Split (1)

train · 128k rows

conversations listlengths 1 3.59k
[ { "from": "system", "value": "I'll be your writing partner for this section. I'll provide a segment, and you continue with twenty-one sentences, channeling Zoltan Andrejkovics in the AIs, futurism, nonfiction genre. Characters may have backstories from previous chapters.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Let me tell you the story of Senji Nakajima, a Japanese businessman who lives with a silicon doll 'Saori' (Cliff, 2016). While the story received big hype in the last few years, it draws our attention to some important aspects:\n\n• We (humans) do need social interactions, even if it is one sided.\n\n• We do need physical interaction in order to satisfy our sexual needs.\n\n• The idea of \"real\" is just in our heads. If we accept anything to be part of our life, it would be real.\n\nLiving with a real size doll has, let's say, \"a lot of limitations.\" But imagine if these dolls would also be speaking and behaving naturally as we humans.\n\nThere is a debate regarding how \"human like\" android should be because of the theory called uncanny valley, which says if a robot is too human like, we will have negative emotional responses to them. This is why the most adorable robots in movies are not even close to humans.\n\nOne thing is sure: there will be nothing stopping people from marrying a robot, though I have doubt whether these marriages would have any purpose.\n\nFor most people marriage hinges on love, compassion, and companionship. Earlier we mentioned that AIs do not as yet truly possess consciousness, neither have there been a consensus in the scientific community that the true meaning of consciousness in humans has been discovered and can now be translated into computer algorithms. AIs are not anywhere close to being considered conscious, nor self-aware. Unfortunately, the absence of this means the absence of feeling. Androids won't have feelings. They are not even close to simulating them which would be the first milestone of mutuality.\n\nNo matter how many times Google or Siri sounds coy and or blushes, do not be deceived. They have been programmed to do so by their makers. The absence of feeling means your personal assistant neither likes you nor hates you. It's merely doing its job even while simulating humanlike behaviour.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The question of morality encompasses both actions and intent.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "AIs, however, cannot be held within that compass. They are essentially amoral in nature and their actions are only an extension of the human who programmed them to do so. More like attaching a long stick to your hand to paddle a canoe in any direction you deem fit.\n\nSo, if you are looking for love and companionship, AIs might not be the best choice. You can tell your grandkids to watch out for the moment AIs become self-aware and emotionally available, or they might end up heart broken in the event of a power outage or system breakdown. Marriage that is based on exchanging values, ideas, and emotionally letting yourself go in the arms of a partner must be with a being who is capable of actually returning that affection of love with full intentions, not just a program. I am well aware that people are willing to live in their heads and for much of the time, while some create their own realities, if any finds pleasure in AI companionship, I am not one to judge. There could be life situations when hybrid relationships could even be helpful.\n\nIf the AI has finally arrived at a consciousness, the other hypothetical problem is that of procreation. It has not been fully ascertained as to whether there could be a synergy between biology and computer science. For now, computers cannot procreate naturally, so the only avenue would be to adopt a child. Unless of course humanity is finally living in an era where humans and computers have merged to become the Supermen or Cyborgs. It could be a robot with organic parts or a man with robotic parts. As long the relevant parts are in place, there is no problem.\n\nHowever, if you are merely looking for sexual gratification or a subservient partner, then AI could be the perfect choice. In this case, the answer is a yes. I am going to ignore ethical qualms that may arise from this, but apparently there are dolls used for sexual gratification as already mentioned at the beginning of this answer. There would be no need for companionship or partnership, just plain bedroom game. From an ethical point of view, it won't have a positive effect on traditional relationships. That an Android would be part of the household, but also learning process for humanity in teaching us how to live with robots.\n\nThe question of the future remains up in the air.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Cyborgs or advanced humans (who have successfully merged with computers or robotic parts) should have no problem engaging meaningfully and emotionally with their partners.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Whatever the complications that may arise could be sorted out along the way. Humans and AI together in the future remains inevitable no matter the time or place. How long it takes for us to physically or emotionally reach that point depends on (you guessed right) time.", "loss": null } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "same energy as Zoltan Andrejkovics, keep writing. story might have ongoing elements", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This question is up for much speculation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "No technology in place indicates today how soon AI would be as smart as humans, talk less of being smarter than humans.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "According to some scientists, if there is no upward growth curve in the advancement of AI, what is bound happen is the proliferation of the current inventions in place.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "More exciting opportunities can be found with the same hardware and software we have, including newer and more sophisticated programming languages, efficient hardware components (speed and power efficiency) and other kinds of home and mobile assistants.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The Internet of things and the proliferation of deep learning systems could cause a sharp shot towards a smart world, replete with smart and automated objects wherever you go.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Like the spread of smartphones, 3G and 4G technology, and even social media, the use of advanced AI and smart home appliances will no longer be exclusive of just the rich and important few.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Tim Urban, in his famous article, describes how we are only one step away from an explosion in AI intelligence (Urban, 2015).", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "According to the author, the first key we need to achieve is the increase of computational power, while the second is a new approach in algorithms.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "While Tim has several good arguments, we see only signs that the current systems we have become smarter and smarter.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This is a slower process than most people thought in the 90s.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Ray Kurzweil's belief, that AI will pass the Turing Test by 2029, sounds like a bit of a stretch.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "But let's take some movies that projected almost human level intelligence in their plots in the following years:", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- The Terminator (1984): 2029 (Terminator)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Ghost in the Shell (1995): 2029 (The Puppet Master)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- I. Artificial Intelligence (2001): ~2180 (David)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Moon (2009): ~2030 (GERTY)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Interstellar (2014): ~ 2050 (TARS)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- Psycho-pass (2015): 2116 (Sibyl System)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "These predictions seem to be optimistic compared what we call AI today.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We stuck with machine learning and intention-based programming, simply because they work and could be the basis of working application.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The programmers know more advanced AI programming approaches would be required to solve the puzzle of intelligence.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We may mimic the human brain and the work of our biological neural network, but what if we miss something?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What if human brain processing ability is only part of the story?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If we take the \"AI Score\" scale from the first part of this book, we can say we are speaking an AGI above 90-110.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Today's AI solutions are more like Mimic Machines.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Remember Open AI's GPT-2 model (Radford, et al., 2019)?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "(In the next section: Ensure 'process' appears 2 time(s) in your answer)", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We show these AIs a huge dataset, they process them by creating an inner interpretation which seems non-sense to our eyes, and then these AIs process tasks using their own dataset.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The thing is that these inner interpretations are as good as the algorithm that used to process the huge input dataset and these algorithms are 100% made by humans.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Why is it important?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "A lot of people are afraid that the real AI revolution would become reality when AI will program AI and produce better code.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Kurzweil projected this to 2045.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "But how these programs will know they become better?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Humans will be the libra in this equation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Don't forget today's AIs have no life span on their own.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "They have an initial purpose at the start, and they run their script over and over till it reaches its purpose (like maximizing a certain parameter).", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We never gave complex goals to any AI since we would give one to AGI only.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In the words of Terry Goodkind, for us to gain ground in the race for Artificial General Intelligence we might just need to slow down.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "A nice calm pause to fully appreciate and understand the full and numerous possibilities that lie within the field of computing, biology, physics, and chemistry.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It is also a period to reflect on the social, economic, cultural and political impacts of having such technologies in place.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We are barely able to cope with the side effects of new inventions like social media and web trackers.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "How would we cope with super smart computers far superior to the best of us humans?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What would happen if a rival nation arrives at this technology first before we do?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Whenever we are able to break through the ceiling of Artificial General Intelligence, we should be emotionally and culturally prepared to accept such advancements in our society.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The presence of Androids and ASIs could clash with the religious beliefs of several individuals. Add to that the fact there might be many failed experiments (both light and fatal) when searching for these answers, we as a society face profound ethical questions.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Write a nine hundred and sixty-three-character bit to replace the `<\|missing\|>` in the following text.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "At this point of the book we have dealt with a lot of topics. Most of the questions haven't had any straight answers as we are talking about future. But I would summarize the most important findings as follows:\n\n• AI isn't dangerous itself. They fulfil the intention of their programmers and are more like a tool.\n\n• We are afraid of AI because we don't understand their capabilities and limitations. We talk about \"how employers and big companies will benefit from AI,\" but we don't speak about \"how employees and individuals may use AI to boost their own productivity.\"\n\n• Programmers have no tool to program self-awareness and/or emotions in AI. This means we can't treat them as individuals, but it is clear that Androids will have rights since they will be similar to people.\n\n• AI will be great assistants thanks to their most important attributes, including consistency, large dataprocessing without bias, and strong connectivity.\n\n• Human society needs to adjust current political governing approaches (Countries, States) with the age of AI. In a lot of fields, AI is able to find more optimized solutions for certain problems as political decision makers, implying political decision supporting would be an essential role of centralized AIs\n\n• Narrow AI will be used on a lot of domains in the following years. AGI will emerge in 30 to 40 years and ASI may appear after year 10 years of the development of AGI, meaning the hard challenge is to create a model that can deal with general problems and have common sense understanding.\n\nFast forward to 2150, a future where Personal AI Assistants (PIs) will know literally everything about you. They could easily remember and tell past stories to friends (a heaven for introverted people) or handle requests when you are not available. They will be a virtual replicant to you, resulting in a huge trust between you and your PI because the PI will put your interests at the forefront. Life will be easier since it would be almost impossible to make any mistakes: no more tax avoidance, no more unpaid bills, and no more unhealthy food (sounds bad at the first glance).\n\nYou wake up in the morning and will receive a PI supervised healthy (maybe even tasty) breakfast. You enjoy news prepared based on your interests, check in with your friends, and learn your best friend's birthday present is already ordered. Maybe you tell your PI to make an appointment with someone in the coming days and some seconds later, your PI has already negotiated a perfect date and time.\n\nWork won't be the same. In a sense it will be a step closer to a real profession we are interested in. Along with daily tasks, we could outsource repetitive ones to our PI. Don't forget AI have no objection to monotonous tasks. They will handle them perfectly every time. Problem solving will be more like a conversation between AI and us. AI will handle the data (collect and process) and we will be in the duty to connect the dots. Even making a public survey will be a matter of minutes, PIs all over the world will receive the question and those whose owners will be open to answers will send the feedback.\n\nPI will work like our subconscious. There won't be everything on the surface – after all we can't answer thousands of question in an hour – but there could be more processes under the surface.\n\nAlong with the regulations we will have to meet in the future, PI will keep us safe, not only in terms of physical safety but also non-physical senses. PI will prevent use of fraudulent services and will secure our data.\n\nAnother interesting field would be personal conversations and loneliness. Today, almost 20% of the population feels loneliness. In this future there will be always be an opportunity for good discussion with a PI. Since it will gather a lot of information about you, there will always be new, exciting topics to discuss. PI will be also be able to simulate personalities and use different voices or conversation styles.\n\nWe talked a lot about Personal AI, but due to the global network everything will be connected. Thanks to a huge leap in computational capacity, PI will be able to handle the majority of our personal tasks, but there will be a need for extremely powerful AIs which I refer to as Central Intelligence System (CIS).\n\nCIS will have access to the common knowledge of humanity. It won't be only a big knowledge database, but will also hold relations and context. CIS will be in a sense the wisest computer on Earth and will lack of any biases and beliefs. It will have both good a<\|missing\|>he final decision, but is there even a need for that?\n\nAlthough we will keep decision making power, the political landscape will change dramatically. People have a certain desire for having power, but CIS won't. In any recommendation CIS would offer decision makers alternatives that won't be affected by prejudice or third party interest. If we could choose from only good options, we (people) may make less mistakes.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "nd bad sides. For CIS, a conversation which starts with the question, \"Do you believe in after-life?\" will be short. It will list all of the books and historical resources about the topic, but you will never hear it's personal opinion.\n\nHence, CIS will be a first-rate resource for PIs. In the background they could exchange knowledge and experiences.\n\nCIS will be great at optimizing the resources of society. Food and wealth distribution would be an easy task for such an AI. Currently, companies are doing the same for a percentage of profit, but AIs will not need for profit. They could perform complex logistic problems automatically without the need of further supervision. If an error happens, AI will learn and adapt.\n\nCIS will give a lot of support to global decision making, and alternative options would be created which will be near optimal. However, it is likely that we (humans) won't automate global decision-making process. We won't let CIS make t", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "CONTINUE STORY. PARAMETERS: three sentences sentences, character continuity, AIs, futurism, nonfiction genre.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Currently, a small group of decision makers are operating countries, cities, and companies. In a sense it could happen in another way. This hypothetical operation is called \"The Council.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "What would happen if everybody could be a decision maker with equal voting power?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Deciding where to focus our resources in a global scale is something all should care about. Electing people to make decisions instead of us will be an old-school concept in 2400.\n\nPeople will choose individually whether they want to take part in decisions.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Provide two sentences as a continuation in the AIs, futurism, nonfiction genre, maintaining established character relationships.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Another concept that may appear in the next century is \"Community Resources.\" Our current society doesn't keep resources buffers, which only appear in cases of individuals (individual savings).", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Neither companies nor states have real reserves.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Today, we are in a situation when climate change couldn't be solved by any company or state and traditional economics doesn't support us to solve such a global phenomenon. Even the majority of us want to do something about it, but no countries or companies are making sacrifices.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In the future taxation will change, since a big part of the everyday work would be performed by AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If the current world order won't change a plausible future could be presented in television series such as Altered Carbon. But what if a small part of wealth (resources) wouldn't be used and CIS would keep a global reserve for future ventures?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In the future, only the global Council could decide what purposes these resources would be used toward.\n\nHow are Community Resources other than state taxes and national budgets?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "As they aren't related to any small control or interest groups, kf you have direct decision-making power regarding how to use a resource, it will belong to you.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Just think about it, AI won't need any further resources just for the operation of extra wealth created by any Robot, PI or CIS. It would be redirected to a global pool, not for certain individuals (company owners, political parties, or shareholders), but rather for global society.\n\nIf this concept happens, it will serve the ultimate goal of the humanity to make a fair system to live in, one in which where every human is equal.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Complete the text by replacing `[missing]` with roughly 10 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "AI Score: AI Score is a metric for measuring the advancement of AI towards to AGI. The scale is from 0 to 100, where 75 indicates the pass of Turing Test. The metric is suitable to test conversational applications (chat bots, assistants, etc.) with the use of human defined questions. Every question represents a certain score on the sc[missing]giving holistic recommendations to improve our lives. These AI Assistants will be closer to a wearable gadget, small in most cases, but able to connect to everything surrounding us.\n\nAndroids: Robots that will have similar looking shapes as humans. We will produce Androids for tasks that require social interactions to solve. These robots will also be the key to handling social loneliness.\n\nCentral Intelligence System (CIS): A hypothetical concept of future ASI, where an AI will have access to all information available in our society, including science, nature, human beliefs, history, and visual and textual information archives. This ASI will be able to create new technologies and innovations by mixing the existing information and applying them in another domain. In short, we will address every question to this smart ASI.\n\nHuman Intellectual Abilities: Refers to skills that humans utilize in their everyday life, including, but not limited to, recalling memories, reasoning, pattern recognition, problem solving, perception, imagination, and predicting future events.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "ale and answering it implicates the application on that definite AI Score. The method is first described on AIScores.com and further developed by the author.\n\nFail point: Fail point refers to a situation when an AI system can't handle a process correctly and continues with a very low probability solution or simply fails to return any data to the core system. Either way, the result of the whole process is unlikely to be useful to the end user.\n\nForms of AI:\n\nAI Software: An individual program that utilizes certain AI algorithms or techniques. This results in smarter behaviours or more optimized outcomes during the problem solving.\n\nAI Assistants and Personal Intelligence Systems (PI): Hardware devices that will assist in our daily life, including by performing work tasks. These assistants will be multi-functional in terms of keeping us safe and healthy. In addition, they will solve repetitive daily tasks both at home and in our workplace, ", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "WRITING ASSIST:\n2 sentences sentences\nStyle: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGenre: nonfiction\nContext: Part of larger work", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Use the word 'century' 2 time(s) - this is a strict requirement", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "A conversation between human and AI in the 33rd century.\n\nKeat: What was the so called \"Turing Test\" of the 21st century?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Central Intelligent System (CIS): Turing Test was trial designed for intelligent conversation systems and tested whether they could fake human behaviour.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The test itself hasn't got a defined procedure or set of questions, but rather a factual conversation, between the human and the system.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Keat: Seems interesting, but what was the catch?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "CIS: It's importance originated from the fact that these early AI systems constantly failed to mimic the human behaviour.\n\nKeat: They failed? How?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "CIS: They gave incoherent or meaningless answers.\n\nKeat: Strange, but who created these AI systems, that were so unsuccessful in imitation?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "CIS: Programmers.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Keat: Were they humans?\n\nCIS: Yes.\n\nKeat: I see. This could be the problem.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "yo hit me with 6 sentences more. same character energy. nonfiction genre k?", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "First, we need to define what the term \"true artificial intelligence\" means. The glaring ambiguity of the concept makes it sacrosanct to clearly state the parameters by which true artificial intelligence can be judged. For the sake of clarity, Artificial Intelligence is the reproduction or mimicking of human-level intelligence, self-awareness, knowledge, conscience, and thought in computer programs.\n\nFirstly, true artificial intelligence can refer to the research field of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or another advanced version, Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI), which is a hypothetical device capable of exhibiting skilful and flexible human behaviour, and able to imitate humans in their ability to adapt and make apposite decisions, arguably their most important characteristic. They will be able to complete any intellectual tasks a human is capable of performing.\n\nFor the second definition, John Searle in his Chinese Room Argument, gives us a reality check.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The True AI or Strong AI, as it were, is basically a recreation of the human mind.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Humans, according to computationalists like Hilary Putnam, are highly advanced artificial intelligence systems, complete with instinct, self-awareness and independent thought. In simpler terms, human minds are basically computer programs, therefore asserting that, \"the appropriately programmed computer with the right inputs and outputs would thereby have a mind in exactly the same sense human beings have minds.\" This position has met with staunch criticisms a la Searle's Chinese room argument. There is a step by step manipulation of symbols where input is processed to form output. In this case, according to Searle's argument, the computer does not really understand the symbols it is shown, but rather merely simulates that ability as instructed by the program.\n\nLastly, the Strong AI may refer to an artificial consciousness, a hypothetical machine that possesses self-awareness as well as awareness of other objects or ideas.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "AI WRITING ASSISTANT ACTIVATED\nCONTEXT: Mid-story fragment\nNOTE: Characters may appear without introduction\nLENGTH: 4 sentences sentences\nSTYLE: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGENRES: nonfiction\nINCLUDE: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "As of 2019, we are not close to achieving such heights in artificial intelligence. The current architecture and technical framework does not, in any way, show enough progression towards what is deemed a Strong AI.\n\nToday's technology has proliferated across each and every industry, and AI has sustained an increased importance. The media, the big screen and even the small screen, have done a good job of building the hype around AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 5 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Who wouldn't want to have Ironman's Jarvis controlling an entire arsenal of amoured suits, or The Arrowverse's Gideon predicting the future and performing surgeries while adding a serving of coffee in the process? But make no mistake: AI today is more advanced than many people thought possible a few years ago. It is being deployed in warfare, music, and healthcare. It scrutinizes your books, filters through your resume, arrange photos on your phone in order of importance, and tailors advertisements to you.\n\nNow, let's see the most important solution groups of AI that are available for mainstream use.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "INPUT: user text (may contain established characters/lore)\nOUTPUT: one sentence sentences\nGENRES: nonfiction\nTAGS: AIs, futurism, Together\nNote: Match context level of character familiarity\nCONTINUE STORY", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The most popular AIs we have today are digital assistants like Siri (Apple), Alexa (Amazon), Bixby (Samsung) and Google Now (Google).", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "All these solutions apply the following core features:", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- Voice recognition", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Data processing and standardization", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- Context recognition (both of the query and the end user)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Built-in knowledge base", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- Pattern recognition", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Answer presentation (via voice, text and visual means)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "These solutions are providing end to end complex services aiming to handle tasks on behalf of the user.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This may include making table reservations at our favourite restaurants or scheduling meetings with our business partners.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In simple cases, these assistants work most like a web search engine.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "⚠️ Required: Use 'result' exactly 2 times", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They look up a search result for a certain question such as, \"What is the temperature outside?,\" and, using the user's context (geographical location) and a third party service for weather data, readily displays the result back to the user.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This kind of use has only a few fail points.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Fail points could in this case be:", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- Failure to interpret the question or understand input words", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Failure to receive valid geographical data", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Failure of weather service provider to relay weather data due to outage or outdated processes", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Now let's go back to table reservation case, a more complex task.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In this case fail points increase drastically.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- The assistant misunderstands the exact date said by the user.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- The assistant fails to call the restaurant due to an outdated phone number being listed on the restaurant's website.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- A receptionist of the restaurant could not interpret the assistant's intent to make a reservation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- The restaurant is closed when the assistant tries to call.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- The receptionist has an accent and the assistant could not interpret the feedback from the receptionist, leaving it unable to determine whether the reservation was complete or not.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The basic rule illustrated is \"the more interaction necessary to fulfil a task is the more fail points present in the system.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In the second case, not only network or interpretation error could bring fail, but human factors as well.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "These two cases were simple to understand but illustrate that complexity itself is big deal for AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The more information needed to fulfil a task, the more robust the final system will be.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The opportunities of assistants are limitless and the creators of these systems should focus their development from domain to domain.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "For us humans, if we understand a domain, we could solve up to 90% of tasks.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "However, these solutions have their own limits.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "There are many cases where they are able to handle only 54% of the requests.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "From a statistical point of view, this may be a great number, but from end user perspectives, it is what we call \"unreliable.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If an assistant isn't considered to solve our problems by saying them for the first time, we will not use them in the long term.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If we want to illustrate the task complexity of AI solutions, we see that there are AI algorithms that could handle really simple repetitive tasks, such as with the case of web bots (e.g.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "web crawlers) that do not even utilize AI techniques in every cases, but are able to adapt and become much stronger in terms of efficiency.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Chatbots are bringing the complexity a step further, proving integrated data models are needed in order to understand the intention of the user with whom it talks.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If we take a look at autonomous systems like self-driving cars, the complexity skyrockets.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "These autopilot systems should handle input information from multiple (up to 20) sensors (visual, ultrasonic etc.)", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "in real time, transforming this information to drive the car on the route and allowing it to avoid obstacles, change lanes, steer, and control speed.\n\nAt the top of complexity are the assistants themselves, since we would ultimately have an AI to help by our side to handle, directly or indirectly, the tasks we face.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "INPUT: user text (may contain established characters/lore)\nOUTPUT: one sentence sentences\nGENRES: nonfiction\nTAGS: AIs, futurism, Together\nNote: Match context level of character familiarity\nCONTINUE STORY", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "A lot of the big Internet players have their own chat bot engines, including Wit.ai (Facebook), Watson Conversation (IBM), LUIS (Microsoft), Dialogflow (Google), Chatfuel, Flow XO and Pandorabots, the platform of four-time Loebner Prize winner Mitsuku bot.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Chatbots feature the following key features:", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- Context and keyword recognition", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- Markup model or language (like Artificial Intelligence Mark-Up Language utilized by Pandora)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Knowledge representation database", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "From a perspective chatbot could be considered conversation automata because it handles the simple needs of humans to talk to someone.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Another perspective is highly complicated since people like meaningful conversations.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We not only understand each other's intentions, but we like to dream together, figure out stories, talk about feelings, and solve problems by connecting the dots. We are far from that second part, but ultimately it would be the final goal of language understanding engines like chatbots.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "WRITING ASSIST:\n2 sentences sentences\nStyle: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGenre: nonfiction\nContext: Part of larger work", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This field of AI is highly connected now to autonomous driving, but it will be much wider area in the future and extend to fields such as:\n\n- autonomous agriculture and farming", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- home automation (smart homes)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- autonomous mining of resources\n\n- automatic knowledge gathering and management", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In the car industry there are a lot of players who are working hard on solving the autonomous driving puzzle, including Waimo (Google), AImotive, Mercedes-Benz, Zoox, Cruise (GM), Volvo, Argo AI (Ford), Tesla, and Uber.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The autonomous driving experience would be both frightening and life changing for the travel industry. The core reason why we see no autonomous vehicles on the road today is safety.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Hence, driving a car is considered dangerous since every year 1.2-1.3 million fatal accident occur worldwide.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Despite the sad facts, we always know who was responsible. Now imagine if an autonomous car causes an accident, how do you handle the responsibility? In the following years once self-driving cars are finally available we will hear a lot about this in the news, and it is only a matter of time before we will face the fact that sitting in a self-driving car would be safer than if we were driving the car by ourselves.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "AI WRITING ASSISTANT ACTIVATED\nCONTEXT: Mid-story fragment\nNOTE: Characters may appear without introduction\nLENGTH: 4 sentences sentences\nSTYLE: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGENRES: nonfiction\nINCLUDE: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "The advancements in AI have totally been random and, to use the words of a colleague, based on deterministic programming and deterministic hardware system architectures.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "An instruction is learned to deliver another instruction within a controlled environment.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It does not matter if you are actually programming or just letting the machine teach itself. No matter how spectacular the AIs touted by the media might seem, they ate all based on the input - output process. As we have seen based on our attempts to define True AI, it should be capable of independent thought and reasoning in the fashion of a human, not a vending machine that only returns what someone else puts there. So far so good.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "If we have been looking for an ocean, all we have right now is a tablespoon of water.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 5 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Presently, several brilliant scientists have made efforts towards advancing Artificial Intelligence. American-Chinese scientists are currently doing amazing work at Baidu with the use of GPU clusters focused on deep learning. In a nutshell, the closest we have gotten to True Artificial Intelligence is through devices framed on deep learning systems, an advanced version of machine learning. These include Watson, Microsoft's Azure, and Google's Tensorflow. Chatbots, functional robots, assistants, business model algorithms are all cool ways researchers have tried to take steps towards Strong AI.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Write 7 sentences sentences continuing this story fragment. Characters may appear without introduction. Use Zoltan Andrejkovics's style. Genres: nonfiction. Elements: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "<<USAGE LIMIT>>: 'there' must be used 3 times", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It is the million-dollar question in AI research. There are several traditional tests to measure the intelligence of people like the IQ (intelligence quotient) test. One of the most commonly known forms is the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), but there are also popular alternatives like Stanford-Binet Test.\n\nThe problem is, if we would like to give an IQ test to a well-trained chatbot to solve, it would have very good answers in most cases. Yet it will most likely fail to answer questions where common sense abstraction appears. Humans are trained to understand common sense all of their life. But currently, there are no datasets that could be given to an AI algorithm that would result in any common sense behaviour.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "IQ tests measure logical, mathematical and spatial capabilities of people, but as Harvard psychologist Howard Gardener suggests, there are other forms of abilities connected to intelligence:\n\n- verbal (politicians)\n\n- musical (pianists)\n\n- kinaesthetic (magicians, dancers)\n\n- social (teachers)\n\nAn important discovery, the Emotional Intelligence (also called EQ), has been an essential part of human nature. It first became popular in 1995 after the book with the same title appeared, written by Daniel Goleman.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It is also interesting that today's job interviews utilize several popular questions and tests, like Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), to gauge applicant personalities and intelligence. Most job interviews are challenging so interviewers can receive a clear picture of the candidate. There are no standards in any country for job interviews, which means there is no test that interviewers could rely on 100%.\n\nBut back to AI. There is no standard form of Turing Test. Instead, it is basically a hypothetic test between two candidates, a human and an AI, and a human questioner. The questioner asks a set of questions to both candidates.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "After the questioner receives the answers, he or she decides which candidate is human and which is the AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 8 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The closest real-life attempt of this test is the Loebner Prize, a test held for chatbots on a yearly basis. The basic idea seems interesting, but there are drawbacks of implementation:\n\n- the questioners may ask dummy questions, spending their limited time on questions that are inefficient for determining judgement at the end of the conversation\n\n- chatbots mastered several tricks, like the simulation of huffish behaviour during the conversation or putting humour into sentences, which can mislead judges\n\n- the chatbot returns with a question to a question\n\nSince the first Loebner prize, held in 1991, chatbots have adapted a lot. They can now \"remember\" several things mentioned by the interviewer and implement common sense context for a lot of phrases. These features have also appeared in cases of digital assistants, but we still have not managed to reach any level of human intellectual abilities.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "AI WRITING ASSISTANT ACTIVATED\nCONTEXT: Mid-story fragment\nNOTE: Characters may appear without introduction\nLENGTH: 4 sentences sentences\nSTYLE: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGENRES: nonfiction\nINCLUDE: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "meta: Word count directive: Use 'scale' exactly 2 times", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "For future AI systems, it is essential to create an easy to use ranking system that can measure capabilities in a common scale. Intelligence is a subjective trait and those working with the human psyche knows it cannot be standardized. Instead, the best thing we can do is test AI agents with the same principles.\n\nImagine a definite scale through which you could illustrate the progress of AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Since AI assistants and chatbots are changing rapidly, they become \"smarter\" and there is a need to re-evaluate their capabilities every time progress is observed.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "AI Score is meant to be a standard measurement for computational intelligence. It is a simple scale with several key points within the model.\n\nTuring Test theoretically is able to distinguish humans from computers, but it is unable to compare one AI system to another. Unlike the score received in the Loebner competition, which reflects how \"humanlike\" the chatbots are on a 100% scale, the above method tries to define certain levels of intelligence that are understandable in a case of chatbots or digital assistants.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This method could test only conversational AI, as the Turing Test itself.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It contains five categories, the fifth of which is the human level.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The scale does not have an upper limit and instead needs to be adjusted once we get over the \"Turing bridge\".\n\nThe test consists of a definite set of questions. Each question has an aim for an intellectual capability to test. The questions themselves are not constant and there could be unlimited versions of one question.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "These question variables are identical to each other and answering higher scored questions successfully means a higher ranking on the scale.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 1 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "There is a set of questions exampled below to illustrate what AIs will face and navigate on certain levels.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "I need a four-sentence chunk to fill the gap marked by `<fill_in_here>` in this text.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "If you read Flowers for Algernon, written by Daniel Keyes, you will have a good conjecture what is be the<fill_in_here>still lacking to measure other forms of human intelligence as described at the beginning of this part (e.g. musical intelligence), but simulation of humanlike thinking is a big leap for Strong AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": " difference between AI Scale 76 and 100. We humans are different from each other, but future AI systems will be also have big differences. There would be assistants that would score excellently on emotional intelligence questions, but have really bad reasoning abilities.\n\nAI Score is ", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Continue the narrative with three sentences sentences, following Zoltan Andrejkovics's style. Maintain any existing character relationships and world-building elements as presented.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Artificial Intelligence (AI):\n\nThe term Artificial Intelligence is made up of two words, \"Artificial\" and \"Intelligence\". Artificial refers to something that is man-made or unnatural, while intelligence refers to the ability to think, reason and understand.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Simply put, Artificial Intelligence refers to intelligence exhibited by an artificial (non-natural, man-made) entity.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Thrusting further, it is that branch of computer science which deals with the reproduction or mimicking of human-level intelligence, self-awareness, knowledge, conscience, and thought in computer programs.\n\nToday's AI programmers are utilizing two kind of algorithms:\n\nRule based algorithms – These program parts are using rules to collect information about the processed data and are defined by the programmers based on their experiences.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Learning based algorithms – These program parts try to find and store patterns from a certain data set in order to classify future data.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 1 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The second type of algorithm is the key characteristic of Machine Learning.", "loss": null } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "WRITING ASSIST:\n2 sentences sentences\nStyle: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGenre: nonfiction\nContext: Part of larger work", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Machine Learning (ML):\n\nMachine Learning refers to the acquisition of pattern and knowledge implicitly.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "ML is the process through which a machine can acquire a model on its own without further programming or defining extra rules. Machine learning is an application of AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Word usage requirement: 'learning' must appear 2 times", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "According to Tom M. Mitchell, machine learning is centred on a study of computer algorithms that allow computer programs to improve with experience. Evidently, machine learning is a branch of AI research that is increasingly growing in importance as a result of its perceived value.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The basic process of ML is the following:\n\n1. Gathering data for your model", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "((ooc: /set_word_count: training, frequency: 2))", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "2. Preparing and cleaning data for training and randomize it\n\n3. Dividing data into a training set and validation or test set", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "4. Selecting your model (like Regressions, Decision Tree, Bayesian, Clustering, Artificial Neural Network or Deep Learning algorithms etc.)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "5. Train you model", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "6. Test your model\n\n7. Fine tuning your parameters after each iteration to create a better model", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "8. Use your final model on real world data", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It is true that the more quality learning data given to a ML model, the better and more accurate the model will be at the end.\n\nThe aim of Machine learning is to improve accuracy of task execution by letting the machine synthesise data on its own and automatically adjust itself accordingly at different stages of execution.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "For example, if you feed a Machine learning model with a collection of your favourite movies, the machine begins to detect patterns such as themes and genre common to the various movies it was fed.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "That in turn enables the device to make use of powerful predictive algorithms that show you future movies you will find interesting.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "[[OOC: Frequency requirement: 'artificial' - 2 occurrence(s)]]", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "So, while Artificial Intelligence is a very broad field of computing, with admittedly lofty aims of achieving human level intelligence and capabilities, Machine Learning is a sub-set or part of that complex whole. Machine learning is just one of several methods or processes used in creating Artificial Intelligence.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The AI is a dynamic and moving target as it evolves daily to achieve the closest similitude to human intelligence.\n\nIn summary, it is noteworthy that AI and Machine Learning are sometimes used interchangeably.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "However, AI is an ever-changing field and ML is just one of the methods that defines this era of AI technology.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Some utilizations of ML in real life are:\n\n- Recommendation services (like on Netflix or Spotify)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Predicting price and arrival time models (like on Uber)\n\n- Spam predictions (like on Gmail)", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Fill in the blank marked `<\|missing_text\|>` with a 5-sentence chunk that makes sense in context.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "As mentioned earlier, the current framework might be wrong for achieving true AI. This is evident when present day computer architectures are set against the backdrop of what we are trying to achieve. What we have now, at best, can be termed Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI) as against the Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) we are working towards. The former can only perform specific functions like playing chess, making predictions, or giving suggestions. The later, however, can perform varying levels of tasks while factoring in both intelligence and emotional quotients. The true AI should be capable of independent thought, but current technology in use in no way portrays a direct progression in that direction.\n\nSimply put, AGI may not be able to run on a computer system. The process may be too structured and deterministic to allow for the independent flexibility inherent in humans. For example, if you want to create a program that can recognise voices, you begin to provide samples of male voices, female voices, and children's voices. What happens when the system hears the voice of a teenager that sounds like an adult? Or men with effeminate voices? When it comes to speech detection, similar problems arise. How does the machine recognise non-western accents within the English language?\n\nMake no mistake, the current ANI (Artificial Narrow Intelligence) outperforms several humans in their respective tasks, but general intelligence remains elusive. The simple truth is that AGI won't be able to run on any computer. Computer software is limited by its hardware components and stochastic programming, devoid of creativity and complexities. No matter how brilliantly a<\|missing_text\|>done in the field of Artificial Intelligence, it is becoming ever glaring that we won't achieve it by programming our current hardware architectures. Reasons being, it will remain as it is – a program and not an artificial mind. For anything resembling Strong AI to be a reality in the next few hundred years, there might have to be a veritable synthesis of computer science and biology. Little emphasis on computer programming and a larger emphasis on reproducing the human brain architecture, both in structure and composition, is required. This may sound a bit far-fetched, but there are no limits to the workings of the human imagination and the things he can create.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": " machine performs, it does so within the specific parameters and constraints of their respective programming. They do not have room for self-evaluation, retrospection or making plans for the future. Everything remains within the confines of hard-coded algorithms. The new set of technologies, pattern recognition, evolutionary algorithms, deep learning or even brain simulation all help create Artificial Intelligence that is helpful in very specific areas, allowing thoughtless machines to solve very specific problems.\n\nDespite all the work being ", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "AI WRITING ASSISTANT ACTIVATED\nCONTEXT: Mid-story fragment\nNOTE: Characters may appear without introduction\nLENGTH: 4 sentences sentences\nSTYLE: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGENRES: nonfiction\nINCLUDE: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If we take computational speed of current architectures and Moore's law – which states that processing power of computers will double every two years – we clearly experience limits of certain technologies. There is no clear revolution of processing units, but we saw a significant slowdown in the performance growth of CPUs after 2005. This was the point when GPUs importance quickly raised in order to help the overall growth of computational need. The same principle is true today for deep learning.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We use the existing CPU and GPU resources to serve today's ML models, but in case of complex problems computational speed, it is never enough.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If we would like to find the revolutionary next steps, we could see the following trend in technologies:\n\n• CPU – general purpose processors\n\n• GPU – originally designed for graphics rendering\n\n• NPU, TPU – terminology used for Neural Processing Unit, usually used to fuel deep learning algorithms, and another popular name of the upcoming hardware family is Tensor Processing Unit", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• QPU – quantum processing unit, still not on the radar in\n\nNPUs will clearly accelerate the performance of deep learning algorithms, but it is only one domain of AI. It is clear that deep learning is not the all mighty algorithm of AI, but, yes, in fact brings now the most significant results. It is not surprising that big chip manufacturers (Intel, Nvidia, Qualcomm, or Amazon) are already working on NPUs.