Everyone seems to forget why GNOME and GNOME 3 and Unity happened
I think that MS here is being used as a convenient scapegoat. This worry was never expressed at the time in significant terms. The FAT and SMB patents were much more of a worry than anything related to the desktop interface - only outright clones were being pursued.<p>At the time, KDE, GNOME and Ubuntu developers alike, were simply drunk on popularity. Linux usage was in ascendancy, money was being thrown around, and the FOSS world was starting to attract young designers who saw it as a cheap way to build professional credibility. And then the iPhone happened and the whole UX world just went apeshit. The core teams really thought they had a shot at redesigning how people interact with computers, &quot;like Apple did with phones&quot;. Interaction targets moved from keyboard+mouse to touch screens, because &quot;convergence&quot; and the fact that the mobile sector was suddenly awash with cash.<p>It&#x27;s sad that people try to justify their missteps in this way. Microsoft was (and is) a terrible company and a constant threat to the FOSS ecosystem, but defining some of the biggest design choices of the Linux desktop only in antagonistic or reflective terms does a real disservice to those projects and the people who worked in them.<p>If experience is the name we give our errors, refusing to accept errors were made means stating you&#x27;ve learnt nothing.