image
imagewidth (px)
32
2.77k
label
class label
0 classes
english
stringlengths
1
93
steel
stringlengths
1
90
-1no label
dying , but he went on living in an ocean of
dying , but he went on living in an osean of
-1no label
he looked at her . head thrown back in a pool of hair ,
he loked at her . head thrown bak in a pol of hair ,
-1no label
her blood-red lips parted and the beating of her
her blod-red lips parted and the beating of her
-1no label
under him , in him and through him ...
under him , in him and throgh him ...
-1no label
he sat down and ran his finger down along her
he sat down and ran his finger down along her
-1no label
spine . do you love me now ? like yesterday ! i 'm
spine . do yo love me now ? like yesterday ! i 'm
-1no label
you . but you wouldn't marry me ?
yo . but yo woldn't mary me ?
-1no label
me rocking on my feet , but i 'll still be only fond of
me roking on my fet , but i 'l stil be only fond of
-1no label
to satisfy my physical wants does not change that .
to satisfy my fysikal wants does not cange that .
-1no label
before long you 'll give me the satisfaction that 'll set
before long yo 'l give me the satisfaktion that 'l set
-1no label
the previous year , but consumption was maintained
the previos year , but konsumption was maintained
-1no label
households containing children reduced their consumption
hoseholds kontaining cildren redused ther konsumption
-1no label
the unclassified households with children or
the unklasifid hoseholds with cildren or
-1no label
adolescents .
adolesents .
-1no label
75 . the smaller families and the residual groups of
75 . the smaler familis and the residual grops of
-1no label
household a decline in purchases of the one was
hosehold a dekline in purcases of the one was
-1no label
average expenditure associated with a child was on cereal foods ,
average expenditure asosiated with a cild was on sereal fods ,
-1no label
potatoes and milk ; for fresh green vegetables , fruit , cheese , fish and
potatoes and milk ; for frex gren vegetables , fruit , cese , fix and
-1no label
carcase meat , the incremental expenditure was slight .
karkase meat , the inkremental expenditure was slight .
-1no label
milk was reduced ; since 1957 it has again declined . most of the
milk was redused ; sinse 1957 it has again deklined . most of the
-1no label
the relative expenditure per child declined from 1952 to 1956 ,
the relative expenditure per cild deklined from 1952 to 1956 ,
-1no label
white bread and more rolls and speciality
white bread and more rols and spesiality
-1no label
supplies and lower prices of fresh fruit compared
suplis and lower prises of frex fruit kompared
-1no label
their purchases of puddings , cakes and biscuits ,
ther purcases of pudings , kakes and biskuits ,
-1no label
but obtained less flour .
but obtained les flor .
-1no label
all types of household benefited from the improved
al types of hosehold benefited from the improved
-1no label
breads than in 1958 . most groups increased
breads than in 1958 . most grops inkreased
-1no label
bread consumption was virtually unchanged ,
bread konsumption was virtualy uncanged ,
-1no label
least in families containing children . 77 . total
least in familis kontaining cildren . 7 . total
-1no label
with 1958 , but the increase in consumption was
with 1958 , but the inkrease in konsumption was
-1no label
although most types of household bought less
althogh most types of hosehold boght les
-1no label
presence of children .
presense of cildren .
-1no label
income with the family households , so that differences
inkome with the family hoseholds , so that diferenses
-1no label
different commodities attributable to the adult
diferent komoditis atributable to the adult
-1no label
the annual report for 1956 . the younger childless
the anual report for 1956 . the yonger cildles
-1no label
couples are broadly comparable in age and family
koples are broadly komparable in age and family
-1no label
78 . regression estimates of the expenditure on
78 . regresion estimates of the expenditure on
-1no label
in food expenditure may be associated with the
in fod expenditure may be asosiated with the
-1no label
group of households consisting of childless couples
grop of hoseholds konsisting of cildles koples
-1no label
( both under 55 ) and couples with different numbers
( both under 5 ) and koples with diferent numbers
-1no label
of children were given for 1952-56 in table 39 of
of cildren were given for 1952-56 in table 39 of
-1no label
couple and each additional child in a selected
kople and eac aditional cild in a selekted
-1no label
in comparison with the previous year , changes were small
in komparison with the previos year , canges were smal
-1no label
four or more children the levels of adequacy for all
for or more cildren the levels of adequasy for al
-1no label
of the british medical association , are also shown in table 30 .
of the britix medikal asosiation , are also xown in table 30 .
-1no label
comparison with allowances based on the recommendations
komparison with alowanses based on the rekomendations
-1no label
nutrients other than vitamin c decreased slightly .
nutrints other than vitamin k dekreased slightly .
