The case for induction cooking
Top reader comment seems apt w&#x2F;r&#x2F;t the pollution aspect anyway:<p>As a scientist (an immunologist) who leads a research lab on lung inflammation including asthma, the cavalier attitude Times columnists have toward scientific references in their articles is appalling.<p>RMI is a thinktank with an agenda. Not a research institution. And Brady Seals is not a scientist. Note the lack of PhD. She has an MBA and has never worked in science. Nor did she &#x27;author a study&#x27;. She authored a REPORT. Which is not peer-reviewed and not published in a reputable journal.<p>As an immunologist I assure you that scientific evidence does not indicate that &#x27;increase of asthma is on par with living in a home with a smoker&#x27;.<p>And frankly- just walking outdoors in NYC you&#x27;re exposed to far higher levels of lung-irritating pollutants than you are cooking stir fry on your stove. But that doesn&#x27;t fit the agenda the Times is pushing with multiple induction stove articles lately all focused on bogus health effects and the (more legitimate) climate concerns.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nyti.ms&#x2F;3i1tj3B#permid=117337268" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nyti.ms&#x2F;3i1tj3B#permid=117337268</a>