Category: media bias
President Trump's Memes Hall of Fame…, so far!
President Trump has been under attack from all sides during his first two years in office.
These memes offer up a little payback!
Here is my personally selected collection of some of the best President Trump memes that I could find…, so far.
Why do I feel this actually appeared on CNN?!
Ya…, what happened?! Mueller missed your Christmas present, your birthday present, your President's Day present, your Valentine's Day present…, and most importantly of all his going away present!!!
Ya…, 24/7 for over two year! The sad thing is they knew there wasn't any Russian collusion from the start…, at least by President Trump or his team!
No comment needed.
Pretty nice to serve our liberal friends some ketchup with their crow!
A little "Game of Thrones" tribute by "The Prez!"
Actually…, yes…, there was collusion…, but by you and your friends!
And "yes," he beat you "fair and square," as if you would have any idea what that means!
I just can't get enough of this blubbering snowflake!
We all understand now that, as far as Congress goes, it was never, and still isn't, about the American people.
I believe you have proven that to be an accurate statement, Mr. President.
Again…, not too far from the truth!
Bam!!! Wow…, that was brutal…, and accurate…, bust mostly brutal and accurate!
Wah, wah, wah, waaaaah!
Still WINNING!
Stay tuned for a second edition of my favorite President Trump memes coming in the not too distant future!
And a special "thanks" Robert Mueller, Hillary Clinton, and our other confused liberals everywhere. Without losers like you there wouldn't be any winners!
How portions of the liberals' playbook has evolved AND the recently released Mueller Report!
I would contend that prior to the 1980's the political playbook for liberals and conservatives was pretty similar.
During the 90's, Bill and Hillary Clinton changed the "deflect accusations" portion of the liberal playbook to "deny, deny, deny" and "lie, lie, lie." They just would not admit to anything…, even if they were caught red-handed.
Then in the 2000's, in addition to "deny, deny, deny" and "lie, lie, lie," the liberals went one step further. Before they could even be accused of doing something, they would take the initiative and blame the conservatives of doing exactly what they were already doing; thus not only getting themselves off the hook, but giving the complicit "biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media" an excuse to harass and investigate conservatives.
I would say it's a pretty ingenious strategy, however, this strategy only works when you have a cooperative media. Having the cooperative media changes the strategy from ingenious to diabolical…, and even treasonous in some cases.
We have now seen this new strategy employed over and over again.
Most recently we have the cases of the democrats charging President Trump and the republicans of tampering with the election of 2016, Russian collusion, and obstruction of justice…, all of which the democrats were doing, but the complicit media, of course, looked the other way.
The recent completion and subsequent release of Robert Mueller's report has cleared The President and his people of any election tampering, as well as any type of Russian collusion.
Mueller and his team, in fact, were unable to come up with ANYTHING they could charge The President with.
If they could've you know they would've!
So what are we left with?
We're left with the democrats crying about redactions in the report and more unfounded claims of obstruction of justice.
President Trump wasn't charged with anything…, so what exactly do they feel he was obstructing…, the proving of his innocence in all of these manufactured matters?
The whole thing would be funny if it wasn't so sad and pathetic.
So now we have come full circle, for the first time I believe, regarding a topic(s) put forward by this "preemptive accusal strategy."
The question remains then…, if your opposition is cleared of those things you accused them of, which you did or are still doing, how do we proceed and what can we expect?
If matters are handled correctly, this could be an epic beat down for the democrats.
Not only would they be held accountable for the wild goose chase of an investigation, but they would then begin to face the music for their own sins in these matter(s).
This has the potential to be an extremely beautiful thing…, especially if President Trump rolls in the 2020 election and regains control of The House of representatives on his coat tails.
The democrats' sole mission now is to keep the American peoples' eyes off of the ensuing investigations into democrats and to cover their a$$es by any means possible.
The "biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media" will of course be doing its best to assist in these matters, but I still have faith that some semblance of justice will be done, and karma will collect its toll.
