NYTimes Peru N-Word: My side of the story, in four parts
I&#x27;ll admit, I didn&#x27;t read all four articles. I got about half way through the first one and was just wondering &quot;I still have no idea what this is all about.&quot; Fortunately, the Wikipedia article on the author has a brief summary.<p>In particular, I thought this quote from the Wikipedia article really summarizes the differences between older and younger generations: &quot;there is a profound difference between using a racial epithet in the course of a discussion about that racial epithet&#x27;s use, and using a racial epithet to diminish or to wound someone.&quot;<p>For &quot;socially conscious&quot; people in my generation (Gen X), I think nearly all of us would find calling someone a racial epithet abhorrent. At the same time, while I understand culture has shifted and I wouldn&#x27;t do it now, I still find it quite bizarre that <i>the mere utterance</i> of the epithet, even in a sentence like &quot;You should never call someone a &lt;racial epithet&gt; because that is extremely offensive&quot; is considered itself racist by younger people.<p>I recall hearing about a young popular YouTuber about a year or so ago who was accused of being racist simply for singing along to the lyrics of a popular rap song. Even more strange to me was that his defense (which was true if one looked up his Instagram video) was that he did NOT utter said epithet, in that he was singing along with the lyrics but when it got to that word he just skipped it and didn&#x27;t say it.<p>I understand culture changes, but it still bothers me that we&#x27;ve gotten to the point where we completely disregard intent and focus instead just on the syntax of what was said. To be clear, I&#x27;m not sure if that&#x27;s indeed what occurred in Mr. McNeil&#x27;s case, but I certainly have seen it in other examples.