Speed of Rust vs. C
> "Clever" memory use is frowned upon in Rust. In C, anything goes.<p>No, it does not. If Rust programmers don't have discipline in C, other people have.<p>And don't drag out some random CVE numbers again. These are about a <i>fraction</i> of existing C projects, many of them were started 1980-2000.<p>It is an entirely different story if a project is started with sanitizers, Valgrind and best practices.<p>I'm not against Rust, except that they managed to take OCaml syntax and make it significantly worse. It's just ugly and looks like design by committee.<p>But the evangelism is exhausting. I also wonder why corporations are pushing Rust. Is it another method to take over C projects that they haven't assimilated yet?