Dsxyliea
This reminds me of the meme that went around a few years ago (dear god, 2003!?), claiming that Cambridge researchers showed that you had no trouble reading scrambled word text:<p><pre><code>  &quot;Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn&#x27;t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.&quot;
</code></pre>
Of course, it later circulated that you could absolutely make hard-to-read scrambled text, it really depended what words and how scrambled.<p>Anyhow, because the Internet is magic, an <i>actual</i> researcher from Cambridge has since posted a more thorough examination of the phenomenon, with counter-examples and proper citation:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk&#x2F;people&#x2F;matt.davis&#x2F;cmabridge&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk&#x2F;people&#x2F;matt.davis&#x2F;cmabridge&#x2F;</a>