Half of Americans now believe that news organizations deliberately mislead them
There are literal mountains of sociological studies on how (state and corporate) media have been in service of the powers that be, for decades, and how exactly this works. With a mountain of examples. So, for sociologists, this feels like &quot;wow, it only took half a century to trickle through.&quot;<p>Though of course this is the wrong reaction; it has always trickled through. Only that, in the past, it took a few years or decades to be come publicized knowledge that the media lied about every war, about every economic policy, created panics to serve its profit motive and aided the authorities, legitimizing their power; now, we know this in an instant. Thank decentralized distribution protocols.<p>Every piece of information is produced with interests for audiences; objectivity is a pink unicorn Santa Claus, something you really shouldn&#x27;t believe exists after you&#x27;re, like, 8. But many of the structural pressures that sociologists have long identified shape commercial and state sourced news stories just don&#x27;t apply to independent journalists, who don&#x27;t have to rely on continued access state contacts, commercial paychecks, don&#x27;t have to serve ad revenue and corporate PR aims, and who are not organizations whose literal existence depends on state licensing as a corporation. Not to say that there is no structural pressure in the independent realm; ideology still exists, years of socialization in the country of origin with their (often folly) &quot;self-evidence&quot; myths exist, the need to eat and make money somehow still exists. But the pressures are much, MUCH fewer than in the case of corporate and state news.