Climate change could pose 'existential threat' by 2050
Yes, but it could also be earlier. Call it conspiration or not, its only how i think about it.                                                                           All know what corruption is, and what it can cause. Some govs. know these facts earlier as well. Also the stateleaders had know that carbon outblast should be reduced years ago. But money was more important, than human health.                                                                                                                     Then they started with creating new fuels. Specially jet-fuels. Oil money = easy money. New technology has beeing supressed from big companys for decades. Think on ford and hemp.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Some are questioning about the IPCC, do they know that one of their heads, is an oil-friendly lobbyist? Do people realy know that geoengineering is an ongoing thing since the 70s? That there are international regulation rules from the WMO, how states should handle their climate.                                                                                                                                                                                                 While whole world is watching at boeing since 2 crashes,blaming it on outsourced program code from india. No one is taking a closer look at the jet-fuels, wich also can corrupt these sensors, and produce a wrong software reaction. Years before, boing had trouble with juels.                                And the biggst thing in my opinion, do researches and climate scientists realy know what chemicals are used and what reactions they realy cause when out in the air, or when NOT fully burned(engine-problem).<p>Big evidence that this is nearly impossible! There are materials you cant detect them with laser, cause they are only in traces in fuels, for example. Also they are not an object in climateobservation. Do people know how many diffrent chemicals, carbons, hydrocarbons, in these new experimental jet-fuels realy are? I quess, not. This boeing type was already in the air 2 years ago! Then it started crashing? So many planes fly 2 years long and this never happend before? They werent tested before?  There were selled more than exactly 500, who stay at ground now. Whats with the others? May they use another fuel? Someone know that NASA takes it to the MAX programm, startet jan 2018? Boeing was included in these experiments. NASA takes it to the MAX, with boing MAX. Also in germany. Its about experimental jet-fuels. What if one of these experiments is going wrong? Because of an unpredictable reaction. You rly think, they came up and say then: Hey folks we destroyed out atmosphere a little, but its only about the watervapour and the global watercircuit. Because the air is so thick now with these parafin and jetfuels, that water reacts now in a diffrent condition. But no stress were working on it. Now sucking carbon out from the air, is the next big thing. Even big oilcompanies started with. 
Good morning.                                                                                                                                       And whos gona be blamed? An indian software guy. All these other possible things, are faded out.                                                                               Because some big fuel-deals are running.                                                                                                                                             Tink about it.