Wc in D: 712 Characters Without a Single Branch
Perhaps I&#x27;m just being pedantic or maybe I am misunderstanding.<p>The author claims to be IO bound toward the end. But they are comparing to two versions that are faster.<p>It is my understanding that IO-bound means that the IO subsystem is the thing which limits run time of the program. But the author clearly demonstrates that the IO subsystem of their machine is capable of supporting faster wc binaries.<p>So what am I missing here?