Oatly: The New Coke?
The author should write a similar article about himself, because the whole article is filled with dubious claims and misguided evidence. The two main claims are &quot;Since the GI is a measure of how much of a negative response your body has to certain sugars&quot; and &quot;research showing harms from canola oil&quot;. Neither can be ascertained. A big problem with nutritional science is that it&#x27;s complex, therefore it is neigh impossible to discover the truth how specific foods really impact the body. I&#x27;m also of the opinion that the term &quot;healthy&quot; shouldn&#x27;t be really used. Here I go with Paracelsus: &quot;All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; the dosage alone makes it so a thing is not a poison.&quot;
The author invites us to his newsletter &quot;on getting healthy, wealthy, and wise.&quot; Yeah, it&#x27;s all a baseless marketing ploy by, and for, the author.<p>I want to note, I&#x27;m making no argument that Oatly should be considered healthy though.