We need to talk about systematic fraud
I think back to the recent group of academics that wanted to prove how most Grievance Studies journals don&#x27;t property review submissions. One of the papers they got accepted had chapters from Mein Kampf rewritten with terminology from modern social cause rhetoric.<p>Instead of accepting the issues, with the entire process, these professors are now facing disciplinary hearings for submitting false research. In a way I can understand this; they did after all submit papers they knew weren&#x27;t academic (in bad faith?) in order to prove a greater point. But does that justify what they did?