waiting it out: then I'm going to be off the wagon fairly quickly.  I want to start hearing strategies that start to address the issues of how we minimize impacts of this problem.  I want to know what we're buying for the pain that we're being sold on.  I want to know when people estimate that the societal damages of the illness start to be outweighed by the damages of our response.<p>I see the admin of the site suggesting we're buying time for these things.  I want to start hearing this from the officials making policy.