Scientist Who Discredited Meat Guidelines Didn’t Report Past Food Industry Ties
If there is any information domain were it’s harder to figure out the real truth than current US politics, it’s “nutrition science”.  As someone who actually tries to invest the time to check on sources and methods beyond the clickbait headlines, it’s really a mess.  Poor scientific methods (observational studies), cherry-picking data to match a bias (Ancel Keys), conflicts of interest all over the place, etc.  At a very macro level it seems like a few things are true:  (a) 300,000 years of human evolution eating meat; (b) per-capita leveling off or even a drop in consumption of red meat, that didn’t stem the huge spikes in disease; and (c) being told to swap out good fats (meat, eggs, dairy) for industrial seed oils and ‘fat-free’ cookies to make up the calories, leading to an explosion of diabetes.<p>Fallacious arguments abound for the carnivore group all the way over to the militant vegans who would want to tax or outlaw meat eating altogether, while telling us to shut up and eat our processed patty of canola oil and isolated pea protein.  For now, I’ll keep eating like my grandparents ate - you know, real food.