Senate votes to reinstate net neutrality
This seems like the way that this should be addressed.  The case against Net Neutrality was made almost strictly as a case of regulatory overreach and overly burdensome regulations that inherited irrelevant restrictions and unenforceable provisions designed for specific telecom use cases that don&#x27;t apply to ISPs.<p>The first issue is clearly addressed by a legislative approach -- it stops being regulatory overreach when the regulators are mandated to enforce.  The second issue depends on how this bill is worded, but in theory it gives an opportunity to create more specialized regulations that directly address the issue at hand without bringing on board historical cruft that applies to a different problem domain.<p>EDIT: after actually reading the article and the actual resolution [1], I see that the second point is unaddressed; this just directly reverses the ruling.  Even the first point is barely addressed because it doesn&#x27;t expand the mandate; it just asserts that the mandate means something that it arguably does not mean.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.congress.gov&#x2F;bill&#x2F;115th-congress&#x2F;senate-joint-resolution&#x2F;52&#x2F;text&#x2F;is?format=txt" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.congress.gov&#x2F;bill&#x2F;115th-congress&#x2F;senate-joint-re...</a>