'Not of faculty quality': How Penn mistreated Katalin Karikó
My wife was hired last year as a full time professor and leads her own lab. By far the largest pressure on new faculty is the ability to get money into her lab, and by extension the university since they take a very hefty cut (50-100%! btw this doubles the &quot;cost&quot; of the grant, it doesn&#x27;t lessen the amount the professor gets). Getting approved for the money via the grant process means having published &quot;interesting&quot; research along avenues of inquiry that other folks find worth pursuing. Often times this means building on existing lines of research over pursuing new paths.<p>The hiring process is setup basically to filter for folks who they think are the most likely to publish lots of papers, collaborate to push existing lines of inquiry, write lots of hopefully approved grants, and grow a lab into what is effectively a &quot;successful small business&quot;. Quality is an after thought taken care of by what passes for peer review.<p>The incentives for everyone involved is just a complete and total mess. I&#x27;m reading tea leaves here, but my guess as to why she was never hired is that she was deemed &quot;unable to get grants&quot;. Had she been, then she would have found herself hired immediately somewhere because universities are incentivized to play a numbers game and get as many folks in writing grants as possible.