A “Better C” Benchmark
What I find funny is his choice of languages: 'hipe driven' I'd say.<p>If you can use a GCd language like Go why would you go with Rust(which add a lot of complexity) or Zig(which is unsafe(1)) instead of the numerous existing GCd languages D,Nim, Crystal, Java,... which provides memory safety without complexity<p>If you can't why evaluate Go instead of Ada or DasBetterC?<p>1: At work a frequent issue in C++ is UAF a pointer to a stack variable which outlives the function, Zig don't help you here..