So the American people weren't the only ones who got lectured to by Barack Obama!
One of the main things that always annoyed me about former President Obama was that I always felt he was talking down to me.
Apparently he started to believe all of his "fake news" propaganda and press clippings, and actually believed he knew something about something.
I don't know about you, but I was always grateful to President Obama when he would decide to grace us by sharing his wisdom and knowledge with all of us unenlightened "trailer trash."
That, on the "flip-side," is one of the things I like about President Trump. I feel like he's communicating with me on equal terms; talking with me not at me.
Hungary's top diplomat has the same feelings apparently. He praised President Trump and his NATO policies recently, while contrasting President Trump's positive communication style against the Obama-era "lecturing."
According to Adam Shaw for Fox News, "Hungary's top diplomat, in an interview with Fox News, praised President Trump's push for NATO partners to boost military spending, and said the administration's treatment of Central European countries as allies represents a stark contrast from what he called the "lecturing" of the Obama years."
'"Since the current administration has been in power, the relationship has totally changed and the relationship is based on mutual respect which used not to be the case,' Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto told Fox News. 'So before this administration took office, "lecturing" was basically the right expression to describe our relationship.'"
"Szijjarto's comments came just days after Hungary and the U.S. signed a new Defense Cooperation Agreement (DCA). A State Department official told Fox News that the new agreement means the U.S. and Hungary will be 'better positioned to meet and overcome current and future challenges that threaten stability in the region and beyond.'"
"Szijjarto hailed the agreement as a 'clear signal' of the change that has come to the U.S.-Hungarian relationship since Trump entered the White House."
"Both Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Trump have won elections running campaigns heavy on nationalism and tough on illegal immigration (Hungary has built two border fences since 2015). Hungary was one of the countries to join the U.S. in withdrawing from the U.N. global pact on migration last year."
The United Nations Global Migration Agreement is a non-binding deal that has created political tensions in several countries, with politicians claiming it will lead to more migration or erode a country's ability to be in charge of immigration laws.
It was designed "to de-politicize migration again but the pact has done the opposite," Marion Anne Perrine "Marine" Le Pen, President of the French National Rally political party, has said.
The United States was the first country to pull out of the agreement in December of 2017. A statement at the time said "The agreement was incompatible with US sovereignty and our decisions on immigration policies must always be made by Americans and Americans alone."
"Hungary followed in July 2018 – and, at the time, the foreign minister said: 'This pact poses a threat to the world from the aspect that it could inspire millions [of migrants].'"
According to Jack Goodman for BBC News, "Criticism in Europe rose as the date for the signing of the agreement approached."
'"The country that signs the pact, obviously signs a pact with the devil,' said Ms. Le Pen.
"Polish Interior Minister Joachim Brudziński has said the pact 'could also be an incentive for illegal migration.'"
"Germany backed the agreement but faced stern opposition. Alice Weidel, leader in the German parliament of the far-right party Alternative for Germany (AfD), said: 'In effect, illegal migration is being legalized.'"
Adam Shaw continued by saying, "Both Orban and Trump have been criticized for their immigration policies, while liberal groups in Hungary have alleged that the Orban government is eroding judicial independence and cracking down harshly on political opposition groups, including passing a 'Stop Soros' package of laws aimed at curbing the influence of Hungarian-American left-wing billionaire George Soros in the country."
Wow…, this George Soros guy really makes the rounds! I still don't really understand what he's actually trying to accomplish. I just get the feeling he hates everybody and just wants people to suffer.
I think deep down he has a serious inferiority complex. It's a combination of the "Napoleon complex" and the "Ugly duckling complex!"
If you're not familiar with the term, "The Napoleon complex occurs in people of short stature. It is characterized by overly-aggressive or domineering social behavior, and carries the implication that such behavior is compensatory for the subject's stature," according to Wikipedia.
I would add that he would also seem to exhibit "The God complex;" believing he has the ability to control people and situations by virtue of his seemingly limitless funds.
