Stanford hates fun
Wow, I don&#x27;t always agree with Cochrane, but I found myself nodding in agreement to everything in this OP. The passage about Stanford asking students to apply two weeks in advance to host parties (WTF?), with an advance list of attendees (WTF?), is <i>shocking</i> to me. The university&#x27;s response is <i>surreal</i>. Quoting from the WSJ:<p><i>&gt; Samuel Santos Jr., associate vice provost of inclusion, community and integrative learning within the Division of Student Affairs, says the school is working to address students’ concerns about Stanford’s social atmosphere.   “The party-planning process will be streamlined and more administrators will be hired to help facilitate student social life.” “We want events to be fun, inclusive and safe and those things can happen,” Mr. Santos says. “They just require collaboration and honesty.”</i><p>I couldn&#x27;t agree more with Cochrane that <i>the real problem</i> lies in the fact that Stanford&#x27;s bureaucracy has gotten so bloated that it now has an apparatchik with the title of &quot;associate vice provost of inclusion, community and integrative learning&quot; (<i>not</i> a provost, <i>not</i> a vice provost, but an <i>associate vice provost</i>... WTF?), who promises that &quot;the party-planning process will be streamlined&quot; (WTF?) and that &quot;more administrators will be hired&quot; to do so (WTF?).