Dalai Lama: Behind Our Anxiety, the Fear of Being Unneeded
There is a lot of discussion on HN (in this thread and in many others) about what we will do when technology replaces a significant fraction of our jobs.  People are talking about a 10%, 50%, or even 99% reduction in the workforce size due to technological advances (mostly AI).<p>I totally reject the conclusion that the workforce will be significantly reduced by any imminent technology.  Look at humans throughout history.  We have continuously invented ways to automate (or nearly automate) away the labor behind our needs and desires, but people have been working 40+ hour weeks since the industrial revolution.  It seems that our wants and needs advance as quickly, or even more quickly, than our ability to meet them with technology.<p>I think a good analogy (for this crowd) is personal computing.  Every year our computers get much faster, yet the overall &quot;speed&quot; of the experience remains about the same.  Why?  Because as soon as we get our hands on a new CPU we go and write a program that requires more CPU power, rather than simply watching our old programs run faster.  I don&#x27;t think there is anyone out there running Netscape on Windows XP on top of a brand new Intel Processor with 32GB of RAM.<p>I think we are being a combination of overconfident and unimaginative when we think we are on the brink of a technological utopia where DeepMind AI does our job for us.  We are unable to imagine the wants we will have in the future.  This is by definition, if we could imagine them we&#x27;d have already started working towards them!<p>I will present a concrete example, one that&#x27;s overused but still effective.  Consider the smartphone.  This is a device that is pocketable, affordable to ~50% of the world&#x27;s population, and can answer nearly any factual query in seconds.  I think if you had told someone in the 90s about that they would assume we&#x27;d have vastly more leisure time.  We&#x27;d have fired all the librarians, replaced the teachers with machines, and our children could complete 12 years of education at home in a fraction of the time.  But of course this is not what happened.  In fact we created <i></i>more<i></i> work for ourselves, I bet half the people in this thread are employed by a company that makes software for smartphones.  We didn&#x27;t know we&#x27;d want 100 apps and games on each phone, but now that we&#x27;re here we won&#x27;t easily give them up.<p>I don&#x27;t mean any of the above to sound negative.  This is a wonderful thing!  This infinite cycle of desire is what has driven us to this point and is what will drive us into the future.  But the one negative consequence (in my opinion) is that humans will not soon be a leisurely species.  We will keep busy, and we will keep inventing things to busy ourselves with.