Tinyland
Kudos for the project, but I am afraid that if people keep calling random AR experiments "Dynamicland", it will quickly lose meaning - see  <a href="https://paperprograms.org" rel="nofollow">https://paperprograms.org</a>, a project <i>much</i> closer to Dynamicland, but at least still cognizant of the fact it's not a "small Dynamicland":<p>>Paper Programs recreates just a tiny part of what makes Dynamicland so interesting. To learn more about their system and vision, be sure to visit Dynamicland in Oakland -- and please consider donating, too!
>Paper Programs is inspired by the projector and camera setup of the 2017 iteration of Dynamicland. I liked how you could physically hold a program in your hands, and then put on any surface in the building, where it would start executing, as if by magic. [...]
>In contrast, Dynamicland is a community space designed around Realtalk. Realtalk is a research operating system (in development for several years) designed to bring computation into the physical world. It is more general than papers, projectors, and cameras. Dynamicland is intended as a new medium of human communication, and is designed to be learned and used by a community of people interacting face-to-face, not over the internet.<p>But also - I realize you know about the limitations, but being only able to interact with one static program at a time, and not being able to see the source code of the components is crucial, it's what makes it "not even a Dynamiclandish prototype" for me.<p>But I don't want to be a killjoy and kill your enthusiasm; I think it's great what you've done! But I'm just irked at namedropping Dynamicland like this.