I do know one thing though…, George Soros did not become a billionaire while living under a socialistic system of government, which he now promotes for the rest of us. I think Soros would consider the downfall of Venezuela to be his road map to success.
"Szijjarto indicated there are similarities between the opposition facing Trump and the Hungarian government."
'"We understand the global liberal political elite and global liberal media hate your president, they hate what he has been doing, but they hate what we have been doing as well,' he said."
Hmmm…, sounds like they have their own issues with the "biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media" and the so-called "elites."
'"We are very happy that this administration looks at us Central Europeans as allies instead of lecturing us how to accommodate our life,' he said, calling it a 'totally different approach' from the previous [Obama] administration."
"Szijjarto said Hungary has no issue with Trump's push for nations to meet commitments to spend 2 percent of GDP on defense."
'"We think that it was absolutely legitimate from his perspective to argue for nation's commitments to be fulfilled as soon as possible,' he said, adding that Hungary had already met that commitment."
"Trump's aggressive stance with NATO allies, including reports that he has considered withdrawing from the alliance, has led to criticism he is weakening NATO. But Szijjarto's remarks echo those of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg who, in a speech to Congress this month, said that Trump's push to increase defense spending made the alliance stronger."
Hmmm…, that's interesting. Things sure seem quite different when you hear them right from the horse's mouth as opposed to hearing them through the filter of the "biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media."
Here we have a "reverse" Jussie Smollett situation…, only this actually happened! How much "fake media" news coverage do you think this guy will get?
My humble opinion says little to no coverage…, by the "biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media," at least.
So what actually happened here?
According to Robert Gearty of Fox News, "Montgomery County [Maryland] police on [this past] Monday [4/15/19] announced two arrests in connection with the alleged politically-motivated beat-down."
"Atsu Nable told FOX5 DC that he was the one in the MAGA [Make America Great Again] hat. He said the two men approached him Saturday in Germantown [20 miles north of Washington DC], outraged he was wearing it. He said one of the men struck him from behind, leaving him shocked."
Please remind me again who the ones are displaying this fascist type of behavior all of the time?
"Maryland cops have accused Scott Roberson, 25, and Jovan Crawford, 27, with assaulting a West African immigrant for wearing a MAGA hat over the weekend."
'"I was like, 'Why are you doing this?' Nable said. They said, 'No, the hat,' and they started punching me on my head.'"
"Nable told the station he was proud to wear the hat as a long-time supporter of President Trump. He said he became a naturalized U.S. citizen after emigrating from Togo in West Africa in 2007, attended Trump campaign events and served as a volunteer at Trump's inauguration."
I think this guy has become one of my new heroes!
"Police said in a news release Nable initially tried to walk away from the two men. When they approached him, he reportedly said he was wearing the MAGA hat because 'he was entitled to his own views.'"
We are still entitled to our own views in America, are we not?
You may get an argument about that these days from radical liberal democrats…, and radical liberal democrats are becoming more "the norm" than the exception these days.
The two men then began striking Nable and telling him to take the hat off, the news release says.
'"The victim continued to be struck by the suspects until he fell to the ground,' cops said in the release. 'The suspects then removed property from the victim, and destroyed items of value.'"
"Nable told FOX5 his assailants also destroyed his headphones and tried to steal his cellphone."
"After witnesses called 911, officers found Crawford and Roberson attempting to hide among a group of children playing basketball, police said."
"Cops charged Jovan Crawford, 27, of Germantown, and Scott Duncan Roberson, 25, of D.C., with assaulting Nable. They were also charged with robbery, attempted theft and conspiracy."
Poor Mr. Nable.
Atsu Nable was an obvious victim of a hate crime here, but some would say he himself is guilty of the even more egregious crimes, in ascending order, of:
One, being a LEGAL immigrant.
Two, being a person of color who feels, "he was entitled to his own views."
And three, being a person of color…, and an immigrant, who supports President Trump!
Who the hell does this guy think he is!!!