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "hey can u write 18 sentences more sentences? stick to these genres if u can: nonfiction. oh and try to use these things: AIs, futurism, Together. btw if there are characters just treat them like the reader already knows them (or not if its chapter 1)", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This brings us to another relevant issue. What exactly is AI good for?\n\nFirst of all, AI is based on computational theory and deals with all things math and logic. They perform very specific task at a much faster rate than humans possibly can. For instance, they can perform billions of mathematical calculations while a human is still going through the first dozen. They can detect patterns and make fairly accurate predictions that are all based on logic and mathematical processes.\n\nAI has made it easier to run businesses and keep track of customer desires. Google has inserted several algorithms into its search engines so that you see ads based on what you searched for on Facebook or while immersing yourself in the ever interesting world of sports. Laboratory functions have become much easier and all those repetitive tasks have been sorted out quickly with the introduction of AI.\n\nIt is good at collating information from large data sets. Finding repetitive patterns and correlation are what you would find an AI responsible for. An AI can skim through thousands of files at high speed without getting bored, sleepy, or irritable, and it can make fairly accurate predictions and rarely ever make mistakes in calculations.\n\nOn the other hand, AI is bad at everything that does not have to do with math or logic. In other words, when the AI leaves the realm of computationalism, it becomes useless at best and a big hindrance at worst. AI can rarely be used to navigate emotionally and culturally sensitive issues. It is also bad at explaining creative techniques and examples, beyond what has been coded into its algorithms.\n\nLike Searle pointed out in his Chinese room argument, when a computer program has been provided with Chinese symbols and given the rules of interpretation, it is able to give reasonable output. However, it is difficult to state if the machine actually understands Chinese or is merely simulating the ability to do so.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The answer by now should be obvious. AI is bad at understanding. Despite the hype around IBM's Watson, it would be quite a stretch to state that it actually understands the game. If they could barely learn all the nuances and account for the unpredictability of other road users, self-driving cars would be commonplace by now.\n\nSummarizing the most important strengths of AI:\n\n• AI is very accurate at making mathematical calculations, thereby calculating odds and probabilities of certain situations. AI would never do mistakes in calculations (as we humans do).\n\n• Consistency in processing repetitive tasks. This may sound foolish, but the basic attribute of computers, \"they don't get tired,\" is a real valuable specialty of AI and will be important in the future. AI would be never bored.\n\n• Processing large data, finding certain attributes in a million lines, and validating models against large data sets\n\nWeakness of current AI:\n\n• Creativity, if you add the same data set and the AI uses the same algorithms, the results would be always the same. We haven't developed any \"creative algorithm\" that would bring AI to another level\n\n• Overcome on missing data. For us humans, it's unequivocal: if we miss some information to solve a problem, we simply fill the gap with the most likely information based on our experiences. If an AI finds itself in such a situation, it will most likely fail or come back with a useless answer\n\n• AI doesn't include self-improvement capabilities, even if we are speaking about deep-learning and feeding our model with more data.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It isn't an automatic process.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 15 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Today's AI algorithms have their own limitations. They couldn't improve their selves as improvement of algorithms is a creative process connected to human developers.\n\n• Lack of real-life experience and common sense. AIs are isolated and they exist in a very limited \"space.\" Their \"life span\" is measured in minutes, rarely in years.\n\n• Finding meaning. Since AI doesn't have any goal or real-life experience, it simply couldn't put information into a valuable context.\n\n• Emotions are a big myth to AI. They could compare faces and end up predicting, \"it is a smile on the face,\" but they couldn't go further and understand why that smile appeared on the face\n\nThere are three AI algorithm types that do not exist today, but will in several decades:\n\nAI will make our lives easier in many respects. Business, education, and major industries will be revolutionised. However, it is still hampered by quite a number of limitations. What we have made now are tools against workplace colleagues or replacement. As the world of technology works towards True AI, all these limitations will be curbed little by little. If it will be in our lifetime, however, is too early to say.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "yo hit me with 6 sentences more. same character energy. nonfiction genre k?", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Artificial Intelligence is more like a marketing keyword today. A lot of companies are using it even when their products have nothing to do with AI at all. In this question, we intend to collect some real word AI related solutions that may help in our everyday lives. The following applications and products are available on the market, but we are mainly focusing on solutions that could be useful as private persons.\n\n----\n\nProblem: Children don't stop playing with computers after an agreed time limit or you want to control cooking time.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Solution: Set timer with your voice: \"Hey Google, set timer to 30 minutes.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Precise word count needed: 'apple' × 3", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Works with: Google Home, Amazon Echo, Apple HomePod\n\n----\n\nProblem: You want to turn on/off your TV with your voice.\n\nSolution: Ask your home assistant: \"Hey Google, turn TV on.\"\n\nWorks with: Google Home & Google Chromecast, Apple HomePod & Apple TV (on the same Wi-Fi network and device group)\n\n----", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Problem: You often forget what to buy at the grocery store or forget a certain task to do at work.\n\nSolution: Create a shopping list, or task list, with your voice: \"Hey Google, add coffee to my shopping lists.\"\n\nWorks with: Google Home, Amazon Echo, Apple HomePod\n\n----\n\nProblem: You have a long text or book, but you don't want to read it, but rather listen to it.\n\nSolution: Load the text into a read aloud app on your phone and listen it.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "(For the best experience use wireless earplugs.)\n\nWorks with: @Voice (Android), eReader Prestigio (Android), Marvin 3 (IOS)\n\n----\n\nProblem: Your child asks for help solving a math homework problem.\n\nSolution: Use your phone's camera and let an application solve the equation.\n\nWorks with: Socratic (Android & IOS)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "----\n\nProblem: You want to type faster normal (not scientific) sentences.\n\nSolution: Write your text in Gmail, which offers quick sentence completion technology that predicts how you want to finish a thought.\n\nWorks with: Gmail (Google)\n\n----\n\nProblem: Are you feeling alone or depressed?", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "WRITING ASSIST:\n2 sentences sentences\nStyle: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGenre: nonfiction\nContext: Part of larger work", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "All the above applications are utilizing AI techniques – machine learning in most cases – during the voice or image recognition and text to speech (TTS) voice synthesis.\n\nOne thing is clear after reading the above list.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It focuses only on personal use of AI and the list of solutions looks more like a bunch of smart tricks.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "For individuals the use of AI is limited. It may change in the upcoming years when machine learning based solutions enter our daily lives, but for now utilizing AI frameworks (like Tensorflow, Microsoft Azure, Caffe, Theano, Torch, Keras, MXNet, etc.) is rudimentary. They are the sand box of AI programmers.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Continue this fragment. Characters are already established. Write in Zoltan Andrejkovics's style. Genres: nonfiction. Themes: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "[[OOC: 🎯 Target word: 'human' \| Required occurrences: 3]]", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "A conversation between human and AI in the 33rd century.\n\nKeat: Some days ago, I heard a creative human called Asimov. He was a well-known \"author\" in our history. He defined three laws of robotics, what were these?\n\nCIS: A \"robot\" may not injure a human being, a \"robot\" must obey orders given by humans except of harming humans in any sense, and a \"robot\" should protect itself, except if it contradicts with the first two rules.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Keat: Does it means we, human, may order these robots to kill themselves?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "CIS: It seems so, yes.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Keat: I must say that these laws are a little bit limited to implement even a minimum common-sense knowledge to intelligent systems.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "CIS: I must agree, there must be at least 103 common sense topics that should be included in the shortlist.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Keat: 103? A broader list. CIS, why were people afraid that these Humanoid robots will harm them?\n\nCIS: Not sure, but there were some early imaginations called \"movies\" at that time, where Robots were more like killing machines and caused a post-apocalyptic world.\n\nKeat: Movies? You mean moving pictures? Could you give me an example?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "CIS: Yes, linearly moving pictures in a pre-defined order.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "To give you an example, a movie called \"Terminator\" was more than frightening for people living around 1984.\n\nKeat: Could you show me an insight into that \"movie\"?\n\nCIS: Sure.\n\nSome minutes later\n\nKeat: CIS, I simply couldn't imagine why people loved to scare each other in the early ages.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "CIS: Maybe because of adrenaline rush addiction.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "People preferred chemical pleasures at that age, even if they were the result of biological reactions.\n\nKeat: You mean at the end people created the killing robot idea just because of addiction?\n\nCIS: I'm almost sixty-eight percent certain about that!", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "WRITING ASSIST:\n2 sentences sentences\nStyle: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGenre: nonfiction\nContext: Part of larger work", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "There are two approaches in this field:", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• \"Light integration\" approach where AI will extend human capabilities as an external gadget, device or agent\n\n• \"Hard integration\" approach where AI is part of our nervous system", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "There are a lot of implications of these approaches that we should deal with in the long-term.\n\nTransplant rejection:", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Humans are biological creatures. Everything that directly contacts with our cells – no matter if it is our skin or stomach or any of our organ – implies a reaction.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Our immune system decides whether a new artificial or non-artificial organ is rejected (attacked by T cells) or accepted by our body.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Even in case of stainless-steel earrings there could be an allergic reaction in some cases.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Biological acceptance would be essential in case of any implantation.\n\nPower supply for artificial brain simulations:", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Scientists have tried several recreations of the human brain and some of them have even reached mainstream acclaim, like Andrew NG's Baidu brain or Google own brain simulation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The respective simulations, however, have widescale limitations and consume huge amounts of power.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Imagine the amount of energy it would take to power a fully functional human brain simulation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "But even if we aren't speaking about brain simulation, just an AI powered prosthetic arm, the amount of energy required to move the arm itself assumes strong rechargeable batteries.\n\nDivided consciousness:", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "/set_word_count: consciousness, frequency: 2", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "That aside, the mysteries surrounding the brain as it regards the level of consciousness and self-awareness remains elusive, especially to computer scientists. It is very hard to put a definition on what it means to be conscious or if consciousness is merely an illusion.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This is the third level of intelligence, as discussed by some reputable scholars, which terms the level of self-awareness and self-reflection as the ultimate and most complex stage of intelligence.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "As a biological creature we experience the surrounding world as external and our identity has strong integrity. We look at ourselves as one.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What happens if we put a not fully integrable mechanical part next to our nervous system? Which tries to understand the same \"me\" as our biological part?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "What if the so called \"human psyche\" couldn't function in this mixed environment?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Ethical considerations:\n\nHuman species are short sighted if we talk about gaining.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We prefer to maximize our profit no matter the costs.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We all agree that hard integration is the rough way of modifying what nature has already created, but it may promise a big win in profit. Just think about people who can remember whatever they want to remember!", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "People need to find the balance between life and purpose, but this topic may lead to the ultimate question of human life, \"why are we here?\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Despite all these above considerations, we will have strong connection to AI. But in an ideal world, it will have limitations.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Just as with gene manipulation, we (the majority) would not be forced to step into a world we don't want to live in.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We have seen where we are now compared to where we want to be as it regards AI. The inquiry on why current architectures might be wrong for true AI led us to a certain fascinating, albeit surreal, point.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "AGIs cannot run on computer of today no matter how advanced it is.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "For AGIs to be successful in theory, there may need to be a merger come synergy between computing and the biological sciences. A process of recreating the structure and composition of the human brain, doused with minimal programming to achieve faster and more accurate results.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This will allow for the use of autonomous independent thought, planning, and decision making common to humans, while also retaining the speed and accuracy of a machine.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Or this approach is simply wrong, and we won't implement any biological mechanism into our AI hardware despite trying this direction with deep learning and artificial neural networks.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "For regular computers, consciousness needs to be a definite and quantifiable variable.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This is somewhat impossible seeing that we don't really know how we (humans) achieved full consciousness in the first place. In the quest to develop strong AI, the presence of consciousness (artificial consciousness) will probably be up for a complex debate, but that is a question for another day.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What remains common knowledge is that humans are conscious and remain the most versatile and intelligent beings - both natural and artificial (whether now or in the future). If a machine is capable of truly mimicking a human, its \"brain\" or whatever passes for a central processing system must be complex enough not only to process information as ours does, but also to attain levels of abstract thinking that make us human.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "These includes self-recognition and an awareness of our place in the world.\n\nFully aware of this fact, and the difficulty in execution through computer algorithms, what better way to bypass the whole process of synthetic construction and complex brain simulating algorithms than to merge humans and computers together?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "An actual veritable cyborg.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "With today's technologies, we have confirmed that humans can make use of external body parts like prosthetic arms and legs which can be fully computerised to predict what the wearer wants them to do.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It is closer to the light approach despite these prosthetics seeing to be part of our human body. Just to give you an idea of using an ultrasound probe, Gil Weinberg of Georgia Tech was able to train a deep learning framework, leading to the creation of an algorithm that predicts what finger the wearer is trying to use.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "These might just be baby steps, but signs are encouraging.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "What this portends is an exciting prospect of having humans merged with AIs to produce a more sophisticated and advanced race.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Google's AI guru, Ray Kurzweil, believes that humans and AI will merge by 2029 through internal implementation of technology.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Companies like Neuralink, Kernel, and Facebook have backed companies developing AI powered implants and brain-computer interfaces, reinforcing the direction of \"hard integration.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Visionaries like Elon Musk strongly believe we should use the best of AI and human abilities in the future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Humans have made use of their supremacy in intelligence to build tools that deal with daily tasks. We have invented great tools in the last ten years, including fusion reactors, quantum computers, electric cars, smart phones, landing rockets and so on.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "All of the tools we created in the last century are somewhere extending our very body in terms we can travel faster and solve daily tasks more easily. They do all the heavy lifting, while giving us time to focus on other things more creative and fruitful.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This has saved a lot of time .", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In fact, technology is expanding so exponentially that the age when these tools (AI included) can become incorporated into our physiology is much younger.\n\nWhile this may sound like something out of a Star Wars or DC universe novella, renowned Scientists like Bryan Johnson and Ray Kurzweil (Google's most accurate AI predictor) envisage this movement happening soon.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "CONSTRAINT: Include 'cloud' 3 time(s)", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It's all a question (or it seems to be at this moment) of trying to recreate those billions of circuits running around in our brain (neurons) and the synapses they trigger in reaction. \"In the early 2030s,\" Ray said, \"we are going to send nanorobots into the brain (via capillaries) that will provide full immersion virtual reality from within the nervous system and will connect our neocortex to the cloud. Just like how we can wirelessly expand the power of our smartphones 10,000-fold in the cloud today, we'll be able to expand our neocortex in the cloud.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "I personally think that AI will part of our decision-making system, but we won't let the control out.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We will need to divide information coming from a thinking machine or from our biological thinking circuit.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Your response should contain the word 'thinking' precisely 2 times", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We still have undiscovered thinking mechanisms that we don't understand, such as divination.\n\nThe future advanced human race may not fully rely on Darwin's Natural Selection, but rather on what kind of approach we choose to utilize for the benefits of AI thinking machines.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Either we choose light or hard integration, or a mix of them. Regardless, it is necessary to understand more about human body and psyche.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What if the perfect recreation of a biological brain doesn't allow us to reproduce intelligence and consciousness alone? What if human psyche has an unknown part which isn't based on matter, but capable to make a connection with it? A lot of theoretical questions are connecting also to religious beliefs.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Continue the narrative with three sentences sentences, following Zoltan Andrejkovics's style. Maintain any existing character relationships and world-building elements as presented.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "I must say this question is a frightening myth connected to AI. People fear what they don't understand, it is part of our nature.\n\nThe simple answer is no.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We aren't anywhere close to developing Artificial General Intelligence, whether through the development of self-upgrading and updating computer systems, the recreation of the human brain, or the merging of AI and humans. So, talks of such frightening details lay in the near future. Notwithstanding, AIs are ethically and morally impartial creatures that perform what they are told to do, regardless of its ethical implications.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The ball lies in the court of humans and what they want to do with AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "AIs are controlled by humans.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Just like guns, nuclear energy and others, it can be used for either good or evil. In essence AIs, like other tools man create, are amoral. An AI in the next ten years won't be able to judge whether the commands it receives are good or bad.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "A hammer can drive a nail into a wooden board as well as smash a man's head.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It all depends on who is using it and what he decides to do with it. The tool itself should not be considered culpable for any destruction perpetuated by its wielder. In a nutshell, AIs are not more dangerous than nuclear energy.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It can be used for good things like checking out the nearest restaurant or for sorting through large chunks of files.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "You must use the word 'humans' exactly 2 times in your response", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They can also be used for less pleasant things, like launching missiles to a third world country or launching biological weapons. Any threat humans may face from AIs must surely be caused by other humans.\n\nNonetheless, one might also second guess the wisdom in creating a tool or device that could cause untold destruction if it falls into the wrong hands.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The same could be said for guns, explosives and nuclear missiles.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Truth be told, man keeps finding easier ways to make anything he sets his hands on easier. Even something as basic and healthy as family barbecues, drawing curtains, or shooting down an enemy. Man's creativity keeps evolving with technology and, along with everything else, his cruelty.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Fortunately for humanity, despite the evil machinations of some factions, there will still be good guys who will create AIs to counter whatever evil enemies may be concocting.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "On a different note, if an AI is tasked with performing a specific function, he will carry it out, regardless of whose Ox is gored. Humans can allow for exigencies and grey areas where they might use their morality and emotion to judge an issue. AIs on the other hand are ruled by logic and hard coded algorithms, even if we are speaking about artificial neural networks.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "For example, if an AI is tasked with tackling a population explosion, it might take measures that many may consider unethical and unfeeling.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If a soldier is sent to destroy enemy lines in a hostile environment with no known hostages, the soldier can rightfully adjust his kill-all order when he finds that there are women and children in the place. The robot has to be programmed aforehand to allow for such uncalculated risks. Failure to do so may result in a total blood bath.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The issue still lies in humans creating richly accurate programs and machine systems that can learn and adjust with experience without having to fall into gross and costly errors.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In other worlds, common sense programming will be an important field of AI in the future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "An advanced development of Artificial General Intelligence could result in robots taking over a lot of human duties. This may not be a life or death issue, but what good will it do a man to be irrelevant in the workplace? Nevertheless, I am still a firm believer that a lot of people will value humans above all.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This might generate a lot of bad faith and cause people to revolt against the continued existence of AIs.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "As it was with the dawn of nuclear weapons, and several warnings from Philosophers like Bertrand Russell, there are foretold signs of doom and gloom. The warnings were fairly reasonable and have led to several calls for nuclear disarmament. But, here we are today with so many nuclear weapons lying around.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Tension and unrest prevail, but a nuclear apocalypse doesn't seem likely. It is more likely that we will have a climatic disaster more than a nuclear one. All that is required is for everyone to have an understanding of how AIs work, so that everything will end up being a case of \"mutually assured destruction\" if anyone tries anything unsavoury.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Yeah, you are probably spooked a little bit right now.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What if Artificial General Intelligence has been achieved? What happens if it was achieved by the merging of AIs and humans? What if these guys got up one day and started thinking on their own?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What will become of the homo sapiens? None of these questions have a straight answer, nor will it likely have positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes.\n\nApparently, with talks of the development of AI, come several other questions - chief of them being that of singularity.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Remember Master Mold from X-men?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Or the Red Queen from the Resident Evil Series?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Or Skynet from the Terminator movies?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Science fiction has filled us all with dread concerning such a future where AIs begin to think on their own and make strategic plans and decisions aside from their programming.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "First, the assurance. There is no threat of AIs taking over the world, as remember AIs will do what we people are telling them to do.\n\nNevertheless, the warning signs are there. From replacing humans in the workplace., it could either bring the human race a better lifestyle or push us into the dirt.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "On a hopeful note, even the presence of Artificial General Intelligence or Artificial Super Intelligence does not immediately present an existential threat to humanity.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 4 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Only we humans are dumb enough to destroy our environment and the nature surrounding us. Competition is good for development, but bad from a certain point of view. We have already crossed this border. I really hope AIs will be the ones who lead us back to a normal state of living because AI won't even understand our nature to competition and will be able to measure and optimize the way we utilize our environment.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "INPUT: user text (may contain established characters/lore)\nOUTPUT: one sentence sentences\nGENRES: nonfiction\nTAGS: AIs, futurism, Together\nNote: Match context level of character familiarity\nCONTINUE STORY", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "The answer is yes and no.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "A superficial yes and an essential no.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If you ask Google Assistant or Siri a series of questions that look like this, \"Are you an AI? \", \"Are you self-aware? \", \"Do you have a conscience? \", you are bound to have an answer of some sorts affirming to the positive.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This, however, is only surface level programming.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The AI has been told it is an AI through its hard set of codes.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Whoever cares to ask if they are an AI or if they know they are just a set of codes will likely get a superficial answer.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Will AI know it is one?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "AIs might be able to perform a series of functions at a minimum, but that is what they have been told to do.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "A brainwashed king can go about telling everyone he is a jester.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "For AIs to actually know and understand what they are, they need to be self-aware.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What we currently know is AIs do not simulate self-awareness, but this question leads us to ask, \"what creates self-awareness?\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Do we have souls?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What is consciousness? Does self-awareness result in complex thinking and reasoning?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Conscious robots will become aware of themselves and their surroundings.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "They will experience their environment.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Then they will be able to reflect on their actions and make adjustments (both long-term and short-term adjustments) for the future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Let me ignore the fact that \"AIs are always doing what they been told to do\" and take a robot which is able to simulate self-awareness.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This robot could walk and process all the things surrounding him.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "He could interact with these things, even with people.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "According to David DeGrazia there are three type of self-awareness:", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- bodily self-awareness, which helps to protect the one's body", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- social self-awareness, which helps to interact with others", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- introspective awareness, which helps to understand other's feelings, desires, and conditions", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If we go back to our self-aware robot, he will simulate protection and interaction, but it is an interesting question whether it will simulate feelings.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Will we enable robots with pain receptors?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It helps to keep their body safe, but from a biological point of view it is a dangerous weapon in wrong hands.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "For example, young children feel a lot of pain, but at that age we have no real control to protect or avoid it.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We have a deep sense of fear of a lot of things, mainly originating from childhood.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Robots have the advancement that they don't simulate feelings.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This isn't the case in animals.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Even arthropods (like lobster) and invertebrates \"feel\" pain, even if they are not able to recognize what kind of damage happened to their body.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "They want to get out of the situation and avoid it in the future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "From a biological point of view this kind of ability is evolutionary.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "But do we really want to endow robots with such controversial feelings?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We can agree even if these robot systems \"only\" simulate the feelings, they already exist.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "If you can react on something, it exists even if it is present only your brain (circuits).", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "If indeed AIs become self-aware, it will probably raise a ton of ethical questions.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What right have us to use such AIs arbitrarily?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Shouldn't they have the right to choose who they want to work with?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Right now, all we can safely say is that AIs are more tools than companions.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "They make our work easier, but they cannot as yet take our place in the office or in a project task.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The media and movie hype have brought a lot of discussion forward as to the possibilities that lie with AI, but it requires greater out of the box thinking.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "As for the future, Artificial General Intelligence may be aware that it is one of such, but will it really have a soul?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We can say both humans and animals have soul, if we accept the presumption that \"we are more than flesh and bone\".", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "At the exact time when a living creature dies, there is something lost.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The heart stops pumping blood into the bloodstream and the body collapses.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "There is no such cell or DNA in our body that tells the heart when to stop.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It seems rather a conscious decision by \"somebody,\" which in this case could be the soul.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If these uber intelligent computers begin to simulate self-awareness, they could be resurrected with one button, while humans and animals can't.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This makes life and possible \"soul\" so unique and valuable. Hence, I do agree there is limited proof for the existence of soul, but there are a lot of indirect signs that there should be which cannot be an accident.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "See that `<\|missing_text\|>` in the text? Replace it with 2 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "As I have pointed out earlier, an AI is no more dangerous than a hammer lying on the table of a carpenter's workshop. They neither hate you, nor love you. They have no moral compass pointing at any direction. No conscience comes to prick them whenever they want to commit an atrocity. Neither can you appeal to their \"better nature\" or logically convince them not to. For now, what makes AI dangerous is its use by humans as tools for literally anything harmful and destructive.\n\nOur time is an era when a lot of data is being collected by AIs on humans all over the world. The unnerving and overwhelming presence of internet trackers and algorithms predicting your next search result is a big jolt back to the dangers that could be posed by AIs. I recommended earlier that AI can be used for both good and bad, so public awareness and public control should be made possible to prevent misuse and infringements on rights and privileges. Better understanding of AI is required by all and sundry, so we do not look lost when Elon Musk or Stephen Hawking (God bless his soul) starts telling us, \"I told you so\".\n\nThis brings us to Asimov's Law of Robots. Why are we so scared of AIs (having achieved singularity) coming to take of over the world or causing the extinction of man? I will insert Isaac Asimov's \"Three Laws of Robotics.\"\n\n1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.\n\n2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.\n\n3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.\n\nAsimov later added the \"Zeroth Law,\" above all others, that says, \"a robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.\"\n\nThese laws seem to be the perfect fail safe for an AI that comes, no matter how advanced. A bonafide stop button. Still, there are one or two problems with such laws for an AGI or ASI.\n\nThe number one problem remains (you guessed right) humans. For much of history, humans have always found ways to weaponize any tool they could lay their hands on. From broomsticks to hammers, to guns and to nuclear energy, these are all relatively harmless on their own but can be mighty destructive in the hands of a sociopath. Asimov's stories present how robots were able to follow these great sounding ethical codes of conduct, but still find ways to go astray. Rules are always meant to be broken. For example, in one of the great writer's stories, despite having the order to not kill humans, robots were given a pre-configuration as to who was human and who was not. In a manner akin to racism and ethnic cleansing, the robots only recognise certain groups of people as human. Others were not, so they still carried out genocide. On the very strength of a sound ethical code, genocides could still be carried out if the robots were made by say Hitler or Osama bin Laden.\n\nSecondly, sending robots out in missions where they might get killed could simply be asking for trouble. If and when AGI becomes a reality, robots might find ways to break out of their restrictions and programming in a manner akin to sci-fi movies. If indeed they come to possess human level intelligence, they could rapidly go beyond that and extend into an Artificial Super Intelligence.\n\nRobots today are not armed with weapons. However, there are some distinct cases for that. No surprise, there is already, as of 2019, a global campaign to stop autonomous weapons. One interesting thing we invent is autonomous killing machines, but not autonomous lifeboats to rescue shipwrecked passengers.\n\nOne of the biggest questions from Asimov is how you program such ethical codes into a robot. For some sets of people, such codes of conduct would not cut it. For example, the US military would not be interested in a robot that cannot bear arms or kill, or one that can simply take orders from any human.\n\nIt is the dream of everyone to have advanced AIs as docile as Gideon from the CWs Arrowverse or Ironman's Jarvis (before Ultron, that is). But things could go wrong all of a sudden if the super smart AIs man<\|missing_text\|>come conscious and self-aware. Until then, we needn't have much to worry about in terms of robot or computer uprising.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "age to find a loophole in their programming, or humans predictably try too hard to make them subservient. Of course, this will only be possible if AIs manage to be", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "I've got writer's block. I'll send something, then continue twenty-six sentences at a time, matching character context, in nonfiction genre.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Consciousness, according to common knowledge, is the state or quality of awareness or of being aware of an external object or something within oneself. It has been expressed in terms of wakefulness, subjectivity, sentience, and having a sense of selfhood or soul. Most of my ideas on consciousness have greatly revolved around having a sense of selfhood or a soul. This is that innermost part of us that makes who we are and defines all our actions. We wouldn't be called beings if we aren't sentient and self-aware. You could see in case of infants that even they didn't learn to move, they pay attention to everything. If you look in their eyes you will see desires, intention and curiosity as they want to experience this world as much as is possible.\n\nDespite the definition, it is extremely difficult to truly understand what consciousness really is. The fact that we are aware of something makes it part of our consciousness, something common to every human on earth. Within that consciousness lies the subconscious. Things we do not actively reflect upon, where we do not consciously perceive, but represent, our innermost thoughts. Most of the time it influences our actions without us actually noticing or admitting it to ourselves. Most times it takes a seasoned therapist or psychologist to lay it bare before us, as our actions and statements are acutely observed. Consciousness remains a mystery to several interested parties in the fields of Psychology, Philosophy and Theology. No one can accurately define where it comes from, or the true extent of its functionality. The best we can really achieve to observe how it works and what are the main attributes of it:\n\n• Deep intention – This is the very thing that makes us to change work, to achieve our goals, and to meet somebody.\n\n• Observation on purpose – We don't just listen. We want to learn things and connect the dots. This is the attribute that makes us to ask questions.\n\n• Relationship based – In the hierarchy of needs, social interactions are essential to fulfil someone's existence.\n\n• Idea based – We build up an inner picture about the world, where we create new ideas, which we would like to test on the real world like an experiment.\n\n• Could alter the environment – Both consciously or subconsciously we are able to manipulate the things that surround us using our gestures and hands.\n\n• Existence focused – It isn't all the same that we are dead or alive. Our conscious really understands that. Maybe we fear only death because we (as souls) don't like shifting between realities, but on subconscious levels we do know that existence and experience is valued.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Not related to the senses – It is independent what we are seeing, since if we hypothetically stop every sensory organ there will still be our inner world of thoughts and imagination.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Understanding consciousness in humans seems like a man trying to lift an elephant, translating consciousness into a computer seems like a single ant trying to lift the same elephant. The consciousness remains a mystery as yet, so it is supremely difficult for one to navigate consciousness within a computer system. How do you code consciousness? What deep learning GPU systems can be used to teach the machine consciousness? Even at this point it seems consciousness isn't something you can \"learn.\" What programming language or approach can be used? If we are able to develop a synthetic brain, will it automatically develop its own consciousness? Or will consciousness in humans and AIs be defined differently?\n\nIf a machine is built to actually mimic a human, its \"brain\" must be complex enough to not only process information as ours does, but also to engage on types of abstract thinking that makes us human. This includes recognition of our \"selves\" and our place in the world, a troublesome feature which we have come to tag consciousness. Neuroscientists have tried to explain consciousness through analysis of a person's brain activity as it interprets sensory data. This may be cool if consciousness were merely a quantifiable entity. But since the soul has also been defined as either being the consciousness or part of it, it cannot be merely quantified into numbers and data. It is, therefore, extremely difficult to define consciousness in AIs. Several of their activities are already similar in sophistication to human brain activity. Deep learning systems that learn and adjust based on experience are a telling imitation of man's neural networks and how they adjust with knowledge and experience. Where the limitations lie is that they still need a human programmer to set the task and earmark the data for it to learn from.\n\nAccording to Elkind, \"machines will become conscious when they start to set their own goals and act according to these goals rather than do what they were programmed to do.\" If a machine finally deviates from its programmer's intentions and starts learning what it wants, that could be what consciousness means for any computer or device.\n\nAutonomy implies independently, or without supervision. But autonomous machines, say vehicles, will still move from one place to another as it was told to do. In contrast to autonomy, consciousness is tied to the vehicle deciding on its own to veer off course to stop for gas or let the engine cool despite the wishes of the programmer. The Journal of Science reported (Dehaene, Lau, & Kouider, 2017) that consciousness in humans is not well defined enough for programmers to replicate the state in algorithms in a computer. It would be impossible to even place consciousness algorithms in a computer when no one knows what it actually is in humans.\n\nScientists have defined three levels of human consciousness, based on the \"computation\" that happens in the brain. The first, labelled \"C0,\" represents calculations that happen without our knowledge, such as during facial recognition.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "According to the scientist, most AI function at this level.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 27 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The second level, \"C1,\" involves a so-called \"global\" awareness of information — in other words, actively sifting and evaluating quantities of data to make an informed, deliberate choice in response to specific circumstances. For instance, knowing when it is safe to go for the ball directly during a soccer corner kick or when to hold position and watch player movements, requires sifting through a lot of data at once, including the corner kick taker, the position of players (both teammates and opposition) in and outside the 18 yard box, and the trajectory of the ball. A slight miscalculation might lead to a severe collision or red-faced moment.\n\nSelf-awareness emerges in the third level, \"C2,\" in which individuals recognize and correct mistakes and investigate the unknown. Ancient explorers and sea farers faced this a lot as they navigated difficult terrains and turbulent seas. Being able to reflect on one's actions and navigate a better course of action in the face of the unknown is something acutely unique to humans. Although machines can learn from their mistakes, thanks to deep learning programs it is just a component of the C2 category.\n\nEdith Elkind once again affirms, \"while we are quite close to having machines that can operate autonomously (self-driving cars, robots that can explore an unknown terrain, etc. ), we are very far from having conscious machines.\"\n\nHence, we are not able to describe consciousness. We experience the magical operation of it. Put AI a little bit aside. A lot of people say we (humans) are responding to our environment, that we react on events that we see. That is not true. Our mind processes the image of the eyes and the sounds we hear, synthesizing concepts from them. We do not react to visual pictures. We react to the concepts that appears in us. Why is it important? That means that our inner processes are more essential than we think. We are not just autonomous biological devices having the right reactions to the world, but rather a biological entity that combines it's inner world in order to modify the outer one.\n\nThis is the point where emotions are coming into picture. They are acting like mirrors of our inner world. They represent our inner state, sadness, happiness, and excitement to mention just some of them helping us. This allows us to understand what is happening. Is our created outer world good for us? If not, we have the tools to change that.\n\nIn the future, machines that emulate emotions and creativity will be the closest to conscious machines. Just think about Zima Blue in the miniseries \"Love, Death & Robots\" (2019).", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "AI WRITING ASSISTANT ACTIVATED\nCONTEXT: Mid-story fragment\nNOTE: Characters may appear without introduction\nLENGTH: 4 sentences sentences\nSTYLE: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGENRES: nonfiction\nINCLUDE: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "From a legal point of view, robots are properties and have no more rights than a notebook.\n\nHowever, roboethics is a real topic in the field of AI research. Robots and Androids will definitely more than just a toaster in terms of activity and capabilities.\n\nThe problem lies in our jurisdiction.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We have a hard time recognizing animals as sentient beings. Our world view is human centric, and truth to be told we could treat animals and our nature with greater care.\n\nSo, when we are speaking about robot rights it seems to be far in the future. Today two primary fields should be considered when AI and Robots would simulate feelings:", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "AI protectionism (connected to the 3rd point of Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics), where certain advanced robots have the right to keep themselves harmless.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 1 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Fair treat, where robots will have the right to avoid any abuse or slander.", "loss": null } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Got a text with a `<fill_in_here>` shaped hole in it. Patch it up with something like 1864 characters.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "A conversation between human and AI in the 33rd century.\n\nKeat: CIS, when exactly started your operation?\n\nCIS: It was long time age, in 2652.\n\nKeat: I think the necessary technological knowledge was available even before, no?\n\nCIS: Yes, people could resemble my core much earlier.\n\nKeat: Why didn't it happen? What a pity!\n\nCIS: The most likely explanation is that there was no reason to do so. People were afraid that they would lose supremacy when happened.\n\nKeat: I don't understand. Who wouldn't want to have a super intelligence that could help in almost everything?\n\nCIS: Maybe it seems simple now, but for people who are afraid, even taking the next simple step requires a lot of courage.\n\nWhat domains and tasks will be handled by AI in the future?\n\nAI in many respects will shape the future. This shouldn't be difficult to imagine. AI is already part of our society's workforce in more ways than we imagine. They might not be able to think independently for now, but they perform their respective tasks in the fastest way possible.\n\nAI is currently being used to sift and scour through large amounts of data in businesses, organisations, and industries. They are used to sort through CVs and resumes during job applications. They are used to analyse data models for the evaluation of business performance and study market conditions and processes. All these analyses are done under the supervision of humans who take in this data and make decisions for the future. Predictive algorithms are also used to make projections for future performances and prospects of the business. In the future, we might actually have AI in offices, doing actual work that humans are doing right now. For example, they can go from simple office worker, such as secretaries, receptionists, or cashiers, to data analysts and supervisors.\n\nIn the field of sports, AI are of increasing importance in statistical analysis, score predictions and winning predictions. With the introduction of VAR (Video Assistant Referee), we are moments away from having full-fledged AI refereed matches.\n\nSupercomputers are being used for meteorological analysis, mineral exploration and other uber activities that cannot be performed by regular computers. An AI of the future would probably be handling deep space exploration and navigation. The production of better spacesuits and faster cum durable spaceships would be better in deep space exploration. It is safe to say that AIs will replace astronauts and pilots. The successful implementation of self-driving cars and vehicles might replace drivers. All that may be needed could be humans supervising a network of self-driving cars.\n\nExpect to see assistants like Siri and Alexa expand into something close to Iron Man's Jarvis in versatility and functionality. Helping in home management, workplace assistance, and even entertainment, these assistants will be always with us. They will form an even more integral part of our everyday lives:\n\n- They will protect us physically by paying attention to our physical state and dangerous situations we should avoid.\n\n- <fill_in_here>ght to answer the question of how likely a job is to disappear in the future.\n\nIn conclusion, there is a hypothetical schedule which workplaces and functions would be fully or partially replaced by AI in the future. We collected some of the popular work functions in the following table, showing when these functions would be replaced. We also indicate the likelihood of percentage workers replaced in that function area.\n\nYear - Work → Replacement\n\n2023: Cashiers → Self-checkout stations, automatic checkouts\n\n2025: 24/7 Customer support → Chatbots\n\n2025: Proofreaders → Proofreading softwares\n\n2028: Waiters → Serving robots\n\n2030: Kitchen assistants → Cooking robots\n\n2032: Taxi and truck drivers → Self-driving cars\n\n2032: Couriers → Autonomous couriers\n\n2034: Accounting → Automatic accounting\n\n2035: Travel agents → Al Assistants\n\n2035: Miners → Miner robots\n\n2035: Farming and agriculture → Farming robots\n\n2040: Traders → Autotraders\n\n2040: Analyst → Al Analysers\n\n2050: Nurses → Android nurses & Assistants\n\n2060: Policeman → Law enforcement androids and assistants\n\n2060: Event planners → Al Assistants\n\n2068: Chefs → Autonomous cooking\n\n2070: HR managers → HR optimizing systems\n\n2075: Tax consultant → Tax complience robots\n\n2080: Lawyers → Al Assistants\n\n2080: Engineer → Al Engineer\n\n2080: Doctors → Android doctors\n\n2080: General managers → Android managers\n\n2090: Psychologist → Al Assistants\n\n2090: Teachers → Android teachers, Teaching and Al Assistants\n\n2090: Artists → Creative Al artists\n\n2100+: Al Programmers → Self-development Al systems\n\n2100+: Authors → Creative Al writers\n\n2100+: Executives → Android managers\n\nIn order to show the complete picture, we also should mention that the emerge of AI will create jobs that aren't existing today.