Designing Windows 95’s User Interface
It&#x27;s hard to remember, but even though Windows 3.11 was extremely dominant at the time, it was by no means assured that Windows 95 would be the success that it was. The very first version missed wildly in some big ways (MSN was a folder integrated into the desktop, for example, and no TCP&#x2F;IP support [*Edit: yes there was - I misremembered.]), but the core, underlying redesign of the GUI was so profoundly good it propelled Microsoft into a new level of ubiquity. Compare it to other GUIs at the time, like CDE, IBM&#x27;s Presentation Manager, or even Mac OS 8 and there&#x27;s no comparison. Windows 95 solidified Microsoft&#x27;s dominance, but could just as easily eroded it had they dropped the ball.<p>Even though I&#x27;ve used a Mac daily for the past decade or so, I still miss the task bar, and window-oriented GUI of Windows. I still get frustrated on OSX when I minimize a window and have to hunt around for it. I wouldn&#x27;t switch back because of the underlying crap that is the Windows OS and file system, but I still miss the interface.<p>Edit: Found this fantastic PDF &quot;Chicago Reviewers Guide&quot; which goes over all the new stuff in Win95. So much stuff I had forgotten - TrueType fonts, Plug and Play, registry settings, right-click properties, long file names... Basically everything that makes Windows what it is today.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;tech-insider.org&#x2F;windows&#x2F;research&#x2F;acrobat&#x2F;940601.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;tech-insider.org&#x2F;windows&#x2F;research&#x2F;acrobat&#x2F;940601.pdf</a>