Ethics in Strategy Gaming, Part 1: Panzer General
This little chunk seems questionable:<p>&#x27;Hart befriended many of the surviving German generals — often by visiting them in their prison cells — and bolstered his case via a tacit quid pro quo that would have gone something like this if anyone had dared to speak it aloud: “Say that you developed Blitzkrieg warfare by reading my old texts, and I’ll use my influence to promote the position that you were only a soldier following orders and don’t deserve to die in prison.”&#x27;<p>If it was tacit, how do we know it happened?