No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-interview feedback
You generally don&#x27;t get technical interview performance feedback because technical interviews are constrained by the interviewer to put themselves in a technically confident light against the candidate. The interview is as much a crapshoot for the interviewer, because they might be less&#x2F;more&#x2F;similarly skilled to the candidate, but they absolutely cannot reveal themselves to be less skilled because they would undermine their status if the candidate gets hired. So interviewers stick to the same random technical question that they feel very confident of, answers to it are studied. The myth is that this posed problem is a general test of skill for the candidate, but the primary motivation is for the interviewer to maintain the appearance of professional dominance. Hence the technical discussion is kept to a narrow problem domain. Obviously there is a spectrum here, and it&#x27;s more true when the interviewer feels insecure. Only when the interviewer is very skilled&#x2F;confident relative to the candidate do people go off script and give advice. I confess this is how I have seen it from both sides of the interview, I&#x27;m no saint either.