Big Time Public License
The general consensus is that AS IS isn&#x27;t enough to protect you against implied warranties, because - despite the language of the UCC - some courts are freaking idiots.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;casetext.com&#x2F;case&#x2F;gaylord-v-lawler-mobile-homes-inc" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;casetext.com&#x2F;case&#x2F;gaylord-v-lawler-mobile-homes-inc</a><p>Why did you choose not to disclaim the big four implied warranties that nearly all open source licenses disclaim?<p>Even BSD (the worst drafted license ever) explicitly disclaims two of the four (MIT and some forms of ISC get all three that realistically would apply to non-tangible property, and Apache 2.0 disclaims all four just to be safe). So it&#x27;s a bit of a head-scratcher why you&#x27;d draft a license that incurs that legal risk.