Court rules in Pornhub’s favor: Age-verification law violates First Amendment
The article reports the Texas law said &quot;pornography sites would have been forced to display a “Texas Health and Human Services Warning” in at least 14-point font — one such warning was specified to read, “Pornography increases the demand for prostitution, child exploitation, and child pornography”<p>I not sure I can believe all that. I do believe porm can be addictive for some folks because I knew a guy who had barrels full of hard core porn magazines at his metal fabrication shop in Hollywood when I was young teen in the 70s. He must&#x27;ve had 1000s of them.<p>I&#x27;m not at all convinced that it &quot;increases the demand for prostitution, child exploitation, and child pornography” though. With the few exceptions for prostitution all of that is already illegal in most places here in the U.S. and has been long before porn on the web became a thing, and &quot;child pornography&quot; has always been a crime.<p>I don&#x27;t think a &quot;warning&quot; like that on porn sites will change any of that at all. It&#x27;s nothing more than political bullshit.