question
stringlengths 236
348k
| answer
stringlengths 10
2.11k
|
|---|---|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Running transaction test
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/sysusers.attr from install of systemd-rpm-macros-253.14-1.fc38.noarch conflicts with file from package rpm-build-4.18.91-3.fc38.x86_64]: [DNF executed by Mock is trying to check whether the package build dependencies are installable. It appears that `rpm-build` and `systemd-rpm-macros` conflict with each other on `sysusers.attr` file (both packages provide the same package but with different content).]
=============
[
rpm-build x86_64 4.18.91-3.fc38 copr_base 69]: [Note that `rpm-build` is installed from `copr_base` directory, not from Fedora default repositories. It means that the `rp-build` package is "overwritten" by the Copr repository, and is non-default. The fact that the Copr author overwrites this low-level utility looks suspicious and is likely guilty for the transaction failure.]
| Issue: Likely because the repository provides broken `rpm-build` package, and thus Mock failed to install all the needed dependencies.
Resolution: Fix `rpm-build` package or `systemd-rpm-macros`, but likely the former. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Running transaction test
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/sysusers.attr from install of systemd-rpm-macros-253.14-1.fc38.noarch conflicts with file from package rpm-build-4.18.91-3.fc38.x86_64 | DNF executed by Mock is trying to check whether the package build dependencies are installable. It appears that `rpm-build` and `systemd-rpm-macros` conflict with each other on `sysusers.attr` file (both packages provide the same package but with different content). |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
rpm-build x86_64 4.18.91-3.fc38 copr_base 69 | Note that `rpm-build` is installed from `copr_base` directory, not from Fedora default repositories. It means that the `rp-build` package is "overwritten" by the Copr repository, and is non-default. The fact that the Copr author overwrites this low-level utility looks suspicious and is likely guilty for the transaction failure. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljack: No such file or directory]: [GNU linker `/usr/bin/ld` can not find library `jack`. This will cause issues with compilation.]
=============
[collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status]: [GNU linker `ld` has failed with status `1`.]
=============
[make[1]: *** [makefile.qt-jack:480: miniAudicle] Error 1]: [Line `480` of `makefile.qt-jack` has been executed with an error.]
=============
[make: [makefile:53: linux-jack] Error 2 (ignored)]: [Line `53` of makefile for linux-jack has been executed with error. The error was ignored.]
=============
[mv: cannot stat 'miniAudicle': No such file or directory]: [Program `mv` for moving directories and files, has failed with `miniAudicle` argument. No file or directory `miniAudicle` was found.]
=============
[RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zYxGaU (%build)]: [General message, indicating that RPM build has experienced errors.]
| Issue: Library `jack` required for build was not found by linker.
Resolution: Ensure that all build time dependencies are available on the machine used for build. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljack: No such file or directory | GNU linker `/usr/bin/ld` can not find library `jack`. This will cause issues with compilation. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status | GNU linker `ld` has failed with status `1`. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
make[1]: *** [makefile.qt-jack:480: miniAudicle] Error 1 | Line `480` of `makefile.qt-jack` has been executed with an error. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
make: [makefile:53: linux-jack] Error 2 (ignored) | Line `53` of makefile for linux-jack has been executed with error. The error was ignored. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
mv: cannot stat 'miniAudicle': No such file or directory | Program `mv` for moving directories and files, has failed with `miniAudicle` argument. No file or directory `miniAudicle` was found. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zYxGaU (%build) | General message, indicating that RPM build has experienced errors. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'epel':
- Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed6)
- Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed7)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'epel': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed7)]: [DNF is not able to download repository metadata for "epel" repository. This repository server returns error code 404 (not found).]
=============
[WARNING: DNF4 command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
]: [DNF transaction has failed and it will retry after 10 seconds. ]
| Issue: The 'epel' repository is required for the build but it can't be reached.
Resolution: Make sure the 'epel' repository is accessible. You can raise this issue to maintainers of the repository. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'epel':
- Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed6)
- Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed7)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'epel': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed7) | DNF is not able to download repository metadata for "epel" repository. This repository server returns error code 404 (not found). |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
WARNING: DNF4 command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
| DNF transaction has failed and it will retry after 10 seconds. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/thumbnailprovider/thumbnailgenerator.cpp.rej
]: [There the build failed]
| Issue: The patch failed to apply
Resolution: Review the patch and modify it so it can be applied correctly. The file containing the rejects will help you to see what parts of the patch actually failed. Most common ways the hunk can fail are either when the baseline code is already patched or when the baseline code changed significantly enough. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/thumbnailprovider/thumbnailgenerator.cpp.rej
| There the build failed |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[gcc -Isrc/boot/linuxx64.elf.stub.p -Isrc/boot -I../src/boot -I. -I.. -Isrc/fundamental -I../src/fundamental -fvisibility=hidden -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wextra -Werror -std=gnu17 -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-nonnull-compare -Warray-bounds -Warray-bounds=2 -Wdate-time -Wendif-labels -Werror=bool-compare -Werror=discarded-qualifiers -Werror=flex-array-member-not-at-end -Werror=format=2 -Werror=format-signedness -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -Werror=int-conversion -Werror=missing-declarations -Werror=missing-prototypes -Werror=overflow -Werror=override-init -Werror=pointer-sign -Werror=return-type -Werror=shift-count-overflow -Werror=shift-overflow=2 -Werror=strict-flex-arrays -Werror=undef -Wfloat-equal -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5 -Winit-self -Wlogical-op -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wmissing-noreturn -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn -Wunterminated-string-initialization -Wunused-function -Wwrite-strings -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant -Wzero-length-bounds -fdiagnostics-show-option -fno-common -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-strong -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-unused-result -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -Werror=shadow -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fPIE -DSD_BOOT=1 -ffreestanding -fno-strict-aliasing -fshort-wchar -include efi_config.h -fwide-exec-charset=UCS2 -maccumulate-outgoing-args -mstack-protector-guard=global -fcf-protection=none -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-exceptions -fno-unwind-tables -fno-sanitize=all '-DEFI_MACHINE_TYPE_NAME="x64"' -m64 -march=x86-64 -mno-red-zone -mgeneral-regs-only -MD -MQ src/boot/linuxx64.elf.stub.p/cpio.c.o -MF src/boot/linuxx64.elf.stub.p/cpio.c.o.d -o src/boot/linuxx64.elf.stub.p/cpio.c.o -c ../src/boot/cpio.c
In file included from ../src/boot/device-path-util.h:5,
from ../src/boot/cpio.c:4:
../src/boot/util.h:17:6: error: redundant redeclaration of âfreeâ [-Werror=redundant-decls]
17 | void free(void *p);
| ^~~~
In file included from ../src/boot/cpio.h:5,
from ../src/boot/cpio.c:3:
../src/fundamental/iovec-util-fundamental.h:14:6: note: previous declaration of âfreeâ with type âvoid(void *)â
14 | void free(void *p);
| ^~~~]: [Build failed during compilation, with redundant redeclaration of free function.]
