On the growing, intentional uselessness of Google search results
I don&#x27;t understand this article, particularly this footnote:<p>&gt;OK, confession time: the article linked to in the fourth result – the one that says “no retina support […] Deluge” actually talks about another app’s lack of retina support on OS X, but just go with it!<p>That&#x27;s the result he&#x27;s using to say the results are worse, that that result should be higher, but says in the footnote that&#x27;s not even a result relevant to what he&#x27;s looking for. What am I missing? He&#x27;s saying the first results are worse, but they are better results. They return the actual app he&#x27;s looking for, where he could presumably find info on retina support, not some completely different app&#x27;s lack of retina. <i>All</i> of the links in the second screenshot are wildly irrelevant to what he&#x27;s looking for.