Popcorntime is leaving GitHub
I've not used popcorntime and didn't really believe it would work with a smooth experience (and when you've got Netflix why bother?).<p>But this: <a href="https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2014-07-11-MPAA.md" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2014-07-11-MPAA.m...</a> ... this is great marketing for popcorntime. It shows it working and giving an experience that looks very much like Netflix.<p>Seems like the MPAA have given popcorntime some free marketing.<p>Reading the DMCA notice though, does it really apply to a repo of code?<p>Their argument is that it can access infringed content (but so could a web browser, or network media player, etc) and that MGM vs Grokster means that "the distribution of a product can itself give rise to liability where evidence shows that the distributor intended and encouraged the product to be used to infringe". But if Github can be considered the distributor of the product (rather than just the hosting company for source code) then I'm not sure Github have ever intended or encouraged use of the product to infringe, or indeed whether Github have any interest in the use of code hosted in repositories by them.<p>Do Github just roll over on DMCA requests? Or will they challenge ones like this where an entity is requesting a takedown even though the code itself contains no infringed content and Github have not encouraged use of the code to infringe?