Elm is Wrong
So is it fair to say that it is possible for me to conclude &quot;xyz is broken&quot; based on a single paragraph?  For example, if I read the Wikipedia article on Perl 6, the second paragraph says &quot;While historically several interpreter and compiler implementations were being written, today only the Rakudo Perl implementation is in active development.&quot;<p>So let me skip the part where I spend 2 weeks picking up a language!<p>Let&#x27;s go straight to: &quot;if an ostensibly open language only has one single implementation, it is fundamentally broken and underspecified and should not be used by anyone, period.&quot;<p>Is the part I quoted enough for me to conclucde that it&#x27;s a broken language not fit for any use by anyone?  Because the article that we&#x27;re talking about has the title &quot;Elm is wrong.&quot;<p>Can I say, &quot;Perl 6 is wrong&quot; without even bothering with coding in it for a few months?