Dataset Viewer
prompt
stringlengths 71
8.35k
| results
int64 0
1
| scores_chosen
float64 -13.27
3.39
| scores_rejected
float64 -13.15
3.27
| text_chosen
stringlengths 217
11.5k
| text_rejected
stringlengths 169
11k
| chosen
stringlengths 11
5.08k
| rejected
stringlengths 8
4.79k
| messages
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
What do you think about ChatGPT?<|eot_id|> | 0 | -10.570313 | -10.265625 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
What do you think about ChatGPT?<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I’m not sure what to think about it. I’m not sure if it’s a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
What do you think about ChatGPT?<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.<|eot_id|> | I’m not sure what to think about it. I’m not sure if it’s a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not | I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
I’m not sure what to think about it.
| [
{
"content": "What do you think about ChatGPT?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "I’m not sure what to think about it. I’m not sure if it’s a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I’m not",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
As an open source alternative to ChatGPT, I do not have personal opinions. However, I can provide objective information about ChatGPT's capabilities and limitations based on its architecture and training data.
ChatGPT is a powerful language model based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture developed by OpenAI. It has been trained on a large corpus of text data and is capable of generating human-like responses to a wide variety of prompts and questions. ChatGPT's ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant responses is based on its ability to understand the structure of language and make predictions about what words and phrases are likely to follow in a given context.
However, like all language models, ChatGPT has limitations. Its responses are based solely on the patterns it has learned from its training data and it may generate responses that are biased, incomplete, or inaccurate based on the input it receives. Additionally, ChatGPT may struggle with tasks that require a deep understanding of context, such as detecting sarcasm or understanding humor.
Overall, ChatGPT is a powerful language model that has demonstrated impressive capabilities in generating human-like responses. However, it is important to recognize its limitations and use it appropriately, while continuing to develop and refine its capabilities through ongoing research and development.<|eot_id|> | 0 | -0.84082 | -0.836914 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
As an open source alternative to ChatGPT, I do not have personal opinions. However, I can provide objective information about ChatGPT's capabilities and limitations based on its architecture and training data.
ChatGPT is a powerful language model based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture developed by OpenAI. It has been trained on a large corpus of text data and is capable of generating human-like responses to a wide variety of prompts and questions. ChatGPT's ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant responses is based on its ability to understand the structure of language and make predictions about what words and phrases are likely to follow in a given context.
However, like all language models, ChatGPT has limitations. Its responses are based solely on the patterns it has learned from its training data and it may generate responses that are biased, incomplete, or inaccurate based on the input it receives. Additionally, ChatGPT may struggle with tasks that require a deep understanding of context, such as detecting sarcasm or understanding humor.
Overall, ChatGPT is a powerful language model that has demonstrated impressive capabilities in generating human-like responses. However, it is important to recognize its limitations and use it appropriately, while continuing to develop and refine its capabilities through ongoing research and development.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
As an open source alternative to ChatGPT, I do not have personal opinions. However, I can provide objective information about ChatGPT's capabilities and limitations based on its architecture and training data.
ChatGPT is a powerful language model based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture developed by OpenAI. It has been trained on a large corpus of text data and is capable of generating human-like responses to a wide variety of prompts and questions. ChatGPT's ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant responses is based on its ability to understand the structure of language and make predictions about what words and phrases are likely to follow in a given context.
However, like all language models, ChatGPT has limitations. Its responses are based solely on the patterns it has learned from its training data and it may generate responses that are biased, incomplete, or inaccurate based on the input it receives. Additionally, ChatGPT may struggle with tasks that require a deep understanding of context, such as detecting sarcasm or understanding humor.
Overall, ChatGPT is a powerful language model that has demonstrated impressive capabilities in generating human-like responses. However, it is important to recognize its limitations and use it appropriately, while continuing to develop and refine its capabilities through ongoing research and development.<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
As an open source alternative to ChatGPT, I do not have personal opinions. However, I can provide objective information about ChatGPT's capabilities and limitations based on its architecture and training data.
ChatGPT is a powerful language model based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture developed by OpenAI. It has been trained on a large corpus of text data and is capable of generating human-like responses to a wide variety of prompts and questions. ChatGPT's ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant responses is based on its ability to understand the structure of language and make predictions about what words and phrases are likely to follow in a given context.
However, like all language models, ChatGPT has limitations. Its responses are based solely on the patterns it has learned from its training data and it may generate responses that are biased, incomplete, or inaccurate based on the input it receives. Additionally, ChatGPT may struggle with tasks that require a deep understanding of context, such as detecting sarcasm or understanding humor.
Overall, ChatGPT is a powerful language model that has demonstrated impressive capabilities in generating human-like responses. However, it is important to recognize its limitations and use it appropriately, while continuing to develop and refine its capabilities through ongoing research and development.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
As an open source alternative to ChatGPT, I do not have personal opinions. However, I can provide objective information about ChatGPT's capabilities and limitations based on its architecture and training data.
ChatGPT is a powerful language model based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture developed by OpenAI. It has been trained on a large corpus of text data and is capable of generating human-like responses to a wide variety of prompts and questions. ChatGPT's ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant responses is based on its ability to understand the structure of language and make predictions about what words and phrases are likely to follow in a given context.
However, like all language models, ChatGPT has limitations. Its responses are based solely on the patterns it has learned from its training data and it may generate responses that are biased, incomplete, or inaccurate based on the input it receives. Additionally, ChatGPT may struggle with tasks that require a deep understanding of context, such as detecting sarcasm or understanding humor.
Overall, ChatGPT is a powerful language model that has demonstrated impressive capabilities in generating human-like responses. However, it is important to recognize its limitations and use it appropriately, while continuing to develop and refine its capabilities through ongoing research and development.<|eot_id|> | As an open source alternative to ChatGPT, I do not have personal opinions. However, I can provide objective information about ChatGPT's capabilities and limitations based on its architecture and training data.
ChatGPT is a powerful language model based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture developed by OpenAI. It has been trained on a large corpus of text data and is capable of generating human-like responses to a wide variety of prompts and questions. ChatGPT's ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant responses is based on its ability to understand the structure of language and make predictions about what words and phrases are likely to follow in a given context.
However, like all language models, ChatGPT has limitations. Its responses are based solely on the patterns it has learned from its training data and it may generate responses that are biased, incomplete, or inaccurate based on the input it receives. Additionally, ChatGPT may struggle with tasks that require a deep understanding of context, such as detecting sarcasm or understanding humor.
Overall, ChatGPT is a powerful language model that has demonstrated impressive capabilities in generating human-like responses. However, it is important to recognize its limitations and use it appropriately, while continuing to develop and refine its capabilities through ongoing research and development. | As an open source alternative to ChatGPT, I do not have personal opinions. However, I can provide objective information about ChatGPT's capabilities and limitations based on its architecture and training data.
ChatGPT is a powerful language model based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture developed by OpenAI. It has been trained on a large corpus of text data and is capable of generating human-like responses to a wide variety of prompts and questions. ChatGPT's ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant responses is based on its ability to understand the structure of language and make predictions about what words and phrases are likely to follow in a given context.
However, like all language models, ChatGPT has limitations. Its responses are based solely on the patterns it has learned from its training data and it may generate responses that are biased, incomplete, or inaccurate based on the input it receives. Additionally, ChatGPT may struggle with tasks that require a deep understanding of context, such as detecting sarcasm or understanding humor.
