source_identifier
stringlengths 40
303
⌀ | input
stringlengths 0
32.9k
| output
stringlengths 0
32.9k
|
|---|---|---|
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2200254.json | exception relied on by the trial court is statutory, MCL 768.27; MSA 28.1050. There also exists a judicially created exception. It *474is on this latter exception which we rely in affirming the defendant’s conviction.1
Evidence of prior bad acts is admissible | exception relied on by the trial court is statutory, MCL 768.27; MSA 28.1050.<|sentence|> There also exists a judicially created exception.<|sentence|> It *474is on this latter exception which we rely in affirming the defendant’s conviction.1<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Evidence of prior bad acts is admissible |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1727736.json | J.
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
On May 8, 1972, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (Board) issued identical citations against the appellants in this action, three Lancaster County beer distributors; Elemar, Inc., Garrett Hill Beverage Co., Inc. and Railsplitter, Inc., all of which were trading under the name “Thrifty Beverage”. Each of the licensees was charged with having “permitted a person who has an interest in another Distributor or Importing Distributor License to have an interest | J.<|paragraph|>
OPINION<|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM.<|paragraph|>
On May 8, 1972, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (Board) issued identical citations against the appellants in this action, three Lancaster County beer distributors; Elemar, Inc., Garrett Hill Beverage Co., Inc. and Railsplitter, Inc., all of which were trading under the name “Thrifty Beverage”.<|sentence|> Each of the licensees was charged with having “permitted a person who has an interest in another Distributor or Importing Distributor License to have an interest |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3399047.json | Chicagoan, Inc., Appellant.
Gen. No. 42,352.
McSurely, J., dissents.
opinion filed March 22, 1943;
rehearing denied April 5, 1943.
Samuel Levin and Stanley Watson, for appellant;
Levinson & Rosenfeld, for appellee;
Louis Rosenfeld, of counsel.
Opinion by
Justice O’Connor.
“Not to be published in full.’’ | Chicagoan, Inc., Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Gen. No. 42,352.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
McSurely, J., dissents.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
opinion filed March 22, 1943;<|sentence|>
rehearing denied April 5, 1943.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Samuel Levin and Stanley Watson, for appellant;<|sentence|>
Levinson & Rosenfeld, for appellee;<|sentence|>
Louis Rosenfeld, of counsel.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Opinion by<|paragraph|>
Justice O’Connor.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
“Not to be published in full.’’ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6069741.json | the determination of the gain upon the exchange of petitioner’s 200 shares of stock in the Libbey Glass Co. in 1922 for shares of stock which had an admitted value of $72,105. The respondent contends that the basis is the cost, of the property. (Section 202 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1921.) The petitioner contends, on the other hand, that the basis is the fair market value of the stock at the date that he received it in 1915. What this fair market value is is not disclosed by the | the determination of the gain upon the exchange of petitioner’s 200 shares of stock in the Libbey Glass Co. in 1922 for shares of stock which had an admitted value of $72,105.<|sentence|> The respondent contends that the basis is the cost, of the property.<|sentence|> (Section 202 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1921.)<|sentence|> The petitioner contends, on the other hand, that the basis is the fair market value of the stock at the date that he received it in 1915.<|sentence|> What this fair market value is is not disclosed by the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4288257.json | can, at any time before the final hearing, permit St. Amant’s answer to be amended. At all events, the reversal of the direction as to a reference would not aid the banks and | can, at any time before the final hearing, permit St. Amant’s answer to be amended.<|sentence|> At all events, the reversal of the direction as to a reference would not aid the banks and |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1538311.json | his appeal, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled adversely to petitioner on two of the points now made the basis for his petition for writ of habeas corpus, namely, the illegal search and seizure and the trial incident. The other points now raised were not preserved in the motion for new trial, and were neither | his appeal, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled adversely to petitioner on two of the points now made the basis for his petition for writ of habeas corpus, namely, the illegal search and seizure and the trial incident.<|sentence|> The other points now raised were not preserved in the motion for new trial, and were neither |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.state.gov/drl-mel-360-accompaniment-in-democratizing-drg-evaluation/index.html.json | a MyGrants account in order to accept the final award. Accounts must be logged into to every 60 days in order to maintain an active account.
### *D.3 Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM)* | a MyGrants account in order to accept the final award.<|sentence|> Accounts must be logged into to every 60 days in order to maintain an active account.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
### *D.3 Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM)* |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6802273.json | -moving party so long as the issue on which the ruling has been made has been completely presented to it. Basic Energy Services, L.P. v. Petroleum Resource Management, Corp., 2015 WY 22, ¶ 20 n. 11, 343 P.3d 783, 789 n. 11 (Wyo.2015) (citing City of Powell v. Busboom, 2002 WY 58, ¶ 6, 44 P.3d 63, 65 (Wyo.2002); Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Caballo Coal Co., 2011 WY 24, ¶ 33 n. 4, 246 P.3d 867, 876 n. 4 (Wyo. | -moving party so long as the issue on which the ruling has been made has been completely presented to it.<|sentence|> Basic Energy Services, L.P. v. Petroleum Resource Management, Corp., 2015 WY 22, ¶ 20 n. 11, 343 P.3d 783, 789 n. 11 (Wyo.2015) (citing City of Powell v. Busboom, 2002 WY 58, ¶ 6, 44 P.3d 63, 65 (Wyo.2002); Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Caballo Coal Co., 2011 WY 24, ¶ 33 n. 4, 246 P.3d 867, 876 n. 4 (Wyo. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6140386.json | intoxicated.
On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charges. The State concedes error on this point. We agree and | intoxicated.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charges.<|sentence|> The State concedes error on this point.<|sentence|> We agree and |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/211744.json | 458 A.2d 280
#### Collette et al., Appellants v. Arborio, Inc.
Argued June 2, 1982.
John T. Stieh, for appellants;
Cal Leventhal, for appellee.
Before HESTER, CIRILLO and JOHNSON, JJ.
The order is affirmed. | 458 A.2d 280<|paragraph|>
#### Collette et al., Appellants v. Arborio, Inc.<|paragraph|>
Argued June 2, 1982.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
John T. Stieh, for appellants;<|sentence|>
Cal Leventhal, for appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Before HESTER, CIRILLO and JOHNSON, JJ.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The order is affirmed. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3723658.json | of such disparate treatment, even if the product of erroneous or illegal state action, is not enough by itself to state a constitutional claim.”); *Smith v. City of Picayune,*795 F.2d 482, 487 (5th Cir.1986) ("Although the City did not conform to state law in zoning the property, that violation of state law does not per se constitute denial of the federal constitutional right to equal protection of law.”).
26
. *Stern v. Tarrant Cnty. Hosp. Dist.,*778 F.2d 1052, 1056 (5th Cir.1985) (en banc); | of such disparate treatment, even if the product of erroneous or illegal state action, is not enough by itself to state a constitutional claim.”<|sentence|>); *Smith v. City of Picayune,*795 F.2d 482, 487 (5th Cir.1986) ("Although the City did not conform to state law in zoning the property, that violation of state law does not per se constitute denial of the federal constitutional right to equal protection of law.”<|sentence|>).<|paragraph|>
26<|sentence|>
. *Stern v. Tarrant Cnty. Hosp. Dist.,*778 F.2d 1052, 1056 (5th Cir.1985) (en banc); |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9968955.json | . He fixed his hair with this black thing and he told me he was tired and he just was tired of nuts and bolts and he just didn’t feel like going on and I thought he had a pick in his hand. When he started to go out of the bedroom door I was laying in the bed with a nighty | . He fixed his hair with this black thing and he told me he was tired and he just was tired of nuts and bolts and he just didn’t feel like going on and I thought he had a pick in his hand.<|sentence|> When he started to go out of the bedroom door I was laying in the bed with a nighty |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/list?awardee=&city=PULLMAN&combine_awards=&field_award_status_value=All&field_funding_type_value=All&field_served_nationally_value=All&fiscal_year=&form_topic=&state=WA&order=field_fiscal_year&sort=desc.json | Police Performance in Deadly Force Situations
NIJ FY 08 ORE Policing and Public Safety Interventions
Washington State University Pullman
WA
2008-IJ-CX | Police Performance in Deadly Force Situations<|paragraph|>
NIJ FY 08 ORE Policing and Public Safety Interventions<|paragraph|>
Washington State University Pullman<|paragraph|>
WA<|paragraph|>
2008-IJ-CX |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3778985.json | for filing a notice of appeal; therefore, the debtor’s notice of appeal, filed after the district court denied the motion for new trial, is untimely. Mid-State argues that this court should not treat the debtor’s motion for a new trial as a motion for rehearing under Rule 8015 because the motion requested that the district court reopen the case to take additional evidence, which is an invalid basis for relief under Rule 8015.
