Cannnot train Roberta: 2 different errors
## Environment info

- `transformers` version: 4.4.0.dev0
- Platform: Linux-4.19.112+-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-18.04-bionic
- Python version: 3.6.9
- PyTorch version (GPU?): 1.7.0+cu101 (True)
- Tensorflow version (GPU?): 2.4.1 (True)
- Using GPU in script?: Yes
- Using distributed or parallel set-up in script?: No (Single GPU) --> **COLAB**

### Who can help
I am not sure, since the error is very vague and untraceable
## Information

Model I am using (Bert, XLNet ...): Roberta

The problem arises when using:
* [ ] the official example scripts: (give details below)


The tasks I am working on is:
* [x] my own task or dataset: (give details below)

It is a private dataset, so I am not at liberty to share it. However, I can provide a clue as to how the `csv` looks like:-

,ID,Text,Label
......................

> I do not think there can be anything wrong with the DataFrame as I am taking data from specific columns and converting them to numpy arrays for the rest of the steps in the HF "Fine-tuning" guide.

## To reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

```
!git clone https://github.com/huggingface/transformers.git
!cd transformers
!pip install -e .

train_text = list(train['Text'].values)
train_label = list(train['Label'].values)

val_text = list(val['Text'].values)
val_label = list(val['Label'].values)

from transformers import RobertaTokenizer, TFRobertaForSequenceClassification
import tensorflow as tf

tokenizer = RobertaTokenizer.from_pretrained('roberta-base')
model = TFRobertaForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained('roberta-base')

train_encodings = tokenizer(train_text, truncation=True, padding=True)
val_encodings = tokenizer(val_text, truncation=True, padding=True)

train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((
    dict(train_encodings),
    train_label
))
val_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((
    dict(val_encodings),
    val_label
))

```

All this code is common. Howver, now there is a difference in errors depending upon the training method.