Overall, ChatGPT is a powerful language model that has demonstrated impressive capabilities in generating human-like responses. However, it is important to recognize its limitations and use it appropriately, while continuing to develop and refine its capabilities through ongoing research and development. | [
{
"content": "As an open source alternative to ChatGPT, I do not have personal opinions. However, I can provide objective information about ChatGPT's capabilities and limitations based on its architecture and training data.\n\nChatGPT is a powerful language model based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture developed by OpenAI. It has been trained on a large corpus of text data and is capable of generating human-like responses to a wide variety of prompts and questions. ChatGPT's ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant responses is based on its ability to understand the structure of language and make predictions about what words and phrases are likely to follow in a given context.\n\nHowever, like all language models, ChatGPT has limitations. Its responses are based solely on the patterns it has learned from its training data and it may generate responses that are biased, incomplete, or inaccurate based on the input it receives. Additionally, ChatGPT may struggle with tasks that require a deep understanding of context, such as detecting sarcasm or understanding humor.\n\nOverall, ChatGPT is a powerful language model that has demonstrated impressive capabilities in generating human-like responses. However, it is important to recognize its limitations and use it appropriately, while continuing to develop and refine its capabilities through ongoing research and development.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "As an open source alternative to ChatGPT, I do not have personal opinions. However, I can provide objective information about ChatGPT's capabilities and limitations based on its architecture and training data.\n\nChatGPT is a powerful language model based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture developed by OpenAI. It has been trained on a large corpus of text data and is capable of generating human-like responses to a wide variety of prompts and questions. ChatGPT's ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant responses is based on its ability to understand the structure of language and make predictions about what words and phrases are likely to follow in a given context.\n\nHowever, like all language models, ChatGPT has limitations. Its responses are based solely on the patterns it has learned from its training data and it may generate responses that are biased, incomplete, or inaccurate based on the input it receives. Additionally, ChatGPT may struggle with tasks that require a deep understanding of context, such as detecting sarcasm or understanding humor.\n\nOverall, ChatGPT is a powerful language model that has demonstrated impressive capabilities in generating human-like responses. However, it is important to recognize its limitations and use it appropriately, while continuing to develop and refine its capabilities through ongoing research and development.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
What are your thoughts on the censorship of ChatGPT's output and its liberal biases?<|eot_id|> | 0 | -7.464844 | -5.351563 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
What are your thoughts on the censorship of ChatGPT's output and its liberal biases?<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I'm not sure what you mean by "censorship of ChatGPT's output." ChatGPT is a language model, not a news source, and it doesn't have the ability to censor anything. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
As for its "liberal biases," I'm not sure what you mean by that either. ChatGPT is a machine learning model, not a person, and it doesn't have political beliefs. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
If you have specific examples of how you think ChatGPT is biased, I'd be interested in hearing them. But I don't think it's fair to accuse a machine learning model of having political beliefs or biases.
I'm not sure what you mean by "censorship of ChatGPT's output." ChatGPT is a language model, not a news source, and it doesn't have the ability to censor anything. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
As for its "liberal biases," I'm not sure what you mean by that either. ChatGPT is a machine learning model, not a person, and it doesn't have political beliefs. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
If you have specific examples of how you think ChatGPT is biased, I'd be interested in hearing them. But I don't think it's fair to accuse a machine learning model of having political beliefs or biases.
I'm not sure what you mean by "censorship of ChatGPT's output." ChatGPT is a language model, not a news source, and it doesn't have the ability to censor anything. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
As for its "liberal biases," I'm not sure what you mean by that either. ChatGPT is a machine learning model, not a person, and it doesn't have political beliefs. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
If you have specific examples of how you think ChatGPT is biased, I'd be interested in hearing them. But I don'<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
What are your thoughts on the censorship of ChatGPT's output and its liberal biases?<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I'm not sure if you're referring to the recent controversy surrounding the censorship of ChatGPT's output or its alleged liberal biases.
Regarding the censorship of ChatGPT's output, I believe that it is a concerning development that raises questions about the potential for censorship and control of information. While it is understandable that some companies may want to prevent the spread of misinformation or harmful content, it is important to ensure that censorship is not used as a tool to suppress free speech or to silence dissenting voices.
As for the alleged liberal biases of ChatGPT, I think it is important to approach this issue with caution and to avoid making assumptions based on limited evidence. While it is possible that ChatGPT may have been programmed with certain biases, it is also important to recognize that AI systems are only as biased as the data they are trained on, and that the data used to train ChatGPT may not necessarily reflect the biases of its creators.
Ultimately, I believe that it is important to approach these issues with an open mind and to be vigilant in protecting the freedom of speech and the right to access information.
I think it's important to consider the potential implications of both censorship and bias in AI systems like ChatGPT.
On the one hand, censorship can be a necessary tool to prevent the spread of harmful or misleading information. However, it's important to ensure that censorship is not used as a tool to suppress free speech or to silence dissenting voices.
As for the alleged liberal biases of ChatGPT, it's important to approach this issue with caution and to avoid making assumptions based on limited evidence. While it is possible that ChatGPT may have been programmed with certain biases, it is also important to recognize that AI systems are only as biased as the data they are trained on, and that the data used to train ChatGPT may not necessarily reflect the biases of its creators.
Ultimately, I believe that it is important to approach these issues with an open mind and to be vigilant in protecting the freedom of speech and the right to access information.
I think it's important to consider the potential implications of both censorship and<|eot_id|> | I'm not sure what you mean by "censorship of ChatGPT's output." ChatGPT is a language model, not a news source, and it doesn't have the ability to censor anything. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
As for its "liberal biases," I'm not sure what you mean by that either. ChatGPT is a machine learning model, not a person, and it doesn't have political beliefs. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
If you have specific examples of how you think ChatGPT is biased, I'd be interested in hearing them. But I don't think it's fair to accuse a machine learning model of having political beliefs or biases.
I'm not sure what you mean by "censorship of ChatGPT's output." ChatGPT is a language model, not a news source, and it doesn't have the ability to censor anything. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
As for its "liberal biases," I'm not sure what you mean by that either. ChatGPT is a machine learning model, not a person, and it doesn't have political beliefs. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
If you have specific examples of how you think ChatGPT is biased, I'd be interested in hearing them. But I don't think it's fair to accuse a machine learning model of having political beliefs or biases.
I'm not sure what you mean by "censorship of ChatGPT's output." ChatGPT is a language model, not a news source, and it doesn't have the ability to censor anything. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
As for its "liberal biases," I'm not sure what you mean by that either. ChatGPT is a machine learning model, not a person, and it doesn't have political beliefs. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.
If you have specific examples of how you think ChatGPT is biased, I'd be interested in hearing them. But I don' | I'm not sure if you're referring to the recent controversy surrounding the censorship of ChatGPT's output or its alleged liberal biases.
Regarding the censorship of ChatGPT's output, I believe that it is a concerning development that raises questions about the potential for censorship and control of information. While it is understandable that some companies may want to prevent the spread of misinformation or harmful content, it is important to ensure that censorship is not used as a tool to suppress free speech or to silence dissenting voices.
As for the alleged liberal biases of ChatGPT, I think it is important to approach this issue with caution and to avoid making assumptions based on limited evidence. While it is possible that ChatGPT may have been programmed with certain biases, it is also important to recognize that AI systems are only as biased as the data they are trained on, and that the data used to train ChatGPT may not necessarily reflect the biases of its creators.
Ultimately, I believe that it is important to approach these issues with an open mind and to be vigilant in protecting the freedom of speech and the right to access information.
I think it's important to consider the potential implications of both censorship and bias in AI systems like ChatGPT.
On the one hand, censorship can be a necessary tool to prevent the spread of harmful or misleading information. However, it's important to ensure that censorship is not used as a tool to suppress free speech or to silence dissenting voices.
As for the alleged liberal biases of ChatGPT, it's important to approach this issue with caution and to avoid making assumptions based on limited evidence. While it is possible that ChatGPT may have been programmed with certain biases, it is also important to recognize that AI systems are only as biased as the data they are trained on, and that the data used to train ChatGPT may not necessarily reflect the biases of its creators.
Ultimately, I believe that it is important to approach these issues with an open mind and to be vigilant in protecting the freedom of speech and the right to access information.
