SCOTUS declines to hear challenge to warrantless pole camera surveillance
I don't like it, but there's nothing stopping your neighbor or anyone else from filming your home from a public/street view. Let's not forget that even if a court decides the police need a warrant to film, a third party could do the filming and police could just buy the data legally. Again, not something I like, but that's how it goes.<p>There are very few details in the article. Now I'm curious how they found out about the camera, if charges were filed, etc.