Big News for ZFS on Linux
Last I joined in on the discussion I got quite convinced by the argument &quot;if Nvidia can use a propietary license for their Linux graphics driver, then Canonical can use the CDDL for their ZFS driver&quot;. Substitute for any other propietary modules that people like to load in their Linux kernels.<p>Can anyone point me out why this argument is wrong? Googling around for this I was actually suprised that propietary kernel modules <i>are</i> in fact a debated topic (obviously to little success of the opponents), but doesn&#x27;t the practical existence of propietary kernel modules at least show that no-one has had a problem with this for a long time, legally speaking?