Microsoft Full Circle
There is a really key quote towards the end of this piece that really captures the spirit of this post, and that&#x27;s from Satya Nadella. I&#x27;m including it in its entirety because I think it does a really good job at summarizing what Ben is writing about here:<p>&quot;Sometimes I think the new OS is not going to start from the hardware, because the classic OS definition, that Tanenbaum, one of the guys who wrote the book on Operating Systems that I read when I went to school was: “It does two things, it abstracts hardware, and it creates an app model”. Right now the abstraction of hardware has to start by abstracting all of the hardware in your life, so the notion that this is one device is interesting and important, it doesn’t mean the kernel that boots your device just goes away, it still exists, but the point of real relevance I think in our lives is “hey, what’s that abstraction of all the hardware in my life that I use?” – some of it is shared, some of it is personal. And then, what’s the app model for it? How do I write an experience that transcends all of that hardware? And that’s really what our pursuit of Microsoft 365 is all about.&quot;<p>The key part is &quot;abstracting all of the hardware in your life&quot;. I use a Windows laptop, a Mac laptop, and an iPhone interchangeably in my life. When I switch between them pretty much nothing changes - I have access to the same core apps: Office, Obsidian, 1Password, web browser. If there were a new device, say some kind of headset, I suspect that would plug right into my existing ecosystem of hardware and software. There needs to be an &quot;OS&quot; that manages all of that, and right now the frontrunner here is Microsoft. That could change of course, but there are <i>so</i> many interesting problems to solve along the way.<p>Disclosure: I work at Microsoft.