<h1 dir="auto">Bug report</h1>
<p dir="auto"><strong>What is the current behavior?</strong><br>
Im using <a href="https://npmjs.com/package/wallpaper" rel="nofollow">Wallpaper</a><br>
and I Get a node: urls error</p>
<div class="snippet-clipboard-content notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content=" App •  ERROR  •  Renderer  in node:util

UnhandledSchemeError: Reading from &quot;node:util&quot; is not handled by plugins (Unhandled scheme)  .
  Webpack supports &quot;data:&quot; and &quot;file:&quot; URIs by default.
  You may need an additional plugin to handle &quot;node:&quot; URIs."><pre class="notranslate"><code class="notranslate"> App •  ERROR  •  Renderer  in node:util

UnhandledSchemeError: Reading from "node:util" is not handled by plugins (Unhandled scheme)  .
  Webpack supports "data:" and "file:" URIs by default.
  You may need an additional plugin to handle "node:" URIs.
</code></pre></div>
<p dir="auto">This might be a duplicate, but i dont understand the other issues because they were'nt providing a clear solution<br>
<strong>If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce.</strong></p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>What is the expected behavior?</strong></p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Other relevant information:</strong><br>
webpack version:  5<br>
Node.js version: 16.x.x<br>
Operating System: MacOS<br>
Additional tools: Quasar, VueJs</p>
<h2 dir="auto">Feature request</h2>





<p dir="auto"><strong>What is the expected behavior?</strong><br>
Ability to force bundling of a module</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>What is motivation or use case for adding/changing the behavior?</strong><br>
It is impossible to dynamically import a module using import(moduleName) with moduleName being a variable</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>How should this be implemented in your opinion?</strong><br>
In settings, there should be an array of bundled modules, the modules within it will be bundled even if they're not required in the project itself</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Are you willing to work on this yourself?</strong><br>
no</p>