Game Critic Uses Workaround for YouTube's Copyright System (2016)
So if I understand correctly:<p>1. Youtube makes money from ads.<p>2. Jimquisition is funded from Patreon, and despises ads on his content.<p>3. To resolve this paradox, Jim has found a way to (allegedly) infringe on multiple parties' copyright<p>4. Youtube's technology doesn't allow multiple monetizers, and therefore in this situation allows none.<p>If Jim disagrees with the funding stategy of YouTube, why bother with YouTube at all? Is free riding on youtube video distribution that valuable?