GM self-driving tech unit Cruise laying off about 8% of staff
It's still keeping the self-driving unit thought, even though there's a good chance it won't ever be successful. I don't think self-driving cars are realistic at all. I bet if you did a study and ran the numbers, it would be cheaper to put down rail on existing roads and make them rail-car only, automate those and subsidize rail cars.<p>I feel in the minority in thinking self driving tech will ever be viable. I've worked in computer vision startups and know how powerful the tech can be, but it still can't account with even a fraction of challenging driving conditions. I don't think anything short of general purpose AI could handle it. We are some pretty big discoveries away from general AI.<p>I also don't think they solve any real transport issues compared to traditional mass transit: <a href="https://battlepenguin.com/tech/self-driving-cars-will-not-solve-the-transportation-problem/" rel="nofollow">https://battlepenguin.com/tech/self-driving-cars-will-not-so...</a>