I Looked into 34 Top Real-World Blockchain Projects So You Don’t Have To
&gt; Money transfer use-cases would fall directly in the category of “crypto-only”. For as long as Bitcoin has existed, this has been touted as a great use-case — but it never really materialised.<p>So Stellar and MoneyGram are not <i>&#x27;Money Transfer Use Cases&#x27;</i>? [0] If not, why did they partner on this in the first place if they didn&#x27;t think this was a possible or a feasible use case?<p>On NFTs, Blockchain domains like ENS (Ethereum Name Service [1], Handshake [2], etc) are the only valid NFTs that have a use case. Seem to work fine for Namecheap [3], Encirca [4], etc, with millions of these domains registered so far. Once again, 90% of all NFTs, including the JPEG ones will die with the remaining 10% still surviving including blockchain domains.<p>But yes as always, the extreme anti-crypto boosters like ghuntley will do anything to boost the most ridiculous of posts. Including this one.<p>Oh dear.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.prnewswire.com&#x2F;news-releases&#x2F;moneygram-launches-pioneering-global-crypto-to-cash-service-on-the-stellar-network-301565815.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.prnewswire.com&#x2F;news-releases&#x2F;moneygram-launches-...</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ens.domains" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ens.domains</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;handshake.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;handshake.org</a><p>[3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.namecheap.com&#x2F;domains&#x2F;handshake-domains&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.namecheap.com&#x2F;domains&#x2F;handshake-domains&#x2F;</a><p>[4] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.encirca.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.encirca.com&#x2F;</a>