Bi-partisan Senate Bill Would Give Locals More Say Over Transpo Spending
Improving local access to transportation funds would help build project's like the multi-modal Atlanta BeltLine. Rendering: Atlanta BeltLine
When it comes to transportation funding, cities and towns occupy the bottom of the totem pole. The vast majority of federal transportation money goes to states, to the exclusion of local governments. That means state DOTs get tens of billions to spend on highways each year, while mayors and local agencies have to scrounge for money to improve transit, build sidewalks, or add bike lanes.
A bipartisan bill introduced in the Senate Thursday could give local governments greater access to federal funding. Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Roger Wicker (R-MS) introduced the Innovation in Surface Transportation Act — Senate Bill 2891 [PDF] — which would set aside some federal transportation money for states to redistribute to cities and towns on a competitive basis.
Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker says municipalities around his state want access to federal transportation funds. Photo: Senator Wicker
The legislation would devote 10 percent of federal surface transportation funding — or about $5 billion per year — to local-level projects. The funds would be split up between the states, and in each state a panel would distribute the money on a competitive basis to local governments, transit agencies, and regional planning agencies.
Senator Wicker said the bill is supported by localities across Mississippi as well as the Mississippi Municipal League.
"Local officials in Mississippi are on the front lines of America's transportation challenges but often lack the resources to pay for critical improvements," he said in a statement. "This measure would enable these local leaders to have a larger role in deciding which projects merit consideration. In doing so, leaders could implement the most targeted and cost-effective solutions to meet unique and urgent infrastructure needs."
Three other senators — Mark Begich (D-Alaska), Bob Casey (D-Pennsylvania), and Thad Cochran (R-Mississippi) — have also signed on as sponsors. The Senate bill has a companion in the House — HR 4726, which has been held up in committee.
David Goldberg, communications director for Transportation for America, a leading supporter of the measure, said he doesn't expect the bill to be passed into law before the holiday recess. But support for the bill today, he said, could help shape the next transportation bill.
Transportation for America is asking supporters to email their senators and urge them to support the measure.
Filed Under: Federal Funding, Local Control, Transportation for America, U.S. Senate
9 thoughts on Bi-partisan Senate Bill Would Give Locals More Say Over Transpo Spending
Froggie says:
Probably DOA in the House…
C Monroe says:
Hopefully not. I always wondered why the state roads were smooth as glass and always being redone while local roads were like washboards and local transit suffered, the state pads its departments first before sharing.
Jack Jackson says:
in that picture, where do the delivery trucks bring the retailers stock?
Lars Ulrich says:
some States use as little as 20% federal funds in their overall spending programs. which means the balance of all transportation spending is state and local
they use federal $ for highways because it's far more likely to benefit national mobility
there is plenty of State money locals have access to. how they spend it is between the locals abd state
but you knew this
Coolebra says:
On a competitive basis. Hmmm. I wonder if that means states, like Illinois, would be precluded from establishing arbitrary geographic distribution formulas before projects are reviewed competitively.
Southeasterner says:
Wouldn't this make things worse? I would think federal money would have more restrictions in how it is used then if the state were to decide how to spend/allocate all the money. Keep in mind many states are ruled by rural republican legislatures who could actually find ways to allocate even less money to urban projects, which they already (wrongly) claim are receiving all the federal and state gas tax funds.
This sounds like a disaster.
Bolwerk says:
Maybe around back. Maybe they let trucks into ped areas for delivery. Maybe retailers cart goods a block.
Depends on the state. The old joke in Illinois is that the only decent roads are those going into Springfield (the state capital).
Its the Atlanta beltline, the trail area was never a road (it was a rail corridor) so you are (technically) looking at the backside of the buildings.
Cardin-Cochran Amendment Would Boost Local Control of Bike-Ped Funding
By Angie Schmitt	| Feb 14, 2012
We mentioned it briefly last week, but the amendment to the Senate transportation bill from Maryland Democrat Ben Cardin and Mississippi Republican Thad Cochran is a critical one to track. The amendment would give local governments, rather than state DOTs, access to most federal bike-ped funding. The way the Senate transportation bill, MAP-21, is currently […]
Movement in Congress to Let Cities and Towns Access Federal Transpo Funds
Finally, proof that Congress is capable of crafting smart transportation legislation and not just zany ways to avoid raising the gas tax. A bipartisan coalition of 10 lawmakers is supporting the Innovation in Surface Transportation Act, which would help cities, counties, and other local governments directly access federal funding for transportation projects, according to Transportation for America. The proposal, first floated last year, […]
House Bill Would Give Cities and Towns More Say Over Transpo Spending
By Angie Schmitt	| Jun 3, 2014
A bill to give local governments greater access to transportation funds has bipartisan sponsors in the House of Representatives. The Innovation in Surface Transportation Act, introduced late last month, would let local communities access a much more significant share of federal transportation funds. The legislation would set aside a share of various federal programs that flow to […]
Meet the $4.7 Billion Birmingham Highway Only Cronyism Could Build
It is really a testament to how dominant the highway industrial complex has become that we even have to talk about Birmingham's Northern Beltline, a $4.7 billion outerbelt first proposed in the 1960s. But with backing from big companies that would reap windfall real estate profits from the highway — and with a U.S. Senator […]
Compare the Senate and House Transpo Bills, Side-By-Side
By Ben Goldman	| Mar 15, 2012
Now that the Senate has passed a transportation bill and everyone's waiting to see what the House will do next, Transportation for America has done us all a great service and compared the Senate's bill to the House's — well, to the last thing the House showed us before things fell apart for John Boehner's […]
Mica's Transportation Proposal: Responses Flood In
By Tanya Snyder	| Jul 7, 2011
The GOP transportation proposal is now online. Here are some early reactions. Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ), chair of the Senate Banking subcommittee with jurisdiction over public transportation: "It used to be that Republicans understood that transportation investment was necessary to spur economic growth and create jobs. Now, I guess they think if we give the […]