Some Thoughts on Zig
Nice balanced writeup! However, I am not convinced one can make something solving all the things Rust solves which is substantially simpler as language.<p>Whether we look at Zig, Go or Julia they stay relatively simple because they simply avoid solving certain problems. I think that is a fair tradeoff. I think good language design is really about figuring out what problems can we dump on the user which they will be able to handle relatively well.<p>A reason why there are so many languages I think is because different people have different preferences in terms of what problems the want to avoid dealing with and what problems they are fine dealing with.<p>Personally I think that if you "solve" a problem by making the language so complex that developers cannot easily read and reason about the code, then you haven't actually solved any problem. Priority must always be placed on the ability of developers to read and understand code.<p>Unreadable code will naturally be a source of bugs.