I'm betting on HTML
I had heard of almost none of these HTML elements, and that&#x27;s such a shame, because they could seriously help put the &quot;we need JavaScript for every gosh darn thing&quot; ecosystem to an end (or at least return JS to what it was originally meant to be: a way to add some flair, some interactivity, some whatever, but not necessarily a replacement for all of your markup and a full-DOM manager).<p>I&#x27;m starting to think my dream browser might be something like visurf <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sr.ht&#x2F;~sircmpwn&#x2F;visurf&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sr.ht&#x2F;~sircmpwn&#x2F;visurf&#x2F;</a> but with the underlying Netsurf engine updated to support various modern HTML+CSS, such as these elements. I bet you could have a nearly JS-free smolweb through that browser that:<p>1. is more accessible (in the &quot;doesn&#x27;t break screenreaders, system theming, keybinds, etc&quot; way)<p>2. could be made to use way fewer resources than these heavy JS contraptions these elements can replace<p>3. would still be able to do most things we expect the median web app of today to do (sure, fire up Firefox for WebGL or whatever still, but I could see, say, a Matrix client potentially needing only a smidge of JS (largely for WebSockets and E2EE stuff) over top of very-modern HTML)