Poor writing, not specialized concepts, drives difficulty with legal language
For everyone commenting "laypeople aren't the intended audience", this monstrosity was a recent Texas constitutional ballot proposal, i.e. all voters in the state were asked to vote on it:<p>> The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for the reduction of the amount of a limitation on the total amount of ad valorem taxes that may be imposed for general elementary and secondary public school purposes on the residence homestead of a person who is elderly or disabled to reflect any statutory reduction from the preceding tax year in the maximum compressed rate of the maintenance and operations taxes imposed for those purposes on the homestead.<p>I have an Ivy League education and I still could hardly understand it, and I still think some of the language is ambiguous (i.e. I think "the reduction of the amount of a limitation on the total amount" can be interpreted both ways).<p><a href="https://www.dallasnews.com/news/watchdog/2022/03/25/the-language-in-a-may-vote-to-lower-texas-property-taxes-is-so-confusing-that-its-incomprehensible/" rel="nofollow">https://www.dallasnews.com/news/watchdog/2022/03/25/the-lang...</a>