Apple tells Telegram to take down protestor channels in Belarus
Here is a source in Russian [0] saying that Apple is asking Telegram to remove messages that de-anonymize Belorussian police members, rather than blocking channels outright. I don't know whether their source is reliable, but here is the relevant snippet (google translate):<p>> Apple says it didn’t require any channels to be removed. But they demanded to immediately remove any information that discloses someone's data on the Internet without the consent of these persons, as well as content aimed at specific people in accordance with the rules of the App Store.<p>This refers to the efforts of the Belorussian opposition to 'unmask' members of the riot police by posting their personal details online. Without going into the moral weeds, from the terms-of-service point of view that's basically griefing, no?<p>So this is a very curious quandary Apple finds itself in. Let's assume that griefing Belorussian law enforcement is a good thing. But at the same time griefing people (regardless of whether they are bad/good/chaotic neutral) is against the TOS.<p>So what do you do if you are Apple?<p>[0] <a href="https://tjournal.ru/tech/221326-apple-zayavila-chto-ne-trebovala-udalit-telegram-kanaly-i-rasskazala-o-sodeystvii-so-storony-durova" rel="nofollow">https://tjournal.ru/tech/221326-apple-zayavila-chto-ne-trebo...</a>