The gift of it's your problem now
Actually, cryptocurrencies and DAOs were supposed to be socialism. The network was going to be owned by the people. The natural way to monetize open source.<p>Well, minus the whole one person one vote part, but still better than the surveillance capitalism of Big Tech companies funded by VCs buying shares, propping up their “free to lockin” model and dumping them on the public, who then made them extract rents forever to satisfy wall street earnings.<p>In my opinion, cryptos were seduced by the dark side of profit, and buyers failed to care that the emperor (blockchain) has no clothes (scalability).<p>I am focused on micropayments and local currencies with actual utility, and moving past blockchain. I am going to link to something — and historically this link was immediately knee-jerk perceived as “shilling a coin” but if you read, there is no coin, it’s just talking about how to ACTUALLY monetize open source projectsand joirnalism and other online content on the WEB using WEB technology instead of government enforcers: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qbix.com&#x2F;token" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qbix.com&#x2F;token</a>