Indiana Supreme Court Rules That Police Can’t Force User to Unlock Her Phone
&gt; In the case, Seo v. State, the court found that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination protected a woman against unlocking her phone because complying with the order was a form of “testimony” under the Fifth Amendment.<p>The ruling:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;law.justia.com&#x2F;cases&#x2F;indiana&#x2F;supreme-court&#x2F;2020&#x2F;18s-cr-595.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;law.justia.com&#x2F;cases&#x2F;indiana&#x2F;supreme-court&#x2F;2020&#x2F;18s-...</a><p>Original title was too long. It was:<p>Indiana Supreme Court Rules that Police Can’t Force Smartphone User to Unlock Her Phone