In *Butler | for filing a notice of appeal;<|sentence|> therefore, the debtor’s notice of appeal, filed after the district court denied the motion for new trial, is untimely.<|sentence|> Mid-State argues that this court should not treat the debtor’s motion for a new trial as a motion for rehearing under Rule 8015 because the motion requested that the district court reopen the case to take additional evidence, which is an invalid basis for relief under Rule 8015.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
In *Butler |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9064052.json | that a state seal, because it is the symbol of a sovereign, is not a type of work that comes within the subject matter of copyright.
We agree with the State-copyright law does not preempt the Alaska statute limiting the commercial use of the state seal. We believe it is clear that states have the power to protect symbols of their sovereignty.16 For instance, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in | that a state seal, because it is the symbol of a sovereign, is not a type of work that comes within the subject matter of copyright.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
We agree with the State-copyright law does not preempt the Alaska statute limiting the commercial use of the state seal.<|sentence|> We believe it is clear that states have the power to protect symbols of their sovereignty.<|sentence|>16 For instance, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.huduser.gov/portal/node/6314.json | has used innovative practices to implement a bold vision for redeveloping an abandoned airport and revitalizing a section of Austin. As a result, Mueller “has become a place where the city can try new development ideas and practices and learn from them,” according to Desjardin. The development’ | has used innovative practices to implement a bold vision for redeveloping an abandoned airport and revitalizing a section of Austin.<|sentence|> As a result, Mueller “has become a place where the city can try new development ideas and practices and learn from them,” according to Desjardin.<|sentence|> The development’ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12010628.json | 72-1027.
#### In re Gross.
Sup. Ct. Mont. Cer-tiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. | 72-1027.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
#### In re Gross.<|paragraph|>
Sup. Ct. Mont.<|sentence|> Cer-tiorari denied.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4174690.json | ¶¶ 24, 29-30; Pl.’s Mem. at 18-19.
Although defendant identifies numerous additional pieces of information that may be required for plaintiff to succeed on these counts at a later | ¶¶ 24, 29-30; Pl.’s Mem. at 18-19.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Although defendant identifies numerous additional pieces of information that may be required for plaintiff to succeed on these counts at a later |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.federalreserve.gov/feeds/Data/H15_H15_RIFLGFCM03_N.B.XML.json | /" xmlns:cb="http://www.cbwiki.net/wiki/index.php/Specification_1.1" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# rdf.xsd | /" xmlns:cb="http://www.cbwiki.net/wiki/index.php/Specification_1.1" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# rdf.xsd |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/203119.json | , the defendants moved for summary judgment based on the absence of notice of the allegedly hazardous condition.
On a motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on lack of notice, a defendant is required to make a prima facie showing affirmatively establishing the absence of notice as a matter of law | , the defendants moved for summary judgment based on the absence of notice of the allegedly hazardous condition.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
On a motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on lack of notice, a defendant is required to make a prima facie showing affirmatively establishing the absence of notice as a matter of law |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/215659.json | Under Local Rules (# 59, filed 9/11/03) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot.
That does not end the inquiry; there is a question of the propriety of the defendants each | Under Local Rules (# 59, filed 9/11/03) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
That does not end the inquiry; there is a question of the propriety of the defendants each |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2532887.json | obligation binds it to see that they are kept in reasonably safe condition for ordinary travel, but does not bind it to provide for their safety under the strain of an unusual gathering or any extraordinary use. City of Bloomington v. Bay, 42 Ill. 503; City of Chicago v. Kohlhof, 64 Ill. App. 353; Kohlhof v. City of Chicago, 192 Ill. 249.
In City of Chicago v. Keefe, 114 Ill. 222, in its additional opinion on the petition for rehearing, the Supreme Court thus expresses the rule : “ The measure of the duty of the city in | obligation binds it to see that they are kept in reasonably safe condition for ordinary travel, but does not bind it to provide for their safety under the strain of an unusual gathering or any extraordinary use.<|sentence|> City of Bloomington v. Bay, 42 Ill. 503;<|sentence|> City of Chicago v. Kohlhof, 64 Ill. App. 353;<|sentence|> Kohlhof v. City of Chicago, 192 Ill. 249.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
In City of Chicago v. Keefe, 114 Ill. 222, in its additional opinion on the petition for rehearing, the Supreme Court thus expresses the rule :<|sentence|> “ The measure of the duty of the city in |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8720605.json | Arkansas at that point. All three tracts, as we have indicated, were bounded on the east by the Arkansas River.
In 1963 (and for some years earlier | Arkansas at that point.<|sentence|> All three tracts, as we have indicated, were bounded on the east by the Arkansas River.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
In 1963 (and for some years earlier |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nist.gov/document/07tuesdayraneibpc2014-template-protectionpdf.json | Cancelable
Transform
or
Cancelable
Transform
Determine D Similarity
L Cancelable Biometrics
A
pri
k
Decision
Biometric
S Database
EncrypBon
or
public key
D
L
Secure
Distance
CalculaBon
Encrypted
Distance
Threshold
Secure
Protocol
vate
ey
Secure
Computa | Cancelable<|paragraph|>
Transform<|paragraph|>
or<|paragraph|>
Cancelable<|paragraph|>
Transform<|paragraph|>
Determine D Similarity<|paragraph|>
L Cancelable Biometrics<|paragraph|>
A<|paragraph|>
pri<|paragraph|>
k<|paragraph|>
Decision<|paragraph|>
Biometric<|paragraph|>
S Database<|paragraph|>
EncrypBon<|paragraph|>
or<|paragraph|>
public key<|paragraph|>
D<|paragraph|>
L<|paragraph|>
Secure<|paragraph|>
Distance<|paragraph|>
CalculaBon<|paragraph|>
Encrypted<|paragraph|>
Distance<|paragraph|>
Threshold<|paragraph|>
Secure<|paragraph|>
Protocol<|paragraph|>
vate<|paragraph|>
ey<|paragraph|>
Secure<|paragraph|>
Computa |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12517941.json | consolidation and trial, so that these aged disputes [may] finally be resolved." The District Court denied Acosta's renewed motion. Soon, the District Court entered a default judgment against Acosta. The court noted that Acosta's "failure to pay the arbitration fees constitutes a default under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3." The court continued:
> Based on the arbitrator's cancellation of this proceeding, the defendant's admission that it refused to | consolidation and trial, so that these aged disputes [may] finally be resolved."<|sentence|> The District Court denied Acosta's renewed motion.<|sentence|> Soon, the District Court entered a default judgment against Acosta.<|sentence|> The court noted that Acosta's "failure to pay the arbitration fees constitutes a default under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3."<|sentence|> The court continued:<|paragraph|>
> Based on the arbitrator's cancellation of this proceeding, the defendant's admission that it refused to |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/npin.cdc.gov/search?query=&f[0]=disease:3770&f[1]=disease:3772&f[2]=topic:4372&f[3]=topic:4567&f[4]=type:publications.json | Rural
(1)Safer Sex
(5)School Health Education
(13)Schools
(11)Sex Education
(13)Sexual Assault or Abuse
(5)Sexual Behavior or Behaviors
(4)Sexually Transmitted Diseases/Infections
(21)Sexual Transmission
(1) | Rural<|paragraph|>
(1)Safer Sex<|paragraph|>
(5)School Health Education<|paragraph|>
(13)Schools<|paragraph|>
(11)Sex Education<|paragraph|>
(13)Sexual Assault or Abuse<|paragraph|>
(5)Sexual Behavior or Behaviors<|paragraph|>
(4)Sexually Transmitted Diseases/Infections<|paragraph|>
(21)Sexual Transmission<|paragraph|>
(1) |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4079179.json | have intended the plain meaning of the statute. *Fleet Business Credit, LLC v Krapohl Ford Lincoln Mercury Co,*274 Mich App 584, 591; 735 NW2d 644 (2007). An unambiguous statute must be enforced as written. *Fluor Enterprises, Inc v Dep’t of Treasury,*477 Mich 170, 174; 730 NW2d 722 (2007).
