Superintelligence Cannot Be Contained: Lessons from Computability Theory
There is nothing here that applies particularly to intelligence. A universal Turing machine that &quot;contains all Turing machines&quot; already exists; it&#x27;s called a computer. So yes, computers cannot be &quot;contained,&quot; but what does it have to do with intelligence? Even their definition is merely the definition of a general-purpose computer attached to some sensors and actuators:<p>&gt; A superintelligent machine is a programmable machine with a program R, that receives input D from the external world (the state of the world), and is able to act on the external world as a function of the output of its program R(D). The program in this machine must be able to simulate the behavior of a universal Turing machine.<p>There is <i>nothing</i> in the paper that distinguishes between a &quot;superintelligent machine&quot; and my laptop.<p>What has always fascinated me in discussions about the safety and power of artificial intelligence (or &quot;strong&quot; AI as it has unfortunately come to be called [1]) is that the people who are obsessed with the problem are those who like to believe that intelligence carries much more power than the evidence suggests. Over the history of all the intelligent species we know, much more power has been yielded by unintelligent beings (microorganisms and even insects); even the presence agency does not seem to play a role in the potential for harm. Within human society itself, other traits, such as charisma, seem to be correlated with power, and especially harm, much more than intelligence.<p>I think that the reason a certain group of people chooses to focus particularly on the dangers of intelligence [2] have a power fantasy about intelligence because they believe it to be their own extraordinary trait.<p>[1]: Not to be confused with the proven dangers of statistical inference methods that are sometimes called AI these days.<p>[2]: We have no idea what &quot;superintelligence&quot; is, whether or not it could exist (that question is separate from the question of whether human-level intelligence could be achieved in a mechanical computer, to which the answer is most likely yes), what it could do that mere &quot;ordinary&quot; intelligence could not, or even if the term can be meaningfully defined at all.