I wish GPT4 had never happened
1) Chaudry&#x27;s article is amazing in its lack of creative thinking. If people like Priya can be ~10 times more productive wielding some AI tools, that means that many companies can potentially produce 10 times as many products&#x2F;services and make more things that will enrich peoples&#x27; lives. Though some people in some companies might be laid off, it doesn&#x27;t necessarily mean that more people will be laid off than new jobs are created.<p>2) Chaudry ignores that you need a human in the loop to check an AI&#x27;s work. You don&#x27;t know that an AI&#x27;s answer is always right. Even if it&#x27;s perfect in 99% of cases, the answer could be jaw-droppingly destructive in that 1% of cases and make errors that even the dumbest human wouldn&#x27;t make. Being grossly wrong even a small percentage of the time is far worse than a human making minor errors sometimes, and being slow all of the time.<p>3) Go and look at some of those historical picture sites to see images of an accounting department in some companies throughout 1900s America. Before computers, you&#x27;d see a fascinating image of a gigantic floor of an office building with desks filled with typewriters and calculators and tons of workers just adding things up and trying to store records in a bunch of file cabinets. Desktop Computers and spreadsheets were invented and all of a sudden an accountant could quickly update a few values in a spreadsheet and figure out an answer to a question far faster and more reliably than that entire floor of accountants. Did accounting software make the world worse and destroy jobs even though it made 1 accountant ridiculously more productive than they were in the past?