gaverfraxz/jigsaw_sample · Datasets at Hugging Face

id string	comment_text string	toxic int64	severe_toxic int64	obscene int64	threat int64	insult int64	identity_hate int64
9b18d7bbfcf3f6f0	" ASUE Hello, On, WP:ASUE, your username, as well as all other participants' names, have been moved under Inactive Participants. If you are still are an active member, please move your username to Active Participants. Thanks! <3 "	0	0	0	0	0	0
05a57134e3ae592e	I am glad that wikipedia has realized the malicious intent of the wikicohen account. 70.26.72.221	0	0	0	0	0	0
56d1499b5c1f57b6	", 28 August 2006 (UTC) I agree. I know the media is calling it various names, but we can correctly title the article Comair Flight 191 and have both ""Delta Flight 5191"" and ""Comair Flight 5191"" redirect to it. Obviously ""Delta Flight 191"" shouldn't redirect, however, since it was a famous plane crash in Dallas during the 1970s or 1980s (I can't exactly remember which but that's not important). Alex 07:35"	0	0	0	0	0	0
0209cdf3131130ed	" WILL MY MOTHERFUCKING SAFETY BE GUARANTEED???? I FUCKING HOPE SO!!! I'M BRINGING MY OWN FUCKIN' WEAPONS!! PAY ME WHEN I GET BACK MOTHERFUCKERS!!! OH YEAH I'VE GOT A JOKE...A FAMILY (HUSBAND, WIFE, SON, DAUGHTER, DOG) WALKS INTO AN AGENT'S OFFICE AND TELLS HIM THAT THEY'VE GOT A GREAT VAUDEVILLE ROUTINE...HE SAYS ""WE DON'T HIRE KIDDY ACTS"" AND THEY SAY ""BUT WE'RE REALLY GOOD!"" AND SO THE AGENT SAYS ""FINE, LET ME SEE WHAT YOU'VE GOT, BUT IF YOU SUCK I'M THROWING YOU OUT""...SO THE FAMILY GETS READY...THE DAUGHTER HITS THE CD PLAYER AND CIRCUS MUSIC BEGINS PLAYING, THE FATHER JUMP KICKS THE SON IN THE HEAD AND STOMS HIS FACE IN THE GROUND UNTIL IT'S A BLOODY PULP, THEN PROCEEDS TO JERK OFF AND CUM ALL OVER HIS SHATTERED SKULL. MEANWHILE THE MOTHER BEGINS VIOLENTLY FINGER FUCKING THE DAUGHTER AS THE DOG FUCKS THE MOTHER IN THE ASS HOLE. THIS IS THE POINT WHEN THE FATHER TAKES THE LEFTOVER BRAIN MATTER FROM THE SON'S HEAD AND SHOVES IT INTO THE MOTHER'S PUSSY, THEN BEGINS FUCKING HER PUSSY WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY STICKING HIS FINGER DOWN THE DAUGHTER'S THROAT UNTIL SHE VOMITS ALL OVER THEM BOTH. THEN THE DOG BITES THE MOTHER'S HAND OFF AS SHE'S FINGER FUCKING THE DAUGHTER, LEAVING HER HAND IN THE DAUGHTER'S PUSSY AS BLOOD SQUIRTS ALL OVER THE PLACE...THE FATHER TAKES BLOOD FROM THE GROUND, SMEARS IT ALL OVER THE MOTHER'S CHEST, BENDS OVER, AND BEGINS SHITTING ALL OVER THE OPEN WOUND WHERE HER HAND USED TO BE BEFORE THE DOG BIT IT OFF. THEY TAKE THE DOG AND SHOVE IT IN A MICROWAVE, HEATING IT UP UNTIL IT EXPLODES, THEN TAKE THE DOG REMAINS, MIX IT WITH THE FATHER'S SHIT, THE SON'S HEAD WOUND, AND THE FATHER'S CUM, AND SHOVE IT INTO THE DAUGHTER'S MOUTH. THEN THE FATHER RIPS THE SON'S DICK OFF AND FUCKS THE DAUGHTER WITH IT, AS THE MOTHER LOCATE'S THE SON'S TESTICLES, BREAKS THEM OPEN, AND DRINKS THE SPERM THAT COMES OUT. THEN THE FAMILY LINES UP AND SAYS ""TA DA!""...THERE'S SILENCE FROM THE AGENT, UNTIL HE FINALLY SAYS ""I LOVE IT! WHAT DO YOU CALL THAT?""...AND THE FAMILY SAYS ""WE CALL IT...THE ARISTOCRATS!"""	1	1	1	0	1	0
936fbc33ea68e700	Bach tag Please see my note on -	0	0	0	0	0	0
6d4867dee7fc79bb	" It never specifically states the exact length that signatures should be. But it does say the height that they should be, which is why I corrected Carrera and Jeff. â€¢ \| "	0	0	0	0	0	0
8f8318dadc0a8f72	(amended by (typo fixes) at )	0	0	0	0	0	0
63b1bca9df4ed812	The Ting Tings Leeds University claim is true!!!!87.36.25.39	0	0	0	0	0	0
c929a449230a9850	" Invitation to wikiFeed Hello Acabashi, I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Wikipedia articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Wikipedia in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this survey and follow this link to our website. Once you're there, click the ""create an account"" link to get started. For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at [email protected]. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed! Thanks! "	0	0	0	0	0	0
0a2a9baea1def1fd	" Dodger - And a merry whatever it is you celebrate too ) To sign your name you just need to type three tildas (~~~) and to sign and date put four tildas (~~~~). In the edit box, this will just look like tildas, but when you save the page the software automatically converts it for you. If you have java enabled on your browser you will see a signature looking button at the top of the edit box (it is the second from the right) if you click this it will automatically put four tildas for you. If you want to change how your signature appears, you can go to ""my preferences"" which is at the top right of the webpage. There you can alter your signature. I've done this which is why my signature looks a little different from other's. Does this help? Again, welcome!best, kevin [][talk] "	0	0	0	0	0	0
8534852325dcc549	" I want to add pages related in Bitcoin India, Like meetups, Startups, Bitcoin videos in India etc Started of with listing startup, 1st one ""Coinsecure"" ended up as bad idea.. How do I start? Should I directly edit relevant pages? or Copy authentic information from known websites and news media? "	0	0	0	0	0	0
64c4a2b1b950adc5	Sorry to disturb. Can you please place a link somewhere in this page? Thanks.	0	0	0	0	0	0
0b82c84ba824190b	I agree with Status. Some of the pictures shouldn't be used in the Katy Perry article, but they still are. I have been trying to change the picture to another one, but they kept deleting my edit. Plus, there are lots of Katy Perry pictures and I don't know why most of them aren't being used.	0	0	0	0	0	0
158c4c9f2cd8ef8c	" I do not see how it is relevant if sources use the word famous. We are never obliged to use the same words as any source. You can find a source claiming that almost anything is famous - it's hardly a rare case where lots of sources do so - so should we describe everything as famous? No, I tried that and it was rightly shot down. You can find a source - a famous one! - which says that this opera is a shabby little shocker. And those words aren't even listed as ones to avoid, so do we use them as if they are objectively true? Obviously not. I don't believe the word is forbidden on Wikipedia, I already said that. But we have a guideline called ""words to avoid"". It doesn't say ""avoid these words, unless you really want to use them"", it doesn't say ""avoid these words unless you see them in external sources"", it says ""avoid these words, because they neither impart nor summarise verifiable information"". The guideline is very long established, and I see no sensible case for an exception here. 200.83.101.199 "	0	0	0	0	0	0
f0921d666432d6c8	" re: Say Anything Yeah, ""Early years"" is probably a good idea."	0	0	0	0	0	0
f8d247036f7fad00	REDIRECT Talk:Prince LuÃs, Duke of Beja	0	0	0	0	0	0
88e03fd210222fc9	YazdÃ¢nism AND BahÃ¡'Ã should be DELETED from Template:Islam Since you modify this template frequently, Ä±f you compare Template:Islam with Template:Religion topics it is clear that YazdÃ¢nism AND BahÃ¡'Ã should be DELETED from Template:Islam According to Template:Religion topics BÃ¡bism Azali BahÃ¡'Ã Faith Druze ARE Abrahamic religions BUT NOT Islam AND YazdÃ¢nism (Yazidism Â· Ishikism Â· Ali-Illahism Â· Yarsanism) ARE Indo-Iranian religions AND they are non-islamic IN CONCLUSION YazdÃ¢nism AND BahÃ¡'Ã SHOULD BE DELETED from Template:Islam Druze Druze, on the other hand, might be included explicitly in to the list.68.100.166.227 Corrected template Corrections \| list5name = classical denominations \| list5title = Classical denominations \| list5 = Sunni Shia Sufism Ibadi \| list6name = other denominations \| list6title = Other denominations \| list6 = Ahmadiyya Druzism Mahdavia Nation of Islam Quranism Tolu-e-Islam Wahhabism (?) 68.100.166.227 I'll appreciate if you modify it accordingly.	0	0	0	0	0	0
1d40bfa9dffeead1	" The precise definition of race is under dispute.. I wrote this to help spread understanding, please make sure to read the definitions of outcrossing on the link. There is a lot of misunderstanding of genetics and further there is a lot of misinformation that people spread because they WANT you to think that there is no difference between peoples for a political or social agenda, that does not make it so. Humans share 98% of our genetic code with Chimpanzees, yet that 2% defines our differences and is important as is the difference in the human population, no matter how small the difference. There are obviously differences in the expressed traits between Asian, African and Caucasian. These are different types of humans, if you choose to call the a race/breed or type it's up to you and it's immaterial. My argument has always been that racial diversity should be preserved which is a more neutral position rather than promoting that race mixing and interbreeding is somehow positive. You and many people that listen to pop culture may think that by interbreeding you are helping humanity and there are lots of myths about how you will create better offspring; offspring that have the best of both parents. This is just a myth told by people who, are trying to say that people are equal, if different. Yes, people are people as Americans we believe that all people have certain