I have a lot to say about Signal’s Cellebrite hack
The standard in U.S. criminal courts is &quot;beyond a reasonable doubt.&quot;<p>All I understood Moxie&#x27;s original article to be doing was sowing that seed of &quot;reasonable doubt.&quot; Is it now reasonable, based on Moxie&#x27;s article, to doubt that information obtained by a Cellebrite device from a device running Signal is reliable? If I were a juror, I would probably think so.<p>That doesn&#x27;t at all mean someone couldn&#x27;t be convicted on the strength of other evidence, but if the primary evidence the prosecution relied on was Cellebrited off a phone running Signal, I&#x27;d have some trouble trusting it enough to render a guilty verdict.