Vertical farming does not save space
<i>Artificial lighting saves land because plants can be grown above each other, but if the electricity for the lighting comes from solar panels, then the savings are canceled out by the land required to install the solar panels. The vertical farm is a paradox unless fossil fuels provide the energy. In that case, there’s not much sustainable about it.</i><p>This entire piece is based on the assumption that the only sources of energy are solar panels and fossil fuels. This is false. According to the US Department of Energy, 19.6% of the energy produced in 2019 is nuclear. In that same year, 7.1% was from wind, 7.0% was hydroelectric, 1.4% from biomass, 0.4% geothermal. Only 1.7% was photovoltaics! <a href="https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427" rel="nofollow">https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427</a><p>If we look into the relatively near future, fusion energy is going to account for a rapidly increasing share of energy production by the end of this decade. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkpqA8yG9T4" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkpqA8yG9T4</a>