In ordering attachment of the South Madison house, the trial court relied on *Wood v Savage,*2 Doug 316 (Mich, 1846), and held that “if a person is indebted at the time the transfer is made that asset remains available for use by [defendant | have intended the plain meaning of the statute.<|sentence|> *Fleet Business Credit, LLC v Krapohl Ford Lincoln Mercury Co,*274 Mich App 584, 591; 735 NW2d 644 (2007).<|sentence|> An unambiguous statute must be enforced as written.<|sentence|> *Fluor Enterprises, Inc v Dep’t of Treasury,*477 Mich 170, 174; 730 NW2d 722 (2007).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
In ordering attachment of the South Madison house, the trial court relied on *Wood v Savage,*2 Doug 316 (Mich, 1846), and held that “if a person is indebted at the time the transfer is made that asset remains available for use by [defendant |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7084353.json | No.
> Q. But when the Judge asked you the question, are you pleading guilty because you are, in fact, guilty, you answered yes?
> A. Yes.
> Q. And you were | No.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> Q. But when the Judge asked you the question, are you pleading guilty because you are, in fact, guilty, you answered yes?<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> A. Yes.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> Q. And you were |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.occ.gov/topics/charters-and-licensing/interpretations-and-actions/1997/cra78.pdf.json | to
investigate the allegations. Our conclusions, based on the additional investigation, did not
support the allegations of unfair lending practices, prejudicial and discriminatory statements
by bank officials, or improper credit denials.
The comment letter also brought to our attention the need for the bank to improve its record
of lending in low- and moderate-income areas in Longview, Texas, which we confirmed in
our targeted review. In 1995, the bank made no loans in low-income areas. Our review
revealed that in 1996 the bank increased its lending in both low- and moderate-income areas | to
investigate the allegations.<|sentence|> Our conclusions, based on the additional investigation, did not
support the allegations of unfair lending practices, prejudicial and discriminatory statements
by bank officials, or improper credit denials.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The comment letter also brought to our attention the need for the bank to improve its record
of lending in low- and moderate-income areas in Longview, Texas, which we confirmed in
our targeted review.<|sentence|> In 1995, the bank made no loans in low-income areas.<|sentence|> Our review
revealed that in 1996 the bank increased its lending in both low- and moderate-income areas |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4396735.json | this was done, although the award of child support raises the inference that the disability benefits were considered as income with respect to that award.
*629Child support and spousal support are separate and distinct obligations based on different criteria. Spousal support is awarded according to the relative needs and abilities of both parties in accordance with the factors set forth in Code | this was done, although the award of child support raises the inference that the disability benefits were considered as income with respect to that award.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*629Child support and spousal support are separate and distinct obligations based on different criteria.<|sentence|> Spousal support is awarded according to the relative needs and abilities of both parties in accordance with the factors set forth in Code |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9783220.json | opinion. We have carefully considered the motion and have concluded that it should be sustained.
The key question presented and decided on appeal in this case related to the validity of contract provisions requiring monthly payments to appellee of $750 from the Kenning-ton Estate after the death of Kennington. This Court affirmed the decree of the chancery court upholding the contract, directing the | opinion.<|sentence|> We have carefully considered the motion and have concluded that it should be sustained.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The key question presented and decided on appeal in this case related to the validity of contract provisions requiring monthly payments to appellee of $750 from the Kenning-ton Estate after the death of Kennington.<|sentence|> This Court affirmed the decree of the chancery court upholding the contract, directing the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4617664.json | is conflicting evidence, except the weight of evidence clearly preponderates against the verdict.” But when the court grants a new trial, “the appellate court will not interfere unless the weight of evidence clearly preponderates against the ruling of the court.”
*71The establishment of this rule is one of the necessary results which flow from the well known superior advantages of the court below to determine the credibility of witnesses. The questions to be decided are purely questions of fact which are peculiarly within the province of a jury and the court below to determine; and as | is conflicting evidence, except the weight of evidence clearly preponderates against the verdict.”<|sentence|> But when the court grants a new trial, “the appellate court will not interfere unless the weight of evidence clearly preponderates against the ruling of the court.”<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*71The establishment of this rule is one of the necessary results which flow from the well known superior advantages of the court below to determine the credibility of witnesses.<|sentence|> The questions to be decided are purely questions of fact which are peculiarly within the province of a jury and the court below to determine;<|sentence|> and as |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/831471.json | Newly discovered evidence, merely cumulative, is no ground for a new trial. *Adams*v. *People,*47 Ill. 376; *Sahlinger*v. *People,*102 id. 241.
The instruction given in the language of the statute is not open to the objection taken in *Ro | Newly discovered evidence, merely cumulative, is no ground for a new trial.<|sentence|> *Adams*v. *People,*47 Ill. 376;<|sentence|> *Sahlinger*v. *People,*102 id. 241.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The instruction given in the language of the statute is not open to the objection taken in *Ro |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/ecfr/2024-08-29/34/463.175.json | intrastate and interstate wages paid to an individual, the social security number (or numbers, if more than one) of the individual, and the name, address, State, and the Federal employer identification number of the employer paying the wages to the individual.
( c ) The Governor may designate a State agency (or appropriate State entity) to assist in carrying out the performance reporting requirements for WIOA core programs and ETPs. The Governor or such agency (or appropriate State entity) is responsible for | intrastate and interstate wages paid to an individual, the social security number (or numbers, if more than one) of the individual, and the name, address, State, and the Federal employer identification number of the employer paying the wages to the individual.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
( c ) The Governor may designate a State agency (or appropriate State entity) to assist in carrying out the performance reporting requirements for WIOA core programs and ETPs.<|sentence|> The Governor or such agency (or appropriate State entity) is responsible for |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/493323.json | are affirmed.
GERBER and SULT, JJ., concur.
1
. We see a potential question concerning A.R.S. section 13-105(8), which the parties have not raised or discussed. That subsection provides that a person is a criminal street gang member if he meets any two of seven listed criteria. If the statute is interpreted to quantify the proof needed to convict, as opposed to establishing the | are affirmed.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
GERBER and SULT, JJ., concur.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
1<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
. We see a potential question concerning A.R.S. section 13-105(8), which the parties have not raised or discussed.<|sentence|> That subsection provides that a person is a criminal street gang member if he meets any two of seven listed criteria.<|sentence|> If the statute is interpreted to quantify the proof needed to convict, as opposed to establishing the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/ecfr/2024-09-16/7/3550.160.json | any deferred recapture amount to permit a borrower to refinance with private credit. The amount to which the RHS debt will be subordinated may include: ( 1 ) The amount required to repay the RHS debt, exclusive of recapture;
( 2 ) Reasonable closing costs;
( 3 ) Up to one percent of the loan amount for loan servicing costs, if required by the lender; and
( 4 ) The cost of any necessary repairs or improvements | any deferred recapture amount to permit a borrower to refinance with private credit.<|sentence|> The amount to which the RHS debt will be subordinated may include:<|sentence|> ( 1 ) The amount required to repay the RHS debt, exclusive of recapture;<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
( 2 ) Reasonable closing costs;<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
( 3 ) Up to one percent of the loan amount for loan servicing costs, if required by the lender;<|sentence|><|paragraph|> and<|sentence|>
( 4 ) The cost of any necessary repairs or improvements |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2972964.json | , for appellants.
Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General, and Ralph H. Gillan, for appellees.
