Royal Society cautions against censorship of scientific misinformation online
Just throwing my 2c into the well, as someone who used to be highly &quot;pro-science&quot; but lost confidence in much of academia and the validity of scientific research in general after starting a PhD and seeing how the sausage is made.<p>The biggest problem science is facing is not an external threat from a rabble of ignorant science deniers, but the complete degradation of quality within the scientific institutions themselves.<p>Most research is flawed or useless, but published anyway because it&#x27;s expedient for the authors to do so.  Plenty of useful or interesting angles are not investigated at all because doing so would risk invalidating the expert status of the incumbents.  Of the science that is communicated to the public (much of which is complete horseshit), the scientists themselves are often complicit in the misrepresentation of their own research as it means more of those sweet, sweet grants.  The net result is the polished turd that is scientific research in the 21st century.<p>&quot;Educated&quot; people can say what they want about how important it is to believe in the science and have faith in our researchers and the institutions they work for.<p>The fact remains that if one were to assume that every single scientific discovery of the last 25 years was complete bullshit, they&#x27;d be right more often than they were wrong.