Why Don’t the 20 Cities on Amazon's HQ2 Shortlist Collectively Bargain?
I completely disagree with the “race to the bottom” framing of the idea that cities shouldn’t compete to provide the best services for the commercial enterprises which reside there.<p>At the 50-75 year timeframe we are talking about at least hundreds of billions of dollars of economic value, if not trillions. The clustering effect of becoming Silicon Valley 2 cannot be overstated.<p>My personal opinion is cities should be talking about the Billions they will be committing to supporting infrastructure improvements rather than the billions in tax cuts. HQ2 needs a fuck ton of support systems, akin to building an Olympic City which never shuts down.<p>Of <i>course</i> city governments should be working hard to bring this kind of value creation and massive economic engine to their constituents. Of <i>course</i> Amazon should be asking tough questions of cities akin to “and what are you going to do to support me” before spending $5 billion building a new campus.<p>Personally I think the cities that only have tax incentives to offer will not come out the winner. Amazon cares a lot more about the surrounding infrastructure and ecosystem than a short term $1 Billion.<p>It’s completely irrational anti-capitalistic knee jerking to whine that cities shouldn’t be working hard to support HQ2 in their backyard. We are watching capitalism at its <i>finest</i> here folks - and market efficiency driving negotiation and competition is creating significantly better outcomes than the “fuck Amazon they don’t need handouts” crowd would arrive at.<p>If someone came to your town and said, I want to build a $20m community arts center with a theater, coworking space, parks, gardens, and playground — would you want your town to say “good luck with that” or would you want them to say “that’s amazing what do you need from us to make that happen?!” Just because Amazon happens to be for-profit, their presence in your city is an extraordinary asset and it makes perfect sense to entice them to come.<p>In fact, you can’t even consider building at anywhere near HQ2 scale without an intimate partnership with the host city which is, in one form or another, going to require somewhere on the order of dollar-for-dollar public investment to match the private investment. We’ve proven that this public&#x2F;private partnership is basically <i>the most effective</i> growth engine we’ve got. I certainly hope my city would do everything possible to roll out the red carpet. It’s the most effective dollars they could possibly spend, because it’s effectively corporate matching of public funds.