A response to the git.centos.org changes
I genuinely don't understand why anyone is using rhel or rhel-derived distros anymore.<p>'we' (and by 'we' -- I can only speak for the small slice of uk/eu companies I've worked at for the last ~18 or so years) were /forced/ to use redhat when running stuff like SAP, IBM WebSphere, Oracle, various terrible BI systems, ERP stuff, and so on for 'support'.<p>Then the cloud happened, and rhel/centos came along initally as we knew the tools, and we were running mostly the same stuff but on other peoples gear.<p>Slowly the application estate exploded and now I think it's fair to say we target k8s instead of 'rhel' as the place where our software is running, and rhel and it's brothers go absolutely nowhere near my k8s estate or any I've worked on (typically, ubuntu server nodes if I have to build my own, and alpine for contiainers).<p>So; people who are upset by the recent developments (and lets be honest, did you expect a thriving community around an IBM product?) -- why? What's rhel got that debian doesn't? Or ubuntu?