AI Data Laundering
The Authors Guild v Google decision about Google Books seems relevant:<p>> In late 2013, after the class action status was challenged, the District Court granted summary judgement in favor of Google, dismissing the lawsuit and affirming the Google Books project met all legal requirements for fair use. The Second Circuit Court of Appeal upheld the District Court's summary judgement in October 2015, ruling Google's "project provides a public service without violating intellectual property law." The U.S. Supreme Court subsequently denied a petition to hear the case.<p>[...]<p>> The court's summary of its opinion is:<p>[...]<p>> Google’s unauthorized digitizing of copyright-protected works, creation of a search functionality, and display of snippets from those works are non-infringing fair uses. The purpose of the copying is highly transformative, the public display of text is limited, and the revelations do not provide a significant market substitute for the protected aspects of the originals. <i>Google’s commercial nature and profit motivation do not justify denial of fair use.</i><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,_Inc" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,...</a>.<p>This doesn't touch on the ethics of course – at minimum I think allowing people to exclude themselves or their work from a dataset is necessary.