A New Way of Voting That Makes Zealotry Expensive
It's clever, but it doesn't solve the problem.<p>Because the problem isn't with <i>strong</i> preferences -- it's with <i>extreme</i> preferences.<p>If there were 7 versions of a bill (A,B,C,D,E,F,G) ranging from ultra-conservative (a "A") to ultra-liberal (a "G"), in a polarized community people could still be spending the minimum 1 point each on the A's or G's and none on B-F.<p>The problem with politics today isn't that people are single-issue voters (because they generally aren't -- it's not a problem that needs to be solved)... it's that the natural evolution of the two-party system has forced us into choices that are more <i>polarized</i> than ever before in the history of the US -- in a two-party election, we're often only <i>given</i> options A and G, or maybe B and F, but rarely C through E.