Falling in love with Rust
I&#x27;ve been on something of a language tour recently - trying out C++, Typescript, OCaml each for a couple of weeks just to get a taste of living in each ecosystem. I haven&#x27;t been actively following Rust beyond reading Hacker News articles (of which there are many) about people liking the language.<p>One of my pet peeves with several &quot;newer&quot; languages that I&#x27;ve looked at is that users don&#x27;t usually talk about the ugly parts. You can try out C++ for a week visiting forums and r&#x2F;cpp and you find out fairly quickly what the pain points are and what typical workarounds look like. At that point, it is up to you to decide to what extent you can live with those downsides and where to tread lightly. Same for C, Python, OCaml etc.<p>To be clear, I don&#x27;t mean that you should go looking for the bad parts in a language but I do believe you should be aware of them before you invest a lot of your time in it. Unfortunately, a lot of the language love blog posts do not talk about the pain points of the language and what kind of problems it isn&#x27;t well suited for.<p>I like Rust and I love several features that Bryan talks about (algebraic data types being one of them) but I would love to read a more balanced evaluation of the language - focusing on aspects which are rough around the edges and expected future improvements.