The Worst CPUs Ever Made (2021)
This doesn&#x27;t seem to be the best-researched article out there.<p>If they thought Itanium was bad, they should have looked into the i860. Itanium was an attempt to fix a bunch of the i860 ideas. i860 quickly went from a supercomputer chip to a cheap DSP alternative (where it had at least the hope of hitting more than 10% of its theoretical performance).<p>Intel iAPX 432 was preached as the second coming back in the 80s, but failed spectacularly. The i960 was take 2 and their joint venture called BiiN also shuttered. Maybe Rekursiv would be worthy of a mention here too.<p>We now know that core 2 dropped all kinds of safety features resulting in the Meltdown vulnerabilities. It also partially explains why AMD couldn&#x27;t keep up as these shortcuts gave a big advantage (though security papers at the time predicted that meltdown-style attacks existed due to the changes).<p>Rather than an &quot;honorable mention&quot;, the Cell processor should have easily topped the list of designs they mentioned. It was terrible in the PS3 (with few games if any able to make full use of it) and it was terrible in the couple supercomputers that got stuck with it.<p>I&#x27;d also note that Bulldozer is also maligned more than it should be. There&#x27;s a lot to like about the concept of CMT and for the price, they weren&#x27;t the worst. I&#x27;d even go so far as to say that if AMD wasn&#x27;t so starved for R&amp;D money during that period, they may have been able to make it work. ARM&#x27;s latest A510 shares more than a few similarities. A big&#x2F;little or big&#x2F;little&#x2F;little CMT architecture seems like a very interesting approach to explore in the future.