The FBI now recommends using an ad blocker when searching the web
I recommend using an ad-blocker while visiting that site :-&#x2F;<p>Lately, I find myself using more and more plugins to make the &quot;modern web&quot; tolerable. To list a few:<p>Channel Blocker (lets me block channels from search results on Youtube); 
uBlock Origin; 
Disconnect; 
F.B Purity; 
Consent-O-Matic (auto fill cookie consent forms); 
Kagi Search; 
PopUpOFF; 
Facebook Container; 
Privacy Badger; 
ClearURLs; 
Return YouTube Dislike<p>Basically, if I visit a website and don&#x27;t like the experience, I either never go back (Kagi lets me exclude it from search results) or find a plugin to make it tolerable.<p>What I really want now is the ability to exclude entire websites from any permissions I grant to plugins. I feel like in the last year, I&#x27;ve read a couple stories about companies buying successful plugins and then using them to track you or show ads or whatever. I&#x27;m worried this will be the next stage in the battle for our attention -- best case: companies will buy popular plugins to track us and show us intrusive ads; worst case: nefarious actors will buy them to scrape information we think is private and collect it.<p>IE: I just want to be able to say &quot;Hey, Firefox... those permissions that I granted to plugins x, y, and z? They don&#x27;t apply to www.myfavoritebank.example.com&quot;<p>Is there a browser that has that feature yet? I spent a few hours trying to figure out if Firefox did. It did not appear to.<p>edit: Added semicolons to separate plugins in list b&#x2F;c HN stripped the newlines from my comment.