###Training using `trainer`

Code:
```

from transformers import TFTrainingArguments, TFTrainer

training_args = TFTrainingArguments(
    output_dir='./results',          # output directory
    num_train_epochs=3,              # total number of training epochs
    per_device_train_batch_size=16,  # batch size per device during training
    per_device_eval_batch_size=64,   # batch size for evaluation
    warmup_steps=500,                # number of warmup steps for learning rate scheduler
    weight_decay=0.01,               # strength of weight decay
    logging_dir='./logs',            # directory for storing logs
    logging_steps=10,
)

with training_args.strategy.scope():
    model = TFRobertaForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("roberta-base")

trainer = TFTrainer(
    model=model,                         # the instantiated Transformers model to be trained
    args=training_args,                  # training arguments, defined above
    train_dataset=train_dataset,         # training dataset
    eval_dataset=val_dataset             # evaluation dataset
)

trainer.train()
```
**ERROR:-**



```
All model checkpoint layers were used when initializing TFRobertaForSequenceClassification.

Some layers of TFRobertaForSequenceClassification were not initialized from the model checkpoint at roberta-base and are newly initialized: ['classifier']
You should probably TRAIN this model on a down-stream task to be able to use it for predictions and inference.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

TypeError                                 Traceback (most recent call last)

<ipython-input-52-f86f69d7497b> in <module>()
     22 )
     23 
---> 24 trainer.train()

10 frames

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/transformers/trainer_tf.py in train(self)

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/def_function.py in __call__(self, *args, **kwds)
    826     tracing_count = self.experimental_get_tracing_count()
    827     with trace.Trace(self._name) as tm:
--> 828       result = self._call(*args, **kwds)
    829       compiler = "xla" if self._experimental_compile else "nonXla"
    830       new_tracing_count = self.experimental_get_tracing_count()

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/def_function.py in _call(self, *args, **kwds)
    869       # This is the first call of __call__, so we have to initialize.
    870       initializers = []
--> 871       self._initialize(args, kwds, add_initializers_to=initializers)
    872     finally:
    873       # At this point we know that the initialization is complete (or less

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/def_function.py in _initialize(self, args, kwds, add_initializers_to)
    724     self._concrete_stateful_fn = (
    725         self._stateful_fn._get_concrete_function_internal_garbage_collected(  # pylint: disable=protected-access
--> 726             *args, **kwds))
    727 
    728     def invalid_creator_scope(*unused_args, **unused_kwds):

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/function.py in _get_concrete_function_internal_garbage_collected(self, *args, **kwargs)
   2967       args, kwargs = None, None
   2968     with self._lock:
-> 2969       graph_function, _ = self._maybe_define_function(args, kwargs)
   2970     return graph_function
   2971 

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/function.py in _maybe_define_function(self, args, kwargs)
   3359 
   3360           self._function_cache.missed.add(call_context_key)
-> 3361           graph_function = self._create_graph_function(args, kwargs)
   3362           self._function_cache.primary[cache_key] = graph_function
   3363 

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/function.py in _create_graph_function(self, args, kwargs, override_flat_arg_shapes)
   3204             arg_names=arg_names,
   3205             override_flat_arg_shapes=override_flat_arg_shapes,
-> 3206             capture_by_value=self._capture_by_value),
   3207         self._function_attributes,
   3208         function_spec=self.function_spec,

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/framework/func_graph.py in func_graph_from_py_func(name, python_func, args, kwargs, signature, func_graph, autograph, autograph_options, add_control_dependencies, arg_names, op_return_value, collections, capture_by_value, override_flat_arg_shapes)
    988         _, original_func = tf_decorator.unwrap(python_func)
    989 
--> 990       func_outputs = python_func(*func_args, **func_kwargs)
    991 
    992       # invariant: `func_outputs` contains only Tensors, CompositeTensors,

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/def_function.py in wrapped_fn(*args, **kwds)
    632             xla_context.Exit()
    633         else:
--> 634           out = weak_wrapped_fn().__wrapped__(*args, **kwds)
    635         return out
    636 

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/function.py in bound_method_wrapper(*args, **kwargs)
   3885     # However, the replacer is still responsible for attaching self properly.
   3886     # TODO(mdan): Is it possible to do it here instead?
-> 3887     return wrapped_fn(*args, **kwargs)
   3888   weak_bound_method_wrapper = weakref.ref(bound_method_wrapper)
   3889 

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/framework/func_graph.py in wrapper(*args, **kwargs)
    975           except Exception as e:  # pylint:disable=broad-except
    976             if hasattr(e, "ag_error_metadata"):
--> 977               raise e.ag_error_metadata.to_exception(e)
    978             else:
    979               raise

TypeError: in user code:

    /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/transformers/trainer_tf.py:669 distributed_training_steps  *
        nb_instances_in_batch = self._compute_nb_instances(batch)
    /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/transformers/trainer_tf.py:681 _compute_nb_instances  *
        nb_instances = tf.reduce_sum(tf.cast(labels != -100, dtype=tf.int32))
    /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/util/dispatch.py:201 wrapper
        return target(*args, **kwargs)
    /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/ops/math_ops.py:1786 tensor_not_equals
        return gen_math_ops.not_equal(self, other, incompatible_shape_error=False)
    /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/ops/gen_math_ops.py:6412 not_equal
        name=name)
    /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/framework/op_def_library.py:531 _apply_op_helper
        repr(values), type(values).__name__, err))

    TypeError: Expected string passed to parameter 'y' of op 'NotEqual', got -100 of type 'int' instead. Error: Expected string, got -100 of type 'int' instead.


```

###Using Native `Tensorflow` code (from official example)
CODE:

from transformers import TFRobertaForSequenceClassification
```

model = TFRobertaForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained('roberta-base')

optimizer = tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=5e-5)
model.compile(optimizer=optimizer, loss=model.compute_loss) # can also use any keras loss fn
model.fit(train_dataset.shuffle(1000).batch(16), validation_data=val.shuffle(1000).batch(16), epochs=3, batch_size=16)
```

**ERROR:-**
```
All model checkpoint layers were used when initializing TFRobertaForSequenceClassification.

Some layers of TFRobertaForSequenceClassification were not initialized from the model checkpoint at roberta-base and are newly initialized: ['classifier']
You should probably TRAIN this model on a down-stream task to be able to use it for predictions and inference.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

AttributeError                            Traceback (most recent call last)

<ipython-input-51-a13d177c752e> in <module>()
      5 optimizer = tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=5e-5)
      6 model.compile(optimizer=optimizer, loss=model.compute_loss) # can also use any keras loss fn
----> 7 model.fit(train_dataset.shuffle(1000).batch(16), validation_data=val.shuffle(1000).batch(16), epochs=3, batch_size=16)

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/pandas/core/generic.py in __getattr__(self, name)
   5139             if self._info_axis._can_hold_identifiers_and_holds_name(name):
   5140                 return self[name]
-> 5141             return object.__getattribute__(self, name)
   5142 
   5143     def __setattr__(self, name: str, value) -> None:

AttributeError: 'DataFrame' object has no attribute 'shuffle'

```

This is very surprising since the error are pretty different and I can't find many fixes online. I tested the datatypes of the input data and it seems to check out. 

