The Internet Relies on People Working for Free
Some other commenters in this thread have pointed out that nobody is forcing open source developers to work on the contributions that they make, and that is strictly speaking true. But in the culture of software development, there does seem to be an ambient message often repeated or hinted at, that it is good to &quot;give back&quot; to open source by contributing and that it is virtuous to do so.<p>I now am starting to rethink this sentiment because the vast majority of the benefit of open source contributions on github, be they to languages, runtimes, application frameworks, databases, etc, go towards increasing the bottom line of for-profit companies, not to developers. And the vast majority of the beneficiaries of open source will never support the project even when they are fortune 50 companies saving millions of dollars by using the work of one volunteer.<p>There is also the idea that contributing will be great for your career development. I have found that not to be the case at all, I think that no potential or current employer has ever given a rat&#x27;s ass about open source contributions, and do not consider that work as valuable when making hiring decisions. The work you are paid to do is the only thing anyone cares about. I&#x27;m not saying that that shouldn&#x27;t be the case, but just that that is the case.<p>Given then, that there&#x27;s very little upside to doing open source, and most&#x2F;all the benefits go to profit-making corporations, it is puzzling why do we even push for greater involvement in open source at all? It seems we shouldn&#x27;t be, we should be warning people who want to contribute to Open Source that they should probably spend their time doing their own studying and personal&#x2F;skill development which will allow them to succeed in the roles that they have with their current role or a role they&#x27;d like to obtain one day, for money.