More Fakery
My favorite article on this topic is &quot;Escaping science&#x27;s paradox&quot; by Stuart Buck[1]. I&#x27;m, in particular, interested by the idea (at least within the United States) of &quot;red teaming&quot; science. This would involve having an independent agency funding attempts to replicate (and to find&#x2F;publish flaws in) NSF- or NIH-funded projects, and publishing those. Ideally, the history of replication for authors&#x27; papers could then be part of the criteria for receiving funding for more novel research in the future.<p>Obviously, there&#x27;s a few fields where this might not work (you can&#x27;t just create a second Large Hadron Collider for validation), but in areas from sociology to organic chemistry to environmental science, I think there&#x27;s a lot of promise in that method for helping to re-align incentives around producing solid, replicable research.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.worksinprogress.co&#x2F;issue&#x2F;escaping-sciences-paradox&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.worksinprogress.co&#x2F;issue&#x2F;escaping-sciences-parad...</a>