Wikipedia is not short on cash
Eh.  If you don't want to donate, don't, but I don't quite get the outrage here.  The Wikimedia Foundation is still small as far as charities go and is visibly making Wikipedia better: the new UI is a breath of fresh air, and given the <i>insane</i> complexity of MediaWiki markup, the visual editor is a piece of unimaginable technical wizardry.  Wiktionary is an unheralded gem and even Wikidata is starting to be genuinely useful.<p>For what it's worth, Charity Navigator gives them 4 out of 4 stars with a 98.33/100 rating: <a href="https://www.charitynavigator.org/ein/200049703" rel="nofollow">https://www.charitynavigator.org/ein/200049703</a><p>Meanwhile eg the American Cancer Society gets 73/100 and spends more on fundraising than WMF's entire budget, so oncologists can snort blow off hookers in Vegas, but nobody cares.