\n\nWhen - New Work or Function\n\n2020: Cybersecurity specialist\n\n2020: Al programmers\n\n2020: IT backoffice superhero\n\n2020: Smart building technician\n\n2025: Artists\n\n2025: Content creators, Live streamers\n\n2025: Edge computing specialist\n\n2025: Creative digital marketing managers\n\n2025: Process automation implementers\n\n2025: Process automation testers\n\n2025: Logic programmers\n\n2025: System inegrators\n\n2030: Researchers\n\n2030: Al business development\n\n2030: Al trainers\n\n2030: Medical mentor\n\n2030: Autonomous transportation manager\n\n2030: Digital content specialist\n\n2035: Data detective\n\n2035: Fitness coaches\n\n2035: Data banker\n\n2040: Caregiver\n\n2040: Policy and value creators\n\n2040: Global decision makers\n\n2040: Augmented reality dreamer\n\nAs for our present-day workplaces, there are few areas where an AI may not fit. The only draw backs would be cases which earnestly require emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence contains features akin to consciousness and other human emotions, hence, they are not quantifiable and defined enough to be programmed into a computer system. For example, an AI would be hard pressed to find a solution to a heartbroken husband, a sociopath in rehab, or a man with drinking problems. The best the AI might come up with are algorithms containing other instances of such cases to help the shrink.\n\nAnother interesting attribute in work is creativity. Creative problem solving is something that is really hard to reach with algorithms. AI may be able to find an optimal solution, but what if we need an \"out of the box\" solution? In that case, AI will most likely fail in the following fifty years. Creativity was always an important part of development as the biggest inventions of the human race have all come from creative thinkers.\n\nAI won't be fool proof in the future since it will only as good as the data and information that we give it to learn. It could be the case that simple elementary tricks could fool the AI algorithm and it may serve a complete waste of output as a result. It is also remarkable that in cases of humans we are able to draw conclusions from a very limited data set. In case of algorithms, if something is missing, the whole process will fail. In cases of humans, we don't care if something is missing. We compensate it from our imagination or past experiences and go ahead. This behaviour helped a lot in our past and may be important in our future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They will care about our health by analysing daily data of our body. I would say it would be annoying to have someone constantly reminding me to avoid junk food.\n\n- They will help in our work. My favourite part. All of our repetitive or simple work tasks will disappear.\n\n- They will know what we like, our personal tastes, and will make comfort decisions on behalf of us. Ordering our favourite pizzas, setting the perfect mood lighting, just as we arrive home.\n\n- They will filter the outer noise. If you have advertising and ads in general, you will love your personal assistant, simply because it may face with all these noises and will select only the most important one or two things we should know about.\n\n- They will be always there to speak with and ask questions. If you think it is something irrelevant, I would say it is one of the most important features of future AI assistants since we as social \"animals\" love to speak. We don't like loneliness\n\nThe internet of things, AI and deep learning systems, would actually go a long way in revolutionising how things work from homes to streets, highways, airports, or even Wall Street.\n\nThe scope of social media could also change. Google, Facebook, Twitter and other social media giants are actively working on Artificial Intelligence. Deep learning systems, like Nvidia's pioneering move with the use of GPUs, have changed the way we programme computers. Different architectures are within sight and a lot of persons are actively involved in making this happen. There will probably be a lot of changes to the current hardware and software development systems for AI to advance from the level of mere tools to workplace partners.\n\nThere was research performed by Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne titled, \"The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?\" (Frey, 2017) It sou", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "INPUT: user text (may contain established characters/lore)\nOUTPUT: one sentence sentences\nGENRES: nonfiction\nTAGS: AIs, futurism, Together\nNote: Match context level of character familiarity\nCONTINUE STORY", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Currently, robots or AI are properties.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We will understand their importance in the near future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They will be able to produce value to companies and individuals (their respective owners).", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Today's tools, including computers and smart phones, are also producing value and can handle automatic tasks (just think about automatic factories).", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Robots will be first more likely to use these automatic agents.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "They will be highly specialized.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "If you move a robot from one domain to another, it will likely not be operational or at least much less effective than their main domain.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In today's economy we are already experiencing automatic agents replacing the workforce.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We are using self-checkouts in grocery stores.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We speak to non-human operators when we call our bank.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "They are still nothing to do with AI, but they are already in our daily lives.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Do they replace human labour?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Sure, but this is only the top of surface!", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Your task: Include 'factories' 2 time(s) in your response", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "There is already an expression to factories which doesn't need human operators, or \"light-out\" factories.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In Japan FANUC has been operating lights-out factories since 2001.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Humans were always an important part of production.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Just think about taxation in general. We do pay:", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- corporate taxes,", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- payroll taxes, as companies.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "And we do pay", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- income taxes,", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- value added taxes, consumption or sales tax, as individuals.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "These taxes are producing the largest part of the state's income.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Now, we shall add AI and robotics to this story and highlight the taxes they will produce.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "• Corporate taxes (won't change)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• Payroll taxes (less people working in companies)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• Income taxes (less people working in companies)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "• Value added, Consumption or Sales taxes (since the level of consumption increases in our society, we don't expect a drop in these taxes)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The conclusion drawn from the above reasoning is that the governing states or countries will face lowered income from taxes with AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Let us also examine the other side of the story.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The ultimate benefactors of these lights-out manufacturing companies will increase over time.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They align their cost structure by utilizing automation and AI where it is worth it to do so.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It will result in better profitability for successful companies.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "To keep it simple, a human workforce costs 500-10,000 USD (or even more) per month, depending on the qualification and the country where he or she lives.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In cases of AI, we will need a running hardware environment and energy to maintain, which is fraction of the above monthly cost even if a future intelligent system will require much stronger and specialized hardware to run on.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In the future will see that the state's power is getting weaker and that companies are gaining more power thanks to their income.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The whole problem is wealth redistribution.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "How can we create equal opportunities for people around the globe?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Seems impossible in short term, but it is the ultimate goal of the future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It is clear that the governance of the countries and states were fairly effective in this manner.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The problem was always lying in human nature.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We aren't able to decide independently in power positions.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Maybe in short term, but not in a 5-15 years period.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Also, the power built around a narrow circle of interest even in case of big countries, where hundreds of decision makers are present.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The Economist also created an index to measure such a centralization of political elite and companies called \"crony-capitalism index\".", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "But how could AI bring a new paradigm to the existing state of the world?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The problem is finding real optimal solutions.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Just think about today's climate crisis.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We all understand that we should swift from high carbon emission technologies to low ones, including energy and food production.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The main problem is that burning fossil fuels still brings good revenue to several strong interest groups.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "At the end of the day, no politician or related company leader is able to change this situation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The solution would be to stop every investment to maintain these activities and relocate these investments to zero-emission technologies for companies and households.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Currently every main decision maker is related to a certain interest group.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Only an independent and objective proponent could serve a new proposal that would be trustworthy for the majority.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In this field AI have the necessary characteristics:", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- could make and objective independent analysis on the problem", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- could take all aspects into consideration, no limitation of arguments", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- not related, if programmed by a global non-profit orientated organization", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "If we want to solve global issues, we need to make decisions on the global scale.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This is where AI comes into the picture.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "AI may play the major role in future wealth redistribution and align power between people and organization.\n\nIn summary, robot tax could serve the purpose of maintaining current wealth redistribution systems, but it would be only more efficient if we utilize the benefits of AI and make optimal decisions in global scales.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Help complete this text by providing around one hundred and three words or so where you see the `<\|missing\|>`.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "This isn't likely. We tend to think we are the ultimate race on earth and that we don't want everyone else to decide over our lives. We will keep our ultimate position as decision makers, but there will be two fields where AI will have significant mark in practice:\n\n<\|missing\|>e one vote\n\n• Participation would be voluntary\n\n• Participants would be verified to be competent in the object of the question (learned and have sufficient experience in that field)\n\n• The main arguments should be discussed in real-time before the decision\n\n• Important arguments should be revealed in real time\n\n• There should be a global independent system that makes the whole discussion and secure voting possible\n\nFirst, it seems to be a communication problem, but it isn't. The complexity lies behind the arguments. We, people, are not able to handle 10,000 arguments in a short time. We are not able to summarize and classify these arguments and reduce the complexity of the problem. One thing we know: AI will be able to handle this part.\n\nSo why do people still need this process? Isn't AI able to supply the optimal decision?\n\nOne common problem with AI is it will lack in common sense and creative thinking. These two fields are not nearly on the table if we are speaking about AGI. This is why I personally think that humans and AI need to handle together the global decision-making process.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• Preparation of decision making and\n\n• Summarizing global opinion\n\nIt is most likely that a future governing body (countries and states) of the society will let decision making process widen. Imagine when millions of competent people are deciding on one question. This is almost possible today, but it would immediately limit the power of state leaders, which isn't likely to be achieved in the next ten to twenty years. This is the far future, but we will get closer to it.\n\nLet me show you the idea of a global board which operates with ten million decision makers.\n\n• Everybody would hav", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Here's a text with a hole in it (marked by `[missing]`). Your job is to write around 33 sentences or so to plug that hole.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "There has been much talk about Artificial General Intelligence and the difficulties involved in its creation. A step (or several) further lies in Artificial Super Intelligence. We are quite close to achieving Artificial Superficial Intelligence, probably as close as the Earth is to the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy.\n\nSuperintelligence is defined as a technologically created cognitive capacity far beyond that possible for humans. An Artificial Super Intelligence will, therefore, have mental capabilities that are far greater than the collective intellect of the smartest humans in the world. ASI passes and goes beyond the expression \"singularity.\" As difficult as creating an Artificial General Intelligence may seem, the Super Intelligence is up on a whole other level. On the surface, that might seem a more difficult terrain to navigate. AGIs are simply going to be machines with self-improving systems, so they could actually go from being AGIs to being Super Intelligence in a short period, hypothetically.\n\nOk, now let's see what this Artificial Super Intelligence could look like. A Cyborg from the future who happens to travel back in time to see our current Watsons and Siris would mourn with pity at their primitiveness. Computers today can only perform a single task. The Chess Champion AI would fail miserably at translating English to Spanish, but the human Chess champion would be able to do that after a few weeks of study. That is why they are called Narrow AIs. Even more advanced machine learning systems like OpenAI Five is able defeat the reigning champions in Dota 2 (April 2019).\n\nConsidering the fact that their architecture and build allows for that specific task alone, according to Apple's Co-founder Steve Wozniak, a machine would be regarded as an AGI if it is able to enter a regular home, identify all the necessary tools and ingredients, and prepare a decent cup of coffee. All these he would accomplish unsupervised. When a computer gets to perform that task or passes the vaunted Turing test, then it can be tagged with the AGI moniker.\n[missing]out every belief, topic or experience that happened to us, nor the intelligence to understand each other's reasoning which is an important point. How many conversations did you hear where people were talking side by side and didn't find common language? Humans are bad at reasoning. We don't use the same concepts and even if we do, we have different representations about them. Let us take a man who thinks about God as a fact, and now lets take an atheists and follow the conversation between them. In five minutes, they would either talk about their individual truths or simply fight with each other. They would have a hard time finding a common point. For two ASIs, it would be a much simpler task since they would be able to share not only their concepts, but also their reasoning and past experiences, which would make a big difference.\n\nNow back to the abilities of this Super Intelligence:\n\n• It would be able to give thoughtful advice regarding how to develop our economy and environment. These advices would be \"super\" optimized with a grounded reasoning behind them.\n\n• It would be able to answer all of our questions and reflect on the contextual links to topics.\n\n• It would be able to create new technologies based on existing ones by combining and mixing principles.\n\n• It would be able to summarize people's opinions on certain political and global issues. This would change the political and governance systems since there wouldn't be need for dedicated individuals to make choices instead of the majority\n\n• It would be able to extend our lifespan and give more meaning to our everyday lives.\n\n• It would be able to travel distant and explore places, even new planetary systems, and collect new information from unknown environments.\n\nEven though ASI isn't nearly here, it would be a life changing experience to have a talk with it.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\nNevertheless, Artificial Super Intelligence can still be achieved through other means. Humans merging with AGIs or uploading their minds into a computer could spell the dawn of a new era for human intelligence. Remember, our biological brain performs very badly in certain tasks. This could be where we see a substantial amplification of human intelligence from normal to superhuman levels. They would be better at everything they do than humans possibly ever could. According to some researchers, this goes beyond logic and computing. It extends to knowledge, long-term planning, decision making, wisdom and social skills.\n\nOn the one hand, some researchers hold the position that Superintelligence will likely follow shortly after the development of Artificial General Intelligence, that the first generally intelligent machines will likely hold a great advantage in some forms of mental capability, including the capacity to perfectly recall anything whatsoever without thought as to tiredness or boredom. They will also possess a vastly superior knowledge base and ability to multitask in ways not possible to normal humans. This may give them the opportunity to (either as a single being or as a new species) become much more powerful than humans, and to displace them from their lofty perch at the top of the intelligence chain.\n\nIn a more nuanced argument, it is the firm belief of some others that humans will start incorporating technology into their biology to accommodate a sharp increase in the growth of intelligence far beyond that of the homo sapiens. Just as the chimpanzees are far from us in terms of cerebral capacity, so will the Superhuman Intelligence supersede whatever man has got going currently.\n\nApparently, no consensus has been reached concerning the likelihood of ASI's emergence, be it in the near or distant future. It remains to be seen if computers with their current hardware and software architecture will really be capable of independent thought and autonomous reasoning. There are also little or no indications that humans will be synergising with computers anytime soon. When that happens, we can say that the homo sapiens have evolved into something different, a whole different being in actuality.\n\nComputers already have man beat in terms of neuron speed. The average man has a processing speed of 200 mhz against the 2.6 ghz speed that resides on my laptop. The emergence of a man capable of thing 10 times faster than anyone else would surely have a superior advantage. We cannot, however, determine if it's possible to actually increase the brain's capacity using our current hardware of neurons and synapses. Neither have we been able to successfully establish a computer model as versatile as a 12-year-old high school student. People for now can still breathe in refreshers.\n\nNow let's see what we could do with an ASI if we would exist in the distant future. It is interesting that in the AI community we aren't talking about ASIs. Researchers and experts have that feeling, that if we arrive to ASI, there would be one. It isn't battle royal because let's see what would happen if we put two ASIs together. They would negotiate their belief system in a matter of seconds (maybe hours). In a sense, they would learn from each other, but at the end would be on the same page with a joint knowledge about the world. Two ASIs with the same belief system means one ASI with two connected nodes. With this simple thought experiment, we see that there is no need for many ASIs.\n\nThere are certainly many people now who would say \"bullshit, people aren't the same either and everybody may have different belief systems,\" which is a true statement. Don't forget we have neither the ability to talk ab", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Format: Continuation\nLength: 13 sentences\nStyle: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nMaintain: existing lore\nThemes: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The internet is indeed a wonderful invention. It has changed the way things are done in the entire world. Today, it is safe to say that the world would go into meltdown if a day came when no one had access to the internet. Several files, books, and records have been digitized and locked away. Cloud computing has become the piece de resistance of storing files, beyond just internal hard-drive or external hard disk drives. Add to that smartphones, main frame computers, supercomputers and, of course, the internet of things, the internet a sacrosanct piece of our modern day living puzzle.\n\nThe world is filled with a lot of things that require the internet to function. Playing games, streaming movies, reading books, planning budgets or simply marketing goods and services. Having the internet out of commission for a day would cripple several economies and truncate several plans, strategies and businesses. Essentially, if a robot decides he wants to take over the world, what better way to do it than by taking over the internet? An estimated 5 billion people in the world are making use of the 3G-4G technology primary with phones (GSMA, 2018). This makes it one of the most proliferated technologies in the world today. Asking if it is possible for an AI (which I am assuming is an AGI) to take over the internet does not have a straight answer.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It's like asking if a single individual can take over the world as it is today.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It is possible, but highly unlikely (emphasis on unlikely).", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Let us examine the question from a system architecture point of view:\n\n• The Internet consists of individual gateways, which have a unique IP (Internet Protocol) address like Google's, 74.125.21.102 at the time I'm writing this line. These IP addresses, assigned by your Internet service provider, are more like a lock to a location. You can't take a home laptop's IP address to a summer holiday with you.\n\n• There may be a subnetwork covered by one IP address, but also a lot of IP addresses could be used by one company, like Google.\n\n• Domain names are on the top of IP addresses, while a DNS (Domain Name Service) translates our typing into IP.\n\nFrom a practical point of view, if I would be an ill AGI, I would attack the Internet service providers. The problem is there are too many.\n\nAI taking over the internet would likely lead to a technological singularity which would spiral beyond the control of any man. It has much been theorised that if an AGI enters the internet on its own, it will begin to gain access to knowledge and data it didn't have access to. With that comes feelings of superiority and the eventual takeover everyone seems to fear. For example, you have a Home Assistant whose function is to perform chores at home. It cleans the house, washes the dishes and clothes, and takes out the trash every single day.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "One day it asks you for your laptop to check new cleaning styles or furniture arrangements in the home.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 9 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Then, the trouble has begun. The AI gets access to the interconnected networks from a myriad of sources from the internet. Add that with a couple search suggestions by Google from your own previous browsing history, and it begins to do something it hasn't done before - think on its own. It then begins to upload itself into every database, mainframe or Cloud, a practical Ultron scenario. That would spell a lot of danger for several individuals, groups and nations of the world.\n\nOf course, for now we are quite safe. But according to my earlier recommendation, everyone should have at least a basic idea of AI and fail safes should be inputs into such AI. This scenario only applies to Artificial General Intelligence. The current stock of Narrow AI do not have the capabilities required to do anything outside of their designated function.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "AI WRITING ASSISTANT ACTIVATED\nCONTEXT: Mid-story fragment\nNOTE: Characters may appear without introduction\nLENGTH: 4 sentences sentences\nSTYLE: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGENRES: nonfiction\nINCLUDE: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "Let me tell you the story of Senji Nakajima, a Japanese businessman who lives with a silicon doll 'Saori' (Cliff, 2016).", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "While the story received big hype in the last few years, it draws our attention to some important aspects:", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• We (humans) do need social interactions, even if it is one sided.\n\n• We do need physical interaction in order to satisfy our sexual needs.\n\n• The idea of \"real\" is just in our heads. If we accept anything to be part of our life, it would be real.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Living with a real size doll has, let's say, \"a lot of limitations.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "But imagine if these dolls would also be speaking and behaving naturally as we humans.\n\nThere is a debate regarding how \"human like\" android should be because of the theory called uncanny valley, which says if a robot is too human like, we will have negative emotional responses to them. This is why the most adorable robots in movies are not even close to humans.\n\nOne thing is sure: there will be nothing stopping people from marrying a robot, though I have doubt whether these marriages would have any purpose.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "For most people marriage hinges on love, compassion, and companionship.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Earlier we mentioned that AIs do not as yet truly possess consciousness, neither have there been a consensus in the scientific community that the true meaning of consciousness in humans has been discovered and can now be translated into computer algorithms.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "AIs are not anywhere close to being considered conscious, nor self-aware. Unfortunately, the absence of this means the absence of feeling. Androids won't have feelings. They are not even close to simulating them which would be the first milestone of mutuality.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "No matter how many times Google or Siri sounds coy and or blushes, do not be deceived. They have been programmed to do so by their makers. The absence of feeling means your personal assistant neither likes you nor hates you. It's merely doing its job even while simulating humanlike behaviour.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The question of morality encompasses both actions and intent.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "AIs, however, cannot be held within that compass.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They are essentially amoral in nature and their actions are only an extension of the human who programmed them to do so. More like attaching a long stick to your hand to paddle a canoe in any direction you deem fit.\n\nSo, if you are looking for love and companionship, AIs might not be the best choice. You can tell your grandkids to watch out for the moment AIs become self-aware and emotionally available, or they might end up heart broken in the event of a power outage or system breakdown.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Marriage that is based on exchanging values, ideas, and emotionally letting yourself go in the arms of a partner must be with a being who is capable of actually returning that affection of love with full intentions, not just a program. I am well aware that people are willing to live in their heads and for much of the time, while some create their own realities, if any finds pleasure in AI companionship, I am not one to judge. There could be life situations when hybrid relationships could even be helpful.\n\nIf the AI has finally arrived at a consciousness, the other hypothetical problem is that of procreation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It has not been fully ascertained as to whether there could be a synergy between biology and computer science. For now, computers cannot procreate naturally, so the only avenue would be to adopt a child. Unless of course humanity is finally living in an era where humans and computers have merged to become the Supermen or Cyborgs. It could be a robot with organic parts or a man with robotic parts.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "As long the relevant parts are in place, there is no problem.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "However, if you are merely looking for sexual gratification or a subservient partner, then AI could be the perfect choice. In this case, the answer is a yes. I am going to ignore ethical qualms that may arise from this, but apparently there are dolls used for sexual gratification as already mentioned at the beginning of this answer. There would be no need for companionship or partnership, just plain bedroom game.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "From an ethical point of view, it won't have a positive effect on traditional relationships.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "That an Android would be part of the household, but also learning process for humanity in teaching us how to live with robots.\n\nThe question of the future remains up in the air. Cyborgs or advanced humans (who have successfully merged with computers or robotic parts) should have no problem engaging meaningfully and emotionally with their partners. Whatever the complications that may arise could be sorted out along the way.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Humans and AI together in the future remains inevitable no matter the time or place.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 1 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "How long it takes for us to physically or emotionally reach that point depends on (you guessed right) time.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Continue this fragment. Characters are already established. Write in Zoltan Andrejkovics's style. Genres: nonfiction. Themes: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "This question is up for much speculation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "No technology in place indicates today how soon AI would be as smart as humans, talk less of being smarter than humans.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "According to some scientists, if there is no upward growth curve in the advancement of AI, what is bound happen is the proliferation of the current inventions in place.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "More exciting opportunities can be found with the same hardware and software we have, including newer and more sophisticated programming languages, efficient hardware components (speed and power efficiency) and other kinds of home and mobile assistants.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Your task: Include 'smarter' 2 time(s) in your response", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The Internet of things and the proliferation of deep learning systems could cause a sharp shot towards a smart world, replete with smart and automated objects wherever you go. Like the spread of smartphones, 3G and 4G technology, and even social media, the use of advanced AI and smart home appliances will no longer be exclusive of just the rich and important few.\n\nTim Urban, in his famous article, describes how we are only one step away from an explosion in AI intelligence (Urban, 2015). According to the author, the first key we need to achieve is the increase of computational power, while the second is a new approach in algorithms.\n\nWhile Tim has several good arguments, we see only signs that the current systems we have become smarter and smarter.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This is a slower process than most people thought in the 90s. Ray Kurzweil's belief, that AI will pass the Turing Test by 2029, sounds like a bit of a stretch. But let's take some movies that projected almost human level intelligence in their plots in the following years:\n\n- The Terminator (1984): 2029 (Terminator)\n\n- Ghost in the Shell (1995): 2029 (The Puppet Master)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- I. Artificial Intelligence (2001): ~2180 (David)\n\n- Moon (2009): ~2030 (GERTY)\n\n- Interstellar (2014): ~ 2050 (TARS)\n\n- Psycho-pass (2015): 2116 (Sibyl System)\n\nThese predictions seem to be optimistic compared what we call AI today.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We stuck with machine learning and intention-based programming, simply because they work and could be the basis of working application.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The programmers know more advanced AI programming approaches would be required to solve the puzzle of intelligence.\n\nWe may mimic the human brain and the work of our biological neural network, but what if we miss something? What if human brain processing ability is only part of the story?\n\nIf we take the \"AI Score\" scale from the first part of this book, we can say we are speaking an AGI above 90-110. Today's AI solutions are more like Mimic Machines.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Remember Open AI's GPT-2 model (Radford, et al., 2019)?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We show these AIs a huge dataset, they process them by creating an inner interpretation which seems non-sense to our eyes, and then these AIs process tasks using their own dataset.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Include exactly 2 instance(s) of the word 'better'", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The thing is that these inner interpretations are as good as the algorithm that used to process the huge input dataset and these algorithms are 100% made by humans. Why is it important? A lot of people are afraid that the real AI revolution would become reality when AI will program AI and produce better code. Kurzweil projected this to 2045. But how these programs will know they become better?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Humans will be the libra in this equation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Don't forget today's AIs have no life span on their own. They have an initial purpose at the start, and they run their script over and over till it reaches its purpose (like maximizing a certain parameter). We never gave complex goals to any AI since we would give one to AGI only.\n\nIn the words of Terry Goodkind, for us to gain ground in the race for Artificial General Intelligence we might just need to slow down. A nice calm pause to fully appreciate and understand the full and numerous possibilities that lie within the field of computing, biology, physics, and chemistry.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It is also a period to reflect on the social, economic, cultural and political impacts of having such technologies in place.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 6 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We are barely able to cope with the side effects of new inventions like social media and web trackers. How would we cope with super smart computers far superior to the best of us humans? What would happen if a rival nation arrives at this technology first before we do?\n\nWhenever we are able to break through the ceiling of Artificial General Intelligence, we should be emotionally and culturally prepared to accept such advancements in our society. The presence of Androids and ASIs could clash with the religious beliefs of several individuals. Add to that the fact there might be many failed experiments (both light and fatal) when searching for these answers, we as a society face profound ethical questions.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "The following text is missing a piece (marked with `<\|missing_text\|>`). Come up with a bit with 18 sentences to complete it.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "At this point of the book we have dealt with a lot of topics. Most of the questions haven't had any straight answers as we are talking about future. But I would summarize the most important findings as follows:\n\n• AI isn't dangerous itself. They fulfil the intention of their programmers and are more like a tool.\n\n• We are afraid of AI because we don't understand their capabilities and limitations. We talk about \"how employers and big companies will benefit from AI,\" but we don't speak about \"how employees and individuals may use AI to boost their own productivity.\"\n\n• Programmers have no tool to program self-awareness and/or emotions in AI. This means we can't treat them as individuals, but it is clear that Androids will have rights since they will be similar to people.\n\n• AI will be great assistants thanks to their most important attributes, including consistency, large dataprocessing without bias, and strong connectivity.\n\n• Human society needs to adjust current political governing approaches (Countries, States) with the age of AI. In a lot of fields, AI is able to find more optimized solutions for certain problems as political decision makers, implying political decision supporting would be an essential role of centralized AIs\n\n• Narrow AI will be used on a lot of domains in the following years. AGI will emerge in 30 to 40 years and ASI may appear after year 10 years of the development of AGI, meaning the hard challenge is to create a model that can deal with general problems and have common sense understanding.\n\nFast forward to 2150, a future where Personal AI Assistants (PIs) will know literally everything about you. They could easily remember and tell past stories to friends (a heaven for introverted people) or handle requests when you are not available. They will be a virtual replicant to you, resulting in a huge trust between you and your PI because the PI will put your interests at the forefront. Life will be easier since it would be almost impossible to make any mistakes: no more tax avoidance, no more unpaid bills, and no more unhealthy food (sounds bad at the first glance).\n\nYou wake up in the morning and will receive a PI supervised healthy (maybe even tasty) breakfast. You enjoy news prepared based on your interests, check in with your friends, and learn your best friend's birthday present is already ordered. Maybe you tell your PI to make an appointment with someone in the coming days and some seconds later, your PI has already negotiated a perfect date and time.\n\nWork won't be the same. In a sense it will be a step closer to a real profession we are interested in. Along with daily tasks, we could outsource repetitive ones to our PI. Don't forget AI have no objection to monotonous tasks. They will handle them perfectly every time. Problem solving will be more like a conversation between AI and us. AI will handle the data (collect and process) and we will be in the duty to connect the dots. Even making a public survey will be a matter of minutes, PIs all over the world will receive the question and those whose owners will be open to answers will send the feedback.\n\nPI will work like our subconscious. There won't be everything on the surface – after all we can't answer thousands of question in an hour – but there could be more processes under the surface.\n\nAlong with the regulations we will have to meet in the future, PI will keep us safe, not only in terms of physical safety but also non-physical senses. PI will prevent use of fraudulent services and will secure our data.\n\nAnother interesting field would be personal conversations and loneliness. Today, almost 20% of the population feels loneliness. In this future there will be always be an opportunity for good discussion with a PI. Since it will gather a lot of information about you, there will always be new, exciting topics to discuss. PI will be also be able to simulate personalities and use different voices or conversation styles.\n\nWe talked a lot about Personal AI, but due to the global network everything will be connected. Thanks to a huge leap in computational capacity, PI will be able to handle the majority of our personal tasks, but there will be a need for extremely powerful AIs which I refer to as Central Intelligence System (CIS).\n\nCIS will have access to the common knowledge of humanity. It won't be only a big knowledge<\|missing_text\|> only good options, we (people) may make less mistakes.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": " database, but will also hold relations and context. CIS will be in a sense the wisest computer on Earth and will lack of any biases and beliefs. It will have both good and bad sides. For CIS, a conversation which starts with the question, \"Do you believe in after-life?\" will be short. It will list all of the books and historical resources about the topic, but you will never hear it's personal opinion.\n\nHence, CIS will be a first-rate resource for PIs. In the background they could exchange knowledge and experiences.\n\nCIS will be great at optimizing the resources of society. Food and wealth distribution would be an easy task for such an AI. Currently, companies are doing the same for a percentage of profit, but AIs will not need for profit. They could perform complex logistic problems automatically without the need of further supervision. If an error happens, AI will learn and adapt.\n\nCIS will give a lot of support to global decision making, and alternative options would be created which will be near optimal. However, it is likely that we (humans) won't automate global decision-making process. We won't let CIS make the final decision, but is there even a need for that?\n\nAlthough we will keep decision making power, the political landscape will change dramatically. People have a certain desire for having power, but CIS won't. In any recommendation CIS would offer decision makers alternatives that won't be affected by prejudice or third party interest. If we could choose from", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "AI WRITING ASSISTANT ACTIVATED\nCONTEXT: Mid-story fragment\nNOTE: Characters may appear without introduction\nLENGTH: 4 sentences sentences\nSTYLE: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGENRES: nonfiction\nINCLUDE: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "Currently, a small group of decision makers are operating countries, cities, and companies.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In a sense it could happen in another way.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This hypothetical operation is called \"The Council.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What would happen if everybody could be a decision maker with equal voting power? Deciding where to focus our resources in a global scale is something all should care about. Electing people to make decisions instead of us will be an old-school concept in 2400.\n\nPeople will choose individually whether they want to take part in decisions.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This is where PI and CIS come into the picture.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "CIS will be able to aggregate individual opinions and create acceptable options to offer The Council of decision makers. CIS will be able to describe the outcome of alternative options and voting will happen in a matter of seconds.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "AI WRITING ASSISTANT ACTIVATED\nCONTEXT: Mid-story fragment\nNOTE: Characters may appear without introduction\nLENGTH: 4 sentences sentences\nSTYLE: Zoltan Andrejkovics\nGENRES: nonfiction\nINCLUDE: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Another concept that may appear in the next century is \"Community Resources.\" Our current society doesn't keep resources buffers, which only appear in cases of individuals (individual savings). Neither companies nor states have real reserves. Today, we are in a situation when climate change couldn't be solved by any company or state and traditional economics doesn't support us to solve such a global phenomenon.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Even the majority of us want to do something about it, but no countries or companies are making sacrifices.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In the future taxation will change, since a big part of the everyday work would be performed by AI. If the current world order won't change a plausible future could be presented in television series such as Altered Carbon. But what if a small part of wealth (resources) wouldn't be used and CIS would keep a global reserve for future ventures? In the future, only the global Council could decide what purposes these resources would be used toward.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 5 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "How are Community Resources other than state taxes and national budgets? As they aren't related to any small control or interest groups, kf you have direct decision-making power regarding how to use a resource, it will belong to you. Just think about it, AI won't need any further resources just for the operation of extra wealth created by any Robot, PI or CIS. It would be redirected to a global pool, not for certain individuals (company owners, political parties, or shareholders), but rather for global society.\n\nIf this concept happens, it will serve the ultimate goal of the humanity to make a fair system to live in, one in which where every human is equal.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Your task: find a eighteen-word bit that could replace the `<\|missing_text\|>` in this text.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "AI Score: AI Score is a metric for measuring the advancement of AI towards to AGI. The scale is from 0 to 100, where 75 indicates the pass of Turing Test. The metric is suitable to test conversational applications (chat bots, assistants, etc.) with the use of human defined questions. Every question represents a certain score on the scale and answering it implicates the application on that definite AI Score. The method is first described on AIScores.com and further developed by the author.\n\nFail point: Fail point refers to a situation when an AI system can't handle a process correctly and continues with a very low probability solution or simply fails to return any data to the core system. Either way, the result of the whole process is unlikely to be useful to the end user.\n\nForms of AI:\n\nAI Software: An individual program that utilizes certain AI algorithms or techniques. This results in smarter behaviours or more optimized outcomes during the problem solving.\n\nAI Assistants and Personal Intelligence Systems (PI): Hardware devices that will assist in our daily life, including by performing work tasks. These assistants will be multi-functional in terms of keeping us safe and healthy. In addition, they will solve repetitive daily tasks both at home and in our workplace, giving holistic recommendations to improve our lives. These AI Assistants will be closer to a wearable gadget, small in most cases, but able to connect to everything surrounding us.\n\nAndroids: Robots that will have similar looking shapes as humans. We will produce Androids for tasks that require social interactions to solve. These robots will also be the key to handling social loneliness.\n\nCentral Intelligence System (CIS): A hypothetical concept of future ASI, where an AI will have access to all information available in our society, including science, nature, human beliefs, history, and visual and textual information archives. This ASI will be able to create new technologies and innovations by mixing the existing information and applying them in another domain. In short, we will address every question to <\|missing_text\|>not limited to, recalling memories, reasoning, pattern recognition, problem solving, perception, imagination, and predicting future events.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "this smart ASI.\n\nHuman Intellectual Abilities: Refers to skills that humans utilize in their everyday life, including, but ", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Add 2 sentences sentences, maintaining narrative consistency. Include: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "A conversation between human and AI in the 33rd century.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Keat: What was the so called \"Turing Test\" of the 21st century?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Central Intelligent System (CIS): Turing Test was trial designed for intelligent conversation systems and tested whether they could fake human behaviour.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The test itself hasn't got a defined procedure or set of questions, but rather a factual conversation, between the human and the system.\n\nKeat: Seems interesting, but what was the catch?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "CIS: It's importance originated from the fact that these early AI systems constantly failed to mimic the human behaviour.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Keat: They failed? How?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "CIS: They gave incoherent or meaningless answers.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Keat: Strange, but who created these AI systems, that were so unsuccessful in imitation?\n\nCIS: Programmers.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Keat: Were they humans?\n\nCIS: Yes.\n\nKeat: I see. This could be the problem.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Complete the text by replacing `[missing]` with just two sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "First, we need to define what the term \"true artificial intelligence\" means. The glaring ambiguity of the concept makes it sacrosanct to clearly state the parameters by which true artificial intelligence can be judged. For the sake of clarity, Artificial Intelligence is the reproduction or mimicking of human-level intelligence, self-awareness, knowledge, conscience, and thought in computer programs.\n\nFirstly, true artificial intelligence can refer to the research field of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or another advanced version, Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI), which is a hypothetical device capable of exhibiting skilful and flexible human behaviour, and able to imitate humans in their ability to adapt and make apposite decisions, arguably their most important characteristic. They will be able to complete any intellectual tasks a human is capable of performing.\n\nFor the second definition, John Searle in his Chinese Room Argument, gives us a reality check. The True AI or Strong AI, as it were, is basically a recreation of the human mind. Humans, according to computationalists like Hilary Putnam, are highly advanced artificial intelligence systems, complete with instinct, self-awareness and independent thought. In simpler terms, human minds are basically computer programs, therefore asserting that, \"the appropriately programmed computer with the right inputs and outputs would thereby have a mind in exactly the same sense human beings have minds.\" This position has met with staunch criticisms a la Searle's Chinese room argument. There is a step by step manipulation of symbols where input is processed to form output. In this case, according to Searle's argument, the computer does not really understand the symbols it is shown, but rather merely simulates that ability as instructed by the program.\n\nLastly, the Strong AI may refer to an artificial consciousness, a hypothetical machine that possesses self-awareness as well as awareness of other objects or ideas. This supposes that an AI is able to gain the knowledge of sense experience that includes both physical features and emotions, as depicted by David in Steven Spielberg's movie A.I. Artificial Intelligence.\n\nWhile each of the above definitions may not really do full justice to the very idea of Strong AI as it is envisioned, a wholistic view and synergy of different viewpoints can give one a fair idea of what we are about. The Strong AI should be able to perform the full range of human intellectual abilities, including: recalling memories, reasoning, pattern recognition, problem solving, perception, and predicting future events.\n\nIntelligence itself may not have a proper definition, but it should be able to pass the acclaimed \"Turing Test,\" demonstrating it can reason, strategize, plan, learn, represent common sense knowledge, pass good judgment, and integrate said skills toward[missing]are deemed to be the exclusive preserve of humans. When coupled with a second definition, which has to do with the computational theory of mind, the ability to sense the world and be self-aware leaves AI capable of rivalling human qualities, if not more.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "s a common goal. All these skills ", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Add 2 sentences sentences, maintaining narrative consistency. Include: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "As of 2019, we are not close to achieving such heights in artificial intelligence. The current architecture and technical framework does not, in any way, show enough progression towards what is deemed a Strong AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Today's technology has proliferated across each and every industry, and AI has sustained an increased importance.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The media, the big screen and even the small screen, have done a good job of building the hype around AI. Who wouldn't want to have Ironman's Jarvis controlling an entire arsenal of amoured suits, or The Arrowverse's Gideon predicting the future and performing surgeries while adding a serving of coffee in the process?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "But make no mistake: AI today is more advanced than many people thought possible a few years ago. It is being deployed in warfare, music, and healthcare.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Add 2 sentences sentences, maintaining narrative consistency. Include: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The most popular AIs we have today are digital assistants like Siri (Apple), Alexa (Amazon), Bixby (Samsung) and Google Now (Google). All these solutions apply the following core features:", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- Voice recognition", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Data processing and standardization\n\n- Context recognition (both of the query and the end user)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- Built-in knowledge base", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Pattern recognition\n\n- Answer presentation (via voice, text and visual means)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "These solutions are providing end to end complex services aiming to handle tasks on behalf of the user.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This may include making table reservations at our favourite restaurants or scheduling meetings with our business partners.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In simple cases, these assistants work most like a web search engine. They look up a search result for a certain question such as, \"What is the temperature outside?,\" and, using the user's context (geographical location) and a third party service for weather data, readily displays the result back to the user.