Bloomberg chief editor: We publish too many mediocre and long enterprise stories
The point of the chief editor is so true that I&#x27;m surprised to read that from them.<p>I have noticed that a lot of times with this kind of web media.<p>- You have a clickbait title like this: &quot;How a normal guy managed to hack WallStreet with a simple pen&quot;<p>- Then, you have one page of interesting introduction on the topic but without the reply to the title question.<p>&quot;In november 2018, WallStreet was busy with the introduction of xxxx, and suddenly a problem happened, everything went black. To understand, wallstreet works with computers that are connected with a modern system... 300 words ... and on that cold night of the 23 nov 2020, one man John Crowford destroyed all of that.&quot;<p>- Then you have 10 pages of useless crap and fake intervews about the childhood of the guy and a lot of things that are not interesting, and not related to the subject.<p>&quot;His mother was blond, she liked to eat fries. But despite that, John Crowford liked to eat popcorn. So much that his friend reported that, one time, he stayed at a movie theater for a whole day just to eat popcorns ... Studies at the yyy school were ok, but he followed them without passion until he met Carolinas Brocolis a hot night of summer 1992. Together they got 3 kids ... he was not supposed to live in New York as he was born in California, but he found a job there, ...&quot;<p>- And then, you finally have the explanation that is, most of the time, short and straightforward.<p>&quot;So, he was hired as a Janitor in Wall Street, and accidentally put his pen inside the holes of a power plug, resulting in a major power failure. THE END&quot;<p>After reading such a story, either you did skip to the end directly, or you are very angry to have lost so much time reading useless things.