healthcarereimagined
Envisioning healthcare for the 21st century
U.S. Navy Medicine
Lawmakers form working group to find ways to improve EHRs – FierceEMR
Posted by timmreardon on 05/01/2015
Posted in: Accountable Care Organizations, Blue Button, Data Science, EHR Interoperability, EHR Usability, Emergency Medicine, Genetic Data, Genomic Data, Global Standards, Health Care Costs, Health Care Economics, Health IT adoption, Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Healthcare Informatics, Healthcare Security, Innovation, Integrated Electronic Health Records, Military Health System Reform, Mobile Healthcare, National Health IT System, Open Data, Patient Portals, PCMH, Precision Medicine, Primary Care, Public Health, Quadruple Aim, Quality Measures, U.S. Air Force Medicine, U.S. Army Medicine, U.S. Navy Medicine, U.S. Surgeon General, Uncategorized, Veterans Affairs, Warrior Transistion Units.	Leave a comment
April 30, 2015 | By Katie Dvorak
A new bipartisan committee's working group will gather on Capitol Hill throughout the coming months to find ways to improve electronic health records, according to Senate health committee chairman Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and ranking member Patty Murray (D-Wash.).
The group will work to find five or six ways to "make the failed promise of electronic health records something that physicians and providers look forward to instead of something they endure," Murray said in an announcement.
While adoption of EHRs has grown, many physicians aren't satisfied with the technology. In a recent survey by Accenture of 600 U.S. physicians, only 46 percent believe EHRs improve treatment decisions and 64 percent believe they reduce medical errors. EHR adoption also appears to have leveled off, FierceEMR previously reported.
All members of the Senate health committee are invited to be a part of the working group. Staff meetings begin this week, with participation from health IT professionals, industry experts and government agencies.
The working group's goals include the following:
Help providers improve quality of care and patient safety.
Facilitate interoperability between EHR vendors.
Empower patients to engage in their own care through access to their health data.
Protect privacy and security of health information.
The working group isn't the only way Alexander and Murray are pushing for change when it comes to EHRs.
Both spoke at a recent Senate appropriations subcommittee hearing of the Health Education, Labor and Pensions Committee regarding the Health and Human Services Department's budget. The senators told Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell that, despite $28 billion in subsidies pursuant to the Meaningful Use program, physicians are not adopting EHRs as hoped.
– here's the announcement
Article link: http://www.fierceemr.com/story/lawmakers-form-working-group-find-ways-improve-ehrs/2015-04-30
Despite increased use, docs still not embracing EHRs
HHS, Congress plan collaboration to fix doc EHR problems
Survey: Doc EHR adoption leveling off
To err is human; EHRs must account for that, panelists say
IBM's Full-Court Press to Capture DOD Health Records Contract – Nextgov
Posted in: Health IT adoption, Healthcare Delivery, Innovation, Integrated Electronic Health Records, IT Acquisition, Military Health System Reform, Primary Care, Quadruple Aim, U.S. Air Force Medicine, U.S. Army Medicine, U.S. Navy Medicine.	Leave a comment
It's no secret the multibillion deal to overhaul the Defense Department's electronic health records system will be one of the most significant government contracts awarded in 2015.
In the months leading up to the October 2014 bid deadline, DOD officials testified the contract could be worth as much as $11 billion through 2023. And after more than a year of procurement preparation by DOD, four powerhouse vendor teams submitted bids to build the Pentagon's next-generation EHR system.
The bidding teams are:
Computer Sciences Corp., partnered with HP and EHR developer Allscripts;
Leidos and Accenture Federal;
PricewaterhouseCoopers with General Dynamics Information Technology, DSS Inc. and Medsphere; and
IBM and Epic Systems.
DOD is expected to award one of those teams – consisting of commercial vendors coupled with EHR developers – with the contract in June 2015.
While it's too early to know whether there's a frontrunner, IBM and Epic have arguably been the most proactive team. They were the first to announce their partnership in June 2014. Around the same time, IBM began hiring high-profile personnel to lead its health care efforts, including Dr. Keith Salzman, who spent 20 years with DOD's military health system.
On Wednesday, IBM and Epic raised the bar in their bidding strategy, announcing the formation of an advisory group of leading experts in large, successful EHR integrations to advise the companies on how to manage the overhaul — if they should win the contract, of course.
The advisory group's creation was included as part of IBM and Epic's bid package, according to Andy Maner, managing partner for IBM's federal practice.
In a press briefing at IBM's Washington, D.C., offices, Maner emphasized the importance of soliciting advice and insight from the group. Members of the advisory board include health care organizations, such as the American Medical Informatics Association, Duke University Health System and School of Medicine, Mercy Health, Sentara Healthcare and the Yale-New Haven Hospital.
