ChatGPT: Mayor starts legal bid over false bribery claim
I don&#x27;t know what to think here.<p>Australian defamation law is insanely bad.  And a lot of Australians are very lawsuit happy because of it.  So my knee-jerk response to any Australian filing a lawsuit is to roll my eyes.  Particularly if they are doing it against an entity which does not exist in Australia.<p>Furthermore US law has recognized how bad defamation law can be in other countries and therefore includes <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.law.cornell.edu&#x2F;uscode&#x2F;text&#x2F;28&#x2F;4102" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.law.cornell.edu&#x2F;uscode&#x2F;text&#x2F;28&#x2F;4102</a>.  Anyone with a judgment against someone in the USA has to prove to a US judge that the law they were judged on maintains the same protections for free speech that the USA does.  (The case that prompted it involved UK law, but it still applies here.)  Since very few places do, Americans can generally ignore defamation suits in other countries.  And this goes double for Australia.<p>BUT what he&#x27;s upset about is reasonable.  Search companies like Google have discovered that it is very important to modify search results in various countries based on court judgments, and OpenAI is going to find that the same is true for ChatGPT.  ChatGPT will get things like this wrong, everyone knows that, but there needs to be a way to tell it, &quot;Don&#x27;t get THIS one wrong.&quot;<p>I just wish it wasn&#x27;t an Australian who brought this kind of case first.  Though in retrospect, I should have expected it.