DOJ plans to strike against encryption while the Techlash iron is hot
Why does this say that the DOJ has been pushing for this since 2016?<p>They have been pushing for some variation on this since basically forever.  I first became aware of it back under Clinton with the <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Clipper_chip" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Clipper_chip</a>.  And the debate has been essentially the same since.<p>Law enforcement wants to be able to break security, and promises that their super secret, super safe system will provide everyone else protection from evildoers while letting law enforcement find the bad guys.  Cryptographers have maintained that when you create a back door, it is a question of time until it is found and publicized.<p>And the back door doesn&#x27;t even have to be found to be abused.  Because it will be made available to law enforcement and the courts.  Which are surprisingly easy for third parties to subvert.  And which are happy to build programs for themselves that break the rules that they are supposed to follow.  (Snowden anyone?)<p>Success has gone to both sides.  But on the balance, the cryptographers have been right.