*392Heard before Krivosha, C.J., Boslaugh, McCown, | , for appellants.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General, and Ralph H. Gillan, for appellees.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*392Heard before Krivosha, C.J., Boslaugh, McCown, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3689336.json | Glencord Building Corp. et al., Respondents, v Elena Strujan, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Submitted April 25, 2011;
decided June 7, 2011
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie *(see*CPLR 5602). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as | Glencord Building Corp. et al., Respondents, v Elena Strujan, Appellant, et al., Defendant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Submitted April 25, 2011;<|sentence|>
decided June 7, 2011<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie *(see*CPLR 5602).<|sentence|> Motion for poor person relief dismissed as |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist_xls/RL2R56SKY_1a.xls.json | 1
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rl2r56sky_1a.htm
U.S. Energy Information Administration
[email protected] | 1<|paragraph|>
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rl2r56sky_1a.htm<|paragraph|>
U.S. Energy Information Administration<|paragraph|>
[email protected] |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2607546.json | put in evidence any matter in defense of this action which would be admissible if well pleaded, to have effect as if so pleaded.”
The above plea included a plea that the plaintiff, Wallace Carter, was | put in evidence any matter in defense of this action which would be admissible if well pleaded, to have effect as if so pleaded.”<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The above plea included a plea that the plaintiff, Wallace Carter, was |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1847988.json | *It is so ordered.*
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the petitioner’s motions for a stay of respondent Commis*1036sion’s order dated March 10, 1983 and for clarification and modification of the court’s decision of March 1, 1983, and respondents’ and intervenor’s opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED by the court that
> (1) this | *It is so ordered.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>*
ORDER<|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM.<|paragraph|>
Upon consideration of the petitioner’s motions for a stay of respondent Commis*1036sion’s order dated March 10, 1983 and for clarification and modification of the court’s decision of March 1, 1983, and respondents’ and intervenor’s opposition thereto, it is<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
ORDERED by the court that<|paragraph|>
> (1) this |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2228589.json | sidewalk and crashes through a store and into an adjoining residence the happening of the accident justifies an inference or “presumption” of negligence — of some one. In the instant case the court properly directed a verdict against Cromwell. But the legislature has not declared an automobile | sidewalk and crashes through a store and into an adjoining residence the happening of the accident justifies an inference or “presumption” of negligence — of some one.<|sentence|> In the instant case the court properly directed a verdict against Cromwell.<|sentence|> But the legislature has not declared an automobile |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/363960.json | guide the judge in its application, and to aid those defending one charged with its violation. *State v. Monteleone,*36 *N. J.*93, 99 (1961). This axiom is particularly relevant where constitutional freedoms are involved. *State v. Hudson County News Co.,*35 *N. J.*284, 295 (1961). However, the requirement of reasonable certainty does hot preclude the use of appropriate terms in common usage. *State v. Joas,*34 *N. J.*179, 186 (1961). In the present | guide the judge in its application, and to aid those defending one charged with its violation.<|sentence|> *State v. Monteleone,*36 *N. J.*93, 99 (1961).<|sentence|> This axiom is particularly relevant where constitutional freedoms are involved.<|sentence|> *State v. Hudson County News Co.,*35 *N. J.*284, 295 (1961).<|sentence|> However, the requirement of reasonable certainty does hot preclude the use of appropriate terms in common usage.<|sentence|> *State v. Joas,*34 *N. J.*179, 186 (1961).<|sentence|> In the present |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/visibleproofs/education/measure/index.html.json | - a box or bag
- overhead projector and transparency sheets
- flip chart or black board
- Bertillonage Measurement diagram (259KB, PDF)
- Anthropometric Measurement Sheet (54KB, PDF)
Back to top
## Vocabulary
- Bertillonage:
- ( | - a box or bag<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
- overhead projector and transparency sheets<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
- flip chart or black board<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
- Bertillonage Measurement diagram (259KB, PDF)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
- Anthropometric Measurement Sheet (54KB, PDF)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Back to top<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
## Vocabulary<|paragraph|>
- Bertillonage:<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
- ( |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/885361.json | person dying testate, section 200 of the Surrogate’s Court Act provides that no property shall be set apart to a surviving spouse who can neither inherit nor claim any rights against the estate of a | person dying testate, section 200 of the Surrogate’s Court Act provides that no property shall be set apart to a surviving spouse who can neither inherit nor claim any rights against the estate of a |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11088690.json | . After hearing, the trial court denied defendant’s motion. Defendant thereafter entered into a negotiated guilty plea to DWI-3, under *State v. Crosby,*338 So.2d 584 (La.1976), | . After hearing, the trial court denied defendant’s motion.<|sentence|> Defendant thereafter entered into a negotiated guilty plea to DWI-3, under *State v. Crosby,*338 So.2d 584 (La.1976), |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3185969.json | s services and medical expenses. Mrs. Merrifield sustained a nonpermanent neck injury and a permanent injury to the base of her right thumb, and Mr. Merrifield also sustained a nonpermanent neck injury. The evidence shows, and the defendant admits, that Mr. Merrifield spent $830.20 for medical expenses of his wife; the sum of $567 for his own medical expenses and | s services and medical expenses.<|sentence|> Mrs. Merrifield sustained a nonpermanent neck injury and a permanent injury to the base of her right thumb, and Mr. Merrifield also sustained a nonpermanent neck injury.<|sentence|> The evidence shows, and the defendant admits, that Mr. Merrifield spent $830.20 for medical expenses of his wife;<|sentence|> the sum of $567 for his own medical expenses and |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1230491.json | v. Paul L. Smith, Inc., 44 D. & C. 2d 49 (1967). It is also clear that a defendant will be permitted to join another defendant as additional defendant where the party | v. Paul L. Smith, Inc., 44 D. & C. 2d 49 (1967).<|sentence|> It is also clear that a defendant will be permitted to join another defendant as additional defendant where the party |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5740632.json | ADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Lance Campbell (“Campbell”) is a ballet dancer. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. (“Royal Caribbean”) hired Campbell to perform on its cruise ship, the Radiance of the Seas. Before embarking, Campbell participated in on-shore | ADO, Circuit Judges.<|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM: *<|paragraph|>
Lance Campbell (“Campbell”) is a ballet dancer.<|sentence|> Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. (“Royal Caribbean”) hired Campbell to perform on its cruise ship, the Radiance of the Seas.<|sentence|> Before embarking, Campbell participated in on-shore |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4856536.json | urge that the lack of compliance with NRS 148.2201 stripped the district court of jurisdiction to confirm the sale of the property, thus rendering the order confirming the sale void and subject to collateral attack. The statute serves two purposes: one purpose is to advertise the sale to potential bidders, *see*NRS 148.240; the second purpose is to serve constructive notice on all heirs, so that they may have the opportunity to | urge that the lack of compliance with NRS 148.2201 stripped the district court of jurisdiction to confirm the sale of the property, thus rendering the order confirming the sale void and subject to collateral attack.<|sentence|> The statute serves two purposes: one purpose is to advertise the sale to potential bidders, *see*NRS 148.240;<|sentence|> the second purpose is to serve constructive notice on all heirs, so that they may have the opportunity to |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1944268.json | ,*Prosecuting Attorney, and O. H. *Bogue,*for the State.
*A.*Hess, for the appellee.
Niblack, J.
This was a prosecution against Andrew Gowgill, the appellee, | ,*Prosecuting Attorney, and O. H. *Bogue,*for the State.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*A.*Hess, for the appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Niblack, J.<|paragraph|>
This was a prosecution against Andrew Gowgill, the appellee, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4824668.json | Minor, Appellants, v. KAREN D. McCORKLE CRANDALL and JACK E. McCORKLE, Respondents.
No. 6855
November 17, 1972
503 P.2d 21
*Michael Roth,*of Reno, for Appellants | Minor, Appellants, v. KAREN D. McCORKLE CRANDALL and JACK E. McCORKLE, Respondents.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. 6855<|paragraph|>
November 17, 1972<|paragraph|>
503 P.2d 21<|paragraph|>
*Michael Roth,*of Reno, for Appellants |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6697987.json | Ins. Co., appellee v. Stanley J. Bowers, Tax Commr., appellant.
Mercer County.