inalienable rights but the best position for humanity is for each of the races to exist, separately to be the best we can. If you truly understand the advantages that diversity offers you will agree too. I personally breed horses. And this is where I'll start telling you a story: the Thoroughbred horse started out as a mixed race horse. It was based on Arab stock and was bred only for speed for many generations, regardless of breed, the horse that ran the race the fastest was bred to other fast horses. The Thoroughbred breeding book is now closed, which means you cannot breed a Thoroughbred to any other breed, because, ANY cross you make outside of the gene pool will reduce the speed of the horse. This is called line breeding, please read this article as a basic ""learn to breed"" guideline: http://www.learntobreed.com/linebreeding.html. Line breeding(inbreeding) is a useful technique as is outcrossing when advantagous to produce quality results, random mixing is like a child finger-painting and does nothing positive. What Wikipedia has been proposing is that random interbreeding is potentially a good idea and should be treated as potentially positive. Any person who knows about breeding animals will disagree, it's very unlikely that race mixing will result in a positive result unless it was planned for by a geneticist. When you cited the plant hybridization, that's what you were doing citing a hybrid that was designed in a laboratory and there were not human beings or living animals as a result of a genetic mistake. You can't through bad human crosses in the trash like you can with corn."	0	0	0	0	0	0
de5378580df88eb1	Reverted some strange changes and wholesale deletion of all links by an unregistered user on Nov 9, 2006. Thanks.	0	0	0	0	0	0
119889469c0421c1	" (1) Please remain civil. You may have a personal relationship with the subject, or have personal reasons for supporting him, but taking personal offence on his behalf isn't useful to improvement of the article. (2) You keep conflating my changes with those of someone else. The use of the word ""caused"" appears to be the major source of your dudgeon, and I didn't make that change. You keep reverting all changes wholesale including changes made for reasons purely of style rather than picking out the ones which are bothering you. (3) We have no proof that the documents are ""sensitive"" or that Bradley Manning is responsible for anything at all, since there has been no legal action. You complain about BLP, but accepting claims about Bradley Manning's guilt in the matter of a serious criminal offence are an extremely serious BLP policy violation. Until the claims of Lamo and the US government have been established in a court of law, we CANNOT use the word-of-God to state their claims are true. As for the torture citation, if you read the article (and many others also easily obtainable), you will see that it's the newspaper which chose to put ""torture"" in quotation marks, not the experts they consulted. We are not interested in the editorial opinion of the newspaper, but rather the opinion of the experts whom the newspaper has consulted who clearly states that Manning's treatment amounts to torture. "	0	0	0	0	0	0
6f85e3180440a535	Be nice and don't be a dick, or I will kick your ass.	1	0	1	1	1	0
6bbe2d1b5e3d8fb5	I do not regard my edits to the wikipedia as partisan. It would take the most unintelligent reader to presume that Nairn voted other than with his party on Work Choices. In fact it would be noteworthy if he did not. I think the rest of my edits on this article, eg providing formatting for references for less than complimentary Nairn facts suggests that I am other than partisan. Furthermore another editor has also reverted the change, indicating thereby that she agrees with my reversion. talk	0	0	0	0	0	0
608162692dce4c00	Keep Maakhir State has been declared. http://www.markacadeey.com/maqaalo/maqaal_abdalla_hirad_20070811.htm The Warsangeli clan (a Harti clan related to the Majerteen who dominate Puntland) have been largely alienanted by the Puntland administration, and are probably sick of the Somaliland and Puntland administrations claiming their territory. The Dulbahante south of them will probably declare their own state soon, Darwiishland. Like it or lump it, it's there.	0	0	0	0	0	0
e21ce905c416cbff	proposition to add link puck.ch I propose to add a link to http://puck.ch/ to the page. It includes almost all the results of Swiss Ice Hockey for LNA-LNB-1st league-2nd league since season 1995-1996. What must I do to be able to add it to the page ?	0	0	0	0	0	0
1f76fb5781e6b730	" After edit conflict including with myself. (D'oh.) The way your reply is phrased leads me to wonder... but never mind, this could end up as an infinite regression. Shall we just say, the inferences you draw from my statement are not the ones I recognise as my intent, or as their actual implication, so you making a corresponding complaint seems somewhat ironic. (You also don't address my question about notification at all.) My statement was about a) JS's actual notability being predominantly in the area of Creationism, rather than chess (and certain versions of the article veering away from this reality); and b) the motivation of that editor (indeed, every editor, at least to that point) to be writing about him at all. That's pretty clearly related to his significance as a creationist, and not some interest in writing about about chess more generally. An implication of a ""pretext to promote a creationist agenda"" does not appear to correlate with what I said at all. (What I had in mind was more, increasing similarity to dust-jacket prose, and AA being reluctsnt to acknowledge this about his relative notabilities.) Your ""false comparison"" is likewise, nothing like any I was making. JS is very notable as a Creationist, being a bucketload-selling author on such topics, as well as an internet celeb, which certainly merits an article, which in turn requires some discussion of his prowess and distinctly lesser notability as a chess player. He's not so notable as a chess player that he would ordinarily have an article purely on him as such, and I see no reason to include every possible fact about him as a chess player, out of proportion to actual notability. At any rate, if your evidence on the RFAr page stands as is, I shall feel compelled to respond to dispute your assertions about my comment. I was rather hoping to keep out of the whole mess, personally, going as it largely does to ""does privacy policy completely trump autobiography concerns"", about which I have opinions, but little direct involvement. I'd like to ask you to withdraw them, or at least, to rephrase. "	0	0	0	0	0	0
cc29191ed4b9964b	Must be a Wikipedia bug. I did not remove his comment (or even read it).	0	0	0	0	0	0
6ee6027aa0e8b149	I hugely disagree. Him staring in a movie is a huge thing for any person and there should be something to represent his new soldier gimmic.	0	0	0	0	0	0
f844f7a50d780706	":::::::::*""White House"" and ""AACS encryption key"" are not person's names, but I do concede that we have some articles with a title composed of a person's name combined with a controversy. The rest of my comments stand. Since the title of either article is not a question to be answered in this RfC, this will be useful information to consider for another discussion.- MrX "	0	0	0	0	0	0
b889e4ec342cd8c2	The Seaforth Highlanders of Canada I saw you photo request on the talk page. I was wondering if this might be them on the seawall. they all look the same to me.	0	0	0	0	0	0
99b528a420c2bbc2	Homey is, I am quite confident, far more aware of the protocols around blocking than am I, so you should heed his advice. I, on the other hand, am very glad that you finally put us all out of AVD's misery. He has soaked up other people's time like a great big thirsty sponge. While I would prefer a Wikipedia in which evryone is welcoome to participate, there comes a time when you have to make the tough decision that someone is working against the broader interests of the project, and boot them out. If I can be of assistance, Zach, in defending your decision, please let me know. \| t	0	0	0	0	0	0
130ecb2c4f086cbb	Why should we users have to create a user name or log in to avoid seeing this rubbish? If I have the same IP as someone else then it is not my problem!!! Sort it out!	1	0	0	0	0	0
0d33b227369ba45d	This article is not like an encyclopedia at all 'their overall strangeness' 'the legend grows' this seems like a fanzine not an encyclopedia == Headline text ==	0	0	0	0	0	0
d96735d9d54076ef	. To further support my willingness to be impartial, I even removed the common myth statement and opinionated statement I placed after user jweiss11 mentioned those specific statements. In short, I edited it, so it was nothing but the facts and even gave the website I provided a few lines prior.	0	0	0	0	0	0
011d0c0a6c8e5765	I NEVER FUCKING MADE THIS MOTHER FUCKING ARTICLE I JUST FUCKING EDITED IT AND THAT WAS A FUCKING LONG TIME AGO FUCKING ASSHOLES! PISSING ME OFF @	1	0	1	0	1	0
c75259ead42782c6	" ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section."	0	0	0	0	0	0
6cf250aa7c0b833e	" Nfaloo has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with ! "	0	0	0	0	0	0
