Ask HN: Where are the interesting conversations?
I&#x27;m curious why you think this sort of conversation would only happen between wealthy people.<p>The other aspect to consider is that to have deep conversations, you essentially need 95% reading 5% actual discussing because the depth can be pretty high on most topics.<p>To give a practical example: you can have a deep and touchy convo about the place of religion in life, but in all likelihood every argument you will come up with will have already been written about in far more depth elsewhere. By the very nature of the medium and its history you are only going to have the illusion of depth if you only seek to have conversations as you are describing.<p>It would also be a good idea to carefully consider what you consider touchy. Chances are, it&#x27;s just normal things to think about for your demographic. For instance, HN readers like to talk about controlling the masses, large future trends, and revel in the forbidden aspect of discussing this sort of thing. But in reality, population control and an &#x27;architect&#x27; view of their place in the world has been a normal feature of the well-to-do classes for pretty much forever.