Shame on Y Combinator
Response to Sam Altman&#x27;s post:<p><i>A Trump presidency would be a disaster for the American economy.  He has no real plan to restore economic growth.</i><p>The truth is that no one knows for sure what will be best for the American economy for the next four years.  There are too many variables and too much unpredictability to know for certain what a Trump president would look like.<p><i>His racist, isolationist policies would divide our country, and American innovation would suffer.</i><p>This is a fallacy.  The country is already divided over immigration, and has been for a long time.  The prevalence of this kind of fallacious rhetoric from elites like Sam Altman is precisely why the nationalist faction chose Trump to lead them.  In order to counter this kind of deceptive propaganda, they needed someone willing to use equally powerful rhetoric in their favor.<p>Also, the claim that his policies are racist is simply not true.  They are not racist.<p><i>But the man himself is even more dangerous than his policies.  He&#x27;s erratic, abusive, and prone to fits of rage.</i><p>Sam cites no evidence and makes no argument to back up these exceptional claims.  I have been watching Trump for an entire year, and I have not observed any erratic or &quot;abusive&quot; behavior.  At least, nothing exceptional that wasn&#x27;t already directed at him.  Sure, he savaged his GOP rivals with name-calling and theatrics.  But they had already called him a clown, a sideshow, a circus.  So it&#x27;s OK to call Trump names but not OK to for him to respond in kind?<p>Trump supporters see this hypocrisy and understand that Trump is doing what he needs to do to win the election.<p><i>He represents a real threat to the safety of women, minorities, and immigrants, and I believe this reason alone more than disqualifies him to be president.  My godson’s father, who is Mexican by birth and fears being deported or worse, is who convinced me to spend a significant amount of time working on this election at the beginning of this year, when Trump still seemed like an unlikely possibility.</i><p>More blatantly fallacious reasoning.  Because a Mexican national fears deportation (why?), suddenly Trump is a threat to all women minorities and immigrants?<p>Ridiculous fallacy.  This is why Trump must use the rhetoric he does, because his opponents are so full of shit that they don&#x27;t even realize it.<p><i>Trump shows little respect for the Constitution, the Republic, or for human decency, and I fear for national security if he becomes our president.</i><p>I&#x27;ll grant that Trump shows little explicit respect for the Constitution.  But Hillary doesn&#x27;t either.  No one&#x27;s respecting the constitution because no one (Sam Altman) has been demanding it.  There&#x27;s nothing in the Constitution that guarantees immigration to anyone who wants it, which so far is the only issue he has identified that has not been a grossly biased representation.<p>Speaking of which, &quot;human decency.&quot;  Again, another extreme claim with absolutely NO argument or evidence to back it up.  Altman boldy claims that Trump shows little respect for human decency, and yet anyone who has actually watched Trump interact with his supporters all year long shows that he is overflwing with of decency.  People love him, he makes them feel good just to be around him.  Here Altman is appealing to popular prejudice about Trump, which has been reinforced repeatedly by others like him in his echo chamber.<p>It&#x27;s one thing to not waste time justifying claims for which the evidence is abundant and easily found.  But there&#x27;s no such evidence for these claims.  There&#x27;s a lot of other people saying similarly bad things that also have no evidence.  So there&#x27;s a clear reason why this perception exists.  But I see no real argument.<p>As for fearing for national security?  Again just another emotional appeal with no justification.  What about Hillary actively antagonizing Russia?  Speaking recklessly of no-fly zones over Syria, which our own Generals claim would mean going to war with Russia.  This fear just seems ignorant.<p><i>Though I don’t ascribe all positions of a politician to his or her supporters, I do not understand how one continues to support someone who brags about sexual assault, calls for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the US, or any number or other disqualifying statements.  I will continue to try to change both of their minds.</i><p>First thing: if Sam Altman wants to understand, then he needs to learn how to listen.  Trump never bragged about sexual assault, and to claim he did is a lie.  Everyone repeating this is also lying.  If you actually want to understand, the first thing you need to do is admit your interpretation of this is wrong.  If you can&#x27;t do that, you&#x27;ll never make any progress towards understanding.<p>As for a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the US?  Immigration is not a right.  There&#x27;s no amendment that says anyone anywhere has the right to come to this country.  We have the right (and some would say duty) to restrict entry to anyone for any reason.  The fact is that Muslims tend to hold very different values than Americans (Sam Altman might want to ask what Peter thinks about Muslim&#x27;s beliefs on homosexuality), and there there are Muslim organizations who have made an explicit goal of destroying Western European civilization through a combination of settlement, violence, and propaganda. You can&#x27;t say that about any other major religion in the world.<p>And so of all the &quot;basket of deplorables&quot;, that is the one I will admit to.  I am not racist, at least, no more than anyone can be in the US given the amount of race-baiting done by corporate media.  I am not sexist.  I&#x27;m not homophobic or anti-semitic.<p>But I am an Islamaphobe.  Islam scares me.  The religion itself scares me as does the activities of its leaders-- the so-called moderates as well as the extremists.  It scares me more than any other major religion in the world.  No other religion of significant size has the same combination of intolerance, subversiveness, violence, conquest, and hostility to those outside the faith.  I look at the character of Islamic civilization, and I know without a doubt that I do would not want to live under those values.  While I totally understand that it&#x27;s possible to interpret the Quran and Hadith in less violent and aggressive ways, and that most Muslims are just ordinary people who want to live happy and healthy lives, that&#x27;s not the trend in the world today.  There&#x27;s not a single Islamic country that I would want to live in.<p>You won&#x27;t see me harassing anyone or trying to deny American Muslims their 1st amendment rights.  It&#x27;s not hatred I feel.  I&#x27;ll never condone &quot;hate speech&quot; or &quot;hate crimes.&quot;  I do not fear ordinary Muslims, individually.  I am not even opposed to having a solid and stable minority of American Muslims in perpetuity.  But I most emphatically do not think we should be inviting substantial numbers of them into the country.  We are not prepared to assimilate them and once there are sufficient numbers of them in the country they will start agitating to impose their political will on everyone else, which is likely to include political violence.