Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade
I&#x27;ll be the begrudging devils advocate for a decision that is sure to have devastating consequences for poor women in red states.<p>It is good for unelected bodies like the Supreme Court to allow such dividing issues be figured out democratically. The US house has bled power to the other 3 institutions and of them, the judiciary is the least democratic. Ofc, my support for this change assumes that this Supreme Court will show restraint towards political activism (in either direction) in general. Call it naive, but I&#x27;ll wait and see.<p>States rights has always been a double edged sword. You can&#x27;t have your cake and eat it too. The same state rights that allow gun control and homosexuality to be locally legalized before national concensus; also now lead to abortion legislation being a state issue.<p>The sad part of democracy is that it aims to represent the views of the voting majority. If the voting majority truly cares about access to abortion then we will hopefully see enough democratic traction to give them the mandate needed. Now, the rural republican votes counting for more in the senate is a huge issue and threat to democracy that the US needs to figure out if it ever wants to represent the views of the people. But, the Supreme Court should not be responsible for managing dysfunction in other branches of govt.<p>My personal opinion is that polarization has pushed both sides to be completely antagonistic towards each other. &#x27;Own the libs, fuck the deplorables&#x27;, no compromise. The jaded side of me says: vote in more moderates that are willing to strike compromises. Crazed jesus Republicans and hyperprogressive activists are terrible people to put into national office. They gain power by antagonizing and being unhelpful roadblocks for change, all while asking for the most stubbornly impossible outcomes.<p>In the long run, history will have a dim view of this era of global polarization with all political sides to blame.