UC Berkeley inappropriately admitted students as favors to donors
People are always going to use their money to buy status.  So as long as these college offer prestige &amp; status, people with money are going to use it to get in.<p>Much like doping in sports, you have two paths you can take: try to combat cheating, or accept the cheating as part of the game.<p>I think these universities should accept that they are providing an education, but they are selling prestige, and split their admissions into two pots: people who pay their way in and the other who earns it. And they announce ahead of time what the size of each bucket is.  When you apply, you chose which path you will take and that&#x27;s it, you&#x27;re stuck.<p>The people who choose the merit path take the standard entry exams, have their grades review, etc.  And the ones who do the best get in.  Those who choose to pay for admission participate in a silent auction, and those willing to pay the most are admitted.<p>This system isn&#x27;t &quot;fair&quot;, but the outcome is effectively the same as our current setup.  With the most notable difference being that, at least this system is transparent and acknowledges that X% of incoming students paid for their post.