What's wrong with social science and how to fix it (2020)
We absolutely need to change the way we do social sciences. My favourite pet peeve in social sciences is idea laundering.<p>&quot;It’s analogous to money laundering. 
Here’s how it works: First, various academics have strong moral impulses about something. For example, they perceive negative attitudes about obesity in society, and they want to stop people from making the obese feel bad about their condition. In other words, they convince themselves that the clinical concept of obesity (a medical term) is merely a story we tell ourselves about fat (a descriptive term); it’s not true or false—in this particular case, it’s a story that exists within a social power dynamic that unjustly ascribes authority to medical knowledge.<p>Second, academics who share these sentiments start a peer-reviewed periodical such as Fat Studies—an actual academic journal. They organize Fat Studies like every other academic journal, with a board of directors, a codified submission process, special editions with guest editors, a pool of credentialed “experts” to vet submissions, and so on. The journal’s founders, allies and collaborators then publish articles in Fat Studies and “grow” their journal. Soon, other academics with similar beliefs submit papers, which are accepted or rejected. Ideas and moral impulses go in, knowledge comes out. Voilà!<p>Eventually, after activist scholars petition university libraries to carry the journal, making it financially viable for a large publisher like Taylor &amp; Francis, Fat Studies becomes established. Before long, there’s an extensive canon of academic work—ideas, prejudice, opinion and moral impulses—that has been laundered into “knowledge.” (source: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;idea-laundering-in-academia-11574634492" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;idea-laundering-in-academia-115...</a>)<p>I was one of the extreme &quot;trust the science&quot; people, until I joined a startup that worked with academia. The amount of pettiness, vindictiveness, cutthroat power games I have seen  surpassed even the most hardcore of startups.