Moving your SSH port isn’t security by obscurity
An FBI agent from the Cyber Crimes division gave a talk while I was in college (>10 years ago). He was interested in brute force attacks against SSH daemons and created a couple hypotheses around number of logins and common passwords. To test this he setup two Honey Pot to record all of the username/passwords. The first one listened on standard SSH port 22, the other listened on a random high-numbered port. He left both of these running for ~6 months.<p>Results:
The honey pot listening on standard port 22 received 1,000s of login attempts (sorry, don't remember the exact number).  The honey pot listening on the random high-numbered port received exactly 0.<p>I know this is just an anecdote and it might not necessarily be true today, but this experiment always sticks in my head. At least the guy used the scientific method: created a hypothesis, conducted the experiment, analyzed his results.