Big no on Big Sur: Mullvad disallows Apple apps to bypass firewall
This makes me feel somewhat better, honestly. The fact that packet-level firewalls work is reassuring.<p>It hadn't been clear from previous reports that they all have to do with content-level filtering and VPN's. In that context, it seems to make more sense for Apple to exempt its own critical services (like malware detection and security updates). Kind of the same way applications can't overwrite system files either.<p>I am curious though: can anyone think of any real-world scenario where it's a genuine problem that Apple traffic isn't routed through the VPN?<p>When I think of normal uses for VPN's -- security for online work and communications, evading censorship, bypassing geo blocks -- these would all seem to be entirely unaffected.<p>Is there <i>anything</i> at all an ISP or attacker could snoop on outside your VPN that could ever be genuinely threatening or privacy-invading? Or is there a worry that we don't have a definitive answer to this because nobody's catalogued everything Apple sends and looked for privacy vulnerabilities?