Cruise
Knowing very little about the case, it&#x27;s hard to take a side without legal due process. Statistically, from other similar cases, there&#x27;s a good chance this Jeremy guy is probably full of shit. But this rubbed me the wrong way:<p>&gt; Still, it’s important to the way Silicon Valley works that such behavior not be tolerated.<p>You&#x27;re not above the law, nor should you have more say than any other resident in Silicon Valley (but by all means, vote in elections and write your congressman). If someone makes a legal claim, that&#x27;s up for the courts to decide. They have every right to make such a legal claim. And investors have the right to fire back publicly, sure.<p>But this attitude is now starting to make me think that there&#x27;s more to this:<p>&gt; Kyle made an extremely generous offer to settle this claim by offering to give Jeremy a lot of his own money.<p>Smart people don&#x27;t settle if a claim is baseless. Baseless claims get thrown out quickly and easily.<p>Edit: from another top-level comment,<p>&gt;To that point, the fourth cause of action is regarding &quot;Trade Secrets&quot; in the possession of the Defendant and states that &quot;Plaintiffs have reason to be concerned that Defendant may attempt to use such trade secrets in his further endeavors&quot;
Which does prompt a question of how a person who never had any involvement in the company and its technology came to be in possession of its trade secrets.<p>And now I already have some reasonable doubt that makes me want to think a bit harder.<p>To re-iterate, I still think this Jeremy guy is most likely full of crap. But I am not a big fan of the attitude and public shaming of YC here. What this tells me is as follows: if I have anything to do with a successful YC company in the future and I get involved in a legal claim that looks unfavorable, some popular top investor could write a blog post shaming me and ruining my reputation for other startups. Not professional if you ask me.