The camel doesn't have two humps: Programming “aptitude test” canned
The title seems to intentionally misrepresent the retraction to push an agenda (or the author has some issues with basic logic)<p>The retraction is that the strong&#x2F;definitive proof that &quot;the camel has two humps&quot; was fabricated&#x2F;exaggerated.<p>The converse - that it has one hump hasn&#x27;t been proven. From the quote, Richard Bornat doesn&#x27;t say that they re-crunched the numbers and now there is proof of one hump.<p>The camel has gone back to having an unknown number of humps