## Expected behavior

<!-- A clear and concise description of what you would expect to happen. -->
 The model to start training on this `SequenceClassification` task and achieve good accuracy on it.
Please follow the instructions in the template and do not tag more than three people. In this case you are sending notifications to seven different persons for a problem no one can help you solve since you did not give enough information. Let's see why:

The first error seems to indicate your labels are strings, which cannot be known for sure since you did not provide an example of what your data look like. Just saying "My data is private so I can't share it with you" is not helpful. You could give us the first line of the dataset, potentially masking some private content.

If your labels indeed are strings, you need to convert them to some IDs (going from 0 to your number of labels) before trying to train your model with them. You model should also be instantiated with the correct number of labels by passing along `num_labels=xxx` (otherwise you will get other errors down the line).

The second error has nothing to do with transformers, you are passing `val.shuffle` as validation data where `val` is a pandas DataFrame and therefore as no `shuffle` method.<|||||>Sorry for tagging more than 3 people :( my bad
About the labels, it is actually a string, and there are about 20 unique labels. Does that mean I should hot encode them (like 20 columns and the value `1` in the correct column) or just simple like:-

```
ID_UNiqe_23, "Lorem Ipsum .....", 2
ID_UNiqe_2314, "Lorem Lorem .....", 13
```
Note that I want to do simple classification, NOT multi-label classification. I shall update you with the problem regarding the `shuffle` method because the error was before I added `validation_data` argument in the fit function. 

Lastly, where should the `num_labels` argument be put, since I can't find any reference to that for `TFTrainingArguments`. 

Thanx a ton for your help!
<|||||>Hello @neel04! 

Yes, all your labels have to be ids and not strings. You can find a complete example among the examples, and more precisely the text classification one, https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/master/examples/text-classification/run_tf_text_classification.py I suggest you to thoroughly read it as it contains what you need to know for the labels :)

