Russia Blocks Access to Major Independent News Sites
The greatest instrument used in the societal tragedies of the last century has (undoubtedly) been state delivered propaganda.<p>Japan (Empire of the Rising Sun), Nazi Germany, Maoism (and the following Cultural Revolution), in America: Red Scare (age of McCarthyism, ending as a consequence of JMc.'s untimely death), the Red Peril (the predecessor of the Red Scare) -- the list goes on.  The efficacy of those at the top to wield their power would have been far less without propaganda.  Their ability to acquire it -- even less still.<p>Consider current-day North Korea, Venezuela, or numerous Middle-Eastern countries (which regulate education as well as the internet); consider the intellectually subdued population of China and the unconscionable acts which have been silently taking place in Tibet (and elsewhere) behind the Great Firewall.  All of these nations are suffering from handicapped/censored versions of the internet -- while simultaneously being subjected to propaganda.<p>Russia can now officially be added to that club.  I can't help but extrapolate -- applying this trend to other nations.<p>An Uncensored and Open Internet* is crucial to the subversion of tyrannical governments' propaganda efforts.<p>* - (I prefer this to "Free and Open" because 'free' is so easily misunderstood by baby boomers)<p>~ ~<p>We are witnessing (again [0]) a complete lack of attempted narrative on the part of the US/UK mainstream press. There isn't the slightest reason to not give this story ample coverage -- it is anti-Putin/Russia (which, we can all agree is the current fetish in the media), and it is absolutely newsworthy -- even by their standards (they covered when the Russia Today anchors quit and spoke-out).  SO WHAT GIVES?  This is the dereliction of duty in "journalism." Shame.  And it is greatly affecting the movement for an Uncensored and Open Internet.<p>"Coverage" is different from "being reported." This needs to reach baby boomers in the form of a headline.  They don't appreciate the internet because they can't connect the dots.<p>I've snapshoted cnn.com, foxnews.com, msnbc.com, bbc.com - at 8:51pm CST at web.archive.org .  I'm the crackpot that believes there are ulterior motives in this pattern of institutional ignorance/behavior.<p>~ ~<p>When it comes to the marketing of high stakes legislation - know that the true motives are often-times blended with an actual public desire, with the bill being a means to another end entirely.  As mike_esspe points out: this action being taken is through the passage of Russia's "anti-child pornography" bill.  For those that missed it, here's what happening in the UK on the same front of misdirection. [0]<p>If you care about making a difference, beyond "liking" and "upvoting" -- I highly recommend (as did Aaron Swartz) reading "The Power Broker," and you will have a greater appreciation of the forces at play and how opaque the processes which deliver and execute the policies of governance really are.<p>[0] - A recent example of the mainstream press giving essentially no coverage came with GHCQ webcam revelations: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7315743" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7315743</a>  The loose connection between the (casually addressed) problems of pictures obtained of minors' nudity in the webcam program and the governments' attempts to censor the internet on the back of the serious child pornography issue is worth noting, for its hypocrisy.<p>[1]  - <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1zhd6i/david_camerons_aide_on_child_internet_policy_has/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1zhd6i/david_came...</a>
~~<p>For the inevitable Godwin's Law comebacks.  People too often focus on Hitler's 1936-39 rise to global prominence:  what is often overlooked is the unabated role of the party's propaganda-machine from 1921 to 1932 to gain popular support and 1932 to ~1936 to brainwash the remaining populace.