The "biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media" does not want anyone knowing that people like Atsu Nable even exist!
I feel completely safe in saying that all of the "biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media" probably applauded his beating, although not publicly, of course) and were certain that he absolutely deserved it.
I wouldn't be surprised to see these two fine examples of liberal tolerance receive some kind of community service award from the NAACP on top of it…, just like their friend Jussie Smollett did!
Just don't be surprised is all I'm saying.
My reaction to some recent headlines about the Electoral College, AOC and the 22nd Amendment, DNC Chair calls Republican lawmakers "cowardly," Joe Biden's behavior with women, and did the NY Times and The Washington Post help elect President Trump!?
There are so many topics I'd like to offer my insight on, but so little time!
Welcome to my first crack at the "MrEricksonRules headline buffet line!"
Pick your favorite(s) or have some of each. It's totally up to you.
<<<<<<<*>>>>>>>
Senate democrats introduce measure to abolish Electoral College.
"Would election by popular vote be better than the Electoral College?"
"A group of Democratic senators on Tuesday introduced a measure to do away with the Electoral College, picking up on a talking point that has caught fire in the 2020 Democratic presidential field."
"According to NBC News: 'Leading Democratic senators are expected to introduce a constitutional amendment Tuesday to abolish the Electoral College, adding momentum to a long-shot idea that has been gaining steam among 2020 presidential candidates.'"
"…changing the Constitution is seen as virtually impossible today. A constitutional amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds supermajority in both the House (about 290 votes) and Senate (67 votes) and requires ratification by 38 states."
As is usually the case with the democrat party, what we have here is either disingenuous political grandstanding, uninformed ignorance, or a combination of the two. I'm going to give them some credit and say it's disingenuous political grandstanding for the most part, since actually amending the Constitution would never happen, mostly due to the requirement of having 38 states go along with it.
So…, in the grand scheme of things, it's kind of like "The Green New Deal," a bunch of noise that ain't never going to happen.
Andrew O'Reilly of Fox News contributed.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Liz Cheney disagree over knowledge of 22nd Amendment, Constitution.
"[Liz] Cheney, R-WY, took issue with a comment [Alexandria] Ocasio-Cortez, D-NY, made during a recent MSNBC town hall event in which the freshman congresswoman talked about Democrats being in control of Congress in the 1930s and 1940s."
'"When our party was boldest, the time of the New Deal, the Great Society, the Civil Rights Act and so on, we had, and carried, supermajorities in the House, in the Senate. We carried the presidency,' she told MSNBC's Chris Hayes."
'"They had to amend the Constitution of the United States to make sure (President Franklin D.) Roosevelt did not get reelected,' Ocasio-Cortez continued."
"In response to Ocasio-Cortez's remarks, Cheney tweeted: 'We knew the Democrats let dead people vote. According to AOC, they can run for president too!'"
"The New Yorker then fired off her own response. 'Hey Rep. Cheney, I see from your dead people comment that you get your news from Facebook memes, but the National Constitution Center + Newsweek are just two of many places where you can clarify your misunderstanding of the history of the 22nd Amendment,' she wrote."
"Roosevelt died while in office in 1945 and the 22nd Amendment was proposed by Congress in 1947. The Amendment reads, "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some of other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."
I think we can safely score this:
Representative Liz Cheney………..ONE
Representative Ocasio-Cortez…….ZERO
Kathleen Joyce of Fox News contributed.
DNC Chair Tom Perez calls Republican lawmakers "cowardly," says they will be "judged harshly" by history
"Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez launched a stunning attack on Republican lawmakers, saying history will "judge" them for supporting President Trump."
What's so "stunning" about that? I hear much worse on a daily basis directed at President Trump, republicans and various conservatives.
'"The reason why we [Democrats] are winning, and we won at scale in 2018, is because our message is clear. Our message was: we are the ones who actually have your back on the issues that really matter. Healthcare, education. He said he had your back, but actually he had a knife in your back,' Perez said."