1917ef12698c12dd	" Regarding Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2010/Coordination Hi there. I am interested in volunteering at the Arbitration elections, mostly out of a desire to help Wikipedia, but also out of an intellectual curiosity spurred on my my academic training in political science. I have three questions. Am I elegible to join (I'm not an admin, but I am an editor in good standing) Is it too late to join (The elections are only what, a month away) If I can join, what still needs to be done. Please use a talkback to inform me if you respond. Thanks, Talk "	0	0	0	0	0	0
2cfd93de3df0c0b4	" There was no ""profanity"", just a bit of good old Anglo-Saxon plain speaking. Fatuorum "	0	0	0	0	0	0
bdbea0baa69e8d56	" I would tend to agree. Shocking that higher-level Wiki bureaucrats/stewards aren't bothered by the conflict of interest, the ""circumsexual"" self identity, or the pro-circ bias that exists on his own talk page! I haven't tried the higher levels of Wikipedia's heirarchy... yet. "	0	0	0	0	0	0
04f8cad9735b8c3c	Recent? You just a pussy.	1	0	1	0	1	0
59848f78ef38e37c	" That's fine, I wasn't that attached to this. I've tried to throw in a lot of cites to the new Routledge Hume by Garrett, which I regard as a fairly consensual, strong introductory source. Much of the material here that's been added is sourced to there, and I should probably cite it more often here. https://www.routledge.com/products/9780415283342 I'm hoping to add sections as well based on the SEP articles on ""Hume and Kant"" (there are actually more than 1) and the SEP article on ""Hume and Newtonianism""."	0	0	0	0	0	0
e3fae8843929f968	!!VideoClip2 !!SalsaBalroomDance !!Country!!TBA !!Semifinal	0	0	0	0	0	0
d72087606c237d29	unfortunately it would seem that sql access is disabled for admins atm so a developer would have to do it 05:32, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0	0
7ca3578b2a8a83cf	U-552 Reverts That wasn't me you fucking moron. You just blocked the wrong person and the idiot that is claiming it was a war crime has just undone someone elses work. If you look at what he has written and then look at his sources you will see that they do not support his case.75.181.143.239	1	0	0	0	0	0
d3a694a797edc081	Too big This page is ridiculously large. I have taken the liberty of asking MiszaBot to do something about it. Needless to say, you are at liberty to tell MiszaBot not to. â€” (talk Â· contribs)	0	0	0	0	0	0
08928f83ed0dfbea	what i never meant to edit your page had several tabs open and clicked wrong one which is why i changed it back as soon as it happened	0	0	0	0	0	0
82449a1856e3d1e8	So who decides what is silly and what isn't? I think you're objections are silly.	0	0	0	0	0	0
56b34612588a5a10	I strongly feel the first paragraph should be left the way it is. The dead have been verified to be of Cherokee ancestry and the Piaute Tribal Leadership denies involvement. Any piautes participating may have been mormon converts and probably were, which means they were mormons, not paiutes. The tribe has stated they had no involvement as a directive of that sovereign government. I have reviewed all of the materials, and it appears some individuals participated, but they clearly did not have the consent or backing of the Paiute tribe as a whole. The mormons did it, its verified, their dishonesty about the affair is a matter of verifiable public record, I do not see where any other debates are necessary on the matter of the cultural identity of the victims or the involvement of the Paiute Tribe.	0	0	0	0	0	0
c39e6fa22cb8290d	Mose T Art https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/be/Mosetart.JPG The file was uploaded in 2007. I don't recall the attribution, however I don't upload images unless they're clearly attributed as open/CC, so whoever the 'author' is who I 'clearly am not' is welcome to assert whatever they please.	0	0	0	0	0	0
8bda486f09659c34	i am editing this page	0	0	0	0	0	0
d13afb574683df45	whether there might be clashes with other parameters (there shouldn	0	0	0	0	0	0
f66878b1d1f8abcd	" Rictus A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Rictus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . - "	0	0	0	0	0	0
5fb17981820cd500	, 8 November 2012 (UTC) Raise away; I have a minor drama on my hands, but happy to turn my mind to Moody's again. (talk) 16:50	0	0	0	0	0	0
c3b92438c930fed7	Joe Biden's wife has an article. She has the same notability as Todd Palin. Both have news articles written specifically about them which are not about their politician spouse. If Todd Palin is not allowed to be created, Mrs. Biden must be deleted. This is not to be mean, just to apply the same standards of what makes an article.	0	0	0	0	0	0
cc13280f15d2cffd	" I'm tired Hi, I would not have contacted you (or anyone) on this matter since there is nothing unusual from what I see regularly but because of the recent incident where you served a a judge of sorts, I figured I give you an example. Things like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1938_Polish_ultimatum_to_Lithuania&diff;=next&oldid;=201584454 this] and this, an this recent ""notification"" that my contributions are watched (note the date of the article's creation, nd note that it could'n hae been on anyone watchlist) happens a lot in Lithianian topics. Those are all diffs from just one day (today) and the first one is especially powerful. Now, I do not have and I do not intend to develop a habit of stacking up diffs to attack Piotrus' ""when I have enough"" but It's just a tiny example, what Lithuanian editors have go through. I've already expressed my angst on another page. Finally there is my question - should I run to AE with that? Should I demand ""sanctions for stalking and offensive speech? I would not have even brought this up, as I do usually ignore this stuff. But because of the recent incident, I just want to illustrate, what Lithuanian editors have to deal with on a daily basis. Regards. "	0	0	0	0	0	0
62f078e4c932f51c	Why include the mosaic from the Arian baptistery in Ravenna? A mosaic is not a fresco. AN May 20, 2010.	0	0	0	0	0	0
ae012f3ce45b9945	"==Notability of Umera Ahmed== A tag has been placed on Umera Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "	0	0	0	0	0	0
d820d9ac518a89f7	" Cited article from The Independent says ""global warming"". Press or not, it allows us to use the term here. Â·âœ† "	0	0	0	0	0	0
a24eef95d85bd95f	Count I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms	0	0	0	0	0	0
0a71ec382f0717b9	"'m not going to argue with you. The page clearly said that the biography was written by Muze, not NME. If you don't believe me, take a look. Scroll all the way down to the bottom, and you'll see this disclaimer. ""Copyright 1989-2008 Muze UK Ltd. For personal non-commercial use only. All rights reserved."" Information from Muze is mass-distributed and appears on various websites, including NME. Just because it appears on the website of a reliable source doesn't mean that Muze is reliable. I've repeatedly apologized for my actions, but any stubbornness on my part does not mean that I was the only person who behaved against the rules. You were clearly being stubborn, as you are now, by denying that the biography is from Muze rather than NME. ( ) I"	0	0	0	0	0	0
03a39d2dfe116248	" Please specifically name the ""officials"" you are describing by individual name? Are you from a Soviet country? Wikipedia is NOT PutinÂ´s Russia!! "	0	0	0	0	0	0
b0c0b354c7ebc723	March 2009 (UTC) It improves the article because it shows that Keith has FRAUDULENTLY presented himself as something OTHER than what he is. It goes right to his character. Asking how it 'improves' the article is like asking how including revelations that Clifford Irving made up the Hughes bio 'improves' that article. The real takeway? User Blaxthos will do ANYTHING to help cover for liberals. And he is a prolific editor at Wikpiedia. Ultimately this inclusion will stay because it's both newsworthy and speaks to Olbermann's dishonestly. But this attempt at liberal damage control is FAR more incriminating of Wikipedia in general and user Blaxthos in specific. 68.40.123.217 10:37, 31	0	0	0	0	0	0
65155275fe5d34ab	I added another recent OR diff.	0	0	0	0	0	0
0541cd5983c7966d	October 2011 (UTC) It will be kept so enwiki upload isn't necessary. It is superior to illustrating recent inequality, but loses the historic context; which is important to seeing the consequence of inequality. - Boy 02:26, 27	0	0	0	0	0	0
67b93d0664b22930	" Re: Template:TWP Got it. A couple of parser functions weren't doing what I thought they would do, but I got it working in so the change is now live. The unknown-importance category should start repopulating soon. (Speak) "	0	0	0	0	0	0
2ae122ebd6062758	" you are a joke as well. i thought this was uncivial personal attack against me: ""Don't bother arguing with ClichÃ© Online, he's a delusional and hypocritical fanboy"". so why are you posting on my talk page instead of his. i think you're an idiot just like them. "	1	0	0	0	1	0
f0aa5d856e7c339e	You're being a jerk. Block who you want. I'll just change my IP. Who the hell to do you think you are, anyway? I read the warnings and considered them. Keeping them up there is some kind of anal retentive power play on your part. You're exactly why wiki mods are considered ASSHOLES.	1	0	1	0	1	0
