ClusterHQ is shutting down
We&#x27;ve been running Kubernetes (500+ containers) in production for over a year now.  I believe (and hope) that 2017 will be the year that persistent data storage will be solved.  We are ready to move our data out of OpenStack and have our data services (Elasticsearch, Cassandra, MySQL, MongoDB) join the rest of our apps on Kube-orchestrated infrastructure.<p>But, we&#x27;re not there yet.  The options just aren&#x27;t good enough.  Look at the list of PV types for Kube [1].  You have technologies like Fibre Channel that are simply too expensive when compared with local storage on a Linux server.  There&#x27;s iSCSI, which is mostly the same story.  Ceph is great for object storage but not performant enough for busy databases. GCE and AWS volumes are not applicable to our private cloud [2].  Cinder, to me, has the stench of OpenStack.  Maybe it&#x27;s better now?  NFS?  No way.  Not performant.<p>I&#x27;m looking forward to seeing what shakes out in the next few months.  It&#x27;s just really hard to beat local storage right now.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;kubernetes.io&#x2F;docs&#x2F;user-guide&#x2F;persistent-volumes&#x2F;#types-of-persistent-volumes" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;kubernetes.io&#x2F;docs&#x2F;user-guide&#x2F;persistent-volumes&#x2F;#typ...</a><p>[2] Beyond a certain size, it becomes more cost-effective to host your own Kubernetes cluster on managed or colocated hardware.