FAA authorizes Zipline to deliver commercial packages using drones
A few days ago, i saw this article in SF Chronicle; a joint opinion piece from MIT professor Carlo Ratti:<p>&quot;Uber was supposed to help traffic. It didn’t. Robotaxis will be even worse&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sfchronicle.com&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;openforum&#x2F;article&#x2F;robotaxi-car-technology-traffic-18362647.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sfchronicle.com&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;openforum&#x2F;article&#x2F;robota...</a><p>The basic gist was, convenience of ride-sharing &#x2F; seduced us into over using cars. It was supposed to have the opposite effect<p>&quot;...ride-hailing and ride-sharing could make our streets cleaner and more efficient. ... With minimal delays to passengers, we could match riders and reduce the size of New York City taxi fleets by 40%. More people could get around in fewer cars for less money. We could reduce car ownership, and free up curbs and parking lots for new uses&quot;<p>but ... they did not take into account changes in human behavior. People stopped walking, using bicycles, etc...<p>&quot;On average, ride-hailing trips generated far more traffic and 69% more carbon dioxide than the trips they displaced.&quot;<p>I think this is what will happen with these drone delivery services. As it becomes easier to order a box of bandaids and have it delivered in 4 minutes, people will change their behavior, we will be ordering more frequently one-off things from Walmart several times a week, and the sky will be filled with drones...<p>and it will be hell.