One woman's struggle to remove all traces of videotaped sexual assault
What a nice manipulative article perfectly targeted at clueless general public.<p>So the criminal was her husband, the video was reposted by random users or just bots (probably not illegal, but can start a long talk about personal moral obligations), and the blame is on… Pornhub (because all other porn sites are supposedly very noble). First, because it is silently implied that all good websites should collect and check the official IDs of all good citizens uploading any data to them (what a great perspective), and, second, because it had The Download Button (this lame Don&#x27;t-Copy-That-Floppy point gets stressed in most of the articles in anti-Pornhub campaign — bravo, incorruptible journalists). But what is the alternative? Of course, it&#x27;s good old trusted porn studios that have all the papers to prove that women (and men) pretending to have sex on camera and even destroying the functions of their body parts have legal contract. Hooray!<p>It is amusing how porn industry leveraged anti-porn, women&#x27;s rights, and other groups to kill the competition from amateur and no-name internet content. It is clear that Pornhub owners understood that they can not refuse the offer, and the goal was reached: now Porn Site #1 is mostly a shop-front for big porn studios (and you can be sure they get their share of those horrible, horrible ad revenue money).