California votes to ban new gas car sales by 2035
A car requires about as much, or even more CO2 for its manufacturing, than a lifetime of driving. And EV manufacturing uses 40% more CO2 than ICE cars [0]. Naturally, that difference comes from the batteries and the extra weight needed to accommodate them. Batteries are dense and heavy, carbon intensive in mining and manufacturing.  
In addition, batteries are also ecologically harmful at every stage of their lifecycle.<p>So, EV cars take a long time before CO2 savings are seen, and they may not be seen at all. Accounting for the current mix of clean Vs dirty energy in our electricity supply, nations would need to invest many $trillions in building a clean energy network, before EV cars become a net negative CO2 force. But that would also require intense mining and manufacturing, which, if not revolutionised, first, will necessarily cause a dramatic surge in CO2 production. There is no way around this problem, except to clean up manufacturing and supply chain, first.<p>Selling people EVs is trying to solve the problem from the wrong end. But it perpetuates the myth that CO2 levels, and&#x2F;or climate change are a simple function of consumer choice.<p>[0] &quot;The emissions from Materials production and refining of the ICE are roughly 40 per cent less than for the BEV&quot;  <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.volvocars.com&#x2F;images&#x2F;v&#x2F;-&#x2F;media&#x2F;project&#x2F;contentplatform&#x2F;data&#x2F;media&#x2F;my23&#x2F;xc40-electric-light&#x2F;volvo-cars-LCA-report-xc40.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.volvocars.com&#x2F;images&#x2F;v&#x2F;-&#x2F;media&#x2F;project&#x2F;contentpl...</a>