Senator Wyden Demands Access to Text of Secret International Agreements Regulating the Internet
News Update by Gwen Hinze and Maira Sutton
Senator Ron Wyden yesterday introduced a bill on the floor of the U.S. Senate demanding access to draft texts of international trade agreements under negotiation by the Office of the United States Trade Representative such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) that carry provisions that could severely choke off users' rights on the Internet around the world. This is a great positive step in the right direction.
The proposed bill, titled the "Congressional Oversight Over Trade Negotiations Act", calls for all Members of Congress, together with all of their staff with proper security clearance, to be given access to "documents, including classified materials, relating to negotiations for a trade agreement to which the United States may be a party and policies advanced by the Trade Representative in such negotiations."
Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the sole power to regulate foreign commerce in order to ensure that such laws and policies take into consideration all the interests of the people rather than those of the select few. Congress has delegated certain powers to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), but remains subject to Congressional oversight. The USTR is required to consult wth the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee, and is supposed to regularly consult with the House and Senate Leadership Offices. In addition, under amendments to the Trade Act enacted by Congress in 2002, the USTR is required to consult with members of the Congressional Oversight Group.
Senator Wyden is a member of the Senate Finance Committee (which has jurisdiction over "reciprocal trade agreements; tariff and import quotas, and related matters thereto") and is Chair of its subcommittee on International Trade, Customs and Global Competitiveness. And yet, as he explains, neither he nor his staff which have obtained proper security clearance, have been able to get access to material related to the negotiations of the TPP from the USTR. This is something that he also raised with the U.S. Trade Ambassador at a Senate hearing on 7 March. The USTR has apparently read the 2002 legislation as narrowing the requirement for the USTR to consult with Members of Congress, contrary to what Senator Wyden and others had intended at the time it was enacted. Meanwhile, the USTR is continuing to consult on TPP negotiating texts with representatives of large entertainment companies, and the pharmaceutical industry on the private sector Industry Trade Advisory Committee on Intellectual Property. Senator Wyden introduced yesterday's bill to rectify this situation.
In his remarks introducing yesterday's bill, Senator Wyden states:
Put simply, this legislation would ensure that the representatives elected by the American people are afforded the same level of influence over our nation's policies as the paid representatives of PhRMA, Halliburton and the Motion Picture Association.
Senator Wyden has nailed it. The USTR has continued to exclude our Congressional representatives, civil society and public interest groups from learning about the policy issues that are being discussed in these negotiations, while welcoming private sector industry groups' inputs on negotiation texts with open arms.
The leaked U.S. TPP Intellectual Property chapter has provisions that will directly impact the future of the open Internet. This is a vital issue that all of us should have a say in, not just representatives from a few selective parts of the economy. Sound and balanced policy-making requires transparency and meaningful input from all affected Internet stakeholders.
Through our action alert, concerned citizens have sent over 20,000 emails to our Congressional representatives since February, calling on Congress to demand transparency in these negotiations. That demonstrates that there is very substantial interest from constitutents in understanding how what the USTR is negotiating will affect our digital rights and the open Internet. However, this battle is not close to being over.
Help us keep the pressure on Congress and let them know we'd like to see them defend Internet freedom against the powerful trans-national industries that are currently unilaterally shaping these secret international trade agreements.
Click here to take action. Tell Congress that you refuse any more backroom deals to regulate the Internet.
Use the hashtag #TPP and #TPPA to keep talking and raising awareness on the agreement on Twitter.
Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
Deeplinks Blog by Cara Gagliano, Katharine Trendacosta | January 3, 2021
A Smorgasbord of Bad Takedowns: 2020 Year in Review
Here at EFF, we take particular notice of the way that intellectual property law leads to expression being removed from the Internet. We document the worst examples in our Takedown Hall of Shame. Some, we use to explain more complex ideas. And in other cases, we offer our help.In terms...
The CASE Act Is Just the Beginning of the Next Copyright Battle
As we feared, the "Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act"—the CASE Act—that we've been fighting in various forms for two years has been included in a "must-pass" spending bill. This new legislation means Internet users could face up to $30,000 in penalties for sharing a meme or...
Deeplinks Blog by Katharine Trendacosta | December 22, 2020
This Disastrous Copyright Proposal Goes Straight to Our Naughty List
Just yesterday we saw two wretched copyright bills-the CASE Act and a felony streaming bill -- slipped into law via a must-pass spending bill. But it seems some people in Congress were just getting started. Today, Senator Thom Tillis launched a "discussion draft" of the so-called Digital...
Press Release | December 10, 2020
Unfiltered: How YouTube's 'Content ID' Helps Shape What We See Online
San Francisco –YouTube is supposed to be a vibrant space for new creativity, but in practice creators are sharply hampered by the site's "Content ID" system. A new whitepaper from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) takes a deep dive into the confusing process of getting a video past YouTube's...
Filters Do More Than Just Block Content, They Dictate It
Today, EFF is publishing a new white paper, "How YouTube's Content ID Discourages Fair Use and Dictates What We See Online." The paper analyzes the effects of YouTube's automated copyright filter, Content ID, on the creative economy that has sprung up around the platform. Major platforms like YouTube have...
Deeplinks Blog by rainey Reitman, Jason Kelley | December 8, 2020
Podcast Episode: You Bought It, But Do You Own It?
Episode 006 of EFF's How to Fix the InternetChris Lewis joins EFF hosts Cindy Cohn and Danny O'Brien as they discuss how our access to knowledge is increasingly governed by click-wrap agreements that prevent users from ever owning things like books and music, and how this undermines the legal doctrine...
Deeplinks Blog by Elliot Harmon, Mitch Stoltz | November 17, 2020
GitHub Reinstates youtube-dl After RIAA's Abuse of the DMCA
GitHub recently reinstated the repository for youtube-dl, a popular free software tool for downloading videos from YouTube and other user-uploaded video platforms. GitHub had taken down the repository last month after the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) abused the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's notice-and-takedown procedure to pressure...
Deeplinks Blog by Rory Mir | October 22, 2020
Open Education and Artificial Scarcity in Hard Times
The sudden move to remote education by universities this year has forced the inevitable: the move to an online education. While most universities won't be fully remote, having course materials online was already becoming the norm before the COVID-19 pandemic, and this year it has become mandatory for millions of...
Deeplinks Blog by Mitch Stoltz | October 15, 2020
Education Groups Drop Their Lawsuit Against Public.Resource.Org, Give Up Their Quest to Paywall the Law
This week, open and equitable access to the law got a bit closer. For many years, EFF, along with co-counsel at Fenwick & West and attorney David Halperin, has defended Public.Resource.Org in its quest to improve public access to the law — including standards, like the National Electrical...