Grover – A State-of-the-Art Defense Against Neural Fake News
Wow, the generator is amazing. Two out of three articles were beyond what I perceived was possible, beyond maybe GP2. Is there a browser extension that detects and warns about possible fake news this can be built into?<p>1.<p><pre><code>  seed: nytimes.com
  seed: AI will certainly be good
  seed: June 6, 2019 - Paul Krugman
  generated: ∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨ 
  Artificial intelligence – by definition, computer code – can provide
  more than a speed boost. Many researchers now believe that intelligence,
  better defined as capacity to learn, will be increasingly provided
  by machines. Autonomy, already on the march, has become even more
  central. Future programs will likely be as familiar as Adam Smith’s
  invisible hand.

  If true, such predictions open up fundamentally new possibilities
  for future development. We will be able to quickly develop services
  based on or even built around lots of self-learning software. We’ll
  be able to use AI-based services without physically owning the software.
  As sensors in buildings, cars, buildings and cities start recording
  our activities, we will be able to experience “smart cities” and
  “smart cities” the moment they materialize.
  
  This future, however, is not yet in the cards. The gains are probably
  years or even decades away. Even in the areas where AI might dominate,
  such as physical warehousing, improving automation has lagged behind
  improvements in other areas of business. And our thinking, though
  improving, is still far from sophisticated enough to take full
  advantage of AI.
  
  Also:
  
  Please take a moment to watch the full program of this interview.
  Every panelist will speak out in favor of AI.
</code></pre>
2.<p><pre><code>  seed: nytimes.com
  seed: Uncertainty around AI is overhyped
  seed: June 6, 2019 - Paul Krugman
  generated: ∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨
  There’s no denying that AI, in many ways, is in its infancy. It isn’t
  something that belongs on a refrigerator or wall clock; it’s a whole 
  new area of research and development. While it may be commonplace 
  within a few years, AI will likely be a long way off; if it even 
  becomes an important factor in the economy as a whole, well, 
  probably about a century from now.
  
  It’s also true that many worry about the potential for 
  superintelligent machines, who could threaten all sorts of things 
  from human liberty to national security. But that’s not the right 
  question to ask.
  
  There is no “right” or “wrong” answer here — nobody really knows 
  how AI will evolve. And there’s no “theory” (although there are 
  several, ranging from quantum theory to AI techniques employed 
  by biologists, and from genetics to postulates to mathematical 
  models) that will explain it. Neither are there explanations 
  for the values, levels or usefulness of AI models. So, what 
  we’re left with is sheer hard scientific uncertainty.
  
  But let’s say we do know a little. The odds of a superintelligent 
  agent that can become sentient, one that would harm other humans 
  or destroy our civilization, seem minuscule. If you think that 
  chance is small, and that AI is likely to be less likely to 
  cross that threshold than is real intelligence, then the effects 
  on your consciousness and your mental space and our experience 
  of it may seem inconsequential. And that’s no reason to spout 
  half-baked fear mongering.
</code></pre>
3.<p><pre><code>  seed: nytimes.com
  seed: AI Uncertainty is Exaggerated
  seed: June 6, 2019 - Paul Krugman
  generated: ∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨
  As noted, Donald Trump uses the expression “AI Doom” – in part because 
  he understands AI but mostly because he responds to the media’s reports 
  on AI, which Trump himself frequently repeats, frequently without 
  evidence.
  
  AI may have risks – as in the threats from robots and remotely piloted 
  aircraft – but most analysts who follow AI say it has such promise 
  that its damage to people’s security and quality of life is likely 
  to be contained. Indeed, the main ethical question with AI is what 
  to do when machines decide that killing their human masters is a 
  good idea.
  
  It’s easy to exaggerate AI’s immediate threat. The machine that 
  driverless cars are supposed to replace is still pretty active. 
  And if, as predicted, the development of AI renders it easier for 
  people to work, then it’s also likely to give them more jobs.
  
  The main threat with AI is what it could do to workers, although 
  the more automation, the more all sorts of jobs become easily 
  replaceable. But a small dose of AI is actually a very good thing.</code></pre>