A New Kind of Science: A 15-Year View
Can anyone who has actually read NKS comment on the value of its contents?<p>I&#x27;ve seen a lot of criticism[0], most concerning being the lack of mathematical rigor in the work[1]. Seems damning considering the author&#x27;s background in math.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;A_New_Kind_of_Science#Reception" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;A_New_Kind_of_Science#Receptio...</a>
[1]: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;crd-legacy.lbl.gov&#x2F;~dhbailey&#x2F;dhbpapers&#x2F;dhb-wolfram.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;crd-legacy.lbl.gov&#x2F;~dhbailey&#x2F;dhbpapers&#x2F;dhb-wolfram.pd...</a>