New JFK assassination revelation could upend the lone gunman theory
The problem with conversations about this topic and similar topics (9&#x2F;11) is that almost no-one who cares about the topic deeply enough to have an argument about it online is interested because they&#x27;re just super into ballistics and forensics and don&#x27;t care about the political implications.  It&#x27;s all motivated reasoning because they don&#x27;t like the _implications_ of the official story for whatever reason (or, alternatively, the conspiratorial reading), or they&#x27;re selling something to the people who don&#x27;t like the official story (or the conspiracy).<p>You think you&#x27;re having an argument with someone about the facts and what you&#x27;re actually doing is having a conversation with someone who is deeply invested in defending their _entire world view_ which means they just can&#x27;t accept whatever argument you&#x27;re trying to make.  You can go after each argument they make and dispense with them in turn, and they&#x27;ll continue to invent new ones -- for decades if they have to.  It&#x27;s like trying to argue with a christian fundamentalist about the logical impossibilities of noah&#x27;s ark.  And it really doesn&#x27;t matter _who is right_.  Nobody is going to be arguing in good faith about it.  Probably if you&#x27;re about to comment on this post, you&#x27;ve got some motivated reasoning behind it that has nothing to do with finding out what really happened.