Seattle's Uber union law set to go into effect
Move the goalposts much?<p>I&#x27;m discussing the underlying problem <i>why</i> the union formed you are still attacking the fundamental existence of unions.<p>As I stated<p><pre><code>   Unions are a bandage on a gaping wound,
   yes you can say the bandage isn&#x27;t doing the best job. 
   But why do you have the gaping wound to start with?
</code></pre>
You say<p><pre><code>   That they&#x27;re disenfranchising some of their own members should be a big red flag.
</code></pre>
Okay but that doesn&#x27;t disagree with my core point.<p>Unions aren&#x27;t a solution to the underlying problem. I agree with you.<p>Why are you still attacking a <i>temporary solution</i> to a <i>much larger</i> problem? Do you just hate unions that much?<p>:.:.:<p><pre><code>    Whatever the historical reasons for power structures, 
    once enacted they tend to serve their own ends.
</code></pre>
Power Structures are a spook! - Avar and Max Stirner<p><pre><code>    That they&#x27;re disenfranchising some of their own members
   should be a big red flag.
</code></pre>
Enforcement of a power structure is disenfranchisement?<p>Every single organization in modern society experiences this. Either you truly are on some next level Max Strirner individualism or you don&#x27;t really realize what you insinuating (which is every single human organization is a fundamental oppression again humanity, this is what Strirner wrote about).