String Theory Does Not Win a Nobel, and I Win a Long Bet
FWIIW, Horgan is a well known science writer and author of a 1996 book called &quot;the end of science&quot; which pointed out that science in general and physics in particular has reached a point where there is no appreciable forward progress and is obsessed with non falsifiable woo like string theory. It&#x27;s a provocative book; and people have raised the issue that Kelvin said something similar 120 years ago, but it&#x27;s really worth reading.<p>He was 100% on the money that Noodle Theory was a lot of non-scientific mathematical baloney; a super unpopular position at the time (1996); pretty much the only prominent person in agreement with him was Nobel Prize Winner Phil Warren Anderson, who disagrees with him in many other respects. Ultimately many other writers came out in agreement on this issue at least; Woit and Smolin most notably, though others agreed. At this point I&#x27;m pretty sure even the physics establishment is a little nervous about hiring new noodle theorists. He&#x27;s basically right about stuff like &quot;complexity theory&quot; as well.<p>I had a couple buddies who were prominent string theorists; some involved in its inception. One in particular retired a very disappointed man.