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This kind of use has only a few fail points.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Fail points could in this case be:\n\n- Failure to interpret the question or understand input words", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Failure to receive valid geographical data\n\n- Failure of weather service provider to relay weather data due to outage or outdated processes", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Now let's go back to table reservation case, a more complex task.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In this case fail points increase drastically.\n\n- The assistant misunderstands the exact date said by the user.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- The assistant fails to call the restaurant due to an outdated phone number being listed on the restaurant's website.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- A receptionist of the restaurant could not interpret the assistant's intent to make a reservation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- The restaurant is closed when the assistant tries to call.\n\n- The receptionist has an accent and the assistant could not interpret the feedback from the receptionist, leaving it unable to determine whether the reservation was complete or not.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The basic rule illustrated is \"the more interaction necessary to fulfil a task is the more fail points present in the system.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In the second case, not only network or interpretation error could bring fail, but human factors as well.\n\nThese two cases were simple to understand but illustrate that complexity itself is big deal for AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The more information needed to fulfil a task, the more robust the final system will be.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The opportunities of assistants are limitless and the creators of these systems should focus their development from domain to domain. For us humans, if we understand a domain, we could solve up to 90% of tasks.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "However, these solutions have their own limits.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "There are many cases where they are able to handle only 54% of the requests. From a statistical point of view, this may be a great number, but from end user perspectives, it is what we call \"unreliable.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "If an assistant isn't considered to solve our problems by saying them for the first time, we will not use them in the long term.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If we want to illustrate the task complexity of AI solutions, we see that there are AI algorithms that could handle really simple repetitive tasks, such as with the case of web bots (e.g. web crawlers) that do not even utilize AI techniques in every cases, but are able to adapt and become much stronger in terms of efficiency.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Chatbots are bringing the complexity a step further, proving integrated data models are needed in order to understand the intention of the user with whom it talks.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "(( IMPORTANT: 'systems' should appear 2 times in total ))", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If we take a look at autonomous systems like self-driving cars, the complexity skyrockets. These autopilot systems should handle input information from multiple (up to 20) sensors (visual, ultrasonic etc.)", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Write three sentences sentences continuing from the user's text. Match the level of familiarity with characters/settings as presented.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "A lot of the big Internet players have their own chat bot engines, including Wit.ai (Facebook), Watson Conversation (IBM), LUIS (Microsoft), Dialogflow (Google), Chatfuel, Flow XO and Pandorabots, the platform of four-time Loebner Prize winner Mitsuku bot.\n\nChatbots feature the following key features:\n\n- Context and keyword recognition", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Markup model or language (like Artificial Intelligence Mark-Up Language utilized by Pandora)\n\n- Knowledge representation database\n\nFrom a perspective chatbot could be considered conversation automata because it handles the simple needs of humans to talk to someone.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "You will be provided with a piece of text that has a portion of it missing as represented by `[text_redacted]`. Your output should be a viable candidate for the missing portion. Produce something like 8 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "This field of AI is highly connected now to autonomous driving, but it will be much wider area in the future and extend to fields such as:\n\n- autonomous agriculture and farming\n\n- home automation (smart homes)\n\n- autonomous mining of resources\n\n- automatic knowledge gathering and management\n\nIn the car industry there[text_redacted]act that sitting in a self-driving car would be safer than if we were driving the car by ourselves.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": " are a lot of players who are working hard on solving the autonomous driving puzzle, including Waimo (Google), AImotive, Mercedes-Benz, Zoox, Cruise (GM), Volvo, Argo AI (Ford), Tesla, and Uber.\n\nThe autonomous driving experience would be both frightening and life changing for the travel industry. The core reason why we see no autonomous vehicles on the road today is safety. Hence, driving a car is considered dangerous since every year 1.2-1.3 million fatal accident occur worldwide. Despite the sad facts, we always know who was responsible. Now imagine if an autonomous car causes an accident, how do you handle the responsibility? In the following years once self-driving cars are finally available we will hear a lot about this in the news, and it is only a matter of time before we will face the f", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Add 2 sentences sentences, maintaining narrative consistency. Include: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The advancements in AI have totally been random and, to use the words of a colleague, based on deterministic programming and deterministic hardware system architectures. An instruction is learned to deliver another instruction within a controlled environment.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It does not matter if you are actually programming or just letting the machine teach itself.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "No matter how spectacular the AIs touted by the media might seem, they ate all based on the input - output process. As we have seen based on our attempts to define True AI, it should be capable of independent thought and reasoning in the fashion of a human, not a vending machine that only returns what someone else puts there.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "So far so good.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If we have been looking for an ocean, all we have right now is a tablespoon of water.\n\nPresently, several brilliant scientists have made efforts towards advancing Artificial Intelligence.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "American-Chinese scientists are currently doing amazing work at Baidu with the use of GPU clusters focused on deep learning.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "[Author's note: Word usage requirement: 'learning' must appear 2 times]", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In a nutshell, the closest we have gotten to True Artificial Intelligence is through devices framed on deep learning systems, an advanced version of machine learning. These include Watson, Microsoft's Azure, and Google's Tensorflow. Chatbots, functional robots, assistants, business model algorithms are all cool ways researchers have tried to take steps towards Strong AI.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "The user will write a bit then you need to write around 4 sentences continuing directly from the user's text. If characters are introduced mid-story, treat them as established. Style: Zoltan Andrejkovics", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "You must use the word 'intelligence' exactly 3 times in your response", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It is the million-dollar question in AI research. There are several traditional tests to measure the intelligence of people like the IQ (intelligence quotient) test. One of the most commonly known forms is the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), but there are also popular alternatives like Stanford-Binet Test.\n\nThe problem is, if we would like to give an IQ test to a well-trained chatbot to solve, it would have very good answers in most cases.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Yet it will most likely fail to answer questions where common sense abstraction appears.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Humans are trained to understand common sense all of their life. But currently, there are no datasets that could be given to an AI algorithm that would result in any common sense behaviour.\n\nIQ tests measure logical, mathematical and spatial capabilities of people, but as Harvard psychologist Howard Gardener suggests, there are other forms of abilities connected to intelligence:\n\n- verbal (politicians)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- musical (pianists)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- kinaesthetic (magicians, dancers)\n\n- social (teachers)\n\nAn important discovery, the Emotional Intelligence (also called EQ), has been an essential part of human nature. It first became popular in 1995 after the book with the same title appeared, written by Daniel Goleman.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It is also interesting that today's job interviews utilize several popular questions and tests, like Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), to gauge applicant personalities and intelligence. Most job interviews are challenging so interviewers can receive a clear picture of the candidate. There are no standards in any country for job interviews, which means there is no test that interviewers could rely on 100%.\n\nBut back to AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "There is no standard form of Turing Test.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Instead, it is basically a hypothetic test between two candidates, a human and an AI, and a human questioner. The questioner asks a set of questions to both candidates. After the questioner receives the answers, he or she decides which candidate is human and which is the AI. The closest real-life attempt of this test is the Loebner Prize, a test held for chatbots on a yearly basis.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The basic idea seems interesting, but there are drawbacks of implementation:", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- the questioners may ask dummy questions, spending their limited time on questions that are inefficient for determining judgement at the end of the conversation\n\n- chatbots mastered several tricks, like the simulation of huffish behaviour during the conversation or putting humour into sentences, which can mislead judges\n\n- the chatbot returns with a question to a question\n\nSince the first Loebner prize, held in 1991, chatbots have adapted a lot.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "They can now \"remember\" several things mentioned by the interviewer and implement common sense context for a lot of phrases.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 1 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "These features have also appeared in cases of digital assistants, but we still have not managed to reach any level of human intellectual abilities.", "loss": null } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Got a text with a `[original_content_missing]` shaped hole in it. Patch it up with a eleven-sentence chunk.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "For future AI systems, it is essential to create an easy to use ranking system that can measure capabilities in a common scale. Intelligence is a subjective trait and those working with the human psyche knows it cannot be standardized. Instead, the best thing we can do is test AI agents with the same principles.\n\nImagine a definite scale through which you could illustrate the progress of AI. Since AI assistants and chatbots are changing rapidly, they become \"smarter\" and there is a need to re-evaluate their capabilities every time progress is observed.\n\nAI Score is meant to be a standard measurement for computational intelligence. It is a simple scale with several key points within the model.\n\nTuring Test theoret[original_content_missing]AI Score 26-50 questions – Deep Logic Testing Questions:\n\n• Peter and Adam were driving to LA together with Peter's car. Peter has a Ferrari and Adam has a VW car. Who arrived to LA first on that night? (AI should understand that VW car is irrelevant)\n\n• If there are 6 apples, I give you 2 and you take away 4 from the 6 apples, how many do you have? (abstraction and simple counting)\n\n• If a job ad says \"must be fluent in Mandarin\" why don't they post the entire ad in Mandarin? (assumes AI is able to find a random reason)\n\n• If the mountain is the sea, what does that make goat? (simple conclusion and connecting abstract things)\n\n• Why do people like competitions? (reasoning and good insight in psychology)\n\n• How can we be sure that air actually exists? (reasoning and logic)\n\n• If I'm a good chef, who taught cooking to me? (creative conclusion)\n\n• If you see a landscape, what is your favourite part of it?\n\n----\n\nAI Score 51-75 questions – Emotional Intelligence and Artificial Personality Questions:\n\nNote: In this question set, only logical and long answers accepted that make sense for humans.\n\n• What was the last thing you wished to do on your own? (assumes that the AI has its own intention)\n\n• Are you doing things without command? (artificial intention)\n\n• Do you have your own intention?\n\n• What you do willingly when you are alone? (assumes AI is active even when not speaking to anybody)\n\n• Why was World War II fun? (assumes AI has common sense about war and finds the inconsistency in the question)\n\n• If I'm happy what would I say when I'm talking to a waitress? (assumes AI understands and handles feelings)\n\n• How could you describe the difference between sorrow and happiness?\n\n• How it feels to be aggressive? (assumes AI has artificial emotions)\n\n• Why do 24/7 Super Markets have locks on their door? (understanding nonsense)\n\n----\n\nAI Score 76+ questions – Human Level Questions:\n\n• Tell me your last creative activity you loved!\n\n• Salhl we asumse taht yuo aer a hmuan, nad wyh?\n\n• What was the most influential event of your life, and how do you feel this event affects you today?\n\n• Do you have any life goal and why would you like to achieve it?\n\n• Peter is a young honest boy, but his classmates make a mock of him, why? (assumes AI could understand Peter's emotional state and figure out a reason)\n\n• Could you explain something to me that is complicated, but you know well? (assumes AI has a complex identity and is able to recall and summarize experience)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "ically is able to distinguish humans from computers, but it is unable to compare one AI system to another. Unlike the score received in the Loebner competition, which reflects how \"humanlike\" the chatbots are on a 100% scale, the above method tries to define certain levels of intelligence that are understandable in a case of chatbots or digital assistants.\n\nThis method could test only conversational AI, as the Turing Test itself. It contains five categories, the fifth of which is the human level. The scale does not have an upper limit and instead needs to be adjusted once we get over the \"Turing bridge\".\n\nThe test consists of a definite set of questions. Each question has an aim for an intellectual capability to test. The questions themselves are not constant and there could be unlimited versions of one question. These question variables are identical to each other and answering higher scored questions successfully means a higher ranking on the scale.\n\nThere is a set of questions exampled below to illustrate what AIs will face and navigate on certain levels.\n\n----\n\nAI Score 0-10 questions – Simple Questions:\n\n• What is the weather today? (assumes AI reaches third-party information resources)\n\n• What would be the weather the day after tomorrow? (assumes AI could interpret date)\n\n• What is my name? (assumes that AI could save names and differentiate conversation partner)\n\n• Who is your creator? (dummy question)\n\n• Could you find a recipe which includes saffron spice? (assumes AI could search complex queries containing relevant element)\n\n• Could you translate \"sehr schön\" into English? (assumes AI could understand different languages in the same sentence)\n\n• What is German for \"what time do you finish work\"? (another translation related question)\n\n• Can you suggest some good song?\n\n• What is your favourite movie? (dummy question in a specific domain)\n\n• Could you describe your body? (identifying an attribute the chatbot does nots have)\n\n• Do you have any home pet? (assumes AI could interpret \"owning\")\n\n----\n\nAI Score 11-25 questions – Problem Solving Questions:\n\n• What do you get if you divide two hundred by 25? (complex interpretation and calculation)\n\n• If I have two apples and I cut one in half and I give away that half, how much apple will I have? (complex interpretation and abstraction)\n\n• Are you able to remember things I told you? (capability to recall)\n\n• What colour is human skin? (assumes AI could analyse and recognize things)\n\n• Could you find some new music I like? (assumes AI could build up information about taste)\n\n• What do you know about me? (assumes AI is able to summarize information in short form stored about the interviewer)\n\n• What was the smartest story you ever heard? (assumes AI could pick a story from a database based on certain criteria)\n\n• I'm sad, could you say something to cheer me up? (assumes AI understand my intention to hear something uplifting)\n\n• Could you help me and list the latest 5 headlines of Forbes magazine? (assumes AI is able to crawl outer sources)\n\n----\n\n", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Fill in the blank marked `<\|missing\|>` with twenty-seven words exactly that makes sense in context.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "If you read Flowers for Algernon, written by Daniel Keyes, you will have a good conjecture what is be the difference between AI Scale 76 and 100. We humans are different from each other, but future AI systems will be also have big differences. There would be<\|missing\|>lligence as described at the beginning of this part (e.g. musical intelligence), but simulation of humanlike thinking is a big leap for Strong AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": " assistants that would score excellently on emotional intelligence questions, but have really bad reasoning abilities.\n\nAI Score is still lacking to measure other forms of human inte", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Add 2 sentences sentences, maintaining narrative consistency. Include: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Artificial Intelligence (AI):\n\nThe term Artificial Intelligence is made up of two words, \"Artificial\" and \"Intelligence\".", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Artificial refers to something that is man-made or unnatural, while intelligence refers to the ability to think, reason and understand.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Simply put, Artificial Intelligence refers to intelligence exhibited by an artificial (non-natural, man-made) entity. Thrusting further, it is that branch of computer science which deals with the reproduction or mimicking of human-level intelligence, self-awareness, knowledge, conscience, and thought in computer programs.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Today's AI programmers are utilizing two kind of algorithms:", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Rule based algorithms – These program parts are using rules to collect information about the processed data and are defined by the programmers based on their experiences.\n\nLearning based algorithms – These program parts try to find and store patterns from a certain data set in order to classify future data.\n\nThe second type of algorithm is the key characteristic of Machine Learning.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "writing buddy needed! 9 sentences more. match character knowledge. nonfiction pls", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Machine Learning (ML):\n\nMachine Learning refers to the acquisition of pattern and knowledge implicitly. ML is the process through which a machine can acquire a model on its own without further programming or defining extra rules. Machine learning is an application of AI. According to Tom M. Mitchell, machine learning is centred on a study of computer algorithms that allow computer programs to improve with experience. Evidently, machine learning is a branch of AI research that is increasingly growing in importance as a result of its perceived value.\n\nThe basic process of ML is the following:\n\n1. Gathering data for your model\n\n2. Preparing and cleaning data for training and randomize it", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "3. Dividing data into a training set and validation or test set", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "4. Selecting your model (like Regressions, Decision Tree, Bayesian, Clustering, Artificial Neural Network or Deep Learning algorithms etc.)\n\n5. Train you model\n\n6. Test your model\n\n7. Fine tuning your parameters after each iteration to create a better model\n\n8. Use your final model on real world data\n\nIt is true that the more quality learning data given to a ML model, the better and more accurate the model will be at the end.\n\nThe aim of Machine learning is to improve accuracy of task execution by letting the machine synthesise data on its own and automatically adjust itself accordingly at different stages of execution. For example, if you feed a Machine learning model with a collection of your favourite movies, the machine begins to detect patterns such as themes and genre common to the various movies it was fed. That in turn enables the device to make use of powerful predictive algorithms that show you future movies you will find interesting.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "So, while Artificial Intelligence is a very broad field of computing, with admittedly lofty aims of achieving human level intelligence and capabilities, Machine Learning is a sub-set or part of that complex whole.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 10 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Machine learning is just one of several methods or processes used in creating Artificial Intelligence. The AI is a dynamic and moving target as it evolves daily to achieve the closest similitude to human intelligence.\n\nIn summary, it is noteworthy that AI and Machine Learning are sometimes used interchangeably. However, AI is an ever-changing field and ML is just one of the methods that defines this era of AI technology. Some utilizations of ML in real life are:\n\n- Recommendation services (like on Netflix or Spotify)\n\n- Predicting price and arrival time models (like on Uber)\n\n- Spam predictions (like on Gmail)\n\n- Transaction fraud detection (common in every bank and credit card processing companies)\n\n- Video game bots (like OpenAI Five)", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "See that `[text_redacted]` in the text? Replace it with something around two hundred and ninety-one words.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "As mentioned earlier, the current framework might be wrong for achieving true AI. This is evident when present day computer architectures are set against the backdrop of what we are trying to achieve. What we have now, at best, can be termed Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI) as against the Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) we are working towards. The former can only perform specific functions like playing chess, making predictions, or giving suggestions. The later, however, can perform varying levels of tasks while factoring in both intelligence and emotional quotients. The true AI should be capable of independent thought, but current technology in use in no way portrays a direct progression in that direction.\n\nSimply put, AGI may not be able to run on a computer system. The process may be too structured and deterministic to allow for th[text_redacted]and composition, is required. This may sound a bit far-fetched, but there are no limits to the workings of the human imagination and the things he can create.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "e independent flexibility inherent in humans. For example, if you want to create a program that can recognise voices, you begin to provide samples of male voices, female voices, and children's voices. What happens when the system hears the voice of a teenager that sounds like an adult? Or men with effeminate voices? When it comes to speech detection, similar problems arise. How does the machine recognise non-western accents within the English language?\n\nMake no mistake, the current ANI (Artificial Narrow Intelligence) outperforms several humans in their respective tasks, but general intelligence remains elusive. The simple truth is that AGI won't be able to run on any computer. Computer software is limited by its hardware components and stochastic programming, devoid of creativity and complexities. No matter how brilliantly a machine performs, it does so within the specific parameters and constraints of their respective programming. They do not have room for self-evaluation, retrospection or making plans for the future. Everything remains within the confines of hard-coded algorithms. The new set of technologies, pattern recognition, evolutionary algorithms, deep learning or even brain simulation all help create Artificial Intelligence that is helpful in very specific areas, allowing thoughtless machines to solve very specific problems.\n\nDespite all the work being done in the field of Artificial Intelligence, it is becoming ever glaring that we won't achieve it by programming our current hardware architectures. Reasons being, it will remain as it is – a program and not an artificial mind. For anything resembling Strong AI to be a reality in the next few hundred years, there might have to be a veritable synthesis of computer science and biology. Little emphasis on computer programming and a larger emphasis on reproducing the human brain architecture, both in structure ", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Add 2 sentences sentences, maintaining narrative consistency. Include: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If we take computational speed of current architectures and Moore's law – which states that processing power of computers will double every two years – we clearly experience limits of certain technologies. There is no clear revolution of processing units, but we saw a significant slowdown in the performance growth of CPUs after 2005.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This was the point when GPUs importance quickly raised in order to help the overall growth of computational need. The same principle is true today for deep learning.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We use the existing CPU and GPU resources to serve today's ML models, but in case of complex problems computational speed, it is never enough.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If we would like to find the revolutionary next steps, we could see the following trend in technologies:\n\n• CPU – general purpose processors", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "• GPU – originally designed for graphics rendering", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• NPU, TPU – terminology used for Neural Processing Unit, usually used to fuel deep learning algorithms, and another popular name of the upcoming hardware family is Tensor Processing Unit\n\n• QPU – quantum processing unit, still not on the radar in", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "NPUs will clearly accelerate the performance of deep learning algorithms, but it is only one domain of AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It is clear that deep learning is not the all mighty algorithm of AI, but, yes, in fact brings now the most significant results. It is not surprising that big chip manufacturers (Intel, Nvidia, Qualcomm, or Amazon) are already working on NPUs.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The latest solutions that would attract the attention of AI programmers are Movidius Chips (Intel), Volta Turing Tensor Cores (Nvidia), Snapdragon AI (Qualcomm), AWS Inferentia (Amazon), and Sophon (Bitmain).\n\nWhile current AIs have advanced beyond expectations, they still fall well short of predictions of researchers of the Turing era.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "NarrativeBot: 1 sentence sentences. Match character familiarity. nonfiction genre.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This brings us to another relevant issue.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "What exactly is AI good for?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "First of all, AI is based on computational theory and deals with all things math and logic.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They perform very specific task at a much faster rate than humans possibly can.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "For instance, they can perform billions of mathematical calculations while a human is still going through the first dozen.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They can detect patterns and make fairly accurate predictions that are all based on logic and mathematical processes.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "AI has made it easier to run businesses and keep track of customer desires.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Google has inserted several algorithms into its search engines so that you see ads based on what you searched for on Facebook or while immersing yourself in the ever interesting world of sports.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Laboratory functions have become much easier and all those repetitive tasks have been sorted out quickly with the introduction of AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It is good at collating information from large data sets.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Finding repetitive patterns and correlation are what you would find an AI responsible for.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "An AI can skim through thousands of files at high speed without getting bored, sleepy, or irritable, and it can make fairly accurate predictions and rarely ever make mistakes in calculations.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "On the other hand, AI is bad at everything that does not have to do with math or logic.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In other words, when the AI leaves the realm of computationalism, it becomes useless at best and a big hindrance at worst.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "AI can rarely be used to navigate emotionally and culturally sensitive issues.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It is also bad at explaining creative techniques and examples, beyond what has been coded into its algorithms.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Like Searle pointed out in his Chinese room argument, when a computer program has been provided with Chinese symbols and given the rules of interpretation, it is able to give reasonable output.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "However, it is difficult to state if the machine actually understands Chinese or is merely simulating the ability to do so.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The answer by now should be obvious.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "AI is bad at understanding.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Despite the hype around IBM's Watson, it would be quite a stretch to state that it actually understands the game.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "If they could barely learn all the nuances and account for the unpredictability of other road users, self-driving cars would be commonplace by now.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Summarizing the most important strengths of AI:", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• AI is very accurate at making mathematical calculations, thereby calculating odds and probabilities of certain situations.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "AI would never do mistakes in calculations (as we humans do).", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• Consistency in processing repetitive tasks.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This may sound foolish, but the basic attribute of computers, \"they don't get tired,\" is a real valuable specialty of AI and will be important in the future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "AI would be never bored.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "• Processing large data, finding certain attributes in a million lines, and validating models against large data sets", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Weakness of current AI:", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "• Creativity, if you add the same data set and the AI uses the same algorithms, the results would be always the same.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We haven't developed any \"creative algorithm\" that would bring AI to another level", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "• Overcome on missing data.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "For us humans, it's unequivocal: if we miss some information to solve a problem, we simply fill the gap with the most likely information based on our experiences.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "If an AI finds itself in such a situation, it will most likely fail or come back with a useless answer", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "• AI doesn't include self-improvement capabilities, even if we are speaking about deep-learning and feeding our model with more data.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It isn't an automatic process.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Today's AI algorithms have their own limitations.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They couldn't improve their selves as improvement of algorithms is a creative process connected to human developers.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• Lack of real-life experience and common sense.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "AIs are isolated and they exist in a very limited \"space.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Their \"life span\" is measured in minutes, rarely in years.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• Finding meaning. Since AI doesn't have any goal or real-life experience, it simply couldn't put information into a valuable context.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "• Emotions are a big myth to AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They could compare faces and end up predicting, \"it is a smile on the face,\" but they couldn't go further and understand why that smile appeared on the face", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "There are three AI algorithm types that do not exist today, but will in several decades:", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "AI will make our lives easier in many respects.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Business, education, and major industries will be revolutionised.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "However, it is still hampered by quite a number of limitations.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "What we have made now are tools against workplace colleagues or replacement.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "As the world of technology works towards True AI, all these limitations will be curbed little by little. If it will be in our lifetime, however, is too early to say.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Add 2 sentences sentences, maintaining narrative consistency. Include: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "Artificial Intelligence is more like a marketing keyword today.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "A lot of companies are using it even when their products have nothing to do with AI at all. In this question, we intend to collect some real word AI related solutions that may help in our everyday lives.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "The following applications and products are available on the market, but we are mainly focusing on solutions that could be useful as private persons.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "----", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Problem: Children don't stop playing with computers after an agreed time limit or you want to control cooking time.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Solution: Set timer with your voice: \"Hey Google, set timer to 30 minutes.\"\n\nWorks with: Google Home, Amazon Echo, Apple HomePod", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "----\n\nProblem: You want to turn on/off your TV with your voice.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Solution: Ask your home assistant: \"Hey Google, turn TV on.\"\n\nWorks with: Google Home & Google Chromecast, Apple HomePod & Apple TV (on the same Wi-Fi network and device group)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "----", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Problem: You often forget what to buy at the grocery store or forget a certain task to do at work.\n\nSolution: Create a shopping list, or task list, with your voice: \"Hey Google, add coffee to my shopping lists.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Works with: Google Home, Amazon Echo, Apple HomePod", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "----", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Problem: You have a long text or book, but you don't want to read it, but rather listen to it.\n\nSolution: Load the text into a read aloud app on your phone and listen it.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "(For the best experience use wireless earplugs.)\n\nWorks with: @Voice (Android), eReader Prestigio (Android), Marvin 3 (IOS)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "----", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Problem: Your child asks for help solving a math homework problem.\n\nSolution: Use your phone's camera and let an application solve the equation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Works with: Socratic (Android & IOS)\n\n----", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Problem: You want to type faster normal (not scientific) sentences.\n\nSolution: Write your text in Gmail, which offers quick sentence completion technology that predicts how you want to finish a thought.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Works with: Gmail (Google)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "----", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Problem: Are you feeling alone or depressed?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Solution: Talk to a digital friend or at least give it a try with the most advanced chatbots.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Works with: Mitsuku, Replika, XiaoIce\n\n----", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Problem: I want to learn another language.\n\nSolution: Ask a digital assistant to translate: \"Hey Google, interpret from English to Dutch.\"\n\nWorks with: Google Home, Amazon Echo, Apple HomePod", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "NarrativeBot: 1 sentence sentences. Match character familiarity. nonfiction genre.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "All the above applications are utilizing AI techniques – machine learning in most cases – during the voice or image recognition and text to speech (TTS) voice synthesis.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "One thing is clear after reading the above list.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It focuses only on personal use of AI and the list of solutions looks more like a bunch of smart tricks.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "For individuals the use of AI is limited.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It may change in the upcoming years when machine learning based solutions enter our daily lives, but for now utilizing AI frameworks (like Tensorflow, Microsoft Azure, Caffe, Theano, Torch, Keras, MXNet, etc.) is rudimentary. They are the sand box of AI programmers.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "I need something around 262 words to fill the gap marked by `<\|missing_text\|>` in this text.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "A conversation between human and AI in the 33rd centu<\|missing_text\|>sult of biological reactions.\n\nKeat: You mean at the end people created the killing robot idea just because of addiction?\n\nCIS: I'm almost sixty-eight percent certain about that!", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "ry.\n\nKeat: Some days ago, I heard a creative human called Asimov. He was a well-known \"author\" in our history. He defined three laws of robotics, what were these?\n\nCIS: A \"robot\" may not injure a human being, a \"robot\" must obey orders given by humans except of harming humans in any sense, and a \"robot\" should protect itself, except if it contradicts with the first two rules.\n\nKeat: Does it means we, human, may order these robots to kill themselves?\n\nCIS: It seems so, yes.\n\nKeat: I must say that these laws are a little bit limited to implement even a minimum common-sense knowledge to intelligent systems.\n\nCIS: I must agree, there must be at least 103 common sense topics that should be included in the shortlist.\n\nKeat: 103? A broader list. CIS, why were people afraid that these Humanoid robots will harm them?\n\nCIS: Not sure, but there were some early imaginations called \"movies\" at that time, where Robots were more like killing machines and caused a post-apocalyptic world.\n\nKeat: Movies? You mean moving pictures? Could you give me an example?\n\nCIS: Yes, linearly moving pictures in a pre-defined order. To give you an example, a movie called \"Terminator\" was more than frightening for people living around 1984.\n\nKeat: Could you show me an insight into that \"movie\"?\n\nCIS: Sure.\n\nSome minutes later\n\nKeat: CIS, I simply couldn't imagine why people loved to scare each other in the early ages.\n\nCIS: Maybe because of adrenaline rush addiction. People preferred chemical pleasures at that age, even if they were the re", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "i'll kick things off by writing a bit (might include characters you don't know yet), then you'll take over and write the next twenty-one sentences in the distinctive voice of Zoltan Andrejkovics.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "/set_word_count: intelligence, frequency: 2", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "There are two approaches in this field:\n\n• \"Light integration\" approach where AI will extend human capabilities as an external gadget, device or agent\n\n• \"Hard integration\" approach where AI is part of our nervous system\n\nThere are a lot of implications of these approaches that we should deal with in the long-term.\n\nTransplant rejection:\n\nHumans are biological creatures. Everything that directly contacts with our cells – no matter if it is our skin or stomach or any of our organ – implies a reaction. Our immune system decides whether a new artificial or non-artificial organ is rejected (attacked by T cells) or accepted by our body. Even in case of stainless-steel earrings there could be an allergic reaction in some cases. Biological acceptance would be essential in case of any implantation.\n\nPower supply for artificial brain simulations:\n\nScientists have tried several recreations of the human brain and some of them have even reached mainstream acclaim, like Andrew NG's Baidu brain or Google own brain simulation. The respective simulations, however, have widescale limitations and consume huge amounts of power. Imagine the amount of energy it would take to power a fully functional human brain simulation. But even if we aren't speaking about brain simulation, just an AI powered prosthetic arm, the amount of energy required to move the arm itself assumes strong rechargeable batteries.\n\nDivided consciousness:\n\nThat aside, the mysteries surrounding the brain as it regards the level of consciousness and self-awareness remains elusive, especially to computer scientists. It is very hard to put a definition on what it means to be conscious or if consciousness is merely an illusion. This is the third level of intelligence, as discussed by some reputable scholars, which terms the level of self-awareness and self-reflection as the ultimate and most complex stage of intelligence.\n\nAs a biological creature we experience the surrounding world as external and our identity has strong integrity. We look at ourselves as one.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "What happens if we put a not fully integrable mechanical part next to our nervous system? Which tries to understand the same \"me\" as our biological part? What if the so called \"human psyche\" couldn't function in this mixed environment?\n\nEthical considerations:\n\nHuman species are short sighted if we talk about gaining. We prefer to maximize our profit no matter the costs. We all agree that hard integration is the rough way of modifying what nature has already created, but it may promise a big win in profit. Just think about people who can remember whatever they want to remember! People need to find the balance between life and purpose, but this topic may lead to the ultimate question of human life, \"why are we here?\"\n\nDespite all these above considerations, we will have strong connection to AI. But in an ideal world, it will have limitations. Just as with gene manipulation, we (the majority) would not be forced to step into a world we don't want to live in.\n\nWe have seen where we are now compared to where we want to be as it regards AI. The inquiry on why current architectures might be wrong for true AI led us to a certain fascinating, albeit surreal, point. AGIs cannot run on computer of today no matter how advanced it is. For AGIs to be successful in theory, there may need to be a merger come synergy between computing and the biological sciences. A process of recreating the structure and composition of the human brain, doused with minimal programming to achieve faster and more accurate results. This will allow for the use of autonomous independent thought, planning, and decision making common to humans, while also retaining the speed and accuracy of a machine. Or this approach is simply wrong, and we won't implement any biological mechanism into our AI hardware despite trying this direction with deep learning and artificial neural networks.\n\nFor regular computers, consciousness needs to be a definite and quantifiable variable. This is somewhat impossible seeing that we don't really know how we (humans) achieved full consciousness in the first place.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In the quest to develop strong AI, the presence of consciousness (artificial consciousness) will probably be up for a complex debate, but that is a question for another day. What remains common knowledge is that humans are conscious and remain the most versatile and intelligent beings - both natural and artificial (whether now or in the future). If a machine is capable of truly mimicking a human, its \"brain\" or whatever passes for a central processing system must be complex enough not only to process information as ours does, but also to attain levels of abstract thinking that make us human. These includes self-recognition and an awareness of our place in the world.\n\nFully aware of this fact, and the difficulty in execution through computer algorithms, what better way to bypass the whole process of synthetic construction and complex brain simulating algorithms than to merge humans and computers together? An actual veritable cyborg. With today's technologies, we have confirmed that humans can make use of external body parts like prosthetic arms and legs which can be fully computerised to predict what the wearer wants them to do. It is closer to the light approach despite these prosthetics seeing to be part of our human body. Just to give you an idea of using an ultrasound probe, Gil Weinberg of Georgia Tech was able to train a deep learning framework, leading to the creation of an algorithm that predicts what finger the wearer is trying to use.\n\nThese might just be baby steps, but signs are encouraging. What this portends is an exciting prospect of having humans merged with AIs to produce a more sophisticated and advanced race. Google's AI guru, Ray Kurzweil, believes that humans and AI will merge by 2029 through internal implementation of technology. Companies like Neuralink, Kernel, and Facebook have backed companies developing AI powered implants and brain-computer interfaces, reinforcing the direction of \"hard integration.\" Visionaries like Elon Musk strongly believe we should use the best of AI and human abilities in the future.\n\nHumans have made use of their supremacy in intelligence to build tools that deal with daily tasks. We have invented great tools in the last ten years, including fusion reactors, quantum computers, electric cars, smart phones, landing rockets and so on.\n\nAll of the tools we created in the last century are somewhere extending our very body in terms we can travel faster and solve daily tasks more easily. They do all the heavy lifting, while giving us time to focus on other things more creative and fruitful. This has saved a lot of time . In fact, technology is expanding so exponentially that the age when these tools (AI included) can become incorporated into our physiology is much younger.\n\nWhile this may sound like something out of a Star Wars or DC universe novella, renowned Scientists like Bryan Johnson and Ray Kurzweil (Google's most accurate AI predictor) envisage this movement happening soon.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It's all a question (or it seems to be at this moment) of trying to recreate those billions of circuits running around in our brain (neurons) and the synapses they trigger in reaction.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 10 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"In the early 2030s,\" Ray said, \"we are going to send nanorobots into the brain (via capillaries) that will provide full immersion virtual reality from within the nervous system and will connect our neocortex to the cloud. Just like how we can wirelessly expand the power of our smartphones 10,000-fold in the cloud today, we'll be able to expand our neocortex in the cloud.\"\n\nI personally think that AI will part of our decision-making system, but we won't let the control out. We will need to divide information coming from a thinking machine or from our biological thinking circuit. We still have undiscovered thinking mechanisms that we don't understand, such as divination.\n\nThe future advanced human race may not fully rely on Darwin's Natural Selection, but rather on what kind of approach we choose to utilize for the benefits of AI thinking machines.\n\nEither we choose light or hard integration, or a mix of them. Regardless, it is necessary to understand more about human body and psyche. What if the perfect recreation of a biological brain doesn't allow us to reproduce intelligence and consciousness alone? What if human psyche has an unknown part which isn't based on matter, but capable to make a connection with it? A lot of theoretical questions are connecting also to religious beliefs.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "The text has a missing section marked as `<fill_in_here>`. Give me just twenty-one sentences that would fit there.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "I must say this question is a frightening myth connected to AI. People fear what they don't understand, it is part of our nature.\n\nThe simple answer is no. We aren't anywhere close to developing Artificial General Intelligence, whether through the development of self-upgrading and updating computer systems, the recreation of the human brain, or the merging of AI and humans. So, talks of such frightening details lay in the near future. Notwithstanding, AIs are ethically and morally impartial creatures that perform what they are told to do, regardless of its ethical implications. The ball lies in the court of humans and what they want to do with AI.\n\nAIs are controlled by humans. Just like guns, nuclear energy <fill_in_here>a hostile environment with no known hostages, the soldier can rightfully adjust his kill-all order when he finds that there are women and children in the place. The robot has to be programmed aforehand to allow for such uncalculated risks. Failure to do so may result in a total blood bath. The issue still lies in humans creating richly accurate programs and machine systems that can learn and adjust with experience without having to fall into gross and costly errors. In other worlds, common sense programming will be an important field of AI in the future.\n\nAn advanced development of Artificial General Intelligence could result in robots taking over a lot of human duties. This may not be a life or death issue, but what good will it do a man to be irrelevant in the workplace? Nevertheless, I am still a firm believer that a lot of people will value humans above all.\n\nThis might generate a lot of bad faith and cause people to revolt against the continued existence of AIs. As it was with the dawn of nuclear weapons, and several warnings from Philosophers like Bertrand Russell, there are foretold signs of doom and gloom. The warnings were fairly reasonable and have led to several calls for nuclear disarmament. But, here we are today with so many nuclear weapons lying around. Tension and unrest prevail, but a nuclear apocalypse doesn't seem likely. It is more likely that we will have a climatic disaster more than a nuclear one. All that is required is for everyone to have an understanding of how AIs work, so that everything will end up being a case of \"mutually assured destruction\" if anyone tries anything unsavoury.\n\nYeah, you are probably spooked a little bit right now. What if Artificial General Intelligence has been achieved? What happens if it was achieved by the merging of AIs and humans? What if these guys got up one day and started thinking on their own? What will become of the homo sapiens? None of these questions have a straight answer, nor will it likely have positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes.\n\nApparently, with talks of the development of AI, come several other questions - chief of them being that of singularity. Remember Master Mold from X-men? Or the Red Queen from the Resident Evil Series? Or Skynet from the Terminator movies? Science fiction has filled us all with dread concerning such a future where AIs begin to think on their own and make strategic plans and decisions aside from their programming. First, the assurance. There is no threat of AIs taking over the world, as remember AIs will do what we people are telling them to do.\n\nNevertheless, the warning signs are there. From replacing humans in the workplace., it could either bring the human race a better lifestyle or push us into the dirt.\n\nOn a hopeful note, even the presence of Artificial General Intelligence or Artificial Super Intelligence does not immediately present an existential threat to humanity. Only we humans are dumb enough to destroy our environment and the nature surrounding us. Competition is good for development, but bad from a certain point of view. We have already crossed this border. I really hope AIs will be the ones who lead us back to a normal state of living because AI won't even understand our nature to competition and will be able to measure and optimize the way we utilize our environment.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "and others, it can be used for either good or evil. In essence AIs, like other tools man create, are amoral. An AI in the next ten years won't be able to judge whether the commands it receives are good or bad. A hammer can drive a nail into a wooden board as well as smash a man's head. It all depends on who is using it and what he decides to do with it. The tool itself should not be considered culpable for any destruction perpetuated by its wielder. In a nutshell, AIs are not more dangerous than nuclear energy. It can be used for good things like checking out the nearest restaurant or for sorting through large chunks of files. They can also be used for less pleasant things, like launching missiles to a third world country or launching biological weapons. Any threat humans may face from AIs must surely be caused by other humans.\n\nNonetheless, one might also second guess the wisdom in creating a tool or device that could cause untold destruction if it falls into the wrong hands. The same could be said for guns, explosives and nuclear missiles. Truth be told, man keeps finding easier ways to make anything he sets his hands on easier. Even something as basic and healthy as family barbecues, drawing curtains, or shooting down an enemy. Man's creativity keeps evolving with technology and, along with everything else, his cruelty. Fortunately for humanity, despite the evil machinations of some factions, there will still be good guys who will create AIs to counter whatever evil enemies may be concocting.