Public Apology to Jeremy Howard
Am I reading this correctly?<p>It seems to say that Jeremy is still considered guilty of a CoC violation but if he appeals then the board will hear it (rather than the committee). So Jeremey has to file an appeal or the decision will stand? So the onus to fix this is on Jeremy who seems so exhausted by this whole process that he&#x27;s quit conference talks?<p>That seems a response that lacks any sense of empathy to Jeremy.<p>edit: Okay. On Twitter they said that no judgement was made even now. However their enforcement policy (which the apology explicitly references) only mentions appeal if an action was already decided upon &quot;Give them a place to appeal to if there is one, but in the meantime the action stands.&quot; Given that not adhering to their own process and written documents was a chief complaint it seems they haven&#x27;t learned much yet from the incident.