The truth is the democrats under performed in the 2018 midterms, and by any measure we can say the democrats do not "have our back." The democrats, most recently led by Barack Obama, sold America and Americans out. They gave away our jobs, our wealth, our respect around the world, and our American soul.
"The DNC chair continued that President Trump found success in 2016 by putting 'fear on the ballot,' and that Republican lawmakers who have supported his policies over the last three years are 'cowards' who have allowed damage to be done to their part."
That's a good one Tom! The democrats are historically the party of fear. How many times have we heard "the republicans will gut social security," due to the republicans, millions will die without healthcare, our children will starve and grandma will be left out on the street!?
We didn't need President Trump to "put fear on the ballot" in 2016, we were all scared already that our country was going down the drain. And rightly so.
'"I mean, history will not only judge Donald Trump harshly. It will judge Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan and all the other cowards who refused to stand up to this president and allowed the party of Lincoln to die. They will be judged harshly because whatever he says goes right now.'"
I feel more correctly, "history" will judge these times as the times of the great liberal lies. The times of liberal propaganda and the times of the corrupt and biased media who backed them up rather than do their jobs as watchdogs for We the People.
Anna Hopkins of Fox News contributed.
Pelosi: Biden didn't know "the world we're in now."
"House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi is the most high-profile Democrat to come to the defense of former Vice President Joe Biden's 'affectionate demeanor,' Peter Doocy reports from Washington."
Ha! "Affectionate demeanor!?" Is that what we're calling "Uncle Joe's" creepy behavior now?
And according to Politico (a news journalism company), "Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday that she does not think the allegations against Joe Biden of unwelcome contact are disqualifying for a 2020 run, but that the former vice president should be more aware of others' personal space. 'I don't think it's disqualifying,' Pelosi said… 'He has to understand in the world that we're in now that people's space is important to them, and what's important is how they receive it and not necessarily how you intended it.' … Pelosi pushed back against the tone of former vice president's apologies. 'It is how it's received, so to say, 'I'm sorry that you were offended' is not an apology,' the California Democrat said. ''I'm sorry I invaded your space,' but not, 'I'm sorry you were offended.' What's that? That's not accepting the fact that people think differently about communication.'"
I'm a little confused. Is she coming to Joe's defense or is she scolding him?
National Public Radio (NPR) noted, "On the most obvious level, complaints of this kind renew the criticism of Biden's past performance on issues affecting women and people of color, the two constituencies likely to matter most in choosing the next Democratic nominee."
As usual with the democrats, us poor white guys are treated like second class citizens.
"Perceptions of Biden as 'old school' or 'old fashioned' are not just liabilities to be shed. They are also the basis of his appeal to many older, white, working-class Democrats and independents."
The democrat party can say what they want about the new breed of democrat-socialists out there; Joe Biden leads in the polls for president, and he hasn't even officially declared yet!
"Biden's advisers believe coverage of allegations of inappropriate behavior is being stoked by rival Democrats…"
That basically leaves one guy…, and I can hear 'em now, Bernie, Bernie, Bernie.
New York Post: How the New York Times, Washington Post helped get Trump elected.
"If either paper had done the sort of digging on Hillary Clinton that they did on Trump, then Clinton would never have been the presidential nominee for the Democratic Party."
True. And actually, "If either paper had done the sort of digging on Hillary Clinton that they did on Trump," she would be in jail, along with a lot of her friends.
"So, in a different scenario, if the Times and the Washington Post probe Clinton, alert the public to all of her 'problems' then the Democrats are forced to pick someone else as their candidate. In that case, Trump might not have won."
In reality, Mr. Crudele, anything "might" have happened. It really annoys me these days when reporters say, "this might happen," or that "could happen," or this "may" happen.
Here's some news for all of you journalism majors: ANYTHING "MIGHT," "COULD," OR "MAY" HAPPEN! THAT'S NOT NEWS!
John Crudele of The New York Post contribued.
Robert Mueller and his "investigation" were just bad jokes. End of story.
