An erroneous paper on religion and generosity is retracted
I think it&#x27;s situations like this that result in society having such a hard time with &#x27;science&#x27;. The term has been so heavily co-opted by fields that just don&#x27;t have sufficient rigger for the term to hold weight. Yet, on various topics, we have this publicized attack of &quot;your a science denier!&quot;. At the end of the day, there are two &#x27;types&#x27; of science, one where I can take the results and make accurate predictions, and one where I can&#x27;t. The later just amounts to &#x27;our best guess&#x27; where the accuracy is entirely unknown. If we want the general populous to &#x27;trust science&#x27;, we need to stop calling the later science. In short, if you can&#x27;t repeat and predict, stop calling it science.