Georgism
<i>The main Georgist policy recommendation is a tax assessed on land value, arguing that revenues from a land value tax (LVT) can be used to reduce or eliminate existing taxes (such as on income, trade, or purchases) that are unfair and inefficient.</i><p>If I am understanding this correctly, wouldn’t it result in a world where landowners put the minimum amount of investment into the land, and then move to cheaper land as soon as possible&#x2F;when their current land becomes more valuable?<p>The assumption here seems to me that land in NYC&#x2F;wherever is inherently valuable, which doesn’t seem true to me. Especially in a remote working world increasingly detached from physical spaces.