The Microsoft paradox: Contributing to cyber threats and monetizing the cure
I very much do not like Microsoft, and I find this article to be specious at best, and a blatant and malicious lie at worst.  By the logic displayed here, every organization that&#x27;s ever created a network protocol or programming language is responsible for all exploits that make use of it, forever, even though they are not intentional outcomes.  There&#x27;s also no evidence whatosever that Microsoft is monetizing &quot;the cure&quot;, as if any such cure even exists.  At best, there&#x27;s a bevy of &quot;security&quot; companies that exist because of their response to issues in Microsoft-land, but Microsoft is not directly profiting in any way, and if anything it exists as a stain on their reputation.