How did so much of the media get the Steele dossier so wrong?
I don’t think this is an indictment of the media at all.   I never saw this material discussed anywhere except in the middle of a forest of qualifications about it being “unconfirmed” or “unproven.”  That’s the right way to cover it.  No one reading those stories had any business thinking these allegations were proven.  I doubt many did.<p>It’s also intrinsically a lot harder for <i>any</i> US news organization to investigate these allegations (which concern private events in Russia!) than it is for them to investigate Gary Hart’s infidelity.<p>It seems like the appropriate way to handle potentially significant but extremely difficult or impossible to verify allegations is to note that they are unverified.<p>I suspect this isn’t going to be a popular opinion here bc people love to crap on “the media,” but imperfect as they are they are the best and frequently only source for important information as it is happening in real time.