Signal president says company will not comply with U.K. ‘mass surveillance’ law
Governments seem to want to have it both ways. As new technologies are introduced they assume that capabilities and practices available to analogous predecessors must remain available to them (e.g. wire-tapping phones =&gt; undermining cryptography) but they don’t feel the same way about public benefits or rights associated with other technology that is being replaced (anonymous cash transactions =&gt; ???)<p>It also seems like there’s a tendency to relitigate battles that are lost.  I assume the UK had some equivalent to the 90s crypto wars in the US where attempts to weaken and backdoor crypto by legal means were pretty decisively defeated.<p>It’s sad that precedents should only accrue to one side’s benefit.