| Issue: Compiler found redundant declaration which failed the build
Resolution: Remove redundant declaration of build in function free(). Or rename function to use name which is not used yet. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
gcc -Isrc/boot/linuxx64.elf.stub.p -Isrc/boot -I../src/boot -I. -I.. -Isrc/fundamental -I../src/fundamental -fvisibility=hidden -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wextra -Werror -std=gnu17 -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-nonnull-compare -Warray-bounds -Warray-bounds=2 -Wdate-time -Wendif-labels -Werror=bool-compare -Werror=discarded-qualifiers -Werror=flex-array-member-not-at-end -Werror=format=2 -Werror=format-signedness -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -Werror=int-conversion -Werror=missing-declarations -Werror=missing-prototypes -Werror=overflow -Werror=override-init -Werror=pointer-sign -Werror=return-type -Werror=shift-count-overflow -Werror=shift-overflow=2 -Werror=strict-flex-arrays -Werror=undef -Wfloat-equal -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5 -Winit-self -Wlogical-op -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wmissing-noreturn -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn -Wunterminated-string-initialization -Wunused-function -Wwrite-strings -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant -Wzero-length-bounds -fdiagnostics-show-option -fno-common -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-strong -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-unused-result -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -Werror=shadow -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fPIE -DSD_BOOT=1 -ffreestanding -fno-strict-aliasing -fshort-wchar -include efi_config.h -fwide-exec-charset=UCS2 -maccumulate-outgoing-args -mstack-protector-guard=global -fcf-protection=none -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-exceptions -fno-unwind-tables -fno-sanitize=all '-DEFI_MACHINE_TYPE_NAME="x64"' -m64 -march=x86-64 -mno-red-zone -mgeneral-regs-only -MD -MQ src/boot/linuxx64.elf.stub.p/cpio.c.o -MF src/boot/linuxx64.elf.stub.p/cpio.c.o.d -o src/boot/linuxx64.elf.stub.p/cpio.c.o -c ../src/boot/cpio.c
In file included from ../src/boot/device-path-util.h:5,
from ../src/boot/cpio.c:4:
../src/boot/util.h:17:6: error: redundant redeclaration of âfreeâ [-Werror=redundant-decls]
17 | void free(void *p);
| ^~~~
In file included from ../src/boot/cpio.h:5,
from ../src/boot/cpio.c:3:
../src/fundamental/iovec-util-fundamental.h:14:6: note: previous declaration of âfreeâ with type âvoid(void *)â
14 | void free(void *p);
| ^~~~ | Build failed during compilation, with redundant redeclaration of free function. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[6 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_credentials.py.rej
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_signers.py.rej
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_utils.py.rej
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/utils/botocore/__init__.py.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ba6Qwl (%prep)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ba6Qwl (%prep)]: [Output from failed patch.]
=============
[ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/awscli2-2.27.0-1.fc43.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 7 seconds]: [Error line indicating which srcrpm failed building.]
| Issue: Build failed because it tried to apply wrong patch.
Resolution: Make sure the patch is correct and up-to-date. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
6 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_credentials.py.rej
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_signers.py.rej
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_utils.py.rej
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/utils/botocore/__init__.py.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ba6Qwl (%prep)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ba6Qwl (%prep) | Output from failed patch. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/awscli2-2.27.0-1.fc43.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 7 seconds | Error line indicating which srcrpm failed building. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[[ 14%] Built target MathMLSolver_shared
gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/openCOLLADA-1.6.70-build/OpenCOLLADA-1.6.70-maya/redhat-linux-build'
gmake: *** [Makefile:139: all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pYU25I (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pYU25I (%build)
RPM build errors:
Finish: rpmbuild openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 1 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1745242947.611776/root/var/log/dnf5.log
INFO: chroot_scan: creating tarball /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan.tar.gz
/bin/tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm) Config(fedora-41-x86_64) 0 minutes 20 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: ]: [It's where it says error]
| Issue: I have no clue
Resolution: For the build not to fail |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
[ 14%] Built target MathMLSolver_shared
gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/openCOLLADA-1.6.70-build/OpenCOLLADA-1.6.70-maya/redhat-linux-build'
gmake: *** [Makefile:139: all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pYU25I (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pYU25I (%build)
RPM build errors:
Finish: rpmbuild openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 1 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1745242947.611776/root/var/log/dnf5.log
INFO: chroot_scan: creating tarball /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan.tar.gz
/bin/tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm) Config(fedora-41-x86_64) 0 minutes 20 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: | It's where it says error |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-devel'
Package krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.amzn2023.x86_64 is already installed.