To dismiss appeal as of right. Overruled. Motion and cross-motion to certify record | Ins. Co., appellee v. Stanley J. Bowers, Tax Commr., appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Mercer County.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
To dismiss appeal as of right.<|sentence|> Overruled.<|sentence|> Motion and cross-motion to certify record |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6038698.json | tract of land involved herein, consisting of 12 lots, included 10 hillside lots, the fronts of which adjoined a semicircular street that extended up-grade in a northerly direction. Beginning at the southerly end of the tract and extending northerly, the lots fronting on that street were numbered from 1 to 10 inclusive. Generally stated, the lots faced as follows: lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, south; lots 5 and 6, southeast; and lots 7, 8, 9, and 10, east | tract of land involved herein, consisting of 12 lots, included 10 hillside lots, the fronts of which adjoined a semicircular street that extended up-grade in a northerly direction.<|sentence|> Beginning at the southerly end of the tract and extending northerly, the lots fronting on that street were numbered from 1 to 10 inclusive.<|sentence|> Generally stated, the lots faced as follows: lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, south; lots 5 and 6, southeast; and lots 7, 8, 9, and 10, east |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2818014.json | Rose Marder, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Marder, Deceased, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.
No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, J | Rose Marder, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Marder, Deceased, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No opinion.<|sentence|> Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, J |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/476063.json | 1. In reviewing the overwhelming evidence of appellant’s guilt, we find that the court below did not err in denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. It is not error for the court to refuse to direct a verdict when “viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” *90
*Wright v | 1. In reviewing the overwhelming evidence of appellant’s guilt, we find that the court below did not err in denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal.<|sentence|> It is not error for the court to refuse to direct a verdict when “viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”<|sentence|> *90
*Wright v |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4311086.json | properly acquired or duplicated by others. *Com., Department of Public Welfare*v. *Eiseman,*85 A.3d 1117, 1126 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2014); Crum, 907 A.2d at 585. “Whether information qualifies as a ‘trade secret’ is a highly fact-specific inquiry that cannot be distilled to a pure matter of law.” *Eiseman, supra.*The crucial criteria for determining whether information constitutes a trade secret “are substantial secrecy and competitive value to the owner.” *Markwest Liberty Midstream &*Resources, 71 A.3d at 344; *Crum | properly acquired or duplicated by others.<|sentence|> *Com., Department of Public Welfare*v. *Eiseman,*85 A.3d 1117, 1126 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2014); Crum, 907 A.2d at 585.<|sentence|> “Whether information qualifies as a ‘trade secret’ is a highly fact-specific inquiry that cannot be distilled to a pure matter of law.”<|sentence|> *Eiseman, supra.*The crucial criteria for determining whether information constitutes a trade secret “are substantial secrecy and competitive value to the owner.”<|sentence|> *Markwest Liberty Midstream &*Resources, 71 A.3d at 344; *Crum |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10148158.json | an argument to the jury.
*651Appellant’s brief complains that at the trial before the court on the issue of guilt or innocence, the court allowed the state to elicit evidence that he had been previously convicted of felonies.
Appellant testified as a witness in his own behalf, being interrogated by his counsel. The prior convictions were admitted and limited in the court | an argument to the jury.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*651Appellant’s brief complains that at the trial before the court on the issue of guilt or innocence, the court allowed the state to elicit evidence that he had been previously convicted of felonies.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Appellant testified as a witness in his own behalf, being interrogated by his counsel.<|sentence|> The prior convictions were admitted and limited in the court |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.usbr.gov/uc/albuq/water/ETtoolboxV2/gages/legacy/streamflow/2007/SFPN5.txt.json | 538
Oct 18 1400 5.03 538
Oct 18 1330 5.04 547
Oct 18 1300 5.04 547
Oct 18 1230 5.05 557
Oct 18 1200 5.04 547
Oct 18 1130 5.04 547
Oct 18 1100 5.05 | 538<|paragraph|>
Oct 18 1400 5.03 538<|paragraph|>
Oct 18 1330 5.04 547<|paragraph|>
Oct 18 1300 5.04 547<|paragraph|>
Oct 18 1230 5.05 557<|paragraph|>
Oct 18 1200 5.04 547<|paragraph|>
Oct 18 1130 5.04 547<|paragraph|>
Oct 18 1100 5.05 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/list?awardee=&city=&combine_awards=&field_award_status_value=All&field_funding_type_value=All&field_served_nationally_value=All&fiscal_year=&form_topic=&page=2&state=MI&order=field_fiscal_year&sort=asc.json | Research and Development Process
Assessments of NIJ
Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
Staff Directory
Funding & Awards
Funding & Awards
Current Funding
Forthcoming Funding
Expired Funding
Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
Fellowship & Student Programs
Travel Scholarships
NIJ Challenge Program
Library & Multimedia | Research and Development Process<|paragraph|>
Assessments of NIJ<|paragraph|>
Annual Reports & Reports to Congress<|paragraph|>
Staff Directory<|paragraph|>
Funding & Awards<|paragraph|>
Funding & Awards<|paragraph|>
Current Funding<|paragraph|>
Forthcoming Funding<|paragraph|>
Expired Funding<|paragraph|>
Awards: Listing of Funded Projects<|paragraph|>
Guidance for Applicants and Awardees<|paragraph|>
Fellowship & Student Programs<|paragraph|>
Travel Scholarships<|paragraph|>
NIJ Challenge Program<|paragraph|>
Library & Multimedia |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ahrq.gov/topics/R.html.json | - Careers
- Contact Us
- Español
- FAQs
- Accessibility
- Disclaimers
- EEO
- Electronic Policies
- FOIA
- HHS Digital Strategy
- HHS Nondiscrimination Notice
- Inspector General
- Plain Writing Act
- Privacy Policy | - Careers<|paragraph|>
- Contact Us<|paragraph|>
- Español<|paragraph|>
- FAQs<|paragraph|>
- Accessibility<|paragraph|>
- Disclaimers<|paragraph|>
- EEO<|paragraph|>
- Electronic Policies<|paragraph|>
- FOIA<|paragraph|>
- HHS Digital Strategy<|paragraph|>
- HHS Nondiscrimination Notice<|paragraph|>
- Inspector General<|paragraph|>
- Plain Writing Act<|paragraph|>
- Privacy Policy |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5867247.json | the employ of the Insured during the Bond Period who is not required by law to furnish an Individual Bond to qualify for office and who is a member of the staff or personnel of the Insured but does not mean any Treasurer or Tax Collector by whatever title known.
Prior | the employ of the Insured during the Bond Period who is not required by law to furnish an Individual Bond to qualify for office and who is a member of the staff or personnel of the Insured but does not mean any Treasurer or Tax Collector by whatever title known.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Prior |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1455298.json | Ins. Co.*(1958), 28 N. J., 17, 145 A. (2d), 15. See, also, *Cimarron Ins. Co., Inc.,*v. *Travelers Ins. Co.*(1960), 224 Ore., 57, 355 P. (2d), 742. These authorities were also followed in the two Ohio Common Pleas Court cases cited above. An opinion | Ins. Co.*(1958), 28 N. J., 17, 145 A. (2d), 15.<|sentence|> See, also, *Cimarron Ins. Co., Inc.,*v. *Travelers Ins. Co.*(1960), 224 Ore., 57, 355 P. (2d), 742.<|sentence|> These authorities were also followed in the two Ohio Common Pleas Court cases cited above.<|sentence|> An opinion |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5698157.json | less than two rods wide. The test applied here was that specified for a road more than two rods in width. The only proof of width was that Sample Corners Road was at most 20 feet wide (a rod is 16.5 feet) and that it was too narrow to admit a snowplow. The Commissioner nevertheless affirmed a finding that the road was presumed to be at least three rods wide, relying | less than two rods wide.<|sentence|> The test applied here was that specified for a road more than two rods in width.<|sentence|> The only proof of width was that Sample Corners Road was at most 20 feet wide (a rod is 16.5 feet) and that it was too narrow to admit a snowplow.<|sentence|> The Commissioner nevertheless affirmed a finding that the road was presumed to be at least three rods wide, relying |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5560294.json | #### Frances Swinick, Appellant, v. City of New York Department of Social Services et al., Respondents.
Oder entered on November 7, 1969, unanimously affirmed, without and without disbursements, from | #### Frances Swinick, Appellant, v. City of New York Department of Social Services et al., Respondents.<|paragraph|>
Oder entered on November 7, 1969, unanimously affirmed, without and without disbursements, from |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3005150.json | leg, Deceased. Mary R. Milleg, Appellant; Isabel Goodwin et al., Respondents.