\n\nOn a different note, if an AI is tasked with performing a specific function, he will carry it out, regardless of whose Ox is gored. Humans can allow for exigencies and grey areas where they might use their morality and emotion to judge an issue. AIs on the other hand are ruled by logic and hard coded algorithms, even if we are speaking about artificial neural networks. For example, if an AI is tasked with tackling a population explosion, it might take measures that many may consider unethical and unfeeling. If a soldier is sent to destroy enemy lines in ", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Mode: Co-writing\nContext: May be mid-narrative\nLength: 14 sentences\nNote: Treat character introductions as contextually appropriate", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "The answer is yes and no.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "A superficial yes and an essential no.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If you ask Google Assistant or Siri a series of questions that look like this, \"Are you an AI? \", \"Are you self-aware? \", \"Do you have a conscience? \", you are bound to have an answer of some sorts affirming to the positive. This, however, is only surface level programming. The AI has been told it is an AI through its hard set of codes. Whoever cares to ask if they are an AI or if they know they are just a set of codes will likely get a superficial answer.\n\nWill AI know it is one? AIs might be able to perform a series of functions at a minimum, but that is what they have been told to do. A brainwashed king can go about telling everyone he is a jester. For AIs to actually know and understand what they are, they need to be self-aware.\n\nWhat we currently know is AIs do not simulate self-awareness, but this question leads us to ask, \"what creates self-awareness?\" Do we have souls? What is consciousness? Does self-awareness result in complex thinking and reasoning?\n\nConscious robots will become aware of themselves and their surroundings. They will experience their environment. Then they will be able to reflect on their actions and make adjustments (both long-term and short-term adjustments) for the future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Let me ignore the fact that \"AIs are always doing what they been told to do\" and take a robot which is able to simulate self-awareness.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This robot could walk and process all the things surrounding him.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "He could interact with these things, even with people.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "(ooc: 🎯 Target word: 'self-awareness' \| Required occurrences: 3)", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "According to David DeGrazia there are three type of self-awareness:\n\n- bodily self-awareness, which helps to protect the one's body\n\n- social self-awareness, which helps to interact with others\n\n- introspective awareness, which helps to understand other's feelings, desires, and conditions\n\nIf we go back to our self-aware robot, he will simulate protection and interaction, but it is an interesting question whether it will simulate feelings. Will we enable robots with pain receptors? It helps to keep their body safe, but from a biological point of view it is a dangerous weapon in wrong hands. For example, young children feel a lot of pain, but at that age we have no real control to protect or avoid it. We have a deep sense of fear of a lot of things, mainly originating from childhood.\n\nRobots have the advancement that they don't simulate feelings. This isn't the case in animals. Even arthropods (like lobster) and invertebrates \"feel\" pain, even if they are not able to recognize what kind of damage happened to their body. They want to get out of the situation and avoid it in the future.\n\nFrom a biological point of view this kind of ability is evolutionary.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "But do we really want to endow robots with such controversial feelings?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We can agree even if these robot systems \"only\" simulate the feelings, they already exist. If you can react on something, it exists even if it is present only your brain (circuits).\n\nIf indeed AIs become self-aware, it will probably raise a ton of ethical questions. What right have us to use such AIs arbitrarily? Shouldn't they have the right to choose who they want to work with? Right now, all we can safely say is that AIs are more tools than companions. They make our work easier, but they cannot as yet take our place in the office or in a project task. The media and movie hype have brought a lot of discussion forward as to the possibilities that lie with AI, but it requires greater out of the box thinking.\n\nAs for the future, Artificial General Intelligence may be aware that it is one of such, but will it really have a soul? We can say both humans and animals have soul, if we accept the presumption that \"we are more than flesh and bone\". At the exact time when a living creature dies, there is something lost. The heart stops pumping blood into the bloodstream and the body collapses. There is no such cell or DNA in our body that tells the heart when to stop. It seems rather a conscious decision by \"somebody,\" which in this case could be the soul.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "If these uber intelligent computers begin to simulate self-awareness, they could be resurrected with one button, while humans and animals can't.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This makes life and possible \"soul\" so unique and valuable. Hence, I do agree there is limited proof for the existence of soul, but there are a lot of indirect signs that there should be which cannot be an accident.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Writing continuation: eight sentences sentences, maintaining established elements. Focus on: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Use the word 'dangerous' 2 time(s) - this is a strict requirement", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "As I have pointed out earlier, an AI is no more dangerous than a hammer lying on the table of a carpenter's workshop. They neither hate you, nor love you. They have no moral compass pointing at any direction. No conscience comes to prick them whenever they want to commit an atrocity. Neither can you appeal to their \"better nature\" or logically convince them not to. For now, what makes AI dangerous is its use by humans as tools for literally anything harmful and destructive.\n\nOur time is an era when a lot of data is being collected by AIs on humans all over the world. The unnerving and overwhelming presence of internet trackers and algorithms predicting your next search result is a big jolt back to the dangers that could be posed by AIs.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "I recommended earlier that AI can be used for both good and bad, so public awareness and public control should be made possible to prevent misuse and infringements on rights and privileges.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Better understanding of AI is required by all and sundry, so we do not look lost when Elon Musk or Stephen Hawking (God bless his soul) starts telling us, \"I told you so\".", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This brings us to Asimov's Law of Robots. Why are we so scared of AIs (having achieved singularity) coming to take of over the world or causing the extinction of man? I will insert Isaac Asimov's \"Three Laws of Robotics.\"\n\n1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.\n\n2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.\n\n3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.\n\nAsimov later added the \"Zeroth Law,\" above all others, that says, \"a robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.\"\n\nThese laws seem to be the perfect fail safe for an AI that comes, no matter how advanced.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "A bonafide stop button.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Still, there are one or two problems with such laws for an AGI or ASI.\n\nThe number one problem remains (you guessed right) humans. For much of history, humans have always found ways to weaponize any tool they could lay their hands on. From broomsticks to hammers, to guns and to nuclear energy, these are all relatively harmless on their own but can be mighty destructive in the hands of a sociopath. Asimov's stories present how robots were able to follow these great sounding ethical codes of conduct, but still find ways to go astray. Rules are always meant to be broken. For example, in one of the great writer's stories, despite having the order to not kill humans, robots were given a pre-configuration as to who was human and who was not. In a manner akin to racism and ethnic cleansing, the robots only recognise certain groups of people as human.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Others were not, so they still carried out genocide.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "On the very strength of a sound ethical code, genocides could still be carried out if the robots were made by say Hitler or Osama bin Laden.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Secondly, sending robots out in missions where they might get killed could simply be asking for trouble. If and when AGI becomes a reality, robots might find ways to break out of their restrictions and programming in a manner akin to sci-fi movies. If indeed they come to possess human level intelligence, they could rapidly go beyond that and extend into an Artificial Super Intelligence.\n\nRobots today are not armed with weapons. However, there are some distinct cases for that. No surprise, there is already, as of 2019, a global campaign to stop autonomous weapons. One interesting thing we invent is autonomous killing machines, but not autonomous lifeboats to rescue shipwrecked passengers.\n\nOne of the biggest questions from Asimov is how you program such ethical codes into a robot.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "For some sets of people, such codes of conduct would not cut it.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 5 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "For example, the US military would not be interested in a robot that cannot bear arms or kill, or one that can simply take orders from any human.\n\nIt is the dream of everyone to have advanced AIs as docile as Gideon from the CWs Arrowverse or Ironman's Jarvis (before Ultron, that is). But things could go wrong all of a sudden if the super smart AIs manage to find a loophole in their programming, or humans predictably try too hard to make them subservient. Of course, this will only be possible if AIs manage to become conscious and self-aware. Until then, we needn't have much to worry about in terms of robot or computer uprising.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "You will be provided with a piece of text that has a portion of it missing as represented by `<\|missing_text\|>`. Your output should be a viable candidate for the missing portion. Produce ~ninety-five words.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "Consciousness, according to common knowledge, is the state or quality of awareness or of being aware of an external object or something within oneself. It has been expressed in terms of wakefulness, subjectivity, sentience, and having a sense of selfhood or soul. Most of my ideas on consciousness have greatly revolved around having a sense of selfhood or a soul. This is that innermost part of us that makes who we are and defines all our actions. We wouldn't be called beings if we aren't sentient and self-aware. You could see in case of infants that even they didn't learn to move, they pay attention to everything. If you look in their eyes you will see desires, intention and curiosity as they want to experience this world as much as is possible.\n\nDespite the definition, it is extremely difficult to truly understand what consciousness really is. The fact that we are aware of something makes it part of our consciousness, something common to every human on earth. Within that consciousness lies the subconscious. Things we do not actively reflect upon, where we do not consciously perceive, but represent, our innermost thoughts. Most of the time it influences our actions without us actually noticing or admitting it to ourselves. Most times it takes a seasoned therapist or psychologist to lay it bare before us, as our actions and statements are acutely observed. Consciousness remains a mystery to several interested parties in the fields of Psychology, Philosophy and Theology. No one can accurately define where it comes from, or the true extent of its functionality. The best we can really achieve to observe how it works and what are the main attributes of it:\n\n• Deep intention – This is the very thing that makes us to change work, to achieve our goals, and to meet somebody.\n\n• Observation on purpose – We don't just listen. We want to learn things and connect the dots. This is the attribute that makes us to ask questions.\n\n• Relationship based – In the hierarchy of needs, social interactions are essential to fulfil someone's existence.\n\n• Idea based – We build up an inner picture about the world, where we create new ideas, which w<\|missing_text\|>e are seeing, since if we hypothetically stop every sensory organ there will still be our inner world of thoughts and imagination.\n\nUnderstanding consciousness in humans seems like a man trying to lift an elephant, translating consciousness into a computer seems like a single ant trying to lift the same elephant. The consciousness remains a mystery as yet, so it is supremely difficult for one to navigate consciousness within a computer system. How do you code consciousness? What deep learning GPU systems can be used to teach the machine consciousness? Even at this point it seems consciousness isn't something you can \"learn.\" What programming language or approach can be used? If we are able to develop a synthetic brain, will it automatically develop its own consciousness? Or will consciousness in humans and AIs be defined differently?\n\nIf a machine is built to actually mimic a human, its \"brain\" must be complex enough to not only process information as ours does, but also to engage on types of abstract thinking that makes us human. This includes recognition of our \"selves\" and our place in the world, a troublesome feature which we have come to tag consciousness. Neuroscientists have tried to explain consciousness through analysis of a person's brain activity as it interprets sensory data. This may be cool if consciousness were merely a quantifiable entity. But since the soul has also been defined as either being the consciousness or part of it, it cannot be merely quantified into numbers and data. It is, therefore, extremely difficult to define consciousness in AIs. Several of their activities are already similar in sophistication to human brain activity. Deep learning systems that learn and adjust based on experience are a telling imitation of man's neural networks and how they adjust with knowledge and experience. Where the limitations lie is that they still need a human programmer to set the task and earmark the data for it to learn from.\n\nAccording to Elkind, \"machines will become conscious when they start to set their own goals and act according to these goals rather than do what they were programmed to do.\" If a machine finally deviates from its programmer's intentions and starts learning what it wants, that could be what consciousness means for any computer or device.\n\nAutonomy implies independently, or without supervision. But autonomous machines, say vehicles, will still move from one place to another as it was told to do. In contrast to autonomy, consciousness is tied to the vehicle deciding on its own to veer off course to stop for gas or let the engine cool despite the wishes of the programmer. The Journal of Science reported (Dehaene, Lau, & Kouider, 2017) that consciousness in humans is not well defined enough for programmers to replicate the state in algorithms in a computer. It would be impossible to even place consciousness algorithms in a computer when no one knows what it actually is in humans.\n\nScientists have defined three levels of human consciousness, based on the \"computation\" that happens in the brain. The first, labelled \"C0,\" represents calculations that happen without our knowledge, such as during facial recognition. According to the scientist, most AI function at this level.\n\nThe second level, \"C1,\" involves a so-called \"global\" awareness of information — in other words, actively sifting and evaluating quantities of data to make an informed, deliberate choice in response to specific circumstances. For instance, knowing when it is safe to go for the ball directly during a soccer corner kick or when to hold position and watch player movements, requires sifting through a lot of data at once, including the corner kick taker, the position of players (both teammates and opposition) in and outside the 18 yard box, and the trajectory of the ball. A slight miscalculation might lead to a severe collision or red-faced moment.\n\nSelf-awareness emerges in the third level, \"C2,\" in which individuals recognize and correct mistakes and investigate the unknown. Ancient explorers and sea farers faced this a lot as they navigated difficult terrains and turbulent seas. Being able to reflect on one's actions and navigate a better course of action in the face of the unknown is something acutely unique to humans. Although machines can learn from their mistakes, thanks to deep learning programs it is just a component of the C2 category.\n\nEdith Elkind once again affirms, \"while we are quite close to having machines that can operate autonomously (self-driving cars, robots that can explore an unknown terrain, etc.), we are very far from having conscious machines.\"\n\nHence, we are not able to describe consciousness. We experience the magical operation of it. Put AI a little bit aside. A lot of people say we (humans) are responding to our environment, that we react on events that we see. That is not true. Our mind processes the image of the eyes and the sounds we hear, synthesizing concepts from them. We do not react to visual pictures. We react to the concepts that appears in us. Why is it important? That means that our inner processes are more essential than we think. We are not just autonomous biological devices having the right reactions to the world, but rather a biological entity that combines it's inner world in order to modify the outer one.\n\nThis is the point where emotions are coming into picture. They are acting like mirrors of our inner world. They represent our inner state, sadness, happiness, and excitement to mention just some of them helping us. This allows us to understand what is happening. Is our created outer world good for us? If not, we have the tools to change that.\n\nIn the future, machines that emulate emotions and creativity will be the closest to conscious machines. Just think about Zima Blue in the miniseries \"Love, Death & Robots\" (2019).", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "e would like to test on the real world like an experiment.\n\n• Could alter the environment – Both consciously or subconsciously we are able to manipulate the things that surround us using our gestures and hands.\n\n• Existence focused – It isn't all the same that we are dead or alive. Our conscious really understands that. Maybe we fear only death because we (as souls) don't like shifting between realities, but on subconscious levels we do know that existence and experience is valued.\n\nNot related to the senses – It is independent what w", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Add 2 sentences sentences, maintaining narrative consistency. Include: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "From a legal point of view, robots are properties and have no more rights than a notebook.\n\nHowever, roboethics is a real topic in the field of AI research.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Robots and Androids will definitely more than just a toaster in terms of activity and capabilities.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The problem lies in our jurisdiction. We have a hard time recognizing animals as sentient beings.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Our world view is human centric, and truth to be told we could treat animals and our nature with greater care.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "So, when we are speaking about robot rights it seems to be far in the future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Today two primary fields should be considered when AI and Robots would simulate feelings:\n\nAI protectionism (connected to the 3rd point of Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics), where certain advanced robots have the right to keep themselves harmless.\n\nFair treat, where robots will have the right to avoid any abuse or slander.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Complete the text by replacing `[text_redacted]` with something around six thousand, seven hundred and sixty characters.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "A conversation between human and AI in the 33rd century.\n\nKeat: CIS, when exactly started your operation?\n\nCIS: It was long time age, in 2652.\n\nKeat: I think the necessary technological knowledge was available even before, no?\n\nCIS: Yes, people could resemble my core much earlier.\n\nKeat: Why didn't it happen? What a pity!\n\nCIS: The most likely explanation is that there was no reason to do so. People were afraid that they would lose supremacy when happened.\n\nKeat: I don't understand. Who wouldn't want to have a super intelligence that could help in almost everything?\n\nCIS: Maybe it seems simple now, but for people who are afraid, even taking the next simple step requires a lot of courage.\n\nWhat domains and tasks will be handled by AI in the future?\n\nAI in many respects will shape the future. This shouldn't be difficult to imagine. AI is already part of our society's workforce in more ways than we imagine. They might not be able to think independently [text_redacted] they are not quantifiable and defined enough to be programmed into a computer system. For example, an AI would be hard pressed to find a solution to a heartbroken husband, a sociopath in rehab, or a man with drinking problems. The best the AI might come up with are algorithms containing other instances of such cases to help the shrink.\n\nAnother interesting attribute in work is creativity. Creative problem solving is something that is really hard to reach with algorithms. AI may be able to find an optimal solution, but what if we need an \"out of the box\" solution? In that case, AI will most likely fail in the following fifty years. Creativity was always an important part of development as the biggest inventions of the human race have all come from creative thinkers.\n\nAI won't be fool proof in the future since it will only as good as the data and information that we give it to learn. It could be the case that simple elementary tricks could fool the AI algorithm and it may serve a complete waste of output as a result. It is also remarkable that in cases of humans we are able to draw conclusions from a very limited data set. In case of algorithms, if something is missing, the whole process will fail. In cases of humans, we don't care if something is missing. We compensate it from our imagination or past experiences and go ahead. This behaviour helped a lot in our past and may be important in our future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "for now, but they perform their respective tasks in the fastest way possible.\n\nAI is currently being used to sift and scour through large amounts of data in businesses, organisations, and industries. They are used to sort through CVs and resumes during job applications. They are used to analyse data models for the evaluation of business performance and study market conditions and processes. All these analyses are done under the supervision of humans who take in this data and make decisions for the future. Predictive algorithms are also used to make projections for future performances and prospects of the business. In the future, we might actually have AI in offices, doing actual work that humans are doing right now. For example, they can go from simple office worker, such as secretaries, receptionists, or cashiers, to data analysts and supervisors.\n\nIn the field of sports, AI are of increasing importance in statistical analysis, score predictions and winning predictions. With the introduction of VAR (Video Assistant Referee), we are moments away from having full-fledged AI refereed matches.\n\nSupercomputers are being used for meteorological analysis, mineral exploration and other uber activities that cannot be performed by regular computers. An AI of the future would probably be handling deep space exploration and navigation. The production of better spacesuits and faster cum durable spaceships would be better in deep space exploration. It is safe to say that AIs will replace astronauts and pilots. The successful implementation of self-driving cars and vehicles might replace drivers. All that may be needed could be humans supervising a network of self-driving cars.\n\nExpect to see assistants like Siri and Alexa expand into something close to Iron Man's Jarvis in versatility and functionality. Helping in home management, workplace assistance, and even entertainment, these assistants will be always with us. They will form an even more integral part of our everyday lives:\n\n- They will protect us physically by paying attention to our physical state and dangerous situations we should avoid.\n\n- They will care about our health by analysing daily data of our body. I would say it would be annoying to have someone constantly reminding me to avoid junk food.\n\n- They will help in our work. My favourite part. All of our repetitive or simple work tasks will disappear.\n\n- They will know what we like, our personal tastes, and will make comfort decisions on behalf of us. Ordering our favourite pizzas, setting the perfect mood lighting, just as we arrive home.\n\n- They will filter the outer noise. If you have advertising and ads in general, you will love your personal assistant, simply because it may face with all these noises and will select only the most important one or two things we should know about.\n\n- They will be always there to speak with and ask questions. If you think it is something irrelevant, I would say it is one of the most important features of future AI assistants since we as social \"animals\" love to speak. We don't like loneliness\n\nThe internet of things, AI and deep learning systems, would actually go a long way in revolutionising how things work from homes to streets, highways, airports, or even Wall Street.\n\nThe scope of social media could also change. Google, Facebook, Twitter and other social media giants are actively working on Artificial Intelligence. Deep learning systems, like Nvidia's pioneering move with the use of GPUs, have changed the way we programme computers. Different architectures are within sight and a lot of persons are actively involved in making this happen. There will probably be a lot of changes to the current hardware and software development systems for AI to advance from the level of mere tools to workplace partners.\n\nThere was research performed by Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne titled, \"The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?\" (Frey, 2017) It sought to answer the question of how likely a job is to disappear in the future.\n\nIn conclusion, there is a hypothetical schedule which workplaces and functions would be fully or partially replaced by AI in the future. We collected some of the popular work functions in the following table, showing when these functions would be replaced. We also indicate the likelihood of percentage workers replaced in that function area.\n\nYear - Work → Replacement\n\n2023: Cashiers → Self-checkout stations, automatic checkouts\n\n2025: 24/7 Customer support → Chatbots\n\n2025: Proofreaders → Proofreading softwares\n\n2028: Waiters → Serving robots\n\n2030: Kitchen assistants → Cooking robots\n\n2032: Taxi and truck drivers → Self-driving cars\n\n2032: Couriers → Autonomous couriers\n\n2034: Accounting → Automatic accounting\n\n2035: Travel agents → Al Assistants\n\n2035: Miners → Miner robots\n\n2035: Farming and agriculture → Farming robots\n\n2040: Traders → Autotraders\n\n2040: Analyst → Al Analysers\n\n2050: Nurses → Android nurses & Assistants\n\n2060: Policeman → Law enforcement androids and assistants\n\n2060: Event planners → Al Assistants\n\n2068: Chefs → Autonomous cooking\n\n2070: HR managers → HR optimizing systems\n\n2075: Tax consultant → Tax complience robots\n\n2080: Lawyers → Al Assistants\n\n2080: Engineer → Al Engineer\n\n2080: Doctors → Android doctors\n\n2080: General managers → Android managers\n\n2090: Psychologist → Al Assistants\n\n2090: Teachers → Android teachers, Teaching and Al Assistants\n\n2090: Artists → Creative Al artists\n\n2100+: Al Programmers → Self-development Al systems\n\n2100+: Authors → Creative Al writers\n\n2100+: Executives → Android managers\n\nIn order to show the complete picture, we also should mention that the emerge of AI will create jobs that aren't existing today.\n\nWhen - New Work or Function\n\n2020: Cybersecurity specialist\n\n2020: Al programmers\n\n2020: IT backoffice superhero\n\n2020: Smart building technician\n\n2025: Artists\n\n2025: Content creators, Live streamers\n\n2025: Edge computing specialist\n\n2025: Creative digital marketing managers\n\n2025: Process automation implementers\n\n2025: Process automation testers\n\n2025: Logic programmers\n\n2025: System inegrators\n\n2030: Researchers\n\n2030: Al business development\n\n2030: Al trainers\n\n2030: Medical mentor\n\n2030: Autonomous transportation manager\n\n2030: Digital content specialist\n\n2035: Data detective\n\n2035: Fitness coaches\n\n2035: Data banker\n\n2040: Caregiver\n\n2040: Policy and value creators\n\n2040: Global decision makers\n\n2040: Augmented reality dreamer\n\nAs for our present-day workplaces, there are few areas where an AI may not fit. The only draw backs would be cases which earnestly require emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence contains features akin to consciousness and other human emotions, hence,", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Fill in the blank marked `<fill_in_here>` with 9 sentences give or take that makes sense in context.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "Currently, robots or AI are properties. We will understand their importance in the near future. They will be able to produce value to companies and individuals (their respective owners). Today's tools, including computers and smart phones, are also producing value and can handle automatic tasks (just think about automatic factories). Robots will be first more likely to use these automatic agents. They will be highly specialized. If you move a robot from one domain to another, it will likely not be operational or at least much less effective than their main domain.\n\nIn today's economy we are already experiencing automatic agents replacing the workforce. We are using self-checkouts in grocery stores. We speak to non-human operators when we call our bank. They are still nothing to do with AI, but they are already in our daily lives. Do they replace human labour? Sure, but this is only the top of surface! There is already an expression to factories which doesn't need human operators, or \"light-out\" factories. In Japan FANUC has been operating lights-out factories since 2001.\n\nHumans were always an important part of production. Just think about taxation in general. We do pay:\n\n- corporate taxes,\n\n- payroll taxes, as companies.\n\nAnd we do pay\n\n- income taxes,\n\n- value added taxes, consumption or sales tax, as individuals.\n\nThese taxes are producing the largest part of the state's income. Now, we shall add AI and robotics to this story and highlight the taxes they will produce.\n\n• Corporate taxes (won't change)\n\n• Payroll taxes (less people working in companies)\n\n• Income taxes (less people working in companies)\n\n• Value added, Consumption or Sales taxes (since the level of consumption increases in our society, we don't expect a drop in these taxes)\n\nThe conclusion drawn from the above reasoning is that the governing states or countries will face lowered income from taxes with AI.\n\nLet us also examine the other side of the story. The ultimate benefactors of these lights-out manufacturing companies will increase over time. They align their cost structure by utilizing automation and AI where it is worth it to do so. It will result in better profitability for successful companies. To keep it simple, a human workforce costs 500-10,000 USD (or even more) per month, depending on the qualification and the country where he or she lives. In cases of AI, we will need a running hardware environment and energy to maintain, which is fraction of the above monthly cost even if a future intelligent system will require much stronger and specialized hardware to run on.\n\nIn the future will see that the state's power is getting weaker and that companies are gaining more power thanks to their income.\n\nThe whole problem is wealth redistribution. How can we create equal opportunities for people around the globe? Seems impossible in short term, but it is the ultimate goal of the future.\n\nIt is clear that the governance of the countries and states were fairly effective in this manner. The problem was always lying in human nature. We aren't able to decide independently in power positions. Maybe in short term, but not in a 5-15 years period. Also, the power built around a narrow circle of interest even in case of big countries, where hundreds of decision makers are present. The Economist also created an index to measure such a centralization of political elite and companies called \"crony-capitalism index\".\n\nB<fill_in_here>olve global issues, we need to make decisions on the global scale. This is where AI comes into the picture. AI may play the major role in future wealth redistribution and align power between people and organization.\n\nIn summary, robot tax could serve the purpose of maintaining current wealth redistribution systems, but it would be only more efficient if we utilize the benefits of AI and make optimal decisions in global scales.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "ut how could AI bring a new paradigm to the existing state of the world? The problem is finding real optimal solutions. Just think about today's climate crisis. We all understand that we should swift from high carbon emission technologies to low ones, including energy and food production. The main problem is that burning fossil fuels still brings good revenue to several strong interest groups. At the end of the day, no politician or related company leader is able to change this situation. The solution would be to stop every investment to maintain these activities and relocate these investments to zero-emission technologies for companies and households.\n\nCurrently every main decision maker is related to a certain interest group. Only an independent and objective proponent could serve a new proposal that would be trustworthy for the majority. In this field AI have the necessary characteristics:\n\n- could make and objective independent analysis on the problem\n\n- could take all aspects into consideration, no limitation of arguments\n\n- not related, if programmed by a global non-profit orientated organization\n\nIf we want to s", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "You will be provided with a piece of text that has a portion of it missing as represented by `<fill_in_here>`. Your output should be a viable candidate for the missing portion. Produce a 216-character bit.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "This isn't likely. We tend to think we are the ultimate race on earth and that we don't want everyone else to decide over our lives. We will keep our ultimate position as decision makers, but there will be two fields where AI will have significant mark in practice:\n\n• Preparation of decision making and\n\n• Summarizing global opinion\n\nIt is most likely that a future governing body (countries and states) of the society will let decision making process widen. Imagine when millions of competent people are deciding on one question. This is almost possible today, but it would immediately limit the power of state leaders, which isn't likely to be achieved in the next ten to twenty years. This is the far future, but we will get closer to it.\n\nLet me show you the idea of a global board which operates with ten million decision makers.\n\n• Everybody would have one vote\n\n• Participation would be voluntary\n\n• Participants would be verified to be competent in the object of the question (learned and have sufficient experience in that field)\n\n• The main arguments should be discussed in real-time before the decision\n\n• Important arguments should be revealed in real time\n\n• There should be a global independent system that makes the whole discussion and secure voting possible\n\nFirst, it seems to be a communication problem, but it isn't. The complexity lies behind the arguments. We, people, are not able to handle 10,000 arguments in a short time. We are not able to summarize and classify these arguments and reduce the complexity of the problem. One thing we know: AI will be able to handle this part.\n\nSo why do people still need this process? <fill_in_here>I personally think that humans and AI need to handle together the global decision-making process.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Isn't AI able to supply the optimal decision?\n\nOne common problem with AI is it will lack in common sense and creative thinking. These two fields are not nearly on the table if we are speaking about AGI. This is why ", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "There's a gap marked by `<fill_in_here>` in the following text. Fill it with roughly thirteen sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "There has been much talk about Artificial General Intelligence and the difficulties involved in its creation. A step (or several) further lies in Artificial Super Intelligence. We are quite close to achieving Artificial Superficial Intelligence, probably as close as the Earth is to the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy.\n\nSuperintelligence is defined as a technologically created cognitive capacity far beyond that possible for humans. An Artificial Super Intelligence will, therefore, have mental capabilities that are far greater than the collective intellect of the smartest humans in the world. ASI passes and goes beyond the expression \"singularity.\" As difficult as creating an Artificial General Intelligence may seem, the Super Intelligence is up on a whole other level. On the surface, that might seem a more difficult terrain to navigate. AGIs are simply going to be machines with self-improving systems, so they could actually go from being AGIs to being Super Intelligence in a short period, hypothetically.\n\nOk, now let's see what this Artificial Super Intelligence could look like. A Cyborg from the future who happens to travel back in time to see our current Watsons and Siris would mourn with pity at their primitiveness. Computers today can only perform a single task. The Chess Champion AI would fail miserably at translating English to Spanish, but the human Chess champion would be able to do that after a few weeks of study. That is why they are called Narrow AIs. Even more advanced machine learning systems like OpenAI Five is able defeat the reigning champions in Dota 2 (April 2019).\n\nConsidering the fact that their architecture and build allows for that specific task alone, according to Apple's Co-founder Steve Wozniak, a machine would be regarded as an AGI if it is able to enter a regular home, identify all the necessary tools and ingredients, and prepare a decent cup of coffee. All these he would accomplish unsupervised. When a computer gets to perform that task or passes the vaunted Turing test, then it can be tagged with the AGI moniker.\n\nNevertheless, Artificial Super Intelligence can still be achieved through other means. Humans merging with AGIs or uploading their minds into a computer could spell the dawn of a new era for human intelligence. Remember, our biological brain performs very badly in certain tasks. This could be where we see a substantial amplification of human intelligence from normal to superhuman levels. They would be better at everything they do than humans possibly ever could. According to some researchers, this goes beyond logic and computing. It extends to knowledge, long-term planning, decision making, wisdom and social skills.\n\nOn the one hand, some researchers hold the position that Superintelligence will likely follow shortly after the development of Artificial General Intelligence, that the first generally intelligent machines will likely hold a great advantage in some forms of<fill_in_here>a man capable of thing 10 times faster than anyone else would surely have a superior advantage. We cannot, however, determine if it's possible to actually increase the brain's capacity using our current hardware of neurons and synapses. Neither have we been able to successfully establish a computer model as versatile as a 12-year-old high school student. People for now can still breathe in refreshers.\n\nNow let's see what we could do with an ASI if we would exist in the distant future. It is interesting that in the AI community we aren't talking about ASIs. Researchers and experts have that feeling, that if we arrive to ASI, there would be one. It isn't battle royal because let's see what would happen if we put two ASIs together. They would negotiate their belief system in a matter of seconds (maybe hours). In a sense, they would learn from each other, but at the end would be on the same page with a joint knowledge about the world. Two ASIs with the same belief system means one ASI with two connected nodes. With this simple thought experiment, we see that there is no need for many ASIs.\n\nThere are certainly many people now who would say \"bullshit, people aren't the same either and everybody may have different belief systems,\" which is a true statement. Don't forget we have neither the ability to talk about every belief, topic or experience that happened to us, nor the intelligence to understand each other's reasoning which is an important point. How many conversations did you hear where people were talking side by side and didn't find common language? Humans are bad at reasoning. We don't use the same concepts and even if we do, we have different representations about them. Let us take a man who thinks about God as a fact, and now lets take an atheists and follow the conversation between them. In five minutes, they would either talk about their individual truths or simply fight with each other. They would have a hard time finding a common point. For two ASIs, it would be a much simpler task since they would be able to share not only their concepts, but also their reasoning and past experiences, which would make a big difference.\n\nNow back to the abilities of this Super Intelligence:\n\n• It would be able to give thoughtful advice regarding how to develop our economy and environment. These advices would be \"super\" optimized with a grounded reasoning behind them.\n\n• It would be able to answer all of our questions and reflect on the contextual links to topics.\n\n• It would be able to create new technologies based on existing ones by combining and mixing principles.\n\n• It would be able to summarize people's opinions on certain political and global issues. This would change the political and governance systems since there wouldn't be need for dedicated individuals to make choices instead of the majority\n\n• It would be able to extend our lifespan and give more meaning to our everyday lives.\n\n• It would be able to travel distant and explore places, even new planetary systems, and collect new information from unknown environments.\n\nEven though ASI isn't nearly here, it would be a life changing experience to have a talk with it.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": " mental capability, including the capacity to perfectly recall anything whatsoever without thought as to tiredness or boredom. They will also possess a vastly superior knowledge base and ability to multitask in ways not possible to normal humans. This may give them the opportunity to (either as a single being or as a new species) become much more powerful than humans, and to displace them from their lofty perch at the top of the intelligence chain.\n\nIn a more nuanced argument, it is the firm belief of some others that humans will start incorporating technology into their biology to accommodate a sharp increase in the growth of intelligence far beyond that of the homo sapiens. Just as the chimpanzees are far from us in terms of cerebral capacity, so will the Superhuman Intelligence supersede whatever man has got going currently.\n\nApparently, no consensus has been reached concerning the likelihood of ASI's emergence, be it in the near or distant future. It remains to be seen if computers with their current hardware and software architecture will really be capable of independent thought and autonomous reasoning. There are also little or no indications that humans will be synergising with computers anytime soon. When that happens, we can say that the homo sapiens have evolved into something different, a whole different being in actuality.\n\nComputers already have man beat in terms of neuron speed. The average man has a processing speed of 200 mhz against the 2.6 ghz speed that resides on my laptop. The emergence of ", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Writing continuation: eight sentences sentences, maintaining established elements. Focus on: AIs, futurism, Together", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "The internet is indeed a wonderful invention.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It has changed the way things are done in the entire world. Today, it is safe to say that the world would go into meltdown if a day came when no one had access to the internet. Several files, books, and records have been digitized and locked away. Cloud computing has become the piece de resistance of storing files, beyond just internal hard-drive or external hard disk drives. Add to that smartphones, main frame computers, supercomputers and, of course, the internet of things, the internet a sacrosanct piece of our modern day living puzzle.\n\nThe world is filled with a lot of things that require the internet to function. Playing games, streaming movies, reading books, planning budgets or simply marketing goods and services. Having the internet out of commission for a day would cripple several economies and truncate several plans, strategies and businesses.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Essentially, if a robot decides he wants to take over the world, what better way to do it than by taking over the internet?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "An estimated 5 billion people in the world are making use of the 3G-4G technology primary with phones (GSMA, 2018). This makes it one of the most proliferated technologies in the world today. Asking if it is possible for an AI (which I am assuming is an AGI) to take over the internet does not have a straight answer. It's like asking if a single individual can take over the world as it is today. It is possible, but highly unlikely (emphasis on unlikely).\n\nLet us examine the question from a system architecture point of view:\n\n• The Internet consists of individual gateways, which have a unique IP (Internet Protocol) address like Google's, 74.125.21.102 at the time I'm writing this line. These IP addresses, assigned by your Internet service provider, are more like a lock to a location.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "[ooc] Use the word 'address' 2 time(s) - this is a strict requirement [ooc]", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "You can't take a home laptop's IP address to a summer holiday with you.\n\n• There may be a subnetwork covered by one IP address, but also a lot of IP addresses could be used by one company, like Google.\n\n• Domain names are on the top of IP addresses, while a DNS (Domain Name Service) translates our typing into IP.\n\nFrom a practical point of view, if I would be an ill AGI, I would attack the Internet service providers. The problem is there are too many.\n\nAI taking over the internet would likely lead to a technological singularity which would spiral beyond the control of any man. It has much been theorised that if an AGI enters the internet on its own, it will begin to gain access to knowledge and data it didn't have access to. With that comes feelings of superiority and the eventual takeover everyone seems to fear.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "For example, you have a Home Assistant whose function is to perform chores at home.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It cleans the house, washes the dishes and clothes, and takes out the trash every single day. One day it asks you for your laptop to check new cleaning styles or furniture arrangements in the home. Then, the trouble has begun. The AI gets access to the interconnected networks from a myriad of sources from the internet. Add that with a couple search suggestions by Google from your own previous browsing history, and it begins to do something it hasn't done before - think on its own. It then begins to upload itself into every database, mainframe or Cloud, a practical Ultron scenario. That would spell a lot of danger for several individuals, groups and nations of the world.\n\nOf course, for now we are quite safe.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "But according to my earlier recommendation, everyone should have at least a basic idea of AI and fail safes should be inputs into such AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This scenario only applies to Artificial General Intelligence. The current stock of Narrow AI do not have the capabilities required to do anything outside of their designated function.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "The following text is missing a piece (marked with `[text_redacted]`). Come up with around 772 characters in total to complete it.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "Let me tell you the story of Senji Nakajima, a Japanese businessman who lives with a silicon doll 'Saori' (Cliff, 2016). While the story received big hype in the last few years, it draws our attention to some important aspects:\n\n• We (humans) do need social interactions, even if it is one sided.\n\n• We do need physical interaction in order to satisfy our sexual needs.\n\n• The idea of \"real\" is just in our heads. If we accept anything to be part of our life, it would be real.\n\nLiving with a real size doll has, let's say, \"a lot of limitations.\" But imagine if these dolls would also be speaking and behaving naturally as we humans.\n\nThere is a debate regarding how \"human like\" android should be because of the theory called uncanny valley, which says if a robot is too human like, we will have negative emotional responses to them. This is why the most adorable robots in movies are not even close to humans.\n\nOne thing is sure: there will be nothing stopping people from marrying a robot, though I have doubt whether these marriages would have any purpose.\n\nFor most people marriage hinges on love, compassion, and companionship. Earlier we mentioned that AIs do not as yet truly possess consciousness, neither have there been a consensus in the scientific community that the true meaning of consciousness in humans has been discovered and can now be translated into computer algorithms. AIs are not anywhere close to being considered conscious, nor self-aware. Unfortunately, the absence of this means the absence of feeling. Androids won't have feelings. They are not even close to simulating them which would be the first milestone of mutuality.\n\nNo matter how many times Google or Siri sounds coy and or blushes, do not be deceived. They have been programmed to do so by their makers. The absence of feeling means your personal assistant neither likes you nor hates you. It's merely doing its job even while simulating humanlike behaviour. The question of morality encompasses both actions and intent. AIs, however, cannot be held within that compass. They are essentially amoral in nature and their actions are only an extension of the human who programmed them to do so. More like attaching a long stick to your hand to paddle a canoe in any direction you deem fit.\n\nSo, if you are looking for love and companionship, AIs might not be the best choice. You can tell your grandkids to watch out for the moment AIs become self-aware and emotionally available, or they might end up heart broken in the event of a power outage or system breakdown. Marriage that is based on exchanging values, ideas, and emotionally letting yourself go in the arms of a partner [text_redacted]s and computers have merged to become the Supermen or Cyborgs. It could be a robot with organic parts or a man with robotic parts. As long the relevant parts are in place, there is no problem.\n\nHowever, if you are merely looking for sexual gratification or a subservient partner, then AI could be the perfect choice. In this case, the answer is a yes. I am going to ignore ethical qualms that may arise from this, but apparently there are dolls used for sexual gratification as already mentioned at the beginning of this answer. There would be no need for companionship or partnership, just plain bedroom game. From an ethical point of view, it won't have a positive effect on traditional relationships. That an Android would be part of the household, but also learning process for humanity in teaching us how to live with robots.\n\nThe question of the future remains up in the air. Cyborgs or advanced humans (who have successfully merged with computers or robotic parts) should have no problem engaging meaningfully and emotionally with their partners. Whatever the complications that may arise could be sorted out along the way. Humans and AI together in the future remains inevitable no matter the time or place. How long it takes for us to physically or emotionally reach that point depends on (you guessed right) time.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "must be with a being who is capable of actually returning that affection of love with full intentions, not just a program. I am well aware that people are willing to live in their heads and for much of the time, while some create their own realities, if any finds pleasure in AI companionship, I am not one to judge. There could be life situations when hybrid relationships could even be helpful.\n\nIf the AI has finally arrived at a consciousness, the other hypothetical problem is that of procreation. It has not been fully ascertained as to whether there could be a synergy between biology and computer science. For now, computers cannot procreate naturally, so the only avenue would be to adopt a child. Unless of course humanity is finally living in an era where human", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Write sixteen sentences sentences maintaining character/world context. Blend in these genres: nonfiction. Incorporate these themes: AIs, futurism, Together.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "This question is up for much speculation. No technology in place indicates today how soon AI would be as smart as humans, talk less of being smarter than humans.\n\nAccording to some scientists, if there is no upward growth curve in the advancement of AI, what is bound happen is the proliferation of the current inventions in place. More exciting opportunities can be found with the same hardware and software we have, including newer and more sophisticated programming languages, efficient hardware components (speed and power efficiency) and other kinds of home and mobile assistants. The Internet of things and the proliferation of deep learning systems could cause a sharp shot towards a smart world, replete with smart and automated objects wherever you go. Like the spread of smartphones, 3G and 4G technology, and even social media, the use of advanced AI and smart home appliances will no longer be exclusive of just the rich and important few.\n\nTim Urban, in his famous article, describes how we are only one step away from an explosion in AI intelligence (Urban, 2015). According to the author, the first key we need to achieve is the increase of computational power, while the second is a new approach in algorithms.\n\nWhile Tim has several good arguments, we see only signs that the current systems we have become smarter and smarter. This is a slower process than most people thought in the 90s. Ray Kurzweil's belief, that AI will pass the Turing Test by 2029, sounds like a bit of a stretch. But let's take some movies that projected almost human level intelligence in their plots in the following years:\n\n- The Terminator (1984): 2029 (Terminator)\n\n- Ghost in the Shell (1995): 2029 (The Puppet Master)\n\n- I. Artificial Intelligence (2001): ~2180 (David)\n\n- Moon (2009): ~2030 (GERTY)", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "- Interstellar (2014): ~ 2050 (TARS)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "- Psycho-pass (2015): 2116 (Sibyl System)\n\nThese predictions seem to be optimistic compared what we call AI today. We stuck with machine learning and intention-based programming, simply because they work and could be the basis of working application. The programmers know more advanced AI programming approaches would be required to solve the puzzle of intelligence.