Attorney General will ask Zuckerberg to halt plans for end-to-end encryption
The claim of catching 99% of activity is really hard to justify. In many detection systems you cannot know your true number of false negatives. It&#x27;s inherently unknowable in this case. A better metric would be mean time to detection for a given CEP sharer or perhaps a metric around how much CEP is shared before detection, or perhaps a metric for network size of CEP and how well FB can clean up an entire network at once.<p>This NYTimes article <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;interactive&#x2F;2019&#x2F;09&#x2F;28&#x2F;us&#x2F;child-sex-abuse.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;interactive&#x2F;2019&#x2F;09&#x2F;28&#x2F;us&#x2F;child-sex-...</a> is quite good. I don&#x27;t want to punish FB for doing a good job of detection by turning around clutching my pearls at them. Stamos tweeted that every hosting platform has these challenges and I believe him.<p>There has to be some nuance from the absolute privacy folks on this one. How do we balance the need to fight child abuse with privacy?