How to exploit home routers for anonymity
The opening paragraph asserts that simply not
publishing ("censoring") such concrete, recipe-like
exploits of the deficiencies of our shared
infrastructure "won't make practices like those
outlined [in the article] disappear"[2].<p>I am reminded of Steve Kemp's 2014 post »Secure your
rsync shares, please«[0], relating how he abandoned a project employing zmap[1] upon 
discovering numerous openly accessible rsync
shares containing sensible information.  His
closing remarks echo the sentiment of the article
under discussion here: "I considered not posting
this, but I suspect 'bad people' already know..,"[0]<p>What can be done?  Are we reduced to just securing
our friends' and families' infrastructure, all the
while standing by idly while others outside of our
direct sphere of influence suffer the consequences
of naïvety?<p>[0] <a href="http://blog.steve.org.uk/secure_your_rsync_shares__please_.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.steve.org.uk/secure_your_rsync_shares__please_.h...</a><p>[1] A cleverly-built, fast network scanner,
    <a href="https://zmap.io/" rel="nofollow">https://zmap.io/</a><p>[2] <a href="http://danmcinerney.org/how-to-exploit-home-routers-for-anonymity/" rel="nofollow">http://danmcinerney.org/how-to-exploit-home-routers-for-anon...</a>