Package libxml2-2.10.4-1.amzn2023.0.6.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be foun]: [shows the dnf error]
=============
[
No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-deve]: [package cannot be installed]
=============
[ING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository 64 kB/s | 1.5 kB 00:00
Package findutils-1:4.8.0-2.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-devel'
Package krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.amzn2023.x86_64 is already installed.
Package libxml2-2.10.4-1.amzn2023.0.6.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository 66 kB/s | 1.5 kB 00:00
Package findutils-1:4.8.0-2.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-devel'
Package krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.amzn2023.x86_64 is already installed.
Package libxml2-2.10.4-1.amzn2023.0.6.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.
Finish: build setup for sssd-2.9.4-3.amzn2023.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for sssd-2.9.4-3.amzn2023.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/sssd-2.9.4-3.amzn2023.src.rpm) Config(amazonlinux-2023-x86_64) 0 minutes 23 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M eaa0c5d8c4ee49bb9b089861cde90da7 -D /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-bootstrap-1710356556.638268/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.yjyaseyk:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' ]: [cannot install those packages]
| Issue: some packages could not be installed
Resolution: make sure the packages can be installed on the system |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-devel'
Package krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.amzn2023.x86_64 is already installed.
Package libxml2-2.10.4-1.amzn2023.0.6.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be foun | shows the dnf error |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-deve | package cannot be installed |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository 64 kB/s | 1.5 kB 00:00
Package findutils-1:4.8.0-2.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-devel'
Package krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.amzn2023.x86_64 is already installed.
Package libxml2-2.10.4-1.amzn2023.0.6.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository 66 kB/s | 1.5 kB 00:00
Package findutils-1:4.8.0-2.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-devel'
Package krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.amzn2023.x86_64 is already installed.
Package libxml2-2.10.4-1.amzn2023.0.6.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.
Finish: build setup for sssd-2.9.4-3.amzn2023.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for sssd-2.9.4-3.amzn2023.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/sssd-2.9.4-3.amzn2023.src.rpm) Config(amazonlinux-2023-x86_64) 0 minutes 23 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M eaa0c5d8c4ee49bb9b089861cde90da7 -D /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-bootstrap-1710356556.638268/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.yjyaseyk:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' | cannot install those packages |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[cmd: ['dist-git-client', 'sources']
cwd: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-agh4tp54/watchman
rc: 1
stdout:
stderr: INFO: Reading stdout from command: git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
ERROR: Exactly one spec file expected in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-agh4tp54/watchman/. directory, 0 found]: [Spec file is missing for the build.]
| Issue: Spec file is not available so SRPM can't be created.
Resolution: Please make sure that the spec file is available during build. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
cmd: ['dist-git-client', 'sources']
cwd: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-agh4tp54/watchman
rc: 1
stdout:
stderr: INFO: Reading stdout from command: git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
ERROR: Exactly one spec file expected in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-agh4tp54/watchman/. directory, 0 found | Spec file is missing for the build. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[meson.build:499:15: ERROR: Dependency "libffado" not found, tried pkgconfig]: [Meson build system reports that a required dependency `libffado` was not found. Compilation of the source can not proceed.]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eIaP2Z (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eIaP2Z (%build)]: [General message, indicating that an error has occurred during build. ]
| Issue: One of the dependencies `libffado` was not found during build. Since `libffado` is not an optional dependency, it must be present during compilation.
Resolution: Ensure that package `libaffado` is installed on the build system before attempting another build. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
meson.build:499:15: ERROR: Dependency "libffado" not found, tried pkgconfig | Meson build system reports that a required dependency `libffado` was not found. Compilation of the source can not proceed. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eIaP2Z (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eIaP2Z (%build) | General message, indicating that an error has occurred during build. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
['srpm_build_method': 'rpkg',]: [This seems like a build with `rpkg-util`.]
=============
[{'clone_url': 'https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Guard]: [But `clone_url` points at Fedora DistGit (the official one). This seems wrong, you would typically use the DistGit source method instead of rpkg.]
| Issue: Improperly picked source method.
Resolution: Start using the DistGit method for building your SRPMs. https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#dist-git-method |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
'srpm_build_method': 'rpkg', | This seems like a build with `rpkg-util`. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
{'clone_url': 'https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Guard | But `clone_url` points at Fedora DistGit (the official one). This seems wrong, you would typically use the DistGit source method instead of rpkg. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
Copr build error: Build fail]: [Final build failure message.]
=============
[No match for argument: libldb-devel >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: libtalloc-devel >= 2.4.2
No match for argument: libtdb-devel >= 1.4.10
No match for argument: libtevent-devel >= 0.16.1
No match for argument: python3-ldb >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: python3-ldb-devel >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: python3-talloc-devel >= 2.4.2
No match for argument: python3-tdb >= 1.4.10
No match for argument: python3-tevent >= 0.16.1]: [Multiple unmatched dependencies. ]
| Issue: Several required packages couldn't be found.
