Request: Re-open JPEG XL issue
As a photographer I am looking forward to it.<p>I process photos in ProPhoto RGB and I’m in the process of switching up my process to always publish images to the web as Display P3 which can be done just fine in JPEG and WEBP by attaching a color profile.<p>Display P3 is moderately larger than the old standard sRGB;  you are trading some color resolution in the “mainstream” area for more saturated greens and reds.<p>4K TV’s use Rec 2020 which has a huge color gamut,  because it is covering a bigger space,  8-bit color is not enough,  you need to go to 10-bit, 12-bit or more (I process in 16 bits) and neither JPEG or WEBP can handle that.  AVIF can,  but so can JPEG XL.<p>I know people doing synthetic tests (instead of looking at the image they run a program that estimates how bad compression artifacts are) are impressed with AVIF but I’ve done some shootouts with JPEG&#x2F;WEBP&#x2F;AVIF&#x2F;JPEG XL where I look at images with my own eyes.<p>For pictures that are moderate-low quality (say images for a blog) I think AVIF does very well,  but I want to publish pictures I took with my mirrorless where I work really hard to get them “tack sharp” (e.g. sometimes a 4000x6000 image w&#x2F; my Sony looks almost like pixel art when you blow it up) and I want people to see something consistent with that on the web.  And my experience is that AVIF falls down at that,  it does not really save bits compared to JPEG and WEBP at high quality.  JPEG XL gives superior compression at high quality <i>and</i> it supports high color depths and it’s an option I’d really like to have.