Superintelligence: An idea that eats smart people (2016)
I don&#x27;t understand what the &quot;Argument From Slavic Pessimism&quot; is arguing <i>against</i>. It seems to be ceding the point that AI could be dangerous and saying that we most like won&#x27;t be able to prevent it. The conclsion therefore is...we shouldn&#x27;t try? Seems like a tangent among the other points. It definitely doesn&#x27;t argue against the possibility of danger.<p>&gt; We know that minds have to play and learn to interact with the world, before they reach their full mental capacity.<p>Disagree somewhat with this one. We know that <i>brains</i> need to do this, but granting substrate neutrality all <i>minds</i> might not.