Get Rid of Equifax
This can be fixed by a small change to privacy liability law.  Current law requires litigants to show actual economic harm.  That is hard to do in cases of identity theft and privacy violations, which is why the OPM case was just dismissed [1].  If this was changed so that a privacy violation could be litigated, companies like Equifax would need to buy insurance against such actions.  Alternatively, there could be a new law that any company storing SSN-type data owed some nominal amount (say, $10) to the owner of that data if it is compromised for any reason.  Either way, companies that aggregate large amounts of such data would end up buying insurance.<p>No insurance company would sell such policies without due diligence -- they would establish security requirements and pen testing.  Consumers are protected by the existence of an actuarially fair insurance policy. not by the (nominal) compensation.  Note that Equifax&#x27;s customers are (primarily) not consumers.  Regulations (in the form of liability law reform or nominal compensation) may not be required in industries where companies only hold the data of their own customers, but such companies could cite their insurance policy to convince their customers that they take security seriously.  (Now it&#x27;s always empty words.)<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;powerpost&#x2F;wp&#x2F;2017&#x2F;09&#x2F;20&#x2F;federal-court-denies-cash-awards-to-22-million-opm-data-theft-victims&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;powerpost&#x2F;wp&#x2F;2017&#x2F;09&#x2F;20&#x2F;...</a>