Bloom filters debunked: Dispelling 30 Years of bad math with Coq
I feel like most commenters are missing the point. The fact that this issue was finally settled once and for all using a proof assistant is a huge achievement! That&#x27;s the highest degree of scrutiny that a proof can undergo. This is especially important given the high number of mistakes in prior work—one would be forgiven for distrusting new papers on this topic that <i>don&#x27;t</i> have machine-certified proofs. I can&#x27;t believe people think this is just clickbait. Do y&#x27;all not recognize the importance of math being...well...correct?