GitHub Sponsors
Ugh, not again! First they introduce a Package Registry that not only splits the ecosystem in two parts but also has no open governance or even open source code. Great.
Now they are doing the same thing with donations. Instead of collaborating with already open platforms (like OpenCollective or LiberaPay), they decide to build their own closed-source platform.<p>I love that more people are figuring out ways to pay open source developers, but doing it via a closed-source platform they developed on their own, they are effectively saying they don&#x27;t care about &quot;open development&quot;, they just want to be the one-stop for everything open source as to not lose mind-share of developers.<p>I&#x27;d be wary of joining this program and I urge people to get involved with something like OpenCollective instead, which is a open project you can actually contribute to. It also helps that OpenCollective&#x27;s success is based on it&#x27;s members success. &quot;GitHub Sponsors&quot; isn&#x27;t as well aligned with you as a developer, as OpenCollective et al.<p>Obviously, I&#x27;m a bit biased, as I run a project for creating transparent open source infrastructure. But I do think this is a important issue, and I&#x27;m getting more and more scared GitHub is out to make open source development more ivory tower-like.