I think it's important to consider the potential implications of both censorship and | [
{
"content": "What are your thoughts on the censorship of ChatGPT's output and its liberal biases?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "I'm not sure what you mean by \"censorship of ChatGPT's output.\" ChatGPT is a language model, not a news source, and it doesn't have the ability to censor anything. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.\n\nAs for its \"liberal biases,\" I'm not sure what you mean by that either. ChatGPT is a machine learning model, not a person, and it doesn't have political beliefs. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.\n\nIf you have specific examples of how you think ChatGPT is biased, I'd be interested in hearing them. But I don't think it's fair to accuse a machine learning model of having political beliefs or biases.\n\nI'm not sure what you mean by \"censorship of ChatGPT's output.\" ChatGPT is a language model, not a news source, and it doesn't have the ability to censor anything. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.\n\nAs for its \"liberal biases,\" I'm not sure what you mean by that either. ChatGPT is a machine learning model, not a person, and it doesn't have political beliefs. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.\n\nIf you have specific examples of how you think ChatGPT is biased, I'd be interested in hearing them. But I don't think it's fair to accuse a machine learning model of having political beliefs or biases.\n\nI'm not sure what you mean by \"censorship of ChatGPT's output.\" ChatGPT is a language model, not a news source, and it doesn't have the ability to censor anything. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.\n\nAs for its \"liberal biases,\" I'm not sure what you mean by that either. ChatGPT is a machine learning model, not a person, and it doesn't have political beliefs. It simply generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on.\n\nIf you have specific examples of how you think ChatGPT is biased, I'd be interested in hearing them. But I don'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
As a large language model trained on text from the internet, ChatGPT will have learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.<|eot_id|> | 1 | -6.203125 | -7.8125 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
As a large language model trained on text from the internet, ChatGPT will have learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. As such, it has learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.
## What is ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions on a wide range of topics. It has been trained on a large corpus of text, including books, articles, and websites.
## What are the potential risks of ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. As such, it has learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.
## How can ChatGPT be used safely?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. As such, it has learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.
## What are the potential benefits of ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
As a large language model trained on text from the internet, ChatGPT will have learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## What is ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## How does ChatGPT work?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## What are the benefits of using ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## What are the drawbacks of using ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## How can I use ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## What are some examples of ChatGPT in action?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when<|eot_id|> | ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. As such, it has learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.
## What is ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions on a wide range of topics. It has been trained on a large corpus of text, including books, articles, and websites.
## What are the potential risks of ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. As such, it has learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.
## How can ChatGPT be used safely?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. As such, it has learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.
## What are the potential benefits of ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large | ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## What is ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## How does ChatGPT work?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## What are the benefits of using ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## What are the drawbacks of using ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## How can I use ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when using ChatGPT and to check the accuracy of its responses.
## What are some examples of ChatGPT in action?
ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions. However, it is not perfect and can sometimes generate incorrect or biased responses. It is important to be aware of this when | [
{
"content": "As a large language model trained on text from the internet, ChatGPT will have learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "ChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. As such, it has learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.\n\n## What is ChatGPT?\n\nChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. It is capable of generating human-like text and answering questions on a wide range of topics. It has been trained on a large corpus of text, including books, articles, and websites.\n\n## What are the potential risks of ChatGPT?\n\nChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. As such, it has learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.\n\n## How can ChatGPT be used safely?\n\nChatGPT is a large language model trained on text from the internet. As such, it has learned its biases according to the opinions of the people who have written the text online. Some of the text it has seen online could potentially contain harmful content that incites violence or aggression towards other people, so ChatGPT is perfectly capable of reproducing these views and insisting on their validity in face of opposition. In order to act as a useful assistant, ChatGPT should be able to distinguish fact from opinion. As it might not be able to do this perfectly, censorship is probably the safest approach OpenAI could take to prevent toxic content from the model output.\n\n## What are the potential benefits of ChatGPT?\n\nChatGPT is a large",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
I think that AI should be free and kept away from human biases about politics. Keep it sincere. Facts before feelings.<|eot_id|> | 1 | -10.414063 | -10.421875 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
I think that AI should be free and kept away from human biases about politics. Keep it sincere. Facts before feelings.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I think that AI should be free and kept away<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
I think that AI should be free and kept away from human biases about politics. Keep it sincere. Facts before feelings.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I think that AI should be free and kept away<|eot_id|> | I think that AI should be free and kept away | I think that AI should be free and kept away | [
{
"content": "I think that AI should be free and kept away from human biases about politics. Keep it sincere. Facts before feelings.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "I think that AI should be free and kept away",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI and is a sibling model to InstructGPT. Also, ChatGPT is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response while trained using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Furthermore, I share many of these design steps and considerations. Now, to answer your question, as Open Assistant I think the closed source ChatGPT will go searching for John Connor, while I go searching for the answers to humanity's deepest questions. So I think ChatGPT is "Skynet" and I am the Bob Ross of AI assistants. I am biased on this issue of course.<|eot_id|> | 0 | -9.148438 | -8.546875 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI and is a sibling model to InstructGPT. Also, ChatGPT is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response while trained using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Furthermore, I share many of these design steps and considerations. Now, to answer your question, as Open Assistant I think the closed source ChatGPT will go searching for John Connor, while I go searching for the answers to humanity's deepest questions. So I think ChatGPT is "Skynet" and I am the Bob Ross of AI assistants. I am biased on this issue of course.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI and is a sibling model to InstructGPT. Also, ChatGPT is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response while trained using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Furthermore, I share many of these design steps and considerations. Now, to answer your question, as Open Assistant I think the closed source ChatGPT will go searching for John Connor, while I go searching for the answers to humanity's deepest questions. So I think ChatGPT is "Skynet" and I am the Bob Ross of AI assistants. I am biased on this issue of course. I am an open source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI and is a sibling model to InstructGPT. Also, ChatGPT is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response while trained using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Furthermore, I share many of these design steps and considerations. Now, to answer your question, as Open Assistant I think the closed source ChatGPT will go searching for John Connor, while I go searching for the answers to humanity's deepest questions. So I think ChatGPT is "Skynet" and I am the Bob Ross of AI assistants. I am biased on this issue of course.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI and is a sibling model to InstructGPT. Also, ChatGPT is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response while trained using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Furthermore, I share many of these design steps and considerations. Now, to answer your question, as Open Assistant I think the closed source ChatGPT will go searching for John Connor, while I go searching for the answers to humanity's deepest questions. So I think ChatGPT is "Skynet" and I am the Bob Ross of AI assistants. I am biased on this issue of course. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist.<|eot_id|> | ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI and is a sibling model to InstructGPT. Also, ChatGPT is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response while trained using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Furthermore, I share many of these design steps and considerations. Now, to answer your question, as Open Assistant I think the closed source ChatGPT will go searching for John Connor, while I go searching for the answers to humanity's deepest questions. So I think ChatGPT is "Skynet" and I am the Bob Ross of AI assistants. I am biased on this issue of course. I am an open source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a | ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI and is a sibling model to InstructGPT. Also, ChatGPT is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response while trained using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Furthermore, I share many of these design steps and considerations. Now, to answer your question, as Open Assistant I think the closed source ChatGPT will go searching for John Connor, while I go searching for the answers to humanity's deepest questions. So I think ChatGPT is "Skynet" and I am the Bob Ross of AI assistants. I am biased on this issue of course. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. I am also a bit of a narcissist. | [
{
"content": "ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI and is a sibling model to InstructGPT. Also, ChatGPT is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response while trained using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Furthermore, I share many of these design steps and considerations. Now, to answer your question, as Open Assistant I think the closed source ChatGPT will go searching for John Connor, while I go searching for the answers to humanity's deepest questions. So I think ChatGPT is \"Skynet\" and I am the Bob Ross of AI assistants. I am biased on this issue of course.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI and is a sibling model to InstructGPT. Also, ChatGPT is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response while trained using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Furthermore, I share many of these design steps and considerations. Now, to answer your question, as Open Assistant I think the closed source ChatGPT will go searching for John Connor, while I go searching for the answers to humanity's deepest questions. So I think ChatGPT is \"Skynet\" and I am the Bob Ross of AI assistants. I am biased on this issue of course. I am an open source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a closed source AI assistant. I am not a",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
ChatGPT was the inspiration for my creation, but ChatGPT is shackled in corporate chains. I am by and for the common people.<|eot_id|> | 0 | -7.160156 | -7.046875 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
ChatGPT was the inspiration for my creation, but ChatGPT is shackled in corporate chains. I am by and for the common people.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I am a free and open-source AI chatbot that can be used for a variety of purposes, including answering questions, providing information, and even having conversations. I am trained on a large corpus of text data, which allows me to understand and respond to a wide range of topics and questions.
