Ask HN: Why is Microsoft Teams still so bad?
Long ago Microsoft had MSN Messenger, which was one of the leading messaging apps. It worked well, and many &#x27;normal&#x27; users were using it. Then Microsoft dissolved the team behind it and screwed up the product so bad with bloatware and ads that everyone moved to WhatsApp (except in the US where people went back to texting).<p>Then Microsoft came out with Communicator, renamed it to Lync, which was a corporate messenger&#x2F;meeting software. It used its own server, that could federate outside. It worked very well. They added LiveMeeting as a separate app for meetings, built on the same protocols. Our company used it with the &quot;roundtable&quot; camera from 2008, and it all worked amazingly well. We had meetings with people joining in from home and other offices over the internet using inexpensive webcams, 15 years ago.<p>Then they bought Skype and it went downhill from there. I don&#x27;t know what happened, but they took a lot of time integrating technologies from Skype (peer-to-peer) with their own tech (which was more telecom&#x2F;server based) and tried competing with ever-changing perceived competitors by copying parts of their features and UI, without ever making any feature really good. They integrated everything into a single program, Skype for Business, now renamed Teams, and made it bloated and obnoxious. Just try to get it to <i>not</i> start at login... It&#x27;s like MSN all over again.<p>I think the Communicator&#x2F;LiveMeeting software combo they had 15 years ago would still (conceptually) do pretty well as messenger&#x2F;meeting software now, when modernized. It was much less intrusive and behaved like nice software that you actually wanted to use.