Monsanto Effort to Defund Cancer Researchers
This press article is <i>mostly</i> void of substance.<p>Yes, Monsanto do everything, even semi illegal things to defend it&#x27;s economical interests. 
I actually learned they hired fake journalists.<p>But nothing about the real issue: is glyphosate carcinogenic and if so, how much compared to very common carcinogenics.
By <i>far</i> most independent studies (listed on Wikipedia) conclude that glyphosate is not or is unlikely to be carcinogenic.
This is solid evidence of glyphosate being of little worry, especially when we have far more worrying carcinogens in our everyday life.<p><i>The FTI-written letter declared that glyphosate “does not cause cancer,” accused the IARC of peddling “bunk science,” and threatened a reassessment of the NIH budget to ensure that the agency is “committed to only funding organizations that produce information and conclusions based on sound science, robust processes, and credible methodology.”</i>
How solid scientifically are the IARC reviews? Nobody adress this real question.<p>Btw everybody talk about potential lives that Monsanto indirectly maybe killed. 
Monsanto is often considered as evil. 
But thanks to their scientific innovations, they <i>feed</i> the world.
It&#x27;s difficult to realize how many lives they have saved or improved, but they are probably on the top 10 list of most impactful entities for increasing well being and diminishing suffering.