Opening the code of our X-Pack features
Background: They introduced X-Pack by bundling it with the default distribution as a time-limited trial without explicitly stating that it is just a demo. People who did the update were bitten weeks later when it just stopped working because the demo license had expired. [Documentation of this was ridiculously bad and I only learned through this post that there apparently was some way to get a free license (maintaining an instance for a 501(c)(3), I just assume we&#x27;d have qualified).]<p>This looks like an attempt at fixing their karma balance, but until I&#x27;ve reviewed the EULA I am pessimistic about the value of &quot;allowing for some derivative works&quot;. And I don&#x27;t really get the &quot;allowing for some [..] contribution&quot;. &lt;zyn&gt;Is a patch that improves performance by 10% welcome but I&#x27;ll have to pay them to make them accept a patch that improves performance by 100%?&lt;&#x2F;zyn&gt;