Tor’s Branding Pivot Is Going to Get Someone Killed
From the article:<p>&gt; You propose running a Tor node or using Tor internally. Before, this was just something you could do. After Tor’s pivot, you now have to justify why the company should explicitly associate itself with banned HR activism and draw the government’s ire. Using Tor is now an additional mild liability for all of its non-HR users.<p>Using Tor already marks you as suspicious depending on who&#x27;s looking, regardless of why you use it. The ideals or mission statement of the Tor project don&#x27;t change this.<p>Tor suffers from the same impediment as the Bittorrent protocol; it is used a lot for illegal purposes, so a stigma of illegality surrounds the tool itself. By focusing on the legitimate use of Tor (e.g., as a human rights facilitating tool) the Tor project might actually improve adoption rather than frustrate it.