Show HN: Slow Social, a social network built for friends, not influencers
As other people have mentioned but I think not quite nailed perfectly, restrictions on behavior aren&#x27;t quite the right solution to the problems that plague social media. Some people think that the right move is to eliminate engagement optimization algorithms, and I think that&#x27;s not quite exactly right either.<p>IMO the right solution is personal executive autonomy over content presentation and algorithmic optimization. By which I mean, I want to be able to make an &quot;executive&quot; choice over what kind of experience I want to have on a social platform. By &quot;executive&quot; I mean, I want to be able to make that choice explicitly, not implicitly by my behavior. For instance, an implicit choice is walking by a beautiful chocolate cake and being unable to resist eating it. An explicit choice is being able to architect my environment in advance, such that there are no beautiful chocolate cakes to tempt me.<p>The biggest problem with social media right now is that the incentives of the existing platforms do not allow people to make these choices explicitly. They do not allow us to craft our information environment using our higher order executive functions, they force us to do it using our reptillian brains, one moment at a time. Essentially, they force us to choose: either you get none of what social media has to offer, or you take every aspect of it, whether you like it or not.<p>Being able to explicitly say &quot;for the next hour I want to be fed thirst traps and rage bait, but then I want that turned off&quot; would be an amazing feature. People have a right to that kind of content if they want it. But they equally have a right to engage their higher cognitive functions and choose not to be expose to it if they don&#x27;t want it, or choose to be able to architect the manner in which they are exposed to it.