*
Not published with other decisions of February 19, 1951, 278 App. Div. 664, April 27, 1953, 281 App. Div. 991, and Jan. 27, 1958, 5 A D 2d 789.— [Rep.
Motion to dismiss appeal granted upon consent, | leg, Deceased.<|sentence|> Mary R. Milleg, Appellant; Isabel Goodwin et al., Respondents.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*
Not published with other decisions of February 19, 1951, 278 App. Div. 664, April 27, 1953, 281 App. Div. 991, and Jan. 27, 1958, 5 A D 2d 789.— [Rep.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Motion to dismiss appeal granted upon consent, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ssa.gov/personal-record/correct-date-birth.json | show you the best way to make your request.
- Answer a few questions
## Other ways to complete this task
### Visit a local office
Fill out the Application for a Social Security Card (Form SS-5) (PDF) and bring it to a local office along with unexpired identification and proof of the correct birth date, such as your U.S. birth certificate. Documents must be original or have a signature, stamp, or raised seal from the issuing agency. | show you the best way to make your request.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
- Answer a few questions <|paragraph|>
## Other ways to complete this task<|paragraph|>
### Visit a local office<|paragraph|>
Fill out the Application for a Social Security Card (Form SS-5) (PDF) and bring it to a local office along with unexpired identification and proof of the correct birth date, such as your U.S. birth certificate.<|sentence|> Documents must be original or have a signature, stamp, or raised seal from the issuing agency. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/627420.json | that *Blakely,*implicitly if not explicitly, precluded federal courts from sentencing defendants for uncharged relevant conduct or even applying most Sentencing Guideline enhancements. Gaviria contends that he never stipulated to the fact that he knew the laundered funds were drug proceeds and never consented to judicial factfinding. Gaviria asserts that the district court’s reliance on the fact that he pleaded guilty to Count Five, which explicitly charged knowledge that the funds were drug-related, is misplaced because the specific | that *Blakely,*implicitly if not explicitly, precluded federal courts from sentencing defendants for uncharged relevant conduct or even applying most Sentencing Guideline enhancements.<|sentence|> Gaviria contends that he never stipulated to the fact that he knew the laundered funds were drug proceeds and never consented to judicial factfinding.<|sentence|> Gaviria asserts that the district court’s reliance on the fact that he pleaded guilty to Count Five, which explicitly charged knowledge that the funds were drug-related, is misplaced because the specific |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/38801.json | in a corporation having voted in favor of a merger with other companies, this court cannot reasonably believe that the dissenting stockholders (who held two and eighty-five hundredths per cent, of the stock) will suffer any substantial injury by the consummation of the scheme. The court will, therefore, not enjoin a merger in such a case unless the proposed action is illegal.
2. Although a trust company was organized before the Revised Trust Companies | in a corporation having voted in favor of a merger with other companies, this court cannot reasonably believe that the dissenting stockholders (who held two and eighty-five hundredths per cent, of the stock) will suffer any substantial injury by the consummation of the scheme.<|sentence|> The court will, therefore, not enjoin a merger in such a case unless the proposed action is illegal.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
2. Although a trust company was organized before the Revised Trust Companies |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2119/ML21190A068.pdf.json | additional stakeholder engagement to discuss the
comment evaluation process for the RROAR effort.
Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) Design Certification Renewal: Direct Final Rule
and Issuance of Environmental Assessment; 10 CFR Part 52 (NRC-2017-0090;
RIN 3150-AK04)
On July 1, 2021, the NRC published a notice in | additional stakeholder engagement to discuss the <|sentence|>
comment evaluation process for the RROAR effort.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) Design Certification Renewal: Direct Final Rule <|sentence|>
and Issuance of Environmental Assessment; 10 CFR Part 52 (NRC-2017-0090; <|sentence|>
RIN 3150-AK04) <|sentence|><|paragraph|>
On July 1, 2021, the NRC published a notice in |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5372606.json | Indiana Central Ry. Co.*v. *Potts,*7 id. 681; *Reams*v. *City,*23 id. 111; *Blood*v. *Marcelliott,*53 Pa. St. 391; *Fuller*v. *People,*92 Ill. 185; *People ex rel.*v. *Brislin,*80 id. 433; *Gunter*v. *Dale County,*44 | Indiana Central Ry. Co.*v. *Potts,*7 id. 681;<|sentence|> *Reams*v. *City,*23 id. 111;<|sentence|> *Blood*v. *Marcelliott,*53 Pa. St. 391;<|sentence|> *Fuller*v. *People,*92 Ill. 185;<|sentence|> *People ex rel.*v. *Brislin,*80 id. 433;<|sentence|> *Gunter*v. *Dale County,*44 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/npin.cdc.gov/search?query=&f[0]=disease:3772&f[1]=disease:11237&f[2]=topic:4471&f[3]=topic:4518&f[4]=type:publications.json | It describes what the disease is, how it is transmitted, its effect on the liver, symptoms, the difference between acute (short-term) illness and chronic (long-term) infection, and prevention. It...
[Hepatitis B: When Someone in the Family has Hepatitis B]
[Hepatitis B: When Someone in the Family has Hepatitis B]
Thumbnail image of [Hepatitis B: When Someone in the Family has Hepatitis B]
This information sheet discusses what to do if a family member has hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. It describes what the disease is, how it is transmitted, | It describes what the disease is, how it is transmitted, its effect on the liver, symptoms, the difference between acute (short-term) illness and chronic (long-term) infection, and prevention.<|sentence|> It...<|paragraph|>
[Hepatitis B: When Someone in the Family has Hepatitis B]<|paragraph|>
[Hepatitis B: When Someone in the Family has Hepatitis B]<|paragraph|>
Thumbnail image of [Hepatitis B: When Someone in the Family has Hepatitis B]<|paragraph|>
This information sheet discusses what to do if a family member has hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.<|sentence|> It describes what the disease is, how it is transmitted, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2237129.json | was still pending and undetermined against Sam Zimberoff. Execution had been issued and levied but no sale had been made. Hertz and wife were joined as plaintiffs after they purchased the property.
The decree read as set out below.1 Plaintiffs Zimberoff appeal from the judgment; Hertz and wife do not appeal.
*557The bank filed an amended answer | was still pending and undetermined against Sam Zimberoff.<|sentence|> Execution had been issued and levied but no sale had been made.<|sentence|> Hertz and wife were joined as plaintiffs after they purchased the property.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The decree read as set out below.1 Plaintiffs Zimberoff appeal from the judgment;<|sentence|> Hertz and wife do not appeal.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*557The bank filed an amended answer |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5626696.json | meaning of an agreement by the city to pay certain persons “two per cent of the contract price” for superintending the work.
Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—-heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. JESSE Holdom, Judge, presiding.
Leon Hornstein, (James Hamilton Lewis, Corporation Counsel, of counsel,) for appellant.
Goodrich, Vincent & Bradley | meaning of an agreement by the city to pay certain persons “two per cent of the contract price” for superintending the work.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—-heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. JESSE Holdom, Judge, presiding.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Leon Hornstein, (James Hamilton Lewis, Corporation Counsel, of counsel,) for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Goodrich, Vincent & Bradley |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7682155.json | KLEIN, Respondent, v. PETRI, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
June 16, 1911.)
Action by Emanuel Klein against John A. Petri, as administrator, etc., of Conrad Petri, deceased.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the alleged contract to pay the sum of $500 is not established by satisfactory evidence.
