Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech
There are legitimate criticism to blockchain technologies and arguments that could be made against its usefulness in the future.<p>However, one of the things that fuel my believe on blockchain is how many the arguments against it are falacies and&#x2F;or full of ignorance like this one.<p>&quot;Someone made the wrong assertion that git is blockchain IMPLIES THAT blockchain is going down and their adepts are desperate&quot; a very simple fallacy to realize to be honest, not worthy of hacker news.<p>Also ignorant things like: &quot;stumping up in a complicated, exclusionary, and non-existent proof-of-stake system its advocates claim is just around the corner every six months&quot;<p>1. It is not complicated, I understand it
 2. It is less exclusionary than proof of work
 3. It exists
 4. It launches next month (aprox 15th September) on Ethereum