WebAssembly’s post-MVP future
>People have a misconception about WebAssembly. They think that the WebAssembly that landed in browsers back in 2017—which we called the minimum viable product (or MVP) of WebAssembly—is the final version of WebAssembly.<p>They do? When people point out that WASM can't do stuff they are simply pointing out that WASM would need to be extended. That is a pretty simple concept and a very important observation because historically that is the phase where everything falls apart.<p>Creating an intermediate language that all the higher level languages can compile to is not a new idea. It has been done over and over again with little practical result. Some current scepticism is in order.