What Is AGI-Hard
I hereby endorse ChatGPT as a limited form of AGI.  It can complete a variety of novel cognitive tasks (example: judging texts and proposals) often enough that it meets my personal requirements for this. My opinion is that the definitions which others believe disqualify ChatGPT from being considered AGI are not relevant, since they focus on things it fails at rather than what it can do. For example, when it tests as well as average human students, people focus on its mistakes rather than its achievements applying general forms of intelligence to succeed at that level. I&#x27;ve also personally interacted with it as an intelligent conversational partner with severe limitations.  It&#x27;s not that it can do everything, but that it does things that require what meets my personal definition of general intelligence often enough to qualify as limited AGI. You can have your own definition.  Maybe that means never dropping the ball.  Maybe that means getting 100% on tests.  It&#x27;s not my definition.  In my opinion, ChatGPT is a general form of intelligence, remarkably, able to generate novel opinions and judgments about all sorts of situations, as well as sometimes briefly appear to learn things.  Sure it has limitations, sure it isn&#x27;t human in its abilities, but it passes my tests often enough that I personally consider AGI a milestone humanity successfully passed with the release of ChatGPT on November 30, 2022.<p>As someone who personally uses ChatGPT&#x27;s general intelligence on a daily basis and has not encountered issues with its cognitive function that are serious enough to stop me from continuing to do so, I can confidently say that ChatGPT meets my definition of limited AGI.