Resolution: Check if required packages actually exist and are present in the repos. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Copr build error: Build fail | Final build failure message. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No match for argument: libldb-devel >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: libtalloc-devel >= 2.4.2
No match for argument: libtdb-devel >= 1.4.10
No match for argument: libtevent-devel >= 0.16.1
No match for argument: python3-ldb >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: python3-ldb-devel >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: python3-talloc-devel >= 2.4.2
No match for argument: python3-tdb >= 1.4.10
No match for argument: python3-tevent >= 0.16.1 | Multiple unmatched dependencies. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.n8lCM0: line 55: curl: command not found
]: [Curl is not present on system - missing dependency for curl]
=============
[/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.n8lCM0: line 56: /builddir/.cargo/env: No such file or directory
]: [Due to missing curl, rustup was not installed so rust/cargo is missing on system]
| Issue: Rust is not correctly installed due to failure to find curl on system
Resolution: Add curl to build dependencies |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.n8lCM0: line 55: curl: command not found
| Curl is not present on system - missing dependency for curl |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.n8lCM0: line 56: /builddir/.cargo/env: No such file or directory
| Due to missing curl, rustup was not installed so rust/cargo is missing on system |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dpdk-24.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/dpdk-dumpcap
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dpdk-24.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/dpdk-pdump]: [Files dpdk-dumpcap and dpdk-pdump are meant to be installed in the buildroot but are not there.]
| Issue: File paths /usr/bin/dpdk-dumpcap and /usr/bin/dpdk-pdump are defined in the %files section but unfortunately these are not present in the buildroot.
Resolution: Either update your %files section by removing these 2 files or make sure they are properly installed in the expected target location. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dpdk-24.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/dpdk-dumpcap
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dpdk-24.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/dpdk-pdump | Files dpdk-dumpcap and dpdk-pdump are meant to be installed in the buildroot but are not there. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[install: target '/builddir/build/BUILD/pioneer-20250501-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/pioneer/': No such file or directory]: [Error message]
| Issue: install program tries to copy files into destination that doesn't exist.
Resolution: Create the target directory before running `install`. Add `mkdir -p ...` before the failing `install` in %install section of SPEC file |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
install: target '/builddir/build/BUILD/pioneer-20250501-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/pioneer/': No such file or directory | Error message |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[:: [ 08:52:43 ] :: [ BEGIN ] :: Running 'dnf -y --installroot=/tmp/tmp.ExxofwZ4XW --releasever=43 install net-tools'
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: net-tools
No repositories were loaded from the installroot. To use the configuration and repositories of the host system, pass --use-host-config.
:: [ 08:52:43 ] :: [ FAIL ] :: Command 'dnf -y --installroot=/tmp/tmp.ExxofwZ4XW --releasever=43 install net-tools' (Expected 0, got 1)]: [Indication that the installation of net-tools failed.]
| Issue: Installation of net-tools failed because of the missing parameter of dnf.
Resolution: Add "--use-host-config" parameter to the dnf command. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
:: [ 08:52:43 ] :: [ BEGIN ] :: Running 'dnf -y --installroot=/tmp/tmp.ExxofwZ4XW --releasever=43 install net-tools'
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: net-tools
No repositories were loaded from the installroot. To use the configuration and repositories of the host system, pass --use-host-config.
:: [ 08:52:43 ] :: [ FAIL ] :: Command 'dnf -y --installroot=/tmp/tmp.ExxofwZ4XW --releasever=43 install net-tools' (Expected 0, got 1) | Indication that the installation of net-tools failed. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ Running scriptlet: java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1:1.8.0.402.b06-1.el7_9. 1/1
error: lua script failed: /var/lib/rpm-state//copy_jdk_configs.lua:39: attempt to index a nil value (global 'arg')
Error in PRETRANS scriptlet in rpm package java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless
]: [lua script fails, then openjdk is not properly installed]
=============
[ ant -Dant.java.version=1.8 prepare-dist
Error: could not find libjava.so
Error: Could not find Java SE Runtime Environment.]: [ant fails to load libjava.so]
| Issue: For some reason openjdk is not properly installed.
Note that same source RPM build succeeds on build.opensuse.org for same EPEL 7 package
Resolution: No idea, fails on COPR, working fine on build.opensuse.org |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Running scriptlet: java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1:1.8.0.402.b06-1.el7_9. 1/1
error: lua script failed: /var/lib/rpm-state//copy_jdk_configs.lua:39: attempt to index a nil value (global 'arg')
Error in PRETRANS scriptlet in rpm package java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless
| lua script fails, then openjdk is not properly installed |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ant -Dant.java.version=1.8 prepare-dist
Error: could not find libjava.so
Error: Could not find Java SE Runtime Environment. | ant fails to load libjava.so |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Robert-André Mauchin <[email protected]> 0.1.1-2]: [error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Robert-André Mauchin <[email protected]> 0.1.1-2]
| Issue: Bad changelog format
Resolution: Fix the format. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Robert-André Mauchin <[email protected]> 0.1.1-2 | error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Robert-André Mauchin <[email protected]> 0.1.1-2 |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[gen/shim_headers/minizip_shim/third_party/zlib/contrib/minizip/ioapi.h:5:10: fatal error: minizip/ioapi.h: No such file or directory
5 | #include <minizip/ioapi.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.]: [The g++ compilation phase failed. Seems like the `minizip/ioapi.h` file is not present on the include path.]
