Unexpected behavior when input ends with multiple newlines
### System Info

- `transformers` version: 4.15.0
- Platform: Windows-10-10.0.19041-SP0
- Python version: 3.8.5
- PyTorch version (GPU?): 1.11.0+cu113 (True)
- Tensorflow version (GPU?): 2.5.1 (True)
- Flax version (CPU?/GPU?/TPU?): not installed (NA)
- Jax version: not installed
- JaxLib version: not installed
- Using GPU in script?: yes
- Using distributed or parallel set-up in script?: no

### Who can help?

@patrickvonplaten, @Narsil

### Information

- [ ] The official example scripts
- [X] My own modified scripts

### Tasks

- [ ] An officially supported task in the `examples` folder (such as GLUE/SQuAD, ...)
- [ ] My own task or dataset (give details below)

### Reproduction

```
from transformers import GPTNeoForCausalLM, GPT2Tokenizer

model_name = "EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125M"

model = GPTNeoForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name, low_cpu_mem_usage=True, cache_dir='gpt_cache_dir', resume_download=True).half().to("cuda:0")
tokenizer = GPT2Tokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name, low_cpu_mem_usage=True, cache_dir='gpt_cache_dir', resume_download=True)

input_ids = tokenizer("This is a line 1\n\nThis is a line 2\n\nThis is a line 3\n\n", return_tensors="pt").input_ids.cuda()
gen_tokens = model.generate(input_ids, do_sample=True, temperature=0.01, max_length=40, min_length=1, repetition_penalty=1.0)

gen_text = "Output: \"" + tokenizer.batch_decode(gen_tokens[:, input_ids.shape[1]:])[0] + "\""

print(gen_text)
```


Actual behavior:
-If the input ends with 1 newline, generating multiple tokens works as expected, but generating just 1 token says the next token should be a newline by itself.
-If the input ends with 2 newlines, generate multiple tokens doesn't work as expected, and printing the next top score reveals the next token is some unexpected thing such as another newline or a token beginning with a space.

### Expected behavior

Expected behavior: If prompt ends in \n\n, generated text shouldn't start with \n.

Duplicate of https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/issues/17860 but it won't let me re-open
Stop telling the model what it should do: [quote](https://history.aip.org/exhibits/einstein/ae63.htm).

Joke aside, how do you know what the model should do ? It's a small model, so if it's less performant than expected or than the larger ones is completely normal.<|||||>> Stop telling the model what it should do: [quote](https://history.aip.org/exhibits/einstein/ae63.htm).
> 
> Joke aside, how do you know what the model should do ? It's a small model, so if it's less performant than expected or than the larger ones is completely normal.

Please take a closer look; it is literally impossible for this discrepancy to be caused by model performance/accuracy. Otherwise I would not have reported this as a bug. Again: If you take away one or more of the "\n\n" at the end, it completes the expected "\n\n", followed by the expected sentence. But if you end with "\n\n" it predicts the next token is yet another "\n". That means at the point of the end of "\n\n" there were two different token predictions even though the input at that point was exactly the same in both cases.<|||||>You are talking about strings here, the model reasons in tokens.

So it's perfectly possible that your sentence ending with `\n\n` is chunked differently than without, yielding different tokens, and so different outputs.

Could you check the different tokenizations ?<|||||>Assuming what you say is true (which seems like the most likely explanation):

1. Isn't this still considered a bug during tokenization? Shouldn't the same input at each step lead to the same output?
2. Is there a possible workaround, other than making sure certain types of inputs never get passed in?<|||||>> Isn't this still considered a bug during tokenization? Shouldn't the same input at each step lead to the same output?

Not really, all models usually have the basic ASCII chars, so the model is free to generate `t` + `h` + `e` which most likley will be in its vocabulary as `the`. Now this is usually not the case (since the model was usually not trained to output individual letters like here. But it's definitely not a guarantee. Some models actually DO train on such irregular tokenizations, and this is called tokenization `dropout`. Benefits in general seems mitigated (some says it's super important, some that it negatively impacts final performance. I personnally don't have any opinion on this).

> Is there a possible workaround, other than making sure certain types of inputs never get passed in?

You could do that. This is what is done under the hood for GPT-3 for instance, where you have these "START" and "STOP" sequence which are inserted for you as tokens, which avoids letting the tokenizer doing it on its own. For Bloom, we also had the same issue, where prompt perform better when it doesn't end with a trailing space (so removing trailing spaces from prompts help the perceived quality of free text users). 
As far as I know, there is no "FIX" for it  entirely. 

If you could stick to using tokens, things would make more sense maybe, but it depends on the use case and how the model was trained really.
<|||||>This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If you think this still needs to be addressed please comment on this thread.

Please note that issues that do not follow the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) are likely to be ignored.