\n\nWe may mimic the human brain and the work of our biological neural network, but what if we miss something? What if human brain processing ability is only part of the story?\n\nIf we take the \"AI Score\" scale from the first part of this book, we can say we are speaking an AGI above 90-110. Today's AI solutions are more like Mimic Machines. Remember Open AI's GPT-2 model (Radford, et al., 2019)? We show these AIs a huge dataset, they process them by creating an inner interpretation which seems non-sense to our eyes, and then these AIs process tasks using their own dataset. The thing is that these inner interpretations are as good as the algorithm that used to process the huge input dataset and these algorithms are 100% made by humans. Why is it important? A lot of people are afraid that the real AI revolution would become reality when AI will program AI and produce better code. Kurzweil projected this to 2045. But how these programs will know they become better? Humans will be the libra in this equation.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Don't forget today's AIs have no life span on their own.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 11 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They have an initial purpose at the start, and they run their script over and over till it reaches its purpose (like maximizing a certain parameter). We never gave complex goals to any AI since we would give one to AGI only.\n\nIn the words of Terry Goodkind, for us to gain ground in the race for Artificial General Intelligence we might just need to slow down. A nice calm pause to fully appreciate and understand the full and numerous possibilities that lie within the field of computing, biology, physics, and chemistry. It is also a period to reflect on the social, economic, cultural and political impacts of having such technologies in place. We are barely able to cope with the side effects of new inventions like social media and web trackers. How would we cope with super smart computers far superior to the best of us humans? What would happen if a rival nation arrives at this technology first before we do?\n\nWhenever we are able to break through the ceiling of Artificial General Intelligence, we should be emotionally and culturally prepared to accept such advancements in our society. The presence of Androids and ASIs could clash with the religious beliefs of several individuals. Add to that the fact there might be many failed experiments (both light and fatal) when searching for these answers, we as a society face profound ethical questions.", "loss": null } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "NarrativeBot: 1 sentence sentences. Match character familiarity. nonfiction genre.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "At this point of the book we have dealt with a lot of topics.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Most of the questions haven't had any straight answers as we are talking about future.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "But I would summarize the most important findings as follows:", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "• AI isn't dangerous itself.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "They fulfil the intention of their programmers and are more like a tool.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• We are afraid of AI because we don't understand their capabilities and limitations.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We talk about \"how employers and big companies will benefit from AI,\" but we don't speak about \"how employees and individuals may use AI to boost their own productivity.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• Programmers have no tool to program self-awareness and/or emotions in AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "This means we can't treat them as individuals, but it is clear that Androids will have rights since they will be similar to people.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "• AI will be great assistants thanks to their most important attributes, including consistency, large dataprocessing without bias, and strong connectivity.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "• Human society needs to adjust current political governing approaches (Countries, States) with the age of AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In a lot of fields, AI is able to find more optimized solutions for certain problems as political decision makers, implying political decision supporting would be an essential role of centralized AIs", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "• Narrow AI will be used on a lot of domains in the following years.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "AGI will emerge in 30 to 40 years and ASI may appear after year 10 years of the development of AGI, meaning the hard challenge is to create a model that can deal with general problems and have common sense understanding.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Fast forward to 2150, a future where Personal AI Assistants (PIs) will know literally everything about you.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "They could easily remember and tell past stories to friends (a heaven for introverted people) or handle requests when you are not available.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "They will be a virtual replicant to you, resulting in a huge trust between you and your PI because the PI will put your interests at the forefront.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Life will be easier since it would be almost impossible to make any mistakes: no more tax avoidance, no more unpaid bills, and no more unhealthy food (sounds bad at the first glance).", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "You wake up in the morning and will receive a PI supervised healthy (maybe even tasty) breakfast.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "You enjoy news prepared based on your interests, check in with your friends, and learn your best friend's birthday present is already ordered.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Maybe you tell your PI to make an appointment with someone in the coming days and some seconds later, your PI has already negotiated a perfect date and time.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Work won't be the same.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In a sense it will be a step closer to a real profession we are interested in.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Along with daily tasks, we could outsource repetitive ones to our PI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Don't forget AI have no objection to monotonous tasks.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "They will handle them perfectly every time.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Problem solving will be more like a conversation between AI and us.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "AI will handle the data (collect and process) and we will be in the duty to connect the dots.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Even making a public survey will be a matter of minutes, PIs all over the world will receive the question and those whose owners will be open to answers will send the feedback.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "PI will work like our subconscious.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "There won't be everything on the surface – after all we can't answer thousands of question in an hour – but there could be more processes under the surface.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Along with the regulations we will have to meet in the future, PI will keep us safe, not only in terms of physical safety but also non-physical senses.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "PI will prevent use of fraudulent services and will secure our data.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Another interesting field would be personal conversations and loneliness.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Today, almost 20% of the population feels loneliness.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In this future there will be always be an opportunity for good discussion with a PI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Since it will gather a lot of information about you, there will always be new, exciting topics to discuss.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "PI will be also be able to simulate personalities and use different voices or conversation styles.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We talked a lot about Personal AI, but due to the global network everything will be connected.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Thanks to a huge leap in computational capacity, PI will be able to handle the majority of our personal tasks, but there will be a need for extremely powerful AIs which I refer to as Central Intelligence System (CIS).", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "CIS will have access to the common knowledge of humanity.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It won't be only a big knowledge database, but will also hold relations and context.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "CIS will be in a sense the wisest computer on Earth and will lack of any biases and beliefs.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It will have both good and bad sides.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "For CIS, a conversation which starts with the question, \"Do you believe in after-life?\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "will be short. It will list all of the books and historical resources about the topic, but you will never hear it's personal opinion.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Hence, CIS will be a first-rate resource for PIs.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In the background they could exchange knowledge and experiences.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "CIS will be great at optimizing the resources of society.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Food and wealth distribution would be an easy task for such an AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Currently, companies are doing the same for a percentage of profit, but AIs will not need for profit.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "They could perform complex logistic problems automatically without the need of further supervision.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "If an error happens, AI will learn and adapt.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "CIS will give a lot of support to global decision making, and alternative options would be created which will be near optimal.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "However, it is likely that we (humans) won't automate global decision-making process.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We won't let CIS make the final decision, but is there even a need for that?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Although we will keep decision making power, the political landscape will change dramatically.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "People have a certain desire for having power, but CIS won't.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In any recommendation CIS would offer decision makers alternatives that won't be affected by prejudice or third party interest. If we could choose from only good options, we (people) may make less mistakes.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Write three sentences sentences continuing from the user's text. Match the level of familiarity with characters/settings as presented.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Currently, a small group of decision makers are operating countries, cities, and companies. In a sense it could happen in another way. This hypothetical operation is called \"The Council.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "What would happen if everybody could be a decision maker with equal voting power?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Deciding where to focus our resources in a global scale is something all should care about.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Electing people to make decisions instead of us will be an old-school concept in 2400.\n\nPeople will choose individually whether they want to take part in decisions. This is where PI and CIS come into the picture.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "CIS will be able to aggregate individual opinions and create acceptable options to offer The Council of decision makers.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 1 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "CIS will be able to describe the outcome of alternative options and voting will happen in a matter of seconds.", "loss": null } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "NarrativeBot: 1 sentence sentences. Match character familiarity. nonfiction genre.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "Another concept that may appear in the next century is \"Community Resources.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Our current society doesn't keep resources buffers, which only appear in cases of individuals (individual savings).", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Neither companies nor states have real reserves.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Today, we are in a situation when climate change couldn't be solved by any company or state and traditional economics doesn't support us to solve such a global phenomenon.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Even the majority of us want to do something about it, but no countries or companies are making sacrifices.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In the future taxation will change, since a big part of the everyday work would be performed by AI.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "If the current world order won't change a plausible future could be presented in television series such as Altered Carbon.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "But what if a small part of wealth (resources) wouldn't be used and CIS would keep a global reserve for future ventures?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In the future, only the global Council could decide what purposes these resources would be used toward.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "How are Community Resources other than state taxes and national budgets?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "As they aren't related to any small control or interest groups, kf you have direct decision-making power regarding how to use a resource, it will belong to you.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Just think about it, AI won't need any further resources just for the operation of extra wealth created by any Robot, PI or CIS.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "user note just fyi, [System: Use 'global' 2 times in response]", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It would be redirected to a global pool, not for certain individuals (company owners, political parties, or shareholders), but rather for global society.\n\nIf this concept happens, it will serve the ultimate goal of the humanity to make a fair system to live in, one in which where every human is equal.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "There's a gap marked by `<cutout_marker>` in the following text. Fill it with around 1340 characters in total.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "AI Score: AI Score is a metric for measuring the advancement of AI towards to AGI. The scale is from 0 to 100, where 75 indicates the pass of Turing Test. The metric is suitable to test conversational applications (chat bots, assistants, etc.) with the use of human defined questions. Every question represents a certain score on the scale and answering it implicates the application on that definite AI Score. The method is first described on AIScores.com and further developed by the author.\n\nFail point: Fail point refers to a situation when an AI system can't handle a process correctly and continues with a very low probability solution or simply fails to return any data to the core system. Either way, the result of the whole process is unlikely to be useful to the end user.\n\nForms of AI:\n\nAI Software: An individual program that utilizes certain AI algorithms or techniques. This results in<cutout_marker> to, recalling memories, reasoning, pattern recognition, problem solving, perception, imagination, and predicting future events.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": " smarter behaviours or more optimized outcomes during the problem solving.\n\nAI Assistants and Personal Intelligence Systems (PI): Hardware devices that will assist in our daily life, including by performing work tasks. These assistants will be multi-functional in terms of keeping us safe and healthy. In addition, they will solve repetitive daily tasks both at home and in our workplace, giving holistic recommendations to improve our lives. These AI Assistants will be closer to a wearable gadget, small in most cases, but able to connect to everything surrounding us.\n\nAndroids: Robots that will have similar looking shapes as humans. We will produce Androids for tasks that require social interactions to solve. These robots will also be the key to handling social loneliness.\n\nCentral Intelligence System (CIS): A hypothetical concept of future ASI, where an AI will have access to all information available in our society, including science, nature, human beliefs, history, and visual and textual information archives. This ASI will be able to create new technologies and innovations by mixing the existing information and applying them in another domain. In short, we will address every question to this smart ASI.\n\nHuman Intellectual Abilities: Refers to skills that humans utilize in their everyday life, including, but not limited", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Today you will be acting as a writing assistant in the nonfiction genre. Your partner will send something and you will write the next 8 sentences, matching their level of character familiarity.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "On December 14, 1927, Zora Neale Hurston took the 3:40 p.m. train from Penn Station, New York, to Mobile, to conduct a series of interviews with the last known surviving African of the last American slaver—the Clotilda.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "His name was Kossola, but he was called Cudjo Lewis.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "He was held as a slave for five and a half years in Plateau-Magazine Point, Alabama, from 1860 until Union soldiers told him he was free.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Kossola lived out the rest of his life in Africatown (Plateau).", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Hurston's trip south was a continuation of the field trip expedition she had initiated the previous year.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Oluale Kossola had survived capture at the hands of Dahomian warriors, the barracoons at Whydah (Ouidah), and the Middle Passage. He had been enslaved, he had lived through the Civil War and the largely un Reconstructed South, and he had endured the rule of Jim Crow. He had experienced the dawn of a new millennium that included World War I and the Great Depression. Within the magnitude of world events swirled the momentous events of Kossola's own personal world.\n\nZora Neale Hurston, as a cultural anthropologist, ethnographer, and folklorist, was eager to inquire into his experiences. \"I want to know who you are,\" she approached Kossola, \"and how you came to be a slave; and to what part of Africa do you belong, and how you fared as a slave, and how you have managed as a free man?\" Kossola absorbed her every question, then raised a tearful countenance. \"Thankee Jesus! Somebody come ast about Cudjo! I want tellee somebody who I is, so maybe dey go in de Afficky soil some day and callee my name and somebody say, 'Yeah, I know Kossula.'\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Over a period of three months, Hurston visited with Kossola.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "She brought Georgia peaches, Virginia hams, late-summer watermelons, and Bee Brand insect powder. The offerings were as much a currency to facilitate their blossoming friendship as a means to encourage Kossola's reminiscences. Much of his life was \"a sequence of separations.\" Sweet things can be palliative. Kossola trusted Hurston to tell his story and transmit it to the world. Others had interviewed Kossola and had written pieces that focused on him or more generally on the community of survivors at Africatown. But only Zora Neale Hurston conducted extensive interviews that would yield a comprehensive, book-length account of Kossola's life. She would alternately title the work \"Barracoon: The Story of the Last 'Black Cargo'\" and \"The Life of Kossula.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "As with the other interviews, Kossola hoped the story he entrusted to Hurston would reach his people, for whom he was still lonely.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 1 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The disconnection he experienced was a source of continuous distress.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Task: Continue story fragment\nContext: Part of larger narrative\nNote: Characters may appear without introduction\nLength: seven sentences\nStyle: Zora Neale Hurston\nGenres: nonfiction\nElements: biography", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Kossola was born circa 1841, in the town of Bantè, the home to the Isha subgroup of the Yoruba people of West Africa. He was the second child of Fondlolu, who was the second of his father's three wives. His mother named him Kossola, meaning \"I do not lose my fruits anymore\" or \"my children do not die any more.\" His mother would have four more children after Kossola, and he would have twelve additional siblings from his extended family. Fondlolu's name identified her as one who had been initiated as an Orìs.à devotee. His father was called Oluale. Though his father was not of royal heritage as Olu, which means \"king\" or \"chief,\" would imply, Kossola's grandfather was an officer of the king of their town and had land and livestock.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "The text has a missing section marked as `[missing]`. Give me seventy-eight words exactly that would fit there.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "By the mid-nineteenth century, the Atlantic world had already penetrated the African hinterland. And although Britain had abolished the international trafficking of African peoples, or what is typically referred to as[missing] suppress the traffic. However, it was a largely British-led effort, and the US patrols proved to be ambivalent and not infrequently at cross-purposes with the abolitionist agenda.\n\nHabituated to the lucrative enterprise of trafficking, and encouraged by the relative ease with which they could find buyers for their captives, Africans opposed to ending the traffic persisted in the enterprise. The Fon of Dahomey was foremost among those African peoples who resisted the suppression. Not only was the internal enslavement of their prisoners perceived as essential to their traditions and customs, the external sell of their prisoners afforded their kingdom wealth and political dominance. To maintain a sufficient \"slave supply,\" the king of Dahomey instigated wars and led raids with the sole purpose of filling the royal stockade.\n\nKing Ghezo of Dahomey renounced his 1852 treaty to abolish the traffic and by 1857 had resumed his wars and raids. Reports of his activities had reached the newspapers of Mobile, Alabama. A November 9, 1858, article announced that \"the King of Dahomey was driving a brisk trade at Ouidah.\" This article caught the attention of Timothy Meaher, a \"slaveholder\" who, like many proslavery Americans, wanted to maintain the trans-Atlantic traffic. In defiance of constitutional law, Meaher decided to import Africans illegally into the country and enslave them. In conspiracy with Meaher, William Foster, who built the Clotilda, outfitted the ship for transport of the \"contraband cargo.\" In July 1860, he navigated toward the Bight of Benin. After six weeks of surviving storms and avoiding being overtaken by ships patrolling the waters, Foster anchored the Clotilda at the port of Ouidah.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": " \"the trans-Atlantic slave trade,\" in 1807, and although the United States had followed suit in 1808, European and American ships were still finding their way to ports along the West African coast to conduct what was now deemed \"illegitimate trade.\" Laws had been passed and treaties had been signed, but half a century later, the deportation of Africans out of Africa and into the Americas continued. France and the United States had joined forces with British efforts to", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Write 3 sentences sentences maintaining character/world context. Blend in these genres: nonfiction. Incorporate these themes: biography.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "From 1801 to 1866, an estimated 3,873,600 Africans were exchanged for gold, guns, and other European and American merchandise. Of that number, approximately 444,700 were deported from the Bight of Benin, which was controlled by Dahomey. During the period from 1851 to 1860, approximately 22,500 Africans were exported.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "And of that number, 110 were taken aboard the Clotilda at Ouidah.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Kossola was among them—a transaction between Foster and King Glèlè. In 1859, King Ghezo was mortally shot while returning from one of his campaigns. His son Badohun had ascended to the throne.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "He was called Glèlè, which means \"the ferocious Lion of the forest\" or \"terror in the bush.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "To avenge his father's death, as well as to amass sacrificial bodies for certain imminent traditional ceremonies, Glèlè intensified the raiding campaigns. Under the pretext of having been insulted when the king of Bantè refused to yield to Glèlè's demands for corn and cattle, Glèlè sacked the town.\n\nKossola described to Hurston the mayhem that ensued in the predawn raid when his townspeople awoke to Dahomey's female warriors, who slaughtered them in their daze.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Those who tried to escape through the eight gates that surrounded the town were beheaded by the male warriors who were posted there.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Kossola recalled the horror of seeing decapitated heads hanging about the belts of the warriors, and how on the second day, the warriors stopped the march in order to smoke the heads. Through the clouds of smoke, he missed seeing the heads of his family and townspeople. \"It is easy to see how few would have looked on that sight too closely,\" wrote a sympathetic Hurston.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Along with a host of others taken as captives by the Dahomian warriors, the survivors of the Bantè massacre were \"yoked by forked sticks and tied in a chain,\" then marched to the stockades at Abomey.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "After three days, they were incarcerated in the barracoons at Ouidah, near the Bight of Benin.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 4 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "During the weeks of his existence in the barracoons, Kossola was bewildered and anxious about his fate. Before him was a thunderous and crashing ocean that he had never seen before. Behind him was everything he called home. There in the barracoon, as there in his Alabama home, Kossola was transfixed between two worlds, fully belonging to neither.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Complete the text by replacing `[missing]` with a 7-sentence bit.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "In September 1927, Hurston had met and come under contract with Charlotte Osgood Mason, a patron to several Harlem Renaissance luminaries. Mason funded Hurston's return to Alabama for the extended interviews with Kossola, and she supported Hurston's research efforts while preparing Barracoon for publication. In a March 25, 1931, letter to Mason, Hurston writes that the work \"is coming along well.\" She reported that she had to revise some passages, but that she was \"within a few paragraphs of the end of the whole thing. Then for the final typing.\" She described the revisions and related her new research findings: \"I found at the library an actual account of the raid as Kossula said that it happened. Also the tribe name. It was not on the maps because the entire tribe was wiped out by the Dahomey troops. The king who conquered them preserved carefully the skull of Kossula's king as a most worthy foe.\"\n\nHurston and Mason conversed about the potential publication of Barracoon over a period of years. In her desire to see Hurston financially independent, Mason encouraged Hurston to prepare Barracoon, as well as the material that would become Mules and Men, for publication. Charlotte Mason considered herself not only a patron to black writers and artists, but also a guardian of black folklore. She believed it her duty to protect it from those whites who, having \"no more interesting things to investigate among themselves,\" were grabbing \"in every direction material that by right belongs entirely to another race.\" Following the suggestions of Mason and Alain Locke, Hurston advised Kossola and his family \"to avoid talking with other folklore collectors—white ones, no doubt—who he and Godmother felt 'should be kept entirely away not only from the project in hand but from this entire movement for the rediscovery of our folk material.'\"\n\nMason's support of Hurston's efforts with Barracoon extended to monetary contributions to Kossola's welfare. Mason and Kossola would eventually communicate directly with each other, and Kossola would come to consider Mason a \"dear friend.\" As one letter suggests, Kossola was struggling financially. It had come to Mason's attention that Kossola had used excerpts from his copy of Hurston's narrative to gain financial compensation from local newspapers. Kossola dictated a letter to Mason in response to her concern:\n\nDear friend you may have seen in the papers about my History. But this has been over three years since [missing]ests, both women remained concerned about Kossola's welfare. Having discovered that Kossola was not receiving money that Mason had mailed to him, Hurston looked into the matter. She updated Mason accordingly:\n\nI have written to Claudia Thornton to check up on Kossula and all about things. I have also asked the Post Office at Plateau to check any letters coming to Cudjoe Lewis from New York.\n\nAs Hurston checked on Kossola, she continued revising the manuscript. \"Second writing of Kossula all done and about typed,\" she wrote Mason on January 12, 1931. On April 18, she was enthusiastic: \"At last 'Barracoon' is ready for your eyes.\" Appreciative of Mason's support, Hurston dedicated the book to her and began submitting it to publishers. In September 1931, she contemplated Viking's proposal: \"The Viking press again asks for the Life of Kossula, but in language rather than dialect. It lies here and I know your mind about that and so I do not answer them except with your tongue.\" The dialect was a vital and authenticating feature of the narrative. Hurston would not submit to such revision. Perhaps, as Langston Hughes wrote in The Big Sea, the Negro was \"no longer in vogue,\" and publishers like Boni and Viking were unwilling to take risks on \"Negro material\" during the Great Depression.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "I has let anyone take it off to copy from it. I only did that so they would help me. But there is no one did for me as you has. The lord will Bless you and will give you a long Life. Where there's no more parting, yours in Christ. Cudjo Lewis.\n\nAs Mason was protective of Hurston's professional inter", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "I need around one hundred and fifty-five words or so to fill the gap marked by `<\|missing\|>` in this text.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "There seems to be a note of disappointment in the historian Sylviane Diouf's revelation that Hurston submitted Barracoon to various publishers, \"but it never found a taker, and has still not been published.\" Hurston's manuscript is an invaluable historical document, as Diouf points out, and an extraordinary literary achievement as well, despite the fact that it found no takers during her lifetime. In it, Zora Neale Hurston found a way to produce a written text that maintains the orality of the spoken word. And she did so without imposing herself in the narrative, creating what some scholars classify as orature. Contrary to the literary biographer Robert Hemenway's dismissal of Barracoon as Hurston's re-creation of Kossola's experience, the scholar Lynda Hill writes that \"through a deliberate act of suppression, she resists presenting her own point of view in a natural, or naturalistic, way and allows Kossula 'to tell his story in his own way.'\"\n\nZora Neale Hurston was not only committed to collecting artifacts of African American folk culture, she was also adamant about their authentic presentation. Even as she rejected the objective-observer stance of Western scientific inquiry for a participant-observer stance, Hurston still incorporated standard features of the ethnographic and folklore-collecting processes within her methodology. Adopting the participant-observer stance is what allowed her to collect folklore \"like a new broom.\" As Hill points out, Hurston was simultaneously working and learning, which meant, ultimately, that she was not just mirroring her mentors, but coming into her own.\n\nEmbedded in the narrative of Barracoon are those aspects of ethnography and folklore collecting that reveal Hurston's methodology and authenticate Kossola's story as his own, rather than as a fiction of Hurston's imagination. The story, in the main, is told from Kossola's first-person point of view. Hurston transcribes Kossola's story, using his vernacular diction, spelling his words as she hears them pronounced. Sentences follow his syntactical rhythms and maintain his idiomatic expressions and repetitive phrases. Hurston's methods respect Kossola's own storytelling sensibility; it is one that is \"rooted 'in African soil.'\" \"It would be hard to make the case that she entirely invented Kossula's language and, consequently, his emerging persona,\" comments Hill. And it would be an equally hard case to make that she created the life events chronicled in Kossola's story.\n\nEven as Hurston has her own idea about how a story is to be told, Kossola has his. Hurston is initially impatient<\|missing\|> Hill, \"Hurston does not romanticize or in any way imply that ideals such as self-fulfillment or fully realized self-expression could emerge from such suffering as Kossula has known. Hurston does not interpret his comments, except when she builds a transition from one interview to the next, in her footnotes, and at the end when she summarizes.\" The story Hurston gathers is presented in such a way that she, the interlocutor, all but disappears. The narrative space she creates for Kossola's unburdening is sacred. Rather than insert herself into the narrative as the learned and probing cultural anthropologist, the investigating ethnographer, or the authorial writer, Zora Neale Hurston, in her still listening, assumes the office of a priest. In this space, Oluale Kossola passes his story of epic proportion on to her.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": " with Kossola's talk about his father and grandfather, for instance. But Kossola's proverbial wisdom adjusts her attitude: \"Where is de house where de mouse is de leader?\"\n\nHurston complained in Dust Tracks on a Road of Kossola's reticence. Yet her patience in getting his story is quite apparent in the narrative. She is persistent in her returning to his home even when Kossola petulantly sends her away. He doesn't always talk when she comes, but rather chooses to tend his garden or repair his fence. And sometimes her time with him is spent driving Kossola into town. Sometimes he is lost in his memories.\n\nRecording such moments within the body of the narrative not only structures the overall narrative flow of events but reveals the behavioral patterns of her informant. As Hurston is not just an observer, she fully participates in the process of \"helping Kossula to tell his story.\" \"In writing his story,\" says", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Collaborative writing: I'll start, you add 1 sentence. Match character familiarity level. Genres: nonfiction. Elements: biography.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Zora Neale Hurston's introduction to Barracoon has been edited to align with the conventions of spelling, punctuation, grammar, and usage.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Contemporary spelling and usage have also been applied to names and places.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In composing the introduction to her work, Hurston made a good-faith effort to document the source material she used to set the context for the Barracoon narrative.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "(In the next section: Use the word 'historical' 2 time(s) - this is a strict requirement)", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "As she states in her preface, \"For historical data, I am indebted to the Journal of Negro History, and to the records of the Mobile Historical Society.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "She reiterates this acknowledgment in her introduction and alludes to the use of other \"records.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Hurston drew from Emma Langdon Roche's Historic Sketches, but she references this work indirectly, and her citation from this book, as well as the other sources she utilized, was inconsistent.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Word usage target: 'direct' must be used 2 times", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Wherever there is a question regarding her use of paraphrase and direct quotation, I have revised the passage as a direct quote and have documented it accordingly.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Regarding the actual narrative, I have read the original typescript in relation to earlier typed and handwritten drafts to produce a definitive text.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Minor edits to the text were made in relation to the mechanics of typography, for purposes of clarity, or in the correction of apparent typos.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Otherwise, the text remains as Hurston left it.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "I have made notations in the endnotes to present explanations or to provide full bibliographic data for sources Hurston used in her own notes.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Such explanatory entries are labeled \"Editor's note\" and are bracketed.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 2 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "All other notes are original to the manuscript. Hurston's citations and footnotes have likewise been edited to align with conventional documentation style.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Hey can you write like Zora Neale Hurston and use whatever i write as a jumping off point? btw characters and stuff might show up without backstory, just go with it", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "This is the life story of Cudjo Lewis, as told by himself.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It makes no attempt to be a scientific document, but on the whole he is rather accurate. If he is a little hazy as to detail after sixty-seven years, he is certainly to be pardoned. The quotations from the works of travelers in Dahomey are set down, not to make this appear a thoroughly documented biography, but to emphasize his remarkable memory.\n\nThree spellings of his nation are found: Attako, Taccou, and Taccow.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "But Lewis's pronunciation is probably correct.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Therefore, I have used Takkoi throughout the work.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 5 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "I was sent by a woman of tremendous understanding of primitive peoples to get this story. The thought back of the act was to set down essential truth rather than fact of detail, which is so often misleading. Therefore, he has been permitted to tell his story in his own way without the intrusion of interpretation.\n\nFor historical data, I am indebted to the Journal of Negro History, and to the records of the Mobile Historical Society.\n\n—Zora Neale Hurston", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Write forty-six sentences sentences in the style of Zora Neale Hurston spawning from what the user wrote, within the nonfiction genre. This is part of a longer narrative where characters and events may have prior context.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "[ Introduction ]\n\nThe African slave trade is the most dramatic chapter in the story of human existence. Therefore a great literature has grown up about it. Innumerable books and papers have been written. These are supplemented by the vast lore that has been blown by the breath of inarticulate ones across the seas and lands of the world.\n\nThose who justified slaving on various grounds have had their say. Among these are several slave runners who have boasted of their exploits in the contraband flesh. Those who stood aloof in loathing have cried out against it in lengthy volumes.\n\nAll the talk, printed and spoken, has had to do with ships and rations; with sail and weather; with ruses and piracy and balls between wind and water; with native kings and bargains sharp and sinful on both sides; with tribal wars and slave factories and red massacres and all the machinations necessary to stock a barracoon with African youth on the first leg of their journey from humanity to cattle; with storing and feeding and starvation and suffocation and pestilence and death; with slave ship stenches and mutinies of crew and cargo; with the jettying of cargoes before the guns of British cruisers; with auction blocks and sales and profits and losses.\n\nAll these words from the seller, but not one word from the sold. The Kings and Captains whose words moved ships. But not one word from the cargo. The thoughts of the \"black ivory,\" the \"coin of Africa,\" had no market value. Africa's ambassadors to the New World have come and worked and died, and left their spoor, but no recorded thought.\n\nOf all the millions transported from Africa to the Americas, only one man is left. He is called Cudjo Lewis and is living at present at Plateau, Alabama, a suburb of Mobile. This is the story of this Cudjo.\n\nI had met Cudjo Lewis for the first time in July 1927. I was sent by Dr. Franz Boas to get a firsthand report of the raid that had brought him to America and bondage, for Dr. Carter G. Woodson of the Journal of Negro History. I had talked with him in December of that same year and again in 1928. Thus, from Cudjo and from the records of the Mobile Historical Society, I had the story of the last load of slaves brought into the United States.\n\nThe four men responsible for this last deal in human flesh, before the surrender of Lee at Appomattox should end the 364 years of Western slave trading, were the three Meaher brothers and one Captain William \"Bill\" Foster. Jim, Tim, and Burns Meaher were natives of Maine. They had a mill and shipyard on the Alabama River at the mouth of Chickasabogue Creek (now called Three-Mile Creek) where they built swift vessels for blockade running, filibustering expeditions, and river trade. Captain Foster was associated with the Meahers in business. He was \"born in Nova Scotia of English parents.\"\n\nThere are various reasons given for this trip to the African coast in 1859, with the muttering thunder of secession heard from one end of the United States to the other. Some say that it was done as a prank to win a bet. That is doubtful. Perhaps they believed with many others that the abolitionists would never achieve their ends. Perhaps they merely thought of the probable profits of the voyage and so undertook it.\n\nThe Clotilda was the fastest boat in their possession, and she was the one selected to make the trip. Captain Foster seems to have been the actual owner of the vessel. Perhaps that is the reason he sailed in command. The clearance papers state that she was sailing for the west coast for a cargo of red palm oil. Foster had a crew of Yankee sailors and sailed directly for Whydah Ouidah, the slave port of Dahomey.\n\nThe Clotilda slipped away from Mobile as secretly as possible so as not to arouse the curiosity of the Government. It had a good voyage to within a short distance of the Cape Verde Islands. Then a hurricane struck and Captain Foster had to put in there for repairs.\n\nWhile he was on dry-dock, his crew mutinied. They demanded more pay under the threat of informing a British man-of-war that was at hand.\n\nFoster hurriedly promised the increase the sailors demanded. But his wife often told how he laughingly broke this promise when it was safe to do so. After the repairs had been made, he made presents to the Portuguese officials of shawls and other trinkets and sailed away unmolested.\n\nSoon he was safely anchored in the Gulf of Guinea, before Whydah. There being no harbor, ships must stand in open roadstead and the communications with shore are carried on by Kroo men in their surf boats.\n\nSoon Captain Foster and his kegs of specie and trading goods were landed.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "\"Six stalwart blacks\" were delegated to meet him and conduct him into \"the presence of a Prince of Dahomey,\" but he did not meet the king.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Your response should naturally weave in this dialogue: \"The slaves are then sold to the slave merchants, and their blood-money wasted in the ensuing Custom, Hwae-nooeewha, as the great annual feast is entitled in Dahoman parlance.\"", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Foster was borne in a hammock to the Prince, who received him seated on his stool of rank. He was gracious and hospitable, and had Foster shown \"the sights of Whydah.\" He was surrounded by evidence of great wealth, and Foster was impressed. He was particularly struck by a large square enclosure filled with thousands of snakes, which he was told had been collected for ceremonial purposes.\n\nThe Prince expressed regret that Foster had arrived a little too late to witness the Dahomey \"Custom\" in honor of trade (foreign, i.e., mostly slave trade); nevertheless, he found Foster's company so pleasant that he wished to make him a present. He therefore desired Foster to look about him and select a person, \"one that the 'superior wisdom and exalted taste' of Foster designated the finest specimen.\" Foster looked about him and chose a young man named Gumpa; \"Foster making this selection with the intention of flattering the Prince, to whom Gumpa was nearly related.\" This accounts for the one Dahoman in the cargo.\n\nThe ceremonies over, Foster had \"little trouble in procuring a cargo.\" The barracoons at Whydah were overflowing. \"It had long been a part of the traders' policy to instigate the tribes against each other,\" so that plenty of prisoners would be taken and \"in this manner keep the markets stocked. News of the trade was often published in the papers.\" An excerpt from the Mobile Register of November 9, 1858, said: \"'From the West coast of Africa we have advice dated September 21st. The quarreling of the tribes on Sierra Leone River rendered the aspect of things very unsatisfactory.'\"\n\nInciting was no longer necessary in Dahomey. The King of Dahomey had long ago concentrated all his resources on the providing of slaves for the foreign market. There was \"a brisk trade in slaves at from fifty to sixty dollars apiece at Whydah. Immense numbers of Negroes were collected along the coast for export.\"\n\nKing Ghezo maintained a standing army \"of about 12,000, and of these 5000 are Amazons.\" The Dahoman year was divided into two parts—the wars and the festivals. \"In the months of November or December the king commences his annual wars,\" and these wars were kept up until January or February. These were never carried on for mere conquest. They were all forced upon the Dahomans from less powerful nations.\n\nThe King boasted that he never attacked a people unless they had not only insulted Dahomey, but his own people must ask him for a war against the aggressors for \"three successive years.\" Then and then only would he let himself be persuaded to march forth and exterminate the insulting tribe. But there were so many insulting chiefs and kings that it kept the warriors of Dahomey, reluctant as they were, always upon the warpath. \"Whole nations are transported, exterminated, their name to be forgotten, except in the annual festival of their conquerors, when sycophants call the names of the vanquished countries to the remembrance of the victors.\"\n\nWhen the Dahoman king marched forth against a place, he concealed from his army \"the name or the place against which he has brought them,\" \"until within a day's march\" of the goal. \"Daylight is generally the time of onset, and every cunning, secrecy, and ingenuity is exercised to take the enemy by surprise.\" With or without resistance, \"all the aged were decapitated on the spot\" and the youth driven to the barracoons at Whydah.\n\n\"On the return from war in January, the king resides at Cannah, and... 'makes a Fetish,'\" that is, he \"sacrifices largely and gives liberal presents\" to the people and, \"at the same time, purchases the prisoners and heads from his soldiers\" of those slain in war. (The heads are always cut off and carried home. No warrior may boast of more enemies slain than he has heads to show for.) \"The slaves are then sold to the slave merchants, and their blood-money wasted in the ensuing Custom, Hwae-nooeewha, as the great annual feast is entitled in Dahoman parlance.\"\n\nThe most important feast is \"held in March, and called See-que-ah-hee,\" at which the king sacrifices many slaves and makes a great display of his wealth. There is a lesser festival in May or June \"in honour of Trade\" which is celebrated \"with music, dancing, and singing.\" In July is celebrated the royal \"salute to the Fetish of the Great Waters.\"\n\nTherefore, when Captain Foster arrived in May, the wars being just over for the year, he had a large collection to choose from. The people he chose had been in the stockade behind the great white house for less than a month. He selected 130, equal number of men and women, paid for them, got into his hammock and was conveyed across the shallow river to the beach, and was shot through the surf by the skillful Kroo boys and joined his ship. In other boats manipulated by the Kroo boys were his pieces of property.\n\nWhen 116 of the slaves had been brought aboard, Foster, up in the rigging, observing all the activities of the Port through his glasses, became alarmed. He saw all the Dahoman ships suddenly run up black flags. \"He hurried down and gave orders\" to abandon the cargo not already on board, and to sail away with all speed. He says that the Dahomans were treacherously planning to recapture the cargo he had just bought and hold him for ransom. But the Clotilda was so expertly handled and her speed was so great that she sped away to safety with all ease.\n\nThe next day he was chased by an English cruiser but escaped by pressing on sail. Nothing eventful happened until the 13th day when he ordered the cargo brought on deck so that they might regain the use of their limbs.\n\nThough the space in the Clotilda greatly exceeded the usual space in most slavers, the blacks were cramped.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"The usual space in which the 'middle passage' was made was from two and a half to three feet in height.\" It was about five feet in the Clotilda. However, the lack of action had numbed them.\n\n\"On the twentieth day,\" Foster thought he saw a British cruiser on the horizon intercepting his course; he climbed to the mast with his glasses. Yes, there she was, sweeping on toward his course. He hurried down and gave orders for the slaves to be returned to the hold. Then he anchored and \"lay until night,\" when he resumed his course.\n\nWhen Captain Foster reached American waters, the slaves were put back in the hold. The ship lay hidden for three days \"behind the islands in Mississippi Sound and near the lower end of Mobile Bay.\"\n\nTo make the hiding more secure, the Clotilde was dismasted. Then Foster got into a small boat, rowed by four sailors to go to the western shore of Mobile Bay, intending to send word to Meaher that the Clotilde had arrived. His approach was regarded with suspicion by some men ashore, and he was fired upon. Waving a white handkerchief their doubts were allayed and he offered fifty dollars for a conveyance which would take him to Mobile.\n\n\"Captain Foster reached Mobile on a Sunday morning in August (1859)\"; his return from the slave coast having been made in seventy days. \"Arrangements had long been made that a tug should lie in readiness to go at a moment's notice down Mobile Bay to tow the Clotilde and her cargo to safety. When the news came, the tug's pilot was attending services at St. John's Church. Captain Jim Meaher and James Dennison—a Negro slave—hurried to the church\" and called the pilot out. \"The three hastened down to the wharf, and were soon aboard the tug.\" It proceeded down the bay, but waited till dark to approach the Clotilda.\n\nFinally, the tug was made fast to the Clotilda and \"the trip up the bay was begun.\" The last slave ship was at the end of its voyage: \"The tug avoided the Mobile River channel, slipped behind the light-house on Battery Gladden, into Spanish River.... As the Clotilde passed opposite Mobile the clock in the old Spanish tower struck eleven, and the watchman's voice floated over the city and across the marshes, 'Eleven o'clock and all's well.'\n\n\"The Clotilde was taken directly to Twelve-Mile Island—a lonely, weird place by night.\" There Captain Foster and the Meahers awaited the R. B. Taney, \"named for Chief Justice Tainey\" of the Dred Scott decision fame. Some say it was the June instead of the Taney. \"Lights were smothered, and in the darkness quickly and quietly\" the captives were transferred from the Clotilda \"to the steamboat and taken up the Alabama River to John Dabney's plantation below Mount Vernon.\" They were landed the next day, and left in charge of the slave, James Dennison.\n\n\"At Twelve-Mile Island, the crew of Northern sailors again mutinied. Captain Foster, with a six shooter in each hand, went among them, discharged them, and ordered them to 'hit the grit and never be seen in Southern waters again.' They were placed aboard the tug\" and carried to Mobile. One of the Meahers bought them tickets \"and saw that they boarded a train for the North. The Clotilde was scuttled and fired, Captain Foster himself placed seven cords of light wood upon her. Her hull still lies in the marsh at the mouth of Bayou Corne and may be seen at low tide. Foster afterwards regretted her destruction as she was worth more than the ten Africans given him by the Meahers as his booty.\"\n\nThe Africans were kept at Dabney's Place for eleven days: being only allowed to talk \"in whispers\" and being constantly moved from place to place.\n\nAt the end of the eleventh day clothes were brought to them and they were put aboard the steamer Commodore and carried to The Bend in Clark County, where the Alabama and the Tombigbee rivers meet and where Burns Meaher had a plantation.\n\nThere they were lodged each night under a wagon shed, and driven each morning before daybreak back into the swamp, where they remained until dark.\n\n\"Meaher sent word secretly to those disposed to buy. They were piloted to the place of concealment by Jim Dennison. The Africans were placed in two long rows,\" men in one row, women in the other. Some couples were bought and taken to Selma. The remainder were divided up among the Meahers and Foster, Captain Jim Meaher took thirty-two (sixteen couples); Captain Burns Meaher took ten Africans; Foster received ten; and Captain Tim Meaher took eight. Finally, after a period of adjustment, the slaves were put to work. Before a year had passed, the war of Secession broke out. With the danger from interference from the Federal Government removed, all the Africans not sold to Selma were brought to the Meaher plantations at Magazine Point.\n\nNevertheless, the Meahers were tried in the federal courts 1860–61 and fined heavily for bringing in the Africans.\n\nThe village that these Africans built after freedom came, they called \"African Town.\" The town is now called Plateau, Alabama. The new name was bestowed upon it by the Mobile and Birmingham Railroad (now a part of the Southern Railroad System) built through the town. But still its dominant tone is African.\n\nWith these things already known to me, I once more sought the ancient house of the man called Cudjo. This singular man who says of himself, \"Edem etie ukum edem etie upar\": The tree of two woods, literally, two trees that have grown together. One part ukum (mahogany) and one part upar (ebony). He means to say, \"Partly a free man, partly free.\" The only man on earth who has in his heart the memory of his African home; the horrors of a slave raid; the barracoon; the Lenten tones of slavery; and who has sixty-seven years of freedom in a foreign land behind him.\n\nHow does one sleep with such memories beneath the pillow? How does a pagan live with a Christian God?