Robert Mueller and his Hillary Clinton "hit squad" just were not able to manufacture any wrong doings by The President, his family, or anyone involved in his campaign.
Remember that Mueller and his team and everyone else knew going in that President Trump wasn't guilty of any of this stuff, but Hillary, Obama, the Obama DOJ and the Obama FBI were, and it was their job to create a distraction and deflect an investigation away from their "swampy" friends.
This was not an investigation of a crime, this was an "investigation" in search of a crime…, any crime…, but there was no crime to be found. Believe me…, if they could have found anything…, ANYTHING…, A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G…, that's all we would be hearing about.
But as it is, Robert Mueller and his team finally had to slink away, with their tails between their legs, unable to come up with anything that would justify the "biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media's" and the democrats' daily charges (for almost two years now) of Russian collusion and obstruction of justice.
This is what today's New York Times headline SHOULD look like!
Instead, after close to two years of bashing our president on a daily basis, they are sporting some mealy-mouthed small print headline that doesn't come anywhere near giving The President his due.
According to Dan Gainor of Fox News, "[The] Liberal media's Mueller collusion coverage turns out to be Titanic of media disasters."
The "biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media" bought "the swamp's" fantasy narrative, hook, line and sinker!
The rallying cries of "It's Mueller time!" have turned into "What you talkin' 'bout Willis?"
The much anticipated Mueller Report has exposed, "… one of the worst disasters of media bias in history – the false claim that Donald Trump, his campaign or associates colluded with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election."
"Attorney General William Barr sent a letter to members of Congress Sunday stating that Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no evidence of Trump-Russia collusion – something the president has been saying [all along]."
"Like the luxury liner Titanic, the supposedly unsinkable passenger ship that sank when it collided with an iceberg in 1912 in the Atlantic, the claim of Trump-Russia collusion was supposed to be unsinkable. At least that's what we were told repeatedly by the anti-Trump media."
"But in reality, there's nothing new about Russia's attempts to influence our elections. The Washington Post has reported that Russia and its predecessor Soviet Union have been trying to influence American elections since 1960."
"Yet ever since President Trump was elected – surprising media pundits who expected Democrat Hillary Clinton to defeat him – many news organizations have claimed he only got to the Oval Office because of help from Russia. Forget that President Obama had promised Russia's leader he'd have "more flexibility" working with Russia after the 2012 election. It had to be Trump who was the one working with Russia."
"Journalists set aside ordinary things like honesty, professionalism and accuracy in their desperate quest to be the one who took down Trump."
I would argue that things like honest, professionalism and accuracy had been set aside long before this by the "biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media." The whole Russian collusion hoax just removed any shadow of a doubt that the "biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media" was real and an enemy of We the People, just like President Trump had warned.
"The Russia collusion claim dominated the news for the past two years because much of the media couldn't accept that their favored candidate – Hillary Clinton – was beaten by a man they could not stand."
"There had to be another reason Trump won. The media had reported many times he was almost guaranteed to lose."
"Buzzfeed published the uncorroborated dossier attacking Trump with salacious gossip and rumor even before he took office. Then it defended the foul result."
"Three CNN reporters resigned after their false Trump-Russia story was removed from the CNN website."
"On it went. ABC's then-investigative reporter Brian Ross incorrectly reported that Trump directed Michael Flynn to contact Russia. ABC had to bail the lifeboats when it turned out that the contact was post-election. The Dow was underwater briefly for about 350 points. Ross was later suspended and he no longer works at ABC."
"The list of such failures is almost endless. Now the press is forced to admit the Mueller report vindicated the president on collusion."
"According to Barr, Mueller found that when the president said repeatedly that "there was no collusion" the president was right."
"The narrative collapse would cause sane men and women to stop and reassess how they got here, how they got to a point where they violated every tenet of journalism they claim to support – just for revenge on Trump."
