Who Will Rein in Facebook? Challengers Are Lining Up
Note to those who don't/can't read the article: the title is slightly misleading. The author does not mean business challengers to Facebook but rather political challengers (i.e. legislators, regulators, activists.)<p>Basically, the glory days of free-range hacking without government regulation appear limited, especially with the likes of Bruce Schneier[0], advocating for the same.<p>Cherish these moments while they last.* If you want to help mitigate the governments reach and make sure policy is implemented wisely, support our lobbying power through the EFF (<a href="https://www.eff.org/" rel="nofollow">https://www.eff.org/</a>) and FSF (<a href="https://www.fsf.org/" rel="nofollow">https://www.fsf.org/</a>).<p>Edit: Updated language above to make it more clear that I am not anti-regulation.<p>[0]: <a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/11/regulation_of_t.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/11/regulation_of...</a><p>[*]: What I mean to say is that I can foresee a world where you are mandated by the government to perform certain services through specific providers. For example, the government could, in the interest of protecting user security, mandate that all apps must provide user registration and auth through a provider that has received XYZ certification (i.e. OAuth through Facebook, Google, Auth0)