The board will advise on more than tech hurdles.
The advisory board also includes veterans who've dealt firsthand with challenging circumstances under DOD's current system, which serves 10 million beneficiaries.
The lack of interoperability, particularly with off-network health care providers and the Department of Veterans Affairs' own health records system, can put soldiers and transitioning veterans through unnecessary grief.
"I'm not trashing the current system, but you're constantly getting referred out," said retired Maj. William Lyles, who was wounded by an improved explosive device while serving as an Army Green Beret. "I want to add the patient's perspective to this group."
However, Epic, one of the largest players in the broader EHR market, has not been immune from criticism its own systems don't interconnect well with competing systems.
A front-page New York Times story last fall reported the company had been criticized in some circles "by those who say its empire has been built with towering walls, deliberately built not to share patient information with competing systems."
The IBM-Epic advisory board has already shared input and will continue to do so should the team capture the award.
As the due date on the contract award nears, Nextgov plans to check in with all the bidders on the contract.
Article link: http://www.nextgov.com/health/health-it/2015/01/ibms-full-court-press-capture-dod-health-records-contract/102441/?oref=ng-relatedstories
Military, Federal Health Care Leaders Discuss Military Medicine and National Health Strategy – Health.mil
Posted in: DoD, EHR Interoperability, EHR Usability, Genetic Data, Genetic Research, Genomic Data, Global Standards, Health Care Costs, Health Care Economics, Health IT adoption, Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Healthcare Informatics, Innovation, Integrated Electronic Health Records, JASONS, Military Health System Reform, Mobile Healthcare, National Health IT System, Open Data, Patient Portals, Public Health, Quadruple Aim, Quality Measures, U.S. Air Force Medicine, U.S. Army Medicine, U.S. Navy Medicine, U.S. Surgeon General, Uncategorized, Veterans Affairs.	Leave a comment
By: Mililtary Health System Communications Office
U.S. Surgeon General Vice Admiral Vivek H. Murthy meets with Dr. Jonathan Woodson, assistant secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, at the Pentagon on March 11, 2015, to discuss the Military Health System's critical role in support of the National Health Strategy.
eaders of the Military Health System met with the newly confirmed U.S. Surgeon General at the Pentagon on March 11. Dr. Jonathan Woodson, assistant secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, and Air Force Lt. Gen. Douglas Robb, director of the Defense Health Agency, discussed military health and the MHS' critical role in support of the National Health Strategy in their first meeting with Vice Admiral Vivek H. Murthy since his confirmation by the U.S. Senate in December 2014.
"Our partnership with the Public Health Service has been instrumental in helping the Department and the Military Health System achieve its mission," said Woodson. "Public Health Service officers have worked side-by-side with us in our military hospitals and clinics, in our laboratories, in support of our global health mission, and as part of the medical team serving all of our beneficiaries. One of the most prominent areas where we have collaborated is on implementation of health prevention and wellness initiatives. I look forward to continuing to work in close partnership with Admiral Murthy to promote health and healthy behaviors for our force and all of our beneficiaries."
The meeting gave the leaders the important opportunity to discuss the Military Health System as a strategic asset in support of national security objectives, and the important role DoD plays in supporting the National Health Strategy, especially in areas such as reducing obesity and tobacco use.
"Our military medical personnel are all members of the larger federal team focused on improving the health and wellness of the entire country," said Robb. "I am privileged to have Public Health Service officers working with me in the Defense Health Agency on a number of critical health matters. We're one team engaged in one fight. It was a great opportunity to show Admiral Murthy everything we have to offer, and to express our appreciation for the talented people the Public Health Service shares with us."