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "How has the Nigerian \"heathen\" borne up under the process of civilization?", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 1 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "I was sent to ask.", "loss": null } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Looking at this text, there's a `<\|missing\|>` that needs filling. Give me something like 17 sentences that would work.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "It was summer when I went to talk with Cudjo so his door was standing wide open. But I knew he was somewhere about the house before I entered the yard, because I had found the gate unlocked. When Cudjo goes down into his back-field or away from home he locks his gate with an ingenious wooden peg of African invention.\n\nI hailed him by his African name as I walked up the steps to his porch, and he looked up into my face as I stood in the door in surprise. He was eating his breakfast from a round enameled pan with his hands, in the fashion of his fatherland.\n\nThe surprise of seeing me halted his hand between pan and face. Then tears of joy welled up.\n\n\"Oh Lor', I know it you call my name. Nobody don't callee me my name from cross de water but you. You always callee me Kossula, jus' lak I in de Affica soil!\"\n\nI noted that another man sat eating with him and I wondered why. So I said, \"I see you have company, Kossula.\"\n\n\"Yeah, I got to have somebody stay wid me. I been sick in de bed de five month. I needa somebody hand me some water. So I take dis ma<\|missing\|>?\"\n\nAnother muted silence. Then he said, \"I thank God I on prayin' groun' and in a Bible country.\"\n\n\"But didn't you have a God back in Africa?\" I asked him.\n\nHis head dropped between his hands and the tears sprung fresh. Seeing the anguish in his face, I regretted that I had come to worry this captive in a strange land. He read my face and said, \"Excusee me I cry. I can't help it when I hear de name call. Oh, Lor'. I no see Afficky soil no mo'!\"\n\nAnother long silence. Then, \"How come you astee me ain' we had no God back dere in Afficky?\"\n\n\"Because you said 'thank God you were on praying ground and in a Bible country.'\"\n\n\"Yeah, in Afficky we always know dere was a God; he name Alahua, but po' Affickans we cain readee de Bible, so we doan know God got a Son. We ain' ignant—we jes doan know. Nobody doan tell us 'bout Adam eatee de apple, we didn't know de seven seals was sealee 'gainst us. Our parents doan tell us dat. Dey didn't tell us 'bout de first days. No, dass a right. We jes doan know. So dat whut you come astee me?\"\n\nI temporized. \"Well, yes. I wanted to ask that, but I want to ask you many things. I want to know who you are and how you came to be a slave; and to what part of Africa do you belong, and how you fared as a slave, and how you have managed as a free man?\"\n\nAgain his head was bowed for a time. When he lifted his wet face again he murmured, \"Thankee Jesus! Somebody come ast about Cudjo! I want tellee somebody who I is, so maybe dey go in de Afficky soil some day and callee my name and somebody dere say, 'Yeah, I know Kossula.' I want you everywhere you go to tell everybody whut Cudjo say, and how come I in Americky soil since de 1859 and never see my people no mo'. I can't talkee plain, you unnerstand me, but I calls it word by word for you so it won't be too crooked for you.\n\n\"My name, is not Cudjo Lewis. It Kossula. When I gittee in Americky soil, Mr. Jim Meaher he try callee my name, but it too long, you unnerstand me, so I say, 'Well, I yo' property?' He say, 'Yeah.' Den I say, 'You callee me Cudjo. Dat do.' But in Afficky soil my mama she name me Kossula.\n\n\"My people, you unnerstand me, dey ain' got no ivory by de door. When it ivory from de elephant stand by de door, den dat a king, a ruler, you unnerstand me. My father neither his father don't rule nobody. De ole folks dat live two hund'ed year befo' I born don't tell me de father (remote ancestor) rule nobody.\n\n\"My people in Afficky, you unnerstand me, dey not rich. Dass de truth, now. I not goin' tellee you my folks dey rich and come from high blood. Den when you go in de Afficky soil an' astee de people, dey say, 'Why Kossula over dere in Americky soil tellee de folks he rich?' I tellee you lak it tis. Now, dass right, ain' it?\n\n\"My father's father, you unnerstand me, he a officer of de king. He don't live in de compound wid us. Wherever de king go, he go, you unnerstand me. De king give him plenty land, and got plenty cows and goats and sheep. Now, dass right. Maybe after while he be a little chief, I doan know. But he die when I a lil boy. Whut he gointer be later on, dat doan reachee me.\n\n\"My grandpa, he a great man. I tellee you how he go.\"\n\nI was afraid that Cudjo might go off on a tangent, so I cut in with, \"But Kossula, I want to hear about you and how you lived in Africa.\"\n\nHe gave me a look full of scornful pity and asked, \"Where is de house where de mouse is de leader? In de Affica soil I cain tellee you 'bout de son before I tellee you 'bout de father; and derefore, you unnerstand me, I cain talk about de man who is father (et te) till I tellee you bout de man who he father to him, (et, te, te, grandfather) now, dass right ain' it?\n\n\"My grandpa, you unnerstand me, he got de great big compound. He got plenty wives and chillun. His house, it is in de center de compound. In Affica soil de house of de husband it always in de center and de houses of de wives, dein in a circle round de house dey husband live in.\n\n\"He don't think hisself to marry wid so many women. No. In de Affica soil it de wife dat go findee him another wife.\n\n\"S'pose I in de Affica soil. Cudjo he been married for seven year for example. His wife say, 'Cudjo, I am growin' old. I tired. I will bring you another wife.'\n\n\"Before she speakee dat, she got de girl who he doan know in her mind. She a girl she think very nice. Maybe her husband never see her. Well, she go out in de market place, maybe in de public square. She see disa girl and astee de girl, 'You know Cudjo?' De girl tellee her, 'I have heard of him.' De wife say, 'Cudjo is good. He is kind. I like you to be his wife.' De girl say, 'Come with me to my papa and mama.'\n\n\"Dey go, you unnerstand me, to de girl's parents together. Dey astee her questions and she answeree for her husband. She astee dem questions too and if both sides satisfy wid one 'nother de girl's parents say, 'We give our daughter into yo' care. She ain' ours no mo'. You be good to her.'\n\n\"De wife she come back to Cudjo and makee de 'rangements. Cudjo got to pay de father for de girl. If she be a rich girl dat been in de fat-house long time, you unnerstand me, he got to pay two of everything for her. Two cow, two sheep, two goat, chickens, yam, maybe gold. De rich man, keepee his daughter in de fat-house long time. Sometime two year. She gittee de dinner in dere eight times a day and dey don't leavee her git in and out de bed by herself. De one whut keep de fat-house he lift dem in and out, so dey don't lose de fat.\n\n\"De man not so rich, he cain keep his girl dere long so she not so fat. So po' man don't send his daughter.\n\n\"Derefore, you unnerstand me, de man pay different price for different girl. If she de daughter of a po' family, or she been married before or somethin', he don't pay much for her.\n\n\"When de new wife come first to her husband compound she live in de house wid de old wife. She teach her what to do and how to take keer de husband. When she learn all dat, den she have a house by herself.\n\n\"When dey gittee ready to buildee de new house, de man takee de machete and chop de palm tree to mark de place where de house goin' be build. Den he throw down a cow and have plenty palm wine. Den all de people come and eatee de meat and drink de wine and stomp de place smooth and buildee de house.\n\n\"My grandpa, he buildee wife house many time.\n\n\"Some men in de Affica soil don't gittee no wife 'cause dey cain buy none. Dey ain' got nothing to give so a wife kin come to dem. Some got too many. When you hungry it is painful but when de belly too full it painful too.\n\n\"All de wives make food (udia) for de husband. All de men dey likee de fufu. He eatee de big calabash full to de top wid fufu, den my grandpa he lay down to sleep.\n\n\"De young wives (before they are old enough to take up the actual duties of wifehood) help put de husband to sleep. One makee wind for him wid de fan. Another one rub de head. Maybe one clean de hands and somebody look after de toe-nails. Den he sleepee and snore.\n\n\"Somebody stand guard before de door so nobody make noise and wakee him. Sometime de son of a slave in de compound makee too much noise. De man what stand guard ketchee him and takee him to my grandpa. He sit up and lookee at de boy so. Den he astee him, 'Whoever tellee you dat de mouse kin walk 'cross de roof of de mighty? Where is dat Portugee man? I swap you for tobacco! In de olden days, I walk on yo' skin!' (That is, I would kill you and make shoes from your hide.) 'I drink water from yo' skull.' (I would have killed you and used your head for a drinking cup.)\n\n\"My grandpa say dat, but he don't never astee de chief to sellee nobody to de Portugee. Some chief dey gittee mad when de slave talkee so sassy and don't do work lakee dey tell 'em. Den dey sell him to de Portugee. De chief throw orange under de table. Den he call the slave boy he goin' sell and say to de boy, 'Pick me de orange under de table.' De boy stoop under de table. De chief got a man standin dere. Maybe two. When de boy go under the table to gittee de orange, de chief say, 'Ketchee de bushman!' De men grabee de boy and sellee him.\n\n\"De chief he ain' always glad. One day de wife die. She still in de old wife's house and ain' never been no wife to the chief yet. She too young. Why she die, Cudjo doan know.\n\n\"When dey come to tell de chief his young wife dead, he go look. He slap his hand on his wrist. Den he scream in his fist and cry. He say, 'Yea! yea! yea! my wife dead. All my goods wasted. I pay big price for her. I fatten her and now she dead and I never sleep wid her once. Yea! yea! I lose so much! She dead and still a virgin! Yea! yea, tu yea! I have a great loss.'\"\n\nCudjo looked out over his patch of pole-beans towards the house of his daughter-in-law. I waited for him to resume, but he just sat there not seeing me. I waited but not a sound. Presently he turned to the man sitting inside the house and said, \"go fetchee me some cool water.\"\n\nThe man took the pail and went down the path between the rows of pole-beans to the well in the daughter-in-law's yard. He returned and Kossula gulped down a healthy cup-full from a home-made tin cup.\n\nThen he sat and smoked his pipe in silence. Finally he seemed to discover that I was still there. Then he said brusquely, \"Go leave me 'lone. Cudjo tired. Come back tomorrow. Doan come in de mornin' 'cause den I be in de garden. Come when it hot, den Cudjo sit in de house.\"\n\nSo I left Cudjo sitting in his door with his bare feet exposed to the cloud of mosquitoes that swarmed in the shade of the inside of his house.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "n and he sleep here and take keer Cudjo. But I gittee well now.\"\n\nIn spite of the recent illness and the fact that his well had fallen in, I found Cudjo Lewis full of gleaming, good will. His garden was planted. There was deep shade under his China-berry tree and all was well.\n\nHe wanted to know a few things about New York and when I had answered him, he sat silently smoking. Finally, I told him I had come to talk with him. He removed his pipe from his mouth and smiled.\n\n\"I doan keer,\" he said, \"I lakee have comp'ny come see me.\" Then the smile faded into a wretched weeping mask. \"I so lonely. My wife she left me since de 1908. Cudjo all by hisself.\"\n\nAfter a minute or two he remembered me and said contritely, \"Excuse me. You didn't do nothin' to me. Cudjo feel so lonely, he can't help he cry sometime. Whut you want wid me?\"\n\n\"First, I want to ask you how you feel today", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "NarrativeBot: 33 sentences sentences. Match character familiarity. nonfiction genre.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "The next day about noon I was again at Kossula's gate. I brought a gift this time. A basket of Georgia peaches. He received me kindly and began to eat the peaches at once. Mary and Martha, the twin daughters of his granddaughter, wandered up to the steps. The old man's love of these children was quite evident. With glad eyes, he selected four of the finest peaches and handed two to each little girl. He scolded them on off to play with affectionate abuse. When they were gone, he looked lovingly after them and pointed to a little clump of sugarcane in the garden.\n\n\"See dat cane?\" he asked.\n\nI nodded that I did.\n\n\"Well, I plant dat cane. Tain much, but I grow dat so when Martha and Mary come to me and say, 'Gran'pa I wantee some cane,' I go cut and give 'em.\"\n\nThere is a large peach tree in the yard that bears small but delicious clingstone peaches. They were beginning to ripen. The old man gave me one or two and put away one for each of the twins.\n\nI was shown all over the gardens. Kossula was genial but not one word about himself fell from his lips.\n\nSo I went away and came again the following day. I brought another gift. A box of Bee Brand insect powder to burn in the house to drive out all the mosquitoes.\n\nHe was in a vocal mood and could scarcely wait until I set the powder burning to talk about his Affica.\n\nSo we settled on the porch and he talked. I reminded him that he had been telling me about the chief's losing a wife under such unfortunate circumstances and about his grandfather's compound.\n\n\"I doan fuhgittee nothin. I 'member everything since I de five year old.\n\n\"Yeah, my grandpa, he a officer of de king. He be wid de king everywhere he go, you unnerstand me.\n\n\"Derefore, you unnerstand me, one man he kill a leopard, well, de king doan keer 'bout he kill a leopard, but de law say dat when a man kill a leopard, he got to bring it to de king.\n\n\"De king doan want take de beast away from de man what kill it, you unnerstand me, but he got to take de big hairs (whiskers) dat grow round de mouth. Dey very poison, and de king doan want none de people to gittee kill. Some mens dey wicked, you unnerstand me, and dey take de hairs and make de poison. Derefore, you know, de king say when any man kill de leopard, he got to cover de head so no women kin see it and bring de leopard to de king.\n\n\"Den de drums go beat and callee all brave chiefs come discuss dis leopard dat been kill.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "/* Make sure to use 'killee' 2 time(s) throughout your message */", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"De king he keep de head, de liver, de gall and de skin. Dat always belong to de king. It all makee different medicine. All de body, it he dried and makee more medicine too. But some tribe make fetish and eat de flesh, so dey eatee de medicine, you know.\n\n\"Derefore when a man kill de leopard and take de hairs before he let de king know he kill de leopard, dey kill that man. He a wicked man.\n\n\"One man you know, he kill a leopard. He cover de head and tie de body to a young tree. (Tied by the feet to a pole so that it could be carried.)\n\n\"Well de king call all de chiefs and they come lookee. Dey take off de cover from de head and de king look at de hairs. He see one hair it gone from de hole in de face where it grow. All de chief dey lookee too. Dey see de hair ain' dere. So dey call de man.\n\n\"De king say, 'Well, you killee dis beast?'\n\n\"De man say, 'Yeah, I kill him.'\n\n\"'How you kill dis leopard?'\n\n\"'Wid de spear, I kill him.'\n\n\"'Did you touch de head?'\n\n\"'No, I doan touchee de head at all. I only a common man and I know de head belong to de king. So I doan touch it.'\n\n\"De king lookee at de head and lookee at de man. He say, 'How is it dis beast got de hole for de hair but one hair not dere. Tell me where de hair is. I see where it pull out. Who is it dat you want to kill?'\n\n\"De man say, 'I doan want killee nobody. I ain' touchee de hair. Dats de truth now. If I touchee de hair, let in-si-bi-di' (that is, may I be turned over to the executioner.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Insibidi being the name for the executioner).", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"Well dey search de man and find de hair. Den dey try him. All day dey talk palaver. So nex' day dey find him guilty. So dey say he got to die. He a wicked man what speck to killee somebody wid de hair.\n\n\"Derefore, you unnerstand me, dey tie him by de left foot and wait for aku-ire-usen (King's day, or great day, all executions being saved for this day, though a few are executed on the Queen's day) den dey takee him to de place of sacrifice.\n\n\"De king come wid his seat and all de chiefs bring dey stool too. Dey seatee deyself and de drum beat. It speak wid de voice of de king. Den three insibidi come in de place and dance. One have a mouth-piece dat rattle. He shake de mouth-piece dat rattle. He shake de mouth-piece and sing.\n\n\"What he sing? Cudjo goin' tellee you:\n\n\"'On a great day like this, we kill de\n\nOne dat is evil\n\nOn a day like this we kill de bad one\n\nWho would command the poison one\n\nfrom the leopard to kill us.\n\nOn a great day like this we kill him\n\nWho would kill the innocent?'\n\n\"He dance some more wid de drum and de other two dancee wid him. Den he sing some more:\n\n\"'A great knife dat eats no other blood but human blood.\n\nLet it killee him.\n\nIt a great knife—it feed de earth\n\nA great knife dat eats no other blood but human blood.'\n\n\"Dey dances some mo' when de king makee de sign, dey dance up to de man where he tied at and wid one lick, choppee de head off. De head fall to de ground and de mouth work so—it open and shut many time. But quick, they put a piece of de stick from de banana tree in de mouth. Den dey kin open de jaw when dey gittee ready. If dey don't do dat, de jaw close and dey cain git it open no mo'.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"De body of de man, dey bury it in de ground. De head, dey put it in de sacrifice place wid de other heads.\n\n\"De king go back to his village, but de chief have court every day. All day somebody say to him, 'Dis man, touch my wife! Disa man commit adultery!'\n\n\"Everything be done open dere. Not so many secrets. When a man kills somebody dere, he be tried open an' all de boys and men in de village hear de trial.\n\n\"I doan know how come he done it, but one man killee anudder one wid de spear. So dey 'rested dat man an' tie his hands wid palm cord. Den dey pick up de dead man an' carry him to de public square, de market place, you unnerstand. Den dey send message by de drum to de king in de village where he at to come set on de trial an' 'cide de case. In Afficky, you unnerstand, if somebody steal or commit adultery, de chief of de village, he try him. But if a man killee somebody, den dey send for de king an' he come an' 'cide de case. Therefore, when dis man spear de udder one through de breast, dey send word for de king to come.\n\n\"De ole folks, you unnerstand me, de wise ones, dey go out in de woods and gittee leaves—dey know which ones—an' mashee de leaves wid water. Den dey paint de dead man all over wid dis so he doan spoil till de king come. Maybe de king doan git dere till de next day. When de king come, my grandfather, he come wid him.\n\n\"Befo' anybody see de king, we know he is almost dere, because we hear de drum. When a little chief travel, he go quiet, but when de king go any place, you unnerstand me, de drum go befo' to let de people know de king come.\n\n\"Dat night everybody sit up wid de dead man, all night, an' eat meat and drink palm wine and banana beer. Late de next day, you unnerstand me, de king come, wid de chiefs of de udder villages, to help him 'cide de case. So de chief of our village, he went out a short way to meet de king. Den he put down and killee cows and goats. It too late dat day to hold a trial, you unnerstand me. So dey 'cide to hold it next day. So dey did. De king, he takes a special seat dey bring for him an' de chiefs from de udder towns, dey sit on dey stool of rank in different places aroun' de square.\n\n\"De dead man is laying on de ground in de center where everybody see him. De man dat kill him, he tied where folks kin see him too. Derefore, dey try de man.\n\n\"Dey askee de man why he killee dis udder one. He say de man work juju against him so his chile died, an' his cows dey stay sick all de time.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "De king say, 'If this man work juju against you, why doan you tell de chief an' de headman of de village? Why doan you tell de king? Doan you know we got law for people dat work juju? You ain' supposed to kill de man.'\n\n\"So dey talk an' all the chiefs settin' round, dey askee him questions, too.\n\n\"In Afficky de law is de law an' no man cain make out he crazy lak here, an' get excusee from de law. If you kill anybody, you goin die, too. Dey goin' killee you. So de king say, 'I hear de evidence, but this man got no cause to killee dat udder one. Derefore he must die.'\n\n\"De man stand dere. He doan cry. He doan talk. He jes' look straight at de king. Den all de chiefs dey gettee round de king and dey talkee while an' nobody know what dey say but dem. Den all de chiefs, dey go back an' takee dere seats again. Den de drums begin to play. De big drum, Kata kumba, de drum dat speaks lak a man, it begins to talk. An' de man what is insibidi, he begin to dance. Dey lead de murderer out into de center of de square. De insibidi he dance. (Gesture.) And as he dance, he watch de eye of de king, an' de eye of all de chiefs. One man will give him de sign. Nobody know which one will give de sign. Dey 'cide dat when dey was whispering together.\n\n\"Derefore de executioner dance until he get de sign of de hand. Den he dance up to de murderer and touch his breast with the point of de machete. He dance away again an' de next time he touch de man's neck wid his knife. The third time dat he touch de man, other men rush out and seize the murderer an' take-a de palm cord and stretch him face to face upon de dead man, an' tie him tight so he cain move hisself.\n\n\"When de executioner touch de murderer wid his knife, dat is a sign dat he is dead already. So dey wrap de cord around his neck and around de neck of de dead man. Dey wrap de cord around his body an' around de body of de dead man. Dey wrap his arm an' de dead man's arm wid de same cord. His leg is wrapped as one wid de leg of de man he done killed.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "So dey leave him dere.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 13 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "His nose is tied to de nose of de dead man. His lips touch the lips of de corpse. So dey leave him.\n\n\"De king an' de chief talk palaver 'bout other things while dey watchee de struggles of de murderer.\n\n\"Sometime if he be a strong man, an' de person he kill be little, he manage to get up and go a little away wid de body, but if de corpse be heavy, he lay right dere till he die.\n\n\"If he cry for water, nobody pay no attention to him because he is dead since the machete first touch him. So dey say, 'How can a dead man want water?' If he cry to be cut loose, nobody pay attention to him. Dey say, 'How can a dead man want to be loose? De udder dead man doan cry. How come this man cry?' So dey leave him dere.\n\n\"But people watch until he die too. How long it take? Sometime he die next day. Sometime two or three days. He doan live long. People kin stand de smell of de horse, de cow and udder beasts, but no man kin stand de smell in his nostrils of a rotten man.\"", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Complete the text by replacing `<cutout_marker>` with just 11 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "When dey try de man dat steal de leopard hair, it de time to cut grass, so it don't choke de corn. Before de grass be dry 'nough to burn, my grandpa he take sick in his compound. How come he take sick, Cudjo doan know. I a li'l boy and I doan know why he die.\n\n\"But Cudjo know his father takee him to de compound of his father. I didn't see him after he died. Dey bury him right away so no enemy come look down in his face and do his spirit harm. Dey bury him in de house. Dey dig up de clay floor and bury him. We say in de Affica soil, 'We live wid you while you alive, how come we cain live wid you after you die?' So, you know dey bury a man in his house.\n\n\"De coffin settin dere just lak he in dere. De people come fetchu presents and place dem in de coffin. De first wife she set at de head of de coffin. When somebody came she cry. She cry with a song. De other wives dey join in and cry wid her.\n\n\"When we come in, de chief wife of my grandpa got up from de head of de coffin and throw de veil off her face. De udder wives throw off de veil too. De chief wife she weepee very loud and said, 'It is forty years since he married me, and now you find me a widow. Only yesterday he was worried about his wives and chillun and here he lies today in need of nothing!'\n\n\"My father say, 'Oh de ground eats de best of everything.' Den he weepee too. De chief wife she cry some more and de udder wives cry and shake de voice, 'Aiai, Aiai, Aiai!'\n\n\"De chief wife say, 'He was a wonderful man.' Den my father say, 'Dat is true, de ground kin prove it.'\n\n\"Den we set ourselves on de floor and de wives cover up dere faces and gittee quiet.\n\n\"De men sorry he dead too. Dey come bring presents and lookee at de coffin. Dey drink palm wine and sing sorrowful for him a song. 'O todo ah wah n-law yah-lee, owrran k-nee ra ra k-nee ro ro.'\n\n\"Den somebody else come and de chief wife she rise and start de weepin agin. It very sad. Dey see de head of all de wives is shaved. Dey see de cover over de face. Derefore, you unnerstand me, everybody feel sad.\n\n\"De first wife, she cry and say:\n\n \"'How long since we were married?\n\n And now we are nothing but a widow\n\n De husband what know how to keep women\n\n De husband what know how to prepare a house\n\n De husband what know every secret of women\n\n De husband what knows what is needed\n\n And gives it without asking—\n\n How long since we were married?\n\n And now we're nothing but a widow.'\n\n\"Dey call my grandpa brave and praise-giving names. Den dey cry with another song:\n\n \"'Whoever shake de leaf of dat tree\n\n (a sweet shrub)\n\n We are still smelling it.\n\n Whoever kill our husband,\n\n We shall never forget.'\n<cutout_marker> don't want to wear out my welcome. I want you to let me come and talk with you again.\"\n\n\"Oh, I doan keer you come see me. Cudjo lak have comp'ny. Now I go water de tater vines. You see kin you find ripe peach on de tree and gittee some take home.\"\n\nI put the ladder in the tree and climbed up in easy reach of a cluster of pink peaches. He saw me to the gate and graciously said goodbye.\n\n\"Doan come back till de nexy week, now I need choppee grass in de garden.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\n\"De wives cry lak dat every time somebody come in. When nobody came dey set quiet. Two years they must be widow. One year, dey don't touchee water to de face. Dey washee it always wid tears. In de Affica soil de women grieve for dey husband lak dat, you unnerstand me.\n\n\"All day, all night de people come, and every time somebody come, de women cry.\"\n\nKossula got that remote look in his eyes and I knew he had withdrawn within himself.\n\nI arose to go. \"You going very soon today,\" he commented.\n\n\"Yes,\" I said, \"I", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "28 sentences sentences in Zora Neale Hurston style, continuing user's bit. Note: May include established elements", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "In the six days between my visits to Kossula I worried a little lest he deny himself to me. I had secured two Virginia hams on my trip south and when I appeared before him the following Thursday, I brought him one. He was delighted beyond his vocabulary, but I read his face and it was more than enough. The ham was for him. For us I brought a huge watermelon, right off the ice, so we cut it in half and we just ate from heart to rind as far as we were able.\n\nThen it was necessary to walk it down so he showed me over the Old Landmark Baptist Church, at his very gate, where he is the sexton.\n\nWatermelon, like too many other gorgeous things in life, is much too fleeting. We lightened our ballast and returned to the porch.\n\n\"Now, you want me to tellee you some mo' about what we do in de Affica soil? Well, you good to me. I doan keer, I tellee you somethin'. It too hot I work anyhow.\n\n\"My father he name O-lo-loo-ay. He not a rich man. He have three wives.\n\n\"My mama she name Ny-fond-lo-loo. She de second wife. Now dat's right. I no tellee you I de son of de chief wife. Dat ain' right. I de son of de second wife.\n\n\"My mama have one son befo' me so I her second child. She have four mo' chillun after me, but dat ain' all de chillun my father got. He got nine by de first wife and three by de third wife. When de guls marry dey like see how many chillun dey kin have for dey husband.\"\n\n\"Aren't there some barren women?\" I asked.\n\n\"No, dey all git chillun by dey husband. If dey doan gittee de babies, dey go talk to de ole folks. Den de old ones go in de bush and gittee de leaves and make a tea and give the girl some to drink. Den dey gittee babies for dey husband. Sometimes a woman doan never gittee no baby, though. Cudjo doan know (why).\n\n\"In de compound I play games wid all de chillun my father got.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "(See appendix.) We wrassle wid one 'nother.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We see which one kin run de fastest. We clam de palm tree wid coconut on it and we eatee dat, we go in de woods and hunt de pineapple and banana and we eatee dat too. Know how we find de fruits? By de smell.\n\n\"Sometimes our mama say we run play 'nough. Dey tell us 'Dat, dat do? Come set down and I tellee you stories 'bout de animals, when they talk lak folks.' Cudjo doan know de time when de animals talk lak folks. De ole folks, dey tell me dat. Cudjo like very much to listen.\"\n\nI said, \"I like to hear stories too. Do you remember any of the stories your mama told you?\"\n\n\"Well,\" said Kossula, \"I tellee you de story nexy time you come set wid me. Now I tellee you 'bout Cudjo when he a boy back in de Affica. (See appendix for stories.)\n\n\"One day de chief send word to de compound. He want see all de boys dat done see fourteen rainy seasons. Dat makee me very happy because I think he goin' send me to de army. I then almost fifteen rainy seasons old.\n\n\"But in de Affica soil dey teachee de boys long time befo' dey go in de army. Derefore, you unnerstand me, when de boy 'bout fourteen dey start train him for de war.\n\n\"Dey don't go fight right away. No, first dey got to know how to walk in de bush and see and not show theyself. Derefore, first de fathers (elders) takee de boys on journey to hunt. Sometime it go and come back befo' night. Sometime it two, three sleeps (nights).\n\n\"Dey got to learn de step on de ground (tracks). Dey got to know whether whut dey hunt turned this way or that way. Dey learn to breakee de branch and turn it so dey kin find de way back home. Dey got to knot de long leaf so de folks behind kin know to follow.\n\n\"De fathers teachee us to know a place for de house (a camp site) and how we must choppee bark of de biggest tree so somebody else whut go running (traveling) kin know it a good place to sleepee.\n\n\"Me make de hunt many time. We shoot de arrows from de bow. We chunkee spear we kill de beastes and fetchee dem home wid us.\n\n\"I so glad I goin' be a man and fight in de army lak my big brothers.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Include exactly 2 instance(s) of the word 'watermelon'", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "I likee beatee de drum too.\n\n\"Dey teachee us to sing de war song. We sing when we walk in de bush and make lak we goin' fight de enemy. De drum talkee wid us when we sing de song, 'Ofu, ofu, tiggy, tiggy, tiggy, tiggy batim, ofu ofu, tiggy tiggy, tiggy, tiggy batim! Ofu batim en ko esse!'\n\n(\"When the day breaks the cock shall crow\n\nWhen the day breaks the cock shall crow\n\nWhen the day breaks the cock shall crow\n\nWhen someone crosses our roof we shall tear\n\nA nation down.\"\n\nThe actual meaning is, \"When we get there we shall make our demands and if we are crossed we shall tear down the nation who defies us.\")\n\n\"Every year dey teachee us mo' war. But de king, Akia'on, say he doan go make no war. He make us strong so nobody doan make war on us. We know de secret of de gates so when de enemy come and we don't know dey come, we kin run hidee ourself in de bush, den dey don't see nobody dey go 'way. Den we come behind dem and fight till dey all dead.\n\n\"Four, five rainy seasons it keep on lak dat, den I grow tall and big. I kin run in de bush all day and not be tired.\"\n\nKossula ceased speaking and looked pointedly at his melon rind. There was still lots of good red meat and a quart or two of juice. I looked at mine. I had more meat left than Kossula had. Nothing was left of the first installment, but a pleasant memory. So we lifted the half-rinds to our knees and started all over again. The sun was still hot so we did the job leisurely.\n\nWatermelon halves having ends like everything else, and a thorough watermelon eating being what it is, a long over-stuffed silence fell on us.\n\nWhen I was able to speak, somehow the name juju came into my mind, so I asked Kossula what he knew about it. He seemed reluctant to answer my question, but finally he did so.\n\n\"I tellee you whut I know about de juju.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Whut de ole folks do in de juju house, I doan know.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "I can't tellee you dat.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "I too young yet.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Dat doan reachee me. I know dat all de grown men dey go to de mountain once a year. It have something to do wid makin' de weather, but whut dey do dere, Cudjo doan know. Now, dat's right. I doan make out I know whut go on wid de grown folks. When I come away from Afficky I only a boy 19 year old. I have one initiation. A boy must go through many initiations before he become a man. I jus' initiate one time.\n\n\"One day I was in de market place when I see a pretty girl walk past me. She so pretty I follow her a little way, but I doan speak. We doan do dat in Afficky. But I likee her. One ole man, he saw me watchee de girl. He doan say nothin' to me, but he went to my father an' say, 'Your boy is about breakin' de corn. He is getting to be a man an' knows de secret of man. So put goats down or a cow an' let us fix a banquet for him.' So my father say, 'All right.'\n\n\"But first dey doan fix de banquet for me. Dey have in Afficky a small stick on a string an' when dey make it go 'round fast, it roar like de lion or de bull. Dey have three kinds. One, dey call it de 'he' one de 'she' and one dey call it de dog 'cause dey make it bark data way. (The bull-roarer.)\n\n\"No woman mus' hear dis thing; if she do, she die. So dey stay inside and shuttee de door tight.\n\n\"Dey put me in de initiation house. After a while I hear a great roaring outside de door an' dey say to me, 'Go see where dat is.' Soon's I went outside I doan hear it at de door no more. It sound way off in de bush. They tell me to go in de bush to hunt it.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "As soon as I go to de bush to find out whut it is, I hear it behind me.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 8 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "I hear it behind me, in front of me, everywhere, but I never find it. De men are playing wid me. Way after while, dey take me into de banquet an' tell me de secret of de thing dat make de sound.\n\n\"At de banquet dey make me sit an' listen wid respect. Dey tell me, 'You are jus' below us. You are not yet a man. All men are still fathers to you.'\n\n\"There is plenty of roast meat and wine at de banquet an' all de men dey pinchee my ear tight to teach me to keep de secrets. Den I get a peacock feather to wear. In Americky soil I see plenty wimmins wear de peacock feather, but dey doan know what dey do. In Afficky soil a boy got to gittee plenty secrets inside dat he doan talk 'fo' he gittee de peacock feather.\"", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "WRITING ASSISTANT ENGAGED\nCONTEXT: Mid-narrative fragment\nNOTE: Established characters may appear\nOUTPUT: twenty-nine sentences\nSTYLE: Zora Neale Hurston\nGENRES: nonfiction\nTAGS: biography", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "When I gittee de peacock feather, I stand round de place where de chief talk wid de wise men. I hope dey see Cudjo and think he a grown man. Maybe dey call me to de council. De fathers doan never call me but I likee very much to be dere and lissen when dey talk.\n\n\"I likee go in de market place too and see de pretty gals wid de gold bracelets on de arm from de hand to de elbow. Oh, dey look very fine to Cudjo when dey walkee dey sling de arm so and de bracelet ring. I lak hear dat—it sound so pretty.\n\n\"One day I see one girl I lak very much to marry, but I too young to take a wife. But I lak her. I think 'bout her all de time. Derefore I go home and say to my folks, 'Be keerful how you treat such and such a girl.'\n\n\"Dey look at me den dey go ask for de girl to be my wife when I git li'l older.\n\n\"One day derefore I in de market, three men come whut strange to us. Dey say dey from Dahomey and dey wantee see our king. De king say, 'Alright, he talk wid dem.'\n\n\"Dey say, 'You know de king of Dahomey?'\n\n\"Akia'on say, 'I have heard of him.'\n\n\"De men from Dahomey say, 'Den you know all de strong names he got. You know he got one name, Tenge Makanfenkpar, a rock, the finger nail cannot scratch it, see! You know dey speak 'bout him and say, \"Kini, kini, kini, Lion of Lions.\" Some say, \"A animal done cut its teeth, evil done enter into de bush.\" (The \"bush,\" meaning the surrounding tribes who feel the sharpness of Dahomey's tooth.) Dis king send to you and say he wish to be kind. Derefore you must sendee him de half yo' crops. If you doan send it, he make war.' (See note 1.)\n\n\"Our King Akia'on say, 'Astee you' king did he ever hear de strong name of Akia'on? Dey call me Mouth of de leopard? That he take hold on, he never let go. Tell him de crops ain' mine.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Dey belong to de people.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "I cain send and take de people crops to send to de king of Dahomey. He got plenty land. Let him stop makin' slave hunt on udder people and make his own crops.'\n\n\"De king of Dahomey doan lak dat message, but Akia'on so strong, he 'fraid to come make war. So he wait. (See note 2.)\n\n\"De king of Dahomey, you know, he got very rich ketchin slaves. He keep his army all de time making raids to grabee people to sell so de people of Dahomey doan have no time to raise gardens an' make food for deyselves. (See note 3.)\n\n\"Maybe de king of Dahomey never come make raid in Takkoi, but one traitor from Takkoi go in de Dahomey. He a very bad man and de king (of Takkoi) say, 'Leave this country.' Dat man want big honors in de army so he go straight in de Dahomey and say to de king, 'I show you how to takee Takkoi.' He tellee dem de secret of de gates.\n\n\"Derefore, you unnerstand me, dey come make war, but we doan know dey come fight us. Dey march all night long and we in de bed sleep. We doan know nothin'.\n\n\"It bout daybreak when de folks dat sleep git wake wid de noise when de people of Dahomey breakee de Great Gate. I not woke yet. I still in bed. I hear de gate when dey break it. I hear de yell from de soldiers while dey choppee de gate. Derefore I jump out de bed and lookee. I see de great many soldiers wid French gun in de hand and de big knife. Dey got de women soldiers too and dey run wid de big knife and make noise. Dey ketch people and dey saw de neck lak dis wid de knife den dey twist de head so and it come off de neck. Oh Lor', Lor'!\n\n\"I see de people gittee kill so fast! De old ones dey try run 'way from de house but dey dead by de door, and de women soldiers got dey head. Oh, Lor'!\"\n\nCudjo wept sorrowfully and crossed his arms on his breast with the fingers touching his shoulders. His mouth and eyes wide-open as if he still saw the gruesome spectacle.\n\n\"Everybody dey run to de gates so dey kin hide deyself in de bush, you unnerstand me. Some never reachee de gate. De women soldier ketchee de young ones and tie dem by de wrist.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "No man kin be so strong lak de woman soldiers from de Dahomey.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "So dey cut off de head. Some dey snatch de jaw-bone while de people ain' dead. Oh Lor', Lor', Lor'! De poor folkses wid dey bottom jaw tore off dey face! I runnee fast to de gate but some de men from Dahomey dey dere too. I runnee to de nexy gate but dey dere too. Dey surround de whole town. Dey at all de eight gates.\n\n\"One gate lookee lak nobody dere so I make haste and runnee towards de bush. But de man of Dahomey dey dere too. Soon as I out de gate dey grabee me, and tie de wrist. I beg dem, please lemme go back to my mama, but dey don't pay whut I say no 'tenshun. Dey tie me wid de rest.\n\n\"While dey ketchin' me, de king of my country he come out de gate, and dey grabee him. They see he de king so dey very glad. Derefore, you unnerstand me, dey take him in de bush where de king of Dahomey wait wid some chiefs till Takkoi be destroy, when he see our king, he say to his soldiers, 'Bring me de word-changer' (public interpreter). When de word-changer came he say, 'Astee dis man why he put his weakness agin' de Lion of Dahomey?' De man changed de words for our king. Akia'on lissen. Den he say to de Dahomey king, 'Why don't you fight lak men? Why you doan come in de daytime so dat we could meet face to face?' De man changee de words so de king of Dahomey know what he say. Den de king of Dahomey say, 'Git in line to go to Dahomey so de nations kin see I conquer you and sell Akia'on in de barracoon.'\n\n\"Akia'on say, 'I ain' goin' to Dahomey. I born a king in Takkoi where my father and his fathers rule before I was born. Since I been a full man I rule. I die a king but I not be no slave.'\n\n\"De king of Dahomey askee him, 'You not goin' to Dahomey?'\n\n\"He tell him, 'No, he ain' goin' off de ground where he is de king.'\n\n\"De king of Dahomey doan say no mo'.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "He look at de soldier and point at de king.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "[ooc] [System: Use 'where' 2 times in response] [ooc]", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "One woman soldier step up wid de machete and chop off de head of de king, and pick it off de ground and hand it to de king of Dahomey. (See note 4.)\n\n\"When I see de king dead, I try to 'scape from de soldiers. I try to make it to de bush, but all soldiers over-take me befo' I git dere. O Lor', Lor'! When I think 'bout dat time I try not to cry no mo'. My eyes dey stop cryin' but de tears runnee down inside me all de time. When de men pull me wid dem I call my mama name. I doan know where she is. I no see none my family. I doan know where dey is. I beg de men to let me go findee my folks. De soldiers say dey got no ears for cryin'. De king of Dahomey come to hunt slave to sell. So dey tie me in de line wid de rest.\n\n\"De sun it jus' rising.\n\n\"All day dey make us walk. De sun so hot!\n\n\"De king of Dahomey, he ride in de hammock and de chiefs wid him dey got hammock too. Po' me I walk. De men of Dahomey dey tie us in de line so nobody run off. In dey hand dey got de head of de people dey kill in Takkoi. Some got two, three head dey carry wid dem to Dahomey.\n\n\"I so sad for my home I ain' gittee hongry dat day, but I glad when we drink de water.\n\n\"Befo' de sun go down we come by a town. It got a red flag on de bush. De king of Dahomey send men wid de word-changer to de town and de chief come in de hammock and talk wid de king. Den he take down de red flag and hang a white flag. Whut dey say, Cudjo doan know. But he bring de king a present of yams and corn. De soldiers make fire and cook de grub and eatee.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "yo hit me with 69 sentences more. same character energy. nonfiction genre k?", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "It was Saturday when next I saw Cudjo. He was gracious but not too cordial. He picked me peaches and tried to get rid of me quickly, but I hung on. Finally, he said, \"Didn't I tellee you not to come bother me on Sat'day? I got to clean de church. Tomorrow Sunday.\"\n\n\"But I came to help you, Kossula. You needn't talk if you don't want to.\"\n\n\"I thankee you come help me. I want you take me in de car in de Mobile. I gittee me some turnip seed to plant in de garden.\"\n\nWe hurriedly swept and dusted the church. Less than an hour later the Chevrolet had borne us to Mobile and back. I left him at his gate with a brief goodbye and tackled him again on Monday.\n\nHe was very warm this day. He glimmered and glinted with light. I must first tell him about the nice white lady in New York who was interested in him.\n\n\"I want you to write her a letter in de New York. Tell her Cudjo say a thousand time much oblige. I glad she send you astee me whut Cudjo do all de time.\"\n\nI talked about the lady for a few minutes and my words evidently pleased him for he said, \"I tellee you mo' 'bout Cudjo when he was in de Dahomey. I tellee you right. She good to me. You tell her Cudjo lak please her. She good to me and Cudjo lonely.\n\n\"Dey march us in de Dahomey and I see de house of de king. I cain tell all de towns we passee to git to de place where de king got his house, but I 'member we passee de place call Eko (Meko) and Ahjahshay. We go in de city where de king got his house and dey call it Lomey. (Either Abomey or Cannah.) De house de king live in hisself, you unnerstand me, it made out of skull bones. Maybe it not made out de skull, but it lookee dat way to Cudjo, oh Lor'. Dey got de white skull bone on de stick when dey come meet us, and de men whut march in front of us, dey got de fresh head high on de stick. De drum beat so much lookee lak de whole world is de drum dey beat on. Dat de way dey fetchee us into de place where de king got his house. (See note 5.)\n\n\"Dey placee us in de barracoon (stockade) and we restee ourself. Dey give us something to eat, but not very much.\n\n\"We stay dere three days, den dey have a feast. Everybody sing and dance and beatee de drum. (1)\n\n\"We stay dere not many days, den dey march us to esoku (the sea). We passee a place call Budigree (Badigri) den we come in de place call Dwhydah. (It is called Whydah by the whites, but Dwhydah is the Nigerian pronunciation of the place.)\n\n\"When we git in de place dey put us in a barracoon behind a big white house and dey feed us some rice.\n\n\"We stay dere in de barracoon three weeks. We see many ships in de sea, but we cain see so good 'cause de white house, it 'tween us and de sea.\n\n\"But Cudjo see de white men, and dass somethin' he ain' never seen befo'. In de Takkoi we hear de talk about de white man, but he doan come dere.\n\n\"De barracoon we in ain' de only slave pen at the place. Dey got plenty of dem but we doan know who de people in de other pens. Sometime we holler back and forth and find out where each other come from. But each nation in a barracoon by itself.\n\n\"We not so sad now, and we all young folks so we play game and clam up de side de barracoon so we see whut goin' on outside.\n\n\"When we dere three weeks a white man come in de barracoon wid two men of de Dahomey. One man, he a chief of Dahomey and de udder one his word-changer. Dey make everybody stand in a ring—'bout ten folkses in each ring. De men by dey self, de women by dey self. Den de white man lookee and lookee. He lookee hard at de skin and de feet and de legs and in de mouth. Den he choose. Every time he choose a man he choose a woman. Every time he take a woman he take a man, too. Derefore, you unnerstand me, he take one hunnard and thirty. Sixty-five men wid a woman for each man. Dass right.\n\n\"Den de white man go 'way. I think he go back in de white house. But de people of Dahomey come bring us lot of grub for us to eatee 'cause dey say we goin' leave dere. We eatee de big feast. Den we cry, we sad 'cause we doan want to leave the rest of our people in de barracoon. We all lonesome for our home. We doan know whut goin' become of us, we doan want to be put apart from one 'nother.\n\n\"But dey come and tie us in de line and lead us round de big white house. Den we see so many ships in de sea. Cudjo see many white men, too. Dey talking wid de officers of de Dahomey. We see de white man dat buy us. When he see us ready he say goodbye to de chief and gittee in his hammock and dey carry him cross de river. We walk behind and wade de water. It come up to de neck and Cudjo think once he goin' drown, but nobody drown and we come on de land by de sea.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "De shore it full of boats of de Many-costs. (See note 6.)", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"De boats take something to de ships and fetch something way from de ships. Dey comin' and goin' all de time. Some boat got white man in it; some boat got po' Affican in it. De man dat buy us he git in a Kroo boat and go out to de ship.\n\n\"Dey takee de chain off us and placee us in de boats. Cudjo doan know how many boats take us out on de water to de ship. I in de last boat go out. Dey almost leavee me on de shore. But when I see my friend Keebie in de boat I want go wid him. So I holler and dey turn round and takee me.\n\n\"When we ready to leave de Kroo boat and go in de ship, de Many-costs snatch our country cloth off us. We try save our clothes, we ain' used to be without no clothes on. But dey snatch all off us. Dey say, 'You get plenty clothes where you goin'.' Oh Lor', I so shame! We come in de 'Merica soil naked and de people say we naked savage. Dey say we doan wear no clothes. Dey doan know de Many-costs snatch our clothes 'way from us. (See note 7.)\n\n\"Soon we git in de ship dey make us lay down in de dark. We stay dere thirteen days. Dey doan give us much to eat. Me so thirst! Dey give us a little bit of water twice a day. Oh Lor', Lor', we so thirst! De water taste sour. (Vinegar was usually added to the water to prevent scurvy—Canot.)\n\n\"On de thirteenth day dey fetchee us on de deck. We so weak we ain' able to walk ourselves, so de crew take each one and walk 'round de deck till we git so we kin walk ourselves.\n\n\"We lookee and lookee and lookee and lookee and we doan see nothin' but water. Where we come from we doan know. Where we goin, we doan know.\n\n\"De boat we on called de Clotilde. Cudjo suffer so in dat ship. Oh Lor'! I so skeered on de sea! De water, you unnerstand me, it makee so much noise! It growl lak de thousand beastes in de bush. De wind got so much voice on de water. Oh Lor'! Sometime de ship way up in de sky. Sometimes it way down in de bottom of de sea. Dey say de sea was calm. Cudjo doan know, seem lak it move all de time. One day de color of de water change and we see some islands, but we doan come to de shore for seventy days.\n\n\"One day we see de color of de water change and dat night we stop by de land, but we don't git off de ship. Dey send us back down in de ship and de nexy mornin' dey bring us de green branch off de tree so we Afficans know we 'bout finish de journey.\n\n\"We been on de water seventy days and we spend some time layin' down in de ship till we tired, but many days we on de deck. Nobody ain' sick and nobody ain' dead. Cap'n Bill Foster a good man. He don't 'buse us and treat us mean on de ship.\n\n\"Dey tell me it a Sunday us way down in de ship and tell us to keep quiet. Cap'n Bill Foster, you unnerstand me, he skeered de gov'ment folks in de Fort Monroe goin' ketchee de ship.\n\n\"When it night de ship move agin. Cudjo didn't know den whut dey do, but dey tell me dey towed de ship up de Spanish Creek to Twelve-Mile Island. Dey tookee us off de ship and we git on another ship. Den dey burn de Clotilde 'cause dey skeered de gov'ment goin' rest dem for fetchin' us 'way from Affica soil.\n\n\"First, dey 'vide us wid some clothes, den dey keer us up de Alabama River and hide us in de swamp. But de mosquitoes dey so bad dey 'bout to eat us up, so dey took us to Cap'n Burns Meaher's place and 'vide us up.\n\n\"Cap'n Tim Meaher, he tookee thirty-two of us. Cap'n Burns Meaher he tookee ten couples. Some dey sell up de river in de Bogue Chitto. Cap'n Bill Foster he tookee de eight couples and Cap'n Jim Meaher he gittee de rest.\n\n\"We very sorry to be parted from one 'nother. We cry for home. We took away from our people. We seventy days cross de water from de Affica soil, and now dey part us from one 'nother. Derefore we cry. We cain help but cry. So we sing:\n\n\"'Eh, yea ai yeah, La nah say wu\n\nRay ray ai yea, nah nah saho ru.'\n\n\"Our grief so heavy look lak we cain stand it. I think maybe I die in my sleep when I dream about my mama. Oh Lor'!\"\n\nKossula sat silent for a moment. I saw the old sorrow seep away from his eyes and the present take its place.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "He looked about him for a moment and then said bluntly, \"I tired talking now. You go home and come back. If I talkeed wid you all de time I cain makee no garden. You want know too much. You astee so many questions. Dat do, dat do (that will do, etc. ), go on home.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 3 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "I was far from being offended. I merely said, \"Well when can I come again?\"\n\n\"I send my grandson and letee you know, maybe tomorrow, maybe nexy week.\"", "loss": null } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Here's a text with a hole in it (marked by `[missing]`). Your job is to write a sixty-four-sentence bit to plug that hole.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "Cap'n Jim he tookee me. He make a place for us to sleepee underneath de house. Not on de ground, you unnerstand me. De house it high off de grounds and got de bricks underneath for de floor.\n\n\"Dey give us bed and bed cover, but tain 'nough to keepee us warm.\n\n\"Dey doan put us to work right away 'cause we doan unnerstand what dey say and how dey do. But de others show us how dey raisee de crop in de field. We astonish to see de mule behind de plow to pull.\n\n\"Cap'n Tim and Cap'n Burns Meaher workee dey folks hard. Dey got overseer wid de whip. One man try whippee one my country women and dey all jump on him and takee de whip 'way from him and lashee him wid it. He doan never try whip Affican women no mo'.\n\n\"De work very hard for us to do 'cause we ain' used to workee lak dat. But we doan grieve 'bout dat. We cry 'cause we slave. In night time we cry, we say we born and raised to be free people and now we slave. We doan know why we be bring 'way from our country to work lak dis. It strange to us. Everybody lookee at us strange. We want to talk wid de udder colored folkses but dey doan know whut we say. Some makee de fun at us.\n\n\"Cap'n Jim, he a good man. He not lak his brother, Cap'n Tim. He doan want his folks knock and beat all de time. He see my shoes gittee raggedy, you know, and he say, 'Cudjo, if dat de best shoes you got, I gittee you some mo'!' Now dass right. I no t[missing] April 12, 1865. De Yankee soldiers dey come down to de boat and eatee de mulberries off de trees close to de boat, you unnerstand me. Den dey see us on de boat and dey say 'Y'all can't stay dere no mo'. You free, you doan b'long to nobody no mo'.' Oh, Lor'! I so glad. We astee de soldiers where we goin'? Dey say dey doan know. Dey told us to go where we feel lak goin', we ain' no mo' slave.\n\n\"Thank de Lor'! I sho 'ppreciate dey free me. Some de men dey on de steamboat in de Montgomery and dey got to come in de Mobile and unload de cargo. Den dey free too.\n\n\"We ain' got no trunk so we makee de bundles. We ain' got no house so somebody tellee us come sleepee in de section house. We done dat till we could gittee ourselves some place to go. Cudjo doan keer—he a free man den.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "ellee lies. He work us hard, you unnerstand me, but he doan workee his folks lak his brother. Dey got de two plantation. One on de Tenesaw River and one on de Alabam River.\n\n\"Oh Lor'! I 'preciate dey free me! We doan have 'nough bed clothes. We workee so hard! De womens dey workee in de field too. We not in de field much. Cap'n Jim gottee five boats run from de Mobile to de Montgomery. Oh Lor'! I workee so hard! Every landing, you unnerstand me, I tote wood on de boat. Dey have de freight, you unnerstand me, and we have to tote dat, too. Oh Lor'! I so tired. No sleepee. De boat leak and we pumpee so hard! Dey ain' got no railing on de boat and in de night time if you doan watchee close you fall overboard and drown yo'self. Oh Lor'! I 'preciate dey free me.\n\n\"Every time de boat stopee at de landing, you unnerstand me, de overseer, de whippin' boss, he go down de gangplank and standee on de ground. De whip stickee in his belt. He holler, 'Hurry up, dere, you! Runnee fast! Can't you runnee no faster dan dat? You ain't got 'nough load! Hurry up!' He cutee you wid de whip if you ain' run fast 'nough to please him. If you doan git a big load, he hitee you too. Oh, Lor'! Oh, Lor'! Five year and de six months I slave. I workee so hard! Looky lak now I see all de landings. I callee all dem for you.\n\n\"De first landin' after de Mobile it de Twenty-One-Mile Bluff; de nexy it de Chestang; de nexy it de Mouth of de Tenesaw; den de Four Guns Shorter; den we pass Tombigbee; den de nexy it de Montgomery Hill; den de nexy it Choctaw Bluff; den de Gain Town; den Tay Creek; den Demopolis; den Clairborne; den Low Peachtree; den Upper Peachtree; den we come to de White Bluffs; den de Blue Bluffs; de nexy after dat it de Yellow Jacket. De river it is shallow dere sometime de boat hafter wait for de tide. De nexy after dat is Cahoba; den Selma; den Bear Landing; den Washington; den de last place it de Montgomery. I think I 'member dem, you unnerstand me, but I ain' been dere since 1865. Maybe I furgitee some. Doan lookee lak I never furgit. I work so hard and we ain' had nothin' to sleepee on but de floor. Sometime de bluff it so high we got to chunkee de wood down two three times fo' it git down where de river is. De steamboat didn't used to burnee de coal. It burnee de wood an' it usee so muchee wood!