RMS addresses the free software community
Now, would the journalists who wrote articles with titles that are a variation of "RMS defended Epstein" [1,2] apologize or at least correct their articles?  Also, now that RMS has explicitly clarified his position on these issues, can the people who leveraged his "silence" and "bad behavior" to oust him from the FSF at least admit that their motive was less about making the free-software movement welcoming and was more about getting rid of RMS?<p>[1]: <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/famed-mit-computer-scientist-richard-stallman-defends-epstein-victims-were-entirely-willing" rel="nofollow">https://www.thedailybeast.com/famed-mit-computer-scientist-r...</a>
[2]: <a href="https://www.vice.com/en/article/9ke3ke/famed-computer-scientist-richard-stallman-described-epstein-victims-as-entirely-willing" rel="nofollow">https://www.vice.com/en/article/9ke3ke/famed-computer-scient...</a>