=============
[
minizip-ng-compat-devel x86_64 3.0.10-7.fc40 fedora 86.0 K]: [The minizip-ng-compat-devel package is being installed. But the `ng` seems like next-generation or new-generation, so perhaps the header file has changed a location or disappeared?]
| Issue: Missing header file for g++ compilation. Seems like some build-time dependency is not installed.
Resolution: Try to find where the header file is now. If the code that is being used (from the corresponding header) has moved, start including a different header file. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
gen/shim_headers/minizip_shim/third_party/zlib/contrib/minizip/ioapi.h:5:10: fatal error: minizip/ioapi.h: No such file or directory
5 | #include <minizip/ioapi.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated. | The g++ compilation phase failed. Seems like the `minizip/ioapi.h` file is not present on the include path. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
minizip-ng-compat-devel x86_64 3.0.10-7.fc40 fedora 86.0 K | The minizip-ng-compat-devel package is being installed. But the `ng` seems like next-generation or new-generation, so perhaps the header file has changed a location or disappeared? |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Problem: cannot install both gcc-15.0.0-0.2.fc42.aarch64 from https_dmalcolm_fedorapeople_org_gcc_gcc_15_mass_prebuild_arch and gcc-14.2.1-6.fc42.aarch64 from fedora
- package libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64 from fedora requires gcc(major) = 14, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best candidate for the job
- conflicting requests
You can try to add to command line:
--no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates]: [Package manager error. Package `libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64` requires `gcc(major) = 14`. However `gcc(major) = 14` is not available from any of the installed repositories.]
| Issue: One of the required packages depends on `gcc(major) = 14` which is not available from any installed repository.
Resolution: All direct and indirect dependencies must be satisfied before the build is attempted. You may loosen constraints on packages required, replace them with alternatives, or provide them yourself. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem: cannot install both gcc-15.0.0-0.2.fc42.aarch64 from https_dmalcolm_fedorapeople_org_gcc_gcc_15_mass_prebuild_arch and gcc-14.2.1-6.fc42.aarch64 from fedora
- package libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64 from fedora requires gcc(major) = 14, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best candidate for the job
- conflicting requests
You can try to add to command line:
--no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates | Package manager error. Package `libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64` requires `gcc(major) = 14`. However `gcc(major) = 14` is not available from any of the installed repositories. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[libfdt_wrap.c:5626:17: error: too few arguments to function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’
5626 | resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, val);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libfdt_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libfdt_wrap.c: In function ‘_wrap_fdt_get_mem_rsv’:
libfdt_wrap.c:6433:19: error: too few arguments to function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’
6433 | resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, val);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [Build failed because function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’ expected 3 arguments.]
| Issue: The build failed due to changes in SWIG 4.3.0.
There is new declaration of SWIG_Python_AppendOutput is now:
SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void);
The 3rd parameter is new and the new $isvoid special variable should be passed to it.
Resolution: There are two ways how to solve it.
* Add the 3rd parameter to indicate whether or not the wrapped function returns void.
* or also consider replacing with:
SWIG_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj); |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
libfdt_wrap.c:5626:17: error: too few arguments to function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’
5626 | resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, val);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libfdt_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libfdt_wrap.c: In function ‘_wrap_fdt_get_mem_rsv’:
libfdt_wrap.c:6433:19: error: too few arguments to function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’
6433 | resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, val);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Build failed because function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’ expected 3 arguments. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.djl1SM]: [issue in prep section]
=============
[/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.djl1SM: line 41: cd: ka_GE-0.1: No such file or directory]: [shows the exact reason for failure]
| Issue: cd tries to open a non-existent directory.
Resolution: fix the path that should be used by cd |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.djl1SM | issue in prep section |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.djl1SM: line 41: cd: ka_GE-0.1: No such file or directory | shows the exact reason for failure |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1SspOy (%check)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1SspOy (%check)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1
]: [The build failed in %check phase.]
=============
[test result: ok. 83 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 1.26s
error: 1 target failed:
`--test ber`]: [The test `ber` failed.]
| Issue: The build failed in %check phase because testsuite failed.
