Trolls will be jailed for ‘psychological harm’
A society where:<p>- you are held responsible for other people&#x27;s feelings, and for their feelings as a result of your words and actions, and:<p>- anything that causes anyone to feel bad, is looked down upon by the collective<p>Is tyranny by the emotionally stunted.<p>The fundamental problem with it, is it makes society more enmeshed (a pathological relationship dynamic). People start caring more about going with the grain, the mainstream opinion, and rejecting the troublemakers, because they don&#x27;t want to be cast out too; and they self-censor more. Humans are beautiful in their diversity, their wildness, and their distrust of authority, and there&#x27;s been a definite attempt to domesticate people on all fronts (funny, there was a discussion here days ago about domesticated animals having 15-35% smaller brains). Societal cohesion is the Borg, not a utopia. And I just watched Demolition Man yesterday (fantastic movie), this immediately reminds me of the &quot;verbal morality fines&quot; they hand out.<p>The most fundamental piece of <i>applicable</i> psychology is the idea that you are responsible for your own thoughts, feelings, and actions, period. You are responsible for making yourself happy, for asserting yourself, for setting any boundaries you choose. People on Twitter can just block, or mute, or turn off their DMs for people they don&#x27;t follow. What&#x27;s wrong with that? <i>Now</i> there&#x27;s a human right to use Twitter unhindered? They just spent the last decade telling us there wasn&#x27;t!<p>Besides it seems clear we&#x27;ve already swung far too far in the &quot;style over content&quot; direction. People hate on Nassim Taleb because he dares insult lobbyists and people he considers scientific frauds; would he be put in jail if he lived in the UK?<p>Big Tech is being used to engineer a new kind of society, and I don&#x27;t like it. It seems Web 3.0 is the only thing able to fight this dynamic.