Wikipedia is not short on cash
Eh.  If you don&#x27;t want to donate, don&#x27;t, but I don&#x27;t quite get the outrage here.  The Wikimedia Foundation is still small as far as charities go and is visibly making Wikipedia better: the new UI is a breath of fresh air, and given the <i>insane</i> complexity of MediaWiki markup, the visual editor is a piece of unimaginable technical wizardry.  Wiktionary is an unheralded gem and even Wikidata is starting to be genuinely useful.<p>For what it&#x27;s worth, Charity Navigator gives them 4 out of 4 stars with a 98.33&#x2F;100 rating: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.charitynavigator.org&#x2F;ein&#x2F;200049703" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.charitynavigator.org&#x2F;ein&#x2F;200049703</a><p>Meanwhile eg the American Cancer Society gets 73&#x2F;100 and spends more on fundraising than WMF&#x27;s entire budget, so oncologists can snort blow off hookers in Vegas, but nobody cares.