Convicted Post Office workers have names cleared
Does anyone know how the courts rendered these verdicts?<p>Courts are <i>supposed</i> to be a level of protection.<p>If they can&#x27;t show motivation, point to actual dates and quantities of money stolen, a bank account or purchase it showed up in, all the usual standards of evidence to make an <i>actual criminal case</i>...<p>...how does this progress from an accusation to beyond reasonable doubt?<p>Software is buggy. Since when does a court accept the uncorroborated report of software, without <i>any</i> other corroborating evidence, and sentence someone?<p>This boggles my mind, and seems to go against fundamental legal principles.<p>Is this going to result in some sort of legal reform? The root cause here isn&#x27;t a software bug, it&#x27;s a legal system bug.