<ul dir="auto">
<li>VSCode Version: 1.0</li>
<li>OS Version: Windows</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">In LICENSE file it says that VS Code is licensed under MIT. However, when installing it, you have to agree to a completely different license, which says that you can't not only "reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble the software" but also "share, publish, or lend the software". In my opinion it quite contradicts the MIT license:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation<br>
files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy,<br>
modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software<br>
is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:</p>
<p dir="auto">The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.</p>
<p dir="auto">THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED <em>AS IS</em>, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES<br>
OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS<br>
BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT<br>
OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Should it be like that or is it a mistake?</p>
<p dir="auto"><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6719472/14562761/3dcc5700-0327-11e6-978b-ac3223631d8b.png"><img src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6719472/14562761/3dcc5700-0327-11e6-978b-ac3223631d8b.png" alt="installation screenshot" style="max-width: 100%;"></a></p>
<p dir="auto">Today we have an interface that describes the contract of telemetry (ITelemetryService) which is OK. The bad thing is that there many implementations of that interface (AbstractTS, MainTS, ElectronTS, AbstractRemoteTS, WorkerTS, ExtHostTS, NullTS, MockTS, TestTS) which have led to leakage and duplication of events. I believe this problem should be solved with less code and abstraction</p>