Row over AI that 'identifies gay faces'
The press release from GLAAD and HRC is ridiculously misleading.  One of their repeated claims - that the paper has not been peer-reviewed - is directly contradicted by the first sentence of the first page of the manuscript, and their other criticisms are similarly baseless.  Mistakes that obvious imply to me that their goal is not an honest debate but rather to stir the pot and promote misinformation.  The alternative is that no one from either organization read the pre-print with any scrutiny.  In my opinion, it&#x27;s especially telling that visiting GLAAD&#x27;s site (including the press release) prompts an immediate pop-over asking for donations.  Who is the unethical actor here, I wonder...?<p>Edit: Can anyone downvoting me please stand up and tell me why?