Resolution: You can temporary disable the testsuite or one specific test:
%cargo_test -f bigint,bits,datetime,serialize -- -- --skip from_ber_length_invalid
You need to contact upstream and work with them on fixing the testsuite. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1SspOy (%check)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1SspOy (%check)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1
| The build failed in %check phase. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
test result: ok. 83 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 1.26s
error: 1 target failed:
`--test ber` | The test `ber` failed. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/default) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/default) < 4.5.0~)
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/derive) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/derive) < 4.5.0~)
]: [Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/default) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/default) < 4.5.0~)
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/derive) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/derive) < 4.5.0~)
]
| Issue: Fedora rawhide repository does not have packaged dependencies with correct version
Resolution: Update existing packages to provide required version or add them if missing. Alternatively build older version, which has all dependencies already present in repositories. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/default) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/default) < 4.5.0~)
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/derive) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/derive) < 4.5.0~)
| Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/default) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/default) < 4.5.0~)
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/derive) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/derive) < 4.5.0~)
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[tar/test/test_copy.c:216: Summary: Failed 396 times
tar/test/test_copy.c:224: Summary: Failed 390 times
tar/test/test_copy.c:250: Summary: Failed 2 times]: [Shows that some tests failed]
| Issue: The test 'tar/test/test_copy.c' failed and thus the %check phase failed
Resolution: Figure out why the test failed and fix the bugs |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
tar/test/test_copy.c:216: Summary: Failed 396 times
tar/test/test_copy.c:224: Summary: Failed 390 times
tar/test/test_copy.c:250: Summary: Failed 2 times | Shows that some tests failed |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: nothing provides requested (php-composer(ralouphie/getallheaders) >= 2.0.5 with php-composer(ralouphie/getallheaders) < 4.0)
DEBUG util.py:608: Child return code was: 1
]: [DNF fails to resolve dependency]
| Issue: php-composer(ralouphie/getallheaders) version >= 2.0.5 and < 4 is not available
Resolution: If ralouphie/getallheaders is needed at runtime
- the package needs to be adapted to run with available version
- OR required version needs to be added to the repository
- OR this package be retired
If this package is only required at buildtime, for test suite:
- tests needs to be adapted for version available
- OR relevant unit tests ignored |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: nothing provides requested (php-composer(ralouphie/getallheaders) >= 2.0.5 with php-composer(ralouphie/getallheaders) < 4.0)
DEBUG util.py:608: Child return code was: 1
| DNF fails to resolve dependency |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[FAILED: systemd-modules-load.p/src_modules-load_modules-load.c.o
gcc -Isystemd-modules-load.p -I. -I.. -Isrc/basic -I../src/basic -Isrc/fundamental -I../src/fundamental -Isrc/systemd -I../src/systemd -I../src/libsystemd/sd-bus -I../src/libsystemd/sd-device -I../src/libsystemd/sd-event -I../src/libsystemd/sd-hwdb -I../src/libsystemd/sd-id128 -I../src/libsystemd/sd-journal -I../src/libsystemd/sd-netlink -I../src/libsystemd/sd-network -I../src/libsystemd/sd-resolve -Isrc/shared -I../src/shared -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wextra -Werror -std=gnu11 -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-nonnull-compare -Warray-bounds -Warray-bounds=2 -Wdate-time -Wendif-labels -Werror=format=2 -Werror=format-signedness -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -Werror=int-conversion -Werror=missing-declarations -Werror=missing-prototypes -Werror=overflow -Werror=override-init -Werror=return-type -Werror=shift-count-overflow -Werror=shift-overflow=2 -Werror=strict-flex-arrays -Werror=undef -Wfloat-equal -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5 -Winit-self -Wlogical-op -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wmissing-noreturn -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn -Wunused-function -Wwrite-strings -Wzero-length-bounds -fdiagnostics-show-option -fno-common -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-strong -fstrict-flex-arrays --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-unused-result -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -Werror=shadow -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fstrict-flex-arrays=1 -fvisibility=hidden -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -include config.h -MD -MQ systemd-modules-load.p/src_modules-load_modules-load.c.o -MF systemd-modules-load.p/src_modules-load_modules-load.c.o.d -o systemd-modules-load.p/src_modules-load_modules-load.c.o -c ../src/modules-load/modules-load.c
../src/modules-load/modules-load.c: In function âexec_taskâ:
../src/modules-load/modules-load.c:97:22: error: assignment discards âconstâ qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
97 | data[i].line = line;
| ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
]: [This error occurs at line 97 of the file modules-load.c. The error message "assignment discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type" indicates that there is an assignment in which the const qualifier is being discarded. Here, you are trying to assign the variable line (which is presumably declared as const) to data[i].line, which is likely not declared as const.]
| Issue: const Qualifier: In C, the const keyword is used to declare that a variable's value cannot be changed after initialization. It is a promise that the variable is read-only.
Discarding const: When you assign a const variable to a non-const variable, you are essentially telling the compiler that this previously unmodifiable variable is now modifiable. This can lead to unintended side effects, where parts of your code might change the value of variables that are meant to be immutable based on their initial declaration.
Resolution: The issue is in the source code. You have to work with upstream to resolve this error.
To resolve this error, you have a couple of options:
Change the Declaration of data[i].line: If it is appropriate for data[i].line to be modified, you can change its declaration to include the const qualifier. For example, if data[i].line is a pointer, you would change it from:
```
char* line;
```
to
```
const char* line;
```
Review the Use of const: If line should indeed remain const, but data[i].line needs to be modifiable (i.e., it must hold different values or be processed in some way), consider if there is a logical error in your approach. You might need to rethink how you are managing data between these variables.
Copy the Data: If you need to modify the data coming from line, but without changing the source, consider copying the content pointed to by line to data[i].line. This can be done using strdup(line), assuming line is a null-terminated string. However, remember to free the allocated memory when it is no longer needed to avoid memory leaks.
Compiler Flags: As a last resort (generally not recommended), you could consider compiling with less strict flags regarding const correctness. This can be done by removing -Werror=discarded-qualifiers from your build settings, but it's better to address the root cause as described above.
