Music industry welcomes landmark ruling in Google delisting case
How is Google beholden to the Canadian court to perform actions outside it&#x27;s jurisdiction? Surely the response from Google should be something like &quot;Google.ca can comply in removing links from all web pages and databases it legally controls in the jurisdiction of the court but as this court has no jurisdiction over foreign partner corporations <i>will not</i> comply with <i>ultra vires</i> demands against third-party legal entities in other countries&quot;?<p>I guess Google can choose to comply, what benefit is there for Google in that?<p>Aside OP lacks detail: it sounds naively like a company was butt-hurt because someone did marketing better than them and sold more re-branded product? Anyone got analysis of the actual harm committed?