Wikipedia is swimming in money–why is it begging people to donate?
> But keeping Wikipedia online is a task that the WMF could comfortably manage on $10 million a year<p>This part is disingenuous and bordering on malicious. The linked email (<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2013-March/124621.html" rel="nofollow">https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2013-March...</a>) has so much more nuance, and in typical fashion a single number from it is taken completely out of context to push a certain narrative. It is also an estimate from almost a decade ago.<p>Wikimedia's finances are audited and published every year. Here's the latest one from 2019-2020 - <a href="https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/annualreport/2020-annual-report/financials/" rel="nofollow">https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/annualreport/2020-annu...</a>. They had $120M in donations and $9M in other revenue for the year. Expenses were $112M. That isn't even close to the buffer that the article implies. The foundation's total current assets (~$160M) would keep their sites running for <2 years, and maybe a few more with major operational cuts. Why on earth <i>shouldn't</i> they fundraise more?