Tesla remotely converts battery pack, cutting 1/3 of range
So the way I&#x27;m reading the post is Tesla swapped out a battery pack for a 60 with a 90 and enabled the 90. Tesla, years later, discovers that even though the hardware for a 90 was installed it should have been software limited to be a 60. (I&#x27;m assuming that Tesla only made the owner pay the cost of the 60 battery swap even though they replaced it with a 90). They go and &quot;fix the glitch&quot; and set it back to the 60. Since the new owner bought it thinking it was a 90, because it was enabled to be a 90, presumably paid for it assuming this was the case and is now upset because they don&#x27;t have what they thought they bought.<p>Sounds like all around bad decisions. The previous owner shouldn&#x27;t have sold it as a 90 or at least disclosed that, &quot;It&#x27;s a 60 but Tesla swapped out the batter with a 90 and left it configured as a 90&quot;. Tesla, being notified, should have just enabled the 90 and made the customer happy. How exactly are people supposed to abuse this? Tesla put the 90 in there and they&#x27;re the only ones who are going to be doing that. Presumably this cost them a fortune to do it in the first place. Why not get some good will out of it? &quot;Hey sorry about your battery. We only had a 90 so we threw that in there. Enjoy. Tell everyone you know about how awesome Tesla was about fixing the problem and remember that next time you go to buy your next car&quot;