How Precision Time Protocol is being deployed at Meta
So they state:<p>> <i>One could argue that we don’t really need PTP for that. NTP will do just fine. Well, we thought that too. But experiments we ran comparing our state-of-the-art NTP implementation and an early version of PTP showed a roughly 100x performance difference:</i><p>While I'm not necessarily against more accuracy/precision, what problems specifically are experiencing? They do mention some use cases of course:<p>> <i>There are several additional use cases, including event tracing, cache invalidation, privacy violation detection improvements, latency compensation in the metaverse, and simultaneous execution in AI, many of which will greatly reduce hardware capacity requirements. This will keep us busy for years ahead.</i><p>But given that NTP (either ntpd or chrony) tends to give me an estimated error of around (tens of) 1e-6 seconds, and PTP can get down to 1e-9 seconds, I'm not sure how many data centre applications need that level of accuracy.<p>> <i>We believe PTP will become the standard for keeping time in computer networks in the coming decades.</i><p>Given the special hardware needed for the grand master clock to get down to nanosecond time scales, I'm doubtful this will be used in most data centres of most corporate networks. Adm. Grace Hopper elegantly illustrates 'how long' a nanosecond is:<p>* <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eyFDBPk4Yw" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eyFDBPk4Yw</a><p>How many things need to worry the latency of signal travelling ~300mm?