Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
&gt; <i>Some argue that we should terminate these services to content we find reprehensible so that others can launch attacks to knock it offline. That is the equivalent argument in the physical world that the fire department shouldn&#x27;t respond to fires in the homes of people who do not possess sufficient moral character.</i><p>&gt; <i>For instance, when a site that opposed LGBTQ+ rights signed up for a paid version of DDoS mitigation service we worked with our Proudflare employee resource group to identify an organization that supported LGBTQ+ rights and donate 100 percent of the fees for our services to them. We don&#x27;t and won&#x27;t talk about these efforts publicly because we don&#x27;t do them for marketing purposes; we do them because they are aligned with what we believe is morally correct.</i><p>These are the two strongest points for me. The former is one I already believed, and the latter makes me more hopeful as someone in that specific minority community.<p>In addition, I think it&#x27;s touched on but Cloudflare is huge. Even if they changed their mind on terminating amoral customers, how would that go down? Another automated moderation system that checks for certain keywords? Ask the LGBTQ people banned from Facebook&#x2F;Twitter&#x2F;Reddit&#x2F;Google&#x2F;etc. if those systems really work all that well. All too often person A implying that X group deserves violence skirts the system, while the actual text calling out Person A&#x27;s beliefs from an advocate is considered hate.