Obama at SXSW: ‘Absolutist view’ on digital privacy cannot prevail
There was another discussion about this which dropped off the front page [1]<p>I am not as bothered by Obama&#x27;s conclusions as I am bothered by the errors in his supporting facts.  These are going to contribute to the mis-education of portions of the American public.  Here is his full keynote which I think we all should watch [2]<p>One year ago President Obama held nearly the opposite view. He spoke with President Xi in China about legislation Beijing was considering that would similarly handcuff tech companies [3]. He criticized Xi for this and pointed out that it would damage their economy.<p>I don&#x27;t know whether Obama continues to hold the view that mandating backdoors would damage a country&#x27;s economy or not. Perhaps he does think it will hurt our economy but is worth the cost. Perhaps he thinks it is better for our security too. Of course he is wrong.<p>I am baffled that nobody, to date, has been able to explain the entirety of the issues we must balance to maintain public safety and security to our President. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was able to achieve that understanding [4]<p>Shouldn&#x27;t the President have access to the best minds in technology? It&#x27;s not as if any of us would refuse his phone call. Note I don&#x27;t claim to be a best mind but I think I can talk through the issue to present understanding of the full tech side of the picture to a layperson, and at the same time be respectful of the challenges faced by the DOJ when trying to give justice to victims and security to the public. I think all of you on HN can, too.<p>Fortunately, some Congressmen are well-informed.  They realize Apple is not simply being disobedient here.  Lindsey Graham changed his mind [4] and Mike Lee made great points too [5] in an oversight hearing this week. Dianne Feinstein is of course still clueless [6].  Other personalities have also changed their views when presented with facts.  Sam Harris was initially very outspoken against strong encryption [10], but then changed his mind after reading responses to his initial video [11].<p>On balance, putting backdoors on encrypted devices is not the right way to maintain security. For Obama&#x27;s understanding, I&#x27;ll concede one circumstance under which I feel we ought to help unlock an iPhone.<p>In the incredibly movie-like scenario where the location of a nuclear weapon is hidden on an encrypted iPhone, then we should sick all our computers on decrypting that phone. I believe this is already done by the NSA program, Bullrun, revealed by Snowden.<p>Obama thinks he has technological advisors but he doesn&#x27;t.  Around 12:00 in the full keynote [2], he starts to talk about how he has coordinated with technologists to form a special task force that solve persistent technological issues the government faces.  I think that is a good start.  But he is still missing someone or some group who he trusts to act in an advisory role to him about technology and, in particular, encryption.  In fact, in this part of the keynote, he&#x27;s trying to appeal to technologists, but he&#x27;s still treating them as a mere tool to bring about his goals.  He says &quot;We want to create a pipeline where there&#x27;s a continuous flow of talent that is helping to shape the government.&quot; [2a]  He says government propaganda is dangerous [2b], yet does not listen to the leagues of technologists who tell him backdoors are bad, or even himself from one year ago [3].  He is pursuing his own agenda and engaging in government propaganda that is unfactual, thus <i>doing the very thing he says he isn&#x27;t</i>.<p>I do believe that if Obama understood the facts about encryption then he would come to a different conclusion.  If he really understood the equation, and the factors we must balance to maintain public security, then he would not be asking tech companies to add backdoors to their devices.  However, at the moment he does not understand the technology, therefore he does not know the things we must balance, and therefore the result of his equation is wrong.  There&#x27;s an error in variables he&#x27;s established in his mind.  His calculation of the final result is reasonable given the facts he understands, but the calculation is based on mis-information.<p>Let&#x27;s inform each other and contact our representatives to make sure they are informed so that when the time does come to vote on this issue, we are all voting knowing that the debate is primarily about security vs. security [7] [8] [9], and not just security vs. privacy.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11270529" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11270529</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=wfsIZioIpdI" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=wfsIZioIpdI</a><p>[2a] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;wfsIZioIpdI?t=14m54s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;wfsIZioIpdI?t=14m54s</a><p>[2b] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;wfsIZioIpdI?t=16m15s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;wfsIZioIpdI?t=16m15s</a><p>[3] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;us-usa-obama-china-idUSKBN0LY2H520150302" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;us-usa-obama-china-idUSKBN0LY...</a><p>[4] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;uk4hYAwCdhU?t=1m44s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;uk4hYAwCdhU?t=1m44s</a><p>[5] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=XOZLEhTlr6E" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=XOZLEhTlr6E</a><p>[6] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.c-span.org&#x2F;video&#x2F;?406201-1&#x2F;attorney-general-loretta-lynch-testimony-justice-department-operations" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.c-span.org&#x2F;video&#x2F;?406201-1&#x2F;attorney-general-loret...</a> (seek to 51:00)<p>[7] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;g1GgnbN9oNw?t=3h35m52s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;g1GgnbN9oNw?t=3h35m52s</a><p>[8] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;g1GgnbN9oNw?t=3h11m46s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;g1GgnbN9oNw?t=3h11m46s</a><p>[9] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;g1GgnbN9oNw?t=3h19m39s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;g1GgnbN9oNw?t=3h19m39s</a><p>[10] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;ZQAmlVFjJ9k" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;ZQAmlVFjJ9k</a><p>[11] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;9HK4IBscfMQ?t=4m50s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;9HK4IBscfMQ?t=4m50s</a>