8947ab2e1175d64c	" It wasn't done on RFCU. "	0	0	0	0	0	0
6c0be608a932df53	REDIRECT Talk:James Bruce (cricketer)	0	0	0	0	0	0
ec06cffbcc2392c8	Thanks for explaining why you think the sources support the IP's addition. You are quite helpful.	0	0	0	0	0	0
e1ac48ad8e823379	" Either don't do a ""bold"" histmerge or undo it when it's proven to be contentious if you're gonna be away for 6 days. â€” lfdder "	0	0	0	0	0	0
c717998854397512	Well, I felt you had deliberately ignored the links I had provided (where it says that I was AldeBaer). On a related note: When someone says he's drunk and keeps posting although his main account has already been blocked: How much good do you think it does with regard to prevention to extend that block? But nevermind, I don't want to talk right now. â€”Â Dorftrottelâ	0	0	0	0	0	0
4ce9b6b91c0a5ffa	during the preliminary coursework	0	0	0	0	0	0
43346ed16a37ce08	Huh? You page protected Amanda Knox. The previous editor was redirecting it because they said the article was a copy of the murder article. But the article has been up only 2 hours and already it has changes. The previous editor before that was John Carter, who is an administrator. What you should do is not to listen to the pro-redirect editor and let many editors improve the article so that it is not a copy of the murder article. Then it can be judged on its own. If people add biographical details to the murder article, those will probably be removed because they are unrelated to the murder. So we are stunning the growth due to inflexible rules. There is already a consensus, about 5 editors have edited the article and 1 changed it to a redirect and demanded page protection. 5:1 is consensus. You should unprotect it and ask for opinions on the Amanda Knox talk page. Then see what the real consensus is. I came here and typed Amanda Knox. This is because she is the key article. I did not type in Murder of Kirscher.	0	0	0	0	0	0
9cf3ccf77817e6af	" Just to be clear, in many cases I personally added a link pair like ""[[July 4]], [[1976 in radio\|1976]]"" to an article so 1) I created that link pair, 2) I did not realize that it broke autoformatting, and 3) I acknowledge that date autoformatting is now deprecated and is being removed by the bot. Also to be clear, Lightbot is converting my example above to ""[[July 4]], [[1976]]"" which 1) created a new yet deprecated autoformatted date link pair and 2) removes the useful, on topic link to 1976 in radio. Given that there is no consensus for an urgent removal of date autoformatting, I'm simply asking that the bot not undo ""date in radio"" links if it can't, as you note, handle them properly. - "	0	0	0	0	0	0
20b5201b9228e208	" We'll need a template. 110 â™£ "	0	0	0	0	0	0
f65fc8a149dbd44d	WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! (talk â€¢ contrib)	0	0	0	0	0	0
6fa3f4c86c804223	dont mess with my contributions buddy ok? i know what im talking about i will continue to add necro where i see he needs to be included he is one of the most relevant hiphop artists today moving 100,000's of units indie no major label ever he is the number one hustler in hiphop underground u might not like his music but dont try to edit the facts i add here if u continue to touch my contributions i will erase your contributions i have 20 computers here with different ips, so there is nothing you can do except leave me alone	0	0	0	0	0	0
3d2dc2e8e2f6f64d	". With the dreadful experience, I get that I'm distrusted by admins even though Roux poured personal attacks. I will only ""contribute"" content building if I'm unblocked"	0	0	0	0	0	0
ece0a228382a1f48	Done. Let me know what you think. 17:29, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0	0
234d9a0c73c42c06	your a faggot and a nigger	1	1	1	0	1	1
d095ee68048c5e0d	" Blocked You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. â€” (push to talk) "	0	0	0	0	0	0
52af009ffb256772	It's a bit empty now. I forgot that the Lego Universe was non-free image. Anyone else have a suitable image for this box? (Talk to me)	0	0	0	0	0	0
4897e9702e0fe668	, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Jimbo, I have not lied about the above. I can forward the email to anyone, if they want. I'll tell you the story. I send email explaining the situation to A volunteers answering the email asked me if they could forward this to Arb Com. I recieved the arb com reply, detailing my second chance. Look, I will even give out my password to prove it. I can send a screenshot or forward the email or give a password (to jimbo). I will forward the email to , and ask they post a confirmation here. 92.5.91.181 20:45	0	0	0	0	0	0
8e8d380a429f4dbf	GAN backlog contest Hi mate, I'm not sure if you know about this or if you'll have the time, but over the month of October the project is running a GAN review contest. It can be found here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Contest/GAN backlog elimination/October 2010 in case you are interested. Cheers.	0	0	0	0	0	0
c283940b3d84cefd	Agreed. Just everything about is suspect (and just lol how so many fucking Chinese users have it on their watchlist - I seriously can't do shit without somebody undoing my changes). It stays, for now. I'm planning on doing massive rewrites on the whole thing per Cydevil.	1	0	1	0	0	0
b0d258881162013c	" Contested deletion This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) FWIW I haven't worked at the company for over 8 years, I originally created the page to contribute to Wikipedia on a subject which, at the time, I knew about. I don't know how accurate what is written is at the moment as I haven't followed it, but I know the company does still exist as I have a friend who still works there. While I agree the wording of the opening 2 sentences at the moment do now come across a bit 'marketing-ey' (I'm guessing someone has edited since it was created), as a Wikipedia user I'd find it stranger a big company wouldn't have a page on Wikipedia than that the page had some marketing speak. Rather than deleting the page entirely, why not just fix it by cutting down to the first two sentences to just have the facts about what it does and size? eg: ""Isobar is a global full service digital marketing agency with over 70 locations, across 44 markets worldwide""? "	0	0	0	0	0	0
b570b11a7c7b6e27	" Paul, you seem to be assuming that everyone with an M.D. Is engaged in evidence based practice, while this is clearly not the case. You further appear to be asserting that users of specific treatment modalities, e.g. massage, are engaged in ""naturopathic"" treatment. This is a false generalization, as the use of one modality does not imply the use of the whole suite. come howl! "	0	0	0	0	0	0
be479cf2c359e9ab	Concerning your last talk page edit There are a few concerns. I think that you should clean up the grammar and some general santorum to avoid a retaliatory response. 208.54.44.224	0	0	0	0	0	0
586cb069c63839dc	I was convinced by the logic and reason of your arguments here and on the edit summaries that it should stay. Thank you.	0	0	0	0	0	0
728c5e7b99e226a2	" You are free to do so. If consensus is lacking on some page then, of course, the guideline cannot be used there. However, if you are one of a few editors who object to it on some page, you have to stick to these ""de-facto"" guidelines on such a page. "	0	0	0	0	0	0
e36e6ff8ba9e4610	hi if you want 2 meet up or become a friend send to me and i'll be more than happy to.	0	0	0	0	0	0
65c277e15bb04d97	" Good question. I think one ""final warning"" and then block on the second edit is what I would do. Hey! You should run for adminship! I bet you'd be good at it. (Talk) "	0	0	0	0	0	0
f7b92d287809ef40	" Hi! Good idea for the front page. nake has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. nake "	0	0	0	0	0	0
dfdf88e4a3b889b9	Rationale Thanks for clarifying. Any time we strike comments we should explain the striking for presumably obvious reasons. Thanks again. -	0	0	0	0	0	0
c8363fde9330ede1	Where is the discussion around Ceschi's notability in the year 2015? All I see ois a discussion that took place eight years ago. He has become a good deal more notable since then, releasing his most widely reviewed album and founding Fake Four. Non-notability is not a permanent affliction.	0	0	0	0	0	0
f7218727ff8c52e6	" What? You're too chicken to change your ""Declined"" decision? You're an admin too, act like one! "	1	0	0	0	0	0
2abf44a34158583e	Wow AFD IS a discussion about the notability of articles because AFD is for debating what articles should stay or go (Look at other AFDs and you will see that you are wrong.) WP:N IS important to AFD because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and AFD is about debating what article belongs and doesn't belong in this encyclopedia.	0	0	0	0	0	0
068e0a8032a4cf5c	Thank You Thanks for the link on the reference desks to 'Crux orthodoxa' it was a good read, pretty much what i was looking for, it seems that the cross is slightly ambiguous and has no defined reasons for extra beams. So again, thank you	0	0	0	0	0	0
a6c407f791ab70f3	Exactly I was saying same thing but he never understood that.( )	0	0	0	0	0	0

