Terminated
&gt; The First Amendment, or anything close to it, is MIA on the Web.<p>... she declared, uncensored, from her self-hosted journal.<p>A multinational Fortune-500 megacorp declined to host Cornell&#x27;s content for free because they have standards the content violates. Cornell has more than enough cash in the ol&#x27; war chest to spin up their own video hosting. This is almost a non-story because it&#x27;s either telling us something we already know about how corporations treat potentially-embarrassing-to-them content or how society treats the content Susie Bright creates.<p>ETA: In addition, YouTube does not appear to have decided not to host the content after all (it was likely found initially objectionable because they can code a recognizer for &quot;objectionable&quot; more accurately than a recognizer for &quot;educational value&quot;). This doesn&#x27;t change the fact that YouTube is within their rights to choose not to associate with Cornell as a business arrangement, but it perhaps matters that here, they didn&#x27;t even make that choice.