Quadlets might make me finally stop using docker-compose
Overall this looks really good but it also obfuscates whether how &amp; where this really integrates with systemd.<p>Maybe everything is this easy &amp; good. Maybe this is an &#x2F;etc&#x2F;systems&#x2F;system&#x2F;WordPress.quadlet file, part &amp; parcel to everything else in the systemd-verse. But it doesn&#x27;t say clearly whether it is or isn&#x27;t. It&#x27;s an acontextual example.<p>I think it&#x27;s powerful tech either way, but so much of the explanation is missing here. It focuses on the strengths, on what is consistent, but isn&#x27;t discussing the overall picture of how things slot together.<p>In many ways I think this is the most interesting frontier for systemd. It&#x27;s supposedly not a monolith, supposedly modular,  it so far that has largely meant that components are modular, optional. You don&#x27;t need to run the pretty fine systemd-resolvd, for example. But what k8s has done is make handling resources modular, and that feels like the broad idea here. But it seems dubious that systemd really has that extensibility builtin; it seems likely that podman quadlet is a secondary entirely unrelated controller, ape-ing what systemd does without integrating at all. It seems likely that&#x27;s not a podman-quadlet fault: it&#x27;s likely a broad systemd inflexibility.<p>Could be wrong here. But the article seems to offer no support that there is any integration, no support that this systemd-alike integrates or extends at all. Quadlet seem to be a parallel and similar-looking tech, with deep parallel, but those parallels from what I read here are handcrafted. Jt&#x27;s not quadlet that fails here to be great,  ut systemd not offering actual deep integration options.