This electrical transmission tower has a problem
This is definitely a failure on PG&amp;E&#x27;s part, but I&#x27;m still not sure how much sense it makes to assign them blame for this fire. The environment they&#x27;re operating in is somewhat ridiculous - the forest is so dry and overgrown that pretty much any flame source will start a fire large enough to burn a huge area; this specific tower failure is basically just the thing that revealed a much larger issue.<p>With proper engineering and maintenance, PG&amp;E could probably reduce the frequency of fires significantly, but there&#x27;s always going to be a non-zero risk of fire, both from power lines and other sources, and it seems basically inevitable that one of them would have started another fire at some point. If this failure hadn&#x27;t happened, and the same fire had happened a year later due to an &quot;excusable&quot; cause (like a tree falling on a line, or someone&#x27;s house catching on fire), would that outcome have been any better?<p>PG&amp;E does ultimately have some responsibility, due to the fact that they were the immediate cause, but it really seems like people want to blame PG&amp;E for the entire situation while avoiding the much harder truth: that this area will likely never be safe without significant policy changes (if ever).