Are real numbers really real?
Ok, I&#x27;m not a mathematician (or a physicist), but this seems... dubious... 
Like... what?:<p>&gt; Moreover, a better terminology for the so-called real numbers is &quot;random numbers&quot;, as their series of bits are truly random<p>0.5 is a real number. Its series of bits is not random at all. sqrt(2) is also a real number, and its digits looks sort-of random, but they&#x27;re not really: they&#x27;re exactly the sequence of digits that forms a number that, when squared, equals 2. You can easily develop very simple formulas or programs to generate them, so in a &quot;Kolmogorov complexity&quot; sense, it&#x27;s not random at all. Point is: the concept of &quot;having random digits&quot; is in NO way intrinsic to &quot;being a real number&quot;. I guess what he meant to say was &quot;non-computable numbers&quot;? So he&#x27;s saying &quot;in a finite volume, there can&#x27;t be non-computable numbers&quot;... or something?<p>Again: not a mathematician or a physicist, but this comes off as pretty crank:y to me. I would love to be corrected.