Sorry, NSA, Terrorists Don't Use Verizon. Or Skype. Or Gmail
I would just like to crosspost a comment from reddit user MarcusHalberstram88 which I found to be insightful :<p>Ok, I feel I have to speak up.  This is why I take issue with subs like /r/politics, and I would hope for more from /r/technology.<p>Most people who see this post will only read the title and not follow the link to the article (even though the title sensationalizes the article).  If someone does actually click, this post links to a Motherboard article, which basically just cites, summarizes, and links to a Bloomberg article.  The Bloomberg article[1] cites, extrapolates, and links to AIVD UK (a Dutch website).  Said Dutch website[2] (finally) links to the actual report that all these different sources are supposedly reporting on. That report was by the General Intelligence and Security Service for the Dutch Ministry of Interiors and Kingdom Relations.<p>The actual report itself is just shy of 30 pages long and dedicates one of its four chapters of findings to "How does online Jihadism work?" (roughly 4 pages).<p>I think 4 pages discussing where and how (it is thought) 25,000 Jihadists gather online is one thing.  Making a blanket statement saying that terrorists do not use Verizon, Skype, or Gmail is another.  But anyone who just reads the title of this post, or just reads the article that the post links to, or even the article that THAT article links to, may believe otherwise.<p>[1] <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-23/u-s-surveillance-is-not-aimed-at-terrorists.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-23/u-s-surveillance-is...</a><p>[2] <a href="https://www.aivd.nl/english/publications-press/@2873/jihadism-web/" rel="nofollow">https://www.aivd.nl/english/publications-press/@2873/jihadis...</a>