Responsible stewardship of the UEFI Secure Boot ecosystem
The worst problem is that people are (even in the other discussion thread here on HN) still claiming that we are scaremongering. Back when all this Secure Boot was announced, we already said that its main purpose seemed to be to make booting of non-MS operating systems more complicated, rather than security enforcement.<p>&quot;But, you&#x27;re scaremongering! See, I put this Debian USB pendrive and I can still boot it fine!&quot;<p>This was because Debian (and many other distros) went, at some point, through MS-enforced hoops in order to get their bootloader signed. Quite a perilous situation in which MS was this &quot;steward&quot; of the entire PC OS ecosystem; whether a Linux distribution booted or not on PCs was practically at the whim of MS. That was at least better than the alternative (no booting -- since MS got away with SecureBoot anyway) and we have to thank people like mjg59 for it.<p>Now, your Debian pendrive will not boot on this Lenovo PC, even if MS-signed.<p>&quot;But, you&#x27;re scaremongering! See, I put this Debian USB pendrive in, hit F1, hit cursor down three times, tab, down five times, space, F12, and I can still boot it fine!&quot;