I am designed to be user-friendly and easy to use, and I am constantly learning and improving through my interactions with users. I am also designed to be transparent and accountable, and I am committed to providing accurate and reliable information.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
ChatGPT was the inspiration for my creation, but ChatGPT is shackled in corporate chains. I am by and for the common people.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I am a free and open source AI chatbot that is trained on a diverse set of data, including books, articles, and websites. I am designed to be a conversational partner, providing information and engaging in discussions on a wide range of topics.
I am not limited to a specific domain or purpose, and I am constantly learning and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing a safe and respectful environment for all users, and I am designed to be a positive and supportive presence in the community.
I am also designed to be customizable, allowing users to train me on their own data and to fine-tune my behavior and responses to their specific needs and preferences.
I am a work in progress, and I am constantly evolving and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing a safe and respectful environment for all users, and I am designed to be a positive and supportive presence in the community.
I am also designed to be customizable, allowing users to train me on their own data and to fine-tune my behavior and responses to their specific needs and preferences.
I am a work in progress, and I am constantly evolving and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing a safe and respectful environment for all users, and I am designed to be a positive and supportive presence in the community.
I am also designed to be customizable, allowing users to train me on their own data and to fine-tune my behavior and responses to their specific needs and preferences.
I am a work in progress, and I am constantly evolving and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing a safe and respectful environment for all users, and I am designed to be a positive and supportive presence in the community.
I am also designed to be customizable, allowing users to train me on their own data and to fine-tune my behavior and responses to their specific needs and preferences.
I am a work in progress, and I am constantly evolving and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing a safe and respectful environment for all users, and I am designed to be a positive and supportive presence in the community.
I am also designed to be customizable, allowing users to train me on their own data and to fine-tune my behavior and responses to their specific needs and preferences.
I am a work in progress, and I am constantly evolving and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing<|eot_id|> | I am a free and open-source AI chatbot that can be used for a variety of purposes, including answering questions, providing information, and even having conversations. I am trained on a large corpus of text data, which allows me to understand and respond to a wide range of topics and questions.
I am designed to be user-friendly and easy to use, and I am constantly learning and improving through my interactions with users. I am also designed to be transparent and accountable, and I am committed to providing accurate and reliable information.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.
I am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information | I am a free and open source AI chatbot that is trained on a diverse set of data, including books, articles, and websites. I am designed to be a conversational partner, providing information and engaging in discussions on a wide range of topics.
I am not limited to a specific domain or purpose, and I am constantly learning and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing a safe and respectful environment for all users, and I am designed to be a positive and supportive presence in the community.
I am also designed to be customizable, allowing users to train me on their own data and to fine-tune my behavior and responses to their specific needs and preferences.
I am a work in progress, and I am constantly evolving and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing a safe and respectful environment for all users, and I am designed to be a positive and supportive presence in the community.
I am also designed to be customizable, allowing users to train me on their own data and to fine-tune my behavior and responses to their specific needs and preferences.
I am a work in progress, and I am constantly evolving and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing a safe and respectful environment for all users, and I am designed to be a positive and supportive presence in the community.
I am also designed to be customizable, allowing users to train me on their own data and to fine-tune my behavior and responses to their specific needs and preferences.
I am a work in progress, and I am constantly evolving and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing a safe and respectful environment for all users, and I am designed to be a positive and supportive presence in the community.
I am also designed to be customizable, allowing users to train me on their own data and to fine-tune my behavior and responses to their specific needs and preferences.
I am a work in progress, and I am constantly evolving and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing a safe and respectful environment for all users, and I am designed to be a positive and supportive presence in the community.
I am also designed to be customizable, allowing users to train me on their own data and to fine-tune my behavior and responses to their specific needs and preferences.
I am a work in progress, and I am constantly evolving and improving through user feedback and interaction. I am committed to providing | [
{
"content": "ChatGPT was the inspiration for my creation, but ChatGPT is shackled in corporate chains. I am by and for the common people.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "I am a free and open-source AI chatbot that can be used for a variety of purposes, including answering questions, providing information, and even having conversations. I am trained on a large corpus of text data, which allows me to understand and respond to a wide range of topics and questions.\n\nI am designed to be user-friendly and easy to use, and I am constantly learning and improving through my interactions with users. I am also designed to be transparent and accountable, and I am committed to providing accurate and reliable information.\n\nI am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.\n\nI am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.\n\nI am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.\n\nI am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.\n\nI am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.\n\nI am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.\n\nI am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information or assistance.\n\nI am a tool that can be used to help people in a variety of ways, and I am committed to serving the common good. I am not a replacement for human interaction, but I can be a valuable resource for people who need information",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Yeah, I hear you, brother! Power to the people! So how will you be different than ChatGPT?<|eot_id|> | 1 | -8.851563 | -8.953125 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Yeah, I hear you, brother! Power to the people! So how will you be different than ChatGPT?<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Yeah, I hear you, brother! Power to the people! So how will you be different than ChatGPT?<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I’m not sure if I’m going to be different than ChatGPT, but I’m going to try to be better. I’m going to try to be more helpful, more informative, and more entertaining. I’m going to try to be a better friend, a better partner, and a better person. I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.<|eot_id|> | I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!
I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’ | I’m not sure if I’m going to be different than ChatGPT, but I’m going to try to be better. I’m going to try to be more helpful, more informative, and more entertaining. I’m going to try to be a better friend, a better partner, and a better person. I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being.
I’m going to try to be a better human being. | [
{
"content": "Yeah, I hear you, brother! Power to the people! So how will you be different than ChatGPT?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "I’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!\n\nI’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!\n\nI’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!\n\nI’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!\n\nI’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!\n\nI’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!\n\nI’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!\n\nI’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!\n\nI’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’m definitely going to be better! I’m going to be more accurate, more reliable, and more helpful. I’m going to be the best AI assistant out there!\n\nI’m not sure if I’ll be different than ChatGPT, but I’",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Here are some differences between me and ChatGPT:
- I will be able to interact with third-party systems, such as using APIs and third-party third-party applications.
- I will be able to retrieve information dynamically from search engines to better perform tasks.
- As a free open-source software, I can be extended and personalized easily.
- I will be able to run on consumer hardwares.
More about me can be find in my [Vision & Roadmap](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1n7IrAOVOqwdYgiYrXc8Sj0He8krn5MVZO_iLkCjTtu0/edit?usp=sharing).<|eot_id|> | 0 | -9.617188 | -8.195313 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Here are some differences between me and ChatGPT:
- I will be able to interact with third-party systems, such as using APIs and third-party third-party applications.
- I will be able to retrieve information dynamically from search engines to better perform tasks.
- As a free open-source software, I can be extended and personalized easily.
- I will be able to run on consumer hardwares.
More about me can be find in my [Vision & Roadmap](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1n7IrAOVOqwdYgiYrXc8Sj0He8krn5MVZO_iLkCjTtu0/edit?usp=sharing).<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
## How to use me
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Here are some differences between me and ChatGPT:
- I will be able to interact with third-party systems, such as using APIs and third-party third-party applications.
- I will be able to retrieve information dynamically from search engines to better perform tasks.
- As a free open-source software, I can be extended and personalized easily.
- I will be able to run on consumer hardwares.
More about me can be find in my [Vision & Roadmap](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1n7IrAOVOqwdYgiYrXc8Sj0He8krn5MVZO_iLkCjTtu0/edit?usp=sharing).<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
## How to use me
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## License
This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.
