California’s Roadmap to Modify the Stay-at-Home Order [pdf]
A real plan would look like this <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;spemOeG" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;spemOeG</a> specifying the levels of restrictions and the metrics we will use to track the metrics.  This allows people to understand what to expect the best possible. We already have huge uncertainty, we don&#x27;t need to add uncertainty of government response on top of uncertainty of the virus. I think there is huge room to debate the numbers and what goes in what level, but this is what a real roadmap looks like.<p>This &quot;roadmap&quot; is quite scary as this is not a plan that would pass muster in in YC Boardroom.
(1) The one chart with data is horribly innacurate:
(a) It shows interventions causing worse than no interventions in the short term?
(b) Shows hospitalizations increasing despite the fact that they have not for some time.
(c) Shows &quot;Surge Capacity&quot; as a static value, which you would hope they are increasing if they really think this is the issue.<p>(2) It does not specify in any fashion what the different levels of coming back are. 
When can medical procedures resume?
When can non-essential work where social distancing is easy resume (e.g. Los Angeles apparently has banned gardeners, who don&#x27;t need to get near a soul)?<p>(3) If he believes masks work (as I do and as indicated in this presentation), why are masks not required and businesses shut down? Shouldn&#x27;t we do the less painful and restrictive measure first before we shut down businesses?<p>(4) Most importantly there is not an actual goal clearly articulated here. Is he going for suppression?  Is he going for mitigation?<p>I like many others are deeply upset by leadership from both parties, at all levels of government.