Net neutrality is in jeopardy again
<i>Net neutrality is fundamental to free speech. Without net neutrality, big companies could censor your voice and make it harder to speak up online. Net neutrality has been called the “First Amendment of the Internet.”</i><p>Not just harder.  Infinitely more dangerous.  Probably the scariest implications for NN being gutted are those around loss of anonymity through the Internet. ISPs who are allowed to sell users&#x27; browsing history, data packets, personal info with zero legal implications --&gt; that anonymity suddenly comes with a price.  And anything that comes with a price can be sold.<p>A reporter&#x27;s sources must be able to be anonymous in many instances where release of information about corruption creates political instability, endangers the reporter, endangers the source, endangers the truth from being revealed. These &quot;rollbacks&quot; of regulations make it orders of magnitude easier for any entity in a corporation or organization to track down people who attempt to expose their illegal actions &#x2F; skirting of laws. Corporations have every incentive to suppress information that hurts their stock price.  Corrupt local officials governments have every incentive to suppress individuals who threaten their &quot;job security&quot;.  Corrupt PACs have every incentive to drown out that one tiny voice that speaks the truth.<p>A government that endorses suppression cannot promote safety, stability, or prosperity of its people.<p>EDIT:  Yes, I am also referring to the loss of Broadband Privacy rules as they have implications in the rollback of net neutrality: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theverge.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;3&#x2F;29&#x2F;15100620&#x2F;congress-fcc-isp-web-browsing-privacy-fire-sale" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theverge.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;3&#x2F;29&#x2F;15100620&#x2F;congress-fcc-isp...</a><p>Loss of broadband privacy:  Yes, your data can and will be sold<p>Loss of net neutrality:  How much of it and for how much?