Swiss Political System: More Than You Ever Wanted to Know
Fascinating read. As an American, I&#x27;ve always been curious about the Swiss political system ever since I traveled the world and met a lot of Swiss people, and was shocked that unlike in my home country, they generally seemed satisfied with their government. Don&#x27;t get me wrong - nobody is totally satisfied with their government, but compared to the anger and jadedness me and most of my fellow Americans have always felt about our government, it was a shock to me. 7 presidents, referendums, 11 parties with at least one seat - Switzerland sounds like a great case study in politics, especially since the country is so culturally diverse with 4 national languages.<p>It looks like the referendum system has had a hugely positive effect, mostly because it&#x27;s a real-time check on their representatives&#x27; power since citizens can directly change the law, forcing representatives to respect the interests of the population. In the U.S, our only recourse as citizens is to vote for one of the Democratic or Republican party candidates every 2-6 years (Senate elections are every 6 years), and being locked into a two-party system means the parties tend to gravitate towards the status quo. Ultimately referendums result in more power in the people, as well as a more politically active and educated citizenry as opposed to power being delegated to a relatively elite political class.<p>The following passage stood out to me:<p>&gt; Back in 1917 Switzerland used to use majority system in the parliamentary elections. This led to a situation where the Liberal Democrats got only 40.8% of the vote, but 54.5% of the seats in parliament. The absolute majority allowed them to pass the laws, regardless of the will of the 59.2% who voted for other parties.<p>&gt; Needless to say, Liberal Democrats torpedoed every attempt to replace the majority voting system by a proportional one. If the instrument of popular initiatives was not available, it would be a dead end. The voters would have to wait until Liberal Democrats lose some of their voter support. But even then, thanks to the majority system, an absolute majority in parliament could be won by another party, who would again find it difficult to abolish the system that brought it to power.<p>&gt; General dissatisfaction with the state of affairs led to the launch of the popular initiative &quot;For a proportional system of elections to the National Council&quot; in 1918 which succeeded with 66.8% votes in favor.<p>This is a prime example of what would otherwise be a permanent government failure being rectified by the referendum system. Only the referendum system can fix a problem that persists because it is against the majority lawmakers&#x27; interests to fix it. It seems that voting rules in general should not be decided by lawmakers because they are incapable of voting against their own self-interest.<p>This is why despite all the complaints in the U.S. about the electoral college, winner-take all elections, gerrymandering, and being locked into a two-party system, nothing will every change since fixing the problem will always be against the interests of the majority party. Referendum seems to be the only solution here. Not that referendum guarantees change either, but it&#x27;s much easier to vote against the party system as a citizen than as a party member who lives in and has benefited from the system. Expecting lawmakers to vote in the public good is like expecting CEOs to vote themselves a fair salary.<p>I was also impressed at the extent to which the public is educated on both sides of the referendum, with all sides having a chance at fair representation. Hard to imagine this kind of neutrality in the U.S. This is also made much easier by the fact that referendums must focus on a single matter, rather than conflating multiple unrelated issues (reducing military spending + increasing spending on social services).<p>It&#x27;s amazing that past referendums included votes on universal basic income (2016) and full reserve banking (2018), both very forward thinking policies that haven&#x27;t even been in the public debate in the U.S. except for basic income thanks to Andrew Yang&#x27;s presidential run. Whereas the U.S. lags behind the world politically, unable to fix problems that Americans have been complaining about for decades like the skyrocketing cost of healthcare and university, countries like Switzerland have their act together and are pioneering forward into the future.<p>As an American, I&#x27;m completely in favor of tearing down our system and replacing it with something like the Swiss&#x27;s. Direct democracy is the only true form of democracy, and representative democracy is like the halfway point between real democracy and monarchy. It&#x27;s sad that representative democracy has been conflated with democracy, when it doesn&#x27;t actually give the citizens the power to do anything other than vote for a new Democratic or Republican party representative every couple years. It&#x27;s no wonder Americans are so dissatisfied and jaded with their government and rioting on the streets.