Google Ad Disguising Itself as www.gimp.org
In this particular case, I suspect a trademark complaint against Google would make sense.<p>Google misrepresented the ad as the product of the Gimp project, and were paid as a result.  They usually use an "obeying the law would not scale" type argument in court, but that would clearly be bullshit in this case.  They have a business relationship with the ad buyer, and should have verified their affiliation with gimp.org.  Also, a simple string match on the URL would expose the attempted fraud on Google's end.<p>I'm not sure how to check if Gimp is a registered trademark in the US.  This page kind of implies it might be (or that the author of the page does not understand trademarks):<p><a href="https://www.gimp.org/about/selling.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.gimp.org/about/selling.html</a>