Harnessing telepathy using quantum mechanics
&gt; &quot;<i>The book implies human brains are able to communicate some degree of information through what today I suspect we refer to as quantum entanglement. Humans, as a species, potentially primarily communicated this way</i><p>Quantum Entanglement can&#x27;t be used for communication: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;Why-cant-quantum-entanglement-be-used-for-communication" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;Why-cant-quantum-entanglement-be-used-...</a><p>Not sure it&#x27;s needed as an explanation either; humans have good vision and mirror neurons and imaginations, such that we can read other people&#x27;s expressions, imagine what they&#x27;re feeling inside, empathically feel the same, without any need for telepathy - although it basically is telepathy in a sense; silent communication over long distance carried at light speed. Just not words.<p>&gt; &quot;<i>even citing a scientific study claiming to conclusively demonstrate telepathy.</i>&quot;<p>James Randi&#x27;s million dollar prize for demonstrating paranormal ability was never won. He did describe paranormal researchers being fooled and completely convinced by such tricks as a thin thread, or blowing on card to move them, later admitted by the test subjects.<p>&gt; &quot;<i>commonly represented by the feeling one gets if another person is watching them.</i>&quot;<p>I have a copy of Rupert Sheldrake&#x27;s &quot;The sense of being stared at&quot;, maybe I should get round to reading it one day.<p>&gt; &quot;<i>Im not implying these these are true, but it is interesting to see how they formed several arguments describing events today we have a more sophisticated understanding of.</i>&quot;<p>It&#x27;s easy to make an encryption system that you yourself cannot break, but can easily be broken. It&#x27;s easy to convince yourself that your view on a math problem is right, but a proof has to be not just convincing but irrefutable. Woo and the paranormal and medical quackery and so on have so many good stories, amazing ideas and awe-inspiring consequences, and great story tellers, they are rather similar, I think, and that science generally is the process of weeding out the irrefutable unarguable facts from the enticing stories.