THOMAS and WOODWARD, JJ., | KLEIN, Respondent, v. PETRI, Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.<|paragraph|>
June 16, 1911.)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Action by Emanuel Klein against John A. Petri, as administrator, etc., of Conrad Petri, deceased.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM.<|paragraph|>
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the alleged contract to pay the sum of $500 is not established by satisfactory evidence.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
THOMAS and WOODWARD, JJ., |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1647247.json | E. 178, 112 Ga. 93; Manyz v. Zeigler, 49 111. 303; Rarick v. Ulmer, 42 1ST. E. 1099, 144 Ind. 25; Battin v. Marshalltown, 77 N. W. 493; Troublesome v. Estill, 4 Ky. 238; Curtiss v. Jackson, 13 Mass. 507; Harrington v. Mining Co., 69 Pac. 102, 27 | E. 178, 112 Ga. 93;<|sentence|> Manyz v. Zeigler, 49 111. 303;<|sentence|> Rarick v. Ulmer, 42 1ST. E. 1099, 144 Ind. 25;<|sentence|> Battin v. Marshalltown, 77 N. W. 493;<|sentence|> Troublesome v. Estill, 4 Ky. 238;<|sentence|> Curtiss v. Jackson, 13 Mass. 507;<|sentence|> Harrington v. Mining Co., 69 Pac. 102, 27 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6740675.json | he had made a careful search of the records of the Privy Council; that he searched for and failed to find a royal patent or grant or government deed covering the land.
The judge of the land court, in weighing the testimony of this witness, referred to the fact that the search of the Mahele records was not “page by page,” and to the admission of the witness that in making’ his search he was working | he had made a careful search of the records of the Privy Council; that he searched for and failed to find a royal patent or grant or government deed covering the land.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The judge of the land court, in weighing the testimony of this witness, referred to the fact that the search of the Mahele records was not “page by page,” and to the admission of the witness that in making’ his search he was working |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/stumpstatement060921.json | Anti-Money Laundering
Law & Regulation
Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
How Rules Are Made
Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
Federal Register
Public Comments | Anti-Money Laundering<|paragraph|>
Law & Regulation<|paragraph|>
Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations<|paragraph|>
How Rules Are Made<|paragraph|>
Holding Wrongdoers Accountable<|paragraph|>
Federal Register<|paragraph|>
Public Comments |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2005272.json | #### People ex rel. Lillie M. Holt, Appellant, *v.*Lillian Lambert et al., Respondents.
(Submitted April 10, 1933;
decided April 18, 1933.)
*Henry Salitan*for motion.
*Nathaniel Ellenbogen*opposed.
Motion denied. | #### People ex rel. Lillie M. Holt, Appellant, *v.*Lillian Lambert et al., Respondents.<|paragraph|>
(Submitted April 10, 1933;<|sentence|>
decided April 18, 1933.)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Henry Salitan*for motion.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Nathaniel Ellenbogen*opposed.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Motion denied. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1504689.json | of the parties.
2. A careful reading of evidence introduced before the commissioner convinces us that there was ample evidence to support the award denying compensation to the claimant. The superior court erred in setting aside the award and in awarding compensation.
*Judgment reversed,.*
*B | of the parties.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
2. A careful reading of evidence introduced before the commissioner convinces us that there was ample evidence to support the award denying compensation to the claimant.<|sentence|> The superior court erred in setting aside the award and in awarding compensation.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Judgment reversed,.*<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*B |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1308/ML13083A237.pdf.json | Records
Notices" that is available in the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS).
1. AUTHORITY: 5 U.S.C. 552a; 5 U.S.C. 5514; 15 U.S.C. 1681; 26 U.S.C. 6103; 31 U.S.C. Chapter 37; 31
U.S.C. 6501-6508; 42 U.S.C. 2201; 42 U.S.C. 5841; 31 CFR 900-904; 10 CFR Parts 15, 16, 170, 171;
Executive Order (E.O.) 9397, as amended | Records <|paragraph|>
Notices" that is available in the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System <|sentence|>
(ADAMS).<|paragraph|>
1. AUTHORITY: 5 U.S.C. 552a;<|sentence|> 5 U.S.C. 5514;<|sentence|> 15 U.S.C. 1681;<|sentence|> 26 U.S.C. 6103;<|sentence|> 31 U.S.C. Chapter 37;<|sentence|> 31 <|paragraph|>
U.S.C. 6501-6508;<|sentence|> 42 U.S.C. 2201;<|sentence|> 42 U.S.C. 5841;<|sentence|> 31 CFR 900-904;<|sentence|> 10 CFR Parts 15, 16, 170, 171;<|sentence|>
Executive Order (E.O.) 9397, as amended |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11118006.json | , Quality filed exceptions of lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue to Tulane’s petition. Quality alleged that despite the terms of the dispute resolution clause of the contract, it could not | , Quality filed exceptions of lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue to Tulane’s petition.<|sentence|> Quality alleged that despite the terms of the dispute resolution clause of the contract, it could not |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/995759.json | Roland Wilson, Appellant.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Kelly, J.—criminal | Roland Wilson, Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Judgment unanimously affirmed.<|sentence|> Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38).<|sentence|><|paragraph|> (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Kelly, J.—criminal |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10119393.json | 552.010, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., and that each was mentally fit to proceed and knew and appreciated at the time of the alleged offenses the nature, quality and wrongfulness of their acts and each was capable of conforming his conduct to 'the requirements of the law.
The April 14, 1972, Order of Commitment is invalid for the further reason that subsection 2 of Section 552.030, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., as amended Laws 1971, proscribes | 552.010, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., and that each was mentally fit to proceed and knew and appreciated at the time of the alleged offenses the nature, quality and wrongfulness of their acts and each was capable of conforming his conduct to 'the requirements of the law.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The April 14, 1972, Order of Commitment is invalid for the further reason that subsection 2 of Section 552.030, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., as amended Laws 1971, proscribes |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/list?awardee=&city=ROCKVILLE&combine_awards=&field_award_status_value=All&field_funding_type_value=All&field_served_nationally_value=All&fiscal_year=&form_topic=&page=3&state=MD&order=field_award_amount&sort=desc.json | JF-FX-0143
$39,648
Closed1996
National Institute of Justice Continuation Awards
National Institute of Justice Continuation Awards
Lock | JF-FX-0143<|paragraph|>
$39,648<|paragraph|>
Closed1996<|paragraph|>
National Institute of Justice Continuation Awards<|paragraph|>
National Institute of Justice Continuation Awards<|paragraph|>
Lock |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.cftc.gov/IndustryOversight/IndustryFilings/SwapExecutionFacilityRules/49798.json | of Technology Innovation
Market Data & Economic Analysis
Data at CFTC
Commitments of Traders
Bank Participation Reports
Cotton On-Call
Financial Data for FCMS
Net Position Changes Data
Staff Reports
Weekly Swaps Report
Cleared Margin Reports
Office of the Chief Economist
Forms & Submissions
Learn & | of Technology Innovation<|paragraph|>
Market Data & Economic Analysis<|paragraph|>
Data at CFTC<|paragraph|>
Commitments of Traders<|paragraph|>
Bank Participation Reports<|paragraph|>
Cotton On-Call<|paragraph|>
Financial Data for FCMS<|paragraph|>
Net Position Changes Data<|paragraph|>
Staff Reports<|paragraph|>
Weekly Swaps Report<|paragraph|>
Cleared Margin Reports<|paragraph|>
Office of the Chief Economist<|paragraph|>
Forms & Submissions<|paragraph|>
Learn & |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6962900.json | robbery. There was no physical evidence. The perpetrator’s face was partially covered during much of the episode. Video surveillance did not permit positive identification, and the “shoe size” testimony was equivocal. The jury’s finding that the defendant did not possess a gun during the robbery evidenced a | robbery.<|sentence|> There was no physical evidence.<|sentence|> The perpetrator’s face was partially covered during much of the episode.<|sentence|> Video surveillance did not permit positive identification, and the “shoe size” testimony was equivocal.<|sentence|> The jury’s finding that the defendant did not possess a gun during the robbery evidenced a |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3219303.json | a manager Ted Stock); John Borel (and his supervisor Janet Mathus); and John Hoopes (and his supervisor Terri Reynolds). None of the five employees worked in BDS, and none were in the plaintiffs chain of command. All of the five employees had been discussed in the summary judgment process and plaintiffs proffer was essentially a cut-and-paste from the fact section of her brief in opposition to Sprint’s motion for summary judgment. *See Plaintiff Ellen Mendelsohn’s Response Opposing Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment*(Doc. # 70) filed August 24, 2004. | a manager Ted Stock); John Borel (and his supervisor Janet Mathus); and John Hoopes (and his supervisor Terri Reynolds).<|sentence|> None of the five employees worked in BDS, and none were in the plaintiffs chain of command.<|sentence|> All of the five employees had been discussed in the summary judgment process and plaintiffs proffer was essentially a cut-and-paste from the fact section of her brief in opposition to Sprint’s motion for summary judgment.<|sentence|> *See Plaintiff Ellen Mendelsohn’s Response Opposing Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment*(Doc. # 70) filed August 24, 2004. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5102355.json | this character which the relator suffered and permitted to be maintained is not sustained by the evidence.
