What's wrong with enterprise Linux
There is another problem that wasn't covered in the article.  The 10+ years of stability leads to behaviors and outcomes that remind me of the long-lived SSL certificate problem.  Updating is done so infrequently that the "how?" is forgotten.  As the 10 year support limit approaches, most of the old team members who did it last time are gone, tech debt is through the roof, few people know where everything is or how to build it, and so on.  Enterprise Linux "stability" enables all sorts of bad behavior if your company is inclined that way.<p>LetsEncrypt did us a huge favor by forcing automation vs having the guy who knows how to update the SSL certs every 4.9 years and left 6 months ago.  I'd like to see the RHEL stability model go away too and force people to complete their automation and solve the problems of being able to rebuilding on demand - and actually doing it.<p>(I know, most HN folk are well disciplined but there are a lot of corporate cultures that are not.)