Quantum Mechanics for Programmers
It's puzzling to see the author call himself multiple times a scientist while lending so much importance to Occam's razor (which is spelled differently in the article, not sure if it's an alternative spelling in his language or a mistake).<p>Occam's razor is not a law. It's not a fact. It's a simple suggestion if you're looking for a starting hypothesis.<p>Not sure which way to start to investigate a phenomenon? Pick the simplest one and verify that one. It doesn't mean it's right, it doesn't mean it's wrong, just that it's a reasonable first guess.<p>But not a proof. Not a fact. Just a guess that's statically more likely to be right.