-1no label
expenditure increased less than that in other groups ,
expenditure inkreased les than that in other grops ,
-1no label
defined number of children . in 1959 the households in
defined number of cildren . in 1959 the hoseholds in
-1no label
they purchased less , namely dried milk , potatoes , carcase
they purcased les , namely drid milk , potatoes , karkase
-1no label
biscuits and breakfast cereals which , in general , are more
biskuits and breakfast sereals whic , in general , are more
-1no label
years cannot be made so precisely as in groups with a
years kanot be made so presisely as in grops with a
-1no label
and they purchased more of certain foods such as fish ,
and they purcased more of sertain fods suc as fix ,
-1no label
for the commodities constituting the average household
for the komoditis konstituting the average hosehold
-1no label
as in 1958 , younger couples paid some 12 1/2 per cent
as in 1958 , yonger koples paid some 12 1/2 per sent
-1no label
diet in 1959 .
dit in 1959 .
-1no label
more per calorie than the national average , and families
more per kalori than the national average , and familis
-1no label
compares the prices paid by different types of household
kompares the prises paid by diferent types of hosehold
-1no label
also shows the corresponding values of an index which
also xows the koresponding values of an index whic
-1no label
with four or more children 19 per cent less . the only
with for or more cildren 19 per sent les . the only
-1no label
for whom the index declined from 91 to 88 . table 27
for whom the index deklined from 91 to 8 . table 27
-1no label
of younger parents with lower earnings ,
of yonger parents with lower earnings ,
-1no label
many of which were incomplete families
many of whic were inkomplete familis
-1no label
several children than in those with only ,
several cildren than in those with only ,
-1no label
and of course with lower tax reliefs and
and of korse with lower tax relifs and
-1no label
no family allowances . the rise in net family
no family alowanses . the rise in net family
-1no label
was appreciably higher in families with
was apresiably higher in familis with
-1no label
est for childless couples , especially older
est for cildles koples , espesialy older
-1no label
couples ( probably because of the
koples ( probably bekause of the
-1no label
nevertheless , average net family income
nevertheles , average net family inkome
-1no label
incomes between 1954 and 1959 was great-
inkomes betwen 1954 and 1959 was great-
-1no label
consumption by younger childless couples declined
konsumption by yonger cildles koples deklined
-1no label
allowances were introduced in october 1956 , and the welfare
alowanses were introdused in oktober 1956 , and the welfare
-1no label
throughout this period , but that of the smaller families was
throghot this period , but that of the smaler familis was
-1no label
changes for couples with several children . the quantity
canges for koples with several cildren . the quantity
-1no label
children and those with one child , and much smaller
cildren and those with one cild , and muc smaler
-1no label
almost unchanged in 1959 for couples with two or more
almost uncanged in 1959 for koples with two or more
-1no label
showed increases of 4 to 6 per cent for couples without
xowed inkreases of 4 to 6 per sent for koples withot
-1no label
couples and couples with one child .
koples and koples with one cild .
-1no label
compared with 1958 , the expenditure index for 1959
kompared with 1958 , the expenditure index for 1959
-1no label
gradients being steepest for
gradints beng stepest for
-1no label
cheese , sugar , bread and flour
cese , sugar , bread and flor
-1no label
the price ranges for milk ,
the prise ranges for milk ,
-1no label
the highest average prices and
the highest average prises and
-1no label
foods younger childless couples paid
fods yonger cildles koples paid
-1no label
were very narrow . for most other
were very narow . for most other
-1no label
gradation in purchases of canned vegetables and canned
gradation in purcases of kaned vegetables and kaned
-1no label
the two latter groups consumed much smaller
the two later grops konsumed muc smaler
-1no label
tomatoes .
tomatoes .
-1no label
quantities per head of canned vegetables and canned and
quantitis per head of kaned vegetables and kaned and
-1no label
consumption of canned fruit fell off sharply with
konsumption of kaned fruit fel of xarply with
-1no label
bottled tomatoes than any other group , and much smaller
botled tomatoes than any other grop , and muc smaler
-1no label
quantities of canned and bottled fruit than younger
quantitis of kaned and botled fruit than yonger
-1no label
the diets of households of different composition . the averages
the dits of hoseholds of diferent komposition . the averages
-1no label
to needs .
to neds .
-1no label
showed little change compared with those for the previous year ,
xowed litle cange kompared with those for the previos year ,
-1no label
in which the index fell by 1.8 to 97.5 per cent of the average for
in whic the index fel by 1.8 to 97.5 per sent of the average for
-1no label
four or more children , compared with +3.6 to -5.4 per cent in 1958
for or more cildren , kompared with +3.6 to -5.4 per sent in 1958
-1no label
and +2.8 to -2.6 per cent in 1957 . as with the price of energy index ,
and +2.8 to -2.6 per sent in 1957 . as with the prise of energy index ,
-1no label
the only noteworthy change was for households with three children ,
the only noteworthy cange was for hoseholds with thre cildren ,