By addressing the issue with one of these approaches, you should be able to resolve the error and understand the implications of const correctness in C. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
FAILED: systemd-modules-load.p/src_modules-load_modules-load.c.o
gcc -Isystemd-modules-load.p -I. -I.. -Isrc/basic -I../src/basic -Isrc/fundamental -I../src/fundamental -Isrc/systemd -I../src/systemd -I../src/libsystemd/sd-bus -I../src/libsystemd/sd-device -I../src/libsystemd/sd-event -I../src/libsystemd/sd-hwdb -I../src/libsystemd/sd-id128 -I../src/libsystemd/sd-journal -I../src/libsystemd/sd-netlink -I../src/libsystemd/sd-network -I../src/libsystemd/sd-resolve -Isrc/shared -I../src/shared -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wextra -Werror -std=gnu11 -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-nonnull-compare -Warray-bounds -Warray-bounds=2 -Wdate-time -Wendif-labels -Werror=format=2 -Werror=format-signedness -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -Werror=int-conversion -Werror=missing-declarations -Werror=missing-prototypes -Werror=overflow -Werror=override-init -Werror=return-type -Werror=shift-count-overflow -Werror=shift-overflow=2 -Werror=strict-flex-arrays -Werror=undef -Wfloat-equal -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5 -Winit-self -Wlogical-op -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wmissing-noreturn -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn -Wunused-function -Wwrite-strings -Wzero-length-bounds -fdiagnostics-show-option -fno-common -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-strong -fstrict-flex-arrays --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-unused-result -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -Werror=shadow -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fstrict-flex-arrays=1 -fvisibility=hidden -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -include config.h -MD -MQ systemd-modules-load.p/src_modules-load_modules-load.c.o -MF systemd-modules-load.p/src_modules-load_modules-load.c.o.d -o systemd-modules-load.p/src_modules-load_modules-load.c.o -c ../src/modules-load/modules-load.c
../src/modules-load/modules-load.c: In function âexec_taskâ:
../src/modules-load/modules-load.c:97:22: error: assignment discards âconstâ qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
97 | data[i].line = line;
| ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
| This error occurs at line 97 of the file modules-load.c. The error message "assignment discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type" indicates that there is an assignment in which the const qualifier is being discarded. Here, you are trying to assign the variable line (which is presumably declared as const) to data[i].line, which is likely not declared as const. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ERROR: Meson version is 1.3.2 but project requires >= 1.4.0
]: [Build reported an error due to insufficient build system version.]
| Issue: Meson build system was of older version 1.3.2, but the required version is newer or equal to 1.4.0.
Resolution: Update the meson build system either via package repository or directly via pip. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ERROR: Meson version is 1.3.2 but project requires >= 1.4.0
| Build reported an error due to insufficient build system version. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/sbin/conmux-registry
/usr/sbin/conmuxd
File listed twice: /usr/bin/conmux-attach
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/sbin/conmux-registry
/usr/sbin/conmuxd]: [Extra files are present in build root.]
| Issue: There are files that are present in build root but not listed in %files section.
Resolution: Verify that files are expect to be in rpm and add them to %files section. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/sbin/conmux-registry
/usr/sbin/conmuxd
File listed twice: /usr/bin/conmux-attach
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/sbin/conmux-registry
/usr/sbin/conmuxd | Extra files are present in build root. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[RPM build errors:]: [Error header]
=============
[File must begin with "/": %{_sysusersdir}/testcloud.conf]: [Error message]
=============
[el9]: [Package is being built for EPEL9]
| Issue: Looks like %{_sysusersdir} is not defined
Resolution: Define the macro yourself, possibly in an if statement:
%if 0%{?rhel} <= 9
%global _sysusersdir /usr/lib/sysusers.d
%endif |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
RPM build errors: | Error header |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
File must begin with "/": %{_sysusersdir}/testcloud.conf | Error message |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
el9 | Package is being built for EPEL9 |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[No match for argument: cmake(Qt6WebEngineWidgets)]: [Qt6WebEngineWidgets is only available on x86_64 and aarch64 arches.]
| Issue: Qt6WebEngineWidgets build dependency not found.
Resolution: Use this snippet:
%ifarch %{qt6_qtwebengine_arches}
BuildRequires: cmake(Qt6WebEngineWidgets)
%endif |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No match for argument: cmake(Qt6WebEngineWidgets) | Qt6WebEngineWidgets is only available on x86_64 and aarch64 arches. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[misc.c:61:98: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘)’ token
61 | _PROTOTYPE(static int doinchild,(int (*fn)(char *, char *, int), char *fp, char *rbuf, int rbln)));
| ]: [Error report due to incorrect C code.]
| Issue: Extra parenthesis in function definition.
Resolution: Enclose the function definition with correct number of parentheses. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
misc.c:61:98: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘)’ token
61 | _PROTOTYPE(static int doinchild,(int (*fn)(char *, char *, int), char *fp, char *rbuf, int rbln)));
| | Error report due to incorrect C code. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1]: [The build failed in `%build` phase.]
=============
[CMake Generate step failed. Build files cannot be regenerated correctly.]: [CMake cannot prepare the build environment.]
=============
[CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
"/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES. Possible reasons include:
* The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
* An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
* The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
provide.
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
"/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES. Possible reasons include:
* The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
* An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
* The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
provide.]: [You are missing devel files for qt6-qtbase-private.]
| Issue: The build failed in `%build` phase becase CMake was missing devel files for qt6-qtbase-private.
Resolution: You should add build dependency to your spec file:
BuildRequires: qt6-qtbase-private-devel |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1 | The build failed in `%build` phase. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CMake Generate step failed. Build files cannot be regenerated correctly. | CMake cannot prepare the build environment. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
"/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES. Possible reasons include:
* The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
* An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
* The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
provide.
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
"/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES. Possible reasons include:
* The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
* An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
* The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
provide. | You are missing devel files for qt6-qtbase-private. |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ 'tags': [],
'task_id': '9069244-fedora-eln-x86_64',
'timeout': 18000,]: [The task is for Fedora ELN.]
=============
[ 'git_repo': 'https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/git/zdohnal/qpdf/R-qpdf',]: [It is a task in Copr repository]
=============
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: R-Rcpp-devel
No match for argument: R-askpass
No match for argument: R-curl
No match for argument: R-devel
No match for argument: R-testthat]: [DNF transaction error about missing packages]
| Issue: Some of the required packages were not found in repositories when building for Fedora ELN in Copr.
