The Big [Censored] Theory
What&#x27;s the moral here?<p>There is also a lot of censoring in the &quot;western&quot; world.<p>It&#x27;s also mostly justified by the exact same &quot;reasons&quot; like the ones mentioned in that blog post. Especial the &quot;but the children&quot; &quot;argument&quot; is used the whole time. And if that gets boring than it&#x27;s &quot;terrorism&quot;. Than again &quot;the children&quot;.<p>Also there are a lot of things one can&#x27;t publicity say for <i>political</i> reasons.<p>In Germany for example most people know: If you want to watch some more &quot;controversial&quot;  movies, or play uncensored games you need to get them on the gray or black market. The German versions are very often heavily censored, or there is just no German version at all because the content is outright verboten.<p>Also communication online gets censored. It&#x27;s impossible by now to say some (still) completely &quot;legal&quot; but &quot;not politically correct&quot; things online especially around mainstream media.<p>The censorship in the EU gets also stronger every year. Now they banned &quot;dangerous&quot; foreign media… Actually without any grounding in established law. But who needs laws? It will take as always many many years until some judge will have the last saying and declare the things the government did as illegal. But than the game will just start again, also as always: Making illegal &quot;laws&quot; takes weeks. Getting rid of them takes decades. Then they change the wording, and you need to sue through all instance form the beginning. Ad nauseam.