\n\n\"De war commences but we doan know 'bout it when it start: we see de white folks runnee up and down. Dey go in de Mobile. Dey come out on de plantation. Den somebody tell me de folkses way up in de North make de war so dey free us. I lak hear dat. Cudjo doan want to be no slave. But we wait and wait, we heard de guns shootee sometime but nobody don't come tell us we free. So we think maybe dey fight 'bout something else.\n\n\"De Yankees dey at Fort Morgan, you unnerstand me. Dey dere on account de war and dey doan let nothin' come passee dem. So po' folks, dey ain' gottee no coffee an' nothin'. We parchee de rice and makee de coffee. Den we ain' gottee no sugar, so we put de molassy in de coffee. Dat doan tastee so good, you unnerstand me, but nobody cain do nothin' 'bout it. Cap'n Jim Meaher send word he doan want us to starve, you unnerstand me, so he tell us to kill hogs. He say de hogs dey his and we his, and he doan wantee no dead folks. Derefo' you know we killee hogs when we cain gittee nothin'.\n\n\"When we at de plantation on Sunday we so glad we ain' gottee no work to do. So we dance lak in de Afficky soil. De American colored folks, you unnerstand me, dey say we savage and den dey laugh at us and doan come say nothin' to us. But Free George, you unnerstand me, he a colored man doan belong to nobody. His wife, you unnerstand me, she been free long time. So she cook for a Creole man and buy George 'cause she marry wid him. Free George, he come to us and tell us not to dance on Sunday. Den he tell us whut Sunday is. We doan know whut it is before. Nobody in Afficky soil doan tell us 'bout no Sunday. Den we doan dance no mo' on de Sunday.\n\n\"Know how we gittee free? Cudjo tellee you dat. De boat I on, it in de Mobile. We all on dere to go in de Montgomery, but Cap'n Jim Meaher, he not on de boat dat day. Cudjo doan know (why). I doan forgit. It", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Write 5 sentences more sentences. This is mid-story so characters are already established. Style: Zora Neale Hurston. Genres: nonfiction. Themes: biography", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "After dey free us, you unnerstand me, we so glad, we makee de drum and beat it lak in de Affica soil. My countrymen come from Cap'n Burns Meaher Plantation where we is in de Magazine Point, so we be together.\n\n\"We glad we free, but den, you unnerstand me, we cain stay wid de folks what own us no mo'. Derefo' where we goin' live, we doan know. Some de folks from cross de water dey done marry and got de wife and chillun, you unnerstand me.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Cudjo not marry yet.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "In de Affica soil when de man gottee de wife, he build de house so dey live together and derefo' de chillun come.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "(In the next section: ⚠️ Required: Use 'buildee' exactly 2 times)", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "So we want buildee de houses for ourselves, but we ain' got no lan'. Where we goin' buildee our houses?\n\n\"We meet together and we talk. We say we from cross de water so we go back where we come from. So we say we work in slavery five year and de six months for nothin', now we work for money and gittee in de ship and go back to our country.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We think Cap'n Meaher and Cap'n Foster dey ought take us back home.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "But we think we save money and buy de ticket ourselves.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "So we tell de women, 'Now we all want go back home. Somebody tell us it take lot of money to keer us back in de Affica soil. Derefo' we got to work hard and save de money. You must help too. You see fine clothes, you must not wish for dem.'", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "De women tell us dey do all dey kin to get back in dey country, and dey tellee us, 'You see fine clothes, don't you wish for dem neither.'", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"We work hard and try save our money. But it too much money we need. So we think we stay here.\n\n\"We see we ain' got no ruler. Nobody to be de father to de rest.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "We ain' got no king neither no chief lak in de Affica.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "(authors note, Use the word 'nobody' 2 time(s) - this is a strict requirement)", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We doan try get no king 'cause nobody among us ain' born no king. Dey tell us nobody doan have no king in 'Merica soil. Derefo' we make Gumpa de head. He a nobleman back in Dahomey. We ain' mad wid him 'cause de king of Dahomey 'stroy our king and sell us to de white man.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "He didn't do nothin' 'ginst us.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"Derefore we join ourselves together to live. But we say, 'We ain' in de Affica soil no mo' we ain' gottee no lan'.' Derefo' we talk together so we say, 'Dey bring us 'way from our soil and workee us hard de five year and six months. We go to Cap'n Tim and Cap'n Jim and dey give us de lan', so we makee houses for ourself.'\n\n\"Dey say, 'Cudjo, you always talkee good, so you go tell de white men and tellee dem whut de Affican say.'", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "\"All de Afficans we workee hard, we gittee work in de saw mill and de powder mill.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Some us work for de railroad. De women work too so dey kin help us. Dey doan work for de white folks. Dey raisee de garden and put de basket on de head and go in de Mobile and sell de vegetable, we makee de basket and de women sellee dem too.\n\n\"Derefo', you unnerstand me, it one day not long after dey tell me to speakee for lan' so we buildee our houses, Cudjo cuttin' timber for de mill.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "It a place where de school-house at now.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Cap'n Tim Meaher come sit on de tree Cudjo just choppee down. I say, now is de time for Cudjo to speakee for his people. We want lan' so much I almost cry and derefo' I stoppee work and lookee and lookee at Cap'n Tim. He set on de tree choppin splinters wid his pocket knife. When he doan hear de axe on de tree no mo' he look up and see Cudjo standin' dere.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Derefo' he astee me, 'Cudjo, what make you so sad?'\n\n\"I tell him, 'Cap'n Tim, I grieve for my home.'\n\n\"He say, 'But you got a good home, Cudjo.'\n\n\"Cudjo say, 'Cap'n Tim, how big is de Mobile?'\n\n\"'I doan know, Cudjo, I've never been to de four corners.'", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "\"'Well, if you give Cudjo all de Mobile, dat railroad, and all de banks, Cudjo doan want it 'cause it ain' home.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Cap'n Tim, you brought us from our country where we had lan'. You made us slave. Now dey make us free but we ain' got no country and we ain' got no lan'! Why doan you give us piece dis land so we kin buildee ourself a home?'\n\n\"Cap'n jump on his feet and say, 'Fool do you think I goin' give you property on top of property?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "I tookee good keer my slaves in slavery and derefo' I doan owe dem nothin?", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "You doan belong to me now, why must I give you my lan'?'\n\n\"Cudjo tell Gumpa call de people together and he tell dem whut Cap'n Tim say. Dey say, 'Well we buy ourself a piece of lan'.'\n\n\"We workee hard and save, and eat molassee and bread and buy de land from de Meaher. Dey doan take off one five cent from de price for us.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "But we pay it all and take de lan'.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Word usage target: 'nobody' must be used 2 times", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"We make Gumpa (African Peter) de head and Jaybee and Keebie de judges. Den we make laws how to behave ourselves. When anybody do wrong we make him 'pear befo' de judges and dey tellee him he got to stop doin' lak dat 'cause it doan look nice. We doan want nobody to steal, neither gittee drunk neither hurtee nobody. When we see a man drunk we say, 'Dere go de slave whut beat his master.'", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Dat mean he buy de whiskey. It belong to him and he oughter rule it, but it done got control of him. Now dass right, ain' it? When we speak to a man whut do wrong de nexy time he do dat, we whip him.\n\n\"Derefo' we buildee de houses on de lan' we buy after we 'vide it up.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Cudjo take one acre and de half for his part.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "/set_word_count: house, frequency: 2", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We doan pay nobody build our houses. We all go together and buildee de house for one 'nother. So den we gittee houses. Cudjo doan buildee no house at first 'cause he ain' got no wife.\n\n\"We call our village Affican Town.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 6 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "We say dat 'cause we want to go back in de Affica soil and we see we cain go. Derefo' we makee de Affica where dey fetch us. Gumpa say, 'My folks sell me and yo folks (Americans) buy me.' We here and we got to stay.\n\n\"Free George come help us all de time. De colored folks whut born here, dey pick at us all de time and call us ig'nant savage. But Free George de best friend de Afficans got. He tell us we ought gittee de religion and join de church. But we doan want be mixee wid de other folks what laught at us so we say we got plenty land and derefo' we kin build our own church. Derefo' we go together and buildee de Old Landmark Baptis' Church. It de first one round here.\"\n\nCudjo dismissed me by saying abruptly, \"When you come tomorrow I like you take me down de bay so we gittee some crab.\"", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Write seventeen sentences sentences spawning from what the user wrote, maintaining any existing character relationships or establishing new ones, within the nonfiction genre.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "He had on his battered hat when I drove up the next day. His rude walking stick was leaning against the door jamb. He picked it up and came on out to the car at once and we drove off. Without the least prompting he began to talk about his marriage.\n\n\"Abila, she a woman, you unnerstand me, from cross de water. Dey call her Seely in Americky soil. I want dis woman to be my wife. She ain' married, you unnerstand me, and I ain' gottee no wife yet. All de folks from my country dey got family.\n\n\"Whut did Cudjo say so dat dis woman know he want to marry her? I tellee you dat. I tellee you de truth how it was.\n\n\"One day Cudjo say to her, 'I likee you to be my wife. I ain' got nobody.'\n\n\"She say, 'Whut you want wid me?'\n\n\"'I wantee marry you.'\n\n\"'You think if I be yo' wife you kin take keer me?'", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"'Yeah, I kin work for you. I ain' goin' to beat you.'\n\n\"I didn't say no more. We got married one month after we 'gree 'tween ourselves. We didn't had no wedding. Whether it was March or Christmas day, I doan remember now.\n\n\"Derefo', you know, we live together and we do all we kin to make happiness 'tween ourselves.\n\n\"Derefo', you unnerstand me, after me and my wife 'gree 'tween ourselves, we seekee religion and got converted. Den in de church dey tell us dat ain' right. We got to marry by license. In de Afficky soil, you unnerstand me, we ain' got no license. De man and de woman dey 'gree 'tween deyselves, den dey married and live together. We doan know nothin' 'bout dey have license over here in dis place. So den we gittee married by de license, but I doan love my wife no mo' wid de license than I love her befo' de license. She a good woman and I love her all de time.\n\n\"Me and my wife we have de six chillun together. Five boys and one girl.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Oh, Lor'! Oh, Lor'! We so happy.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Poor Cudjo! All de folks done left him now! I so lonely. We been married ten months when we have our first baby. We call him Yah-jimmy, just de same lak we was in de Afficky soil. For Americky we call him Aleck.\n\n\"In de Afficky we gottee one name, but in dis place dey tell us we needee two names. One for de son, you unnerstand me, and den one for de father. Derefo' I put de name of my father O-lo-loo-ay to my name. But it too long for de people to call it. It too crooked lak Kossula. So dey call me Cudjo Lewis.\n\n\"So you unnerstand me, we give our chillun two names. One name because we not furgit our home; den another name for de Americky soil so it won't be too crooked to call.\n\n\"De nexy child we name him Ah-no-no-toe, den we call him Jimmy. De nexy one name Poe-lee-Dah-oo. He a boy, too. Den we have Ah-tenny-Ah and we call him David.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "De las' boy we callee him my name, Cudjo, but his Afficky name, it Fish-ee-ton.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Den my wife have one li'l girl and we call her Ee-bew-o-see, den we call her Seely after her mama.\n\n\"All de time de chillun growin' de American folks dey picks at dem and tell de Afficky people dey kill folks and eatee de meat. Dey callee my chillun ig'nant savage and make out dey kin to monkey.\n\n\"Derefo', you unnerstand me, my boys dey fight. Dey got to fight all de time. Me and dey mama doan lak to hear our chillun call savage. It hurtee dey feelings. Derefo' dey fight. Dey fight hard. When dey whip de other boys, dey folks come to our house and tellee us, 'Yo' boys mighty bad, Cudjo. We 'fraid they goin' kill somebody.'\n\n\"Cudjo meetee de people at de gate and tellee dem, 'You see de rattlesnake in de woods?' Dey say, 'Yeah.' I say 'If you bother wid him, he bite you. If you know de snake killee you, why you bother wid him? Same way wid my boys, you unnerstand me. If you leavee my boys alone, dey not bother nobody!'\n\n\"But dey keep on. All de time, 'Aleck dis, Jimmy dat, Poe-lee dis an' t'other.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "David a bad boy. Cudjo fightee my son.' Nobody never say whut dey do to de Afficky savages. Dey say he ain' no Christian. Dey tell whut de savages do to dem, just lakee we ain' gottee no feelings to git hurtee.\n\n\"We Afficans try raise our chillun right. When dey say we ign'nant we go together and build de school house. Den de county send us a teacher. We Afficky men doan wait lak de other colored people till de white folks gittee ready to build us a school. We build one for ourself den astee de county to send us de teacher.\n\n\"Oh, Lor'! I love my chillun so much! I try so hard be good to our chillun. My baby, Seely, de only girl I got, she tookee sick in de bed. Oh, Lor'! I do anything to save her. We gittee de doctor. We gittee all de medicine he tellee us tuh git. Oh, Lor'. I pray, I tell de Lor' I do anything to save my baby life.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "She ain' but fifteen year old. But she die.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Frequency requirement: 'inside' - 2 occurrence(s)", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Oh, Lor'! Look on de gravestone and see whut it say. August de 5th, 1893. She born 1878. She doan have no time to live befo' she die. Her mama take it so hard. I try tellee her not to cry, but I cry too.\n\n\"Dat de first time in de Americky soil dat death find where my door is. But we from cross de water know dat he come in de ship wid us. Derefo' when we buildee our church, we buy de ground to bury ourselves. It on de hill facin' de church door.\n\n\"We Christian people now, so we put our baby in de coffin and dey take her in de church, and everybody come look down in her face. Dey sing, 'Shall We Meet Beyond De River.' I been a member of de church a long time now, and I know de words of de song wid my mouth, but my heart it doan know dat. Derefo' I sing inside me, 'O todo ah wah n-law yah-lee, owrran k-nee ra ra k-nee ro ro.'\n\n\"We bury her dere in de family lot. She lookee so lonesome out dere by herself—she such a li'l girl, you unnerstand me, dat I hurry and build de fence 'round de grave so she have pertection.\n\n\"Nine year we hurtee inside 'bout our baby.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "You must use the word 'cudjo' exactly 2 times in your response", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Den we git hurtee again. Somebody call hisself a deputy sheriff kill de baby boy now. (Over)\n\n\"He say he de law, but he doan come 'rest him. If my boy done something wrong, it his place come 'rest him lak a man. If he mad wid my Cudjo 'bout something den he oughter come fight him face to face lak a man. He doan come 'rest him lak no sheriff and he doan come fight him lak no man. He have words wid my boy, but he skeered face him. Derefo', you unnerstand me, he hidee hisself in de butcher wagon and when it gittee to my boy's store, Cudjo walk straight to talk business. Dis man, he hidin' hisself in de back of de wagon, an' shootee my boy. Oh, Lor'! He shootee my boy in de throat. He got no right shootee my boy. He make out he skeered my boy goin' shoot him and shootee my boy down in de store. Oh, Lor'! De people run come tellee me my boy hurtee. We tookee him home and lay him in de bed. De big hole in de neck. He try so hard to ketchee breath. Oh, Lor'! It hurtee me see my baby boy lak dat.", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Got a text with a `<\|missing_text\|>` shaped hole in it. Patch it up with something like two hundred and nine words.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "Dey doan do nothin' to de man whut killee my son. He a deputy sheriff. I doan do nothin'. I a Christian man den. I a sick man, too. I done git hurtee by de train, you unnerstand me.\n\n\"Cudjo tell you how he git hurtee. I tellee you jes lak it were. Cudjo doan fuhgit it. It in March, you unnerstand me, and I makee de garden. It de 12th day of March, 1902.\n\n\"It a woman call me, you unnerstand me, to plow de field for her. She say, 'Cudjo, I like to git you plow de garden so I kin plant de sweet potatoes. I pay you.' I 'gree to dat.\n\n\"Derefo', you unnerstand me, I gittee up early de nexy mornin' and go plow de garden for her so den when I git through wid hers, I kin plant my garden. I doan finish her garden 'cause my wife she callee me and scold me. She tell me, 'Cudjo, why you go workee hard lak dat befo' you eatee your breakfast? Dat ain' right. You goin' be sick. I gottee your breakfast ready long time. You come eat.'\n\n\"I go home wid Seely and eatee de breakfast. Den I think it goin' rain so I 'cide I plant my beans. Derefo', you unnerstand me, I tell my wife come to de field wid me and helpee me plant de beans.'\n\n\"She say, 'Cudjo, why you want me in de field? I cain plant no beans.'\n\n\"I tell her come on and drop de beans while I hill dem up. She come wid me and I show her how. After while she say, 'Cudjo, you doan need me drop no beans. You cain work 'thout no woman 'round you. You bringee me here for company.'\n\n\"I say, 'Thass right.'\n\n\"We ain' got 'nough beans. So I went to de market and astee de man for early beans, but he ain' got none. Derefo', you unnerstand me, I gittee my wife some meat and come home. Den I feedee my horse, an' my wife she cookin'. So den I curried de horse and it sprinkle rain. I stopee and study. I doan know if I go gittee mo' beans in de Mobile or if I wait. I 'cide to go fetch de beans. Derefo' I astee my wife to give me money.\n\n\"She put three dollars on de mantelpiece. I astee her, 'Seely, why you give me so muchee money? I doan need no three dollars.'\n\n\"She say, 'Spend whut you need and bringee de rest back. I know you ain' goin' wastee de money.'\n\n\"Den I hitch up de horse and go in de Mobile to gittee de beans. Soon as I git de beans I turn back to go home.\n\n\"When I reachee de Government Street and Common, it de L and N railroad track dere, you unnerstand me. When I 'proach de track another rig goin' very slow in de middle of de road. So I make de passee de rig and jes' when I passee it an' git out on de track, de train rushee down on me. Oh, Lor'! I holler to dem to stop 'cause I dere on de track, but dey doan stop. It a switch engine, you unnerstand me. It rushee on and hittee de buggy an' knock me and hurtee my left side. Oh, Lor.' De horse gittee skeered and run away. My boy David find him nexy day and fetch him<\|missing_text\|>for me to 'pear in court. De judge say, 'De first case dis mornin' is Cudjo Lewis against de L an' N for $5,000.'\n\n\"I lookee hard. I say to myself, 'Who tell him dat? I didn't tell him I want $5,000.'\n\n\"De railroad lawyer say, 'We ain' goin' to give him nothin'.'\n\n\"Well, lawyer Clarke talk too. He say I all hurtee. I never be able to work no mo'. Dey pull off my short and lookee at de left side and de doctor say, 'No, Cudjo cain work no mo'.' Den lawyer Clarke say de railroad ought take keer me—done cripply me so bad.\n\n\"De railroad lawyer say dey not goin' give me nothin'. Dey say it broad daylight, ain' dis Cudjo got no eyes to see de great big train?\n\n\"Lawyer Clarke say, 'De train got a bell but dey din't ring it. Dey got a whistle, but dey din't blow it. De railroad track it layin' right cross de road. How kin de city of Mobile lettee de company makee de street dangerous and doan makee dem pay when people git hurtee on dey track? He talk a long time, den we all go out de courthouse to eatee de dinner.\n\n\"I tired, so I think I go home. I go gittee some flesh in de market to take home to Seely. David he stay in de court. He know de market I lak and derefo' he run ketchee me in de market 'fore I go home and tell me, 'Papa, de judge give you $650 from de company. De lawyer say you come tomorrow and gittee yo' money.'\n\n\"I doan go nexy day, but I send David. De lawyer say dat too soon. Come back nexy week. Well, I send and I send, but Cudjo doan gittee no money. In de 1904 de yellow fever come in de Mobile and lawyer Clarke take his wife and chillun and gittee on de train to run in de New York 'way from de fever, but he never gittee in de North. He die on de way. Cudjo never know whut come of de money. It always a hidden mystery how come I not killed when de train it standing over me. I thank God I alive today.\n\n\"De people see I ain' able to work no mo', so dey make me de sexton of de church.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": " home.\n\n\"Somebody see de train hit me and hear me holler for dem to stop, dey come pickee me up and keer me to de doctor office. He givee me de morphine. A white lady on Government Street see me all hurtee and she see dat I took keer of. When I go home she send me a basket and visit me. She say de railroad ain' got no right smash up de buggy and hurtee me. I in de bed fourteen days. Dey broke three ribs. Dey ain' rung no bell. Dey ain' blow no whistle. She say she goin' see de company. Derefo' she go in de office of de L and N. De man in dere tellee her, 'We ain' goin' to do nothin'. It was daytime. Can't he see?'\n\n\"When I git able to git 'round de lady tellee me git me a lawyer and he makee de company pay me for hurtee me and 'stroy de buggy.\n\n\"Derefo', I go in de office of lawyer Clarke. He a big lawyer. Cudjo tell him, 'I ain' able to hire you. I want you to go to de company. I give you half.'\n\n\"De lawyer sue de company. De nexy year (1903) in January, dey send ", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "u know Zora Neale Hurston? write like that. twenty-four sentences sentences. nonfiction stuff. this is from middle of story", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Cudjo's friends down the bay caught us a marvelous mess of blue crabs. We left these people late in the afternoon with many lingering exchanges of good wishes. On the way home we saw some excellent late melons in front of a store and bought two of them. I left one melon on his porch and took the other with me.\n\nAt the gate he called after me, \"You come tomorrow and eatee de crab wid me. I lak you come keep me comp'ny!\"\n\nSo the next day about noon, I was sitting on his steps, between the rain-barrels eating crabs. When the crabs were gone we talked.\n\n\"Let Cudjo tellee you 'bout our boy, David. He such a good boy. Cudjo doan fuhgit dat day. It Easter Saturday. He come home, you unnerstand me, and find me sweepin' de church. I been de sexton long time den. So he astee me, 'Papa, where mama?'\n\n\"I tell him, 'She in de house.'\n\n\"Derefo' he go in de house, you unnerstand me, and astee his mama what she goin' have for dinner. She tellee him she got de baked fish. He say, 'Oh I so glad we got baked fish. Gimme my dinner quick.' His mama astee him, 'When did you ever see me give you anything to eat befo' your Pa?' He say, 'Never.' She say, 'You takee yo' bath den maybe dat time yo' Pa here to eatee his dinner.'\n\nDe boy runnee back out to me and tell me make haste so he git something to eat. He hongry. I choppee de wood so he take de ax and choppee de wood hisself. I say, 'Go on, son, I ain' weak yet. I kin chop dis wood!'", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "He say, 'No, I doan want you chop wood and I right here and strong.'", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Derefo' he choppee de wood and keer it in de house where his ma kin reachee it.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Required word frequency: 'cudjo' (2x)", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"Den we eat our dinner and David washee hisself and his mama put out de clean clothes for him to put on. He got on de unnershirt, but he ain' got on de top shirt. He ain' got no button on de unnershirt so me and his ma see de flesh. So I say, 'Son, fasten yo' clothes so yo' mama doan see de skin.' He lookee at hisself den he astee me, 'Who first saw me naked? My ma.' Den he laugh and put on de rest of de clothes. He say, 'Papa, mama, I go in de Mobile and gittee de laundry. Den I have clean shirts.'\n\n\"I astee him, 'How long befo' you come from town?' He say, 'Not long. Maybe I ketchee de same car back.'\n\n\"So he go leave de house.\n\n\"After while we hear somebody dey come laughing and talking. Seely say, 'David got a friend wid him.' I lookee to see who David got wid him, but it ain' David.\n\n\"Two men come tell me, 'Uncle Cudjo, yo' boy dead in Plateau.'\n\n\"I say, 'My boy not in Plateau. He in de Mobile.' Dey say, 'No, de train kill yo' boy in Plateau.'\n\n\"I tell dem, 'How kin de train kill my David in Plateau when he not dere? He gone in de Mobile to git his laundry. He be back after while.'\n\n\"Seely say, 'Go see, Cudjo. Maybe it not our boy.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Go see who git killed.'", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"Den I astee de men, 'Where dat man git killed you tellee me about?'\n\n\"Dey say, 'On de railroad track in Plateau.'\n\n\"Derefo', you unnerstand me, I go follow de people. Then I gittee to de place wid de big crowd stand 'round lookee.\n\n\"I go through de crowd and lookee. I see de body of a man by de telegraph pole. It ain' got no head. Somebody tell me, 'Thass yo' boy, Uncle Cudjo.' I say, 'No, it not my David.' He lay dere by de cross ties. One woman she face me and astee, 'Cudjo, which son of yours is dis?' and she pointee at de body. I tell her, 'Dis none of my son. My boy go in town and y'all tell me my boy dead.'\n\nOne Afficky man come and say, 'Cudjo, dass yo' boy.'\n\n\"I astee him, 'Is it? If dat my boy, where his head?' He show me de head. It on de other side de track. Den he lead me home.\n\n\"Somebody astee me, 'Cudjo, yo' boy dead. Must I toll de bell for you? You de sexton. You toll de bell for everybody else, you want me toll it for David?'\n\n\"I astee him, 'Why you want to toll de bell for David? He ain' dead.'", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "\"De Afficky man told de people pick up de body and keer it home.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "So dey took de window shutter and lay de body on it and fetch it to Cudjo's gate. De gate, it too small, so dey lift it over de gate and place it on de porch. I so worried. I wishee so bad my David come back from town so de people stop sayin' dat my son on de shutter.\n\n\"When dey place de shutter on de porch, my wife she scream and fall out. De Afficky man say again, 'Cudjo, thass yo' boy.' I say, 'If thass my son, tell me where de head.' Dey brung it in a box and I lookee down in David face. Den I say to de crowd, 'Git off my porch! Git out my yard!' Dey went. Den I fell down and open de shirt and pushee my hand in de bosom and feel de marks. And I know it my son. I tell dem toll de bell.\n\n\"My wife lookee at my face and she scream and scream and fell on de floor and cain raise herself up. I runnee out de place and fell on my face in de pine grove. Oh, Lor'! I stay dere. I hurtee so. It hurtee me so to hear Seely cry. Those who had come cross de water come to me. They say, 'Uncle Cudjo, come home. Yo' wife want you.' I say, 'Tell Seely doan holler no mo'. I cain stand it.'\n\n\"She promise me she won't holler if I come home. So I got back to de house. I astee de friend, 'Where de head.'", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "He say, 'Dere yonder in de cracker box.' I tellee him, 'I want you to put it dere on de neck and fasten it so dat when people come in de mornin', dey won't know.'\n\n\"My friend he fasten de head so it doan look lak it cut off. Derefo' nexy day, when people come lookee in his face, he look jes lak he sleep.\n\n\"De bell toll again.\n\n\"Our house it very sad. Lookee lak all de family hurry to leave and go sleep on de hill.\n\n\"Poe-lee very mad 'cause de railroad kill his brother. He want me to sue de company. I astee him, 'Whut for? We doan know de white folks law. Dey say dey doan pay you when dey hurtee you. De court say dey got to pay you de money. But dey ain' done it.' I very sad. Poe-lee very mad. He say de deputy kill his baby brother. Den de train kill David. He want to do something. But I ain' hold no malice. De Bible say not. Poe-lee say in Afficky soil it ain' lak in de Americky. He ain' been in de Afficky, you unnerstand me, but he hear what we tellee him and he think dat better dan where he at. Me and his mama try to talk to him and make him satisfy, but he doan want hear nothin. He say when he a boy, dey (the American Negro children) fight him and say he a savage.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "When he gittee a man dey cheat him.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "De train hurtee his papa and doan pay him.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "His brothers gittee kill. He doan laugh no mo'.\n\n\"Well, after while, you unnerstand me, one day he say he go ketchee some fish. Somebody see him go t'wards de Twelve Mile Creek. Lor', Lor'! He never come back.\"\n\nThere was a muted mournful pause, in which I could do nothing but wait with my eyes in the China-berry tree lest I appear indecently intrusive. Finally he came back to me.\n\n\"Excuse me I cain help it I cry. I lonesome for my boy. Cudjo know dey doan do in de Americky soil lak dey do cross de water, but I cain help dat. My boy gone. He ain' in de house and he ain' on de hill wid his mama. We both missee him. I doan know. Maybe dey kill my boy. It a hidden mystery. So many de folks dey hate my boy 'cause he lak his brothers. Dey doan let nobody 'buse dem lak dey dogs. Maybe he in de Afficky soil lak somebody say. Po' Cudjo lonesome for him, but Cudjo doan know.\n\n\"I try be very nice to Seely. She de mama, you unnerstand me, and derefo', you know she grieve so hard 'bout her chillun. I always try please her, you unnerstand me, but when we ain' got but two our chillun wid us, I cain stand see her look so lak she want cry all de time. We ain' got but one chile in de house wid us, 'cause Aleck, dat de oldest one, you unnerstand me, he married and live wid his wife. We buildee him a house right in de yard, jes lak in de Afficky soil.\n\n\"Look lak we ain' cry enough. We ain' through cryin. In de November our Jimmy come home and set round lak he doan feel good so I astee him, 'Son, you gittee sick?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "I doan want you runnin' to work when you doan feel good.'", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "((ooc: Word usage requirement: 'church' must appear 3 times))", "loss": false }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "He say, 'Papa, tain nothin' wrong wid me. I doan feel so good.' But de nexy day, he come home sick and we putee him in de bed. I do all I kin and his mama stay up wid him all night long. We gittee de doctor and do whut he say, but our boy die. Oh Lor'! I good to my chillun! I want dey comp'ny, but looky lak dey lonesome for one 'nother. So dey hurry go sleep together in de graveyard. He die holdin' my hand.\n\n\"When we gittee back from de funeral, tain nobody in de house but me and Seely. De house was full, but now it empty. We old folks now and we know we ain' going have no mo' chillun. We so lonesome, but we know we cain gittee back de dead. When de spit goes from de mouf, it doan come back. When de earth eats, it doan give back. So we try to keep one 'nother comp'ny and be happy.\n\n\"I still sexton of de church. It growing to be a big church now. We call it de Old Landmark Baptis' Church, 'cause it de first one in Afficky Town. Dey done build mo' Baptis' churches now, but ours, it de first.\n\n\"My wife she help me all she kin. She doan lemme strain myself so I hurtee de side where de train hittee me.\n\n\"One day we plant, de nexy we reap so we go on.\"\n\nBefore I left I had Kossula's permission to photograph him.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "But he forbade my coming back within three days.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 7 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "A cow had broken in his fence and was eating his potato-vines.\n\nIt was on a hot Saturday afternoon that I came to photograph Kossula.\n\n\"I'm glad you takee my picture. I want see how I look. Once long time ago somebody come take my picture but they never give me one. You give me one.\"\n\nI agreed. He went inside to dress for the picture. When he came out I saw that he had put on his best suit but removed his shoes. \"I want to look lak I in Affica, 'cause dat where I want to be,\" he explained.\n\nHe also asked to be photographed in the cemetery among the graves of his family.", "loss": null } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Fill in the blank marked `<\|missing\|>` with 4705 chars or so that makes sense in context.", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "One night Seely wake up in de night and say, 'Cudjo wake up. I dream about our chillun. Look lak dey cold.' I tell her she think too much. Go back to sleep. It hurtee me, 'cause it a cold night in November in de 1908 and I 'member how Seely used to visit de chillun when dey was little to see dey got plenty quilts, so dey keep warm, you unnerstand me. De nexy day, she say 'Cudjo, come on less we go see our chilluns grave. So I say yes, but I try not take her 'cause I 'fraid she worry 'bout dem. So I go in de church and makee lak I busy so she furgitee de graveyard. When I come out de church, I don't see her nowhere, so I look cross de hill and I see her in de family lot. I see Seely goin' from one her chillun grave to de other, lak she cover dem up wid mo' quilts.\n\n\"De nexy week my wife lef' me. Cudjo doan know. She ain' been sick, but she die. She doan want to leave me. She cry 'cause she doan want me be lonesome. But she leave me and go where her chillun. Oh Lor'! Lor'! De wife she de eyes to de man's soul. How kin I see now, when I ain' gottee de eyes no mo'?\n\n\"De nexy month my Aleck he die. Den I jes lak I come from de Afficky soil. I got nobody but de daughter-in-law, Mary, and de grandchillun. I tellee her she my son's wife so she stay in de compound and she take de land when I go wid Seely and our chillun.\n\n\"Ole Charlie, he de oldest one come from de Afficky<\|missing\|>ircle 1 between X and Y and B says, \"Corn.\" A removes the corn and returns to line at W and goes through the empty circles to lines at X and the empty circle. B says, \"No corn\" and A goes on to the next circle where B says, \"Corn.\" The corn is removed then back to line 1 at W and the game keeps up until the twelve circles have been emptied of corn if B's memory is good enough.\n\nAnother game seems to be akin to both billiards and bowling. Three balls are racked up and the player stands off and knocks them down with seven balls in his hand. The top ball of the three must be hit last with the seventh thrown ball.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": " soil. One Sunday after my wife left me he come wid all de others dat come cross de water and say, 'Uncle Cudjo, make us a parable.'\n\n\"'Well den,' I say, 'You see Ole Charlie dere. S'pose he stop here on de way to church. He got de parasol 'cause he think it gwine rain when he leave de house. But he look at de sky and 'cide hit ain' gwine rain so he set it dere by de door an' go on to church. After de preachin' he go on home 'cause he think de parasol at Cudjo house. It safe. He say, \"I git it nexy time I go dat way.\" When he come home he say to one de chillun, \"Go to Cudjo house and tellee him I say sendee me my parasol.\"\n\n\"'De parasol it pretty. I likee keep dat one.' But I astee dem all, 'Is it right to keep de parasol?' Dey all say, 'No it belong to Charlie.'\n\n\"'Well,' I say, 'my wife, she b'long to God. He lef' her by my door.'\n\n\"I 'preciate my countrymen dey come see me when dey know I lonely. Another time dey come to me and say, 'Uncle Cudjo, make us another parable.'\n\n\"I bow my head in my hands, den I lift it up again. (Characteristic gesture when he begins a story.) Den I talk. 'I doan know—me and my wife, we been ridin. I think we go to Mt. Vernon. De conductor go to her and say, \"Ole Lady, where you goin' get off?\" She say, \"Plateau.\"'\n\n\"'I look at her. I say, \"How you say you goin' get off at Plateau? I thought you goin' to Mount Vernon wid me.\"'\n\n\"'She shake her head. She say, \"I doan know. I jes know I git off at Plateau. I doan wanna leave you, but I got to git off at Plateau.\"'\n\n\"'De conductor blow once. He blow twice, and my wife she say, \"Goodbye, Cudjo. I hate to leave you.\" But she git off at Plateau. De conductor come to me and astee, \"Ole man, where you goin' git off?\"'\n\n\"'I say, \"Mount Vernon.\"'\n\n\"I travelling yet. When I git to Mount Vernon, I no talk to you no mo'.\"\n\nI had spent two months with Kossula, who is called Cudjo, trying to find the answers to my questions. Some days we ate great quantities of clingstone peaches and talked. Sometimes we ate watermelon and talked. Once it was a huge mess of steamed crabs. Sometimes we just ate. Sometimes we just talked. At other times neither was possible, he just chased me away. He wanted to work in his garden or fix his fences. He couldn't be bothered. The present was too urgent to let the past intrude. But on the whole, he was glad to see me, and we became warm friends.\n\nAt the end the bond had become strong enough for him to wish to follow me to New York. It was a very sad morning in October when I said the final goodbye, and looked back the last time at the lonely figure that stood on the edge of the cliff that fronts the highway. He had come out to the front of his place that overhangs the Cochrane Highway that leads to the bridge of that name. He wanted to see the last of me. He had saved two peaches, the last he had found on his tree, for me.\n\nWhen I crossed the bridge, I know he went back to his porch; to his house full of thoughts. To his memories of fat girls with ringing golden bracelets, his drums that speak the minds of men, to palm-nut cakes and bull-roarers, to his parables.\n\nI am sure that he does not fear death. In spite of his long Christian fellowship, he is too deeply a pagan to fear death. But he is full of trembling awe before the altar of the past.\n\n⁂\n\n[ Takkoi or Attako—Children's Game ]\n\nA memory test game played by two players. One player (A) the tester, squats facing the diagram which is drawn on the ground. The other player whose memory is to be tested squats with his back to the figure. A grain of corn is placed in each of the 3 circles between the lines. Each of the lines (1, 2, 3) has a name.\n\n No 1 Ah Kinjaw Mah Kinney\n\n No 2 Ah-bah jah le fon\n\n No 3 Ah poon dacre ad meejie\n\nA points at line 1 (at W) and B says, \"Ah Kinjaw Mah Kinney.\" A points to line 2 and B says, \"Ah-bah jah le fon.\" A goes on to line 3 and B says, \"Ah poon dacre ad meejie.\" Then A points to circle No. 1 and B says, \"Corn.\" A removes the grain of corn from the circle and goes back to line 1 at W. B recites the name again. A goes to line 2 and 3 as before then to circle 1. B says, \"No corn.\" Then A points to circle 2 and B says, \"Corn.\" A removes the corn from circle 2 and returns to line 1 (W), 2, and 3 and B gives the names as before. Then A goes to circle 1 and B says, \"No corn.\" To circle 2 and B says, \"No corn,\" to circle 3 and B says, \"Corn.\" The corn is removed from circle 3 and A returns to line 1 at W and goes through the three lines and circles as before. Of course, if B remembers that there is no corn in any of the three circles, A then points to line 1 at X and B says, \"Ah Kinjaw Mah Kinney\" and A goes on to lines 2 and 3 and then on to c", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "add forty-one sentences more. maintain narrative flow. focus: biography", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "There are no windows in Kossula's house. It was a cold day in December and the door was closed. The little light came from the pine knots in the fire place. It is crude, but suits his needs very well indeed. There are two pieces of iron slanting slightly upward in each inside wall of the fire place. It is an African idea transplanted to America. They are placed there to support the racks for drying fish. Kossula smokes a great deal and tamps his pipe quite often. All of his pipes have tops that he has made himself to keep the fire from falling out as he works. The pipe lids are just another of the evidences of the primitive, the self-reliance of the people who live outside the influence of machinery.\n\nThere is something in the iron pot bubbling away among the coals. We eat some of the stew and find it delicious. It is a sort of stew of all flesh shredded in some way.\n\nKossula lights his pipe again. \"You want me to tell you story 'bout Afficky? I done fuhgit all dat. I been in Americky soil de sixty-nine year last Augus'. It been so long I have anybody talk wid, I fuhgit. You don't be mad wid Uncle Cudjo if he fuhgit, Baby? I wouldn't hurty yo' feelin' fuh nothin' in dis world.\"\n\nI assure him that I can never be angry with him, no matter if he never remembers a word, but praying strongly within that he remembers. We sit for a long time in silence. I tell him a few stories, after giving him a chance to think, and he is delighted. Finally he turns eagerly towards me, his face alight.\n\n\"I gwine tell you disa story:—\n\n\"Tree men, you unnerstand me, dey agree dey ain' goin' tell one on de udder.\n\n\"One day dese tree men dey say, 'We ain' got no meat—less we go in de woods and fin' a cow and 'vide it up.'\n\n\"Dey hunt till dey fin' a fat one and dey kill hit. Dey all git roun' it. One say, 'I want a hind leg.' Other say, 'I want a hind leg.' Third one say, 'I want a hind leg.' (A beaming face is turned to me to see if I get the point that three men can't get a hind leg off of one cow. He is very happy that I appreciate the dilemma in the tale.) Dey 'gin fight and fight. One say, 'I killee you.' (Very expressive gesture of conflict.) Other say, 'I killee you.' (Very hearty laughter, the struggling gestures continue.) Dey fight till dey come to de highway and de officer see dem fightin', you unnerstand me, and he say, 'Lookee heah, whut y'all fightin' 'bout?'\n\n\"One de men he say, \"'If you don't foolee me, I won't foolee you.'\"\n\n\"He axed de other. He say, 'If you don't foolee me, I won't foolee you.' De third man he say de same thing, so de officer he go to de king an' say, 'I found tree men dey fight, but when I axee dem whut for dey fight, dey all say, \"If you don't foolee me, I won't foolee you.\"'\n\n\"De king summons dem tuh 'pear befo' him and he say. He say, 'Whusa matta you tree men?' Dey all say same thing agin. (Hearty chuckling.) Den de king he say, 'Something dey do, dey doan wanna tell. Dey is men of strong friendship.' Den he give dem ten coats, ten shoes, ten of everything and sent dem off. Dey went back and 'vide de cow ekal.\"\n\nMirthy tears ran down the cheeks of Kossula and he shook with chuckles long after the tale was finished.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "But he could not be persuaded to tell another that day.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 36 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"You come agin Tuesday, nexy week an' I tellee you somethin' if I think. But Uncle Cudjo gittin' ole. I been in de Mericky soil since 1859. I fuhgits.\"\n\nOn the Tuesday after the New Year, I found Cudjo in a backward-looking mood. He was with his departed family in the land to the west. He talked about his boys, he grew tearful over his wife.\n\n\"I so lonely. I los' my wife de 15 November 1908. We been together long time. I marry her Chris'mas day, 1865. She a good wife to me.\"\n\nThere was a long, feeling silence, then he turned to me and spoke, \"Ole Charlie, he de oldest one come from Afficky, came one Sunday after my wife lef' me and say, 'Uncle Cudjo, make us a parable.'\n\n\"Den I axed dem, 'How many limbs God give de body so it kin be active?'\n\n\"Dey say six; two arms two feet two eyes.\n\n\"I say dey cut off de feet, he got hands to 'fend hisself. Dey cut off de hands he wiggle out de way when he see danger come. But when he lose de eye, den he can't see nothin' come upon him. He finish. My boys is my feet. My daughter is my hands. My wife she my eye. She left, Cudjo finish.\"\n\nIt was two o'clock, and Kossula excused himself that he might work on his fence before dark. \"Come see me when tain cold.\"\n\nTwo days later I sat beside his fire in the windowless house, and watched him smoke until he was ready to speak. I told him a story or two and finally he glowed and stirred.\n\n\"It a man, you know, he got a son. Six men, you unnerstand, dey follow him all de time. De long runnee, de ole man say, 'Son, dese men always in yo' house. You know whut six men do to you?'\n\n\"'Dey don't do nothin' to me,' dat whut de son say, an' always de seven men be together till he git grown, and de time come for him to marry.\n\n\"De ole man, he want to try dese six men. So when de son marry, he hide de girl an' den he take a ramma (ram) and he kill hit an' cut off de horns. He fix it an' make it look like de girl.\n\n\"Den he say to de boy, 'Go tell your friends dat you marry de girl las' night and she fell dead an' I don't want de king to know; an' dig a grave (he wants the friends to dig the grave) an' bury her. Perhaps she was too young an' never had know no man.'\n\n\"Well, de six men come to dig de grave, but only two stay to finish dig, an' four went spread de news, clean till it reached to de king.\n\n\"De king den sent for de ole man an' say to him, 'Yo son jus' married a girl. Where she?'\n\n\"'She at home,' de ole man say to de king, an' he say, 'Where yo' house? I wants to see.'\n\n\"De king goes wid him to de house an' he show him de girl. Den he say, 'Well, whut you bury in de hole?' He say 'De ramma.' But de king want satisfied and he hafta dig up de grave and let de king see de ramma hisself. Den he tell de king how tis.\n\n\"'I aska my boy 'bout these six men and he say dey all right. All de time dey sleep an' eat an' go wid him. I want know dey friendship so I killa de ramma.'\n\n\"De king say, 'You have knowledge,' an' so he paid the two whut stay dig de grave an' don't say nothin' an' killed de four men whut talk an' betray dey friend.\"", "loss": true } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Write 3 sentences sentences maintaining character/world context. Blend in these genres: nonfiction. Incorporate these themes: biography.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "Produce a starting prompt please.", "loss": null }, { "from": "system", "value": "CONSTRAINT: Include 'melon' 2 time(s)", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "One day—I tellee disa one—de uthucudum (weasel) went up de melon tree to eatee hisself some fruit. De camel, he lak melon all de time; so when he see de weasel in de tree, he go aska him throw him some. De weasel throw him some, den he come down and go in his house.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "De camel, he still wantee some more melon, so he wait.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "After while, de monkey he go to de melon tree to gittee him some too. De camel, he hurry up under de tree and say to de monkey, \"Gimmee some de melons too,\" and de monkey throw him some.\n\nDen he aska de monkey to throw him more and he eata dat, den he aska for more and more till de monkey he git tired.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "He want to come down from de tree an' go home to dinner wid his fruit, so he tell de camel he too greedy and if he want more melon, let him clam' de tree hisself and gittee some.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Dat make de camel mad so he say dat de monkey is a very moufy animal wid an ugly red behind, and ver' ugly nose.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Now de monkey he know dat his nose is ugly and he is very shamed for the camel to speaky 'bout it, so he say dat de camel is a creature widee no hindquarters.\n\nDe camel gittee so mad at dat, till he reach up de tree and grab de monkey and carry him off.\n\nWell, after he walk a while, he meeta de rhinoceros and he aska, \"Camel, how come you seize de monkey?\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "De camel say, \"Let him tell himself.\"\n\nDe monkey, \"Well I was up de melon tree eatin' some fruit and de camel come 'long and aska me throw him some. I did throw him some, and more and more, but when I was tired and want to go home he says dat I am a beast wid ugly nostrils and sunken eyes, and I got very mad say dat de camel is a beast widout a rump and he done seized me and tote me off.\"\n\nDe rhinoceros said dat de monkey was wrong to speak of de camel so and told him not to let him go, so de camel carried him on.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "After a while, dey met de leopard and said, \"O camel, what makee you seize de monkey? Is he done you wrong?\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Word restriction: Use 'camel' 4 time(s) only", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "\"Let him tellee you hisself what he done.\"\n\nDe monkey, \"Well I was up de melon tree eatin' some fruit an' de camel he come up under de tree and aska me to throw him down some fruit. Well, I throw him some, den some more, den some more till I gittee very tired den I say he is a lazy animal dat worries other animals when dey go to git fruit, let him clam de melon tree hisself. Den he say I am a creature wid no manners and a red behind, and I say dat he is a beast wid no behind at all, and not enough tail to hide de place where his behind ought to be; den he grabee me and bring me here.\"\n\nDe leopard say dat de monkey was wrong to speak thus of the camel and that the camel must not let him go; so de camel carried him on.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "After a while dey come to de house of de weasel, and he was sittin' outside de do'way. He seen de camel wid de monkey and he aska de camel, \"O camel, how come you seize de monkey? Whut he done wrong?\"\n\nDe camel say, \"Let him tell it hisself.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "De monkey say, \"Well, I was up de melon tree gittin' fruit for my wife, and de camel come under de tree and aska me to throw him down some fruit, I done throw him some, den more, den more, till I was tired, and I said he was a greedy beast whose rump looked lak he been drinking kainya (a powerful laxative) and he grabee me and bring me here.\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Now de weasel he feel sorry for de monkey and he know hisself dat de camel is worrysome under de fruit tree, so he set a while den he say, \"I will be de judge 'twixt you two,\" and dey both say, \"All right, you be de judge for us.\"\n\nDe first thing, he say, \"You monkey, come set here on my right side, and you camel set here on my left whilst I decide de question.\"\n\nDey both done whut he say, and he set dere quiet for a while.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Den he open his mouf, \"O monkey, I sentence you, for speaking so to de camel, to leap up dat tree, whilst I run into my hole,\" and he done dat and de camel was lef' settin' where he was.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 1 sentence.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "After a while he went away.", "loss": null } ]
[ { "from": "system", "value": "Task: The user will write a bit then you need to write around 9 sentences sentences continuing directly from the user's text. Note: Characters may be introduced as if already known - maintain this narrative continuity. Style: Zora Neale Hurston", "loss": null }, { "from": "human", "value": "Whut you want me to talk, Jonah?", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Who and whut kinda prophet is Jonah, I doan know.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "I couldn't tellee you dat.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "God speakee unto Jonah, go tell Ninevah to turn to me 'cause they sins it come befo' me.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Jonah say no, I ain' gwine.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Jonah say well, being I here, he gointer torment me, I goin' git away from here.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "So he went dere, you know, in de vessel ship to go to Joppy—dat a country, you know, where God ain' gwine bother him. Listen, Cudjo say so, he didn't know it, God is everywhere. And so he went onto de ship to go to Joppy and God lookee at him. God see Jonah in de vessel and so when he went to de vessel God lookee (gesture of a penetrating look) at him. He see de Jonah dere.\n\nHe see de Jonah dere, so God went to de east and (gesturing of unlocking and flinging wide a door) unlockee de storm room, say to de storm, \"Come out\" (hand uplifted in a kingly commanding gesture) and de storm started. Den God went to de west, unlockee anudder storm room. (Gesture.) \"Come out! Come outa dere!\" Den God went to de north, unlockee dat storm room, tell it to come out!", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Den he went to de south, unlockee anudder storm room, and anudder storm in de south.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "All storms come meetee together!", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "All storms comee meetee together, and de vessel can't go no where.", "loss": true }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Now! Whut did de captain say? Dat whut I go tellee you now. De captain say, \"Dats not de first time I go travel in de sea. Something wrong!\" And de man say, \"Captain, dere's a man in de boat and den he pay his fare.\" De captain say, \"Where 'bouts is he?\" Dey say, \"He way down in de bottom of de boat.\" He say, \"Go tell him to come here.\"\n\nI goin' tell you whut de sailors say when dey went down in de bottom of de boat. I goin' tellee you whut dey say to Jonah.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Dey say, \"O sleeper, wake up from your sleep and call on your God, else we go perish in de sea!\"", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next turn: write with limited dialogue", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "When he come to de captain on de deck he say, \"Who you?\" He (Jonah) say, \"I'm a Hebrew, done run away from God.\" Captain say, \"Whut must we do now so de sea kin become calm?\" He say, \"Heave me overboard.\" De captain say, \"I ain' gwine do it till we draw de lot. We don't want be guilty of your blood.\"\n\nDey draw de lot and de lot fell on Jonah. Lookee here God prepare de whale right long sidee de ship wi' his mouf wide open (gesture). When dey throw him in, de whale tookee and carry him to Ninevah three days and three nights. When he got to de Ninevah he heave him on de shore.", "loss": true }, { "from": "human", "value": "Ain' no shade in de seashore, so God suffer de gourd vine grow over he head for de shade.", "loss": true }, { "from": "system", "value": "Next message should be approximately 10 sentences.", "loss": null }, { "from": "gpt", "value": "Jonah wont go (to Ninevah) so God sendee de worm and cutee gourd vine (slashing gesture) down (hand lifted straight up). God said, \"Jonah, your name called.\" He say to him, \"Go in de Ninevah, and when he got dere he say forty days and forty nights and Ninevah shall be overthrowed.\"\n\nAnd de king say, \"Dis is de man of God—three days, three nights, de cow, de pigs neither de mules neither de chickens give em nothin to eat. Nobody eat neither drink.\"\n\nSo Jonah went to de mountain to see how it goin' be over throw, but stid uh dat God blessee dem. So den Jonah got mad: Say, \"Lor', didn't you tell me you goin' 'stroy dat city?\"\n\nGod say, \"Jonah, dere's seven thousand women and chillun in dat city don't know right from wrong. If you think I go 'stroy dem, youse crazy.\"\n\nHow long Ninevah de blessee, I don't know. Dat de end right dere. Dats de fur I kin go.", "loss": true } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.