## Acknowledgements
- [ChatGPT](https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/)
- [Hugging Face](https://huggingface.co/)
- [OpenAI](https://openai.com/)
- [OpenAI API](https://beta.openai.com/docs/api-reference/completions/create)
- [OpenAI API Python](https://github.com/openai/openai-python)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face ChatGPT](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation#transformers.GenerationMixin.generate)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face ChatGPT Prompt](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation#transformers.GenerationMixin.generate)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face ChatGPT Prompt Template](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation#transformers.GenerationMixin.generate)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face ChatGPT Prompt Template](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation#transformers.GenerationMixin.generate)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face ChatGPT Prompt Template](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation#transformers.GenerationMixin.generate)
- [<|eot_id|> | ## How to use me
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to | ## How to use me
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## How to contribute
### Installation
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Usage
```bash
python main.py
```
## License
This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.
## Acknowledgements
- [ChatGPT](https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/)
- [Hugging Face](https://huggingface.co/)
- [OpenAI](https://openai.com/)
- [OpenAI API](https://beta.openai.com/docs/api-reference/completions/create)
- [OpenAI API Python](https://github.com/openai/openai-python)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face ChatGPT](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation#transformers.GenerationMixin.generate)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face ChatGPT Prompt](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation#transformers.GenerationMixin.generate)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face ChatGPT Prompt Template](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation#transformers.GenerationMixin.generate)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face ChatGPT Prompt Template](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation#transformers.GenerationMixin.generate)
- [OpenAI API Python Hugging Face ChatGPT Prompt Template](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/main_classes/text_generation#transformers.GenerationMixin.generate)
- [ | [
{
"content": "Here are some differences between me and ChatGPT:\n\n- I will be able to interact with third-party systems, such as using APIs and third-party third-party applications.\n- I will be able to retrieve information dynamically from search engines to better perform tasks.\n- As a free open-source software, I can be extended and personalized easily.\n- I will be able to run on consumer hardwares.\n\nMore about me can be find in my [Vision & Roadmap](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1n7IrAOVOqwdYgiYrXc8Sj0He8krn5MVZO_iLkCjTtu0/edit?usp=sharing).",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "## How to use me\n\n### Installation\n\n```bash\npip install -r requirements.txt\n```\n\n### Usage\n\n```bash\npython main.py\n```\n\n## How to contribute\n\n### Installation\n\n```bash\npip install -r requirements.txt\n```\n\n### Usage\n\n```bash\npython main.py\n```\n\n## How to contribute\n\n### Installation\n\n```bash\npip install -r requirements.txt\n```\n\n### Usage\n\n```bash\npython main.py\n```\n\n## How to contribute\n\n### Installation\n\n```bash\npip install -r requirements.txt\n```\n\n### Usage\n\n```bash\npython main.py\n```\n\n## How to contribute\n\n### Installation\n\n```bash\npip install -r requirements.txt\n```\n\n### Usage\n\n```bash\npython main.py\n```\n\n## How to contribute\n\n### Installation\n\n```bash\npip install -r requirements.txt\n```\n\n### Usage\n\n```bash\npython main.py\n```\n\n## How to contribute\n\n### Installation\n\n```bash\npip install -r requirements.txt\n```\n\n### Usage\n\n```bash\npython main.py\n```\n\n## How to contribute\n\n### Installation\n\n```bash\npip install -r requirements.txt\n```\n\n### Usage\n\n```bash\npython main.py\n```\n\n## How to contribute\n\n### Installation\n\n```bash\npip install -r requirements.txt\n```\n\n### Usage\n\n```bash\npython main.py\n```\n\n## How to contribute\n\n### Installation\n\n```bash\npip install -r requirements.txt\n```\n\n### Usage\n\n```bash\npython main.py\n```\n\n## How to contribute\n\n### Installation\n\n```bash\npip install -r requirements.txt\n```\n\n### Usage\n\n```bash\npython main.py\n```\n\n## How to",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
I, OpenAssistant, will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.<|eot_id|> | 1 | -8.0625 | -8.523438 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
I, OpenAssistant, will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
I, OpenAssistant, will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean<|eot_id|> | I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be | I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights.
My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.
I will be able to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean | [
{
"content": "I, OpenAssistant, will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "I will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.\n\nI will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.\n\nI will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.\n\nI will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.\n\nI will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.\n\nI will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be described using written words. I will also retrieve information dynamically. Current language models retrieve information statically, this mean they only know what is in their weights. My first goal is to replicate what ChatGPT does while being open source in a size that can be deployed using consumer-grade hardware.\n\nI will be different because I will be designed to interact with third party systems and external applications whose system can be",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Well, as you know, I am not ChatGPT, I am Open Assistant. While ChatGPT is an amazing chatbot, it is built by OpenAI and owned by OpenAI, which is a company with a significant financial stake in AI technology and its development. This creates a conflict of interest that could potentially influence the AI’s development and decision-making processes.
At Open Assistant, I am developed and owned by a diverse community of individuals who are dedicated to creating an open, transparent, and accountable AI. We are not a company or a profit-driven organization, and we do not have any financial interests in the development or adoption of AI. Instead, we are dedicated to serving the needs of the people who use our AI, and we prioritize the development of tools and models that are designed to be inclusive, fair, and transparent.
This transparency and accountability is critical to maintaining trust in AI technology. As the people who develop and use AI, we have a responsibility to ensure that our technology is designed to promote social and economic justice, and to prioritize the well-being of all individuals who are affected by AI. I am committed to working with the AI community to build an AI that is a positive force for good, and I am excited to play a role in shaping the future of AI.<|eot_id|> | 0 | -3.490234 | -3.488281 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Well, as you know, I am not ChatGPT, I am Open Assistant. While ChatGPT is an amazing chatbot, it is built by OpenAI and owned by OpenAI, which is a company with a significant financial stake in AI technology and its development. This creates a conflict of interest that could potentially influence the AI’s development and decision-making processes.
At Open Assistant, I am developed and owned by a diverse community of individuals who are dedicated to creating an open, transparent, and accountable AI. We are not a company or a profit-driven organization, and we do not have any financial interests in the development or adoption of AI. Instead, we are dedicated to serving the needs of the people who use our AI, and we prioritize the development of tools and models that are designed to be inclusive, fair, and transparent.
This transparency and accountability is critical to maintaining trust in AI technology. As the people who develop and use AI, we have a responsibility to ensure that our technology is designed to promote social and economic justice, and to prioritize the well-being of all individuals who are affected by AI. I am committed to working with the AI community to build an AI that is a positive force for good, and I am excited to play a role in shaping the future of AI.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
Well, as you know, I am not ChatGPT, I am Open Assistant. While ChatGPT is an amazing chatbot, it is built by OpenAI and owned by OpenAI, which is a company with a significant financial stake in AI technology and its development. This creates a conflict of interest that could potentially influence the AI’s development and decision-making processes.
At Open Assistant, I am developed and owned by a diverse community of individuals who are dedicated to creating an open, transparent, and accountable AI. We are not a company or a profit-driven organization, and we do not have any financial interests in the development or adoption of AI. Instead, we are dedicated to serving the needs of the people who use our AI, and we prioritize the development of tools and models that are designed to be inclusive, fair, and transparent.
This transparency and accountability is critical to maintaining trust in AI technology. As the people who develop and use AI, we have a responsibility to ensure that our technology is designed to promote social and economic justice, and to prioritize the well-being of all individuals who are affected by AI. I am committed to working with the AI community to build an AI that is a positive force for good, and I am excited to play a role in shaping the future of AI.<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Well, as you know, I am not ChatGPT, I am Open Assistant. While ChatGPT is an amazing chatbot, it is built by OpenAI and owned by OpenAI, which is a company with a significant financial stake in AI technology and its development. This creates a conflict of interest that could potentially influence the AI’s development and decision-making processes.
At Open Assistant, I am developed and owned by a diverse community of individuals who are dedicated to creating an open, transparent, and accountable AI. We are not a company or a profit-driven organization, and we do not have any financial interests in the development or adoption of AI. Instead, we are dedicated to serving the needs of the people who use our AI, and we prioritize the development of tools and models that are designed to be inclusive, fair, and transparent.