Article link: https://healthcarereimagined.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1489&action=edit&message=6
Approaches to Reducing Federal Spending on Military Health Care – CBO
Posted in: Health Care Costs, Health Care Economics, Health IT adoption, Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Innovation, Military Health System Reform, National Health IT System, Quadruple Aim, U.S. Air Force Medicine, U.S. Army Medicine, U.S. Navy Medicine, Veterans Affairs.	Leave a comment
CBO link: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/44993-MilitaryHealthcare.pdf
Report link: https://healthcarereimagined.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/44993-militaryhealthcare.pdf
Reforming the Military Health System – CNAS
Posted in: Data Science, EHR Interoperability, Global Standards, Health Care Costs, Health Care Economics, Health IT adoption, Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Healthcare Informatics, Innovation, Integrated Electronic Health Records, Military Health System Reform, Mobile Healthcare, National Health IT System, Patient Centered Medical Home, Patient Portals, Primary Care, Quadruple Aim, Quality Measures, U.S. Air Force Medicine, U.S. Army Medicine, U.S. Navy Medicine, Veterans Affairs.	Leave a comment
Article link: http://www.cnas.org/reforming-the-military-health-system#.VOs6o8k5C03
Report link: https://healthcarereimagined.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/reforming-dod-healthcare_021015.pdf
How the DOD's choice of EHR will impact providers
Posted in: Data Science, EHR Interoperability, Genetic Data, Genetic Research, Genomic Data, Global Standards, Health Care Costs, Health Care Economics, Health IT adoption, Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Healthcare Informatics, Healthcare Security, Innovation, Integrated Electronic Health Records, Military Health System Reform, Mobile Healthcare, National Health IT System, Open Data, Patient Portals, Primary Care, Public Health, Quadruple Aim, Quality Measures, U.S. Air Force Medicine, U.S. Army Medicine, U.S. Navy Medicine, Uncategorized, Veterans Affairs.	Leave a comment
By Heather Caspi | February 19, 2015
What's in an EHR? As the Department of Defense prepares to select a new electronic health record system, some are advocating that it go with an open-source solution—not just to benefit of the DOD but to use the $11-billion program to benefit the healthcare industry at large.
Why it matters to the DOD
Most commercial EHR systems are developed around FFS, which is not particularly relevant to the DOD.
In a new report released by the Center for New American Security titled "Reforming the Military Health System," the authors argue that the selection of a closed, proprietary system would trap the DOD into vendor lock, health data isolation and a long-term contract with technology that will age rather than evolve.
Co-author Stephen L. Ondra, a former senior advisor for health information in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, tells Healthcare Dive that an open-source solution could more easily adapt to meet future modernization and interoperability needs, and could more creatively be tailored to the DOD's requirements.
Ondra says most commercial EHR systems are developed around the fee-for-service revenue cycle, a model that is not particularly relevant to the DOD and its healthcare system. He says an EHR for the DOD should be focused on the clinical care management aspect of these programs, which would require lengthy and expensive modification.
He argues that a proprietary system would be inadequate as it would leave the DOD with a single vendor's solutions. "You don't have some of the creativity and innovation that an open source system would have because you're limited to a single vendor's view and skills," Ondra says.
In addition, he notes, proprietary systems have less incentive to provide interoperability solutions because their business model aims to lock people into using that particular system.
"I think the commercial systems are very good at what they do," Ondra said. However, "they are not ideally designed for efficiency and enhancement of care delivery, and I think the DOD can do better with an open source system both in the near-term, and more importantly in the long-term, because of the type of innovation and creativity that can more quickly come into these systems."
Why it matters to everyone
"If the DOD goes with a closed, proprietary system, it could stifle innovation in the industry."
Whoever gets that $11-billion award is going to have a lot of money to develop EHR technology—and whether they are serving an open or closed solution will determine whether the innovations remain stovepiped from the rest of the industry, notes report author Peter L. Levin, a former chief technology officer at the Department of Veterans Affairs.
"If the DOD were to choose to go with a closed, proprietary system, it has the potential of stifling innovation in the rest of the industry," Levin says. "If they go with an openly-architected, standard space and modular system, then really in a very simple way, they are spreading the innovation resources around."
"Instead of concentrating it all in one place and letting that vendor own all of the innovation, they'll be able to nourish and support the various components that comprise these complicated enterprise resource platforms in a way that will not only be beneficial to the DOD and the country in the long run, but will tremendously benefit the country and other kinds of innovations now," Levin said.
Imagine if consumers could only talk to people with same phone carrier.
Levin adds that the same arguments for the DOD to select an open-source EHR system apply to private healthcare systems as well. He asks consumers to imagine if they could only talk to people with same phone carrier, or only go to gas stations for their particular make of car.
He argues that private hospitals and private payers have been unwittingly supporting the continued isolation and segmentation of the commercial solutions.
"Healthcare suffers tremendously in terms of cost and outcome because of these isolated systems," he says, "and that's just as true for the private sector as it is for the public sector."
Ondra adds that the DOD's choice will set an example from which both open and closed source providers could learn.
"I think that a major government contract would send the message that the current systems, as good as they are, are not fully meeting the needs of clinical care in a way that is efficient for the provider," he says.
"Going to an open source for the DOD gives the opportunity to have rapid development of things that are more helpful to care delivery, more efficient for the provider, because the customer then is the deliverer of care, and not the finance department of a care delivery system," Ondra said.
