Fox News Is Sued by Election Technology Company for over $2.7B
And this right here is why so many people have been dead against voting machines. Even if you think you understand them, most voters can&#x27;t. Most voters have no idea what to look for to see signs of fraud.<p>Ballot papers are understood by everyone. Just about every voter knows when they&#x27;re seeing something happen with ballot papers that is suspect. Just about every voter knows when there really isn&#x27;t anything remotely credible about ballot papers marked and properly counted and scruitinised. It&#x27;s not perfect but it is so much better than litterally anything else it&#x27;s not comparable. Justice must not only be done it must be seen to be done.<p>Any and all voting machines &#x2F;must&#x2F; only ever be used to mark ballot papers that are filed in the usual way and can be counted in the usual way if there is any doubt whatsoever.<p>To hell with these election tech companies for doing anything else. Undermining the proper functioning of democracy for profit is something for which I will never, ever forgive them.<p>The whole point is <i>I</i> should be convinced, <i>everyone</i> should be convinced that the election was run and counted fairly when I loathe and hate the result. When I can&#x27;t understand how it could be true I should be utterly convinced that it is.<p>So here we are with baseless claims of election fraud and yet there&#x27;s some fertile ground to sew them where there should be NONE. Cheering these assholes for suing fox is just because I hate Murdoch is beneath me and should be beneath us all.<p>So here&#x27;s the question. Will America reform its electoral process to increase citizens confidence that the voting and counting is free of political and&#x2F;or corporate interests? Including gerrymanders and such or will the disease march on ever worsening to more and louder cries from all losers of &quot;We were robbed!&quot; See Neera Tanden&#x27;s &quot;Russia tampered with the election to make Hilary lose&quot; if you need examples for the whole &quot;both sides&quot; thing.