"A few have noticed. Liberal writer Matt Taibbi released a whole chapter of his upcoming book 'Hate, Inc.,' demolishing media coverage of Trump. The piece was headlined: 'It's official: Russiagate is this generation's WMD,' comparing the false collusion claims to the incorrect claim that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction to justify the U.S.invasion."
"Taibbi called the Mueller report 'a death-blow for the reputation of the American news media.'
"The media didn't just ignore warnings like the Titanic captain. They aimed right at an iceberg (Trump) and were determined to smash it. Instead, the only thing that sank was their reputation."
Agreed, Mr. Gainor, although I would say a lot more than their reputation has sank…, many of these networks, newspapers and magazines have lost any shred of credibility they may have had, and their viabilities as functioning media outlets are now in question.
"A picture is worth a thousand words." In these cases…, maybe more.
Here are some of the famous pictures that reflect our American history and reflect events that have changed our history.
… although this picture is not one of those pictures!
Let's continue…
09/11/2001. Some pictures don't need any description.
The assassination of John F. Kennedy, the ensuing investigation, and all of the questions surrounding the assassination, have remained for over 50 years.
1963 – President John F. Kennedy and his wife Jacqueline in Dallas, Texas, moments before he was fatally shot.
President Kennedy is hit.
A frantic Jackie scrambles onto the back of the car.
The murder of Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin of The President, by Jack Ruby, in the Dallas jail.
In 1986 The Space Shuttle Challenger exploded shortly after lift-off, shocking our nation and the world.
Neil Armstrong takes the first step onto the moon's surface, July 20, 1969. He and Buzz Aldrin were the first humans to land on the moon. A smart phone, like most of us have, has thousands of times the computing power of the computers on Apollo 11.
"That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." – Neil Armstrong, as he stepped onto the surface of the moon.
This picture, taken in New York City, known as "The Kiss," represents the unbridled joy by all Americans that World War II had finally come to an end.
On August 14, 1945, President Harry Truman announced from the White House that the Japanese were unconditionally surrendering. As soon as the news was announced, spontaneous celebrations erupted across the United States.
But as memorable as the arrival of victory over Japan was, the day was bittersweet for the many Americans whose loved ones would not be returning home. More than 400,000 Americans had given their lives in World War II, and America would never be the same.
In 2016, Donald Trump shocked the entire country by pulling off the upset of the century, while not only winning the presidency, but doing so convincingly. The "forgotten men and women" in our country rose up and made their votes count. Politics and the way we view "the media" in our country would never be the same.
I hope you enjoyed this trip through some of our history as Americans, as seen through the camera lens.
Please let me know if you agree with the events I've chosen, if you feel I missed any, or if you you'd just like to reminisce or leave a comment.
The "biased, liberal propaganda, fakes news media" strikes again!
"We should be outraged by FOX and its apologists," according to The Washington Post.
Another liberal "rag" magazine, The Nation, recently pronounced that, "Fox News has always been propaganda."
Sounds like just another coordinated, fake news narrative being spun on multiple fronts.
The sheer and utter hypocrisy of the "biased, liberal propaganda, fakes news media" just never ceases to amaze me…, and they just have NO shame.
The "biased, liberal propaganda, fakes news media" turned its collective head and looked the other way on countless occasions during the Obama years, or when it had to, they "reasoned away" many concerns or dreamed up excuses as they deemed necessary.
Their behavior during Obama's reign was the definition of being an "apologist."
Any fair minded people know that the "biased, liberal propaganda, fakes news media" does not even make an attempt anymore to appear fair or balanced with their coverage of President Trump, the republicans, or conservatives in general.
So I'll tell you what Washington Post…, you and your friends go on and be outraged at whoever you want and the rest of us will be outraged at whoever we want…, ok?
We all know what causes your "outage." It's the fact that FOX and FOX News does not walk in lock step with your liberal agenda.
What causes our "outrage" is the fact that the mainstream media has become a propaganda arm of the democrat party and along with liberals and socialists everywhere.
The trust and the reputation of the mainstream media is gone and I don't think it's ever coming back.