You Weren't Meant to Have a Boss (2008)
This article again.<p><i>sigh</i><p>What grates me about Paul&#x27;s writing is the sheer pomposity of it all, coupled with a tone that deals only in absolutes. There is no space for doubt, for hesitancy, for understatement. It is grandiosity dialed up to 11 in a way I&#x27;ve seen precious few &quot;essayists&quot; do. Even that word grates me. Oh, no sir! Paul is above mere &#x27;blogging&#x27;. He is an &quot;essayist&quot; because his blogposts feature more than 2500 words. Look at what he claims:<p>&gt; And founders and early employees of startups, meanwhile, are like the Birkenstock-wearing weirdos of Berkeley: though a tiny minority of the population, they&#x27;re the ones living as humans are meant to. In an artificial world, only extremists live naturally.<p>&gt; It will always suck to work for large organizations, and the larger the organization, the more it will suck.<p>My god! One must have a super limited and convenient worldview to inflict such idiotic statements onto the world with such a wanton disregard of anything approaching sensitivity. Here&#x27;s Jeff Atwoods take on it: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.codinghorror.com&#x2F;paul-grahams-participatory-narcissism&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.codinghorror.com&#x2F;paul-grahams-participatory-nar...</a><p>It&#x27;s an opinion I sympathise with a lot more than PG&#x27;s.<p>I work for a big company (CERN). Group of thousands upon thousands. It&#x27;s <i>wonderful</i> here. I wouldn&#x27;t trade it for the next &quot;Uber of...&quot;. My &#x27;boss&#x27; is just someone who has worked on my topic for a lot longer than me, and is therefore a veritable treasure chest of knowledge. I LOVE working for him because I learn a shitload on a weekly basis, and the projects that he is responsible for align with my interests. I LOVE working in my &#x27;group of hundreds&#x27;, because that group of hundreds can accomplish a lot more than a full-stack developer straight out of Stanford thinking he can disrupt everything just by ignoring zoning laws. I also imagine there are a significant portion of people working for places like NASA&#x2F;ESA etc who share my view. Where does this jive with Mr Graham&#x27;s World Of Absolutes?<p>Further, even if we limit ourselves to the corporate world, &#x27;groups of hundreds&#x27; can afford to do more than one guy. A large group can, for example, dedicate resources to lowering the environmental impact of the product chain, in a way that a three person startup couldn&#x27;t. They can have customer service that a small startup just cannot match. Is all of that worthless?<p>And if it isn&#x27;t, just what is Graham getting at in this article? Is it limited to young graduates? Then why the far reaching claims and the excessive overreach? And if not, is he genuinely so delusional as to think he can speak for everyone?<p>I will give another example, at the risk of outing myself, just because this article is <i>still</i> fucking grinding my gears. My mum is working on the Polio program. In a couple of years, they will have rid the world of this killer disease. Millions of lives saved. It&#x27;s not necessarily the glorious work environment that gives Paul Graham a hardon. Doesn&#x27;t mean it &#x27;sucks&#x27;. Just means that most of the people working there are capable of understanding that there are some necessary evils involved in taking on such an enormous challenge. You need to talk to Politicians the world over. You need to coordinate the door to door vaccine distribution. You need to balance the books for millions and millions of dollars in funding. You need to set up secure enclaves for staff that are going into dangerous zones and risking their lives for the project. I would like to see some fucking bossless Ycombinator graduate try their hand at that.