FanDuel not honoring bet that would have paid over $82,000 due to line error
Yeah, a quick read of the relevant regs tells me Fanduel is gonna lose this one (Unless i&#x27;ve missed something)[1,2]<p>The law on this is pretty clear, and they can&#x27;t unilaterally decide not to apply the gaming regulations of the state, or change them through their contracts.<p>(They can decide not to do business in states they don&#x27;t like the regulations of course)<p>BTW, somewhat hilariously, the part they &quot;...&quot;&#x27;d is just 4 words.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;state.nj.us&#x2F;lps&#x2F;ge&#x2F;docs&#x2F;Regulations&#x2F;CHAPTER69N.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;state.nj.us&#x2F;lps&#x2F;ge&#x2F;docs&#x2F;Regulations&#x2F;CHAPTER69N.pdf</a><p>[2] (c) Upon accepting a wager pursuant to this chapter, a wagering cashier shall cause
the wagering system to generate a wagering ticket.<p>(IE them generating the ticket is acceptance)<p>(d) A wagering operator shall not unilaterally rescind any wager pursuant to this
chapter without the prior written approval of the Division.<p>(h) Winning wagering tickets shall be redeemed by a wagering cashier after
verifying the validity of the wagering ticket through the wagering system.<p>(IE they should have redeemed it because it was valid)<p>(k) No wagering ticket shall be voided after the start of the wagering event on which a wager has been placed<p>Another reason the could not have voided it.<p>Essentially the best argument they have is that it&#x27;s a house rule under 13:69N2-2 .
This only works if their internal controls were approved by the division.
Even then, a reasonable court would likely find that clearly contrary to the written regulations (and thus, not a reasonable interpretation of the regulations by  the commission).