Quantum Mechanics for Programmers
Hmm he seems to imply that MWI is the &quot;right&quot; interpretation, and that the measurement problem is solved. Most physicists would not agree. If you follow the link to his MWI description, there&#x27;s this gem:<p>&gt; But fortunately, I knew computer science, which most physicists do not know, with the Church-Turing thesis, which roughly states that anything physical can be simulated by a computer.<p>But that is not what the Church-Turing thesis says. A Turing machine cannot mimic a truly random physical process, pretty much by definition.<p>And then:<p>&gt; This means that observers can be simulated by a computer.<p>Except that nobody really understands what kinds of physical interactions qualify as measurements -- or even if that is the right framework to use at all.