Resolution: There are possible causes:
1. the missing packages are not in repositories at all - add them into repositories and rerun the build,
2. there is typo in their names - search for them with "dnf search", fix the package names in SPEC file and reupload the srpm in copr to rebuild it
3. the packages are present in eln-build repository, which is not present in Copr - you have to add repository link into specific chroot via Project Settings -> Project Details -> Build Options -> Chroots -> <chroot you want> -> Edit -> insert the link into 'Repos:' box.
How to find the link - go to /etc/mock/templates/fedora-eln.tpl, find the section '[local]' and take the url from option 'baseurl'. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
'tags': [],
'task_id': '9069244-fedora-eln-x86_64',
'timeout': 18000, | The task is for Fedora ELN. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
'git_repo': 'https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/git/zdohnal/qpdf/R-qpdf', | It is a task in Copr repository |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: R-Rcpp-devel
No match for argument: R-askpass
No match for argument: R-curl
No match for argument: R-devel
No match for argument: R-testthat | DNF transaction error about missing packages |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [The error type.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'poetry'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-admin'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-oidc >= 2.0.0'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-xml-rpc'
No matching package to install: 'python3-mrtparse'
No matching package to install: 'python3-sqlalchemy-helpers']: [Missing dependencies]
| Issue: There are unpackaged dependencies.
Resolution: You need to package the dependencies first. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found. | The error type. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'poetry'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-admin'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-oidc >= 2.0.0'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-xml-rpc'
No matching package to install: 'python3-mrtparse'
No matching package to install: 'python3-sqlalchemy-helpers' | Missing dependencies |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[PHPUnit 7.5.20 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.
Runtime: PHP 8.4.7
]: [Test suite uses PHPUnit version 7 with PHP version 8.4]
=============
[PHPUnit\Framework\ExceptionWrapper::originalException(): Implicitly marking parameter $exceptionToStore as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead]: [PHP exception raised by the script]
| Issue: phpunit7 has reached its end of live and is not supported
phpunit7 is not compatible with PHP 8.4 and newer
Resolution: Test needs to run with newer and supported PHPUnit version (phpunit8, phpunit9...)
Test suite may need to be adapted for the newer PHPUnit |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
PHPUnit 7.5.20 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.
Runtime: PHP 8.4.7
| Test suite uses PHPUnit version 7 with PHP version 8.4 |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
PHPUnit\Framework\ExceptionWrapper::originalException(): Implicitly marking parameter $exceptionToStore as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead | PHP exception raised by the script |
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ CMake Error: CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER not set, after EnableLanguage
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!]: [The variable CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER was not set during invocation of the cmake. This caused configuration to be incomplete.]
=============
[Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/pip/_vendor/pyproject_hooks/_in_process/_in_process.py", line 353, in <module>
main()
~~~~^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/pip/_vendor/pyproject_hooks/_in_process/_in_process.py", line 335, in main
json_out['return_val'] = hook(**hook_input['kwargs'])
~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/pip/_vendor/pyproject_hooks/_in_process/_in_process.py", line 251, in build_wheel
return _build_backend().build_wheel(wheel_directory, config_settings,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
metadata_directory)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 410, in build_wheel
return self._build_with_temp_dir(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
['bdist_wheel'],
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...<3 lines>...
self._arbitrary_args(config_settings),
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 395, in _build_with_temp_dir
self.run_setup()
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 311, in run_setup
exec(code, locals())
~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "<string>", line 87, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/__init__.py", line 104, in setup
return distutils.core.setup(**attrs)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/core.py", line 185, in setup
return run_commands(dist)
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/core.py", line 201, in run_commands
dist.run_commands()
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/dist.py", line 969, in run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 967, in run_command
super().run_command(command)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/dist.py", line 988, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/wheel/bdist_wheel.py", line 368, in run
self.run_command("build")
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/cmd.py", line 318, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 967, in run_command
super().run_command(command)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/dist.py", line 988, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/command/build.py", line 131, in run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/cmd.py", line 318, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 967, in run_command
super().run_command(command)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/dist.py", line 988, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_ext.py", line 91, in run
_build_ext.run(self)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/command/build_ext.py", line 345, in run
self.build_extensions()
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/command/build_ext.py", line 467, in build_extensions
self._build_extensions_serial()
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/command/build_ext.py", line 493, in _build_extensions_serial
self.build_extension(ext)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
File "<string>", line 79, in build_extension
File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call
raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['cmake', '/builddir/build/BUILD/python-cmgdb-1.1.1-build/cmgdb-1.1.1', '-DCMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY=/builddir/build/BUILD/python-cmgdb-1.1.1-build/cmgdb-1.1.1/build/lib.linux-x86_64-cpython-313/CMGDB/', '-DPYTHON_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/python3', '-DEXAMPLE_VERSION_INFO=1.1.1', '-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release', '-DUSER_INCLUDE_PATH=./src/CMGDB/_cmgdb/include']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
error: subprocess-exited-with-error]: [Traceback of error from Python script invoking cmake with invalid arguments using the `subprocess` module. While prominent, this is not a causative error.]
=============
[ Ã Building wheel for CMGDB (pyproject.toml) did not run successfully.
â exit code: 1
â°â> See above for output.]: [General message, explaining that wheel build of the package failed.]
| Issue: The build failed as the `cmake` was not provided with all the necessary arguments.
Resolution: Ensure that all invocations of `cmake` are performed with valid arguments. |
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CMake Error: CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER not set, after EnableLanguage
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! | The variable CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER was not set during invocation of the cmake. This caused configuration to be incomplete. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.