For you second example, you cannot call `compille` and `fit` directly on the models, you have to re-create a model by specifying the inputs and output. Such as:
```
r_model = TFRobertForSequenceClassification(....)
input_ids = tf.keras.layers.Input([None,], dtype=tf.int32, name="input_ids")
attention_mask = tf.keras.layers.Input([None,], dtype=tf.int32, name="attention_mask")
token_type_ids = tf.keras.layers.Input([None,], dtype=tf.int32, name="token_type_ids")
output = model([input_ids, attention_mask, token_type_ids])
model = tf.keras.models.Model(inputs=[input_ids, attention_mask, token_type_ids], output=output)

model.compile(....)
model.fit(....)
``` <|||||>So I converted the labels to Python Integers and tried using the `Trainer()` method but I am getting this error:-

```
Some weights of the model checkpoint at Roberta-base were not used when initializing TFRobertaForSequenceClassification: ['lm_head']
- This IS expected if you are initializing TFRobertaForSequenceClassification from the checkpoint of a model trained on another task or with another architecture (e.g. initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForPretraining model).
- This IS NOT expected if you are initializing TFRobertaForSequenceClassification from the checkpoint of a model that you expect to be identical (initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForSequenceClassification model).
Some weights of TFRobertaForSequenceClassification were not initialized from the model checkpoint at Roberta-base and are newly initialized: ['classifier']
You should probably TRAIN this model on a down-stream task to be able to use it for predictions and inference.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

AttributeError                            Traceback (most recent call last)

<ipython-input-54-f86f69d7497b> in <module>()
     22 )
     23 
---> 24 trainer.train()

11 frames

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/transformers/trainer_tf.py in train(self)
    410             if self.args.past_index >= 0:
    411                 self._past = None
--> 412             for step, training_loss in enumerate(self._training_steps(train_ds, optimizer)):
    413                 self.global_step = iterations.numpy()
    414                 self.epoch_logging = epoch_iter - 1 + (step + 1) / steps_per_epoch

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/transformers/trainer_tf.py in _training_steps(self, ds, optimizer)
    457         Returns a generator over training steps (i.e. parameters update).
    458         """
--> 459         for i, loss in enumerate(self._accumulate_next_gradients(ds)):
    460             if i % self.args.gradient_accumulation_steps == 0:
    461                 self._apply_gradients(optimizer)

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/transformers/trainer_tf.py in _accumulate_next_gradients(self, ds)
    490         while True:
    491             try:
--> 492                 yield _accumulate_next()
    493             except tf.errors.OutOfRangeError:
    494                 break

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/def_function.py in __call__(self, *args, **kwds)
    826     tracing_count = self.experimental_get_tracing_count()
    827     with trace.Trace(self._name) as tm:
--> 828       result = self._call(*args, **kwds)
    829       compiler = "xla" if self._experimental_compile else "nonXla"
    830       new_tracing_count = self.experimental_get_tracing_count()

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/def_function.py in _call(self, *args, **kwds)
    869       # This is the first call of __call__, so we have to initialize.
    870       initializers = []
--> 871       self._initialize(args, kwds, add_initializers_to=initializers)
    872     finally:
    873       # At this point we know that the initialization is complete (or less

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/def_function.py in _initialize(self, args, kwds, add_initializers_to)
    724     self._concrete_stateful_fn = (
    725         self._stateful_fn._get_concrete_function_internal_garbage_collected(  # pylint: disable=protected-access
--> 726             *args, **kwds))
    727 
    728     def invalid_creator_scope(*unused_args, **unused_kwds):

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/function.py in _get_concrete_function_internal_garbage_collected(self, *args, **kwargs)
   2967       args, kwargs = None, None
   2968     with self._lock:
-> 2969       graph_function, _ = self._maybe_define_function(args, kwargs)
   2970     return graph_function
   2971 

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/function.py in _maybe_define_function(self, args, kwargs)
   3359 
   3360           self._function_cache.missed.add(call_context_key)
-> 3361           graph_function = self._create_graph_function(args, kwargs)
   3362           self._function_cache.primary[cache_key] = graph_function
   3363 

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/function.py in _create_graph_function(self, args, kwargs, override_flat_arg_shapes)
   3204             arg_names=arg_names,
   3205             override_flat_arg_shapes=override_flat_arg_shapes,
-> 3206             capture_by_value=self._capture_by_value),
   3207         self._function_attributes,
   3208         function_spec=self.function_spec,

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/framework/func_graph.py in func_graph_from_py_func(name, python_func, args, kwargs, signature, func_graph, autograph, autograph_options, add_control_dependencies, arg_names, op_return_value, collections, capture_by_value, override_flat_arg_shapes)
    988         _, original_func = tf_decorator.unwrap(python_func)
    989 
--> 990       func_outputs = python_func(*func_args, **func_kwargs)
    991 
    992       # invariant: `func_outputs` contains only Tensors, CompositeTensors,

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/def_function.py in wrapped_fn(*args, **kwds)
    632             xla_context.Exit()
    633         else:
--> 634           out = weak_wrapped_fn().__wrapped__(*args, **kwds)
    635         return out
    636 

/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/framework/func_graph.py in wrapper(*args, **kwargs)
    975           except Exception as e:  # pylint:disable=broad-except
    976             if hasattr(e, "ag_error_metadata"):
--> 977               raise e.ag_error_metadata.to_exception(e)
    978             else:
    979               raise

AttributeError: in user code:

    /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/transformers/trainer_tf.py:488 _accumulate_next  *
        return self._accumulate_gradients(per_replica_features, per_replica_labels)
    /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/transformers/trainer_tf.py:498 _accumulate_gradients  *
        per_replica_loss = self.args.strategy.experimental_run_v2(

    AttributeError: 'OneDeviceStrategy' object has no attribute 'experimental_run_v2'

