Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize
I was in a union (not by choice) the first ten years or so of my professional life.  To put it in simple terms: I despise them.  Yes, of course, they had reason to exist in the dark ages.  Today, I think they are in a range between counterproductive and dangerous.<p>Before anyone make a move for the jugular:  I make a distinction between union members and union management (the entity).  Union members are hard working folks, just like anyone else.  They want the best for their families.  That&#x27;s their driving force.  Nothing wrong with that at all.  We all want the same things.  Union management, on the other hand, well, I the tend to be between evil and criminal.<p>Today, US unions, in my opinion, destroy jobs.  And they have done this in massive numbers.  I still remember having a long conversation with a guy who retired from the printing industry.  He explained, in great detail, how the union that ruled his industry absolutely decimated it.  He lost his pension, benefits, etc.<p>The problem with US unions is that they exist to squeeze as much from companies as humanly possible.  One of the most egregious examples I have seen of this is what the UAW (United Auto Workers) contracts that made US auto companies have more than 10,000 employees getting paid full wages and benefits (about $130K&#x2F;year) to do nothing.  Non-US car companies don&#x27;t have this unbelievably destructive expense.<p>The effect of squeezing every possible drop out of a business is that you simply cannot be competitive over the long run.  The other side effect is that economics and competitive pressures will force you to move portions of your process offshore and automate as much as you possibly can.<p>So, yeah, union leaders likely gave themselves a huge pat in the back for pulling that one off.  And they made millions themselves (they get paid very well).  And yet, a the ground level, they destroyed jobs, damaged companies, likely caused people to have serious psychological problems and damaged the long term viability of jobs.<p>When a company had hundreds of millions of dollars in dead-weight over head for years and years, sooner or later, there will be consequences.  This is like fundamental laws of physics that cannot be violated.<p>In my little slice of the universe, as we are building a new manufacturing business, everything that can be automated will be so.  There is no way we can pay someone $15 per hour (EDIT: to put screws into holes).  If there was a way to do so and remain viable, I would have no problem with it.  The truth of the matter is, this wage is a job killer.  The US is already not competitive due to the huge cost of doing business here.  This makes it worse.<p>On top of that, the combination of the $15&#x2F;hr minimum wage, pandemic and other world issues has resulted in serious inflationary issues.  Which means that the people who got that $15&#x2F;hr wage (if they have a job at all), did not, in reality, get a raise at all.  So, all we&#x27;ve done by pushing this nonsense is increase costs and destroy jobs.<p>Brilliant.<p>I know they look at all of this in China and cannot believe the US seems intent on destroying itself from the inside.  I know because I also manufacture in China and talk to our suppliers all the time.  They always tell me about how they are getting new customers because the cost of doing business in the US increases year after year.<p>As I said.  Brilliant.<p>Sadly, people will not learn this lesson until things are bad enough to be obvious to nearly everyone.  To be fair, what I am saying above requires having a reasonable understanding of business and skin in the game.  Most people, the vast majority of people, go through life in complete ignorance of these realities.  And so it is to be expected that, when the time comes to make decisions (voting) they are easily swayed into making truly dumb choices from the perspective of those who do have context.