AI are taking jobs
The author does not fully understand the totality of the work these professional do. From the two example listed.<p><i>"Radiologists, who can earn over $300,000 a year in America, after 13 years of college education and internship, are among the first to feel the heat. It is not just that the task of scanning tumour slides and X-ray pictures is being outsourced to Indian laboratories, where the job is done for a tenth of the cost. The real threat is that the latest automated pattern-recognition software can do much of the work for less than a hundredth of it."</i><p>a very naive understanding of radiologists.
This only one of the many task a radiologists must handle, including interaction with patient, which is the most important task. We are far away from replace that service with Ai. Software handling one task won't eliminate the need for radiologists.<p><i>"Lawyers are in a similar boat now that smart algorithms can search case law, evaluate the issues at hand and summarise the results. Machines have already shown they can perform legal discovery for a fraction of the cost of human professionals—and do so with far greater thoroughness than lawyers and paralegals usually manage."</i><p>Case discovery is only one of the many task a Lawyer must perform,
case discovery alone won't replace lawyers. It will only allow them to be more productive. Lawyers still responsible for many other task, they have to broker deals, consult clients and in the case of trial attorneys, win trials.<p>more thoughts at: 
<a href="http://techiroll.com/post/10173031897/do-not-blame-technology" rel="nofollow">http://techiroll.com/post/10173031897/do-not-blame-technolog...</a>