US Customs Database Of Traveler Photos Was Hacked And Stolen
Can I play devils advocate here?<p>This is, of course, a serious breach and there will and should of course be consequences for the negligent parties<p>but<p>I am struggling to see the threat model being faced here.<p>biometric data is <i>just</i> a username. I flash my face around all day, and am careless as to where I leave my thumbprint.<p>The loss of so many photos and names is unlikely to have national level consequences (Compare this to say the Office Of Personnel management breach from some years back - that has horrible implications for US National security for decades) and the personal level consequences are ... hard to see<p>What this <i>does</i> underline is that we are outrageously careless as an industry with our data (comparable to early industrial &quot;pollution&quot; as Schneier points out).  And it is not going to get better without a) career and business ending consequences b) new ways to store &#x2F; secure data c) a new way of thinking about who owns and what is personal data<p>Personally I think we need a new form of intellectual property (just as we are trying to work out what kind of company FAANG are (not telcos, not newspapers, what <i>is</i> a platform?) we need to ask what is personal data<p>This comment is presumed under law to be <i>my</i> property, my copyright. I might license that property away (dunno never read HN T&amp;Cs) but it is mine.  But google and apple and others will track that I sat down at a certain time and place to write it, my ISP will see when I sent to which servers.<p>All of that data is also <i>created</i> by my conscious actions - should that data not also be <i>my</i> property.  And if need be licensed - and compensated for its use?<p>And when (if) my data is held - then we should presume that it can be accessed by my agents for my benefit (from spending patterns to heart data). I would argue that Sometimes surveillance can be good for us - but only in ways similar to doctors knowing more about me can be good for me - the entire industry of medicine has individual interests at its heart and took a long time to get there.<p>We are heading in that direction (perhaps) but till we get there, carelessness will be the cheapest option, surveillance always bent agansit is (by state or other actors).  We should rail against this stupid dumb breach, but punishing the &quot;bad guys&quot; is not even the first step on the road.<p>If I can make a bad analogy - It&#x27;s not one incident that people got sick from one chef badly cooking chicken - it&#x27;s we need to look at factory farming and meat consumption and healthy eating and marketing bias as a whole.