Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade authorities
Seems like a lot of people are confused&#x2F;have questions about why Uber is being criminally investigated by the Department of Justice.*<p>Here&#x27;s why:<p>1. Uber is subject to the laws in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Evading authorities is textbook obstruction of justice. Not only did Uber build software that they used to evade authorities &amp; break local laws in multiple states and countries, but they profited from it (which has a variety of other RICO implications.)<p>2. Sure, corporations are people too, but, nonetheless, only people engage in civil disobedience. Related, for courts, a company that profits from violating of local laws is not a protester or freedom fighter battling injustice, it is criminal enterprise.<p>3. Charging Uber under RICO would by no means be unusual or a stretch; this is a quite run of the mill application of these laws. (eg see Preet Bharara&#x27;s RICO prosecutions:  <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=preet+bharara+rico+prosections&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8#q=preet+bharara+rico+prosecutions" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=preet+bharara+rico+prosectio...</a> )<p>4. This is unquestionably a federal matter, within the DOJ&#x27;s jurisdiction. Uber operates across state lines--and used Greyball in multiple jurisdictions. That said, Uber could &amp; likely will face criminal investigation in other jurisdictions.<p>5. Finally, this is definitely not Trump&#x27;s revenge on Travis.  Not only does it simply not work that way--USAs are independent &amp; it&#x27;d be beyond illegal, but this specific USA was appointed by Obama. (There were two Trump didn&#x27;t fire; USA Stretch is one of them)<p>(*And, yes, I am a lawyer. And, many years ago, I worked at the Department of Justice)