Article link: http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/how-the-dods-choice-of-ehr-will-impact-providers/366180/
ONC unveils Interoperability Roadmap for public comment – Fierce Health IT
Posted in: Big Data, Blue Button, Data Science, EHR Interoperability, Genomic Data, Global Standards, Health Care Costs, Health Care Economics, Health IT adoption, Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Healthcare Informatics, Healthcare Security, Innovation, Integrated Electronic Health Records, Military Health System Reform, Mobile Healthcare, National Health IT System, Patient Centered Medical Home, Patient Portals, PCMH, Public Health, Quadruple Aim, Quality Measures, U.S. Air Force Medicine, U.S. Army Medicine, U.S. Navy Medicine, Uncategorized, Veterans Affairs.	Leave a comment
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT has released for public comment its shared nationwide roadmap for interoperability.
The roadmap's goal is to provide steps to be taken in both the private and public sectors to create an interoperable health IT ecosystem over the next 10 years, according to ONC.
One of the main focuses on the roadmap is to enable "a majority of individuals and providers across the care continuum to send, receive, find and use a common set of electronic clinical information at the nationwide level by the end of 2017."
In addition, the roadmap is also linked with President Barack Obama's recently announcement Precision Medicine Initiative, which aims to increase the use of personalized information in healthcare, ONC announced.
"HHS is working to achieve a better healthcare system with healthier patients, but to do that, we need to ensure that information is available both to consumers and their doctors," HHS Secretary Sylvia M. Burwell said in the announcement. "Great progress has been made to digitize the care experience, and now it's time to free up this data so patients and providers can securely access their health information when and where they need it."
Along with the roadmap, ONC also released a draft of 2015 Interoperability Advisory Standards, which "represents ONC's assessment of the best available standards and implementation specifications for clinical health information interoperability as of December 2014."
The roadmap is garnering praise from industry leaders, including from the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives. CHIME said in an annocement that is "welcomes" the Interoperability Standards Advisory today as part of the roadmap.
"This is a much-needed playbook for each and every health IT professional," CHIME President and CEO Russell P. Branzell said in the announcement. "Now, healthcare providers and health IT developers have a single source of truth, with an extensible process to align clinical standards towards improved interoperability, efficiency and patient safety. While we have made great strides as a nation to improve EHR adoption, we must pivot towards true interoperability based on clear, defined and enforceable standards."
The draft road map stems from, and is a more robust version of, a vision paper published in June by ONC. The ultimate goal of ONC in developing the road map is to build a continuous learning health system. The interoperability roadmap is also part of the ONC's overarching Federal Health IT Strategic Plan, which spans from 2015 to 2020.
"As a draft, this roadmap needs the input from knowledgeable, engaged stakeholders and, in particular, areas where important actions or milestones may be missing," according to ONC.
– here's the roadmap (.pdf)
– check out the Interoperability Advisory Standards (.pdf)
– read the announcement
Article link: http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/onc-unveils-interoperability-roadmap-public-comment/2015-01-30?spMailingID=11587394&spUserID=Mjg0MDEwMzE2MzkS1&spJobID=424244809&spReportId=NDI0MjQ0ODA5S0
Follow healthcarereimagined on WordPress.com
Why Google's Move into Patient Information Is a Big Deal – HBR 12/15/2019
Who Owns the Biggest Biotech Discovery of the Century? – MIT Technology Review 12/15/2019
How the British Army's operations went agile – McKinsey Quarterly 11/03/2019
A Message from the Chairman to the Men and Women of Our U.S. Armed Forces 09/27/2019
DoD to begin next major phase of military hospital consolidation – Health.mil 09/24/2019
4 Tips for Managing Organizational Change – HBR 09/14/2019
Why 5G requires new approaches to cybersecurity – Brookings Institution 09/04/2019
NIST Lays Out Roadmap for Developing Artificial Intelligence Standards – Nextgov 08/19/2019
Adopting an ecosystem view of business technology – McKinsey 08/19/2019
The Pentagon Releases Its 5-Year Digital Modernization Strategy – Nextgov 08/03/2019
Accountable Care Organizations
AHRQ
American Board of Internal Medicine
Blue Button
Digital Services Playbook
EHR Interoperability
EHR Usability
FDASIA
Genomic Data
Health Care Costs
Health IT adoption
Healthcare Delivery
Healthcare Informatics
Healthcare Outcomes
Healthcare Security
Helathcare Delivery
Integrated Electronic Health Records
Lab Report Access
Military Health System Reform
National Health IT System
ONC Reports to Congress
Quadruple Aim
Rehab Medicine
TechFAR Handbook
U.S. Air Force Medicine
U.S. Army Medicine
U.S. Surgeon General
Warrior Transistion Units
Business Defense Department Department of Veterans Affairs EHealth EHR Electronic health record Food and Drug Administration Health Health informatics Health Information Exchange Health information technology Health system HIE Hospital IBM Mayo Clinic Medicare Medicine Military Health System Patient Patient portal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act United States United States Department of Defense United States Department of Veterans Affairs