To grasp the extent of inequality, look at the relatively well-off
The points the article raises are completely moot.<p>&gt;Meanwhile, traditionally upper-middle class professions such as law, medicine and academia are threatened by automation, precarisation and increased competition in globalised labour markets.<p>Apart from this being the entire point of globalization, the attitude that an academic degree alone is a guarantee to a good income is one of insane privilege and entitlement. This is a take from someone that doesn&#x27;t like that his humanities degree is worthless in a globalized Meritocracy.<p>The New Zurich Newspaper had a very sobering article on how academia is loosing it&#x27;s last edge, that of gatekeeping higher paid jobs in a globalized economy. A degree used to be an effective showstopper for upwards mobility, because not many could afford one. This might be europe specific, but conditions for undergrads from the middle class were abhorrent up until the mid 80s here in europe.<p>The truth is that I don&#x27;t need an electrical engineer or a compsci graduate from some no name university to obtain someone with a specialized skill, if some kid from Shenzen can do it for a fraction of the price. That&#x27;s overstating it, but the comparison holds imo.<p>&gt; The children of high earners will increasingly see their position depend on, as Maren Toft and Sam Friedman put it, the “bank of mum and dad”, and on what they inherit, rather than only on their professional status.<p>Because of the environment created by their parent generation. They&#x27;re the ones pushing for ever more &quot;professionalization&quot; your honor! Where my parent&#x27;s could have gone into the field I want to get into without a degree at my age, I have to graduate in order to attain any respect.