9b18d7bbfcf3f6f0

" ASUE Hello, On, WP:ASUE, your username, as well as all other participants' names, have been moved under Inactive Participants. If you are still are an active member, please move your username to Active Participants. Thanks! <3 "

0

05a57134e3ae592e

I am glad that wikipedia has realized the malicious intent of the wikicohen account. 70.26.72.221

0

56d1499b5c1f57b6

", 28 August 2006 (UTC) I agree. I know the media is calling it various names, but we can correctly title the article Comair Flight 191 and have both ""Delta Flight 5191"" and ""Comair Flight 5191"" redirect to it. Obviously ""Delta Flight 191"" shouldn't redirect, however, since it was a famous plane crash in Dallas during the 1970s or 1980s (I can't exactly remember which but that's not important). Alex 07:35"

0

0209cdf3131130ed

" WILL MY MOTHERFUCKING SAFETY BE GUARANTEED???? I FUCKING HOPE SO!!! I'M BRINGING MY OWN FUCKIN' WEAPONS!! PAY ME WHEN I GET BACK MOTHERFUCKERS!!! OH YEAH I'VE GOT A JOKE...A FAMILY (HUSBAND, WIFE, SON, DAUGHTER, DOG) WALKS INTO AN AGENT'S OFFICE AND TELLS HIM THAT THEY'VE GOT A GREAT VAUDEVILLE ROUTINE...HE SAYS ""WE DON'T HIRE KIDDY ACTS"" AND THEY SAY ""BUT WE'RE REALLY GOOD!"" AND SO THE AGENT SAYS ""FINE, LET ME SEE WHAT YOU'VE GOT, BUT IF YOU SUCK I'M THROWING YOU OUT""...SO THE FAMILY GETS READY...THE DAUGHTER HITS THE CD PLAYER AND CIRCUS MUSIC BEGINS PLAYING, THE FATHER JUMP KICKS THE SON IN THE HEAD AND STOMS HIS FACE IN THE GROUND UNTIL IT'S A BLOODY PULP, THEN PROCEEDS TO JERK OFF AND CUM ALL OVER HIS SHATTERED SKULL. MEANWHILE THE MOTHER BEGINS VIOLENTLY FINGER FUCKING THE DAUGHTER AS THE DOG FUCKS THE MOTHER IN THE ASS HOLE. THIS IS THE POINT WHEN THE FATHER TAKES THE LEFTOVER BRAIN MATTER FROM THE SON'S HEAD AND SHOVES IT INTO THE MOTHER'S PUSSY, THEN BEGINS FUCKING HER PUSSY WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY STICKING HIS FINGER DOWN THE DAUGHTER'S THROAT UNTIL SHE VOMITS ALL OVER THEM BOTH. THEN THE DOG BITES THE MOTHER'S HAND OFF AS SHE'S FINGER FUCKING THE DAUGHTER, LEAVING HER HAND IN THE DAUGHTER'S PUSSY AS BLOOD SQUIRTS ALL OVER THE PLACE...THE FATHER TAKES BLOOD FROM THE GROUND, SMEARS IT ALL OVER THE MOTHER'S CHEST, BENDS OVER, AND BEGINS SHITTING ALL OVER THE OPEN WOUND WHERE HER HAND USED TO BE BEFORE THE DOG BIT IT OFF. THEY TAKE THE DOG AND SHOVE IT IN A MICROWAVE, HEATING IT UP UNTIL IT EXPLODES, THEN TAKE THE DOG REMAINS, MIX IT WITH THE FATHER'S SHIT, THE SON'S HEAD WOUND, AND THE FATHER'S CUM, AND SHOVE IT INTO THE DAUGHTER'S MOUTH. THEN THE FATHER RIPS THE SON'S DICK OFF AND FUCKS THE DAUGHTER WITH IT, AS THE MOTHER LOCATE'S THE SON'S TESTICLES, BREAKS THEM OPEN, AND DRINKS THE SPERM THAT COMES OUT. THEN THE FAMILY LINES UP AND SAYS ""TA DA!""...THERE'S SILENCE FROM THE AGENT, UNTIL HE FINALLY SAYS ""I LOVE IT! WHAT DO YOU CALL THAT?""...AND THE FAMILY SAYS ""WE CALL IT...THE ARISTOCRATS!"""

1

0

1

0

936fbc33ea68e700

Bach tag Please see my note on -

0

6d4867dee7fc79bb

" It never specifically states the exact length that signatures should be. But it does say the height that they should be, which is why I corrected Carrera and Jeff. â€¢ | "

0

8f8318dadc0a8f72

(amended by (typo fixes) at )

0

63b1bca9df4ed812

The Ting Tings Leeds University claim is true!!!!87.36.25.39

0

c929a449230a9850

" Invitation to wikiFeed Hello Acabashi, I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Wikipedia articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Wikipedia in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this survey and follow this link to our website. Once you're there, click the ""create an account"" link to get started. For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at [email protected]. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed! Thanks! "

0

0a2a9baea1def1fd

" Dodger - And a merry whatever it is you celebrate too ) To sign your name you just need to type three tildas (~~~) and to sign and date put four tildas (~~~~). In the edit box, this will just look like tildas, but when you save the page the software automatically converts it for you. If you have java enabled on your browser you will see a signature looking button at the top of the edit box (it is the second from the right) if you click this it will automatically put four tildas for you. If you want to change how your signature appears, you can go to ""my preferences"" which is at the top right of the webpage. There you can alter your signature. I've done this which is why my signature looks a little different from other's. Does this help? Again, welcome!best, kevin [][talk] "

0

8534852325dcc549

" I want to add pages related in Bitcoin India, Like meetups, Startups, Bitcoin videos in India etc Started of with listing startup, 1st one ""Coinsecure"" ended up as bad idea.. How do I start? Should I directly edit relevant pages? or Copy authentic information from known websites and news media? "

0

64c4a2b1b950adc5

Sorry to disturb. Can you please place a link somewhere in this page? Thanks.

0

0b82c84ba824190b

I agree with Status. Some of the pictures shouldn't be used in the Katy Perry article, but they still are. I have been trying to change the picture to another one, but they kept deleting my edit. Plus, there are lots of Katy Perry pictures and I don't know why most of them aren't being used.

0

158c4c9f2cd8ef8c

" I do not see how it is relevant if sources use the word famous. We are never obliged to use the same words as any source. You can find a source claiming that almost anything is famous - it's hardly a rare case where lots of sources do so - so should we describe everything as famous? No, I tried that and it was rightly shot down. You can find a source - a famous one! - which says that this opera is a shabby little shocker. And those words aren't even listed as ones to avoid, so do we use them as if they are objectively true? Obviously not. I don't believe the word is forbidden on Wikipedia, I already said that. But we have a guideline called ""words to avoid"". It doesn't say ""avoid these words, unless you really want to use them"", it doesn't say ""avoid these words unless you see them in external sources"", it says ""avoid these words, because they neither impart nor summarise verifiable information"". The guideline is very long established, and I see no sensible case for an exception here. 200.83.101.199 "

0

f0921d666432d6c8

" re: Say Anything Yeah, ""Early years"" is probably a good idea."

