Netflix stops paying the ‘Apple tax’ on its $853M in annual iOS revenue
I find it hard to blame anyone for leaving any store when there has been almost nothing of value added in years and things are even regressing.  That 30% should have gone a lot further; after 10 years, I can’t even use two different search-and-sort criteria at once to find new apps (and I refuse to sit there and scroll through offensively-bad lists of useless results, much less buy them).<p>I am however not surprised by the slow rate of new features in stores because there still aren’t “tiers” for developers to willingly become early adopters of new store capabilities.  When there are millions of apps, why does it make sense to delay <i>any</i> new feature until the infrastructure has grown to provide that feature to <i>all million apps</i>?<p>Clearly there should be a way to roll out enhanced storefronts to a few apps at a time.  For example, charge early adopters&#x2F;beneficiaries for complex new features and don’t roll them out to all apps right away (if ever).<p>And then, developers shouldn’t have to sacrifice 30% for features they don’t use, either.  I’d rather have a tiny percentage as the base to provide <i>only essential features</i>, with infrastructure upgrade options!  I should be able to give up some low X% for “basic payment processing and auto-installation on devices”, with an option of X+N% to provide “that, plus hosting of app preview videos and several dozen screenshot images”, a higher option of X+2N% for “all that, plus an increased chance of being featured”, etc.