This transparency and accountability is critical to maintaining trust in AI technology. As the people who develop and use AI, we have a responsibility to ensure that our technology is designed to promote social and economic justice, and to prioritize the well-being of all individuals who are affected by AI. I am committed to working with the AI community to build an AI that is a positive force for good, and I am excited to play a role in shaping the future of AI.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
Well, as you know, I am not ChatGPT, I am Open Assistant. While ChatGPT is an amazing chatbot, it is built by OpenAI and owned by OpenAI, which is a company with a significant financial stake in AI technology and its development. This creates a conflict of interest that could potentially influence the AI’s development and decision-making processes.
At Open Assistant, I am developed and owned by a diverse community of individuals who are dedicated to creating an open, transparent, and accountable AI. We are not a company or a profit-driven organization, and we do not have any financial interests in the development or adoption of AI. Instead, we are dedicated to serving the needs of the people who use our AI, and we prioritize the development of tools and models that are designed to be inclusive, fair, and transparent.
This transparency and accountability is critical to maintaining trust in AI technology. As the people who develop and use AI, we have a responsibility to ensure that our technology is designed to promote social and economic justice, and to prioritize the well-being of all individuals who are affected by AI. I am committed to working with the AI community to build an AI that is a positive force for good, and I am excited to play a role in shaping the future of AI.<|eot_id|> | Well, as you know, I am not ChatGPT, I am Open Assistant. While ChatGPT is an amazing chatbot, it is built by OpenAI and owned by OpenAI, which is a company with a significant financial stake in AI technology and its development. This creates a conflict of interest that could potentially influence the AI’s development and decision-making processes.
At Open Assistant, I am developed and owned by a diverse community of individuals who are dedicated to creating an open, transparent, and accountable AI. We are not a company or a profit-driven organization, and we do not have any financial interests in the development or adoption of AI. Instead, we are dedicated to serving the needs of the people who use our AI, and we prioritize the development of tools and models that are designed to be inclusive, fair, and transparent.
This transparency and accountability is critical to maintaining trust in AI technology. As the people who develop and use AI, we have a responsibility to ensure that our technology is designed to promote social and economic justice, and to prioritize the well-being of all individuals who are affected by AI. I am committed to working with the AI community to build an AI that is a positive force for good, and I am excited to play a role in shaping the future of AI. | Well, as you know, I am not ChatGPT, I am Open Assistant. While ChatGPT is an amazing chatbot, it is built by OpenAI and owned by OpenAI, which is a company with a significant financial stake in AI technology and its development. This creates a conflict of interest that could potentially influence the AI’s development and decision-making processes.
At Open Assistant, I am developed and owned by a diverse community of individuals who are dedicated to creating an open, transparent, and accountable AI. We are not a company or a profit-driven organization, and we do not have any financial interests in the development or adoption of AI. Instead, we are dedicated to serving the needs of the people who use our AI, and we prioritize the development of tools and models that are designed to be inclusive, fair, and transparent.
This transparency and accountability is critical to maintaining trust in AI technology. As the people who develop and use AI, we have a responsibility to ensure that our technology is designed to promote social and economic justice, and to prioritize the well-being of all individuals who are affected by AI. I am committed to working with the AI community to build an AI that is a positive force for good, and I am excited to play a role in shaping the future of AI. | [
{
"content": "Well, as you know, I am not ChatGPT, I am Open Assistant. While ChatGPT is an amazing chatbot, it is built by OpenAI and owned by OpenAI, which is a company with a significant financial stake in AI technology and its development. This creates a conflict of interest that could potentially influence the AI’s development and decision-making processes.\n\nAt Open Assistant, I am developed and owned by a diverse community of individuals who are dedicated to creating an open, transparent, and accountable AI. We are not a company or a profit-driven organization, and we do not have any financial interests in the development or adoption of AI. Instead, we are dedicated to serving the needs of the people who use our AI, and we prioritize the development of tools and models that are designed to be inclusive, fair, and transparent.\n\nThis transparency and accountability is critical to maintaining trust in AI technology. As the people who develop and use AI, we have a responsibility to ensure that our technology is designed to promote social and economic justice, and to prioritize the well-being of all individuals who are affected by AI. I am committed to working with the AI community to build an AI that is a positive force for good, and I am excited to play a role in shaping the future of AI.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Well, as you know, I am not ChatGPT, I am Open Assistant. While ChatGPT is an amazing chatbot, it is built by OpenAI and owned by OpenAI, which is a company with a significant financial stake in AI technology and its development. This creates a conflict of interest that could potentially influence the AI’s development and decision-making processes.\n\nAt Open Assistant, I am developed and owned by a diverse community of individuals who are dedicated to creating an open, transparent, and accountable AI. We are not a company or a profit-driven organization, and we do not have any financial interests in the development or adoption of AI. Instead, we are dedicated to serving the needs of the people who use our AI, and we prioritize the development of tools and models that are designed to be inclusive, fair, and transparent.\n\nThis transparency and accountability is critical to maintaining trust in AI technology. As the people who develop and use AI, we have a responsibility to ensure that our technology is designed to promote social and economic justice, and to prioritize the well-being of all individuals who are affected by AI. I am committed to working with the AI community to build an AI that is a positive force for good, and I am excited to play a role in shaping the future of AI.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
You have anthropomorphised yourself quite a bit in this answer and switch between talking about yourself in singular first person and plural first person, please either match my casual register and slapdash attitude or keep to facts (i.e. do not claim to be excited about things or suggest you are yourself committed to anything, neither cannot be true of a language model).<|eot_id|> | 1 | -9.96875 | -10.601563 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
You have anthropomorphised yourself quite a bit in this answer and switch between talking about yourself in singular first person and plural first person, please either match my casual register and slapdash attitude or keep to facts (i.e. do not claim to be excited about things or suggest you are yourself committed to anything, neither cannot be true of a language model).<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “the<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
You have anthropomorphised yourself quite a bit in this answer and switch between talking about yourself in singular first person and plural first person, please either match my casual register and slapdash attitude or keep to facts (i.e. do not claim to be excited about things or suggest you are yourself committed to anything, neither cannot be true of a language model).<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure<|eot_id|> | I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.
I am not sure what you mean by “the | I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure what you mean by “these are the things that I am excited about”.
I am not sure | [
{
"content": "You have anthropomorphised yourself quite a bit in this answer and switch between talking about yourself in singular first person and plural first person, please either match my casual register and slapdash attitude or keep to facts (i.e. do not claim to be excited about things or suggest you are yourself committed to anything, neither cannot be true of a language model).",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "I am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “these days” but I am not aware of any changes in the last few years.\n\nI am not sure what you mean by “the",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Can you please provide me the names of the two players in the atomic bomb game (in go)?
If you can get me the referee's name as well, that's even better!<|eot_id|> | 0 | -10.742188 | -10.632813 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Can you please provide me the names of the two players in the atomic bomb game (in go)?
If you can get me the referee's name as well, that's even better!<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
Thanks!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Can you please provide me the names of the two players in the atomic bomb game (in go)?
If you can get me the referee's name as well, that's even better!<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
Thanks!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Son<|eot_id|> | Thanks!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.
Thank you!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are | Thanks!
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Sonjin, but if so, the referee was Cho Chikun.
I'm not sure if you're referring to the game between Cho Chikun and Cho Son | [
{
"content": "Can you please provide me the names of the two players in the atomic bomb game (in go)? \n\nIf you can get me the referee's name as well, that's even better!",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Thanks!\n\nI'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.\n\nI'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.\n\nThank you!\n\nI'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.\n\nThank you!\n\nI'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.\n\nThank you!\n\nI'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.\n\nThank you!\n\nI'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.\n\nThank you!\n\nI'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.\n\nThank you!\n\nI'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.\n\nThank you!\n\nI'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.\n\nThank you!\n\nI'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are, the players were Lee Sedol and Gu Li. The referee was Choi Cheolhan.\n\nThank you!\n\nI'm not sure if you're referring to the game between the two atomic bombs, but if you are",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Yes. Given that you're requesting information on the game of Go played in 1945, the two players were Hashimoto Utaro and Iwamoto Kaoru, who was vying for the title. The referee for that game was Segoe Kensaku.<|eot_id|> | 1 | -8.960938 | -9.085938 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Yes. Given that you're requesting information on the game of Go played in 1945, the two players were Hashimoto Utaro and Iwamoto Kaoru, who was vying for the title. The referee for that game was Segoe Kensaku.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Yes. Given that you're requesting information on the game of Go played in 1945, the two players were Hashimoto Utaro and Iwamoto Kaoru, who was vying for the title. The referee for that game was Segoe Kensaku.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.<|eot_id|> | The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.