0

f8d247036f7fad00

REDIRECT Talk:Prince LuÃs, Duke of Beja

0

88e03fd210222fc9

YazdÃ¢nism AND BahÃ¡'Ã should be DELETED from Template:Islam Since you modify this template frequently, Ä±f you compare Template:Islam with Template:Religion topics it is clear that YazdÃ¢nism AND BahÃ¡'Ã should be DELETED from Template:Islam According to Template:Religion topics BÃ¡bism Azali BahÃ¡'Ã Faith Druze ARE Abrahamic religions BUT NOT Islam AND YazdÃ¢nism (Yazidism Â· Ishikism Â· Ali-Illahism Â· Yarsanism) ARE Indo-Iranian religions AND they are non-islamic IN CONCLUSION YazdÃ¢nism AND BahÃ¡'Ã SHOULD BE DELETED from Template:Islam Druze Druze, on the other hand, might be included explicitly in to the list.68.100.166.227 Corrected template Corrections | list5name = classical denominations | list5title = Classical denominations | list5 = Sunni Shia Sufism Ibadi | list6name = other denominations | list6title = Other denominations | list6 = Ahmadiyya Druzism Mahdavia Nation of Islam Quranism Tolu-e-Islam Wahhabism (?) 68.100.166.227 I'll appreciate if you modify it accordingly.

0

1d40bfa9dffeead1

" The precise definition of race is under dispute.. I wrote this to help spread understanding, please make sure to read the definitions of outcrossing on the link. There is a lot of misunderstanding of genetics and further there is a lot of misinformation that people spread because they WANT you to think that there is no difference between peoples for a political or social agenda, that does not make it so. Humans share 98% of our genetic code with Chimpanzees, yet that 2% defines our differences and is important as is the difference in the human population, no matter how small the difference. There are obviously differences in the expressed traits between Asian, African and Caucasian. These are different types of humans, if you choose to call the a race/breed or type it's up to you and it's immaterial. My argument has always been that racial diversity should be preserved which is a more neutral position rather than promoting that race mixing and interbreeding is somehow positive. You and many people that listen to pop culture may think that by interbreeding you are helping humanity and there are lots of myths about how you will create better offspring; offspring that have the best of both parents. This is just a myth told by people who, are trying to say that people are equal, if different. Yes, people are people as Americans we believe that all people have certain inalienable rights but the best position for humanity is for each of the races to exist, separately to be the best we can. If you truly understand the advantages that diversity offers you will agree too. I personally breed horses. And this is where I'll start telling you a story: the Thoroughbred horse started out as a mixed race horse. It was based on Arab stock and was bred only for speed for many generations, regardless of breed, the horse that ran the race the fastest was bred to other fast horses. The Thoroughbred breeding book is now closed, which means you cannot breed a Thoroughbred to any other breed, because, ANY cross you make outside of the gene pool will reduce the speed of the horse. This is called line breeding, please read this article as a basic ""learn to breed"" guideline: http://www.learntobreed.com/linebreeding.html. Line breeding(inbreeding) is a useful technique as is outcrossing when advantagous to produce quality results, random mixing is like a child finger-painting and does nothing positive. What Wikipedia has been proposing is that random interbreeding is potentially a good idea and should be treated as potentially positive. Any person who knows about breeding animals will disagree, it's very unlikely that race mixing will result in a positive result unless it was planned for by a geneticist. When you cited the plant hybridization, that's what you were doing citing a hybrid that was designed in a laboratory and there were not human beings or living animals as a result of a genetic mistake. You can't through bad human crosses in the trash like you can with corn."

0

de5378580df88eb1

Reverted some strange changes and wholesale deletion of all links by an unregistered user on Nov 9, 2006. Thanks.

0

119889469c0421c1

" (1) Please remain civil. You may have a personal relationship with the subject, or have personal reasons for supporting him, but taking personal offence on his behalf isn't useful to improvement of the article. (2) You keep conflating my changes with those of someone else. The use of the word ""caused"" appears to be the major source of your dudgeon, and I didn't make that change. You keep reverting all changes wholesale including changes made for reasons purely of style rather than picking out the ones which are bothering you. (3) We have no proof that the documents are ""sensitive"" or that Bradley Manning is responsible for anything at all, since there has been no legal action. You complain about BLP, but accepting claims about Bradley Manning's guilt in the matter of a serious criminal offence are an extremely serious BLP policy violation. Until the claims of Lamo and the US government have been established in a court of law, we CANNOT use the word-of-God to state their claims are true. As for the torture citation, if you read the article (and many others also easily obtainable), you will see that it's the newspaper which chose to put ""torture"" in quotation marks, not the experts they consulted. We are not interested in the editorial opinion of the newspaper, but rather the opinion of the experts whom the newspaper has consulted who clearly states that Manning's treatment amounts to torture. "

0

6f85e3180440a535

Be nice and don't be a dick, or I will kick your ass.

1

0

1

0

6bbe2d1b5e3d8fb5

I do not regard my edits to the wikipedia as partisan. It would take the most unintelligent reader to presume that Nairn voted other than with his party on Work Choices. In fact it would be noteworthy if he did not. I think the rest of my edits on this article, eg providing formatting for references for less than complimentary Nairn facts suggests that I am other than partisan. Furthermore another editor has also reverted the change, indicating thereby that she agrees with my reversion. talk

0

608162692dce4c00

Keep Maakhir State *has* been declared. http://www.markacadeey.com/maqaalo/maqaal_abdalla_hirad_20070811.htm The Warsangeli clan (a Harti clan related to the Majerteen who dominate Puntland) have been largely alienanted by the Puntland administration, and are probably sick of the Somaliland and Puntland administrations claiming their territory. The Dulbahante south of them will probably declare their own state soon, Darwiishland. Like it or lump it, it's there.

0

e21ce905c416cbff

proposition to add link puck.ch I propose to add a link to http://puck.ch/ to the page. It includes almost all the results of Swiss Ice Hockey for LNA-LNB-1st league-2nd league since season 1995-1996. What must I do to be able to add it to the page ?

0

1f76fb5781e6b730

" After edit conflict including with myself. (D'oh.) The way your reply is phrased leads me to wonder... but never mind, this could end up as an infinite regression. Shall we just say, the inferences you draw from my statement are not the ones I recognise as my intent, or as their actual implication, so you making a corresponding complaint seems somewhat ironic. (You also don't address my question about notification at all.) My statement was about a) JS's actual notability being predominantly in the area of Creationism, rather than chess (and certain versions of the article veering away from this reality); and b) the motivation of that editor (indeed, every editor, at least to that point) to be writing about him at all. That's pretty clearly related to his significance as a creationist, and not some interest in writing about about chess more generally. An implication of a ""pretext to promote a creationist agenda"" does not appear to correlate with what I said at all. (What I had in mind was more, increasing similarity to dust-jacket prose, and AA being reluctsnt to acknowledge this about his relative notabilities.) Your ""false comparison"" is likewise, nothing like any I was making. JS is very notable as a Creationist, being a bucketload-selling author on such topics, as well as an internet celeb, which certainly merits an article, which in turn requires some discussion of his prowess and distinctly lesser notability as a chess player. He's not so notable as a chess player that he would ordinarily have an article purely on him as such, and I see no reason to include every possible fact about him as a chess player, out of proportion to actual notability. At any rate, if your evidence on the RFAr page stands as is, I shall feel compelled to respond to dispute your assertions about my comment. I was rather hoping to keep out of the whole mess, personally, going as it largely does to ""does privacy policy completely trump autobiography concerns"", about which I have opinions, but little direct involvement. I'd like to ask you to withdraw them, or at least, to rephrase. "

0

cc29191ed4b9964b

Must be a Wikipedia bug. I did not remove his comment (or even read it).

0

6ee6027aa0e8b149

I hugely disagree. Him staring in a movie is a huge thing for any person and there should be something to represent his new soldier gimmic.

0

f844f7a50d780706

":::::::::*""White House"" and ""AACS encryption key"" are not person's names, but I do concede that we have some articles with a title composed of a person's name combined with a controversy. The rest of my comments stand. Since the title of either article is not a question to be answered in this RfC, this will be useful information to consider for another discussion.- MrX "

0

b889e4ec342cd8c2

The Seaforth Highlanders of Canada I saw you photo request on the talk page. I was wondering if this might be them on the seawall. they all look the same to me.

