RethinkDB Relicensed under Apache 2.0
This really bugs me. Copyleft has always been feared by lawyers and corporate people alike. Let&#x27;s not forget how Ballmer called the GPL a cancer that infects everything it touches. Yet, copyleft is our only defense against abusive proprietary software and without copyleft we might not have the fertile collaboration of projects such as Linux, git, or OpenWrt.<p>The AGPL is just an updated GPL. Back when software mostly came in boxes, the GPL was as feared as the AGPL is now. Now that software mostly comes from the internet, the AGPL is there to address this new distribution method. Now the AGPL is the new cancer.<p>Overzealous lawyers trying to &quot;protect&quot; copyrights have indoctrinated an entire generation of hackers that sharing code is a danger and the AGPL is the prime threat. I have spoken to too many Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, or Google employees that are convinced that sharing their source code would be tantamount to death. The result is a world where their secret software controls the news we read, the ads we see, the people we talk to, and even the emotions we feel.<p>&quot;Open source, but licensed under the AGPL.&quot;, says the article. There is no &quot;but&quot; here. The AGPL is the very definition of &quot;open source&quot;, because it defends openness. If you have nothing to fear from open source, you have nothing to fear from the AGPL.