Inaccurate chart led to unwarranted fears of 5G wireless technology
The reason that this is absurd is that there&#x27;s this popular notion that 5G is fundamentally new technology. The reality is that it is literally just radio. You know, like &quot;the wireless&quot; from 1905, which is the same fundamental thing as 4G, 3G, 2G, LTE, Analog, WiFi, radar, satellite, and a bazillion other things that have repeatedly and conclusively been shown to not cause harm at typical power levels. Sure, a kilowatt microwave emitter will literally cook you, but yeah... so will a gas fire! Don&#x27;t put your hand in the fire you idiot and you&#x27;ll be fine. Get a grip.<p>Meanwhile there&#x27;s people frothing at the mouth and endlessly repeating &quot;We just don&#x27;t know! It could be dangerous!&quot; is equally daft. A little-known German scientist called Einstein won a Nobel prize back in 1921 for showing that wavelengths longer than a certain cut-off (typically in the UV light range) simply do not cause ionisation, irrespective of power levels. Radio simply cannot give you cancer. It&#x27;s been proven. We understand the physics. It&#x27;s been tested to death.<p>Stop. Saying. We. Don&#x27;t. know. It&#x27;s YOU that doesn&#x27;t know, because you&#x27;re apparently blithely unaware of the last century of human progress. Catch up to the rest of us.<p>Meanwhile the real risk of cell phones is idiots texting and driving. That KILLS and MAIMS people. I bet 90% of the people arguing against 5G technology have done that at least a few times...