```
Any Idea what it might be? code is still the same.
```

from transformers import TFTrainingArguments, TFTrainer

training_args = TFTrainingArguments(
    output_dir='./results',          # output directory
    num_train_epochs=3,              # total number of training epochs
    per_device_train_batch_size=16,  # batch size per device during training
    per_device_eval_batch_size=64,   # batch size for evaluation
    warmup_steps=500,                # number of warmup steps for learning rate scheduler
    weight_decay=0.01,               # strength of weight decay
    logging_dir='./logs',            # directory for storing logs
    logging_steps=10,
)

with training_args.strategy.scope():
    model = TFRobertaForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("roberta-base")

trainer = TFTrainer(
    model=model,                         # the instantiated Transformers model to be trained
    args=training_args,                  # training arguments, defined above
    train_dataset=train_dataset,         # training dataset
    eval_dataset=val_dataset             # evaluation dataset
)

trainer.train()

```<|||||>This error should be fixed if you use the latest trainer 4.3.1 version of transformers :) <|||||>I am on `4.4.0.dev0`. Downgrade?<|||||>from what I can see you have the error ` AttributeError: 'OneDeviceStrategy' object has no attribute 'experimental_run_v2'`. This error has been fixed in 4.2. So this tells me that you are using an outdated version of transformers.<|||||>Shouldn't the latest "Bleeding-edge" version at `4.4.0` be better than that of `4.2`?
Or is this just a bug in the latest?

**EDIT:-** I used the specific version (`4.3.1`) from Pypi and ran the code. This time it just produced some warnings and stopped (i.e the cell completed execution). It didn't start training despite calling `trainer.train()`.

This is the output:-

All model checkpoint layers were used when initializing TFRobertaForSequenceClassification.
```
Some layers of TFRobertaForSequenceClassification were not initialized from the model checkpoint at roberta-base and are newly initialized: ['classifier']
You should probably TRAIN this model on a down-stream task to be able to use it for predictions and inference.

WARNING:tensorflow:The parameters `output_attentions`, `output_hidden_states` and `use_cache` cannot be updated when calling a model.They have to be set to True/False in the config object (i.e.: `config=XConfig.from_pretrained('name', output_attentions=True)`).
WARNING:tensorflow:The parameter `return_dict` cannot be set in graph mode and will always be set to `True`.
WARNING:tensorflow:The parameters `output_attentions`, `output_hidden_states` and `use_cache` cannot be updated when calling a model.They have to be set to True/False in the config object (i.e.: `config=XConfig.from_pretrained('name', output_attentions=True)`).
WARNING:tensorflow:The parameter `return_dict` cannot be set in graph mode and will always be set to `True`.

```
GPU memory is still occupied but Usage drops to `0%`. Any Idea what causes it not to train? @jplu <|||||>That was a bug in the versions < 4.2. So you might have some conflicts in your env with multiple versions installed.<|||||>So the bug still remains - **I cannot train the model with `Trainer()`** but using native Tensorflow+edit for instantiating the number of labels, it's now training alright. Thanx a lot @jplu and @sgugger for your help! :+1: :1st_place_medal: 

Now its just to figure out how to get Trainer to work - I want to do a Hyperparameter search which apparently Trainer can be used for interfacing. Let's see how that's gonna be resolved<|||||>> Now its just to figure out how to get Trainer to work - I want to do a Hyperparameter search which apparently Trainer can be used for interfacing. 

This isn't implemented on the TensorFlow side, only PyTorch.<|||||>Well that's bad. Any other way I could use HypSearch in TF?<|||||>> > Now its just to figure out how to get Trainer to work - I want to do a Hyperparameter search which apparently Trainer can be used for interfacing.
> 
> This isn't implemented on the TensorFlow side, only PyTorch.

Also, if this isn't implemented on TF side, then why is there a toggle button for TF version, and why don't the docs tell that?
https://huggingface.co/transformers/training.html?highlight=fine%20tune#trainer<|||||>Fine-tuning is implemented for both PyTorch and TF. You were talking about hyper-parameter search.<|||||>I am talking about using `Trainer()`. I can't use it - the cell executes successfully but it never starts training
<|||||>Also, I found that the model has pretty low validation accuracy (~1-2%) and it doesn't go any further (this was achieved in 1 epoch). I suspect that the problem could be the activation function not being `Sigmoid` which is required for `Categorical Crossentropy loss`. Should I post my questions here or should I make a new issue? @jplu @sgugger 