0

99b528a420c2bbc2

Homey is, I am quite confident, far more aware of the protocols around blocking than am I, so you should heed his advice. I, on the other hand, am very glad that you finally put us all out of AVD's misery. He has soaked up other people's time like a great big thirsty sponge. While I would prefer a Wikipedia in which evryone is welcoome to participate, there comes a time when you have to make the tough decision that someone is working against the broader interests of the project, and boot them out. If I can be of assistance, Zach, in defending your decision, please let me know. | t

0

130ecb2c4f086cbb

Why should we users have to create a user name or log in to avoid seeing this rubbish? If I have the same IP as someone else then it is not my problem!!! Sort it out!

1

0

0d33b227369ba45d

This article is not like an encyclopedia at all 'their overall strangeness' 'the legend grows' this seems like a fanzine not an encyclopedia == Headline text ==

0

d96735d9d54076ef

. To further support my willingness to be impartial, I even removed the common myth statement and opinionated statement I placed after user jweiss11 mentioned those specific statements. In short, I edited it, so it was nothing but the facts and even gave the website I provided a few lines prior.

0

011d0c0a6c8e5765

I NEVER FUCKING MADE THIS MOTHER FUCKING ARTICLE I JUST FUCKING EDITED IT AND THAT WAS A FUCKING LONG TIME AGO FUCKING ASSHOLES! PISSING ME OFF @

1

0

1

0

1

0

c75259ead42782c6

" ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section."

0

6cf250aa7c0b833e

" Nfaloo has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with ! "

0

1917ef12698c12dd

" Regarding Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2010/Coordination Hi there. I am interested in volunteering at the Arbitration elections, mostly out of a desire to help Wikipedia, but also out of an intellectual curiosity spurred on my my academic training in political science. I have three questions. Am I elegible to join (I'm not an admin, but I am an editor in good standing) Is it too late to join (The elections are only what, a month away) If I can join, what still needs to be done. Please use a talkback to inform me if you respond. Thanks, Talk "

0

2cfd93de3df0c0b4

" There was no ""profanity"", just a bit of good old Anglo-Saxon plain speaking. Fatuorum "

0

bdbea0baa69e8d56

" I would tend to agree. Shocking that higher-level Wiki bureaucrats/stewards aren't bothered by the conflict of interest, the ""circumsexual"" self identity, or the pro-circ bias that exists on his own talk page! I haven't tried the higher levels of Wikipedia's heirarchy... yet. "

0

04f8cad9735b8c3c

Recent? You just a pussy.

1

0

1

0

1

0

59848f78ef38e37c

" That's fine, I wasn't that attached to this. I've tried to throw in a lot of cites to the new Routledge Hume by Garrett, which I regard as a fairly consensual, strong introductory source. Much of the material here that's been added is sourced to there, and I should probably cite it more often here. https://www.routledge.com/products/9780415283342 I'm hoping to add sections as well based on the SEP articles on ""Hume and Kant"" (there are actually more than 1) and the SEP article on ""Hume and Newtonianism""."

0

e3fae8843929f968

!!VideoClip2 !!SalsaBalroomDance !!Country!!TBA !!Semifinal

0

d72087606c237d29

unfortunately it would seem that sql access is disabled for admins atm so a developer would have to do it 05:32, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

0

7ca3578b2a8a83cf

U-552 Reverts That wasn't me you fucking moron. You just blocked the wrong person and the idiot that is claiming it was a war crime has just undone someone elses work. If you look at what he has written and then look at his sources you will see that they do not support his case.75.181.143.239

1

0

d3a694a797edc081

Too big This page is ridiculously large. I have taken the liberty of asking MiszaBot to do something about it. Needless to say, you are at liberty to tell MiszaBot not to. â€” (talk Â· contribs)

0

08928f83ed0dfbea

what i never meant to edit your page had several tabs open and clicked wrong one which is why i changed it back as soon as it happened

0

82449a1856e3d1e8

So who decides what is silly and what isn't? I think you're objections are silly.

0

56b34612588a5a10

I strongly feel the first paragraph should be left the way it is. The dead have been verified to be of Cherokee ancestry and the Piaute Tribal Leadership denies involvement. Any piautes participating may have been mormon converts and probably were, which means they were mormons, not paiutes. The tribe has stated they had no involvement as a directive of that sovereign government. I have reviewed all of the materials, and it appears some individuals participated, but they clearly did not have the consent or backing of the Paiute tribe as a whole. The mormons did it, its verified, their dishonesty about the affair is a matter of verifiable public record, I do not see where any other debates are necessary on the matter of the cultural identity of the victims or the involvement of the Paiute Tribe.

0

c39e6fa22cb8290d

Mose T Art https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/be/Mosetart.JPG The file was uploaded in 2007. I don't recall the attribution, however I don't upload images unless they're clearly attributed as open/CC, so whoever the 'author' is who I 'clearly am not' is welcome to assert whatever they please.

0

8bda486f09659c34

i am editing this page

0

d13afb574683df45

whether there might be clashes with other parameters (there shouldn

0

f66878b1d1f8abcd

" Rictus A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Rictus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . - "

0

5fb17981820cd500

, 8 November 2012 (UTC) Raise away; I have a minor drama on my hands, but happy to turn my mind to Moody's again. (talk) 16:50

0

c3b92438c930fed7

Joe Biden's wife has an article. She has the same notability as Todd Palin. Both have news articles written specifically about them which are not about their politician spouse. If Todd Palin is not allowed to be created, Mrs. Biden must be deleted. This is not to be mean, just to apply the same standards of what makes an article.

0

cc13280f15d2cffd

" I'm tired Hi, I would not have contacted you (or anyone) on this matter since there is nothing unusual from what I see regularly but because of the recent incident where you served a a judge of sorts, I figured I give you an example. Things like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1938_Polish_ultimatum_to_Lithuania&diff;=next&oldid;=201584454 this] and this, an this recent ""notification"" that my contributions are watched (note the date of the article's creation, nd note that it could'n hae been on anyone watchlist) happens a lot in Lithianian topics. Those are all diffs from just one day (today) and the first one is especially powerful. Now, I do not have and I do not intend to develop a habit of stacking up diffs to attack Piotrus' ""when I have enough"" but It's just a tiny example, what Lithuanian editors have go through. I've already expressed my angst on another page. Finally there is my question - should I run to AE with that? Should I demand ""sanctions for stalking and offensive speech? I would not have even brought this up, as I do usually ignore this stuff. But because of the recent incident, I just want to illustrate, what Lithuanian editors have to deal with on a daily basis. Regards. "

0

62f078e4c932f51c

Why include the mosaic from the Arian baptistery in Ravenna? A mosaic is not a fresco. AN May 20, 2010.

0

ae012f3ce45b9945

"==Notability of Umera Ahmed== A tag has been placed on Umera Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "

0

d820d9ac518a89f7

" Cited article from The Independent says ""global warming"". Press or not, it allows us to use the term here. Â·âœ† "

0

a24eef95d85bd95f

Count I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms

0

0a71ec382f0717b9

"'m not going to argue with you. The page clearly said that the biography was written by Muze, not NME. If you don't believe me, take a look. Scroll all the way down to the bottom, and you'll see this disclaimer. ""Copyright 1989-2008 Muze UK Ltd. For personal non-commercial use only. All rights reserved."" Information from Muze is mass-distributed and appears on various websites, including NME. Just because it appears on the website of a reliable source doesn't mean that Muze is reliable. I've repeatedly apologized for my actions, but any stubbornness on my part does not mean that I was the only person who behaved against the rules. You were clearly being stubborn, as you are now, by denying that the biography is from Muze rather than NME. ( ) I"

0

03a39d2dfe116248

" Please specifically name the ""officials"" you are describing by individual name? Are you from a Soviet country? Wikipedia is NOT PutinÂ´s Russia!! "

0

b0c0b354c7ebc723

March 2009 (UTC) It improves the article because it shows that Keith has FRAUDULENTLY presented himself as something OTHER than what he is. It goes right to his character. Asking how it 'improves' the article is like asking how including revelations that Clifford Irving made up the Hughes bio 'improves' that article. The real takeway? User Blaxthos will do ANYTHING to help cover for liberals. And he is a prolific editor at Wikpiedia. Ultimately this inclusion will stay because it's both newsworthy and speaks to Olbermann's dishonestly. But this attempt at liberal damage control is FAR more incriminating of Wikipedia in general and user Blaxthos in specific. 68.40.123.217 10:37, 31

0

65155275fe5d34ab

I added another recent OR diff.

