You are not Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs was not a "hacker". [‡] He knew almost nothing about computer languages, computer architecture, and according to Neil Young, he listened to vinyl records at home [1] — which shows that he was ignorant of how audio quality works (see [2]). Steve did not contribute any original ideas or any important technological innovations. He claimed during his Stanford commencement speech that if Macintosh had not included eye pleasing typography, then computers would never have had typographically pleasing typefaces (because "Microsoft just copied Apple); this is ludicrous. In fact, Apple's software patents for digital typography added unnecessary difficulties. [3] Many people are unhappy about Apple culture of paranoia, litigation, and features that restrict user's freedoms that Steve created.<p>Steve is known for having a great sense of design, but it seems that he only had taste in choosing among the good designs of others. Just look at the yacht he designed without Jonathan Ive's collaboration. [4]<p>Many of you may say that I'm missing the point; that his ability to convince others of what was important and his "vision" is what made him great. My contention is that he appropriated other people's original ideas, and other people implemented his modifications. I'll admit that directing such efforts is not an easy thing to do, and most breakthroughs are improvements upon others' ideas. But it is very rare for the original creators to be alive and ignored while the modifier is celebrated with maudlin elegies.<p>EDIT: The media's treatment of his death, President Obama's statement that he was a great "inventor", etc. was not his fault. But I think that when the deaths of people like Dennis Ritchie and John McCarthy in the same month as Steve are ignored, then the world is suffering from a serious case of myopia. Ignoring Dennis and John while celebrating Steve is like fawning over the interior decorator with praise about the warmth of a house while ignoring the carpenter and contractor.<p>Perhaps I should add that I am being critical of Steve because of an abundance of articles that did not focus on what he actually contributed, or criticized only his behavior towards others. Steve did seem to be able to hire, attract, or motivate as many talented engineers as he did drive away. This is a very hard thing for a CEO to do, and he deserves a large amount of credit for doing this. The talent that he helped attract and the products they create are responsible for Apple's stock price rise and continued profitability since his death.<p>[‡] <a href="http://www.dourish.com/goodies/jargon.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dourish.com/goodies/jargon.html</a>
    (see definition of "hacker")<p>[1] <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/02/01/146206585/steve-jobs-listened-to-vinyl-at-home-neil-young-says" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/02/01/146206585/ste...</a><p>[2] <a href="http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html" rel="nofollow">http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html</a><p>[3] <a href="http://www.freetype.org/patents.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.freetype.org/patents.html</a><p>[4] <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/21/tech/innovation/steve-jobs-yacht/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/21/tech/innovation/steve-jobs-yac...</a>