Papers finding that lockdowns had little or no efficacy
I spot-checked the first link:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;onlinelibrary.wiley.com&#x2F;doi&#x2F;full&#x2F;10.1111&#x2F;eci.13484" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;onlinelibrary.wiley.com&#x2F;doi&#x2F;full&#x2F;10.1111&#x2F;eci.13484</a><p>The argument is the same well-hashed &quot;Sweden is a counterexample&quot; with mathematical window dressing. Bonus points for chopping the Sweden dataset before the big spike in Swedish cases even though the paper was published after the spike and is still being held up as a flagship example half a year after <i>that</i>.<p>Like the other anti-lockdown papers I&#x27;ve spot checked, I&#x27;m not impressed.