Twitter Suspends Prominent Alt-Right Accounts
I&#x27;m not a fan of the &quot;alt-right&quot; or a lot of its subculture. I also don&#x27;t find it particularly &quot;alt&quot;, as much as it is &quot;far&quot; right. It is a lot of the ideas that powered the NSDAP enveloped in the language of the Internet and memes, with the targets broadened from Jewry to non-whites in general. However, I&#x27;m also not a fan of suspending these accounts for controversial views if they are not harassing people on the Twitter platform with the Twitter platform; it is crossing into a murky area that feels remarkably like political censorship. I know Milo et al were calling to brigade&#x2F;raid users like Leslie Jones, and that&#x27;s crossing the line, and it&#x27;s clear he was banned for a reason.<p>But let&#x27;s scope this out for a second, neutrally: if the subculture is sharing information that is against the political status quo to its own adherents, and it is organizing for its beliefs, should it be censored because its belief is fundamentally unpopular, especially when it is so far maligned from the political views of Silicon Valley? If Twitter aims to be a neutral platform, dissent takes more forms than just those that we agree with. It&#x27;s being able to express, share, and debate those views that we can come to agreements on things.<p>The alt-right movement is in the crosshairs because a lot of people are still reeling from the election, myself included, and people are trying to find any and every excuse as to why Clinton didn&#x27;t wrap this one up like it seemed to be happening in the exit polls and on the coastal cities. The alt right is popular, full of rage, and more than a little scary to some of us, but I don&#x27;t think that means they should be instantly suppressed. Only hearing what politics are agreeable to you is how these types of movements rise in the first place.