GCP to introduce an additional charge for publicly addressed VM instances
This is silly and will further harm GCP's viability as alternative to AWS or Azure. Firstly, I can't find any official announcement regarding the rationale and suggested solutions for their customers to reduce their cost. Just adding a banner to docs pages is plain lazy and is not customer friendly.<p>Ideally IPv6 support should have been added or at least scheduled to be available at instance level [1] before enforcing such charges. This indicates a lack of engineering capability (more likely resource commitment) to implement such a critical feature on its platform in a timely manner, particularly given that its rivals already have the support in place. To me, that is more worrying than an increase in bill. What is the pace of innovation one can expect from GCP platform? How committed are its leaders as a public cloud service provider?<p>1. <a href="https://googlecloudplatform.uservoice.com/forums/302595-compute-engine/suggestions/8518246-support-ipv6" rel="nofollow">https://googlecloudplatform.uservoice.com/forums/302595-comp...</a>