Teach Yourself Computer Science
This is a really good list. I love the simplicity. I also agree that it is both worthwhile and very interesting to learn the fundamentals of CS.<p>That said, I think it is a mistake to assume that lots of Type 2 developers wander around in a perpetual state of under-achievement. Most of these people are indeed a different class of developer (I think the word engineer is positively abused), but many of them really have almost no professional requirement to understand fundamentals. Any more than they need to understand particle physics.<p>These developers are a class of systems integrators and they produce a lot of usable systems, at a quality level that represents appropriate trade-offs to the business case they are employed to address.<p>Yes, many will say this is a less elevated pursuit. It has its own challenges and mindset. It lives at a particular level of abstraction and its very existence assumes stability of that layer of abstraction. The fact that this breaks down sometimes is besides the point.<p>The reality is most developers probably do Type 2 work, though very many may have or aspire to have a Type 1 level of knowledge and insight. However I think it&#x27;s unfair to portray a contented Type 2 developer as lacking in some essential.