How Elmo Ruined Sesame Street
The number of people who are quick to jump unquestioningly on this and say, &quot;It was better before&quot; are... well it bums me out.<p>Sesame Street&#x27;s role in child development has changed radically as the general opinion on how TV should interact with kids has changed. These kids shows have been pushed down the age bracket, appealing to younger markets where demand is a lot greater for the content. Older kids shows? They exist in the spaces between cartoon network hot properties, and do a good job of confronting the complex issues kids will face from 4-12. The same is true of The Mr. Rogers-&gt;Daniel Tiger&#x27;s Neighborhood. They&#x27;re tuned for totally different age ranges and <i>requirements</i>.<p>I dunno how many of you are parents. I have a 15 month old daughter. A constant chime of the following information is reiterated by child care consulting, doctors, and developmental evaluators:<p>- Sensory experiences are more important than anything right now.
- Emotional stability is more important than anything.
- Disregard the advice about &quot;no screen time.&quot; Screens shouldn&#x27;t be a substitute for parenting, but kids can learn to use tablets startlingly early in life and interactive education is provably better than passive education. In some specific subjects, interactive solo play is superior even to parentally guided play.<p>Let&#x27;s also not forget: This article is just false. The idea that no one ever corrects Elmo? Totally wrong. Elmo gets a lot of screen time, but over the last year we&#x27;ve seen a huge amount of investment in a lot of other characters. Cookie Monster, Abby&#x27;s complexity, and most importantly a huge increase in the time <i>humans</i> spend on sesame street talking.<p>The idea that Seasme Street doesn&#x27;t touch on tricky subjects is false. Just last week the PBS Kids app rotated the episode on &quot;Minne Myna&quot;. It&#x27;s a two-sided story. On the one hand, Big Bird makes a case to bird court that someone else can&#x27;t steal his nest just because he left it. &quot;Finders Keepers is a bad rule.&quot;<p>But it&#x27;s <i>also</i> trying to talk to kids and say it is okay to be sad and that they SHOULD be sad if they lose their homes. The episode is delicately touching on the subject of home eviction. Someone who has never been evicted might not even notice, but anyone who has lost a home will immediately realize what Big Bird&#x27;s singing about. Big Bird gets a happy ending, but the episode leaves reminding kids that many other birds didn&#x27;t get their nests back and that it&#x27;s okay to be sad.<p>I see so much of these kinds of articles. All I can do is despair as my generation begins to make the exact same mistake as our outrageous parents who had very similar things to say about childhood programming which we all wax nostalgically on now.