Improved code caching
This feature is really cool, however the ratio of parse-time and compile-time improvement is not always meaningful to end users. I would be curious to see the absolute & relative load-time gains.<p>When I was benchmarking Firefox on the same feature [1], back in November 2017, I noticed that reddit loads very little JavaScript that any improvement on it does not matter.<p>Also, I wish that the benchmark website domains were not truncated, such as "<a href="http://www."" rel="nofollow">http://www."</a>, and better distinguish websites such as "<a href="http://reddit."" rel="nofollow">http://reddit."</a> (for <a href="http://reddit.musicplayer.io" rel="nofollow">http://reddit.musicplayer.io</a>) as opposed to "<a href="http://www.reddit."" rel="nofollow">http://www.reddit."</a> (for <a href="http://www.reddit.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.reddit.com</a>).<p>[1] <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/javascript/2017/12/12/javascript-startup-bytecode-cache/" rel="nofollow">https://blog.mozilla.org/javascript/2017/12/12/javascript-st...</a>