Justice Department to propose limiting internet firms’ Section 230 protections
I&#x27;m generally sympathetic to the idea that Section 230 protections should come with some sort of obligation to allow free speech.<p>However, the actual policy proposals for replacing Section 230 are all outright dystopian. Josh Hawley, in particular, is <i>NOT</i> a free speech advocate. His problem with Facebook&#x2F;Tiwtter is perceived liberal bias, and the alternatives to Section 230 that he suggests are 100% about wrestling editorial oversight away from one class (tech CEOs) and then giving it to another (a politically-appointed board).<p>Does anyone have a good proposal for how to go about reforming Section 230 in a way that&#x27;s workable and values free speech?