The FBI 'is manufacturing terrorism cases' on a greater scale than ever before
This is inexcusable. In many of the mass shootings, there&#x27;s typically someone with mental issues, which you may not expect to properly differentiate between right and wrong.<p>The FBI is basically seeking these people out, handing them all the weapons and bombs and they need, and then say &quot;see that school over there? Go ahead and lay waste to it. Come on, you&#x27;ll feel good about it. We&#x27;ll even give you money to do it!&quot;<p>This is the danger of having unaccountable authorities that have a profound lack of respect for the rule of law and due process, and think they can do whatever they want to further whatever they think the &quot;mission&quot; is. Eventually <i>they</i> become the enemy of the people and instead of <i>improving</i> public safety, they actively work to undermine it.<p>If they are so worried about people with mental issues, they should be seeking them out to give them help, not arm them. You&#x27;d think that should be common sense. But when civil law enforcement becomes militarized, something like that is anything <i>but</i> common sense.<p><i>&gt; Karen Greenberg, for example — author of “Rogue Justice: The Making of the Security State” — believes that the “tension between security and liberty” that can result from these tactics is a good thing.<p>&gt; “The amount of money, time and resources that have been put into rethinking law enforcement since 9&#x2F;11 has made us safer,” she told Business Insider in an interview. “And now we’re sort of trying to figure out where the lines are.”</i><p>I&#x27;d like to see some evidence for that. How many mass shootings still happen in the U.S. every year? - &quot;But we don&#x27;t count <i>those</i> as terrorism!&quot; - Oh, okay. But you do when it&#x27;s the government itself that trains these people and encourages them to do these acts against itself?!