This brings us to a consideration of the second branch of the inquiry, and that is, whether | this character which the relator suffered and permitted to be maintained is not sustained by the evidence.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
This brings us to a consideration of the second branch of the inquiry, and that is, whether |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8827346.json | S„ 160 U. S. 484, 16 Sup. Ct. 353, 40 L. Ed. 499. The burden was not on the defendant to show he had a certificate of qualification. Gar-butt’s Case, 17 Mich. 9, 97 Am. Dec. 162. Where there is conflict in the evidence, the state .is not entitled to have the verdict directed. Carter v. State, 3 Ala. App. 112, 57 South. 1022; King v. State, 151 | S„ 160 U. S. 484, 16 Sup. Ct. 353, 40 L. Ed. 499.<|sentence|> The burden was not on the defendant to show he had a certificate of qualification.<|sentence|> Gar-butt’s Case, 17 Mich. 9, 97 Am. Dec. 162.<|sentence|> Where there is conflict in the evidence, the state .is not entitled to have the verdict directed.<|sentence|> Carter v. State, 3 Ala. App. 112, 57 South. 1022;<|sentence|> King v. State, 151 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1431289.json | Phillips, Respondent.
[782 NYS2d 373]
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility, dated August 19, 2003, which affirmed a determination of a Hearing Officer dated July 28, 2003, made after a Tier II disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating prison rules and imposing a penalty.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
“In reviewing a prison disciplinary determination, the court’s inquiry is limited to deciding whether the determination | Phillips, Respondent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
[782 NYS2d 373]<|paragraph|>
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility, dated August 19, 2003, which affirmed a determination of a Hearing Officer dated July 28, 2003, made after a Tier II disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating prison rules and imposing a penalty.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
“In reviewing a prison disciplinary determination, the court’s inquiry is limited to deciding whether the determination |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3163508.json | art. IV, § 7, 28 U.S.T. 7399.
18
. *Id.*
19
. *Id.*
20
. The record in this case is a jumble of pages, some translated and some untranslated, often duplicative, unnumbered and in no order. The Parole Commission and counsel have exercised no care to afford this court with an understandable record where we are asked to decide a prisoner’ | art. IV, § 7, 28 U.S.T. 7399.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
18<|paragraph|>
. *Id.*<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
19<|paragraph|>
. *Id.*<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
20<|paragraph|>
. The record in this case is a jumble of pages, some translated and some untranslated, often duplicative, unnumbered and in no order.<|sentence|> The Parole Commission and counsel have exercised no care to afford this court with an understandable record where we are asked to decide a prisoner’ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9148191.json | No. 01-216.
#### American Medical Security, Inc. *v.*Skilstaf, Inc.
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. | No. 01-216.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
#### American Medical Security, Inc. *v.*Skilstaf, Inc.<|paragraph|>
C. A. 11th Cir.<|sentence|> Certiorari denied. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3353922.json | 1 Russ. 191; 2 Younge & Col. 562; Rawstone *v.*Parr, 3 Russ. 427; Ex parte Kendall, 17 Ves. 528, note. So strong is this equity regarded against the estate of one deceased, in either of these classes, that chancery will allow it to be pursued without a resort first to the survivor. Wilkinson *v.*Henderson, 1 Mylne & Keen, 588; Sleech’s case, 1 Meriv. 539, and 3 Meriv. 593. | 1 Russ. 191; 2 Younge & Col. 562; Rawstone *v.*Parr, 3 Russ. 427; Ex parte Kendall, 17 Ves. 528, note.<|sentence|> So strong is this equity regarded against the estate of one deceased, in either of these classes, that chancery will allow it to be pursued without a resort first to the survivor.<|sentence|> Wilkinson *v.*Henderson, 1 Mylne & Keen, 588;<|sentence|> Sleech’s case, 1 Meriv. 539, and 3 Meriv. 593. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1561806.json | request and waive in behalf of John S. Burns and James Neet and no others and request the probate court to appoint them to act as said administrators.”
The remaining resident heir, Martha J. Neet, was . 'an aged | request and waive in behalf of John S. Burns and James Neet and no others and request the probate court to appoint them to act as said administrators.”<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The remaining resident heir, Martha J. Neet, was . 'an aged |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11175745.json | & Grant, for Mulcahy; H. M. Hagellarger, for Akron; all of Akron.
In bidding, the bidders were required^ first to bid for materials and labor; to submit his proposal for some 30 alternates; substitutions of high grade materials of manufacturers not mentioned as acceptable within the base bid. Among other, things the specifications were altered provided the | & Grant, for Mulcahy; H. M. Hagellarger, for Akron; all of Akron.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
In bidding, the bidders were required^ first to bid for materials and labor; to submit his proposal for some 30 alternates; substitutions of high grade materials of manufacturers not mentioned as acceptable within the base bid.<|sentence|> Among other, things the specifications were altered provided the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/npin.cdc.gov/search?query=&f[0]=disease:3770&f[1]=disease:3772&f[2]=topic:4187&f[3]=topic:14758&f[4]=type:publications.json | to notfiy a health professional.
Development of New Drugs for TB Chemotherapy: Analysis of the Current Drug Pipeline
Development of New Drugs for TB Chemotherapy: Analysis of the Current Drug Pipeline
This report provides an overview of various anti-TB medications.
Guía de Información de Medicamentos Antitiberculosos[Tuberculosis Drug Information Guide]
Guía de Información de Medicamentos Antitiberculosos[Tuberculosis Drug Information Guide]
This manual is | to notfiy a health professional.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Development of New Drugs for TB Chemotherapy: Analysis of the Current Drug Pipeline<|paragraph|>
Development of New Drugs for TB Chemotherapy: Analysis of the Current Drug Pipeline<|paragraph|>
This report provides an overview of various anti-TB medications.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Guía de Información de Medicamentos Antitiberculosos[Tuberculosis Drug Information Guide]<|paragraph|>
Guía de Información de Medicamentos Antitiberculosos[Tuberculosis Drug Information Guide]<|paragraph|>
This manual is |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2228589.json | .*
The cause was argued before Marbury, C. J., and Collins, Grason, Henderson and Markell, JJ.
*Isidor Roman*and *Eugene A. Alexander III,*with whom was *Harry Lott*on the brief, for the appellant.
*Paul F. Due,*with whom were *Due, Nickerson & White-ford*on the brief, for | .*<|paragraph|>
The cause was argued before Marbury, C. J., and Collins, Grason, Henderson and Markell, JJ.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Isidor Roman*and *Eugene A. Alexander III,*with whom was *Harry Lott*on the brief, for the appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Paul F. Due,*with whom were *Due, Nickerson & White-ford*on the brief, for |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/human-factors/2006/nine-mile-point1.pdf.json | or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair
317
Number of Items for this Docket:
Percent of Total for this Docket:
Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - | or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
317<|paragraph|>
Number of Items for this Docket:<|paragraph|>
Percent of Total for this Docket:<|paragraph|>
Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7555021.json | 6% of the shares of the Company for only $7,000 cash and knew that the note of $25,500 was “to make up the thirty-two, five that would buy the 5.6 percent eventually.”
Introduction of Kubelka’s income tax returns for the appropriate years revealed that Kubelka received investment tax credits of $11,152 in 1981 and $249 in 1982 as a result of his investment in the Company. He also received a dividend of $6,835 in 1982.
Under the circumstances we find that the promissory note was | 6% of the shares of the Company for only $7,000 cash and knew that the note of $25,500 was “to make up the thirty-two, five that would buy the 5.6 percent eventually.”<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Introduction of Kubelka’s income tax returns for the appropriate years revealed that Kubelka received investment tax credits of $11,152 in 1981 and $249 in 1982 as a result of his investment in the Company.<|sentence|> He also received a dividend of $6,835 in 1982.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Under the circumstances we find that the promissory note was |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.