No-code low-code companies show positive financial results
I am a non-technical founder.<p>I spent approx 18 months developing a B2B SaaS app involving 4-5 separate developers (2 individuals, and 3 separate devs at one agency). Post-launch we grew to about $13k MRR in 8 months.<p>We haven&#x27;t added any new features in 4+ months, we&#x27;ve been focused on stabilizing. I can say without a doubt, stability has impacted free to paid conversions, retention and word of mouth recommendations .<p>It&#x27;s unclear when we will ever be done stabilizing. As a non-tech founder it appears to me that little nuances across our tech stack are consuming 100% of our developers time (schema?). It also seems like devs spend a very significant percentage of their time re-inventing CRUD.<p>I&#x27;m launching another B2B SaaS, and going to use a Bubble.io and one of their recommended agencies.<p>Here is what I like:<p>- MVP cost of ~25k<p>- MVP launch time frame of 2-3 months<p>- Almost all of the Bubble agencies I&#x27;ve engaged seem a lot more process and systems oriented than sole developers and dev agency I&#x27;ve engaged with in the last 24+ months.<p>- Bubble provides a solid CRUD framework, so most of our time is not spent re-inventing CRUD and instead of core features.<p>Based on the goals of the MVP, it does not appear we have to make any trade offs to using Bubble in terms of functionality - Bubble can be extended w&#x2F; code &amp; easily integrates with 3rd party services, e.g. Stripe &amp; SendGrid.<p>Will check back in 12 months from today to let you know if the product was more successful than the previous one due to choosing a low code platform.