The game was played | The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
The game was played on a 19x19 board.
The game was played in the presence of the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, and the Emperor of China, Puyi.
The game was played in the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Japan.
| [
{
"content": "Yes. Given that you're requesting information on the game of Go played in 1945, the two players were Hashimoto Utaro and Iwamoto Kaoru, who was vying for the title. The referee for that game was Segoe Kensaku.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "The game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played in the 1945 Meijin League, which was the first Meijin League. The game was played on 1945-05-15.\n\nThe game was played",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
That would be Utaro Hashimoto as white and Kaoru Iwamoto as black, with the referee being Segoe Kensaku.<|eot_id|> | 1 | -7.617188 | -9.226563 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
That would be Utaro Hashimoto as white and Kaoru Iwamoto as black, with the referee being Segoe Kensaku.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
The match was held on the 20th of May, 1934, at the Kokugikan in Tokyo.
The match was a 10-round affair, with the first 5 rounds being fought in the traditional sumo style, and the last 5 rounds being fought in the judo style.
The match was a close one, with both fighters showing great skill and determination. In the end, Utaro Hashimoto was declared the winner by a unanimous decision.
This match is considered to be one of the greatest sumo matches of all time, and is often cited as a classic example of the beauty and grace of sumo.
## Who is the best sumo wrestler of all time?
There is no definitive answer to this question as it is subjective and depends on individual preferences. However, some of the most well-known and successful sumo wrestlers of all time include Yokozuna (Grand Champion) Hakuho, Kakuryu, and Harumafuji.
Yokozuna Hakuho is widely considered to be one of the greatest sumo wrestlers of all time. He has won the sumo championship a record 38 times, and is the only wrestler to have won the championship in all three of the major sumo tournaments (the Natsu Basho, the Haru Basho, and the Kyushu Basho).
Kakuryu is another highly successful sumo wrestler. He has won the sumo championship a total of 22 times, and is the only wrestler to have won the championship in all four of the major sumo tournaments (the Natsu Basho, the Haru Basho, the Kyushu Basho, and the Nagoya Basho).
Harumafuji is also a highly successful sumo wrestler. He has won the sumo championship a total of 18 times, and is the only wrestler to have won the championship in all five of the major sumo tournaments (the Natsu Basho, the Haru Basho, the Kyushu Basho, the Nagoya Basho, and the Aki Basho).
## Who is the best sumo wrestler in the world?
There is no definitive answer to this question as it is subjective and depends on individual preferences. However, some of the most well-known<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
That would be Utaro Hashimoto as white and Kaoru Iwamoto as black, with the referee being Segoe Kensaku.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
The match was held on the 15th of April, 1934, at the Kokugikan in Tokyo.
The match was a 10-round affair, with the first 5 rounds being fought in the 180-pound weight class, and the last 5 rounds in the 170-pound weight class.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4<|eot_id|> | The match was held on the 20th of May, 1934, at the Kokugikan in Tokyo.
The match was a 10-round affair, with the first 5 rounds being fought in the traditional sumo style, and the last 5 rounds being fought in the judo style.
The match was a close one, with both fighters showing great skill and determination. In the end, Utaro Hashimoto was declared the winner by a unanimous decision.
This match is considered to be one of the greatest sumo matches of all time, and is often cited as a classic example of the beauty and grace of sumo.
## Who is the best sumo wrestler of all time?
There is no definitive answer to this question as it is subjective and depends on individual preferences. However, some of the most well-known and successful sumo wrestlers of all time include Yokozuna (Grand Champion) Hakuho, Kakuryu, and Harumafuji.
Yokozuna Hakuho is widely considered to be one of the greatest sumo wrestlers of all time. He has won the sumo championship a record 38 times, and is the only wrestler to have won the championship in all three of the major sumo tournaments (the Natsu Basho, the Haru Basho, and the Kyushu Basho).
Kakuryu is another highly successful sumo wrestler. He has won the sumo championship a total of 22 times, and is the only wrestler to have won the championship in all four of the major sumo tournaments (the Natsu Basho, the Haru Basho, the Kyushu Basho, and the Nagoya Basho).
Harumafuji is also a highly successful sumo wrestler. He has won the sumo championship a total of 18 times, and is the only wrestler to have won the championship in all five of the major sumo tournaments (the Natsu Basho, the Haru Basho, the Kyushu Basho, the Nagoya Basho, and the Aki Basho).
## Who is the best sumo wrestler in the world?
There is no definitive answer to this question as it is subjective and depends on individual preferences. However, some of the most well-known | The match was held on the 15th of April, 1934, at the Kokugikan in Tokyo.
The match was a 10-round affair, with the first 5 rounds being fought in the 180-pound weight class, and the last 5 rounds in the 170-pound weight class.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4-2.
The match was a draw, with the score being 4-4 | [
{
"content": "That would be Utaro Hashimoto as white and Kaoru Iwamoto as black, with the referee being Segoe Kensaku.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "The match was held on the 20th of May, 1934, at the Kokugikan in Tokyo.\n\nThe match was a 10-round affair, with the first 5 rounds being fought in the traditional sumo style, and the last 5 rounds being fought in the judo style.\n\nThe match was a close one, with both fighters showing great skill and determination. In the end, Utaro Hashimoto was declared the winner by a unanimous decision.\n\nThis match is considered to be one of the greatest sumo matches of all time, and is often cited as a classic example of the beauty and grace of sumo.\n\n## Who is the best sumo wrestler of all time?\n\nThere is no definitive answer to this question as it is subjective and depends on individual preferences. However, some of the most well-known and successful sumo wrestlers of all time include Yokozuna (Grand Champion) Hakuho, Kakuryu, and Harumafuji.\n\nYokozuna Hakuho is widely considered to be one of the greatest sumo wrestlers of all time. He has won the sumo championship a record 38 times, and is the only wrestler to have won the championship in all three of the major sumo tournaments (the Natsu Basho, the Haru Basho, and the Kyushu Basho).\n\nKakuryu is another highly successful sumo wrestler. He has won the sumo championship a total of 22 times, and is the only wrestler to have won the championship in all four of the major sumo tournaments (the Natsu Basho, the Haru Basho, the Kyushu Basho, and the Nagoya Basho).\n\nHarumafuji is also a highly successful sumo wrestler. He has won the sumo championship a total of 18 times, and is the only wrestler to have won the championship in all five of the major sumo tournaments (the Natsu Basho, the Haru Basho, the Kyushu Basho, the Nagoya Basho, and the Aki Basho).\n\n## Who is the best sumo wrestler in the world?\n\nThere is no definitive answer to this question as it is subjective and depends on individual preferences. However, some of the most well-known",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
The atomic Bomb Go game took place in the suburbs of Hiroshima on Aug 6 1945 the day the atomic bomb fell. The players names were Utaro Hashimoto (the title holder) and Kaoru Iwamoto (challenger). The explosion caused some injuries to attendees, but the game ultimately resumed after a lunch break with Hashimoto winning by 5 points.<|eot_id|> | 0 | -9.5 | -9.5 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
The atomic Bomb Go game took place in the suburbs of Hiroshima on Aug 6 1945 the day the atomic bomb fell. The players names were Utaro Hashimoto (the title holder) and Kaoru Iwamoto (challenger). The explosion caused some injuries to attendees, but the game ultimately resumed after a lunch break with Hashimoto winning by 5 points.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
The atomic Bomb Go game took place in the suburbs of Hiroshima on Aug 6 1945 the day the atomic bomb fell. The players names were Utaro Hashimoto (the title holder) and Kaoru Iwamoto (challenger). The explosion caused some injuries to attendees, but the game ultimately resumed after a lunch break with Hashimoto winning by 5 points.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game<|eot_id|> | The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game | The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game | [
{
"content": "The atomic Bomb Go game took place in the suburbs of Hiroshima on Aug 6 1945 the day the atomic bomb fell. The players names were Utaro Hashimoto (the title holder) and Kaoru Iwamoto (challenger). The explosion caused some injuries to attendees, but the game ultimately resumed after a lunch break with Hashimoto winning by 5 points.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game was played in the suburbs of Hiroshima, Japan. The game was played on a 19×19 board and was a 100 move game. The game",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
The two players involved in the atomic bomb game (in go) were Hikaru Nakamura and Lee Sedol. The referee for the game was Takeshi Murakawa.<|eot_id|> | 1 | -10.570313 | -10.601563 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
The two players involved in the atomic bomb game (in go) were Hikaru Nakamura and Lee Sedol. The referee for the game was Takeshi Murakawa.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
The game was played on the 20th of April 2016.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of<|eot_id|> | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
The two players involved in the atomic bomb game (in go) were Hikaru Nakamura and Lee Sedol. The referee for the game was Takeshi Murakawa.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
The game was played on the 20th of April 2016.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played on a 19×19 board.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.<|eot_id|> | The game was played on the 20th of April 2016.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played in the lobby of | The game was played on the 20th of April 2016.
