Reddit Strike Has Started
> others will go away permanently unless the issue is adequately addressed,<p>Without a very clear statement of demands -- what it would take to end the action -- that everyone (or at least majority) of those participating understand and agree too -- it makes this even less effective as a form of pressure.<p>Those planning on going away "unless the issue is adequately addressed", what does that mean?  Completely ending and reverting all plans to charge for API? That's not what they say, they say "adequately addressed", so that probably isnt' consensus (and probably isn't winnable? Or reasonable?).   Making the charges some kind of reasonable... so every mod just decides on their own if any change announced is "adequate" or not?<p>What makes a boycott most likely to be effective as a pressure tactic is if the target knows exactly what they have to do to end the boycott, and has some confidence that if they do it the boycott will indeed end.<p>Now, whether this is actually winnable here (and via this tactic) is another question, but you might as well do your best if you're trying it.<p>I feel like at least some of the people participating in this boycott are just sick of reddit (and the internet, and society) and would be just as happy to see it burn though.<p>There's very little discussion of strategy and tactics in this thread -- how we can actually win, when organizing collectively for collective demands. If we want to be able to win, it's a good thing to think and talk about, not just react instinctively.