I'm tired of this anti-Wayland horseshit
&gt; In the case of Wayland, the “vague authority” are a bunch of volunteers who have devoted tens of thousands of hours of their free time towards making free shit for you.<p>That does not mean anyone is under an obligation to like it.<p>&gt; Maybe Wayland doesn’t work for your precious use-case. More likely, it does work, and you swallowed some propaganda based on an assumption which might have been correct 7 years ago.<p>If you insist on disregarding people&#x27;s use cases, don&#x27;t be surprised they don&#x27;t like your software. I&#x27;ve been down this road a lot with FOSS software: &quot;I don&#x27;t use it because it doesn&#x27;t do what I need&quot;, &quot;sure it does!&quot;, &quot;no, it really doesn&#x27;t&quot;, &quot;well you don&#x27;t need that anyway!&quot;...<p>On the whole however, I can certainly understand the frustration at having to deal with a community that gets annoyed at anything that changes simply because they&#x27;re already so used to the garbage pile they have that they now hold the delusion that it&#x27;s actually not garbage.<p>In my admittedly somewhat distanced opinion, Wayland&#x27;s biggest mistakes were not launching with a coherent strategy for replicating functionality like screen sharing, screenshots, and to a lesser extent remote desktop&#x2F;applications. They just punted and said &quot;that&#x27;s a compositor problem!&quot; as though that was supposed to make it ok. People have thus harbored some inherent resentment ever since.