0

0541cd5983c7966d

October 2011 (UTC) It will be kept so enwiki upload isn't necessary. It is superior to illustrating recent inequality, but loses the historic context; which is important to seeing the consequence of inequality. - Boy 02:26, 27

0

67b93d0664b22930

" Re: Template:TWP Got it. A couple of parser functions weren't doing what I thought they would do, but I got it working in so the change is now live. The unknown-importance category should start repopulating soon. (Speak) "

0

2ae122ebd6062758

" you are a joke as well. i thought this was uncivial personal attack against me: ""Don't bother arguing with ClichÃ© Online, he's a delusional and hypocritical fanboy"". so why are you posting on my talk page instead of his. i think you're an idiot just like them. "

1

0

1

0

f0aa5d856e7c339e

You're being a jerk. Block who you want. I'll just change my IP. Who the hell to do you think you are, anyway? I read the warnings and considered them. Keeping them up there is some kind of anal retentive power play on your part. You're exactly why wiki mods are considered ASSHOLES.

1

0

1

0

1

0

8947ab2e1175d64c

" It wasn't done on RFCU. "

0

6c0be608a932df53

REDIRECT Talk:James Bruce (cricketer)

0

ec06cffbcc2392c8

Thanks for explaining why you think the sources support the IP's addition. You are quite helpful.

0

e1ac48ad8e823379

" Either don't do a ""bold"" histmerge or undo it when it's proven to be contentious if you're gonna be away for 6 days. â€” lfdder "

0

c717998854397512

Well, I felt you had deliberately ignored the links I had provided (where it says that I was AldeBaer). On a related note: When someone says he's drunk and keeps posting although his main account has already been blocked: How much good do you think it does with regard to prevention to extend that block? But nevermind, I don't want to talk right now. â€”Â Dorftrottelâ

0

4ce9b6b91c0a5ffa

during the preliminary coursework

0

43346ed16a37ce08

Huh? You page protected Amanda Knox. The previous editor was redirecting it because they said the article was a copy of the murder article. But the article has been up only 2 hours and already it has changes. The previous editor before that was John Carter, who is an administrator. What you should do is not to listen to the pro-redirect editor and let many editors improve the article so that it is not a copy of the murder article. Then it can be judged on its own. If people add biographical details to the murder article, those will probably be removed because they are unrelated to the murder. So we are stunning the growth due to inflexible rules. There is already a consensus, about 5 editors have edited the article and 1 changed it to a redirect and demanded page protection. 5:1 is consensus. You should unprotect it and ask for opinions on the Amanda Knox talk page. Then see what the real consensus is. I came here and typed Amanda Knox. This is because she is the key article. I did not type in Murder of Kirscher.

0

9cf3ccf77817e6af

" Just to be clear, in many cases I personally added a link pair like ""[[July 4]], [[1976 in radio|1976]]"" to an article so 1) I created that link pair, 2) I did not realize that it broke autoformatting, and 3) I acknowledge that date autoformatting is now deprecated and is being removed by the bot. Also to be clear, Lightbot is converting my example above to ""[[July 4]], [[1976]]"" which 1) created a new yet deprecated autoformatted date link pair and 2) removes the useful, on topic link to 1976 in radio. Given that there is no consensus for an urgent removal of date autoformatting, I'm simply asking that the bot not undo ""date in radio"" links if it can't, as you note, handle them properly. - "

0

20b5201b9228e208

" We'll need a template. 110 â™£ "

0

f65fc8a149dbd44d

WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! (talk â€¢ contrib)

0

6fa3f4c86c804223

dont mess with my contributions buddy ok? i know what im talking about i will continue to add necro where i see he needs to be included he is one of the most relevant hiphop artists today moving 100,000's of units indie no major label ever he is the number one hustler in hiphop underground u might not like his music but dont try to edit the facts i add here if u continue to touch my contributions i will erase your contributions i have 20 computers here with different ips, so there is nothing you can do except leave me alone

0

3d2dc2e8e2f6f64d

". With the dreadful experience, I get that I'm distrusted by admins even though Roux poured personal attacks. I will only ""contribute"" content building if I'm unblocked"

0

ece0a228382a1f48

Done. Let me know what you think. 17:29, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

0

234d9a0c73c42c06

your a faggot and a nigger

1

0

1

d095ee68048c5e0d

" Blocked You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. â€” (push to talk) "

0

52af009ffb256772

It's a bit empty now. I forgot that the Lego Universe was non-free image. Anyone else have a suitable image for this box? (Talk to me)

0

4897e9702e0fe668

, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Jimbo, I have not lied about the above. I can forward the email to anyone, if they want. I'll tell you the story. I send email explaining the situation to A volunteers answering the email asked me if they could forward this to Arb Com. I recieved the arb com reply, detailing my second chance. Look, I will even give out my password to prove it. I can send a screenshot or forward the email or give a password (to jimbo). I will forward the email to , and ask they post a confirmation here. 92.5.91.181 20:45

0

8e8d380a429f4dbf

GAN backlog contest Hi mate, I'm not sure if you know about this or if you'll have the time, but over the month of October the project is running a GAN review contest. It can be found here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Contest/GAN backlog elimination/October 2010 in case you are interested. Cheers.

0

c283940b3d84cefd

Agreed. Just everything about is suspect (and just lol how so many fucking Chinese users have it on their watchlist - I seriously can't do shit without somebody undoing my changes). It stays, for now. I'm planning on doing massive rewrites on the whole thing per Cydevil.

1

0

1

0

b0d258881162013c

" Contested deletion This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) FWIW I haven't worked at the company for over 8 years, I originally created the page to contribute to Wikipedia on a subject which, at the time, I knew about. I don't know how accurate what is written is at the moment as I haven't followed it, but I know the company does still exist as I have a friend who still works there. While I agree the wording of the opening 2 sentences at the moment do now come across a bit 'marketing-ey' (I'm guessing someone has edited since it was created), as a Wikipedia user I'd find it stranger a big company wouldn't have a page on Wikipedia than that the page had some marketing speak. Rather than deleting the page entirely, why not just fix it by cutting down to the first two sentences to just have the facts about what it does and size? eg: ""Isobar is a global full service digital marketing agency with over 70 locations, across 44 markets worldwide""? "

0

b570b11a7c7b6e27

" Paul, you seem to be assuming that everyone with an M.D. Is engaged in evidence based practice, while this is clearly not the case. You further appear to be asserting that users of specific treatment modalities, e.g. massage, are engaged in ""naturopathic"" treatment. This is a false generalization, as the use of one modality does not imply the use of the whole suite. come howl! "

0

be479cf2c359e9ab

Concerning your last talk page edit There are a few concerns. I think that you should clean up the grammar and some general santorum to avoid a retaliatory response. 208.54.44.224

0

586cb069c63839dc

I was convinced by the logic and reason of your arguments here and on the edit summaries that it should stay. Thank you.

0

728c5e7b99e226a2

" You are free to do so. If consensus is lacking on some page then, of course, the guideline cannot be used there. However, if you are one of a few editors who object to it on some page, you have to stick to these ""de-facto"" guidelines on such a page. "

0

e36e6ff8ba9e4610

hi if you want 2 meet up or become a friend send to me and i'll be more than happy to.

0

65c277e15bb04d97

" Good question. I think one ""final warning"" and then block on the second edit is what I would do. Hey! You should run for adminship! I bet you'd be good at it. (Talk) "

0

f7b92d287809ef40

" Hi! Good idea for the front page. nake has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. nake "

0

dfdf88e4a3b889b9

Rationale Thanks for clarifying. Any time we strike comments we should explain the striking for presumably obvious reasons. Thanks again. -

0

c8363fde9330ede1

Where is the discussion around Ceschi's notability in the year 2015? All I see ois a discussion that took place eight years ago. He has become a good deal more notable since then, releasing his most widely reviewed album and founding Fake Four. Non-notability is not a permanent affliction.

0

f7218727ff8c52e6

" What? You're too chicken to change your ""Declined"" decision? You're an admin too, act like one! "

1

0

2abf44a34158583e

Wow AFD IS a discussion about the notability of articles because AFD is for debating what articles should stay or go (Look at other AFDs and you will see that you are wrong.) WP:N IS important to AFD because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and AFD is about debating what article belongs and doesn't belong in this encyclopedia.

0

068e0a8032a4cf5c

Thank You Thanks for the link on the reference desks to 'Crux orthodoxa' it was a good read, pretty much what i was looking for, it seems that the cross is slightly ambiguous and has no defined reasons for extra beams. So again, thank you

0

a6c407f791ab70f3

Exactly I was saying same thing but he never understood that.( )

0