AI Won't Cause Unemployment
Sorry, but there&#x27;s so many things wrong with this...<p>- nobody cares about &quot;unemployment&quot; - they care about investing decades of their lives and losing their jobs and not being able to replace them quickly at the same level of income and quality of life, including a million photographers, models, makeup artists, etc. who are looking at diffusion model results and wondering who&#x27;d pay for their work next year, let alone in 10. &quot;employment&quot; is a made up number that could be 100Ms prospering and optimistic about the future, or 100Ms terrified of the future and millions giving up and disappearing from the employment stats: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=working+age+men+employment" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=working+age+men+employment</a><p>- nobody cares about average prices by category - they care about what they pay for the goods they buy, and the baskets of goods used for these surveys are comically different from what actual consumers experience. Notably, the &quot;TV&quot; from 20 years ago is not the same &quot;TV&quot; as today, let alone cellphones or even healthcare. Also, healthcare has seen continuous improvement e.g. cancer therapies, while the TV innovations that consumers care about have sometimes zoomed forward (thin displays, larger displays, 4K, HDR) and failed to take hold (3D, long-throw projectors).<p>- MA is not an expert on employment and neither am I, but I&#x27;m not prognosticating.