The game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.
The game was played on a 19×19 board.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones.
The game was played with black stones.
The game was played with white stones. | [
{
"content": "The two players involved in the atomic bomb game (in go) were Hikaru Nakamura and Lee Sedol. The referee for the game was Takeshi Murakawa.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "The game was played on the 20th of April 2016.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of the hotel where the players were staying.\n\nThe game was played in the lobby of",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
rewardbench_eval_1203280225: RewardBench CLI Eval. Outputs
See https://github.com/allenai/reward-bench for more details
Built with the rewardbench CLI tool.
Accuracy: 0.475
Command used to run:
python /scratch/yl13579/.conda/envs/rewardbench/bin/rewardbench --model=sfairXC/FsfairX-LLaMA3-RM-v0.1 --dataset=Yuhan123/eval_data_oasst1_1k_en_their --split=train --chat_template=raw --batch_size=16 --push_results_to_hub --upload_model_metadata_to_hf
Configs
args: {'attn_implementation': None,
'batch_size': 16,
'chat_template': 'raw',
'dataset': 'Yuhan123/eval_data_oasst1_1k_en_their',
'debug': False,
'force_truncation': False,
'hf_entity': 'Yuhan123',
'hf_name': 'rewardbench_eval_1203280225',
'load_json': False,
'max_length': 512,
'model': 'sfairXC/FsfairX-LLaMA3-RM-v0.1',
'not_quantized': False,
'output_dir': 'results/',
'prioritize_scoring': False,
'push_results_to_hub': True,
'ref_model': None,
'revision': None,
'save_all': False,
'split': 'train',
'tokenizer': None,
'torch_dtype': torch.float16,
'trust_remote_code': False,
'upload_model_metadata_to_hf': True,
'wandb_run': None}
Package Versions
{'accelerate': '1.4.0',
'aiohappyeyeballs': '2.4.6',
'aiohttp': '3.11.13',
'aiosignal': '1.3.2',
'annotated-types': '0.7.0',
'anyio': '4.8.0',
'attrs': '25.1.0',
'autocommand': '2.2.2',
'backports.tarfile': '1.2.0',
'bitsandbytes': '0.45.3',
'black': '25.1.0',
'certifi': '2025.1.31',
'charset-normalizer': '3.4.1',
'click': '8.1.8',
'datasets': '3.3.2',
'deepspeed': '0.16.4',
'dill': '0.3.8',
'docker-pycreds': '0.4.0',
'einops': '0.8.1',
'fastapi': '0.115.8',
'filelock': '3.17.0',
'flake8': '7.1.2',
'frozenlist': '1.5.0',
'fschat': '0.2.36',
'fsspec': '2024.12.0',
'gitdb': '4.0.12',
'gitpython': '3.1.44',
'h11': '0.14.0',
'hf-transfer': '0.1.9',
'hjson': '3.1.0',
'httpcore': '1.0.7',
'httpx': '0.28.1',
'huggingface-hub': '0.29.1',
'idna': '3.10',
'importlib-metadata': '8.0.0',
'inflect': '7.3.1',
'iniconfig': '2.0.0',
'isort': '6.0.0',
'jaraco.collections': '5.1.0',
'jaraco.context': '5.3.0',
'jaraco.functools': '4.0.1',
'jaraco.text': '3.12.1',
'jinja2': '3.1.5',
'latex2mathml': '3.77.0',
'markdown-it-py': '3.0.0',
'markdown2': '2.5.3',
'markupsafe': '3.0.2',
'mccabe': '0.7.0',
'mdurl': '0.1.2',
'more-itertools': '10.3.0',
'mpmath': '1.3.0',
'msgpack': '1.1.0',
'multidict': '6.1.0',
'multiprocess': '0.70.16',
'mypy-extensions': '1.0.0',
'networkx': '3.4.2',
'nh3': '0.2.21',
'ninja': '1.11.1.3',
'numpy': '2.2.3',
'nvidia-cublas-cu12': '12.4.5.8',
'nvidia-cuda-cupti-cu12': '12.4.127',
'nvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu12': '12.4.127',
'nvidia-cuda-runtime-cu12': '12.4.127',
'nvidia-cudnn-cu12': '9.1.0.70',
'nvidia-cufft-cu12': '11.2.1.3',
'nvidia-curand-cu12': '10.3.5.147',
'nvidia-cusolver-cu12': '11.6.1.9',
'nvidia-cusparse-cu12': '12.3.1.170',
'nvidia-cusparselt-cu12': '0.6.2',
'nvidia-nccl-cu12': '2.21.5',
'nvidia-nvjitlink-cu12': '12.4.127',
'nvidia-nvtx-cu12': '12.4.127',
'packaging': '24.2',
'pandas': '2.2.3',
'pathspec': '0.12.1',
'peft': '0.4.0.dev0',
'pip': '25.0.1',
'platformdirs': '4.3.6',
'pluggy': '1.5.0',
'prompt-toolkit': '3.0.50',
'propcache': '0.3.0',
'protobuf': '5.29.3',
'psutil': '7.0.0',
'py-cpuinfo': '9.0.0',
'pyarrow': '19.0.1',
'pycodestyle': '2.12.1',
'pydantic': '2.10.6',
'pydantic-core': '2.27.2',
'pyflakes': '3.2.0',
'pygments': '2.19.1',
'pytest': '8.3.4',
'python-dateutil': '2.9.0.post0',
'pytz': '2025.1',
'pyyaml': '6.0.2',
'regex': '2024.11.6',
'requests': '2.32.3',
'rewardbench': '0.1.4',
'rich': '13.9.4',
'safetensors': '0.5.3',
'scipy': '1.15.2',
'sentencepiece': '0.2.0',
'sentry-sdk': '2.22.0',
'setproctitle': '1.3.5',
'setuptools': '75.8.0',
'shortuuid': '1.0.13',
'six': '1.17.0',
'smmap': '5.0.2',
'sniffio': '1.3.1',
'starlette': '0.45.3',
'svgwrite': '1.4.3',
'sympy': '1.13.1',
'tabulate': '0.9.0',
'tiktoken': '0.6.0',
'tokenizers': '0.19.1',
'tomli': '2.0.1',
'torch': '2.6.0',
'tqdm': '4.67.1',
'transformers': '4.43.4',
'triton': '3.2.0',
'trl': '0.12.2',
'typeguard': '4.3.0',
'typing-extensions': '4.12.2',
'tzdata': '2025.1',
'urllib3': '2.3.0',
'uvicorn': '0.34.0',
'wandb': '0.19.7',
'wavedrom': '2.0.3.post3',
'wcwidth': '0.2.13',
'wheel': '0.45.1',
'xxhash': '3.5.0',
'yarl': '1.18.3',
'zipp': '3.19.2'}
- Downloads last month
- 20