Modern programming languages require generics
Essentially every language provides some form of generics. Even Go 1.0 had `append` (a polymorphic function) and `map[K]V` (a polymorphic type). What Go 1.0 didn't have was <i>user-defined</i> generics. I am still of the (unorthodox) opinion that adding more built-in generics would have been a better solution than opening the door to arbitrary user-defined generics. Providing a generic `sort`, `reverse`, and a few others would cover 90% of the cases mentioned in every "Go needs generics!!" article.